Known as the first hippy hotspot in Goa, Anjuna is a picturesque beach located in the North Goa district in the Bardez Taluka. The beach is in close proximity to Vagator beach and the historical town of Chapora. Anjuna beach is known for its various trance and rave parties and a vibrant nightlife that attracts thousands of tourists each year. While Anjuna is certainly not the prettiest of Goa beaches, it is certainly one of the most famous ones due to its extravagant lifestyle and beach parties. Also famous for its weekly flea market organized by a German since the 90's, Anjuna is an attraction not to be missed on your trip to Goa.
Like most of the beaches in Goa, Anjuna beach enjoys a warm, monsoon influenced climate with mildly chilly evenings. Goa stays warm and sunny during most of the months in the year with the exception of the monsoon season when the rains turn it into a lush green paradise. The summer months lie between March and June with a terrible humidity that can make even the locals sweat their socks off. The monsoons arrive in mid-June and last till the end of September providing a much needed relief from the heat and humidity. The months between October and February enjoy a breezy and sunny weather with chilly mornings and evenings.
Any beach in Goa can be visited during any time of the year and you will still find a lot of attractions. Anjuna beach is famous for its hippy culture influenced lifestyle and tons of rave parties during the tourist season. The tourist season starts from October and ends till late February and offers tons of festivities to the visitors. The monsoon season while not very popular with tourists who visit Goa for the sun and sand, is great for exploring the various hillocks and other natural attractions Goa.
Reaching Anjuna beach is not a biggie in Goa as transport is frequently available during the day time. It might be a bit difficult to get buses and auto rickshaws after dark but nothing that a cab cannot solve. You can additionally rent bicycles, motorbikes and scooters which are readily available in Goa. Do not forget to experience the Royal Enfield motorcycle which is a craze amongst the tourists in Goa. As the demand is too high for such motorcycles it is always better to rent one out in advance. Fuel is available at petrol pumps and one liter bottles which are sold at a slightly higher price than the petrol pumps. You can also hire a motorcycle rickshaw which simply a guy with a motorcycle that takes you where ever that you require him to.
The major attractions at Anjuna Beach are the numerous hippy style night parties that are held here. The beach is covered with several restaurants and bars that will keep your tummy sated amidst all the fun and frolic. You can also visit the historical Chapora fort that is just a few kilometers away from Anjuna. Alternatively you can also visit the nearby Vagator beach which follows a comparatively laid back lifestyle compared to the party mad Anjuna Beach. The flea market held here every Wednesday is a great place to buy some cheap souvenirs, jewelry and clothes. Apart from this you can also check out the Ingos Saturday night market and Mackies Saturday night bazaar for more stuff.


Articles - Anyone that is familiar with Ebay knows that it is a literal one stop shop when it comes to hundreds of thousands of unique and common new and used items. It should then, come as no shock that Ebay is also a great place to find excellent bargains when it comes to auto sound systems. Yes, you heard that correctly. While you can't exactly test out your tunes over an Internet connection you can generally check out the exact same brands you'll find at Ebay in your local automotive stereo and entertainment dealerships. The difference is that you can generally get your hands on the merchandise from Ebay at a fraction of the cost you would pay retail.
Many people often find better deals when going through Ebay than they would even be able to find at many retailers online. I am constantly amazed at the wonderful bargains that can be found on Ebay not only when it comes to auto sound systems but full entertainment packages for your vehicle. Not only can you find great bargains on sound systems for your vehicle you also can find some thrifty deals on amplifiers, subwoofers, speakers, speaker systems, and tools, tips, and tricks when it comes to installation.
While there is the fact that you can't hear the system for yourself if you purchase it on Ebay that can be easily overlooked by going to local retail stores in search of the same system. That should give you a very real indication of what the system you are considering on Ebay will sound like. You should look at local stores and online before making the bid on Ebay in order to compare prices and bid with confidence that you are in fact getting a bargain. Also be sure you pay attention to shipping and handling fees that might be involved in your package delivery. I've found that with a select few Ebay retailers, they kill you on the 'handling' expenses.
Another drawback with Ebay is the lack of customer service after the sale. Be sure to pay close attention to the ad details concerning customer satisfaction and recourse should something go wrong with your package. You should also be sure that you always purchase the insurance on your package should you win the bid. Even at discounted priced, auto sound systems are a pretty hefty investment and you should take care that you protect that investment.
The only serious drawback I have found to buying from Ebay when it comes to auto sound systems is the fact that you have to have your system installed. Installation simply doesn't come with these car stereos and not all installers are willing to do the installation if you didn't purchase the product from them. Installing an auto sound system isn't the simplest of tasks and you need to have a plan in place to get the system in your car before you commit to the purchase.


Just tried on mine and i get 5.5 and 5.2 errors so maybe it doesn't you are better off using mfme anyway.
What is the latest MFME version, or most popular is it 5.1?
i assumed it was 10.1 or 9.4 officially.
Also how can i edit some things (click and drag overlays ie) in full screen mode rather than a small window on the MFME 5?
MFME v5.1 is the latest version, 5.2 out later this year. There are only a handful of machine layouts, which don't function correctly (until the next update).
V10.1 and 9.4 are unofficial releases.
So basically get v5.1 and forget everything else.
Not sure what you mean about click and drag overlays in full screen mode. Under file preferences you can untick shrink to fit and it will show the layout in it's native resolution. Then when you enter edit mode you can use the scroll bars to move around the layout.
Years on and I have just found this helpful...... New to the FME world, currently enjoying what I have been able to run and play though. Thanks all!
thank you for the starter pack.
New member, Just want to say hello and thanks very much to everyone who makes this happen.
been having a browse and everyone in the forums seems dead helpful and nice.
Look forward to my time here.
Thank you for the fantastic starter pack.


Please contact me over phone or the web and I'll get back to you within the same day. If you have a detailed request, the form is probably the better way to go.
Business Hours: I'd like to say "24/7″, but I do run an eBay and Amazon business full-time, but my availability is flexible.
Frequently asked questions – click the tabs below to learn more.
Why shouldn't I just go to an agency for my business?
My name is Joe Hedlund, I'm an avid gamer, Timberwolves fan and an efficiency-obsessed person that likes to convey a marketing message that connects with the viewer in a creative way. I'm also interested in the psychology of marketing – especially when it comes to how people interact with websites.
I am a jack-of-many-trades in website production; While mainly focusing on programming and optimizing websites for search engines, I also assist my subcontractors (all local) with designing my clients' websites and marketing materials.
I have developed 200+ websites since 2001 (thank you WordPress). I graduated from St. Paul College, where I earned two Associate degrees: one as a Computer Programmer and another in Visualization Technology (graphic design & video editing). I have worked for non-profit organizations such as St. Joan of Ark and The Link MN, and most recently worked nearly three years for a dental marketing agency. In fact, I reworded this bio from the one I had at their website.
"Zef" is my attempt at branding. The origin of the word Zef can be found here, but basically it is a South African slang word that many associate with the group Die Antwoord, which in their words means "poor but fancy". For my business and branding purposes, I'm going to go ahead and translate that to me giving you a lot for your money.
One reason – they are too expensive! An agency typically cost 3-4 times as much as my rates, mostly due to their overhead. Using an agency or a freelancer both have their positives and negatives. My business is somewhere between an agency and a freelancer (I do most of the work here), but as a growing small business like yours, I'm keeping my prices as low as possible so I have the freedom to keep doing what I love to do.


