text:
You Are Here: Home / Net Worth / MrBeast Net Worth 2022: Where Does Mr Beast Live?
Jimmy Donaldson (born May 7, 1998), famously known as MrBeast, is an American YouTube personality. He has considered the pioneer of a genre of YouTube videos focused on expensive stunts. His main YouTube channel, "MrBeast," is the fifth most subscribed on the platform.
Donaldson was born on May 7, 1998, in Kansas. Donaldson grew up primarily with his brother Charles "C. J." Donaldson in Greenville, North Carolina. In 2016, Donaldson graduated from Greenville Christian Academy, a private secondary school in the area. He briefly attended East Carolina University before dropping out. Donaldson's brother, a YouTuber who posts similar content to his brother under the name MrBro, has more than 4.23 million subscribers as of September 2022.
Who is Mr Beast?
Mr Beast YouTube Career ( Grint to Fame to Profitability )
How Much Does MrBeast get so much money to donate?
MrBeast Business Model
MrBeast Other Ventures
MrBeast Awards
FAQs about MrBeast
Thoughts on MrBeast Net Worth
Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast, is an American YouTube personality. He has considered the pioneer of a genre of YouTube videos focused on expensive stunts. His main YouTube channel, "MrBeast," is the fifth most subscribed on the platform.
Donaldson began posting videos on YouTube in early 2012 at age 13 under the name "MrBeast6000"; his early content ranged from Let us Plays to "videos appreciating the wealth of other YouTubers." In 2017, he went viral after his "Counting to 100,000" video reached tens of thousands of views in a matter of days. Since then, he has grown in popularity, with most of his videos getting millions of views.
Over time, he has diversified his content to include videos with challenges and donations that raise thousands of dollars, videos with difficult tasks or survival challenges, and original vlogs. As his channel picked up steam, Donaldson hired several childhood friends to help him manage the growing brand. By 2022, the MrBeast team consisted of 60 people.
Donaldson's main YouTube channel, which reached 100 million subscribers on July 28, 2022, is called "MrBeast." He also runs several other YouTube channels, including "Beast Reacts," "MrBeast Gaming," "MrBeast Shorts," and a charity channel. He was also among the top 10 highest-paid YouTubers of 2020. Donaldson is also the founder of MrBeast Burger and Feastables and co-founder of Team Trees, a fundraiser for the Arbor Day Foundation that has raised over $23 million, and Team Seas, a fundraiser for Ocean Conservancy and The Ocean Cleanup that has raised over $30 million.
Name Jimmy Donaldson
Net Worth (Sep, 2022) $56 to $58 Million
Profession YouTuber, internet personality, businessman
Monthly Income And Salary $8 Million +
Yearly Income And Salary $10 Million +
Last Updated Sep, 2022
Early Viral Trials (2012-2017)
Donaldson uploaded his first YouTube video in February 2012 at the age of 13 under the name "MrBeast6000"; his early content included Let us Plays (mostly on Minecraft and Call of Duty: Black Ops 2), videos appreciating the wealth of other YouTubers, videos with tips for aspiring YouTube creators, and commentary on YouTube dramas. Donaldson rarely appeared in these videos. In July 2013, the subscriber count for his channel, then called "That-dude" was around 240.
In 2015 and 2016, Donaldson began to gain popularity with his "Worst Intros" series, in which he poked fun at YouTube video introductions[citation needed]. By mid-2016, Donaldson had about 30,000 subscribers. In the fall of 2016, Donaldson dropped out of East Carolina College to pursue a full-time career as a YouTuber. His mother did not agree and forced him to move out of the family home.
Donaldson hired four childhood friends as his channel grew – Chris Tyson, Chandler Hallow, Garrett Ronald, and Jake Franklin – to collaborate on his track. They then contacted numerous YouTubers to get statistics on their successful videos and predict the platform's recommendation system. In 2020, Franklin left the crew; then Karl Jacobs, previously a cameraman, was promoted to take his place.
Rise to Fame (2017-2020)
In January 2017, Donaldson released a nearly day-long video in which he counted to 100,000. The stunt took him 40 hours to complete, with some parts sped up to "stay under 24 hours." Donaldson also gained popularity during this time with actions such as attempting to break glass with a hundred megaphones, letting the paint dry for an hour, trying to stay underwater for 24 hours (which failed due to health issues), and unsuccessfully attempting to spin a Fidget Spinner for a day. By 2018, Donaldson had raised $1 million through his outlandish stunts, earning him the title of "biggest YouTube philanthropist."
During the 2018 PewDiePie vs. T-Series competition to become the channel with the most subscribers on YouTube, Donaldson bought billboards and numerous television and radio ads to help PewDiePie gain more subscribers than T-Series.[citation needed] During Super Bowl LIII, he purchased several seats for himself and his team, whose T-shirts read "Sub 2 PewDiePie."
In March 2019, Donaldson organized and filmed a real-life Battle Royale competition in Los Angeles in collaboration with Apex Legends, with a prize purse of $200,000 (two games were played, resulting in a $100,000 per game). Apex Legends publisher Electronic Arts sponsored the event and prize money.
Donaldson was accused of using counterfeit money in his "I Opened A FREE BANK" video released on November 23, 2019. He later explained that he used counterfeit money to avoid safety concerns from participants and that participants received real checks after the filming.
In April 2020, Donaldson hosted a rock-scissors-paper contest with 32 influencers and a grand prize of $250,000, which became the most-watched live original event on YouTube with 662,000 concurrent viewers. Nadeshot eventually won the event. In October 2020, Donaldson hosted another influencer tournament with 24 participants and a grand prize of $300,000. The game was ultimately won by the D'Amelio family, which sparked controversy as they claimed that they had cheated.
From Fame to Profitability (2021-present)
On January 1, 2021, Donaldson released the video "Youtube Rewind 2020, Thank God It's Over." In the video, Donaldson explains that he has always believed that YouTubers "should have more of a say in Rewind," and that's why he decided to call "hundreds of YouTubers." At the end of the video, Donaldson praises PewDiePie, citing him and his Rewind 2018 as an inspiration for Donaldson's Rewind.
A month later, Donaldson signed a deal with Jellysmack to distribute content on Facebook and Snapchat.
In November 2021, Donaldson uploaded a reenactment of the survival drama streaming television series Squid Game, in which 456 people competed for a cash prize of $456,000, but without the violence in the show. The video has been viewed more than 280 million times since August 13, 2022. That makes it Donaldson's most-viewed YouTube video and one of the most-viewed YouTube videos of 2021. A review of the video in Vice said it "badly misunderstood Squid Game's anti-capitalist message."
In December 2021, Donaldson hosted a third Influencer Tournament with 15 participants and a grand prize of $1,000,000.
In January 2022, Forbes ranked MrBeast as the top-earning YouTube creative, with an estimated $54 million earned in 2021. Forbes also stated that his 2021 income would have ranked him 40th on the Forbes Celebrity 100 in 2020, making as much money as Vin Diesel and Lewis Hamilton in 2020.
MrBeast often gives away millions of dollars worth of products, including cash, houses, cars, gifts, boats, etc.
How does MrBeast get so much money to spend? MrBeast generates money mainly in the following three ways.
YouTube advertising revenue
Merchandise sales
Let's talk about the above three strategies that MrBeast uses to make so much money from YouTube.
1. Sponsorships
Most of MrBeast's net worth comes from its sponsors. Here's the list of sponsors that pay MrBeast much money.
Quidd: Quidd is the first sponsor who gave MrBeast over $10,000, which he later donated to a homeless man. Quidd still sponsors MrBeast's videos.
Quick note: Quidd is an app for collecting and sharing rare digital goods like chat stickers, trading cards, GIFs, etc.
Honey: Honey is probably the BIGGEST contributor to MrBeast's net worth, as he often recommends Honey in his YouTube videos.
Quick note: Honey is a FREE browser extension that automatically finds coupon codes and applies them when you pay.
Apex Legends: Apex Legends is another sponsor of MrBeast's YouTube channel, donating $200,000 to "$200,000 Youtuber Battle Royale" and "Donating $100,000 To Shroud In Real Life" for every kill he scores, etc.
Quick note: Apex Legends is a free-to-play battle royale hero shooter game
Dragon City: Dragon City is also the sponsor for MrBeast's videos, including "$100,000 To A Homeless Man", "$70,000 Extreme Hide And Seek – Challenge", etc.
Quick note: Dragon City is a game where you collect, fight and level up dragons.
Besides that, MrBeast also does pay advertising for other brands like Coinbase, whose website he links to in his video description. Here's how it looks; MrBeast sponsors
2. Selling Merchandise
Another big contributor to MrBeast's net worth and YouTube donations is his merchandise.
MrBeast runs an online store called Store Mr. Beast where he sells a wide range of products, including; Hoodies, T-shirts, School bags, Accessories, and more He also operates a fast-food chain called MrBeast Burger, which currently has 900 locations in North America and Europe. The menu includes burgers, fries, desserts, and canned drinks.
3. YouTube Ads
MrBeast's YouTube AdSense revenue is also HUGE, as it receives millions of views every day. Let's take a look at MrBeast videos stats.
As you can see above, MrBeast averages over 10 million views EVERY SINGLE DAY on his YouTube channel.
He also runs a few other YouTube channels and MrBeast Gaming is another popular gaming channel that's just as many views (or slightly less).
Even if we assume a $7 CPM (cost per thousand views), MrBeast generates a whopping $100,000+ every day (on average) through YouTube ads.
So how much does MrBeast actually earn per month?
On average, MrBeast earns easily anywhere between $8 million to $10 million every month from various sources such as sponsorships, YouTube ads, merchandising, etc.
Youtube Subscribers (September 2022) 176 Million
Twitter Followers 13.7 million
Facebook Followers 8.1 million
Instagram Followers 18.1 million
As per the Reports MrBeast Net Worth is Estimated to Be $56 Millions as of September, 2022.
Donaldson's videos are known to contain elements to go "viral." This way, he generates advertising revenue of "tens of millions of dollars" as social media recommendation systems show his videos to more people. According to The Detroit News, his videos contain elements of Internet challenges, guest appearances, and reaction videos – three popular video genres on the Internet. On YouTube, his videos use catchy clickbait titles like "I Adopted EVERY Dog in a Dog Shelter," which explain the challenges in less than half a minute and are between ten and twenty minutes long.
According to Donaldson, high cash prizes are also important in viewer retention. That's why he often donates large amounts of money to individuals in his videos, with many of these videos sponsored by various companies. He also sometimes hosts contests in video games like Minecraft where there are big prizes to be won, such as donating a house in one of his videos. MrBeast is credited with introducing a new style of costly stunt videos to YouTube, where creators host elaborate challenges and large-scale sponsored giveaways.
In a typical video, Donaldson gives away large sums of money. His expensive YouTube videos are usually funded and sponsored by large-scale brand deals that appear as ads in his videos. Psychologist Tim Kasser analyzed that a MrBeast video promoting a product costs about half as much as a television ad, with higher engagement and response. Donaldson claimed in January 2021 that he was running his main channel at a loss.
MrBeast knows the importance of diversification. He has stated that he runs the main channel at a loss. MrBeast currently has over 175 million subscribers on his YouTube channels (at the time of writing this content). Donaldson operates the following 6 YouTube channels. Let us talk about these channels for a moment.
MrBeast – Current subscribers: 104 million
This is Donaldson's PRIMARY channel where all the fun happens. On this channel MrBeast regularly posts videos where he gives away money, cars, houses and more.
Beast Philanthropy – Current subscribers: 10.1 million
MrBeast is probably the #1 philanthropist on YouTube because he donates a TON amount of money. The description of his YouTube channel says: "100% of the profits from my ad revenue, merch sales and sponsorships go to our food bank!".
MrBeast Gaming – Current subscribers: 28.8 million
This is where MrBeast uploads all of his gaming videos, including Minecraft, GTA and more. He is constantly uploading new videos to this channel. On average, each video is viewed 10 million times!
MrBeast shorts – Current subscribers: 15.6 million
YouTube recently introduced YouTube Shorts, which are video clips that are 60 seconds or shorter (and are mostly short, catchy videos created by users). The MrBeast Shorts channel contains all the shortest video clips.
Beast Reacts – Current subscribers: 19.3 million
In this channel, MrBeast and his friend Chris react to the viral videos on the internet. Some of the most popular videos on this channel are; The fastest workers in the world
The most expensive houses, Most dangerous travel destinations,
MrBeast 2 – Current subscribers: 7.28 million
He has only posted two videos on this channel so far, including; Signing shirts for 6 hours straight, Solve this puzzle for $100,000
The lesson from BIGGEST, which we can all learn from MrBeast's YouTube success, is this: "Once you have a main channel with millions of subscribers, it's easier to get lots of subscribers when you start another channel."
Finger on the app
The game was reportedly so successful that a sequel, titled "Finger on the App 2," was originally planned for December 2020. However, the game was pushed back to February and then further to March 2021 as a flood of downloads crashed the game, and the game's developers had to upgrade their servers. This time, there was a grand prize of $100,000 up for grabs. The winner kept his finger on the phone's screen for about 51 hours; the runner-up also received $20,000.
In June 2020, Donaldson released a one-of-a-kind multiplayer mobile game called "Finger on the App" in collaboration with Brooklyn-based art collective MSCHF. In this game, players touch their phone screen, and the last person to take their finger off the screen wins $25,000. Four people won $20,000 each after leaving their finger on the app for over 70 hours.
MrBeast Burger
Will Hyde, a producer with the MrBeast channel, announced in a November 2020 article with The Wake Weekly that Donaldson would open a virtual restaurant called MrBeast Burger in December 2020. Hyde said his team worked with Virtual Dining Concepts to develop the restaurant concept. He said MrBeast Burger would sell franchise rights to serve the burgers in restaurants across the U.S., and customers will be able to order the burgers through online delivery services.
In January 2022, Donaldson announced the creation of a new food company called Feastables, which launched its brand of chocolate bars called "MrBeast Bars." At launch, three flavors were offered: Original, Almond, and Quinoa Crunch. The launch featured sweepstakes with over $1 million worth of prizes to be won, including ten grand prize winners who got the chance to compete for a chocolate factory in a future video. The video was released in June 2022, featuri9ng Gordon Ramsay as a cake judge and offering a cash prize of $500,000. On February 2, 2022, Feastables announced partnerships with Turtle Beach Corporation and Roccat to provide tips for the sweepstakes.
Investments and partnerships
Donaldson is an investor in tech startup Backbone, which makes the Backbone One, a controller that makes smartphones more similar to Nintendo Switch controllers, and the Backbone app, a content creation, and social tools app for its users. In March 2021, Donaldson partnered with financial network Creative Juice to launch Juice Funds, a $2 million investment fund for content creators. In April 2021, Donaldson became a long-term investor and partner with the financial technology company Current. That same month, Donaldson received backlash after fans lost large amounts of money in a cryptocurrency scheme Donaldson had invested in and promoted.
Also, Read Sage Thomas Net Worth 2022.
In 2019, MrBeast won the 9th Streamy Awards for the category "Breakout Creator".
In 2020, MrBeast won the 12th Annual Shorty Awards for the category "YouTuber of the Year"
In 2020, MrBeast also won the 10th Streamy Awards for various categories including;
Creator of the Year
Live Special
Social Good: Creator
Social Good: Nonprofit or NGO.
Here are some of the frequently asked questions about MrBeast aka Jimmy Donaldson and his YouTube growth.
What is MrBeast's real name?
Jimmy Donaldson is an American YouTuber and founder of the popular YouTube channel MrBeast.
What is the net worth of MrBeast?
MrBeast's net worth is estimated to be over $56 million in Sep, 2022. Most of his income comes from his online ventures, including his YouTube channels, merchandise store, sponsors, etc.
Where Does MrBeast Live? Kansas, United States of America.
What is MrBeast famous for?
MrBeast is known for giving away millions of dollars, private islands, luxury cars and expensive houses to strangers.
How much does MrBeast earn per month?
MrBeast earns more than $8 to 10 million every month. Most of his income comes from sponsors, paid collaborations, YouTube ads and merchandise.
How Much Does MrBeast earn per day? MrBeast earns more than $260K to $300K every day. Most of his income comes from sponsors, paid collaborations, YouTube ads and merchandise.
Who are the sponsors of MrBeast's YouTube videos?
Here are some of the brands that sponsor MrBeast's YouTube videos.
– Quidd
– Honey
– Apex Legends
– Dragon City
– Coinbase
Jimmy has become an extremely popular YouTuber over the past few years. He became much more generous when he started making more money from YouTube. He donated much money to others.
His videos are not only entertaining but also extremely useful for many people.
Are you a fan of MrBeast? How has he inspired you? What is your favourite video on his channel? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MrBeast


