text:
The Stormlight Archive
Oathbringer Reread
Oathbringer Reread: Chapter Thirty-Four
Alice Arneson and Lyndsey Luther
Thu Aug 2, 2018 9:00am 88 comments 3 Favorites [+]
Welcome back to Roshar! Way, way back to Roshar… This week Dalinar revisits one of his visions which apparently took place long before Aharietiam; this time, he's got company, as a certain queen is drawn into the vision when the highstorm passes over her. She's going to see some strong evidence that things are changing!
Reminder: we'll potentially be discussing spoilers for the ENTIRE NOVEL in each reread. Not this week, so no worries about the article itself, though we make no promises about the comments. But if you haven't read ALL of Oathbringer, best to wait to join us until you're done.
Chapter Recap
WHO: Dalinar Kholin
WHERE: Undisclosed village in one of Dalinar's visions
WHEN: 1174.1.6.1, three days after Shallan talks to Jasnah and six days after Dalinar learns the Stormfather can bring other people into his visions.
Dalinar enters into the Stormfather's visions again, this time by design. He inhabits the form of one of the Knights Radiant arriving to protect a town from the Midnight Mother, and finds Queen Fen—whom he'd asked the Stormfather to pull into this vision. The two have a heated discussion about Dalinar and why Fen doesn't trust him, but his honesty and passion convince her to give him another chance.
Threshold of the Storm
Title: Resistance
Alice: The comment that accompanied this suggestion speaks for itself: "Fen organized a great resistance. The KR talked about how all those that resist should go to Urithiru. And Dalinar was able to overcome her resistance about joining forces. (At least somewhat.)"
Chanarach, Nale
Lyn: I think Chanarach (Dustbringers, divine attributes of Brave and Obedient) is here because of Fen. She shows great bravery in this scene, saving the child and uniting the townspeople against the Midnight Mother. Nale (Skybreakers, divine attributes Just and Confident), on the other hand… He could be also symbolic of Fen in that she's certainly confident. Alice?
A: It's funny; I'd have expected Jezrien and Taln for the two Radiants in the vision, or at least Ishar for Dalinar. Instead we get Chana, though I agree that she fits well with Fen's actions. I'm less sure about Nale; again, I'd have thought maybe Jezrien for her leadership. But… confident, I guess? And maybe the justice of her accusation against Dalinar, that it's not reasonable to expect the rest of the world to simply take him at his word, given his past record. That's all I've got.
Kholin glyph-pair
I noticed its arrival immediately, just as I noticed your many intrusions into my land.
A: Well, somebody sounds miffy! This is the evidence that the first letter comes from a Shard whose world Hoid has visited many times… which could be any of them, eh?
Stories & Songs
All went dark around Dalinar, and he entered a place between his world and the visions. A place with a black sky and an infinite floor of bone-white rock. Shapes made of smoke seeped through the stone ground, then rose around him, dissipating. Common things. A chair, a vase, a rockbud. Sometimes people.
L: Wait. This isn't Shadesmar… is it? Is there another Realm?
A: ::can't resist…:: RAFO!
"What was that place?" Dalinar asked.
IT IS NO PLACE.
I IMAGINED IT, the Stormfather said more softly, as if he were admitting something embarrassing.
L: Okay, so definitely not Shadesmar, then. But close? Can anyone else access this Realm, or only the Stormfather? Can it be used to travel, like Shadesmar can?
A: I honestly don't know. The Stormfather doesn't seem to think so. He's not omniscient, but he probably knows more about the realms than I do!
ALL THINGS HAVE A SOUL. A VASE, A WALL, A CHAIR. AND WHEN A VASE IT BROKEN, IT MIGHT DIE IN THE PHYSICAL REALM, BUT FOR A TIME ITS SOUL REMEMBERS WHAT IT WAS. SO ALL THINGS DIE TWICE. ITS FINAL DEATH IS WHEN MEN FORGET IT WAS A VASE, AND THINK ONLY OF THE PIECES.
L: This is really deep, and reminds me of the concept that men also truly die twice—once when they pass on, and once when their name is spoken for the last time.
A: This was deep, and also unexpected. Not so long ago, Kaladin was railing at the Stormfather for not changing the highstorm to suit him, and good ol' StormDad blew him off… so to speak.
L: Heh. Puns.
A: (They're rare from me, but they do happen!) It's interesting to see him here, the soul of a highstorm that breaks everything in its path, imagining a place for the souls of the broken things to dwell while they wait to be forgotten. It's very melancholy, and sort of sweet.
Also, this foreshadows how Dalinar will be able to rebuild some things later, and might possibly be linked to why Renarin can't heal people who have accepted their injuries.
About the size of an axehound, they had oily black skin that reflected the moonlight. While they moved on all sixes, they were like no natural animal. They had spindly legs like a crab's, but a bulbous body and a sinuous head, featureless except for a slit of a mouth bristling with black teeth.
L: I'm certain that I've seen something like this in a horror film but I've seen too many to keep them all straight, or remember exactly where I've seen it. Anyway. If the Midnight Mother is trying to copy something here, I wonder if it was just axehounds, or some creation of her own? I find it hard to believe that with all of her life experience she'd have such a hard time recreating humans in the present—maybe she had just forgotten after being trapped in Urithiru alone for so long.
A: Or, perhaps, during all that time she was trapped she developed a desire to copy the beings who trapped her? I'm not much help with the horror-film aspect; that's not my gig!
"You don't eat the corpses," Dalinar said to it. "You kill for pleasure, don't you? I often think of spren and man are so different, but this we share. We can both murder."
L: I wonder if the Midnight Mother's creations have a sort of… hive mind thing going on, or if each of them has its own sapience until it gets reclaimed by the main body. If the former, Dalinar's speaking directly to the Unmade here, which is pretty chilling to consider.
A: Either one is a bit creepy, come to think of it. They don't seem particularly intelligent, so I sort of assumed they were like dogs (except dumber) set loose with a "kill" command, but when I stop to think about it… I sort of think they'd have to be actively maintained by Mommy Dearest. So the next question is, was he talking to the Unmade, or just to a memory of the Unmade? (Okay, I'm really glad this is in a vision, because it means he probably wasn't actually talking to her. I hope.)
Bruised & Broken
"Maybe all the good men are dead, so all you have is me!"
L: It makes me sad that Dalinar thinks of himself this way, but… in a way, he's right. He wasn't a good man, in his past. Maybe it takes a man who truly understands the horror of war, having experienced it himself, to save the world. I find it interesting that in Dalinar and Kaladin we have two men who have experienced the horror of war, but from opposite sides. Dalinar was the bloodthirsty tyrant, and Kaladin the stalwart soldier trying to preserve the lives of those beneath him.
A: This book really gave me a sense of mental whiplash with Dalinar. I like him. A lot. Except that when he was younger, he was a real piece of work. It's been well over a year since I first read this, and I still have trouble reconciling the two different men he is.
Places & Peoples
In Alethkar, a fine wooden mansion would be a symbol of wealth. Here, however, many of the other houses were of wood.
L: Because trade restrictions with Shinovar are lessened, or because the highstorms aren't as powerful and hence trees are growing in more places? Is it possible that the highstorms are growing more potent with time, as more and more people come to worship the Stormfather? If he's a manifestation of the peoples' ideals, then wouldn't it make sense that he's become more powerful over time?
A: Fine, go all meta on me! Here I was just assuming that this took place in a part of the world that had more trees—probably farther west where the highstorms are less devastating, maybe even in Shinovar itself. But the theory about the highstorms growing in strength is pretty cool.
He'd have expected everything in the past to be crude, but it wasn't. The doors, the buildings, the clothing. It was well made, just… lacking something he couldn't define.
L: This would have taken place after the last Desolation but before the Recreance, right? Or could it have been a few Desolations back? That would make sense that the society is advanced… each society regressed after the Desolation hit, so if this vision happened just before one….
A: You're most likely right that it's just before a Desolation. My best guess is that it's many Desolations back—so, maybe 5000 or more years ago, before the Heralds started to buckle so quickly. It's all speculative, but I'd say this was long enough ago that the Heralds were giving humanity a lot of time to recover. I'm still puzzled about the thing is that he thought was lacking, though.
"Should you wish to learn true leadership, come to Urithiru."
L: Is he insinuating that she should become a Radiant, or do the Radiants just train people in mundane methods of leadership as well?
A: After seeing this vision in TWoK, I had assumed the former. Knowing what we know now, which is still not much, it certainly seems that the Radiants would train all comers to the best of their abilities, with a likelihood that at least a significant percentage would become squires or Radiants.
"If you have the soul of a warrior, that passion could destroy you, unless you are guided."
L: Wait, what? Is this a reference to the Thrill, perhaps?
A: Yay, it's not just me! I thought that too. If we're right, the Radiants seem to have had a way to help people avoid Thrill-addiction.
Tight Butts and Coconuts
"Honestly, I just wanted to talk to you."
"Send me a storming letter."
L: Queen Fen continuously reminds me of Professor McGonagall and it makes me so happy.
A: I love Fen. Almost as much as much as I love Navani.
Weighty Words
Dalinar still didn't know why Radiant Plate glowed, while modern Shardplate did not. Was the ancient Plate "living" somehow, like Radiant Blades lived?
L: Finally caught on, have you, Dalinar?
In response, the other Radiant made his [helm] vanish. Dalinar caught sight of a puff of Light or mist.
L: This is cool to finally see. If his armor is made up of windspren, as theorized, why does it vanish into Light or mist?
A: Because they're poofing back into the Cognitive realm right away? Or… no. We don't need new theories. But… what if there are other kinds of spren involved, like maybe the helm comes from a different spren related to light (so you can see through) or something? Please tell me this is a totally loony theory.
"You had to dismiss [your Plate] so I could Lash you."
L: Well that's an interesting tidbit, I wonder why?
A: WHY?? We know that ordinary Plate interferes with Lashings, but I'd expected that living Plate would be different. Apparently not. Sigh.
"Talk to Harkaylain then, or to your spren."
L: Who? (SO MANY QUESTIONS.)
A: I've heard people assume that this means the armor is crafted by someone, with this guy cast in the role of "blacksmith." (Sprensmith?) Personally, I'm betting he is either the head of the Stonewards, or possibly a Bondsmith. Back in the TWoK version of this vision, the Stoneward mentioned that "Harkaylain says the Desolation is close, and he is not often wrong." It seems reasonable that she's referring either to the leader of her own Order, or to one of the three Bondsmiths. This time, it seems reasonable that if she's having trouble with her sprenPlate, the Windrunner would recommend either someone high in her own Order, or… a Bondsmith.
"How," Dalinar whispered to the Stormfather. "How do we get the armor?"
Speak the Words.
"Which words?"
You will know or you will not.
L: Super helpful as always. But at least this is in-text verification that gaining Plate is another step in the Radiant progression.
A: I laughed so hard at this one. Poor Dalinar. Still, I liked the confirmation for him, specifically, that despite not getting a StormfatherBlade, he will eventually get Plate. (GlorysprenPlate FTW!)
Meaningful/Moronic/Mundane Motivations
"You really expect me to believe that the storming Knights Radiant are back and that the Almighty chose you—a tyrant and a murderer—to lead them?" …
"Your Majesty, you're being irrational."
"Am I? Oh, let me storming reconsider, then. All I need to do is let the storming Blackthorn himself into my city, so he can take control of my armies!"
"What would you have me do?" Dalinar shouted. "Would you have me watch the world crumble?"
A: This isn't really a surprise to anyone, but the Thaylen Queen has very good and logical rationale for not cooperating with Dalinar, based on what she knew up to this point. Their shouting match, combined with the vision, creates an odd impetus to change their relationship. Have I ever mentioned that I really like Fen?
"A mandate from God—the very same argument the Hierocracy used for seizing control of the government. What about Sadees, the Sunmaker? He claimed he had a calling from the Almighty too."
A: Again… we've discussed before the possibility that others received these visions in the past. How many of them could have been Bondsmiths had they studied the visions long enough to realize that they were not interactive, and had another purpose?
A Scrupulous Study of Spren
I am not a man. I do not bend or cower. I do what is in my nature, and to defy that is pain.
L: Pain? Well that's interesting. Other highspren with bonds (like Syl) have drawn away from their Radiants when they displayed attributes that threatened breaking the oaths they'd made, but pain? That's new.
A: This took me back to Syl's remark to Kaladin in Chapter 31, that what he was asking of the Stormfather was like asking fire not to be so hot, thankyouverymuch. I think it's a good reminder to the humanoids—both the characters and the readers—that the spren are not humans, and they neither function nor reason like humans. They cannot defy their nature, or pretend to be anything other than what they are. Not like… humans.
In context, it's tough for me not to read it as the Stormfather just being stubborn because it bugs him when Dalinar pushes ideas he's not used to. Because it's so natural for us to read them with human emotions, this was a useful interjection. We really don't understand the nature of spren yet, much less the Stormfather. We'll learn more as we go through the book, and it's going to be some good stuff, but it's still going to take work to quit assuming they are even able to function like humans in certain ways.
Quality Quotations
Flailing his arms, he shouted in panic. His stomach lurched and his clothes flapped in the wind. He continued yelling until he realized that he wasn't actually getting closer to the ground. He wasn't falling, he was flying.
A: The mental image of Dalinar flapping around was pretty funny… until I was reminded of the last time someone Lashed him into the sky.
It was a painful irony that he should have such vivid feelings about this place, these people, when his memories of Evi were still so shadowy and confused.
"Where was this passion earlier?" she asked. "Why didn't you speak like this in your letters to me?"
A: Is this connected to the Thaylen "Passions"?
"I know how to talk to her now. She doesn't want polite words or diplomatic phrases. She wants me to be myself. I'm fairly certain that's something I can deliver."
As always, thanks for joining us on this little jaunt through Roshar, and join us for more theorizing in the comments and for next week's reread, when we'll tackle chapter 35, the first of the Bridge 4 POV sections in Part 2.
Alice's hair is getting whiter by the day—her daughter just started driver's training, and that means lots of time in the car with a student driver. Terror takes on a new dimension.
Lyndsey is so excited to start getting into the Bridge 4 POVs next week. If you're an aspiring author, a cosplayer, or just like geeky content, follow her work on Facebook or her website.
Brandon SandersoncosmereOathbringerOathbringer RereadrereadsThe Stormlight Archive
Isn't It Necromantic? — Introducing the Gideon the Ninth Reread
Oathbringer Reread: Chapter One Hundred Ten
Tera on In Memory of Neil Peart: Fantasy, Science Fiction, and the Mystic Rhythms of Rush 1 min ago
swampyankee on Five Sword-Wielding Women in SFF 27 mins ago
krad on "That's life" — Joker 5 hours ago