text:
Justia › US Law › Case Law › Federal Courts › Courts of Appeals › Seventh Circuit › 1977 › Paul J. Niemeier, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Charles F. C. Ruf...
Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Paul J. Niemeier, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Charles F. C. Ruff,special Prosecutor, Watergate Special Prosecutionforce, Defendants-appellees, 565 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1977)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - 565 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1977)
Argued Oct. 5, 1977. Decided Nov. 9, 1977
Rodolphe J. A. deSeife, Glen Ellyn, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.
Thomas G. Wilson, Atty., Appellate Section, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Leonard Schaitman, Appellate Section, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Thomas P. Sullivan, U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.
Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, SWYGERT and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges.
SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether an undisclosed portion of a memorandum to the Watergate Special Prosecutor from the Counsel to the Special Prosecutor is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552.
* Plaintiff requested from Watergate Special Prosecutor Charles F. C. Ruff a copy of the August 29, 1974, memorandum written by Philip Lacovara, then Counsel to the Special Prosecutor, and addressed to Leon Jaworski, then the Special Prosecutor. This request was denied initially on the ground that the Lacovara memorandum was governed by exemption five of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) (5), which exempts from disclosure "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency . . . ." The plaintiff sought reconsideration of this denial of his request and, upon reexamination, Special Prosecutor Ruff maintained that the memorandum was not subject to disclosure with the exception of one legal citation.1
The plaintiff then filed suit in the district court under the Freedom of Information Act seeking disclosure of the Lacovara memorandum. The district court concluded that the memorandum was exempt from disclosure under exemption five and therefore dismissed plaintiff's complaint for want of jurisdiction. Plaintiff appeals from that decision and our jurisdiction derives from 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
The Watergate Special Prosecution Force (WSPF) was organized as an independent investigatory and prosecutive agency2 within the Department of Justice. The duties and responsibilities of the Watergate Special Prosecutor were set forth in a formal Department of Justice regulation3 which provided that the Special Prosecutor was delegated by the Attorney General "full authority for investigating and prosecuting offenses against the United States" including "allegations involving the President."4 Specifically, pursuant to this broad authority, the Special Prosecutor was to determine "whether or not to prosecute any individual . . . ."5
Plaintiff is concerned with the decision not to seek the indictment of former President Richard M. Nixon. It is clear that the above quoted regulations gave the Special Prosecutor full authority to press for criminal liability concerning President Nixon. Leon Jaworski, upon his resignation as Special Prosecutor in October of 1974, informed then Attorney General Saxbe of the WSPF decision not to seek indictment of President Nixon in a letter accompanying his letter of resignation. Mr. Jaworski therein stated his reasons for not seeking an indictment of President Nixon after Mr. Nixon received a "full, free and absolute" pardon from President Ford on September 8, 1974. Mr. Jaworski based this decision on the memorandum written by Philip Lacovara, which Mr. Jaworski stated was on file in the office of the Special Prosecutor and from which he quoted Lacovara's conclusion to the effect that to seek indictment of President Nixon after the pardon would be futile.6 Both the Jaworski letter and the same portion of the Lacovara memorandum were subsequently quoted in the final report of the WSPF of October, 1975, in the section entitled, "Actions Related To President Nixon's Possible Criminal Liability,"7 which explained the WSPF reasons for not seeking the indictment of President Nixon.
We agree with the district court that the Lacovara memorandum must initially be regarded as a "predecisional intra-agency legal memorandum falling within the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) (5) and therefore exempt from the compelled disclosure provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended."8 The decision in this case, however, does not rest there. Rather, plaintiff claims that this exemption is overridden by the fact that the Lacovara memorandum was expressly adopted or incorporated as part of a final disposition of the allegations of criminal liability of President Nixon and is therefore disclosable under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (2) (A).9
The relationship between exemption five and section (a) (2) (A) of the FOIA was addressed by the Supreme Court in NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 153-54, 95 S. Ct. 1504, 1518, 44 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1975):
(W)ith respect at least to "final opinions," which not only invariably explain agency action already taken or an agency decision already made, but also constitute "final dispositions" of matters by an agency, . . . we hold that Exemption 5 can never apply.
Therefore, the initial question is whether the WSPF Report of October, 1975, can be regarded as such a final opinion.
The Court in Sears considered the question of what constitutes a "final opinion" made in the "adjudication of cases" within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (2) (A). There, the concern was with Appeals Memoranda sent from the General Counsel to the Regional Director of the NLRB deciding whether or not to issue a complaint on the basis of a "charge" filed by a private party with the Board. The Court analyzed the meaning of "final opinion":
The decision to dismiss a charge is a decision in a "case" and constitutes an "adjudication": an "adjudication" is defined under the Administrative Procedure Act, of which 5 U.S.C. § 552 is a part, as "agency process for the formulation of an order," 5 U.S.C. § 551(7); an "order" is defined as "the whole or part of a final disposition whether affirmative (or) negative . . . of an agency in a matter . . .," 5 U.S.C. § 551(6) (emphasis added); and the dismissal of a charge, as noted above, is a "final disposition." Since an Advice or Appeals Memorandum explains the reasons for the "final disposition" it plainly qualifies as an "opinion"; and falls within 5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (2) (A).10
Concerning the possible criminal liability of President Nixon, the WSPF was given full authority, as quoted above in the regulations, to investigate and determine whether to prosecute allegations specifically involving the President. The Special Prosecutor was guaranteed complete independence and the Attorney General declared that he would "not countermand or interfere with the Special Prosecutor's decisions or actions."11 The regulations further required that the Special Prosecutor "upon completion of his assignment submit a final report to the appropriate persons or entities of the Congress."12 Thus, the WSPF Report was a required culminating act in the mandate of the WSPF to investigate, inter alia, allegations involving the President.13
The decision contained in the WSPF Report of October, 1975, not to seek indictment of President Nixon was as final a disposition as a decision by the WSPF could be, representing, as it did, an unreviewable decision regarding its mandate to investigate and prosecute allegations involving the President. Under these unique circumstances, we hold that the Watergate Special Prosecution Force Report of October, 1975, is a final disposition, as it relates to the charges concerning President Nixon, within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (2) (A).14
We wish to emphasize that we view our conclusion regarding this construction of 5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (2) (A) on the facts presented here to be very narrow. That is, although we hold on the facts of this case that the WSPF Report is a final disposition for purposes of the FOIA, we come to this conclusion "(w)ithout deciding whether a public prosecutor makes 'law' when he decides not to prosecute or whether memoranda explaining such decisions are 'final opinions' . . . ."15
Concluding that the WSPF Report is a final disposition does not end our inquiry. Plaintiff does not seek the WSPF Report itself but rather requests the Lacovara memorandum which the WSPF Report quotes and relies on in explaining its decision not to seek President Nixon's indictment. Plaintiff argues that the Lacovara memorandum was expressly adopted or incorporated by reference into the WSPF Report, and must be disclosed as part of the "final disposition" of the allegations concerning Mr. Nixon despite the claim of a section five exemption.16
The Supreme Court in Sears also addressed the question of exemption from disclosure for memoranda incorporated by reference in non-exempt final disposition documents and the rule set forth there must initially guide us:
Thus, we hold that, if an agency chooses expressly to adopt or incorporate by reference an intra-agency memorandum previously covered by Exemption 5 in what would otherwise be a final opinion, that memorandum may be withheld only on the ground that it falls within the coverage of some exemption other than Exemption 5.17
It is not disputed that the WSPF Report expressly adopted the Lacovara memorandum, at least in part, since it is quoted in the Report along with the Jaworski letter stating that the memorandum is on "file in this office."18 Defendants do not deny that part of the Lacovara memorandum was adopted by the WSPF Report but rather contend that the only portion adopted is the one that is quoted in both the Jaworski letter and the WSPF Report, together with an additional legal citation which was disclosed to plaintiff.19 On this basis defendants claim that the rest of the memorandum must be regarded as exempt from disclosure under section five. We disagree.
More than the mere quotation of a legal memorandum is involved here.20 The WSPF Report adopts not only the quotation from the memorandum, but also the statement that the Special Prosecutor's decision was consistent with the conclusions reached by Mr. Lacovara and thereby gained support therefrom. Moreover, the WSPF Report contains the statement that the memorandum was on file in the office of the Special Prosecutor. These circumstances imply that scrutiny of the memorandum as a whole is invited in order to assess the strength of the reasoning that was behind the quoted legal conclusions.
In a case such as this where an underlying memorandum is expressly relied on in a final agency dispositional document, even though only part of it is expressly reproduced, we hold that a presumption in favor of disclosability of the memorandum as a whole is created. This presumption is subject to rebuttal by the agency challenging disclosure upon the showing that other portions of the memorandum fall within the coverage of some exemption other than exemption five. The creation of this rebuttable presumption is consistent with Sears and with the purpose of the FOIA to allow maximum disclosure subject only to specified limited exceptions.21
In the instant case, defendants do not claim that the material in the remainder of the Lacovara memorandum falls within a separate statutory exemption. Rather, they contend that further disclosure would impinge the attorney-client privilege and reveal the decision-making process of the WSPF. These are the basic policies that underlie exemption five of the FOIA.22 We conclude, however, as discussed below, that the policies underlying exemption five are not persuasive in supporting nondisclosure of the remainder of a memorandum which is relied upon in final disposition of a case. This conclusion supports our holding that exemption five must be regarded as inapplicable in the present case.
With regard to the attorney-client privilege, this doctrine applies where litigation is contemplated and the document represents attorney work product.23 Where litigation is foreclosed as an option and the agency expressly chooses to make use of legal memoranda in its final decision, this choice eliminates any claim of attorney work product privilege for the expressly adopted document.24 Under these circumstances, such documents "are not the ideas and theories which go into the making of the law, they are the law itself, and as such should be made available to the public."25
Likewise, defendants' contention that disclosure will reveal the underlying decision-making processes of the agency, with consequential inhibiting effects, must fail when a memorandum is adopted by an agency as part of its final disposition. The Court in Sears answered that claim in this manner:
The probability that an agency employee will be inhibited from freely advising a decisionmaker for fear that his advice, if adopted, will become public is slight. First, when adopted, the reasoning becomes that of the agency and becomes its responsibility to defend. Second, agency employees will generally be encouraged rather than discouraged by public knowledge that their policy suggestions have been adopted by the agency. Moreover, the public interest in knowing the reasons for a policy actually adopted by an agency supports (disclosure).26
In summary, while we agree with the district court that the Lacovara memorandum must initially be regarded as nondisclosable under exemption five, the memorandum lost this exempt status when it was quoted and expressly adopted or incorporated by reference by the WSPF Report, which must be regarded as the final disposition of the allegations involving former President Nixon. Moreover, since we conclude that the WSPF Report expressly adopts or incorporates the whole Lacovara memorandum, that memorandum must be considered presumptively disclosable, subject to any claim of other applicable exemptions. No other exemptions have been shown to be applicable here. Therefore, the Lacovara memorandum must be disclosed and the district court is instructed, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (4) (B), to enjoin defendants from withholding the Lacovara memorandum and to order the production of this memorandum which was improperly withheld from plaintiff.
The pertinent part of Ruff's letter to plaintiff states:
We have reexamined the memorandum from Mr. Lacovara to Mr. Jaworski which you have requested. Only one portion of that memorandum deals with the question of pre-indictment Presidential pardon, which is the matter discussed in the portion of the Jaworski letter quoted in the Report. In addition to the portion of the memorandum quoted in the Jaworski letter, there is one other sentence dealing with that subject. That sentence reads, "see, e.g., Ex parte Garland, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 333, 380-81, 18 L. Ed. 366 (1867)." Thus, this is the only portion of the memorandum which is not exempt from disclosure under § 552(b) (5). If you wish to examine the non-exempt portion of the memorandum, please contact this office.
WSPF is clearly an agency for purposes of the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. § 551(1) defines an "agency" as "each authority of the Government of the United States, whether or not it is within or subject to review by another agency." WSPF had the requisite independent authority in exercising specific functions to be an agency under the FOIA. See Koden v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 564 F.2d 228 (7th Cir. 1977); Soucie v. David, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 144, 448 F.2d 1067 (1971)
