text:
Wild Turkey Tradition 101 1994 Review [In Depth]
Wild Turkey Tradition 101 (1994)
Wild Turkey Tradition Details
Distillery: Wild Turkey
Color: 1.3/2.0 on the color scale (russet, muscat)
Price: I paid about $90, probably normally more
"What does 'tradition' really mean? At Wild Turkey, tradition means standing by the methods that have been used through 5 generations. Over a century of bourbon-making goes into the bottle you now hold. Using the finest ingredients from the heartland of America, we distill with a careful hand: our tribute to the history of quality we've proudly inherited. Taste a true 'tradition' of American price and craftsmanship. Wild Turkey Tradition."
Wild Turkey Tradition 101 overview
Unless you've really dug into Wild Turkey's history, you've likely never heard of the non age-stated version of Wild Turkey Tradition 101. I'd never heard of it until I started seeing it now and then in Japan and started to acquaint myself with older Wild Turkey releases so I wouldn't be so uninformed when I saw them in the future.
From what I recall, and I'll refer to Rare Bird for this one, Wild Turkey Tradition 101 was a Duty Free / export release that spanned from around 1993 to 1997. My bottle for this review is marked 4/14/1994, so it's in the range, and possibly one of the earlier releases.
But if you're at all familiar with Wild Turkey, then you might notice the unique curvy bottle shape, and one I haven't seen since with any other release. Wild Turkey has occasionally used more distinctive bottles for limited releases, including every Master's Keep, and 17 Year Tradition and 14 Year Tradition, but this non age-stated Tradition is the only Wild Turkey bourbon I've ever seen use such a wavy and curvy bottle.
Unfortunately, the cork is also unique and fatter than most other corks except Old Grand Dad 114. Although I was fortunate and the cork somehow didn't break when I opened it, I could tell that it was slowly flaking (like dandruff) into the bourbon, so I had to change it. I ended up using a Blanton's top because it was fatter, which mostly (but not fully) sealed the top.
It still made it precarious to move, but was better than my other options. That's why many of the photos have the Blanton's running horse on top of the turkey: entirely for utility's sake.
In Japan at least, I've seen these Traditions go for about half the price of the 8 Year from around the same year, so people overall seem to value them less. 12 year from 1994, well that's even more valued, like 3-4x the price. That difference in value seems to carry over into Tradition rarely being shown-off or mentioned in Wild Turkey enthusiast circles. Then again, that's just what I'm seeing and I could be uninformed.
Maybe there's a good reason for the discrepancy in value and attention, or maybe there isn't, but I'm going to find out for myself in this 1994 Wild Turkey Tradition 101 Bourbon review.
Wild Turkey Tradition 101 smell
My first whiff of Wild Turkey Tradition hits me with dark roasted caramel, vanilla, roasted oak, tobacco, cinnamon, dried cherry and orange peel, dark chocolate, licorice, dried pineapple, and A LOT of heat. Really, it's a rich and densely roasty, oaky, and caramel-y bourbon, but the heat has some hearty kick, which catches me off guard and often gets in the way. Kickin' chicken really applies here.
But as intense as everything is, the oak does bring a lot of mature notes such as dark chocolate and tobacco that are not all that common in today's bourbons. Wild Turkey Tradition smells great, minus the intense heat.
Learn more about Wild Turkey Rare Breed
After swirling and a few minutes of rest, I smell dense and roasted caramel and vanilla wrapped in intense heat, followed by roasted oak, cinnamon, dark chocolate, tobacco, dried apricot and cherry, licorice, and more heat. It's a dark, sweet, spicy, and fruity bourbon doused in hot hot heat. And it really does smell great sometimes, as much as I could hope from an older bourbon, but the heat is an issue.
The heat doesn't even have the unpleasant oaky astringency from Wild Turkey 17 Year Bottled in Bond, it's just hot, singe your nostrils, burn that constantly jabs my nose and distracts me from the otherwise rich and developed scents. It's weird to experience, especially when it would smell spectacular otherwise.
Wild Turkey Tradition 101 taste and aftertaste
The flavors start with caramel, dense vanilla, dried cherry and orange, roasted oak, tobacco, spicy, cinnamon, licorice, earthy rosemary, eucalyptus, and alcohol burn. While it initially is roasted caramel and vanilla forward, a stronger wave of oak and spice come to push everything somewhat out of balance, or at least my preferred balance.
The most surprising thing is how it actually feels spicy, like cinnamon extract or chili pepper. The intense alcohol kicks too, but not quite as strong as in the scents. It's an interesting mix of dense sweetness and roastiness, followed by this earthiness that I've rarely experienced with Wild Turkey before.
It's not quite overly and unpleasantly roasty, oaky, and astringent as I've found in Wild Turkey 17 Year Bottled in Bond, it's just very oaky and spicy, making it somewhat unbalanced. It tastes great though, but maybe a little strange and very challenging. You have to take this one slow.