text:
Q: regular expression which does not match specific string in a line I have been trying for hours to get this working, can anyone assist me with a regex that will match the string "map" and "brand" in the text below. It should not match "reverse_map" line. So the first two lines are OK but not the third.
map             brand
map             brand
reverse_map     brand

A: If "map brand" is always the only string in the line, just use ^ and $ to tell where are, respectively, the beginning and the end of the line:
^map[[:space:]]+brand$

A: Use a word boundary to require the m in map not have a word character before it:
/\bmap brand/

https://regex101.com/r/wE9spT/1/
If you need something similar for brand to ensure, for example, map brandfoo doesn't get matched, add another word boundary at the end:
/\bmap brand\b/

A: Something like
(?:\bmap\b.*\bbrand\b|\bbrand\b.*\bmap\b)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Lady Cavs' season ends with loss to Davison
By sPORTs sTaFF
Carman-Ainsworth's Deja Lester gets under a dig.
SWARTZ CREEK — The Carman-Ainsworth volleyball season came to a close on Monday in the district playoff opener against Saginaw Valley League-South rival Davison, 21-25, 22-25, 9-25.
Deja Lester was solid, as usual, with six kills and 10 digs while Katie Speaks added nine digs and Sarah Thurston had 12 assists.
Carman-Ainsworth ends the season at 14-28-1 overall.
OTHER RESULTS: The Lady Cavaliers concluded the regular season on Saturday, hosting their own invitational. Carman-Ainsworth went 3-3 on the day and Cadillac ended up winning the tournament with a victory over Clio 26-24, 25-14.
The Lady Cavs began the day with a loss to eventual champion Cadillac, 22-25, 9-25, before bouncing back with consecutive wins. The first was a triumph over Pinckney, 25-22, 17-25, 15-9, and then over Kearsley, 25-19. Carman-Ainsworth's final match of pool play was a loss to Clio, 18-25, 25-21, 11-15.
After pool play wrapped up, the Cavs moved on to the gold division quarterfinals and defeated Kearsley once more, 25-17, 25-16. Their run, however, came to an end in a rematch with Cadillac, losing, 25-21, 12-25, 13-25.
Eriona Chambers racked up 19 kills, 16 blocks and 17 digs while Che'Anne Hicks came through with 22 kills and 20 digs. Lester added to the effort with nine aces, 27 kills, 11 blocks and 38 digs, Jessica Smith picked up six aces, 24 kills, six blocks and 60 digs and Sarah Thurston added nine aces, five blocks, 85 assists and 28 digs. — B.P.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


While using the Logos app on my iPhone, I have been prompted to either give a review on the App Store or contact you guys. I have left a review on the store a few times. I do not think any of the issues have really been addressed though.
I use the Logos app as my primary Bible app and have invested pretty significantly buying quite a few individual resources. It is a part of my iPhone dock and where I do most my reading/studying/comparing. I think it is the most powerful Bible app I have used. It is also probably the most expensive and the least intuitive. I really wish there were a much easier way of accessing original language resources. Accordance does an excellent job here. With the free ESV you get pretty solid free, one touch links to the original language word underlying each word of the English text. I am attaching a screenshot.


