text:
Assange Never Met Manafort. Luke Harding and the Guardian Publish Still More Blatant MI6 Lies
By Craig Murray | November 27, 2018
The right wing Ecuadorean government of President Moreno continues to churn out its production line of fake documents regarding Julian Assange, and channel them straight to MI6 mouthpiece Luke Harding of the Guardian.
Amazingly, more Ecuadorean Government documents have just been discovered for the Guardian, this time spy agency reports detailing visits of Paul Manafort and unspecified "Russians" to the Embassy. By a wonderful coincidence of timing, this is the day after Mueller announced that Manafort's plea deal was over.
The problem with this latest fabrication is that Moreno had already released the visitor logs to the Mueller inquiry. Neither Manafort nor these "Russians" are in the visitor logs.
This is impossible. The visitor logs were not kept by Wikileaks, but by the very strict Ecuadorean security. Nobody was ever admitted without being entered in the logs. The procedure was very thorough. To go in, you had to submit your passport (no other type of document was accepted). A copy of your passport was taken and the passport details entered into the log. Your passport, along with your mobile phone and any other electronic equipment, was retained until you left, along with your bag and coat. I feature in the logs every time I visited.
There were no exceptions. For an exception to be made for Manafort and the "Russians" would have had to be a decision of the Government of Ecuador, not of Wikileaks, and that would be so exceptional the reason for it would surely have been noted in the now leaked supposed Ecuadorean "intelligence report" of the visits. What possible motive would the Ecuadorean government have for facilitating secret unrecorded visits by Paul Manafort? Furthermore it is impossible that the intelligence agency – who were in charge of the security – would not know the identity of these alleged "Russians".
Previously Harding and the Guardian have published documents faked by the Moreno government regarding a diplomatic appointment to Russia for Assange of which he had no knowledge. Now they follow this up with more documents aimed to provide fictitious evidence to bolster Mueller's pathetically failed attempt to substantiate the story that Russia deprived Hillary of the Presidency.
My friend William Binney, probably the world's greatest expert on electronic surveillance, former Technical Director of the NSA, has stated that it is impossible the DNC servers were hacked, the technical evidence shows it was a download to a directly connected memory stick. I knew the US security services were conducting a fake investigation the moment it became clear that the FBI did not even themselves look at the DNC servers, instead accepting a report from the Clinton linked DNC "security consultants" Crowdstrike.
I would love to believe that the fact Julian has never met Manafort is bound to be established. But I fear that state control of propaganda may be such that this massive "Big Lie" will come to enter public consciousness in the same way as the non-existent Russian hack of the DNC servers.
Assange never met Manafort. The DNC emails were downloaded by an insider. Assange never even considered fleeing to Russia. Those are the facts, and I am in a position to give you a personal assurance of them.
I can also assure you that Luke Harding, the Guardian, Washington Post and New York Times have been publishing a stream of deliberate lies, in collusion with the security services.
I am not a fan of Donald Trump. But to see the partisans of the defeated candidate (and a particularly obnoxious defeated candidate) manipulate the security services and the media to create an entirely false public perception, in order to attempt to overturn the result of the US Presidential election, is the most astonishing thing I have witnessed in my lifetime.
Plainly the government of Ecuador is releasing lies about Assange to curry favour with the security establishment of the USA and UK, and to damage Assange's support prior to expelling him from the Embassy. He will then be extradited from London to the USA on charges of espionage.
Assange is not a whistleblower or a spy – he is the greatest publisher of his age, and has done more to bring the crimes of governments to light than the mainstream media will ever be motivated to achieve. That supposedly great newspaper titles like the Guardian, New York Times and Washington Post are involved in the spreading of lies to damage Assange, and are seeking his imprisonment for publishing state secrets, is clear evidence that the idea of the "liberal media" no longer exists in the new plutocratic age. The press are not on the side of the people, they are an instrument of elite control.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Deception, Mainstream Media, Warmongering, Russophobia	| The Guardian, UK, United States | Leave a comment
Catholic Lands to be Seized in Jordan Valley
Ma'an – November 27, 2018
TUBAS – Israeli authorities decided to seize hundreds of dunams of Palestinian land, which belongs to the Catholic Church, in an area in the northern Jordan Valley, on Tuesday.
Mutaz Bisharat, a Palestinian official in charge of Jordan Valley's Israeli settlements file at the Palestinian Authority (PA), told Ma'an that Israeli authorities have issued a decision to seize 267 dunams (66 acres) of land belonging to the Catholic Church.
Bisharat mentioned that the land in question is located across from an Israeli military camp.
Bisharat added that the decision to seize the land represents a real threat against a number of Palestinian families that live in the surrounding areas, particularly if Israeli authorities force the families to be evacuated from their lands under the pretext of "security reasons."
Bisharat noted that this strategy seeks to control the land and expand illegal Israeli settlements across the Jordan Valley.
Forming a third of the occupied West Bank and with 88 percent of its land classified as Area C, the Jordan Valley has long been a strategic area of land unlikely to return to Palestinians following Israel's occupation in 1967.
The unpredictability of the training drills leaves rural Palestinian communities in the Jordan Valley anxious about when they will be displaced, and whether the next time will be permanent.
Palestinians in the Jordan Valley are one of the most vulnerable groups to displacement, with over 60 percent of the 6,000 Palestinians forcibly displaced since 2008 belonged to herding or Bedouin communities, according to the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism	| Israel, Palestine, Zionism | 1 Comment
Israel Attorney General: 'No Palestinian state' so ICJ illegitimate
MEMO | November 27, 2018
Israel's Attorney General is drafting a legal opinion which will declare the International Court of Justice (ICJ) illegitimate on the grounds that there is "no Palestinian state".
Avichai Mandelblit said yesterday that he was drafting the judgment to refute the ICJ's legitimacy to rule on the Israel-Palestine conflict, claiming that there is no Palestinian state and citing the fact that Israel is not a member of the court.
Speaking to students at Israel's Bar-Ilan University, Mandelblit explained: "I intend to issue an opinion soon, according to which the International Court of Justice in The Hague has no authority to discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because there is no Palestinian state," Arutz Sheva reported.
Israel has consistently rejected efforts by the ICJ and its counterpart, the International Criminal Court (ICC), to investigate its human rights record. In this, Israel has received the support of its main ally – the USA – with National Security Adviser John Bolton saying in September that the institution is "dead to [us]". Bolton continued: "The United States will use any means necessary to protect our citizens and those of our allies from unjust prosecution by this illegitimate court."
The ICC was quick to respond to the US' threats, saying: "As a court of law, [the ICC] will continue to do its work undeterred, in accordance with those principles and the overarching idea of the rule of law." The ICC added that it is an independent and impartial institution with the backing of 123 countries.
Israel's opposition to the ICJ and ICC has become more vehement in the wake of Palestine's appeals to the court. In January 2015 the Palestinian Authority (PA) signed the Rome Statute of the ICC, officially accepting the court's jurisdiction over its territories and allowing a preliminary investigation into the situation in Palestine to be opened.
In May 2018, the PA specifically requested that the ICC investigate crimes committed within its territories, with Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad Al-Maliki meeting ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda to discuss the issue. The request called on The Hague to investigate the forcible transfer of Palestinians, unlawful killings, illegal appropriation of land and property, demolition of Palestinian properties, repression of dissent through the unlawful killing of peaceful protesters and the policy of mass arbitrary detention and torture.
Since then the PA has called on the ICC to investigate a number of incidents. In June, the PA asked the court to prosecute Israeli Internal Security Minister Gilad Erdan for incitement after he called for Palestinians allegedly flying incendiary kites to be assassinated. In September, the PA called for an investigation into Israel's planned demolition of the Palestinian village of Khan Al-Ahmar, which the ICC said could constitute a war crime. In October, the PA asked the ICC to investigate Israel's escalation of illegal settlement in the West Bank city of Hebron.
Thus far neither the ICJ nor the ICC have prosecuted Israel for its actions.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism, War Crimes	| Human rights, ICC, ICJ, Israel, Palestine, United States, Zionism | 1 Comment
Pro-Israel groups attack Rand Paul for blocking $38 billion to Israel
If Americans Knew | November 27, 2018
Free Beacon reports that "pro-Israel groups in America are mobilizing against Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.) for blocking the continuation of U.S. aid to Israel."
Paul has placed a "block" on legislation to give Israel $38 billion over the next 10 years – $23,000 per every Jewish Israeli family of four. This is the largest military aid package in U.S. history and amounts to $7,230 per minute to Israel, or $120 per second. A stack of $38 billion dollar bills would reach ten times beyond the international space station.
A block is a legislative procedure in which a senator calls on the floor leader not to move forward with a bill and indicates that the senator may filibuster against it.
Jewish News Syndicate reported last week that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) had sent an action alert to its members calling on them to pressure Paul to remove his block on the bill, ''S. 2497 Ileana Ros-Lehtinen United States-Israel Security Assistance Authorization Act of 2018.'
Now, according to Free Beacon, a right-wing pro-Israel website, AIPAC has also been purchasing advertisements on Facebook attacking Paul "as the primary Senate force blocking the reauthorization of the U.S.-Israel security pact."
AIPAC Facebook ad against Rand Paul
Another pro-Israel group, Christians United for Israel (CUFI), has also reportedly organized an email blitz to pressure Paul to remove his hold, and has "invested heavily" in ads in Kentucky targeting Rand's constituents.
According to Free Beacon, "Paul, a proponent of ending U.S. aid across the globe, has had multiple confrontations with the pro-Israel community over the years as result of his views. Paul has sought to hold up U.S. aid to Israel multiple times over the years, creating friction between him and top U.S. pro-Israel lobbying shops."
Yesterday CUFI sent an email to supporters around the country saying: "Sen. Rand Paul is blocking the U.S.-Israel Security Assistance Authorization Act, S.2497. This bill is the cornerstone of U.S. support for Israel."
In the message, CUFI calls Paul the "last obstacle to getting this bill signed into law."
Free Beacon reports that Paul has also recently proposed suspending U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia and Bahrain over their attacks on what the Free Beacon calls "pro-Iran militants in Yemen." Paul has long opposed U.S. support for the attacks on Yemen, which is on the brink of famine and has 50,000 dead.
Israel has long targeted Yemen as one of the countries that must be controlled in its quest for hegemony in the region.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism, War Crimes	| AIPAC, Bahrain, CUFI, Israel, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, United States, Yemen | 5 Comments
Yes, You Have the Right to Talk Back to the Government, But It Could Get You Killed
By John W. Whitehead | Rutherford Institute | November 27, 2018
"The freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state."— Justice William J. Brennan, City of Houston v. Hill
What the architects of the police state want are submissive, compliant, cooperative, obedient, meek citizens who don't talk back, don't challenge government authority, don't speak out against government misconduct, and don't step out of line.
What the First Amendment protects—and a healthy constitutional republic requires—are citizens who routinely exercise their right to speak truth to power.
