text:
Midlands Wood Fuel Partners With Devon-based Forest Fuels
Midlands Wood Fuel has today partnered with Okehampton-based Forest Fuels, under the ownership of AMP PLC.
The acquisition – which sees two of the UK's largest, long-standing wood fuel distributors joining forces – is another huge step in consolidating the wood fuel supply chain, something Forest Fuels has been increasingly focusing on in recent years with the acquisition of many smaller businesses.
Forest Fuels supplies more than 1,100 customers with wood chip and wood pellet from its head-office in Okehampton, three regional offices and 20 depots across the UK. MWF is mainly a wood chip supplier, with 14 depots, covering an area that stretches from York down to Gloucester and Oxford, with more than 500 customers. MWF is a very well-regarded and long-established business, and was a finalist in the REA's British Renewable Energy Awards this year.
Forest Fuels' Managing Director Peter Solly, who joined the company when he invested in the business in 2010, said: "This acquisition is great news and represents a huge boost for the wood fuel supply chain. MWF and Forest Fuels' depots fit together extremely well, and the strength of the combined staff team will enable us to offer exceptional quality and service to our customers."
We have a clear strategy to grow Forest Fuels into the leading wood fuel business in the UK, and this latest acquisition is a key step towards that.
The purchase of MWF builds on Forest Fuels other acquisitions, which include recently purchasing Anglia Biofuels, Lakes Biomass and Liverpool Woodpellets' commercial business. Forest Fuels currently turns over in excess of £9 million per annum, and Peter and his team have developed a clear strategy for further growth, aiming for a turnover of £20-30 million within a few years.
"The government's Renewable Heat Incentive has resulted in many more biomass installation over the past five years and therefore a considerable growth in the wood fuel market," added Peter. "Our model of bringing together smaller operators – and now a larger operator in MWF – allows us to retain local staff while using specialist local managers to look after local depots and customers. This is backed up by head office support and dedicated logistics, spreading the overheads of the increasingly complicated regulation, enabling the industry to stay profitable and therefore sustainable."
In order to achieve this long-term sustainability, Forest Fuels was purchased by Aggregated Micro Power (AMP) PLC – the first PLC to enter the small-scale wood fuel industry – in March this year, providing substantial financial investment.
MWF's Managing Director Mark Appleton said: "This is a natural fit. Joining forces with Forest Fuels makes us a formidable force with an unbeatable quality wood fuel supply chain spanning the whole of the UK."
Related Topics:acquisitionAggregated Micro PowerAMPBritish Renewable Energy AwardsForest FuelsFossil FuelsMidlands Wood FuelMWFREA
Laundry Solution Aims To Rack Up Investment
Unsustainable Logging Leads To Tropical Forest Overexploitation
Renewable Energies Are Finally Becoming Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels
Linear Actuators in Alternative Energy Solutions and Technologies
5 Ways to Preserve Fossil Fuels and Avoid a Mass Extinction
5 Clean Energy Options Worth Looking at in 2018
A Step Towards Change By The Industrial Strategy
Boost For Biomass In The North West Following New Liverpool Wood Pellet Depot


What does it mean to be a woman after coming out as transgender?
South Asian-Canadian trans artist Vivek Shraya explores this question and womanhood in her 12th album, "Part-Time Woman," which debuts Friday. The album adds to a long list of books, short films and music she has produced to embolden LGBTQ people to live authentically, while also learning to embrace the intersections within their race, gender and sexuality.
"The album is dedicated to anyone who has been misgendered, made to feel not feminine enough or struggles to find home in a gendered, complex language," Shraya told to NBC Out in a phone conversation. "The album is very much for trans* people by a trans* person. I also see these as songs of love to other trans* girls."
The six-song album is her first solo music project in six years. Shraya collaborated in February with the 11-piece Queer Songbook Orchestra and inclusive singing group Choir! Choir! Choir!, which produces spontaneous, guerilla musical performances in museum exhibitions, art galleries and at political rallies. The Canadian government, Shraya said, gave her a grant to produce her latest album.
"Much of my older work is electronic, because you have to remember the funding aspect of this," Shraya said. "Making laptop music was so much more inexpensive. I wanted to produce an album of all originals, so I applied for an arts grant from the government."
While Shraya created her album with the help of government funding, she hopes to raise awareness of racial divides in Canada and within the LGBTQ community; she wants people to remember that her country was founded on land taken from Indigenous peoples. For Shraya, Pride Month is about augmenting individuals who are normally excluded from political discussion.
Last year, Shraya was Grand Marshall of the Pride Toronto march, and Black Lives Matter (BLM) stopped the procession for 20 minutes to share a list of demands. One of such stated LGBTQ police should not be able to march in a Pride event while dressed in uniform, because it causes trauma for a range of queer people.
"The history of Pride is born as a response to police violence, so the demand was quite important and vital," Shraya said. "They got booed by other gay people, and it is a strange thing being at a Pride parade and seeing white gay people booing BLM, because there is this idea that they weren't queer or fighting a queer cause."
"Part-Time Woman," according to Shraya, is partially a response to those who ignore or are unaware of the various intersections of race, gender, class and sexuality. With her song "Brown Girls," Shraya sings an ode to the strength and perseverance of femme people of color.
"We talk about great things in Canada, but these attitudes exist but never have the opportunity to come to the surface," she said.
While Shraya grew up in Edmonton, Canada — her parents are Indian immigrants — she feels frustrated with the glamorization of the country, especially when Americans declare they will seek sanctuary in Canada if something goes awry in the U.S.
"We have a lot of privileges here in Canada," Shraya said. "For me as a racialized person, I think people don't acknowledge the fact that we are on stolen land and indigenous people continue to face incredible violence in this country."
"Part-Time Woman" is another extension of Shraya's work to create informative, comfortable spaces for LGBTQ folks and people of color. When she is not writing books or making music, Shraya works as a Positive Space Coordinator at George Brown College in Toronto. She has been there since 2003.
"In the U.S. you call them Safe Spaces," Shraya said. "A lot of post-secondary schools have these campaigns or programs so the university or college can be a positive space and safer space for LGBTQ students and staff."
Shraya runs a three-hour training workshop for allies, students, professors and administrators to learn terminology within the LGBTQ spectrum. Her work also centers on dealing with potential harassment on and off campus.
"Once people take the training, they hang a rainbow in their office to symbolize they have attended Positive Space training and they are open to supporting students with LGBTQ-specific issues," Shraya explained.
First solo album in 6 yrs: PART-TIME WOMAN.
w/ @queersongbook. Out June 9.
You can pre-order "Part-Time Woman" here.


text:
Home/Activism/Trump Bans Press that Reports Facts He Doesn't Like
ActivismArtFeaturedPolitics
Trump Bans Press that Reports Facts He Doesn't Like
Amy RothFebruary 25, 2017
Fake news. Trump and company have been using this tired excuse since before his election. Whenever an organization has published critical information about the administration or reported on the connections between Russia and the Trump inner circle, the shouts of "fake news" come back. Yes, there are fake news stories but they are easy to distinguish from credible news sources. Today, Trump banned some of the most respected news sources from a press conference or "gaggle" as it is known. Banned orgs included, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times and CNN. Basically, if you had reported on Russia and Trump in a way he perceived as negative or published White House leaks then you weren't allowed and he and his men have labeled you as "fake."
This is sort of banning of the press has never happened before in our country and it's a direct assault on democracy. But when I think more about it, I realize that it's not only horribly un-American, it's also a bad strategy.
I don't think pissing off the best investigative journalists in the business is the best idea if you want to bury the truth. Seems to me that calling highly respected and talented journalists fakes and liars is just going to encourage them to find the truth. Imagine being the journalist who breaks the story that brings old 45 down. You'd forever be a hero in the pages of history.
In related news I'm very proud of myself for subscribing to the LA Times this week. If they are banned, they must be on to something.
Stay strong and stay informed.
This was originally posted on my Patreon. Please support me there if you want my political art commentary to continue.
EDIT: I had a request to make this as a shirt so here ya go!
https://www.redbubble.com/people/surlyamy/works/25447644-the-enemy-of-the-people
altad Fake news Trump
Amy Davis Roth (aka Surly Amy) is a multimedia, science-loving artist who resides in Los Angeles, California. She makes Surly-Ramics and is currently in love with pottery. Daily maker of art and leader of Mad Art Lab. Support her on Patreon. Tip Jar is here.
Mad Quickies 5:18
REvolutionary Theory: Science Stories Part 1
A Wheelie Good Cause
Citizen Scientry
By Amy Roth
Say Goodbye to the Banana You Know and Love
Quicky (Just one!): We've Contaminated the Moon, with Human DNA and Tardigrades
Mad Quickies: The President Committed Crimes and Killer Fungus Among Us
Mad Quickies (Sorta Quick): Sometimes I Feel Sad
Mad Quickies: Megan Rapinoe Speaks Out in NYC and All the Cool Hair.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
sexual pathology
Strive For Simplicity, Economise on Energy (6)
The Kiss (Lovers), Gustav Klimt, oil and gold leaf on canvas, , 1907–1908.
"Behind every shallow sexual interaction, there hides a person who does not want to see or be seen at a deeper level."
― Michael Mirdad, An Introduction To Tantra And Sacred Sexuality
Before we continue exploring the vital role of simplifying and economising through attention to sexual energy let's take a brief detour into the brain and the spaghetti junction of incessant thoughts.
