Item 1. Business.
Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Item 2. Properties.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 4.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
The following substitute information is provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:
Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB. Significant Obligors of Pool Assets.
No single obligor represents 10% or more of the asset pool owned by Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust (the “Trust”).
Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB. Credit Enhancement and Other Support, Except for Certain Derivatives Instruments.
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support with respect to either payment on the pool assets owned by the Trust or payments on the notes (the “Notes”) or the certificate (the “Certificate”) issued by the Trust.
Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB. Certain Derivatives Instruments.
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external derivative instruments to either payment on the pool assets owned by the Trust or payments on the Notes or the Certificate.
Item 1117 of Regulation AB. Legal Proceedings.
As previously disclosed by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”), TMCC has received a request for documents and information from the New York State Department of Financial Services relating to its lending practices (including fair lending), and a request for documents and information pursuant to a civil investigative demand from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General relating to TMCC’s financing of guaranteed auto protection (GAP) insurance products on retail contracts. TMCC is cooperating with these requests, but is unable to predict their outcome given their preliminary status.
The following seven paragraphs are disclosures received from Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”), which serves as the indenture trustee under the indenture for the Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust transaction.
DBTCA and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.
On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed a derivative action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court purportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trusts asserting claims for alleged violations of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the “TIA”)), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on DBNTC and DBTCA’s alleged failure to perform their duties as trustees for the trusts. Plaintiffs subsequently dismissed their state court complaint and filed a derivative and class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of and for the benefit of 564 private-label RMBS trusts, which substantially overlapped with the trusts at issue in the state court action. The complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $89.4 billion, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss, and on January 19, 2016, the court partially granted the motion on procedural grounds: as to the 500 trusts that are governed by pooling and servicing agreements, the court declined to exercise jurisdiction. The court did not rule on substantive defenses asserted in the motion to dismiss. On March 22, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in federal court. In the amended complaint, in connection with 62 trusts governed by indenture agreements, plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract, violation of the TIA, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $9.8 billion, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On July 15, 2016, DBNTC and
DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On January 23, 2017, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs’ conflict-of-interest claim, thereby dismissing it, and denied the motion to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim (except as noted below) and claim for violation of the TIA, thereby allowing those claims to proceed. On January 26, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty. On January 27, 2017, the court entered the parties’ joint stipulation and ordered that plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty be dismissed. On February 3, 2017, following a hearing concerning DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss on February 2, 2017, the court issued a short form order dismissing (i) plaintiffs’ representation and warranty claims as to 21 trusts whose originators and/or sponsors had entered bankruptcy and the deadline for asserting claims against such originators and/or sponsors had passed as of 2009 and (ii) plaintiffs’ claims to the extent they were premised upon any alleged pre-event of default duty to terminate servicers. On March 27, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the amended complaint. On January 26, 2018, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. DBNTC and DBTCA’s opposition to plaintiffs’ motion is due on March 26, 2018, and plaintiffs’ reply is due on April 16, 2018. Discovery is ongoing.
On March 25, 2016, the BlackRock plaintiffs filed a state court action against DBTCA in the Superior Court of California, Orange County with respect to 513 trusts. On May 18, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint with respect to 465 trusts, and included DBNTC as an additional defendant. The amended complaint asserts three causes of action: breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Plaintiffs purport to bring the action on behalf of themselves and all other current owners of certificates in the 465 trusts. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $75.7 billion, but does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On August 22, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a demurrer as to plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty cause of action and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest cause of action and motion to strike as to plaintiffs’ breach of contract cause of action. On October 18, 2016, the court granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s demurrer, providing plaintiffs with thirty days’ leave to amend, and denied DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to strike. Plaintiffs did not further amend their complaint and, on December 19, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the amended complaint. On January 17, 2018, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. DBNTC and DBTCA’s opposition to plaintiffs’ motion is due on March 30, 2018, and plaintiffs’ reply is due on April 30, 2018. Discovery is ongoing.
On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.
On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.