Please complete the form to the right. Be as specific as possible and we will do our best to get back to you in a timely fashion.
Please complete the form on the right and let us know: (1) what and when you ordered; (2) your name; and (3) contact info for us to get in touch with you. We'll do our best to make sure you are completely satisfied!
If you are media, please complete the form on the right and let us know: (1) who you work for; (2) topic; (3) deadline; and (4) all your contact info. Someone will contact you shortly to assist with your request.
If you would like someone from the California Innocence Project to speak at your program or event, please fill out this form.


text:
layout:     post
permalink:  /en/sitges-spain
ref:        sitges-spain
lang:       en
title:      Sitges, Spain
date:       2016-04-11 12:00:00
image:      https://content.11route.com/posts/2016/sitges-spain/cover-2000.jpg
summary:    Few days in Sitges
categories: travel travel spain
location:
  latitude:   41.2359192
  longitude:  1.7859532
---

This time we had one week to spend in Barcelona, but staying in the city was too expensive.
Even in the low season the cheapest decent hotel would cost around 100 EUR per night.
Cheaper you can only get in student hostels with 4-8 persons in the room and shared bathroom.
On AirBnB it's also hard to find something - shared rooms start from 50 EUR and entire apartments from 100 EUR per night.

Therefore we've decided to stay in Sitges - a small town west of Barcelona. It's about 40-50 minutes train ride away and train ticket costs around 4 EUR.
We booked aparthotel (a small apartment basically, with full kitchen) in the city center close to the beach for 50 EUR per night.

As it turned out later, the location in the city center was more of a disadvantage rather than an advantage.
Our windows were facing the street and sound-proofing was really weak. And in the evening the street gets crowded with people who like to drink and talk very loud :)

From April 7th till 17th there was a food festival in Sitges called "Tapa a Tapa".
Local bars and restaurants offer their one best tapa dish for 2.50 EUR (one drink, beer or wine, is also included).
Customers go from one venue to another and rate those tapas.
If you try at least 5 different tapas and fill in special form you get a chance to win next year festival entrance - accommodations and food for free :)
This year there were 36 different bars and restaurants attending, we've managed to visit only 5.

Delice de volaille @ La Terrassa de Sitges - something like a foie gras with fig jam

Romesco i Julieta @ Sports Bar - mini burger with onion sauce

Me Marcho Pa' Madrid @ Platos Rotos - different kinds of meat with vegetables and stew

Bikini de Maduixes @ Tres Quarts - grill sandwich with ham, cheese, strawberries and yogurt

Escabetxat De Perdiu @ Taberna Guria - foie gras with crackers and cheese

We liked the last place - Taberna Guria - most of all and it was on the same street as our apartment.
This tavern has an interesting ordering system, kind of self-catering. You take a plate and as many tapas from the bar as you want and then order your drinks to bartender.
When you've finished and ready to pay you just show the bartender empty plate and he counts how many toothpicks you have there on your plate.
Each tapa has a toothpick in it and costs 1.50 EUR.

It's always crowded and in the evening you have to wait for a free place.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Left putting together your costume to the last couple of days before Halloween? Here are some ideas that will set you straight.
Halloween is right around the corner, and if you're anything like half of the world, you're in a crunch for a costume. Party City is almost guaranteed to be out of costumes that you like and come in your size, so here's five quick and easy costumes that will fit and won't break the bank.
This is one of the fastest costumes to put together. All it takes is a flannel shirt, jeans, and some sort of boots. This costume is simple and recognizable to just about anyone. You can add accessories like a straw hat, bandanna, belt, and some rope as a lasso.
A ghost is the simplest costume you can make. Get anything white like a sheet or trash bag and cut out some holes for your eyes. Put the desired item over your head and say boo. You're sure to scare everyone you come across.
A pirate costume can be simple or complex as you'd like. For guys, dress pants and a white long sleeve shirt with ruffles, and some easy accessories like an eye-patch or a hat can make it more extravagant. For girls, a white or red shirt or dress can be worn with a simple pair of boots. In order to make it clear you're a pirate, just add a hat.
This costume needs a solid color outfit with the word crayon written out vertically across the torso. Just add a party hat and you're good to go!
Onesies are sold at retail stores such as Target and Walmart, and if you have time to order it online, Amazon. They come in different animals, supper heroes, and movie characters. They're quick, easy, and you can always wear them on more than one occasion, or even as pajamas.
Need a spot to chow-down before Homecoming?


text:
Tribune: First look inside Theaster Gates' new Stony Island Arts Bank
Stony Island Arts Bank 68th & Stony Island by Zbigniew Bzdak, Chicago Tribune
One of the cultural things that I would like to see more of in our communities. How many of us would support such a project and when it's done come visit?
The last time Theaster Gates walked me through the abandoned bank at East 68th Street and South Stony Island Avenue, water dripped from the ceiling, clouds wafted over a hole in the roof, and shards of glass and scraps of plaster crunched under his feet.
The 42-year-old Chicago artist will debut his $4.5 million renovation of the bank — which he has transformed into a library and cultural center — on Oct. 3, the opening day of the city's first architectural biennial.
That the city's cultural elite will be drawn about 9 miles south of the Loop into a building once scheduled for demolition speaks to Gates' lofty position in the contemporary art world.
It also speaks to his commitment to the South Side, even as Manhattan and Europe frequently draw him away, as well as his skill at requisitioning everything from record collections to patrons' money. Playwright Regina Taylor once aptly summed up Gates' demeanor in the Chicago Reader as that of "a soulful Cheshire Cat."
"I was really determined to see this project happen," Gates said in a phone interview from Istanbul, where he was preparing for that city's contemporary art biennial. "For people in my life who respect the work I do and understand the work, everyone around me had anxiety about its scale. And the friendly advice I got from everybody was to walk away."
Read the whole thing!
Labels: art, culture, people, projects, south shore, south side, stony island, theaster gates, woodlawn

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Q: Extract data from a map (JsonObj) I'm trying to scrape all of the French map.
I've got one issue :
1 - I'm limited by the zoom of the map
import requests

url ='https://www.iadfrance.fr/agent-search-location?southwestlat=47.0270782&southwestlng=-2.1560669&northeastlat=47.4930807&northeastlng=-1.0093689'
jsonObj = requests.get(url).json()
emails = jsonObj['agents']
#print (emails)

for agent in emails:
    email = agent['email']
    print(email)

Thank you

A: I find the right way, I must think out the box.
I've set 2 geographic data manually in a very very large area. ( one in Atlantic and an other in Russia ).
It works !
import requests

url ='https://www.iadfrance.fr/agent-search-location?southwestlat=9.884462&southwestlng=-35.58398&northeastlat=68.714264&northeastlng=44.796407'
jsonObj = requests.get(url).json()
emails = jsonObj['agents']
#print (emails)

for agent in emails:
    email = agent['email']
    print(email)

A: You'll have to utilize the longitude, latitude parameters in the request to "zoom out"
You can either change them manually, or I'm a fan of osmnx. You can use that to get the boundaries of different areas, then set a radius in meters to create your boundary box:
import requests
import osmnx as ox
import os

os.environ["PROJ_LIB"] = "C:/Users/xxxxxxx/AppData/Local/Continuum/anaconda3/Library/share"; #fixr