An enormous amount of energy is expended in thinking deeply about a subject and still more when our thoughts are a product of stress and anxiety. Factor in low-grade fantasy and you have a major energy drain in the mind-body system. With such a breach, our perception, impressions – what we give out and receive – and ability to think critically is seriously impaired by subjective evaluations, warped still further by defensive mechanisms and stagnant beliefs.
The brain is a big, jelly-like battery making up 2 per cent of our body weight. Even at rest, this incredible hub gobbles up a whopping 20% of the body's energy. [1] It's long been known that the brain uses more energy than any other human organ, – up to 20 per cent of the body's total output., with two-thirds of that energy used to help neurons or nerve cells "fire" the remaining third devoted to general "housekeeping," and cell-health maintenance. [2]
Each neuron has a small voltage 70 millivolts or 0.07 volts. That may not seem much when compared to the 1.5 volts of a AA battery or the 115 volts from a wall socket, but at the microscopic scale, which is where it functions, it's pretty impressive. In fact, when you take into account that the brain is made of 80 billion neurological batteries each of which contains four times the electrostatic force that normally results in lightning during a thunderstorm. [3]
Our brains pack a powerful punch.
And when the procreative urge gets in on the act, usually as a form of grounding all that "electrostatic" tension, then a massive explosion of neurochemicals occurs at the point of climax. Sexual saiety is the result – or offspring.
The point is, this is a major "charge" which has a major downside and may not only be exhausting your physiological responses and your nervous system but re-wiring the neurology of the brain toward habituation. We become addicts to what is a very narrow mental and biological mechanism rationalised by the intellect, fuelled by ignorance.
Posted in Establishment / Elite, Health, Occult, Psychology, Spirituality / Esoterica and tagged alchemy, biochemicals, biology, bonding, brain, centres, chakras, Chinese medicine, dopamine, economy of energy, energy, energy conservation, Gnosticism, healing, Heaven, Karezza, Kundalini, love, marriage, meridians, mind, Narcissism, orgasm, sex, Sex Magick, sexual abuse, sexual energy, sexual pathology, sexuality, Simplicity, Social Media, Tantra, Taoism on June 1, 2019 by M.K. Styllinski. Leave a comment
Infrakshun / pixabay.com
'In order to make gold, you need to have gold.'
— Medieval alchemist
Eastern philosophy and medicine has been well in advance of the West when it comes to recognising the energy of the body and mind. For thousands of years Chinese, Tibetan, Japanese and Indian practitioners had knowledge of the channels or meridians which carried two kinds of force, yin and yang, which flow along a network of energy pathways which map the entire body.
It is now accepted that our bodies are electromagnetic in nature with these energy pathways acting as electricity conductors, a fact of which acupuncturists take full advantage in order to regulate and "unblock" certain imbalances in the energy field. Knowledge of the energy network of meridians forms the diagnostic methodology behind Shiatsu/Acupressure, Qigong, Tai Chi and Yoga. Indeed, science seems to be catching up with what the ancients have already known for thousands of years.
As no anatomical foundation was perceived to exist for the meridian network in our current Darwinian-saturated science establishment the concept had been discarded and ignored as the Newtonian/Cartesian mindset held sway. However, a flurry of new experiments emerged in 2013 which produced a new anatomical foundation called the 'Primo Vascular System'. Researchers at the Seoul National University in South Korea describe the PVS as "… a previously unknown system that integrates the features of the cardiovascular, nervous, immune, and hormonal systems. It also provides a physical substrate for the acupuncture points and meridians." They propose "…a new vision of the anatomical basis for the PVS and the vital energy—called "Qi"—as an electromagnetic wave that is involved very closely with the DNA in the PVS."
What is most fascinating is the duplication of the PVS by the vascular and the nervous systems during the very early stage of body development. Consequently: "… the PVS combines the features of the vascular, nervous, immune, and hormonal systems. The PVS in all its aspects is understood as a system that covers the entire body, and regulates and coordinates all biological life processes." [1]
This was followed in 2016 with discoveries on the microstructure of the PVS via the use of a patented microscopy system by Professor Vitaly Vodyanoy of Auburn University in Alabama. He revealed for the first time "the microstructure of the miniscule, translucent system of vessels, subvessels and stem cell-filled nodes—together making up the primo-vascular system…" which appears in and on blood vessels, organ tissue and the lymphatic system. As for less complex biological of rats, it too features in the human system. [2]
Instead of a simplistic version of meridians lying on the surface of the skin, classical Chinese texts have always indicated the three-dimensional nature of energy pathways which carry liquid Chi to the internal organs. This liquid is made of stem-cells packed with DNA. And we know the enormous healing and regeneration properties of stem-cells and the mysterious nature of DNA as one factor in the interface of consciousness with knowledge and reality.
Now, keep in mind the importance of liquid in our bodies and its role in carrying protective and nourishing information.
Posted in Health, Psychology, Spirituality / Esoterica and tagged alchemosexuality, alchemy, biochemicals, biology, brain, centres, chakras, Chinese medicine, DNA, Earth, economy, economy of energy, energy, energy conservation, food for the moon, Fourth Way, Gnosticism, Gurdjieff, Heaven, I Ching, Kundalini, love, meridians, Mouravieff, Ouspensky, ponerology, Primo Vascular System, semen, service to others, service to self, sex, sex centre, sexual abuse, sexual pathology, sexuality, Simplicity, Tantra, Taoism, yin-yang on May 22, 2019 by M.K. Styllinski. Leave a comment
© Creator76 | Dreamstime.com
"A man builds a fine house; and now he has a master, and a task for life: he is to furnish, watch, show it, and keep it in repair, the rest of his days."
— Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reading time: 15-18 mins
To conserve our energy in the way we think, feel and act we need to know how they might all relate in simple terms. So, let's simplify it.
Think of energy efficiency (upgrades) and energy conservation (energy use) leading to the correct economy for your life. The home can be thought of as a metaphor or symbol of your mind and body. (If you like, this is an extension of Jordan Peterson's thinking of tidying up your room).
Energy conservation involves using less energy by changing your behaviours and habits. Energy efficiency, on the other hand, involves using techniques, traditional systems of knowledge and new technologies that requires less energy to perform the same function.
Energy efficiency = all those qualities and techniques you can find to maximize your potential and minimize chaos. Accumulate energy for creativity and minimize loss from internal and external entropy.
Energy Conservation = simplifying your life through judicious, careful attention and limiting unnecessary drains on energy. employing measures which ensure you are not only efficient but have a constant supply on tap. Conservation sometimes means getting very creative. The more you conserve, the more likely that can be!
In other words, to be energy efficient means looking at ways your personality system can be upgraded so that less energy is needed to perform certain functions and which provides qualitatively better results. This can be "costly" in the short-term but requires much less effort in the long-term. This includes insulation, replacements, careful monitoring and upgrades.
Energy conservation involves actively seeking new ways to on your internal efficiency. You change your relationship to energy within your home. You seek ways to receive energy for minimum loss and a minimum amount of effort. It is strategic, long-term and eminently practical. It requires a re-calibration of existing appliances (organs of perception; centres) in order to extract a maximum amount of energy. The energy that you have is used wisely.
In other words, it means a change in overall behaviour through commitment and a creative application of knowledge.
How might we use our energy more efficiently?
Insulate, upgrade and monitor.
Insulate your mind and body from that which would drain but remain porous enough to let constructive influences through. And if you have good quality insulation then you have more energy to produce warmth and proper flow of electricity and therefore creative potential. (It might be stretching this metaphor to its limit but it's no coincidence that key brain areas found to have more nerve fibre insulation or "myelination" equates to advantageous personality traits!)
Posted in Environment / Nature, Health, Psychology, Spirituality / Esoterica and tagged alchemosexuality, alchemy, biochemicals, biology, centres, Chinese medicine, economy, energy, energy conservation, Fourth Way, gender roles, Gurdjieff, I Ching, men's rights, ponerology, postmodernism, Radical Feminism, Schizoidia, sex, sex centre, sexual abuse, sexual pathology, sexuality, Simplicity, Taoism on May 22, 2019 by M.K. Styllinski. Leave a comment
The Sex Establishment V: "Normaphiliacs" and Freudian Slips
"This condition had no name, under the pen of Freud it would become the Oedipus complex and create a universal pathology for the sole purpose that he could be less alone [with his creation]." […] Here is the key to the Freudian epistemology: the extrapolation of a universal theory from a personal adventure."
– Michel Onfray, Le crépuscule d'une idole – l'affabulation freudienne (Twilight of the Idol – The Freudian Fable)
In the 21st century we have the results of various social engineering programmes made manifest. Alfred Kinsey managed to contribute to the gradual detachment of sex from love, and the fragmentation of family and community cohesion by placing the sexual act at top of the pleasure pyramid as an end in itself. As we saw in the previous post, the pathologising and mainstreaming of minority orientation and encouragement of greater and more extreme forms of unlimited sexual expression produced the prevalence of promiscuity and body-centric values which then became a dominant part of culture. This went beyond mere tolerance and acceptance of different forms of sexual identity and preference. It has led to acts of perversion as cool, anonymous sex as normal and sacred union based on love as old fashioned and silly.
