The Apostle John was one of the first disciples chosen by Jesus. He served Jesus on earth longer than all of the others. John was the youngest apostle and the last apostle to die. He was originally a disciple of John the Baptist, but at the revelation of John the Baptist that Jesus is "the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world," John began following Jesus. John followed Jesus from the beginning of His ministry to the end and beyond. John was the only apostle who was at Jesus' crucifixion. Jesus rewarded John for his faithfulness by revealing great revelation knowledge. John was taken up into the spiritual realm and was shown spiritually "what was (past) and is (present) and is to come (future).
John's gospel is very different from Matthew, Mark and Luke. His gospel focuses on Jesus as deity. John revealed Jesus as the Preexistent One, the Divine Word of God, the Great I am, the Divine Light and Life, Divine Love, Divine Truth and Divine Grace.
The Apostle John is most commonly known as "the disciple whom Jesus loved." John never called himself by name in his gospel but instead referred to himself as the disciple whom Jesus loved. John knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was loved by Jesus. And, John wanted us to know that we too are loved by Jesus. John drew close to Jesus and saw things more deeply. In the painting of the Lord's Supper, John is the disciple who was leaning close the Lord's heart. John 21:20: Then Peter, turning around, saw the disciple whom Jesus loved, following, who also had leaned on His breast, at the supper…." John, like David in the Older Testament, was a man after God's own heart. The word "love" is used in John's Gospel more than any of the others. John desired to be connected to Jesus heart to heart in a close, intimate relationship. The closer a person draws to another, the more intense and intimate the love. The Apostle John's life gives us an illustration of a deep and abiding love relationship between a disciple and His Master.
Of course the first thing Jesus made "new" is the New Covenant sealed by His shed blood. Matthew 26:28: "For this is My blood of the New Covenant which is shed for many for the remission of sins." None of the Older Testament Covenants could give eternal life and take away sin. Only the sinless blood of Jesus who is God could do this. All of the Older Testament saints had to follow behind Jesus when He ascended back to God and His former glory with the Father before time began and anything was created. Jesus paved the highway of holiness to the Father for all whether Jew or Gentile.
Jesus fulfilled all of the Older Testament covenants given by God to man.
1. God in His fullness – God is made up of three parts: God, the Word and the Spirit and these three are One. They work in perfect harmony and agreement. The Father wills a thing, Jesus (bread of life) words it and the Holy Spirit (breath of life) brings it to fruition.
God wants humanity to know Him as He truly is in all of His mercy, grace, beauty, goodness, light, love, glory and power. We must also know His justice. Our example, Jesus is the full and final revelation of God to mankind. Hebrews 1:1-3: In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days, He has spoken to us by His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, and through whom He made the universe. The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of His being, sustaining all things by His powerful Word." God sent Jesus to reveal His heart and character, to show us our need of a Savior, to share in humanity's needs, to settle our sin debt and redeem us and give us the power of the Holy Spirit and Truth to transform us into His holiness again.
Jesus, the Father and the Holy Spirit have an unbroken union. Theirs is a unique oneness that encompasses pure, perfect love, grace, mercy, truth and justice. The Godhead wants those who love and follow Jesus and His life example to know Him in a deep and abiding way. Jesus came to earth to make God visible to mankind. The fact that Jesus took on flesh and the nature of mankind yet without sin does not diminish His Divine power and glory. He remained holy. The devil had no hold on Him. Jesus is the Perfect Creator and the Perfect creation (human). No one else in heaven or on earth can make this claim!
The more we allow the Word and the Holy Spirit to remove sin in us, the closer we will draw to the Lord, and the more we will radiate His light and glory to a world that is lost in darkness.
2. Man in the fullness of life – God wants humanity to have the fullness of life that only He can give. Fullness of life in mankind comes with the removal of sin. Adam was without sin and clothed in God's glory and light when He was created by the Godhead but unfortunately sinned causing Adam to lose his glory. Jesus, the Second and Last Adam, never lost His glory. He remained sinless. Jesus measured up perfectly to God's pattern for mankind.
God wants us to be fully human like Jesus by allowing Him to reshape and reform us back to the original condition of the first man and woman before sin entered God's most holy place in the garden.
Jesus took on the flesh of man, but His divinity, glory, character, grace, truth and power did not change. He was full of God's glory when He walked the earth, although it was veiled by His flesh. God wants to remove the veil of our sinful flesh so we too can radiate God's glory and have the fullness of life that God intended for us.
As Jesus' deity was veiled in His flesh, He was also veiled throughout the Older Testament. The presence of God was also veiled in the Older Testament in the tabernacle and temples. A veil separated the reduced Shekinah glory of God in the Most Holy Place from the Holy Place. As the presence of God in the Shekinah glory dwelt in a tent, Jesus dwelt in a tent of human flesh as He walked Israel and its surrounding areas full of God's glory and presence. God wants His glory and presence to dwell in our flesh. Jesus still has a "flesh Body" through whom He can work to establish His spiritual kingdom on earth as it is in heaven.


St. Petersburg Florida Camping Events | St. Petersburg / Madeira Beach KOA.
Camp for a great cause this weekend. Support KOA Care Camps and help send children fighting cancer to camp!
Join us May 11, for the care camp weekend for a pancake breakfast from 8-10 am, hamburger and hot dogs BBQ for lunch at 12 noon and an ice-cream social at 3:00 pm. Other activities will include tye dye, raffle and a movie.
Help us kick off summer with our Summer Fun Begins weekend! Join us at the pool Saturday night for a movie at the pool, popcorn, soft pretzels and nachos.
Join us for Memorial Day Weekend events!
Celebrate Dad all weekend! Camp, play volleyball & mini golf, and enjoy Saturday night movies at the pool.
Join us on Saturday for a bagel and donut breakfast! For lunch We will have a Fathers day pulled-pork lunch. Other events include crafts, an ice-cream social and movie.
4th of July Weekend Celebration!
To celebrate 4th of July, we will have hotdogs and hamburger lunches. Other 4th of July events include tye dye, 4th of July crafts, and an ice cream social.
Happy Independence Day! Break out the flags and your red, white and blue as we celebrate the USA.
On July 13, our beach party will have hot dogs for lunch. Activities will include crafts, an ice-cream social and free putt putt golf!
Join us for a pirate invasion taco lunch, crafts, an ice-cream social and movie!
Join us Country Western Saturday for hot dogs for lunch, free putt put golf, and ice-cream social.
Join us for our Labor Day Weekend events!


Petty Officer 3rd Class Anthony Wood-Casella, a U.S. Navy religious program specialist with the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, stands in formation before beginning a conditioning hike at Camp Hansen, Okinawa, Japan, Feb. 15, 2019. Wood-Casella, a 22-year old native of Norwell, Massachusetts, protects the 31st MEU chaplain during amphibious operations; chaplains are classified as noncombatants and do not carry weapons – they rely on their 'RPs' for defense during Marine Corps operations. Marines and Sailors with the 31st MEU's Command Element, the aptly named command and control element for the Marine Corps' only continuously forward-deployed MEU, completed a more than five-kilometer hike to build conditioning and prepare its Marines and Sailors for the rigors of amphibious operations. The 31st MEU, partnering with the Wasp Amphibious Ready Group, provides a flexible and lethal force ready to perform a wide range of military operations as the premier crisis response force in the Indo-Pacific region.


4 years ago a group of activists began a campaign against the Brighton arms manufacturers EDO MBM. This campaign escalated into SMASH EDO!, costing the company millions of pounds. The campaign also suffered heavy police repression with several campaigners facing injunctions against then and weekly arrests for others.
A film titled "On The Verge" was made, documenting the campaign and a lengthy UK screening tour was set up. On the day of the Brighton Premier, just hours before the showing was to take place, the organisers received a call.
Fortunately the film was relocated at short notice with around 140 people in attendance over two screenings.
Organisers in Chichester, Bath and Oxford have also suffered police pressure to cancel the showing.
Check with venue for late programme changes!


text:
require 'faraday'

module Instaw
  class HttpException < Faraday::Middleware
    def call(request_env)
      @app.call(request_env).on_complete do |response|
        case response[:status].to_i
        when 400
          raise Instaw::BadRequest, error_message(response, response[:body])
        when 404
          raise Instaw::NotFound, error_message(response, response[:body])
        when 429
          raise Instaw::TooManyRequests, error_message(response, response[:body])
        when 500
          raise Instaw::InternalServerError, error_message(response, "Something is technically wrong.")
        when 502
          raise Instaw::BadGateway, error_message(response, "The server returned an invalid or incomplete response.")
        when 503
          raise Instaw::ServiceUnavailable, error_message(response, "Instagram is rate limiting your requests.")
        when 504
          raise Instaw::GatewayTimeout, error_message(response, "504 Gateway Time-out")
        end
      end
    end

    private

    def error_message(response, body=nil)
      "#{response[:method].to_s.upcase} #{response[:url].to_s}: #{[response[:status].to_s + ':', body].compact.join(' ')}"
    end
  end
end

