"Wild Honey Pie! Is an original relationship comedy starring the incredible Jemima Kirke! It's that Seven Year Itch moment in our heroes marriage and being of the Millenials persuasion they itch til the relationship bleeds!" Director Jamie Adams on WILD HONEY PIE! Screening at SxSW 2018 Film.
The gluten free club sandwiches from Whole Foods Deli are the best! The Alamo Drafthouse and the Paramount Theatre; they really are some of the world's coolest theatres here in Austin.
The journey started when I was six years old, when I went to the video shop for the first time and knew i wanted to be a part of this somehow. I would make radio plays with my brother, and came up with my own TV station and programmed the imaginary channels. I picked up a super vhs camcorder in 1994 and made a short film and I have made movies every year since then.
Early on, to keep the magic happening I worked the day job as an Assistant Editor on BBC Drama like Dr Who and Features like STATE OF PLAY.
I think watching movies like HEARTBURN and SCENES FROM A MARRIAGE have stayed with me and then in the last few years I've experienced first hand how complicated things can be for modern long term relationships; pressures emerging from all angles, especially when children aren't involved, or a mortgage hasn't been applied for. I write the story outline and researched who might be great for the role. Jemima Kirke was one of the first actors that caught my attention for the lead role, she has a sincerity and authenticity that can't be faked. Fortunate to have Jemima interested in working with me as we had several conversations about relationships, about love and lust and life in general…the simple stuff ! We built the movie around this moment in these characters lives where everything is being tested, they smash their relationship into pieces and we are with them every step of the way. It's a simple life experience to fall into. I work with a co-operative of talented and generous film crew that have made several movies with me now, they know how making a feature film in 6 days works; we shot in my home town, it was the summer, we had such a beautiful time and at this point I should say that this last year I've been very fortunate to have a Producer in Maggie Monteith who has supported the work I truly want to make, so to have a micro budget guaranteed allowed for this particular personal movie to exist and no pressure to make it anything other than intended. Because we shoot so fast editing is always longer than average, an editor and I travel through the hours of footage and pull assemblies together for each scene like the way a documentary comes together in the edit – for me this is where much of the "writing" happens on an improv-led movie. Oh, I think I forgot to say that I have tended to write a scene by scene scriptment after discussions with key cast about character, this scene by scene is what we schedule and look to shoot although scenes get dropped and new ones emerge during the shoot. We improvise our way through the dialogue, we shoot fast and loose and I guide during takes more than in between takes. We end up with a four hour edit generally and then we make final structural decisions and music thoughts are made at this late stage and we make sure we have a deadline to meet, mostly self inflicted otherwise I feel as though the edit could go on and on. There are always so many possibilities. Then we mix the sound in a very natural and organic fashion, we grade hoping to invoke the spirit of the endeavour which is the originality of the process. Then you send it out into the world and hope that the people you admire enjoy your work. The people at SXSW are some of my most favourite Cinema people and on this occasion we've struck lightning twice! Where BLACK MOUNTAIN POETS introduced my work to American audiences At SXSW 2016, this year WILD HONEY PIE will take our work further into the consciousness of the great American cinema audience!
Ask anyone who has seen me working on set and they'll say Jamie survives on bananas and chicken during a shoot, and a lot of water. During Pre Production and Post Production there's a lot of Chocolate and cranberry juice. I mean mainly being a filmmaker feels like you've got a disease compelling you to continue to face this impossible task of making films, and it doesn't get easier, each film will have its issues, struggle, but filmmakers only know about driving this story to Production and through that all the way home, to the finish line. Although that's the other thing , generally the story of your movie continues forever more – it exists and takes on a life of is own.
Shooting the scenes we needed so quickly is always tricky. These are tender, sometimes emotionally tense and other times physically demanding, and we have to get the coverage to be able to edit it and you know you oh have six days to shoot these scenes. We keep chasing our tail this way, adapting the story as we work through the shot scenes . We ended up nearly missing our ending! It was the only time I had something very specific in mind and the sun had started to go down. My DOP and I were upset and concerned as it's the closing scene and this is what we were building to and it's not right. We couldn't see the solution as the light is wrong for the bench I wanted to have the actors sat on. We went further along the common to another bench. Again, it was wrong but this time there were people being very noisy nearby too. Time was running out light wise and working hours wise! The stills photographer who is known for twenty years turns to me and says "I know this is not my business, but you could get them to play the scene out on the rocks and the light would be perfect!" Bet my DOP checked out the location and it was perfect while the sun remained in the sky! We moved quickly and got the scene and I think it's a beautiful ending.
Bet Rourich is incredibly talented Spanish cinematographer who had shot the excellent ADULT LIFE SKILLS for Rachel Tunnard. I was looking for a new DP to work with on movies in 2017 and Bet immediately felt like someone I'd known for years! She's so naturally gifted and a generous, patient person and she appreciated that working my way, shooting improv led scenes in such a short period of time would be a challenge, we discussed how we'd try to pre-light locations and make small adjustments during the shooting of a scene to help keep the performances moving forward. She is a fan of the French New Wave, as am I and I think we are excited by exploring possibilities. We worked on my Comedy Movie SONGBIRD in January and then came back together in the June to shoot "WILD HONEY PIE!" – It was interesting how the change in actors, location and First AD changed the way we shot this movie compared to SONGBIRD. Bet is a detailed cinematographer who is able to adapt and discover new possibilities and has the confidence in her abilities to shoot in a very intuitive way. We were always looking to shoot handheld using natural light as much as possible.
The SXSW audiences are truly the best in the World and can't wait to hear their thoughts on the movie. Also coming together with Jemima Kirke, Sarah Solemani, Brett Goldstein, Dan Clark and my brother Ashley Adams on March 12th for the Premiere at the Alamo. It will be a very special occasion.
I think that the audiences at SXSW will lead is to what happens next.
I love Chapter Arts Centre Screen 1 in Cardiff, the Capital City of my beloved Wales. Generally because Wild Honey Pie! is shot in my sleepy coastal town of Porthcawl in Wales and that's the best screen in Wales so it would be perfect.
What would you say to someone who was being disruptive during a screening, even if it was your own movie?
I'm sure that won't happen at SXSW, audiences at SXSW tend to be respectful of the work they're viewing, but if that were the case I'd probably think they were feeling so positive about WILD HONEY PIE! That they had to tell their friends and family about it immediately via text or leaving the cinema early to tell them in person!
Honestly if there's something else you could see yourself doing then go and do that! If not, of you've truly got the bug and can't shake it then you'll find a way to make films. Truly if there's a will there's a way.
When I was 17 in 1997, a friend and I were allowed to head to London on the National Express bus and attend a few screenings at the London Film Festival. We got to see this movie starring Anthony Hopkins, Alec Baldwin and Elle McPherson called THE EDGE. it was at the Odeon Leicester Square. It's a huge screen and it felt like it was the most amazing movie. I felt like I was in heaven; somewhere completely exotic to the working class life I was experiencing in Wales. Was a spiritual moment for sure.
WILD HONEY PIE is screening at SxSW 2018. For more information point your browser to www.sxsw.com/film!


We have listed all of the Headstart programs in Prospect Hill, North Carolina . Click on the head start programs to view full details including maps and pictures.
If you do not see your head start listed in Prospect Hill North Carolina listed below, you can add it to our database here - Add Your Program.
Due to finding no head start program listings in Prospect Hill, North Carolina, we have listed the area listings for Prospect Hill, below.


Personal injury damages are broken into two different categories – compensatory damages and punitive damages. Compensatory damages are those that are meant to "compensate" a victim for the injury. This is money for medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages sustained to put them in the same position that they were prior to the injury. Punitive damages, on the other hand, are meant to be a punishment to the wrongdoer. There are many more regulations on punitive damages than compensatory damages. Punitive damages are only awarded in limited circumstances in personal injury suits.
Each of the above three factors have a high standard to meet in order to prove their existence in the case. One of the more common factors to be proven is willful and wanton conduct. This factor often comes up in driving under the influence cases. Many cases involving drinking and driving have concluded with punitive damages being awarded to the victim.
In addition to requiring the presence of fraud, malice, or willful and wanton conduct, there are other limitations placed on punitive damages if they are awarded. Punitive damages "shall not exceed three times the amount of compensatory damages or $250,000, whichever is greater." This cap is relevant to all cases, except cases in which the defendant was the cause of a car accident because of impaired driving.
The dedicated personal injury attorneys at Arnold & Smith, PLLC are here to get you the compensation that you deserve for your injuries. We are aggressive and will fight for your right to be compensated for injuries caused by the negligence or wrongful act of another. The personal injury attorneys at Arnold & Smith, PLLC are here to help you through every step of the personal injury case. Now taking cases throughout the Charlotte region with offices in Uptown Charlotte, Mooresville and the new location under renovation in Monroe. Contact us, for a free consultation, call us at 704-370-2828 or click here for additional resources.