That is not to say that we must all toe the line of heterosexual sex or that there is a right or wrong way to express ones sexuality. The key issue here is being true to yourself and whether or not sexuality and sex has been engineered in a certain direction and if it has benefited societies. If that is so, as I believe, then the choices presented to us as we are growing up are not choices at all, but a product of perception management. Are we getting closer to a greater understanding of not just our sexuality, but our place in the world or are we experiencing one expression of an endemic pathology that is tainting our sexual and emotional selves under cover of "normality"?
Are we roaming further and further away from our innate human potential while believing the opposite?
By delving into the reality of psychopathy within our socio-political institutions we might be able to find the answer.
Screen shot from the film 'Fifty Shades of Grey' (2013) based on the book of the same name which involves a young woman's exploration into sexual practices involving bondage/discipline, dominance/submission, and sadism/masochism (BDSM). The book became a global best seller with 90 million sold worldwide by 2013.
Professor Amy Bonomi chairperson and professor in Michigan State University's Department of Human Development and Family Studies conducted extensive studies which show that young adult women who read "Fifty Shades of Grey" are more likely than nonreaders to exhibit unhealthy behaviours. These include: eating disorders, binge drinking, having verbally abusive partners and a predeliction for multiple sexual partners. In other words, when films and books glorify and thereby normalise a narcissistic and/or psychopathic perception of reality, we can hardly be surprised that young people begin to exhibit stress and personality deformations. Or as Miriam Grossman M.D. observed: "There's nothing grey about Fifty Shades of Grey. It's all black."
The sexual revolution was in large part a triumph of emotional immaturity and anonymous sex with women and men reflecting a caricature of their gender roles: literal objects to use and consume as a true reflection of our consumer society. Sure, there was also genuine examples of a mystical liberation through sex to which our pagan ancestors connected. There is no doubt that nature and the body was synonymous with a spark of ecstasy, a way to commune with God which developed into the cults of Dionysus and Bacchus and other body-centric, sensual rituals. The body as a bio-chemical conduit for achieving altered states can give that mystical "high" in the same way that drugs can bypass the brain filters and introduce to dimensions beyond the five senses – even if for a moment. Sometimes that's enough to initiate dramatic change. But it is a short cut to a spiritual union that usually requires years of self development and inner work. Which is why drugs and sex magick tend to backfire. So, too the fire of sexual revolution which liberated more than just blocked emotions and neuroses. Could it be that the pendulum was allowed to swing much to far in the other direction?
As discussed, rather than feminism increasing the freedom of women's rights in the West, under the elite-sponsored role of sexual emancipation it may have led to less rights for women and less happiness. The sexual freedom that women have rightly struggled for has proved poisonous where the modern woman is either trying to emulate the model of the alpha male in the corporate world or being caught between the false liberation of sexual promiscuity. In between those two poles lies confusion and doubt for women exemplified in the rise in narcissism.
This Kinseyian form of pseudo-scientific justification for abuse seems to be alive and well in the form of the American Psychiatric Association and the psychoanalysis tradition. Back in 2003, The American Psychiatric Association Symposium Debated whether "Paedophilia, Gender-Identity Disorder, Sexual Sadism Should Remain Mental Illnesses." Psychiatrist Charles Moser of San Francisco's Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality and co-author Peggy Kleinplatz of the University of Ottawa presented a paper entitled, "DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias: An Argument for Removal." They argued that people whose sexual interests are atypical, culturally forbidden, or religiously prescribed should not, for those reasons, be labelled mentally ill. These included exhibitionism, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism which are to be viewed as simply another form of sexual expression. They were also calling for paedophilia to be removed from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). Further, that all of us "normophilics" should allow paraphilias the freedom to be who they are and to remove the label of a mental illness forthwith. Though in the minority, a significant number of members agreed.
Another speaker at the same conference exclaimed: "Any sexual interest can be healthy and life-enhancing…" and "…that society should not discriminate against adults who are attracted to children…" noting that "many beloved authors and public figures throughout history have been high-functioning individuals who could actually be classified as paedophiles." [1] This debate has continued to the present day.
Firstly, the emphasis is not to ostracise and place a judgment upon those of differing sexual preferences but to assist and heal if these extremes exhibit pathology that is negative to both the individual and the persons who do not harbour the same sexual preference. Healing the self by practicing bondage sado-masochism (BDSM) in the privacy of your own home is fine. Propagandising such a fetish and/or accepting predatory behaviour and sexual confusion as a template for society isn't the way forward either. A sexual interest can indeed be "Healthy and life enhancing," depending on which lens we have decided to view reality. Our focus can be tinkered with in order that it may flow in a direction not of our choosing, yet, we follow it by rote all the same.
Mainstreaming pathology: You can buy yourself a Black Padded PU Leather Hood "Gimp Mask" for Sensory Deprivation Bondage or be lead round the house on a lead if you so wish.
BDSM dog collar (wikipedia)
It is not a case of whether or not society should be free to choose how to heal and release what we perceive to be natural sexual expressions, but to explore why it is that those sexual preferences have arisen in the first place and if the various factors involved are indeed natural rather than carefully conditioned.
Ethics and values appear to be shifting in favour of a voting consensus that removes mental disorders without any safety net concerning rehabilitation and treatment, which begs the question: from what basis are these disorders or genetic predispositions decreed normal? What appears to be happening here is a spin that suggests that if it is defined as ill or pathological it is outdated and anti-progressive. If it can all be seen as just another deviancy and thus normalised we can all go home and stop being so retrogressive. If it is not an illness but one symptom among many drawn from narcissism or psychopathy, then we have clear and present implications for the safety of our nation's health, especially children. The legitimisation of psychopathology via the Sex Establishment is joining forces with the politicisation of values that is reshaping our culture.
Paedophilia has qualities that align itself not only towards pathological narcissism but elements of psychopathy. It is interesting that there are a growing number of "scientists" of the behaviourist and psychoanalysis schools that advocate a redefinition of paedophilia rather than a redefinition of causes which could direct resources towards the treatment and prevention of child abuse. This includes learning every possible method of pulling the wool over the eyes of the authorities be it psychiatrist, policeman or lawyer, making the whole question of science, law and sexual freedom an increasingly difficult equation to solve. For to do so, means that we must see the distortion and deformation of sexuality and the sexual predators that personify such a malaise. We must see this through entirely new eyes and as a web of relations intimately connected with psychopaths in power.
Paedophilia and related pathologies may well be a symptom of biological, environmental, and traumatic abuse. It may also be a choice. What is conspicuous by its absence in the above appeals for paedophile rights are the rights of children for whom we must, by virtue of our roles as guardians and protectors, take a positive discrimination in these matters regarding their welfare and safety. People with "sexually unusual" interests, said Charles Moser and co-author Peggy Kleinplatz "may in fact be quite happy and well-adjusted," which is entirely beside the point. The paedophile's victims may not be quite so happy and well-adjusted after he has molested them. It is these kinds of remarks that feed into the mainstreaming" of pathologies under the guise of normality which may progressively alter the landscape of mass sexuality and under specific directives – then we have a problem, a problem that is not even the fault of those exhibiting sexual pathologies or otherwise.
We can regard all kinds of pathology and child trauma masquerading as healthy and well-adjusted living. This is not about making judgements about what is right or wrong in our sexuality but rather to question where we draw the line in favour of sexual expression that enriches society rather than infects it; where sexual boundaries are being pushed towards more and more extremes, rather than augmenting social relations.
Is the line between "healthy" and "damaged" becoming blurred here?
It is a contradiction that behind closed doors a select minority of paraphilics and a larger proportion of humanity seek to indulge their fantasies towards violence, fetishism, paedophilia, ritualistic sex and child molestation which may be indicative of a suppressed and learned behaviour caused by inverted and unresolved suffering. Meantime, an entirely different face is presented to the world at large. Genetics may play a significant role whereby traumas are imported down the generational line and impose "bombshells" on the next generation if no other role models exist. Yet what this means for society is the set up between the guardians of over-protection and the guardians of over-liberalisation with the resulting chaos created between the two, where opportunities for creative solutions are forever denied.
Noted luminaries were paedophiles or had paedophilic tendencies. There is certainly an historical basis in fact that much of the Establishment or "high functioning" individuals could be classed as paedophiles and/or child rapists. The nature of government, secret societies, occult fraternities, and religious institutions that offer protection of power and status as a class-based tradition may also offer a sanctuary for such people.
Is there a link that those with deviant sexual expressions gravitate towards that which can offer them cover?
This quote from The American Psychiatric Association sums up this conversive thinking in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: "302.71 Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder': 'The essential feature of this so-called condition is a deficiency or absence of sexual fantasies and desire for sexual activity (Criterion A). There is little motivation to seek stimuli and diminished frustration when deprived of the opportunity for sexual expression. The individual usually does not initiate sexual activity or may only engage in it reluctantly when it is initiated by the partner." [2]
This illustrates the point and might be drawn directly from Kinseyian sexology. If you do not have sexual fantasies, a desire for sexual activity, little motivation to seek stimuli and little frustration when an opportunity for sexual expression comes your way, or even – horror of horrors – you have minimal interest in sex, then you are abnormal. You have a disorder. Notice too, that the idea of love being a factor in this purely mechanical equation is of little importance. If clinically, the activity or desire itself is no longer classified as a pathology "unless accompanied by distress or interference with normal functioning," then what is known as zoophilia *can be considered no more functionally different from any other love/sex relationship. Even having sex with a deer can be considered fine and dandy in our paralogical reality as one Wisconsin man's attorney claimed in his client's defence that the: "'crimes against sexual morality' statute prohibits sex with animals, but fails to mention carcasses … "The statute does not prohibit one from having sex with a carcass." Getting this man off is not the issue but the social and developmental factors governing his desire to see a carcass as sexually fulfilling is obviously the real point of contention. [3] Paralogical and paramoralistic arguments are employed to suggest that it is perfectly normal for human beings to use animals for sex – be it dog, horse or the neighbour's parakeet – should the desire be strong enough.
