If you own Jivi Energy 3, please do leave your feedback too.
Lowest price of Jivi Energy 3 price in India starts at Rs. 2,560 Jivi Energy 3 is available on Amazon at Rs. 2,560. Prices updated on 20th April 2019.


Evoking the familiar spirit of Khalil Ibrahim's beloved East Coast once more, this is a variation of the work of his East Coast Series, where the artist was inspired by his rustic upbringing in Kelantan. Featuring a group of ladies about their antics, Khalil brings out the the colour of the earth and detailed the vibrant and contrasting colours of the women's apparels.
Khalil Ibrahim graduated from the prestigious St. Martin's School of Art & Design, United Kingdom in 1964. Thereafter, he became a full-time artist and has been so for fifty years now. He has held solo and group exhibitions in Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia and Switzerland, with most of his works centre around figures and are heavily influenced by East Coast fishermen and women.


Aetna Canceling CA Health Plans and leaving California. I heard that Aetna is leaving California, and that people with Aetna plans have received cancellation notices. What about my health plan with a different insurance carrier, will it be cancelled too?People with Aetna plans have received cancellation notices. I'm with another carrier, will that happen to me? I know that health insurance reform is set to start in 2014, but I already have my own health insurance plan, not through any employer. Can I keep the plan I have, or do I have to buy another one. I do not really want to buy a new one because I like my doctor.
Any Californian, who currently has an Aetna individual plan, will be required to find coverage elsewhere 01/01/2014.
And if you are with another carrier, will your plan also be cancelled? Maybe. It depends on whether your health plan meets certain health care reform requirements and can be "grandfathered".
Under Health Care Reform, insurance carriers will be discontinuing many of their existing health plans because they do not meet the criteria established by the Affordable Care Act. Most carriers in this situation will transfer or "map" you to a new, compliant plan that closest resembles your current plan. In this case, there will be minimal action required on your part and you can continue with your current carrier on the new plan. In the case of Aetna, they choose to no longer sell health plans in certain States, as Aetna has done in California. So if you had an Aetna plan, you will need to shop for a health plan.
So, if your plan does not comply with one of these six criteria, it may be dropped by your carrier.
How will I know if my plan will be cancelled?
You will receive a notice from the carrier. The notice may advise you of your options to roll into another plan, if that carrier is still selling health plans in your state. People in California have already received notices from Aetna that they will be canceling their plans and they need to buy new health plans.
Will there be rate increases?
Most likely, unless you qualify for premium assistance credit (subsidy). Your new plan will be more expensive, mainly because the plan will have more benefits, in accordance with the Affordable Care Act.
Can I keep my same doctor under a different plan?
Your doctor accepts more than one insurance plan, so the first step is to call your doctor, find out what plans he is considered in-network, and shop for a new plan from there.
Networks of doctors, subsidy, how often you go to the doctor, all play a role in deciding a health plan. Answer this set of questions before you shop for health insurance.
What about just staying uninsured?
Being uninsured is gambling with your health, and never advisable. Health Care Reform makes it more difficult for uninsured individuals to receive health care, because hospitals and clinics will receive less compensation for treating the uninsured.


text:
Beltsville, MD has quite recently received the accolade by the Washington Post as the area within the DMV with the most diverse offering of good eats, and deservedly so. For a few years, I passed by one of its establishments, Swahili Village, a Kenyan eatery, on my errand rounds, and I was always tempted to savor their offerings. But such enthusiasm was always thwarted by the sight of their small parking lot and its congestion during busy hours. However, for over a year, I had been eyeing a larger shop lot a few blocks away that the restaurant has decided to put down its new roots. After much delay and anticipation, it opened its new doors, and that is where I paid it a few visits.
Walking into the space, you immediately notice that this is not your usual African dive – money has definitely been spent here, and in a tasteful manner. The decor and lights are both modern yet inviting, with splashes of Afrikana to remind one of this place's roots. Taking my seat, I noticed the glass window opening to the kitchen, which added more psychological space for the eater. I was enjoying the details of the set-up and in the glassware as well as the cutlery. But I had to refocus my attention to the rather simple menu and figure out how to maneuver my appetite around it.
From the appetizers, I had Chicken Wings on an occasion. Usually one to avoid this ubiquitous offering, I was urged by the waiter to give it a try. One bite into it revealed lots to me. The pieces of wing tasted fresh and well-seasoned, without any distinctive spice coming through. I marveled at the crispness despite the absence of any batter and the use of fresh oil to produce a greaseless finished product. Each bite cascaded into another due to the above quality and the poultry being seasoned thoroughly judging by the spice coloring in every morsel. It came with a mild Marsala Sauce which was more a detractor from the already flavorful wings. On another occasion, the order was Bhajia. Thin slices of potato were covered in lentil flour and fried. Its appearance was not exactly very tempting due all the brownness, but one bite into it changed my mind. The potato was perfectly seasoned with the batter adding more flavor and a slightly mealy crisp texture. Judging by the batter color, perhaps turmeric powder was added, hence its faint perfume in the mix. A side of the house-made fiery Pili Pili sauce should be taken with extreme caution but they added some more flavor to these bites. The handling of this lowly tuber was enobling and revelatory. Another appetizer order was of Indian origin, Samosas, pointing to Indian migration to this former African British colony. The packets were phyllo dough wrapped around a filling of ground meat that was well-seasoned and made herbaceous from a handful of cilantro. The dough was perfectly fried with a greaseless touch and a crispy texture. The side sweet hot sauce tasted house-made, providing the right sweet heat for these tasty bites. The appetizers here are some savory starters that are worth the diner's attention.
On the menu, the entrees include some stew and soup offerings. Goat Soup is the only offering in the soup category and I gave it a try. I enjoyed the whole mix of goat meat that was extremely tender and faintly gamey, perfectly cooked bits of carrots and potato that lent some sweetness and body, alongside tomato that added the slight acid to the mix, and leaves of collard green, all brought together by a fairly clear full-flavored broth that is the sum of the long cooking. I thoroughly enjoyed this sip and I wished it came in a bigger bowl. For the stews, they were either made with goat or beef. The pieces of boneless beef and the bone-in goat were completely tender and flavored by their lengthy time in the stew. The mix tasted slightly tomato-base, making it full-flavored yet rather light for it to be eaten in the midst of summer. The sides also garnered some attention. The cabbage were pieces of finely julienned pieces lightly cooked with some fenugreek, which added a unique scent. The rice pilau was basmati rice scented by cardamon and Indian cinnamon, moistened by some stock just before service. The spinach tasted and had the consistency of creamed spinach (made from coconut milk), enough to give a reputable steakhouse a run for its money. The plantains were not too sweet, for a change, tasting clean having been fried in fresh oil. I must say that my dining companion and I were truly satisfied by these offerings, both the mains and the sides.
The grilled meats in the entree section menu looked very tempting and we had to try them out. One of my first visit, my friend's order was Grilled Goat. I had a taste of it and it immediately raised my eyebrows. The flavors reminded me of when my Dad had office dinners in the house compound with a goat roasting over a pit fire. Well, the meat was well seared from some charcoal fire, its gaminess suppressed, well-seasoned from a good marination, and tender at the same time. The side of bread, Chapati (of Indian origin), tasted house-made and fresh. The other accompaniment was boiled ground hominy or Ugali, which I thought was too plain for my taste (I prefer the Ghanaian fermented version), but I appreciated its authentic nature. But I kept going back to the goat as its flavors and textures beckoned me to return for more. The side of tomato salad was the perfect counterpoint to the meat with its fruity ripeness and the spot-on seasoning, as well as a slight piquant kick. After tasting the goat, I wanted to come back for some Grilled Beef. But this time, it was served as part of the Group Platter. The oval dish came with the aforementioned grilled meats, as well as grilled chicken breast. The sides were the spinach, collard greens, cabbage, tomato salad, Chapati bread, and Rice Pilau in lieu of the usual order of hominy. The beef came in cube form and they were quite dark from a good stay on the grill which give it a charred flavor that I appreciate with this meat. The pieces were perfectly seasoned, and as it sat on the plate, they got a bit chewy since they were fully cooked – medium rare is a Western taste sensibility, but not here. This house knows how to handle grilled meats and I wouldn't miss these dishes when visiting.
On a couple of occasions, we tried their lighter fare. Samaki Wa Nazi is fish in a curry sauce. One taste of it pointed to a certain level of care in its preparation. The cubes of tilapia was devoid of the dark fishiness usually associated with it (removing the central nerve is the key), and it had a thin layer of batter from a light frying before it was coated by a savory, creamy and slightly tomato-tangy sauce. I was thoroughly enjoying this concoction, as well as the sides of mashed peas and potato that reminded me of the English version but here studded with reconstituted hominy, and the finely julienned collard green that held its texture and color from a light sauté, akin to how the Brazilians prepare it as a topping for Feijoada. The other light dish was for my vegan BFF – Ndengu or Lentils in Coconut Sauce. The mix had a rather silky feel made creamy from the coconut milk and fragrant from the use of what I suspect Garam Masala, the ubiquitous Indian spice mix, since there was no distinctive single note in the aroma and flavor. My friend was equally satisfied by the sides of Chapati bread and mashed pea and potato.
Swahili Village grabbed my attention from the moment I walked in, from its new space, to the decor, and to the array of gastronomic offerings. What makes the experience at the new place special besides the arresting visuals, is the attention given to the dishes and the refinement in both presentation, seasoning, and flavor combinations, all elements necessary to elevate soulful dishes from the Motherland. Rarely was there an item that I was not drawn to, even the plain hominy that was a direct tribute that I respected and I would't try to mess with. The owner, Kevin, was both warm and knowledgeable, and he has something good going here, judging by the large crowds of expats on the weekends and Friday nights. The service was faulted by online reviewers at the previous location, but I get a feeling that they heard the customers loud and clear as our servers were attentive and congenial. Don't worry about the parking – there is a lot of space. Even less to worry about is their wonderful authentic cooking that would please just about anyone.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Everything you didn't know about Street Sharks
September 12, 2019, 2:53 PM ET
By SYFY WIRE Staff
Everyone remembers the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, but only a true child of the '90s will recall the Street Sharks! Because TMNT was such a huge success, there were a legion of imitators, including the Biker Mice From Mars and Battletoads. Street Sharks definitely took its inspiration from the Turtles, but the show and toyline was one of the more successful TMNT-inspired properties.
SYFY WIRE's latest episode of Everything You Didn't Know is throwing the spotlight on the Street Sharks. Naturally, we couldn't resist a chance to bring out Vin Diesel's Street Sharks promo video, which was recorded very early in his career. In fact, you'll even get to see our modern-day update of Diesel's promo! You'll also find that some of the character details changed from Diesel's video before they were introduced as toys and cartoon characters.
And oh, what characters they were. The Bolton brothers — Ripster, Jab, Streex, and Big Slammu — had larger-than-life personas ... that also seemed to liberally borrow from the TMNT's core four. And while the Street Sharks were largely at peace with their transformations, their mutations are straight out of a David Cronenberg film. It's really quite disturbing, even through the lens of a children's TV animation series.
Although the show only ran for 40 episodes, the Street Sharks toys were a massive success. Plus, they were pretty cool figures. We totally get why Vin Diesel was so excited in that video. But even the Street Sharks had a limited shelf life before they were forced to share the spotlight with the Dino Vengers. We wish that was a joke.
For Jawsome details about the Street Sharks, check out the full video!
Everything You didn't Know
Original Video
Street Sharks
Everything You Didn't Know about the original Child's Play trilogy ahead of SYFY & USA's 'Chucky'
Everything You Didn't Know About iconic anime Saint Seiya, explained