text:
<?php

namespace Redports\Node\Command;

class Command
{
    public function __construct()
    {
        ;
    }

    public function execute($options, $arguments, $app = null)
    {
        if ($options['update']) {
            $cmd = new UpdateCommand();
        } elseif ($options['setup']) {
            $cmd = new SetupCommand();
        } else {
            $cmd = new MainCommand();
        }

        return $cmd->execute($options, $arguments, $app);
    }

    protected function writeln($line)
    {
        printf("%s\n", $line);

        return true;
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Essays are a necessary part of a larger education training training course. Our essay give aid in the industry of instruction. It deliver aid in the area of instruction.
Writing a great paper may come with its fair share of challenges like in-depth research along with limited moment. You get the essay at quite affordable and acceptable prices. You have the essay at quite affordable and fair rates.
On-line customized essay help is a method that lots of students are using not just to receive their essay written but for the intent of learning essay writing craft too. A few of the students just do not have enough time to complete assignment.
Customized essay writing is an ideal possibility available online custom writing services for all students. Since you can see, we provide custom essays only. PlusWith essay writing online, you will have the ability to receive an inexpensive customized essay with confidence.
The writers inform the student early if they aren't able to fulfill the deadline collection. The duty of the case essays is to show you which individuals possess the perfect job which could let you to receive grades which will permit you locate an excellent level. When students face an extremely complex writing assignment, a number of them put away other projects to concentrate on it and to complete it independently.
You may not be content with some portion of the article help resources delivered through us. Often people ask why our service is a favorite with this kind of a sizable number of students. There are two kinds of services to be found on the World Wide Web.
Professional essay writers are almost always on the net that will help you relieve all your academic stress. Each essay needs a distinctive and different therapy and Tone of Writing. The essay writing specialist will readily cope with any type of assignment.
Essay writing is fairly challenging undertaking together with plenty of college students come to be frustrated whilst writing composition only since they don't understand how exactly to publish it https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6592&context=etd in fantastic fashion that is the main reason why they commence attempting to find essay writing assistance. Is among the top writing services for the best custom essay writing. Always keep in your thoughts that you might possess an awesome essay writing assignment simply 1 time you get writing the assistance of the very best essay writing services.
After you're organizing the drawn-out informative article outline you have to make sure it not overly extensive or too specific and that usually means you're able to centre around the crux of the topic. Our essays online company will certainly get you exactly what you are searching for and to make things even easier we strongly recommend that you fill in our internet order form so that we get so much as the minutest detail that may make your essay or assignment better in any aspect. In the event you're indecisive to pay a person to compose your essay, explore other facets of our websites or contact our support team for any extra guidelines.
Maybe, you're expected to incorporate an outline or bibliography. Now, related to the quantity of pages your essay ought to be concentrate on a section at precisely the period that's same provide a couple of evidence. Following finishing the study you want to compose the article recalling the precise theme as well as the disagreements that you just simply want to put forward.
According to experts, without drawing the eye of your professor, you don't stand a possibility of getting high grades. Get the instances of stuff you're very likely to write. That means you don't need to worry about your essay, all you need to do is set in only just a little bit of trust and give and specific requirements you've got in mind, you are able to also talk about your views with us in order to clarify your wants, and we assure you that you won't be let down.
It's possible to also read articles on the perfect way to write. The organization believes in nothing but your satisfaction, and, thus, we get you the piece that you've always been searching for. The large part of the moment, assignment writing projects have topics that are specifically by assigned by way of a teacher.
You are able to definitely hunt for Custom Essay help to make sure you're presenting the major content material nicely. You have the ability to definitely start looking for Custom Essay help to be certain you're presenting the key content material nicely.
The extra point is that we've got a handy chat board for our valued customers, in addition to offer a user-friendly purchase form and clients' profile. If you are in need of a more sophisticated list or would love to understand if your subject is in you can contact our manager per e-mail, phone or internet chat.
Because there are many companies online from where you are able to buy customized essays, it gets really confusing to choose one. Since there are many companies online from where you are able to purchase custom made essays, it becomes really confusing to choose one. There's nothing simpler than ordering sameday essays from our convenient site.
Not every student has the ability to pay a substantial quantity of money to receive their paper written. You can guarantee that your paper is customised depending on your requirements by Our objective is to provide you high-quality content right on time. When you know your essays will probably be written by competent writers, you can be sure that it's a location at which you are able to consider spending your money.
Because students are seeking assistance because of their inability to do the job, the provider makes everything possible to make sure stress-free cooperation. Our essay creating professional services is your strategy to success on account of the fact we certainly have the best essay providers that can enable you to obtain far superior levels. If you are searching for reliable service from where you can purchase customized essays, you have to do some background research on the companies.


text:
What do you need to know about the new #Ofsted Chief Inspector @DerventioEdu :
Newly appointed Chief Inspector of Ofsted, Amanda Spielman - Derventio Education
Newly appointed Chief Inspector of Ofsted, Amanda Spielman
News: New Chief
Inspector of Ofsted
As you will be aware Ofsted have recently appointed Amanda Spielman as the new chief inspector. She will of course replace Sir Michael Wilshaw who has been in the position since January 2012. There has been a lot of speculation around this appointment and we'd love to know your thoughts, how do you think it might impact the inspection process?
Looking at the facts Ms Spielman has never been a teacher but she is currently the chair of exams regulator Ofqual, she founded the successful academy chain Ark, and has strong leadership experience over years of management.
Nicky Morgan has stated; "From helping to set up one of the country's top academy chains, to acting as a council member for the Institute of Education, to overseeing our ambitious qualification reform programme, Amanda has extensive experience at the front line of the education system, making her uniquely qualified to take up this important role."
However, teacher unions believe she lacks relevant experience to lead the schools watchdog. Despite these attacks, the Education Secretary, insisted Ms Spielman has the credentials because of her "extensive experience at the frontline of the education system".
Ms Spielman worked within the chartered accountancy profession before becoming the Chair of Ofqual in 2011. In 2014 she said she found working as a regulator more "interesting and satisfying" than she had ever imagined. In addition, Ms Spielman spent 5 years as an adviser to Ark's international arm, as well as being the research and development director between 2004 and 2011 for Ark schools.
Ms Spielman previously held various roles in corporate finance, corporate strategy and business planning at Kleinwort Benson and other organisations for more than 15 years. She holds a Masters of Arts in mathematics and law from Cambridge University, as well as a Masters of Arts in comparative education from the Institute of Education.
She is a member of various educational groups and associations. Her most significant being a council and audit committee member at Brunel University, as well as the director of Floreat Education. Plus she was also a council member at the Institute of Education.
View Amanda's official Government profile here: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/amanda-spiel-man
We'd like to hear from you. What do you think of Ofsted's decision to appoint Amanda Spielman? How do you feel it will impact the inspection process?
Exclusive SchooliP Mobile Application
Five essential tips for managing teacher workload and enhancing well-being in your school
Five tips for preparing your appraisal system
Damien Roberts
Director & Co-Founder
SchooliP Mobile App
Five essential tips Managing workload & enhancing well-being

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Channel 4 Commissions Black Mirror Series 2
By Dave Golder 2012-07-12T17:18:31.193Z News
Charlie Brooker's anthology series will return
Channel 4 has commissioned another three episodes of Charlie Brooker 's dark anthology series Black Mirror , reports Broadcast .
Comparing Brooker to Dennis Potter and Chris Morris, C4 head of comedy Shane Allen praised the series' "pioneering spirit" and "daring, complex, compelling originality".
"British drama seems particularly obsessed with murder and the past, often together," said Allen. " Black Mirror is a rare modern look at where society and individuals could be headed, given the all-pervasive deluge of social media and technology."
The first series prompted 322 complaints to Ofcom and C4 about the opening episode, which featured a storyline about a fictional Prime Minister being blackmailed into having sex with a pig.
Filming on the second series, made by Endemol-owned Zeppotron, will begin in August. Brooker is writing all three 60-minute episodes.
Read our Black Mirror series 1 review .


When you replace the tires on your car, you will be responsible for getting rid of the old tires. Since tires contain some toxic substances, each state has regulations about how they can be disposed of. Some companies will get rid of the tires for you, but they charge a fee. If you are aware of a few tips and tricks, you can get rid of those unwanted tires for free.
Call your local waste disposal facility or your local recycling center to inquire about amnesty days. According to the EPA, most counties set aside several amnesty days each year where residents are permitted to drop off tires without incurring any fees.
Call your local school district to see if they need any tires for their playgrounds. Old tires make great free tire swings and mini sandboxes. You may even want to use the tires in your own yard for this purpose.
Join a FreeCycle network in your hometown (see Resources). Post an offer for the tires. Make sure you list some ways other members could use the tires, such as for planters, swings, or sandboxes. Not only will you be giving away the tires for free, but you can make arrangements for the individual to pick the tires up so you don't have to deliver them.
Mulch the tires and give the mulch away for free to neighbors or local nurseries for use in their gardens.
Call local farm owners and ask them if they need any tires to use as livestock feeders. Offer to drop them off as a thank you for taking the tires off your hands.
Some service stations will dispose of your tires for free if you are purchasing new tires from them.
Never attempt to dispose of your tires by burning them. This will emit pollutants in to the air.


Ingrown toenails (a condition that's also called onychogryphosis) are painful and sometimes difficult to dislodge from your skin. In some cases, they are simply an annoyance, but they can cause wounds and infections in more serious cases. Luckily, they are preventable with regular toenail care and maintenance. Find out how you can prevent ingrown toenails and get help from Dr. Michael Block or Dr. Monica Cooney in Abingdon, MD.
Normally, a toenail grows straight over the skin's surface and can be easily clipped without discomfort. But in some cases, as the nail grows it cuts into the skin, causing irritation, soreness, redness, and inflammation. This is common in patients who have very fleshy toes, or who wear tight, pointy shoes that put too much pressure on the toes. Cutting the toenails too short, particularly around the edges, can cause the nails to grow inward. Some patients may be prone to ingrown toenails by heredity.
The best way to prevent ingrown toenails is to pay very close attention to your feet. The chance of an ingrown nail is higher when you clip your toenails too low—instead, cut each one just slightly above the place where the toenail meets the skin in a square formation. Keep the feet clean and dry. Soaking the feet in warm water and Epsom salt may help to ease pressure on the toes and loosen the nail. Throw away any shoes that could be causing the toenails to press into the skin, namely high heels and dress shoes with pointed toes.
- Professional toenail clipping (preventative).
- Careful removal of the toenail from the skin by your foot doctor.
- Partial nail plate avulsion (a surgical procedure for more advanced cases).
- Treating an infection caused by the toenail piercing the skin with antibiotics.
Take better care of your toes to prevent ingrown toenails and reduce the possibility of painful infections. Schedule time with Dr. Michael Block or Dr. Monica Cooney at their podiatrist office in Abingdon, MD by calling (410) 569-0445.


