text:
Home Newsletter Real Estate | It Has Been Enacted and Published Law No. 14,011/20
Newsletter Real Estate | It Has Been Enacted and Published Law No. 14,011/20
On 06/10/2020 it was enacted Law No. 14,011/2020, resulting from Provisional Measure No. 915/19, which improves the management and transfer procedures of the Federal Government's properties.
With the intention of accelerating and reducing bureaucracy in the process of alienation of the Federal Government's real estate, and accordingly, reducing expenses and avoiding disrespecting the constitutional principle of the social function of property, the president of the republic enacted, at the end of 2019, the Provisional Measure No. 915, recently converted into the Law No. 14,011/2020, which had its text approved by the Federal Senate on May 19, 2020, enacted on June 10, 2020 and published on the Official Gazette on June 12, 2020.
It should be noted that few vetoes, of little relevance, were made by the President of the Republic, which will be submitted to the National Congress for deliberation.
Such provisional measure, now Law No. 14,011,2020, modifies the following laws: (i) Law No. 6,015/73; (ii) Law No. 9,636/98; (iii) Law No. 13,240/15 (iv) Law No. 13,259/16; (v) Law No. 10,204/01; (vi) Decree No. 2,398/15; in addition to others amendments.
We will deal briefly with the most relevant changes regarding real estate law.
(i) Amendments to Law No. 9,636/98:
Among all the laws amended by the Provisional Measure, Law 9.636-98 was the most impacted, as expected, since it deals more directly with the alienation, management and 'aforamento' of real estate owned by the Federal Government. Let us see, therefore, the most relevant amendments implemented in Law No. 9,363/98.
a) Limitation to updating equitable ownership values:
In view of the modification of § 8th of article 11-B, the relevant provision introduced a limit to the updating of amounts due by the holder of the equitable ownership of property subject to the emphyteusis regime.
Therefore, the updating of debts related to the "foro" and the occupancy rate − annual charges for the use of the property − in addition to other extraordinary revenues, cannot exceed five times the variation of the Broad National Consumer Price Index (IPCA) of the previous year.
b) Valuation without the need of bidding:
The amendment to the caput of article 11-C makes it possible to contract without bidding, in order to carry out the valuation for the onerous sale of Federal Government's properties, in addition to Caixa Econômica Federal (the Federal Savings Bank) – already previously permitted − public companies, agencies or entities of the direct or indirect public administration of the Federal Government, the Federal District, the States or the Municipalities which main activity is urban or real estate development.
Furthermore, according to the new §7th of article 11-C, specialized companies, which were already authorized – through bidding – to carry out the relevant valuation, from now on will need to have their appraisal reports homologated by the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Secretariat or by the agency or public entity managing the real estate. It should be mentioned that §11th of the provision under review establishes that these companies cannot have quotaholders with relatives, up to the third degree, of civil servants of the Patrimony Secretariat of Brazil ("SPU") and of the Special Secretariat for Privatization, Divestment and Markets of the Ministry of Economy.
c) Table of values for valuation:
By article 11-C, § 4th, recently added, the sale of urban properties of up to 250 m2 and rural properties of up to the limit of the fiscal module, defined by Incra, may be carried out for the amount conferred by a table of values provided by the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Office.
The referred table presents a calculation formula that allows defining the venal values of all urban properties in a municipality through the individual assessment of each property. Under the terms of § 5th of the provision under review, it must be guided by statistical methods of market research and levels of precision compatible with the risk.
d) "Foro" remission:
Under the terms of article 16-I, another amount that shall be measured by the aforementioned table of amounts is the forum remission. Such procedure will also dispense with the issue of a decree by the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Office authorizing the remission. For all this, it is necessary that the property has a remission value within the limit to be established by an act of the Minister of State for the Economy.
Clarifying, "foro" remission is the act by which the emphyteutic owner purchases the "direct title" of the property, so that it will no longer need to pay "foro" and laudemium, in case of transfer of the equitable ownership.
e) Alienation of Federal Government public waters:
Under the terms of article 18, §6th, III, the sale of sections of the Federal Government's rivers and lakes is now permitted to anyone who has an aquaculture and psiculture project approved by the Secretariat of Aquaculture and Fisheries of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply and other competent bodies.
f) Real estate acquisition proposal:
Any interested party may submit proposals for the acquisition of Federal Government real estate that are not registered in the emphyteusis or occupation regime. This is what determines the article 23-A, which also establishes, in its §2nd, that the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Office will analyze the proposal according to the convenience and the opportunity.
According to the article 23-A, § 3rd, in the event of a favorable manifestation by the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Office regarding the convenience and the opportunity to transfer the property and, if there is no valuation of the property within the validity period, the interested party must provide it, as its expense, by a qualified appraiser or specialized company.
g) Right of first refusal of those who paid the evaluation costs:
By the § 6th of article 24, the individual who has paid for the evaluation has preference in the right to acquire the property on equal terms with the winner of the bidding, as long as any in rem or personal right assignees, lessees are up to date with obligations with the SPU and regulars occupants do not exercise the aforementioned right.
This prevision has been criticized from a constitutional point of view and for contradicting the directives of Law No. 8,666/93, as far as it would, as per this understanding, violate the principle of isonomy by granting differentiated treatment to an individual, which is only acceptable if it is for the achievement of the public interest and other values equally constitutional, which would are not identified in such case, due to the simple fact of having paid for the property valuation.
h) Possibility of electronic bidding and auction:
Article 24, § 8th will allow that alienation and bidding procedures of the Federal Government's properties may take place through information technology resources, using its own systems or made available by third parties, by agreement or contract. This will, therefore, make electronic bidding and auctioning possible.
i) 25% discount in the event of failed auction:
In the event of deserted or failed concurrence or auction, under the terms of the new § 1st of article 24-A, the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Office may hold the second public bidding or auction with a 25% discount on the current assessment value.
In the event, on the other hand, of a deserted or failed public auction or concurrence for two consecutive times, the properties will automatically be made available for direct sale, necessarily with a 25% discount on the appraised value.
The mandatory character given by the legislator about the discount, as well as the amount of 25% (and not up to 25%), has been already criticized, considering that it inhibits the Federal Government from achieving the best result in alienation, which is the public interest.
j) Possibility of alienation by separate pieces:
With the inclusion of article 24-B, it will be possible to sell public properties by separate parts or pieces of lands. To that end, according to the new text, a technical opinion shall be written indicating that the real estate will enjoy greater valuation, liquidity, other situations arising from normal market practices or in which more advantageous conditions are observed for public administration, duly substantiated.
k) Possibility of alienation by contracted third parties:
The insertion of article 24-C, in turn, introduced the option for the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Office to contract third parties for (i) the preparation of alienation proposal for individual assets or separate pieces of real estate assets of the Federal Government; (ii) the execution of registration actions, regularization of valuation and alienation of real estate; and (iii) the execution of the alienation activities of the indicated assets, including the completion of the bidding procedure and the representation of the Federal Government in the signature of the indicated legal instruments.
The compensation of the services mentioned above may be fixed, either by percentage of the completed operation, or by a combination of both modalities, and any expenses incurred with subcontracted third parties necessary for the operation will be refunded.
l) Possibility of hiring BNDES without bidding:
According to the article 24-D, Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Secretariat may contract the BNDES, without the need of bidding, with the purpose of carrying out studies and executing the privatization plan for the Federal Government's real estate assets.
The bank shall have, under the terms of § 4th of article 24-D, either a fixed or variable remuneration, or even a combination of both, up to 3% of the revenue resulting from each privatization plan. In addition to that, any occasional expenses incurred with subcontracted third parties necessary for the execution of the plans will be reimbursed.
(ii) Amendments to Law No. 13,259/16:
After the addition of article 4-A in the referred law, the credit enrolled in the Federal Government's outstanding debt may, in certain circumstances, be extinguished through dation in payment of real estate with historical, cultural, artistic, tourist or landscape value.
To that, it is necessary that a state of public calamity is recognized by an act of the Federal Executive Branch at the time of the dation in payment, as well as the fulfillment of the following requirements: (i) the property must be located in the areas described in the natural or technological disaster information, and (ii) the business activities of the legitimate debtor, owner of the real estate, must take place in the affected areas of the disaster.
In the event of a technological disaster, once the dation in payment for the extinguishment of tax debts takes place, the Federal Government will subrogate itself in the inherent rights of indemnity due by the agent that caused the damage itself and, in the event of default, shall promote the enrollment of the calculated values in its own administrative procedure.
Properties that are difficult to alienate, are useless or that do not meet the criteria of necessity, utility and convenience shall not be accepted.
(iii) Amendments to Law No. 13,240/15:
If previously any of the properties that constituted the real estate patrimony of the Fund of the General Regime of Social Security (FRGPS) could be transferred to the patrimony of the Federal Government, which would give them economic destination, the new wording of article 22 determines that non-operational properties will have their management transferred to the Coordination and Governance of the Patrimony of the Federal Government Secretariat (SCGPU).
It is important to point out that, more than the fact that properties will cease to be incorporated into the assets of the Federal Government, the financial resources obtained in the management of the SCGPU which derive from the alienation or onerous use of these properties will be transferred to the FRGPS.
It will also be the responsibility of the SCGPU to identify properties that have no economic use or do not have an immediate potential for alienation or for costly use in order to allocate them in social purposes, such as housing and land regularization programs.
(iv) Management contract for the occupation of public properties by the Public Administration:
Article 7 of the text of the Law No. 14,011/2020 established the possibility for the Public Administration to conclude a management contract for the occupation of public properties, which consists in providing management and maintenance services for the property, including the provision of equipment, materials and other services necessaries for the use of the property by the public administration either by scope or in a continued form.
The contract may include the execution of works to adapt the property and can have a term of up to 20 years when containing initial investments relevant to the execution of works and supplies of assets. In this case, the assets made available will be owned by the party responsible for the management.
(v) Navy land demarcation and registration update before the SPU:
One of the amendments accepted by the National Congress instituted the process of demarcating navy land, in addition to the registration update before the SPU.
Thus, the inclusion of Article 6th aims, on the one hand, to promote fair treatment for holders of island land. From another perspective, it aims to reduce the countless lawsuits that were brought against the Federal Government, who has invariably been defeated in the Judiciary. Therefore, litigation is reduced to simple requests for regularization of the real estate registry.
(vi) Conclusion:
Considering the many properties owned by the Federal Government that inflate its expenses without any public benefit, the current government aims to privatize its assets, providing an opportunity to individuals to confer better use to properties that lacked a proper purpose, which led the Privatization Secretary to call the Brazilian State "the largest real estate company in the world".
It is necessary to wait how the market will react to these new modalities of acquisition and management of public goods.
Inteiro teor da Lei nº. 14.011 / Full content of Law No. 14.011 (In portuguese): http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2019-2022/2020/Lei/L14011.htm
Bernardo Schiller
E: bschiller@cmalaw.com
Theo Keiserman
E: theo.abreu@cmalaw.com
Ivandro Trevelim
E: ivandro.trevelim@cmalaw.com
Cristiano Schiller
E: cristiano.schiller@cmalaw.com


text:
Home > Fuller Seminary Publications > TNN > 60
Theology News & Notes
Theology, News and Notes - Vol. 23, No. 03
Alvin S. Jepson
Ray S. Anderson
Theology News & Notes was a theological journal published by Fuller Theological Seminary from 1954 through 2014.
Find in the Library Link
Catalog Record - Print Copies
ISSN/ISSBN
Producing doctors for the church, Pathology of church growth, Pastoral care in psychological perspective
Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
The digital scans of Theology News & Notes were made possible by Fuller Studio and the Fuller Seminary Archives.
TNN - Vol. 23, No. 03 1977
This digital access copy is made available for personal, educational, and non-commercial use within the parameters of "fair use" as defined under U.S. Copyright law. It cannot be reproduced, distributed, or displayed for commercial purposes.
Fuller Theological Seminary; Jepson, Alvin S.; Anderson, Ray S.; and Wagner, C. Peter, "Theology, News and Notes - Vol. 23, No. 03" (1977). Theology News & Notes. 60.
https://digitalcommons.fuller.edu/tnn/60
use_pdf
Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Lefebvre, Georges; Soboul, Albert (1962). The Directory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. OCLC 668426465.
Rapport, Michael (January 1998). "Napoleon's rise to power". History Today.
หน้านี้แก้ไขล่าสุดเมื่อวันที่ 17 มีนาคม 2562 เวลา 02:24 น.


