Item 1. Business
General Overview
New Media Investment Group Inc. (“New Media,” “Company,” “us,” or “we”), was formed as a Delaware corporation on June 18, 2013. Pursuant to the Restructuring (as defined below), Newcastle Investment Corp. (“Newcastle”) owned approximately 84.6% of New Media until February 13, 2014, upon which date Newcastle distributed the shares that it held in New Media to its shareholders on a prorata basis. New Media had no operations until November 26, 2013, when it assumed control of GateHouse Media, LLC (formerly known as GateHouse Media, Inc.) (“GateHouse” or “Predecessor”) and Local Media Group Holdings LLC (“Local Media Parent”). GateHouse was determined to be the predecessor to New Media, as the operations of GateHouse comprise substantially all of the business operations of the combined entities. Both New Media and Newcastle are externally managed and advised by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”).
New Media is a company that owns, operates and invests in high quality local media assets. We have a particular focus on owning and acquiring strong local media assets in small to mid-size markets. With our collection of assets, we focus on two large business categories; consumers and small to medium size businesses (“SMBs”).
Our portfolio of media assets today spans across 489 markets and 31 states. Our products include 564 community print publications, 489 websites, 476 mobile sites and six yellow page directories. We reach over 19 million people per week and serve over 193,000 business customers.
We are focused on growing our consumer revenues primarily through our penetration into the local consumer market that values comprehensive local news and receives their news primarily from our products. We believe our rich local content, our strong media brands, and multiple platforms for delivering content will impact our reach into the local consumers leading to growth in subscription income. We also believe our focus on smaller markets will allow us to be a dominant provider of valuable, unique local news to consumers in those markets. We believe that one result of our local consumer penetration in these smaller markets will be transaction revenues as we link consumers with local businesses. For our SMB business category, we focus on leveraging our strong local media brands, our in-market sales force and our high consumer penetration rates with a variety of products and services that we believe will help SMBs expand their marketing, advertising and other digital lead generation platforms. We also believe our strong position in our local markets will allow us to develop other products that will be of value to our SMBs in helping them run and grow their businesses.
Our business strategy is to be the preeminent provider of local news, information, advertising and digital services in the markets we operate in today. We aim to grow our business organically through both our consumer and SMB strategies. We also plan to pursue strategic acquisitions of high quality local media assets at attractive valuation levels. Finally, we intend to distribute a substantial portion of our free cash flow as a dividend to stockholders through a quarterly dividend, subject to satisfactory financial performance, approval by our board of directors (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) and dividend restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement (as defined below). The Board of Directors’ determinations regarding dividends will depend on a variety of factors, including the Company’s U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) net income, free cash flow generated from operations or other sources, liquidity position and potential alternative uses of cash, such as acquisitions, as well as economic conditions and expected future financial results.
We believe that our focus on owning and operating dominant local-content-oriented media properties in small to mid-size markets puts us in a position to better execute our strategy. We believe that being the dominant provider of local news and information in the markets in which we operate and distributing that content across multiple print and digital platforms, gives us an opportunity to grow our audiences and reach. Further, we believe our strong local media brands and our in-market sales presence gives us the opportunity to expand our advertising and lead generation products with local business customers.
Central to our business strategy are our digital marketing services products called Propel Marketing (“Propel”). We launched the products in 2012 and have seen rapid growth since then. Revenues have grown from $1 million in 2012 to $31.3 million in 2015. We believe Propel and our other digital marketing service products, combined with our strong local brands and in market sales force, position this product group to be a key component to our overall organic growth strategy.
We believe that Propel will allow us to capitalize on the following opportunities in the marketplace:
There are approximately 27.9 million SMBs in the U.S. according to the 2011 U.S. Census data. Of these, approximately 26.7 million have 20 employees or less.
Many of the owners and managers of these SMBs do not have resources or expertise to navigate the fast evolving digital marketing sector, but are increasingly aware of the need to establish and maintain a digital presence in order to stay connected with current and future customers.
Propel is designed to offer a complete set of turn-key digital marketing services to SMBs that provides transparent results to the business owners. Propel provides four broad categories of services: building businesses a presence, helping businesses to be located by consumers online, engaging with consumers, and growing their customer base.
We believe our local media properties and local sales infrastructure are uniquely positioned to sell these digital marketing services to local business owners and give us distinct advantages, including:
•
our strong and trusted local brands, with 85% of our daily newspapers having been publishing local content for more than 100 years;
•
our ability to market through our print and online properties, driving branding and traffic; and
•
our more than 1,480 local, direct, in-market sales professionals with long standing relationships with small businesses in the communities we serve.
Our core products include:
•
124 daily newspapers with total paid circulation of approximately 1.5 million;
•
322 weekly newspapers (published up to three times per week) with total paid circulation of approximately 321,000 and total free circulation of approximately 2.0 million;
•
118 “shoppers” (generally advertising-only publications) with total circulation of approximately 2.8 million;
•
489 locally focused websites and 476 mobile sites, which extend our businesses onto the internet and mobile devices with approximately 226 million page views per month;
•
six yellow page directories, with a distribution of approximately 348,000, that cover a population of approximately 620,000 people; and
•
Propel digital marketing services.