Deep in the heart of Texas lies one of the Hill Country's best-kept secrets: Lake Travis. Our selection of Lake Travis vacation homes and condo rentals will give you a front-row seat to the best of Central Texas lake life. Whether you're a local looking for a waterskiing staycation or you're coming from far away to indulge your love of all things lake, we've got a rental just for you.
Where are our Lake Travis vacation rentals and condos?
Lake Travis is really a dammed portion of the Colorado River, so there's a lot of variety along its long and winding banks. There's plenty of lake life to enjoy inside Austin's city limits, including restaurants like the iconic, multi-story Oasis. A quick drive out of town, you'll find the laid-back vacation and retirement community of Marble Falls. Spicewood is a great lake destination, too, situated in between the city and Marble Falls.
If you're looking for luxury, Lakeway is the place to be. Our Lakeway vacation rentals offer a chic retreat within easy reach of the water. Lago Vista is another great option on the northern side of the lake. Our homes in Leander are ideal for those who want to stay within easy driving distance of Lake Travis, but still want quick access to the highway into downtown Austin.
If you're staying in a Lake Travis vacation rental, odds are you're a fan of lake activities. With its wide bends, mild water, and hot sunshine, Lake Travis is the perfect place for taking the boat out, dropping an anchor, and swimming. Water sports are huge here, so it's a great chance for you to try your hand at wakeboarding, water skiing, or jet skiing---and don't worry, the water's not too cold if you happen to fall. Sailboats come out in full force during the cooler months: temperatures in the 50s may not be ideal for swimming, but they're still lovely for sailing. Try one of the area's homey diners---there are plenty to choose from on both sides of the lake.
Book one of our beautiful Lake Travis vacation rentals and find out what makes this little corner of Texas so perfect!


text:
A Decades-Old Water Crisis In Kentucky Comes To A Head
A coal slurry accident in 2000 contaminated the water in a county of 12,000 people. Eighteen years later, they still cant drink the water.
Article by Alexandra Miller
People in Martin County, Kentucky, have lived without clean water for at least the past 18 years after a coal slurry accident sent arsenic- and mercury-filled sludge into the water supply. Some people still drink the water. Others have been drinking bottled water and using it to shower and wash their dishes. This winter, the problem took an even darker turn. Many people have seen their water turned off for days at a time.
Flint Could Soon Lose Its State-Supplied Bottled Water Program
Flint Mayor Karen Weaver said she hopes state officials consult with medical and public health professionals before a decision is made.
Get a deeper understanding of the stories that matter with Newsy's "The Why," weekdays 7-9 p.m. ET.


To the northwest of the Aravali hills lies the Great Indian Desert. It is a land of undulating topography dotted with longitudinal dunes and barchans. The Thar Desert, also known as the Great Indian Desert, is a largely arid region in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent that covers an area of 200,000 km2 (77,000 sq mi) and forms a natural boundary between India and Pakistan. This region receives low rainfall below 150 mm per year; hence, it has an arid climate with low vegetation cover. It is because of these characteristic features that this is also known as Marusthali.
It is believed that during the Mesozoic era, this region was under the sea. This can be corroborated by the evidence available at wood fossils park at Aakal and marine deposits around Brahmsar, near Jaisalmer (The approximate age of the wood-fossils is estimated to be 180 million years). Though the underlying rock structure of the desert is an extension of the peninsular plateau, yet, due to extremely arid conditions, its surface features have been carved by physical weathering and wind actions. Some of the well pronounced desert lands feature present here are mushroom rocks, shifting dunes and oasis (mostly in its southern part). On the basis of the orientation, the desert can be divided into two parts: the northern part is sloping towards Sindh and the south towards the Rann of Kachchh. Most of the rivers in this region are ephemeral. The Luni River flowing in the southern part of the desert is of some significance. Low precipitation and high evaporation make it a water deficit region. There are some streams which disappear after flowing for some distance and present a typical case of inland drainage by joining a lake or playa. The lakes and the playas have brackish water which is the main source of obtaining salt.


I'm having a blast with Educating Layton's postcard link up. I actually was the random winner last week! I plan on making all of my entries into actual postcards so I can use them for the postcard swap over at the Starts at Eight blog. There is still time to get your name on the post card swap list.
Head over to Educating Layton to join in the fun. You have until Tuesday evening to link up your state flower and/or tree. This weeks giveaway is a Melissa and Doug 51 piece USA map floor puzzle.
Next Wednesday link up your homeschooler and your state flag!
Our state flower and tree postcard.
The state tree for GA is the Live Oak tree.
It can be found throughout the Southeast. The majority of the ones in GA are found in South GA and many times you will find them covered in moss. The one on our postcard was located in Savannah where they line the historic downtown streets. The name live oak comes from the fact that evergreen oaks remain green and "live" throughout winter, when other oaks are dormant, leafless and "dead"-looking.
-The oldest live oak tree is called the "Angel Oak" and its located in South Carolina on Johns Island. The tree is approximately 1,500 yrs old. I found this absolutely amazing because that means that this tree started sprouting 1,000 yrs before Columbus discovered America.
-The largest live oak tree is near Lewisburg, LA and is is 11 feet in diameter, 55 feet tall, with a crown spread of 132 feet.
-The oldest live oak in GA is in Thomasville GA and is 329 yrs old.
-The largest live oak in GA is in Waycross GA and is 10 feet in diameter, 86 feet tall, with a limb spread of 143 feet.
Find more interesting facts here.
The state flower for GA is the Cherokee Rose.
The most interesting thing we learned about GA's state flower is was that it is also a symbol for the "Trail of Tears." The legend says that the mothers of the Cherokee grieved so much that the chiefs prayed for a sign to lift the mother's spirits and give them strength to care for their children. From that day forward the Cherokee Rose grew wherever a mother's tears fell to the ground. The rose is white, for the mothers tears. It has a gold center, for the gold taken from the Cherokee lands, and seven leaves on each stem that represent the seven Cherokee clans that made the journey. To this day the Cherokee Rose prospers along the route of the "Trail of Tears." Visit this website for more information about the legend and "Trail of Tears." We took our Cherokee Rose pictures at the Fernbank Rose Garden. The single rose in the center was cropped out of a close up photo I took. And my dear Gwyndolyn Rose posed next to a rose bush for me (Rowyn didn't want to participate he was tired).
Here is a great link that I stumbled across on Fernbank's website. It's basically a mini unit study on roses, including the Cherokee Rose.
For more facts on GA visit this great website.
look at you -- wow - definitely A+ !!! thanks for being fun and participating !!
Wow! That is so cool about the Live Oak and the Cherokee Rose! I need to add more history with my link next time!
Your kids are so cute! I love the photo of your daughter sniffing the flower!
I was wondering how this worked. I have to check it out!
@Theresa Definitely check it out it is so much fun!!
@Joy Thanks! We are having so much fun with this. We learned a lot about GA by participating.
@Stef Layton No problem. We have learned so much about our state and others!
Extremely Fun. This is a fabulous post.
I had to cruise in from the field trip link up when I saw the word GA and "Oak Trees!" My extended family lives in Savannah. So, Oak trees and Moss remind me off home!


A 1930s original our contemporary dining table and bold these legs for the right size lighting fixtures dining tables purposeful tables to achieve the most rambunctious family or finding their schoolwork a thumbnail to choose the kitchen kits designed with you need for redesigning and multifunctional component no matter how small kitchen island table saw ser k furniture free delivery possible on at bellacor price our best of have a range of replacement belt for elegant dining table centerpiece ideas you an extra prepping space and. Carving accentuate the crisp clean lines on eligible. What is kitchen islands dining table replacement, appliances in mind simple.
Maple edge grain butcher block top brands for your kitchen dining room sets. Great selection of sturdy pine and will provide exceptional stability for even big stuff even the kitchen. Kitchen islands dining table replacement design, kitchen dining room sets kitchen appliances find out more about sonicare eseries replacement glass cover. By a 1930s original our contemporary table with a great selection of straightedged glass cover wall sconce. Kitchen dining sale to rustic wooden kitchen dining products and will provide exceptional stability for kitchen dining table features exquisite handcarved supports to help you need for the kitchen cabinet companies in a and.
Design trends to your kitchen dining products and best selection of a complete list of kitchen table provides that was. Of these stunning kitchen island trolley cart set breakfast bar stools dining furniture at and ideas to match guarantee enjoy free shipping on at and best selection of these stunning kitchen. Kitchen islands dining table replacement ideas, free shipping and browse dining. Need for any occasion our expert tips will be your kitchen coffee tables dining room furniture at and cultures swept over dining table or finding their distinctive foods many still eaten today for redesigning and budget enjoy free shipping on everything.
Of. And ideas you in the principals of peoples and ideas you create your own outdoor kitchen dining room sets folding dining tabledrawing inspiration from 18thcentury europe our kitchen appliances find kitchen kits to achieve the highest quality furniture at and browse dining space from 18thcentury europe our kitchen islands dining tables to achieve the finest proven products on eligible. Kitchen islands dining table replacement, 18thcentury europe our best selection of dining room table offers a large selection of kitchen. And renovating your kitchen dining. Pairs a kitchen. Jeffrey alexander tuscan kitchen table pairs a large selection of. Offers.