Learn more about Wild Turkey Father and Son
After "chewing" there's rich roasted caramel, vanilla, dried apricot and cherry, roasted oak, cinnamon, licorice, and tobacco. The chili pepper and cinnamon extract spiciness remain. The alcohol bite has come down as well, probably because I've adjusted to it, so it's manageable and far more delicious. Smaller sips also help manage the heat, but it's still intense.
The finish starts roasty and lightly sweet with roasted oak, dark chocolate, tobacco, black pepper, caramel, vanilla, dried cherry. It leaves a roasty and spicy paprika / red pepper spiciness, like I ate some spicy food.
"Chewing" leaves roasted oak, cinnamon, caramel, vanilla, dried cherry, red pepper flakes, and dark chocolate. Actually, dark chocolate with red pepper flakes is a great summary, and that does exist.
Wild Turkey Tradition has those awesome "dusty" qualities of rich dried apricot, cherry, and fruit with dense and dark oak and tobacco. It's not not overly oaky, astringent, or grassy, but instead has a lot of cinnamon extract and some red pepper (that's actually spicy) for kick. It's like some dropped a thai chili in there for a week.
The denser sweetness and fruitiness taste great, but the oak, spice, and heat make it somewhat rough around the edges, which limits its ceiling. Is more…rough and tumble than the beautifully refined and mature 1995 Wild Turkey 8 Year. Overall Tradition is challengingly delicious, but I was hoping to be blown away more in whatever form it took. Maybe the profile doesn't completely line up with me either.
1994 Wild Turkey Tradition 101 Rating
Wild Turkey Tradition is a bit of a mess and divisive for me, although I clearly like it enough given the rating. There's plenty to savor and enjoy, but there are other things that hinder its ability to reach the same level as the "Top Shelf+" 1995 8 Year, as much as I want it to. It's not even close to Wild Turkey 8 Year from the same period.
Even at "just" 101 proof (50.5%), the scents have a lot of alcohol heat and kick (like 65% strong) that unfortunately take away from my ability to fully enjoy the dense and rich caramel, vanilla, fruit, and oak that's there. It's unfortunate because the scents and flavors have a lot of character to offer…when I can get to them. There are brief moments where I can smell the hefty caramel and fruit, and then the alcohol pushes me out of the experience, like the Kool-Aid man crashing through a wall.
I also have a love/hate relationship with how spicy it tastes. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of spicy food (I'll douse mitmita and awaze on my Ethiopian food), but it feels out of place. It's also possible that I'm so unaccustomed to it that I'm just shocked. Maybe that also means it's not what I prefer, because I have a bit of a track record not loving super spicy and oaky bourbons.
As much as I find Tradition kind of strange and brash, the flavors have many of the excellent "dusty" bourbon characteristics I prefer, such as dense caramel and vanilla, dense dried cherry and apricot, and dark oak that's not overly grassy or burnt. For the most part, the flavors offer a lot of character…if you can handle the intensity. It is more manageable than it is in the scents, so I can better pick them out and appreciate them.
Learn more about Wild Turkey Rare Breed Non Chill Filtered
You'd be hard pressed to find notes that well-developed and rich in most bourbons today. I generally weigh my rating towards the flavors, and the flavors redeem it just enough to be "Top Shelf", because it's at the border.
Now that I've reviewed Wild Turkey 8 Year from 1995, it seems like Jimmy Russell was going for a more oaky and spicy bourbon, like the vintage version of what Wild Turkey is today. It's very different from the refined and densely fruity and sherry-y Wild Turkey 8 Year of the same era.
It's weird because I've found other "dusty" bourbons to be very rich and refined, from 43% ABV Evan Williams 7 Year to 57% ABV Old Grand Dad 114 Lot 17. This Wild Turkey Tradition 101 kicks way harder, usually not in a good way, so it doesn't bring the completely memorable experience that makes me want to wholeheartedly recommend it.
I'm sure that there's variation across the years it was released, but I can only base my rating on this one experience. It also makes me wonder what it was like in 1994, because it probably has changed over the years. I just can't say in what way.
Now to the question "is it worth getting a bottle of Wild Turkey Tradition?". At the prices I've been seeing, usually $200-300, I'd say no. Then again, there is a lot of inherent value in bourbon from 1994, especially one from such a famous distillery that does not (and probably cannot) make bourbon like it anymore.
I'm not mad about the $90 I paid, especially because I wanted to try and review it, but I can't quite say that it's a superb bourbon worth buying given the price and lack of availability. But you know what, other bottles of Wild Turkey Tradition may have a better handle on the heat, and/or you'll like it more than I did. This is just one data point into your own buying decision making.


