text:
Mother's Day, T.V. Antony Raj, This is Life, tvaraj, United States
History of Mother's Day – Part 1
May 13, 2017 tvaraj	2 Comments
By T. V. Antony Raj
The tradition of honouring Motherhood has its roots in antiquity.
According to the primaeval Egyptian mythology, divine Osiris, the eldest son of the Earth god Geb and the sky goddess Nut was the god of fertility, the afterlife, the underworld and the dead.
Osiris was a wise king who brought civilization. His siblings were Horus the Elder, Seth, Isis, and Nephthys. His younger brother Seth was the god of the desert, storms, darkness, and chaos. He was hostile and outright evil. Though they were brothers their diametric personalities made them adversaries.
Osiris was happily married to his sister, Isis while Seth married his other sister Nephthys.
Though Osiris and Seth were brothers, their diametric personalities made them adversaries.
Seth, the envious brother slew Osiris, dismembered him into 13 pieces and scattered the remains all over Egypt. He usurped the throne of his dead brother.
Isis collected the dismembered body of her brother-husband Osiris, reassembled the pieces. As the archetypal mummy, Osiris reigned over the after-world as a king among deserving spirits of the dead.
Isis used the embalmed corpse of Osiris to impregnate herself to conceive posthumously. She gave birth to Horus. She then hid her baby son amidst reeds lest Seth slaughtered him too. Horus grew up as a natural enemy of Seth, defeated him and became the first ruler of a unified Egypt. Isis thus earned her stature as the "Mother of the Pharaohs."
In ancient Egypt and Ethiopia, Isis was one of the four most widely venerated deities. The ancient Egyptians held an annual festival to honour the goddess Isis as the ideal mother and wife.
The worship of Isis spread throughout the Greco-Roman world as the patroness of nature and magic; friend of slaves, sinners, artisans, and the poor. The rich aristocrats, rulers and maidens prayed to the goddess who was also known as the goddess of children, and protector of the dead.
Despite being a foreign deity, the Romans venerated Isis and reserved a place for her in their temples. The Romans commemorated an important battle with a festival in her name that lasted for three days with female dancers, musicians and singers marking the beginning of winter.
Societies around the world celebrated symbols of motherhood as mythological goddesses and not real human mothers except the Christian Church. The Mother and Son imagery of Isis and Horus, where Isis cradles and suckles her son, and that of the Virgin Mary and Infant Jesus is astonishingly similar.
Celebrations in England and Europe
By the 16th century, due to the spread of Christianity, people in England and Europe moved away from the ancient roman religious and cultural traditions. Hilaria, the ancient Roman religious festival celebrated on the vernal equinox to honour Cybele gave way to Laetare Sunday – the fourth Sunday of Lent in the Christian liturgical calendar (the 40 days of fasting preceding Easter Sunday), once known as "the Sunday of the Five Loaves." Christians in England used this Sunday, to honour the Mother of Christ and decorated the church in which they were baptized, which they knew as their "Mother Church" with flowers and offerings.
In the 17th century, a clerical decree in England referred to the Laetare Sunday as "Mothering Day." The decree broadened the celebration, from one focused on the "Mother of Christ" and the "Mother Church," to include real mothers. It became a compassionate holiday toward the working classes of England. During this Lenten Sunday, the masters allowed their servants and trade workers to travel back to their towns of origin to visit their families. Mothering Day also provided a reprieve from the fasting and penance of Lent. Across England family members, living far away came home to visit and enjoy a family feast. The children presented cakes and flowers to their mothers.
Celebrations in America
The first English settlers, the Pilgrims, who came to America discontinued the traditional Mothering Day. They fled from England to practice a more conservative Christianity without being persecuted. In the new land, they lived under harsh conditions and worked long hours to survive. Due to their devotion to God, they ignored secular holidays. For them, even holidays such as Christmas and Easter were sombre occasions that took place in a Church stripped of all extraneous ornamentation.
Mother's Day Proclamation of 1870
In 1870, Julia Ward Howe conceptualized the first North American Mother's Day with her "Mother's Day Proclamation."
Julia Ward (May 27, 1819 — October 17, 1910) born in New York City was a prominent American abolitionist, social activist, and poet. She wrote "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" after she and her husband, Samuel Gridley Howe, visited Washington, D. C., and met President Abraham Lincoln at the White House in November 1861.
Twelve years later, distraught by the death and carnage of the Civil War, she called on mothers to protest what she saw as "the futility of their sons killing the sons of other mothers." She wrote the following "Mother's Day Proclamation" and called for an international Mother's Day to celebrate peace and motherhood:
Arise, then, women of this day!
Arise, all women who have hearts, Whether our baptism be of water or of tears!
Say firmly: "We will not have great questions decided by irrelevant agencies, Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage, for caresses and applause. Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn All that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience. We, the women of one country, will be too tender of those of another country To allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs."
From the bosom of the devastated Earth, a voice goes up with our own. It says: "Disarm! Disarm! The sword of murder is not the balance of justice." Blood does not wipe out dishonour, nor violence indicates possession. As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil at the summons of war, Let women now leave all that may be left of home for a great and earnest day of counsel.
Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead. Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means Whereby the great human family can live in peace, Each bearing after his own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar, But of God.
In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask That a general congress of women without limit of nationality May be appointed and held at someplace deemed most convenient And at the earliest period consistent with its objects, To promote the alliance of the different nationalities, The amicable settlement of international questions,
The great and general interests of peace.
Julia Ward Howe even proposed converting July 4th into Mother's Day, to dedicate the nation's anniversary to peace, but June 2nd was designated for the celebration.
In 1873, women's groups in 18 North American cities observed this new Mother's Day. Initially, Julia funded many of these celebrations. Most of them died out when she stopped funding. Boston city, however, continued celebrating Julia Ward Howe's Mother's Day for the next ten years.
Despite the failure of her Mother's Day, Julia Ward had nevertheless planted the seed that blossomed into the modern Mother's Day.
Next: → History of Mother's Day – Part 2
History of Mother's Day – Part 2 (tvaraj.com)
And God said, "Call her Mother!" (tvaraj.com)
Isis, Divine Mother (ayearandadaywicca.wordpress.com)
BLACK MADONNAS OF EUROPE: DIFFUSION OF THE AFRICAN ISIS (AUSET) (arf-int.net)
MOTHER'S DAY HISTORY (mothersdaycentral.com)
Anna Jarvis Museum, Webster, Taylor County, West Virginia (lindasflipside.blogspot.in)
THANK YOU FOR THE GIFT OF A MOTHERS' LOVE (vineandbranchworldministries.com)
SHE – a poem on mother's day by my friend Hazel (guitaristindia.com)
Celebrating Mother's Day Today… (dshenai.wordpress.com)
Mother's Day for Peace Zinn Education Project (wurdiz.blogspot.in)
EnglandEuropeFood for ThoughtHistory of Mother's DayIsisJulia Ward HoweOsirisT. V. Antony RajThis is lifetvarajUnited States
#WPLongform, Advertisement, Cleanliness, England, English, Food for Thought, Post A Day 2014, Russia, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 6 – Did the Kings and Queens of the Renaissance Period Bathe?
December 7, 2014 tvaraj	7 Comments
.By T.V. Antony Raj
Information and opinions about the attitudes toward bathing in the 16th century are quite mixed among historians. The general consensus seems to be that bathing was quite popular as a social ritual. In fact, the Catholic Church allowed bathing, but warned against excessive indulgence in the habit.
In the first volume of his "Geschichte des deutschen Volkes seit dem Ausgang des Mittelalters" ("History of the German people since the end of the Middle Ages") the 19th century German Catholic priest and historian Johannes Janssen wrote details on the popular use of baths in Germany during the Middle Ages. According to him, German men bathed several times each day. Some German spent the whole day in or about their favorite springs. The mid 16th-century German merchant Lucas Rem wrote in his diary that in 1511, he bathed 127 times from May 20th to June 9th.
Queen Elizabeth, c.1575-1578. Painting attributed to Nicholas Hilliard. Anglesey Abbey.
Queen Elizabeth I (7 September 1533 – 24 March 1603) was Queen of England and Ireland from November 17, 1558 until her death. Sometimes called The Virgin Queen, Gloriana, or Good Queen Bess, the childless Elizabeth was the fifth and last monarch of the Tudor dynasty.
Queen Elizabeth I boasted that she bathed once a month, "whether I need it or not"?
James I, her successor, seems to have washed only his fingers.
King Louis XIV of France
King Louis XIV of France by Hyacinthe Rigaud (1701).
King Louis XIV (September 5, 1638 – September 1, 1715) of France known as Louis the Great (Louis le Grand) or the Sun King (le Roi-Soleil), was a monarch of the House of Bourbon. He became King of France and Navarre at the age of four in 1643 after the death of his father, Louis XIII. His reign spanning 72 years and 110 days is the longest of any monarch of a major country in European history.
The palace of Versailles (French: Château de Versailles) was once the most lavish largest home in the world. It was the home of the French royal family along with hundreds of their courtiers and servants. It was created by Louis XIV (1638 – 1715) of France. The court of Versailles was the center of political power in France from 1682, when Louis XIV moved from Paris. For more than 30 years, the King's obsession was to enlarge and enhance his residence. Now, three million people visit it every year, hoping to get a glimpse of the royal lifestyle of the 17th century.
Today, when looking at the gleaming golden palace, it is difficult to believe that life at Versailles in the 17th century was quite dirty. There were no bathrooms as we would know them. "Then how did…?"
Well, there were decorative commodes for the royalty and the courtiers in each room. The commoners simply relieved themselves in the hallways or stairwells. The royal dogs were not house-trained and the servants never bothered to remove the dog poo lying on the floors. The chimneys did not exhaust well and everything inside the palace was covered with soot.
I want to share the following excerpt from the interesting article titled "A History of Humanity's Disgusting Hygiene" by Helen from Fife, Scotland writing under the pseudonym Seeker7.
'Garde Loo' and Other Toilet Habits
The romantic scene of a towering castle surrounded by the pristine sparkling waters of a moat is not strictly true. Especially when we talk about toilets from hundreds of years ago.
In Tudor houses they were called 'privies'. Many were basically a bowl with a slab of wood and a hole carved in the top. This would be set into a recess or cupboard-like area called a garderobe.
The castles were not much better. The slab of wood often just covered a hole in the floor that took waste products straight into the moat – now you know why there are no picturesque paintings of some cute rustic fishing in a castle moat.
Peasants did not have the luxury of any form of toilet no matter how crude. They were forced to relieve themselves where they could and then bury any waste matter. Washing your hands after doing your business was not practiced by anyone.
Of course, rich or poor, neither had toilet paper. Poor people would use leaves or moss to wipe their bottoms. If you had a bit more money then you would use lambs wool.