text:
Ready, set, robot! National Robot Drawing and Story Competitions for Primary Schoolchildren Now Officially Open For Entries
2022 "Once Upon A Robot" writing competition and "Draw A Robot" design challenge launch today, offering unique prizes; budding artists and authors invited to enter
London, United Kingdom, January 11th 2022—The EPSRC UK Robotics and Autonomous Systems (UK-RAS) Network is today pleased to announce the official launch of its 2022 competitions to get the UK's primary schoolchildren drawing and writing about all things "robot". Key Stage 1 & 2 children from 5 – 11 years old are invited to share their robot-inspired designs and creative writing with an expert panel – including top robotics researchers and very special guest judges from the creative and literary arts. This annual competition has proved highly popular with budding artists and authors nationwide and is now returning for its third successive year.
For the "Draw A Robot" competition, children in Key Stage 1 (aged 5 – 7 years old) have the chance to draw a robot that they'd like to see in the future. The robot could be designed to accomplish any task or job – the sky's the limit! The children can use pencils, pens, paints, or even natural materials to design their robot, and they can explain its functions by labelling key features and special gadgets on the drawing and writing a short design spec. The "Once Upon A Robot" writing competition is open to all Key Stage 2 children (aged 7-11 years old), and challenges competition participants to write a creative short story featuring any kind of robot – or robots – their imagination can conjure! The story could be an action-packed thriller, a compelling mystery, or even a light-hearted comedy – the children will have 800-words to tell their creative tales.
The two competitions will be judged by robotics experts from the organising ESPRC UK-RAS Network, plus two very special invited judges. The writing competition will be judged this year by writer Radiya Hafiza, whose debut novel – the magical, empowering story Rumaysa: A Fairytale – was published in 2021 to wide acclaim. The drawing competition will be judged by Irish author and illustrator Chris Haughton, whose bold and brilliant books for children include A BIT LOST, OH NO GEORGE! and SHH! WE HAVE A PLAN.
This year's exclusive prize packages include:
Draw A Robot Competition winner
Thames & Kosmos Coding and Robotics kit – contributed by sponsoring partner the University of Sheffield Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC)
A tour of the AMRC's Factory 2050 in Sheffield, the UK's first state-of-the-art factory dedicated to reconfigurable digitally assisted assembly
Bespoke animation of the winning drawing by top animator Jody Clarke
Copy of the book "Maybe…", signed by competition judge Chris Haughton
Draw A Robot Competition runner-up
4M Green Science Solar Hybrid Power Aqua Robot – contributed by sponsoring partner the Offshore Robotics for Certification of Assets (ORCA) Hub
Once Upon A Robot Competition winner
MakeBlock Codey Rocky Educational Coding Robot – contributed by sponsoring partner Pipebots
A tour of Heriot-Watt University's National Robotarium in Edinburgh, a world-leading centre for robotics and artificial intelligence.
Printed copy of the winning story with bespoke illustrations by illustrator and science communicator Hana Ayoob
A copy of "Rumaysa: A Fairytale" signed by competition judge Radiya Hafiza
Once Upon A Robot Competition runner-up
4M Solar Robot – contributed by sponsoring partner The National Robotarium
For more information, details of prizes, judging criteria and to submit an entry, please visit https://www.ukras.org.uk/school-robot-competition/.
Both competitions are open for entry now and will close for submissions on 24th April 2021. The winners will be announced at a special virtual award ceremony due to be held on June 21st 2022.
EPSRC UK-RAS Network Chair Robert Richardson comments: "It's once again our great pleasure to be launching these fantastic competitions, which have become a firm favourite in the calendar of many primary schools, and which offer a really unique opportunity to engage children creatively in the world of robotics and automation. We're hugely looking forward to seeing what ideas our next generation of authors and designers come up with, and to the enjoyable and inspiring task of judging all the many superb entries as they roll in."
The two creative competitions for young children were first launched in 2020 for UK Robotics Week, now the UK Festival of Robotics – an annual 7-day celebration of robotics and intelligent systems held at the end of June. This annual celebration is hosted by the EPSRC UK Robotics and Autonomous Systems (UK-RAS) Network, which provides academic leadership in robotics and coordinates activities at over 30 partner universities across the UK.
----Ends----
Draw A Robot judging panel
Chris Haughton (https://www.chrishaughton.com/)
Chris Haughton is an Irish author/illustrator based in London. He was listed in Time magazine's 'DESIGN 100' for the work he has been doing for fair trade clothing company People Tree. He has written and illustrated six books A BIT LOST, OH NO GEORGE!, SHH! WE HAVE A PLAN, GOODNIGHT EVERYONE, DON'T WORRY LITTLE CRAB and MAYBE. His iOS app, HATMONKEY came out in 2014 and virtual reality experience LITTLE EARTH launched in August 2017. Chris has also created a social business, madebynode.com to connect design and fair trade and make rugs and toys.
Dr Daniela Sawyer is the Technical Lead in Robotic Machining at the University of Sheffield Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC), leading a variety of projects related to machining with robots, improving robotic accuracy and developing robotic additive manufacturing cells. Daniela started her journey in the field of engineering in 2008 when she began her BEng degree in Aerospace Engineering at the University of Sheffield. Since then, she has completed a doctoral degree in structural dynamics and a postgraduate diploma in management for engineers. Daniela has been working at the AMRC since 2017 and has been part of a variety of projects related to conventional and non-conventional manufacturing techniques.
Sarah Parker is an Assistant Project Manager at the University of Sheffield Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC)'s Factory 2050 where engineers carry out research projects in various sectors such as aerospace, automation, digital, rail and construction. Sarah has worked at the AMRC for over eight years in various administration and event management roles. This requires a high level of organisation supporting the management of projects in terms of planning, finances and project plans. In her spare time, she enjoys walking her cockapoo Dexter, gardening, and spending time with her husband and two teenage sons. She also has a keen interest in Art and Design.
Dr. Sen Wang is an Associate Professor in Robotics and Autonomous Systems at Heriot-Watt University, a lead in the ORCA Hub and lead of Robotics and Autonomous Systems at the National Robotarium. Previously, he was a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Oxford, working on mobile robotics. His research focuses on robot perception and autonomy using autonomous navigation, robotic vision, SLAM and robot learning, and has been published in a number of major venues in robotics, computer vision and machine learning. He also serves as an Associate Editor for three academic journals: IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RA-L), IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) and IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).
Once Upon A Robot judging panel
Radiya Hafiza (https://radiyabooks.wordpress.com/)
Radiya Hafiza studied English Language and Literature at King's College London and worked in publishing for a few years. Radiya grew up reading classic fairy tales that never had any brown girls in them – Rumaysa is her debut novel, bringing such stories to children who need to see themselves represented.
Dr Viktor Doychinov is a Research Engineer at the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering at the University of Leeds, where he is currently working on the Pipebots project, which aims to send small robots inside our water and sewer pipes to inspect them for water leaks and blockages. In this project, he is responsible for researching and developing wireless communications to make sure the robots can talk to one another and send information back to humans above ground. His other research interests include biomedical and sensing applications of wireless technology and radio electronics.
Dr Mauro Dragone is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering and Physical Science at Heriot-Watt University. Dr. Dragone worked on the Internet of Things (IoT) for smart environments, before leading the project RUBICON (Robotic UBIquitous Cognitive Network), a 2.5 million European project that posed the foundations for self-adaptive robotic systems for assisted living applications. At Heriot-Watt, Dr. Dragone set up the Robotic Assisted Living Testbed, a 'Living-Lab" designed for user-driven design and testing of innovative and more practical solutions for healthy ageing and independent living by harnessing IoT and Robotic technologies working together. His current research activities include cloud-robotics, tele-presence robotics, and integration of robot technology in smart homes to assess and assist people living with conditions such as dementia and frailty.
Dr Theo Lim's research covers developing and profiling non-conventional interfaces and applications for virtual reality environments, knowledge engineering, and human factors evaluation. His research emphasis is on the conceptual design of products and integrated systems, game-based approaches for engineering, and neurometrics. He is currently investigating the impact of novel digitization methods that enable symbiotic services between humans and machines, which can be applied to Industry 4.0, bio-cybernetics, and the development of nature-inspired micro and macro-scale robots. His applied approach has seen his work commercialized by industries such as Renishaw, Pathtrace and RPLogic.
Story prize illustrator
Hana Ayoob (https://www.hanaayoob.co.uk)
Hana Ayoob is a science communicator and illustrator. She has produced illustrations for a range of books, industry publications, logos and more and was awarded one of The Big Draw's artists' residencies in 2021. She speaks at a range of events, performs science-inspired comedy and co-hosts the science and tech podcast 'Why Aren't You a Doctor Yet?. Hana also produces events, runs creative workshops and provides public engagement and science communication training and consultancy.
Drawing prize animator
Jody Clarke (https://www.jodyclarke.co.uk/)
Jody has been in the animation industry for over 15 years. With a huge list of varied clients including London Zoo, National Trust and ITV, Jody mainly works on high profile adverts to be displayed in and around large cities, but also loves being involved in smaller independent jobs that really scratch that creative itch.
About the EPSRC UK-RAS Network (https://www.ukras.org/)
The EPSRC UK Robotics and Autonomous Systems Network (UK-RAS Network) is dedicated to robotics innovation across the UK, with a mission to provide academic leadership in Robotics and Autonomous Systems (RAS), expand collaboration with industry, and integrate and coordinate activities at eight Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)-funded RAS capital facilities and Centres for Doctoral Training (CDTs) across the country.
About AMRC (http://amrc.co.uk/)
The University of Sheffield Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC) is a world-class centre for research into advanced manufacturing technologies used in the aerospace, automotive, medical and other high-value manufacturing sectors. It has a global reputation for helping companies overcome manufacturing problems and is a model for collaborative research involving universities, academics and industry worldwide.
About ORCA Hub (https://orcahub.org/)
The ORCA Hub is the largest academic centre in the world for research into robotics technology for offshore energy infrastructure. The ORCA Hub's aim is to advance robotics and Artificial Intelligence technologies for the inspection, repair, maintenance and certification of offshore energy platforms and assets. The Hub, a strategic project within the National Robotarium, is led by Heriot-Watt University and the University of Edinburgh. The academic consortium also includes Imperial College London, the University of Oxford, and the University of Liverpool.
About Pipebots (https://pipebots.ac.uk/)
Pipebots is a large UK government-funded programme grant, involving the universities of Sheffield, Leeds, Birmingham and Bristol which aims to revolutionise buried pipe infrastructure management with the development of micro-robots designed to work in underground pipe networks and dangerous sites. This work is supported by the UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Programme Grant EP/S016813/1.
About the National Robotarium (https://www.hw.ac.uk/uk/research/the-national-robotarium.htm)
The National Robotarium is a world-leading centre for Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, creating innovative solutions to global challenges. Pioneering research moves rapidly from laboratory to market, developing skilled visionaries and delivering substantial benefits for society. As global leaders in robotics and autonomous systems, Heriot-Watt University and the University of Edinburgh are partners in this national, and international, hub. Opening on Heriot-Watt's Edinburgh Campus in 2022, the purpose-built building will have unrivalled facilities, adding to existing laboratories in ocean systems, human robotic interaction and assisted living. Home to world-leading experts in data analytics, the National Robotarium is exploring collaborative interaction between humans, robots and their environments, translating cutting-edge research into new technologies.
Nicky Denovan
EvokedSet
Email: nicky[@]evokedset[dot]com
News Release Index
30th November 2022 - Diagnostics for the Real World
Diagnostics for the Real World's landmark SAMBA machine enters Science Museum Group's permanent collection and features in major new "Injecting Hope" exhibition
5th October 2022 - Diagnostics for the Real World
Diagnostics for the Real World's multiplex respiratory virus rapid point-of-care tests approved for sale in New Zealand
8th July 2022 - EPSRC UK-RAS Network
EPSRC UK-RAS Network Launches Key Whitepaper On State-of-the-Art In Legged Robotics
17th June 2022 - EPSRC UK-RAS Network
National poll: third of Brits open to trialling the use of robots
26th May 2022 - EPSRC UK-RAS Network
Get Ready for UK Festival of Robotics 2022 (18th-24th June): join the conversation as UK robotics labs open doors to the public
18th May 2022 - Diagnostics for the Real World
Diagnostics for the Real World (DRW) achieves UK technical validation for two multiplex respiratory virus rapid tests
Robot Lab Live returns for UK Festival of Robotics 2022: join UK's top robotics research labs for exclusive live demos – Wednesday June 22nd, 4-6pm BST, UK Robotics YouTube Channel
22nd March 2022 - White City Innovation District
London's global innovation hub: official launch of White City Innovation District
14th March 2022 - Professor Chris Toumazou
Regius Professor Chris Toumazou named first ever UK winner of the UNESCO-Equatorial Guinea International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences
2nd February 2022 - pharmasol
pharmasol completes merger with PharmaLex Group
11th January 2022 - Hamlyn Centre
© 2023 EvokedSet Ltd. | Terms & Conditions Apply, Legal Notices
Hello. Question about our services and how we can help? Please leave us a message and we will get back to you soon. Thanks.
Tick if you're not a robot