These are extreme examples. Nonetheless, what does this mean for more down-to-earth issues of sexuality? The fusing of definitions of acceptable and pathological become habitual and thus the propensity for normalisation. The manual's criterion for mental illness appears to be getting both ever more flexible and increasingly restrictive. With a suitably biased psychiatrist, the manual can be used as a way to give undue credence to almost any abnormality or disorder depending on the required outcome. As a tool for removing subversive persons for example, a method to which psychiatry has long since lent itself. For instance, there is still no diagnostic test for schizophrenia or any of the other three hundred so-called mental disorders listed in the current edition. A cursory look at the manual gives the impression that American psychiatry is sometimes a mix of culturally biased, reactive, class-driven moral judgements of what it considers to be abnormal behaviour.
Sigmund Freud believed that any and all symptoms of perceived dysfunction or neuroses could be sourced from repressed memories, irrevocably tied to a repressed sexuality. Although Freud offered intellectual insights into our understanding of human sexuality, the final analysis reveals that his psychoanalysis was an indication of his own neurosis and sexual abuse which he was busy burying under a grandiose schema of rationalisation.
While casting out any possibility of incest as predatory, he rejected the body in favour of an acute form of biological asceticism; a kind of clinical denial that strangely lent itself to the exact kind of religious conservatism that he was trying to avoid. It may be true that his victims' pleas for understanding were merely absorbed into his own fragmented, mechanical view of sexuality by turning them all into variations on the theme of Oedipus. His rejection of incest as abusive or traumatic fit perfectly with future psychiatry and Kinseyian programming. Proven cases of recovered memories were simply ignored. Repressed and false memories can exist but the battle between both is currently being expressed through their respective extremes with money and psychopathy as the deciding factor.
Freud's simplistic associations have allowed pathocratic principles to burrow deeper into human consciousness and to drop our crumbling defences against the psychopath still further. Author George K. Simon, Jr., writes in his cautionary book: In Sheep's Clothing: "The malignant impact of overgeneralizing Freud's observations about a small group of overly inhibited individuals into a broad set of assumptions about the causes of psychological ill-health in everyone cannot be overstated." Simon further suggests: "We need a completely different theoretical framework if we are to truly understand, deal with, and treat the kinds of people who fight too much as opposed to those who cower or "run" too much." [4]
The whole basis upon which Freudian psychoanalytical movement rests is the wholly subjective notion that all psychological illness is rooted in repressed sexual impulses, unconscious incestuous fantasies, the spectre of death and the fear of castration, the latter of which appears to have their roots in the genital mutilation (circumcision) of the Old Testament. Freudian psychoanalysis has given credence to the myth that girls secretly want to have sex with their fathers for example, which is crude, simplistic and on a par with the generalizations we can find in the Kinsey reports. In fact, if the denial of whatever sexual impulse is at work – whether depraved or perverted – then the basis for finding perversion distasteful must necessarily lie in one's own unconscious desire for perverse practices. This is a both an intensely paralogical, materialist and nihilistic view of life that has no room for multiple psychotherapeutic dimensions of healing.
The psychoanalytical movement made claims that there's was a new science when in fact it was nothing more than pseudo-science that developed a cult following. As Bob Altemeyer a Canadian professor of Psychology astutely sums up: "One gets nowhere with a theory that can 'predict' whatever happened, after it happens. Having an answer for everything may make one a great used car salesman, but it rings the death knell for a theory in science. In science, the best explanations are nailed-down-testable." [5]
Freud: Father of the Cult of Psychoanalysis
While undoubtedly breaking new ground in tapping the unconscious fears that lie within the human psyche, these successes paled in comparison to the fear and loathing of both sexuality and the feminine that Freud seemed to set in motion. Freud's own neuroses as well as the broader fears of the Jewish culture were injected into this new "science."
Psychiatrist Hervey M. Cleckley illustrated the cult of psychoanalysis in this way:
Today celebrated psychiatric authors "plainly demonstrate" by methods widely proclaimed as scientific that the chief reason human beings came in time to wear clothing lies in the ever-present influence of a "castration fear" of which they all remain unconscious. Not for protection against the weather, primarily, we are told, or for purposes of adornment, did primitive men and women first don bearskin coats or grass skirts. According to high authority, the real motivation lies deeper, in a universal but unconscious terror felt by each male that a jealous father will amputate his penis. Concealing his genital organs with apparel offers him, it is claimed, a slight measure of protection from this inescapable anxiety. The female (unconsciously), believing herself already dismembered as a punishment for (unconscious) incestuous aims, hastens to cover her mutilation and veil her shame.
Much of the reasoning and investigation classed as dynamic depends upon verbal constructs which can be readily manipulated by the accepted rules to furnish a bogus proof for virtually any assumption the human imagination might contrive. […]From the standpoint of modern operational logic, a theory must be expressed in such a way that it may be proved. This is surely the case with the Freudian theory. On the other hand, from the standpoint of modern methodology, the evidence or experiment which is designed to prove the theory must he one which could have a possible negative outcome and so disprove the theory. At the present time, many of the concepts of psychoanalysis are undoubtedly developed in such a way that only proof and not disproof is possible …[6]
And it is this "bogus proof" and extreme subjectivity that gave the perfect cover for psychoanalysis to gain dominance in psychology, psychiatry and culture. It lent itself not only to misuse but acted as a gateway for any and all interpretations. Disagreements with Freud's and his associates' interpretations were summarily dismissed as products of "resistance." This was a word used by Freud to illustrate the reluctance patients showed in speaking of painful or humiliating experiences during the process of analysis. He believed this resistance: "… often utilized the mechanism of repression to remove or to withhold from consciousness impulses or memories which the patient found it particularly unpleasant to accept and admit as his own." [7] Therefore, when the medical psychology community did not accept these chief concepts Freud put this down to the theory of resistance thereby placing constructive criticism into a box he could padlock at will.
In the early part of the twentieth until the post war period, psychoanalysis firmly stamped its mark on the subconscious of the West. Although the diversity of psychology, psychotherapy and alternative medicine has diluted Freud's power the legacy of his influence lives on as it did most strongly in the 1950s. As Cleckley outlines:
If a psychiatrist cannot accept as adequate the evidence Freud offers for his claim that at age four this patient was intensely motivated by a specific desire for his father to practice sodomy upon him, and was restrained in these inclinations by a fear of castration, he must be prepared to defend himself against the argument that similar (unconscious) desires and fears are determining factors in the dissident opinion. So, too, the critic who cannot accept the popular concept of universal bisexuality lays himself open to suspicions that an unrecognized homosexual tendency within himself, probably one of more than ordinary magnitude, is playing an important part in his alleged failure to accept evidence and react to it normally. [8]
Dr. Cleckley highlights the fact that Freud's cherished beliefs do not necessarily equate with rigorous science. Politics and religion are bastions of such authoritarian, fear-based thinking that imposes the same fundamentalist beliefs upon others. Psychoanalysis is no different, which is why it has fallen out of favour in more recent times. The idea that those who disagree with the methods of the Freudian approach are somehow expressing resistance and respond: "…with unconscious longings to emulate the very thing being criticised is obviously a ridiculous simplification. The idea that the roots of all neuroses are from the repression of the procreative, biological sex impulse is equally fallacious."
Perhaps the most revealing legacy of psychoanalysis is offered from author and consultant on abusive men and family issues, Lundy Bancroft. He wrote about Freud's discovery at the turn of the 19th Century, of just how many of his female patients revealed instances of incest by their fathers and brothers. Early in his career Freud came to the conclusion that child sexual abuse was a key issue in emotional illness in adult women which resulted in his famous paper: "The Aetiology of Hysteria." He reminds us it was at this juncture that Freud, so keen to be accepted by his peers found himself ridiculed and rejected for proposing such a thing. How could it possibly be that pillars of society with unimpeacable reputations could be perpetrators of incest? It was unthinkable. The results of this shock to Freud's intellectual pride and the consequences for the future of psychology were enormous:
"Within a few years, Freud buckled under this heavy pressure and recanted his conclusions. In their place he proposed the "Oedipus complex," which became the foundation of modern psychology. According to this theory any young girl actually desires sexual contact with her father, because she wants to compete with her mother to be the most special person in his life. Freud used this construct to conclude that the episodes of incestuous abuse his clients had revealed to him had never taken place; they were simply fantasies of events the women had wished for when they were children and that the women had come to believe were real. This construct started a hundred-year history in the mental health field of blaming victims for the abuse perpetrated on them and outright discrediting of women's and children's reports of mistreatment by men. Once abuse was denied in this way, the stage was set for some psychologists to take the view that any violent or sexually exploitative behaviors that couldn't be denied—because they were simply too obvious—should be considered mutually caused. Psychological literature is thus full of descriptions of young children who "seduce" adults into sexual encounters and of women whose "provocative" behavior causes men to become violent or sexually assaultive toward them."