In addition to our core products, we also opportunistically produce niche publications that address specific local market interests such as recreation, sports, healthcare and real estate. Similarly, GateHouse Live, our events business, concentrates on local markets and interests.
Our print and online products focus on the local community from a content, advertising, and digital marketing perspective. As a result of our focus on small and midsize markets, we are usually the primary, and sometimes, the sole provider of comprehensive and in-depth local market news and information in the communities we serve. Our content is primarily devoted to topics that we believe are highly relevant and of interest to our audience such as local news and politics, community and regional events, youth sports, opinion and editorial pages, local schools, obituaries, weddings and police reports.
More than 85% of our daily newspapers have been published for more than 100 years and 100% have been published for more than 50 years. We believe that the longevity of our publications demonstrates the value and relevance of the local information that we provide and has created a strong foundation of reader loyalty and a highly recognized media brand name in each community we serve. As a result of these factors, we believe that our publications have high local audience penetration rates in our markets, thereby providing advertisers with strong local market reach.
We believe the large number of publications we have, our focus on smaller markets, and our geographic diversity also provide the following benefits to our strategy:
•
Diversified revenue streams, both in terms of customers and markets;
•
Operational efficiencies realized from clustering of business assets;
•
Operational efficiencies realized from centralization of back office functions;
•
Operational efficiencies realized from improved buying power for key operating cost items through our increased size and scale;
•
Ability to provide consistent management practices and ensure best practices; and
•
Less competition and high barriers to entry.
The newspaper industry has experienced declining revenue and profitability dating back to 2007 due to, among other things, advertisers’ shift from print to digital media and general market conditions. Our Predecessor was affected by this trend and experienced a history of net operating losses.
The revenues derived from our SMB category come from a variety of print and digital advertising products, digital service products we offer through Propel, and commercial printing services. Our consumer category revenue comes primarily from subscription income as consumers pay for our deep, rich local contents, both in print and online, however primarily print today.
Our operating costs consist primarily of labor, newsprint, and delivery costs. Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of labor costs. Compensation represents just under 50% of our operating expenses. Over the last few years, we have worked to drive efficiencies through centralization of back office functions, outsourcing and leveraging our scale to purchase more effectively. Additionally, we have taken steps to cluster our operations, thereby increasing the usage of facilities and equipment while increasing the productivity of our labor force. We expect to continue to employ these steps as part of our business and clustering strategy.
Local Media Acquisition
Newcastle acquired Local Media Group Inc. (formerly known as Dow Jones Local Media Group, Inc.) (“Local Media”) on September 3, 2013 from News Corp. Inc. and contributed to New Media 100% of the stock of Local Media Parent (which owns all of Local Media’s stock) on GateHouse’s emergence from bankruptcy on November 26, 2013 (the “Effective Date”). In exchange for the contribution of Local Media, Newcastle received shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New Media (“New Media Common Stock” or our “Common Stock”), equal in value to the cost of the acquisition of Local Media by Newcastle (“Local Media Acquisition”). Local Media Parent became a wholly owned subsidiary of New Media.
GateHouse managed the assets of Local Media pursuant to a management and advisory agreement (“Local Media Management Agreement”). The agreement had a two-year term, with automatic renewal for successive two-year periods unless terminated. While the agreement was in effect, GateHouse received an annual management fee of $1.1 million, subject to adjustments (up to a maximum annual management fee of $1.2 million), and an annual incentive compensation fee based on exceeding EBITDA targets of Local Media. The Local Media Management Agreement was terminated effective June 4, 2014.
Restructuring and Spin-off from Newcastle Investment Corp.
We acquired our operations as part of the restructuring (the “Restructuring”) of our Predecessor, GateHouse. On September 27, 2013, GateHouse commenced the Restructuring in which it sought confirmation of its bankruptcy plan sponsored by Newcastle, as the holder of the majority of the Outstanding Debt (as defined as follows). The Plan relates to the Restructuring of our Predecessor’s obligations under the amended and restated credit agreement by and among certain affiliates of GateHouse, the lenders from time to time thereto and Cortland Products Group, as administrative agent, dated February 27, 2007 (as amended, the “2007 Credit Facility”) and certain interest rate swaps (collectively, the “Outstanding Debt”). The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware confirmed the reorganization plan (the “Plan”) on November 6, 2013 and GateHouse consequently emerged from Chapter 11 protection on November 26, 2013.