New Delhi: Design as a profession will be one of the top professions in demand leading to an increased demand for designers across categories including white goods, FMCG, Auto, Electronics, Gaming, Media & Entertainment to name a few. World University of Design (WUD), India's first and only university dedicated to education in the creative domain, has announcedadmissions for 2019-20 session for its undergraduate, post graduate, diploma and PhD courses.
The University is established by the Haryana Private Universities Act, 2006 with the right to confer degrees under Section 2(f) and 22(I) of the UGC Act.WUD is one if the few recognized Universities in India to offer cutting edge, trans-disciplinary programs in the creative domains of Fashion Design, Communication, Product, Art, Architecture, Curation, Art education, Management and Humanities and unique courses like B.Des &M.Des in Transportation Design, Fashion Design and BBA & MBA in Design & Strategy Management.
WUD offers up to 100%* merit scholarships to eligible candidates. The scholarships under different categories included Merit based scholarships, special scholarships for students with creative talent for wards of Defense Personnel, girl child and students with merits in Sports, Performing Arts and scholarships for students having a Haryana domicile. Valid scores of NIFT, NID, CEED and UCEED exams can be considered in lieu of DAT and those of CET, CAT, MAT and XAT in lieu of GAT. The University also accepts SAT SCORES for admissions.


text:
Dalla Francia un nuovo appello contro le politiche restrittive in Europa
Redazione - 30 Settembre 2010 2 Dicembre 2019
Scarica pdf Partecipa alla discussione Torna indietro Home
Dopo la pubblicazione della Lettera degli economisti, anche gli studiosi francesi hanno prodotto un documento contro le politiche restrittive adottate dai governi europei per fronteggiare la crisi. Il Manifeste d'économistes atterrés riprende i temi della Lettera e sottolinea i rischi legati alle politiche economiche attualmente imposte in Europa e all'assetto istituzionale dell'Unione Monetaria Europea. Il Manifeste è ora disponibile anche in inglese:
Manifesto of the appalled economists
CRISIS AND DEBT IN EUROPE: 10 PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACTS", 22 MEASURES TO DRIVE THE DEBATE OUT OF THE DEAD END
The world economic recovery, permitted by a massive injection of public spending into the economy (from the United States to China), is fragile but real. One continent lags behind, Europe. Finding again the path of growth is no longer its priority policy. Europe has embarked on another path: the fight against public deficits.
In the European Union, these deficits are certainly high – 7% on average in 2010 – but this is much less than the 11% in the United States. While American states whose economic weight is greater than Greece's, such as California, are virtually bankrupt, financial markets have decided to speculate on the sovereign debt of European countries, especially those of the South. Europe is in fact caught in its own institutional trap: states must borrow from private financial institutions, which obtain cheap cash from the European Central Bank. As a consequence, the markets hold the key to the funding of the states. In this context, the lack of European solidarity gives rise to speculation, all the more so when the rating agencies' game accentuates the mistrust.
It took the downgrading, on June 15th, of the rating of Greece by the agency Moody's, to bring the European leaders to use the word "irrational" again, a word that they had used so much at the beginning of the subprime crisis. Similarly, we now discover that Spain is much more threatened by the fragility of its growth model and of its banking system, than by its public debt.
In order to "reassure the markets," a stabilizing fund for the Euro has been improvised, and drastic as well as indiscriminate plans of cuts in public spending have been launched all over Europe. Civil servants are the first affected, including in France, where the increase of their pension contributions is a disguised cut of their wages. The number of civil servants falls everywhere, threatening public services. Social security benefits are severely reduced, from the Netherlands to Portugal, as well as in France, with the current pension reform. Unemployment and the lack of job security will necessarily increase in the forthcoming years. These measures are irresponsible from a political and social perspective, and even in strictly economic terms.
This policy, which has temporarily brought down speculation, has already very negative social consequences in many European countries, especially on the youth, workers and the most vulnerable people. It will eventually stir up tensions in Europe and thereby threaten the European construction itself, which is much more than an economic project. The economy is supposed to serve the construction of a democratic continent, peaceful and united. Instead, a form of dictatorship of the market is being imposed everywhere, and especially today in Portugal, Spain and Greece, three countries that were still dictatorships in the early 1970s, only forty years ago.
Whether it is interpreted as "the desire to reassure markets" on the part of frightened governments, or as a pretext to impose choices driven by ideology, this submission to dictatorship is not acceptable, since it has proven its economic inefficiency and its destructive potential, both at the political and social levels. A real democratic debate on economic policy choices must be opened in France and Europe. Most of the economists who participate in public debates do so in order to justify or rationalize the submission of policies to the demands of financial markets. Admittedly, all governments have had to improvise Keynesian stimuli plans, and even sometimes to nationalize banks temporarily. But they want to close this parenthesis quickly. The neoliberal paradigm is still the only one that is acknowledged as legitimate, despite its obvious failures. Based on the assumption of efficient capital markets, it advocates reducing government spending, privatizing public services, flexibilising the labour market, liberalizing trade, financial services and capital markets, increase competition at all times and in all places…
As economists, we are appalled to see that these policies are still on the agenda, and that their theoretical foundations are not reconsidered. The arguments which have been used during thirty years in order to guide European economic policy choices have been undermined by the facts. The crisis has laid bare the dogmatic and unfounded nature of the alleged "obvious facts" repeated ad nauseam by policy makers and their advisers. Whether it is the efficiency and rationality of financial markets, or the need to cut spending to reduce debt or to strengthen the "stability pact", these "obvious facts" have to be examined, and the plurality of choices of economic policies must be shown. Other choices are possible and desirable, provided that the financial industry's noose on public policies is loosened.
We offer below a critical presentation of ten premises that still inspire decisions of public authorities all over Europe every day, despite the fierce denial brought by the financial crisis and its aftermath. These are pseudo "obvious facts" which are in fact unfair and ineffective measures, against which we propose twenty-two counterproposals that we would like to bring into the debate. Each of the proposals is not necessarily unanimously supported by all the people who have signed this manifesto, but they have to be considered seriously if we want to drive Europe out of the current dead end.
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 1: FINANCIAL MARKETS ARE EFFICIENT
Today, one fact is obvious to all observers: the crucial role played by financial markets in the functioning of the economy. This is the result of a long evolution that began in the late seventies. However it is measured, this evolution constitutes a clear break, both quantitatively and qualitatively, with previous decades. Under the pressure of financial markets, the overall regulation of capitalism has deeply changed, giving rise to a novel form of capitalism that some have called "patrimonial capitalism", "financial capitalism" or "neoliberal capitalism".
The theoretical justification for these mutations is the hypothesis of the informational efficiency of financial markets (or Efficient Markets Hypothesis). According to this hypothesis, it is important to develop financial markets, in order to ensure they operate as freely as possible, because they are the only mechanism allowing an efficient allocation of capital. The policies persistently pursued over the last thirty years are consistent with this recommendation. Their purpose was to create a globally integrated financial market, in which all actors (firms, households, states, financial institutions) can exchange all types of securities (stocks, bonds, debts, derivatives, currencies) for all maturities (long term, medium term, short term). Financial markets have come to resemble the "friction free" market of textbooks: the economic discourse has succeeded in creating reality. The markets being more and more "perfect", in the mainstream's meaning of the term, the analysts have believed that the financial system had become much more stable than in the past. The "great moderation" – this period of economic growth without wage growth experienced by the U.S. from 1990 to 2007 – seemed to confirm this view.
Even now, the G20 still thinks that financial markets are the best mechanism for allocating capital. The primacy and integrity of financial markets remain the ultimate goals pursued by the new financial regulations. The crisis is interpreted not as an inevitable result of the logic of deregulated markets, but as the effect of the dishonesty and irresponsibility of some financial actors poorly supervised by governments.
Yet the crisis has demonstrated that markets are not efficient, and they are unable to allow an efficient allocation of capital. The consequences of this fact in terms of regulation and economic policy are tremendous. The theory of efficiency is based on the idea that investors seek and find the most reliable information on the value of projects that are competing for funding. According to this theory, the price that forms on the market reflects investors' appraisals and synthesizes all available information: it is therefore a good estimate of the true value of the securities. This value is supposed to summarize all the information needed to guide economic activity and social life as well. Thus, the capital is invested in the most profitable projects, and leaves the least efficient ones. This is the central idea of this theory: financial competition generates fair prices, which are reliable signals to investors, and an effective guide for economic development.
But the crisis confirmed various critical works which had cast doubts on this proposition. Financial competition does not necessarily generate fair prices. Worse, financial competition is often destabilizing and leads to excessive price and irrational fluctuations, the financial bubbles.
The major flaw in the theory of efficient capital markets is that it transposes the theory used for ordinary goods and services to financial markets. On markets for goods and services, competition is partly self-regulating under what is called the "law" of supply and demand: when the price of a commodity rises, producers increase their supply, and buyers reduce their demand. As a consequence, the price decreases and goes back towards its equilibrium level. In other words, when the price of a commodity rises, restoring forces tend to impede and reverse this increase. Competition produces what is called "negative feedbacks", i.e. restoring forces that go in the opposite direction from the initial shock. The idea of efficiency arises from a direct transposition of this mechanism to financial markets.
However, for the latter, the situation is very different. When the price increases, it is common to observe, not a decrease but an increase in demand! Indeed, the rising price means a higher return for those who own the security, because of the capital gain. The price increase thus attracts new buyers, which further reinforces the initial increase. The promise of bonuses pushes traders to further strengthen the movement. This is the case until the incident, that is unpredictable but inevitable, takes place. This causes the reversal of expectations and the crash. This herding phenomenon is a process of "positive feedbacks" which worsens the initial imbalances. This is what a speculative bubble consists of: a cumulative increase in prices that feeds itself. Such a process does not produce fair prices, but rather inadequate prices.
As a consequence, the predominant place occupied by financial markets can not lead to any kind of efficiency. Even worse, it is a permanent source of instability, as is evident from the uninterrupted series of bubbles that we have known in the past 20 years: Japan, South-East Asia, the Internet, emerging markets, real estate and securitization. Financial instability is reflected by the huge fluctuations of exchange rates and of the stock market, which are clearly unrelated to the fundamentals of the economy. This instability, arising from the financial sector, spreads to the real economy through many mechanisms.
To reduce the inefficiency and instability of financial markets, we suggest the following four measures:
Measure 1: To separate strictly financial markets and the activities of financial actors, prohibiting banks from speculating on their own account, in order to prevent the spread of bubbles and crashes.
Measure 2: To reduce liquidity and destabilizing speculation by controls on capital movements and taxation on financial transactions.
Measure 3: To restrict financial transactions to those meeting the needs of the real economy (e.g., CDS only to holders of insured securities, etc.).
Measure 4: Capping the earnings of traders.
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 2: FINANCIAL MARKETS CONTRIBUTE TO ECONOMIC GROWTH
Financial integration has hugely increased the power of finance because it unifies and centralizes capitalist property globally. It determines profitability standards which are required of all capital. The idea was that financial markets would replace the financing of investments by banks. But this project has failed, since today, on the whole it is firms that fund shareholders instead of the contrary. Corporate governance was nevertheless profoundly transformed to meet the standards of market profitability. With the rise of shareholder value, a new conception of the firm and its management has emerged, where the firm is being conceived as an entity at the service of the shareholder. The idea of a common interest of the different stakeholders of the firm has disappeared. The operators of publicly traded companies now have the primary and exclusive mission to satisfy the shareholders' desire to enrich themselves. Consequently, they no longer behave as wage earners, as they witness the excessive surge in their incomes. As argued by "agency" theory the aim it is to ensure that the interests of managers now converge with those of shareholders.
An ROE (Return on Equity) of 15% to 25% has now become the standard imposed by the power of finance on companies and employees. Liquidity is the instrument of that power, as it allows unsatisfied investors to go elsewhere in no time. Faced with this power, the interests of wage earners as well as political sovereignty were marginalized. This imbalance leads to unreasonable demands for profit, which then hamper economic growth and lead to a continuous increase in income inequality. Firstly, the profitability requirements greatly inhibit investment: the higher the required return, the more difficult it is to find projects that are competitive enough in order to meet these requirements. Investment rates remain historically low in Europe and the United States. Secondly, these requirements cause a constant downward pressure on wages and purchasing power, which is not favourable to demand. The simultaneous curbing of investment and consumption leads to low growth and endemic unemployment. This trend has been thwarted in the Anglo-Saxon countries by the development of household debt, and by asset bubbles that create fictional wealth, allowing for a growth of consumption without wages, but ending up with crashes.
In order to eliminate the negative effects of financial markets on economic activity, we propose the following three measures:
Measure 5: To strengthen significantly counter-powers within firms, in order to force the management to take into account the interests of all the stakeholders.
Measure 6: To increase significantly the taxation of very high incomes to discourage the race towards unsustainable returns.
Measure 7: To reduce the dependency of firm's vis-à-vis financial markets, and to develop a public policy of credit (preferential rates for priority activities on the social and environmental levels).
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 3: MARKETS ASSESS CORRECTLY THE SOLVENCY OF STATES
According to the proponents of efficient capital markets, market operators take into account the objective situation of public finances in order to assess the risk of taking out state bonds. Take the case of Greek debt: financial operators and policy makers rely exclusively on financial assessments in order to assess the situation. Thus, when the required interest rate for Greece rose to more than 10%, everyone concluded that the risk of default was high: if investors demanded such a risk premium, this meant that the danger was extreme.
This is a profound mistake if one understands the true nature of the assessment by the financial market. As this market is not efficient, it very often produces prices disconnected from the fundamentals. In these circumstances, it is unreasonable to rely exclusively on the financial market assessments in order to assess a situation. Assessing the value of a financial security is not comparable to measuring an objective magnitude, like, for example, estimating the weight of an object. A financial security is a claim on future revenue: in order to evaluate it, one must anticipate what this future will be. It is a matter of appraisal, not of objective measure, because at the instant t, the future is by no means predetermined. In trading rooms, it is what operators imagine it will be. A financial price is the result of an assessment, a belief, a bet on the future: there is no guarantee that the assessment of markets is in any way superior to other forms of assessment.
Above all, financial evaluation is not neutral: it affects the object it is meant to measure, it initiates and builds the future it imagines. So, rating agencies play an important role in determining interest rates on bond markets by awarding grades that are highly subjective, if they are not driven by a desire to fuel instability, a source for speculative profits. When agencies degrade the rating of a state, they increase the rate of interest demanded by financial actors in order to acquire securities of the public debt of this state, and thereby increase the risk of bankruptcy they have announced.
To reduce the influence of market's psychology on the funding of the state, we propose the following two measures:
Measure 8: Rating agencies should not be allowed to influence arbitrarily interest rates on bond markets by downgrading the rating of a State. The activities of agencies should be regulated in a way that requires that their ratings result from a transparent economic calculation.
Measure 8a: States should be freed from the threat of financial markets by guaranteeing the purchase of public securities by the European Central Band (ECB).
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 4: THE SOAR IN PUBLIC DEBTS RESULTS FROM EXCESSIVE SPENDING
Michel Pebereau, one of the "godfathers" of the French banking system, described in 2005, in one of those official ad hoc reports, France as a country stifled by debt and which is sacrificing its future generations by engaging in reckless social spending. The state running into debt as a father who drinks alcohol beyond its means: this is the vision usually propagated by most editorialists. And yet, the recent explosion of public debt in Europe and the world is due to something which is very different: the bailout plans of the financial sector, and, mainly, to the recession caused by the banking and financial crisis that began in 2008: the average public deficit in the euro area was only 0.6% of GDP in 2007, but the crisis has increased to 7% in 2010. In the same time, public debt increased from 66 % to 84% of GDP.
But the rise in public debt, in France as in many European countries, was initially moderate, and prior to that recession: it mainly comes not from an upward trend in public spending – since, on the contrary, as a proportion of GDP, public spending is stable or declining in the EU since the early 1990s – but from the erosion of public revenue, due to weak economic growth over the period, and the fiscal counter-revolution led by most governments in the pas twenty-five years. In the longer run, the fiscal counter-revolution has continuously fuelled the swelling of the debt from one recession to another. Thus, in France, a recent parliamentary report estimated 100 billion Euros in 2010 as the cost of tax cuts granted between 2000 and 2010, even without including exemptions from social contributions (30 billions) and other "tax expenditures". As tax harmonization has not taken place, European states have engaged in tax competition, lowering corporate taxes, as well as taxes on high income and assets. Even if the relative weight of its determinants varies from one country to another, the rise of government deficits and debt ratios that has taken place almost everywhere in Europe over the last thirty years does not primarily result from an increase in public spending. This diagnosis obviously opens up avenues other than the reduction of public spending mantra, repeated ad nauseam, in order to reduce public deficits.
To restore an informed public debate on the origin of the debt and therefore on the means to cure it, we propose the following measure:
Measure 9: To conduct a public audit of public debts, in order to determine their origin and to identify the main holders of debt securities, as well as the amounts held.
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 5: PUBLIC SPENDING MUST BE CUT IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE PUBLIC DEBT
Even if the increase in debt was partly due to an increase in public spending, cutting public spending would not necessarily be part of the solution. This is because the dynamics of public debt have little in common with that of a household's: macroeconomics is not reducible to the economy of the household. The dynamics of debt depends, in all generality, on several factors: the level of primary deficits, but also the spread between the interest rate and the nominal growth rate of the economy.
For, if the latter is lower than the interest rate, debt will increase mechanically because of the "snowball effect": the amount of interests explodes, and the total deficit (including the interests of debt) as well. Thus, in the early 1990s, the "franc fort" policy conducted by Beregovoy, and maintained despite the 1993-94 recession, resulted in an interest rate higher than the growth rate, explaining the surge in France's public debt during this period. The same mechanism caused the increase in debt in the first half of the 1980's, as a consequence of the neoliberal revolution and the high interest rates policy led by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.
But the rate of economic growth itself is not independent from public spending: in the short run, the existence of stable public expenditures restrain the size of recessions (through "automatic stabilizers"); in the long run, public investment and expenditures (education, health, research, infrastructures…) stimulate growth. It is wrong to say that any public deficit further increases public debt, or that any reduction of the public deficit reduces debt. If reducing the deficit weighs down economic activity, this will make debt even larger. Neoliberal news analysts point out that some countries (Canada, Sweden, and Israel) have achieved very abrupt adjustments of their public accounts in the 1990s, followed by an immediate upturn in growth. But this is possible only if the adjustment regards an isolated country, which quickly regains competitiveness over its competitors. Obviously, the proponents of European structural adjustment forget that European countries are the main customers and competitors for the other European countries, the European Union being, on the whole, a rather closed economy. The only effect of a simultaneous and massive reduction of government spending in all EU countries will be a worsened recession, and thus a further increase in public debt.