However, if you were the King, then you employed someone to wipe your bottom for you. The position of royal bum wiper was officially called 'The Groom of the Stool' the more formal title would be read as 'Groom of the King's Close Stool to King (name )'. As disgusting as this job may seem to be, it was a much sought after position. Noblemen would fight hard and dirty – excuse the pun – to get their sons employed in this role, as it often resulted in, eventually, advancing to powerful roles such as Private Secretary to the King. The reason for the promotion was that the groom, who knew the King's most intimate secrets, often became his most trusted advisor and friend.
A medieval toilet or garderobe (Source: "A History of Humanity's Disgusting Hygiene").
Garderobe shafts for getting rid of waste products (Source: "A History of Humanity's Disgusting Hygiene")
A royal toilet – still on view at Hampton Court, London. (Source: "A History of Humanity's Disgusting Hygiene")
Old Edinburgh
If you ever find yourself transported back in time to old Edinburgh be prepared for the shout of 'garde loo '. If you were not quick enough – or if you were disliked – you could find yourself being showered with the contents of chamber pots hurled from the tenement windows. Chamber pots were of course used to collect urine overnight.
The term 'garde loo ' comes from the French garde L'eau which means 'watch out for the water'. This is where the nickname – 'loo' – for the toilet may have come from. The resulting stench of chamber pot contents was ironically known as 'the flowers of Edinburgh' .
So what happened to all this waste littering the streets? There was, in theory, supposed to be some form of street cleaning, but this was seldom carried out effectively. The streets all year round were covered in faeces – human and animal – urine, rotting food, corpses of animals and so on. It wasn't until the end of the 18th century that an effective street cleaning regime came into force.
Old Edinburgh's narrow streets showing the tenement buildings from which chamber pots were emptied out of the windows. (Source: "A History of Humanity's Disgusting Hygiene")
During the reign of Louis XIV people seldom bathed. They believed that a grimy layer of dirt would keep one healthy. The commoners fancied strong body odour, which they adduced gave them potent sexuality. They made up their own proverb:
"The more the ram stinks, the more the ewe loves him."
To combat the smells, the royalty and the courtiers changed their linen wear often, but they still stank. So, they doused themselves with heady perfumes, oils, and scented powders to mask not only their own body odour, but also to avoid inhaling the stench emanating from other persons.
Opinions differ about the bathing habits of King Louis XIV.
It is often said that the physicians of King Louis XIV advised him to bathe as infrequently as possible to maintain good health and he had only three baths in his entire life.
A few primary sources say that King Louis XIV bathed only twice in his life, when his doctors prescribed a bath. Louis they say was usually powdered from head to toe with perfumed powder several times a day since he found the act of bathing disturbing. But the King's reluctance to bathe did not mean that he was covered in dirt.
As there was no running water inside the buildings servants brought hot water in pails or jugs for the King to bathe or wash.
According to one source Louis XIV had several bathrooms in his suite at Versailles, one of which contained two bathtubs. One tub contained all sorts of ingredients from bran to milk. A special valet called a "baigneur" applied soap brought from Marseilles, well-known for their abrasiveness, on the body of the king. So the second tub for rinsing and was necessary.
The King suffered from gangrene but refused an amputation. One day, one of his toes was found in his sock.
A Russian ambassador to the court of King Louis XIV of France said: "His Majesty [Louis XIV] stunk like a wild animal."
The French historian Mathieu da Vinha explains in his book, "Le Versailles de Louis XIV," that Louis XIV had sumptuous bathrooms built at Versailles, but not to clean the body. Valets rather rubbed his hands and face with alcohol, and he took therapeutic baths only irregularly.
"Louis's washing consisted of rubbing his face with cotton soaked in diluted, scented alcohol and dipping his fingertips in a bowl – washing in water was considered dangerous to one's health."
Some have contradicted the above and have said that in reality Louis XIV was an incredibly clean King and bathed regularly in a large Turkish bath in his palace. He disinfected his skin with spirits or alcohol because perfumes gave him headaches. He changed his clothing, especially his underwear, three times a day and was so clean that he was almost fussy about it.
After 72 years on the throne, Louis died of gangrene at Versailles on September 1, 1715, four days before his 77th birthday.
Peter the Great
Peter the Great by Paul Delaroche.
Peter I or Pyotr Alexeyevich (June 9, 1672 – February 8, 1725) was the Tsar of Russia from May 7, 1682 until his death on February 8, 1725. He gave himself the title "Peter the Great" though he was officially known as Peter I.
Peter the Great, was a widely traveled, educated, and cultured person in his own way.
Some writers say that, however educated Peter was he never understood nor followed a proper practice of hygiene. He did not find it wrong or embarrassing with urinating on the shiny palace walls.
According to these writers, Peter was not a regular bather. He washed himself on occasions using the natural mineral spring bath.
To end this series of "To Bathe, or Not to Bathe" articles, I list below "Ten Weird Facts About Grooming In The Past" which I came across in Seeker7's article "A History of Humanity's Disgusting Hygiene."
Ten Weird Facts About Grooming In The Past
Eyebrows that did not look fashionable were often masked by tiny pieces of skin from a mouse.
Ceruse was the foundation make-up of choice for both men and women, that gave the famous smooth, pale look. However, it contained lead that seeped into the body through the skin leading to poisoning. This make-up also tended to crack and had a strong odour.
Although the men wore linen drawers, the women wore no knickers at all.
The reason why so many marriages took place in June was that most people had their yearly bath in May so they were still fairly clean when June arrived. However, as a precaution brides carried bouquets of flowers to cover up any odious smells. June weddings and carrying bouquets are still traditional today but most wedding parties smell a lot nicer.
When people took their bath it was the man of the house who had the privilege of the tub filled with clean water. The sons of the house were allowed next, then the wife, the rest of the females and the babies were last.
Houses in the past did not have the protective roofing we have today. It was not unusual for bugs, pests and droppings to fall onto your clean bedding from the roof. So four poles and a canopy was invented to keep the bed clean and this is where the origin of the canopied and four poster beds come from.
A 17th century publication by Peter Levens gives clear instructions to men on how to cure baldness and thinning hair by making the following mixture – a strong alkaline solution containing potassium salts and chicken droppings to be placed on the area to be treated. In addition if men wanted to remove unwanted hair from any area of the body they should make a paste that contains – eggs, strong vinegar and cat dung. Once beaten into a paste, this should be placed on the areas where the hair is to be removed. Why they didn't just shave is not documented.
When Mary Queen of Scots returned to her native Scotland from France she was astounded and not a little put out that the men continued to wear their hats while sitting down to eat at her banquets. It was then pointed out to the young Queen that this was not a sign of disrespect to her but necessity. The men kept their hats on in order to prevent not only their long hair from touching the food but head lice from falling into their plates.
In the 16th century some members of the church condemned using forks to eat as against the will of god. One put out minister remarked: "God would not have given us fingers if He had wanted us to use forks."
The use of condoms goes back many thousands of years. They went out of favour after the decline of the Roman Empire but re-emerged in the form of linen condoms in the 16th century – perhaps due to the fear of the disease syphilis. The church condemned condoms as a way for the devil to encourage elicit sex. One incensed churchman raged that "the use of these foul things allows people to play filthy persons greater than ever."
← Previous: Part 5 – Did the Kings and Queens of the Early Renaissance Period Bathe?
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 1 – That Was the Question in Europe! (tvaraj.com)
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 2 – The Bubonic Plague (tvaraj.com)
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 3 – Don't Bathe Water Is Your Enemy! (tvaraj.com)
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 4 – Bathing in Medieval Europe (tvaraj.com)
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 5 – Did the Kings and Queens of the Early Renaissance Period Bathe? (tvaraj.com)
Elizabeth I of England (en.wikipedia.org)
Louis XIV of France (en.wikipedia.org)
Peter the Great (en.wikipedia.org)
A History of Humanity's Disgusting Hygiene (hubpages.com)
Public bathing (en.wikipedia.org)
The joy of dirt (economist.com)
The stench of medieval Europe still echoes today (english.pravda.ru)
Clean: An Unsanitised History of Washing By Katherine Ashenburg (books.google.co.in)
#WPLongformbagniosBathBathingCatholic ChurchCleanlinessEnglandEuropeFood for ThoughtKing Louis XIV of FrancePeter the GreatpostadayQueen Elizabeth IRussiaThis is lifeTo Bathe or Not to Bathetvaraj
#WPLongform, Advertisement, Cleanliness, England, English, Food for Thought, France, French, Post A Day 2014, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 5 – Did the Kings and Queens of the Early Renaissance Period Bathe?
. .By T.V. Antony Raj .
The term "Renaissance" is derived from French term "re-naissance" for "re-birth", and from the Italian term "rinascere" meaning "to be reborn." The Renaissance period spanned roughly from the 14th to the 17th century. It was the 'Age of Discovery'. Historians say that this period was the bridge between the Middle Ages and Modern history.
The Renaissance began in Italy in the Late Middle Ages. Later it spread to the rest of Europe as paper became available along with the invention of metal movable types. However, the changes of the Renaissance were not uniformly experienced across Europe.
The Renaissance revolutionized many intellectual pursuits. It brought about a cultural, social and political upheaval. It is perhaps best known for its artistic developments. Leonardo da Vinci, Raphael, Michelangelo and many other notable artists made their contributions during the Renaissance period.
On the cultural front, the Renaissance gave a new lease of life to Latin and the vernacular literatures. On the political front, it contributed to the development of the conventions of diplomacy.
According to historians, the Renaissance began in Florence, Italy, in the latter part of the 14th century due to various factors: the social and civic peculiarities of Florence at the time; its political structure; the patronage of the Medici family to the artists; the migration of Greek scholars and texts to Italy following the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks, etc.
King Philippe VI of France
King Philippe VI of France.
Bubonic plague devastated Europe in the 14th century. In 1348, King Philippe VI of France asked the medical faculty of the University of Paris to investigate the origins of the Bubonic plague. According to the learned professors a disastrous conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter and Mars caused disease-infected vapours to rise out of the earth and water to poison the air. They declared that susceptible people who breathed in the noxious air became ill and died.
Before the medieval period, people susceptible to infection were the obese, the intemperate, and the over-passionate. Now, the professors said that anyone who comes in contact with water was susceptible to disease. Hot baths, they said, had a dangerous moistening, relaxing effect on the body, and opened the pores in the skin which would allow the plague to enter the body.
From this, we can infer that King Philippe VI of France must have had infrequent baths.
Queen Isabel I of Spain
Isabella the Catholic, Queen of Castile and León.
Queen Isabel I of Spain (April 22, 1451 – November 26, 1504), also known as Isabella the Catholic was the queen of Castile. She married King Ferdinand II of Aragon on October 19, 1469, and ruled both Castile and Aragon from 1479 with along with her husband.
In 1484, King John II of Portugal denied the request for aid sought by Christopher Columbus to cross the Atlantic. Two years later, Columbus was in Spain, asking for patronage from King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. After at least two rejections, Columbus obtained royal support in January 1492. Although we cannot accept the story of Queen Isabella offering to pledge her jewels to help finance the expedition, Columbus secured a limited financial support from her.