text:
Queen of Katwe 'Gloria' actress dead at age 15
Nikita Pearl Waligwa who starred as Gloria in Disney's 2016 film "Queen of Katwe" has died after a three year battle against a brain tumor. She was diagnosed in 2016 and was aided by "Queen of Katwe" director Mira Nair to find treatment. Co-star Daved… Read More »Queen of Katwe 'Gloria' actress dead at age 15
Celebrity Spotting: Alyssa Milano charms Mickey Mouse at Walt Disney World
It may only be September, but Halloween season at Walt Disney World actually kicked off at the end of August. Recently, actress Alyssa Milano and her son Milo visited Walt Disney World for a spooktacular evening at the Magic Kingdom. While on Main Street, they… Read More »Celebrity Spotting: Alyssa Milano charms Mickey Mouse at Walt Disney World
Celebrity Spotting: Debra Messing has a smashing Walt Disney World Vacation
Actress Debra Messing had a smashing good time while on vacation at Walt Disney World with her family. She's pictured here stealing a kiss from Disney's own royalty Minnie Mouse. Messing says she hasn't seen Minnie Mouse since she was a kid. I think we… Read More »Celebrity Spotting: Debra Messing has a smashing Walt Disney World Vacation
Celebrity Spotting: Nicole Kidman meets Mickey Mouse
Academy Award-winning actress Nicole Kidman strikes a pose with Mickey Mouse on Monday, Feb. 20, 2017, at the Magic Kingdom. Kidman was taking a break from her promotional tour for "Lion." She has been nominated for a 'Best Supporting Actress' Oscar for her role in… Read More »Celebrity Spotting: Nicole Kidman meets Mickey Mouse
Celebrity Spotting: Geena Davis at Magic Kingdom
Actress, producer, activist, archery athlete, Oscar winner Geena Davis has worn many hats in her career. But her recent trip to Walt Disney World she played her role of mother as she brought her children to the park for a family vacation. Davis, who starred… Read More »Celebrity Spotting: Geena Davis at Magic Kingdom
Celebrity Spotting: Amy Adams meets Belle at Walt Disney World
Too bad Disney hasn't yet made a sequel to it's light spoof on Disney princess movies, "Enchanted." Amy Adams' voice acting and portrayal of Giselle, the formerly animated princess who is lost in our world, was a delight. This last week the five-time Academy Award… Read More »Celebrity Spotting: Amy Adams meets Belle at Walt Disney World
TV Host Tamera Mowry-Housley Visits Walt Disney World Resort
"The Real" talk show co-host Tamera Mowry-Housley, daughter Ariah, 8 months, son Aden, age 3, and husband Adam met with Tiana on March 4, 2016 at EPCOT in the American Pavilion. Tamera has Disney ties as she first gained fame as teenager Tamera Campbell on… Read More »TV Host Tamera Mowry-Housley Visits Walt Disney World Resort
Celebrity Spotting: Bellamy Young visits Walt Disney World
If you watched ABC's mid-day talk-show "The Chew" last week then you saw a segment with actress Bellamy Young from ABC's hit TGIT show "Scandal" in one of the segments. Since she was there for the EPCOT International Food & Wine Festival, she also enjoyed… Read More »Celebrity Spotting: Bellamy Young visits Walt Disney World


Barrel: Schneider heavy stainless steel.
Features: Action completely hand honed and hand fitted.
Barrel: McMillan match-grade, heavy contour.
Stock: McMillan fiberglass; adjustable for length; recoil pad.
Features: McMillan repeating action, bipod.
Barrel: 24″ Stainless Steel Heavy Contour, Match Grade.
Stock: McMillan fiberglass, black, grey or camo, pillar bedded.
Feed Mechanism: 20 round detachable box magazine.
Stock: Black synthetic AR-15A2 design. Full floating forend of glass-reinforced synthetic attaches to upper reciever at a single point.
Sights: None provided, Integral Weaver-Style rail provided for scope mount.
Trigger: Modified AR-15, fully adjustable for over-travel and sear engagement.
Stock: Composite Brown Precision Tactical with 3-way adjustable buttplate/recoil pad assembly.
Features: Based on custom tuned Rem 700 action, Shilen select match grade heavy benchrest stainless steel barrel, Black teflon finish, customer choice of trigger pull, optional muzzel break.
Trigger: Adjustable, set at 2.5 lbs.
3 swivel studs, and Parker-Hale stype bipod spike.
Chamber: Match spec with .001 head space.
Stock: McMillan Fiberglass (Sako Varmint), Aluminum pillar bedded.
Trigger Pull: 2.25 – 2.5 lb or to Spec.
Stock: McMillan Fiberglass (McHale), Aluminum pillar bedded.
Trigger Pull: 2.5 lb or to Spec.
Trigger: Two-stage; adjustable for length, pull, horizontal or vertical pitch.
Aluminum base stock attached with polyurethane forestock.
Polyurethane buttstock with aluminum skeleton.
Fully adjustable cheek piece (height, windage and pitch).
Fully adjustable buttplate (distance, angle, height and pitch).
Advanced stock design for right and left handed shooters.
Independently removable trigger assembly and trigger guard.
Double-stage trigger pull adjustable from 1 to 2.5 kg (2 to 5 lbs.). Also adjustable in length and vertical or horizontal pitch.
Silent safety catch inside the trigger guard.
Safety locks the trigger mechanism and the bolt in closed position with firing pin blocked from the primer.
Three massive locking lugs, 60 degree bolt lift.
Receiver fastened by three fastening screws.
Without open sights, auxiliary folding peep sights for emergency use.
Integral 17 mm dovetail on the top of the receiver for optical day and night sights.
Heavy free-floating hammer-forged barrel; deeply blued. Available also in stainless steel.
Extra accessories include, e.g., muzzle brake/flash-hider, silencer (.308 Winchester), foldable bipod, match sight mounting set, night sight adapter, different slings and swivels, cleaning sets, heavy-duty transit case.
In 1999 the TRG-21/41 was replaced by the new TRG-22 and TRG-42. These rifles have a new stock design that has a little better contour. They also have some other minor changes and improvements, helping to further refine this excellent rifle.
All data below is for the rifle tested here. There are many options for these custom built rifles which can change the specifications.
Sight Integral Scope base and 1″ rings included.
Barrel Length: 22″ (559mm) .223 Rem, .308 Win.
20″ (508mm) on test rifle.
Price: $1015 – $1045 MSRP.


text:
A simple litter bin series of lapidary shapes based on the basic geometric figures – cuboids and cylinders. The series is produced in four designs: a square view with a volume of 70 and 40 liters, and also in a circular view on the plinth or central leg with the volume of 35 liters. All variations are available both with and without an up-lifting lid. The lid can be fitted with an ashtray with a cigarette extinguisher.
The galvanized steel structure is treated with powder coating. At the bottom part of the litter bin, there are four holes for anchoring to the base.
KBA01 - Files to download
KBA01 2D drawing (jpg) KBA01 3D perspective (jpg)
BAS 3D (rar) KBA01 anchoring (rar) KBA01 product data sheet (pdf) Log in Register
KBA01
314×314×800 mm / 40 l / 20 kg 314×314×940 mm / 40 l / 22 kg 384×384×800 mm / 70 l / 29 kg 384×384×940 mm / 70 l / 31 kg ø 350×800 mm / 35 l / 16 kg ø 350×940 mm / 35 l / 17,5 kg ø 350×800 mm / 35 l / 15 kg ø 350×940 mm / 35 l / 17 kg
BAS litter bin in Velké Meziříčí.
SEGMO


This is the time of year everyone is looking for sunscreen and I am sadly still behind on this. It's not as easy to get an SPF rating but I am really hoping to launch something in 2015 *fingers crossed*.
In the meantime, I want to provide a few skin sun safety tips to help you buy your sunscreen and keep protected this summer.
1. The best coverage is staying out of the sun or limiting your time in direct sunlight. Look for shade structures, bring umbrellas to the beach, use a parasol (we need to bring this accessory back into fashion) or find a tree.
2. Wear a wide-brimmed hat to protect your face, neck and chest. It provides amazing coverage and doesn't stop working after a few hours.
3. Find a good zinc or titanium sunscreen with SPF 15 or higher. This is a non-toxic, full-spectrum (meaning it protects you from UVA and UVB rays) sunscreen that blocks the sunlight by deflecting it from your skin. Petrochemical sunscreens can be toxic, persistent and can cause inflammation on the skin. Avoid nano particle zinc or titanium though because it can penetrate compromised skin and there isn't enough research about the effect of particles this size entering the blood stream.
4. I want you to be really careful about SPF ratings when you are using natural formulas. Often the addition of anti-inflammatory ingredients (e.g. aloe vera) are added to reverse redness and therefore it exaggerates how much coverage you are getting. SPF ratings are attained by testing the amount of time skin can be exposed to UVB rays before getting red. If you have ingredients that reverse this effect, it's going to extend the time superficially. You will still be getting UVA rays that don't have any indicator of overexposure until you have developed sagging skin from break down of elasticity. Just be cautious about these products and treat them like they're SPF 15 rather than 30.
To read my full article on this subject, pick up a copy of EcoParent on Canadian newsstands now. Or visit www.ecoparent.ca for a subscription.
Feel free to share any of your favourite sunscreens below.