We're all guilty of it, we beauty editors. We bang on about tanning and self tanning every summer; 'How to get the faux glow' or 'How to be a bronzed beauty' read our headlines.
However, what if you don't want to cake yourself in creosote in the name of looking a nationality you are not? What if you think it's weird to stain your skin a colour it's not? What if actually you think a tan doesn't suit you? Or you are just plain scared of putting anything faintly brown or even beige on your skin?
There is nothing more beautiful than pure, porcelain-looking skin. If you find you have discoloration under the eyes, use a bit of concealer on your ring finger and tap it into the skin. This tapping process will help you build up the concealer to the level you require while keeping it looking like part of your skin, rather than caked.
It's really important to use a foundation that matches your skintone rather than va-vooming it up with a colour that belongs to a Brazilian lady. Please note, if you are very pale and want to tan your skin, use a self tanner - don't try and bronze yourself up with foundation.
Laura Mercier Secret Camouflage Concealer, £26, which she says is "Great for neutralising colour under the eyes." She is also a big fan of Bobbi Brown's Creamy Concealer, £18.
The prettiest colours to experiment with this summer are tones of peach and apricot, or as Kay puts it 'peachy tan'. These shades are flattering on most complexions and can have the added effect of making the colour and whites of your eyes brighter.
Here Kay used a shimmering cream eyeshadow again using her fingertip and patted it all over the eyelid, fading it up towards the eyebrow, for a softly glowing effect. "If you apply shimmer with your fingertip you flatten and compact the particles which make the shadow really shine," she says.
Melon Pigment from MAC cosmetics, £16.50 - or she says you can layer two products - a peachy cream and then add a separate sparkling shimmer on top.
There are now a million mascaras on the market that perform various different tricks. Here, to add to the pretty softness of the eyes, Kay has used a lengthening and separating mascara to define and separate the lashes and create a delicate, wide-eyed and slightly babydoll effect.
Kay hasn't used eyeliner at the base of the lashes as this would move the look into a more glamorous rather than girly territory.
Lash Accelerator Mascara in Extreme Black by Rimmel, £7.99, but also loves Diego Dalla Palma's Transformista Mascara, £17.
A conventional make-up artist might say to use a peachy blush in a similar hue to your eyeshadow here. However for Kay, this could look a bit ordinary, so in order to keep it modern Kay has used a rose coloured, soft cream blush, and has applied it softly with a blusher brush firstly on the apple of the cheeks and then up towards the hairline.
She highly recommends using a brush even to apply cream blusher for the smoothest, most poreless looking finish.
In order to bring this whole look together, Kay has used a lipstick that is a cross between the eyeshadow and the cheeks - a peachy pink. With no lip liner, it's important that there are no hard lines.
Chanel's Rouge Allure Lipstick in Indecise 125, £25 (not launched as of yet, stockist number - 020 7493 3836).


First Sunday following Easter is dedicated to St. Thomas. It's true that we think of Thomas as the "doubtful" one and yet his Feast Day is immediately following the Feast of all Feasts - the Resurrection of Our Lord. We are still in the joyful mood from that wonderful Feast and it was with that joy that we welcomed among us a very special guest: His Excellency Andrej Droba, the Ambassador of the SLovak Republic in Canada. He came to visit us with his lovely wife Daniela and his charming daughter Sara. It was an honour to have him with us at our liturgy at the Cathedral of Nativity of Mother of God in Toronto. Since this was the first time they had attended a Byzantine liturgy, they were pleasantly surprised and truly enjoyed the experience. The main celebrant was His Excellency Bishop John Pazak, CSsR with Fr. Marek Novicky concelebrating. Before the liturgy Fr. Marek officially introduced and welcomed His Excellency and his family and let them know how happy we were that they chose to visit our parish.
Following the liturgy, all were invited downstairs to the hall for some fellowship, a bite to eat and coffee and cake. Fr. Marek once again welcomed our honoured guests and presented Mrs. Droba with a beautiful bouquet of flowers. One of our young parishioners, Madeline Tubaro also presented a smaller bouquet to the charming Sara. Mr. Ambasssador, took the time to thank Fr. Marek and Bishop John as well as the parishioners for the warm welcome that they received. He spoke a little about the way he envisions his job here in Canada. He reiterated that he is here to serve the Slovak community to the best of his ability, he promised to visit as often as his schedule permitted and asked that if anyone needs any help related to Slovak passport or other Slovak document, to please contact him. He then stopped by every table and chatted with as many people as he was able to before he sat down to enjoy the tasty open-faced sandwiches. Thank you to: Mrs. Kapitan, Mrs. Bujdos, Mrs. Bucko and Mrs. Burger for preparing the beautiful and tasty snack, cakes and coffee. You certainly did a great job.
Your Excellency, we were honoured to have you with us on St. Thomas Sunday. Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule and spend it with us. You and your family will be in our prayers and we certainly look forward to many more visits to our parish. May God keep you and your family happy and healthy for many years - Mnoho rokov, stastnych rokov, nech sam nas Pan, daruje Vam. We sure hope you will remember the phrase heard so many times during our liturgy: "Christos Voskrese!"


We all selects the best series using best resolution just for you and now this pictures is one among photos collections within our finest photos gallery in relation to Lovable Engagement Rings with Rose Gold Accent. I hope you may as it.
To see all photographs within Lovable Engagement Rings with Rose Gold Accent graphics gallery you should adhere to this particular hyperlink.


text:
BAFTA winning filmmaker, Asif Kapadia is known for his visually striking films exploring characters living in timeless, extreme and unforgiving landscapes. His films have been awarded and distributed internationally and shown how versatile and expressive British cinema can be.
"I always film in the East End when I can. I love it. The area really hasn't properly been explored, both visually or culturally and it needs to be represented more. Festivals like the East End Film Festival make people more aware of the area, and that's a good thing."
Director: 'Trainspotting', 'The Beach', '28 Days Later'
An actress known for her excellent choices working with new British talent, across both short and feature film roles. Jaime was head of the jury for our 2010 Best UK First Feature Award.
Actress: 'Daddy's Girl', 'Donkey Punch', Boogie Woogie', 'Made in Dagenham'
is an English film critic and broadcaster who has been part of the London film community for nearly a decade.
Jason Solomons
Award winning filmmaker known for Pride and Prejudice, Atonement, The Soloist and Anna Karenina.
Composer of minimalist music, pianist, librettist and musicologist, known for the many film scores he wrote during his lengthy collaboration with the filmmaker Peter Greenaway, and his multi-platinum soundtrack album to Jane Campion's The Piano.
"This is an impressive festival! Its dedication to representing the diversity of East London, and educating the community through cinema is much needed."
Pawel Pawlikowski
Director: 'My Summer of Love' 'Ida'
"Having been brought up in the East End I warmly support a festival that brings the spotlight onto one of the most historic and interesting areas of Europe."
Stephen Woolley
"I am delighted to be part of the celebration of filmmaking talent in the east end of London by being a patron of the East End Film Festival."
Writer, Actor, Director
has made 10 studio albums and has scored over 50 films, among them his much-acclaimed new soundtrack for the restoration of Hitchock's The Lodger.
Nitin Sawhney
is one of Britain's leading screenwriters. His awardwinning work for cinema and TV includes Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas, In This World, Red Riding and Southcliffe
Tony Grisoni
is a British film director, producer and writer, best known for Bollywood Queen as well as the first series of the much-loved Peep Show.
Jeremy Wooding
Director, Producer, Writer
is an American actor and voice actor. He is best known for his award winning role as Vincent in the television series Beauty and the Beast, as the comic book character Hellboy in the Hellboy franchise and as Clay Morrow in television series Sons of Anarchy.