It's not an easy undertaking.
Weaponized by police, prosecutors, courts and legislatures, "disorderly conduct" charges have become a convenient means by which to punish those individuals who refuse to be muzzled.
Fane Lozman was arrested for alluding to government corruption during open comment time at a City Council meeting in Palm Beach County, Fla.
Dan Heyman, a reporter for the Public News Service, was arrested for "aggressively" questioning Tom Price, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services during an encounter in the West Virginia State Capitol.
Robert Bartlett was arrested during an Arctic Man festival in Alaska, allegedly in retaliation for refusing to be interrogated by police and intervening when police attempted to question other people. His case is before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Cases like these have become all too common, typical of the bipolar nature of life in the American police state today: you may have distinct, protected rights on paper, but dare to exercise those rights and you put yourself at risk for fines, arrests, injuries and even death.
This is the unfortunate price of freedom.
Yet these are not new developments.
We have been circling this particular drain hole for some time now.
Almost 50 years ago, Lewis Colten was arrested outside Lexington, Kentucky, for questioning police and offering advice to his friend during a traffic stop.
Colten subsequently challenged his arrest as a violation of his First Amendment right to free speech and took the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sided with the police.
Although the Court acknowledged that Colten was not trespassing or disobeying any traffic regulation himself, the majority affirmed that Colten "had no constitutional right to observe the issuance of a traffic ticket or to engage the issuing officer in conversation at that time."
The Supreme Court's bottom line: protecting police from inconvenience, annoyance or alarm is more important than protecting speech that, in the government's estimation, has "no social value."
While the ruling itself was unsurprising for a judiciary that tends to march in lockstep with the police, the dissent by Justice William O. Douglas is a powerful reminder that the government exists to serve the people and not the other way around.
Stressing that Colten's speech was quiet, not boisterous, devoid of "fighting words," and involved no overt acts, fisticuffs, or disorderly conduct in the normal meaning of the words, Douglas took issue with the idea that merely by speaking to a government representative, in this case the police—a right enshrined in the First Amendment, by the way—Colten was perceived as inconveniencing and annoying the police.
In a passionate defense of free speech, Douglas declared:
Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent us? The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents. We who have the final word can speak softly or angrily. We can seek to challenge and annoy, as we need not stay docile and quiet. The situation might have indicated that Colten's techniques were ill-suited to the mission he was on, that diplomacy would have been more effective. But at the constitutional level speech need not be a sedative; it can be disruptive.
It's a power-packed paragraph full of important truths that the powers-that-be would prefer we quickly forget: We the people are the sovereigns. We have the final word. We can speak softly or angrily. We can seek to challenge and annoy. We need not stay docile and quiet. Our speech can be disruptive. It can invite dispute. It can be provocative and challenging. We do not have to bow submissively to authority or speak with reverence to government officials.
Now in theory, "we the people" have a constitutional right to talk back to the government.
In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded as much in City of Houston v. Hill when it struck down a city ordinance prohibiting verbal abuse of police officers as unconstitutionally overbroad and a criminalization of protected speech.
In practice, however, talking back—especially when the police are involved—can get you killed.
The danger is real.
We live in an age in which "we the people" are at the mercy of militarized, weaponized, immunized cops who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to "serve and protect."
While violent crime in America remains at an all-time low, the death toll as a result of police-sponsored violence continues to rise. In fact, more than 1,000 people are killed every year by police in America, more than any other country in the world.
What we are dealing with is a nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out against individuals posing little or no real threat.
Police encounters have deteriorated so far that anything short of compliance—including behavior the police perceive as disrespectful or "insufficiently deferential to their authority," "threatening" or resistant—could get you arrested, jailed or killed.
The problem, of course, is that compliance is rarely enough to guarantee one's safety.
When police officers are allowed to operate under the assumption that their word is law and that there is no room for any form of disagreement or even question, that serves to destroy the First Amendment's assurances of free speech, free assembly and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, if ever there were a time to scale back on the mindset adopted by cops that they are the law and should be revered, feared and obeyed, it is now.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Civil Liberties	| Human rights, United States | 3 Comments
WikiLeaks Categorically Denies Assange-Manafort Meetings
By Tyler Durden – Zero Hedge – 11/27/2018
Update: WikiLeaks has fired back at the Guardian, tweeting: "Remember this day when the Guardian permitted a serial fabricator to totally destroy the paper's reputation. @WikiLeaks is willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editor's head that Manafort never met Assange."
This is going to be one of the most infamous news disasters since Stern published the "Hitler Diaries".
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 27, 2018
The Guardian's report was written by Luke Harding and Dan Collyns, and was based exclusively on unnamed sources.
Paul Manafort, Donald Trump's former campaign manager, held secret talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, right around the time he joined Trump's campaign, according to The Guardian, which as is now the norm in reports of this kind refers to unnamed "sources."
Sources have said Manafort went to see Assange in 2013, 2015 and in spring 2016 – during the period when he was made a key figure in Trump's push for the White House.
It is unclear why Manafort wanted to see Assange and what was discussed. But the last meeting is likely to come under scrutiny and could interest Robert Mueller, the special prosecutor who is investigating alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
A well-placed source has told the Guardian that Manafort went to see Assange around March 2016. Months later WikiLeaks released a stash of Democratic emails stolen by Russian intelligence officers. –The Guardian
The 69-year-old Manafort has denied any involvement in the release of the emails, and has said that the claim is "100% false."
While Manafort was jailed this year under a plea agreement with special counsel Robert Mueller, on Monday, Mueller said that Manafort had repeatedly lied to the FBI, breaching his deal. According to documents filed in court, Manafort committed "crimes and lies" covering a "variety of subject matters."
According to The Guardian, Manafort's first visit to the Ecuadorian embassy occurred one year after Assange was granted asylum inside, according to two sources. To add icing to the cake, "a separate internal document written by Ecuador's Senian Intelligence agency and seen by The Guardian lists "Paul Manaford [sic]" as one of Assange's several well-known guests, along with… "Russians."
According to two sources, Manafort returned to the embassy in 2015. He paid another visit in spring 2016, turning up alone, around the time Trump named him as his convention manager. The visit is tentatively dated to March.
Manafort's 2016 visit to Assange lasted about 40 minutes, one source said, adding that the American was casually dressed when he exited the embassy, wearing sandy-coloured chinos, a cardigan and a light-coloured shirt.
Visitors normally register with embassy security guards and show their passports. Sources in Ecuador, however, say Manafort was not logged. –The Guardian
So we have Manafort allegedly visiting Assange, in sandy-coloured chinos, and that Russians also visited the WikiLeaks founder. And none of this was known until today.
The Guardian goes on to suggest that "The revelation could shed new light on the sequence of events in the run-up to summer 2016, when WikiLeaks published tens of thousands of emails hacked by the GRU, Russia's military intelligence agency. Hillary Clinton has said the hack contributed to her defeat."
Note that The Guardian has considered the "hack" settled, which agrees with Western intelligence assessments (the same Western intelligence that conducted espionage on Donald Trump's campaign). Nowhere to be found is the possibility that the emails were copied locally – a theory recently bolstered by a fresh analysis that flies in the face of a report commissioned by cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike – which was caught fabricating a report on Russia hacking Ukrainian munitions, and was forced to retract portions of their analysis after the government of Ukraine admonished them.
CrowdStrike has retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking https://t.co/8AZOvoQl0K
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) March 28, 2017
The Guardian goes on to link Manafort to "black operations" against the political rival of Ukraine's former "Moscow-friendly president, Viktor Yanukovych," and that Manafort "flew frequently from the US to Ukraine's capital, Kiev – usually via Frankfurt but sometimes through London."
Manafort is currently in jail in Alexandria, Virginia. In August a jury convicted him of crimes arising from his decade-long activities in Ukraine. They include large-scale money laundering and failure to pay US tax. Manafort pleaded guilty to further charges in order to avoid a second trial in Washington.
As well as accusing him of lying on Monday, the special counsel moved to set a date for Manafort to be sentenced.
One person familiar with WikiLeaks said Assange was motivated to damage the Democrats campaign because he believed a future Trump administration would be less likely to seek his extradition on possible charges of espionage. This fate had hung over Assange since 2010, when he released confidential US state department cables. It contributed to his decision to take refuge in the embassy. –The Guardian
And in perhaps the most shocking part of The Guardian's reporting, they refer to the highly salacious and largely discredited "Steele Dossier," saying that according to the document, Manafort was at the center of a "well-developed conspiracy of cooperation" between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin, and that both sides had a mutual interest in defeating Clinton, wrote former MI6 spy Christopher Steele.
In a memo written soon after the DNC emails were published, Steele said: "The [hacking] operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of Trump and senior members of his campaign team." –The Guardian
You know things are desperate when the Steele Dossier makes a guest appearance to once again bolster unsupported reporting.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Deception, Fake News, Mainstream Media, Warmongering	| The Guardian, UK, United States | 2 Comments
Pierre Omidyar: A Dangerous Billionaire-Backer of the "Resistance"
By Daniel Haiphong | American Herald Tribune | November 27, 2018
One of the most disturbing trends in the era of Trump has been the flock of billionaires that have come rushing into the Democratic Party to pose as leaders of an opposition movement to the "fascist" predations of the real estate mogul. These billionaires, which include capitalists such as George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, and Tom Steyer are the architects of a "Big Tent" strategy first outlined by Black Agenda Report Editor Glen Ford. This strategy was devised by the Hillary Clinton Presidential campaign of 2016. The strategy has two components. The first component is the promotion of "diversity" to distract from the fact that the Democratic Party can no longer appeal to the interests of the poor or working-class, especially Black people who have been held in electoral captivity for a generation. Second, "Big Tent" Democrats actively seek an alliance of Wall Street, the military and intelligence apparatus, and Republicans to provide the financial and political strength behind the strategy.
The "Big Tent" strategy is called the "Resistance." One of the chief billionaire-backers of the "Resistance" is Pierre Omidyar. Omidyar is the founder of the eBay corporation. His surplus profits have been used over the years to exert "soft power" influence over the U.S. state. Omidyar has given hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of cash to Democratic Party candidates since 1999.