Bancroft is under no illusions that the cultural influence of psychoanalysis remains strong and offers an anecdote from his experience to illustrate the point:
A psychologist who is currently one of the most influential professionals nationally in the field of custody disputes writes that women provoke men's violence by "resisting their control" or by "attempting to leave." She promotes the Oedipus complex theory, including the claim that girls wish for sexual contact with their fathers. In her writing she makes the observation that young girls are often involved in "mutually seductive" relationships with their violent fathers, and it is on the basis of such "research" that some courts have set their protocols. The Freudian legacy thus remains strong."
We shortly discover just how strong this belief really is as we look further into the various expressions of abuse presently rising to surface within society.
* Zoophilia (from the Greek Zoon, "animal", and Philia, "friendship or love") is a paraphilia, defined as an affinity or sexual attraction by a human to non-human animals. Such individuals are called zoophiles. See Appendix 3 for further paraphilias.
[1] "Should These Conditions Be Normalized?" American Psychiatric Association Symposium Debates Whether Paedophilia, Gender-Identity Disorder, Sexual Sadism Should Remain Mental Illnesses By Linda Ames Nicolosi, http://www.narth.com/
[2] American Psychiatric Association's DMH (p. 496)
[3] 'Sex With Dead Deer Not Illegal – Lawyer Argues' The Register, November 11, 2006.
[4] In Sheep's Clothing – Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People by George K. Simon, Jr. PhD. Published by AJ Christopher & Co. 2000.
[5] p.54.The Authoritarians by Bob Altemeyer, Associate Professor Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada, 2006 by Bob Altemeyer
[6] op. cit. Cleckley (p.112)
[8] Ibid. (p.118 / p.99-100)
"Freud's long report published under the title From the History of an Infantile Neurosis can, I believe, be taken as a typical example of this work. In it a dream recalled by the twenty-six-year-old patient as having occurred when he was four years of age is confidently interpreted. The chief conclusions reached about this patient appear to be based fundamentally on this interpretation. Freud reports the entire dream as follows:
'I dreamt that it was night and that I was lying in my bed. (My bed stood with its foot towards the window; in front of the window there was a row of old walnut trees. I know it was winter when I had the dream, and night-time.) Suddenly the window opened of its own accord, and I was terrified to see that some white wolves were sitting on the big walnut tree in front of the window. There were six or seven of them. The wolves were quite white, and looked more like Foxes or sheep-dogs, for they had big tails like foxes and they had their ears pricked like dogs when they are attending to something. In a great terror, evidently of being eaten up by the wolves, I screamed and woke up…
'The only piece of action in the dream was the opening of the window; for the waives sat quite still and without any movement on the branches of the tree, to the right and left of the trunk, and looked at me. It seemed as though they had riveted their whole attention upon me,Freud draws from this dream a number of conclusions by interpreting its various items symbolically. From its association with a few fairy tales familiar to the patient in childhood and with some not particularly extraordinary early memories he devises an astonishing explanation of the patient's illness. Freud confidently states that the dream reveals in considerable detail an experience the patient was subjected to approximately two and a half years earlier, when he was eighteen months old.
Fragment after fragment of the dream is used by Freud to derive proof that the infant at that time saw his parents while they were having sexual intercourse.He is quite confident that the dream reveals that the parents had intercourse three times in succession while the infant observed them and also that the a tergo position was chosen for their activities. He maintains also that the patient, at eighteen months of age, was so affected by this scene that he had a bowel movement as a pretext to make an outcry and interrupt the parents in their still enthusiastic love-making. In this interpretation the number of the wolves, which the patient recalled as being six or seven, is regarded as an effect of the dreamer's unconscious processes to disguise what he had really seen—that is to say, the two parents.
The fact that the dream scene is quite stationary and the wolves make no movement is accepted as evidence (by reversal) for vigorous coital activity by the amorous couple.The appearance of keen attention noticeable in the dream-wolves who stood in the tree, according to Freud, indicates an intense and absorbing interest on the part of the infant in what he was watching. The fact that the four-year-old boy experienced fear of the wolves in his dream is said by Freud to represent a terror experienced earlier by the infant at the sight of his mother's external genital organs when seen as an infant of eighteen months.
The interpreter assumes without question that this alleged sight contributed to the belief that the mother had been mutilated sexually. From these points Freud reaches the confident conclusion that when the boy at four years of age had the dream he was suffering from a profound dread of castration by his father. The fact that the wolves who appeared in the dream are remembered as having particularly long tails is considered sound evidence of an opposite state (taillessness) and hence a substantial confirmation of this disquieting dread.
This preoccupation is said by Freud to have been the chief deterrent to this four-year-old boy's dominating impulse, assumed to be a specific and strong yearning for his father to carry out upon him sexual relations per anum. In the entire report no item of objective evidence is offered to support these conclusions. Freud appears, however, to be completely convinced that all this is correct and adequately established. In fact, he insists that his whole study of this case must be 'all a piece of nonsense from start to finish, or everything took place just as I have described it above.' "
[9] Bancroft, Lundy; Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men published by Berkley Books (2003) (kindle edition)
Posted in Abuse, Psychology, Psychopathy, Religion, Social Engineering and tagged Advanced Study of Human Sexualit, Alfred Kinsey, and sadomasochism, bestiality, Child abuse, dreams, Establishment, ethics, fetishism, Freud, Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, Indiana University, Kinseyian programming, love, mental illness, paedophilia, Paraphilias, sexology, sexual pathology, sexual revolution, sexuality, transvestism, voyeurism, zoophilia on February 16, 2014 by M.K. Styllinski. Leave a comment
Sex, Lies and Society V: Minorities
"… if propaganda can bring whole nations to war, why should the sexes be immune?"
– Hervey M. Cleckley M.D.
The belief in homosexuality as the primary link between the sexual abuse of boys and girls has proven to be baseless time and time again, yet the myth persists. [1]
Paedophilia requires the object of desire to be a prepubescent youth so that his or her sexual fantasies may be fulfilled. This may or may not translate into action. Rarely do paedophiles develop an attraction for adults. Paedophilia is more of a sexual fetish and a narcissistic distortion of erotic-love, whereas the child rapist seeks to dominate and regain a sense of power through the sexual abuse of the weakest and the most vulnerable. What is more important for the paedophile is access to young children over and above issues of gender.
Psychologist Anna C. Salter makes the link that there is ingrained cultural association with homosexuality and paedophilia. Therapist Joe Hort agrees: "When a man molests little girls, we call him a 'pedophile' and not a 'heterosexual.' Of course, when a man molests little boys, people say outright, or mutter under their breath, 'homosexual.'" [2] As social scientist David Howitt stated: "It is wrong to assume that homosexuality characterizes a fixed and identifiable proportion of the population: the situation is far more complex than this allows." [3]
Such simplifications feed into false avenues of morality useful for political control. It does not mean a homosexually oriented psychopath cannot traverse all manner of sexual preferences in exactly the same way as the heterosexual psychopath. This does not mean that homosexuality automatically means paedophilia just as it does not mean that heterosexuality equates to preying on underage girls. The key point here is how does psychopathy subvert – whatever orientation? The power of sex has always been a socio-political commodity, as we shall see.
The Kinsey Report data on Human Sexuality which gave a "scientific" justification and promotion of a certain type of "sexual revolution" is pertinent in this respect. The Rockefeller funded authors sold the idea that homosexual experiences were common even in sectors of the population who saw themselves as heterosexual. According to Kinsey's Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953) his data revealed that reported that:
37% of males and 13% of females had at least some overt homosexual experience to orgasm;
10% of males were more or less exclusively homosexual and 8% of males were exclusively homosexual for at least three years between the ages of 16 and 55. For females, Kinsey reported a range of 2-6% for more or less exclusively homosexual experience/response.
4% of males and 1-3% of females had been exclusively homosexual after the onset of adolescence up to the time of the interview. [4]
However, most of the data, methods and sources by which this statistical information was gathered have since been thoroughly disputed if not debunked. With the help of the Rockefeller's obsession with social engineering and financial clout, the Kinsey reports have been used for comprehensive psycho-sexual conditioning of the populace – including homosexual men.
In 1994, a UK study using statistical criteria and sources far superior to Kinsey's dubious methods found that the true rate of homosexuality was about 1 percent which "received considerable adverse criticism." This tells us more about how entrenched the findings of the Kinsey report had become than any objective analysis of the data. Regarding paedophilia: "One implication of such low rates, of course, is that homosexuals are more marginal than suggested by previous studies and less than a numerically substantial minority. Such low estimates also have implications for interpreting the high rates of boy-orientation among paedophiles." In summary: "knowing the nature of an adult's sexual involvement with children says little or nothing about their orientation to adult men or women." [5]
The question that also needs to be asked is: how much of our sexuality is contoured toward orientations which are socially engineered rather than a result of natural development? When Rockefeller social science is involved you can bet your bottom dollar that they have a vested interest in changing Western societies. (We will explore how and why in later posts).