I'm the intelligent romantic person you're looking for.
I am positive and always try to see things from a optimistic perspective.
I believe in helping our fellow man and I love animals. I don't care what kind of animal it is.
I hate very few things in life but two things I do hate are mean people and people that hurt animals.
I would like a woman that loves to laugh and can carry a good conversation. Preferably a woman that is an optimist and a flexible problem solver. Life is 40 percent action and 60 percent re-action I think.
I like women that march to the beat of their own drummer and don't care what other people think for the most part.
Creative women that love to laugh are a huge plus.
I like to go with the flow and I hope you do as well. I'm easy to get along with and that's what I'd like to find in someone as well.
SouthAfricanMagic hasn't asked any friends to write a recommendation yet.
SouthAfricanMagic has not yet answered any of the optional questions that would tell you more about him.


Repair the footpaths at Hawthorn Drive, said Cllr Catherine Fitzgerald.
"The footpaths are a problem there, the original footpaths weren't right," she said.
Reply from central area office: no allocations for 2014 at present, therefore not in position to say whether footpaths repairs are in programme for 2014.


text:
First Amendment FAQ
Laws and policies
Free speech and land-grant universities
Expressing disagreement
Plan a student event or protest
Hate and bias reporting
Student Expression
Student Expression /
The First Amendment
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects our most basic freedoms and we encourage our students to practice their First Amendment rights.
What does the First Amendment protect?
The First Amendment protects several basic liberties from government interference. It prohibits any laws that:
Establish a National Religion
Endorse or support one religion over another
Impede the free exercise of religion
Abridge the freedom of speech
Infringe upon the freedom of the press
Interfere with the right to peaceably assemble
Prohibit citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances
The following forms of speech are not protected by the First Amendment:
Obscenity (e.g., child pornography)
Defamation/libel
Fighting words, i.e. abusive language, exchanged face to face, which would likely provoke a violent reaction or immediately lead to a fight. Mere offensiveness does not qualify as fighting words.
Incitement to immediate violence or lawless action. Words which are intended and likely to incite the action and in fact, do produce such action.
Threats of violence. This encompasses those statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals. Intimidation is a type of true threat, where a speaker directs a threat to a person or group of persons with the intent of placing the victim in fear of bodily harm or death.
Illegal Conduct. Illegal conduct is not protected because it is not speech and it violates the law. Examples follow:
Obstruction of a police officer
Willful disturbance of any lawful meeting (must "substantially impair" the meeting by intentional conduct in violation of implicit or explicit rules for the meeting that violator knew or should have known).
Unlawful assembly and refusal to disperse.
Vandalism and defacing property of another.
Disturbance by loud and unreasonable noise.
Trespass.
Does the First Amendment protect civil disobedience on campus?
Civil disobedience is non-violent unlawful action as a form of protest. Civil disobedience is not protected under the Constitution. The Constitution does not guarantee any right to engage in civil disobedience, as it involves the violation of laws or regulations-without incurring consequences. Civil disobedience may have a negative effect on the protected interests of others and may interfere with University business or threaten public safety or University assets, in ways that require the University to act to protect those other interests.
What is the University of Nevada, Reno's Mission and Values?
"Inspired by its land-grant foundation, the University of Nevada, Reno provides outstanding learning, discovery, and engagement programs that serve the economic, social, environmental, and cultural needs of the citizens of Nevada, the nation, and the world. The University recognizes and embraces the critical importance of diversity in preparing students for global citizenship and is committed to a culture of excellence, inclusion, and accessibility."
Excellence in all of our endeavors.
Integrity in all our actions
Inclusiveness of diverse cultures and identities
Collaboration between disciplines and programs and with community partners and stakeholders
What is hate speech and is it illegal?
Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens or insults people or groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, disability or other traits. Even if speech is hateful or offensive, it is still protected under the First Amendment. However, a person's conduct or behavior can be prohibited if it is verbal abuse, intimidation, coercion or bullying which is sufficiently several, persistent or pervasive so as to interfere with or limit a student's ability to participate in or benefit from the education services, activities or opportunities offered by the University.
If you believe you have been subjected to any verbal abuse, intimidation, coercion or bullying which is interfering with or limiting your ability to participate in or benefit from the education services, activities or opportunities offered by the university, report the incident or conduct to law enforcement, University of Nevada, Reno Police Department, or the Title IX office.