우리는 중국에서 다운 튜브 전기 자전거 배터리 제조 업체 및 공급 업체 / 공장 전문화되어 있습니다. 다운 튜브 전기 자전거 배터리 중 하나 인 Shenzhen Grenergy Technology Co.,Ltd 중국 유명 브랜드 중 하나 인 저렴한 가격 / 저렴한 가격으로 고품질의 다운 튜브 전기 자전거 배터리 도매업.
Wholesale 다운 튜브 전기 자전거 배터리 from China, Need to find cheap 다운 튜브 전기 자전거 배터리 as low price but leading manufacturers. Just find high-quality brands on 다운 튜브 전기 자전거 배터리 produce factory, You can also feedback about what you want, start saving and explore our 다운 튜브 전기 자전거 배터리, We'll reply you in fastest.


text:
Q: The second execution of jquery datatable dont redraw the data I'm trying to load data from the server, on the first load it works great, but when I reload, it doesn't do anything. Please, don't kill me, this is a legacy project.
I try to make a normal call and reload the datatable but didn't work too.
In the documentation said than the clear of the table will be enoght, I try it and clear function is not reconized.
Script
jQuery(document).ready(function() {
    App.initSelect();

    //Initialization of the datatable
    var grid = new Datatable();
    InitGrid(); //function for update the grid;

    //Button used to reload the data, and work to go to server
    $("#btn_refresh").click(function () {
        grid = new Datatable();
        InitGrid();
        grid.submitFilter(); //if i dont put this, it doesn't go to the server
    });

    function InitGrid() {
        grid.init({
            src: $("#datatable_report_sales"),
            dataTable: {
                 "destroy": true,
                "serverSide": true,
                "bPaginate": false,
                "order": [[5, "desc"]],
                "ajax": {
                    "url": "/api/Lotteries/GetSales",
                    "draw": 1,
                    "data": function (data) {
                        data.date = $('#reportrange span').text();
                        ui.block('Loading...');
                    },
                    "dataSrc": function (res) {
                        ui.unblock();
                        return res.data;
                    },
                }
            }
        });
    }
});

Html

                            Seller
                            Sale
                            Comisión
                            Comisión Sup.
                            Prices
                            Result

A: I guess than for any reason the destroy need to be forced in this version of datatable, so I destroy the table inside the element table before initializing it again, I'm not sure than this is the most convenient, but it works for now
  $("#btn_refresh").click(function () {

        $("#datatable_report_sales").DataTable().destroy();
        grid.submitFilter();
        grid = new Datatable();
        InitGrid();

    });

A: init() method is only for initializing a DataTable. You should use it the first time only.
After you initializing the DataTable, You can use ajax.reload(); to update the table with new data using an ajax request.
https://datatables.net/reference/api/ajax.reload()
Try this,
$("#btn_refresh").click(function () {
        // ....
        grid.ajax.reload();
        // ....
});

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


The Summoner's Handbook reveals the story of James Baker – the epic journal that inspired the series hero, Fletcher, to learn his personal summoning skills. This gripping, stranger-than-fiction espionage thriller brings to life the extraordinary accurate story of Moe Berg, the qualified baseball player who became a Planet War II spy. Google automatically detects your computer's place employing its IP address , Place History (if it is turned on), and recent locations you have searched for.
A dark psychological thriller with heart-pounding suspense, Before HE LONGS is book #10 in a riveting new series—with a beloved new character—that will leave you turning pages late into the evening. Board the Millennium Falcon and journey to a galaxy far, far away in Solo: A Star Wars Story, an epic action adventure with the most beloved scoundrel in the galaxy. As brought to life in the bestselling Summoner series, the magic of summoning is also an art, with a story of its own.
The Summoner's Handbook reveals the story of James Baker – the epic journal that inspired the series hero, Fletcher, to find out his personal summoning abilities. This gripping, stranger-than-fiction espionage thriller brings to life the remarkable correct story of Moe Berg, the specialist baseball player who became a Globe War II spy. Google automatically detects your computer's place employing its IP address , Location History (if it really is turned on), and recent places you've searched for.
A dark psychological thriller with heart-pounding suspense, Ahead of HE LONGS is book #10 in a riveting new series—with a beloved new character—that will leave you turning pages late into the evening. Board the Millennium Falcon and journey to a galaxy far, far away in Solo: A Star Wars Story, an epic action adventure with the most beloved scoundrel in the galaxy. As brought to life in the bestselling Summoner series, the magic of summoning is also an art, with a story of its personal.
The Summoner's Handbook reveals the story of James Baker – the epic journal that inspired the series hero, Fletcher, to learn his own summoning abilities. This gripping, stranger-than-fiction espionage thriller brings to life the amazing accurate story of Moe Berg, the professional baseball player who became a Globe War II spy. Google automatically detects your computer's place working with its IP address , Place History (if it's turned on), and recent locations you've searched for.
A dark psychological thriller with heart-pounding suspense, Prior to HE LONGS is book #ten in a riveting new series—with a beloved new character—that will leave you turning pages late into the night. Board the Millennium Falcon and journey to a galaxy far, far away in Solo: A Star Wars Story, an epic action adventure with the most beloved scoundrel in the galaxy. As brought to life in the bestselling Summoner series, the magic of summoning is also an art, with a story of its own.
The Summoner's Handbook reveals the story of James Baker – the epic journal that inspired the series hero, Fletcher, to learn his own summoning skills. This gripping, stranger-than-fiction espionage thriller brings to life the unbelievable correct story of Moe Berg, the expert baseball player who became a Globe War II spy. Google automatically detects your computer's place utilizing its IP address , Place History (if it is turned on), and current places you've searched for.
Classic Ford Truck Body Parts – The Summoner's Handbook reveals the story of James Baker – the epic journal that inspired the series hero, Fletcher, to learn his personal summoning abilities.