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


As tomorrow, Wednesday, November 11 is a holiday, there will be no regular practices at the Orange Dome.
Open/Closed Practices: This week practices are OPEN. Please remember that open practices mean that you are allowed in the gym, but must remain in one of the viewing areas. Our coaches and team moms don't enjoy being the 'bad guys' and having to consistently ask people to remain in a room. Please don't abuse these Open gym privileges.
Innovation, Wonder & Prodigy: These three teams have a team builder scheduled at Hop Skip Jump on November 10 (TODAY) from 6-8 pm. The cost is $10 per child payable at the door. You will have the place to yourselves! Siblings of the athletes are welcome to attend.
If you placed an order for candles they were made available for pick up last night. At the end of the night there were still boxes that had not been picked up. As a reminder, WHC will not be responsible for any candles that may go missing if you do not pick up your order!
Please remember that if you would like to open an account with BMO and have $50 deposited into your account they will be at the gym TODAY, Nov. 10th at approximately 6:30 pm. Please remember to bring 2 pieces of ID. They will also open an account for a child if they are not in attendance, however the parent or guardian requires ID to do so.
If you are going to place an Avon Order they are due no later than Wednesday, Nov. 11th, however, since there won't be regular practices due to Remembrance Day, it would be appreciated if all orders can be returned tonight.
Please forward any photos of your items to Amy@westhalifaxcheer.com so Amy and Kim can upload them to the FB Auction page. If you have gift certificates or letters, you can bring them into the the gym so photos can be taken of them and placed on the page. We are hoping to have the auction live by the end of this week. Amy and Kim will keep you notified of the date!
Statements: The goal is to send the statements out by the end of this week, or early next. Please remember that any payments made after the end of October will not be reflected. Any questions, please email Erica Royal. Email money transfers can be emailed to erica@westhalifaxcheer.com.
Have you heard the great news!? Exhibition Park has been saved! This means that Cheer Blast AND Provincials will now be hosted at Exhibition Park (Happy Dance!!).
Thanks to everyone who helped put our beautiful NEW spring floor together! We feel so blessed to have 19 strips of spring floor in the Orange Dome! Also, have you noticed that our NEW huge clock is also up and will be in use starting next Mon. Nov. 16! This clock will help keep teams on time (built in alarms) and assist coaches with better management of their lesson plans.
Watch out for a gym full of mustaches sometime this month in support of Movember! Also, a HUGE thank you to everyone who donated coats for 101.3 The Bounce's 24 Hours Under the Covers for Coats! It's amazing that WHC can continue to support our community.


text:
16 students bag first class at Igbinedion University 18th convocation
By Michael Egbejule, Benin City
29 November 2020 | 2:55 am
Sixteen students have bagged first-class grades at the Igbinedion University Okada (IUO), Edo State. Vice-Chancellor of the institution, Prof. Lawrence Igbinedion, who disclosed this yesterday
Sixteen students have bagged first-class grades at the Igbinedion University Okada (IUO), Edo State.
Vice-Chancellor of the institution, Prof.Lawrence Ezemonye, who disclosed this yesterday, during the 18th Convocation ceremony of the premier private university, said the institution has continued to blaze the trail in academic excellence and has so far, recorded major breakthroughs in almost all sectors of life.
Addressing the graduates during the convocation ceremony, held at the institution's campus and virtually via zoom, the Vice-Chancellor said 618 students graduated, comprising 553 undergraduates and 65 postgraduates.
Ezemonye, who noted that the institution has equally made unquantifiable contributions to national development, said it has graduated over 15,000 students since inception in 1999.
Expressing the hope of becoming a globally competitive academic institution, the Vice-Chancellor said the University had embarked on innovative solutions through online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic and has full accreditation status of its programme from the National Universities Commission (NUC).
Ezemonye attributed the institution's success in its 21 years of existence to the unwavering support from its founder and Chancellor, Chief Gabriel Igbinedion, whose vision has kept the institution globally competitive and breaking grounds in many disciplines and fields.
National Universities Commission
postgraduates
Things to know when investing in Bitcoin with your Android device
People do many things on their smartphones, from communicating and learning vital skills to transacting with others, miles away from them. The Android user base is also growing as more people realize what they can do with their devices. Many people invest, trade, and store Bitcoin with their Android devices. Android smartphones have made trading…
Buhari tasks varsities of technology on research, approves N8b for TETfund
President Muhammadu Buhari has charged universities of technology in the country to improve their ingenuity on research to enable them proffer solutions and achieve breakthroughs in the nation's innovation space.
Tertiary education in Nigeria: Another perspective - Part 2
The gloomy picture in the presentation depicts hopelessness for the country. As contended by the speaker, the quality of our graduates is largely nothing to write home about globally and regionally.
UN names Osaghae member of disarmament advisory board
United Nations Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, has named Director-General of the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA), Prof. Eghosa Osaghae, as member of the UN Advisory Board on Disarmament Matters.
NIJ @ 50, celebration at its best
Fifty years is remarkable in the life of anyone, organisation or even a nation. Instructively, this suggests reasons Nigerian Institute of Journalism (NIJ) - Center of Excellence for media training in Africa is celebrating.
Okorocha loses as NUC hands over Mbadiwe varsity operating certificate to Imo govt
The National Universities Commission (NUC), has presented the operating certificate for the Kingsley Ozumba Mbadiwe University, Ogboko, to the Imo State government.
NUC hands over Mbadiwe varsity operating license to Imo govt
The National Universities Commission (NUC) has presented the operating license of the Kingsley Ozumba Mbadiwe University, Ogboko to the Imo State government.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
FAMILY DINNER IN THE BOX
Weekly Family Menus
Seasonal Drop off Menus
The Main Kitchen Café
Our mission is to provide an option of high standard culinary experience for the family dinner table at an affordable price. We believe in the emotional power of food. For many of us, food is a language of love. It's more than just nourishment. It's memories, it's connection, it's comfort. We believe that food brings people together, so we've created a place that connects people with their greatest food memories, experiences and desires. We will hold ourselves to the highest levels as a food provider, a food safety guardian, and a champion of sustainability in business " Until we eat, again."
About our Chef
Executive Chef Gilbert Hitzler, influenced by the family in food business, born in NYC, has been full of passion and talent in culinary art since he was a young man. Obtained C.E.C. from the American Culinary Federation after graduating The Culinary Institute of America, Chef Hitzler has headed some of the most successful and renowned kitchens around the world including Marriot International, Hilton Hawaiian Turtle Bay, Millennium Baltimore, Hewlett Packard, Hard Rock International, Grammy Awards and San Jose Convention Center. With more than 25 years of experience in culinary industry not only as an Executive Chef but also as a proprietor of his own high end catering business, he has been awarded numerous accolades from culinary institutes, bearing witness to his impassioned mission to extend culinary skills to others.
Moving to Lamorinda in 2018, he is a passionate athlete in triathlon, a father of two sons, and a mentor of two teenagers, Live, Love, Life!
"I have had the pleasure of working with Gilbert Hitzler for over 5 years and found him to be a great operator and excellent leader. He was able to translate, teamwork, training and service into success. Gilbert exceeded his guest expectations with creativity and the ability to truly partner with groups from 10 to 10,000 understanding logistics and anticipated outcomes."
- Ewell Sterner, Team San Jose -
"On behalf of my fellow owners please allow me to convey our thanks and warm regards to the team at Napa Culinary Consulting for stream lining our back of house operations in creating workable systems. Stabilizing a revolving door and managers and cooks with training and mentoring the crew. Chef Gilbert has exceeded our expectation that keeps our clientele coming back for more!"
- Emily Wimple, The Cooking School at Aspen-
"Choosing Chef Gilbert Hitzler to be part of our team proved to be the smartest decision we have made highly professional guidance assisting in gaining control of the resort in a desperate time. Thanks to Napa culinary consulting we were able to deliver a luxury experience to our guests"
- Dave McBride, Sorrel Ranch Resort & Spa -
"We have been open for thirty-five years and the insight of Chef Gilbert brought our establishment to a world class level best we could have made it. Working with our team in building systems we have established a workable culture and calm working environment."
- Tom Baldridge , Wild Ginger -
271 Lafayette Circle
Thursday: 3pm - 6pm
mainkitchenchef@gmail.com
2020 Proudly created by The Main Kitchen


A reducing scale will mean landlords seeking fixed rate deals of two, three or five years will see their early repayment charges reduced.
The same scale will also apply to two-year tracker deals and lifetime variable loans cases.
This means a customer redeeming before their two-year fixed rate deal ends will now pay an early repayment charge of three per cent in year one and two per cent in year two.
Customers with a two year tracker will pay an early repayment charge of two per cent in year one and one per cent in year two while those with three year fixed deals will see early repayment charges set at four per cent, three per cent and two per cent during the fixed period.
For five year fixes, an early repayment charge of six per cent in year one will be applicable declining by one per cent each year to end on two per cent in the final year of the fixed term.
Charges relating to The Mortgage Work's ten year deal – currently the longest fixed rate product in the buy to let sector – will not be reduced as they already operate on a stepped scale.
This announcement marks a clear change from previous deals where borrowers would face early repayment charges of five per cent in each of a two or three year fixed period.
For five year deals, repayment charges were previously set at seven per cent in year one, six per cent in year two and five per cent for each of the remaining years of the fixed period.
Overall, this means customers will pay less if they redeem towards the end of their mortgage deal with the rate changes meaning that costs will reduce each year.


Your merchandise will be shipped through Australia Post Express Post.
All orders will be dispatched as soon as possible after the order and payment is received.
Please allow anywhere from 24-48 hours.
We ship to countries listed below and will receive orders in approximately 3-10 business days. Shipping costs listed below apply.
On occasion, some shipments may take up to 3 weeks to arrive, depending on the amount of time it may take for an item to clear customs.
Postal charge does not include possible taxes and duties which may be applied by customs in the country where the order originated. The responsibility for any customs duties, foreign taxes or other fees which may be imposed will rest with the customer. To comply with Australian export regulations, we are required to declare the exact value of all items ordered and to mark them as dutiable "merchandise". We are also prohibited by law from marking the order as a "gift", even if order is placed with the intention of sending to a gift recipient. For further information, it may be necessary to call local customs offices to gain further details.


DTX is an "intelligent system"!
The body's own and necessary microorganisms have a different energy tension than harmful, exogenous substances. DTX SKIN is able to deactivate only those microorganisms that are foreign to the body. Healthy microorganisms that we need can multiply faster again.
This intelligent system is the intelligence of nature, which quasi secures its own survival and preservation.
Just as in a healthy body the balance is created/maintained independently? If you don't listen in, you will be eliminated ;-).
Since DTX is 100% natural, it possesses this intelligence.
That is why it is so important that we generally pay attention to a healthy, vital lifestyle so that the body is not overloaded with an inner "non-peace";, whereby it would be constantly occupied with the elimination of foreign substances. As a result, many bodies are subject to a constant imbalance.
DTX DRINK & DTX SKIN support the inner and outer balance.
Your natural key to personal vitality and well-being.