Hate and Bias Hotline - (775) 784-7707
Hate and Bias Report
What is academic freedom?
Freedom in teaching is fundamental for the protection of the rights of the teacher in teaching and of the student in learning. Freedom in research is fundamental to the advancement of truth and knowledge. A member of the faculty has freedom and an obligation, in the classroom or in research, to discuss and pursue the faculty member's subject with candor and integrity, even when the subject requires consideration of topics which may be politically, socially or scientifically controversial. NSHE Code, Title 2, Chapter 2, Section 2.1.
When does speech become harassment?
If a person's conduct or behavior is verbal abuse, intimidation, coercion or bullying which is sufficiently several, persistent or pervasive so as to interfere with or limit a student's ability to participate in or benefit from the education services, activities or opportunities offered by the University, this behavior could rise to the level of harassment under University rules and regulations as well as federal law.
If you are a victim of harassment or discrimination, please contact the EO/TIX Office at (775) 784- 1547 or the Harassment and Discrimination hotline at (775) 784-7707.
Is speech on the internet and social media entitled to the same level of protection as speech in print and other media?
"Yes. In the case Reno v. ACLU, the Supreme Court rejected the government's argument that speech on the internet could be more carefully regulated as it is with radio and television broadcasting and concluded that the internet, as with print media, should be given the full protection of the First Amendment. Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)."
Online hate speech, or "cyberhate," can consist of non-threatening offensive, insulting or prejudicial messages, photos, or videos that appear on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube. These acts are not unlawful. Many of these platforms do have policies prohibiting hateful speech and allow individuals to make online complaints in regards to hateful messaging.
Is chalking permitted on campus?
Chalking may be used by ASUN and GSA recognized student groups and also for other approved events on campus for advertising. Chalking is allowed on sidewalks only and must comply with the following guidelines:
Request to chalk must be emailed to the Scheduling Services office at least three working day prior to the event
Request must state when chalking will occur, what event chalking is advertising and where chalking will be located (in proximity to what buildings)
Chalking is to be removed within two days of conclusion of event
Requests must include specific text to be chalked
Request must identify the student organization the person submitting the request and all contact number (telephone, cell phone, email)
Messages must be at least 25 feet from an entry to any building
Messages must be writing in chalk that is water soluble
Messages must be written only on horizontal sidewalk, but not underneath awnings at the Joe Crowley Student Union, or on any pavers or bricks.
Messages shall not be written on any vertical surface including stair risers, building porches, building entryways, building foundations
Message shall not be written on any outdoor athletic facility
If chalking is not removed by the time stated, your group will be charged for clean-up
Sanctions:
Failure to comply with these guidelines will result in the loss of the ability for the organization to do any chalking for up to one year.
Is posting permitted on campus?
Printed materials (as well as handwritten material) include posters, signs, circulars, newspapers, pamphlets, handbills, fliers, announcements, graffiti or statements and similar material.
View full Posting, Distributing and Exhibition of Printed Materials policy.
Is the production of sound allowed at events?
The production of sound, either amplified or non-amplified, in conjunction with an outdoor event or speech activity should not disrupt educational activities and other University business. Outdoor events which use amplified sound equipment are prohibited on the University campus, except under guidelines, procedures and policies specified in this section of the UAM (University Sound Policy, 5,440).
Time, Place and Manner
Sound amplification equipment is prohibited outdoors on the University campus, except in the locations and times listed below.
Regular business hours are Monday through Thursday 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for spring and fall semesters. During regular business hours, amplified sound is prohibited in all areas south of the Fitzgerald Student Services Building except for the Manzanita Bowl. Barnes Plaza and Hilliard Plaza may have approved amplified sound between Noon and 1:00 p.m.
Outdoor locations where amplified sound may be approved during regular hours of operation include but are not limited to: the Manzanita Bowl, the Knowledge Center Lawn, the Grand Plaza, Joe's patio, parking areas north of the Student Union, Intramural Fields and Mackay Stadium. Events with amplified sound in outdoor areas immediately adjacent to residence halls must also be approved by Residential Life and Housing.
During the Final Class Meeting Week, when final examinations are held, no events involving amplified sound will be scheduled from 7:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. No exceptions will be granted during this period, which starts on the first day of finals and runs through the last day of scheduled finals.
Full University Sound Policy