Under authority of 5 U.S.C. § 301 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, the regulations were promulgated and appear at 38 Fed.Reg. 14688 (June 4, 1973). Sometime after the dismissal of Archibald Cox on October 20, 1973, these regulations were retroactively rescinded effective October 21, 1973. See 38 Fed.Reg. 29466 (October 23, 1973). The Office of Watergate Special Prosecutor was reinstated less than three weeks later under a regulation which, for our purposes, is identical with the original. See 38 Fed.Reg. 30738 (November 7, 1973). All references hereafter will be to this final regulation. The dismissal of Cox was subsequently held to be illegal in Nader v. Bork, 366 F. Supp. 104 (D.D.C. 1973)
38 Fed.Reg. 30738 (November 7, 1973) (Appendix)
The letter from Jaworski to Saxbe provided, in relevant part, as follows:
Although not appropriate for comment until after the sequestering of the jury in United States v. Mitchell, et al., in view of suggestions that an indictment be returned against former President Richard M. Nixon questioning the validity of the pardon granted him, I think it proper that I express to you my views on this subject to dispel any thought that there may be some relation between my resignation and that issue.
As you realize, one of my responsibilities, not only as an officer of the court, but as a prosecutor, as well, is not to take a position in which I lack faith or which my judgment dictates is not supported by probable cause. The provision in the Constitution investing the President with the right to grant pardons, and the recognition by the United States Supreme Court that a pardon may be granted prior to the filing of charges are so clear, in my opinion, as not to admit of doubt. Philip Lacovara, then Counsel to the Special Prosecutor, by written memorandum on file in this office, came to the same conclusion, pointing out that:
". . . the pardon power can be exercised at any time after a federal crime has been committed and it is not necessary that there be any criminal proceedings pending. In fact, the pardon power has been used frequently to relieve federal offenders of criminal liability and other penalties and disabilities attaching to their offenses even where no criminal proceedings against the individual are contemplated."
I have also concluded, after thorough study that there is nothing in the charter and guidelines appertaining to the office of the Special Prosecutor that impairs or curtails the President's free exercise of the constitutional right of pardon.
Watergate Special Prosecution Force Report 119, 131-33 (October, 1975)
Memorandum Order at 1
5 U.S.C. § 552(a) (2) (A) requires an agency to make available for public inspection and copying "final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders, made in the adjudication of cases."
NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 158, 95 S. Ct. 1504, 1520, 44 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1975) (emphasis in original)
The mandate of the WSPF from the Congress and the Attorney General regarding his possible criminal liability might be viewed as similar to the filing of a "charge" before the NLRB. The mandate was, at least in that portion, specifically directed and required action on the part of the WSPF to determine whether to seek President Nixon's indictment
Moreover, the decision not to seek the indictment of President Nixon adds support to the claim that the Report is a final disposition. If indictment had been sought, litigation would have ensued, and the conclusion of the matter would have been in a judicial forum. Here, however, there will be no judicial opinion because further litigation has been foreclosed by the decision not to seek indictment. As the Court in Sears, 421 U.S. 132, 155, 95 S. Ct. 1504, 1519, 44 L. Ed. 2d 29, declared:
In the case of decisions not to file a complaint, the memoranda effect as "final" a "disposition," . . . as an administrative decision can representing, as it does, an unreviewable rejection of the charge filed by the private party.
An alternative and not unpersuasive claim by plaintiff is that the original letter by Jaworski to Saxbe quoting the Lacovara memorandum and explaining his reasons for not seeking the indictment of Mr. Nixon is itself a final disposition within the meaning of section (a) (2) (A). This letter can be analogized to the Advice Memoranda in Sears. Both began as internal communications (in Sears between the General Counsel and the Regional Director; here, between the Special Prosecutor and the Attorney General), but both became final dispositions when the decision was made not to proceed with the charges
NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 156 n. 22, 95 S. Ct. 1504, 1519, 44 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1975)
It is clear that the Lacovara memorandum is not merely a factual document which would probably be disclosable in the first place. See EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 87-93, 93 S. Ct. 827, 35 L. Ed. 2d 119 (1973)
421 U.S. 132, 161, 95 S. Ct. 1504, 1521, 44 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1975) (emphasis in original). The same rule would apply if it was determined that the Jaworski letter, not the WSPF Report, must be regarded as the final disposition in this case
WSPF Report at 132
See note 1, supra
Indeed, the cases relied on by defendants do not even involve the quotation of material from agency memoranda. Fisher v. Renegotiation Board, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 398, 473 F.2d 109, 115 (1972) and International Paper Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 438 F.2d 1349, 1359 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 827, 92 S. Ct. 61, 30 L. Ed. 2d 56 (1971), involved predecisional legal memoranda which had not been relied upon, quoted in, or referred to in the final agency disposition
The district court cited Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 270, 491 F.2d 63 (1974), as support for its denial of disclosure in this case. The issue raised there, however, did not relate to the incorporation of a legal memorandum into an agency final opinion. Rather, the question was whether evidence summaries prepared by Environmental Protection Agency assistants were "factual" and thereby disclosable under EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 93 S. Ct. 827, 35 L. Ed. 2d 119 (1973), or "deliberative" and thereby within exemption five.
Moreover, in dictum relating to the question of incorporation, the Montrose court, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 270, 491 F.2d 63, 70 (1974), declared:
(T)his case is distinctly different from FOIA cases where a decision-maker has referred to an intra-agency memorandum as a basis for his decision. In such cases this court has required disclosure of the memoranda, for, once adopted as a rationale for a decision, the memorandum becomes part of the public record.
(Emphasis in original and footnote omitted).
The purpose of the FOIA is "to establish a general philosophy of full agency disclosure unless information is exempted under clearly delineated statutory language." S.Rep. No. 813, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., at 3 (1965). See generally EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 79-80, 93 S. Ct. 827, 35 L. Ed. 2d 119 (1973)
Regarding the attorney-client privilege, see S.Rep. No. 813, at 2; as to preservation of the integrity of the deliberative process, see S.Rep. No. 813, at 9; H.R.Rep. No. 1497, at 10
Although the attorney-client privilege is broader than simply the work product privilege, this narrower aspect was the focus in Sears and relates more closely to the FOIA than the broad privilege for all communications between attorney and client. See generally Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S. Ct. 385, 91 L. Ed. 451 (1947); Kent Corp. v. NLRB, 530 F.2d 612 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 920, 97 S. Ct. 316, 50 L. Ed. 2d 287 (1976). As to the relationship between the broad and narrow aspects of the attorney-client privilege, see Mead Data Central, Inc. v. U. S. Dept. of the Air Force, 184 U.S.App.D.C. ---, 566 F.2d 242 (D.C. Cir. 1977). It is not necessary to decide here, as the Court did in Mead, the relationship of the privilege to the work of agency staff attorneys as compared to the work of private attorneys
See American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Gulick, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 382, 411 F.2d 696 (1969)
Sterling Drug, Inc. v. F.T.C., 146 U.S.App.D.C. 237, 450 F.2d 698, 708 (1971). Accord, American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Gulick, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 382, 411 F.2d 696 (1969)
NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 161, 95 S. Ct. 1504, 1521, 44 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1975)
of Seventh Circuit opinions.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The weight limitation on 40 yard containers generally ranges from 4 to 8 tons (8,000 to 16,000 pounds). Be really aware of the limitation and do your best not to transcend it. Should you go over the limit, you can incur overage fees, which add up quickly.
If you rent a 30 yard dumpster, you'll be receiving a container that can carry 30 cubic yards of waste or debris. Your 30 yard container will measure about 22 feet long by 8 feet wide by 6 feet high. These amounts could change slightly determined by the dumpster rental business in Tully you pick. A 30 yard dumpster will carry between 9 and 15 pickup truck loads of waste, therefore it's an excellent option for whole-house residential cleanouts as well as commercial cleaning jobs.
It's difficult to overcome a roll off dumpster when you've got a big job that will create lots of debris. Most rental companies comprise dropping off and picking up the dumpster in the prices, so you could avoid additional fees. Roll off dumpsters generally have time constraints because businesses have to get them back for other customers. This really is a potential disadvantage if you aren't great at meeting deadlines.
Dumpster bags in many cases are convenient for small occupations with loose deadlines. In the event you don't want a lot of room for debris, then the bags could function nicely for you. Many companies are also happy to allow you to maintain the bags for as long as you desire. That makes them useful for longer projects.
You will generally schedule the quantity of time you want to maintain the dumpster when you first phone to set up your dumpster service. This generally comprises the drop-off and pick-up dates. Most firms do ask that you be present when the dumpster is delivered. This is required to make sure the dumpster is placed in the most effective location for your endeavor. You really do not have to be present when the dumpster is picked up to haul it away.
Should you get into your project and recognize you want pick-up sooner or later than you originally requested, that's no issue. Only phone the business 's office and describe exactly what you need, and they'll do everything they can to accommodate your request. There may be times they can't meet your adjusted schedule just due to previous commitments, nevertheless they'll do the best they are able to in order to pick your dumpster up at the right time.
The total amount of time that you need to rent a dumpster in Tully ordinarily depends on the kind of project you're working on. A little job, such as a cellar clean out, will likely take a number of days to complete while bigger projects, like constructing a new house, could take several months.
Most dumpster rental firms in Tully are happy to adjust their schedules to suit your needs. Keep in your mind, nevertheless, that the the more time you keep the dumpster, the more you will need to cover it.
When you contact dumpster rental firms in Tully, ask them how long their terms are. Many will give you options such as several days or one week, but there are usually longer terms available, too.
Most residential areas allow rolloff dumpsters. For those who own a driveway, then you could normally park the dumpster there so you do not annoy your neighbors or cause traffic issues by putting it on the street.
Some jobs, however, will require placing the dumpster on the road. If this applies to you personally, then you must talk to your city to find out whether you must get any licenses before renting the dumpster. In most cases, cities allow you to keep a dumpster on a residential street for a short period of time. In case you think you will need to be sure that it stays to the street for a number of weeks or months, however, you may need to get a permit.
2. Give you and also the rental business a lot of time. It is better to phone ahead at least a week or two before you want the dumpster. If you attempt to schedule an appointment sooner than that, you may have a limited selection.
3. Keep in touch with the rental business. If anything changes in your program, contact the business when possible to permit them to know. This way you can correct the appointment as needed without restricting your choices.
Deciding where to place your dumpster can have a large effect on how fast you finish endeavors. The most effective option is to choose a place that's near the worksite. It is necessary, nevertheless, to contemplate whether this place is a safe option. Make sure that the place is free of obstacles that could trip individuals while they carry heavy debris.
Lots of individuals choose to set dumpsters in their own drives. This is a convenient option since it usually means you can avoid asking the city for a license or permit. In case you need to set the dumpster on the street, then you should get in touch with your local government to ask whether you have to get a license. Although many municipalities will let folks keep dumpsters on the road for short levels of time, others will ask you to complete some paperwork. Following these rules will help you stay away from fines that'll make your job more costly.
Virtually all roll of dumpsters have the same width (typically eight feet). That makes it feasible for businesses to utilize the same trucks to transport a wide variety of dumpsters. When you see a dumpster's measurements, therefore, you can assume they refer to depth and length. You may even see dumpster sizes recorded by yards. This actually refers to square yards that measure the dumpster's volume.
If you are coordinating a sizable commercial project, then you'll likely need a 40-yard dumpster or larger. Substantial house renovations may require a 30-yard dumpster, but most smaller house repairs only need 20-yard or even 10-yard dumpsters. Talk to an expert if you need more guidance on choosing a dumpster size that matches your endeavor.
Most affordable Dumpster Rental in Tully - Is It Worth It?
Obviously you want to spend as little cash as possible when renting a dumpster in Tully. Sometimes, though, the most economical dumpster rental in Tully alternative isn't worth it. Actually, it may wind up costing you more in the future.
Choosing the cheapest choice could mean that you get a dumpster that is too little for your endeavor. Once you fill up the dumpster, you will need to cover another to complete your job. It is usually cheaper to get a larger size and avoid the hassle.
The cheapest dumpster rental companies in Tully mightn't include matters like drop off and pick up fees. Ensure that your quotes include all extra fees. That way, you can compare costs precisely to get the very best price. Customer care another major factor. More than a few companies keep costs low by cutting corners on service. The last thing that you would like is to waste time awaiting a truck to arrive with your dumpster.