Pursuant to the Restructuring, Newcastle offered to purchase the Outstanding Debt in cash and at 40% of (i) $1,167 million of principal claims under the 2007 Credit Facility, plus (ii) accrued and unpaid interest at the applicable contract non-default rate with respect thereto, plus (iii) all amounts, excluding any default interest, arising from transactions in connection with interest rate swaps secured under the 2007 Credit Facility (the “Cash-Out Offer”) on the Effective Date. The holders of the Outstanding Debt had the option of receiving, in satisfaction of their Outstanding Debt, their pro rata share of the (i) Cash-Out Offer or (ii) New Media Common Stock and net proceeds, if any, of the GateHouse Credit Facilities. All pensions, trade and all other unsecured claims will be paid in the ordinary course.
On the Effective Date (1) GateHouse became our wholly-owned subsidiary as a result of (a) the cancellation and discharge of the currently outstanding equity interests in GateHouse (the holders of which received warrants issued by New Media) and (b) the issuance of equity interests in the reorganized GateHouse to New Media; (2) Local Media Parent, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newcastle, following the Local Media Acquisition became a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Media as a result of Newcastle’s transfer of Local Media Parent to New Media; (3) New Media entered into the Management Agreement (as defined below) with our Manager (as defined below), (4) New Media entered into the GateHouse Management and Advisory Agreement (the “GateHouse Management Agreement”) with GateHouse; and (5) all of GateHouse’s Outstanding Debt was cancelled and discharged and the holders of the Outstanding Debt received, at their option, their pro rata share of the (i) Cash-Out Offer or (ii) New Media Common Stock and the net proceeds of the two certain Term Loan and Security Agreements dated November 26, 2013 (the “GateHouse Credit Facilities”). Pursuant to the Cash-Out Offer, Newcastle offered to buy the claims of the holders of the Outstanding Debt. As a result of these transactions, Newcastle owned 84.6% of New Media as of the Effective Date. The GateHouse Management Agreement was terminated effective June 4, 2014.
On the Effective Date, New Media entered into a management agreement with FIG LLC (the “Manager”) (the “Management Agreement”) pursuant to which the Manager will manage the operations of New Media. The annual management fee is 1.50% of New Media’s Total Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement) and the Manager is eligible to receive incentive compensation.
On September 27, 2013, Newcastle announced that its board of directors unanimously approved a plan to spin-off our Company. Newcastle’s board of directors made the determination to spin-off our assets because it believed that our value can be increased over time through a strategy aimed at acquiring local media assets and organically growing our digital marketing business.
In order to effect the separation and spin-off of our Company, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1, as amended, which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on January 30, 2014.
Each share of Newcastle common stock outstanding as of 5:00 PM, Eastern Time, on February 6, 2014, the Record Date, entitled the holder thereof to receive 0.07219481485 shares of our Common Stock (the
“Distribution” or the “spin-off”). The spin-off was completed on February 13, 2014. Immediately thereafter, we became a publicly traded company independent from Newcastle trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “NEWM.”
Acquisitions
On February 28, 2014, we completed the acquisition of five publications from Freedom Communications for a total purchase price of $7.9 million, including working capital. The acquisition included two daily and three weekly publications serving Southern California with an aggregate circulation of approximately 56,000.
On June 30, 2014, we completed two acquisitions of 20 publications with a total purchase price of $15.9 million, including working capital. The acquisitions included six daily, ten weekly publications, and four shoppers serving areas of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Virginia with an aggregate circulation of approximately 54,000.
On September 3, 2014, we completed the acquisition of The Providence Journal with a total purchase price of $48.7 million, including working capital. The acquisition included one daily and two weekly publications serving areas of Rhode Island with a daily circulation of approximately 72,000 and 96,000 on Sunday.
On December 1, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Foster’s Daily Democrat along with other publications and related assets for $5.4 million in cash, including working capital, from the Foster family. The publications are located around Dover, NH, and the daily newspaper has a circulation of approximately 12,000.
On January 9, 2015, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets from Halifax Media Group for an aggregate purchase price of $285.4 million, including working capital and net of assumed debt. The acquisition included 24 daily publications, thirteen weekly publications, and five shoppers serving areas of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and South Carolina with a daily circulation of approximately 635,000 and 752,000 on Sunday.
On March 18, 2015, we completed the acquisition of the assets of Stephens Media, LLC (“Stephens Media”) for an aggregate purchase price of $110.8 million, including working capital. The acquisition includes nine daily newspapers, 35 weekly publications and fifteen shoppers serving communities throughout the United States with a combined average daily circulation of approximately 221 and 244 on Sunday.
On June 15, 2015 and September 23, 2015, we acquired substantially all the assets, properties and business of publishing/operating certain newspapers for an aggregate purchase price of $52.0 million, including estimated working capital. The acquisitions included two daily newspapers, twenty-eight weekly publications, and two shoppers serving Central Ohio and Southern Michigan.
Dispositions
On December 10, 2015, we completed the sale of the Las Vegas Review-Journal and related publications (initially acquired in the Stephens Media acquisition), which are located in Las Vegas, Nevada for an aggregate sale price of $140,000 plus working capital adjustment of $1,000. As a result, a gain of $57.0 million is included in (gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for this period.
