text:
Nest Expressed
Laugh. Learn*. Return. (*Learning optional)
GET NEW POSTS BY EMAIL >>
READ A RANDOM POST >>
"The Sound Of Music": Mock Recap (Part III)
November 13, 2011 Daniel Nest
If you're just joining us in reliving the magic of "The Sound Of Music" through words, please make sure to catch up on Part I and Part II first. If you have done so, let's dive right in.
The Captain and Baroness Schraeder are in the middle of their political discussion when Von Trapp suddenly jerks his head towards the lake. He sees Maria and the children rowing a skiff, while singing. Unbelievably, they are still singing the same freaking song about music notes that they've been singing for weeks. These kids are making slower progress than a lobotomised goldfish. Upon seeing the Captain the kids jump up excitedly, yelling "Papa". The boat starts to rock dangerously. Maria is also shocked into standing up rapidly by the mere sight of Von Trapp. At that moment the boat finally capsizes, sending everyone into the water. How Maria has avoided drowning the children up until now will forever remain a mystery.
Von Trapp orders everyone out of the water and brings out his trusty whistle to help him arrange the kids into a perfectly straight line. He introduces the children and the Baroness to each other. Then he tells the children to go inside the house to immediately change into dry clothes. Maria, rightfully considering herself to be one of the children attempts to go inside as well. The Captain, however, tells her to "stay here, please". The Baroness walks off to give Von Trapp some privacy for the verbal lashing he's about to give Maria. The Captain is understandably shocked and disgusted to find out that his children have been running around Salzburg dressed in old drapes like a pack of hobos.
"You made them wear WHAT?!"
The Captain is running on his last drop of patience. Astonishingly, at this very point Maria begins to lecture Von Trapp on parenting, by insisting that he should be more engaged and love his children. The Captain repeatedly implores her to stop telling him how to raise his kids. Maria doesn't. Demonstrating complete lack of social awareness she somehow figures that being enraged brings the Captain into just the right state of mind to absorb parenting tips from the very woman he's mad at. I'm sure if Maria ever took the kids to a zoo she'd climb into a tiger cage during feeding hours to point out the "whiskers on kittens" item on her list of favourite things. The conversation ends with Von Trapp telling Maria to pack her bags and return to the Abbey.
Just at that moment we hear faint singing from inside the house. The Captain is bewildered. What is that melodic combination of sounds? What does it mean? He asks what it is, upon which Maria tells him it's a little something people call "singing". Von Trapp tries to save face by claiming that he was informed about this "singing" phenomenon all along. He says "Yes, I realize it's singing, but who is singing?". Come on buddy, there is a pretty limited number of people in the house, so make an effort to put two and two together! Maria tells him it's the children singing a song they've put together for the Baroness. The Captain runs into the house, probably still unable to figure out what "singing" is actually about.
"What are these demonic symbols?! Get them out of here!"
The children are singing the song that Maria opened the movie with. So they can in fact do more than just sing the music notes out loud. In the middle of their song something clicks in the Captian's mind and all of a sudden he remembers – ah yes, "singing", he knows what that is! He joins in, much to everyone's surprise. Von Trapp and the kids finish the song together and everyone hugs. The Captain chases Maria, who is on her way up the stairs to pack her bags. He says that now he wants her to stay, since she's brought music back into his life. In a matter of minutes the Captain reverses his decision entirely. Behold, the power of music!
Next scene, another day. We see Maria and the kids put on a puppet show for Uncle Max, the Baroness and the Captain. The show involves a lot of different characters and even more yodelling. Everyone is impressed, especially the Captain. He tells Maria exactly how much he is impressed by saying "very very much". That's twice as good as a single "very"! Von Trapp and Maria exchange looks and Baroness Schraeder begins to get jealous. She mockingly asks Maria whether there's anything she cannot do, to which Maria replies that she wouldn't make a very good nun. That's right, it's hard to make a good nun, or any kind of nun, when Reverend Mother herself tells you to get the hell out of the Abbey.
"I like this nun dress, but do you perhaps have something more drape-based?"
Uncle Max announces that he's finally found the group he'll take to the Salzburg Folk Festival. It's pretty obvious he's talking about the Von Trapp children, seeing how they've just finished yet another successful performance and he was right there. However, for some reason everyone begins to stupidly shout out the names of other choirs and singing bands. Uncle Max decides to give them a not-at-all subtle hint and says that it's a singing group "all in one family". The Captain asks whose family that might be. Come on, does any character in this movie have an IQ above a two-digit figure? Uncle Max explains that he's talking about the Captain's kids. The Captain rejects the idea and insists that his children will never sing in public.
Next, the children and Maria decide that Von Trapp himself should sing a song. The Captain is uncomfortable with the idea and communicates this eloquently by saying "no" seven times in a row. Maria says she knows he's been very good a long time ago. The Captain says it was a "very, very, very" long time ago. Three times "very" – the man has a way with words. Finally, under pressure from the kids he caves in and grabs the guitar. The Baroness is becoming annoyed and whispers to Max that if only she knew that everyone in this family communicated exclusively via songs she'd have brought along her harmonica. (CONTINUE TO PAGE 2)
LIKED THIS POST? SHARE THE LOVE:
Baroness SchraederCaptainMariarecapsingingSound Of MusicUncle MaxVon TrappZeller
Leave a comment, get a reply. That's how I roll. Cancel reply