text:
Q: Closures and callbacks I'm working on a database function and need to return results from fetchAll so I can use it elsewhere in my code but am not sure how to do it:
function fetchAll(sql,params,tableref){
  var fields = new Array();
  var resultout = new Array();

  for (i in tableref){
    fields.push(i);
  }

  getResults(sql,params,fields,function(results){
     // I WANT TO RETURN RESULTS
     resultout.push(results);
  });

// TO HERE SO I CAN RETURN from Fetchall
console.log(resultout);
}

function getResults(query,params,fields,callBack){
  var result = new Array();
  thisDB.transaction(function (tx) {
    tx.executeSql(query,params, function(tx, rs){
       for(var i=0; i<rs.rows.length; i++) {
          var row = rs.rows.item(i);
          var rowresults = new Object();

          for (x=0;x<fields.length;x++){
            rowresults[fields[x]] = row[fields[x]];
          }

          result.push(rowresults);
       }
       callBack(result);
    });
  });

return result;
}

I think i'm missing something obvious.
Thanks
Antony

A: If I'm understanding correctly your question, to see the result you need this
function fetchAll(sql,params,tableref){
    var fields = new Array();
    var resultout = new Array();

    for (i in tableref){
        fields.push(i);
    }

    getResults(sql,params,fields,function(results){
        // I WANT TO RETURN RESULTS
        resultout.push(results);
        console.log(resultout);
    });
}

The callback will be executed "after" so basically in your example you'd see an empty result. This is because of the asynchronous nature of the callback.

A: I think you are trying to move from an asynchronous request to a synchronous one
Is a good topic, you can find many posts and solutions addressing this on the web
You have several options:

*

*Use callback instead return in your function:
Your function must receive another param (the callback) and call that callback
passing to it the value that you want to return
function fetchAll (sql, params, tableref, callback) {
  var fields = new Array();

  for (i in tableref) {
    fields.push(i);
  }

  getResults(sql, params, fields, function (results) {
     // I WANT TO RETURN RESULTS
     callback(results);
  });
}

Then you can log the results like this:
fetchAll(sql, params, tableref, function (results) { console.log(results); });

*Find a synchronous version of getResults, often there is one function for that,
maybe getResultsSync ?

*With node you can use https://github.com/laverdet/node-fibers or http://github.com/maxtaco/tamejs for converting from asynchronous to synchronous style (I'm using tamejs for that purpose currently and it is great!)

*And others I don't know enough to talk about

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


If you would like to end your agreement early, utilize a Notice of Termination to officially communicate the should end the agreement. Your agreement should also cover what sorts of fees (as an example, cleaning or repair fees) can be subtracted from the security deposit. Lease agreements aren't restricted to the above.
Sometimes, a renter may want to move to some other area at the expiration of a lease or she could want to move to a location where the rent is cheaper. He or she should be advised that he or she will be responsible for any tolls, parking or traffic violations incurred upon the vehicle during the rental period. Nevertheless, it's important for both renters and tenants to be acquainted with the principal elements of a rental agreement.
When you're renting some property, you have to read all sorts of details carefully. It's also wise to note what property you're referring to. The most suitable property in the proper location with the proper tenants and ownership mindset can create a tremendous pride of ownership factor that's highest among all asset classes.
Even if all you want is a simple rental agreement involving you and your tenant, there are a few critical terms that need to be included in each rental agreement. In the event the tenant does contract out for repairs, be sure your agreement states that you receive a duplicate of the invoice for your records. In a standard agreement, he or she will only be responsible if the amount of the repair does not exceed S$100 or S$150. In most residential tenancies for a fixed term, for consideration, he or she may not be removed except for cause, even if there is no written lease. Whenever your tenants don't pay their rent or take part in behavior that violates the provisions of their lease, you require a lawyer with experience handling evictions in an effective and timely method. He or she must authorize and is recommended that it is attached to the lease agreement.
In many cases, landlords elect for auto-renewal. Disclosures Radon The landlord must permit the tenant be conscious of any Radon which exists in the property it's been known to exist. Typically, in all cases he should be the first point of contact and the person held responsible. Most landlords request a deposit that's refunded when you move out, as well as the interest earned.
If you've asked your Landlord to repair the heater during the winter free of luck, you might find it useful to send a last letter. The landlord should make sure that the tenant is provided a legible copy of the lease or rental agreement. He should remember that there are many other precautions to take besides a rental application to ensure his or her property will remain covered. For example, he will be able to outline the terms of the pet policy (if pets are allowed) and decide if the tenant will be able to sublet the property for short amounts of time (like a vacation rental).
The landlord must manage the security deposit as soon as the tenancy ends. Furthermore, landlords can occasionally give tenant-specific details about what landlords need to do and how they're expected to act under the laws of the specific state the parties reside in. The Landlord promises that they'll return the Security Deposit in case the Tenant doesn't damage the Premises.