To avoid public finance policies that will cause social and political disaster, we submit the following two measures for discussion:
Measure 10: The level of social protections (unemployment benefits, housing…) must be maintained, or even improved;
Measure 11: Public spending on education, research, investment in environmental conversion, etc., must be increased, in order to set up the conditions for sustainable growth and to bring about a sharp fall in unemployment.
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 6: PUBLIC DEBT SHIFTS THE BURDEN OF OUR EXCESSES ON OUR GRANDCHILDREN
There is another fallacious statement that confuses household economics with macroeconomics: that the public debt would be a transfer of wealth to the detriment of future generations. Public debt is a mechanism for transferring wealth, but mainly from ordinary taxpayers to shareholders.
Indeed, on the basis of the belief (rarely documented) that lower taxes stimulate growth and increase government revenue in fine, European states have, since 1980, imitated U.S.fiscal policy. Tax and social contributions cuts have proliferated (on corporate profits, on the income of the wealthiest individuals, on property, on employer contributions…), but their influence on economic growth has been very uncertain. As a consequence, these anti-redistributive tax policies have worsened cumulatively both social inequalities and public deficits.
These tax policies have forced governments to borrow from well-off households and financial markets, in order to finance the deficits created in this way. This might be called the "jackpot effect": with the money saved on their taxes, the rich were able to acquire (interest bearing) securities of the debt issued to finance public deficits caused by tax cuts… The public debt service in France represents 40 billion Euros each year, almost as much as the revenue generated by the income tax. This tour de force is all the more amazing given that political leaders then succeeded in persuading the public that the employees, pensioners and the sick were responsible for the public debt.
Thus, the increase in public debt in Europe or in the USA is not the result of expansionary Keynesian policies, or expensive social policies, but, much more, of a policy in favour of the lucky few: "tax expenditures" (lowered taxes and contributions) increase the disposable income of those who need it least, who, as a result, can further increase their investments in treasury bills, which are reimbursed, with interests, by the state with the tax revenues paid by all taxpayers. On the whole, a mechanism of upwards redistribution has been set up, from the lower to the upper classes, via public debt, the counterpart of which is always private rent.
To bring an upturn in public finances in Europe and in France, we propose the following two measures:
Measure 12: To restore the strongly redistributive nature of direct taxation on income (suppressing tax breaks, creating new steps, and increasing the rates of income tax…)
Measure 13: To suppress tax exemptions granted to companies, which have insufficient effects on employment.
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 7: WE MUST REASSURE FINANCIAL MARKETS IN ORDER TO FUND THE PUBLIC DEBT
At the global level, rising public debt must be analyzed in parallel with the process of financialization. During the last thirty years, due to the full liberalization of capital flows, finance has increased significantly its grip on the economy. Large firms rely less on credits and increasingly on financial markets. Households also see an increasing share of their savings drained to finance for their retirement, through various investment products or in certain countries through the financing of housing (mortgage). Portfolio managers seek to diversify risk invest in government securities in addition to private equity. These public bonds were easy to find as governments were conducting similar policies leading to a surge in deficits: high interest rates, tax cuts targeted on high incomes, massive incentives to the financial savings of households for pensions funds, etc.
At EU level, the financialization of the public debt has been included in the treaties: since the Maastricht treaty, central banks are prohibited from directly funding states, which must find lenders on financial markets. This "monetary punishment" is accompanied by a process of "financial liberalization", and is the exact opposite of the policies adopted after the Great Depression of the 1930s, which consisted of "financial repression" (i.e. severe restrictions on the freedom of action of finance) and "monetary liberation" (with the end of the gold standard). The purpose of the European treaties is to submit states, supposedly too extravagant by nature, to the discipline of financial markets, which are supposed to be by nature efficient and omniscient.
The result of this doctrinal choice is that the European Central Bank is no longer entitled to subscribe directly to the public bonds issued by European states. Deprived from the security of always being financed by the Central Bank, Southern European states have suffered from speculative attacks. Admittedly, in recent months, the ECB has bought government bonds at market interest rates to ease tensions on the European bond market, something that previously it had always refused to do, in the name of unwavering orthodoxy. But nothing says that this will suffice, if the debt crisis worsens and if market interest rates soar. That monetary orthodoxy devoid of scientific foundations may then be difficult to maintain.
To address the problem of the debt we propose the following two measures:
Measure 14: To authorize the European Central Bank to directly fund European states at low interest rates, thus loosening the straitjacket of financial markets (or to require commercial banks to subscribe to the issue of government bonds).
Measure 15: If necessary, to restructure the public debt, for example by capping the service of public debt to a certain percentage of GDP, and by discriminating between creditors according to the volume of shares they hold. In fact, very large stockholders (individuals or institutions) must accept a substantial lengthening of the debt profile, and even partial or total cancellation. We must also renegotiate the exorbitant interest rates paid on bonds issued by countries in trouble since the crisis.
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 8: THE EUROPEAN UNION PROTECTS THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL MODEL
The European experience is ambiguous. Two visions of Europe coexist, without daring to compete openly. For Social Democrats, Europe should promote the European social model, which resulted from the post World War II social compromise, with its welfare states, its public services and industrial policies. Europe should have been a bulwark against liberal globalization, a way to protect, sustain and advance this model. Europe should have defended a certain vision of the organization of the world economy, i.e. a globalization regulated by agencies of global governance. Europe should have allowed member countries to maintain a high level of public spending and redistribution, by protecting their ability to finance spending through the harmonization of taxes on individuals, businesses, and capital.
But Europe does not want to admit and promote its specificity. The currently prevailing view in Brussels and in most national governments is rather that of a liberal Europe, whose objective is to "adapt" European economies to the needs of globalization. According to this view, European integration is an opportunity to undermine the European social model and to deregulate economies. This is evident through the domination, within the Single Market, of the rule of competition law over domestic regulations and social rights, which introduces more competition in markets for products and services, diminishes the importance of public services and organizes competition among European workers. Social and fiscal competition has reduced taxes, notably on capital income and companies (the "mobile bases" of taxation, opposed to the "fixed base" of labour), and has put pressure on social spending. The treaties guarantee the so-called "four freedoms": free movement of people, goods, services and capital. But far from being limited to the internal market, the freedom of movement of capital has been granted to worldwide investors, thereby subjecting the European productive structure to the exploitation of international capital. European integration thus appears as a way to impose neoliberal reforms on the peoples of Europe.
The organization of the macroeconomic policy (i.e. the independence of the European Central Bank from political powers and the Stability and Growth Pact) is marked by distrust of democratically elected governments. This deprives European countries of their autonomy in monetary and budgetary policies. As fiscal balance must be achieved and discretionary stimuli are banished, only "automatic stabilizers" are allowed to play. No common countercyclical economic policy is implemented in the area, and no common goal is defined in terms of growth or employment. The differences between the situations of the different countries are not taken into account, as the Pact does not deal with national interest rates or current accounts deficits. Last, the EU goals for public deficits and debt do not account for national economic circumstances.
The European authorities have tried to give impetus to "structural reforms" (through the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPGs), the open method of coordination, and the Lisbon Agenda), with a very uneven success. These orientations were adopted in a way that is neither democratic nor susceptible to grant adhesion and their neo-liberal orientation did not necessarily correspond to policies implemented at national levels, given the balance of forces existing in each country. These orientations did not immediately result in the kind of brilliant successes which would have legitimized them. The movement towards greater economic liberalization has been questioned (see the failure of the Bolkestein Directive). Some countries have been tempted to nationalize their industrial policy, while most remained opposed to the Europeanization of their fiscal or social policies. Social Europe has remained an empty word, and only the Europe of competition and finance has actually affirmed itself.
For Europe to truly promote a European social model, we propose a discussion based on the following two measures:
Measure 16: To call into question the free movement of capital and goods between the EU and the rest of the world, by negotiating bilateral or multilateral agreements if necessary.
Measure 17: To make "harmonization in progress" the guiding principle of European construction, instead of competition policy. To establish binding common goals in the social and macro-economic areas (with the creation of Broad Social Policy Guidelines, or BSPGs).
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 9: THE EURO IS A SHIELD AGAINST THE CRISIS
The Euro should be a protection against the global financial crisis. After all, the removal of exchange rates uncertainty between European currencies has suppressed a major element of instability. Yet, the Euro did not protect us: Europe is more profoundly, and for a longer period of time, affected by the crisis than the rest of the world. This is due to the way the monetary union has been created.
Since 1999, the Euro area has experienced relatively poor growth and increased divergence between Member States in terms of growth, inflation, unemployment and external imbalances. The economic policy framework of the Euro area, which tends to impose similar macroeconomic policies on countries which happen to be in different situations, has widened the disparity in growth between the Member States. In most countries, especially the larger ones, the introduction of the Euro did not stimulate growth, contrarily to what had been promised. For other countries, growth did take place, but it came at a price of imbalances which prove difficult to sustain. Monetary and fiscal orthodoxy, which has been reinforced by the euro, has shifted the entire burden of adjustment on labour. All in all, labour flexibility and wage moderation have been promoted, the share of wages in total income has been reduced, and inequalities have widened.
This race to the bottom has been won by Germany, which has been able to draw large trade surpluses at the expense of its neighbours, especially its own employees. Germany has established a low cost of labour and social benefits, which has given a commercial advantage to this country over its neighbours, who have not been able to treat their own workers so badly. The German trade surplus is detrimental to growth in other countries. Budget and trade deficits of some countries are only the inevitable counterpart of the surpluses of other Member States. Generally speaking, the Member States have not been able to develop a coordinated strategy.
The Euro zone should have been less affected by the financial crisis than the United States or the United Kingdom. In the Euro zone, households invest much less on financial markets, which are less sophisticated. And, before the crisis, public finances were in a better situation: the deficit of the Euro countries reached only 0.6% of GDP in 2007, to be compared to almost 3% in the U.S., the U.K. and Japan. But the Euro area was suffering from widening imbalances: Northern countries (Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, and Scandinavia) were curbing their wage levels and their internal demand, thus piling on external surpluses, while the Southern countries (Spain, Greece, Ireland) experienced strong growth, driven by interest rates below growth rates, and accumulated external deficits.
While the financial crisis started from the United States, the U.S. has implemented a real policy of fiscal and monetary stimulus, while initiating a movement of financial re-regulation. Europe on the contrary has failed to engage in a sufficiently responsive policy. From 2007 to 2010, the fiscal impulse has been limited to 1.6 percentage points of GDP in the Euro zone, versus 3.2 points in the United Kingdom, and 4.2 points in the United States. The production loss caused by the crisis has been much larger in the Euro area than in the United States. Rising public deficits in the area resulted more from the crisis than they were the result of an active policy.
At the same time, the Commission has continued to launch excessive deficit procedures against Member States, to the point that, by mid 2010, virtually all states in the area were concerned. The Commission asked Member States to commit themselves to limit their deficits to 3% by 2013 or 2014, regardless of economic developments. The European authorities have continued to demand restrictive wage policies and challenged public pension and health systems, at the obvious risk of deepening the recession in the continent and increasing tensions between countries. This lack of coordination, and more fundamentally, the absence of an EU budget allowing for an effective solidarity between Member States, have encouraged financial actors to turn away from the Euro or even to speculate openly against it.
For the Euro to effectively protect European citizens from the crisis, we propose the following two measures:
Measure 18: To ensure effective coordination of macroeconomic policies and a concerted reduction of trade imbalances between European countries.
Measure 19: To offset payments imbalances in Europe by a Bank of Settlements (that would organize loans between European countries)
Measure 20: If the Euro crisis leads to the end of the Euro, and pending the reviving of the EU budget (see below), to establish an intra-European monetary system (with a common currency such as the "Bancor") which would organize the unwinding of imbalances in trade balances in Europe.
PSEUDO "OBVIOUS FACT" # 10: THE GREEK CRISIS WAS A SPRINGBOARD TOWARDS AN ECONOMIC GOVERNMENT OF EUROPE AND EFFECTIVE EUROPEAN SOLIDARITY
From mid-2009 onwards, financial markets have begun to speculate on the debt of European countries. Overall, soaring debts and deficits in the world have not (yet) resulted in higher long term interest rates: financial operators believe that central banks will keep real short term interest rates near zero for a long time, and that there is no real danger of inflation or of default of a large country. But speculators have seen the flaws in the organization of the Euro area. While the governments of other developed countries can still be supported by their central bank, Euro zone countries have abandoned this option and are totally dependent on markets to finance their deficits. As a result, speculation was triggered on the most vulnerable countries in the area, i.e. Greece, Spain, and Ireland.
European authorities and governments have been slow to respond to this issue, as they did not want to give the impression that Members States were entitled to unlimited support from their partners. They wanted to punish Greece, guilty of having hidden – with the help of Goldman Sachs – the true size of its deficits. However, in May 2010, the ECB and the Member States had to create an Emergency Stabilization Fund to show markets that they would bring unlimited support to threatened countries. In return, these countries had to announce programs of unprecedented fiscal austerity, which will condemn them to a downturn in the short term and to a long period of recession. Under the pressure of the IMF and the European Commission, Greece had to privatize its public services, and Spain had to make its labour market more flexible. Even France and Germany, which have not been attacked by speculation, have announced restrictive measures.
But overall, there is no excess demand in Europe. The fiscal situation is better than that of the U.S. or Great Britain, leaving room for fiscal manoeuvre. We must correct imbalances in a coordinated manner: Northern and Central Europe countries with trade surpluses should pursue expansionary policies – higher wages, social spending, etc. – in order to offset the restrictive policies of the Southern countries. In total, fiscal policy should not be restrictive on average in the eurozone, as long as the European economy does not come close to full employment.
But supporters of automatic and restrictive fiscal policies in Europe today are unfortunately reinforced today. The Greek crisis allows them to make us forget about the origins of the financial crisis. Those who have agreed to financially support the Southern countries want to impose in return a tightening of the Stability and Growth Pact. The Commission and Germany want all member countries to include the goal of balanced budgets in their constitutions, and to have their fiscal policy monitored by committees of independent experts. The Commission wants to impose on countries a long cure of austerity, as long as their public debt is higher than 60% of GDP. Ironically, if there is a step towards a European economic government, it is towards a government which, instead of loosening the grip on finance, imposes further austerity and structural "reforms", at the expense of social solidarities, within and between countries.
The crisis provides financial elites and European technocrats an opportunity to implement a "shock strategy", by taking advantage of the crisis to push further for a radical neo-liberal agenda. But this policy has little chance of success:
– The reduction of public spending will undermine the effort needed at the European level to fund spending on needed areas (such as research, education, or family policy) and to help the European industry to maintain itself and to invest in the areas of the future (green economy).
– The crisis will make it possible to impose deep cuts in social spending, a goal relentlessly pursued by the proponents of neo-liberalism, this will come at the risk of undermining social cohesion, reducing effective demand, and leading households to save more for their pension and health plans, thus contributing more to the private financial institutions which are responsible for the crisis.
– Governments and the European authorities are unwilling to put in place the fiscal harmonization that would allow for the required increase in taxes on the financial sector, wealth and higher incomes.
– European countries are currently establishing long lasting restrictive fiscal policies that will weigh heavily on growth. Tax revenues will fall. Thus, public balances will hardly be improved, debt ratios will not diminish, and markets will not be reassured.
– Because of their diverse political and social cultures, not all European countries have been able to bend under the iron discipline imposed by the Maastricht Treaty; not all of them will bend to its current reinforcement. The risk of creating a dynamic where each country will turn towards itself is real.
In order to move towards a genuine economic government and a European solidarity, we propose the following two measures:
Measure 21: To establish a European tax (for instance a carbon tax, or a tax on profits) and to create an effective European budget that would facilitate the convergence of economies, and to work towards equal conditions of access to public and social services in each Member State, on the basis of best practices.
Measure 22: To launch a broad European action plan, which would be funded by public subscription with low but guaranteed interest rates (and / or by money creation from the ECB), that would initiate the green conversion of the European economy.
CONCLUSION: DEBATING ECONOMIC POLICY, CREATING PATHS TO RESHAPE THE EUROPEAN UNION
Europe has been built for three decades on a technocratic basis which has excluded populations from economic policy debates. The neoliberal doctrine, which rests on the now indefensible assumption of the efficiency of financial markets, should be abandoned. We must reopen the space of possible policies and discuss alternative and consistent proposals that constrain the power of finance and organize the "harmonisation while the improvement is being maintained" of European economic and social systems (art. 151 of the Lisbon Treaty). This requires the pooling of substantial budgetary resources, which would be collected from the development of a highly downward redistributive taxation in Europe. Member States should also be freed from the grip of financial markets. It is only if these conditions are met that the European project can hope to regain the democratic legitimacy it currently lacks among its citizens.
It is obviously not realistic to imagine that 27 countries will decide at the same time to make such a break in the methods and objectives of the European construction. The European Economic Community began with six countries: the reshaping of the European Union will also start with an agreement between a few countries willing to explore alternative ways. As the disastrous consequences of current policies will become obvious, the debate on alternatives will rise across Europe. Social struggles and political changes will occur at different times in different countries. Some national governments will take innovative measures. Those who will desire to do so will adopt enhanced co-operations to take bold steps in the realms of financial regulation, and fiscal and social policy. Through specific measures these countries will hold out their hands to other peoples, so that they can join the movement.
As a consequence, it seems important to outline and to debate right now the broad orientations of alternative economic policies that will make the reshaping of the European construction possible.
First signatories: Philippe Askenazy (CNRS); Thomas Coutrot (scientific council of ATTAC); André Orléan (CNRS, EHESS, president of the French Association for Political Economy); Henri Sterdyniak (OFCE).
Website: Manifeste d'économistes atterrés
Categorie 2010 anno 2 n. 03, Primo PianoTag Lettera degli economisti, public debt, public deficit, speculation
RedazioneRedazione di economiaepolitica.it.
La crisi è da domanda, il Fondo Monetario Internazionale ci ripensa
L'Italia perde terreno sull'energia pulita