Queen Isabella had once confessed that she had taken a bath only twice in her lifetime – when she was first-born and when she got married.
During the next two hundred years, whenever the plague threatened, the cry went out: "Bathhouses and bathing, I beg you to shun them or you will die."
By the first half of the sixteenth century, it was common knowledge that French baths would be closed during eruptions of the plague.
Around 1531, Thomas Moulton was a Dominican friar, who called himself a doctor of divinity published a treatise in England titled "The myrrour or glasse of helth." It was a manual purported to help avoid the Bubonic plague and to maintain good health. The book became one of the best-selling medical books of the Tudor period. In it, he says:
"use no baths or stoves; nor swet not too much, for all openeth the pores of a manne's body and maketh the venomous ayre to enter and for to infecte the bloude."
In the 16th century and thereafter, people believed this and similar statements that water carried diseases into the body through the pores in the skin. Most kings and queens, the members of the royal households, the aristocrats, and the commoners heeded to this advice and refrained from bathing.
In 1538, François I of France had the French bathhouses closed. In 1546, Henry VIII of England officially banned all public baths in Southwark. In 1566, the States-General of Orléans closed the French bawdy houses, which included any operating bathhouses.
Some monastic orders made bathing in hot air and steam part of their regimen, while others forbade bathing except at Christmas and Easter. In certain instances, instead of tearing down the Thermae of old, the Catholic clergy converted them into chapels and churches. Many marble tubs became baptismal fonts, bathing chairs became pulpits, and the pagan springs metamorphosed into holy water.
Members of the upper classes, the aristocrats, and the royalty cut down their full body bathing habits to just a few times per year. As directed by their physicians they struck a balance between the risk of contracting a disease by bathing and emanating body stench. To combat body odour, they changed their linen wear often. Even then, they still stunk. So, they doused themselves with heady perfumes, oils, and scented powders to mask the stench emanating from their bodies.
Sadly, the best medical advice of the period doomed many people. Dirtier the people were, more were they likely to harbour Pulex irritatu, the flea now believed to have carried the plague bacillus from rats to humans.
Henry IV of France
King Henry IV of France by Frans Pourbus the younger.
Henry IV (December 13, 1553 – May 14, 1610), also known by the epithet "Good King Henry," was the first French monarch of the House of Bourbon.
In 1568, when Henry IV was a teenager, Ambroise Paré, the French royal barber-surgeon warned about water coming into contact with the human body. He declared:
"Steam-baths and bath-houses should be forbidden because when one emerges, the flesh and the whole disposition of the body are softened and the pores open, and as a result, pestiferous vapour can rapidly enter the body and cause sudden death, as has frequently been observed."
Thereafter, people believed this and similar statements that water carried diseases into the body through the pores in the skin. Most kings and queens, the members of the royal households, the aristocrats and the commoners heeded to this advice and refrained from bathing.
Members of the upper classes, the aristocrats, and the royalty cut down their full body bathing habits to just a few times per year. They struck a balance between the risk of contracting a disease by bathing, and emanating body stench. To combat body odour, they changed their linen wear often. Even then, they still stunk. So, they doused themselves with heady perfumes, oils, and scented powders to mask the stench emanating from their bodies.
During the reign of Henry IV, bathing, and certainly in hot water, was considered a veritable health risk.
The king did not believe in bathing or using perfumes to mask his body stench. He usually wore soiled linen, and people had great difficulty in not closing their nostrils against the stink that emanated from his person. His body odour has been described as "stinking of sweat, stables, feet and garlic."
He usually wore soiled linen, and people had great difficulty in not closing their nostrils against the stench that emanated from his person. His body odour has been described as "stinking of sweat, stables, feet and garlic." He did not believe in bathing or using perfumes to mask his body stench.
One day when the King heard that the Duc de Sully had taken a bath, he turned to his own physician, André du Laurens, for advice. The physician told the king that the poor man would be vulnerable for days. So Henry IV sent a message to Sully informing him that he should not venture outside his residence, or he would endanger his health. Sully was told that the king would visit his home in Paris so that he would not come to any harm as a result of his recent bath.
The veritable womanizer, the 'Good King' Henry of Navarre had many mistresses outside wedlock such as: Charlotte de Beaune Semblançay, Marie Touchet, Diane d'Andoins, Gabrielle d'Estrées, Catherine Henriette de Balzac d'Entragues, to name a few.
Gabrielle d'Estrées
Once, he sent a billet-doux (sweet letter) to Gabrielle d' Estrées, one of his many mistresses. The letter conveyed the following: "Do not wash yourself, my sweetheart, I'll visit you in three weeks."
King James VI and I
King James VI and I. Portrait by Daniel Mytens, 1621.
King James VI and I (June 19,1566 – March 27, 1625) was the son of Mary, Queen of Scots and a great-great-grandson of Henry VII, King of England and Lord of Ireland. James succeeded to the Scottish throne at the age of thirteen months, after his mother Mary abdicated in his favour.
King James sponsored the translation of the Bible named after him: the Authorized King James Version.
Sir Anthony Weldon (1583–1648) was an English 17th-century courtier and politician, purported to have authored: "A Description of Scotland" and "The Court and Character of King James I." However, this attribution has been challenged and so it is unclear whether Weldon was the author of either of these works.
The label "the wisest fool in Christendom," is often attributed to Henry IV of France, but it was possibly coined by Weldon, to describe the paradoxical qualities of King James.
In "The Court and Character of King James I," Weldon wrote:
"A very wise man was wont to say that he believed him the wisest fool in Christendom, meaning him wise in small things, but a fool in weighty affairs."
It is said that the wisdom of King James did not include personal hygiene. The king wore the same clothes for months on end, even sleeping in them on occasion. He also wore the same hat seven days a week, until it fell apart. Moreover, King James refused to wash or bathe because he believed it was bad for his health.
King Louis XIII of France
King Louis XIII King of France and Navarre by Philippe de Champaigne.
Louis XIII (September 27, 1601 – May 14, 1643) was a monarch of the House of Bourbon.
According to meticulous notes kept by Jean Héroard, the French court physician, King Louis XIII of France born in 1601, was not given a bath until he was almost seven years of age.
He boasted, "I take after my father, I smell of armpits."
Next → Part 6 – Did the Kings and Queens of the Renaissance Period Bathe?
← Previous: Part 4 – Bathing in Medieval Europe
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 6 – Did the Kings and Queens of the Renaissance Period Bathe? (tvaraj.com)
Philip VI of France (en.wikipedia.org)
Isabella I of Castile (en.wikipedia.org)
Henry IV of France (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_IV_of_France
Gabrielle d'Estrées (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabrielle_d%27Estr%C3%A9es
James VI and I (en.wikipedia.org)
Louis XIII of France (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_XIII_of_France
The Black Death of 1348 and 1349 (archive.org)
The Epidemics of The Middle Ages (archive.org)
Molecular Clues Hint at What Really Caused the Black Death (livescience.com)
Black Death (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death
Disgusting hygeine of medieval European royals (muslimvilla.smfforfree.com)
A Short History of Bathing before 1601: Washing, Baths, and Hygeine in Medieval and Renaissance Europe, with sidelights on other customs (gallowglass.org)
#WPLongformbagniosBathBathingCatholic ChurchCleanlinessEnglandEuropeFood for ThoughtFrançois I of FranceGabrielle d' EstréesHenry IV of FranceHenry of NavarreHenry VIII of EnglandKing James VI and ILouis XIII of FrancepostadaySir Anthony WeldonThis is lifeThomas MoultonTo Bathe or Not to Bathetvaraj
#WPLongform, Advertisement, Cleanliness, England, English, Europe, Food for Thought, France, French, Post A Day 2014, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 4 – Bathing in Medieval Europe
"We all stink. No one smells."
– Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090 – August 20, 1153)
Antiquity, the Medieval period, and the Modern period are the three traditional divisions of Western history. In European history, the period 5th to the 15th century is known as the Medieval period or the Middle Ages. It began with the collapse of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery. The Medieval period is itself subdivided into the Early, the High, and the Late Middle Ages.
In European history, the Early Medieval Period (or Early Middle Ages) lasted from the 5th century to the 10th century. This period has been labeled the "Dark Ages," due to the relative scarcity of literary and cultural output, especially in Northwestern Europe. However, the Byzantine Empire or Eastern Roman Empire, continued to survive. And, in the 7th century, the Islamic caliphates conquered regions of former Roman territories.
The High Medieval Period (or High Middle Ages) was the period of European history around the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries (c. 1001–1300). During this period, the population of Europe increased and brought about great social and political change from the preceding era.
The Late Medieval Period (or Late Middle Ages) was the period comprising the 14th and 15th centuries (c. 1301–1500). It preceded the onset of the early modern era and, in much of Europe, the Renaissance.
The great social and political change from the High Medieval Period in Europe came to a halt in the early 14th century. A series of calamities such as the Great Famine of 1315-1317 and the Black Death reduced the population to around half of what it was before. The prosperity and growth in Europe came to a halt. Along with depopulation came social unrest and endemic warfare. France and England experienced serious peasant uprisings: the Hundred Years' War, the Jacquerie, the Peasants' Revolt, as well as a century of intermittent conflicts.
The Hundred Years' War was a series of wars waged from 1337 to 1453 between the House of Plantagenet, rulers of the Kingdom of England, and the House of Valois for control of the Kingdom of France.
The Jacquerie was a popular revolt by peasants in northern France in the summer of 1358.
The Peasants' Revolt, also called Wat Tyler's Rebellion or the Great Rising, was a major uprising across large parts of England in 1381.
To add to the many problems of the period, the Western Schism shattered the unity of the Catholic Church. By and large, these events are sometimes called the Crisis of the Late Middle Ages.
Despite these crises, the 14th century was a period of great progress in arts and sciences.
Icon of St. Gregory the Great by Theophilia (Source: theophilia.deviantart.com)
Pope Gregory I (c. 540 – 12 March 604), commonly known as Saint Gregory the Great, was Pope from September 3, 590 until his death in 604.
Jay Stuller of Smithsonian magazine wrote:
"Gregory the Great, the first monk to become pope, allowed Sunday baths and even commended them, so long as they didn't become a 'time-wasting luxury'… medieval nobility routinely washed their hands before and after meals. Etiquette guides of the age insisted that teeth, face and hands be cleaned each morning. Shallow basins and water jugs for washing hair were found in most manor houses, as was the occasional communal tub…"
Icon of St Bernard of Clairvaux by Benedictine nun in England (Source: newclairvaux.org)
During the High Medieval Period (c. 1001–1300) the Europeans smelled terrible and they were used to it. Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (born 1090), a French abbot and the primary builder of the reforming Cistercian order summed up the tolerance of the people to their stinking bodies thus: "We all stink. No one smells."
Saint Francis of Assisi (1181/1182 – October 3, 1226), Italian Catholic friar and preacher considered an unwashed body a stinking badge of piety.