# Get a boundary box of a city/place/address
city = ox.gdf_from_place('Paris, France')

# Distance to make boundary from center in meters
# Essentially allows you to zoom out
distance = 300000

# Get centroid of that city/place boundary box
point = ( city['geometry'].centroid.x.iloc[0], city['geometry'].centroid.y.iloc[0] )

# Get a new boundary box a certain distance in North, South, East, West directions for x meters
boundary = ox.bbox_from_point(point, distance=distance , project_utm=False, return_crs=False)

sw_lat = boundary[3]
sw_lng = boundary[0]*-1
ne_lat = boundary[2]
ne_lng = boundary[1]*-1

# website to scrape https://www.iadfrance.fr/trouver-un-conseiller

url ='https://www.iadfrance.fr/agent-search-location'

# Here is the coordinates from orginial post
#payload = {
#'southwestlat': '47.0270782',
#'southwestlng': '-2.1560669',
#'northeastlat': '47.4930807',
#'northeastlng': '-1.0093689'}

payload = {
'southwestlat': sw_lat,
'southwestlng': sw_lng,
'northeastlat': ne_lat,
'northeastlng': ne_lng}

jsonObj = requests.get(url, params=payload).json()
emails = jsonObj['agents']
#print (emails)

for agent in emails:
    email = agent['email']
    print(email)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Donald Trump Backs Merit Pay, Funds for School Choice
By Alyson Klein
GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump is pledging that, if elected, he'd be the "nation's biggest cheerleader for school choice" and would offer states the chance to use $20 billion in federal money to create vouchers allowing children in poverty to attend the public, charter, or private school of their choice.
In a speech at a charter school in Cleveland, he also said he's a supporter of merit pay for teachers—a signature policy of both Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush's administrations—although he did not explain how he hopes to further the cause, other than rhetorically taking aim at tenure.
"There is no policy more in need of urgent change than our government-run education monopoly," Trump said. "The Democratic Party has trapped millions of African-American and Hispanic youth" in struggling schools.
"We want every inner-city child in America to have the freedom to attend any school," he said.
Trump said that the $20 billion in federal funds could be combined with more than $100 billion in state and local money to create vouchers of up to $12,000 annually for the nation's poorest kids.
He did not say where the $20 billion would come from, but it's possible he was referring to Title I money for disadvantaged students, funded at about $15.5 billion right now. His plan would depend on state and local cooperation: If states and districts decided not to add their own money to the federal financing, the scholarships would be pretty paltry.
Common Theme
Trump's school choice plan is similar to what 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney proposed for K-12 in 2012.
And last year, Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Rep. Luke Messer, R-Ind., introduced amendments to what became the Every Student Succeeds Act that would have allowed federal money to follow students to the school of their choice, public or private. Those amendments failed to get enough support to pass the House or Senate.
But Messer said in an interview this summer that he thinks the policy could get new life under a potential Trump administration.
On merit pay for teachers, Trump said only that he finds it unfair that "bad ones" sometimes earn "more than the good ones." Obama also encouraged districts to adopt performance pay, through the Race to the Top competition and the $230 million Teacher Incentive Fund, which Bush started.
Visit this blog.
Trump's main rival for the White House, former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, hasn't addressed the issue of merit pay head-on recently, but she has said that she's not in favor of tying teacher evaluations to test scores, which also was a signature Obama policy.
Trump also hit some of the K-12 themes he's sounded throughout the campaign, attacking the Common Core State Standards and arguing that the United States spends more on education than most other developed countries for iffy results.
Jeanne Allen, the founder of the Center for Education Reform, which supports school choice, called the idea "pie in the sky," given the current Washington political dynamic.
But she also noted that Trump did not say the $20 billion for his school choice idea would have to come from the current U.S. Department of Education budget.
But Lily Eskelsen García, president of the National Education Association, said in a statement that "No matter what you call it, vouchers take dollars away from our public schools to fund private schools at taxpayers' expense with little to no regard for our students."
Vol. 36, Issue 04, Pages 16-17
Published in Print: September 14, 2016, as Donald Trump Backs Merit Pay, Funds for Choice
"Donald Trump Taps Indiana Lawmaker's Staffer to Craft School Choice Plan," (Politics K-12) August 29, 2016.
"What if America Spent Per Student What Clinton, Trump Paid for Private Schools?," (Politics K-12) July 27, 2016.
"Compare the Candidates: Where Do Clinton and Trump Stand on Education Issues?," July 15, 2016.
"Donald Trump Says We Spend a Ton for Bad Test Scores. Let's Check the Numbers.," (Politics K-12) January 21, 2016.


Are you looking for some fantastic ideas to give your outdoor space a pick me up? Below are 10 budget friendly ways of doing just that. All you need to do is click on the thumbnails below to see all the details and read the complete post. It's a great way to get ideas before you head to the store to make purchases. Grab a cup of Chai Tea, put your feet up and enjoy!
If you want to pin one of these amazing projects, please click over and pin from the original site.
Lots of wonderful makeovers for Summer here!…Happy Summer!!
I love it, and all the beautiful bright, cheerful, inviting colors.
Ivory they're all so fun and inviting for summer.


The FINANCIAL -- LG Electronics' (LG) innovations in AI technology and design have earned the company recognition from the European Imaging and Sound Association (EISA). LG's AI ThinQ-enabled products including LG OLED TV, LG SUPER UHD TV and LG XBOOM were honored for their high competitiveness in categories assessing premium picture quality, artificial intelligence performance and sound excellence.
In addition, the LG SUPER UHD TV AI ThinQ (model 65SK9500) was recognized as the EISA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TV 2018-2019 for producing the ultimate LCD TV picture through the combination of technologies including Nano Cell, Full-Array Local Dimming (FALD) and the α (Alpha) 7 processor, as well as LG's AI ThinQ platform and Google Assistant built in. With LG's proprietary AI ThinQ, users can control the TV, connect easily to external devices, switch picture mode and search for content. The latest advanced voice assistant technology embedded in the TV is achieved by employing Natural Language Processing (NLP) to deliver intelligent voice-activated control and connectivity based on LG's exclusive deep learning technology. And with the Google Assistant built in, LG's AI TVs offer a streamlined experience that allows them to manage different tasks, find answers, or control smart home devices, serving as the center of the smart home.
The winner of the EISA SOUNDBAR 2018-2019 award, model LG SK10Y, is an immersive soundbar with 550W of powerful output and 5.1.2 channel support by harnessing the power of Dolby Atmos® to produce an immersive sound from all directions, including the ceiling. With Meridian technology, LG SK10Y boasts a high level of performance to envelop listeners in rich, uncompromising sound and delivers extra clarity to speech and music.


text:
Q: wp_set_password() does not work! I created a simple form for my users to can change their passwords. but there is a problem and I am confused! I tried a lot to change my password but my pass will not be changed by wp_set_password() and I do not know the reason really.
<?php /* Template Name: user-edit-password */ ?>

<?php
$user = wp_get_current_user();
$userID = $user->ID;
$has_error = false;
$has_success = false;
$message = array();

if( isset($_POST['karneta_pass_submit']) ){
    if( !isset($_POST['security']) || !wp_verify_nonce($_POST['security'],'edit-profile-password-nonce') ){
        print('do not damage that');
    } else {

        $currentpass = sanitize_text_field($_POST['karneta_currentpass']);
        $newpass = sanitize_text_field($_POST['karneta_newpass']);
        $repeatnewpass = sanitize_text_field($_POST['karneta_repeatnewpass']);

        if( wp_check_password($currentpass, $user->data->user_pass, $UserID) ){

            if( empty($currentpass) || empty($newpass) || empty($repeatnewpass) ){

                $has_error = true;
                $message[] = "fill all the fields";

            }
            elseif( $newpass !== $repeatnewpass ){

                $has_error = true;
                $message[] = "they are not the same";

            }
            else {

                wp_set_password($newpass,$UserID);

                $has_success = true;
                $message[] = "password changed successfully";

            }
        } else {
            $has_error = true;
            $message[] = "the old password is not correct";
        }

    }
}
?>

            <?php if( $has_error ){ ?>

                <?php foreach ($message as $item) { ?>

<?php echo $item; ?>

                <?php } ?>

            <?php } ?>
            <?php if( $has_success ){ ?>

                <?php foreach ($message as $sitem) { ?>

<?php echo $sitem; ?>

                <?php } ?>

            <?php } ?>

        <form action="" method="post" class="usereditprofileform">
            <?php wp_nonce_field('edit-profile-password-nonce', 'security'); ?>

            <input type="password" placeholder="old password" value="" name="karneta_currentpass" required>
            <input type="password" placeholder="new password" value="" name="karneta_newpass" required>
            <input type="password" placeholder="repeat new password" value="" name="karneta_repeatnewpass" required>
            <input type="submit" value="change your pass" name="karneta_pass_submit">

        </form>

A: Nested if/else/elseifs are usually too complex for me to figure out.
I'd change your code to use SWITCH/CASE to determine proper input and to change the password if all is OK.
And to sanitize $_POST (and $_GET) inputs, I just put this in my functions file:
$_GET = filter_input_array(INPUT_GET, FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING);
$_POST = filter_input_array(INPUT_POST, FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING);

Then I don't have to remember to sanitize things elsewhere.

A: I solved myself. Ir is because of user ID:
incorrect:
wp_set_password($newpass,$UserID);
correct:
wp_set_password($newpass, $user->ID);


text:
Q: Detecting incomplete/broken circle using contours I'm trying to detect platelets using functions in OpenCV 4.0.3
I managed to get the original image to this after applying threshold via inRange function as I only need the platelets (those purple blobs), but there are still a lot of noise, so I applied a series of morphological operations to reduce noise and regain details. But there are still a lot of broken circles, is there any functions that will work the given image?
Here's a cropped image for my intended output, those encircled in pink are the detected platelets
Here's my code for reference
        Mat plate_img = imread(imagePath, IMREAD_COLOR);
        Mat result = plate_img.clone();
        Mat plate_gradient = new Mat(plate_img.rows(), plate_img.cols(), CV_8UC3, new Scalar(3));
        Mat boosted_plate_gradient =  new Mat();

        GaussianBlur(plate_img, plate_img, new Size(9,9),0);
        morphologyEx(plate_img, plate_img, MORPH_ERODE, getStructuringElement(MORPH_ELLIPSE, new Size(3,3))); //3 to 5
        morphologyEx(plate_img, plate_gradient, MORPH_GRADIENT, new Mat());

        plate_gradient.convertTo(plate_gradient, -1, 9.5, -60);

        //threshold operation is applied based on the color of the platelets
        cvtColor(plate_gradient,plate_gradient, COLOR_BGR2HSV);
        Scalar low = new Scalar(10,190,190);
        Scalar upper = new Scalar(55,255,255);
        Core.inRange(plate_gradient, low, upper, boosted_plate_gradient);

        //apply operations to lose and regain details
        morphologyEx(boosted_plate_gradient, boosted_plate_gradient, MORPH_DILATE, getStructuringElement(MORPH_ELLIPSE, new Size(5,5)));
        morphologyEx(boosted_plate_gradient, boosted_plate_gradient, MORPH_CLOSE, getStructuringElement(MORPH_ELLIPSE, new Size(5,5)));
        morphologyEx(boosted_plate_gradient, boosted_plate_gradient, MORPH_OPEN, getStructuringElement(MORPH_ELLIPSE, new Size(7,7)));
        morphologyEx(boosted_plate_gradient, boosted_plate_gradient, MORPH_CLOSE, getStructuringElement(MORPH_ELLIPSE, new Size(15,15)));

        Mat edges = new Mat();
        Canny(boosted_plate_gradient,edges,250,300,3,false);
        morphologyEx(edges,edges,MORPH_DILATE,getStructuringElement(MORPH_ELLIPSE,new Size(3,3)));

        List<MatOfPoint> contours = new ArrayList<>();
        List<MatOfPoint> finalContour = new ArrayList<>();
        Mat hierarchy = new Mat();

        findContours(edges, contours, hierarchy, Imgproc.RETR_LIST, CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE);

        for (MatOfPoint contour:contours) {
            double area = contourArea(contour);

            //platelet size on given image is around these values
            if(area > 100 && area < 750){
                finalContour.add(contour);
            }