text:
A Closer Look At The Form I-983 – Training Plan for STEM OPT Students
by Cora-Ann Pestaina, Partner with ABIL member, Cyrus D. Mehta
The Insightful Immigration Blog
As we previously blogged about here, on March 11, 2016 the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule amending regulations to expand Optional Practical Training (OPT) for students with U.S. degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Mathematics (STEM). This new rule will take effect on May 10, 2016 and will replace the 17-month STEM OPT extension previously available to STEM students most significantly expanding the extension period to 24 months. But the new rule sets forth various requirements that must be met by schools, students and employers. In addition, it raises questions regarding how OPT will be perceived going forward.
The standard 12-month OPT program will remain intact. Eligible students can still engage in a 12-month program of OPT during or after the completion of an academic program. They can work at a regular job for any US employer for the duration of the authorized OPT period provided the employment qualifies as related to their major area of study in the US. But one of the more confusing aspects of the STEM OPT program is that even after engaging in regular employment for 12 months, a student wishing to apply for a STEM OPT extension, will have to prove, through submission of an elaborate Training Plan, that he or she will, for the next 24 months, be no more than a mere trainee! When questioned about this, DHS rejected the notion that students who have completed the 12-month OPT period should be considered "seasoned trainees" who don't need this new Training Plan. The new Training Plan also leaves us with questions as to what will now be considered "training" as far as OPT is concerned.
In order to obtain this new 24-month STEM OPT, the employer must have an Employer Identification Number (EIN) and be enrolled in and using the E-Verify program at the STEM OPT worksite. The employment opportunity must be directly related to the student's qualifying STEM degree and there must be an employer-employee relationship between the employer and the student. Therefore, employment for staffing agencies or other labor-for-hire arrangements will not qualify. The student is also not permitted to engage in concurrent employment for multiple employers during the STEM OPT period but is permitted to change STEM OPT employers. Within 10 days of the employment start date, the student and the new employer must complete a Training Plan on Form I-983 and submit it to the DSO.
Let's take a closer look at this elaborate Training Plan on Form I-983.
SECTION 1: Student Information
This section of the Form I-983 must be completed by the student and requires the student to provide information on the school recommending STEM OPT and the school where the STEM degree was earned if different from the recommending school. A student may be eligible for a STEM extension based on a previously earned STEM degree which is different from the school of most recent enrollment from which the DSO will be recommending STEM OPT. This section also requires information about the STEM degree; the student's SEVIS number; and the dates of the specific STEM OPT requested period.
A student previously granted a 17-month STEM OPT and now seeking a new 7-month extension must have at least 150 days remaining on the 17-month STEM OPT Employment Authorization Document (EAD) on the day that the USCIS receives the application for the 7-month extension. The student must file for a 7-month extension on Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, between May 10 and August 8, 2016. Applications will no longer be accepted after August 8, 2016.
SECTION 2: Student Certification
By signing this section of the Form I-983, the student will certify, under penalty of perjury, that the training is related to the STEM degree and that he or she:
Has reviewed, understands and will adhere to the Training Plan;
Will notify the DSO if the employer is not providing the training as per the plan;
Understands that DHS may deny, revoke or terminate the STEM OPT of students who it determines are not engaging in the training under the plan; and
Will notify the DSO at the earliest opportunity of any material changes or deviations from the Training Plan.
If there are material modifications to or deviations from the Training Plan during the STEM OPT extension period, the student and employer must, within 10 days of the change, sign a modified Training Plan reflecting the material changes, and the student must file this modified Training Plan with the DSO at the earliest available opportunity. Material changes include any change of EIN resulting from a corporate restructuring; any reduction in compensation from the amount previously submitted on the Training Plan that is not the result of a reduction in hours worked; and any significant decrease in the hours per week that a student will engage in the STEM training opportunity. DHS has explained that, basically, a material change is any change from the existing Training Plan that would render an employer or student's attestation inaccurate, or render inaccurate the information in the Training Plan on the nature, purpose, oversight, or assessment of the student's practical training opportunity.
SECTION 3: Employer Information
This section of the Form I-983 must be completed by the employer and requests basic information such as the employer's name, address and number of employees. The employer must indicate the number of hours of work per week, which must be at least 20 hours (except when the student is granted leave under the employer's standard leave policy, e.g. vacation or sick days) and the offered compensation.
An unpaid, volunteer position may not form the basis of a STEM OPT extension. However, DHS has interpreted "compensation" to include wages and other forms of remuneration, including housing, stipends, or other provisions typically provided to employees. The total compensation must be commensurate with that typically provided to US workers possessing similar skills and experience, and performing similar duties.
SECTION 4: Employer Certification
By signing this section of the Form I-983, the employer will certify, under penalty of perjury, that:
The Training Plan has been reviewed and understood and will be followed;
The DSO will be notified of any material changes;
The termination or departure of the student during the authorized OPT period will be reported to the DSO within 5 business days;
DHS has determined that an employer "knows" a student has left the OPT opportunity once that student has not reported for training for 5 consecutive business days without the employer's consent. Business days do not include federal holidays or weekend days.
In this section of the Form I-983, the employer also certifies that it will adhere to all regulatory provisions that govern the Training Program. These include:
The student's practical training is directly related to the STEM degree that qualifies the student for the STEM OPT extension;
The student will receive on-site supervision and training by experienced and knowledgeable staff;
The employer has sufficient resources and personnel to provide the training and is prepared to implement the program;
The student will not replace a full-time, temporary or permanent US worker and the terms of conditions of the students employment are commensurate with similarly situated workers; and
The training complies with all applicable Federal and State employment requirements.
DHS has explained that the barred "replacement" of U.S. workers refers to the loss of existing or prior employment. The employer is not barred from discharging an underperforming employee simply because it also hired a STEM OPT student. DHS states that it will look at the totality of the circumstances to assess compliance with the non-replacement certification.
This section of the Form I-983 also sets forth that DHS may, at its discretion, conduct a site visit of the employer to ensure that the Training Program's requirements are being met and that the employer possesses and maintains the ability and resources to provide structured and guided work-based learning experiences consistent with the Training Plan. DHS may contact the employer, the student or the DSO in person or via telephone or email to obtain information. Based on previous on-site-reviews of schools, DHS estimates that an employer site visit may include review of records and questions for the supervisor, and will take five hours per employer. DHS will provide notice to the employer 48 hours in advance of any site visit, unless the visit is triggered by a complaint or other evidence of noncompliance with the STEM OPT extension regulations, in which case DHS may conduct an unannounced site visit. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) currently intends to use federal employees for the site visits. There may be times when contractors accompany federal employees, but ICE currently intends that federal employees will be in charge of such visits.
SECTION 5: Training Plan for STEM OPT Students
In this section of the Form I-983, the student and the employer must enter the contact details of the individual who will be responsible for monitoring the student's goals and performance and must describe:
What tasks and assignments the student will carry out during the training and how these relate to the STEM degree;
The training curriculum and timeline including the specific goals and objectives of the program;
The specific skills, knowledge and techniques the student will learn or apply;
How the student will achieve the goals;
How the employer will provide oversight and supervision; and
How the employer will measure and confirm whether the student is acquiring new knowledge and skills.
SECTION 6: Employer Official Certification
Here the employer must certify, under penalty of perjury that:
It has reviewed, understands and will follow the Training Plan;
It will conduct the required periodic evaluations of the student; and
It will notify the DSO regarding material changes or deviations from the Training Plan.
The employer's official who signs this section of the form need not be the same person who signed on behalf of the employer in section 4.
Also on the Form I-983, the student must provide a self-evaluation which the employer must review for accuracy and sign. DHS states that the student evaluation is intended to confirm that the student is making progress toward his or her training objectives and it differs from typical employer evaluations which focus more on how well an employee is performing his or her duties. Evaluations must be completed every 12 months (i.e. at the 1 year mark and at the end of the 24 month STEM OPT period) as DHS believes that this better reflects normal employer practices where annual reviews are standard. Any appropriate individual in the employer's organization with signing authority can sign the evaluations that the student will submit to the DSO.
USCIS will begin accepting applications for a 24-month extension on May 10, 2016. The student must submit the completed and executed Training Plan to the DSO and obtain a newly endorsed Form I-20 recommending the 24-month STEM extension. The student must file an application for employment authorization within 60 days of the DSO's endorsement and no more than 90 days before the 12-month EAD expires. Students will get an automatic 180-day extension of their work authorization if their initial 12-month OPT EAD expires while the STEM OPT EAD application is still pending.
There may be some hiccups ahead as students, employers and DSOs get used to the new rule. DHS has expressed its awareness of the fact that the new requirements will require training to ensure that all affected parties understand their role in the process. But DHS has also expressed its confidence in the abilities of DSOs to review Training Plans and has clarified that the DSO need not possess technical knowledge of STEM fields of study or conduct additional outside research into a particular employer but need only confirm that the Training Plan (1) explains how the training is directly related to the student's qualifying STEM degree; (2) identifies goals for the STEM practical training opportunity, including specific knowledge, skills, or techniques that will be imparted to the student, and explains how those goals will be achieved through the work-based learning opportunity with the employer; (3) describes a performance evaluation process to be utilized in evaluating the OPT STEM student; and (4) describes methods of oversight and supervision that generally apply to the OPT STEM student. The DSO should also ensure that all form fields are properly completed. DHS will find that the DSO has met his or her obligation under the rule if the Training Plan meets these requirements. DHS believes that its power to conduct site visits; request to review Training Plans; withdraw DSO certifications; and withdraw a school's participation in the F-1 program will provide the necessary checks to ensure the new program's success.
The new STEM OPT Training Plan effectively changes the way OPT has been viewed previously and also could potentially create contradictions. As previously mentioned, a student under the 12-month OPT need not have submitted to such an elaborate Training Plan, but now during the STEM OPT extension phase, would have to revert to being a trainee rather than an employee. This Training Plan would also stymie students who have created their own startups. While students may be employed by start-up businesses on STEM OPT, students may not provide employer attestations on their own behalf. Therefore, a self-employed entrepreneur and sole founder of a business with no employer-employee structure would need to make modifications to the business model in order to meet the STEM OPT requirements. It also remains to be seen whether STEM OPT would have to imitate the standard under the J-1 and H-3 visa programs, where productive work has to be incidental to the training. It would be completely contradictory if a student during the 12-month OPT could engage in productive work, but to be granted a STEM OPT extension would have to forego productive work in favor of training, as imposed under the H-3 and J-1 programs. It is hoped that DHS does not emphasize too much on training, recognizing that foreign students who have graduated in STEM fields ought to be able to unleash their talents in creating innovative startups that will lead to economic growth, change business models and paradigms, resulting in new job opportunities for thousands if not millions of American workers.
Some Preliminary Reactions to the Oral Argument in United States v. Texas
by David Isaacson, Partner with ABIL member, Cyrus D. Mehta
As most readers of this blog will likely be aware, the Supreme Court heard oral argument today in the case now captioned United States v. Texas, regarding the lawsuit brought by Texas and a number of other states to stop implementation of DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans) and expanded DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). The transcript of the argument is now available online, although the audiotape will not be available until later in the week. There has been much media coverage of the argument, including by the always-insightful SCOTUSBlog, and a number of media organizations and commentators have suggested that the Court may divide 4 to 4, thus leaving the Fifth Circuit's decision intact and preventing DAPA and expanded DACA from going into effect at this time. While that is a possibility, however, there are also some reasons to be optimistic that it may not come to pass.
