AG: The answer to the question is hard for me because, on the one hand, I think that we should feel really great about the fact that the Republican nominee -- certain nominee -- John McCain, and both of the finalists for the Democratic nomination -- all three have a very different and forward-leaning position on the climate crisis. All three have offered leadership, and all three are very different from the approach taken by the current administration. And I think that all three have also been responsible in putting forward plans and proposals. But the campaign dialogue that -- as illustrated by the questions -- that was put together by the League of Conservation Voters, by the way, the analysis of all the questions -- and, by the way, the debates have all been sponsored by something that goes by the Orwellian label, \"Clean Coal.\" Has anybody noticed that?
AG: Menjawab pertanyaan ini sulit buat saya karena, di satu sisi, saya rasa kita harus merasa senang bahwa kenyataannya nominator dari Partai Republik -nominator tertentu- John McCain, dan dua finalis dari Partai Demokrat -ketiganya memiliki posisi yang sangat berbeda dan maju tentang krisis iklim. Ketiganya menawarkan kepemimpinan, dan ketiganya memiliki pendekatan yang sangat berbeda dibandingkan dengan pemerintahan saat ini. Dan saya rasa ketiganya juga memiliki tanggung jawab dalam memajukan berbagai perencanaan. Namun kampanye dialog yang- sebagaimana digambarkan oleh pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang ada- yang digabungkan oleh Liga Pemilih Konservatif, analisa dari seluruh pertanyaan tersebut- dan, tambahan lagi, semua perdebatan telah disponsori oleh sesuatu yang oleh label Orwellian disebut \"Clean Coal\". Adakah yang menyadari hal itu?