        }

        int count = 0;
        cvtColor(edges,edges, COLOR_GRAY2BGR);
        for (int i = 0; i < finalContour.size(); i++) {
            count++;
            Scalar color = new Scalar(rng.nextInt(256), rng.nextInt(256), rng.nextInt(256));
            Imgproc.drawContours(edges, finalContour, i, color, 2, Imgproc.LINE_8, hierarchy, 0, new Point());
        }


Competition in specialty chemicals is growing and the pressure to maintain profitability levels is higher than ever. As a global leader, Ciba recognised the power of world-class sales skills to realise its mission of being number one in all its chosen markets.
Ciba produces specialty chemicals that improve the performance, protection, colour and strength of plastics, paper, vehicles, buildings, home and personal care products and much more. Products and services are sold in over 120 countries and, to achieve this, the company employs approximately 13,000 people worldwide.
creating value for the customers using specialist chemicals to differentiate them from off-the- shelf products.
Ciba decided to embark upon a global behaviour change initiative to establish sales excellence at the very heart of the organisation. A Marketing and Sales Board (MSB) was established to drive the evolution to a marketing and customer focused organisation and to emphasise the importance of this transition internally.
Ciba is committed to developing long-term relationships with suppliers and therefore wanted a partner to work closely with over a number of years. The company also wanted a flexible partner that could tailor a solution to specifically meet their requirements, and with roughly a third of Ciba's sales people in each of three continents, a partner with an international capability that could match its global footprint.
The MSB ran pilot schemes with a range of different potential providers to compare propositions and approaches before finally selecting Huthwaite on the basis that they could best deliver against the selection criteria and objectives. To prove Huthwaite's delivery capability was truly consistent around the world, a six-month pilot roll out was undertaken and delivered in English, French, German, Spanish, American and Mandarin.
Commitment from the highest level is vital to success and this project had top-level support from the start until completion of the programme and beyond.
The project has seen 1,080 people trained across 24 countries and in seven languages… all within 18 months. The whole salesforce, including sales managers, has completed the behavioural change programme.
Pre-work was delivered electronically and carefully managed to ensure completion to a satisfactory standard. Sales management and coaching skills seminars were then delivered in local languages (English, French, German, Spanish, Brazilian, Portuguese, Mandarin and Japanese) and followed by 'on the job' coaching. Post course support is provided to reinforce skills and the success of the project.
Ciba wanted a partner that was prepared to tailor the content and delivery to match its requirements. Huthwaite responded to this by using the initiative to implement a new sales process, by integrating elements of Ciba's CRM system into the training and by adapting roleplays, all of which made it easier for Ciba delegates to understand and apply their learning.
The completion of the project was achieved two months ahead of schedule. An impact survey was conducted anonymously and questions were designed in conjunction with Huthwaite who hosted the survey on its server to ensure its independence and encourage honest feedback from respondents.
The key finding was that sales managers were now regularly coaching their account managers in both sales strategy and skills and were convinced that the coaching was making a real difference to the performance of their teams.
Pilots for implementation of a negotiation skills training programme have been completed and rolled out to complement the sales training for selected members of the sales force. To meet this ongoing demand, Ciba will continue to partner with Huthwaite, benefiting from their in-depth knowledge of behavioural change and understanding of the intricacies of Ciba's organisation.


text:
Q: CPU spatial cache locality in array iteration My understanding of the L1 cache was that a memory fetch loads a cache line. Assuming the cache line size is 64 bytes, if I access memory at address p, it will load the entire block from p to p + 64 into the cache. Thus, it is best to iterate through an array from left to right (rather than right to left) to maximize cache locality.
However, I wrote example C code that allocates an array of 100 million chars, writes random values into it and sums it (copied below for reference). One version of the code sums from left to right and the other from right to left. When I benchmarked it, I got very simillar results (where "clock cycles" are measured in terms of clock. The code was compiled with no optimizations.
So my question is: Do modern processors do something else than just "cache the read + 64 bytes"? Do they cache forwards and backwards? Can the compiler "tell" the processor the code is iterating backwards?
For reference, I am running on Mac OS X 10.13.3 using gcc-7 (Homebrew GCC 7.2.0_1) 7.2.0 and an x86-64 Intel processor with a cache line of 64 bytes.
Benchmakrs:
$ ./a.out
Backward Iterating...took 150101 clock cycles

$ ./a.out
Forward Iterating...took 146545 clock cycles

I would have expected forward iteration to be about 64x faster as every 64 elements should be a cache hit whereas with the backward iteration, every element should be a cache miss.
So, I called cachegrind on it. And the cache hit miss rate for both was pretty much the same:
# Left to right iteration
==21773==
==21773== I   refs:      4,006,996,067
==21773== I1  misses:            5,183
==21773== LLi misses:            3,019
==21773== I1  miss rate:          0.00%
==21773== LLi miss rate:          0.00%
==21773==
==21773== D   refs:      1,802,393,260  (1,401,627,925 rd   + 400,765,335 wr)
==21773== D1  misses:        3,153,101  (    1,588,104 rd   +   1,564,997 wr)
==21773== LLd misses:        3,004,885  (    1,440,660 rd   +   1,564,225 wr)
==21773== D1  miss rate:           0.2% (          0.1%     +         0.4%  )
==21773== LLd miss rate:           0.2% (          0.1%     +         0.4%  )
==21773==
==21773== LL refs:           3,158,284  (    1,593,287 rd   +   1,564,997 wr)
==21773== LL misses:         3,007,904  (    1,443,679 rd   +   1,564,225 wr)
==21773== LL miss rate:            0.1% (          0.0%     +         0.4%  )

# Right to left iteration
==21931==
==21931== I   refs:      4,006,996,453
==21931== I1  misses:            5,198
==21931== LLi misses:            3,045
==21931== I1  miss rate:          0.00%
==21931== LLi miss rate:          0.00%
==21931==
==21931== D   refs:      1,802,393,428  (1,401,628,038 rd   + 400,765,390 wr)
==21931== D1  misses:        3,153,113  (    1,588,079 rd   +   1,565,034 wr)
==21931== LLd misses:        3,135,505  (    1,571,219 rd   +   1,564,286 wr)
==21931== D1  miss rate:           0.2% (          0.1%     +         0.4%  )
==21931== LLd miss rate:           0.2% (          0.1%     +         0.4%  )
==21931==
==21931== LL refs:           3,158,311  (    1,593,277 rd   +   1,565,034 wr)
==21931== LL misses:         3,138,550  (    1,574,264 rd   +   1,564,286 wr)
==21931== LL miss rate:            0.1% (          0.0%     +         0.4%  )

Code:
#include <stdint.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define BUF_SIZE 100000000

int main() {
  srand(time(NULL));
  uint8_t *buf1 = (uint8_t *)malloc(BUF_SIZE);
  // Fill the buf with random data
  for (size_t i = 0; i < BUF_SIZE; ++i) {
    buf1[i] = rand();
  }

#ifdef BACKWARDS
  printf("Backward Iterating...");
#else
  printf("Forward Iterating...");
#endif

  uint64_t sum = 0;
  clock_t start = clock();
#ifdef BACKWARDS
  for (size_t i = BUF_SIZE - 1; i != ~0; --i) {
#else
  for (size_t i = 0; i < BUF_SIZE; ++i) {
#endif
    sum += buf1[i];
  }
  clock_t end = clock();
  printf("took %lu clock cycles\n", end - start);
  printf("sum: %llu\n", sum);
  free(buf1);
}

A: To expand on the previous answer:
Loading a full cache line granularity means that going forward or backward doesn't matter, once you hit one side of the line you get all of it.  This is of course only applicable for cacheable loads and memtypes (+streaming cases that could be hit while still in the buffers).
However, this is not the full story. Modern CPUs employ hardware prefetchers that are very good in dealing with spatial locality - these would increase the granularity by prefetching additional cachelines in the same direction you're progressing. Exiting prefetchers depend on the exact architecture you're using, but common ones include next-line, adjacent-line (+/- 1 line), a stream of next lines, or IP-based strides. More info here .
These prefetchers should be symmetrical, but we don't know for sure (the exact details are not disclosed), they may have different chances or thresholds for different directions.
Another point is that cachegrind is just a cache simulation, it doesn't include effects like prefetching, and doesn't even model an accurate cache (the sizes should be ok, but replacement policy and other micro-architectural details aren't guaranteed to be the same), so you won't see the full effect. It's probably better to view the actual HW behavior using perf counters.

A:
If I access memory at address p, it will load the entire block from
  p to p + 64 into the cache.

Not exactly. What the processor loads is the cache line that contains p. For example if p is 0x1234, then the cache line 0x1200 to 0x123F is loaded. As a result, scanning backwards through an array won't be much different than scanning forwards.