text:
Linux Version 3.7 Released
by Paul Lilly — Tuesday, December 11, 2012, 11:20 AM EDT
It took a little longer than Linus Torvalds would have liked, but after a last minute delay and an extra Release Candidate (RC) release, Linux 3.7 is all polished up and out in final form. Torvalds initially hoped to roll out Linux 3.7 last week, but said he was "uncomfortable" with the release candidate due to some last-minute issues, most notably the resurrection of a kswapd issue. That prompted him to build an eighth RC.
"Whee. After an extra RC release, 3.7 is now out. After a few more trials at fixing things, in the end we ended up reverting the kswapd changes that caused problems. And with the extra RC, I had decided to risk doing the buffer.c cleanups that would otherwise have just been marked for stable during the next merge window, and had enough time to fix a few problems that people found there too," Torvalds posted on a message board.
One of the last-minute issues Torvalds cleaned up was a SCSI driver bug. Other than that, he says he stomped out a few networking bugs and fixed some trivial networking issues for SPARC and MIPS.
Anyway, it's been a somewhat drawn out release despite the 3.7 merge window having otherwise appeared pretty straightforward, and none of the RCs were all that big either," Torvalds added. "But we're done, and this means that the merge window will close on Christmas eve. Or rather, I'll probably close it a couple of days early."
Some of the things Linux 3.7 bring to the table are NVIDIA graphics drivers, support for 64-bit ARM instructions, the ability for Ext4 to resize volumes of more than 16TB, SMAP (supervisor mode access prevention) support, the ability to sign kernel modules and verify those signature, and more.
Tags: Linux, Software, Open Source, Linus Torvalds, Linux 3.7