Subsequent Events
Acquisitions
On December 31, 2015, we completed the acquisition of the Business Information Division of Dolan LLC (“Dolan”) for $35.0 million in cash, plus working capital. We funded the acquisition with cash on the balance sheet. Dolan is a leading provider of industry-specific news with 39 print and online publications and an audience of over 46,000 paid subscribers.
On January 12, 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the publishing operations of the Times Publishing Company, including the Erie Times-News daily newspaper, for $11.5 million in cash, plus the assumption of the assumed liabilities. We funded the acquisition with cash on the balance sheet. Erie Times-News is a dominant source of local news and advertising in Erie, PA with an average weekday circulation of over 39,000 and 55,000 on Sunday.
Dividends
On February 25, 2016, the Company announced a fourth quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend will be paid on March 17, 2016, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 9, 2016.
Corporate Entity Structure
The chart below sets forth our entity structure and that of our direct and indirect subsidiaries. This chart does not include all of our affiliates and subsidiaries or our Manager and, in some cases, we have combined separate entities for presentation purposes.
Industry Overview
We operate in what is sometimes referred to as the “hyper-local” or community news market and market within the media industry. Media companies that serve this segment provide highly focused local content and advertising that is generally unique to each market they serve and is not readily obtainable from other sources. Local publications include community newspapers, websites, shoppers, traders, real estate guides, special interest magazines and directories. Due to the unique local nature of their content and audience, community publications compete for advertising customers with other forms of traditional media, including direct mail, directories, radio, television, and outdoor advertising. They also compete with new local and national digital and social media businesses for advertising, digital services and customers. We believe that local print and online publications in smaller markets are the most effective medium for local retail advertising, which emphasizes the price of goods in an effort to move inventory on a regular basis, in contrast to radio, broadcast and cable, television, and the internet, which are generally used for image or branding advertising. In addition, we believe local print and online publications generally have the highest local audience penetration rates, which allows local advertisers to get their message to a large portion of the local audience. Finally, national digital competitors tend to have no local in-market sales presence which we believe gives the local community publications an advantage when selling these types of products and services.
Locally focused media in small and midsize communities is distinct from national and urban media delivered through outlets such as television, radio, metropolitan and national newspapers and the internet. Larger media outlets tend to offer broad based information to a geographically scattered audience, which tends to be more of a commodity. In contrast, locally focused media delivers a highly focused product that is often the only source of local news and information in the market it serves. Our segment of the media industry is also characterized by high barriers to entry, both economic and social. Small and midsize communities can generally only sustain one newspaper. Moreover, the brand value associated with long-term reader and advertiser loyalty, and the high start-up costs associated with developing and distributing content and selling advertisements, help to limit competition.
We also believe there is a growing need among small to mid-size businesses to be able to generate leads and interact with consumers across all the digital platforms, which takes many forms including websites, mobile sites, tablets and social media. These local business owners and managers lack the time, expertise and resources to capitalize on the potential of these new consumer-reaching channels. National competitors in this category do not generally have a local in-market presence. Newly formed competitors lack a known and credible brand name in addition to generally not having a local in-market presence. We believe this represents a substantial opportunity for our local media business.
Advertising Market
The primary sources of advertising revenue for local publications are small businesses, corporations, government agencies and individuals who reside in the market that a publication serves. By combining paid circulation publications with total market coverage (“TMC”) publications such as shoppers and other specialty publications (tailored to the specific attributes of a local community), local publications are able to reach nearly 100% of the households in a distribution area. As macroeconomic conditions in advertising change due to increasing internet and mobile usage and the wide array of available information sources, we have seen advertisers shift their focus to incorporate a digital advertising and services component into their overall local marketing strategy. To that end, in addition to printed products, the majority of our local publications have an online presence that further leverages the local brand, ensures higher penetration into the market, and provides a digital alternative for local advertisers to reach consumers. We also have strong digital marketing services, Propel.
Digital Media
The time spent online and on mobile devices each day by media consumers continues to grow and newspaper web and mobile sites offer a wide variety of content providing comprehensive, in-depth and up to the
minute coverage of news and current events. The ability to generate, publish and archive more news and information than most other sources has allowed newspapers to produce some of the most visited sites on the internet. Newspaper websites have proven to be some of the most visited websites by online media news consumers.
We believe that our local publications are well positioned to capitalize on their existing market presence and grow their total audience base by publishing proprietary local content digitally: via the internet, mobile websites and mobile applications. Local digital media include traditional classifieds, directories of business information, local advertising, databases, audience-contributed content and mobile applications. We believe this additional community-specific content will further extend and expand both the reach and the brand of our publications with readers and advertisers. We believe that building a strong local digital business extends the core audience of a local publication.