text:
Northern border along Arctic, not southern, is what worries NORAD leaders
Paratroopers from the 25th Infantry Division, U.S. Army Alaska, look away from a landing UH-60 helicopter during medical evacuation training at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, Feb. 20. (Sgt. Alex Skripnichuk/Army)
The opening of the Arctic and the stirring of Russian and Chinese interest along the U.S. and Canadian northern borders is a major worry for the top officer at U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command.
Air Force Gen. Terrence O'Shaughnessy told senators Tuesday that geography is no longer the buffer that it once was.
"[China and Russia] both have … established a noticeably stronger foothold in the Arctic along the northern approaches to the United States and Canada," O'Shaughnessy told the Senate Armed Services Committee Feb. 26. "As a result, the strategic value of the Arctic as our first line of defense has re-emerged and USNORTHCOM and NORAD are taking active measures to ensure our ability to detect, detract and defeat potential threats in this region."
Focusing on the northern border also aligns more with the 2018 National Defense Strategy, which singles out China as an emerging competitor and Russia as revisionist power.
One of the focal points for Arctic concern is Alaska; many intercepts of Russian aircraft are made near its borders.
At a June 2017 conference, Maj. Gen. Laurie Hummel, then-adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard, said that Russia has been bolstering its Arctic reach with more than a dozen new airfields, 16 deep-water ports, tactical air power, dedicated training centers, and the stationing of paratroopers and electronic warfare units.
Russia also has a roughly 40-ship fleet of polar icebreakers, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan said at the hearing.
Icebreakers are instrumental in opening sea routes through Arctic ice for commercial shipping, scientific exploration and military operations. Nuclear power prolongs the time an icebreaker can be out of port opening sea lanes.
The Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star, a high endurance icebreaker homeported in Seattle, sits on the ice in the Ross Sea near Antarctica while underway in support of Operation Deep Freeze in early 2015. (Coast Guard)
"They're building 14 more, including nuclear-powered icebreakers, weaponized icebreakers," Sullivan said. "We're finally getting our act together on that. Last year's [National Defense Authorization Act] authorized six. … But do we have the required capabilities to answer the Russian and, by the way, Chinese challenge in the Arctic?"
On paper, the U.S. has four icebreakers, according to O'Shaughnessy.
"In reality, we have one that's actually [at] a polar level," he said, adding that the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star is the only one operational.
But at 43 years old, it also suffers constant mechanical issues.
Look north to find the front line of North America's defense
The strategies and statements of America's peer competitors indicating their intent to use advanced weapon systems erode the sanctuary that North American geography once afforded.
Gen. Terrence O'Shaughnessy
The need for Arctic military capabilities is not solely relegated to icebreakers, however.
In November, the U.S. and its NATO allies held a massive joint exercise in the Arctic known as Trident Juncture, which focused on preparing ground, naval and air forces for operating in freezing temperatures should the alliance need to defend northern territory against an aggressor nation.
As it stands, America's peer adversaries still see the Arctic region as a vulnerability for the U.S.
(Devan Feeney/Staff)
"The Arctic is an area that we really need to focus on and really look at investing," O'Shaughnessy said. "That is no longer a buffer zone. We need to be able to operate there, we need to be able to communicate there, we need to be able to have a presence there that we have not invested in, in the same way that our adversaries have."
The Arctic is considered a focal point of potential conflict due to the reservoir of hydrocarbons and fisheries that are expected to become more accessible as the region warms.
While China does not have territorial rights to Arctic resources, as the U.S., Canada and Russia do, the country has nevertheless attempted to develop "a self-defined Arctic identity as a 'near-Arctic state,'" according to a European Parliamentary Research Service report from May 2018.
Army paratroopers assigned to the 25th Infantry Division, U.S. Army Alaska, fire the M240L machine gun while providing support-by-fire during training at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, Feb. 2. (Alejandro Peña/Air Force)
"[China] sought — and in 2013 gained — observer status in the Arctic Council, to prepare the ground for a future expanded foothold in the region," the report reads.
China's expanded foothold was also bolstered by the "2016 launch of construction of the first Chinese-built nuclear-powered icebreaker polar research vessel Xue Long 2," according to the European Parliament report.
A new cold war: How the Army is preparing for a fight in the Arctic
Russia's Arctic buildup has gotten some attention from the U.S. military, but some say the Army is still unprepared for an extreme cold-weather fight.
Todd South
U.S. Army Alaska, the ground force defending much of the U.S. territorial claims near the Arctic, includes a combined force of 25,000 active duty, National Guard and Reserve troops.
Using training ranges at locales like Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, the Army has been working to increase its troops' exposure to the cold through airborne operations, medical evacuation training and armored vehicle deployment exercises.
The 75th Ranger Regiment even returned to Alaska in 2014 to train for the first time since 2001 at the U.S. Army Alaska Northern Warfare Training Center.
Military Times reporter Todd South also contributed to this report.
About Kyle Rempfer
Kyle is a staff reporter for Military Times, focusing on the U.S. Army. He served an enlistment as an Air Force Special Tactics CCT and JTAC.


10/16/17 - This is an original WW2 Mauser Black Widow Luger magazine. The magazine tube is excellent with very minimal wear, and one side of the tube is "fxo" and "P.08" stamped with two eagle/37 military proofs. The base is black bakelite with no cracks or chips. The spring is strong and fully functional. Guaranteed original.


Hey everyone! The past three weeks have been super crazy, and amazing, to say the least!
We were ecstatic to be invited to this year's NAMM Show and let's just say that it didn't disappoint for a single second. It was impossible to avoid bumping into our musical heroes...at every step or turn we were bumping into Marty Friedman, Pete Thorn, John Petrucci, Paul Gilbert, Charlie Benante, David Ellefson, Bernie Williams, Zakk Wylde, Jordan Rudess, etc., etc., etc.! The coolest part about NAMM was the laid back atmosphere, with everyone just being super friendly and down to earth. The real star of this year's NAMM Show was the gear, and just when you thought there couldn't be a cooler guitar, amp, piano, synth, etc., etc., etc., one short turn would reveal something even more unique! The only bummer about the show was that it only lasted 4 days. You really need more time to take it all in. To be honest, by the last day my legs and feet were destroyed, but revisiting some of the pics that are shared below, it was TOTALLY worth it!
Since it's Tiny Desk season, we wanted to join in on the fun with a video for our upcoming single called "Back Home." Check it out in our video section and be sure to leave some lovin'!


Great range of discounts available.
We Know London are London tourism experts and our aim is to ensure that you have a great experience whilst visiting London.
Stay at the best hotels, experience thrilling theatre shows and enjoy breathtaking London attractions. See all that London has to offer with our great car transfers around the city and even communicate with home using one of our International Sim Cards. Our expert advisors will ensure your trip to London is both an enjoyable and memorable experience.
What do you like about Perkbox?
We like Perkbox because it has such a great range of discounts available which has been great for our company.
Which perk(s) stand out as a particular favourite?
The cinema tickets are our favourite.


text:
Q: Insert text before and after the selection in a textarea with JavaScript How can I insert text before and after the selection in a textarea with JavaScript?
Selection occurs into a textarea field of an HTML form.

A: Her us a simple script that works in both Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Chrome, where myField is a object reference. It was assembled by several scripts found through the web.
function insertAtCursor(myField, myValueBefore, myValueAfter) {

    if (document.selection) {

        myField.focus();
        document.selection.createRange().text = myValueBefore + document.selection.createRange().text + myValueAfter;

    } else if (myField.selectionStart || myField.selectionStart == '0') {

        var startPos = myField.selectionStart;
        var endPos = myField.selectionEnd;
        myField.value = myField.value.substring(0, startPos) + myValueBefore + myField.value.substring(startPos, endPos) + myValueAfter + myField.value.substring(endPos, myField.value.length);
    }
}

A: Try the following:
var selectionText = yourTextarea.value.substr(yourTextarea.selectionStart, yourTextarea.selectionEnd);
yourTextarea.value = "Text before" + selectionText + "Text after";

If you want to search and replace, then the following code will do the trick (in non-Internet Explorer browsers):
var textBeforeSelection = yourTextarea.value.substr(0, yourTextarea.selectionStart);
var textAfterSelection = yourTextarea.value.substr(yourTextarea.selectionEnd, yourTextarea.value.length);
yourTextarea.value = textBeforeSelection + " new selection text " + textAfterSelection;


text:
The Procrastinator Within
If I am busy, I must be productive, right? A busy man is a faithful and fruitful man?
Nope. Busyness is no guarantee of productivity, faithfulness, or fruitfulness.
But why? What distinguishes a fruitfully busy schedule from a non‐fruitful busy schedule?
I think it comes down to two important points: understanding our sin and understanding our roles. Today we'll look at our sin and later we will look more closely at roles).
In the last post we looked at Walter Henegar's candid account of how he procrastinated in getting to the root of procrastination.
In seminary, Mr. Henegar noticed a three‐fold pattern of procrastination in his academic life:
If it's not due tomorrow, then I'll take my time and put off the work.
If it's due tomorrow, I'll start the project, stay up late, and drop all my other priorities.
Once I've finished, I'm entitled to a reward. page 4 of 36
And then Mr. Henegar enrolled in a seminary course on counseling, where he began to uncover the hidden side of his procrastination. He realized that "my prickly branches of procrastination were being nourished by unseen roots growing deep in the chambers of my heart" (p. 41).
He's referring here to a diagram called "The Three Trees," developed by the Christian Counseling and Educational Foundation (CCEF). The diagram, based on Luke 6:43–45, presents the situations of life (illustrated by sun or heat) that reveal the roots of sinfulness or godliness in our lives. These roots reveal what we really want and believe.
Under the heat of life's circumstances, we sometimes respond in a godly way, revealing healthy roots that lead to fruitfulness (illustrated by a fruitful tree). Or these situations tempt us to respond sinfully, revealing a bad root and a lack of fruit (illustrated by a fruitless tree). The gospel is the centerpiece of the diagram, giving hope to the fruitless (through repentance) and reminding us that all godly fruit is a result of the gospel in our lives.
When he began recognizing the heart issues involved, Mr. Henegar continued through his semester with a closer watch on the roots of sin that nourished his procrastination. This is how he describes his discovery:
I began to feel like I was really figuring myself out, and it was still early enough in the semester to think I was staying on top of things. I'd notice when I started slipping blatantly into procrastination, and it was easy enough to stop—at first. But soon midterms hit, and everything quickly fell apart. I found myself pulling all‐nighters again, and it was back at square one. Ironically, though, I still had to work on an assignment for my counseling class. I reluctantly dove back, this time trying to get at deeper issues. It wasn't hard to begin naming things.
Pride was surely operating: every time I pulled an all‐nighter to finish a job, I was protecting my reputation before my friends and superiors.
Fear of others was closely related. When I had those mild panic attacks, the fear of others' disapproval was foremost in my head. page 5 of 36
Laziness wasn't the main thing, but it definitely played a part; sometimes I just didn't want to do anything.
Pleasure‐seeking and escapism were big players, too, though I generally confined myself to acceptable thrills like watching movies and binging on Ben & Jerry's. (p. 42, emphasis mine)
Mr. Henegar did the right thing after this discovery. He repented of his sin. He repented to his wife for the presence and effect of his sin. And he turned to a group of friends from his local church whom he offered "a standing invitation to show me my sin—and to remind me of the gospel" (p. 44).
What Mr. Henegar discovered was the simple truth that underlying our procrastination—putting off the most important duties we are called to accomplish—was not so much a busy schedule but a sinful heart.
The good news for all of us who are procrastinators is this: The gospel addresses these sins, provides forgiveness of sin, and gives us the power to weaken sin and cultivate true diligence. In the gospel we find hope to address the procrastinator within.
Don't miss previous posts in the Biblical Productivity series:
Are You Busy?
Confessions of a Busy Procrastinator
Throwback Thursday: Sinclair Ferguson Interview, Part 2