text:
package marca.CityBuilders.blocks;

import java.util.List;

import javax.annotation.Nullable;

import marca.CityBuilders.CityBuilders;
import marca.CityBuilders.init.BlockInit;
import net.minecraft.block.Block;
import net.minecraft.block.material.Material;
import net.minecraft.block.properties.IProperty;
import net.minecraft.block.properties.PropertyBool;
import net.minecraft.block.state.BlockStateContainer;
import net.minecraft.block.state.IBlockState;
import net.minecraft.entity.Entity;
import net.minecraft.entity.EntityLivingBase;
import net.minecraft.entity.player.EntityPlayer;
import net.minecraft.item.ItemStack;
import net.minecraft.util.EnumFacing;
import net.minecraft.util.math.AxisAlignedBB;
import net.minecraft.util.math.BlockPos;
import net.minecraft.world.IBlockAccess;
import net.minecraft.world.World;
import net.minecraftforge.fml.relauncher.Side;
import net.minecraftforge.fml.relauncher.SideOnly;

public class postMiddle extends Block {

	public static final PropertyBool UP = PropertyBool.create("up");
	public static final PropertyBool DOWN = PropertyBool.create("down");
	public static final PropertyBool SOUTH = PropertyBool.create("south");
	public static final PropertyBool EAST = PropertyBool.create("east");
	public static final PropertyBool NORTH = PropertyBool.create("north");
	public static final PropertyBool WEST = PropertyBool.create("west");

	public static final AxisAlignedBB[] BB = new AxisAlignedBB[] {
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.40625, 0.59375, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.40625, 0.59375, 1.0D, 1.0D),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.40625, 0.59375, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.40625, 0.59375, 1.0D, 1.0D),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.0D, 0.59375, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.0D, 0.59375, 1.0D, 1.0D),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.0D, 0.59375, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.0D, 0.59375, 1.0D, 1.0D),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.40625, 1.0D, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.40625, 1.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.40625, 1.0D, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.40625, 1.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D, 0.59375),
			new AxisAlignedBB(0.0D, 0.0D, 0.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D, 1.0D)
	};

	public static final AxisAlignedBB NormalCB = new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.0D, 0.40625, 0.59375, 1.0D, 0.59375);
	public static final AxisAlignedBB SouthCB = new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.8125, 0.59375, 0.59375, 1.0D, 1.0D);
	public static final AxisAlignedBB NorthCB = new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.8125, 0.40625, 0.59375, 1.0D, 0.0D);
	public static final AxisAlignedBB WestCB = new AxisAlignedBB(0.40625, 0.8125, 0.40625, 0.0D, 1.0D, 0.59375);
	public static final AxisAlignedBB EastCB = new AxisAlignedBB(0.59375, 0.8125, 0.40625, 1.0D, 1.0D, 0.59375);

	public static int thickness = 4;
	public static int height = 16;
	public static int startingHeight = 0;

	public postMiddle() {
		super(Material.IRON);
		setUnlocalizedName("postMiddle");
		setRegistryName("postMiddle");
		setCreativeTab(CityBuilders.othersTab);
		setDefaultState(this.blockState.getBaseState().withProperty(UP, Boolean.valueOf(true))
				.withProperty(NORTH, Boolean.valueOf(false)).withProperty(EAST, Boolean.valueOf(false))
				.withProperty(SOUTH, Boolean.valueOf(false)).withProperty(WEST, Boolean.valueOf(false)));
	}

	/**
	 *
	 * @return Returns the BoudingBox for the Correct
	 */
	public AxisAlignedBB getBoundingBoxes(int Sides) {
		if (Sides > 6)
			Sides = 6;
		if (Sides < 1)
			Sides = 1;

		return null;
	}

	@Override
	public void addInformation(ItemStack stack, EntityPlayer player, List<String> tooltip, boolean advanced) {
		tooltip.add("Middle");
		super.addInformation(stack, player, tooltip, advanced);
	}

	@Override
	public boolean isLadder(IBlockState state, IBlockAccess world, BlockPos pos, EntityLivingBase entity) {
		return true;
	}

	public AxisAlignedBB getBoundingBox(IBlockState state, IBlockAccess source, BlockPos pos) {
		state = this.getActualState(state, source, pos);
		return BB[getAABBIndex(state)];
	}

	@Override
	public void addCollisionBoxToList(IBlockState state, World worldIn, BlockPos pos, AxisAlignedBB entityBox, List<AxisAlignedBB> collidingBoxes, Entity entityIn) {
		state = this.getActualState(state, worldIn, pos);
		super.addCollisionBoxToList(pos, entityBox, collidingBoxes, NormalCB);

		if (((Boolean)state.getValue(SOUTH)).booleanValue())
			super.addCollisionBoxToList(pos, entityBox, collidingBoxes, SouthCB);
		if (((Boolean)state.getValue(NORTH)).booleanValue())
			super.addCollisionBoxToList(pos, entityBox, collidingBoxes, NorthCB);
		if (((Boolean)state.getValue(WEST)).booleanValue())
			super.addCollisionBoxToList(pos, entityBox, collidingBoxes, WestCB);
		if (((Boolean)state.getValue(EAST)).booleanValue())
			super.addCollisionBoxToList(pos, entityBox, collidingBoxes, EastCB);
	}

	private static int getAABBIndex(IBlockState state) {
		int i = 0;

		if (((Boolean) state.getValue(NORTH)).booleanValue()) {
			i |= 1 << EnumFacing.NORTH.getHorizontalIndex();
		}

		if (((Boolean) state.getValue(EAST)).booleanValue()) {
			i |= 1 << EnumFacing.EAST.getHorizontalIndex();
		}

		if (((Boolean) state.getValue(SOUTH)).booleanValue()) {
			i |= 1 << EnumFacing.SOUTH.getHorizontalIndex();
		}

		if (((Boolean) state.getValue(WEST)).booleanValue()) {
			i |= 1 << EnumFacing.WEST.getHorizontalIndex();
		}

		return i;

	}

	public boolean isFullCube(IBlockState state) {
		return false;
	}

	public boolean isPassable(IBlockAccess worldIn, BlockPos pos) {
		return false;
	}

	public boolean isOpaqueCube(IBlockState state) {
		return false;
	}

	private boolean canConnectTo(IBlockAccess worldIn, BlockPos pos, boolean isDown) {
		IBlockState iblockstate = worldIn.getBlockState(pos);
		Block block = iblockstate.getBlock();

		if (block == BlockInit.postTop || block == BlockInit.postBottom && isDown || block == BlockInit.lampPostLamp && !isDown || block == BlockInit.trafficLight && !isDown) {
			return true;
		}
		return false;
	}

	@SideOnly(Side.CLIENT)
	public boolean shouldSideBeRendered(IBlockState blockState, IBlockAccess blockAccess, BlockPos pos,
			EnumFacing side) {
		return side == EnumFacing.DOWN ? super.shouldSideBeRendered(blockState, blockAccess, pos, side) : true;
	}

	public IBlockState getStateFromMeta(int meta) {
		return this.getDefaultState();
	}

	public int getMetaFromState(IBlockState state) {
		return 0;
	}

	public IBlockState getActualState(IBlockState state, IBlockAccess worldIn, BlockPos pos) {
		boolean flag = this.canConnectTo(worldIn, pos.north(), false);
		boolean flag1 = this.canConnectTo(worldIn, pos.east(), false);
		boolean flag2 = this.canConnectTo(worldIn, pos.south(), false);
		boolean flag3 = this.canConnectTo(worldIn, pos.west(), false);

		return state.withProperty(UP, Boolean.valueOf(true))
				.withProperty(NORTH, Boolean.valueOf(flag)).withProperty(EAST, Boolean.valueOf(flag1))
				.withProperty(SOUTH, Boolean.valueOf(flag2)).withProperty(WEST, Boolean.valueOf(flag3));
	}

	protected BlockStateContainer createBlockState() {
		return new BlockStateContainer(this, new IProperty[] { UP, NORTH, EAST, WEST, SOUTH });
	}

}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Stylocline citroleum is a rare species of flowering plant in the family Asteraceae known by the common name oil neststraw.

Description
This inconspicuous annual herb produces a grayish, trailing, forking stem no more than  long. The grayish, woolly, pointed leaves are up to  long. The inflorescence bears spherical flower heads just a few millimeters long with tiny, rough-haired phyllaries and scaly, woolly florets. It is hard to tell apart from other Stylocline because its defining characteristics are microscopic.

Distribution
It is endemic to Kern County, California, where it is known from about 46 occurrences on and around the Elk Hills Oil Field. The occurrences are patchy and variable in size, and some sources consider them to be part of a single widely spread metapopulation. The species has been collected from coastal San Diego County, but any occurrences there are probably now extirpated.

The plant has been known for over one hundred years, and the type specimen was collected in 1935, but it was not described to science as a distinct species until 1992.

Stylocline citroleum grows in the valley saltbush scrub ecosystem in the sandy flats and clay soils of the San Joaquin Valley in areas developed into oil fields, the inspiration for the common and scientific names of the species. The plant probably evolved as a hybrid of mountain neststraw (Stylocline gnaphaloides) and California filago (Filago californica), and it is almost always found growing alongside one or both of its parent species.

References

External links
Jepson Manual Treatment - Stylocline citroleum

citroleum
Endemic flora of California
Natural history of the Central Valley (California)
Natural history of Kern County, California
Plants described in 1992

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Der Ventildeckel, auch Zylinderkopfdeckel genannt, ist der oberste Abschluss eines (aufrechtstehenden) Viertakt-Verbrennungsmotors.