The opportunity created by the digital extension of the core audience makes local digital advertising an attractive complement for existing print advertisers, while opening up opportunities to attract new local advertisers that have not previously advertised with local publications. In addition, we believe that national advertisers have an interest in reaching buyers on a hyper-local level and, although they historically have not been significant advertisers in community publications, we believe the digital media offers them a powerful medium to reach local audiences. This opportunity is further enhanced by our behavioral targeting products, which allow advertisers to reach specific demographics of our audience and follow that audience across multiple websites, delivering advertisements across the platforms. Further, digital marketing services businesses are poised to benefit from the rise in internet marketing spend, which grew 16% between 2013 and 2014, and 294% between 2005 and 2014, according to the 2014 IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report issued in April 2015.
We believe that a strong digital business will enhance our revenues. In addition, we believe that we have the expertise and sales resources to help other businesses maximize their digital opportunities. Accordingly, we have launched our digital marketing services business, including Propel, which is designed to help SMBs utilize the digital space to generate leads, interact with consumers and grow their businesses. New Media’s digital revenue derived from advertising, circulation, and other revenue has grown since the launch of Propel in 2012. New Media’s digital revenue was $106.9 million for the year ended December 27, 2015, an 85% growth as compared with the same period in 2014, which had digital revenue of $57.9 million. Of this, $31.3 million, or 29% of digital revenue for the year ended December 27, 2015 was attributable to Propel. See “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We have invested in growing our digital business, including Propel, but such investments may not be successful, which could adversely affect our results of operations.”
We anticipate that the digital marketing services sector will continue to grow as SMBs move from print to digital marketing in connection with consumers spending more time online. According to the 2011 U.S. Census data, there are approximately 27.9 million SMBs in the US, 26.7 million of the SMBs have 20 employees or less, and these businesses are expected to spend $42.6 billion on digital marketing by 2016 (according to the 2015 U.S. Local Media Forecast by BIA/Kelsey). Owners of these businesses often lack the resources and expertise to navigate the digital marketing services sector. A recent study done by SCORE Association in 2014 indicated that 97% of consumers search for local businesses online, 49% of SMBs do not have a website, 93% are not mobile compatible, and 27% of SMBs with websites were found to not have a phone number on their home page. Propel offers SMBs digital services, including website design, search engine optimization, mobile websites, social media, retargeting and other advertising services. Our Predecessor believed, and we too believe, that Propel is well positioned to assist SMBs in the digital space and expect Propel to contribute meaningfully to future revenue growth. Propel is also able to leverage our local media properties and local sales infrastructure and give us distinct advantages, including:
•
our strong and trusted local brands, with 85% of our daily newspapers having been publishing local content for more than 100 years;
•
our ability to market through our print and online properties, driving branding and traffic; and
•
our more than 1,480 local, direct, in-market sales professionals with long standing relationships with small businesses in the communities we serve.
Circulation
Overall daily newspaper print circulation, including national and urban newspapers, has been declining slowly over the past several years. Small and midsize local market newspapers have generally had smaller declines and more stability in their paid print circulation volumes due to the relevant and unique hyper-local news they produce combined with less competition than larger markets. In addition, we believe this unique and valuable hyper-local content along with multiple delivery platforms now available will allow smaller market newspapers to continue to raise prices, leading to stable circulation revenues. Data and technology now available to newspapers allow them to target pricing more at the household level rather than purely by market. This will lead to more effective pricing strategies and enhance stability for circulation revenues. According to the Newspaper Association of America, pay meters and pricing helped the newspaper industry grow circulation revenue by 9% from 2011 to 2013.
Our Strengths
High Quality Assets with Leading Local Businesses. Our publications benefit from a long history in the communities we serve as one of the leading, and often sole, providers of comprehensive and in-depth local content. More than 85% of our daily newspapers have been published for more than 100 years and 100% have been published for more than 50 years. This has resulted in brand recognition for our publications, reader loyalty and high local audience penetration rates, which are highly valued by local advertisers. We continue to build on long-standing relationships with local advertisers and our in-depth knowledge of the consumers in our local markets. We believe our local news content is unique and highly valued by consumers who live in our markets, and there are limited, and in some cases no competing sources of local content for our target customers.
Large Locally Focused Sales Force. We have large and well known “in-market” local sales forces in the markets we serve, consisting of over 1,480 sales representatives, including 42 dedicated to Propel and 17 third party sales affiliations. Our sales forces are generally among the largest locally oriented media sales forces in their respective communities. We have long-standing relationships with many local businesses and have the ability to be face to face with most local businesses due to these unique characteristics we enjoy. We believe our strong brands combined with our “in-market” presence give us a distinct advantage in selling and growing in the digital services sector given the complex nature of these products. We also believe that these qualities provide leverage for our sales force to grow additional future revenue streams in our markets, particularly in the digital sector.