text:
SALTDOGS IN THE MAJORS
SALTDOGS HISTORY
HAYMARKET PARK
MINI MANAGER
SALTDOGS SUITES
HUSKER SUITES
PEPSI HOME RUN TERRACE
PLAYERS & COACHES
SALTDOGS STAFF
TICKETS, SUITES & MORE!
PRESS BOX / NEWS & STATS
'DOGS SNAP SKID AS BROWNELL MAKES MORE HISTORY
LINCOLN, Nebraska – John Brownell tossed his 40th career complete game in his 300th career start, and the Saltdogs snapped a five-game skid with a 5-2 win over the Gary SouthShore RailCats at Haymarket Park on Saturday night.
Brownell allowed just two runs on six hits in his second complete game of the year, and the 'Dogs rallied late for Brownell's eighth win of the season.
Lincoln trailed 2-1 in the 7th after Ray Jones hit a two-out solo homer to give the RailCats a lead, but after Nick Schulz scored on a throwing error in the home-half of the 7th, Tyler Moore hit a pinch-hit sacrifice fly to make it 3-2.
Christian Ibarra later singled in another run before Daniel Herrera added an insurance run in the 8th.
It was the fifth time this year the 'Dogs have not had to use a reliever, and Lincoln's 25th win in 45 games at home.
Ibarra had two hits while Cody Regis went 2-for-4 with a double and a run scored. Moore's RBI was his 40th of the season, and Curt Smith added his team-leading 57th RBI with a game-tying sacrifice fly in the 6th.
The 'Dogs and 'Cats continue the series on Sunday. First pitch is scheduled for 5:05 p.m., and pregame coverage will begin at 4:35 p.m. on ESPN Lincoln 101.5 FM/1480 AM.
The Saltdogs are playing their 19th season in Lincoln. All ticket and promo information can be found at saltdogs.com, and follow the 'Dogs on Twitter/Instagram @saltdogsball.
Michael Dixon2019-08-24T22:48:14-05:00August 24th, 2019|
ABOUT THE SALTDOGS
The Lincoln Saltdogs Baseball Team are a member of the South Division of the American Association of Independent Professional Baseball and play their home games at Haymarket Park in Lincoln, NE.
Join the Saltdogs Newsletter:
GET TICKETS!
STADIUM & BAG POLICIES
403 Line Drive Circle, Ste. A
(402) 474.BALL (2255)
© 2020 Lincoln Saltdogs | All Rights Reserved. A NEBCO, Inc. Company