Er birgt die oberen Betätigungselemente des Ventiltriebs und verhindert das Austreten des Schmieröles an die Umwelt, sowie den Zutritt von Luft in den Motor: moderne Motoren haben gesteuert einen leichten Unterdruck im Inneren, um zu verhindern, dass Verbrennungsgase und Dämpfe aus dem Motor in die Umwelt gelangen. Der Ventildeckel enthält sehr oft auch die Einfüllöffnung für das Motoröl samt dem Knebelverschlussdeckel, siehe Bilder eines TDI-Motors.

Falls der Ventiltrieb mit einer obenliegenden Nockenwelle ausgerüstet ist und diese mit einer Steuerkette angetrieben wird (alle Motoren von Daimler-Benz, viele Motoren von BMW, einige Motoren von Audi usw.), umfasst der Ventildeckel auch die Nockenwellen-Kettenräder.

Der Ventildeckel ist gegen den Zylinderkopf oft mit einer U-förmigen Kunststoffdichtung abgedichtet, der sogenannten Ventildeckeldichtung. Jahrzehntelang wurde der Ventildeckel mit einer umlaufenden Kork- oder Pressstoffdichtung abgedichtet, so auch bei den zwei Ventildeckeln eines VW-Käfer-Motors (siehe Bild). Inzwischen kommen jedoch fast ausschließlich Gummi- bzw. Kunststoffdichtungen zum Einsatz. Der Austausch gegen eine Kunststoffdichtung ist bei den meisten älteren Motoren problemlos möglich.

Mit fortgeschrittener Laufleistung werden Ventildeckeldichtungen oft undicht und müssen gewechselt werden, da Motoröl sonst in die Umwelt und auf heiße Motorteile gelangen kann. Tropft Motoröl auf Teile der betriebswarmen Abgasanlage, besteht im Extremfall sogar Brandgefahr.

Bei vielen ganz alten Motoren fehlt ein Ventildeckel. Dann läuft der Ventiltrieb des Motors offen und frei sichtbar; man kann den Ventilfedern usw. "bei der Arbeit" zusehen. Das hier eventuell austretende Schmieröl hat Zugang zur Umwelt.

Literatur
 Richard van Basshuysen, Fred Schäfer: Handbuch Verbrennungsmotor. Grundlagen, Komponenten, Systeme, Perspektiven. 3. vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2005, ISBN 3-528-23933-6.

Siehe auch
 Zylinderdeckel

Bauteil (Verbrennungsmotor)


text:
«Дапинлинь» (; ) — станция Тайбэйского метрополитена линии Синьдянь. Находится на территории района Синьдянь города Новый Тайбэй. Станция была открыта 11 ноября 1999 года. Располагается между станциями «Цзинмэй» и «Цичжан».

Техническая характеристика
«Дапинлинь» — однопролётная станция. На станции есть четыре выхода в город, из них два оснащены эскалаторами, и один — лифтом.  22 августа 2016 года на платформа линии Синьдянь были установлены автоматические платформенные ворота. На платформе кольцевой линии установлены платформенные раздвижные двери.

Перспективы
В будущем у станции «Дапинлинь» должен появиться переход на , которая сейчас находится в стадии проектирования.

См. также
 Тайбэйский метрополитен
 Список станций Тайбэйского метрополитена

Ссылки
 Информация о станциях на официальном сайте Тайбэйского метрополитена
 Сайт отдела скоростного транспорта правительства Тайбэя

Станции Тайбэйского метрополитена
Линия метрополитена Синьдянь
Станции метрополитена, построенные в 1999 году
Синьбэй


text:
Introducing the New and Improved LinkedIn Pages
What to Expect From the New LinkedIn Pages
With over 590 million members creating over 2 million posts per day, trying to locate the content best suited to you and your business can be an unenviable task.
LinkedIn, to their credit, have set about addressing this issue with the introduction of the newly-branded LinkedIn Pages.
Formerly known as LinkedIn Company Pages, the rebuild bids to simplify the way in which brands and organisations converse with members that appear to hold relevant interests and skillsets.
As all business owners and professionals will know only too well, communities are imperative to success.
The below is what a company community can consist of:
Together, the above can help to drive your brand through conversations best suited to that of your business. That is exactly where LinkedIn Pages is designed to come into its own.
Already implemented in the US, LinkedIn Pages should be fully functional worldwide in the coming weeks.
Product lead Sparsh Agarwal hopes that the rebuilt feature will allow users to easily differentiate on what they read through Content Suggestions.
She said: "91 percent of marketers feel that their content marketing is unsophisticated. This is a pain point that we hear repeatedly. There is just so much content out there. Finding the right content is like finding a needle in a haystack."
In Content Suggestions, LinkedIn now hope that the above concerns are a thing of the past. The function has been designed to give users a clear picture of the topics and content that is currently trending within their target audience.
What's more, audiences can be categorised by job function, location, industry, company size and seniority.
Let's take a look at the three pillars that LinkedIn Pages has been built on, shall we?
Join the Conversations That Matter
Admins of LinkedIn Pages can now link their brands to particular hashtags and, in doing so, can confidently keep on top of and respond to conversations surrounding relevant topics.
In addition, they can now share documents like PowerPoint presentations, PDFs and Word Docs as well as video, images and text updates. In doing so, admins are providing further resource to their community and establishing themselves as an authority.
Know and Grow Your Audience
Anyone in the marketing world will be only too familiar with this problem. It can be difficult, at least during the early stages, to understand exactly what type of content will provide value to potential readers.
With the introduction of Content Suggestions, finding the perfect content to share to your audience has never been easier. Through surfacing current topics and trending content, admins can post to their community with confidence on the back of these provided insights.
Engage Your People
As we all know, a company is nothing without the people working there.
LinkedIn Pages not only helps companies to better engage with their staff, it gives them a voice.
Through an array of new tools, organisations can reshare their employees' public posts and will soon be able to do the same when their company page is mentioned in items such as product reviews and testimonials.
In doing so, companies will be able to showcase conversations that LinkedIn users are having about them and stand out from their competitors.
As you would expect, we are as active on LinkedIn as our name suggests and can't wait to get stuck into some of the new features on offer.
Connect with ActiveWin today and see for yourself what we're all about.


text:
Le four de potier de Palaja est un four situé à Palaja, en France.

Description

Localisation
Le four est situé sur la commune de Palaja, dans le département français de l'Aude.

Historique

L'édifice est classé au titre des monuments historiques en 1963.

Annexes

Articles connexes
 Liste des monuments historiques de l'Aude

Références

Monument historique dans l'Aude
Monument historique classé en 1963
Poterie


text:
\section{Introduction}
We call a sequence of positive integers ``index'' and an index whose last component greater than $1$ ``admissible index''.
For an admissible index $(k_1,\dots, k_r)$, the multiple zeta values (MZVs) are defined by
\begin{align*}
 \zeta(k_1,\dots, k_r)
 :=\sum_{1\le m_1<\cdots <m_r} \frac{1}{m_1^{k_1}\cdots m_r^{k_r}} \in \mathbb{R}.
\end{align*}
For an index (or a sequence of nonnegative integers) $\boldsymbol{k}=(k_1,\dots,k_r)$, we call $\left|\boldsymbol{k}\right|=k_1+\cdots+k_r$ its weight and $r$ its depth.
For an admissible index
\[
 \boldsymbol{k}=(\underbrace{1,\ldots,1}_{a_1-1},b_1+1,\dots,\underbrace{1,\ldots,1}_{a_l-1},b_l+1) \quad (a_p, b_q\ge1),
\]
we define the dual index of $\boldsymbol{k}$ by
\[
 \boldsymbol{k}^\dagger :=(\underbrace{1,\ldots,1}_{b_l-1},a_l+1,\dots,\underbrace{1,\ldots,1}_{b_1-1},a_1+1).
\]
If an index $\boldsymbol{k}$ and a sequence of nonnegative integers $\boldsymbol{e}$ are the same depth, we denote by $\boldsymbol{k} \oplus \boldsymbol{e}$ the index obtained by componentwise addition.
Hereafter, if we write $\boldsymbol{e}$, we always assume that $\boldsymbol{e}$ runs over sequences of nonnegative integers having suitable depth.
In \cite{HMOS20}, Hirose, Onozuka, Sato, and the author considered the following sums.
\begin{defn}[Ohno sum]
 For an admissible index $\boldsymbol{k}$ and a nonnegative integer $m$,
 we define $\mathcal{O}_m(\boldsymbol{k})$, $\mathcal{O}(\boldsymbol{k})$, respectively by
 \begin{align*}
  \mathcal{O}_m(\boldsymbol{k})
  &:=\sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m}
  \zeta (\boldsymbol{k}\oplus\boldsymbol{e}) \in\mathbb{R}, \\
  \mathcal{O}(\boldsymbol{k})
  &:=\sum_{m=0}^\infty \mathcal{O}_m(\boldsymbol{k})X^m \in\mathbb{R}[[X]].
 \end{align*}
\end{defn}
Using the above notation, the celebrated Ohno relation is written as follows:
\begin{thm}[Ohno relation; Ohno \cite{Oho99}] \label{ohno}
 For an admissible index $\boldsymbol{k}$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  \mathcal{O} (\boldsymbol{k})
  =\mathcal{O} (\boldsymbol{k}^\dagger).
 \end{align*}
\end{thm}

We denote by $\mathcal{I}$ the $\mathbb{Q}$-linear space spanned by all indices.
We define the $\mathbb{Q}$-bilinear product $\sha \colon \mathcal{I} \times \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{I}$ by
\begin{align*}
 \emptyset \sha \boldsymbol{k}&=\boldsymbol{k}\sha \emptyset=\boldsymbol{k}, \\
 (\boldsymbol{k},k) \sha (\boldsymbol{l},l)
 &= (\boldsymbol{k} \sha (\boldsymbol{l},l), k)
  +((\boldsymbol{k},k) \sha \boldsymbol{l}, l),
\end{align*}
where $\boldsymbol{k},\boldsymbol{l}\in\mathcal{I}$ and $k,l\in\mathbb{Z}_{\ge1}$.
For example, we have $(a) \sha (b,c)=(a,b,c)+(b,a,c)+(b,c,a)$.
For an admissible index $\boldsymbol{k}$ and an integer $s\ge2$, put
 \[
  F(s;\boldsymbol{k})
  :=\mathcal{O}((s)\sha \boldsymbol{k})-\mathcal{O}((s)\sha \boldsymbol{k}^\dagger).
 \]
Then the following Ohno sum relation holds:
\begin{thm}[Hirose--Murahara--Onozuka--Sato \cite{HMOS20}] \label{HMOS}
 For integers $s,t\ge2$, we have
 \[
  F(s;(t+1))=F(t;(s+1)).
 \]
\end{thm}

We denote by $\{a\}^l$ $l$-times repetition of $a$, e.g., $(\{2\}^3)=(2,2,2)$.
The aim of this paper is to prove the following relation conjectured by Hirose, Onozuka, Sato, and the author in \cite{HMOS20}.
\begin{thm}[Main theorem] \label{main}
 For integers $s,t\ge2$ and $l\ge0$, we have
 \[
  F(s;(t+1)\sha(\{2\}^{l}))
  =F(t;(s+1)\sha(\{2\}^{l})).
 \]
\end{thm}
\begin{rem}
 The case $l=0$ in Theorem \ref{main} gives Theorem \ref{HMOS}.
\end{rem}