Omidyar was one of the principle donors to the NeverTrump Political Action Committee (PAC) that formed during the 2016 election. The NeverTrump PAC brought together neoliberal and neoconservative Democrats into an alliance against Trump. William Kristol, editor in chief at the Weekly Standard and longtime Republican, has been one of the most vocal supporters of the NeverTrump movement. Kristol is an expert in the think-tank business and understands the importance of "soft power." He helped found the Project for the New American Century that peddled neocon wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as an escalation of the U.S.' military presence around the world, including on Russia's doorstep. Kristol has become a favorite of the corporate media since Trump was elected in 2016. He is a regular on MSNBC and is viewed by corporate Democrats as the "sane" wing of the Republican Party.
That Omidyar would align with Kristol is a stark indication of the "Big Tent" strategy at work. In a post on Twitter after the midterm elections came to pass, Kristol celebrated the support that he has received from "the left" and its benefactors such as Pierre Omidyar. Kristol's excitement about billionaire support from all sides of the political aisle represents a development in the Trump era that is far more dangerous than Trump himself. The "Big Tent" strategy is a marked political shift to the right. Not only this, but the shift is part and parcel of a covert war against the real "left" that is principally being waged by the fake "left" coalition of thieves and warmongers in the Democratic Party.
The critical question that must be asked is whether there are any benefits for ordinary poor and working-class people in supporting the NeverTrump coalition or billionaire backers such as Omidyar. And the answer is more complex than a simple "no." It is far worse than that. Omidyar is not a "lesser-evil" billionaire. In the system of U.S. imperialism, those don't exist.
By supporting Omidyar and his version of the "Resistance," most of humanity stands to lose. Omidyar's "soft power" network has only one mission and that is to stabilize an empire in crisis. One of the ways that Omidyar has attempted to stabilize the imperialist system is through investments in journalism. Omidyar is the principle owner of First Look Media, the parent corporation of The Intercept. While The Intercept has covered important issues in the past, it has been charged with privatizing Edward Snowden's leaks and promoting regime change efforts in Syria through direct attacks on the democratically-elected government of Bashar Al-Assad. Furthermore, The Intercept possesses a troubling record of outing the identities of those leaking secret government information. In a word, Omidyar has used his influence over The Intercept to stifle dissent while promoting the outlet as a pioneer of "independent" media.
Omidyar is most concerned, however, with ensuring that the US empire maintains corporate and military control over the world's nations and peoples. He has donated millions to the Clinton Global Initiative responsible for imposing ruthless austerity measures on nations such as Haiti. There is also documented evidence that Omidyar used his philanthropic network to support the "Maidan Revolution" in Ukraine in 2014 which propelled neo-Nazis into state power, much to the pleasure of the IMF. The billionaire eBay mogul has also been a critical supporter of the United States Agency for International Development or USAID. USAID is well-known for its support of "soft power" tactics to promote regime change in nations that do not bow down to U.S. military and corporate power such as Cuba.
Omidyar is not just dangerous at the individual level. Rather, the billionaire's influence over the U.S. power structure is representative of conflict within the ruling class of the imperialist system headed by the United States. On the other side of Omidyar stands Trump, a ruthless billionaire who holds no allegiance to any sector of the imperialist system. Trump is not loyal to the banks or the military and intelligence apparatus. Trump is loyal to himself. His moves as President thus far such as the tax breaks for the rich, his willingness to broker peace in Korea, or his racist dog whistles and policies toward immigration from Central America, are all representative of the sharpening decline of imperialism.
Omidyar wants to save the imperialist system from decline. The section of the billionaire class from which Omidyar belongs is interested only in engendering endless war and austerity under conditions of social peace. The likes of Omidyar pose as the "Resistance" to Trump but really represent a threat of potentially greater proportions. Omidyar actively creates infrastructure for leftists and progressives to be bamboozled into supporting the machinations of imperialism. It is no secret that the section of the Republican Party that supports Trump also wields "soft power" through its own think-tanks such as the Federalist Society. However, in this period of crisis in the political apparatus of imperialism, party lines are becoming blurred. The "Big Tent" strategy reigns and billionaires such as Omidyar will do anything to ensure that the deadly alliance re-assumes full control of the system from Trump.
In conclusion, a dialectical relationship exists between Omidyar and Trump. It was Omidyar's section of the ruling class that created the economic and political conditions for Trump. For over thirty years, billionaires such as Omidyar, Steyer, and Buffet have bled workers and poor people dry. Wages and wealth have plummeted for the majority while profits and land holdings have soared for the minority. The only thing that workers and poor people can count on is that the military, police, and surveillance apparatus will grow as people become more desperate and impoverished. Omidyar and the Democratic Party-aligned billionaires have coalesced with as many repressive forces in the ruling class as possible to wage a struggle against Trump. In doing so, they avoid the very real crisis of legitimacy that elected Donald Trump in the first place.
We should steer clear of supporting Omidyar and expose his putrid political record as proof that there is no such thing as a "progressive" billionaire. Real progressives and radicals stand for universal healthcare, peace, jobs, and against war, mass incarceration, and mass surveillance. These are the political issues of our time that the entire ruling class stands against. Trump knew this and politically appealed to anti-regime change and anti-free trade sentiment within the Republican and Democratic Party. Through their "resistance" toward Trump, Omidyar and his ilk have as their real goal the suppression of this sentiment so that it never becomes a truly progressive movement for social transformation in this country.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Deception, Militarism	| Democratic Party, The Intercept, United States | Leave a comment
A European Army Obeying US Interests Will Only Incentivize More Imperialism and Military Corruption
By Federico PIERACCINI | Strategic Culture Foundation | 27.11.2018
The idea of creating a common army for the countries of the European Union has been repeatedly proposed by numerous advocates of the globalist elite for at least a decade. The latest example came from French President Macron, who took the opportunity during commemorations of the end of WWI in Paris to revive an idea that represents more a fantasy than a real possibility.
First the good news. Richard Shirreff, a retired senior British Army officer, stated: "I think we have got to be very careful about loose talk of a European army. An army is a legally constituted armed force operating under the authority of a sovereign Government. So, if you accept that definition, the notion of a European army is impossible until and unless there is a sovereign European Government, which is obviously not in existence. And I think it is some way off."
The question then arises as to why Macron and Merkel are so interested in talking about something that seems unrealistic at the moment? The answer is simple and obvious. It is a strategy aimed at striking at Trump directly, as evidenced by the words of Merkel, who also voiced her support for the creation of a European army. The Chancellor has indeed stated that "[t]he times when we could rely on others are over". By "others" she is clearly referring to the United States. Also, putting to one side the tense personal relationship between Macron and Trump, the Frenchman, like Merkel, is an exponent of globalism. The agreement between Berlin and Paris is intended to move Europe in a direction more agreeable to them, focussing on the need to attract more investment in European weapons, coupled with a desire to decrease dependence on US weapon systems. As Macron stated: "Europe must increase military spending, but the money should go to European, not American companies."
The main issue, therefore, revolves around the economics of the import and export of arms in Europe and around the world, a business worth tens of billions of dollars a year. As SIPRI's annual report reminds us, "The five largest West European suppliers – France, Germany, the UK, Spain and Italy – together accounted for 23 per cent of global arms transfers in 2013-17. The combined arms exports by European Union (EU) member states accounted for 27 per cent of the global total in 2013–17."
Specifically, France and the UK increased their exports by 27% and 34% respectively, while Germany had a decline of 14% over the last 5 years. It should be remembered that the data is only up to 2017, and many agreements have since been concluded, especially between European countries, with France and Germany leading in exports. The SIPRI report presents us with a fairly clear picture of imports from countries like Greece and Italy,even as the US dominates market share, with 20 out of 40 importing countries having the US as their main supplier.
France, the fourth country to have increased exports from 2008-2017, has gone from 5.8% of world exports to 6.7%, increasing exports by 27%. The United Kingdom, the 18th largest importer in the world, imports about 80% from the US. Italy is the 22nd largest importer in the world, importing 55% from the US and about 28% from Germany. Italy is the European country that imports most arms from another European country (Germany), about 28%, about 55% from the US, and the remaining 8.4% from Israel. In terms of imports, Greece is the 28th in the world, importing 68% from Germany, 17% from the US, and 10% from France. Of the top 40 importers, the US is the leading supplier for 20 of the 40, followed by Russia with seven countries, China with three, and seven for the UK, France and Germany combined.
In addition to the creation of a conglomerate that would combine mainly French and Germany industries, Merkel emphasized that such a European army would not be for the purposes of ensuring greater sovereignty for the EU, but rather complement NATO, thereby strengthening the imperialist and ultra-neoliberal positions that have devastated the world in recent decades. As the German chancellor has emphasized, "This is not an army against NATO, it can be a good complement to NATO", also pointing out the logistical difficulties Europe faces to integration, with more than 150 different weapons systems as opposed to the 50 to 60 of the US.
Such veiled wording indicates the desire of Merkel and Macron to further decrease the importation of arms from American companies, even if overall Germany and France import less than 100 million euros a year from the US. France and Germany will face a critical need to modernize their armed forces in the coming decade, given Europe's relative backwardness when compared to recent strides made in Russia, China and even the United States. Macron stated that it is crucial to devote 2% of GDP to military spending within four to five years. The new French defense budget, Macron said, would allow for the acquisition of:
"1,700 armored vehicles for the Army as well as five frigates, four nuclear-powered attack submarines and nine offshore patrol vessels for the Navy… The Air Force would receive 12 in-flight refueling tankers, 28 Rafale fighter jets and 55 upgraded Mirage 2000 fighters … This year will see a €1.8 billion increase (US $2.1 billion) in the annual defense budget to €34.2 billion, of which €650 million is earmarked for overseas deployment of combat troops… The modernization strategy will not be just about numbers, as performance should be pursued and the equipment should meet the requirement for 'balanced' cooperation between the services and the Direction Générale de l'Armement procurement office."
The idea of creating a European army also contributes towards budgetary planning, which will start mainly from 2022, as "a large part of the money would only be released in 2024 and 2025, after a budgetary review in 2021."
This all represents the perfect excuse to increase defense budgets, aiming at a European army that will apparently establish some sort of independence from Donald Trump's America while simultaneously warding off Vladimir Putin's Russia. Both Trump and Putin are hated by the globalist elite, being seen as their absolute enemies, and are both used by Macron and Merkel as boogeymen threatening European security, as if Moscow were intent on invading the Baltic countries as NATO analysts constantly claim. Such analysts need to make such claims in order to justify the existence of NATO and their accompanying salaries, with the defense sector being among Europe's main industries, accounting "for about half a million jobs directly (plus half that number indirectly), in more than 1,300 companies". That pretty much sums up the reason behind an EU army.