What seems to be key is this: it matters little whether the individual is heterosexual or homosexual but how the individual is manifesting an encouraged sexual psychopathy. Sexual preferences can be ponerised and used as tools of mass control just like any other human orientation. Minority rights can be co-opted and used for purposes which are entirely counter to promoting basic rights and defence against prejudice. Psychopathy subverts and distorts "normal" homosexual relations within society exacerbating and feeding an already sensitive state prone to disequilibrium due to the nature of same sex relations as a minority orientation thus against the tide of the majority. Inversions graduate to places of influence on the public at large due in part to the nature of the deviancy and those who are aware of mass psychology and can use it to further their own ends.
Nonetheless, sexual psychopathy transcends orientation with the resulting promotion of psychopathological preferences taking over loving, intimate relations. Some argue that homosexuality is more open to such influences due to an "unnatural" biological pairing of male to male or female to female. Such speculation cannot be proven either way and is a fruitless line of inquiry. Psychopaths infiltrate and dominate sexuality if there is a potential for loving adult relations whatever the sexual orientation. Yet, it may be the case within a minority belief system of sexual orientation this fact alone can be used to mainstream and promote a propaganda of divide and rule, confusion and dogma under the guise of minority rights as stated.
Where that potential exists you will find expressions of a long and concerted attempt to contour the normal homosexual and heterosexual relations towards an entropic view of sexuality. And this means replacing the creative, feminine, receptive and nurturing qualities of our society towards the narcissistic, cynical, hateful, sadistic-masochistic, brutal, violent, nihilistic and animalistic qualities that resonate along the reality pathway of the psychopath. In other words, the object of distortion and hatred is the embodiment of the feminine: in both men and women; it is the cooperative and inclusive ideals which are under attack. And if you follow the history of monotheistic religions and patriarchal structures that arose out of such mass programming you will see that the defining factor in such "progress" is the subjugation, the degradation and gradual desacralisation of all that we associate with healthy relations between men and women, sexual minorities and by extension, our place in society and the natural world.
Cleckley's Instructive Mistake
Homosexuality has always been a part of the human experience and always will be. This post is not about taking issue with person's natural orientation, the rights of which I'd always defend. What I'd like to do here is to explore the concept that psychopathy can work through any grouping and have the potential to subvert its laudable aims. This will prove to be much more pertinent and in the context of Establishment abuse which will be further explored in future posts.
Hervey M. Cleckley
Hervey M. Cleckley is known for his out of print but ground-breaking book on psychopaths: The Mask of Sanity. His lesser known work: The Cariacature of Love (1957) tackles the subject of homosexuality. It is a product of its time in that he was unapologetic in his conclusion that it was a mental illness and thus in need of treatment, which would partly explain why this book is not in print. [6] However, the obvious anti-homosexual position is not the real reason that the book has disappeared from view since it holds valuable information as to how psychopathy can manifest through a minority sexual orientation. Cleckley was not aware of the dynamics of ponerology at this time and made the mistake of attributing homosexuality in general as a pathological expression rather than examples of essential psychopathy grafted onto sexual orientation and working through it. It is these extremes that caught his attention in the book.
To illustrate this point, look at this example from Cleckley in which I substituted "homosexual" for "psychopath" and "homosexuality" for "psychopathy" as indicated in parenthesis:
But it is not only with such overt examples of [psychopathy] as a theme for popular or highbrow art that we must deal. People buying these books, for instance, know what they are getting and, presumably, buy them for that very reason. Where the phenomena of [psychopathy] are brought right out in the open, the non-[psychopath] at least has the chance to orient himself before exposure. The problem raised by Belvedere* is that most people who watch his antics don't know what he is. His character and his incidental predilections are left intact; it is only the fact of his specific sexual anomaly that has been excised. Thus it is those books, movies, magazines etc, where it is not clearly labelled for all to see—that raise the delicate and difficult question: what pervasive influence, subconscious or otherwise, does a steady diet of [psychopathically]-motivated art have upon the non-[psychopath / pathological narcissist]? [7]
[…] Art arising from pathologic and perverse viewpoints seems to have immediate and specific appeal to men and women suffering from similar emotional illness. Those who find the normal goals of human life unacceptable or distasteful are likely to greet with enthusiasm poetry or philosophy that reflects an appraisal similar to their own. If they find the ordinary premises of life hateful they are likely to hail as truth and beauty expressions of rejection by another. Perhaps it is not surprising that such reactions and tastes appear as achievements of exquisite discernment, as a precious wisdom available only to the elect, to coteries of sexually distorted and often brilliant intellectuals who in each generation are drawn together through veneration for the morbid. [8] [Emphasis mine]
Regardless of whether narcissistic, post-modern thought or gay identities are operating, the impetus behind these influences is mainstreamed categories of psychopathy:
… Our altered attitude toward [psychopathy], whether fostered by [psychopaths] or the result of an enlightened tolerance toward them, … has brought about a new kind of Gentlemen's Agreement, by which the minority seeks to impose its views of life and love upon the majority. The reluctance on the part of creators, critics and informed audiences to utter the "nasty word," or the implication that it has no bearing if they do, is the cause; and a gradual effeminization of artistic and sexual values, the foreseeable result.
If it is true that some of the very greatest poets and philosophers and artists were sexually disordered, and the evidence for this seems strong, there is little doubt that some deviated geniuses are able to express profound matters in human experience without reflecting primarily the distortions and abnormal evaluations so common in their disorder. In current literature, nevertheless, and in well-known works from the past, many examples demonstrate the dispirited, perversely cynical, and one might say life-hating, reactions and judgments that I believe are typical of the brilliant and aggressive homosexual.[9] [Emphasis mine]
And the "aggressive homosexual" that the author mentions is in all probability exhibiting either pathological narcissism, if not full–blown psychopathy with the consequent re-modelling of our cultural norms. In other words, it is merely psychopathy appropriating homosexuality as one convenient medium through which to ponerise society. It is also interesting that this type of "aggression" is directed at the feminine qualities in man and womankind in general. Similarly this same aggression manifests in various groups and organisations across the spectrum of culture and politics. Subversion and distortion comes from narcissism and the gamut of psychopathic anomalies which push a noble idea into its shadow side.
Cleckley gives varied examples in literature of the early part of the 20th century to illustrate the misanthropic, woman-hating themes on show. Commensurate with sexual pathology and the Don Juan conquistadores of the sexual predator, a loathing of the feminine and the qualities therein underscores a threat to the dominance of the male – a complete distortion of the relationship of male and female polarity, or in Cleckley's words: "…these men condemn her as a biologic fraud, a ghastly and detestable blunder of nature. […] They can only point to woman as a biologic monstrosity. Discovering that insofar as she is genuinely woman she is not a sexually perfect man, they perversely see in the very features that give her status as female only the most revolting deformity." [10]
A theme that runs throughout the history of psychopath's domination of both gay and heterosexual men and women and the attempts to engage a more loving, receptive mode of living to emerge, where the man's real role as supporter and protector of the woman simultaneously allows the feminine qualities to reside within him and the masculine to reside in the woman in equal "quantities" without imbalance. Love is cynically marginalised as quaint or fake. Nihilism, mechanical sex and instinct replaces it.
Cleckley was describing the cultural milieu of the late 1950s but the psychopath's propaganda has continued unabated causing confusion, loss of identity and the burgeoning of extremes across the psycho-sexual spectrum:
The truth is this: if one wants to be in the know as far as poetry, fiction, the theatre, magazines and movies go these days—woman or no woman—one has got to expose oneself to art which is [pathological / psychopathic] in nature. But this raises the question: How much exposure does it take before infection, mild or otherwise, sets in? Can women continually see members of their sex destroyed, mocked, isolated and humiliated; pictured as shrews, whores, idiots and mantraps, and retain any self-confidence or sense of personal worth? And can non-[pathological] men swallow the same amount without eventually corning to think that their wives, sweethearts, sisters and mothers have something of the "menacing, aggressive Poles" about them? To say "no," is to conclude that art has no effect whatsoever on the people who give their attention to it. We know this is not true, and if propaganda can bring whole nations to war, why should the sexes be immune? [11] [Emphasis mine]
When such narcissism and sexual psychopathy became normalised in society it is little wonder that normal gay men just like heterosexuals also exhibited the ponerisation of that sexuality as a whole. Once again: "if propaganda can bring whole nations to war, why should the sexes be immune?"
It appears that sexual perversity in all its forms is concerned with aggression, violence, degradation, fear and defiance rather than love. It is the reaffirmation of the pathological ego and its power which is seen as something to celebrate in popular culture. And how do love and the sense of the sacred compete with such "norms" when seen as entertainment, whilst politically correct channels are entirely unaware of the nature ponerogenesis and indeed, fuel its manifestations further? Cleckley believes: "… that perversions are aberrations of the impulses of aggressiveness and domination directed towards a sexual object. Their character is a blending of a large proportion of ego-drives with a minor quantity of sex-urge," [12] and which traverse all sexual orientations.
The defining factor is a greater narcissism and psychopathology encouraged to multiply within society.