Lorraine Kelly has donned a bright pink bikini for a splash-around in the pool to encourage her fans to get ready for the summer with "Bikini Promise + One", saying: "If I can do it, then you can too".
The ITV presenter's campaign calls on viewers to get together with their "plus one" – a friend or partner – and support each other to get fit and healthy with a summer food and fitness plan.
Lorraine, 56, said: "For the finale of the Bikini Promise last year, I danced on the banks of the River Thames in my bikini with a fantastic group of women also in their bikinis.
To give viewers a sneak peek of what's to come, she filmed a special Club Tropicana-themed video of her enjoying herself in a swimming pool.
Lorraine added: "I never thought I would feel confident enough to wear a bikini on national TV but if I can do it then you can too. This plan is all about feeling healthy, fit and happy.
Over the course of six weeks, Lorraine will bring in the help of cook and nutritionist Sally Bee, fitness expert Maxine Jones, and health expert Dr Hilary Jones to help participants feel good about themselves before their summer holidays.


Taken today; an abstarct/macro image of moss growing on pond wall. I'm not sure if this falls into the 'fine art' category, but Epic Edits blogger Brain Auer has just started up a new site dedicated to this genre at: Fine Art Photoblog that has its official launch on Monday.
Wow, your new site is a real improvement, compared to the layout / setup of the shutterchance blog. Very lean und unobtrusive layout, just the right kind of support for your pictures! I would only give people a bit more space for commenting. Right now one can only see two very short lines while writing.
And it's a gorgeous macro. Quite dynamic with just the right depth of field. And a beautiful set of colors.
Very nice once again - Congratulations for this beautiful new site !
Great shot..could almost pass for modern art ;)..
Type your comment here.Such an evocative image. Just my sort of thing Chris, love it.
Lovely!! I think this is the one I have enjoyed the most. It looks like a beautiful painting.
Great macro shot! Love the colors and light.
This is great! Like an abstract painting.
Really love the overall flow to this piece.
I didn't know you have another site beyond shutter. It looks wonderful.
This shot stopped me in my thoughts, Chris. Exceptional in all aspects. Just love it.
This is incredibly beautiful - the tones are awesome!


ANITA MICHELLE WESTER has an office in Riviera Beach, Florida and provides counseling and/or therapy for their clientele. ANITA MICHELLE WESTER is listed as a LMSW, but may provide additional support.
For detailed questions about ANITA MICHELLE WESTER's therapy practice, you should contact their Riviera Beach offices at 5614228259.
ANITA MICHELLE WESTER is local to the 33410-7417 area.
The Fix definitely wants its readers to submit authentic ANITA MICHELLE WESTER reviews, if you had a real-life experience as their client, or know a person who has. If you've gone to ANITA MICHELLE WESTER in Riviera Beach, Florida you are encouraged to share details about your experience, as long as you do not break confidentiality.
We also do not want you to reveal personal information or data about ANITA MICHELLE WESTER or any of their staff members, employees, clientele, or patients.
If you are the business owner or an authorized representative of ANITA MICHELLE WESTER, you may contact us to resolve problematic or false information, but we ask that you not write, copy, paste, or otherwise contribute promotional material about your own place of business (or the business that employs you).


Posted on 2nd November 2017 at 9:03 am.
Does your solution add to the problem?
In the same week, I had been reading about Nick Herbert and the ReplyASAP app he had developed to stop his son ignoring messages. Whichever side of the fence you sit on with this app (personally, I think my kids would kill me if I even considered subjecting them to something like this whereas my husband thinks it's a great idea), the fact remains that Nick developed an android app and his son has an iOS phone. These situations serve to emphasise that what is key is actually ensuring good solid architecture of projects to make sure that your solution is fit for purpose and doesn't add to the problem.
So many systems that set out to simplify a task ending up actually complicating things. Take a step back and remember, just because we can doesn't always mean we should. And the simplest solution is usually the best solution.


text:
Izavukonazol je organsko jedinjenje, koje sadrži 22 atoma ugljenika i ima molekulsku masu od 437,465 -{Da}-.

Osobine

Reference

Literatura

Spoljašnje veze

 -{Isavuconazole}-

Алкохоли
Органофлуориди
Нитрили
Тиазоли

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


The Stars Appeal provided a grant of £54,000 towards the construction and furnishing of the new Bereavement Suite which opened in 2010.
Relatives now have a dedicated supportive environment where they can pay their last respects to loved ones. The Suite has a welcoming new reception area and refurbished family rooms. It provides the hospital's dedicated bereavement team with first class facilities to work from which complement the professional service they provide to bereaved families.
This grant was made possible thanks to the generosity of local people remembering Salisbury District Hospital in their Wills. Legacy donations have long played an important role in funding additional facilities that make a lasting difference to local patients and their families. Find out more about leaving a gift to the hospital in your Will here.


Camilla Cream loves lima beans, but she never eats them because the other kids in her school don't like them. And Camilla Cream is very worried about what other people think of her. In fact, she's so worried that she's about to break out in a bad case of stripes."


text:
package net.spy.memcached;

import junit.framework.Assert;
import net.spy.memcached.collection.BaseIntegrationTest;

public class ArcusClientConnectTest extends BaseIntegrationTest {

	@Override
	protected void setUp() throws Exception {
		// This test assumes we use ZK
		openFromZK();
	}

	@Override
	protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
		// do nothing
	}

	public void testOpenAndWait() {
		ConnectionFactoryBuilder cfb = new ConnectionFactoryBuilder();
		ArcusClient client = ArcusClient.createArcusClient(ZK_HOST,
				ZK_SERVICE_ID, cfb);
		client.shutdown();
	}
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Christian Wichert (born. May 10, 1987) is a German professional ice hockey forward who is currently an Unrestricted Free Agent. He most recently played for EHC München of the Deutsche Eishockey Liga (DEL).

External links

1987 births
Augsburger Panther players
EHC München players
Iserlohn Roosters players
Living people
German ice hockey forwards


Theory , Shallow water exercises , Medium size kites, short lines , no board. Includes equipment and IKO Certification .
Deep water . Body Dragging , first time water start on the board. Includes equipment and IKO Certification .
Deep water , Water Starting , Maintain riding for longer distance. Controlled Stop. Includes equipment and IKO Certification .
2 days private lessons P1 & P2 , Includes equipment and IKO Certification.
3 days , private lessons , P1, P2 & P3.
Includes equipment and IKO Certification .
4 days, private lessons , P123 + upwind riding , learning transitions and theory of jumping. Includes equipment and IKO Certification .
Using a surf board , jibes , tacks and tricks.
If you forgot how to water start , ride upwind , transitions …etc.
An instructor will supervise you and give you some tips to improve your riding.
*Prices for advanced lessons are for using your own equipment if you need to use the school equipment price is +50% !