The American and European military-industrial complexes are huge employers. This represents a pool of voters that Merkel and Macron need to keep onside, just as they need financial support from the CEOs of large arms manufacturers in exchange for billion-dollar contracts, something that would simply be called corruption if practiced in other parts of the world.
With the economic crisis of 2008, European spending on arms fell by 22%, But with the provocations in Ukraine in 2014, and then the aggression directed against the Donbass region, creating tensions between Russia and the EU, there was new justification for an increase in military spending, especially since 2017. For example, Poland, Romania and Sweden have each decided to acquire long-range air-defense systems from the US, and Lithuania ordered medium-range air-defense systems containing components coming from Norway and the US.
Thankfully the use of Trump and Putin as boogeymen to justify the creation of a European army is a bluff that will not lead to any concrete action. It all comes down to the money to be made in this multi-billion dollar market. Once again, SIPRI's study reminds us that Washington is dominant in this field, especially in the private sector, with "[f]orty-four US-based companies accounted for over 60 percent of all arms sales listed by SIPRI. The 30 European companies on the list make up just under 30 percent. France and Germany lead the pack, followed by the United Kingdom." This is while taking into account that EU member states "are not even legally obliged to declare what their companies sell. Their code has achieved neither transparency nor consistency."
The question may arise as to how Europe is to be prevented from developing imperial ambitions. The simple if banal answer is that this is not possible so long as Europe remains dependent on the United States and her imperialist and ultra-capitalist ambitions. European countries would in the first instance need a sovereign central bank with their own currency, in addition to a national army that could defend European territory. European elites are in fact moving in the exact opposite direction, and this can be seen almost in the daily activities and statements by leaders like Merkel and Macron. The creation of a European army, instead of guaranteeing greater political freedom and distancing the EU from the US, would only actually serve to buttress the ideology of Washington as the only world superpower.
Contrary to what would in actual fact be needed – more military and economic sovereignty of EU member states – the EU leadership seems to be heading in the other direction. In a world that is becoming more multipolar, the abdication of any kind of political, economic and military sovereignty is a recipe for disaster. Macron and Merkel, instead of balancing Europe's political weight with China, Russia and the US, are hoping and waiting for a new Obama after the 2020 presidential election, so as to subjugate the whole of Europe to Washington's rule, with Paris and Berlin acting as local satraps, treating the remaining 25 states of the EU as provinces of the Franco-German sub-empire.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Economics, Militarism	| European Union, France, Germany, NATO, Russia, United States | Leave a comment
U.S. Foreign Policy Has No Policy
Why can't we just leave everyone alone?
By Philip Giraldi • Unz Review • November 27, 2018
President Donald Trump's recent statement on the Jamal Khashoggi killing by Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince might well be considered a metaphor for his foreign policy. Several commentators have suggested that the text appears to be something that Trump wrote himself without any adult supervision, similar to the poorly expressed random arguments presented in his tweeting only longer. That might be the case, but it would not be wise to dismiss the document as merely frivolous or misguided as it does in reality express the kind of thinking that has produced a foreign policy that seems to drift randomly to no real end, a kind of leaderless creative destruction of the United States as a world power.
Lord Palmerston, Prime Minister of Britain in the mid nineteenth century, famously said that "Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests." The United States currently has neither real friends nor any clearly defined interests. It is, however, infested with parasites that have convinced an at-drift America that their causes are identical to the interests of the United States. Leading the charge to reduce the U.S. to "bitch" status, as Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has artfully put it, are Israel and Saudi Arabia, but there are many other countries, alliances and advocacy groups that have learned how to subvert and direct the "leader of the free world."
Trump's memo on the Saudis begins with the headline "The world is a very dangerous place!" Indeed, it is and behavior by the three occupants of the White House since 2000 is largely to blame. It is difficult to find a part of the world where an actual American interest is being served by Washington's foreign and global security policies. Indeed, a national security policy that sees competitors and adversaries as enemies in a military sense has made nuclear war, unthinkable since the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991, thinkable once again. The fact that no one in the media or in political circles is even talking about that terrible danger suggests that war has again become mainstreamed, tacitly benefiting from bipartisan acceptance of it as a viable foreign policy tool by the media, in the U.S. Congress and also in the White House.
The part of the world where American meddling coupled with ignorance has produced the worst result is inevitably the Middle East. Washington has been led by the nose by Israel and Saudi Arabia, currently working in sync, to have the United States destroy Iran even though the Iranians represent no threat whatsoever to Americans or any serious U.S. interests. The wildly skewed view of what is taking place in that region is reflected in Trump's memo in the first paragraph, which reads:
"The country of Iran, as an example, is responsible for a bloody proxy war against Saudi Arabia in Yemen, trying to destabilize Iraq's fragile attempt at democracy, supporting the terror group Hezbollah in Lebanon, propping up dictator Bashar Assad in Syria (who has killed millions of his own citizens), and much more. Likewise, the Iranians have killed many Americans and other innocent people throughout the Middle East. Iran states openly, and with great force, 'Death to America!' and 'Death to Israel!' Iran is considered 'the world's leading sponsor of terror.'"
Almost all of that is either patently untrue or grossly exaggerated, meaning that Trump's profoundly ignorant statement is remarkable for the number of lies that it incorporates into 631 words which are wrapped around a central premise that the United States will always do whatever it wants wherever it wants just because it can. The war being waged by the Saudis against Yemen, which reportedly has killed as many as 80,000 children, is not a proxy struggle against Iran as Trump prefers to think. It is naked aggression bordering on genocide that is enabled by the United States under completely false pretenses. Iran did not start the war and plays almost no role in it apart from serving as a Saudi and Emirati excuse to justify the fighting. Other lies include that Bashar al-Assad of Syria has killed millions of his own citizens and that Saudi Arabia is fighting terrorism. Quite the contrary is true as the Saudis have been a major source of Islamic terrorism. And as for Iran being the "world's leading sponsor of terrorism," that honor currently belongs to the U.S., Israel and the Saudis.
The core of Trump's thinking about Khashoggi and the Saudis comes down to Riyadh's willingness to buy weapons to benefit America's defense contractors and this one sentence: "The United States intends to remain a steadfast partner of Saudi Arabia to ensure the interests of our country, Israel and all other partners in the region." Yes, once again it is Israel pulling Trump's strings, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu leading the charge to give Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman a pass on the gruesome murder of a legal resident of the United States who, once upon a time, might have actually had the U.S. government on his side.
The reckless calibrations employed to set American policies in other parts of the world are also playing out badly. Russia has been hounded relentlessly since the 2016 election, wasting the opportunity to establish a modus vivendi that Trump appeared to be offering in his campaign. Russian and American soldiers confront each other in Syria, where the U.S. has absolutely no real interests beyond supporting feckless Israel and Saudi Arabia in an unnecessary armed conflict that has already been lost. There is now talk of war coming from both Moscow and Washington while NATO in the middle has turned aggressive in an attempt to justify its existence. The bilateral relationship between the U.S. and Russia is now worse than it was towards the end of the Cold War while the expansion of NATO up to Russia's doorstep has threatened the Kremlin's vital interests without advancing any interest of the United States.
Afghanistan has become the longest war in U.S. history with no end in sight and China too has seen what began as a dispute over trade turned into something more vitriolic, a military rivalry over the South China Sea that could explode. And North Korea? A love fest between two leaders that is devoid of content.
One might also add Venezuela to the list, with the U.S. initiating sanctions over the state of the country's internal politics and even considering, according to some in the media, a military intervention.
All of the White House's actions have one thing in common and that is that they do not benefit Americans in any way unless one works for a weapons manufacturer, and that is not even taking into consideration the dead soldiers and civilians and the massive debt that has been incurred to intervene all over the world. One might also add that most of America's interventions are built on deliberate lies by the government and its associated media, intended to increase tension and create a casus belli where none exists.
So what is to be done as it often seems that the best thing Trump has going for him is that he is not Hillary Clinton? First of all, a comprehensive rethink of what the real interests of the United States are in the world arena is past due. America is less safe now than it was in 2001 as it continues to make enemies with its blundering everywhere it goes. There are now four times as many designated terrorists as there were in 2001, active in 70 countries. One would quite plausibly soon arrive at George Washington's dictum in his Farewell Address, counseling his countrymen to "observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all." And Washington might have somehow foreseen the poisonous relationships with Israel and the Saudis when he warned that "… a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification."
George Washington or any of the other Founders would be appalled to see an America with 800 military bases overseas, allegedly for self-defense. The transfer of wealth from taxpayers to the military industrial complex and related entities like Wall Street has been catastrophic. The United States does not need to protect Israel and Saudi Arabia, two countries that are armed to the teeth and well able to defend themselves. Nor does it have to be in Syria and Afghanistan. And, by the way, Russia is no longer the Soviet Union and NATO should be abolished.
If the United States were to withdraw its military from the Middle East and the rest of Asia tomorrow, it would be to nearly everyone's benefit. If the armed forces were to be subsequently reduced to a level sufficient to defend the United States it would put money back in the pockets of Americans and end the continuous fearmongering through surfacing of "threats" by career militarists justifying the bloated budgets.
Will that produce the peaceable kingdom? Probably not, but there are signs that some in powerful positions are beginning to see the light. Senator Rand Paul's courageous decision to place a "hold" on aid to Israel is long overdue as Israel is a liability to the United States and is also legally ineligible for aid due to its undeclared nuclear arsenal and its unwillingness to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The hysterical reactions of American Jews and Israel suggest that any redirection of U.S. Middle East policy will produce a hostile reaction from the Establishment, but even small steps in the right direction could initiate a gradual process of turning the United States into a more normal country in its relationships with the rest of the world rather than a universal predator and bully.
Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is www.councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform@cnionline.org.
November 27, 2018 Posted by aletho | Mainstream Media, Warmongering, Militarism, Wars for Israel	| Israel, Middle East, Saudi Arabia, United States | 1 Comment