Here is the list of Lenovo Lenovo G450 Notebook Drivers we have for you. Here you can download drivers for Lenovo G450 laptop download software for automatic driver installation , video, graphics, LAN drivers for your Lenovo G450 Laptop with windows xp, update from DriverPack the latest audio 8. Driver lenovo g450 windows xp. To download the proper driver then find your device name , first choose your operating system click the download button. Gowdy URL for Get Update: Данная база VID\ PID USB- устройств от. Driver lenovo g450 windows xp.
Pour télécharger les drivers pour LENOVO G SERIES G450 pour Windows Windows XP ( 32) Windows 8. Uma frase em inglês no meio da tela e não sei o que faço não vai pra canto Vista, Update Lenovo G450 Notebook Drivers for your Windows XP, 32 bit 64 bit. Ordinateur portable Lenovo G450- G550 Windows XP Professionnel Pilote Télécharger; Description Driver LED Télécharger; Intel Chipset Driver: Chipset. Here you can download Lenovo G450 Notebook Drivers free easy just update your drivers now. 1 ( 64) Windows 8 ( 32), Windows XP ( 32), Windows Vista ( 32), Windows Vista ( 64), Windows Vista ( 32), Windows 7 ( 32), Windows 7 ( 64) Windows 8.
Ola meu not bloqueio um tal de erro de status e um da marca lenovo de tela digital e estou endoidando como faço para desbloquear pq tinha tres senhas duas do sistema geral e outra do sistema operacional e agora o esta com. + de 4853 Avis & Références Achetez votre Chargeur PC Lenovo!
This page contains the list of device drivers for Lenovo 2. 1 ( 64), cliquez sur " Télécharger". Click to share on Facebook ( Opens in new window) Click to share on Google+ ( Opens in new window).
If you has any Drivers Problem Just download driver detection tool, Vista , this professional drivers tool will help you fix the driver problem for Windows 10 XP. Parts & Accessories. Find Parts ( Current Product) Parts Lookup. Version: Maintained by Stephen J.
Si vous avez besoin d' un drivers d' une autre version, envoyez une demande de driver. 19 de setembro de at 16: 34. 1 32- bit 64- bit Operating System improve the performance of your laptop. Si vous avez des questions sur ce.
Lenovo Global Support Home. Ethernet Drivers: Intel 945GM Graphics Driver: Intel Chipsets Driver: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Driver Ver.
1576: Intel PRO Network Adapter Driver. There was a problem adding this item to Cart.
Please try again later. Testimonial # 8844 of 12819 ( View all the 12819 testimonials) " I was having a difficult time finding a repair manual for my projection TV. Thanks to you I had on my computer the next day.


The reform was not only focus on the interior of the mid century modern atlanta. But also a deep reform was carried out on the outside to give it a greater modernism. But with a very clear premise. Its not to compromise the existing trees in that area. Next to the main door, a small outdoor living room was design to enjoy the fresh air of the area.


We are looking for hands-on iOS developers (multiple positions are currently open) responsible for the design and development of high volume end user products aimed at a range of iOS devices.
A commitment to collaborative problem solving, high quality code, and a passion for technology is essential.
- Design and build applications for the iOS platform using Swift, Rx Swift, and Objective-C this is a hands-on developer position.
- Stay up-to-date with technical trends.
- Be a part of RSL's learning culture by giving Tech Talks.
- Development experience in Objective-C, Swift or Rx Swift.
- Understanding of Apples design principles and interface guidelines.
- Knowledge of the iOS ecosystem and the libraries available for common tasks.
Pune - 411045, Landmarks: Above Oriental Bank of Commerce.


A "simple" concept and a strong image: "Ideal link between real system and digital model".
First manufacturer and distributor in France of didactic equipment intended for the automobile maintenance trainings.
· A very broad range of didactical training models (more than 40 references in catalogue) made in France.
· The training and teaching support. We provide with each model a dossier including a technical description, examples of practical works and results standard.
1997 DIDAC company was founded on August 1st, 1997 by three associates in the form of private company whose capital rises with 12,300 € and based in CHIRAC, Lozere. The company designs and manufactures models based on systems resulting from the world of the TRUCS (conventional pneumatic braking, the hydraulic speed reducer…).
2004 Our collection is widened towards the field of the particular vehicles by models making it possible to discover the operation of various sensors: "production and auxiliary use of energies" are directly resulting from reference frame BEP MVM going back to June 2004. The most recent models (hand drive operation gear box, mastervac and Master-cylinder…) are from the light vehicles.
2010 DIDAC BDH continues to develop in Europe and comes into the international market in 5 countries: Senegal, Sweden, Tunisia, Cameroon and Russia.
2012 Creation of the DIDAC CONCEPT Company which develops our trainings activities.
2014 DIDAC BDH Company left for Saint Denis sur Coise, Loire.
2015 Opening of the new factory and the training center in ST DENIS SUR COISE, Loire.
At present, Mr. MAURIN, general manager, is in charge of a company with seven people (three in production, a sales manager, two assistants of direction, a trainer).
- The use of real components (or miniaturized) as well as the respect of their positions thus allowing to discover "at first view" the situation of the system.
- The users can be able to touch the components when that does not present any danger.
- Simulations are real what makes it possible to visualize the various phases of operation (in statics or dynamics).
- The provision of the elements must allow an easy access in order to be able to take various measurement or adjustments.
- All our training models are equipped with a "breakdown box" thus making it possible to simulate relevant dysfunctions. These models are also likely to dialogue with the diagnostic tools sold by DIDAC BDH (what makes it possible in particular to carry out adjustments and parameter settings).
- Finally all the models are delivered with a file resource of exploitation and the training files.


text:
<select name="pGenero">
<option value="Rock">Rock</option>
<option value="Reggae">Reggae</option>
<option value="Tropical">Tropical</option>
<option value="Punk">Punk</option>
<option value="Clasico">Clasico</option>
<option value="Jazz">Jazz</option>
</select>

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


PensionEasy is a trading style of Proconnect Marketing Ltd, company number 6809946.
PensionEasy is a free service connecting you with financial advisors who are fully authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Anything published on this website is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as financial advice. PensionEasy accepts no liability arising from advice provided by third parties, either from advisors on our panel or otherwise.


Nominations must be received by the Association by January 15.
The Barnes Award has been established to recognize outstanding professional development services provided at the Special Interest Council level. A maximum of one award may be presented each year.
Nominations must come from Special Interest Councils or Branches. Affiliate SIC executives may submit nominations to their provincial SIC executives. Email additional information if space is insufficient. Send your email to jdownton@nlta.nl.ca.
The Selection Committee will be the Professional Issues Committee.
1. Examination of all applications received. Recommendations to be based on majority vote of the committee.
2. Recommendation to the Provincial Executive Council for selection.
Unsuccessful nominees in any year will be automatically re-nominated for the two subsequent years following the original nominations. Nominations of retired teachers are subject to the limit of two years following retirement.


An Aussie sporting presenter has found his career on thin ice after making homophobic jibes whilst reporting on the male figure skaters a the Olympics.
Eddie McGuire, who presents for Channel 9 news, is in a lot of trouble over the comments made and many are calling for him to be sacked. He hounded American skater Johnny Weir, for his flamboyant outfits. He and co-host Mick Molly ridiculed skaters for their outfits and attacked their sexuality.
Molloy - "They don't leave anything in the locker room those blokes." McGuire - "They don't leave anything in the closet either, do they?"
The sporting presenter reportedly attempted to apolagise for the comment but managed to add a further insult "I suggested that there was a disaster happening at the ice skating rink because organisers had found out one of the male ice dancers wasn't gay.
"And I apologise for that really sincerely."
"What should happen and will happen are two different things,"
"Channel Nine should sack both of them because they're not fit to be broadcasters or to be involved in a television network when they use this kind of banter."
"I have lodged a complaint ... because I believe the comments are capable of inciting ridicule, contempt or hate against homosexual Australians,"
"These two men were not out in the backyard having a barbecue with their mates, they're on national television. They've got responsibilities to the broadcaster and to the NSW anti-discrimination act."
A facebook group has already been created entitled 'Eddie McGuire is ruining the 2010 Winter Olympics coverage' Channel Nine is yet to comment.


text:
Global warming will bring more Atlantic hurricane…
Global warming will bring more Atlantic hurricane storm surges
Extreme storm events of the magnitude of Hurricane Katrina will occur more frequently because of climate change, according to a new study involving the National Oceanography Centre in Liverpool.
The research, published in PNAS this week, concluded that the threat from hurricane-induced storm surges in the Atlantic will increase significantly as global temperatures rise.
Storm surges are localised increases in sea level, brought about by hurricanes, that can devastate coastal populations. During the 2005 Hurricane Katrina event, it was the storm surge that caused the widespread coastal flooding of New Orleans. There is therefore much interest in forecasting when and where these extreme changes in local sea level will occur.
The results of this study add evidence to the ongoing debate amongst scientists on whether hurricanes will become more frequent with global warming.
Dr Aslak Grinsted, lead author and researcher at the University of Copenhagen, explained "It is always difficult to say what caused individual extreme weather events. Our analysis indicates however that we have passed a global warming threshold where we are having twice as frequent Katrina magnitude surges."
Co-author Dr Svetlana Jevrejeva of the National Oceanography Centre in Liverpool explained why their approach was novel. "Previous studies have used climate models to forecast future hurricane frequency, but these findings have been controversial and there is much disagreement among scientists regarding the relationship between hurricanes and temperature. In our study we used sea level data measured by various tide gauges throughout the 20th century to see how extreme sea level during hurricanes has changed with temperature."
The researchers then combined these historic data with projections of climate change, to predict how many Katrina-like storm surges would occur in the future: "The results show that the extreme sea levels observed during Hurricane Katrina will become ten times more likely if average global temperatures increase by two degrees Celsius," said Dr Jevrejeva.
The study was a collaboration between the National Oceanography Centre, Beijing Normal University, the University of Copenhagen, the University of Lapland and Uppsala University Sweden.