Ability to Acquire and Integrate New Assets. We have created a national platform for consolidating local media businesses and have demonstrated an ability to successfully identify, acquire and integrate local media asset acquisitions. Together with our Predecessor, we have acquired over $2.2 billion of assets since 2006, including both traditional newspaper and directory businesses. We have a scalable infrastructure and platform to leverage for future acquisitions.
Scale Yields Operating Profit Margins and Allows Us to Realize Operating Synergies. We believe we can generate higher operating profit margins than our publications could achieve on a stand-alone basis by leveraging our operations and implementing revenue initiatives, especially digital initiatives, across a broader local footprint in a geographic cluster and by centralizing certain back office production, accounting, administrative and corporate operations. We also benefit from economies of scale in the purchase of insurance, newsprint and other large strategic supplies and equipment. Finally, we have the ability to further leverage our centralized services and buying power to reduce operating costs when making future strategic accretive acquisitions.
Local Business Profile Generates Significant Cash Flow. Our local business profile allows us to generate significant recurring cash flow due to our diversified revenue base and high operating profit margins and
maintain our low capital expenditure and working capital requirements. As a result of the Restructuring, which extinguished GateHouse’s obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility and certain interest rate swaps secured thereunder on November 6, 2013, the confirmation date of the Plan, our interest and debt servicing expenses are significantly lower than our Predecessor’s interest and debt servicing expenses. As of December 27, 2015, our debt structure consists of the New Media Credit Agreement and Advantage Credit Agreements (as defined below). We currently estimate that we will have significant free cash flow totaling $115.0 million to $135.0 million in 2016, which we believe will lead to stockholder value creation through our investments in organic growth, investments in accretive acquisitions and the return of cash to stockholders in the form of dividends, subject to satisfactory financial performance, approval by our Board of Directors and dividend restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement. We further believe the strong cash flows generated and available to be invested will lead to consistent future dividend growth.
Experienced Management Team. Our senior management team is made up of executives who have an average of over 20 years of experience in the media industry, including strong traditional and digital media expertise. Our executive officers have broad industry experience with regard to both growing new digital business lines and identifying and integrating strategic acquisitions. Our management team also has key strengths in managing wide geographically disbursed teams, including the sales force, and identifying and centralizing duplicate functions across businesses leading to reduced core infrastructure costs.
Our Strategy
We intend to create stockholder value through a variety of factors including organic growth driven by our consumer and SMB strategies, pursuing attractive strategic acquisitions of high quality local media assets, and through the distribution of a substantial portion of our free cash flow as a dividend, subject to satisfactory financial performance, approval by our Board of Directors and dividend restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement. However, there is no guarantee that we will be able to accomplish any of these strategic initiatives.
A key component of our strategy is to acquire and operate traditional local media businesses and transform them from print-centric operations to dynamic multi-media operations through our existing online advertising and digital marketing services businesses. We will also leverage our existing platform to operate these businesses more efficiently. We believe all of these initiatives will lead to revenue and cash flow growth for New Media and will enable us to pay dividends to our stockholders. We intend to distribute a substantial portion of our free cash flow as a dividend to stockholders, through a quarterly dividend, subject to satisfactory financial performance, approval by our Board of Directors and dividend restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement. The Board of Directors’ determinations regarding dividends will depend on a variety of factors, including the Company’s GAAP net income, free cash flow generated from operations or other sources, liquidity position and potential alternative uses of cash, such as acquisitions, as well as economic conditions and expected future financial results. The key elements of our strategy include:
Maintain Our Leading Position in the Delivery of Proprietary Local Content in Our Communities. We seek to maintain our position as a leading provider of unique local content in the markets we serve and to leverage this position to strengthen our relationships with both readers and local businesses, thereby increasing penetration rates and market share. A critical aspect of this approach is to continue to provide local content that is not readily obtainable elsewhere and to be able to deliver that content to our customers across multiple print and digital platforms.
Grow Our New Digital Marketing Services Business. We plan to scale and expand our digital marketing services, including Propel. We believe Propel will allow us to sell digital marketing services to SMBs both in and outside existing New Media markets. The SMB demand for digital service solutions is great and represents a rapidly expanding opportunity. According to the 2011 U.S. Census data, there are approximately 27.9 million SMBs in the U.S. and, according to a 2015 U.S. Local Media Forecast by BIA/Kelsey, digital revenues are expected to grow to $42.6 billion in 2016, representing a 3.8% growth rate. Owners of SMBs often lack the
resources and expertise to navigate the digital marketing services sector, with 49% of SMBs not having a website and 93% not having mobile-friendly websites according to a SCORE Association Small Business Study in 2014. We believe local SMBs will turn to our trusted local media brands to help them navigate through developing their digital marketing presence and strategy. We believe our local media properties and local sales infrastructure gives us a distinct advantage to being the leading local provider of digital marketing services, through Propel.