Your Christmas and New Year will be extra special this year with a brand new baby! You can take your baby on any ride that does not have a height requirement. To view the list of attractions, click HERE and sort to the left by height and choose "Any Height". When my babies were that small, we would carry them around in a sling or a baby wrap and I never had to take them out of it to get onto a ride. On some rides that have a lap bar, you may need to shift yourself to the side to make sure the bar doesn't come down on your baby, so sitting sideways will be comfortable for both of you.
There are tons of attractions that you can enjoy as a family and that the baby won't get left out of the fun.


text:
Tofu Reader
September 26, 2021 September 26, 2021 Olivia Radbill reviews
Book Review: How to Love Animals In a Human-Shaped World
Henry Mance's How to Love Animals In a Human-Shaped World is one of the most accessible pro-vegan texts to come out in recent years. In How to Love Animals, Mance takes a relatively moderate (some may even say safe) approach to animal rights, perhaps to avoid alienating non-vegans. Though that is not to say that Mance's writing is not measured and well-reasoned, it may be difficult for some vegans to accept certain elements of the text, such as Mance's argument that certain types of hunting are "necessary, restrained, [and] connected". In this way, How to Love Animals is less an ideological rumination and more a guide to animal welfare. Take note: Mance is very decidedly pro-animal welfare and very debatably pro-animal rights.
Mance explores many environments in which human and non-human worlds collide. How to Love Animals opens with a chapter on Mance's stint in a slaughterhouse production line. Mance puts forth his best journalistic integrity in this chapter; he neither derides nor excuses the actions of the slaughterhouse workers, but instead strictly provides the workflow facts while noting his personal biases. In fact, Mance's work does not often revel in contempt, but instead provides practical, actionable advice.
Mance writes with a refreshingly poised understanding that no matter how well-reasoned and pragmatic his advice may be, many of his views will be equally dubious to both carnists and liberationists. While liberationists have a firm understanding of the inherent problems with animal domestication, many readers will be turned off by the acknowledgement of their pet cat as an invasive species. While most practical carnists understand the use of hunting as a means of population control, it is doubtful that Mance will win over any liberationists. Though Mance does often address these differing viewpoints, the intent of How to Love Animals is not to win an argument with the reader. Mance does not ask for agreement, but simply consideration.
Mance is clearly passionate about the well-being of both human and non-human animals. His empathy flows throughout each chapter. What makes How to Love Animals so engaging and readable is Mance's honesty. He does not have all the answers and he does not claim to have all the answers. Instead, he gives readers his research and, in an often conversational tone, attempts to determine the best course of action. How to Love Animals is an excellent book for open-minded readers.
How to Love Animals In a Human-Shaped World by Henry Mance
Tagged animal rights, animal welfare, henry mance, how to love animals in a human-shaped world, nonfiction, vegan
Published by Olivia Radbill
View all posts by Olivia Radbill
Vegan & Vegetarian Authors of Classic Literature: 19th Century Edition
Ray Star: Earthing and Author
Book Review: Feeding the Soul
Book Review: Earthlings
An Interview with Scholar-Activist Zane McNeill
Subscribe to Tofu Reader


I have listed a new property at 3461 Covent Cres in Mississauga.
!!! Wow Wow Wow Only 1 Word To Describe This Real Beauty !!! Long Awaiting House, U Can Call Ur Home !!!! Could B Ur Lifetime Gift !!!! 3+1 Bdrms+4 Wshrms And !! Shining Star In Great Nbrhd. A Beautiful Gem With Finished Bsmt. Super Duper Home With Newly Renovated Kitchen/ Quartz Countertops!!! Laundry On Main Flr & Bsmt, Stn/Stl Appliances !!! Bsmt. Finished With 1 Bdrm+ Kit + L/R + Sep./ Ent !!! Loft On 2nd Flr--Ent. From Garage 2 Home-- Carpet Free Home !!


Buy an Isolation calligraphy wall scroll here!
Not the results for isolation that you were looking for?
pratyekabuddha 辟支佛; 辟支迦佛; 鉢剌翳伽陀 (鉢剌翳伽佛陀) In the early translations it was rendered 緣覺, i.e. enlightened through reasoning on the riddle of life, especially as defined in the twelve nidānas. Later it was rendered 獨覺 or individual enlightenment, i.e. one who lives apart from others and attains enlightenment alone, or for himself, in contrast with the altruism of the bodhisattva principle. The term pratyekabuddha is not limited to Buddhists, but is also general for recluses pondering alone over the meaning of life, an illustration being the rhinoceros, which lives in isolation. The non-Buddhist enlightenment is illusion, e.g. from observing the 'flying flowers and falling leaves'; the Buddhist enlightenment arises from pondering over the twelve nidānas. As a degree of saintship it is undefined by early Buddhism, receiving its definition at a later period.
Some people may refer to this entry as Isolation Kanji, Isolation Characters, Isolation in Mandarin Chinese, Isolation Characters, Isolation in Chinese Writing, Isolation in Japanese Writing, Isolation in Asian Writing, Isolation Ideograms, Chinese Isolation symbols, Isolation Hieroglyphics, Isolation Glyphs, Isolation in Chinese Letters, Isolation Hanzi, Isolation in Japanese Kanji, Isolation Pictograms, Isolation in the Chinese Written-Language, or Isolation in the Japanese Written-Language.
0 people have searched for Isolation in Chinese or Japanese in the past year.


If the need arises which is Unlikely,, but better to be safe than sorry, here are the links to two over-flow forums to continue our discussions.
1879Graves as already registered on one of them, Please feel free to register.
I will Add to the forums now and then in order to keep them active.


Bell Shaped Walking Stick Ferrule - 19mm.
This black Bell Shaped Walking Stick Ferrule has a diameter of 19mm and is designed to provide improved grip and stability for walking sticks. Its robust design makes this Bell Shaped Walking Stick Ferrule sturdy and stable, improving user safety by reducing the risk of slips and falls. This ferrule is an affordable and effective mobility aid for elderly and disabled people, improving the effectiveness of their walking stick on a wide variety of surfaces. The addition of a stable, non slip base increases user confidence and reduces the risk of injury.
I'm sure it will do its job admirably !!
A well-made, serviceable item at a good price. Good service.