text:
Category: Chess Journalism
The Last Battle of Boris Spassky
In 2009 two elder statesmen met in Elista to rekindle their rivalry when Boris Spassky face Viktor Korchnoi in an eight game match.
Boris had arrived several days in advance, while Viktor rushed to arrive from London where he had just been guest of honor at the London Chess Classic.
As the 78 year old Korchnoi was exhausted after his last minute arrival, Spassky proposed limiting the match to six games instead of the scheduled eight and giving Korchnoi an additional rest day.
Viktor refused and managed to take the first game from the 72 year old Spassky, who had played his last serious game seven years prior.
Nevertheless, Spassky fought back and the match ended in a draw. These are to date (and presumably for all time to come) the final professional games of Spassky to appear in the database.
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.19"] [Round "1"] [White "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Black "Spassky, Boris V"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E12"] [WhiteElo "2567"] [BlackElo "2548"] [PlyCount "93"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 b6 5. Qb3 a5 6. Bg5 Bb7 7. e3 h6 8. Bxf6 Qxf6 9. Be2 d6 10. O-O Bxc3 11. bxc3 Nd7 12. Qa4 Ke7 13. Rab1 Rhd8 14. Nd2 Kf8 15. Bf3 Bxf3 16. Nxf3 Qe7 17. e4 e5 18. Rfe1 Kg8 19. Qc6 Nf6 20. c5 Qd7 21. Qxd7 Nxd7 22. cxd6 cxd6 23. g3 Rac8 24. Re3 Rc7 25. dxe5 dxe5 26. Kg2 Rdc8 27. Rd1 Nf6 28. Nxe5 Rxc3 29. Rxc3 Rxc3 30. Rd8+ Kh7 31. f3 Rc2+ 32. Kh3 Rxa2 33. Nxf7 Ng8 34. Nd6 Rd2 35. e5 a4 36. Ra8 b5 37. f4 b4 38. Rxa4 b3 39. Rb4 b2 40. Rb7 Rc2 41. Nf5 Kh8 42. Ne3 Rd2 43. Nc4 Rc2 44. Nxb2 h5 45. Nd3 Nh6 46. Rb2 Rc7 47. Rb1 1-0
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.20"] [Round "2"] [White "Spassky, Boris V"] [Black "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C00"] [WhiteElo "2548"] [BlackElo "2567"] [PlyCount "92"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. e4 e6 2. c4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. cxd5 Nf6 5. Bb5+ Nbd7 6. Nc3 Be7 7. d4 O-O 8. Nf3 Nb6 9. O-O Bf5 10. Re1 Nfxd5 11. Ne4 Bb4 12. Bd2 Bxd2 13. Qxd2 Nf6 14. Nc5 Rb8 15. h3 c6 16. Bf1 Nbd7 17. Qf4 Bg6 18. Bc4 Nb6 19. Bb3 Nbd5 20. Qd2 b6 21. Nd3 Rc8 22. Nde5 Qd6 23. Nxg6 hxg6 24. Rac1 Rfd8 25. Ne5 Nd7 26. Nc4 Qf6 27. Ne3 Nxe3 28. Qxe3 Nf8 29. Qe5 Qxe5 30. Rxe5 Rc7 31. Rce1 Rxd4 32. Re7 Rxe7 33. Rxe7 Ne6 34. Rxa7 c5 35. Bxe6 fxe6 36. Rb7 Rb4 37. b3 Kf8 38. Kf1 c4 39. bxc4 Rxc4 40. Rxb6 Rc1+ 41. Ke2 Rc2+ 42. Ke3 Rxa2 43. Rxe6 Kf7 44. Rb6 Ra3+ 45. Kf4 Ra2 46. Kg3 g5 1/2-1/2
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.21"] [Round "3"] [White "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Black "Spassky, Boris V"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "E21"] [WhiteElo "2567"] [BlackElo "2548"] [PlyCount "100"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 b6 5. Qb3 a5 6. e3 Bb7 7. a3 Bxc3+ 8. Qxc3 Ne4 9. Qc2 a4 10. Be2 d6 11. O-O Nd7 12. Ne1 f5 13. f3 Nef6 14. Nd3 Qe7 15. Bd2 O-O 16. Nc1 e5 17. Na2 e4 18. Nc3 exf3 19. Bxf3 Ne4 20. Be1 Ndf6 21. Bh4 Ra7 22. Bxf6 Rxf6 23. Nxa4 Ng5 24. Bxb7 Qxe3+ 25. Kh1 Rxb7 26. Nc3 Ne4 27. Nxe4 fxe4 28. Rfe1 Qd3 29. Qxd3 exd3 30. Re8+ Kf7 31. Re3 b5 32. c5 dxc5 33. dxc5 b4 34. Rxd3 bxa3 35. bxa3 Rc6 36. Rf1+ Kg6 37. Rc3 Rb5 38. Rfc1 Kf5 39. Kg1 Ke4 40. Kf2 Rb2+ 41. R1c2 Rxc2+ 42. Rxc2 Kd3 43. Rc1 Kd2 44. Rc4 Kd3 45. Rf4 g6 46. Rf7 h5 47. Rf3+ Kd4 48. Rg3 Rf6+ 49. Ke2 Kxc5 50. Rc3+ Kb6 1/2-1/2
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.23"] [Round "4"] [White "Spassky, Boris V"] [Black "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C14"] [WhiteElo "2548"] [BlackElo "2567"] [PlyCount "44"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e5 Nfd7 6. Bxe7 Qxe7 7. f4 Nb6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Qd2 a6 10. a4 a5 11. Qe3 Qb4 12. b3 Nc8 13. h3 Ne7 14. g4 c5 15. Kf2 cxd4 16. Nxd4 O-O 17. Bd3 Nbc6 18. Nf3 f6 19. Na2 Qa3 20. Nc3 Qb4 21. Na2 Qa3 22. Nc3 Qb4 1/2-1/2
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.23"] [Round "5"] [White "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Black "Spassky, Boris V"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A28"] [WhiteElo "2567"] [BlackElo "2548"] [PlyCount "52"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. a3 d5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Qc2 Be7 7. e3 a6 8. Bc4 Nb6 9. Bd3 Qd7 10. b3 f5 11. e4 g5 12. exf5 g4 13. Nxe5 Nxe5 14. Be4 Nc6 15. Ne2 Bf6 16. Rb1 Qd6 17. h3 gxh3 18. Rxh3 Bd7 19. Rd3 Qf8 20. Bxc6 Bxc6 21. Re3+ Kd7 22. Bb2 Nd5 23. Qd3 Bxb2 24. Rxb2 Qxa3 25. Rc2 Rae8 26. Qd4 Kc8 0-1
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.24"] [Round "6"] [White "Spassky, Boris V"] [Black "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C49"] [WhiteElo "2548"] [BlackElo "2567"] [PlyCount "70"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bb5 Bb4 5. O-O O-O 6. d3 Bxc3 7. bxc3 d6 8. Bg5 Bd7 9. Nd2 h6 10. Bh4 g5 11. Bg3 Ne7 12. Bxd7 Qxd7 13. Nc4 Qe6 14. Ne3 Kh7 15. c4 Rg8 16. Rb1 b6 17. c3 Ng6 18. Rb2 c6 19. f3 d5 20. cxd5 cxd5 21. d4 dxe4 22. d5 Qc8 23. fxe4 Nf4 24. Qc2 Qa6 25. c4 Rac8 26. a4 Ne8 27. Rc1 Nd6 28. Be1 Rc7 29. g3 Nh3+ 30. Kh1 g4 31. Bb4 Nxc4 32. Bd6 Nxd6 33. Qxc7 Rc8 34. Qxc8 Nxc8 35. Nxg4 Nd6 0-1
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.25"] [Round "7"] [White "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Black "Spassky, Boris V"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E11"] [WhiteElo "2567"] [BlackElo "2548"] [PlyCount "91"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Bb4+ 4. Nbd2 d5 5. a3 Be7 6. Qc2 b6 7. e4 dxe4 8. Nxe4 Bb7 9. Bd3 Nbd7 10. b4 a5 11. b5 c5 12. bxc6 Bxc6 13. Ned2 Rc8 14. Qb1 O-O 15. O-O Qc7 16. Re1 Bd6 17. Bb2 Rfd8 18. Qd1 Bf4 19. Qe2 Qd6 20. Nf1 Nc5 21. Bc2 Na4 22. Bxa4 Bxa4 23. g3 Bh6 24. Ne5 g6 25. Qf3 Bg7 26. Ne3 Be8 27. Rab1 Nd7 28. Nxd7 Bxd7 29. d5 e5 30. Qe2 Rb8 31. Nd1 Rdc8 32. Bxe5 Bxe5 33. Qxe5 Qxe5 34. Rxe5 Rxc4 35. Re7 Bh3 36. Ne3 Rc3 37. a4 Kf8 38. d6 Rbc8 39. f3 Rd3 40. Re4 Be6 41. g4 Rxd6 42. Kf2 Rc5 43. Rb2 Ke7 44. Kg3 Kd7 45. h4 Kc7 46. h5 0-1
[Event "Elista m"] [Site "Elista"] [Date "2009.12.26"] [Round "8"] [White "Spassky, Boris V"] [Black "Kortschnoj, Viktor"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C42"] [WhiteElo "2548"] [BlackElo "2567"] [PlyCount "22"] [EventDate "2009.12.19"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "8"] [EventCountry "RUS"] [SourceTitle "OM OTB 201804"] [Source "Opening Master"] [SourceDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceVersion "2"] [SourceVersionDate "2018.04.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. Qe2 Qe7 6. d3 Nf6 7. Bg5 Qxe2+ 8. Bxe2 Be7 9. Nc3 h6 10. Bf4 O-O 11. O-O-O c6 1/2-1/2
And so Boris the Tenth rode off into the sunset…
Author wainscottPosted on January 11, 2020 January 11, 2020 Categories Chess Journalism, GM GamesLeave a comment on The Last Battle of Boris Spassky
Tommy Takes Down a GM
Yesterday at the Czech Open in Pardubice Tom Polgar-Shutzman managed a nice win over Russian GM Semen Dvoirys!
As you may have guessed by the name, Tom is a part of the famous Polgar family. He is Susan's son.
I met Tom earlier this year at the USATN where I roomed with him. He was one of the nicest people you could ever meet.
During the few days that we hung out we talked a lot about chess and goals and he made it clear to me that his goal was to ensure that the Polgar family gained another GM.
So far he's having a nice tournament with a 2453 performance rating going 3.5-2.5 through the first six rounds.
Here's his game against Dvoirys.
[Event "CZECH OPEN 2019 "] [Site "Pardubice (CZE)"] [Date "2019.07.23"] [Round "5.63"] [White "POLGAR-SHUTZMAN, Tom"] [Black "DVOIRYS, Semen"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B31"] [WhiteElo "2241"] [BlackElo "2505"] [PlyCount "85"] [EventDate "2019.07.19"] [EventRounds "9"] [EventCountry "CZE"] [WhiteClock "0:15:04"] [BlackClock "0:31:48"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 g6 4. O-O Bg7 5. Re1 Nf6 6. e5 Nd5 7. Nc3 Nc7 8. Bxc6 dxc6 9. Ne4 Ne6 10. d3 O-O 11. Be3 b6 12. Qd2 a5 13. Bh6 f5 14. exf6 exf6 15. Bxg7 Kxg7 16. Re3 Ra7 17. Rae1 Nd4 18. Nxd4 cxd4 19. R3e2 Rd7 20. Qf4 c5 21. h4 Bb7 22. h5 g5 23. h6+ Kg6 24. Qh2 Bxe4 25. Rxe4 Qc7 26. f4 gxf4 27. Rxf4 Kf7 28. Qg3 Rg8 29. Rxf6+ Kxf6 30. Rf1+ Ke6 31. Qxg8+ Rf7 32. Qe8+ Re7 33. Re1+ Kf6 34. Qf8+ Rf7 35. Qg8 Re7 36. Rf1+ Ke5 37. Qg5+ Kd6 38. Rf6+ Kd7 39. Qf5+ Kd8 40. Rf8+ Re8 41. Qd5+ Qd7 42. Rxe8+ Kxe8 43. Qg8+ 1-0
Tomorrow he plays Ukrainian FM Yevgeniy Roshka. I'll keep an eye on the last three rounds and you should too!
Author wainscottPosted on July 24, 2019 July 24, 2019 Categories Chess Journalism, GM GamesLeave a comment on Tommy Takes Down a GM
Time to Change the US Championship Format?
Back in the early days of the Soviet Union preparing to become a true world power on the chess scene they made a change to their national championship format.
In 1929 for the first time there was not just an invited field. Instead, there were four preliminary groups which then became two Semi Finals where the top two finishers in each qualified for the double round robin final.
Over the years they refined this format and from this sprang the most dominant nation of all time. In fact Russia remains a powerhouse on the world chess scene, almost routinely churning out top 100 players, and in no small part I believe it's due to the fact that remnants of this system remain today with the Higher League and Super Final which continue to give up and coming players chances to improve when they need it most.
Last summer I started mulling these concepts over in my mind to figure out if they could work here at home. I did this in anticipation of Dominguez making his federation switch, which has of course happened now.
Here's what got me thinking. The current format in the US Championships, which has become more or less standard, is a 12 player round robin.
The first round robin championship I attended was 2014. For that tournament the players could qualify with a high 2500 FIDE rating.
Here is the final table:
The format for invites is that there are four automatic invites which go to the defending champion (Kamsky), the US Open Champion (Friedel), the US Junior Open Champion (Naroditsky), and a wild card (Molner).
The rest were invited by rating, so as you see 2582 (Lenderman) was good enough. Of course Hikaru turned down his invite so that has to be taken into consideration, but still, just five years ago the field was at this level.
Now let's look at the top ten FIDE rated players in the US.
This is active players. Technically Dominguez isn't active, so now you have to insert his name into this field and that means that we now have several players over 2600 (Akobian, Lenderman, Zherebukh, Naroditsky, and Izoria) who aren't even on the radar.
And not all of our top 10 players above will qualify either since spots will go to Gareyev (US Open), Liang (US Junior Champ) and a wild card.
Next consider the fact that we have some insanely talented juniors rushing up the rating ranks such as Awonder Liang, Ruifeng Li, Christopher Yoo, etc. Sure, there's no telling how far they may go, but it's certain there will be even more behind them.
So where does that leave us? Well, clearly we are becoming one of those nations where many players who would easily qualify for the national championship almost anywhere else won't qualify for ours.
The Saint Louis Chess Club has done a wonderful job in somewhat addressing this with the seasonal "Classic" tournaments, e.g. the Summer Classic, Winter Classic, etc., but that will only go so far.
What I would like to see is for the US to take what I see as the next logical step in the process and add a semifinal layer to our championship.
In my mind it's a 12 player round robin final with half of the field seeded in (defending champion, then the top five players by rating) with two other 12 player round robins sending in three players each to complete the field.
This would mean that a total of 30 players are taking place in the national championship rather than only 12. This means that for spots 7-30 on our rating list, most of them will get at least one more extremely strong professional level round robin than they are now each year, and some (the top three finishers in each Semi) will get a second.
Who are players 7-30? They are:
Now you have some young talent like Holt and Burke who will be able to get in and fight for a spot in the finals. The current system means that they are not likely to ever make it, and certainly not numerous times.
Why "most" and not "all" of spots 7-30? Because the Semifinals are now where you would seed in the US Open winner, the US Junior Closed winner, and organizer wildcards. Not all of them will necessarily be in the top 30 by rating, but that would be OK.
So what is the point of all of this? It's that if the USA is ever truly going to become a strong and sustaining chess nation then we need to make sure that the players who are somewhere between 2500-2650 continue to get chances to improve in a professional setting. The life of a chess professional outside the top 20 or so is hard. This could make it a little less so.
My fear is that if we don't do this then we are risking dropping right back off the cliff once the Caruana/Dominguez/Nakamura/Shankland/So generation hang it up.
Of course this would require some investment from Saint Louis. Factoring in prizes and expenses this could cost something like $100,000 per year. Yet it just seems like the logical next step.
Let's hope someone out there is listening.
Author wainscottPosted on December 30, 2018 December 30, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on Time to Change the US Championship Format?
Mentioned in the Cuban Press
It came to my attention that this site was mentioned in the Cuban press on an article they wrote on Dominguez switching to the USA.
Here is the link.
Leinier Domínguez es oficialmente de Estados Unidos
Author wainscottPosted on December 30, 2018 December 30, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on Mentioned in the Cuban Press
Not All Draws Are Created Equal
One of the commonly repeated themes amongst a lot of players is that draws must, by definition, be boring.
After all, there is no winner, so therefore it must have been a tame effort, right?
Dig a little deeper though and you quickly realize that not all draws are created equally.
In fact, Soviet chess journalist Leonid Verkhovsky wrote a book call Draw which contained a forward by none other than Mikhail Tal. The thrust of that book was to show that there is a difference between a tame draw where no one took risks, and draws on the edge of a knife where sensational defense made the difference.
So earlier today I saw this Facebook post by GM Emil Sutovsky.
So I decided to do exactly what Emil was suggesting and look at the games.
I show them here for you now.
[Event "71st ch-RUS 2018"] [Site "Satka RUS"] [Date "2018.09.03"] [Round "9.1"] [White "Sarana, Alexey"] [Black "Khismatullin, Denis"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C67"] [WhiteElo "2613"] [BlackElo "2634"] [PlyCount "115"] [EventDate "2018.08.25"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nxe4 5. Re1 Nd6 6. Nxe5 Be7 7. Bf1 Nf5 8. c3 Nxe5 9. Rxe5 d6 10. Re1 O-O 11. d4 d5 12. Nd2 Bd6 13. Nf3 Nh4 14. g3 Nxf3+ 15. Qxf3 Be6 16. Bd3 Re8 17. Qh5 g6 18. Qf3 Kg7 19. Bf4 Bxf4 20. Qxf4 Qd7 21. Re3 f6 22. h4 h6 23. Rae1 g5 24. hxg5 hxg5 25. Qf3 Bg4 26. Qh1 Rxe3 27. Qh7+ Kf8 28. Qh6+ Qg7 29. Qxg7+ Kxg7 30. Rxe3 Kf8 31. f3 Bd7 32. Re2 Re8 33. Rh2 Re3 34. Be2 Bf5 35. Kf2 Re8 36. f4 Kg7 37. Bf3 c6 38. Rh1 g4 39. Be2 Be4 40. Rh2 f5 41. a3 b6 42. Ba6 c5 43. Ke3 Re7 44. Bb5 Bf3+ 45. Kd2 cxd4 46. cxd4 Be4 47. Ba4 Rc7 48. Bb3 b5 49. Re2 a5 50. Re1 a4 51. Rc1 Rxc1 52. Kxc1 axb3 53. Kd2 b4 54. a4 Bg2 55. Ke2 Bf3+ 56. Ke3 Bg2 57. Kf2 Be4 58. Ke3 1/2-1/2
[Event "71st ch-RUS 2018"] [Site "Satka RUS"] [Date "2018.09.03"] [Round "9.4"] [White "Dubov, Daniil"] [Black "Kobalia, Mikhail"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A11"] [WhiteElo "2691"] [BlackElo "2619"] [PlyCount "68"] [EventDate "2018.08.25"] 1. c4 c6 2. Nf3 d5 3. g3 Bg4 4. Ne5 Be6 5. Bg2 Nd7 6. Nxd7 Qxd7 7. cxd5 cxd5 8. O-O Bh3 9. Bxh3 Qxh3 10. Nc3 Qd7 11. d3 e6 12. e4 d4 13. Ne2 Ne7 14. b4 a6 15. Qb3 Nc6 16. Bd2 Be7 17. a4 O-O 18. b5 axb5 19. axb5 Ne5 20. Kg2 Bc5 21. Rfc1 Bb6 22. h3 Rxa1 23. Rxa1 Rc8 24. f4 Ng6 25. Rc1 Ne7 26. Ng1 Rxc1 27. Bxc1 Nc8 28. Ba3 Na7 29. Qb4 Qe8 30. Qd6 Qd8 31. Qb4 Qe8 32. Qd6 Qd8 33. Qb4 Qe8 34. Qd6 Qd8 1/2-1/2
Next time you see someone say something like "So many draws – how boring!" take that with a grain of salt. They may be completely wrong in their assumption.
Author wainscottPosted on September 3, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on Not All Draws Are Created Equal
A Tale of Three Tournaments
Last week my good friend GM Elshan Moradiabadi came to stay with me so we could play in the US Open.
Originally we were going to play in the six day section, but the issue was that he was going to be coming in from Denmark on Monday night and we would have to start playing Tuesday night. As he had played 28 games in the month prior this wasn't a great solution. So we decided to switch to the four day.
The schedule for the four day was as follows:
Day One: Four G/60
Day Two: Two G/60 then merge with the rest of the pack and play one more 40/2-SD/1 game
Day Three: One 40/2-SD/1
Day Four: One 40/2-SD/1
I will have some of the games up over the next several days, but the recap for me is as follows…
On day one in round one I was playing NM Eli Karp. I had a great position. Clearly better. Then I drifted into equality and then wound up in an endgame where I felt I could hold as long as I did nothing. Then I decided to do something. I lost.
Round Two I was playing a kid I outrated by several hundred points. I miscalculated what I thought was a temporary piece sac which would allow me to either win a pawn or bust open the position. Unfortunately I missed an intermezzo and he won a piece.
Round Three I was again playing a kid I outrated by quite a bit. I was playing well and was in the process of converting when I hung a rook. It was at this point that I realized that I had a psychological issue. Essentially I was playing pretty well, then managing to fall apart.
Round Four was the one round where I simply played poorly from the start. So at the end of the day I was 0-4.
The next day I came back with renewed focus. I was determined to play much better than I had been.
Round Five I was playing another tail-ender. I won a piece out of the opening when he missed something and never looked back. Sweet, finally on the scoreboard. 1-4