In his article, "A History of Private Life," the French historian Georges Duby, specializing in the social and economic history of the Middle Ages wrote:
"…Among the dominant class at least, cleanliness was much prized. In the eleventh and twelfth centuries, the Cluniac monasteries and houses of the lay nobility continued to set aside space for baths…No formal dinner (that is, no dinner given in the great hall with a large crowd of guests) could begin until ewers had been passed around to the guest for their preprandial ablutions. Water flowed abundantly in the literature of amusement — over the body of the knight-errant, who was always rubbed down, combed, and groomed by his host's daughters whenever he stopped for the night, and over the nude bodies of fairies in fountains and steam-baths. A hot bath was an obligatory prelude to the amorous games described in the fabliaux. Washing one's own body and the bodies of others seems to have been a function specifically ascribed to women, mistresses of water both at home and in the wilderness.
"Bathing and grooming were regarded with suspicion by moralists, however, because they unveiled the attractions of the body. Bathing was said to be a prelude to sin, and in the penitential of Burchard of Worms we find a full catalog of the sins that ensued when men and women bathed together… Lambert of Ardres, the historian of the counts of Guines, describes the young wife of the ancestor of his hero swimming before the eyes of her household in a pond below the castle, but he is careful to indicate that she is wearing a modest white gown. … [Public baths] were suspect because they were too public; it was better wash one's body in the privacy of one's own home. Scrupulous, highly restrictive precautions were taken in… monasteries. At Cluny, the custom required the monks to take a full bath twice a year, at the holidays of renewal, Christmas and Easter; but they were exhorted not to uncover their pudenda." (p. 525)
Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor
Frederick II (December 26, 1194 – December 13, 1250), was one of the most powerful Holy Roman Emperors of the Middle Ages. He was the head of the House of Hohenstaufen. Though based in Sicily, his political and cultural ambitions stretched through Italy to Germany, and even to Jerusalem. His admirers nicknamed him 'Stupor Mundi' meaning 'Wonder of the World' while his enemies called him an 'Anti-Christ whore of Babylon.'
Having enjoyed discussions with Cardinal de' Fieschi, Frederick II admired the Cardinal's wisdom. On June 25, 1243, Cardinal de' Fieschi reluctantly accepted election as Pope and took on the name Innocent IV.
The emperor was always at daggers drawn with the popes. Following the election the witty Frederick remarked that he had "lost the friendship of a cardinal, but made up for it by gaining the enmity of a pope."
At that time, the Catholic Church considered bathing a sinful act. In 1250, Pope Innocent IV passed the verdict against Frederick II of being a heathen. The first accusation on his list was the King bathed daily.
Étienne Boileau is one of the first known provosts of Paris. In 1261, King Louis IX named him provost for 10 years.
"Trades and guilds of the city of Paris: the thirteenth century" by Étienne Boileau, Provost of Paris (1261–1271).
Around 1270, Boileau brought together the regulations for the police, industry and the trades of Paris in his book "Les métiers et corporations de la ville de Paris: XIIIe siècle" ("Trades and guilds of the city of Paris: the thirteenth century"). This work was a faithful mirror reflecting the smallest details of the industrial and commercial life of Paris in the 13th century.
Here is an excerpt from the book on the regulations governing the Guild of Bathhouse Keepers:
1. Whoever wishes to be a bathhouse-keeper in the city of Paris may freely do so, provided he works according to the usage and customs of the trade, made by agreement of the commune, as follow.
2. Be it known that no man or woman may cry or have cried their baths until it is day, because of the dangers which can threaten those who rise at the cry to go to the baths.
3. No man or woman of the aforesaid trade may maintain in their houses or baths either prostitutes of the day or night, or lepers, or vagabonds, or other infamous people of the night.
4. No man or woman may heat up their baths on Sunday, or on a feast day which the commune of the city keeps. And every person should pay, for a steam-bath, two deniers; and if he bathes, he should pay four deniers. And because at some times wood and coal are more expensive than at others, if anyone suffers, a suitable price shall be set by the provost of Paris, through the discussion of the good people of the aforesaid trade, according to the situation of the times. The male and female bathhouse-keepers have sworn and promised before us to uphold these things firmly and consistently, and not to go against them.
5. Anyone who infringes any of the above regulations of the aforesaid trade must make amends with ten Parisian sous, of which six go to the king, and the other four go to the masters who oversee the trade, for their pains.
6. The aforesaid trade shall have three good men of the trade, elected by us unanimously or by a majority, who shall swear before the provost of Paris or his representative that they will oversee the trade well and truly, and that they will make known to the provost of Paris or his representative all the infringements that they know of or discover, and the provost shall remove and change them as often as he wishes.
Georges Vigarello, the French historian and sociologist, published his book "Concepts of Cleanliness: Changing Attitudes in France since the Middle Ages" in October 2008. In this lucid work he examines how attitudes to and perceptions of human cleanliness, health and hygiene manifested in the history of bathing. He says the use of water for cleanliness has been by no means constant in the Middle Ages. The medieval idea of visible purity, effectively meant the face and the hands only. On pages 21-22, Professo Vigarello says:
"A crier patrolled the streets of thirteenth-century Paris to summon people to the heated steam-baths and bath-houses. These establishments, already numbering twenty-six in 1292 [Riolan, Curieuses Recherches, p. 219], and with their guild, were a familiar feature of the town. They were commonplace enough for it not to be shocking to offer a session in a steam-bath as a tip to artisans, domestic servants, or day-labourers. 'To Jehan Petit, for him and his fellow valets of the bedchamber, which the queen gave him on New Year's Day to visit the steam-baths'… What they would find was a steam-bath, with in addition, according to price, a bath in a tub, wine, a meal, or a bed. Naked bodies sweated and were sponged down side by side in the steam from water heated by wood fires. Baths were taken in a room, often separate, crammed with heavy round iron-bound bathtubs. A steam-bath did not necessarily involve immersion, though a bath could be had. There were, for example, six bathtubs at Saint-Vivien in 1380, with three beds and sets of bedding. [C. de Beaurepaire, Noveaux Melanges historiques, Paris, 1904, p. 94]…"
Next → Part 5 – Did the Kings and Queens of the Early Renaissance Period Bathe?
← Previous: Part 3 – Don't Bathe Water Is Your Enemy!
Ancient Roman bathing (en.wikipedia.org)
Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor (en.wikipedia.org)
Étienne Boileau (en.wikipedia.org)
#WPLongformAmbroise ParéBathBathingBlack DeathBubonic PlagueCatholic ChurchCleanlinessEnglandEuropeFood for ThoughtHohenstaufenHoly Roman EmperorKing Frederick IIKing Philippe VI of FranceMedieval PeriodMiddle AgesPope Clement VIPope Innocent IVpostadayQueen Isabel I of SpainRomansThis is lifeTo Bathe or Not to Bathetvaraj
#WPLongform, Advertisement, Catholic, Catholic Church, Christianity, Christians, Cleanliness, England, English, Europe, Food for Thought, Post A Day 2014, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 3 – Don't Bathe Water Is Your Enemy!
King Philippe VI of France (1293 – 22 August 1350)
In 1348, Philippe VI of France asked the medical faculty of the University of Paris to investigate the origins of the Bubonic plague. Their far-reaching opinion began with a disastrous conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter and Mars that caused disease-infected vapours to rise out of the earth and water to poison the air. They declared that susceptible people who breathed in the noxious air became ill and died.
Who were susceptible?
Some people susceptible to infection recognized in Greek and Roman times were: the obese, the intemperate, and the over-passionate. Now, the medical faculty added a new one that struck fear in the hearts of the medieval people – hot baths, which had a dangerous moistening and relaxing effect on the body. They said that once heat and water created openings through the skin, the plague could easily invade the entire body.
During the next two hundred years, whenever the plague threatened, the cry went out: "Bathhouses and bathing, I beg you to shun them or you will die." Even so, some resisted the idea of refraining from bathing.
In 1450, during an outbreak, Jacques Des Pars, the physician to Charles VII, called for the closing of the Paris baths. This infuriated the bathhouse owners, and he fled to Tournai to avoid their wrath.
Thomas Moulton was a Dominican friar, who called himself a doctor of divinity of the order of friar preachers. Around 1531, he published a small octavo treatise in England titled "The myrrour or glasse of helth." It was a manual purported to help avoid the pestilence and maintain good health. The book became one of the best-selling medical books of the Tudor period. In it, he says:
"use no baths or stoves; nor swet not too much, for all openeth the pores of a manne's body and maketh the venomous ayre to enter and for to infecte the bloude."
Ambroise Paré (1510–1590) by Michiel Jansz. van Miereveld (Photo credit: The Royal College of Surgeons of England)
Ambroise Paré (c. 1510 – December 20, 1590) was a French barber surgeon. He served kings Henry II, Francis II, Charles IX and Henry III. Paré is considered one of the fathers of surgery and modern forensic pathology. As an anatomist, he invented several surgical instruments. He pioneered surgical techniques, battlefield medicine and treatment of wounds. In 1545, Paré published his first book "The method of curing wounds caused by arquebus and firearms."
In 1568, Ambroise Paré, warned about water coming into contact with an unsuspecting victim. He wrote, voicing a now common opinion:
"Steam baths and bath-houses should be forbidden because when one emerges, the flesh and the whole disposition of the body are softened and the pores open, and as a result, pestiferous vapour can rapidly enter the body and cause sudden death, as has frequently been observed."
This and similar statements caused the medical fraternity in Europe to unanimously believe that water and infected air carried diseases into the body through the pores in the skin. Hence, they advised people not to bathe.
The learned professors of the day said that even when a plague did not threaten, water posed a threat to the bather because of the pores in the body. Through water, one might contract syphilis or diseases, yet unnamed and unknown. They warned that women can even become pregnant from sperm floating in the bath water. Not only could spurious matter enter the body through water, but the all-important balance of the four humours – black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, and blood – could become unstable through pores opened by moisture.
This resulted in lower class citizens, particularly men, to forgo bathing. They restricted their hygienic routine to rinsing their mouths, washing their hands and infrequent washing parts of their face. They believed that washing one's entire face was dangerous as it would weaken the eyesight and cause catarrh.
Members of the upper classes, the aristocrats, and the royalty cut down their full body bathing habits to just a few times per year. They struck a balance between the risk of contracting a disease by bathing, and emanating body stench.
In the medieval periods, worries about the body's vulnerability affected fashion as well as hygiene. According to the professors, since the pores might be vulnerable even when dry and not heated, clothing should be smooth, tightly woven and fitted. Taffeta and satin for the wealthy, oil-cloth and jute or hemp sacking for the poor. Cotton and wool were too loosely woven. Fur offered too many places for poisons to lodge. People wore shifts, shirts, collars, coifs, kerchiefs, etc., made of linen. They thought that linen worn next to the skin enabled it to absorb sweat, and remove dirt from the body.