Looking for easy, fast, and safe ways to lose your belly fat? You've come to the right place.
But let's set a few things straight… a little bit of fat on your body isn't a bad thing. In fact, fat plays an essential role in proper nerve and brain functioning and for organ cushioning. But we all know the dangers of too much fat. It definitely won't make you any smarter nor any healthier.
Having too much fat, especially around the midsection, is an indication of poor health. It means you're at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease, hypertension and type-2 diabetes. So, you're in the right place if you're looking to shed off some of that flab—not only to slip into your favorite pair of jeans but also for your long term health.
Say 'no' to leisure eating.
Be intentional about your eating. This means the food choices you make are not a recreational activity you mindlessly use to fill the time. If you're bored, do some leisure walking or activity your enjoy instead.
Swear to live by the half-plate rule.
The half-plate rule states that half your lunch or dinner plate should be allotted for veggies, and that you should eat them first. Because they are packed with nutrients, rich in filling fibers, and low in calories, they are perfect for weight loss. You'll end up eating less calories if you have pre-filled you stomach with them too.
It seems only logical to think that if you starve yourself a little now and then, you'll end up slimmer. But practically speaking, this will only heighten your chances of overeating later in the day or later in the week. And, in truth, starving puts your body into a catabolic state, which can result in muscle loss and fat retention.
Cut back on salt and sugar.
One of the fastest and easiest ways to shrink your tummy is cutting back on salty foods and drinking more water. Salty foods cause water retention and bloating. Not good if you're trying to lose weight. Not good either if you're trying to be healthy either. Flush out the salt by drinking more water. Likewise, an excess of sugar, especially from sugary drinks and packaged snacks, is not good. It's one of the main things to leads to an increased accumulation of fat in your mid-section.
Stress is not only bad for your psyche but for your body too. First, when you are tense, your body starts to store fat in response to the increased stress hormones like cortisol. Second, stress tends to trigger poor eating habits in a lot of people. Thus, if you are under a high level of stress and trying to deal with your growing tummy fat, we suggest getting to the root of the problem. It's time to chill out and relax! Take a break, sleep, and meditate.
Have a structured walking program.
Yeah, we've all heard that you don't have the time to spend in the gym. But you can't stay healthy if you don't move. Good news! An International Journal of Obesity study showed that three hour-long walks in a week had a considerable effect on 113 subjects who were at high risk of type 2-diabetes. It significantly decreased their cholesterol levels and belly fat. So, yes, you still need to exercise. But you can do it leisurely while walking and you don't have to go to the gym.
Do weights first, then cardio.
If you love to hit the gym or you're simply serious about making a lifestyle change, make sure you do weight lifting exercises before your cardio. The rationale behind it is that when you run, bike, or row after hitting the weights, it will cause a larger amount of fat to be burned. And, of course, it's harder and riskier to lift weights when you're quite fatigued from all the running, biking, or rowing.
Proteins are a lot better than carbohydrates. First, they help you feel full longer. Second, the body burns more calories in breaking them down than it does with carbohydrates (and fats, too). Third, they don't cause insulin spikes the way refined carbs do. High levels of insulin have been linked to more tummy flab. Protein, on the other hand, will keep your metabolism fired up all day long. So crack some eggs or grab a protein shake.
Go unrefined – carbs, that is.
This may seem like a contradiction to the previous tip, but not really. In fact, women who boast of slim, toned waistlines have carbohydrates as a dietary staple. What we're saying is ditch the refined, high-glycemic carbs — the white and sugary types — in favor of whole grain types. Between white bread and wheat bread, white rice and brown rice, always choose the latter. These complex carbohydrates help to regulate your insulin levels and provide your body a sustained release of energy, no sugar crashes!
If you're ready to throw in the towel because you can't imagine giving up your favorite chips and cookies, don't. You can play smart by splitting one serving into small portions. This way, you can make your tummy-trimming plans more sustainable.
If you're ready to go full throttle in ditching unhealthy snacks, replace them with non-starchy vegetables. Aside from helping you trim off the tummy fat, you reduce liver fat and develop better insulin sensitivity. A Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics study showed that eating more non-starchy veggies caused a 17% decrease in visceral fat in overweight kids. Kid or not, reach out for broccoli, cauliflower, cucumber, spinach, mushrooms, peppers, and tomatoes for snacks.
A quarter-cup serving of sunflower seeds offers a mere 200 calories and provide 3 grams of fiber. Weight loss experts also love them because they supply a fair share of magnesium which helps boost lipolysis, a process wherein the body releases fat from its stores, great for getting rid of that unwanted tummy bulge.
Eat some raspberries and blueberries.
Raspberries are nature's magical weight loss pill. They are filling and a rich source of ketones — antioxidants that burn stored fat cells. They are also crammed with polyphenols that target the formation of fat cells and that zap abdominal fat, see ya pooch! Blueberries, on the other hand, switch on your get-lean genes. As an added bonus, they ward off and reverse age-related health problems such as memory loss and declined motor coordination.


Lots of business managers or family planners think to themselves what moving corporations near me will offer the best combination of care and the expediency needed to make transfer, transportation, or migration of services a seamless, hassle free enterprise? If at any time of the planning procedure, the thought of employing a moving service has crossed your mind, and to go even further, your decision is for a local "moving company near you" you can rest your mind, and give the wheels of your transportation to us, lay back, and watch our team of consummate experts get to work.
Moving takes a lot of effort and physical stress. From the day of the move leading up to where you'll be unpacking and coordinating stuff causes just as much physical exertion. In cases like this, having the help of someone who can get the work done efficiently may make a major difference. Today, there are professional furniture movers who are geared up to make these activities smooth sailing. Aside from loading and unloading huge furniture effortlessly, professional movers may also offer suitable packing materials that you may not have. In our company, as an example, our team of movers may offer huge boxes that will properly hold huge pieces of art. We understand your need for delicate handling of precious items, and because of that, we guarantee a risk-free trip to make your mind at ease of our service.
Do you want moving services for your businesses' expansion project, or perhaps, you have finally made a decision to make the cross-country move permanent? While you may not give more than a passing thought to your preference of moving services, your preference can spell doom for your enterprise if your hire fails to meet the international standards of haulage and transportation. Experience, referrals, strength of fleet, proximity-these are a few of the aspects to take into account when thinking on a moving service for your company or personal needs. Don't leave your preference of movers and packers to a mere roll of the dice, or worse, a quick scan on the first page of Google; do your homework.
Don't make the thought of cross country move stress you. This is because our packing and moving service is here to give you a realistic yet very precious service that is suitable to all your transfer and transporting needs. Our aim is to provide the best reliable moving service that you can depend upon in times of moving across the state, or from one state to another. We have a professional team of cross country movers, who continued to boost their skills and knowledge in this line of service to ensure that you get 100% customer satisfaction and make your move a relaxing experience.
Are you planning to move to another state? Our local moving service is here to assist you. Our services are not only about making your transfer efforts comfortable and effective, but also to ensure that everything is covered, including observance of federal laws related to interstate transport of items. Compared to other cross country moving corporations, our local company is nonetheless your wisest preference because of our affordable moving quotes and accessible customer service. Since we are local, you can very easily contact us when necessary, and it is going to be easier for us to communicate about the terms and conditions of our transfer service.
House or office transfer must be, not just sleek and effective, but also with extreme care, so as not to incur needless charges during this significant period of time. Furniture removal, storage and movement is so frequently treated with laxity; resulting in spoilage, loss, and a number of negative drawbacks, simply as you have made the incorrect preference of moving service. Keep your belongings safe and sound throughout the course of your movement-safe from natural elements, impediment by customs, or ruined by careless handling. Let us deal with your furniture removal and transfer, while you travel through more complex aspects if your huge move.
A specialist moving service is really important if you'd like to do an office transfer, house transportation, college move or simply haulage of goods. Essentially, this type of service is essential as it will cover the hard work, the moving and the bureaucratic nature of customs and border patrol. It is factual that there are tons of moving services across the country, but it's safer to research before you decide to commit your items to the hands of a moving service. You must take into account the pricing, fleet of vehicle, brand of movers, history in addition to their knowledge of custom laws before you decide to choose. When you put all of these together, we will offer unmatched and hard to beat services with the best rates making us the best moving service.
The dirty waters of international travelling may be quite confusing specifically with regards to the transport of goods. Clearance from customs and all other forms of navigation of bureaucratic hoops are very easily completed by us. We ensure your goods and possessions and movables get where they should be properly and timely. You'll need not worry about how you'll move a precious precious to a country of your preference as we can handle that competently. The veracity of our dependability claims is undoubted as we've got completed this for a lot of years with satisfaction guaranteed by lots of clients. Call us nowadays and we are going to help you move what needs to be moved to where it should be.
It is challenging to move from one state to another, specifically in case you have lots of items that you must transfer. It is going to also be challenging to find a moving service to assist you because there are some corporations that do not offer interstate moving. It is an excellent thing that there are some that may provide state to state moving services, but you must be wary as there are some that can't be trusted.
You are going to have to keep all your options open and make certain that you do your research if you'd like to find the best and the most affordable mover.
Moving may be very costly and we all know this so a lot of people are currently looking for budget movers. Nevertheless, it's not an excellent idea to simply rely on these movers, specifically in case you have tons of options available.
We all realize that you want to find wonderful bang for your buck, specifically if you are going to move from one city to another, but you have to make certain that you can still acquire the best services for your move.
You must understand that most budget movers are guilty of not treating your items and possessions the way they have to be treated and they might violate safety recommendations during the move and your items might go missing. It is essential that you pay attention to both the price of the services and the track record of the moving firm.