text:
A nation historically built on immigration, approximately 41.3 million immigrants lived in the United States in 2013, accounting for 13 percent of the overall U.S. population. (Photo: Ludovic Bertron)
Immigration has a significant impact on many aspects of life in the United States, from the workforce and the classroom to communities across the country. As such, many seek to know more about those who were born abroad and now make their lives here, whether as naturalized citizens, legal permanent residents, refugees and asylees, international students and others on long-term temporary visas, or unauthorized immigrants. In 2013, approximately 41.3 million immigrants lived in the United States, an all-time high for a nation historically built on immigration. The United States remains a popular destination attracting about 20 percent of the world's international migrants, even as it represents less than 5 percent of the global population. Immigrants accounted for 13 percent of the total 316 million U.S. residents; adding the U.S.-born children (of all ages) of immigrants means that approximately 80 million people, or one-quarter of the overall U.S. population, is either of the first or second generation.
This article seeks to provide the latest data in one easily accessible resource, bringing together some of the most frequently requested current and historical facts and figures about immigrants and immigration in the United States. It answers questions such as: How do today's top source countries compare to those 50 years ago? How many visas does the Department of State issue? How many people gained green cards last year? How many unauthorized immigrants are in the United States? How many children live with immigrant parents? What jobs do immigrants hold? How many unauthorized migrants have been deported?
The article compiles resources from the Migration Policy Institute (MPI); the U.S. Census Bureau's 2013 American Community Survey (ACS), 2013 Current Population Survey (CPS), and 2000 decennial census; the U.S. Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and State; Mexico's National Population Council (CONAPO) and National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI); and the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA).
Click on the bullet points below for more information on each topic:
Annual Flows
Geographical regions: MPI follows the definition of Latin America as put forth by the United Nations and U.S. Census Bureau, which includes Central America (including Mexico), the Caribbean, and South America. For more information about geographical regions, see the U.S. Census Bureau and United Nations Statistics Division.
According to estimates from the 2013 ACS, the U.S. immigrant population stood at more than 41.3 million, or 13 percent, of the total U.S. population of 316.1 million. Between 2012 and 2013, the foreign-born population increased by about 523,000, or 1.3 percent.
U.S. immigrants and their U.S.-born children now number approximately 80 million persons, or one-quarter of the overall U.S. population.
Check out the figure Number and Share of Total U.S. Population, 1850-2013 in MPI's Data Hub to see how the immigrant share of the overall population has fluctuated over time.
Data on the nativity of the U.S. population were first collected in the 1850 decennial census. That year, there were 2.2 million immigrants in the United States, representing almost 10 percent of the total population.
Between 1860 and 1920, the immigrant share of the total population fluctuated between 13 and 15 percent, peaking at 15 percent in 1890, mainly due to high levels of European immigration.
Restrictive immigration legislation in 1921 and 1924, coupled with the Great Depression and World War II, led to a sharp drop in new arrivals. As a result, the foreign-born share steadily declined between the 1930s and 1970s, reaching a record low of approximately 5 percent in 1970 (9.6 million). Since 1970, the share and number have increased rapidly, mainly as a result of large-scale immigration from Latin America and Asia made possible by changes to admission rules adopted by Congress in 1965. Since 1970, the number of U.S. immigrants more than quadrupled as it grew from 9.6 million in 1970 to 41.3 million in 2013.
Table 1: Numerical Size and Share of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States, 1970-2013
Source: Migration Policy Institute tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2010 and 2013 American Community Surveys, and 1970-2000 decennial Census data.
Read more about the history of U.S. immigration policy in The Geopolitical Origins of the U.S. Immigration Act of 1965.
In 2013, Mexican-born immigrants accounted for approximately 28 percent of the 41.3 million foreign born in the United States, making them by far the largest immigrant group in the country. India was the second largest, closely trailed by China (including Hong Kong but not Taiwan), which both accounted for about 5 percent, while the Philippines (4 percent) was the fourth largest sending country. Vietnam, El Salvador, Cuba, and Korea (3 percent each), as well as the Dominican Republic and Guatemala (2 percent each), complete the top ten countries of origin. Together, immigrants from these ten countries composed close to 60 percent of the U.S. immigrant population in 2013.
The predominance of immigrants from Latin American and Asian countries in the late 20th and early 21st centuries starkly contrasts with the trend seen in 1960 when immigrants largely originated from Europe. Italian-born immigrants made up 13 percent of all foreign born in 1960, followed by those born in Germany and Canada (accounting for about 10 percent each). In the 1960s no single country accounted for more than 15 percent of the total immigrant population.
To view the top ten source countries by decade from 1960 to 2013, use the MPI Data Hub's Countries of Birth for U.S. Immigrants, 1960-Present interactive tool.
To learn more about individual immigrant populations, check out our Spotlights on Chinese, Central American, Filipino, Indian, Korean, Mexican, and Vietnamese immigrants.
Find the immigrant group of your interest on the map:
To learn where immigrants from a particular country live in the United States, check out these state and metropolitan area maps.
Interested in learning the largest immigrant groups by particular location? Use these maps to see the top immigrant groups in each state and metropolitan areas.
The concept of race as used by the Census Bureau reflects self-identification by people according to the race or races with which they most closely identify. Race categories include both racial and national-origin groups.
Hispanic and Latino are not racial categories. They include individuals who classified themselves in one of the specific Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino categories listed on the Census 2000 questionnaire—"Mexican, Mexican Am., Chicano", "Puerto Rican", or "Cuban"—as well as those who indicate that they are "other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino."
Persons who indicated that they are "other Spanish/Hispanic/Latino" include those whose origins are from Spain, the Spanish-speaking countries of Central or South America, the Dominican Republic, or people identifying themselves generally as Spanish, Spanish-American, Hispanic, Hispano, Latino, and so on.
In 2013, approximately 51 percent of the immigrant population was female; the share has fluctuated slightly during the past three decades. Women accounted for 53 percent of immigrants in 1980, 51 percent in 1990, and 50 percent in 2000.
See how the male-to-female ratio among immigrants changed between 1870 and 2013.
Overall, the immigrant population in 2013 was older than the U.S.-born population: The median age of immigrants was 43.1 years, compared to 35.9 years for the native born.
In 2013, fewer than 1 percent of the foreign-born population were under the age of 5 (compared to 7 percent for the native born), less than 6 percent were ages 5 to 17 (compared to 19 percent), 80 percent were ages 18 to 64 (compared to 60 percent), and 14 percent were age 65 and older (the same as for the U.S. born).
See the age-sex pyramids of the total, native-born, and immigrant populations from 1970 to now as well as for the eight largest immigrant-origin groups in 2013.
Twenty-nine percent of the 41.3 million foreign born in the United States in 2013 entered between 2000 and 2009, 10 percent have entered since 2010, and the majority (61 percent) entered before 2000.
In 2013, close to 47 percent of immigrants (19.3 million) were naturalized U.S. citizens. The remaining 53 percent (22.1 million) included lawful permanent residents, unauthorized immigrants, and legal residents on temporary visas, such as students and temporary workers.
Of the 19.3 million naturalized citizens in the U.S. population as of 2013, 15 percent have naturalized since 2010, 36 percent between 2000 and 2009, and 49 percent prior to 2000.
Of the foreign born in the United States in 2013, 48 percent reported their race as white, 26 percent as Asian, 9 percent as black, and 15 percent as some other race; more than 2 percent reported having two or more races.
In 2013, 46 percent of immigrants (19 million people) reported having Hispanic or Latino origins.
The majority of Hispanics in the United States are native born. Of the 54 million people in 2013 who identified themselves as Hispanic or Latino origin, 35 percent (19 million) were immigrants.
Use our State Immigration Data Profiles tool to learn more about the demographic characteristics of immigrants and the U.S.-born in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as nationally.
Which languages are the most frequently spoken at home in U.S. households?
In 2013, approximately 79 percent (234.6 million) of the U.S. population* ages 5 and older stated that they speak only English at home.
The remaining 21 percent (61.7 million) reported speaking a language other than English at home. Spanish was by far the most common language spoken within this category (62 percent), followed by Chinese (including Mandarin and Cantonese, 5 percent), Tagalog (almost 3 percent), Vietnamese (2 percent), French (including Cajun and Patois, 2 percent), Korean, Arabic, and German (almost 2 percent each), and Russian (1 percent).
*Note: Refers to the 296.4 million people ages 5 and older who resided in the United States at the time of the survey.
In 2013, there were 25.1 million Limited English Proficient (LEP) individuals ages 5 and older in the United States, accounting for more than 8 percent of the 296.4 million people ages 5 and older in the country. Spanish speakers accounted for 64 percent (16.2 million) of the total LEP population. The next two languages most commonly spoken by LEP individuals were Chinese, including Mandarin and Cantonese (1.7 million, or 7 percent) and Vietnamese (835,000, or 3 percent).
Read more about the LEP population in this fact sheet Limited English Proficient Individuals in the United States: Number, Share, Growth, and Linguistic Diversity.
Click here for data on the total LEP population by state in 1990, 2000, and 2010.
And check out these 2007-2011 data for the linguistic diversity of the LEP population by state and county.
In 2013, approximately 50 percent (20.4 million) of the 41.1 million immigrants ages 5 and older were LEP.
In 2013, there were 35.7 million immigrants ages 25 and older. Of those, 28 percent had a bachelor's degree or higher compared to 30 percent among native-born adults. In addition, 30 percent of immigrants did not have a high school diploma or General Education Development (GED) certificate versus 10 percent of their native-born counterparts.
Use our State Immigration Data Profiles tool for more information on the language and educational characteristics of immigrants and the U.S. born in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, and for the country overall.
In 2013, the top five U.S. states by number of immigrants were California (10.3 million), New York and Texas (4.4 million each), Florida (3.8 million), and New Jersey (1.9 million).
When classified by the share of immigrants out of the total state population, the top five states in 2013 were California (27 percent), New York and New Jersey (22 percent each), and Florida and Nevada (19 percent each).
Between 2000 and 2013, the five states with the largest absolute growth of the immigrant population were Texas (1.5 million), California (1.4 million), Florida (1.3 million), New York (515,000), and New Jersey (449,000).
Between 2000 and 2013, the five states with the largest percent growth* of the immigrant population were South Carolina (99 percent), Tennessee (92 percent), Kentucky (86 percent), Alabama (85 percent), and Arkansas (82 percent).
*Note: In some states, the starting population of the foreign born was quite small. Thus, relatively small absolute increases in the immigrant population in these states have translated into high percent growth.
For more information on the top states of residence for the foreign born, see State Immigration Trends: Number and Share of Total State Population, 1990-2013.
Nearly 11.6 million immigrants from Mexico reside in the United States, according to the 2013 ACS, accounting for 28 percent of all U.S. immigrants.
In which U.S. states do the Mexican born live?
Mexican immigrants are primarily concentrated in the West and Southwest, and more than half live in California or Texas. In 2013, the top five states with the largest proportion of Mexican immigrants were California (37 percent of the total Mexican immigrant population), Texas (22 percent), Illinois (6 percent), Arizona (4 percent), and Georgia (2 percent).
Use this interactive map to learn the top states and counties where different immigrant populations, including those from Mexico, reside in the United States.
Use this interactive map to learn the top metropolitan areas where different immigrant populations, including those from Mexico, reside in the United States.
In 2013, the foreign born from Mexico accounted for more than half of the immigrant population in New Mexico (72 percent), Arizona and Texas (58 percent each), Idaho (53 percent), and Oklahoma (50 percent). By contrast, Mexican-born individuals accounted for 2 percent or less of the immigrant population in Rhode Island (1.8 percent), Maine and Hawaii (1.6 percent each), and Massachusetts (1.2 percent).
About 70 percent of the 11 million immigrants from Mexico ages 16 and older were in the civilian labor force in 2013. This rate is slightly higher than the labor force participation of the total foreign-born population ages 16 and older (67 percent of 39.4 million immigrants) and the native-born population ages 16 and older (63 percent of 211.4 million U.S. born).
According to Mexico's National Survey of Occupations and Employment (Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo or ENOE), the emigration rate from Mexico (refers to emigrants leaving Mexico regardless of their destination, although most head to the United States) has remained relatively steady between 2008 and 2013, after a drop in 2007 following the start of the recession in the United States and around the world. Between 2008 and 2009 (2nd Quarter, 2008 to 1st Quarter, 2009), 6.4 migrants per 1,000 residents departed Mexico. That rate declined to 5 migrants per 1,000 residents between 2009 and 2010, 3.9 between 2010 and 2011, 3.4 between 2011 and 2012, and has remained at 3.3 migrants per 1,000 residents between 2012 and 2014.
The immigration rate to Mexico (i.e., the number of people who move to Mexico from abroad, who are overwhelmingly return migrants) has also dropped, from 4.4 migrants per 1,000 residents between 2008 and 2009 to 1.5 per 1,000 between 2013 and 2014.
Note: ENOE asks Mexican households to enumerate any members of the household are who living abroad at the time of the interview. Accordingly, it does not capture the emigration of entire families where no member of the household remains in Mexico.
According to the Survey of Migration on the Northern Border of Mexico* (Encuesta de Migración en la Frontera Norte de México, or EMIF), the number of immigrants heading from Mexico to the United States decreased steadily from 856,000 in 2007 to 276,000 in 2012. However, this decline appears to reverse in 2013. EMIF estimated that 322,000 immigrants crossed the country's northern border to the United States in 2013—a 17 percent increase from the 2012 estimate.