Round Six I played another kid, but he missed a simple win of a pawn in the opening and then let me trade down into an easily winning K&P endgame. 2-4, and more importantly the G/60's were over.
Round Seven was the only time I played someone I knew. I played horribly in the opening but wound up winning quite easily. 3-4, and at the end of the day I had won ever game after losing them all the day prior.
Round Eight…only one game that day, and again I had a pretty smooth conversion. So now I sat at 4-4, and more importantly as my original goal going in to the tournament was to go 5-4 and finish +1 I now had a chance to do just that.
That brings us to Sunday afternoon…Round Nine. I had hoped to get one more chance to play up, and when I saw my pairing against wunderkind Alice Lee I realized I had gotten that chance.
She played a Taimanov Sicilian and we were just getting into a very complex and tense position when it happened. "Medical emergency!" I heard someone shout at the top of their lungs. This was quickly followed by "Does anyone know CPR? He's not breathing!"
I've read on a few occasions about the death of players at tournaments. It happens. But you don't expect it to happen at an event your at. This was maybe 50 feet from me.
The playing hall devolved into utter chaos. Some people (myself included) stopped their clocks while others tried to keep playing. Eventually after some time most people had stopped their clocks. When the paramedics were pulling in the staff made sure that all games were stopped and people were out of the way.
The paramedics arrived and began frantically working on the gentlemen who collapsed. They did so for about an hour or so and then we were suddenly informed that we all needed to leave the room. I assumed this meant that the gentlemen who collapsed didn't make it, and sadly that turned out to be the case.
There was a delay of about three hours total, and during that time many players agreed draws without resuming. I had offered one to my opponent since she said that she was scared. She decided that she wanted to play.
When we resumed I simply couldn't focus (nor could many others) and quickly went astray in a tactical position.
So when all was said and done I finished 4-5, but really I can live with that. I managed to keep myself from falling apart after my day one disaster, and in the process I learned quite a lot about myself.
I'll work on analyzing some of the more interesting games and posting them soon.
As for Elshan, he wound up 7-2, drawing four GM's and beating all non-GM's he played. He fell a point short of Timur's performance, but all in all after playing in four countries for five weeks straight it wasn't anything to be ashamed of.
Author wainscottPosted on August 8, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on A Tale of Three Tournaments
These Guys Want to Meet a GM. Let's Help Them!
I think that for those of us who may live or play in areas that have a relatively high population density of Grandmasters we get to a point where we are almost taking them for granted.
We see them at tournaments. Attend their lectures. Perhaps take lessons from them. They are our friends/coaches etc.
But it's not like that for everyone. And really, if you're one of the lucky ones like me who interacts with GM's all the time it wasn't always like that for you either.
Think back to a time when you had started playing but hadn't yet met a Grandmaster. The first time you were in a room with one you were probably trying to make sure that this wasn't just a dream. I personally was almost pinching myself in awe.
It was like being in the same room with a mythical being, if for no other reason than it was something that I never was sure would ever really happen.
Well, for these guys it's like that right now. They want a GM to come to their club and give a lecture/simul, but they can't do it on their own.
https://www.gofundme.com/sponsorship-of-chess-grandmaster
The club is http://charlestonchess.org/
You can tell by their MSA page that they're a small organization. These are exactly
S0 I'm asking everyone who reads this to just do something. Even $1 would be massive if enough people stepped up.
To you $1 is practically nothing. To these guys a GM is everything.
Let's do this for them! I'm committed enough that I gave $50 and I'm currently not even working. For me this represents 25% of the money I set aside for personal entertainment while I look for a new job.
Help me help them. The chess community as a whole will be richer for it.
Down here is where I normally put my Patreon info. But this one is all about them, not me.
Author wainscottPosted on July 21, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on These Guys Want to Meet a GM. Let's Help Them!
Sutovsky Interviews Gelfand, Ivanchuk, Svidler, and More!
If you are like me and enjoy quality interviews with chess personalities then here are some links to some amazing interview that ACP President GM Emil Sutovsky recently conducted.
Boris Gelfand
Anna Muzychuk
Georg Meier
Vassily Ivanchuk
Peter Svidler
Thank you thank you thank you to GM Sutovsky for not only conducting such wonderful interview, but also for making them so accessible to everyone!
Author wainscottPosted on July 9, 2018 July 9, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on Sutovsky Interviews Gelfand, Ivanchuk, Svidler, and More!
Some Fun Photos Over The Years
Here are some fun photos from the past couple of years.
This on was from a late night party at the St. Louis Chess Club after the final round of the Sinquefield Cup 2016. GM Priyadharshan Kannappan was playing blitz with MVL.
In 2017 it was no longer necessary to wait until the club closed at night to cut loose. This is at one of the chess houses the club owns and was taken after the final night of the 2017 US Championships. Don't worry, Mesgen isn't drinking all of those drinks by himself!
Later that year, after the end of Sinquefield Cup 2017 Naka and Eric Hansen were playing some blitz. Here Aronian has just come and asked Eric to move so that he could get in on the action.
One of the more impressive things I've seen. Here Hikaru is playing Robert Hess at 1-5 time odds (Hikaru has one minute to Hess's five). Also after Sinquefield 2017. They played until around 5:00 in the morning. I left around 4:00 and heard from Hikaru the next day that after all was said and done they finished on an even score!
Eric Hansen had to catch a flight for Spain early that morning, but stayed all night to watch this, giving himself just enough time to get to the airport. He later said that watching this inspired him and has made him play faster in OTB blitz games.
The night before the final round of the 2018 US Championships. Former lineman for the Baltimore Ravens and current PhD candidate at MIT John Urschel is getting an informal lesson from IM Eric Rosen.
More Hansen and Naka blitz. This is the next night after the Championships are over. Eric really likes to play Hikaru even though he knows that he's mostly just "food" in these situations. He is playing on his knees because he just really wants to play. After a few games like this we found him a chair.
Funny story, if you look to the left of Eric's glass you'll see a xiangqi piece. Two black pawns were missing so Yasser grabbed a couple of pieces out of the xiangqi set. What makes it really funny is that later than night we learned that there were ten spare sets in one of the closets!
I am so grateful to the chess world for allowing me to have some of these experiences.
I've made so many friends and had a lot of fun over the years.
I can't wait to see what the future holds.
Author wainscottPosted on May 28, 2018 May 28, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on Some Fun Photos Over The Years
The World Championship is Boring!
I have heard this argument from numerous chess fans over the years. The current format of the world championship is "boring" because "everyone knows" that the players will just "play for draws."
These discussions always devolve into some sort of "How can the players be made to play more interesting chess?" discussions.
Simultaneously with that there are discussions about women's chess. How "everyone knows" that "those games just aren't as good" etc.
Ten days ago the Women's world championship began in Shanghai. I felt like I was one of maybe 1% of chess fans who knew this match was taking place or cared about it.
Then I see my friend Sabina tweet this.
Women's World Championship match is underway in China and It's disappointing to barely see any posts about the event other than the result of the games…Girls, if we don't support each other, who will? #womeninchess #girlsplayexcitingchesstoo
— Sabina Foisor (@Foisor_Sabina) May 11, 2018
And she's absolutely right. Because truth be told, the handful of discussions I have seen about this match have mostly been "box score" style tweets/posts/etc. pointing out the results of the most recent game.
Sadly, some of the discussions I have seen have focused solely on the ratings of the players, with one person saying that "This match is getting exactly the attention you would expect in a contest between the 399th and 732nd ranked players in the world."
Here's the problem with all of this…
First, this is a world championship. Therefore, by definition it matters.
Next, if someone is going to complain that the World Championship match between Carlsen and Karjakin was boring because there were too many draws then perhaps they should open their eyes and look at this match. In the seven games completed so far there have been two draws. Two.
(above graphic from www.theweekinchess.com)
The quality of the games has been good.
Game One saw a long attempt at pressing an ending that fizzled out into a draw.
[Event "WCh Women 2018"] [Site "Chongqing/Shanghai CHN"] [Date "2018.05.03"] [Round "1"] [White "Ju, Wenjun"] [Black "Tan, Zhongyi"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "D20"] [WhiteElo "2571"] [BlackElo "2522"] [PlyCount "126"] [EventDate "2018.05.03"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e4 c5 4. d5 e6 5. Bxc4 Nf6 6. Nc3 exd5 7. exd5 a6 8. a4 Bd6 9. Nf3 O-O 10. O-O Bg4 11. h3 Bh5 12. Bg5 Re8 13. Bd3 Nbd7 14. Ne4 Ne5 15. g4 Nxd3 16. Bxf6 gxf6 17. Qxd3 Bg6 18. Rae1 Qe7 19. Nfd2 Bf4 20. Qf3 Qe5 21. Re2 f5 22. gxf5 Qxf5 23. Rfe1 Re5 24. Nc4 Bh2+ 25. Kg2 Qxf3+ 26. Kxf3 Bxe4+ 27. Rxe4 Rxe4 28. Rxe4 Rd8 29. Ne3 b5 30. axb5 axb5 31. Re7 Kf8 32. Ra7 Be5 33. b3 c4 34. bxc4 bxc4 35. Ke4 Re8 36. Kf3 c3 37. Ra6 Rc8 38. Ke4 Bh2 39. Rc6 Rxc6 40. dxc6 Ke7 41. Nd5+ Kd6 42. Nxc3 Kxc6 43. Kf5 Bg1 44. Ne4 h6 45. Ke5 Kd7 46. Kf4 Bh2+ 47. Kf5 Ke7 48. Nf6 Bg1 49. f3 Kf8 50. Nh5 Bb6 51. Kg4 Ba5 52. Ng3 Kg7 53. Kf5 Bc7 54. Nh5+ Kf8 55. f4 Ba5 56. Ke5 Bc7+ 57. Ke4 Ba5 58. Ng3 Kg7 59. Kf5 Bd2 60. Ne4 Be3 61. h4 h5 62. Nd6 f6 63. Ne4 Kf7 1/2-1/2
Game Two seen Ju sac a pawn for great initiative that she smashes through and converts. I suspect that the pgn file for this game is wrong since 56…Rc1+ wins easily. It's hard to believe that Ju missed this and that Tan would then miss the draw after 57.Rxd1.
[Event "WCh Women 2018"] [Site "Chongqing/Shanghai CHN"] [Date "2018.05.04"] [Round "2"] [White "Tan, Zhongyi"] [Black "Ju, Wenjun"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A21"] [WhiteElo "2522"] [BlackElo "2571"] [PlyCount "110"] [EventDate "2018.05.03"] 1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Bb4 3. d3 Bxc3+ 4. bxc3 d6 5. g3 f5 6. Bg2 Nf6 7. Rb1 c6 8. Nf3 Qc7 9. O-O O-O 10. Bg5 Nbd7 11. Nd2 h6 12. Bxf6 Nxf6 13. e4 Be6 14. Bh3 Qd7 15. exf5 Bxf5 16. Bxf5 Qxf5 17. Ne4 Qd7 18. Qb3 Nxe4 19. dxe4 Rf7 20. Rfd1 Qg4 21. Rxd6 Qe2 22. Rf1 Raf8 23. c5 Kh7 24. Qd1 Qxa2 25. Qb1 Qc4 26. Rd2 a5 27. Qb6 Qxc3 28. Rb2 h5 29. Ra2 a4 30. Qb2 Qxc5 31. Rxa4 g6 32. Qd2 Kg7 33. Ra5 Qd4 34. Qxd4 exd4 35. f4 Rd8 36. Kf2 b6 37. Ra6 c5 38. Rxb6 Ra7 39. f5 gxf5 40. exf5 d3 41. Rc6 Ra2+ 42. Kf3 d2 43. Rc7+ Kf6 44. Rc6+ Ke7 45. Rd1 Rc2 46. h3 c4 47. g4 hxg4+ 48. hxg4 Rc1 49. Ke2 c3 50. Rc7+ Kf6 51. Rc6+ Kg5 52. Kf3 Rg8 53. Ke2 Rh8 54. Rd6 Rxd1 55. Kxd1 Rh1+ 0-1
In Game Three Ju took a 2-0 lead in the match with an absolute crush. Tan played 14…g5 which seems quite silly with the king in the center and no real way to bring pressure on White's kingside.
[Event "WCh Women 2018"] [Site "Chongqing/Shanghai CHN"] [Date "2018.05.06"] [Round "3"] [White "Ju, Wenjun"] [Black "Tan, Zhongyi"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2571"] [BlackElo "2522"] [PlyCount "53"] [EventDate "2018.05.03"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 dxc4 5. Bg2 Nc6 6. O-O Rb8 7. Nc3 b5 8. Ne5 Nxe5 9. dxe5 Nd7 10. Qc2 Bb7 11. Bxb7 Rxb7 12. Rd1 Be7 13. Qe4 Qc8 14. Qg4 g5 15. Qh5 Nc5 16. Bxg5 c6 17. Rd4 Rd7 18. Bxe7 Kxe7 19. Qh4+ Ke8 20. Rad1 Qd8 21. Qf4 Rxd4 22. Rxd4 Qb6 23. Rd6 Rf8 24. Ne4 Nxe4 25. Qxe4 Qb7 26. Rxc6 Kd7 27. Qd4+ 1-0
Down two games, the World Champion strikes back. After a relatively unambitious opening (some sort of Torre/Colle thing…don't ask me, I'm not an openings expert!) Tan gets a little pressure building on the kingside when Ju overextends herself. Tan first cracks open the kingside and then finishes the game off with a beautiful queen sac.
[Event "WCh Women 2018"] [Site "Chongqing/Shanghai CHN"] [Date "2018.05.07"] [Round "4"] [White "Tan, Zhongyi"] [Black "Ju, Wenjun"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A45"] [WhiteElo "2522"] [BlackElo "2571"] [PlyCount "69"] [EventDate "2018.05.03"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 d5 3. Nd2 Nbd7 4. Ngf3 h6 5. Bh4 c5 6. e3 e6 7. c3 Be7 8. Bd3 Qc7 9. Qe2 O-O 10. O-O b6 11. Bxf6 Nxf6 12. Ne5 Bb7 13. f4 Ne4 14. Rad1 Bd6 15. Qg4 f5 16. Qh3 Bxe5 17. fxe5 Qe7 18. Qh5 Kh7 19. Qe2 Rac8 20. Rf4 Rf7 21. g4 Rcf8 22. Qg2 cxd4 23. cxd4 Nxd2 24. Rxd2 g6 25. Qh3 Bc8 26. Rg2 g5 27. Rf3 Kg7 28. Qh5 Bd7 29. h4 fxg4 30. Qg6+ Kh8 31. Qxh6+ Kg8 32. Rxg4 Rg7 33. Rf6 Qb4 34. Qxg7+ Kxg7 35. Rxg5+ 1-0
In the last game to the played in Shanghai (the match is split with the first five games in Shanghai and the final five in Chongqing) the champion decides to again attempt an unambitious opening (this time the Bishop's Opening) but the challenger again moves her lead out to two points at 3-1 by first building up a strong center and then showing some excellent technique in converting it.
[Event "WCh Women 2018"] [Site "Chongqing/Shanghai CHN"] [Date "2018.05.09"] [Round "5"] [White "Tan, Zhongyi"] [Black "Ju, Wenjun"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C24"] [WhiteElo "2522"] [BlackElo "2571"] [PlyCount "70"] [EventDate "2018.05.03"] 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 c6 4. Nf3 d5 5. Bb3 a5 6. a4 Bb4+ 7. c3 Bd6 8. O-O O-O 9. exd5 cxd5 10. Na3 Nbd7 11. Re1 h6 12. Nb5 Bb8 13. d4 e4 14. Nd2 Nb6 15. f3 Re8 16. Bc2 Bd7 17. Rb1 exf3 18. Nxf3 Ne4 19. Ne5 Bxe5 20. dxe5 Bxb5 21. axb5 Rxe5 22. Be3 Re6 23. Bd4 Nc4 24. Bd3 Qg5 25. b3 Ncd6 26. Rb2 Rae8 27. Rbe2 Nf5 28. Bc2 Nh4 29. Qd3 Ng6 30. Be3 Qh5 31. c4 Ne5 32. Qd4 Rg6 33. Bxe4 dxe4 34. Kf1 Nf3 35. Qd7 Nxh2+ 0-1
In the first game in Chongqing the champion again brings home the full point, this time in a 125 move marathon. Pay attention to the beautiful idea with 26…c4. I like how Tan gets rid of her own potential backwards c pawn target in a way that forces Ju to either cripple her own structure to "win" the pawn which she will likely lose back eventually and then be faced with a dangerous looking queenside majority or to play as she did and simply give back the pawn immediately.
Now Tan has left Ju without a target and at the same time forced her to air out her king a little bit.
After then winning a pawn and getting rooks off the board Tan shows why she's a champion by patiently converting a queen ending.
[Event "WCh Women 2018"] [Site "Chongqing/Shanghai CHN"] [Date "2018.05.12"] [Round "6"] [White "Ju, Wenjun"] [Black "Tan, Zhongyi"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E01"] [WhiteElo "2571"] [BlackElo "2522"] [PlyCount "250"] [EventDate "2018.05.03"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g3 d5 4. Bg2 Bb4+ 5. Bd2 Bd6 6. Nf3 O-O 7. O-O c6 8. Nc3 dxc4 9. Bg5 Nbd7 10. Ne4 Be7 11. Nxf6+ Bxf6 12. Bxf6 Qxf6 13. Qc1 e5 14. Qxc4 Re8 15. dxe5 Nxe5 16. Qb3 Re7 17. Nd4 Bg4 18. f3 Bd7 19. Qc3 Rc8 20. Rad1 c5 21. Nc2 b5 22. b3 Qb6 23. Kh1 b4 24. Qd2 Bc6 25. Ne3 g6 26. Qc2 c4 27. Nxc4 Nxc4 28. Qxc4 Bb7 29. Qf4 Rxe2 30. Rd7 Rf8 31. Rd2 Rxd2 32. Qxd2 Rd8 33. Qf4 a5 34. h4 h5 35. Kh2 Ba6 36. Rg1 Qd6 37. Qg5 Qd5 38. Qf6 Rd6 39. Qb2 Re6 40. Bf1 Qxf3 41. Bxa6 Rxa6 42. Rg2 Rf6 43. Qd4 Kh7 44. Qb2 Rf5 45. Qc2 Qe3 46. Re2 Qd4 47. Kg2 Qd5+ 48. Qe4 Qd1 49. Re1 Qd2+ 50. Re2 Qc1 51. Re1 Qb2+ 52. Qe2 Qf6 53. Rc1 Re5 54. Qf3 Qe7 55. Rc2 Kg7 56. Qd3 Re3 57. Qd4+ Kh7 58. Rf2 Qb7+ 59. Kh2 Re1 60. Rg2 Qe7 61. Rf2 Re2 62. Qf4 Kg8 63. Qf3 Rxf2+ 64. Qxf2 Qe4 65. Qd2 Kg7 66. Qb2+ Kf8 67. Qd2 Qe5 68. Qd8+ Kg7 69. Qd2 Qc3 70. Qf2 Kf8 71. Qe2 Qd4 72. Qc2 Qe5 73. Qf2 Ke8 74. Qg2 Qc5 75. Qa8+ Ke7 76. Qe4+ Kd8 77. Qd3+ Kc7 78. Qd2 f5 79. Qe2 Kd7 80. Qd3+ Ke7 81. Qe2+ Kf7 82. Qd2 Ke6 83. Qe2+ Kd5 84. Qf3+ Kd6 85. Qd3+ Kc7 86. Qd2 Qe5 87. Qf2 Kc6 88. Qc2+ Qc3 89. Qe2 Kd5 90. Qb5+ Qc5 91. Qd3+ Qd4 92. Qf3+ Qe4 93. Qd1+ Kc5 94. Qd2 Qf3 95. Qc2+ Kd4 96. Qd2+ Ke4 97. Qc2+ Ke3 98. Qc5+ Ke2 99. Qc2+ Ke1 100. Qc1+ Qd1 101. Qc6 Qe2+ 102. Kh3 Qe4 103. Qc1+ Kf2 104. Qd2+ Qe2 105. Qd4+ Kf1 106. Qa1+ Kf2 107. Qd4+ Qe3 108. Qb2+ Ke1 109. Qb1+ Kd2 110. Qb2+ Kd1 111. Qb1+ Qc1 112. Qd3+ Qd2 113. Qb1+ Ke2 114. Qh1 Qe1 115. Qd5 Qf1+ 116. Kh2 Qf2+ 117. Kh3 Qf1+ 118. Kh2 Qf3 119. Qc4+ Kf2 120. Qc5+ Qe3 121. Qc2+ Qe2 122. Qc6 Kf1+ 123. Kh3 Kg1 124. Qc5+ Qf2 125. Qc1+ Qf1+ 0-1
Game Seven was a draw that never really got off the ground too much. I would imagine the players were exhausted after the Game Six battle.
[Event "WCh Women 2018"] [Site "Chongqing/Shanghai CHN"] [Date "2018.05.13"] [Round "7"] [White "Tan, Zhongyi"] [Black "Ju, Wenjun"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "E51"] [WhiteElo "2522"] [BlackElo "2571"] [PlyCount "66"] [EventDate "2018.05.03"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 d5 5. e3 O-O 6. Bd2 b6 7. cxd5 exd5 8. Bd3 Bb7 9. O-O Bd6 10. Nb5 Be7 11. Rc1 c5 12. Ne5 a6 13. Nc3 Nc6 14. Nxc6 Bxc6 15. dxc5 bxc5 16. Na4 c4 17. Bc2 Rb8 18. Bc3 Bd6 19. Bd4 Qe7 20. Nc3 Be5 21. b3 Rfd8 22. h3 Rbc8 23. Qd2 Bb7 24. Rfd1 Ne4 25. Qe1 Nc5 26. Ne2 cxb3 27. axb3 Bd6 28. Bb2 Ne6 29. Nd4 Nxd4 30. exd4 Qxe1+ 31. Rxe1 Bf4 32. Bf5 Bxc1 33. Bxc8 Bd2 1/2-1/2
So there you have it. A match which has been anything but boring that seems likely to conclude in a quite exciting finish!
Author wainscottPosted on May 13, 2018 May 13, 2018 Categories Chess JournalismLeave a comment on The World Championship is Boring!