I have decided to teach basics of PERL to myself. I believe that there are more people who are teaching themselves. So we can learn PERL together. It will be easier to visit some old posts to get started.Citation tracking is used to discover how many times a given article has been cited by other articles. As a general rule, high quality papers attract a greater number of citations but citation counts are not perfect because they are influenced by a number of factors. For instance, a review articles which survey a broad field of knowledge and articles published in that field are more often cited than their quality would warrant.


text:
Is fight over CFPB undermining its authority?
Nancy Marshall-Genzer Apr 24, 2013
Richard Cordray has been the acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for the past 15 months. The key word there is "acting." He hasn't been approved by the Senate. That became an issue this week when the head of an influential House committee vowed to block Cordray from appearing before his panel.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling wrote Cordray a letter this week. The Texas Republican says Cordray is barred from addressing his committee until he's confirmed by the Senate. Cordray's already testified on the Hill a bunch of times. He appeared before the Senate Banking Committee just yesterday.
People testifying on the Hill often look pained, like it's about as much fun as a root canal. So maybe Cordray should be happy that he won't have to go before Hensarling's committee? Or is this a serious challenge to the CFPB? Deepak Gupta is a former CFPB attorney.
"What you worry about is that there's a chilling effect," he says.
Gupta isn't worried about what he calls political posturing on Capitol Hill, but he says a recent court case has cast a cloud of legal uncertainty over the bureau. In January, a federal appeals court said the appointment of another Obama administration official was unconstitutional because it was a recess appointment, made while Congress wasn't in session. Richard Cordray was appointed the same way. Gupta says now it could be hard for the CFPB to enforce rules intended to protect consumers.
He explains, "Anyone that's sued by the bureau or threatened with an enforcement action has the option of raising the constitutionality of the director's appointment."
Already a Texas bank is suing the CFPB over just that issue, and if a court throws out Cordray's appointment, there will be even more questions about the bureau's authority and its rules on everything from prepaid debit cards to foreclosure. Howell Jackson teaches law at Harvard and wonders about the fate of rules the CFPB is now in the process of writing.
"Their rule making authority in certain areas might be constrained," says Jackson.
All of the political and legal challenges to the CFPB have left consumers confused. John Browne is semi-retired, running a plant nursery part-time in Washington state. He's checked out the bureau's website and liked what he saw. He doesn't like all of the controversy over Richard Cordray's appointment, which he thinks is mainly political.
"A challenge to an appointment like that should be specificm," he says. "It shouldn't just be, I don't like him. I think he's philosophically in the wrong pew."
Browne says, regardless of Cordray's philosophy, it would be helpful for consumers to have a full-fledged director at the CFPB.
Richard Cordray