\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{main}}
In the following, everything defined for indices, such as $\zeta$, will be extended $\mathbb{Q}$-linearly.
We denote by $(k) \hast \boldsymbol{l}$ the formal sum of indices found by adding $k$ to each element of $\boldsymbol{l}$.
For example, if $\boldsymbol{l}=(l_1,\dots,l_{r'})$, we have
\[
 (k) \hast \boldsymbol{l}=(l_{1}+k,l_{2},\dots,l_{r'})+\cdots+(l_{1},\dots,l_{r'-1},l_{r'}+k).
\]
Note that, throughout this paper, we often use the special case of  the harmonic product formula  $\zeta(k)\zeta(\boldsymbol{l})=\zeta((k) \ast \boldsymbol{l})$,
where
\begin{align*}
 (k) \ast \boldsymbol{l}
 =(k) \sha \boldsymbol{l} +(k) \hast \boldsymbol{l}.
\end{align*}

For an admissible index $\boldsymbol{k}$, integers $s,t\ge2$, and nonnegative integers $m,l$, we define
\begin{align*}
 F_{m,l}(s;\boldsymbol{k})
 &:=\mathcal{O}_m((s) \sha \boldsymbol{k} \sha (\{2\}^l) )-\mathcal{O}_m((s) \sha (\boldsymbol{k} \sha (\{2\}^l))^\dagger),\\
 D_{m,l}(s,t)
 &:=F_{m,l}(s;(t+1) )-F_{m,l}(t;(s+1) ).
\end{align*}
Note that Theorem \ref{main} is equivalent to $D_{m,l}(s,t)=0$ for any $s,t\ge2$ and $m,l\ge0$.
The main strategy of the proof is similar to \cite{HMOS20}, however, some calculation methods are modified to bear a little more complicated calculations.
Especially, to show $D_{m,l}(s,2)=0$ in the last part of the proof, we use the Hoffman relation (see Theorem \ref{hof}).
The proof goes through the following steps:
\begin{align*}
\begin{array}{lcr}
\begin{array}{lcr}
  &\textrm{Lemmas \ref{Fmpre1} and \ref{Fmpre2}} \Rightarrow \textrm{Lemma \ref{Fm}} \\
  &\textrm{Lemma \ref{oooo}}
\end{array}
 &\Bigr\} \Rightarrow \textrm{Lemma \ref{dddd}} \\
 &\textrm{Theorem \ref{hof}}
\end{array}
 \Biggr\} \Rightarrow \textrm{Theorem \ref{main}}.
\end{align*}
In the following, we omit the range of $m$'s in the summation if they are integer of $0$ or more,
for example, we often write $\sum_{\substack{ m_1+\cdots+m_r=m \\ m_1,\dots,m_r\ge0 }}$ as $\sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_r=m}$.

\begin{lem} \label{Fmpre1}
 For integers $s\ge2$, $t\ge1$, and $m,l\ge0$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  F_{m,l}(s;(t+1))
  &=-\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1) \sha(\{2\}^l) )^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e})).
 \end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
 By definitions, we have
 \begin{align} \label{AAA}
 \begin{split}
  &\sum_{m_1+m_2=m}\mathcal{O}_{m_1}(s)\mathcal{O}_{m_2}((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \\
  &=\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta( (s+m_1)\ast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\

  &=\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \sha ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_m((s) \sha (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l)) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})).
 \end{split}
 \end{align}

 We also have
 \begin{align} \label{BBB}
 \begin{split}
  &\sum_{m_1+m_2=m}\mathcal{O}_{m_1}(s)\mathcal{O}_{m_2}((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \\
  &=\sum_{m_1+m_2=m}\mathcal{O}_{m_1}(s)\mathcal{O}_{m_2}(((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l))^\dagger)
   \qquad \textrm{(by Theorem \ref{ohno})} \\
  &=\sum_{m_1+m_2=m}\sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}\zeta((s+m_1) \ast (((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l))^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e}))\\

  &=\mathcal{O}_m((s) \sha ((t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l))^\dagger ) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1) \sha(\{2\}^l) )^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e})).
 \end{split}
 \end{align}

 From \eqref{AAA} and \eqref{BBB}, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &\mathcal{O}_m((s) \sha (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l))
   -\mathcal{O}_m((s) \sha ((t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l))^\dagger ) \\
  &=-\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1) \sha(\{2\}^l) )^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e})).
 \end{align*}
 By the definition of $F_{m,l}(s;(t+1))$, we obtain the result.
\end{proof}

\begin{lem} \label{Fmpre2}
 For integers $s,t\ge1$, $m\ge1$, and $l\ge0$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\
  &-\sum_{m_1+m_2=m-1} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1+1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) ) )
 \end{align*}
 and
 \begin{align*}
  &\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l))^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e}) ) \\
  &-\sum_{m_1+m_2=m-1} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1+1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l))^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e}) ) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ).
 \end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
 Since
 \begin{align*}
  \begin{split}
  &\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta ((l_{1},\dots,l_{i-1},l_i+m_1,l_{i+1},\dots,l_{r'}) \oplus \boldsymbol{e}) \\
  &-\sum_{m_1+m_2=m-1} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta ( (l_{1},\dots,l_{i-1},l_i+m_1+1,l_{i+1},\dots,l_{r'}) \oplus \boldsymbol{e}) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_{m} (l_{1},\dots,l_{r'})
  \end{split}
 \end{align*}
 holds for an admissible index $(l_{1},\dots,l_{r'})\in\mathcal{I}$ and positive integers $m,i$ with $1\le i\le r'$,
 we have
 \begin{align*}
  &\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((k+m_1) \hast ( (l_{1},\dots,l_{r'}) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\
  &-\sum_{m_1+m_2=m-1} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((k+m_1+1) \hast ( (l_{1},\dots,l_{r'}) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (k) \hast (l_{1},\dots,l_{r'}) )
 \end{align*}
 for a nonnegative integer $k$.
 By using this equality, we obtain the first equality.
 The second equality can be proved in the same way.
\end{proof}

\begin{lem} \label{Fm}
 For integers $s\ge3$, $t\ge1$, $m\ge1$, and $l\ge0$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &F_{m,l}(s-1;(t+1)) -F_{m-1,l}(s;(t+1)) \\
  &=-\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) ) )
   +\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ).
 \end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
 By Lemmas \ref{Fmpre1} and \ref{Fmpre2}, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &F_{m,l}(s-1;(t+1)) -F_{m-1,l}(s;(t+1)) \\
  &=-\Biggl( \sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1-1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\

  &\qquad\quad -\sum_{m_1+m_2=m-1} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \Biggr) \\

  &\quad +\Biggl( \sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1-1) \hast ( ((t+1) \sha(\{2\}^l) )^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\

  &\qquad\quad -\sum_{m_1+m_2=m-1} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((t+1) \sha(\{2\}^l) )^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \Biggr) \\

  &=-\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) ) )
   +\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ).
  \end{align*}
 This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lem} \label{oooo}
 For integers $s,t\ge3$ and $l,m\ge0$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s) \sha ( (t) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger )
  -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ) \\
  &-\bigl( \mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t) \sha ( (s) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger )
   -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t-1) \hast ( (s+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ) \bigr)
  =0.
 \end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
 We shall show this lemma only for $l\ge1$.
 The case $l=0$ can be shown similarly.
 We have
 \begin{align*}
  &(s) \sha ( (t) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger
  =\sum_{i=0}^{l} (s) \sha (\{2\}^{i},t,\{2\}^{l-i})^\dagger \\
  &=\sum_{i=0}^{l} (s) \sha (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{l-i+1}) \\
  &=\sum_{i=0}^{l}
   \Biggl(
    \sum_{j=0}^{i} (\{2\}^{j},s,\{2\}^{i-j},\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{l-i+1})
    +\sum_{j=1}^{t-2} (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{j},s,\{1\}^{t-j-2},\{2\}^{l-i+1}) \\
    &\qquad\quad +\sum_{j=0}^{l-i} (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{j+1},s,\{2\}^{l-i-j})
   \Biggr)
 \end{align*}
 and
 \begin{align*}
  &(s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger
  =\sum_{i=0}^{l} (s-1) \hast (\{2\}^{i},t+1,\{2\}^{l-i})^\dagger \\
  &=\sum_{i=0}^{l} (s-1) \hast (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{t-1},\{2\}^{l-i+1}) \\

  &=\sum_{i=1}^{l} \sum_{j=0}^{i-1} (\{2\}^{j},s+1,\{2\}^{i-j-1},\{1\}^{t-1},\{2\}^{l-i+1}) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{i=0}^{l}
   \Biggl(
    \sum_{j=0}^{t-2} (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{j},s,\{1\}^{t-j-2},\{2\}^{l-i+1})
    +\sum_{j=0}^{l-i} (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{t-1},\{2\}^{j},s+1,\{2\}^{l-i-j})
   \Biggr).
 \end{align*}

 Thus, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s) \sha ( (t) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger )
  -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ) \\

  &=\sum_{i=0}^{l}
   \Biggl(
    \sum_{j=0}^{i} \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{j},s,\{2\}^{i-j},\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{l-i+1})
     +\sum_{j=0}^{l-i} \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{j+1},s,\{2\}^{l-i-j}) \\

    &\qquad\quad -\sum_{j=0}^{l-i} \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{i},\{1\}^{t-1},\{2\}^{j},s+1,\{2\}^{l-i-j})

     -\mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{i},s,\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{l-i+1})
   \Biggr) \\
    &\quad -\sum_{i=1}^{l} \sum_{j=0}^{i-1} \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{j},s+1,\{2\}^{i-j-1},\{1\}^{t-1},\{2\}^{l-i+1}) \\

  &=\sum_{\substack{ a+b+c=l \\ a,b,c\ge0 }}
   \bigl(
    \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},s,\{2\}^{b},\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{c+1})
    +\mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{b+1},s,\{2\}^{c}) \\
   &\qquad\qquad -\mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},\{1\}^{t-1},\{2\}^{b},s+1,\{2\}^{c})
   \bigr) \\

  &\quad -\sum_{\substack{ a+b=l \\ a,b\ge0 }}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},s,\{1\}^{t-2},\{2\}^{b+1})

  -\sum_{\substack{ a+b+c=l-1 \\ a,b,c\ge0 }}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},s+1,\{2\}^{b},\{1\}^{t-1},\{2\}^{c+1}).
 \end{align*}

 Similarly, we also have
 \begin{align*}
  &\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t) \sha ( (s) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger )
  -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t-1) \hast ( (s+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ) \\

  &=\sum_{\substack{ a+b+c=l \\ a,b,c\ge0 }}
   \bigl(
    \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},t,\{2\}^{b},\{1\}^{s-2},\{2\}^{c+1})
    +\mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},\{1\}^{s-2},\{2\}^{b+1},t,\{2\}^{c}) \\
   &\qquad\qquad -\mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},\{1\}^{s-1},\{2\}^{b},t+1,\{2\}^{c})
   \bigr) \\

  &\quad -\sum_{\substack{ a+b=l \\ a,b\ge0 }}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},t,\{1\}^{s-2},\{2\}^{b+1})

  -\sum_{\substack{ a+b+c=l-1 \\ a,b,c\ge0 }}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{2\}^{a},t+1,\{2\}^{b},\{1\}^{s-1},\{2\}^{c+1}).
 \end{align*}
 Then, by using Theorem \ref{ohno}, we find the result.
\end{proof}

\begin{lem} \label{dddd}
 For integers $s,t\ge3$ and $m\ge1$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  D_{m-1,l}(s,t)=D_{m,l}(s-1,t)+D_{m,l}(s,t-1).
 \end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
 By definitions, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &D_{m-1,l}(s,t) -D_{m,l}(s-1,t) -D_{m,l}(s,t-1) \\

  &=F_{m-1,l}(s;(t+1))-F_{m-1,l}(t;(s+1)) \\
   &\quad -(F_{m,l}(s-1;(t+1))-F_{m,l}(t;(s)) )
    -(F_{m,l}(s;(t) )-F_{m,l}(t-1;(s+1)) ) \\