text:
Sinking the Blues
On this day in 1980, Villa supporters savoured a 3-0 home victory over Birmingham City in the Second City derby.
But this win was about more than just bragging rights.
It completed a double for Ron Saunders' men, who had won 2-1 at St Andrew's in October, and also secured two important points for a team that would go on to win the First Division title.
David Geddis, who made only nine league appearances that season, was on target twice against Blues, with Gary Shaw netting the other goal.
By Rob Bishop @robbishopavfc 13th December 1980
Home Sinking the Blues

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Variety reckons that Mickey Rourke, whose Hollywood stock is once again on the rise after The Wrestler, is in talks to appear as a villain in Iron Man 2. If it's true, then we could have our next winner of the "Worst Mumbler In A Superhero Flick" since Nick Nolte in Hulk.
No, don't worry. You're not going to have to live in fear of stumbling across a trailer that plasters Alan Suger's fizzog 30-foot wide on a cinema screen (they'd only be allowed to show that with 18 films anyway). We're talking The Magician's Apprentice, a live action version of the classic fairy tale which is currently in development at Disney. According to The Hollywood Reporter Teresa (Bedtime Stories) Palmer has been signed to star alongside Nicolas Cage and Jay Baruchel. Rumours that Matt Smith's hair will be co-starring as the mop are unfounded.
Donnie Darko director Richard Kelly's production company has bought the rights to Fade, a young adult novel about an invisible teen set in the 1930s, written by The Chocolate War author Richard Cormier, reports Variety .


text:
Q: Textual Smilies/emoticons usage Just from using SO, I have seen many direct/indirect comments about using smilies. I understand this is a (generally) serious site, but I was wondering just what are the rules/expectations on using textual emoticons, written or not? I generally don't go around using smilies on SO, but I find myself using (or keep myself from using) them sometimes.
I have looked for posts about emoticons and smilies and only found posts about making them pictures. So I was wondering if there was a written rule / post about expected behavior / an unspoken rule concerning the general use of smilies. I know it's not a ban-able offense or anything (I hope?) with moderate usage, and it's more "use them at your own discretion", but every so often I feel they can help 'enhance' a post, if it could be taken more than one way (rude/condescending vs trying to help).

A: Stack Overflow is a work of reference, not a forum. You should approach it like any form of technical writing: Strive to make your writing as concise and clear as possible. Anything that can be removed while maintaining the relevant meaning of the post should be. Your questions and answers exist to serve as a reference for future readers with the same or similar problems. Emoticons have no more place in this style of writing than they would mid-paragraph in a Wikipedia article.
On the other hand, comments are specifically for discussion and I don't think anybody would disagree with the use of emoticons there.

A: I think they are cute :-)
They should be used to spread <3 on the site :D and to show everybody how cool you are. 8-) ;)))
Don't overuse them, though ^^ :-P

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Q: Java syntax question:  O accept(ObjectVisitorEx visitor) Naive question about Java syntax. What does
<T> T accept(ObjectVisitorEx<T> visitor);

mean? What would be the C# equivalent?

A: In C# it could be:
O Accept<O>(ObjectVisitorEx<O> visitor);

A: This is used for passing types as parameters. C# syntax is the same (<Type>). Suggest googling for term 'generics' as this is the term you're looking for.

A: The C# equivalent would be more or less the same.  If the visitor were an interface it would be
O Accept(IObjectVisitorEx<O> visitor);

A: Here's a good comparison between Java and C# generics.

A: see Java: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/language/generics.html
and C#: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms379564(VS.80).aspx
A similar C# method could bepublic T Foo<T>(Queue<T> v) // Queue<T> chosen for simplicity
{
  return v.Dequeue();
}