Pursue Strategic Accretive Acquisitions. We intend to capitalize on the highly fragmented and distressed local print industries which have greatly reduced valuation levels. We initially expect to focus our investments primarily in the local newspaper sector in small to mid-size markets. We believe we have a strong operational platform as well as scalable digital marketing services, including Propel. This platform, along with deep industry specific knowledge and experience that our management team has can be leveraged to reduce costs, stabilize the core business and grow digital revenues at acquired properties. The size and fragmentation of the addressable print media market place in the United States, the greatly reduced valuation levels that exist in these industries, and our deep experience make this an attractive place for our initial consolidation focus and capital allocation. Over the longer term we also believe there may be opportunity to diversify and acquire these types of assets internationally, as well as other traditional local media assets such as broadcast TV, out of home advertising (billboards) and radio, in the United States and internationally. We also believe there may be opportunities to acquire other strong businesses that have strong local brands and local sales infrastructure or digital product companies, both of which could quickly scale for Propel.
Stabilize Our Core Business Operations. We have four primary drivers in our strategic plans to stabilize our core business operations, including: (i) identifying permanent structural expense reductions in our traditional business cost infrastructure and re-deploying a portion of those costs toward future growth opportunities, primarily on the digital side of our business; (ii) accelerating the growth of both our digital audiences and revenues through improvements to current products, new product development, training, opportunistic changes in hiring to create an employee base with a more diversified skill set and sharing of best practices; (iii) accelerating our consumer revenue growth through subscription pricing increases, pay meters for digital content and growth in our overall subscriber base; and (iv) stabilizing our core print advertising revenues through improvements to pricing, packaging of products for customers that will produce the best results for them, and more technology and training for sales management and sales representatives.
The newspaper industry has experienced declining revenue and profitability over the past several years due to, among other things, advertisers’ shift from print to digital media following the consumer shift, and general market conditions. The Restructuring significantly reduced New Media’s interest expense. In addition, New Media intends to focus its business strategy on building its digital marketing business and growing its online advertising business, which we believe will offset some of the challenges experienced by GateHouse. With its improved capital structure and digital focus, combined with its strengths and strategy and dividend strategy, we believe that New Media will be able to grow stockholder value. However, there can be no assurance of this. See “Risk Factors” under Item 1A
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risks and other information in this Annual Report in evaluating us and our common stock. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. The risk factors generally have been separated into the following groups: Risks Related to Our Business, Risks Related to Our Manager, and Risks Related to Our Common Stock.
Risks Related to Our Business
We depend to a great extent on the economies and the demographics of the local communities that we serve, and we are also susceptible to general economic downturns, which have had, and could continue to have, a material and adverse impact on our advertising and circulation revenues and on our profitability.
Our advertising revenues and, to a lesser extent, circulation revenues, depend upon a variety of factors specific to the communities that our publications serve. These factors include, among others, the size and demographic characteristics of the local population, local economic conditions in general and the economic condition of the retail segments of the communities that our publications serve. If the local economy, population or prevailing retail environment of a community we serve experiences a downturn, our publications, revenues and profitability in that market could be adversely affected. Our advertising revenues are also susceptible to negative trends in the general economy that affect consumer spending. The advertisers in our newspapers and other publications and related websites are primarily retail businesses that can be significantly affected by regional or national economic downturns and other developments. Declines in the U.S. economy could also significantly affect key advertising revenue categories, such as help wanted, real estate and automotive.
Uncertainty and adverse changes in the general economic conditions of markets in which we participate may negatively affect our business.
Current and future conditions in the economy have an inherent degree of uncertainty. As a result, it is difficult to estimate the level of growth or contraction for the economy as a whole. It is even more difficult to estimate growth or contraction in various parts, sectors and regions of the economy, including the markets in which we participate. Adverse changes may occur as a result of weak global economic conditions, declining oil prices, wavering consumer confidence, unemployment, declines in stock markets, contraction of credit availability, declines in real estate values, or other factors affecting economic conditions in general. These changes may negatively affect the sales of our products, increase exposure to losses from bad debts, increase the cost and decrease the availability of financing, or increase costs associated with publishing and distributing our publications.
Our ability to generate revenues is correlated with the economic conditions of three geographic regions of the United States.
Our Company primarily generates revenue in three geographic regions: the Northeast, the Southeast, and the Midwest. During the year ended December 27, 2015, approximately 28% of our total revenues were generated in three states in the Northeast: Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New York. During the same period, approximately 21% of our total revenues were generated in two states in the Southeast: Florida and North Carolina. Also during the same period, approximately 19% of our total revenues were generated in two states in the Midwest: Illinois and Ohio. As a result of this geographic concentration, our financial results, including advertising and circulation revenue, depend largely upon economic conditions in these principal market areas. Accordingly, adverse economic developments within these three regions in particular could significantly affect our consolidated operations and financial results.
Our indebtedness and any future indebtedness may limit our financial and operating activities and our ability to incur additional debt to fund future needs or dividends.