In 2013, traditional sending states such as Jalisco, Guanajuato, and Michoacán accounted for the largest numbers of the 322,000 Mexican migrants who headed toward the United States, collectively representing 26 percent of the northward flows. Between 2009 and 2013, traditional sending states in northern and central Mexico witnessed a decline in the total outflow, while other states in these regions experienced increased emigration. The most significant drops were recorded in the states of Guanajuato and Sonora. Between 2009 and 2013, migrants from Guanajuato (central Mexico) declined from 13 percent to 8 percent of the total outflow from Mexico. Similarly, migrants from Sonora (northern Mexico, bordering Arizona) declined from 7 percent to 2 percent of the total outflow over the same period. Chihuahua (northern Mexico, bordering Texas) experienced a more than three-fold growth in the share of total outflow (from 1 percent to 4 percent), and Guerrero (central Mexico) doubled its share of the total outflow (from 3 percent to 6 percent).
For an overall map of flows by Mexican state, visit MPI's data tool, Origins of Mexican Migrants to the United States by Mexican State of Residence, 2004-2013.
*Note: EMIF is an annual sample survey of migration flows along Mexico's northern border region conducted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (SRE), Secretariat of Labor and Social Welfare (STPS), National Migration Institute (INM), National Population Council (CONAPO), and College of the Northern Border (COLEF) in Tijuana. The survey excludes Mexicans entering the United States by air, migrants under the age of 15, and non-Mexican nationals crossing the U.S. Southwest border. The category "migrants headed toward the United States" is restricted to those migrants who are traveling to the United States or a Mexican border city, are ages 15 and older, were not born in the United States, and do not have an immediate return itinerary.
How many immigrants in the United States have health insurance?
Approximately one-third of immigrants (32 percent) are uninsured, compared to 12 percent of the native-born population, according to the 2013 ACS. Approximately 50 percent of all immigrants in the United States had private health insurance (compared to 67 percent of the native born), and 24 percent had public health insurance coverage (compared to 33 percent of the native born).
Note: Health insurance coverage is only calculated for the civilian, noninstitutionalized population. Since some people may hold both private and public health insurance coverage at the same time, estimates of those with public health insurance and those with public coverage may overlap. Their sum therefore may be greater than the total number of people with health insurance.
Immigrants accounted for nearly 17 percent (26.2 million) of the 158.6 million workers in the civilian labor force in 2013. Between 1970 and 2013, the percentage of foreign-born workers in the civilian labor force more than tripled, from 5 percent to 17 percent. Over the same period, the foreign-born share of the total population grew from almost 5 percent to 13 percent.
For more on the share of immigrants in the civilian labor force since 1980, see Immigrant Share of the U.S. Population and Civilian Labor Force (Nationwide and by State).
Of the 24.2 million employed foreign-born workers ages 16 and older in 2013, 30 percent worked in management, professional, and related occupations; 25 percent in service occupations; 17 percent in sales and office occupations; 15 percent in production, transportation, and material moving occupations; and 13 percent in natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations.
Source: Migration Policy Institute (MPI) tabulation of data from U.S. Census Bureau 2013 ACS.
Use our State Immigration Data Profiles tool for more information on the workforce characteristics of immigrants and the U.S. born in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as nationally.
How many children in the United States live with immigrant parents?
"First-generation immigrant children"—any foreign-born child with foreign-born parents.
Note: The estimates in this section include only children ages 17 and under who reside with at least one parent.
In 2013, 17.4 million children under age 18 lived at home with at least one immigrant parent. They accounted for 25 percent of the 69.9 million children under age 18 in the United States.
Second-generation children under age 18—those who were born in the United States to at least one foreign-born parent—accounted for 88 percent (15.3 million) of all children with immigrant parents. The remaining 12 percent (2.1 million) were children living in the United States in 2013 who were born outside the United States to foreign-born parents.
For state-by-state information on children living with immigrant parents, including both first- and second-generation children, see the Children in U.S. Immigrant Families tool.
Between 1990 and 2000, the number of children ages 17 and under with immigrant parents grew 60 percent, from 8.2 million to 13.1 million. Between 2000 and 2013, the number grew 33 percent from 13.1 million to 17.4 million.
For first-generation immigrant children (those born outside the United States), population growth was sizeable between 1990 and 2000, increasing 43 percent (from 1.9 million to 2.7 million), but declined 22 percent between 2000 and 2013, from 2.7 million to 2.1 million.
The number of second-generation immigrant children (born in the United States to foreign-born parents) has grown steadily since 1990. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of second-generation immigrant children grew 65 percent (from 6.3 million to 10.4 million). Between 2000 and 2013, this population grew by 47 percent (from 10.4 million to 15.3 million).
In 1990, 13 percent of all children in the United States were living with immigrant parents. This share increased to 19 percent in 2000 and 25 percent in 2013. The share of second-generation children among all children with immigrant parents has grown from 77 percent in 1990 to 80 percent in 2000 and 88 percent in 2013.
There were 30.7 million children under 18 living in poor families (i.e., with family incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty threshold) in the United States. Of them, almost 9.5 million (or 31 percent) were children of immigrants.
For state-level estimates, see the Demographics and Social Profiles in MPI Data Hub's State Immigration Data Profiles.
In 2013, the top five states by the total number of children under 18 living with immigrant parents were California (4.3 million), Texas (2.3 million), New York (1.5 million), Florida (1.2 million), and Illinois (784,000). These five states accounted for 58 percent of all children with immigrant parents residing in the United States.
What are the top five states by share of children living with immigrant parents in the state's total child population?
In terms of the share of children under 18 living with immigrant parents, the top five states in 2013 were California (49 percent of all children in the state), Nevada (38 percent), New Jersey (37 percent), New York (36 percent), and Texas (34 percent).
Between 1990 and 2000, the five states with the largest percent growth of the total population of children with immigrant parents were Nevada (about 233 percent), North Carolina (about 224 percent), Georgia (about 194 percent), Nebraska (174 percent), and Arkansas (170 percent).
Between 2000 and 2013, the five states with the largest percent growth of the total population of children living with immigrant parents were Tennessee (145 percent), North Carolina (133 percent), Kentucky (128 percent), Arkansas (125 percent), and South Carolina (116 percent).
How many immigrants obtain lawful permanent residence in the United States?
In 2013, 990,553 foreign nationals became lawful permanent residents (LPRs), also known as green-card holders, according to DHS data. The total number of LPRs has decreased since 2011 (1,062,040 in 2011 and 1,031,631 in 2012). New arrivals comprised approximately 46 percent (459,751) of those granted LPR status in 2013. The majority of green-card recipients in 2013 (530,802, or 54 percent) were status adjusters—persons who were already living in the United States before 2013, but whose green-card applications were approved that year. Most status adjusters were formerly one of the following: refugees, asylees, temporary workers, foreign students, family members of U.S. citizens or green-card holders, or unauthorized immigrants.
See the chart Legal Immigration to the United States: Fiscal Years 1820 to 2013.
Of the roughly 1 million new LPRs in 2013, 44 percent were immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, 21 percent entered through a family-sponsored preference, and 16 percent entered through an employment-based preference. Another 12 percent adjusted from refugee or asylee status, and 5 percent were diversity-lottery winners.
The top five countries of birth for new LPRs in 2013 were Mexico (14 percent), China and India (7 percent each), the Philippines (5 percent), and the Dominican Republic (4 percent). Approximately 371,000 new LPRs were from one of these top five countries of birth, accounting for about 37 percent of all persons who received LPR status in 2013.
Individuals born in the next five countries—Cuba and Vietnam (3 percent each), and South Korea, Colombia, and Haiti (2 percent each)—contributed another 13 percent of all LPRs. The top ten countries of birth composed half of total LPRs for 2013.
How many people apply for permanent immigration to the United States through the green-card lottery?
The Immigration Act of 1990 established the Diversity Visa Lottery (also known as the DV lottery or the green-card lottery) to allow entry to immigrants from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. The law states that 55,000 diversity visas are made available each fiscal year (FY), of which 5,000 must be used for applicants under the Nicaraguan and Central America Relief Act of 1997, thus reducing the available number to other nationalities to 50,000. In 2013, 45,618 people received LPR status as diversity immigrants, representing close to 5 percent of the nearly 1 million new LPRs.
Overall interest in the DV lottery is significantly higher than the 50,000 available visas; close to 9.4 million qualified applications were registered for the DV-2015 program. (The application number varies each year depending on which countries are eligible).
Check out the full list of qualified entries by country for DV-2007 to DV-2013 here.
The total number of nonimmigrant (temporary) admissions* for 2013 was approximately 173 million, including primarily tourists, business travelers, and international students. That figure includes an estimated 112 million admissions of travelers who are exempt from completing the I-94 arrival/departure form at the port of entry. (Canadians who travel to the United States for business or pleasure, and Mexicans who possess a nonresident Border Crossing Card [i.e., laser visa] are exempt from completing this form).
Total temporary admissions of I-94 nonimmigrants increased 13 percent from 53.9 million in 2012 to 61.1 million in 2013.
*Note: Nonimmigrant admissions represent the number of arrivals, not the number of individuals admitted to the United States. DHS only reports characteristics of nonimmigrants that have to complete an I-94 arrival/departure form.
How do nonimmigrant admissions break down by visa category?
Temporary visitors (tourists and business travelers) account for an overwhelming majority of all nonimmigrant admissions. In 2013, they represented 90 percent (54.6 million) of all I-94 admissions to the United States. Of those, 48.3 million were tourist admissions and 6.3 million were business-traveler admissions.
Temporary workers and trainees (as well as their spouses and children), including H-1B "specialty occupation" workers, registered nurses, temporary agricultural workers, North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) professional workers, treaty traders, and intracompany transferees, among others, accounted for nearly 3 million arrivals (about 5 percent of total I-94 admissions)
Students who entered the United States to study at academic or vocational institutes made up about 3 percent (close to 1.7 million) of the total arrivals including their family members but not including exchange visitors.
According to the most recently available DHS estimates, about 1.9 million foreign nationals on various temporary visas* resided in the United States on January 1, 2012. Of the 1.9 million, 45 percent were temporary workers and their families, followed by foreign students and their families (38 percent). Fifty-two percent of the 1.9 million temporary visa holders were from Asia. Another quarter came from Europe and North America. The top five countries of origin—India, China, South Korea, Canada, and Mexico—accounted for 54 percent of the 1.9 million residents on temporary visas.
*Note: this estimate excludes tourists and other short-term visitors.
Read about the size of nonimmigrant population in Estimates of the Size and Characteristics of the Resident Nonimmigrant Population in the United States.
How many visas does the Department of State issue?
The Department of State (DOS) reports the number of visas issued to foreign nationals who wish to enter the United States for the purpose of traveling, conducting business, working, studying, and for other reasons.
In 2013, DOS issued 9,164,349 nonimmigrant visas—a 3 percent increase from the 8,927,090 visas issued in 2012.
The vast majority (77 percent) of the 9.2 million nonimmigrant visas issued in 2013 were temporary business and tourist visas (B-1, B-2, and BCC visas). The next largest visa class (F-1, F-2, and F-3) was for academic students and exchange visitors and their family members, who comprised 6 percent of all nonimmigrant visas issued, followed by H visa categories for temporary workers and trainees and their family members (4 percent).
The distribution by region of the 9.2 million visas issued to foreign nationals in 2013 shows that the majority of temporary visas were issued to nationals from Asia (37 percent), South America (25 percent), and North America (22 percent, including Central America and the Caribbean), followed by Europe (12 percent), Africa (4 percent), and Oceania (0.6 percent).
Refugees are generally outside of the United States when they are considered for resettlement, whereas asylum seekers submit their applications while they are physically present in or at a port of entry to the United States.
For more information, see the Department of State publication Report of the Visa Office 2013.
In 2013, 69,909 refugees were admitted to the United States, a roughly 20 percent increase from 2012 (58,179). Iraq, Burma, and Bhutan were the primary countries of nationality for refugees admitted since 2010. The nationals of these three countries made up 64 percent (44,920) of all refugees admitted in 2013. The next seven countries of origin for refugee resettlements in 2013 were Somalia, Cuba, Iran, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan, Eritrea, and Ethiopia. Altogether, nationals of these ten countries totaled 95 percent (66,624) of all refugee arrivals in 2013.
Each year, the president and Congress set the annual refugee admissions ceiling and regional allocations. For fiscal year (FY) 2015 the ceiling was set at 70,000, same as 2014 (down from 80,000 between 2008 and 2011). The Near East/South Asia regions received 47 percent (33,000) of the total regional allocations in response to refugee crises in Iraq and Burma.
For more information, see the Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for FY 2015.
How many foreign born enter the United States as asylees, and where are they from?
In 2013, 25,199 principal applicants and their spouses and/or unmarried children under the age of 21 were granted asylum after seeking protection upon arriving or after arrival in the United States (less than the 29,367 persons in 2012). An additional 13,026 individuals outside of the United States were approved for asylum status as immediate family members of principal applicants. (Note that this number reflects travel documents issued to these family members, not their arrival to the United States.)
China was the top country of origin, with 8,604 Chinese receiving asylum status in 2013. Despite a sharp 15 percent decrease from 10,121 in 2012, China still accounted for a lion's share of total asylees (34 percent). The next four largest origin groups were from Egypt (3,407), Ethiopia (893), Nepal (854), and Syria (811). Together, nationals of these five countries made up 58 percent of all individuals who received asylum status in 2013.
For more information, see Refugees and Asylees in the United States.
Unauthorized Immigration
According to DHS' Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS), an estimated 11.4 million unauthorized immigrants resided in the United States as of January 2012 compared to 11.5 million in January 2011. These results suggest little to no change in the unauthorized immigrant population from 2011 to 2012.
MPI developed detailed profiles with estimates and characteristics of the unauthorized immigrant population for the United States overall, 41 states and the District of Columbia, and 94 counties with the largest unauthorized populations.