To combat body odour, the men and women belonging to the royalty and the aristocracy changed their linen wear often. Even then, they still stunk. So, they doused themselves with heady perfumes, oils, and scented powders to mask the stench emanating from their bodies.
In 1526, Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus, a Dutch Renaissance humanist and a classical scholar wrote:
"Twenty-five years ago, nothing was more fashionable in Brabant than public baths. Today there are none, the new plague has taught us to avoid them."
Before the medieval period, water had furnished comfort, pleasure, companionship, temptation, and cleanliness. Now, during the medieval period, on much of the Continent, water was considered an enemy to be avoided at all costs. The two centuries that followed Erasmus' lament would be among the dirtiest in the history of Europe.
As the plagues recurred somewhere in Europe almost every year, the fears about a too permeable skin lasted until the beginning of the eighteenth century.
Sadly, the best medical advice of the period, probably doomed many people. Dirtier the people were, they were more likely to harbour Pulex irritatu, the flea now believed to have carried the plague bacillus from rats to humans.
In most of Europe, the complete lack of personal hygiene lingered until around mid 19th century.
Next → Part 4 – Bathing in Medieval Europe
← Previous: Part 2 – The Bubonic Plague
Bubonic plague (en.wikipedia.org)
Black Death (en.wikipedia.org)
Ambroise Paré (en.wikipedia.org)
Barber surgeon (en.wikipedia.org)
#WPLongformAmbroise ParébagniosbalneaBathBathingBlack DeathBubonic PlagueCatholic ChurchCleanlinessEnglandEuropeFood for ThoughtGreeceGreeksLouis XIVMiddle AgesMohenjo-daropostadayRomansSaint Ephraim II of PereyaslavThermaeThis is lifeTo Bathe or Not to BathetvarajYersinia pestis
#WPLongform, Advertisement, Catholic, Catholic Church, Cleanliness, England, English, Europe, Food for Thought, Post A Day 2014, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 2 – The Bubonic Plague
In the 13th century, Mongol conquest caused a decline in farming and trading in China. However, by the beginning of the 14th century, China recovered on the economic front. Starting in 1331, many natural disasters and plagues led to widespread famine. A deadly plague arrived soon after. It killed an estimated 25 million Chinese and other Asians in the next 15 years before it reached Constantinople in 1347.
Map of the spread of the Black Death.
The disease may have travelled along the Silk Road with Mongol armies and traders or it could have come via ship. In his book "The Epidemics of The Middle Ages," J.F.C. Hecker says that by the end of 1346 reports of plague had reached the seaports of Europe:
"India was depopulated, Tartary, Mesopotamia, Syria, Armenia were covered with dead bodies".
Jani Beg was a khan of the Golden Horde from 1342 to 1357. He commanded a massive Crimean Tatar force that attacked the Crimean port city of Kaffa in 1343. In February, an Italian relief force lifted the siege. In 1345 Jani Beg again besieged Kaffa. His assault was again unsuccessful due to an outbreak of the Bubonic plague among his troops. The Mongols catapulted their infected corpses over the city walls to infect and weaken the defenders.
The Genoese traders and sailors fled Kaffa, taking the plague by ship into Sicily. From there, according to the traditional theory promulgated by historians, oriental rat fleas living on black rats that infested merchant ships carried the disease. The plague spread throughout the Mediterranean and Europe. It invaded Italy, Spain, France, England, Germany, Austria and Hungary, sometimes travelling two and a half miles a day.
In the 14th century people called the catastrophe either the "Great Pestilence"' or the "Great Plague". Contemporaries to the plague referred to the event as the "Great Mortality". Swedish and Danish chronicles of the 17th century described the events as "black" for the first time; perhaps to refer to the sense of gloom or dread that accompanied the plague. The Latin phrase "atra mors" meaning "black death" first appeared in a book on Danish history by J.I. Pontanus published in 1631. He wrote about a disease that occurred in 1348: "Vulgo & ab effectu atram mortem vocatibant." This may have been a mistranslation as atra can mean black, brooding or terrible. Even so, the name "Black Death" spread through Scandinavia and then Germany. In England, it was not until 1823 that the medieval epidemic was first called the Black Death.
Illustration of the Black Death from the Toggenburg Bible (1411)
However, in the late-stage of the disease, the festering lumps in the groins, armpits and necks of its victims blackened due to subepidermal hemorrhages. And, the extremities would darken with a form of gangrene, acral necrosis.
The disease arrived in London in the fall of 1348 and took a catastrophic toll. According to a report from the time, one cemetery in East Smithfield alone received more than 200 bodies a day.
The disease is commonly believed to be Bubonic Plague, a bacterial infection marked by pain, fever, swollen lymph nodes called buboes. The plague was the most catastrophic pandemic the world has yet known. It peaked in Europe in the years 1346–53. It killed at least one out of every three Europeans. During the time of its first visit, an estimated 75 to 200 million people had died – almost 30 to 60% of Europe's total population. In total, the plague reduced the world population from an estimated 450 million down to 350–375 million in the 14th century. It is clear that several existing conditions such as war, famine, and weather contributed to the severity of the Bubonic Plague.
Boccaccio the author of The Decameron has described the plague's attack on individuals and society shortly after it devastated Florence. He gives a dispassionate, almost clinical account of the disease. In spite of prayers, processions and last-minute attempts at sanitation, it spread through Florence unchecked. The doctors and priests stood helpless. Patients died on the third day after the appearance of the fatal swollen lymph nodes, some of which were as big as apples. Anyone who had so much as touched any object handled by the sick person risked infection.
The plague's effect on the able-bodied members of society confounded Boccaccio. He watched as a panic-stricken populace rapidly sloughed off the civility. And, something worse than barbarism took its place. Brothers fled from sick brothers, wives from their husbands and even mothers from their own children.
The women did not observe the time-honoured lamenting in the houses of the dead persons. The men would not congregate at the threshold of the houses of the dead persons. En masse burial of corpses in common burial pits took place without ceremony or attendants.
Another Florentine observer, Marchionne di Coppo Stefani, wrote that every morning, when the burial pits held a fresh influx of dead bodies, the gravediggers shovelled more earth on them. Next morning they added more corpses and then more earth, "just as one makes lasagna with layers of pasta and cheese."
The governments of Europe were in a quandary. The medical fraternity was at a loss to explain what caused the disease or how it spread. Many believed only God's anger could produce such horrific calamity. People resorted to astrologers. People considered the earthquakes and the poisoning of wells by Jews as possible reasons for the emergence of the plague.
Pope Clement VI sought the insight of astronomers for an explanation for the occurrence of the plague. Johannes de Muris, a French astronomer, mathematician, was among the team of three who drew up a treatise explaining the plague of 1348. They said the conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars in 1341 caused the plague.
The Pope's physicians advised him that surrounding himself with torches would block the plague. However, he soon became skeptical of this recommendation and stayed in Avignon supervising sick care, burials, and the pastoral care of the dying.
Even though there was so much death around him the Pope never contracted the disease.
The cities ran out of ground for cemeteries. So, Pope Clement VI consecrated the entire Rhone River for the bodies to be thrown into it and considered as buried in holy ground.
Renewed religious fervour and fanaticism bloomed in the wake of the Black Death. People blamed various groups such as Jews, friars, foreigners, beggars, pilgrims, lepers and Romani, for the crisis. They singled out lepers and other people with skin diseases such as acne or psoriasis, and exterminated throughout Europe.
When popular opinion blamed the Jews for the plague and pogroms erupted throughout Europe, Pope Clement VI issued two papal bulls on July 6, 1348 and on September 26, 1348. The second bull named Quamvis Perfidiam, condemned the violence and said those who blamed the plague on the Jews had been "seduced by that liar, the Devil." He urged clergy to take action to protect Jews as he had done.
Even after the papal bulls, there were many attacks against Jewish communities. In February 1349, the citizens of Strasbourg murdered 2,000 Jews. In August the citizens of Mainz and Cologne the exterminated Jewish communities. By 1351, the Christians destroyed 60 major and 150 smaller Jewish communities.
Next → Part 3 – Don't Bathe Water Is Your Enemy!
← Previous: Part 1 – That Was the Question in Europe!
Pope Clement VI (en.wikipedia.org)
Jani Beg (en.wikipedia.org)
#WPLongformbagniosbalneaBathBathingBlack DeathBoccaccioBubonic PlagueCatholic ChurchCleanlinessEnglandEuropeFood for ThoughtJani BegMiddle AgespostadayThis is lifeTo Bathe or Not to BathetvarajYersinia pestis
#WPLongform, Advertisement, Cleanliness, England, English, Europe, Food for Thought, Post A Day 2014, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
To Bathe, or Not to Bathe: Part 1 – That Was the Question in Europe!
November 30, 2014 tvaraj	6 Comments
Around the world, the need for cleanliness gave rise to public centres for bathing. According to the historians, the Indus Valley Civilization had the earliest public baths.
The 'Great Bath', Mohenjo-daro, in Sindh, Pakistan. (Source: studyblue.com)
In 1926, archaeologists found the "Great Bath" among the ruins of the ancient Indus Valley Civilization at Mohenjo-daro in Sindh, Pakistan. Housed inside a large, elaborate building the public used it for bathing. It had stairs leading down to the water at both ends. Archaeological evidence indicates that the Great Bath was built in the 3rd Millennium BC.
Ancient Bath in Dion – ΑΡΧΑΙΟ ΛΟΥΤΡΟ ΣΤΟ ΔΙΟΝ (Source: panoramio.com)
The history of public baths in Greece begins in the sixth century BC. The Greeks used small bathtubs, washbasins, and foot baths for personal cleanliness. The earliest such findings were in the palace complexes at Knossos, Crete. Luxurious alabaster bathtubs excavated at Akrotiri, Santorini date from the mid-2nd millennium BC.
The Greeks built public baths and showers in their gymnasiums for relaxation and personal hygiene.
Bathing in Greece grew into a ritualized art. Cities in ancient Greece honoured sites where "young ephebes (adolescents) stood and splashed water over their bodies."
In Greek mythology the gods blessed certain natural springs or tidal pools to cure diseases. The Greeks established bathing facilities around these sacred pools for those desiring healing . Supplicants left offerings to the gods and bathed at these sites hoping for a cure.
The Roman Baths (Thermae) of Bath Spa, England. The entire structure above the level of the pillar bases is a later reconstruction. (Photo by DAVID ILIFF. License: CC-BY-SA 3.0)
In ancient Rome, the need for cleanliness gained much importance. One of the daily activities practiced across a variety of social classes was bathing. In many contemporary cultures bathing was a private activity conducted in the confines of one's home. But in Rome, bathing was a communal activity that took place mostly in public facilities called the Thermae (Greek: θερμός thermos, meaning "hot") and the balnea (from Greek βαλανεῖον balaneion, meaning "baths") for bathing.