I wanted to develop a bit further on my "comment" responding to Baz's Local/Global post — specifically his emphasis on the inherent theatricality of our chosen sites. This is very apparent at the Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal estate especially, which is essentially a giant, eighteenth-century stage set, built with living materials. Take a look at this "Surprise View" of the Abbey down the Skell valley, specifically engineered as part of the estate's picturesque landscaping.
I couldn't help wondering how many other 425-year-old wooden stage sets there are left in the world — this one is apparently supposed to represent the Thebes of "Oedipus Rex" (the theatre's first production), lovingly preserved in suspended animation. But the fragile scenery has been able to survive in part because it is so well-protected from exterior elements: the Teatro Olimpico was built within the so solid walls of Vicenza's former city jail (there's a pun here somewhere on 'captive audiences' that I'm not bright enough to figure out just now).
A few days later I saw Giotto's extraordinary Chapel Scrovegni in Padua – commissioned by the Scrovegni family around 1300 to atone for the sins of their usurer patriarch (so bad he gets a namecheck in Dante's Inferno). Giotto painted images from the lives of Mary and Jesus from floor to ceiling on every wall of the chapel, and added a star-studded sky across the vault that is still the most stunning azure blue after 700 years. (A theatrical space if ever there was one.) But some of the images have decayed somewhat, and not so long ago it was realised that this was because of external atmospheric pollution. After a major renovation a few years ago, visitors are now admitted to the chapel in groups at 20 minute intervals – having sat for the same period in a sort of air-lock space, watching a video about the chapel's history. This zoning phase allows the exterior air that visitors have brought in with them to be filtered out, thereby protecting what they call the "micro-climate" of the chapel itself. An attempt precisely to *arrest* environmental change in a controlled, enclosed space.
Of course, the same cannot be done for the similarly aged Fountains Abbey. I'm reliably informed that bits of the over 800-year old masonry have just been falling off it this year — as the medieval mortar expands and contracts with the rapid temperature fluctuations that we've experienced during the spring and summer. Fountains exists in a "microclimate" of its own — a characteristically damp one, given the way that clouds come across the narrow Skell valley and drop their loads, and the rainwater then drains down the steep hillsides into the river itself. But even after the devastating flooding of 2007, the sheer dryness of this year has left no ground moisture to speak of. There's little flow to the river, and the Georgian lakes are clogged with weed as a result. This microclimate, needless to say, cannot be regulated by airlocks, and so this ancient, very vulnerable "stage set" is increasingly being subjected to erratically destructive exterior forces.
Having now visited Fountains I would agree with the idea that it bears the marks of an 18th century theatricalisation, a narrative of unfolding views, of stripped down sublime ruins and geometrical-symbolic plantings and excavations and halting of flow (reflections as impossible stages) – BUT, what also struck me was that there is almost nothing in the way of a script provided. The modern paths down to the 'site' from the Visitors Centre are misleadingly efficient and non-preparatory. Signs and written materials provide hints, but no coherence narrative of the drama of moving through the site. Perhaps what dominates is a kind of democratised-picturesque in which the visitor gets too close to the geometrical shapings and too enctangled in the ruins of scared/restricted chancels and backstages – is this what generates an encounter that some of saw on the edge of the deer park; a stag alternating between grazing and staring at the visitors gathering a few feet away to photograph it. Too welcoming, too empathetic, too sentimental. Little sense of ruin, ruined, ruining.


Gluten Free - What can I eat? Daily menu plans.: New Chex flavor.
My husband and son both like this. I personally prefer the plain Cinnamon. I'm glad to see companies branching out and offering more choices. I do wish there were better standards for certification of gluten free status because I know some people are sensitive and do react to some of these mainstream products. We don't seem to, thankfully.


text:
(function main(F) {
    'use strict';

    if (F.InstantiationError) {
        return;
    }

    F.InstantiationError = F.Error.create({
        name: 'FrankenScript.InstantiationError',
        messageComposer: composeMessage,
    });

    function composeMessage(params) {

        switch (true) {

            case 'undefined' === typeof params.functionName:
                throw new F.RequiredParamError(
                    'params.functionName is required');
            case 'string' !== typeof params.functionName:
                throw new F.TypeError({
                    functionName: 'new FrankenScript.InstantiationError()',
                    argumentName: 'params.functionName',
                    argumentValue: params.functionName,
                    argumentExpectedType: String,
                });

            case 'undefined' !== typeof params.isExecutable
                && true !== params.isExecutable
                && false !== params.isExecutable:
                throw new F.TypeError({
                    functionName: 'new FrankenScript.InstantiationError()',
                    argumentName: 'params.isExecutable',
                    argumentValue: params.isExecutable,
                    argumentExpectedType: Boolean,
                });
        }

        var helpMessage;

        switch (true) {
            case params.isExecutable:
                helpMessage = 'But it can be executed like'
                    + ' `' + params.functionName + '(...args...)`';
                break;
        }

        return params.functionName + ' cannot be instantiated like'
            + ' `new ' + params.functionName + '()`'
            + '\n\t' + helpMessage;
    }

}(FrankenScript));


text:
Wal-mart heirs buy control of Rapha cycling brand
The new owner of Rapha has finally been revealed with RZC investments reported to have paid around £200 million for control of the brand.
The buy means Rapha has strengthened its leadership position in cycle clothing, accessories and lifestyle and will be ablw to fulfil its growth ambitions with investment from the US-based investment firm, which is now the majority shareholder in the business.
Founder Simon Mottram will remain as chief executive and has retained a significant part of his minority stake in the business after the buyout by the comapny that is owned by two grandsons of Wal-mart founder Sam Walton.
The company plans to expand abroad with new stores and the US is likely to be a major focus.
Rapha has made a major impact in recent years with the application of fashion to cycle clothing and a whole lifestyle offer that includes events, club membership, cafés and a wide range of cycling-linked products.
Additional reporting by Sandra Halliday