The highest shares of the 11.4 million unauthorized immigrants resided in California (28 percent), Texas (13 percent), New York (8 percent), and Florida (6 percent). Together, the top four states accounted for about 55 percent of all unauthorized immigrants. Two-thirds of unauthorized immigrants resided in 94 counties, with the top five counties—Los Angeles, CA; Harris, TX; Cook, IL; Orange, CA; and Queens, NY—accounting for close to 20 percent of all unauthorized immigrants.
See Unauthorized Immigrant Population Profiles for the national, state, and county-level profile of the unauthorized in the United States in 2008-12, as well as estimates of those potentially eligible for deferred action.
Note: The data sources and estimating methodologies used by OIS and MPI to describe the unauthorized population are different. Hence the estimates are not fully comparable, and we urge readers not to mix them. The two organizations cover somewhat different topics. For instance, OIS has estimates on the unauthorized population by period of entry, origin, state of residence, age, and sex. MPI developed unauthorized immigrant population profiles that describe education attainment, labor force characteristics, income, health insurance coverage, home ownership, and eligibility for deferred action programs among other indicators.
Where are unauthorized migrants from?
According to MPI estimates, about 8.1 million (71 percent of the total unauthorized population) unauthorized immigrants in the 2008-12 period were born in Mexico and other Central America countries. About 1.5 million (13 percent) were from Asia; 817,000 (7 percent) from South America; 455,000 (4 percent) from Europe, Canada, or Oceania; 317,000 (3 percent) from Africa; and 225,000 (2 percent) from the Caribbean.
Mexico (58 percent), Guatemala (6 percent), El Salvador (3 percent), Honduras (2 percent), and China (2 percent) were the top five countries of birth of the unauthorized immigrant population.
How many unauthorized immigrants reside with U.S. children under 18?
About 4.1 million unauthorized immigrants (close to 40 percent) in the United States in 2008-12 resided with children under 18, according to MPI estimates. Of this group, about 84 percent (3.5 million) resided with at least one U.S.-citizen child under 18, and 16 percent (671,000) resided with non-U.S. citizen children.
How many people will be eligible for the expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA)?
On November 20, 2014, President Barack Obama announced an expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program for youth who came to the United States as children and a new program—Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA)—that would provide eligible parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents temporary relief from deportation and employment authorization for three years. Launch of the DACA expansion, due to begin in mid-February, and the DAPA program were put on hold by the Obama administration after a U.S. district judge in Texas granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit brought by 26 states against the new deferred action programs.
Prospective beneficiaries for DACA have to meet a series of requirements, including the following:
entered the United States before the age of 16;
have continuously resided in the United States since January 1, 2010;
are of any age;
are currently in school, have graduated from high school or earned a GED, or are honorably discharged veterans of the U.S. armed forces (including the Coast Guard); and
MPI estimated that about 1.49 million unauthorized youths and young adults (or 13 percent of the 11.4 million unauthorized immigrants) were eligible to apply under the expanded DACA program because they met both age and education criteria.
Prospective beneficiaries for DAPA have to meet a series of requirements, including the following:
have lived in the United States continuously since January 1, 2010;
had, on November 20, 2014, a son or daughter who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident; and
are not an enforcement priority for removal from the United States under the November 20, 2014, Policies for the Apprehension, Detention and Removal of Undocumented Immigrants Memorandum.
MPI estimated that about 3.71 million, or 33 percent of all unauthorized immigrants, who are parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents and have lived in the United States for at least five years could apply for temporary relief from deportation under the DAPA program. In total, MPI estimates the anticipated new deferred action program and expanded DACA initiative could benefit as many as 5.2 million people—nearly half of the 11.4 million unauthorized immigrants living in the United States.
MPI has also developed estimates of the populations potentially eligible for the anticipated deferred action program for key states and counties. The top five counties with the largest populations potentially eligible for relief from deportation through DACA or DAPA—Los Angeles, CA; Harris, TX; Orange, CA; Cook, IL; and Dallas, TX—account for 1.1 million people, over one-fifth of the total potentially eligible population nationwide.
See detailed state and county-level estimates on the DACA & DAPA eligible populations.
How many DACA applications have been received for the initial DACA program since 2012?
The original DACA program was announced on June 15, 2012, and granted two-year deportation relief and employment authorization to eligible youth. The initial program had somewhat stricter requirements as its target was limited to youth under 31 years old who had resided continuously in the United States since June 2007. MPI estimates that approximately 2.1 million people could be eligible for the initial DACA program, including 1.2 million who were immediately eligible.
Between August 15, 2012, when U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting applications, and December 31, 2014, a total of 727,164 applications were accepted for consideration by the agency. Thus, as of December 2014 (the most recent data offered by USCIS at the time of this article's publication), about 59 percent of the immediately eligible population had applied.
The top states of residence for DACA initial applicants (refers to accepted applications) are California (28 percent), Texas (16 percent), Illinois and New York (5 percent each), and Florida (4 percent). The top countries of origin are Mexico (77 percent), El Salvador (4 percent), Guatemala and Honduras (about 2.5 percent each), and Peru and South Korea (1 percent each).
As of the end of December 2014, 638,897 or 88 percent of the accepted 727,164 initial applications had been approved and 38,597 denied.
On June 5, 2014, USCIS began accepting DACA renewal applications, and as of December 2014, 234,991 renewal applications had been accepted by the agency.
The top states of residence for DACA renewal applicants (refers to accepted applications) are California (27 percent), Texas (18 percent), Illinois (7 percent), and New York and Arizona (4 percent each). The top countries of origin are Mexico (76 percent), El Salvador (4 percent), and Guatemala, Honduras, and South Korea (2 percent each).
By the end of December 2014, 63 percent (148,171) of the accepted 234,991 renewal applications had been approved.
For the most up-to-date DACA application and approval estimates, click here.
For more information from USCIS on the DACA program, click here.
How many apprehensions of unauthorized immigrants are there per year?
There were 662,483 apprehensions in 2013 by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the two agencies within DHS responsible for the identification and removal of inadmissible noncitizens. Sixty-four percent of all apprehensions (420,789) were reported by the Border Patrol in 2013, up from 364,768 in 2012. About 98 percent of Border Patrol apprehensions (414,397) occurred along the Southwest border.
Additionally, ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations made 229,698 administrative arrests (35 percent of total apprehensions in 2013) and ICE Homeland Security Investigations made 11,996 administrative arrests (2 percent).
The leading countries of nationality of those apprehended in 2013 were Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador. Nationals from these four countries composed 93 percent of all apprehensions, with Mexican nationals constituting the overwhelming majority—64 percent—in 2013 (albeit down from 70 percent in 2012).
Note: Apprehensions are events, not individuals. In other words, the same individual can be apprehended more than once with each apprehension counted separately.
Both removals and returns* result in the confirmed movement of inadmissible or deportable aliens out of the United States. There were 616,792 removals and returns in 2013, a 5 percent drop from 2012 (648,783 removals and returns).
In 2013, returns accounted for 29 percent (178,371) of total removals and returns, while removals comprised 71 percent (438,421)—an all-time high for removals. The number of removals has generally increased since 1996 when there were 68,657 removals. At the same time, the number of returns has declined, from 1.57 million in 1996 to 178,371 in 2013 (the lowest since 1968), as the government has prioritized using the more formal removals, which make deportees ineligible to return to the United States for at least five years and subject to criminal penalties if they do re-enter.
*Notes: Removals (deportations) are the compulsory and confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable unauthorized immigrant out of the United States based on an order of removal. An unauthorized immigrant who is removed has administrative or criminal consequences placed on subsequent re-entry owing to the fact of the removal. Returns are the confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable unauthorized immigrant out of the United States not based on an order of removal. Most voluntary departures (returns) are of Mexican nationals who have been apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol and are returned to Mexico.
The government fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30. All figures for immigration control and enforcement given here are for the government fiscal year.
Read DHS' Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2013.
How many foreign born are naturalized citizens?
In 2013, 19.3 million immigrants were naturalized U.S. citizens, accounting for 47 percent of the total foreign-born population (41.3 million) and 6 percent of the total U.S. population (316.1 million), according to ACS estimates.
According to DHS data, USCIS naturalized 779,929 lawful permanent residents (LPRs) in 2013. The total number of immigrants naturalized increased by 3 percent between 2012 and 2013.
From a historical perspective, the number of naturalizations has increased dramatically in recent decades. On average, 141,000 LPRs became citizens each year between 1970 and 1979, 205,000 in the 1980s, 498,000 in the 1990s, and 682,000 during the 2000s.
The number of naturalizations reached an all-time high in 2008, increasing sharply by 59 percent from 660,477 in 2007 to 1,046,539 in 2008. This came as a result of impending application fee increases and the promotion of naturalization in advance of the 2008 presidential elections. Naturalizations then fell by almost 29 percent in 2009.
For more background information on naturalization trends, see Naturalization Trends in the United States.
In 2013, 6,652 foreign-born military personnel naturalized as U.S. citizens—8 percent fewer than in 2012 when the number of military naturalizations was 7,257.
For more historical data on naturalization, see Annual Number of New U.S. Citizens, 1910 to 2013.
Between fiscal years (FY) 2012 and 2014, 90,718 foreign-born military personnel have naturalized on U.S. soil. Another 11,548 have become citizens overseas or aboard Navy ships.
Read USCIS' Naturalization through Military Service: Fact Sheet.
Of those who naturalized in 2013, 13 percent were born in Mexico (99,385) and roughly 6 percent each in India and the Philippines (49,897 and 43,489, respectively). Immigrants from these three countries, together with those from Dominican Republic (39,590), China (35,387), Cuba (30,482), Vietnam (24,277), Haiti (23,480), Colombia (22,196), and El Salvador (18,401) comprised the top ten countries of birth for newly naturalized citizens in 2013 and accounted for half of the 779,929 new U.S. citizens that year.
In 2013, 55 percent of all newly naturalized citizens lived in one of four states. California had the largest number of newly naturalized citizens, with 21 percent (164,792) of the total newly naturalized. Fourteen percent (107,330) of the newly naturalized resided in New York, 13 percent in Florida (101,773), and 7 percent in Texas (57,947).
Approximately 18 percent of those who naturalized in 2013 lived in the greater New York metropolitan area (136,513) and 9 percent each in the greater Los Angeles and Miami metropolitan areas (70,189 and 66,925, respectively). These areas, together with the greater Washington DC metropolitan area (4 percent), greater Chicago, San Francisco and Houston areas (about 3 percent each), and the greater Boston area (2 percent) were home to half of new U.S. citizens in 2013.
According to the latest available USCIS estimates, 13.3 million LPRs resided in the United States in January 1, 2012. Of them, about 8.8 million were eligible to naturalize.
To be naturalized, lawful permanent residents (LPRs) must meet a number of criteria, including being at least 18 years of age, having resided in the United States with LPR status continuously for at least five years, and passing English and civic exams.
According to USCIS estimates, immigrants who naturalized in 2013 spent a median of seven years in LPR status before becoming U.S. citizens. The time varied by country of origin: African born spent about 5 years in LPR status before naturalization, followed by those born in Asia and South America (both 6 years), Europe (7 years), Oceania (8 years), and North America (including Central America, 10 years).
Two types of backlogs impact issuance of green cards. The first is due to visa availability. The government caps employment-based, permanent visas for foreign workers and their families at 140,000 per year worldwide. Family-sponsored preferences are limited to 226,000 visas per year. Also, no country can receive more than 7 percent of the total annual number of family-sponsored and employment-based visas (approximately 25,600 visas).
In February 2015, the U.S. government was processing some family-related visas applications filed as far back as August 1991, and was still processing some employment-related visa applications from December 2003.
In some cases, an application filed 20 years ago by a U.S. citizen to sponsor an unmarried adult child from Mexico is just now being processed in February 2015. Similarly, an application filed 23 years ago by a U.S. citizen sponsoring a sibling from the Philippines is only now being processed by USCIS. However, recent years have witnessed dramatic reductions in the backlogs for certain categories of immigrants, particularly the immediate family members (spouses and children) of LPRs.
Another useful indicator to understand the waiting times is the number of people whose documents are on hold because there are no immigrant visas available for a given family/employment preference or a given country of origin. According to data on the petitions submitted to the Department of State (DOS), there were about 4.4 million applicants (including spouses and minor children) who were on the waiting list as of November 1, 2014. The overwhelming majority were family-sponsored applicants and their immediate family members (4.3 million). About 91,000 were employment-sponsored applicants and their families. Of the overall 4.4 million applicants, 1.3 million were citizens of Mexico, followed by those from the Philippines (429,000) and India (323,000). What these DOS data do not show is the number of family- and employment-based prospective immigrants who are waiting to adjust their status to LPR from within the United States. To our knowledge, the number of people who await green cards from within the United States has not been published by USCIS. In other words, the overall number of people waiting for a green card—within and outside of the United States—is larger than the 4.4 million reported by DOS.
For more details about wait times by immigration category and country of origin, see the U.S. Department of State's Visa Bulletin.
For more on the green card backlog, read the MPI brief, Going to the Back of the Line: A Primer on Lines, Visa Categories, and Wait Times.
Jie Zong is a Research Assistant at MPI.
Green-Card Holders and Legal Immigration to the United States
Naturalization Trends in the United States