The state-owned large imperial bath complexes called Thermae filled the need for communal cleanliness. In some ways, these resembled modern-day spas. The largest of these, the Baths of Diocletian, could hold up to 3,000 bathers. Fees for both types of baths were quite reasonable, within the budget of most free Roman men.
The balneum was a small private bathhouse. But some balnea were public in the sense that they were open to the populace for a fee.
Although wealthy Romans might set up a bath in their own houses, they often frequented the Thermae, because they were not only facilities for bathing, but were also centres for meeting and socializing as well. A catalogue of buildings in Rome from 354 AD documented 952 baths of varying sizes in the city.
During the 1st century BC, a Roman architect, and civil engineer Marcus Vitruvius Pollio discussed the design of baths in his multivolume work "De Architectura" published as "The Ten Books on Architecture".
The Romans built their public bath around three principal rooms: the caldarium (hot bath), the tepidarium (warm bath) and the frigidarium (cold bath). Some Thermae also featured the sudatorium (steam bath), a moist steam bath, and the laconicum (a dry steam), bath much like a modern sauna. An aqueduct, stream, or an adjacent river supplied water to the bathhouses built in forts, town houses, and private villas. A log fire heated the water channelled into the hot bathing rooms.
Before the Middle Ages, public baths were common in Europe. The public bathed regularly. During the 4th and 5th centuries, the Catholic Church advocated bathing to keep oneself clean and healthy. At the same time, the Church forbade people from attending public bathhouses for pleasure. It also condemned women going to bathhouses that had mixed facilities.
Saint Ephraim, metropolitan of Kyiv and All Rus', Bishop of Pereyaslav (modern Ukraine). (Source – Kyiv Caves Lavra, Ukraine)
Before he became a monk, Saint Ephraim II of Pereyaslav, was the treasurer and steward of household affairs (1054–1068) at the court of the Iziaslav Yaroslavich, the Grand Prince of Kiev. Weighed down by the noisy and bustling life at that time he became a monk. After the year 1072, Ephraim appointed as bishop in Pereyaslav built stone walls around the city like the Greek. He adorned the city with many beautiful churches and public buildings. He also constructed free hospices and public bathhouses for the poor and travelers.
During the Early and the High Middle Ages, the Catholic Church imposed more restrictions. It discouraged bathing naked on moral grounds and disapproved excessive bathing. Eventually, the public bathing culture of antiquity fell into disuse in Europe.
In the 11th and 12th centuries, the returning Crusaders, from Turkey and the Arab world, who had enjoyed warm baths in the Middle east, reintroduced Roman style public baths in Europe. Once again, the public baths became popular in medieval Germany, Switzerland, Italy, France and to a lesser extent in England. During the reign of Henry II, from 1154 AD to 1189 AD, bathhouses, called 'bagnios' were set up in Southwark on the river Thames.
In due course, most of these public baths degenerated into brothels and were closed down at various times. The Medieval Catholic Church proclaimed that public bathing led to immorality, promiscuous sex, and diseases.
The disease "Black Death" was the most catastrophic pandemic the world has yet known. It claimed an estimated 75 to 200 million people and peaked in Europe in the years 1346–53. The plague killed at least one out of every three Europeans. The aftermath of the plague created a series of religious, social, and economic upheavals, which had profound effects on the course of European history. It took 150 years for Europe's population to recover. The plague recurred occasionally in Europe until the 19th century.
In 1538, François I of France had the French bathhouses closed. In 1546, all public baths were officially banned in England by Henry VIII due to their negative reputation.
Ambroise Paré (c. 1510 – December 20, 1590) was a French barber-surgeon. He served kings Henry II, Francis II, Charles IX and Henry III. Considered as one of the fathers of surgery and modern forensic pathology, he pioneered surgical techniques and battlefield medicine and treatment of wounds. He was also an anatomist and invented several surgical instruments. In 1568, Ambroise Paré, warned about water coming into contact with an unsuspecting victim:
This statement caused the medical fraternity in Europe to unanimously believe that water and infected air carried diseases into the body through the pores in the skin. Hence, they advised people not to bathe.
This resulted in lower class citizens, particularly men, to forgo bathing. They restricted their hygienic routine to rinsing their mouths, washing hands and infrequent washing parts of the face. They believed that washing one's entire face was dangerous as it would weaken the eyesight and cause catarrh. Members of the upper classes cut down their full body bathing habits to just a few times per year. They struck a balance between the risk of contracting a disease by bathing, and emanating body stench.
During the reign of Louis XIV people believed that a grimy layer of dirt would keep one healthy. They thought the grime would clog the pores on the skins and help to keep away the water from entering one's body. Throughout the 17th century, people washed little. They wore shifts, shirts, collars, coifs, kerchiefs, etc., made of linen. It was thought that linen worn next to the skin had special properties that enabled it to absorb sweat, and remove dirt from the body. Working class people used cream, grey or beige linen not having the resources to keep their linen white.
To combat body odour, the rich used scented rags to rub the body and heavy use of perfumes to mask their stench. The royalty and the aristocracy changed their linen wear often. Men wore small bags with fragrant herbs between the shirt and waistcoat, while women dusted fragrant powders over their entire body. Even then they still stunk. So, they doused themselves with heady perfumes, oils, and scented powders to mask the stench emanating from their bodies.
A wardrobe full of fine linen smocks or undershirts to enable a daily change was the height of hygienic sophistication. Jean Racine (1639 – 1699), the French dramatist, Molière (1622 – 1673), the French playwright actor, owned 30 pieces each.
This complete lack of personal hygiene in most of Europe lingered until around mid 19th century.
Russians were not so fastidious about bathing. The Europeans considered them perverts. The Russians took regular baths at least once a month.
Next → Part 2 – The Bubonic Plague
Great Bath, Mohenjo-daro (en.wikipedia.org)
Vitruvius (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvius
Ten Books on Architecture (en.wikipedia.org)
Thermae (en.wikipedia.org)
Ephraim of Pereyaslavl (en.wikipedia.org)
#WPLongformAmbroise ParébagniosbalneaBathbathhousesBathingCatholic ChurchCleanlinessEnglandEuropeFood for ThoughtGreeceGreeksLouis XIVMiddle AgesMohenjo-daropostadayRomansSaint Ephraim II of PereyaslavThermaeThis is lifeTo Bathe or Not to Bathetvaraj
British English Slang, England, English, English language, Food for Thought, Great Britain, Post A Day 2014, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
The British English Slang: Q to Z
November 3, 2014 tvaraj	4 Comments
The British English Slang: A to C
The British English Slang: D to J
The British English Slang: K to P
.Q
Queer as a clockwork orange: Very odd indeed; ostentatiously homosexual.
Queer Street: A difficult or odd situation, e.g. "up Queer Street".
Queer someone's pitch: Take the pitch of another street vendor, busker or similar; spoil someone else's efforts.
Quim: Vagina (possibly a play on the Welsh word for valley, cwm).
Rat arsed: Drunk, sloshed; plastered; loaded.
Richard the Third: A piece of excrement (rhyming slang Richard the Third = turd).
Ring: Anal sphincter.
Ringburner: A curry; diarrhoea; painful defecation.
Roger: To copulate; to screw; to have your wicked way with a lady.
Rozzer: Policeman.
Rubber Johnny: Condom.
Rumpy pumpy: A phrase used as a euphemism for sexual intercourse.
Savvy (from the French, savoir): Knowledge; understanding.
Scally, scallywag: A hooligan youth.
Scarper: Run away.
Scouser: A person from Liverpool.
Scrote: Term of abuse, from scrotum.
Scrubber: A promiscuous woman (in Britain); a common or working class woman (in Ireland).
Scrummy: A word used to describe some food that was particularly good, and probably sweet and fattening.
Scrump: To steal fruit, especially apples.
See a man about a dog: What a person would say as an excuse for leaving, to hide their real destination, to attend a secret deal or meeting. This phrase is also used to excuse oneself to go to the toilet to shit.
Shag: Sexual intercourse.
Shagged: The past historic of shag; extremely tired, e.g. "shagged out".
Shambolic: A state of chaos.
Shiner: Black eye.
Shitehawk: Someone of little worth.
Shit-faced: Drunk.
Shirty: Ill-tempered, insolent.
Shufti: To take a look at something. An old Arabic word, picked up by British soldiers during World War II, in North Africa.
Sixes and sevens: In a mess; topsy turvy; somewhat haywire!
Skanky: Dirty, particularly of a marijuana pipe.
Skew-whiff: Crooked.
Skint: Without money.
Skive: a lazy character; a useless person; avoid doing something.
Slag: Worthless or insignificant person; a promiscuous woman; a prostitute.
Slag off: A verbal attack; to criticise or slander; to bad mouth in a nasty manner.
Slap-head: A bald man.
Slap and tickle: making out or heavy petting.
Slapper: An oversexed female; a tart; a tramp; promiscuous woman; prostitute.
Slash: Urinate; urination; pee; piss; piddle; siphon the python; shake the snake; wee; having a jimmy.
Sling one's hook: Go away.
Sloshed: Drunk; plastered.
Smarmy: A smoothy, who has a way with the ladies.
Snog: French kiss; any prolonged physical intimacy without undressing or sexual contact.
Snookered: Placed in a bad situation.
Sod: Annoying person or thing (derived from sodomite).
Sod off: Piss off; go away.
Spawny: Lucky.
Spend a penny: Use the restroom.
Spunk: Semen; ejaculate; courage; bravery.
Stag Night: Bachelor Party
Starkers: Fully naked.
Steaming: Extremely drunk; extremely angry.
Stonker: A boner.
Strawberry creams: Breasts.
Stuffed: Sexual intercourse, e.g. "get stuffed"; used negatively to mean bothered, e.g. "I can't be stuffed to do that!"; having a full belly, e.g. "I am completely stuffed, and can't eat another thing."
Tad: A little bit.
Take the mickey: To tease; to mock.
Take the piss (out of), taking the piss: Messing and screwing around; making fun of; to mock.
Tart: A prostitute; a term of abuse for a woman; used affectionately for a lover; shortened version of sweetheart.
Tickety-Boo: Phrase that means everything is going well.
Todger: Dick.
Toff: A person belonging to the upper class; a posh person.
Ton: A large unspecified amount (18th century); £100 (1940s); 100 MPH (1950s); any unit of 100 (1960s), e.g. a century scored in cricket.
Tosh: total bullshit, nonsense or rubbish.
Tosser: Idiot; a derogatory term for a male masturbator; an affectionate form of address, e.g. "All right you old tosser!".
Tosspot: Drunkard; habitual drinker.
Tube: The London Underground (19th century. Originally 'Tuppeny tube'); Penis; a person (Scottish); a general term of contempt (Irish, 1950s).
Twat: Vagina; a term of abuse; to hit hard.
Twig and berries: male genitalia, the penis and balls.
Up for it: Willing to have sex.
Up The Duff: Pregnant.
Wacky backy: marijuana.
Wag off: Skyve; play truant.
Wank: Masturbation; to masturbate; inferior.