More likely to respond through messenger.
My value criterion is maximizing pleasure.
I haven't said much about metaethics - the nature of morality - because that has a forward dependency on a discussion of the Mind Projection Fallacy that I haven't gotten to yet. I used to be very confused about metaethics. After my confusion finally cleared up, I did a postmortem on my previous thoughts. I found that my object-level moral reasoning had been valuable and my meta-level moral reasoning had been worse than useless. And this appears to be a general syndrome - people do much better when discussing whether torture is good or bad than when they discuss the meaning of "good" and "bad". Thus, I deem it prudent to keep moral discussions on the object level wherever I possibly can. Occasionally people object to any discussion of morality on the grounds that morality doesn't exist, and in lieu of jumping over the forward dependency to explain that "exist" is not the right term to use here, I generally say, "But what do you do anyway?" and take the discussion back down to the object level. Paul Gowder, though, has pointed out that both the idea of choosing a googolplex dust specks in a googolplex eyes over 50 years of torture for one person, and the idea of "utilitarianism", depend on "intuition". He says I've argued that the two are not compatible, but charges me with failing to argue for the utilitarian intuitions that I appeal to. Now "intuition" is not how I would describe the computations that underlie human morality and distinguish us, as moralists, from an ideal philosopher of perfect emptiness and/or a rock. But I am okay with using the word "intuition" as a term of art, bearing in mind that "intuition" in this sense is not to be contrasted to reason, but is, rather, the cognitive building block out of which both long verbal arguments and fast perceptual arguments are constructed. I see the project of morality as a project of renormalizing intuition. We have intuitions about things that seem desirable or undesirable, intuitions about actions that are right or wrong, intuitions about how to resolve conflicting intuitions, intuitions about how to systematize specific intuitions into general principles. Delete all the intuitions, and you aren't left with an ideal philosopher of perfect emptiness, you're left with a rock. Keep all your specific intuitions and refuse to build upon the reflective ones, and you aren't left with an ideal philosopher of perfect spontaneity and genuineness, you're left with a grunting caveperson running in circles, due to cyclical preferences and similar inconsistencies. "Intuition", as a term of art, is not a curse word when it comes to morality - there is nothing else to argue from. Even modus ponens is an "intuition" in this sense - it's just that modus ponens still seems like a good idea after being formalized, reflected on, extrapolated out to see if it has sensible consequences, etcetera. So that is "intuition". However, Gowder did not say what he meant by "utilitarianism". Does utilitarianism say... That right actions are strictly determined by good consequences? That praiseworthy actions depend on justifiable expectations of good consequences? That probabilities of consequences should normatively be discounted by their probability, so that a 50 probability of something bad should weigh exactly half as much in our tradeoffs? That virtuous actions always correspond to maximizing expected utility under some utility function? That two harmful events are worse than one? That two independent occurrences of a harm (not to the same person, not interacting with each other) are exactly twice as bad as one? That for any two harms A and B, with A much worse than B, there exists some tiny probability such that gambling on this probability of A is preferable to a certainty of B? If you say that I advocate something, or that my argument depends on something, and that it is wrong, do please specify what this thingy is... anyway, I accept 3, 5, 6, and 7, but not 4; I am not sure about the phrasing of 1; and 2 is true, I guess, but phrased in a rather solipsistic and selfish fashion: you should not worry about being praiseworthy. Now, what are the "intuitions" upon which my "utilitarianism" depends? This is a deepish sort of topic, but I'll take a quick stab at it. First of all, it's not just that someone presented me with a list of statements like those above, and I decided which ones sounded "intuitive". Among other things, if you try to violate "utilitarianism", you run into paradoxes, contradictions, circular preferences, and other things that aren't symptoms of moral wrongness so much as moral incoherence. After you think about moral problems for a while, and also find new truths about the world, and even discover disturbing facts about how you yourself work, you often end up with different moral opinions than when you started out. This does not quite define moral progress, but it is how we experience moral progress. As part of my experienced moral progress, I've drawn a conceptual separation between questions of type Where should we go? and questions of type How should we get there? (Could that be what Gowder means by saying I'm "utilitarian"?) The question of where a road goes - where it leads - you can answer by traveling the road and finding out. If you have a false belief about where the road leads, this falsity can be destroyed by the truth in a very direct and straightforward manner. When it comes to wanting to go to a particular place, this want is not entirely immune from the destructive powers of truth. You could go there and find that you regret it afterward (which does not define moral error, but is how we experience moral error). But, even so, wanting to be in a particular place seems worth distinguishing from wanting to take a particular road to a particular place. Our intuitions about where to go are arguable enough, but our intuitions about how to get there are frankly messed up. After the two hundred and eighty-seventh research study showing that people will chop their own feet off if you frame the problem the wrong way, you start to distrust first impressions. When you've read enough research on scope insensitivity - people will pay only 28 more to protect all 57 wilderness areas in Ontario than one area, people will pay the same amount to save 50,000 lives as 5,000 lives... that sort of thing... Well, the worst case of scope insensitivity I've ever heard of was described here by Slovic: Other recent research shows similar results. Two Israeli psychologists asked people to contribute to a costly life-saving treatment. They could offer that contribution to a group of eight sick children, or to an individual child selected from the group. The target amount needed to save the child (or children) was the same in both cases. Contributions to individual group members far outweighed the contributions to the entire group. There's other research along similar lines, but I'm just presenting one example, 'cause, y'know, eight examples would probably have less impact. If you know the general experimental paradigm, then the reason for the above behavior is pretty obvious - focusing your attention on a single child creates more emotional arousal than trying to distribute attention around eight children simultaneously. So people are willing to pay more to help one child than to help eight. Now, you could look at this intuition, and think it was revealing some kind of incredibly deep moral truth which shows that one child's good fortune is somehow devalued by the other children's good fortune. But what about the billions of other children in the world? Why isn't it a bad idea to help this one child, when that causes the value of all the other children to go down? How can it be significantly better to have 1,329,342,410 happy children than 1,329,342,409, but then somewhat worse to have seven more at 1,329,342,417? Or you could look at that and say: "The intuition is wrong: the brain can't successfully multiply by eight and get a larger quantity than it started with. But it ought to, normatively speaking." And once you realize that the brain can't multiply by eight, then the other cases of scope neglect stop seeming to reveal some fundamental truth about 50,000 lives being worth just the same effort as 5,000 lives, or whatever. You don't get the impression you're looking at the revelation of a deep moral truth about nonagglomerative utilities. It's just that the brain doesn't goddamn multiply. Quantities get thrown out the window. If you have $100 to spend, and you spend $20 each on each of 5 efforts to save 5,000 lives, you will do worse than if you spend $100 on a single effort to save 50,000 lives. Likewise if such choices are made by 10 different people, rather than the same person. As soon as you start believing that it is better to save 50,000 lives than 25,000 lives, that simple preference of final destinations has implications for the choice of paths, when you consider five different events that save 5,000 lives. (It is a general principle that Bayesians see no difference between the long-run answer and the short-run answer; you never get two different answers from computing the same question two different ways. But the long run is a helpful intuition pump, so I am talking about it anyway.) The aggregative valuation strategy of "shut up and multiply" arises from the simple preference to have more of something - to save as many lives as possible - when you have to describe general principles for choosing more than once, acting more than once, planning at more than one time. Aggregation also arises from claiming that the local choice to save one life doesn't depend on how many lives already exist, far away on the other side of the planet, or far away on the other side of the universe. Three lives are one and one and one. No matter how many billions are doing better, or doing worse. 3 = 1 + 1 + 1, no matter what other quantities you add to both sides of the equation. And if you add another life you get 4 = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1. That's aggregation. When you've read enough heuristics and biases research, and enough coherence and uniqueness proofs for Bayesian probabilities and expected utility, and you've seen the "Dutch book" and "money pump" effects that penalize trying to handle uncertain outcomes any other way, then you don't see the preference reversals in the Allais Paradox as revealing some incredibly deep moral truth about the intrinsic value of certainty. It just goes to show that the brain doesn't goddamn multiply. The primitive, perceptual intuitions that make a choice "feel good" don't handle probabilistic pathways through time very skillfully, especially when the probabilities have been expressed symbolically rather than experienced as a frequency. So you reflect, devise more trustworthy logics, and think it through in words. When you see people insisting that no amount of money whatsoever is worth a single human life, and then driving an extra mile to save $10; or when you see people insisting that no amount of money is worth a decrement of health, and then choosing the cheapest health insurance available; then you don't think that their protestations reveal some deep truth about incommensurable utilities. Part of it, clearly, is that primitive intuitions don't successfully diminish the emotional impact of symbols standing for small quantities - anything you talk about seems like "an amount worth considering". And part of it has to do with preferring unconditional social rules to conditional social rules. Conditional rules seem weaker, seem more subject to manipulation. If there's any loophole that lets the government legally commit torture, then the government will drive a truck through that loophole. So it seems like there should be an unconditional social injunction against preferring money to life, and no "but" following it. Not even "but a thousand dollars isn't worth a 0.0000000001 probability of saving a life". Though the latter choice, of course, is revealed every time we sneeze without calling a doctor. The rhetoric of sacredness gets bonus points for seeming to express an unlimited commitment, an unconditional refusal that signals trustworthiness and refusal to compromise. So you conclude that moral rhetoric espouses qualitative distinctions, because espousing a quantitative tradeoff would sound like you were plotting to defect. On such occasions, people vigorously want to throw quantities out the window, and they get upset if you try to bring quantities back in, because quantities sound like conditions that would weaken the rule. But you don't conclude that there are actually two tiers of utility with lexical ordering. You don't conclude that there is actually an infinitely sharp moral gradient, some atom that moves a Planck distance (in our continuous physical universe) and sends a utility from 0 to infinity. You don't conclude that utilities must be expressed using hyper-real numbers. Because the lower tier would simply vanish in any equation. It would never be worth the tiniest effort to recalculate for it. All decisions would be determined by the upper tier, and all thought spent thinking about the upper tier only, if the upper tier genuinely had lexical priority. As Peter Norvig once pointed out, if Asimov's robots had strict priority for the First Law of Robotics ("A robot shall not harm a human being, nor through inaction allow a human being to come to harm") then no robot's behavior would ever show any sign of the other two Laws; there would always be some tiny First Law factor that would be sufficient to determine the decision. Whatever value is worth thinking about at all, must be worth trading off against all other values worth thinking about, because thought itself is a limited resource that must be traded off. When you reveal a value, you reveal a utility. I don't say that morality should always be simple. I've already said that the meaning of music is more than happiness alone, more than just a pleasure center lighting up. I would rather see music composed by people than by nonsentient machine learning algorithms, so that someone should have the joy of composition; I care about the journey, as well as the destination. And I am ready to hear if you tell me that the value of music is deeper, and involves more complications, than I realize - that the valuation of this one event is more complex than I know. But that's for one event. When it comes to multiplying by quantities and probabilities, complication is to be avoided - at least if you care more about the destination than the journey. When you've reflected on enough intuitions, and corrected enough absurdities, you start to see a common denominator, a meta-principle at work, which one might phrase as "Shut up and multiply." Where music is concerned, I care about the journey. When lives are at stake, I shut up and multiply. It is more important that lives be saved, than that we conform to any particular ritual in saving them. And the optimal path to that destination is governed by laws that are simple, because they are math. And that's why I'm a utilitarian - at least when I am doing something that is overwhelmingly more important than my own feelings about it - which is most of the time, because there are not many utilitarians, and many things left undone.