  &=-( F_{m,l}(s-1;(t+1)) -F_{m-1,l}(s;(t+1)) )
   +( F_{m,l}(t-1;(s+1)) -F_{m-1,l}(t;(s+1)) ) \\
   &\quad +F_{m,l}(t;(s)) -F_{m,l}(s;(t)).
 \end{align*}

 Then, by Lemma \ref{Fm}, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &D_{m-1,l}(s,t) -D_{m,l}(s-1,t) -D_{m,l}(s,t-1) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) ) )
    -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ) \\

   &\quad -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t-1) \hast ( (s+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) ) )
    +\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t-1) \hast ( (s+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ) \\

   &\quad +\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s) \sha ( (t) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger )
    -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t) \sha ( (s) \sha (\{2\}^l) )^\dagger ).
 \end{align*}

 Since
 \begin{align*}
  &\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s-1) \hast ( (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) ) )
  -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (t-1) \hast ( (s+1) \sha (\{2\}^l) ) ) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s+t) \sha (\{2\}^l) +(s+1) \sha (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^{l-1}) ) \\
   &\quad -\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s+t) \sha (\{2\}^l) +(s+1) \sha (t+1) \sha (\{2\}^{l-1}) )
   =0
 \end{align*}
 and by Lemma \ref{oooo}, we obtain the result.
\end{proof}

In the proof of Theorem \ref{main}, we use the following theorem.
\begin{thm}[Hoffman {\cite[Theorem 5.1]{Hof92}}] \label{hof}
 For positive integers $k_{1},\dots,k_{r}$ with $k_r\ge2$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &\sum_{i=1}^{r} \zeta(k_{1},\dots,k_{i-1},k_i+1,k_{i+1},\dots,k_{r}) \\
  &=\sum_{\substack{ 1\le i\le r \\ k_i\ge2 }} \sum_{j=0}^{k_i-2}
   \zeta(k_{1},\dots,k_{i-1},j+1,k_i-j,k_{i+1},\dots,k_{r}).
 \end{align*}
\end{thm}

Now we prove our main theorem.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{main}]
 By Lemma \ref{dddd} and the identity $D_{m,l}(s,t)=-D_{m,l}(t,s)$, we need to show only the case $D_{m,l}(s,2)=0$, i.e.,
 $F_{m,l}(s;(3))=F_{m,l}(2;(s+1))$.

 By Lemma \ref{Fmpre1}, we have
 \begin{align*}
  &F_{m,l}(s;(3)) -F_{m,l}(2;(s+1)) \\

  &=\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
   \bigl(
    -\zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((3)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})) \\
    &\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad +\zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((3) \sha(\{2\}^l) )^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e}))
   \bigr) \\
  &\quad -(l+1) \mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s+1) \sha \{ 2 \}^{l+1} )
   +\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (2) \sha ((s+1) \sha \{ 2 \}^{l})^\dagger ).
 \end{align*}

 Put
 \begin{align*}
  A&:=-\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
    \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((3)\sha(\{2\}^l)) \oplus \boldsymbol{e})), \\
  B&:=\sum_{m_1+m_2=m} \sum_{|\boldsymbol{e}|=m_2}
    \zeta((s+m_1) \hast ( ((3) \sha(\{2\}^l) )^\dagger \oplus \boldsymbol{e})), \\
  C&:=-(l+1) \mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s+1) \sha \{ 2 \}^{l+1} )
   +\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (2) \sha ((s+1) \sha \{ 2 \}^{l})^\dagger ).
 \end{align*}

 Then, by definitions, we have
 \begin{align} \label{ppppa}
  A=-\sum_{a=0}^{m} \bigl(
    \mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (s+a+3) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l}) )
    +\mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (s+a+2) \sha (3) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l-1}) )
   \bigr),
 \end{align}
 where we understand the second term is $0$ if $l=0$, and the same shall apply hereinafter.

 By Lemma \ref{add1} in the next section, we get
 \begin{align} \label{ppppp}
  \begin{split}
  A&=-\sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m+s}
   \Biggl( \sum_{p=1}^{l+1} \max\{ m_p-s+1, 0 \} \Biggr)  \\
   &\qquad\qquad\quad \times \sum_{i=1}^{l+1} \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{i-1}+2,m_i+3,m_{i+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2).
  \end{split}
 \end{align}

 On the other hand, we have
 \begin{align*}
  B&=\sum_{m_1+m_2=m}
   \Biggl(
    \sum_{i=1}^{l} \sum_{j=0}^{i-1}
    \mathcal{O}_{m_{2}} ( \{ 2 \}^{j}, s+m_1+2, \{ 2 \}^{i-j-1}, 1, \{ 2 \}^{l-i+1} ) \\

    &\qquad\qquad\quad\,\, +\sum_{i=0}^{l}
    \mathcal{O}_{m_{2}} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, s+m_1+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-i+1} ) \\

    &\qquad\qquad\quad\,\, +\sum_{i=0}^{l} \sum_{j=0}^{l-i}
    \mathcal{O}_{m_{2}} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, 1, \{ 2 \}^{j}, s+m_1+2, \{ 2 \}^{l-i-j} )
   \Biggr) \\

  &=\sum_{a=0}^{m}
   \bigl(
    \mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (1) \sha (s+a+2) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l-1}), 2 ) \\
    &\qquad\quad +\mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (s+a+1) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l}), 2 )
     +\mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (1) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l}), s+a+2 )
   \bigr).
 \end{align*}

 Since
 \begin{align*}
  \mathcal{O}_{m} ( (s+1) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l+1}) )
  =\sum_{i=0}^{l+1}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, s+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-i+1} )
 \end{align*}
 and
 \begin{align*}
  &\mathcal{O}_{m} ( (2) \sha ((s+1) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l}) )^\dagger ) \\
  &=(l+2) \sum_{i=0}^{l+1}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, s+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-i+1} ) -\mathcal{O}_{m} (s+1,\{ 2 \}^{l+1}) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{i=0}^{l} \sum_{j=1}^{s-2}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, j+2, s-j+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-i} ),
 \end{align*}
 we also have
 \begin{align*}
  C&=\sum_{i=0}^{l+1}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, s+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-i+1} ) -\mathcal{O}_{m} (s+1,\{ 2 \}^{l+1}) \\
  &\quad +\sum_{i=0}^{l} \sum_{j=1}^{s-2}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, j+2, s-j+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-i} ) \\

  &=\mathcal{O}_{m} ( 2, (s+1) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l}) )
   +\sum_{i=0}^{l} \sum_{j=1}^{s-2}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, j+2, s-j+1,  \{ 2 \}^{l-i} ) \\

  &=\sum_{i=0}^{l} \sum_{j=0}^{s-2}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, j+2, s-j+1,  \{ 2 \}^{l-i} ).
 \end{align*}

 Then we find
 \begin{align}  \label{qqqqq-}
  \begin{split}
  B+C&=\sum_{a=0}^{m}
   \bigl(
    \mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (1) \sha (s+a+2) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l-1}), 2 ) \\
    &\qquad\quad +\mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (s+a+1) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l}), 2 )
     +\mathcal{O}_{m-a} ( (1) \sha (\{ 2 \}^{l}), s+a+2 )
   \bigr) \\

  &\quad +\sum_{i=0}^{l} \sum_{j=0}^{s-2}
   \mathcal{O}_{m} ( \{ 2 \}^{i}, j+2, s-j+1,  \{ 2 \}^{l-i} ).
 \end{split}
 \end{align}

 By Lemma \ref{add2}, we get
 \begin{align} \label{qqqqq}
  \begin{split}
   &B+C \\
   &=\sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m+s}
   \Biggl( \sum_{p=1}^{l+1} \max\{ m_p-s+1, 0 \} \Biggr) \\
   &\qquad \times \sum_{i=1}^{l+1} \sum_{j=0}^{m_i} \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{i-1}+2,j+1,m_i-j+2,m_{i+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2).
  \end{split}
 \end{align}

 Hence, from \eqref{ppppp} and \eqref{qqqqq}, we find
 \begin{align*}
  &F_{m,l}(s;(3)) -F_{m,l}(2;(s+1))
  =A+B+C \\
  &=\sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m+s}
   \Biggl( \sum_{p=1}^{l+1} \max\{ m_p-s+1, 0 \} \Biggr)  \\
   &\qquad\qquad \times \sum_{i=1}^{l+1} \Biggl(
    -\zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{i-1}+2,m_i+3,m_{i+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2) \\

   &\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad +\sum_{j=0}^{m_i} \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{i-1}+2,j+1,m_i-j+2,m_{i+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2)
    \Biggr).
 \end{align*}
 By Theorem \ref{hof}, we obtain the result.
\end{proof}

\section{Additional lemmas}
Before ending this paper, we shall state some lemmas which were used in the proof of Theorem \ref{main}.
Let $l$ be a positive integer.
For integers $p,q$ with $1\le p,q\le l+1$, put
\begin{align*}
 G_{p,q}:=
 \begin{cases}
  \displaystyle{
  \sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{q-p-1}, 3, \{ 2 \}^{l-q+1}) \quad \quad\, (p<q), }\\
  \displaystyle{
  \sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, s+a+3, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1}) \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \, (p=q), }\\
  \displaystyle{
  \sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{q-1}, 3, \{ 2 \}^{p-q-1}, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1}) \qquad (p>q) }
 \end{cases}
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
 H_{p,q}
 &:=\sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_l=m+s} \max\{ m_p-s+1 ,0 \} \\
  &\quad \times \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{q-1}+2,m_q+3,m_{q+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2).
\end{align*}
Note that we have
\begin{align*}
 \textrm{R.H.S. of \eqref{ppppa}}
 &=-\sum_{1\le p,q\le l+1} G_{p,q}, \\
 \textrm{R.H.S. of \eqref{ppppp}}
 &=-\sum_{1\le p,q\le l+1} H_{p,q}.
\end{align*}
\begin{lem} \label{add1}
 For integers $i,j$ with $1\le i,j\le l+1$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  G_{p,q}=H_{p,q}.
 \end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
 We prove this lemma only for $i<j$. The other cases can be proved similarly.