[1] op.cit; Howitt: "While some paedophiles are homosexually orientated towards both adults and children, this does not in itself demonstrate a causal association between the two. There are a number of issues: (1) Uncertainty about the rates of paedophilia in heterosexual and homosexual men; (2) Uncertainty about the rates of homosexuality among adult men; (3) The apparent sexual preference of some heterosexual people for adult females while offending against boys. […] "It is important to distinguish homosexuality directed towards adults from that directed towards underage children. This allows us to see that adult-orientated homosexuals are no more likely to become sexually involved with children than are heterosexuals." (p. 47)."There were no peer-oriented homosexual males in our sample who regressed to children. Homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia are not synonymous. In fact, it may be that these two orientations are mutually exclusive, the reason being that the homosexual male is sexually attracted to masculine qualities whereas the heterosexual male is sexually attracted to feminine characteristics, and the sexually immature child's qualities are more feminine than masculine … In any case, in over 12 years of clinical experience working with child molesters, we have yet to see any example of a regression from an adult homosexual orientation. The child offender who is also attracted to and engaged in adult sexual relationships is heterosexual. It appears, therefore, that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater sexual risk to underage children than does the adult homosexual male." (p.48).
[2] 'Homosexuality and Pedophilia: The False link' by Joe Kort, 2004 | www. joekort.com/articles50.htm(Originally published in In the Family magazine Fall, 2003)
[3] op. cit. Howitt (p.46)
[4] Kinsey Institute – 'The Prevalence of Homosexuality' http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/bib-homoprev.html
[6] The Caricature of Love: A Discussion of Social, Psychiatric, and Literary Manifestations of Pathologic Sexuality by Hervey M. Cleckley, M.D.,Clincial Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology Medical College of Georgia Chief of Service, Psychiatry and Neurology University Hospital Augusta. The Roland Press Co. New York. 1957.
Posted in Abuse, Psychology, Psychopathy, Social Engineering and tagged Alfred Kinsey, art, Caricature of Love, child rapist, Children, gay, homosexuality, Kinsey Report, literature, misanthropy, paedophilia, patriarchy, psychopath, Rockefellers, sexual minorities, sexual orientation, sexual pathology, sexual psychopathy, sexuality on February 7, 2014 by M.K. Styllinski. Leave a comment
Sex, Lies and Society IV: Waxing the Line
Eroticism and sensuality is part of the tradition of many ancient religions. A healthy "earthiness" is a natural part of the human experience. It may well be that many parents experience sexual feelings for their children at some stages of their interaction, however fleeting. Similarly, the depiction of erotic images can elicit an array of responses from all ages, child, mother, father, brother and sister and with an equal number of programmed feelings.
How this sexual energy is expressed, creatively, lovingly or selfishly, depends on many developmental factors from experiences in childhood and the formative years. At the same time, innocent eroticism and the healthy expression of our sensuality can be demonised in part, from a severe misunderstanding of the power of sexual cues which have been distorted by religion, advertising, pornography and info-tainment.
What is disturbing in the context of paedophilia for males and females is the effects of our body and pornography obsessed culture which makes us so unhappy with our physicality and self-concept. For instance, the mainstreaming preference for hairless genitals! When did such a thing become so gross? As psychologist Marnia Robinson observes: "Are we waxing away the line between adults and children?" [1]
And it doesn't stop there as Robinson reveals:
In today's porn world, … 'shaved,' like anal sex, is de rigueur. We now hear younger men saying they will have nothing (sexual) to do with an unshaven female. What has happened? Adolescent porn users are cutting their teeth on depilated sirens. This is just when their brains are most sensitive to reward and furiously wiring their sexual arousal to associated cues—in this case, hairless genitals. This same process affects some adult viewers, too. […]…also labia surgery to eradicate signs of sexual maturity are increasingly common. Using shaving and surgery, women are deliberately neotenizing their genitals, that is, intentionally making them look immature, juvenile. [2]
In a nut-shell, these trends can only feed into the normalising of sexual extremes. Those who practice paedophilia and child molestation as a way of life thrive on the same, relying on misguided politically correct ignorance borne from intentionally created confusion that limits preventative measures. Establishment paedophiles and/or child rapists need the public to be kept busy with paedophile rights and paedophile vigilantism while blurring the lines between eroticism, love, sexual perversion and pathology – all serving to protect institutional abuse that operates above the law.
As Robinson eloquently points out:
"Is this change in conditioned visual tastes removing an evolved barrier that once discouraged adult sex with children? If this is a possibility, how can we, as a society, hope to have an open discussion about it? Or even do reliable research? Given the willingness of today's authorities to assume any sexual response to images of minors proves someone is a paedophile, who would dare to discuss such feelings except on an anonymous Internet forum…maybe?" [3]
In case the reader thinks that the move to hairless women and men is trivial and the discerning porn and multi-media user is ultimately in control, you'd be labouring under a false assumption. As Pavlov's experiments * in conditioned response showed, the dogs salivated after they heard the bell alone, regardless of the circumstances. And in relation to the plasticity of our brains: "once we wire up a cue, we have no way of knowing when it will trigger a reaction" and thus such "new wiring" does not necessarily have anything to do with sexual orientation but the neurological pathways they create. This could have serious consequences in a world that is fast becoming paranoid and civil liberty free. Moreover, in this climate of internet hysteria concerning paedophile websites and the dubious nature of police entrapment antics it is hardly likely that any meaningful discourse is going to filter through to where it's needed: in the bastions of local and international law.
There is a school of thought within academia intent on legitimising paedophilia rather than treating it. The "sexual self-determination" that deems children as adults is a twist on the truth that delivers them into paedophiles who benefit from such para-logical discourse.
Child abuse is the result of many complex and problematic issues that should be not trivialised and its social impact and brevity reduced. Some of the most vocal exponents of in the last twenty years who advocate paedophile rights over treatment include Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovitch, Robert Bausermann and Judith Levine. They have also tried to prove that child abuse is vastly overestimated, even to the extent that it may not exist. The media, while touting sensationalist stories and stoking fear on the one hand, has also given a great deal of coverage to these views. The academic credentials of Rind, Tromovitch and Bausermann are negated by their astonishing bias which amounts to a trumpeting of paedophile rights at the expense of their victims. And yet, with the censorship issues and Establishment wrangling creating sexual witchunts, the truth, as is so often the case is somewhere between these two extremes.
Rind's influential collection of studies on the impact of child abuse, conclude that it is largely a symptom of family dysfunction rather than actual sexual abuse. [4] Statistics were produced from select college samples to prove this point. Other conclusions suggested that the age of consent was subject to whether or not violence is involved. If the child – with no distinction to age – gives consent, then it is not abuse. If violent coercion emerges then this is abuse. Even the term "abuse" was to be replaced by the "adult-child" or adult-adolescent sex.
Once again, paedophile apologists fail to distinguish between the emotional differences between child and adult; they fail to address the effects of abuse from non-coercive methods thus excluding the highly manipulative nature of abusers. They place the onus on the child as instigator rather than the victim and manage to twist socio-cultural statistics to fit their own clear bias for sex between adults and children.
This is not to say that all the data collected is without merit, only the methods by which they collected this data and the final conclusions they came to were very far from impartial. Context is everything. The idea that child abuse was really not all that bad and that we were all overreacting and taking an anti-scientific stance are classic symptoms of ponerology agents doing what they do best – seeding pathogens of confusion and dissonance.
The Journal of Paidika (1987-1995) was published in the Netherlands (where the age of sexual consent is twelve) is, in its own words: "… a scholarly journal which seeks to examine the range of cultural, historical, psychological, and literary issues pertaining to consensual adult-child sexual relationships and desires. The journal was attempting to create a "history of record subject to academic peer-review" and "subscribed to by prestigious institutions such as the British Library and "…the Library of Congress." Unfortunately, while this implies rigorous science the reality is somewhat different. Paidika, by its own admission was a journal concerned with placing the scientific acceptance of paedophile's rights firmly on the academic agenda. However, reading the material one is left with the overwhelming realisation that there is only pseudo-science to be found, gift-wrapped for the paedophile intelligentsia.
Extreme narcissists and those with psychopathic tendencies will always use the very same accusations from critics to deflect the perceived attacks against their nature. Rind and Bausermann published articles in the journal for a number of years before their "meta-analysis" appeared on the scene. Both have gone out of their way to promote and defend the scientific justification for seeing paedophilia as just another way to express oneself sexually.
Persons such as author Judith Levine can be commended for raising the issue of child agency power, over-protection and those profiting from child abuse. However, her simplification and selective data is dangerously misleading. For someone who proposes an age of consent to be dropped to twelve and with many of her sources from closet or "practicing" paedophiles, we can understand how Levine's bias then colours that research. [5] She believes paedophiles can be cured rather than treated without the distinction as to whether we are dealing with sexual psychopaths for example. As the association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers clearly state: "… there is no known 'cure.' [6]
The underreported fact that her key source for much of her statistical data and analyses came from her hero Lawrence Stanley for whom academic paedophilia was not simply confined to white papers. He was convicted in absentia, by a Dutch court in 1998 for sexual abuse of three 7 to 10-year-old girls and faces a three-year prison sentence if he returns to the Netherlands. With the Netherland's liberal reputation regarding paedophilia you can imagine the case details must have been rather convincing. At the time of writing, Stanley has yet to face charges for sexually assaulting a girl in Canada who was under the age of 14 and according to a wire services report in The Miami Herald was finally arrested and charged with possession of child pornography in Brazil. [7]
The US paedophile activists have received much support from the liberal traditions of Scandinavia and Northern Europe which have also given opportunities for more repellent forms of "sexual liberation" to take hold. The Netherlands seems to have a strange predilection for this kind of degeneration, where an often valuable and responsible progressive tradition goes headlong over the edge. In fact, in Holland the audacity of Dutch paedophiles fighting for their right to abuse children in their own country launched a new political party in May 2006 called The Charity, Freedom and Diversity Party (NVD) which stands for some interesting forms of "emancipation" including:
Private possession of child pornography to be allowed; (though a ban on trading such material)
The broadcasting of pornography on daytime television, with only violent pornography limited to the late evening.