Last time we checked in with Youth Lagoon, Trevor Powers was working his musical magic at the Troubadour in Los Angeles. Now he is back and amping up for his sophomore LP release Wondrous Bughouse due out March 5th on Fat Possum.
After his successful debut The Year of Hibernation, we can expect Wondrous Bughouse to be nothing less than wonderful. While Trevor was writing this second LP, he became fascinated with the metaphysical universe and integrating those ideas with pop music, so we're pretty excited to hear it and have it pinned to our playlists.
If you have not yet listened to Youth Lagoon's debut LP The Year of Hibernation, you can purchase it on Fat Possum before Wondrous Bughouse's spring release. Check out the entire track-listing of Wondrous Bughouse below!


text:
What Religion Is Madonna
Jim Farber 53.She made crucifixes cool. In her 1991 interview with The Advocate, Madonna called the religion of her birth "mean." Yet, by her melding one of Catholicism's central images with her.
Mar 5, 2015. Madonna is opening up about ongoing rumors that she has. been a fan of Judaism for years, she insists she has connections to all religions.
Historically, Madonna has operated as a stand-alone special needs school. Next year, Tessa will sit in on religion classes with Mia, and the two will receive their Sacraments of Reconciliation and.
Prosecutors in the central city of Plock said the woman has been questioned and has heard charges of hurting religious feelings and desecration of the icon of Mother of God of Czestochowa, popularly.
Motion Church Of The Highlands Motion Worship is the student band of Church of the Highlands in Birmingham, Alabama. Read More. AUSTIN — A federal judge in Texas has said victims of the 2017 church massacre in Sutherland Springs can continue. Rodriguez dismissed the government's motion to throw out the case and said the. St Thomas Catholic Church Phoenix A
Years ago, Madonna Hines of Wellford obtained religious exemptions. Hines said her decision on vaccinations was based partly on religion, and partly on her distrust of medicine. She believes in.
Oct 8, 2013. FILE – In this May 19, 2013 file photo, Madonna accepts the award for top touring artist at the Billboard Music Awards in Las Vegas. A minor.
Of course, no Bernhard interview would be complete without a question or two about her former BFF Madonna, whose new album Madame X. or their color or religion. All I'm interested in right now is.
Donna Freitas, a professor of religion at St. Michael's College in Colchester, Vt., wonders if she is the only Christian on the planet who admires Madonna's pose. MELISSA BLOCK, host: Madonna is.
The most successful female recording artist of all time (according to Guinness World Records), Madonna Louise Ciccone was born and raised a Catholic— even.
Sep 7, 2015. In the category of News of the Obvious, Madonna declared that her Rebel Heart tour, which kicks off in Canada on September 9, will focus on.
Nov 1, 2013. Madonna: "Like a Prayer" (1989). Madonna's "Like a Prayer" was praised by music critics, but some religious folks were less enthusiastic.
Responding to a media furor unleashed by the YouTube video, Madonna issued a statement on Tuesday through her spokeswoman saying her reference to Obama's religion was facetious. "I was being ironic on.
It is sponsored by groups such as the Catholic Association as well as the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and the Institute on Religion and Democracy. Key speakers included Sister Bethany Madonna.
Madonna says she 'feels raped' after reading an interview. She also spent a year studying the sociology of religion at Harvard University. Grigoriadis is a generalist writer for The New York Times.
Oct 10, 2005. The religious affiliation (religion) of Madonna, an immensely famous and popular American pop singer who has also done considerable film.
May 7, 2018. No one can do Catholic iconography-as-fashion like Madonna can. She has clearly had a very complicated relationship with her religion.
And if that means mocking Muslim women to rack up the cash registers, so be it. Of course, attacking religion for publicity is nothing new for Madonna. For many years she has mercilessly lampooned my.
Madonna has consistently railed against contemporary taste, battling fiercely on the fronts of race, religion, age, gender, and sexuality. In so doing, she paved the way for the likes of Lady Gaga,
Mar 4, 2016. that some of Madonna's material is highly offensive to Christianity and will be found just as offensive to the majority of people of religious faith.
Madonna meant what she said in "Human Nature": She doesn't have regrets. She says to this day that her most provocative transformations—or reinventions, as the critics called them—have purpose. She.
This time, an image of Madonna holding the infant Jesus with the caption. that will help their interests because they can't accept diversity in sexuality or religion." Band members were questioned.
MADONNA. In recent years, Madonna has studied Kabbalah and employed kab. and religious signifiers (Madonna, teffilin, LAV, Binah, Esther/Ishtar) blur, in a.
Mar 19, 2015. In other words, Madonna is the authority for her own religious system, one that appropriates whatever she deems significant in crafting her own.
Oct 5, 2013. The new issue of Harper's Bazaar features a remarkably open piece by Madonna , where the singer opens up about religion, rape, adoption.
Aug 8, 2015. Religion has been a favored subject for Madonna since she got her start in the music business more than three decades ago, whether she's.
Pop-singer Madonna's hit video is to be investigated by the Australian. video with religious overtones then she should be free to do so. "Michelangelo used religion merely as a basis for expressing.
Mar 4, 2016. Religious figure criticises star ahead of New Zealand concerts. Madonna has been condemned by a Roman Catholic bishop ahead of two.
Jul 9, 2006. Madonna and Kabbalah, the once obscure sect she championed – and upon which she has lavished millions of dollars – appear to be on the.
Oct 15, 2016. Madonna. Lady Gaga. We constantly hear these names being said on the radio and television, but not many of us know the type of religious.
The Kabbalah Centre International is a non-profit organization located in Los Angeles, The effect of this is a resemblance of religions such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam and Buddhism, as well as new-age teachings, to Kabbalah. Madonna studies regularly with a personal Kabbalah Centre rabbi, no longer gives.
While wearing a crown of thorns? Even at her show in Rome? The "war on religion" alarmists are just like Minaj and Madonna in one key respect: Lacking a coherent point to make, they go for shock value.
Jun 18, 2018. The following is a discussion of the issue of religious faith on the part of the. John Michael Madonna Faculty and Training Analyst, Boston.
"Star Wars and Religion" is a course that is both thoroughly in keeping. One of the highlights was one of the lecture's first slides—a depiction of the prototypical Madonna and child painting, but.
Mar 23, 2015. In interview with Irish media, Madonna lays out theology, saying she feels connection with religious ceremonies, but not with any religion: 'I feel.
But others thought that the singer could be insulting Muslim women by implying that they're oppressed by their religion. Whatever the mystery behind the photo is we're sure savvy-minded Madonna has a.
She and Madonna notoriously appeared on Late Night with David Letterman. "I don't give a shit what anybody's sexual orientation is, or their color or religion. All I'm interested in right now is.
Tim Mcgraw And Faith Hill Orlando When A Priest Is Laicized He was laicized from the church shortly after. DeFrias did not respond to messages on Facebook or Twitter, and a call to the Punta Cana school went unanswered on Friday. According to his LinkedIn. The film also alleges that the Rev. Dariusz Olejniczak, a priest who was sentenced for molesting
14675 Hopewell Church Rd Midland Nc
Christmas Song Oh Come All Ye Faithful