On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of New York’s Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Article 9 of the Uniform
Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice of discontinuance, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to three trusts. As of January 17, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss has been briefed and is awaiting decision by the court. On June 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to four additional trusts. Certain limited discovery is permitted to go forward while the motion to dismiss is pending.
It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the six immediately preceding paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as indenture trustee under the indenture for the Toyota Auto Receivables 2016-A Owner Trust transaction.
PART II
The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:
Item 5.
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 6.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
Item 7.
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 7A.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Item 8.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 9.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Item 9A.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information.
Nothing to report.
PART III
The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:
Item 10.
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Item 11.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
Item 12.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 13.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 14.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The following substitute information is provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:
Item 1119 of Regulation AB. Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Information required by Item 1119 of Regulation AB has been omitted from this report on Form 10-K in reliance on the Instruction to Item 1119.
Item 1122 of Regulation AB. Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.
Each of TMCC and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (each, a “Servicing Participant”) has been identified by the registrant as a party participating in the servicing function during the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “2017 Reporting Period”) with respect to the pool assets owned by the Trust. Each of the Servicing Participants has completed a report on an assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to such Servicing Participant (each, a “Report on Assessment”) as of December 31, 2017, and for the 2017 Reporting Period. In addition, each of the Servicing Participants has provided an attestation report (each, an “Attestation Report”) by a registered public accounting firm regarding its Report on Assessment. Each Report on Assessment and Attestation Report is attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.
Neither the Report on Assessment nor the Attestation Report for TMCC has identified any material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria described in such Report on Assessment as being applicable to TMCC.
Neither the Report on Assessment nor the Attestation Report for Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas has identified any material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria described in such Report on Assessment as being applicable to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.
Item 1123 of Regulation AB. Servicer Compliance Statement.
TMCC has been identified by the registrant as a servicer during the 2017 Reporting Period with respect to the pool assets owned by the Trust. TMCC has provided a statement of compliance for the 2017 Reporting Period, signed by an authorized officer, and such compliance statement is attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1)
Not applicable.
(2)
Not applicable.
(3)
See Item 15(b) below.
(b) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit Number
Description
3.1
Certificate of Formation of Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC (“TAFR LLC”) (included in Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-159170), as filed by the registrant with the Commission on May 28, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference).
3.2
Limited Liability Company Agreement of TAFR LLC (included in Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-159170), as filed by the registrant with the Commission on May 28, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.1
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016, between TAFR LLC and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, National Association, as owner trustee (included in Exhibit 4.1 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 2, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.2
Indenture, dated as of March 2, 2016, between the Trust and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the “Indenture Trustee”) and securities intermediary (included in Exhibit 4.2 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 2, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.3
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016, among TAFR LLC, as seller, TMCC, as servicer and sponsor, and the Trust, as issuer (included in Exhibit 4.3 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 2, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.4
Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016, between TAFR LLC, as purchaser, and TMCC, as seller (included in Exhibit 4.4 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 2, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.5
Administration Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016, among TMCC, as administrator, the Trust, as issuer, and the Indenture Trustee (included in Exhibit 4.5 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 2, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.6
Securities Account Control Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016, between TAFR LLC, as pledgor, and the Indenture Trustee, as secured party (included in Exhibit 4.6 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 2, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.7
Asset Representations Review Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2016, among the Trust, as issuer, TMCC, as servicer and administrator, and Clayton Fixed Income Services LLC, as asset representations reviewer (included in Exhibit 4.7 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 2, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference).
31.1*
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 28, 2018.
33.1*
Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, dated March 28, 2018.
33.2*
Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated February 28, 2018.
34.1*
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria relating to Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, dated March 28, 2018.
34.2*
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of KPMG LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria relating to Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated February 28, 2018.
35.1*
Servicer Compliance Statement, dated March 28, 2018, of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.
_____________
* Filed herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC
(Depositor)
Date: March 28, 2018
By: /s/ Wei Shi
Wei Shi
President, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT
No annual report to security holders, proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material has been sent to security holders or is anticipated to be furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K.