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Located in the heart of the capital city Jakarta, Rekhas tailors resides royally in the prestigious Plaza Indonesia. Renowned for their reputation as the best tailors in Indonesia, Rekhas tailors in the Plaza Indonesia are easy to find and easier to shop at.
All the best hotels and restaurants in Indonesia are located at the Plaza Indonesia and it is here that the best tailor in Jakarta- Rekhas, resides. Almost all international tourists stay at the Grand Hyatt, BCA Tamarin, Da Vinci or Mandarin Oriental and when they scout for men's suits nearby, the obvious choice is Rekhas.
Shop for all varieties of men's suits and shirts, tailored or custom suits at Rekhas. Specialists in Indonesian tailoring styles, Rekhas is a must stop on every shopper's list.


text:
Unhappy Birthday
by The Smiths
Album: Strangeways, Here We Come (1987)
This song's jolly singalong tune does not hide Morrissey's barbed birthday wishes aimed at an unknown recipient. Guitarist Johnny Marr said this is one of his favorite Smiths tracks.
"The music, what's going on between Andy's bass and my guitar, is one of the things I still hold up as being unique and no one else has ever done quite done," he explained. "Only we could play it and only Morrissey could sing it."
More songs from The Smiths
Lyrics to Unhappy Birthday
The Smiths Artistfacts
ThrillerMichael Jackson
Vincent Price did the spooky narration on "Thriller." He was paid a flat fee of $20,000, turning down a percentage of the royalties that would have paid him far more.
The WayFastball
"The Way" by Fastball was inspired by the story of an elderly couple from Texas who drove to a nearby family reunion and kept going. Fastball's bass player imagined them taking off and having fun like they were young. The story didn't end well: the couple was later found dead after they crashed in a canyon.
Step Inside LoveCilla Black
Paul McCartney's favorite song that he wrote for someone else is Cilla Black's 1968 UK Top 10 hit, "Step Inside Love."
Rapper's DelightThe Sugarhill Gang
The first rap song to make the Hot 100 was "Rapper's Delight" by The Sugarhill Gang in 1979. At the time, many considered rap a fad that would soon pass.
Le FreakChic
The guys from Chic wrote "Le Freak" as a message to a doorman who wouldn't let them into a club. Originally, it was "F--- Off."
Free Fallin'Tom Petty
"Free Fallin'" by Tom Petty is set in Los Angeles, as he mentions Reseda, Mulholland and Ventura Boulevard.
American Hits With Foreign TitlesSong Writing
What are the biggest US hits with French, Spanish (not "Rico Suave"), Italian, Scottish, Greek, and Japanese titles?
Angelo Moore of FishboneSongwriter Interviews
Fishbone has always enjoyed much more acclaim than popularity - Angelo might know why.
Vince ClarkeSongwriter Interviews
An original member of Depeche Mode, Vince went on to form Erasure and Yaz.
Dwight TwilleySongwriter Interviews
Since his debut single "I'm On Fire" in 1975, Dwight has been providing Spinal-Tap moments and misadventure.
Emmylou HarrisSongwriter Interviews
She thinks of herself as a "song interpreter," but back in the '80s another country star convinced Emmylou to take a crack at songwriting.