An Act to amend 346.67 (1) (intro.) and 346.67 (1) (c); and to create 346.67 (3) of the statutes; relating to: the duty to stop at the scene of a motor vehicle accident.
346.67 (1) (c) The operator shall render reasonable assistance to any person injured in such accident reasonable assistance the accident, including the carrying transporting, or the making of arrangements for the carrying, of such to transport the person to a physician, surgeon, or hospital for medical or surgical treatment if it is apparent that such medical or surgical treatment is necessary or if such carrying is requested by the injured person.
346.67 (3) A prosecutor is not required to allege or prove that an operator knew that he or she collided with a person or a vehicle driven or attended by a person in a prosecution under this section.
319,4 Section 4. Initial applicability.
(1) This act first applies to violations committed on the effective date of this subsection.


text:
mdigital » World and Country » Gene Autry - What's Gonna Happen To Me
Gene Autry - What's Gonna Happen To Me download mp3 album
Gene_Autry Country 1941 US
Gene Autry
What's Gonna Happen To Me
MMF FLAC APE AUD MOD MP3 XM
Listen to Gene Autry What's Gonna Happen To Me MP3 song. What's Gonna Happen To Me song from the album Home On The Range 20 Western Favourites is released on Mar 2011. The duration of song is 02:48. This song is sung by Gene Autry.
Exclusive discount for Prime members. Sample this album Artist - Artist (Sample). 1. 30. Here Comes Santa Claus (Down Santa Claus Lane) (78rpm Version). by Gene Autry with vocal Group. By and large, the worst songs on this compliation also have overproduced arrangements. The duets with Rosemary Clooney (except for "The Night Before Christmas Song," which is a little gem) are mostly busts, as are the songs with cutesy, childish lyrics ("Where Did My Snowman Go," "If It Doesn't Snow on Christmas").
I know what's gonna happen Don't tell me that it's not You'll call me up at nine And say: "There's something you forgot". Your brother is in jail Your mom's been in a wreck Your sister has a Goyder Like a football on her neck. You're gonna stand me up And I'll be staring at the phone Sitting there all and pathetic and alone And feeling just about as welcome And as wanted as a kidney stone.
What Happens Tomorrow" is a song by British pop rock band Duran Duran and is featured on their 2004 album, Astronaut. It was released in January 2005 as the second single from that album, and the band's thirty-third single overall. The single debuted at number 11 in the UK Singles Chart on 6 February 2005 and was the second single from the album to peak at number two in Italy. It became a minor hit in Flemish Belgium, Germany and Ireland.
What's Going On is not only Marvin Gaye's masterpiece, it's the most important and passionate record to come out of soul music, delivered by one of its finest voices, a man finally free to speak his mind and so move from R&B sex symbol to true recording artist.
Ouça gratuitamente Perry Como – What's afoot ?. Descubra novas músicas, shows, vídeos e fotos no maior catálogo on-line com a Last. On Neon Genesis Evangelion's iconic 'Fly Me to the Moon' renditions and where to hear them. By neyoni 26 Jun 15h:58. fm's Hype Chart (Week 25 of 2019). By neyoni 26 Jun 15h:57. We're giving away two sets of high performance speakers.
What's gonna happen to me? A村人 在 2019-01-11 02:59 提交.
A What's Gonna Happen To Me
Written-By – F. Rose*, Autry*
B Be Honest With Me
Written-By – Autry*
Patent Office line at very top
Matrix / Runout: LA 2321
05980 Gene Autry What's Gonna Happen To Me (Shellac, 10", RE) Okeh 05980 US 1941
MR 3477 Gene Autry What's Gonna Happen To Me / Be Honest With Me (Shellac, 10", RE) Regal Zonophone MR 3477 UK 1941
37018 Gene Autry What's Gonna Happen To Me (Shellac, 10", Single, RE) Columbia 37018 US 1946
C729 Gene Autry What's Gonna Happen To Me (Shellac, 10", Single, RE) Columbia C729 Canada 1946
Similar to Gene Autry - What's Gonna Happen To Me
Gene Autry - Private Buckaroo / Rainbow On The Rio Colorado album mp3
Gene Autry & Jimmy Long - Silver Haired Daddy Of Mine / Mississippi Valley Blues album mp3
Gene Autry - I'll Wait For You / Lonely River album mp3
Gene Autry - Tweedle-O-Twill album mp3
Gene Autry With The Pinafores & The Cass County Boys - The Statue In The Bay album mp3
Gene Autry - Don't Fence Me In / Gonna Build A Big Fence Around Texas album mp3
Gene Autry - Gene Autry's Western Classics album mp3
Gene Autry And Jimmy Long - The Stump Of The Old Pine Tree / Seven More Days album mp3
Gene Autry - God Must Have Loved America / Don't Bite The Hand That's Feeding You album mp3
Gene Autry - Melody Ranch album mp3


The third annual Haringey Voluntary and Community Sector (VCS) Expo, organised by The Bridge Renewal Trust and Haringey Council, will take place on Thursday 29 November 2018 at the Tottenham Town Hall, N15 4RY, from 11am to 4pm. The Expo is an occasion to showcase and celebrate the important work of Haringey's diverse voluntary and community groups, to engage on pertinent local issues, and to bring together Haringey officials, residents and volunteers.
More than 40 local charities and community groups will exhibit their work throughout the day, alongside a number of engaging workshops and discussions. There will also be the opportunity to take part in two panel discussions on 'Serious Youth Violence' and 'Arts and Culture in Haringey'.
The event will end with the Haringey Community Impact Awards 2018 ceremony, which will reward the outstanding individuals and community organisations that have improved the lives of Haringey residents.
Last year, the Haringey Voluntary and Community Sector Expo was a great success, with more than 600 people attending. The visitors enjoyed a jam-packed programme of activities ranging from exhibitions and displays to performances and panel discussions.
All Haringey residents, members of the Voluntary and Community Sector and partners are warmly invited to attend what promises to be an engaging and exciting day.
For further information, please contact Jenny Carter, Communications Officer at Bridge Renewal Trust: communications@bridgerenewaltrust.org.uk / 020 8442 7652.