Wanker: Masturbator; Idiot; abusive term for someone the speaker doesn't like.
Wankered: Very drunk; exhausted.
Wanking spanner: Hand.
Warts and all: Including all negative characteristics.
Wazzock: Stupid.
Whinge: Whine.
Whizz: Urination; to move very fast.
Wicked: Cool!
Willy: Penis (hypocorism).
Willy-waving: Acting in an excessively macho fashion.
Wind up: Tease; irritate; annoy; anger.
Wonky: Not right
Yank: Septic tank.
Zonked: Tired.
The British English Slang (tvaraj.com)
The British English Slang: A to C (tvaraj.com)
The British English Slang: D to J (tvaraj.com)
The British English Slang: K to P (tvaraj.com)
British EnglishBritish English SlangBritish English Slang - Q to ZCockneyEnglandEnglishEnglish languageEnglish slangFood for ThoughtGreat BritainLanguagepostadayThis is lifetvarajUnited Kingdom
British English Slang, England, English, English language, Food for Thought, Language, This is Life, tvaraj, United Kingdom
Keep your pecker up: Keep your chin up.
Khazi, karzy, kharsie: A privy; toilet.
Kip: Sleep; nap; bed; lodging; brothel (mainly Irish).
Knackered: Extremely tired; broken; useless.
Knackers: Vulgar name for testicles.
Knees up: A lively party or dance.
Knob: Penis (noun); to have sexual intercourse (verb).
Knob-end: Ttip of penis; an idiot.
Knob Head: Dickhead; an idiot; a stupid; an irritating person.
Knob jockey: Homosexual.
Knock off: To steal it, not to copy it!
Knock up: To wake someone up.
Knockers: Women's breasts.
Knocking shop: A Brothel.
Know one's onions: Knowledgeable; to be well acquainted with a subject.
Lag: Convict, particularly a long serving one (an old lag).
Lash: Urinate; alcohol.
Lashed: Inebriated.
Laughing gear: Mouth.
Leg it: Run or run for it.
Local: A public house close to one's home.
Lolly: Money.
Loo: Lavatory.
Lost the plot: Gone crazy; become mentally unstable.
Lurgy: Sick; under the weather.
Manky: Dirty; filthy.
Marbles: Wits. As in, to lose one's marbles.
Mare: A derogatory term for a Woman.
Mark: A suitable victim for a con or swindle.
Mate: Friend; chum.
Matelot: Sailor (derived from the French).
Meat and Two Veg: Euphemism for male genitalia. Also used sometimes to mean something unremarkable or ordinary.
Mental: Crazy; insane.
Mick: A derogatory term for an Irishman.
Miffed: Upset or offended.
Minge: Vagina.
Minger: Someone who smells.
Minted: Wealthy.
Mizzle: Decamp.
Moggy: Cat.
Moke: Donkey.
Monged (out): Severely drunk.
Mooch: Loiter or wander aimlessly; skulk.
Moolah: Money.
Moon: To expose one's backside.
Moony: Crazy; foolish.
Morish or moreish: Need more!
Muck about: Waste time; interfere with.
Mucker: Mate; pal.
Muck in: Share a duty or workload.
Mufti: An old army term for civilian dress worn by someone who normally wears a military uniform. The word probably derived from the Muslim dress, popularly worn by British officers serving in India during the 19th century. Now commonly used to refer to a non-uniform day in schools.
Mug: Face; a gullible or easily swindled person.
Munta: Ugly person.
Mush: Face or mouth. Example: "shut your mush".
Naff: Inferior or in poor taste.
Nancy boy: looking pathetic.
Nark: In a bad mood; grumpy (an old nark); annoy or irritate; a spy or informant.
Ned: A lout; a drunken brawling fellow; a tough guy. Sometimes equated with the English chav.
News: Looking pathetic; a bit of a Nancy boy.
Nick: Steal; police station or prison; to arrest; health condition, e.g. "to be in good nick".
Nicked: Stolen; arrested.
Nob: A person of high social standing; head.
Nobble: Disable (particularly a racehorse).
Nod out: To lapse into a drug induced stupor.
Nonce: A prison slang for Sex offender, most commonly a child molester.
Nookie or nooky: Sexual intercourse.
Nose rag: Handkerchief.
Nosh: Food; to eat.
Nosh up: A feast or large, satisfying meal.
Nowt: Nothing.
Numpty: Incompetent or unwise person.
Nut: Head; an eccentric person.
Nutcase: An insane person.
Nuthouse: A lunatic asylum.
Nutmeg: In association football, to pass the ball between an opposing player's legs.
Nuts or nutty: Crazy or insane.
Nutter: Crazy person; insane person.
Odds and sods: Miscellaneous items or articles; bits and pieces. Substitute for 'odds and ends'.
Oik: A derogatory term for someone of a lower social standing.
Off one's head or out of one's head: Mad or delirious.
Off one's trolley: Mad; out of one's mind.
Off the hook: Free from obligation or danger.
Off one's nut: Crazy or foolish.
Off to Bedfordshire: Going to bed.
Old Bill: A policeman or the police collectively.
On the piss: binge drinking to get totally smashed.
On the pull: Looking for sexual intercourse.
One's head off: Loud or excessively, e.g. "I laughed my head off."
Owt: Anything.
Packet: A large sum of money, e.g. "earn a packet"; a nasty surprise, e.g. "catch a packet".
Paddy: A fit of temper; a derogatory term for an Irishman.
Paki: A derogatory term for a Pakistani. Sometimes used to loosely describe anyone or anything from the Indian sub- continent.
Paki-bashing: Unprovoked attacks on Pakistanis living in Britain.
Pants: Panties; total crap.
Parky: Cold weather.
Paste: To hit, punch or beat soundly.
Pasting: A sound thrashing or heavy defeat.
Pavement Pizza: A euphemism for puke or vomit.
Peanuts: Cheap.
Pear shaped: Become a disaster.
Peepers: Eyes.
Penny-dreadful: A cheap, sensationalist magazine.
Phiz or phizog: The face (from a 17th-century colloquial shortening of physiognomy).
Pickled: Drunk.
Pie-eyed: Drunk.
Pig's ear: Cockney slang rhyming with beer; something that has been badly done or has been made a mess of.
Pikey: Pejorative term used, mainly in England to refer to travellers, gypsies or vagrants. Sometimes also used to describe people of lower social class or morals.
Pillock: Stupid or annoying person.
Pinch: Steal; robbery; sail too close to the wind (nautical slang).
Pissed, pissed up: Drunk
Pip pip: An out-dated expression meaning goodbye.
Piss up: A drinking session.
Plastered: Fully drunk.
Plonk: A pejorative word used to describe red wine of poor quality.
Plonker: Something large or substantial; penis.
Porkies: Old Cockney rhyming word for "lies", derived from "pork pies," which rhymes with lies.
Potty: A little crazy; looney; one card short of a full deck.
Puff: Fart.
Pukka: Super or smashing.
Pull: Looking for birds.
Punt: To gamble, wager or take a chance; to sell or promote.
Punter: Gambler; a victim in a confidence trick or swindle; a customer, patron or a client of a prostitute.
Pussy: Cat as in "pussy cat", or in the fairytale, Puss in Boots; female genitalia.
Put a sock in it: Shut up.
The British English Slang: Q to Z (tvaraj.com)
British EnglishBritish English SlangBritish English Slang - K to PCockneyEnglandEnglishEnglish languageEnglish slangFood for ThoughtGreat BritainLanguagepostadayThis is lifetvarajUnited Kingdom
Daft: Stupid.
Daft cow: A stupid person.
Darbies: Handcuffs.
Debag: To remove another person's trousers by force.
Dear: Expensive.
Dekko: Look. Derived from Hindi.
Dick: Fellow; penis.
Dicky: Feel sick.
Dip: Pickpocket.
Dishy: Attractive; good looking.
Div: idiot (prison slang)
Do: A party; prosecute.
Do one's nut: Get angry.
Dobber: Penis.
Doddle: Something simple or easy to do.
Dodgy: Suspicious; something risky, difficult or dangerous.
Dog: A fellow; a rough or unattractive woman.
Dog's Bollocks: Awesome; extremely good; favorable; great; really fantastic. Sometimes abbreviated to, "it's the dog's".
Dog's dinner: Make a real mess of something; ugly.
Done up like a kipper: Beaten up; fitted up or framed; caught red-handed by the police.
Donkey's years: For ages; a very long time. Sometimes abbreviated to, "donkey's".
Doofer: An unnamed object.
Dosser: A person who might stay in a dosshouse.
Dosshouse: A cheap boarding house frequented by tramps.
Dressed like a dog's dinner: Wears clothes inappropriate for the occasion or too formal.
Duck: A term of endearment used in the North of England.
Duff: Useless, junk, trash; broken, not working; pregnant (up the duff).
Duffer: A useless person.
Earwig: To eavesdrop.
Eating irons: Cutlery.
End away: To have sex.
Fag: Cigarette.
Fag end: The used stub of a cigarette, and by extension the unpleasant and worthless loose end of any situation.
Fanny: Vagina; a woman's front bits; female external genitalia; a woman's pudendum.
Fanny Adams: Nothing at all. A euphemism for fuck all. Usually preceded by 'sweet' and often abbreviated to F.A., S.F.A. or sweet F.A.
Fanny around: Procrastinate.
Fence: A person who deals in stolen property.
Fiddle sticks: A swear word.
Filch: To steal or pilfer.
Filth (the): The police (derogatory).
Fit: Hot or sexually desirable.
Fit up: A frame up.
Flasher: A person who exposes oneself indecently.
Flick: The cinema; motion picture; film.
Flog: To sell.
Flog a dead horse: Try to find a solution to an unsolvable problem; to continue talking about a long forgotten topic.
Flutter: To place a wager, usually a small one by someone who is not a serious gambler.
Fly: Clever; quick witted.
Fork out: To pay out, usually with some reluctance.
French letter: Condom.
Frig: To masturbate.
Frig around or frig about: To behave aimlessly or foolishly.
Frigging: The act of masturbating; used as an intensifier, e.g. "You frigging idiot". Considered milder than 'fucking idiot'.
Frog: A derogatory term for a Frenchman.
Fruity: Frisky.
Fuck all: Nothing at all
Full of beans: To have loads of energy.
Fuzz (the): The police.
Gaff: House or flat.
Gaffer: Employer; boss; foreman.
Gagging: Desperate; not nice.
Gallivanting: Fooling around; horseplay.
Gander: To look around. Usually preceded by 'have a' or 'take a'.
Gash: Surplus to requirements, unnecessary; a derogatory term used for female genitalia.
Gassed: Drunk.
Geezer: An old man.
Gen: Information.
Gen up: Do research; get some information.
Git: Incompetent; stupid; annoying; childish person.
Give you a bell: Call you.
Go down: To go to prison.
Go spare: To become angry; frustrated; distressed; enraged.
Gob: Mouth; spittle; to spit.