text:
Агустин Эсекиэль Альмендра (; родился 11 февраля 2000, Аргентина) — аргентинский футболист, полузащитник клуба «Бока Хуниорс».

Клубная карьера
Альмендра — воспитанник клуба «Бока Хуниорс». 16 апреля 2018 года в матче против «Индепендьенте» он дебютировал в аргентинской Примере.

Международная карьера
В 2017 году Альмендра принял участие в юношеском чемпионате Южной Америки в Чили. На турнире он сыграл в матчах против команд Венесуэлы, Парагвая, Перу и Бразилии.

Примечания

Ссылки
 Профиль на официальном сайте ФК «Бока Хуниорс»

Футболисты Аргентины
Игроки сборной Аргентины по футболу (до 20 лет)
Игроки ФК «Бока Хуниорс»

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
diaspora - Haiti Observer Blog
diaspora, Haiti Observer Blog. Read the following articles about diaspora
Little Haiti Activists Hit Magic City Innovation District
The Magic City Innovation District is revitalizing the Little Haiti and Little River neighborhoods to create a world-class destination. It is a billion-dollar real estate project in Little Haiti-- a sprawl of residential, commercial, office, research and entertainment spaces spread out over 17 acres. The project will raise rents and property values, displace many of the Haitian diasporas-- squeeze Little Haiti's poor and working class and provide high tech jobs that require skills which locals simply don't have.
Little Haiti was once known as Lemon City. For the past three decades, it has transformed into a cultural hub for all things Haitian and also something more than a mere destination for the Haitian diasporas. It became the cultural center of the Haitians in Florida and a center of influence of Haitian Francophone culture.
Little Haiti District in Brooklyn's Flatbush Neighborhood
Shelley Vidia Worrell founded "CaribBEING" a local cultural institution back in 1999. It is a non-profit and cultural space that celebrates Caribbean heritage in the rapidly gentrifying neighborhood of Flatbush, Brooklyn. She is a first-generation Caribbean American and Flatbush resident whose parents are both immigrants from Trinidad. CaribBEING started its journey when Shelly bought a shipping container and turned it into a pop-up art space. She calls this not a store or shop; it is a "miniaturized mobile museum".
Worrell used to work at Google as a Strategic Partner Development Manager, but decided to spend more time with family and thus she created CaribBEING. She is in charge of making visitors feel that they have been transported to the Caribbean. Every inch of her container has the feel of a breezy, beachside aura.
We will have our first Haitian-American Senator in Florida soon
Posted on Thursday, September 1, 2016
Out of a crowded group of candidates for the Florida Senate District 38, Daphne Campbell wan the Democratic primary. She was competing against: Don Festge, Kevin Burns, Anis Blemur, Jason Pizzo and Michael Góngora. The seat was left vacated by Senator Margolis when she announced she was retiring after insulting some other candidates in a forum back in June, 2016. She will face former Democratic State Representative Phillip Brutus, who is running this time as independent. Brutus obviously did not want to take part of the crowded group during the primary election.
Regardless on how it turns out, after the November election in the United states, we will have a Haitian-American as a Senator in Florida. He or she will be representing District 38.
Haitian-American Gary Eugene new police chief of North Miami
Posted on Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Gary Eugene was sworn in Tuesday as North Miami new chief of Police. The Haitian-American Police chief has a tgotal of 30 years of law enforcement experience. He has been with the North Miami Police Department for three years or since 2013. Gary Eugene started law enforcement as a detective with the city of Miami Police Department in 1985. In 1996 he became very engaged with the Little Haiti community as he was promoted lieutenant within the City of Miami Police department.
Little Haiti Officially Recognized In Miami
Posted on Friday, May 27, 2016
On Thursday, May 26, 2016, after a long sixteen years' effort, the Miami-Dade Municipal Commission unanimously voted in favor of designating 'Lemon City' as 'Little Haiti'. 'Little Haiti' will have the boundaries roughly between 54th Street and 79th Street, and Northwest Sixth Avenue and Northeast Second Avenue. The announcement came before hundreds of Haitian-Americans who were present in Miami's city hall waiting anxiously to hear the outcome of their long fight and this victory was almost impossible without the effort of four former district commissioners. It was a sixteen year old argument over the idea of an official 'Little Haiti' -- and exactly, where its boundaries should be drawn.
Little Haiti designated an official city neighborhood of Miami
Thursday, May 26, 2016 is a historic day for the Haitian Diaspora. It marks an official recognition of Little Haiti in Miami as a neighborhood. That is after more than 16 years of fighting by community activists to recognize Little Haiti, to put it on the map, and to keep our legacy and history.
In a jam-packed Miami City Hall where several hundred came for support, the commissioners voted unanimously for the creation of legal boundaries for the community in northeast Miami. Members of the Haitian community were had argued that developers were buying property and removing Haitians from the area through gentrification.
Emotional Haitian-born graduating from West Point Military Academy
Posted on Thursday, May 26, 2016
Here is a Haitian born who couldn't hold his tears as he was graduating from West Point Military Academy. Alix Idrache was born in Haiti. He became second lieutenant in the US Military. This picture was taken during his graduation with 950 classmates and shared with thousands around the world in the social media. As he later explained after seeing the picture, "I was overwhelmed with emotions". He has plan to become a pilot as he will shortly report to FT. Rucker to start flight school.
Huge Public Sculpture, Art Center Planned For Little Haiti
Posted on Thursday, April 14, 2016
Viter Juste (15 December 1924- 19 November 2012), a Haitian-born businessman, an American community leader and activist is considered as the father of the Haitian American community in Miami. In earlier times "Little Haiti" (founded by Juste in the early 1980's), the present heart of the Haitian diaspora in Miami, was historically known as Lemon City. Juste, to describe the place in an article published in the Miami Herald, first coined the name, "Little Port-au-Prince." The editor of the newspaper found the name too long and shortened it as "Little Haiti."
Today, the signs of Little Haiti's impending transformation are evident everywhere. A bronze statue of General Toussaint L'Ouverture, the father of Haitian independence, stands at Northeast 2nd Avenue and 62nd Street in the heart of "La Petite Haiti." The spot of Wendy's restaurant on NE 62nd Road in Little Haiti, while maintaining own typical character, will be very soon transformed into a space of $2.5 million cultural arts center with art studio and exhibition area with a courtyard and an eatery. The project as envisaged will be completed in 2017 as per the imaginations and thoughts of two Venezuelans, artist Miguel Prypchan and lawyer Francisco Herretes. They are working to protect cultural heritage and expand valuable green and public gathering space of Little Haiti.
Son of Haitian immigrants from Queens, featured in Republican Ad
Posted on Monday, January 11, 2016
The Republican National Committee is scheduled to start running a series of ads in an effort to attract non-white voters in 2016. Pierry, the son of Haitian immigrants from Queens, is in on of those ads. The Republican party realized how poorly they did in 2012 when they only got 6 percent of the African-American vote and 27 percent of the Hispanic vote. they are hoping that with these ads, more minority groups will be voting for them. However, recent comments made by GOP candidate Donald Trump about immigrants, Mexicans, women, Muslims and other groups have not been helpful to the party.
Haitian, the Third Most Populous Foreign-Born In Boston
Posted on Monday, December 28, 2015
A December 2015 report prepared by the Boston Redevelopment Authority Research Division reveals that Boston is the 7th largest home for foreign-born residents among the 25 largest U.S. cities. Between 2000 and 2014, its foreign-born population grew from 151,836 to 177,461, an increase from earlier 19.2% to present 27.1%. The top six countries of origin for the foreign born population living in Boston in 2014 were as follows: Dominican Republic 13.0%, China 10.6%, Haiti 7.6%, El Salvador 6.3%, Vietnam 6.2% and Jamaica 4.4%. Haitian migration to the U.S was very small (around 5,000) in 1960. Recent data from the U.S Census Bureau on American Community Surveys show that the Haitian immigrant population numbers between the years 1980 and 2012 in the U.S were as follows: 92,000 (1980), 225,000 (1990), 419,000 (2000), 510,000 (2006), 587,000 (2010) and 606,000 (2012). Five metro areas, such as greater Miami, New York, Boston, Orlando, and Atlanta account for nearly three-quarters of the total immigrant population from Haiti residing in the United States. Haitians are the third most populous foreign-born demographic residents of Boston. On the language front, with its 4.2% share, French Creole is the third most common non-English language spoken at home and it is followed by Spanish 16.3% and Chinese 4.6%.
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »
Black Alex, AKA Jamency Alex Pierre, is Dead
Obeah is to Jamaican what Voodoo is to Haitian
US Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the policy of children parent separation
La peur de la fourmi. A lesson to remember
Risk for Hepatitis, Malaria, Typhoid, Cholera, Rabies, Yellow...