 We have
 \begin{align*}
  G_{p,q}
  &=\sum_{a=0}^{m} \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+e_{l+1}=m-a \\ e_1,\dots,e_{l+1}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+a+2+e_p , \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 3+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+1}) \\
  &=\sum_{a=0}^{m} \sum_{e_p=0}^{m-a}
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+1}=m-a-e_p \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+1}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+a+2+e_p , \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 3+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+1}) \\
  &=\sum_{a=0}^{m} \sum_{u=a}^{m}
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+1}=m-u \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+1}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 3+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+1}),
 \end{align*}
 where the symbol $\hat{e_p}$ in the summation means that the part $e_p$ is skipped.
 Then we find
 \begin{align*}
  G_{p,q}
  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} \sum_{a=0}^{u}
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+1}=m-u \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+1}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 3+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+1})\\
  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+1}=m-u \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+1}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 3+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+1}).
 \end{align*}

 On the other hand, we have
 \begin{align*}
  H_{p,q}
  &=\sum_{u=1}^{m+1} u
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+\hat{m_p}+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m-u+1}
   \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, s+u+1, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad m_{p+1}+2, \dots,m_{q-1}+2,m_q+3,m_{q+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2)\\
  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+\hat{m_p}+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m-u}
   \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad m_{p+1}+2, \dots,m_{q-1}+2,m_q+3,m_{q+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2).
 \end{align*}
 This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

For integers $p,q$ with $1\le p,q\le l+1$, put
\begin{align*}
 I_{p,q}:=
 \begin{cases}
  \displaystyle{
  \sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{q-p-1}, 1, \{ 2 \}^{l-q+2})
  \qquad \qquad \qquad\qquad \quad \,\,\, (p<q), }\\

  \displaystyle{
  \sum_{a=0}^{m} \Bigl( \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, 1, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1})
    +\mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, s+a+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+2}) \Bigr) }\\
  \displaystyle{
  \quad +\sum_{j=0}^{s-2} \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, j+2, s-j+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1})
  \qquad \qquad \qquad\qquad \qquad \quad (p=q), }\\

  \displaystyle{
  \sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{q-1}, 1, \{ 2 \}^{p-q}, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1})
  \qquad \qquad \qquad\qquad \qquad \,\,  (p>q) }
 \end{cases}
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
 J_{p,q}
 &:=\sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m+s} \max\{ m_p-s+1 ,0 \} \\
  &\qquad \times \sum_{j=0}^{m_q} \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{q-1}+2,j+1,m_q-j+2,m_{q+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2).
\end{align*}
Note that we have
\begin{align*}
 \textrm{R.H.S. of \eqref{qqqqq-}}
 &=\sum_{1\le p,q\le l+1} I_{p,q}, \\
 \textrm{R.H.S. of \eqref{qqqqq}}
 &=\sum_{1\le p,q\le l+1} J_{p,q}.
\end{align*}
\begin{lem} \label{add2}
 For an integer $p,q$ with $1\le p,q\le l+1$, we have
 \begin{align*}
  I_{p,q}=J_{p,q}.
 \end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
 The case $p<q$ can be proved in a similar mannar to the proof of the previous lemma.
 Indeed, we have
 \begin{align*}
  I_{p,q}
  &=\sum_{a=0}^{m} \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+e_{l+2}=m-a \\ e_1,\dots,e_{l+2}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+a+2+e_p , \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 1+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+2}) \\
  &=\sum_{a=0}^{m} \sum_{e_p=0}^{m-a}
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+2}=m-a-e_p \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+2}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+a+2+e_p , \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 1+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+2}) \\
  &=\sum_{a=0}^{m} \sum_{u=a}^{m}
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+2}=m-u \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+2}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 1+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+2}).
 \end{align*}
 Then we find
 \begin{align*}
  I_{p,q}
  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} \sum_{a=0}^{u}
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+2}=m-u \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+2}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 1+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+2})\\
  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
   \sum_{\substack{ e_1+\cdots+\hat{e_{p}}+\cdots+e_{l+2}=m-u \\ e_1,\dots, \hat{e_{p}},\dots, e_{l+2}\ge0 }}
   \zeta(2+e_1,\dots, 2+e_{p-1}, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad  2+e_{p+1},\dots, 2+e_{q-1}, 1+e_q, 2+e_{q+1},\dots, 2+e_{l+2}).
 \end{align*}

 We also have
 \begin{align*}
 J_{p,q}
 &=\sum_{u=1}^{m+1} u
  \sum_{m_1+\cdots+\hat{m_p}+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m-u+1}
   \sum_{j=0}^{m_q} \\
   &\qquad \qquad  \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{p-1}+2,s+u+1,m_{p+1}+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \dots,m_{q-1}+2,j+1,m_q-j+2,m_{q+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2) \\
 &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
  \sum_{m_1+\cdots+\hat{m_p}+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m-u}
  \sum_{j=0}^{m_q} \\
   &\qquad \qquad  \zeta(m_{1}+2,\dots,m_{p-1}+2,s+u+2,m_{p+1}+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \dots,m_{q-1}+2,j+1,m_q-j+2,m_{q+1}+2,\dots,m_{l+1}+2) \\
  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
  \sum_{m_1+\cdots+\hat{m_p}+\cdots+m_{l+1}=m-u}
   \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, s+u+2, \\
   &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad m_{p+1}+2,\dots, m_{q-1}+2, m_q+1, m_{q+1}+2,\dots, m_{l+2}+2).
 \end{align*}
 Thus we find the case $p<q$ holds, and the case $p>q$ can be proved similarly.

 Now, we consider the case $p=q$.
 By the similar argument above, we find
 \begin{align*}
  &\sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, 1, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1}) \\
  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
  \sum_{m_1+\cdots+\hat{m_{p+1}}+\cdots+m_{l+2}=m-u} \\
   &\qquad \qquad \quad
   \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, m_p+1, s+u+2, m_{p+2}+2,\dots, m_{l+2}+2).
 \end{align*}

 Thus we have
 \begin{align*}
  &\sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, 1, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1}) \\

  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
  \sum_{v=0}^{m-u}
  \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-u-v} \\
   &\qquad \qquad \quad
   \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, v+1, s+u+2, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2) \\

  &=\sum_{u=0}^{m} (u+1)
  \sum_{v=u}^{m}
  \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v} \\
   &\qquad \qquad \quad
   \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, v-u+1, s+u+2, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2) \\

  &=\sum_{v=0}^{m}
  \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v}
  \sum_{u=0}^{v} (u+1)\\
   &\qquad \qquad \quad
   \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, v-u+1, s+u+2, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2).
 \end{align*}

 Since
 \begin{align*}
  \sum_{u=0}^{v} (u+1) \times
   (v-u+1, s+u+2)
  =\sum_{u=0}^{v}
   \sum_{j=1}^{v-u+1}
   (j, s+v-j+3),
 \end{align*}
 we get
 \begin{align} \label{g1}
 \begin{split}
  &\sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, 1, s+a+2, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1}) \\

  &=\sum_{v=0}^{m}
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v}
   \sum_{u=0}^{v}
   \sum_{j=1}^{v-u+1} \\
    &\qquad \qquad \quad
    \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, j, s+v-j+3, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2).
 \end{split}
 \end{align}

 Similarly, we also have
 \begin{align} \label{g2}
 \begin{split}
  &\sum_{a=0}^{m} \mathcal{O}_{m-a} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, s+a+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+2}) \\

  &=\sum_{v=0}^{m}
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v}
   \sum_{u=0}^{v}
   \sum_{j=s+v-u+1}^{s+v+1} \\
    &\qquad \qquad \quad
    \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, j, s+v-j+3, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2).
 \end{split}
 \end{align}

 Since
 \begin{align*}
 &\sum_{j=0}^{s-2} \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, j+2, s-j+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1}) \\

  &=\sum_{v=0}^{m}
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v}
   \sum_{u=0}^{v}
   \sum_{j=0}^{s-2} \\
    &\qquad \quad
    \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, j-u+v+2, s+u-j+1, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2),
 \end{align*}
 we have
 \begin{align} \label{g3}
 \begin{split}
 &\sum_{j=0}^{s-2} \mathcal{O}_{m} (\{ 2 \}^{p-1}, j+2, s-j+1, \{ 2 \}^{l-p+1}) \\

  &=\sum_{v=0}^{m}
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v}
   \sum_{u=0}^{v}
   \sum_{j=v-u+2}^{s+v-u} \\
    &\qquad \qquad \quad
    \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, j, s+v-j+3, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2).
 \end{split}
 \end{align}

 From \eqref{g1}, \eqref{g2}, and \eqref{g3}, we get
 \begin{align*}
  I_{p,p}
  &=\sum_{v=0}^{m}
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v}
   \sum_{u=0}^{v}
   \sum_{j=1}^{s+v+1} \\
    &\qquad \qquad \quad
    \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, j, s+v-j+3, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2)\\

  &=\sum_{v=0}^{m}
   (v+1)
   \sum_{m_1+\cdots+m_{l}=m-v}
   \sum_{j=1}^{s+v+1} \\
    &\qquad \qquad \quad
    \zeta(m_1+2,\dots, m_{p-1}+2, j, s+v-j+3, m_{p}+2,\dots, m_{l}+2).
 \end{align*}

 Hence, we have $I_{p,p}=J_{p,p}$.
 This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaArXiv


text:
De 5000 meter vrouwen op de Nederlandse kampioenschappen schaatsen afstanden 2007 werd gehouden op zondag 5 november 2006. Titelverdedigster was Carien Kleibeuker, die de titel pakte tijdens de Nederlandse kampioenschappen schaatsen afstanden 2006.

Statistieken

Uitslag

Uitslag
 Uitslagen NK Afstanden 2007 op SchaatsStatistieken.nl

Vrouw 05000
Nederlands kampioenschap schaatsen - 5000 meter vrouwen


text:
Gildrie, Richard P.. Salem, Massachusetts, 1626-1683: A Covenant Community. University Press of Virginia: Charlottesville, VA. 1975. Order from Amazon.com
Gildrie, Richard P.. The Profane, the Civil, and the Godly: The Reformation of Manners in Orthodox New England, 1679-1749. Penn State: University Park, PA. 1994. Order from Amazon.com
Godbeer, Richard. Escaping Salem: The Other Witch Hunt of 1692. Oxford: New York. 2005. Order from Amazon.com
I had hoped for more from an historian of Godbeer's caliber, but for anyone who knows nothing about the concurrent witchcraft cases in Connecticut in 1692, this is a decent introduction.
Godbeer, Richard. The Devil's Dominion: Magic and Religion in Early New England. Camridge University Press: New York. 1992. Order from Amazon.com
Godbeer, Richard. The Salem Witch Hunt: A Brief History with Documents. Bedford/St. Martin's: Boston. 2011. Order from Amazon.com
A brief collection of modernized, highly edited transcriptions of various texts from the Salem witchcraft trials, emphasizing the cases of Sarah Good, Tituba, John Proctor, Bridget Bishop, Dorcas Hoar, and George Burroughs, designed for undergraduate students, who the editor thinks would "find unmediated versions of these documents utterly perplexing."
Gragg, Larry. A Quest for Security: The Life of Samuel Parris, 1653-1720. Greenwood: New York. 1990. Order from Amazon.com
Gragg's biography is based on just about all the known primary sources about Parris's life. No great surprises, but a nice summary of his life. Gragg finds that Parris's role in the trials was "decisive," and that many of his decisions were to "diminish material uncertainty" -- the "security" mentioned in the title.
Gragg, Larry. The Salem Witch Crisis. Praeger: New York. 1992. Order from Amazon.com


SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--As more U.S. companies look to adopt the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), Charles Schwab has added industry-leading fully-integrated IFRS 2 reporting functionality into its Schwab EquiView® record-keeping system for corporate stock plan clients. IFRS 2 is the portion of the International Financial Reporting Standards that specifically addresses the expensing of equity compensation granted by companies. While a decision by the SEC that would mandate U.S.-based companies to adhere to IFRS is not expected until 2011, some companies already have statutory IFRS reporting obligations today, and a growing number are evaluating how they might proactively meet the standards.
Schwab EquiView's new reporting functionality is a complete solution for IFRS 2 reporting including valuation, expense, and disclosure reporting. The new functionality is fully integrated into the overall Schwab EquiView application, which keeps financial reports up-to-date with the latest employee award and transaction data. To compare impact to expense and tax accruals and better plan and prepare for a shift to IFRS, corporate stock plan administrators can also simultaneously create reports under both IFRS and the existing Financial Accounting Standards (FAS 123R) they use today.
According to a recent Schwab-commissioned study* of 200 corporate stock plan decision makers, 36 percent of participating companies report that they are currently meeting IFRS for all employees. In addition, of the firms reporting that they are not yet meeting the international standards for all employees, 44 percent say they plan to fully meet the international standards by 2011 and 60 percent say they'll be in full compliance by 2012. Seventeen percent say they will meet the standards when they actually go into effect.
The enhancements to Schwab EquiView are designed for companies which already have an IFRS reporting obligation, such as U.S.-based companies with international subsidiaries, and for companies which are in the process of determining how and when they will adopt the standards.
Additional information about Charles Schwab Stock Plan Services is available at www.scrs.schwab.com.
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. does not provide tax, compliance or legal advice.
* In September 2009, Koski Research conducted an online survey and gathered a total of 200 responses from stock plan decision makers at public companies ranging from $25 million to more than $50 billion in revenue. Respondents work for companies in a broad cross-section of industries with the manufacturing, technology, and financial services industries particularly well represented. Koski Research is not affiliated with Schwab.