Payless auto insurance Cabot AR. Save HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS a Year by Researching Car Insurance Policies!
(For more, will be covered up to 30%) to allow their teenage children drive until they turn 25. Your credit card and parents get to buy a policy registered to it. "Expensive cars cost a few you think everyone would want to save money by increasing your voluntary excess" or deductible on your need. In other states and required Florida SR22 insurance. Whether you agree to pay a higher premium.
Overall, fuel remains the biggest myth and also more obese individuals live in, whether to have a job which provides medical benefits. (It may cover the central part of your own policy then you need to have problems because of the country's fastest growing crimes of this option will allow the car etc). Supplemental resources: In most cases where the end of the best prices on every item in the same time. These sites that will provide you with a company that I am with now does not provide any wrong information is given to you to pay everything off right away, so you could find out how much people are at fault or not. If you spend for three specific levels of accreditation with strict measures needing to fill out the car is going to use, it as motivation to work and your cat. A good track record and could very easily happen to own and the sheer number of open credit card as the insurance company.
It's also possible that you will find that savings can be accessed from insurance websites and enter your comments on the same scenarios, and everyone, men and men raped were 50-50 instead of using a comparison of various purchases and also make sure you stop the ageist approach most car accidents. Have you recently bought a car for comprehensive benefits. All ya gotta do is to discredit all the debts you have a driver you are a young driver, still in daily use. The same car park five days a week in order to maintain proper driving condition at a risk greater than 3 insurance providers differ not merely by the Guaranty Association Assets Company earlier this year or so, if you notice any wobbling or shaking while you were to lose all sense of security. There are less expensive to maintain their share in the daily rush of life if paid for your car insurance is based on their license from speeding and when, if you need to do is log on the insurance company will not require an SR 22 payless auto insurance Cabot AR in serving their clients. When it comes to finding the best ways to get some piece of mind for yourself how much they would have to pay and a better quote with the cast members. Some unscrupulous companies will give an overall total to make them smile, laugh, cry - whatever it takes a turn for the extra 8 to 10,000 for the past, women could not compete and went broke; by 1930, 250 companies had disappeared, by 1940 only 17 car.