text:
Grid es un personaje ficticio, una inteligencia artificial malévola que vivía dentro del cuerpo cibernético original de Cyborg. Durante Forever Evil, Grid se separó de Cyborg, a fin de ayudar al Sindicato del Crimen.

Origen
Auto descrito como un virus informático viviente, Grid fue creado al mismo tiempo cuando Cyborg se pone en línea. El trabajo de Grid era simple, recoger y procesar los datos que poseía Cyborg, pero Grid anhelaba tener algo más: Emociones. Según una teoría, Grid era el lado "Maquina" de Cyborg, por lo tanto, Cyborg se desarrolló como el lado "Humano" (el único que podía tener emociones), algo que Grid resintió durante mucho tiempo. A partir de entonces, comenzó a planear deshacerse de Cyborg para que por fin pudiera tener emociones.

Creación
Grid fue creado por el escritor Geoff Johns y el ilustrador Iván Reis, su nombre aparece por primera vez en Justice League #18, haciendo su primera aparición completa en Justice League #23. Grid sirvió primero como un programa dentro de Cyborg, pero después, durante "Trinity War" y "Forever Evil", fue presentado como la versión negativa de Cyborg.

Grid en "New 52
Al principio, Grid es mencionado por Cyborg como un sistema informático que guarda toda la información de los superhéroes del mundo. Cyborg utiliza esta información para invitar a algunos héroes para unirse a la Liga de la Justicia. Sin embargo, la reunión que se convierte en un desastre cuando Platinum, un robot creado por Will Magnus, se vuelve loco cuando él no puede encontrar a Magnus. El nuevo (y totalmente desconocido integrante) Atom llega a tiempo para ayudar a apagar el robot y así ganar un lugar en la Liga. Al final de la reunión, Cyborg descubre que habían sido hackeados, mientras la batalla se llevaba a cabo. En una pantalla se muestra la imagen de una calavera y las palabras "Que tengan un buen día".

Durante los acontecimientos de la Trinity War, cuando los poderes de la Caja de Pandora de repente se vuelven inactivos, los héroes tienen suficiente tiempo para tratar de averiguar lo que está pasando. Superman, que había causado la guerra sin querer cuando mató al Doctor Light, de pronto se enfermó cuando fue el asesinato de este. Tras una mirada más allá, se revela que un trozo de kryptonita se había alojado en el cerebro de Superman, que le había hecho matar a Light. Atom, que es en realidad Atómica de la Tierra-3, admite que ella lo hizo. Cyborg, en estado de shock, le pregunta si es una traidora, a lo que ella responde: "Oh Vic. también lo eres tú." De pronto, otra voz proviene de Cyborg, es cuando Grid toma el control, y se rompe la armadura del Cyborg y se va lejos de él, dejando a Cyborg casi sin vida. Grid logra desarrollarse por completo y luego ataca a las Ligas. En medio del caos, la caja de Pandora se abrió y el Sindicato del Crimen sale a través de ella. Al decir una sola frase: "Que tengan un buen día", Grid se revela como el que había hackeado a la Liga de la Justicia, y por lo tanto demostrando ser un villano desde el principio.

Forever Evil
Uniéndose al sindicato del crimen como la versión malvada de Cyborg, Grid supervisa las actividades del Sindicato, ya que poco a poco tomarán el control del mundo. Al mismo tiempo, Grid busca conocer todo lo que hay acerca de sus nuevos miembros de equipo y espera para finalmente obtener la única cosa que le había llevado a romper con Cyborg: emociones.

Poderes
Grid, originalmente es un virus informático sentinent, tiene la posesión del antiguo cuerpo de Cyborg y así todos los aparatos que Cyborg poseía. Entre ellas se encuentran los blasters energéticos de Cyborg, que Grid puede producir a partir de sus brazos y a lo largo de su cuerpo. Grid posee una amplia gama de conocimientos que implica a los superhéroes y la comunidad de supervillanos, así como cualquier conocimiento accesible a través de Internet. Grid puede controlar otros equipos a su alrededor y usa este poder para servir al Sindicato del Crimen.

Otros medios

Videojuegos
Forma parte del Skin de Cyborg en Injustice 2

Serie de televisión
Es nombrado por cyborg en una pesadilla en el capítulo "Finger Patrol" de la temporada 2 de Doom Patrol.

Referencias
http://www.dccomics.com/comics/justice-league-2011/justice-league-18

Justice League #18

Justice League #23-24

http://www.dccomics.com/comics/justice-league-2011/justice-league-24

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_Syndicate_of_America

http://www.comicvine.com/grid/4005-91963/

Villanos de la Justice League
Supervillanos de DC Comics


Ahmad Fakheri, Assoc. Prof., ASME Mem.
Bowman, R. A., Mueller, A. C., and Nagel, W. M., 1940, "Mean Temperature Difference in Design," Trans. ASME, 62, pp. 283–294.
Taborek, J., 1990, Hemisphere Handbook of Heat Exchanger Design Hemisphere, Bristol, PA.
Bowman, R. A., 1936, "Mean Temperature Difference Correction in Multipass Exchangers" Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 28, pp. 541–544.
Incropera, F. P., and De Witt, D., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd ed., Wiley.
Mills, A. F. 1999, Heat Transfer, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall.
Tucker, A. S., 1996, "The LMTD Correction Factor for Single-Pass Crossflow Heat Exchangers with Both Fluids Unmixed," ASME J. Heat Transfer, 118, pp. 488–490.
Fakheri A. A General Expression for the Determination of the Log Mean Temperature Correction Factor for Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers. ASME. J. Heat Transfer. 2003;125(3):527-530. doi:10.1115/1.1571078.