We are not just a fashion brand. Love, D.Jenee' is about empowering, uplifting and encouraging others to truly trust their own ideas of style. To give awareness that everyone has a voice and their own purpose. We embrace the beauty of the 'elephant in the room' and give her a seat at the table!
Get into the meaning of it all by exploring our collections page. Every collection has a social impact message conveyed through print design and shape. Notice the elephant strong logo that is key throughout each collection. It means unity, strength, and rebirth. It is based on the uterus and is literally the combination of an elephants face and 3 red poms. Some also recognize it as a flower.
Check out the empowerment blog to get to know more about the concept of our collections, the brand, and what we have to come!
RAW Artist Showcase was a great experience. All models pictured are lovely ladies that volunteered their time and energy to be with me for an entire day. I look forward to being part of many more showcases and hosting my own in the near future.
TILA studios made major waves in the art world at MIAMI Art Basel 2018. Studio owner Tiffany Latrice is featured during this amazing week, wearing original print designs and made-to-order looks from our website! Read more about the studio, which was featured in Forbes, NY Times and Huffington Post! Click on the picture to link to Tiffany's interview with Forbes.
Click to read all about Love, D.Jenee's inspiration in this exclusive interview with TILA Studio's Blog writer Carlyn Pounders.


New Delhi: Vodafone Business Services (VBS), the enterprise arm of Vodafone India, has launched International Toll Free Services (ITFS) to meet the need of Indian enterprises to provide a convenient and free method to their customers, business partners and employees travelling abroad – to communicate with them, through an international toll free number.
The noteworthy benefit of this service for Indian enterprises would be that billing is done in Indian rupees instead in foreign currency, which is the case when calls are routed through international operators. Besides, Vodafone will be providing this service to multiple countries by eliminating the need for Enterprises to talk to multiple service providers.
Vodafone is all set to tap the potential business opportunities in the INR 70 crore (Source F&S) ITFS market and empower the enterprises across sectors – cater to their international customers, call support centres in India or conference bridges hosted in India. Vodafone will work closely with these enterprises to understand their business needs and provide suitable ITFS number solutions. Vodafone customers can directly avail the Toll Free Number of different countries effortlessly. As an added benefit, customers need not connect with the foreign operators and neither do they have to worry about hauling the call back to India.
ITFS is a part of the wireline suite of offering customized solutions for Indian enterprises, over and above other services offered by Vodafone Business Services under wireline portfolio, which include Private Leased Circuits (National and International), MPLS based Virtual Private Network (VPN), Internet Leased Lines, Office Wireline Voice and Audio Conferencing Services. The bouquet of integrated wireline services for businesses aims to ensure uninterrupted and secured communication and will especially empower Indian enterprises to keep pace with the evolution in digital communication.
It is good to know that Vodafone has this free tool free service to cater the concerns of their clients or customers from India and those from international clients. Having this kind of service will help them addressed the queries and problems of their clients without taking their time to go to their office or service center.


text:
Q: JVM Out of Memory Causes Questions are based on Oracle Hotspot JDK8.
When applicaton come across java.lang.OutOfMemory: Java heap space exception, I suppose, where are two possible reasons.

*

*Allocated JVM heap size reaches -Xmx specified size and GC system cann't squeeze out enough space.

*Allocated JVM heap doesn't reach -Xmx, but there are not enough physical memory for JVM heap to grow. Suppose -Xms < -Xmx.

I know 1 is a reason for JVM to throw out java.lang.OutOfMemory: Java heap space exception. Is 2 a reasonable one cause?
I find some articles mentioned java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: native memory exhausted, but they are all limited to IBM website. Is this expetion limited to IBM implemented JVM or it is a standard expetion in JVM Specification?

I did some experiments with code supplied by @Eugene in answer. As @Holger noted the result varies in different environments. I tested in on both CentOS x64 and Win7 x64, with Hotspot JDK8 x64.
For simplicity swap and virtual memory are disabled.
I increase memory bound (-Xmx and -Xms) step by step.
I. -Xmx < available logic memory

*

*On both CentOS and Windows it shows OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
II. available logic memory < -Xmx < max physical memory

*

*CentOS: The GC try to Full GC serveral times, with Allocation Failure, and process be killed by system, leaving a message Killed.

*Windows: The GC try to Full GC serveral times, with Allocation Failure, and throw out  OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
III. -Xmx > max physical memory

*

*CentOS: same as in II

*Windows: same as in II

IV. -Xms > max physical memory

*

*CentOS: JVM seems fail to start. Error message is like:

Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: INFO: os::commit_memory(0x00000000e62a0000, 349569024, 0) failed; error='Cannot allocate memory' (errno=12)

*

*Windows: JVM failed to start. Error message is like:

Error occurred during initialization of VM
Could not reserve enough space for object heap

So, the same JVM behave differently in different OS.

*

*On windows, the OS doesn't kill JVM.  And JVM always throw out OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space when memory usage grow exceeds.

*On Linux, the OS kill processes when there is not enough memory.

*On both OS JVM failed to start when available memory doesn't satisfy JVM minimal requirement.

A: First of all there are more reasons for a GC to fail with "out of memory" as the comment under your question explains.
Proving point number (2) is easy, just create some code that always allocates:
public static void main(String[] args) {
    test(1);
}

static void test(int x){
    List<byte[]> list = new ArrayList<>();
    while(x == 1){
        byte [] b =new byte[1 * 1024 * 1024];
        b[100] = 42;
        list.add(b);
    }

    System.out.println(list.hashCode());
}

And run this with -Xms1g -Xmx100g, on a system that has less then 100g of RAM. You can enable GC logs (I did with "-Xlog:heap*=debug" "-Xlog:gc*=debug" in java-9 flags for example) and see how hard GC is trying to cope with this constant allocation, ultimately failing.


If you order within the next 8 Hours 59 Mins, your order will ship on 04/25/2019.
Natural kraft brings your 15 ounce wine glass favors into your special event with Kate Aspen's Stemless 15 oz. Wine Glass Box! The set of 12 wine glass boxes feature a kraft cardstock construction and each has a clear window in front to allow your wine glass favors to shine. A white ribbon ties together the stemless wine glass favor boxes to add an elegant touch to your gift presentation!
Kraft box with PVC window and white satin ribbon tie.


text:
17 Jul 2017 13:13:25 UTC
All snapshots from host www.khanacademy.org
en.wikipedia.org » Italian language
en.wikipedia.org » Talk:Italian language/Archive 2
en.wikipedia.org » User talk:Reanna.shah/sandbox
en.wikipedia.org » User:Reanna.shah/sandbox