Toddlers should be given sex education.
Youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves.
Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal.
Everybody should be allowed to go naked in public.
The legalization of all soft and hard drugs.
Free train travel for all.
This is similar to the way monotheistic religions work by including a few vital truths floating in a sea of ponerological influences. Sweden went one step further than their Dutch neighbours by lifting the ban that had been imposed on homosexuality in 1944, along with … Bestiality.
According to the country's first government-commissioned study horses are the species most often sexually abused. The government last year tasked the Swedish Animal welfare Agency to determine the scope of the problem including whether or not the animals suffer psychologically from the abuse. A person can be found guilty of cruelty to animals if prosecutors can prove that the animal suffered physical or psychological injury.
One has to question from which reality those who presided over the legalisation of such a law and what criteria they used to come to such a conclusion other than that they were quite partial to these activities themselves. Having sex with animals and then using tax payer's money to determine if the animal enjoyed the experience or was less than satisfied, seems to an odd way to address the balance.
Meanwhile, as money being spent on commissioned studies to determine whether horses have Post Traumatic Stress, victimised children are falling through the net and justice is being ignored. This naturally raises questions regarding the suitability of a judicial system that legalises sex with animals while claiming to uphold the moral integrity required for sexual abuse cases of human beings. It seems that we should be not only keeping a watchful eye on our children, but our pets as well.
Finland too has curious laws which appear to favour predators. In 1996 police discovered a "massive computer library of child pornography that included pictures of torture, mutilation, and cannibalism." However, the owner of the child pornography evaded arrest because distributing hard-core child pornography is a minor offence in Finland.
Is it any wonder that sexual pathologies are on the rise?
* Experiments carried out by 1890's Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov who developed his ideas of conditioned and unconditioned responses. For example, dogs don't learn to salivate whenever they see food being hard wired into the dog. He noticed that his dogs would begin to salivate whenever he entered the room, even when he was not bringing them food. He also found that any object or event which the dogs learnt to associate with food would trigger the same salivating response thus leading to the scientific discovery of Pavlovian conditioning.
** A reminder: Paralogism: n. illogical or fallacious deduction. paralogical, paralogistic, a. paralogize, v.i. be illogical; draw unwarranted conclusions. Paralogist | n. conversive thinking: subconscious selection and substitution of data leading to chronic avoidance of the crux of the matter.
[1] Wiring Sexual Tastes to Hairless Genitals…Oops!' Psychology Today, By Marian Robinson. January 2 2012.
[4] pp. 22-53; A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples; Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovitch & Robert Bauserman; in: Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124-1.
[5] Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex by Judith Levine.
[6] Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA) http://www.atsa.com/
[7] 'American Association for Nudist Recreation' (ASA) lawyer arrested in Brazil; charged with child exploitation By Robert Stacy McCain THE WASHINGTON TIMES, July 24, 2002.
Posted in Abuse, Psychology, Psychopathy, Social Engineering and tagged advertising, bestiality, Child abuse, child molestation, child rapist, conditioned response, hair waxing, media, Narcissism, Netherlands, paedophile, paedophile activism, paedophile rights, paedophilia, Paidika Journal, ponerology, pornography, psychopath, Scandinavia, sex research, sexual abuse, sexual orientation, sexual pathology, sexuality on February 7, 2014 by M.K. Styllinski. Leave a comment


text:
Interview with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on the Kossuth Radio programme "Good morning, Hungary"
There can be no compromise on defending Christian culture
On the Friday edition of the Kossuth Radio programme "Good morning, Hungary", Prime Minister and President of Fidesz Viktor Orbán said that pro-immigration forces in the European People's Party (EPP) have attacked Fidesz and are seeking to transform the entire EPP into a pro-immigration international organisation. He noted, however, that the Hungarian people want to prevent this happening.
Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's address at the Business Year Opening Event of the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Budapest, 27 February 2019
The causes of today's migration tensions will intensify
At the first summit of the European Union and the League of Arab States, held in Egypt on Monday, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said that the causes of today's migration tensions will intensify. The question is whether we "want to passively accept these processes, or […] act to control them".
Viktor Orbán's press conference at the 127th Government Info
10 January 2019, Budapest
Hungary has started on an upward course
Hungary lost the twentieth century, but wants to win the twenty-first, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said in an interview published in the Monday issue of the daily Magyar Idők.
Hungary has set out on an upward path
Christmas conversation with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán
Viktor Orbáns Interview in der Sendung "Guten Morgen Ungarn" ["Jó reggelt, Magyarország!"] von Radio Kossuth
Budapest, 23. November 2018
Pro-immigration forces look upon European institutions as transport agencies
The issues of the migrant bank card and the migrant visa demonstrate that, instead of defending the continent, pro-immigration forces look upon European institutions as "transport agencies" as in their view, this is in the continent's best interests, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said on Kossuth Radio's programme 'Good morning, Hungary'.
« Előző oldal
© Minden jog fenntartva, 2020. | archívum | impresszum


Hey guys!! I'm award winning trans pornstar Natalie Mars! Welcome to my official website! I'm always updating my site with fresh, new, exclusive videos and photo sets of all my shenanigans! My live shows are always free for my loyal members, so join my site today for full access to all my content plus my live shows. Also, when you join my site you'll get full access to the entire Transerotica Network so you'll not only get access to all my content, but all the other girls in the network as well! Hope to see you inside.


Home and School Association is a great way to get involved in the school. We have a great time planning and running events for our kids! Are you interested in joining us or learning more about helping out? Please email us at HSA@BTRCS.ORG. It is not too late to get started! Even if you are able to help on some events or for a couple hours here and there, we welcome the support. Please email us today to learn more.
Don't miss out on any of our events this year! Remember, it's all for our children!


text:
Home » Wholesale Games Industry and Market News » Rockstar Games new trailer for Red Dead Redemption 2
Rockstar Games new trailer for Red Dead Redemption 2
Rockstar Games has released a new trailer for their upcoming title Red Dead Redemption 2. The trailer showed brand new gameplay from the highly anticipated game, detailing new features as well as showing how old ones have been built upon.
Every scene from the trailer has been captured in-game, showing the blend of cinematic cutscene and gameplay that was prevalent in Grand Theft Auto 5. These scenes show that Red Dead Redemption 2 is going to be a far more immersive experience than the previous title, with gameplay melting into story. The ability to use cinematic camera angles at any point further ingrain the focus the developers have put on making an enjoyable experience over all else.
This trailer shows the difference between complex main missions and side quests. In classic Rockstar Games style the world will be full of smaller missions that help the player explore the world and experience new and interesting characters. The core story missions however are explosive and action packed, with heists looking to be as much of a highlight as they were in Grand Theft Auto 5. The trailer shows scenes from a heist that doesn't take place on a train, indicating that these large-scale missions could occur anywhere in the game world.
Divergent gameplay has been built upon with the player now having the ability to take on rival gangs, rob houses, hold up stores, and take part in a huge number of other activities that can keep players engaged for hundreds of hours.
The Dead Eye system, which slows down time to help players accurately take down multiple enemies, has been expanded. Now the system can be evolved to reveal weak points on enemies, animals, and even structures that the player may need to take advantage of.
The Strangers and Weirdos portion of the game has also been expanded to resemble that of Grand Theft Auto 5's. Now players will stumble across these bizarre situations without finding them on the map first, adding to the feeling that this is a living, breathing world.
Finally the trailer also draws focus on the fact that the entire game can be played in first person. This feature was added to the current generation and PC versions of Grand Theft Auto 5 when ported over, but Red Dead Redemption 2 looks to have been built with first person more deliberately in mind.
So much more remains to be revealed when Red Dead Redemption 2 launches on October 26th. The game will be expanded with the release of Red Dead Redemption 2 Online about a month afterwards as well, no gameplay of which has been shown as of yet.
Related Topics: Red Dead Redemption 2, Rockstar Games
By Admin in: Wholesale Games Industry and Market News on October 1, 2018 at 7:30 pm


text:
Benefit corporation
< Back to list
Diana del Bufalo
CHARITY: art4sports Onlus
The non-profit organization Art4sport believes in sport as a therapy for the physical and psychological recovery of children, both boys and girls, between 6 and 18 years of age with limb prostheses. Its mission is to help those families who have children with prosthetic limbs not only on a practical and organizational level but also to support them financially, as their main goal is to give them the chance to be able to play and have fun every day through sports activities.
The artist has reached the maximum amount of video requests for this month.
Send me an email when Diana del Bufalo become available
I have read and agreed to Fameroll's Terms and Conditions of Use and I authorize the treatment of my personal data *
01/10/2019 by Diana del Bufalo
Benefit corporation News Contacts
FAQ Charity partners Help
Terms of use Privacy policy About Fameroll