a. Prefer this because it is specific to the constitutive role of government as a moral agent. Different entities have different moral functions so only util is applicable to governments - any other framework can't meet the needs of governmental policy tradeoffs.
I'll defend implementation of the whole res via normal means and reserve the right to spec and define. CX checks on theory and T interps and allow me to concede to them to deter frivolous theory debates.
Presidents are not required to pass mental health exams or psychological and psychiatric evaluations before taking office in the United States. But some Americans and members of Congress have called for such mental health exams for candidates following the 2016 election of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. The idea of requiring presidential candidates to undergo mental health exams is not new, though. In the mid-1990s, former President Jimmy Carter pushed for the creation of a panel of physicians who would routinely evaluate the most powerful politician in the free world and decide whether their judgment was clouded by a mental disability. "Many people have called to my attention the continuing danger to our nation from the possibility of a U.S. president becoming disabled, particularly by a neurologic illness," Carter wrote in a December 1994 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. Why the President's Mental Health Should Be Monitored Carter's suggestion led to the creation in 1994 of the Working Group on Presidential Disability, whose members later proposed a nonpartisan, standing medical commission "to monitor the president's health and issue periodic reports to the country." Carter envisioned a panel of expert physicians who were not directly involved in the care of the president determining whether he had a disability. "If the president of the United States must decide within minutes how to respond to a dire emergency, its citizens expect them him or her to be mentally competent and to act wisely," wrote Dr. James Toole, a professor of neurology at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center in North Carolina who worked with the working group. "Because the presidency of the United States is now the world's most powerful office, should its incumbent become even temporarily unable to exercise good judgment, the consequences for the world could be unimaginably far-reaching." There is currently no such standing medical commission in place, however, to observe a sitting president's decision-making. The sole test of a candidate's physical and mental fitness to serve in the White House is the rigor of the campaign trail and elector process. Why Mental Fitness Became an Issue in the Trump Era The idea of requiring presidential candidates to undergo mental health evaluations arose in the general election campaign of 2016, primarily because of Republican nominee Donald Trump's erratic behavior and numerous incendiary comments. Trump's mental fitness became a central issue of the campaign and became more pronounced after he took office. A member of Congress, Democrat Karen Bass of California, called for a mental-health evaluation of Trump before the election, saying the billionaire real-estate development and reality-television star exhibits signs of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. In a petition seeking the evaluation, Bass called Trump "dangerous for our country. His impulsiveness and lack of control over his own emotions are of concern. It is our patriotic duty to raise the question of his mental stability to be the commander in chief and leader of the free world." The petition carried no legal weight. A lawmaker from the opposing political party, Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives during Trump's first year in office encouraging the vice president and the Cabinet to hire medical and psychiatric professionals to evaluate the president. The resolution stated: "President Donald J. Trump has exhibited an alarming pattern of behavior and speech causing concern that a mental disorder may have rendered him unfit and unable to fulfill his Constitutional duties."
Recently, 27 qualified psychiatrists warned that Donald Trump is mentally ill, and another 60,000-plus mental health professionals also signed a petition to that effect. At this point, it cannot be denied: Trump's conduct as president (including his endless Twitter screeds and his voluminous use of lies to bolster his demagogic rhetoric) is dangerously destabilizing and brings shame to our country. His taunting of Kim Jong-Un over Twitter and his cavalier invocations of the power he has to annihilate hundreds of thousands of people on the Korean peninsula with the push of a "button" would by itself disqualify him for the presidency — if these were normal times. But these are not normal times. In normal times, the Republican Party would have been strong enough to resist a take-over by a vulgar, morally bankrupt and profoundly ignorant man like Donald Trump. In better times Republicans would have been willing to stand up to a president (even from their own party) who sought to use the presidency as a way to enrich himself and, through the Department of Justice, to settle personal and political scores. But in the face of mounting evidence of corruption and the abuse of presidential powers, in the face of undeniable evidence that the president of the United States is mentally unstable and manifestly unfit to be the commander in chief of the mightiest military in the history of the world, Republicans remain largely silent. Instead, they vote to take away people's health care and give tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans while the people who voted them into office continue to live with stagnant wages and crumbling infrastructure — but might, as consolation, content themselves with the dream of a border wall and the hope that Planned Parenthood won't be able to perform abortions anymore. If the world survives Trump's presidency, he is sure to be reviled by historians as the president who brought us closer to dictatorship and political ruin than any of his predecessors — but not without the help of Republicans who had the power to intervene but did not. Our children and our grandchildren (whom we must now depend upon to usher in more hopeful, sane, and productive days) will wonder how one of our political parties became so narrow-minded and myopic that it allowed itself to be commandeered by a "hollow man," a preening, vapid authoritarian, easily manipulated by the likes of Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping and a young, relatively inexperienced, dictator ruling over one of the most oppressed and isolated countries in the world. Legitimate arguments can already be made for impeachment. Regardless of whether or not these arguments persuade you, reader, you cannot deny that Trump now menaces the American people and the world at large with his fantasy of bullying an emerging nuclear power into submission over social media. None of us can ignore the relief we felt last week when it turned out the president of the United States was otherwise occupied with his golf game, leaving Hawaiian officials to sort out for themselves whether or not they were actually under nuclear attack. This is the hard truth: Donald Trump poses as an ongoing existential threat to the world — and that is not likely to change. We can continue our disagreements and battles over public policy after Trump is gone. But for now we must come together as a people to protect our planet and our posterity.
Lofgren said she drafted the resolution in light of what she described as Trump's "increasingly disturbing pattern of actions and public statements that suggest he may be mentally unfit to execute the duties required of him." The resolution did not come up for a vote in the House. It would have sought the removal of Trump from office by employing the 25th Amendment to the Constitution, which allows for the replacement of presidents who become physically or mentally unable to serve. Trump Declines to Make Health Records Public Some candidates have chosen to make their health records public, particularly when serious questions have been raised about their well being. The 2008 Republican presidential nominee, John McCain, did so in the face of questions about his age - he was 72 at the time - and previous ailments including skin cancer. And in the 2016 election, Trump released a letter from his physician that described the candidate as being in "extraordinary" health both mentally and physically. "If elected, Mr. Trump, I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency," wrote Trump's doctor. Trump himself said: "I am fortunate to have been blessed with great genes --- both of my parents had very long and productive lives." But Trump did not release detailed records about his health. Psychiatrists Can't Diagnose Candidates The American Psychiatric Association banned its members from offering opinions about elected officials or candidates for office after 1964, when a group of them called Republican Barry Goldwater unfit for office. Wrote the association: "On occasion psychiatrists are asked for an opinion about an individual who is in the light of public attention or who has disclosed information about himself/herself through public media. In such circumstances, a psychiatrist may share with the public his or her expertise about psychiatric issues in general. However, it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement." Who Decides When a President Is Unfit to Serve So if there's no mechanism in place by which an independent panel of health experts is able to evaluate a sitting president, who decides when there might be a problem with his decision-making process? The president themself himself, which is the problem. Presidents have gone out of their way to hide their ailments from the public and, more importantly, their political enemies. Among the most notable in modern history was John F. Kennedy, who didn't let the public know about his colitis, prostatitis, Addison's disease and osteoporosis of the lower back. While those ailments certainly would not have precluded him from taking office, Kennedy's failure reluctance to disclose the pain he suffered illustrate the lengths to which presidents go to conceal health problems. Section 3 of the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified in 1967, allows a sitting president, members of his cabinet - or, in extraordinary circumstances, Congress - to transfer his responsibilities to his vice president until he has recovered from a mental or physical ailment. The amendment reads, in part: "Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President." The problem with the constitutional amendment, however, is that it relies on a president or his cabinet to determine when he is unable to perform the duties of the office.
Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren said it's time to use constitutional powers to remove President Donald Trump. Speaking to CNN, Warren said the op-ed published this week from an anonymous administration official is proof the 25th Amendment should come into play. "If senior administration officials think the President of the United States is not able to do his job, then they should invoke the 25th Amendment," Warren said. "The Constitution provides for a procedure whenever the Vice President and senior officials think the President can't do his job. It does not provide that senior officials go around the President...take documents off his desk, write anonymous op-eds ... Everyone of these officials have sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States. It's time for them to do their job." The 25th Amendment provides a method by which a sitting president can be removed from office. Specifically, the Amendment states: "Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President." The amendment also provides a venue for a Congressional hearing on presidential fitness. Warren told CNN it is incumbent on administration officials to remove Trump from office if they believe he cannot do the job, even at the risk of Constitutional crisis. "What kind of a crisis do we have if senior officials believe that the President can't do his job and then refuse to follow the rules that have been laid down in the Constitution?" said Warren, a likely 2020 presidential contender for the Democrats. "They can't have it both ways. Either they think that the President is not capable of doing his job in which case they follow the rules in the Constitution, or they feel that the President is capable of doing his job, in which case they follow what the President tells them to do." Warren's comments aren't the first time Democrats have floated the idea of removing Trump via the 25th Amendment. Last year, a group of Democrats unsuccessfully pushed for a bill to create a panel to examine the president's fitness for office and explore options for removing him.
Ironically, secrecy has made the most dramatic comeback in the country that purports to be the most democratic. Even before the al Qaeda aĴacks, the Bush administration claimed executive privilege in several high-profile requests for information, fighting off congressional calls for the names of private-sector advisors on energy policy and stalling the release of Reagan-era documents under the Presidential Records Act. But September 11 turned this tendency into a habit, sometimes justifiably (as in details of special operations in Afghanistan) but more often reflexively: In recent months, White House officials granted former presidents veto power over release of their administrations' records, ordered agencies to use the most restrictive and legalistic response possible for FOIA requests, and denounced leaks even as mayors and local law enforcement complained about the federal government's failure to share information. The Bush administration's secrecy obsession will likely prove self-defeating, because like markets, governments don't work well in secret. The most effective opponents of the president's yen for secret military tribunals were not civil libertarians but career government prosecutors and military lawyers, who insisted on more open trials and more due process on legal and constitutional grounds, as well as for reasons of efficiency. The prosecutors know what President Bush does not — that openness fights terrorism by empowering citizens, weeding out the worst policies, and holding officials accountable (not least the foreign despots who are now temporary U.S. allies in the war against terrorism). More broadly, the motivations behind the freedom-of-information movement in countries outside the United States generally remain unchanged by the war on terrorism. Openness advocates are successfully challengesng entrenched state and bureaucratic power by arguing that the public's right to know is not just a moral imperative; it is also an indispensable tool for thwarting corruption, waste, and poor governance.