 An introduction to the Protestant Reformation (article) | Khan Academy
 archived 17 Jul 2017 13:13:25 UTC
{{cite web | title = An introduction to the Protestant Reformation (article) Khan Academy | url = https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/world-history/renaissance-and-reformation/protestant-reformation/a/an-introduction-to-the-protestant-reformation | date = 2017-07-17 | archiveurl = http://archive.today/qFj2b | archivedate = 2017-07-17 }}
If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.
If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.
Math by subject
Early math
Math by grade
Eureka Math/EngageNY
Cosmology & astronomy
Finance & capital markets
NCLEX-RN
DonateSign in / Sign up
Search for subjects, skills, and videos
World history 1450 - 1750 Renaissance and Reformation
The Protestant Reformation
An introduction to the Protestant Reformation
Introduction to the Protestant Reformation: Setting the stage
Introduction to the Protestant Reformation: Martin Luther
Introduction to the Protestant Reformation: Varieties of Protestantism
Introduction to the Protestant Reformation: The Counter-Reformation
Read + Discuss
Practice: Protestant Reformation quiz
Cranach, Law and Gospel (Law and Grace)
Practice: Cranach, Law and Gospel (quiz)
Next tutorial
The Russian Empire
Arts and humanities|World history|1450 - 1750 Renaissance and Reformation|
Google ClassroomFacebookTwitterEmail
Wittenberg, 1725, engraving, 18 x 15 cm (State and University Library, Dresden)
Today there are many types of Protestant Churches. For example, Baptist is currently the largest denomination in the United States but there are many dozens more. How did this happen? Where did they all begin? To understand the Protestant Reform movement, we need to go back in history to the early 16th century when there was only one church in Western Europe - what we would now call the Roman Catholic Church - under the leadership of the Pope in Rome. Today, we call this "Roman Catholic" because there are so many other types of churches (for example, Methodist, Baptist, Lutheran, Calvinist, Anglican - you get the idea).
The Church and the State
So, if we go back to the year 1500, the Church (what we now call the Roman Catholic Church) was very powerful (politically and spiritually) in Western Europe (and in fact ruled over significant territory in Italy called the Papal States). But there were other political forces at work too. There was the Holy Roman Empire (largely made up of German speaking regions ruled by princes, dukes and electors), the Italian city-states, England, as well as the increasingly unified nation states of France and Spain (among others). The power of the rulers of these areas had increased in the previous century and many were anxious to take the opportunity offered by the Reformation to weaken the power of the papacy (the office of the Pope) and increase their own power in relation to the Church in Rome and other rulers.
Keep in mind too, that for some time the Church had been seen as an institution plagued by internal power struggles (at one point in the late 1300s and 1400s, church was ruled by three Popes simultaneously). Popes and Cardinals often lived more like kings than spiritual leaders. Popes claimed temporal (political) as well as spiritual power. They commanded armies, made political alliances and enemies, and, sometimes, even waged war. Simony (the selling of Church offices) and nepotism (favoritism based on family relationships) were rampant. Clearly, if the Pope was concentrating on these worldly issues, there wasn't as much time left for caring for the souls of the faithful. The corruption of the Church was well known, and several attempts had been made to reform the Church (notably by John Wyclif and Jan Hus), but none of these efforts successfully challenged Church practice until Martin Luther's actions in the early 1500s.
Lucas Cranach the Elder, Martin Luther as an Augustinian Monk, 1520, engraving, 6-1/4 x 4-3/16 (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Martin Luther was a German monk and Professor of Theology at the University of Wittenberg. Luther sparked the Reformation in 1517 by posting, at least according to tradition, his "95 Theses" on the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany - these theses were a list of statements that expressed Luther's concerns about certain Church practices - largely the sale of indulgences, but they were based on Luther's deeper concerns with Church doctrine. Before we go on, notice that the word Protestant contains the word "protest" and that reformation contains the word "reform"—this was an effort, at least at first, to protest some practices of the Catholic Church and to reform that Church.
The sale of indulgences was a practice where the church acknowledged a donation or other charitable work with a piece of paper (an indulgence), that certified that your soul would enter heaven more quickly by reducing your time in purgatory. If you committed no serious sins that guaranteed your place in hell, and you died before repenting and atoning for all of your sins, then your soul went to Purgatory - a kind of way-station where you finished atoning for your sins before being allowed to enter heaven.
Pope Leo X had granted indulgences to raise money for the rebuilding of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. These indulgences were being sold by Johann Tetzel not far from Wittenberg, where Luther was Professor of Theology. Luther was gravely concerned about the way in which getting into heaven was connected with a financial transaction. But the sale of indulgences was not Luther's only disagreement with the institution of the Church.
Martin Luther was very devout and had experienced a spiritual crisis. He concluded that no matter how "good" he tried to be, no matter how he tried to stay away from sin, he still found himself having sinful thoughts. He was fearful that no matter how many good works he did, he could never do enough to earn his place in heaven (remember that, according to the Catholic Church, doing good works, for example commissioning works of art for the Church, helped one gain entrance to heaven). This was a profound recognition of the inescapable sinfulness of the human condition. After all, no matter how kind and good we try to be, we all find ourselves having thoughts which are unkind and sometimes much worse. Luther found a way out of this problem when he read St. Paul, who wrote "The just shall live by faith" (Romans 1:17). Luther understood this to mean that those who go to heaven (the just) will get there by faith alone - not by doing good works. In other words, God's grace is something freely given to human beings, not something we can earn. For the Catholic Church on the other hand, human beings, through good works, had some agency in their salvation.
Scripture Alone
Luther (and other reformers) turned to the Bible as the only reliable source of instruction (as opposed to the teachings of the Church). The invention of the printing press in the middle of the 15th century (by Gutenberg in Mainz, Germany) together with the translation of the Bible into the vernacular (the common languages of French, Italian, German, English, etc.) meant that it was possible for those who could read to learn directly from Bible without having to rely on a priest or other church officials. Before this time, the Bible was available in Latin, the ancient language of Rome spoken chiefly by the clergy. Before the printing press, books were handmade and extremely expensive. The invention of the printing press and the translation of the bible into the vernacular meant that for the first time in history, the Bible was available to those outside of the Church. And now, a direct relationship to God, unmediated by the institution of the Catholic Church, was possible.
When Luther and other reformers looked to the words of the Bible (and there were efforts at improving the accuracy of these new translations based on early Greek manuscripts), they found that many of the practices and teachings of the Church about how we achieve salvation didn't match Christ's teaching. This included many of the Sacraments, including Holy Communion (also known as the Eucharist). According to the Catholic Church, the miracle of Communion is transubstantiation—when the priest administers the bread and wine, they change (the prefix "trans" means to change) their substance into the body and blood of Christ. Luther denied this change during Holy Communion. Luther thereby challenged one of the central sacraments of the Catholic Church, one of its central miracles, and thereby one of the ways that human beings can achieve grace with God, or salvation.
The Counter-Reformation
The Church initially ignored Martin Luther, but Luther's ideas (and variations of them, including Calvinism) quickly spread throughout Europe. He was asked to recant (to disavow) his writings at the Diet of Worms (an unfortunate name for a council held by the Holy Roman Emperor in the German city of Worms). When Luther refused, he was excommunicated (in other words, expelled from the church). The Church's response to the threat from Luther and others during this period is called the Counter-Reformation ("counter" meaning against).
The Council of Trent
In 1545 the Church opened the Council of Trent to deal with the issues raised by Luther. The Council of Trent was an assembly of high officials in the Church who met (on and off for eighteen years) principally in the Northern Italian town of Trent for 25 sessions.
Selected Outcomes of the Council of Trent:
The Council denied the Lutheran idea of justification by faith. They affirmed, in other words, their Doctrine of Merit, which allows human beings to redeem themselves through Good Works, and through the sacraments.
They affirmed the existence of Purgatory and the usefulness of prayer and indulgences in shortening a person's stay in purgatory.
They reaffirmed the belief in transubstantiation and the importance of all seven sacraments
They reaffirmed the authority of scripture and the teachings and traditions of the Church
They reaffirmed the necessity and correctness of religious art (see below)
The Council of Trent on Religious Art
At the Council of Trent, the Church also reaffirmed the usefulness of images - but indicated that church officials should be careful to promote the correct use of images and guard against the possibility of idolatry. The council decreed that images are useful "because the honour which is shown them is referred to the prototypes which those images represent" (in other words, through the images we honor the holy figures depicted). And they listed another reason images were useful, "because the miracles which God has performed by means of the saints, and their salutary examples, are set before the eyes of the faithful; that so they may give God thanks for those things; may order their own lives and manners in imitation of the saints; and may be excited to adore and love God, and to cultivate piety."
The Reformation was a very violent period in Europe, even family members were often pitted against one another in the wars of religion. Each side, both Catholics and Protestants, were often absolutely certain that they were in the right and that the other side was doing the devil's work.
The artists of this period - Michelangelo in Rome, Titian in Venice, Durer in Nuremberg, Cranach in Saxony - were impacted by these changes since the Church had been the single largest patron for artists. Now art was being scrutinized in an entirely new way. The Catholic Church was looking to see if art communicated the stories of the Bible effectively and clearly (see Veronese's Feast in the House of Levi for more on this). Protestants on the other hand, for the most part lost the patronage of the Church and religious images (sculptures, paintings, stained glass windows etc) were destroyed in iconoclastic riots.
Other developments
It is also during this period that the Scientific Revolution gained momentum and observation of the natural world replaced religious doctrine as the source of our understanding of the universe and our place in it. Copernicus up-ended the ancient Greek model of the heavens by suggesting that the sun was at the center of the solar system and that the planets orbited around it.
At the same time, exploration, colonization and (the often forced) Christianization of what Europe called the "new world" continued. By the end of the century, the world of the Europeans was a lot bigger and opinions about that world were more varied and more uncertain than they had been for centuries.
Please note, this tutorial focuses on Western Europe. There are other forms of Christianity in other parts of the world including for example the Eastern Orthodox Church.
Essay by Dr. Steven Zucker & Dr. Beth Harris