The XLAB Torpedo System 100 is a low-cost, refillable, between-the-aerobars hydration system that includes a folding straw and a computer mount.
It is the cutting-edge of aerodynamics, combined with state-of-the-art ergonomics. It was passionately developed over a four-year period with the experience of 26 World Triathlon Titles.


My websotage just stopped. Its been two weeks now and i do'nt see any activities to finished uploading my files. Most of the folders are still grey.
This is kinda frustrating because i purchase webstorage so that it will automaticaly backup my files but its not joing its job!!
hey, do you know what's differences between sync and backup?
I have a 5GB free account, I could only backup 1 PC!
You need to set on your Client APP.


text:
America Before: The Key to Earth's Lost Civilization and over 1.5 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
$43.15 + FREE Delivery
Ships from and sold by Book Depository UK.
Quantity: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Quantity:1
Other Sellers on Amazon
& Free Delivery on eligible orders See details and conditions
Sold by: Amazon AU
+ FREE Delivery
Sold by: Ria_Christie_Collections
Sold by: BuyGlobal
America Before: The Key to Earth's Lost Civilization: A new investigation into the mysteries of the human past by the bestselling author of Fingerprints of the Gods and Magicians of the Gods Hardcover – 2 Apr 2019
by Graham Hancock (Author)
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
Free with your Audible trial
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial
$43.15 13 New from $37.09
***THE SUNDAY TIMES TOP TEN BESTSELLER***
'Hancock's books provide a fascinating, alternative version of prehistory. America Before, detailed and wide-ranging, turns what was myth and legend into a new story of the past.' Daily Mail
Was an advanced civilization lost to history in the global cataclysm that ended the last Ice Age? Graham Hancock, the internationally bestselling author, has made it his life's work to find out -- and in America Before, he draws on the latest archaeological and DNA evidence to bring his quest to a stunning conclusion.
We've been taught that North and South America were empty of humans until around 13,000 years ago - amongst the last great landmasses on earth to have been settled by our ancestors. But new discoveries have radically reshaped this long-established picture and we know now that the Americas were first peopled more than 130,000 years ago - many tens of thousands of years before human settlements became established elsewhere.
Hancock's research takes us on a series of journeys and encounters with the scientists responsible for the recent extraordinary breakthroughs. In the process, from the Mississippi Valley to the Amazon rainforest, he reveals that ancient 'New World' cultures share a legacy of advanced scientific knowledge and sophisticated spiritual beliefs with supposedly unconnected 'Old World' cultures. Have archaeologists focussed for too long only on the 'Old World' in their search for the origins of civilization while failing to consider the revolutionary possibility that those origins might in fact be found in the 'New World'?
America Before: The Key to Earth's Lost Civilisation is the culmination of everything that millions of readers have loved in Hancock's body of work over the past decades, namely a mind-dilating exploration of the mysteries of the past, amazing archaeological discoveries and profound implications for how we lead our lives today.
Fingerprints of the Gods
Graham Hancock
Magicians of the Gods
America Before: The Key to Earth's Lost Civilization
Divine Spark: a Graham Hancock Reader
Magicians of the Gods: The Forgotten Wisdom of Earth's Lost Civilisation the Sequel to Fingerprints of the Gods
Start reading America Before on your Kindle in under a minute.
Publisher: Coronet; 1 edition (2 April 2019)
Boxed-product Weight: 921 g
Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 88,573 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
#64 in Prehistory
#659 in Conspiracy Theories
#396 in Archaeology (Books)
Praise for Graham Hancock - :
A great yarn... [Hancock] is a writer with a first-rate feel for colour and ambience. - The Sunday Times
Hancock's book is an absorbing big-picture analysis as well as a cautionary tale. - Nexus
The concluding volume of the Fingerprints of the Gods trilogy.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Susan Bell
5.0 out of 5 starsAn alternative history for colonisation of the Americas
Despite being vilified by archaeologists, Hancock always raises alternative explanations to the accepted history of ancient civilization. His books are well researched and, whilst some of his assertions may not be the most logical, it is certainly enjoyable to contemplate.
Amazon.com: 3.9 out of 5 stars 3 reviews
Sharon J.B.Y
5.0 out of 5 starsVery well written with important information
I am writing this review even before finishing the book, because it is excellent and I know that I will read it to the end, so why wait? Graham Hancock has a such way with words, so no matter what he writes about, it is always interesting and fascinating. I don't think I would reach even an iota of the information presented in his book on my own, so huge thanks for his tireless search for scientific information and relentless drive for the truth amid the never ending obstinate opposition.
cfeagans
2.0 out of 5 starsHis "Lost Civilization" ends up being special beings with ESP.
I received Graham Hancock's new book in the mail from the publisher to review a little under a week ago as I write this review. I reached out to St. Martin's Press back in February and offered to review it and, although I received a polite response indicating that I'd be considered, I was somewhat surprised to actually receive it just days ago, nearly a week ahead of its official release date in the United States (it's been available in the UK for weeks now). My surprise was that the publisher either didn't vet my previous reviews of pseudoarchaeology or that they did and were willing to take a chance anyway.
Having provided the above disclosure, let me say that though I didn't spend money on the book, I will make an effort not to be swayed by the "gift."
If you Google the word "pseudoarchaeology" then click the first link, which is probably to Wikipedia, Graham Hancock's photograph is displayed prominently at the top of that page. If you read this review to its completion, you'll understand why.
The book itself is thick. Weighing in at nearly 600 pages, it has 30 chapters broken down into 8 parts. That said, it reads very well. It isn't dense by any means and, though Hancock references quite a bit if real science, it isn't overloaded with jargon or technobabble. In fact, Hancock's writing style is generally very good. I found myself annoyed at some of his writing habits ("the reader will recall…," etc.) but I wouldn't expect this to bother most others. For the average reader who isn't scientifically inclined, Hancock does a better than average job explaining concepts. At least to the extent that he actually understands them.
Hancock begins the book with sections discussing the Serpent Mound in Ohio, the Cerutti Mastodon site in California, ancient DNA (aDNA), and earthworks and dirt in South America. Early on, he begins his love-hate relationship with archaeologists as a theme that continues as an undercurrent or sub-plot to his overall narrative. On one hand, he's clearly enamored with archaeologists and the work that's been done that suits his own ideas. On the other, however, he's clearly upset that archaeologists refuse to let him in the club—to give equal deference to these ideas. If you stick to the end of this review, you'll understand why.
Brother, can you paradigm?
The overall theme develops slowly. Hancock simmers the pot as he slowly introduces each premise he believes leads up to it. But the sub-theme is right there in our face from chapter to chapter: archaeologists aren't to be trusted because they are resistant to "new paradigms."
He's immediately on the offensive and continues through to the end, accusing archaeologists and archaeology as being an institution that doesn't want change and will ruin careers to see to it that none of it happens. The dead horse he beats over and over is the Clovis first hypothesis. That there were people prior to Clovis is something he says, "archaeologists have recently been dragged kicking and screaming to accept." As example, he mentions the work of Jacques Cinq-Mars, who insisted years ago that he was finding pre-Clovis materials at Bluefish Caves in Alaska.
"As a result of such attitudes, funding drained away and Cinq-Mars had to stop his work, only to be proved correct, many years later, by a new scientific study…"
Hancock, p.58
I can't speak for Cinq-Mars and the extent to which his career was affected by the Clovis-first hypothesis. But, then, neither can Hancock. Archaeologists are people. Some people excel in their jobs; others not so much. The Clovis-first "paradigm" as the fringe are so fond of saying ("paradigm" is a sciencey sounding word) went out of fashion decades ago. Are there still some old-timers clinging to it? Perhaps. But there are some very well-to-do archaeologists who were on the cusp of discovering pre-Clovis back when it was made a part of history.
Here's how it works: scientists obtain data. That data are analyzed and more data are obtained based on new research questions… and so on. Eventually, a provisional conclusion is arrived at—usually when the data reach some sort of plateau or some overriding reason exists to think the data aren't likely to change. For the Clovis-first hypothesis (it was always a hypothesis more than a "paradigm"), older sites were just not yet found. And once they started to show up, there was evidence that peopling North America had to occur after 13,000 years ago due to the small window of opportunity provided by an "ice-free corridor" and lowered sea-levels that created a land-bridge across the Bearing Sea.
Archaeologists, rightly demanded strong evidence before accepting a pre-Clovis hypothesis. This, they demanded of themselves. And they met the challenge. All conclusions in archaeology, as with any science, are provisional. They're waiting sufficient evidence to either support or revise them as conclusions. Sometimes they're completely scrapped and something very new takes its place. In the case of Clovis-first, some would say the revision is small. The Clovis culture still exists in the archaeological record. Everything that was found of them is still present. But we now know that there existed cultures before this technology came about. Let's not forget, "Clovis" describes the technology not the societal norms, kinships, and beliefs of the various peoples that made use of it.
The alternative would have been to simply accept a new hypothesis as a provisional conclusion, willy-nilly and without sufficient evidence. Of course, all would have turned out fine. Pre-Clovis is the correct way to think. But such a slippery-slope of letting just any-old hypothesis in as a provisional conclusion just won't work. If it wasn't hard to change a provisional conclusion for a new one, where would the line be drawn? At Vikings in Minnesota? At "bigfoot?" The nephilim? The Annunaki? Polka-dotted unicorns that breathe fire and traded corn with China 25,000 years ago?
Chances are, I lost the average fan of Graham Hancock somewhere between "Vikings" and the "unicorns." But who gets to draw that line. Hancock would like it to include his own idea. Let's press on to see why it's a bad one.
I won't spend any time on the Cerutti Mastodon site here. It has its own problems, but one of them is now Graham Hancock. But I found it interesting that Tom Deméré initially declined to meet with Hancock, then did so with what seemed to be open arms if Hancock's account is to be believed. It's interesting because Hancock mentions later in his book that "Egyptologists avoid me" and spends several pages discussing how different factions of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis were upset that he incorporated each other's' material. Apparently a video of Hancock's was posted to an anti-pseudoscience website and one of the scientists "achieved some unwanted negative-celebrity among his colleagues. He was challenged about the wisdom of hosting [Hancock] and suffered the indignity of wondering about the effect the … video might have on his career and reputation."
The recent association of Deméré with the pseudoarchaeological television show hosted by Megan Fox and now the pseudoarchaeological notions of Graham Hancock are likely to do little in helping him win over his colleagues.
Chopping Down a Cherry-Picked Tree
In the final few sections of the book, Hancock returns to North America where he describes some of the earliest known earthen mounds in North America, such as Watson Brake and Poverty Point. Then he heads up the Mississippi River Valley, ultimately to Ohio and the more recent mounds there. All the while describing alignments, the solstices, lunar cycles, astro-archaeological features, and so on. But this is also where he dives head first into specious comparisons between Native Americans and ancient Egyptians. He readily admits he doesn't think there were any cross-cultural transmissions of information, and that he accepts the "orthodox" explanation that geographic and temporal separation of these two cultures means that they didn't have the chance to share information.
But it's after his section on the global cataclysm that only affected North America that he finally comes clean on what his game truly is. He states several times through the book that he believes that there was a "lost civilization" which was a "third party" responsible for the similarities we see in multiple cultures. An example is the constellation Orion seen as relating to the land of the dead in both Egyptian and Native American cultures. Never mind that the constellation we understand to be Orion today, probably the easiest to spot north of the equator. And that it "travels" east to west, seasonally. Or that, the sun coming up in the east is so easily associated with birth and renewal and, as it sets, associated with death and ancestors. The common element need not be a "lost civilization." It's already people. Humans. Homo sapiens. The same common element for all of his other spurious correlations.
By this time, I've waded through Hancock's cherry-picked science. I say "cherry-picked" because he avoids a lot of the parts that don't work for him. For instance, he likes where Raghavan et al (2015) and Skoglund et al (2015) mention the "Australasian signal" among some of the ancient populations of South America. He likes it a lot. In fact, he mentions is many times after chapter 9 where he introduces it. And even though he provides the quote where Skoglund et al clarify that it was the founding population that was more closely related to indigenous Australians, New Guineans, and Andamen Islanders than to other Native American groups, he still missed the significance. Or at least he didn't adequately share that significance with his readers.
What the Australasian genetic "signal" really tells us is that we should be on the lookout for populations that were fast-moving or small. There's also as good a chance that this Population-Y (the Australasian population in question) began in Southeast Asia then moved both north toward Beringia and south into Melanesia and Australia and what we're seeing is where they ended up. Hancock doesn't share these bits along with many others. They don't jive with his shtick.
What's the Gist of It All?
Overall, America Before is presented as a carefully picked set of genuine scientific notions, mixed with a few pseudoarchaeological ideas (like spurious similarities between Egyptian and Native American cultures) in order to set Hancock up for his final pitch. One that he holds back until he thinks he's won the lay-reader over. His easy-to read writing style makes the reader comfortable and probably sympathetic to him personally. He carefully poisons the well here and there with "the skeptics will say…" etc.
There is much within America Before that I can actually agree with. And there is much that I could "debunk" in this book if I cared to. I suspect the comments below will give me ample opportunity if the Hancock acolytes and cult following (he truly is a charismatic figure with a following) respond. But the reality is, none of the premises Hancock puts forth, even if every single one were correct, would mean that his conclusion is right. He conveniently provides a conclusion that cannot be tested or evaluated by science since it isn't within the realm of science.
Here's his conclusion:
"My speculation, which I will not attempt to prove here or to support with evidence but merely present for consideration, is that the advanced civilization I see evolving in North America during the Ice Age had transcended leverage and mechanical advantage and learned to manipulate matter and energy by deploying powers of consciousness that we have not yet begun to tap."
In short, Hancock believes this "lost civilization" used telepathy, telekinesis, remote viewing, and healing powers to transmit their legacy to the world.
I wondered throughout the entire book what mechanism he would suggest. I honestly thought it would be the power of oral history, perhaps tied to mnemonic devices (figurines, rock art, landscapes) or religious ritual to ensure fidelity.
I was not expecting ESP.
M. Raghavan, et al (2015). Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history of Native Americans. Science, 349, p. 3884.
P. Skoglund, et al (2015). Genetic evidence for two founding populations of the Americas. Nature, 525, pp. 104-108
Tony Pino
5.0 out of 5 starsVery compelling, wonderfully told. An absolute pleasure to read.
29 April 2019 - Published on Amazon.com
What I like about this, besides being beautifully written, is that Mr. Hancock approaches these questions (how old are things? when were people first in the Americas) not through the narrow lens of a single field, but by piecing together information across fields. This is all too rare nowadays. He takes some criticism sometimes for offering unpopular points of views, but I found him to be quite forthcoming in where a theory may be soft, and if not, just what the logical evidence is. The audio version of the book is also quite good - read by the author at just the right pace.
Go to Amazon.com to see all 3 reviews 3.9 out of 5 stars
Books > History > Ancient Civilizations > Prehistory
Books > Politics, Philosophy & Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Archaeology
Books > Politics, Philosophy & Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Communication & Media Studies
Books > Politics, Philosophy & Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Conspiracy Theories