Disclosing sources and ending dark money is key to democracy—it fosters accountability and removes toxic polarization.
This card says its bad because then u have all these corporations dominating politics and we need to know about these things otherwise it will lead to corruption because of not disclosing the corporations that are corrupt.
Barma et al 16 Naazneen Barma, PhD in Political Science from UC-Berkeley, Assistant Professor of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School, Brent Durbin, PhD in Political Science from UC-Berkeley, Professor of Government at Smith College, Eric Lorber, JD from UPenn and PhD in Political Science from Duke, Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, Rachel Whitlark, PhD in Political Science from GWU, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow with the Project on Managing the Atom and International Security Program within the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard. "'Imagine a World in Which': Using Scenarios in Political Science" International Studies Perspectives 17 (2), pp. 1-19. May 2016.
What Are Scenarios and Why Use Them in Political Science? Scenario analysis is perceived most commonly as a technique for examining the robustness of strategy. It can immerse decision makers in future states that go beyond conventional extrapolations of current trends, preparing them to take advantage of unexpected opportunities and to protect themselves from adverse exogenous shocks. The global petroleum company Shell, a pioneer of the technique, characterizes scenario analysis as the art of considering "what if" questions about possible future worlds. Scenario analysis is thus typically seen as serving the purposes of corporate planning or as a policy tool to be used in combination with simulations of decision making. Yet scenario analysis is not inherently limited to these uses. This section provides a brief overview of the practice of scenario analysis and the motivations underpinning its uses. It then makes a case for the utility of the technique for political science scholarship and describes how the scenarios deployed at NEFPC were created. The Art of Scenario Analysis We characterize scenario analysis as the art of juxtaposing current trends in unexpected combinations in order to articulate surprising and yet plausible futures, often referred to as "alternative worlds." Scenarios are thus explicitly not forecasts or projections based on linear extrapolations of contemporary patterns, and they are not hypothesis-based expert predictions. Nor should they be equated with simulations, which are best characterized as functional representations of real institutions or decision-making processes (Asal 2005). Instead, they are depictions of possible future states of the world, offered together with a narrative of the driving causal forces and potential exogenous shocks that could lead to those futures. Good scenarios thus rely on explicit causal propositions that, independent of one another, are plausible—yet, when combined, suggest surprising and sometimes controversial future worlds. For example, few predicted the dramatic fall in oil prices toward the end of 2014. Yet independent driving forces, such as the shale gas revolution in the United States, China's slowing economic growth, and declining conflict in major Middle Eastern oil producers such as Libya, were all recognized secular trends that—combined with OPEC's decision not to take concerted action as prices began to decline—came together in an unexpected way. While scenario analysis played a role in war gaming and strategic planning during the Cold War, the real antecedents of the contemporary practice are found in corporate futures studies of the late 1960s and early 1970s (Raskin et al. 2005). Scenario analysis was essentially initiated at Royal Dutch Shell in 1965, with the realization that the usual forecasting techniques and models were not capturing the rapidly changing environment in which the company operated (Wack 1985; Schwartz 1991). In particular, it had become evident that straight-line extrapolations of past global trends were inadequate for anticipating the evolving business environment. Shell-style scenario planning "helped break the habit, ingrained in most corporate planning, of assuming that the future will look much like the present" (Wilkinson and Kupers 2013, 4). Using scenario thinking, Shell anticipated the possibility of two Arab-induced oil shocks in the 1970s and hence was able to position itself for major disruptions in the global petroleum sector. Building on its corporate roots, scenario analysis has become a standard policymaking tool. For example, the Project on Forward Engagement advocates linking systematic foresight, which it defines as the disciplined analysis of alternative futures, to planning and feedback loops to better equip the United States to meet contemporary governance challenges (Fuerth 2011). Another prominent application of scenario thinking is found in the National Intelligence Council's series of Global Trends reports, issued every four years to aid policymakers in anticipating and planning for future challenges. These reports present a handful of "alternative worlds" approximately twenty years into the future, carefully constructed on the basis of emerging global trends, risks, and opportunities, and intended to stimulate thinking about geopolitical change and its effects.4 As with corporate scenario analysis, the technique can be used in foreign policymaking for long-range general planning purposes as well as for anticipating and coping with more narrow and immediate challenges. An example of the latter is the German Marshall Fund's EuroFutures project, which uses four scenarios to map the potential consequences of the Euro-area financial crisis (German Marshall Fund 2013). Several features make scenario analysis particularly useful for policymaking.5 Long-term global trends across a number of different realms—social, technological, environmental, economic, and political—combine in often-unexpected ways to produce unforeseen challenges. Yet the ability of decision makers to imagine, let alone prepare for, discontinuities in the policy realm is constrained by their existing mental models and maps. This limitation is exacerbated by well-known cognitive bias tendencies such as groupthink and confirmation bias (Jervis 1976; Janis 1982; Tetlock 2005). The power of scenarios lies in their ability to help individuals break out of conventional modes of thinking and analysis by introducing unusual combinations of trends and deliberate discontinuities in narratives about the future. Imagining alternative future worlds through a structured analytical process enables policymakers to envision and thereby adapt to something altogether different from the known present. Designing Scenarios for Political Science Inquiry The characteristics of scenario analysis that commend its use to policymakers also make it well suited to helping political scientists generate and develop policy-relevant research programs. Scenarios are essentially textured, plausible, and relevant stories that help us imagine how the future political-economic world could be different from the past in a manner that highlights policy challenges and opportunities. For example, terrorist organizations are a known threat that have captured the attention of the policy community, yet our responses to them tend to be linear and reactive. Scenarios that explore how seemingly unrelated vectors of change—the rise of a new peer competitor in the East that diverts strategic attention, volatile commodity prices that empower and disempower various state and nonstate actors in surprising ways, and the destabilizing effects of climate change or infectious disease pandemics—can be useful for illuminating the nature and limits of the terrorist threat in ways that may be missed by a narrower focus on recognized states and groups. By illuminating the potential strategic significance of specific and yet poorly understood opportunities and threats, scenario analysis helps to identify crucial gaps in our collective understanding of global politicaleconomic trends and dynamics. The notion of "exogeneity"—so prevalent in social science scholarship—applies to models of reality, not to reality itself. Very simply, scenario analysis can throw into sharp relief often-overlooked yet pressing questions in international affairs that demand focused investigation. Scenarios thus offer, in principle, an innovative tool for developing a political science research agenda. In practice, achieving this objective requires careful tailoring of the approach. The specific scenario analysis technique we outline below was designed and refined to provides a structured experiential process for generating problem-based research questions with contemporary international policy relevance.6 The first step in the process of creating the scenario set described here was to identify important causal forces in contemporary global affairs. Consensus was not the goal; on the contrary, some of these causal statements represented competing theories about global change (e.g., a resurgence of the nation-state vs. border-evading globalizing forces). A major principle underpinning the transformation of these causal drivers into possible future worlds was to "simplify, then exaggerate" them, before fleshing out the emerging story with more details.7 Thus, the contours of the future world were drawn first in the scenario, with details about the possible pathways to that point filled in second. It is entirely possible, indeed probable, that some of the causal claims that turned into parts of scenarios were exaggerated so much as to be implausible, and that an unavoidable degree of bias or our own form of groupthink went into construction of the scenarios. One of the great strengths of scenario analysis, however, is that the scenario discussions themselves, as described below, lay bare these especially implausible claims and systematic biases.8 An explicit methodological approach underlies the written scenarios themselves as well as the analytical process around them—that of case-centered, structured, focused comparison, intended especially to shed light on new causal mechanisms (George and Bennett 2005). The use of scenarios is similar to counterfactual analysis in that it modifies certain variables in a given situation in order to analyze the resulting effects (Fearon 1991). Whereas counterfactuals are traditionally retrospective in nature and explore events that did not actually occur in the context of known history, our scenarios are deliberately forward-looking and are designed to explore potential futures that could unfold. As such, counterfactual analysis is especially well suited to identifying how individual events might expand or shift the "funnel of choices" available to political actors and thus lead to different historical outcomes (Nye 2005, 68–69), while forward-looking scenario analysis can better illuminate surprising intersections and sociopolitical dynamics without the perceptual constraints imposed by fine-grained historical knowledge. We see scenarios as a complementary resource for exploring these dynamics in international affairs, rather than as a replacement for counterfactual analysis, historical case studies, or other methodological tools. In the scenario process developed for NEFPC, three distinct scenarios are employed, acting as cases for analytical comparison. Each scenario, as detailed below, includes a set of explicit "driving forces" which represent hypotheses about causal mechanisms worth investigating in evolving international affairs. The scenario analysis process itself employs templates (discussed further below) to serve as a graphical representation of a structured, focused investigation and thereby as the research tool for conducting case-centered comparative analysis (George and Bennett 2005). In essence, these templates articulate key observable implications within the alternative worlds of the scenarios and serve as a framework for capturing the data that emerge (King, Keohane, and Verba 1994). Finally, this structured, focused comparison serves as the basis for the cross-case session emerging from the scenario analysis that leads directly to the articulation of new research agendas. The scenario process described here has thus been carefully designed to offer some guidance to policy-oriented graduate students who are otherwise left to the relatively unstructured norms by which political science dissertation ideas are typically developed. The initial articulation of a dissertation project is generally an idiosyncratic and personal undertaking (Useem 1997; Rothman 2008), whereby students might choose topics based on their coursework, their own previous policy exposure, or the topics studied by their advisors. Research agendas are thus typically developed by looking for "puzzles" in existing research programs (Kuhn 1996). Doctoral students also, understandably, often choose topics that are particularly amenable to garnering research funding. Conventional grant programs typically base their funding priorities on extrapolations from what has been important in the recent past—leading to, for example, the prevalence of Japan and Soviet studies in the mid-1980s or terrorism studies in the 2000s—in the absence of any alternative method for identifying questions of likely future significance. The scenario approach to generating research ideas is grounded in the belief that these traditional approaches can be complemented by identifying questions likely to be of great empirical importance in the real world, even if these do not appear as puzzles in existing research programs or as clear extrapolations from past events. The scenarios analyzed at NEFPC envision alternative worlds that could develop in the medium (five to seven year) term and are designed to tease out issues scholars and policymakers may encounter in the relatively near future so that they can begin thinking critically about them now. This timeframe offers a period distant enough from the present as to avoid falling into current events analysis, but not so far into the future as to seem like science fiction. In imagining the worlds in which these scenarios might come to pass, participants learn strategies for avoiding failures of creativity and for overturning the assumptions that prevent scholars and analysts from anticipating and understanding the pivotal junctures that arise in international affairs.


text:
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    @autoreleasepool {
        return UIApplicationMain(argc, argv, nil, NSStringFromClass([RecipeBookAppDelegate class]));
    }
}