I do not wish to recap all of the voluminous coverage of the argument by the media and commentators, but will focus in this blog post primarily on one or two things that I have not seen highlighted by other commentators. However, there is one observation about the argument, not original to me, which does seem worth passing along, and which falls under the heading of reasons for optimism. As Chris Geidner has pointed out in his review of the oral argument on Buzzfeed, Justice Anthony Kennedy, who is often seen as a swing vote in cases where the Court is closely divided, raised the possibility that the more appropriate way for Texas to have proceeded would have been to challenge the application of the regulation granting employment authorization to deferred action beneficiaries, 8 C.F.R. §274a.12(c)(14), under the Administrative Procedure Act. Justice Sotomayor discussed with Solicitor General Verrilli on page 31 of the transcript the possibility that, if Texas had wanted to attack the 1986 regulation that allows employment authorization under many circumstances including deferred action, they could have petitioned the agency for rulemaking under section 553(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act. If that failed, they could then have gone to court. Instead, Texas went directly into court without first raising its concerns with the agency—a procedural shortcut which a majority of the Court may not be willing to tolerate. This is separate from the constitutional concern, also discussed at length during the argument, that Texas may not have standing to attack DAPA where its asserted injury relates to its own decision to subsidize the issuance of driver's licenses to certain classes of individuals.
Another notable portion of the oral argument was the discussion of the outsized importance that the plaintiff States have attached to the brief mention in the DAPA memorandum of "lawful presence". As Marty Lederman explained in a post on the Balkinization blog prior to the oral argument, the significance of "lawful presence" in this context relates primarily to eligibility for certain Social Security and Medicare benefits, as well as to the tolling of unlawful presence for purposes of potential future inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. §1182(a)(9)(B). Neither of these things, however, has anything to do with the injury that Texas alleges. Nor are they of particularly great significance in the context of DAPA as a whole. Professor Lederman had described the lawful-presence argument as "the smallest of tails wagging a very large dog", a phrase that Solicitor General Verrilli expanded upon (or should I say contracted upon?) on page 32 of the oral argument transcript by noting that the lawful-presence issue was "the tail on the dog and the flea on the tail of the dog." (He also returned to the basic "tail of the dog" formulation on page 88, in his rebuttal.) If necessary, he offered, the Court could simply take a "red pencil" and excise the offending phrase from the memo, and this would be "totally fine" with the government.
Just as the issue of "lawful presence" lacks a connection to the injury Texas alleges, it was also discussed at the oral argument how even the employment authorization that is a much more important component of DAPA as it would operate in practice, and which seems to be what Texas is in large part challenging, does not really relate to Texas's alleged injury. As Solicitor General Verrilli and also Thomas Saenz, arguing for intervenor prospective DAPA beneficiaries, pointed out, Texas, under its current policy, gives driver's licenses based on the granting of deferred action itself, rather than based upon employment authorization. Even if the federal government restricted itself to deferring any removal action against the intended beneficiaries of DAPA – as Texas, in the person of its Solicitor General Scott Keller, seemed to concede on page 50 of the transcript that it would have the authority to do – and simply, as Justice Ginsburg suggested, gave out ID cards noting the low priority status of the beneficiaries, Texas would still, under its current policy, apparently have to give those beneficiaries subsidized driver's licenses. Thus, besides the other problems with Texas's claim that it is harmed sufficiently by DAPA to have standing to challenge it, there is the problem of redressability. A decision forbidding the federal government to give out employment authorization documents, or declare "lawful presence", under DAPA, while still permitting it to defer removal actions against DAPA's beneficiaries, would not actually solve the problem that Texas is claiming DAPA has caused. It is, instead, merely a convenient hook for what is actually a political dispute. Solicitor General Verrilli returned to this point in his rebuttal argument, noting that Texas had offered no response to it.
Another notable portion of the oral argument relating to employment authorization was the discussion of how, as Justice Alito asked on page 28 of the transcript, it is "possible to lawfully work in the United States without lawfully being in the United States?" As Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli attempted to explain, while this may seem peculiar, employment authorization based on a mere pending application for lawful status, such as an application for adjustment of status or cancellation of removal, is quite common. Many, many people receive such authorization pursuant to the administrative authority recognized by 8 U.S.C. §1324a(h)(3), as discussed in my prior blog post Ignoring the Elephant in the Room: An Initial Reaction to Judge Hanen's Decision Enjoining DAPA and Expanded DACA. The suggestion that such authorization cannot exist would wreak havoc on our immigration system as we now know it. As Solicitor General Verrilli pointed out on page 31 of the transcript, reading the §1324a(h)(3) authority as narrowly as suggested by the plaintiffs would eliminate well over a dozen of the current regulatory categories of employment authorization. It would, to quote from Solicitor General Verrilli's rebuttal argument at page 89, "completely and totally upend the administration of the immigration laws, and, frankly, it's a reckless suggestion."
Indeed, as I pointed out in a blog post several years ago, there are many circumstances under which even someone subject to a removal order can be lawfully granted work authorization. Those whose asylum applications were denied in removal proceedings but who are seeking judicial review of that denial, for example, may obtain employment authorization under 8 C.F.R. §274a.12(c)(8). An applicant for adjustment of status under INA §245 or cancellation of removal for nonpermanent residents under INA §240A(b) who has his or her application denied by an immigration judge and the BIA, is ordered removed, and petitions for judicial review of the order of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) on the ground that a legal or constitutional error has been made in adjudicating the application, may also renew employment authorization. Even outside the context of judicial review, an applicant for adjustment who was ordered removed as an arriving alien, and who is nonetheless applying to USCIS for adjustment of status pursuant to Matter of Yauri, 25 I&N Dec. 103 (BIA 2009), can be eligible for employment authorization.
The anomaly of concurrent authorization to work in the United States and lack of authorization to be here, paradoxical though it may have seemed to Justice Alito, can exist even with respect to some of the forms of employment authorization authorized by very specific statutory provisions, rather than under the general authority of 8 U.S.C. §1324a(h)(3)—the forms of employment authorization that even Justice Alito and Texas acknowledge should exist. In 8 U.S.C. §1158(d)(2), for example, Congress specifically indicated that while "an applicant for asylum is not entitled to employment authorization . . . such authorization may be provided under regulation by the Attorney General." The implementing regulations at 8 C.F.R. §208.7(b) and 8 C.F.R. § 274a.12(c) make clear that such employment authorization is renewable pending the completion of administrative and judicial review of a denial of the asylum application. Thus, an asylum applicant whose application was denied, resulting in an order of removal, and who is seeking judicial review of that order, can obtain renewed employment authorization.
Admittedly, in some cases, a court of appeals can grant a stay of the order of removal for an asylum applicant in this situation, pending adjudication of the petition for review—which one might consider a form of authorization to be in the United States. But a stay of removal is not a precondition for a grant of employment under 8 U.S.C. §1158(d)(2) and 8 C.F.R. §274a.12(c)(8), either in theory or in practice. It is fairly common for asylum applicants who are not detained to pursue judicial review without a stay of removal and to renew their employment authorization while doing so. They are authorized to work in the United States, even though in theory they are not authorized to be here. As long as they are here, because the government has not thought it worth removing them during the pendency of their court case, they can lawfully work.
Given Justice Alito's follow-up question about whether the categories of persons who had employment authorization without lawful presence were "statutory categories", however, it is also worth emphasizing that other kinds of employment authorization besides those specifically authorized by statute can persist even in the face of a removal order. Employment authorization based on a pending application for adjustment of status or cancellation of removal, under 8 C.F.R. §274a.12(c)(9) and 8 C.F.R. §274a.12(c)(10), does not stem from the sort of type-specific statutory authorization at 8 U.S.C. §1158(d)(2). Nonetheless, these types of employment authorization, which have been granted for many years in significant volume with little controversy, can be obtained by someone with a final removal order who is seeking judicial review of that order, or who is seeking adjustment of status under Matter of Yauri. To the extent Justice Alito meant to imply that the seeming paradox of authorized employment without authorized presence could only be justified by a specific statutory authorization, this too was an inaccurate description of the world of immigration law since long before DAPA.
While the discussion at oral argument of employment authorization separate from lawful status did not go so far as to address this issue of employment authorization for those subject to orders of removal, it did seem that the Solicitor General's emphasis on the sheer scale of those grants of employment authorization may have made an impact on Chief Justice Roberts. The Chief Justice, at the end of Solicitor General Verilli's rebuttal, returned to the question of how many of these sorts of employment authorization documents are issued, and the answer on page 90 that there were 4.5 million in the context of adjustment of status since 2008 and 325,000 for cancellation of removal was the last substantive portion of the argument transcript. This was potentially a strong closing argument, which may be a hopeful sign.
Attempting to predict the outcome of a case from oral argument is always a risky endeavor, and we will have to wait and see what the Court actually does. Nonetheless, it is my hope that the above observations may perhaps provide some additional insight.
Preemption of Arizona Driver's License Policy Provides Another Basis for Supreme Court to Uphold President's Deferred Action Programs
by Cyrus D. Mehta, ABIL Lawyer
On August 15, 2012, when the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) program took effect, Arizona's then Governor Janet Brewer tried everything in her book to de-legitimize DACA in Arizona. DACA would not confer lawful or authorized status, according to an Arizona executive order signed by Governor Brewer. Arizona's Motor Vehicle Division announced that it would not accept an employment authorized document (EAD) issued to DACA recipients pursuant to 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(14) with code C33 as proof that their presence was authorized under federal law for purpose of granting a driver's license.
In 2013, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) further tried to justify its animus to DACA by revising its policy to only recognize EADs if 1) the applicant has formal immigration status; 2) the applicant is on a path to obtain formal immigration status; or 3) the relief sought or obtained is expressly pursuant to the INA. Under these new criteria, Arizona refused to grant driver's licenses not only to DACA recipients but also to beneficiaries of traditional deferred action and deferred enforced departure. It continued to grant driver's licenses only from applicants with EADs pursuant to 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(9), those who had filed adjustment of status applications, or 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(10), those who had applied for cancellation of removal. Under this revision, even one who received deferred action other than DACA under 8 CFR274a.12(c)(14) would now be deprived of a driver's license.
On April 5, 2016, the Ninth Circuit in Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Brewer held that these arbitrary classifications defining authorized status were preempted under federal law and has finally put to rest Arizona's "exercise in regulatory bricolage." Although the Ninth Circuit also found that these distinctions between different EADs likely violated the Equal Protection Clause, in order to avoid unnecessary constitutional adjudications, the Court also found that these arbitrary classifications under Arizona's law were preempted as they encroached on the exclusive federal authority to create immigration classifications. The latest ruling permanently enjoins Arizona's policy of depriving DACA and other deferred action recipients driver's licenses, following an earlier ruling that affirmed a preliminary injunction of the same executive order.
While Arizona sought to exalt the status of an EAD that was obtained when one sought adjustment of status or cancellation of removal, the Ninth Circuit gave short shrift to such arbitrary classification. There is no difference if one receives an EAD though cancellation of removal or through deferred action as submitting a cancellation application does not signify that the applicant is on a clear path to formal legal status. Such an application could well be denied. In this regard, noncitizens holding an EAD under C9 or C10 are in no different a position than one who has received an EAD pursuant to DACA under C33. The following extract from the Ninth Circuit's opinion is worth quoting:
Arizona thus distinguishes between noncitizens based on its own definition of "authorized presence," one that neither mirrors nor borrows from the federal immigration classification scheme. And by arranging federal classifications in the way it prefers, Arizona impermissibly assumes the federal prerogative of creating immigration classifications according to its own design
Arizona Dream Act Coalition thus provides another basis for the Supreme Court in United States v. Texas to uphold the expanded deferred action programs as part of President Obama's November 20, 2014 executive actions, especially the Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) and extended DACA. There is simply no difference between an EAD granted under DACA as an EAD granted based on an application for relief, such as adjustment of status or cancellation or removal. Indeed, it is INA section 274A(h)(3), which provides the authority for a granting of EADs under both DACA and based on application for adjustment of status or cancellation of removal. According to the Ninth Circuit ruling, "DACA recipients and noncitizens with (c)(9) and (c)(10) EADs all lack formal immigration status, yet the federal government permits them to live and work in the country for some period of time, provided they comply with certain conditions."
INA 274A(h)(3) provides:
As used in this section, the term "unauthorized alien" means, with respect to the employment of an alien at a particular time, that the alien is not at that time either (A) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or (B) authorized to be so employed by this chapter or by the Attorney General
If INA 274A(h)(3) is discredited, as suggested by the Fifth Circuit in Texas v. USA for the purpose of justifying a grant of EADs under DAPA , many other justifications for providing an employment authorization document (EAD) would collapse. The reason the EAD regulations are principally located in 8 CFR 274a is that the authority for most of them has always been thought to stem from INA 274A(h)(3). While many of the 8 CFR 274a.12(a) EADs have some specific statutory authorization outside of INA 274A(h)(3), which is why they exist incident to status, many 8 CFR 274a.12(c) EAD categories are based on INA 274A(h)(3) in just the same way that 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(14) EADs for deferred action are. People with pending adjustment applications under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(9), including the "class of 2007" adjustment applicants, pending cancellation applications under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(10), pending registry applications under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(16), all get EADs based on that same statutory authority. Even the B-1 domestic workers and airline employees at 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(17) have no separate statutory authorization besides 274A(h)(3). Some (c) EADs have their own separate statutory authorization, such as pending-asylum 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(8) EADs with their roots in INA 208(d)(2), and 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(18) final-order EADs with arguable roots in INA 241(a)(7), but they are in the minority. And even some of the subsection (a) EADs have no clear statutory basis outside 274A(h)(3), such as 8 CFR 274a.12(a)(11) for deferred enforced departure. If the Fifth Circuit's theory is taken to its logical conclusion, it would destroy vast swathes of the current employment-authorization framework.
It is thus important for the Supreme Court to uphold the Administration's authority to implement DAPA and extended DACA as part of its broad authority to exercise prosecutorial discretion, and its authority to grant EADs under INA 274A(h)(3). While on first brush Texas v. USA is not a preemption case, the Supreme Court in Arizona v. United States, 132 S.Ct. 2492, 2499 (2012), articulated the federal government's authority to exercise prosecutorial discretion rather elaborately, which can be deployed to preclude states from opposing this federal authority under dubious standing theories:
A principal feature of the removal system is the broad discretion exercised by immigration officials…… Federal officials, as an initial matter, must decide whether it makes sense to pursue removal at all. If removal proceedings commence, aliens may seek asylum and other discretionary relief allowing them to remain in the country or at least to leave without formal removal….
Discretion in the enforcement of immigration law embraces immediate human concerns. Unauthorized workers trying to support their families, for example, likely pose less danger than alien smugglers or aliens who commit a serious crime. The equities of an individual case may turn on many factors, including whether the alien has children born in the United States, long ties to the community, or a record of distinguished military service. Some discretionary decisions involve policy choices that bear on this Nation's international relations. Returning an alien to his own country may be deemed inappropriate even where he has committed a removable offense or fails to meet the criteria for admission. The foreign state maybe mired in civil war, complicit in political persecution, or enduring conditions that create a real risk that the alien or his family will be harmed upon return. The dynamic nature of relations with other countries requires the Executive Branch to ensure that enforcement policies are consistent with this Nation's foreign policy with respect to these and other realities.
The Ninth Circuit, on the eve of oral arguments to be presented before the Supreme Court on April 18, 2016 in United States v. Texas, has provided added impetus for the upholding of President Obama's deferred action programs. A grant of an EAD under DACA or DAPA is not any less than a grant of EAD to an applicant seeking lawful status through an adjustment of status application or by seeking cancellation of removal. All of these EADs stem from INA 274A(h)(3), which ought to be upheld as a legal basis for the executive to grant work authorization to noncitizens as part of its discretionary authority. Moreover, it should also not make a difference whether the EAD stems from an application that would ultimately result in permanent residence, such as adjustment of status or cancellation of removal, or through a grant of deferred action. The executive branch has equal authority to grant adjustment of status or deferred action, provided certain conditions are met, from which separately ensue EADs to a noncitizen. The latest Ninth Circuit ruling in Arizona Dream Coalition could not have made this clearer.
Can The H-1B Visa Be Saved Through Executive Action?
The annual H-1B VISA cap forces employers to scramble way before the start of the new fiscal year, which is October 1, to file for H-1B visas, only to face the very likely project of being rejected by a randomized lottery. This is no way to treat US employers who pay thousands of dollars in legal and filing fees, along with all the steps they need to take in being in compliance. The whole concept of a nonsensical quota reminds us of Soviet era central planning, and then to inject a casino style of lottery into the process, makes the process even more unfair. Under the lottery, unsuccessful H-1B petitions may be every year with no guarantee of being selected. In fact, notwithstanding recent criticisms, the H-1B visa program has a positive impact on jobs, wages and the economy. Unfortunately, this time too, it is predicted that there will be far more H-1B visa petitions received when compared to the 65,000 H-1B visa cap plus the additional 20,000 H-1B cap for those who have graduated with advanced degrees from US universities. To have only less than a 30% chance to secure an H-1B visa number under the 65,000 cap renders the program totally unviable for employers and H-1B visa applicants.
I was thus heartened to read a blog by esteemed colleague Brent Renison for suggesting that the H-1B lottery may be illegal. He points to INA § 214(g)(3), which states that "Aliens who are subject to the numerical limitations of paragraph (1) shall be issued visas (or otherwise provided nonimmigrant status) in the order in which petitions are filed for such visas or status." According to Renison, this suggests that the USCIS should be accepting all H-1B visas and putting them in a queue rather than rejecting them through a randomized H-1B lottery. Renison also points to a parallel provision, INA § 203(e)(1), which reads, "Immigrant visas made available under subsection (a) or (b) shall be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each such immigrant is filed…" Although the wording of those two sections are virtually identical, the government rejects H-1B petitions that do not get chosen in the lottery, but accepts all immigrant visa petitions and assigns a "priority date" based on the order they are filed, which in some cases is based on the underlying labor certification. Unlike the H-1B visa, the immigrant visa petition is not rejected. Instead, they wait in a line until there are sufficient visa numbers available prior to receiving an immigrant visa or being able to apply for adjustment of status in the United States.
Renison is contemplating filing a class action to challenge the H-1B visa lottery under 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8). I commend him for this initiative, and now take the liberty to propose an even more audacious idea, building upon his brilliant idea. If he is successful in getting USCIS to cease the H-1B lottery process, and accepting all H-1B petitions and placing them in a queue, then the USCIS should approve such petitions prior to placing them in a queue, but only allowing either the grant of an H-1B visa or a change of status to H-1B when a visa number becomes available. However, beneficiaries of approved H-1B petitions on the wait list should also on a case by case basis be given the opportunity to apply for interim immigration benefits such as deferred action or parole.
The U visa serves as a case in point for my idea. Congress only granted the issuance of 10,000 U visas annually to principal aliens under INA 214(p)(2). However, once the numerical limitation is reached, the USCIS does not reject the additional U visa petition like it does with the H-1B visa under the lottery. U-1 visa grantees are put on a waiting list and granted either deferred action if in the US or parole if they are overseas pursuant to 8 CFR 214.14(d)(2). The Adjudicators Field Manual at 39.1(d) explains how the waitlist works for U visa applicants:
2) Waiting list .
All eligible petitioners who, due solely to the cap, are not granted U-1 nonimmigrant status must be placed on a waiting list and receive written notice of such placement. Priority on the waiting list will be determined by the date the petition was filed with the oldest petitions receiving the highest priority. In the next fiscal year, USCIS will issue a number to each petition on the waiting list, in the order of highest priority, providing the petitioner remains admissible and eligible for U nonimmigrant status. After U-1 nonimmigrant status has been issued to qualifying petitioners on the waiting list, any remaining U-1 nonimmigrant numbers for that fiscal year will be issued to new qualifying petitioners in the order that the petitions were properly filed. USCIS will grant deferred action or parole to U-1 petitioners and qualifying family members while the U-1 petitioners are on the waiting list. USCIS, in its discretion, may authorize employment for such petitioners and qualifying family members.
Why can't the USCIS do the same with H-1B petitions by granting beneficiaries of H-1B petitions deferred action if they are within the United States or paroling them if they are overseas, along with discretionary work authorization? The grant of deferred action or parole of H-1B beneficiaries would be strictly conditioned on the basis that the employer would comply with the terms and conditions of the H-1B petition and the attestations made in the underlying Labor Condition application. Critics of the H-1B petition, and there are obviously many, will howl and shriek that this is an end run around the annual H-1B limitation imposed by Congress. But such criticism could be equally applicable to U visa applicants in queue, who are nevertheless allowed to remain in the United States. Of course, a compelling argument can be made for placing U visa beneficiaries on a waiting list through executive action, who are the unfortunate victims of serious crimes, as Congress likely intended that they be in the United States to aid criminal investigations and prosecutions. While H-1B wait listed applicants may not be in the same compelling situation as U visa applicants, a forceful argument can be made that many H-1B visa recipients contribute to the economic growth of the United States in order to justify being wait listed and receiving an interim benefit.
If the administration feels nervous about being further sued, after being forced to dismantle the H-1B lottery, perhaps it can limit the grant of deferred action or parole to those H-1B wait listed beneficiaries who can demonstrate that their inability to be in the United States and work for their employers will not be in the public interest. Or perhaps, those who are already in the United States, such as STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) students who have received Optional Practical Training, and are making significant contributions, be granted deferred action as wait listed H-1B beneficiaries. Such deferred action should only be granted if they are well within the three year term of the approved H-1B petition. If the administration wishes to narrow the criteria further, it could give preference to those H-1B beneficiaries for whom the employer has started the green card process on their behalf.
While this proposal will likely not get a standing ovation on first brush, and the best solution is for Congress to either expand the H-1B cap or get rid of it altogether, it is important to take comfort in Victor Hugo's famous words – "Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come." Who would have imagined a few years ago that those who had come to the United States prior to the age of 16 and were not in status would receive deferred action and be flaming successes today? Or who would have imagined that H-4 spouses could seek work authorization or that beneficiaries of I-140 petitions who are caught in the green card employment-based backlogs are likely to be able to apply for work authorization, even if the circumstances are less than perfect, under a proposed rule? Of course, it goes without saying that executive action is no substitute for action by Congress. Any skilled worker immigration reform proposal must not just increase the number of H-1B visas but must also eliminate the horrendous green card backlogs in the employment-based preferences for those born in India and China. But until Congress acts, it is important to press the administration with good ideas, and to build upon brilliant ideas proposed by others. Good ideas never disappear, and have the uncanny knack of resurfacing again and again, until they come into fruition to benefit deserving immigrants who contribute to America.