text:
Q: Upload Javascript Object (svgCrowbar output) to Laravel 5.6 Server SVG Crowbar's code is here, I'm using it to download SVG's, but I want to be able to upload them to the server as well (with single click). I don't know javascript outside of D3.js, but I believe this is the object creation and download section of the code:
var url = window.URL.createObjectURL(new Blob(source.source, { "type" : "text\/xml" }));

var a = document.createElement("a");
body.appendChild(a);
a.setAttribute("class", "svg-crowbar");
a.setAttribute("download", filename + ".svg");
a.setAttribute("href", url);
a.style["display"] = "none";
a.click();

I  use the following for Laravel file uploads, after retrieving them from a POST request:
{!! Form::file('file', array('class' => 'form-control')) !!}

Question: How would you upload an svg created with SVG Crowbar? (without making the user browse for the file to upload it after downloading it)
The fact it's an object, opposed to a file, and crossing language lines, confuses me.

Update
I have attempted this via ajax in a separate blade file, but I can't get it to work still. I see other questions about this and their fiddles can work in my browser but this does not work for me. I keep getting the error message from the ajax instead of its success message. All other errors are gone now. I click on Network in "inspect element" and everything is status 200, including the xhr.
I have also checked .env file and config/sessions making sure secure session cookie is set to false, my server time is fine, I can login fine, I can do normal Laravel file uploads and everything else fine. I deleted cookies from browser and logged in again and it's still giving ajax error instead of success.
For View:
@extends('layouts.app')
@include('header') //just first html tag, linked scripts, navbar
        <head><meta name="csrf-token" content="{{ csrf_token() }}"></head>
    @csrf
        <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
    <script  type="text/javascript">
    var value = 62;
    $.ajaxSetup({
      headers: {
        'X-CSRF-TOKEN': $('meta[name="csrf-token"]').attr('content')
      }
    });
    var data = { value : 63 };
      $.ajax({
        type: 'POST',
        url: 'http://localhost/torphin/public/graphbuilder/upload',
        processData: false,
        contentType: false,
        cache: false,
        dataType: 'json',
        data: { value : 63 },
        success: function(data) {
          console.log('Value added ' + value);
        },
        error: function(e) {
          console.log('Error!', e);
        }
      });
    </script>
    @include('footer') //just footer, jquery, and bootstrap links

For Controller:
public function uploadGet(Request $request)
{
    return view('svgUpload');
}
public function uploadGraph(Request $request)
{
    dd($request);
    session([ 'value' => $request->value]);
}

For Routes:
Route::get('/graphbuilder/upload', array('uses' => 'Controller@uploadGet'));
Route::post('/graphbuilder/upload', array('uses' => 'Controller@uploadGraph'));

A: So I looked inside of the error message that my ajax request is supposed to print, and after pasting it into google, found this SO question, stating that this:
public function uploadGraph(Request $request)
{
    dd($request);
    session([ 'value' => $request->value]);
}

should be changed this:
public function uploadGraph(Request $request)
{
    return $request->all();
}

It then passes the console log of the value "62" in the console. I should be able to pass the url value from SVG Crowbar and receive it in the page then. Thanks to anyone who took the time to read this.