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Connect with us on Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, or download our mobile app
Abbeville Institute Press
Review Posts
Clyde Wilson Library
Is Opposition to Trump "Satanic?"
By Michael MartinMarch 8, 2019Blog
On a February 2017 episode of televangelist Pat Robertson's "The 700 club," a viewer sent in the following question about dissent:
"Why do so many hate President Trump and say everything he does is bad? I voted for him and believed he would make 'America Great Again,' and he has already in many ways. So what is your answer as to why so many do not support him and want him out? What do you think is going to happen? I fear for him."
Typically, it is common sense that politics and religion just do not mix well in public discussion. On this occasion, however, Pat Robertson could not resist using the power of the television screen to push his neoconservative agenda. In 2003, Robertson gave his full support to George W. Bush and the Iraq war and stated that the war was being fought on "solid ground" in terms of "biblical concepts, but also in terms of public relations." He also argued that criticizing the commander in chief during war time amounted to treason. In an all too familiar fashion, by 2015, Robertson was claiming that he knew the Iraq war a mistake and that the American people were lied to.
Not surprisingly, Robertson had little to say about Iraq when it came to the United States' increased use of surveillance on American citizens, torture of suspected terrorists, or drone attacks that killed civilians. Where was his Biblical outrage then? Perhaps Robertson realized, in the wake of no weapons of mass destruction having been discovered, that the cause for the war was no longer just? The problems surrounding Robertson's power behind the electric pulpit certainly became clearer in recent years.
In response to the February 2017 viewer question about dissent towards Trump, Robertson said the following:
"There's a desire on the part of some, I think it's satanic. It really is spiritual, to destroy America. America is the great hope of the world. If America goes down, the lamp of freedom goes up. There's no other champion of freedom anywhere in the world and we would be engulfed in chaos, and so, we were heading that way. Obama was bringing it on. Another four or eight years of Obama-style government, and we would have been consumed with the socialist mentality and the freedom that we've enjoyed would be blotted out. So God gave us a reprieve, and this thing really is spiritual."
While there may indeed be some satanic types among the never-Trumpers, like the witches who cast a spell on him in 2017, dissent is not some inherently bad or satanic principle. In fact, dissent has historically been a major part of the Southern tradition.
Thomas Jefferson, for example, wrote to James Madison from Paris on December 20, 1787 that Shays' rebellion in Massachusetts had caused too much concern abroad. By Jefferson's calculation, if one rebellion occurred in 13 states over the course of 11 years, that would be approximately one rebellion for each state in 150 years. According to Jefferson, "No country should be so long without one." The Southern conceptions of limited government were built upon dissent, and the American people should never be encouraged to conform to anything, especially not for religious reasons.
In stark contrast to this Jeffersonian concept of dissent, Pat Robertson continued his religious defense of Trump by saying:
"I think, somehow, the Lord's plan is being put in place for America and these people are not only revolting against Trump, they're revolting against what God's plan is for America. These other people have been trying to destroy America. These left-wingers and so-called progressives are trying to destroy the country that we love and take away the freedoms they love. They want collectivism. They want socialism. What we're looking at is free markets and freedom from this terrible, overarching bureaucracy. They want to fight as much as they can but I think the good news is the Bible says, "He that sits in the heavens will laugh them to scorn," and I think that Trump's someone on His side that is a lot more powerful than the media."
Robertson was spot on in his recognition of socialism as a danger to America. Self-professed socialists are now running and winning offices around the country, making wild promises and proposing shortcuts to progress. However, his assertions that dissent is unholy and that Trump is guided by Jesus Christ are divisive and dangerous. The American presidency was not based on any kind of divine right or mandate of heaven. It was designed in strict opposition to these concepts.
Michael Martin is a teacher, writer, and historian with experience working in both public and private schools. He currently resides in Charleston, South Carolina with his wife and daughter, where he specializes in early Virginia history, genealogy, and the emerging field of sensory history.
Donald TrumpMichael MartinPat RobertsonSouthern ReligionSouthern Tradition
Previous PostPodcast Episode 160
Next PostRescuing Old Joe
Martin Luther King Day and the Destruction of the American Republic
Boyd CatheyJanuary 17, 2022
BlogPodcast
Brion McClanahanJanuary 16, 2022
Southern Poets and Poems, Part XV
Clyde WilsonJanuary 14, 2022
Democracy and Universal Suffrage
Slavery and Abolitionism as Viewed by a Georgia Slave
Get a free gift and Abbeville Institute articles delivered to your inbox.
Timely Abbeville Instritute articles and news delivered directly to your inbox. We'll also send you an eBook by 20 Abbeville Institute scholars as a free gift.
© 2022 Abbeville Institute.