Gobby: Opinionated.
Gobshite: A stupid or despicable person.
Gobsmacked: Amazed; awed; flabbergasted; dumbfounded; astounded; speechless.
Gogglebox: Television.
Gong: A medal. Usually a military one.
Goolies: The male genitals and in particular the testicles.
Gormless: Clueless.
Grot: Rubbish or dirt.
Grub: Food.
Guff: Ridiculous talk; nonsense; flatulence.
Gutted: Really upset.
Half-inch: To steal. Rhyming slang for 'pinch'.
Hampton: Penis.
Hampton Rock: Rhyming slang for 'Cock'.
Hampton Wick: Rhyming slang for 'Prick'.
Handbags: A harmless fight, especially between two women.
Hard cheese: Bad luck.
Helmet: The glans of the penis.
Hen Party: Bachelorette Party
Her Majesty's Pleasure: Incarcerated; to be put in prison with no release date!
Honk: Vomit.
Hook: To steal.
Hook it: To run away quickly.
Hooky or hookey: Something that is stolen. Loosely used to describe anything illegal.
Hooter: Nose.
Horses for courses: Won't work for someone else
"How is Your Father?": Euphemism for sexual intercourse or other sexual activity. Read my article "How is your father?"
Hump: To carry or heave; have sex.
Hunky-dory: Excellent; cool and groovy; going according to plan; no worries; going well.
Idiot box: Television.
Inside: In or into prison.
It's Monkeys Outside!: It's very cold outside!
Ivories: Teeth; the keys of a piano; dice.
Jacksy or jacksie: The buttocks or anus.
Jack the lad: A young man regarded as a show off and is brash or loud.
Jack up: Inject an illegal drug.
Jag: A drug taking, or sometimes drinking, binge; a period of uncontrolled activity.
Jammy: Lucky; flukey; pleasant; desirable.
Jerry: A chamber pot; a German; a German soldier.
Jessie: An effeminate man; one that is weak or afraid.
Jism or jissom: Semen.
Jock: Word or term of address for a Scot.
Joe Bloggs: An average, typical or unremarkable man.
Joe Soap: An idiot; stooge; scapegoat.
Johnny or Johnny bag: Condom.
John Thomas: Penis.
Josser: A simpleton.
Jump: Sexual intercourse.
British EnglishBritish English SlangBritish English Slang - D to JCockneyEnglandEnglishEnglish languageEnglish slangFood for ThoughtGreat BritainLanguagepostadayThis is lifetvarajUnited Kingdom


text:
Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham Must Pay for Enabling Trump
The best way to ensure some modicum of accountability for Trump's most reliable wingmen is to boot them from office in 2020.
By Elie MystalTwitter
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). (CQ Roll Call / Tom Williams)
Ready to fight back?
Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week.
You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation's journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.
Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.
Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!
Support Progressive Journalism
The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.
Sign up for Take Action Now and we'll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.
Travel With The Nation
Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.
Sign up for our Wine Club today.
Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?
In the wake of great political tragedies and crimes, history tends to remember the leaders of villainy, but not their accomplices. People have heard of Joseph Stalin, but his right-hand man, Lazar Kaganovitch, is a trivia question for those interested in Soviet history. Kaganovitch was ousted at Stalin's death in 1953, but he lived until 1991 and received a fairly sanitized obituary in The New York Times. The bureaucrats and enablers of great evil often escape real-time consequences for their actions and the retribution of history.
In modern history, only Adolf Hitler's enablers received anything like accountability for their furtherance of the Nazi agenda. A post–World War II West was determined to punish the purveyors of atrocity. But those days are long over. Oh, if you're an African despot, the International Criminal Court will come for you, but if you're committing war crimes on behalf of a Western country, they call you "Dick Cheney" and pretend they can't see you.
Support our mission-driven journalism by purchasing a Nation 2020 full-color wall calendar.
The enablers of President Donald Trump are likely well aware of how history gets made. The record of these times will show that Donald Trump, and Donald Trump alone, was impeached for abuse of power and obstruction of justice. It will show that Donald Trump was a liar, a bigot, and a sexual predator. It will show that Donald Trump presided over the failure of America, if there even is an America left when he's done with it.
Nobody is going to punish Sean Hannity, despite his leading role over at the ministry of propaganda. Nobody is even going to remember Kellyanne Conway. One day, Mick Mulvaney is going to write a book, We Do This All The Time, and laugh in complicity all the way to the bank. Trump exists because a whole bunch of people allow him to exist, and those people will almost uniformly die free in their comfortable beds.
We cannot hope to hold all of the people responsible for Trump to any kind of criminal accountability. And, unless you strongly believe in Hell, we can't count on true moral justice to ever be visited upon these people. But we can hold Trump's enablers politically accountable, at least those enablers who are accountable to the people.
View our current issue
Towards that end, Senators Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham must lose their 2020 reelection bids. They must pay a political price for their shameless debasement in service of Trump. Defeating McConnell and Graham in 2020 is every bit as important as defeating Donald Trump in 2020, if "Trumpism" is what you want to defeat. If you don't take out all three, the lesson of the Trump era will be that refusing to put your country over your party is the politically savvy move. Should Trump lose his job, but McConnell and Graham keep theirs, then these men who embarrass the nation will have won.
To be clear, these people are vulnerable in 2020. The legal world reacted with horror last week when McConnell went on Hannity's show to express his smirking pride in stealing a Supreme Court seat and remaking the federal judiciary for a generation. The political world reacted in horror when, in the same interview, McConnell vowed intimate coordination with Trump's lawyers in preparation for a Senate impeachment trial where the senators are supposed to be "impartial."
To me, McConnell's Hannity interview was a sign of embarrassing weakness. A November poll put McConnell's approval rating at 18 percent—in Kentucky. I do not doubt that McConnell will do everything in his power to see Trump acquitted. But the fact that McConnell wants people to know that he will be doing everything in his power to free Donald Trump, when even mere lip-service to the idea of impartiality would have made things easier for the Republican senators, tells me that McConnell needs Trump's base to be rabidly mobilized if he wants to stand any chance at reelection. McConnell's pivot towards the Supreme Court is a reminder that he thinks Kentucky voters want illegitimate justices and alleged attempted rapists in charge of the judiciary. For McConnell, that Hannity hit counts as a charm offensive, and he doesn't do that unless he knows he's in trouble.
Lindsey Graham is probably in even more trouble. A new poll shows Graham's challenger, Jamie Harrison, within two points of Graham in South Carolina. South Carolina has the third highest percentage of African Americans by population of any state in the union. That alone is clearly not enough to put a state in play—Mississippi and Louisiana are the first and second, respectively—but Harrison is a well-funded, African American challenger. Graham has been the most public sycophant for Trump. If there is any softness among white independents and moderates because of Graham's complete embrace of Trumpism (or because of Graham's total hypocrisy from the last time he was up for election, six years ago), and African Americans are sufficiently motivated to overcome voter suppression to defeat one of Trump's core spokespeople, Harrison could absolutely pull out a victory.
Defeating McConnell and Graham would not merely be the karmic victory we so richly deserve; it could also quake elected Republicans out of their shameful complicity. If McConnell and Graham go down in Kentucky and South Carolina, it's very possible that Democratic Senate candidates in more purple states like Arizona, Colorado, and North Carolina could also win. That would mean the Democrats take back the Senate. Taking back the Senate, not just the White House, is the critical step for any Democratic president, both moderate and progressive, to have any chance to reverse the policies of the Trump era, and not merely the rhetoric. Taking back the Senate is the only way to stop further Trump appointments to the courts, should he eke out an Electoral College victory.
More from Mystal
The Republicans' Star Impeachment Scholar Is a Shameless Hack
Elie Mystal
5 Ways to Debunk the GOP's Defense of Donald Trump
SCOTUS Is Back in Session and Cruelty Is on the Docket
Even more important than all that is the fact that, if Trump loses in 2020 but these Senate enablers remain, it will make it more likely that Trump will refuse to leave office after a defeat. Or that Republicans put up another Trumpesque candidate in 2024. It's essential to understand that the operating theory in the Republican Party right now is that Trumpism is the only way for them to win national and statewide elections. Republican policies are wildly unpopular. Overwhelming majorities of voters reject tax cuts for the wealthy, unending mass shootings, and climate-change denialism. Trump has shown Republicans that the only way to win is to pair those unpopular policy aims with explicit bigotry, unapologetic misogyny, and cartoonish xenophobia. If Trump loses, but the Republican senators who helped him remain, their lesson will be to do the same thing in 2024, just with a candidate who can speak in complete sentences and doesn't solicit bribes.
If people like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham get away with what they're doing, without even losing an election, then there's really no chance at restoring a bipartisan consensus about America. McConnell and Graham have to lose. Other politicians have to see them lose. They must be made an example of.
History will not long remember what those two jokers say during impeachment, but it will remember what we did about it.
Elie MystalTwitterElie Mystal is The Nation's Justice Correspondent—covering the courts, the criminal justice system, and politics—and the force behind the magazine's monthly column, "Objection!" He is also an Alfred Knobler Fellow at the Type Media Center. He can be followed @ElieNYC.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


WEST PALM BEACH, FL (May 2, 2016) – Admission to the Norton Museum of Art will be free to the public beginning in early July and will remain free through the duration of its transformative expansion project, scheduled for completion in late 2018. To prepare for major construction, the Museum will be closed from May 30 through July 4, 2016 and will reopen on July 5, 2016.
Upon reopening, visitors will be directed to use the original 1941 entrance on the east side of the building. The current entrance and parking lot on the south side of the building will be closed for construction. A free shuttle service will be available for visitors who park in the free lot across from the Museum on the west side of Dixie Highway. The Museum will remain closed on Mondays. No food service will be offered during this time, though beverages and snacks will be available during Art After Dark on Thursday evenings.
Highlights from all five departments of the Museum Collection–American, Chinese, Contemporary, and European art, and Photography–will be on view in the east galleries while construction proceeds on the west side of the building. Artworks remaining on view include masterpieces such as Jackson Pollock's Night Mist, George Bellows' Winter Afternoon, Edward Hopper's August in the City, and Georgia O'Keeffe's Pelvis with the Moon—New Mexico. The Museum also will continue presenting a variety of programs, including Art After Dark on Thursdays and Family Studio on Saturdays, and will create special exhibitions using its world-class collection. Programming for the summer and beyond will be announced shortly. The biennial Rudin Prize for Emerging Photographers is set for October 2016, and the Sixth Annual Recognition of Art by Women (RAW) exhibition will open in January 2017.
Museum members will receive added benefits, including discounts at a number of businesses along the Dixie Highway corridor, and free admission to more than 250 museums throughout North America.
• May 22, 2016: Last day to visit the European Galleries in the Nessel Wing.
• May 29, 2016: Last day to dine at The Café at the Norton.
• May 30 – July 4, 2016: The Norton is closed to prepare for construction and reinstall the permanent collection.