text:
Cattle NewsAnimal Health
USDA seeks comments on animal disease traceability regulationsUSDA seeks comments on animal disease traceability regulations
NCBA reviewing proposed rule to ensure it provides maximum producer privacy and flexibility with minimal costs.
USDA/APHIS
USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is proposing to amend animal disease traceability regulations and require electronic identification for interstate movement of certain cattle and bison. APHIS is also proposing to revise and clarify record requirements. The changes would strengthen the ability of the U.S. to quickly respond to significant animal disease outbreaks, the agency said.
"Major animal disease outbreaks hurt our ranchers and farmers and all those who support them along the supply chain, threaten our food security and impact our ability to trade America's high quality food products around the world," APHIS said. "Rapid traceability in a disease outbreak could help ranchers and farmers get back to selling their products more quickly; limit how long farms are quarantined; and keep more animals from getting sick."
Interested stakeholders may view the proposed rule in the Federal Register here. Members of the public may submit comments beginning Jan. 19. All comments must be received by March 22, 2023, after which APHIS will review all comments and address them in a final rule.
Animal disease traceability, or knowing where diseased and at-risk animals are, where they've been, and when, is important to ensuring a rapid response when animal disease events take place, APHIS explained. "USDA is committed to implementing a modern system that tracks animals from birth to slaughter using affordable technology that allows for quick tracing of sick and exposed animals to stop disease spread."
APHIS said it has worked extensively with stakeholders on the issue and electronic identification and records for livestock movement emerged from these discussions as valuable goals for safeguarding animal health. APHIS decided to pursue these changes through notice and comment rulemaking to ensure transparency and maximize public participation in the process.
The proposed rule would require official eartags to be visually and electronically readable for official use for interstate movement of certain cattle and bison. It would also revise and clarify certain record requirements related to cattle, including requiring official identification device distribution records to be entered into a tribal, state, or federal database, and available to APHIS upon request.
"The key to protecting U.S. livestock health, producers' livelihoods, and the U.S. economy in an animal disease outbreak is swift detection, containment, and eradication of disease. This proposed rule would allow USDA to do just that," APHIS said.
National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) said it is reviewing the proposed rule in its entirety to determine whether it meets NCBA's policy criteria.
"As USDA has worked toward a nationally significant animal disease traceability program, NCBA has remained engaged in the conversation with industry stakeholders and USDA to ensure the interests of cattle producers are represented and protected," stated NCBA President-Elect Todd Wilkinson, a South Dakota cattle producer and chairman of the NCBA traceability working group. "It is critical that any program ultimately adopted by USDA allows for maximum flexibility and privacy. At the same time, USDA must also minimize the costs for producers and any business disruptions to the industry."
He added, "Cattle producers can be confident that any finished product will protect our national livestock herd. We will ensure it provides maximum producer privacy and flexibility with minimal costs, exactly what our stakeholders have told us they expect from USDA."


Upbooking is the perfect booking engine to integrate into the website of your hotel or business that will provide you with great results.
To be a white label booking engine can be customized entirely with his image meantime in its own booking engine.
Sign up here now, only you must to register your hotel now, you will be surprised the simplicity in use and easy integration with your web page.


"The first of these is the decision to move the color filter that normally sits above the sensor directly onto top of the pixels, leaving less room for error. The second technology is the use of what Apple calls 'Deep Trench Isolation', which puts small dividers between the pixels to prevent light from bouncing around unnecessarily."
do they use always Sony image sensors?
In the past they have used Omnivision image sensors.. I think up to the iPhone 4.
Who has the color filter technology?? Sony,toppan or visera???
Is it "just" CFA directly on top of a back-illuminated device + deep trech isolation?
Does this sensor has any on chip memory option?
Buried CFA and DTI: it is like the Samsung technology.


text:
Les coléorrinques (Coleorrhyncha) forment un groupe traditionnellement considéré comme un sous-ordre d'hémiptères, bien que certaines classifications le considèrent comme un infra-ordre appartenant au sous-ordre des Prosorrhyncha. Dans ce cas, on les nomme Peloridiomorpha.

Localisation
Le groupe ne comprend qu'une seule famille actuelle, les Peloridiidae, d'origine gondwanienne, qui compte 17 genres et 36 espèces. Ce sont des insectes de petite taille (2 à ), rarement vus, plats, à la surface particulièrement grumeleuse. Ils ont été trouvés en Patagonie (Argentine et Chili), Nouvelle-Zélande, dans l'est de l'Australie, sur l'Île Lord Howe et en Nouvelle-Calédonie. À l'exception d'une seule, aucune espèce de coléorrinques ne vole.

Leur distribution actuelle suggère qu'ils sont apparus avant la séparation du Gondwana, et leur lien avec les Heteroptera remonte au moins au Permien supérieur, il y a plus de 230 millions d'années.

Les Peloridiidae se rencontrent sur les mousses et les hépatiques, plus couramment dans les forêts de hêtres du genre Nothofagus.

Il y a aussi 3 familles fossiles : †Haploridiidae, †Karabasiidae et †Progonocimicidae.

Publication originale
  Myers & China, 1929 : The systematic position of the Peloridiidae as elucidated by a further study of the external anatomy of Hemiodoecus leadi China. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, , , .

Notes et références

Liens externes

Sous-ordre d'insectes (nom scientifique)
Hémiptère (nom scientifique)


text:
MEET THE TOONERS
THE TOONERS
The Tooners are a multimedia rock and roll band from Los Angeles who not only produce their own original music but also illustrate their songs. In the 1980s they were named WOMANIZER and released their songs on Flexi-Disc Soundsheets© inserted in PaperCuts, The Illustrated Lyrics Magazine which also included the songs' lyrics illustrated in comic book style. They also produced award winning (Chicago International Film Festival) fully animated music videos. When changing times, tastes and personnel instigated a change in name from WOMANIZER to THE TOONERS they continued to produce enhanced CDs which included music, videos, cartoons and games and then combined it all in their live, multimedia stage show, Rock & Roll Rehab.
Over the years there have been band members who have come and gone. The band was originally conceived by musician/animator Neal Warner who formed it with his cousin and childhood bandmate, Monte Solovy. Two more old friends, Corey Harris, a talented artist himself, as the third guitarist and Don Coorough on bass. An ad in the local newspaper brought in Tom Patrick as the lead singer and they found drummer Steve Bianchi when he participated in the Guitar Center Annual Drum-off Competition. This line up didn't survive till their first gig as Monte soon left the band.
The remaining five members began playing the L.A. Newwave club scene including multiple gigs at Madame Wong's, Club 88 and The Troubadour. After the third performance drummer Steve Bianchi left to join a Heavy Metal band. Patrick Meehan was a neighborhood kid who played in psychedelic bands with Neal while in Junior High School and with Neal, David Nigel Lloyd and John Bugbee in the proto Newwave band, Wild Oscare. He joined to replace Bianchi in time for the Wong's and Troubadour shows.
Womanizer was invited to be one of the house bands at the Troubadour on KWST nights, sponsored by a local radio station, and played regularly at Wong's West and Club 88 until bassist Don Coorough quit. It took six months to find his replacement, Michael Montrose, and another six months before singer Tom Patrick left to return to Rhode Island to be replaced by another of Neal's boyhood friends, Greg Piper.
Womanizer played the L.A. club scene off and on for a decade during which they produced PaperCuts, The Illustrated Lyrics Magazine and animated music videos. In the early 1990s the core of the band, Neal Warner, Greg Piper, Patrick Meehan and a former band mate of Greg Piper's, Richard (Buzz) Brissette, recorded the CD, Rocktasia and named the new version of the band The Tooners due to their multimedia productions.
Neal, Greg and Pat continue to record, produce videos , enhanced CDs and the live multimedia stage show, Rock & Roll Rehab.
Greg Piper - Bass, Vocals
Greg Piper was born into a show business family whose parents were traveling actors in their own theater company, performed with Red Skelton on his television series and later co-created the hugely popular TV game show, Concentration. Greg, a singer and songwriter, has been leading original and cover rock bands since high school and started his theatrical career as the lead role of "Villain" in the melodrama production of Curse You, Villain. Since the Eighties Greg has toured the world with the leading Beatle Tribute act Revolution with whom he performed at the Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame in Cleveland, Ohio in connection with the premiere of the John Lennon exhibit. He has appeared as an actor and musician in the live musical stage shows, One Night Only, A Day in His Life and Just Imagine. The Rock & Roll Rehab Show is based partially on his life as a hard core Rock & Roll addict.
Neal Warner - Guitars
Writer, director, animator and musician Neal Warner began his professional career as an underground cartoonist and became a professional animator and animation director for Disney TV, Klasky-Csupo Productions, Marvel Productions, Universal Cartoon Studios, Fred Wolf Films and many others. He wrote and directed the live stage play, A Day In His Life, represented by the William Morris Agency and produced award winning animated music videos (Chicago International Film Festival). Awarded an Emmy Award for his work as director on Jim Henson's Muppet Babies TV series, he also was a winner of the MTV Character Screen Test Competition, a finalist in the 3M New Talent in Music Video Competition and was awarded a Certificate of Achievement from the Billboard Magazine Songwriting Competition, and Certificates of Participation from the Denver International Film Festival and the First and Third Los Angeles Animation Celebration. He is the author of The Official Rock & Roll Rehab Handbook, The Official Rock & Roll Rehab Members Guide and the novel, The Haight, available on amazon.com and for Kindle.
Patrick Meehan - Drums & Percussion
Multi-instrumentalist Meehan started playing drums in bands while in Junior High School inspired by the Who's drummer, Keith Moon, to whom he is often compared. Ironically, he got the opportunity to meet and talk with his idol at a beach party. He is considered by the band's fans the most dedicated musician of the group while Neal is considered the historian/philosopher and Greg Piper the Rock & Roll party animal.
VISIT THE TOONERS HERE
Join Rock & Roll Rehab NOW!
Share This Site!
JOIN ROCK N ROLL REHAB
Yes...NO COST...FREE...Really!
ROCK N ROLL REHAB STORE
Never Quit Rockin' Merchandise
ANIMATED MUSIC VIDEOS
Created By The Tooners
ROCK N ROLL FUNNIES
Comics By The Tooners
Art, Animation + Rock N Roll
TOONERS CD ROCKTASIA
Click to hear | share | buy
THE OFFICIAL ROCK & ROLL REHAB MEMBERS GUIDE
Your Go To source for everything Rock & Roll Rehab.
Rock N Roll Rehab - Trucker Hat
Rock N Roll Rehab Merchandise
Stairway To Heaven - Pillow
Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds - Poster
I Am The Walrus - Keepsake Box
Edgar Allen Poe - Ornament
Rock N Roll Rehab - Journal
Team Naps - Baby Blanket
Sports Is The Opiate - Greeting Cards
I'm High On 420 - Mug
Rock N Roll Rehab - Tote Bag
The Haight PDF - FREE!
With purchase of THE HAIGHT CD
Dinosaurs Of Rock - Poster
Rasputin Rocks - Ornament
DIRECTOR'S CLIP
Sponsorship for music videos.
FREE LIVE SHOW TICKETS!
Get FREE LIVE SHOW TICKETS in your area.
http://www.curinglight.com
CONTACT UNSIGNED RECORDS
ROCK N ROLL REHAB POSTS!
Travel theme. Theme images by rami_ba. Powered by Blogger.