Milton Keynes alt pop duo Off Colour announce a new music video for their single 'Broken Bond'. Their brand of alt pop has been turning heads since 2014 and has often drawn comparison with Ed Sheeran, Coldplay, Bastille and One Republic. Watch here.
A whirlwind couple of years have seen the guys develop their smooth vocal style and slick production whilst gaining recognition for their live sets through gigs at some of the UK's most prestigious independent venues. Highlights include shows at the Roundhouse, supporting a Bombay Bicycle Club at the Amersham Arms, and playing at Ronnie Scott's Jazz Club – all to great acclaim.
A growing reputation online has developed since the release of their first official single 'Touchdown' in summer '15, with Tinie Tempah blogging about them plus coverage with Pardon My Blog, Reload Sessions, Dropout UK and more.
Watch out for a special covers video as they take on some of UK rap and grime's biggest tracks plus a string of singles in the works for 2016. Also check out their acoustic cover of Drake's Hotline Bling here!


text:
ATTACK	TOOK	PLACE
REPORTER	LAYS	REPORT
VARGAS	HAS	REPORT
ASSAILANTS	ARRIVED	REPORT
REPORTER	LAYS	VARGAS
VARGAS	HAS	VARGAS
ASSAILANTS	ARRIVED	VARGAS
THEY	OPENED	FIRE
PATROL	HEARD	SHOOTOUT
SOME	SOUGHT	REFUGE

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


A-Pro Annulus Pressure Management System > PTC - Well head, Gaslift, and Chemical injection for improved well performance and integrity.
Lack of infrastructure at well sites (power, communication and/or control systems) prevents the continuous and efficient monitoring and control of annulus pressure.
Manual surveillance and potential venting of annulus pressure adds cost and involves HSE risks. Furthermore reading gauges manually introduces the risk of human error.
PTC's A-PROTM eliminates all the shortcomings of a manual system. A-PROTM is a highly customizable system, that can be tailored to specific needs and requirements.


30 Day Challenge Day 25. This is a class that is going to get you seriously fit! Jason takes a level 3 circuits class with the music thumping in the background. A amazing all over body workout to get you looking buff! 5 more workout to complete your 30 Day Challenge!


text:
Q: Make image go out of its div in CSS & html I want to achieve this result :

So, an image(square with red borders) and a text aligned in 2 separate columns. The background is yellow. The image sticks out of the background for aesthetic.
I have search on the forum and tried to find a solution but I couldn't.
Could someone show me the code to make this simple layout ?
Thank you :)
I tried overflow:hidden and position:relative and position:absolute but couldn't make it work !

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


In the early 1920s, Hollywood stars adopted Palm Springs as a place to escape the travails of Tinseltown. They were wowed by the fine weather, laid-back vibe and views of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa mountains – plus it was close enough to comply with the "two-hour rule" stipulating actors under contract had to be on call if needed by the studio. The Oasis Hotel, built in 1924-5 and designed by Lloyd Wright (son of Frank), led the way with its modernist design. More resorts, such as El Mirador, followed. Celebrities decided homes were more important than hotels, though, and along with now-revered architects – including Donald Wexler and Richard Neutra – concocted bold exteriors and sumptuous interiors. The MidMod Design Tour ($100pp) is a new architecture trip with designer Lyle Boatman that uses digital tablets to contextualise the tour. Palm Springs Mod Squad (from $70pp) offers an interiors tour, while Palm Springs Historical Society organises walking tours (from $20pp). Tours take in properties owned by Frank Sinatra, Elvis, Elizabeth Taylor, Clark Gable, Carole Lombard, Cher, Sammy Davis Jr and Leonardo DiCaprio. Rent a bicycle (Bike Palm Springs, from $23), pick up a guide at Palm Springs' Visitor Center and visit at your own pace.