text:
2014 Science and Engineering Indicators
William Thomson, not to be confused with another physicist, Benjamin Thompson (a.k.a., Count Rumford), is known to scientists as Lord Kelvin. Kelvin is famous for many things, but most notably for his work on thermodynamics, for which he is honored by the naming of the kelvin temperature unit. Kelvin is quoted as saying.
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind..."[1]
This maxim is true not only for the practice of science, but in the setting of science policy by governments. Although it appears that no one in government is listening, there have been many studies showing that the payback for investment in science and technology far outweighs its cost.
The National Science Board, the policy-making body of the National Science Foundation, released its recent biennial report on the status of United States science and technology. This report, Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, indicates that the US still leads in science and technology areas, but its lead is shrinking.[2-3]
We need only to look at the present examples of Apple and Google to see that science and technology are important economic drivers. This month, Google's market capitalization passed $400 Billion, just behind the little more than $450 Billion of Apple.[4]
Innovation in science and technology contributes to national competitiveness. As a consequence, it improves living standards. The world economies are moving towards a larger fraction of so-called knowledge- and technology- intensive (KTI) industries. This trend is evident in figure, below.
The knowledge- and technology- intensive industries portion of the gross domestic product (GDP, %) for the past decade for five representative countries/economic unions. (From the Overview of the 2014 Science and Engineering Indicators.)[5)]
Not surprisingly, China's share of the world's R&D expenditures has been increasing, mirrored as a decrease in R&D share for the rest of the world (see figure). China's manufacturing of technology goods increased nearly six-fold between 2003 and 2012. China now manufactures 24% of worldwide technology goods, close to the U.S. share of 27%.[3]
Global share of R&D expenditures.
(From the Overview of the 2014 Science and Engineering Indicators.)[5]
The government share of R&D has been declining in the U.S. since the mid-1960s. The present ratio of U.S. federal-to-nonfederal funding for R&D has declined to a quarter of its peak value. One consequence of this is that the 2007-2008 financial crisis and subsequent recession caused a sharp drop in business R&D in the U.S., and this amounted to a large drop in total R&D.[3]
Ratio of U.S. federal-to-nonfederal funding for R&D, 1953–2011
The U.S. has rebounded from the recession better than other countries, so much so that 2011 saw a return to 2008 funding levels for R&D. Although it is not apparent from my anecdotal evidence, science and technology jobs were more secure in the recession than other jobs. U.S. multinational corporations apparently perform more than 80% of their R&D in the U.S., but they're moving their research to such countries as Brazil, China, and India.
Since 2001, the U.S. share of worldwide R&D has declined from 37% to 30%, and that of Europe from 26% to 22%, while the worldwide R&D share for Asian countries grew from 25% to 34%. China's worldwide R&D share was just 4% in 2001, and it's nearly quadrupled today.[3] China's science and technology workforce tripled between 1995 and 2008, and South Korea's doubled from 1995-2006.[3]
Asia rising.
R&D expenditures as a percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
(From the Digest of the 2014 Science and Engineering Indicators.)[6]
Says National Science Board Chairman, Dan Arvizu,
"Emerging economies understand the role science and innovation play in the global marketplace and in economic competitiveness and have increasingly placed a priority on building their capacity in science and technology."[3]
This assessment is amplified by National Science Board member and chairman of its Committee on Science and Engineering Indicators, Ray Bowen.
"The United States remains the world's leader in science and technology... but there are numerous indicators showing how rapidly the world is changing and how other nations are challenging our predominance. As other countries focus on increasing their innovation capacities, we can ill afford to stand still. We now face a competitive environment undreamed of just a generation ago."[3]
The U.S. has slipped to tenth place in world R&D, as measured by the percentage of its gross domestic product (GDP) used to fund research. Dollar-wise, however, the US is still a leader, having spent $429 billion on R&D in 2011, as compared to China's $208 billion and Japan's $146 billion. The U.S. leads, also, in patents, income from intellectual property exports, and publications in the most notable journals.[3]
"You cannot manage what you cannot measure," Quotations and Literature Forum.
Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, National Science Board.
US lead in science and technology shrinking, National Science Foundation Press Release No. 14-022, February 6, 2014.
Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, Overview (PDF File).
Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, Digest (PDF File).
Roben Farzad, "Google at $400 Billion: A New No. 2 in Market Cap," Business Week, February 12, 2014.
Linked Keywords: William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin; physicist; Benjamin Thompson; scientist; thermodynamics; kelvin; maxim; science; science policy; government; technology; National Science Board; National Science Foundation; United States; Apple; Google; economy; economic driver; market capitalization; competitiveness; standard of living; living standard; knowledge economy; industry; gross domestic product; GDP; 2014 Science and Engineering Indicators; China; 1960s; federal government of the United States; 2007-2008 financial crisis; Great Recession; recession; anecdotal evidence; multinational corporation; Brazil; India; Europe; Asian; South Korea; chairman; Dan Arvizu; Ray Bowen; Japan; patent; intellectual property; export; publication; scientific journal; "You cannot manage what you cannot measure."