As of December 27, 2015, New Media’s outstanding indebtedness consists primarily of the New Media Credit Agreement. The New Media Credit Agreement provides for (i) a $200 million senior secured term facility and (ii) a $25 million senior secured revolving credit facility, with a $5 million sub-facility for letters of credit and a $5 million sub-facility for swing loans. In addition, we may request one or more new commitments for term loans or revolving loans from time to time up to an aggregate total of $75 million, subject to certain conditions. On September 3, 2014, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for additional term loans under the Incremental Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $25 million. On November 20, 2014, the New Media Credit Agreement was further amended to increase the amount available thereunder for incremental term loans from $75 million to $225 million in order to facilitate the financing of the acquisition of substantially all of the assets from Halifax Media Group LLC. On January 9, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for additional term loans and revolving commitments under the Incremental Facility in a combined aggregate principal amount of $152 million and to make certain amendments to the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below). On February 13, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to, amongst other things, replace the existing term loans with a new class of replacement term loans with extended call protection. On March 6, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for $15 million in additional revolving commitments under the Incremental Facility. On May 29, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for $25 million in additional term loans under the Incremental Facility. As of December 27, 2015, $0 was drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Advantage Credit Agreements, which arose from debt obligations assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of substantially all of the assets from Halifax Media Group LLC on January 9, 2015, are comprised of; (i) debt in the principal amount of $10 million that bears interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, maturing on December 31, 2016 and (ii) debt in the principal amount of $8 million that bears interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 6.25% per annum (with a minimum of 1% LIBOR) payable quarterly in arrears, maturing on March 31, 2019. As of December 27, 2015, $18 million was outstanding under the Advantage Credit Agreements.
All the above indebtedness and any future indebtedness we incur could:
•
require us to dedicate a portion of cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness, including indebtedness we may incur in the future, thereby reducing the funds available for other purposes, including dividends or other distributions;
•
subject us to increased sensitivity to increases in prevailing interest rates;
•
place us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors with relatively less debt in economic downturns, adverse industry conditions or catastrophic external events; or
•
reduce our flexibility in planning for or responding to changing business, industry and economic conditions.
In addition, our indebtedness could limit our ability to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms or at all to fund future acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, general corporate and other purposes, which would have a material effect on our business and financial condition. Our liquidity needs could vary significantly and may be affected by general economic conditions, industry trends, performance and many other factors not within our control.
Each of the New Media Credit Agreement and Advantage Credit Agreements contains covenants that restrict our operations and may inhibit our ability to grow our business, increase revenues and pay dividends to our stockholders.
The New Media Credit Agreement contains various restrictions, covenants and representations and warranties. If we fail to comply with any of these covenants or breach these representations or warranties in any material respect, such noncompliance would constitute a default under the New Media Credit Agreement (subject to applicable cure periods), and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the agreements related thereto to be immediately due and payable and enforce their respective interests against collateral pledged under such agreements.
The covenants and restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement generally restrict our ability to, among other things:
•
incur or guarantee additional debt;
•
make certain investments, loans or acquisitions;
•
transfer or sell assets;
•
make distributions on capital stock or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
•
create or incur liens;
•
enter into transactions with affiliates;
•
consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets; and
•
create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to us from our restricted subsidiaries.
The Advantage Credit Agreements contain covenants substantially consistent with those contained in the New Media Credit Facilities in addition to those required for compliance with the New Markets Tax Credit program.
The restrictions described above may interfere with our ability to obtain new or additional financing or may affect the manner in which we structure such new or additional financing or engage in other business activities, which may significantly limit or harm our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. A default and any resulting acceleration of obligations under any of the New Media Credit Agreement or the Advantage Credit Agreements could also result in an event of default and declaration of acceleration under our other existing debt agreements. Such an acceleration of our debt would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to continue as a going concern. A default under any of the New Media Credit Agreement or the Advantage Credit Agreements could also significantly limit our alternatives to refinance both the debt under which the default occurred and other indebtedness. This limitation may significantly restrict our financing options during times of either market distress or our financial distress, which are precisely the times when having financing options is most important.
We may not generate a sufficient amount of cash or generate sufficient funds from operations to fund our operations or repay our indebtedness.
Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness as required depends on our ability to generate cash flow from operations in the future. This ability, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.
If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy our debt obligations, including interest payments and the payment of principal at maturity, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise
additional capital. We cannot provide assurance that any refinancing would be possible, that any assets could be sold, or, if sold, of the timeliness and amount of proceeds realized from those sales, that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all, or that additional financing would be permitted under the terms of our various debt instruments then in effect. Furthermore, our ability to refinance would depend upon the condition of the finance and credit markets. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms or on a timely basis, would materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to pay dividends in accordance with our announced intent or at all.
We have announced our intent to distribute a substantial portion of our free cash flow as a dividend to our stockholders, through a quarterly dividend, subject to satisfactory financial performance, approval by our Board of Directors and dividend restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement. The Board of Directors’ determinations regarding dividends will depend on a variety of factors, including the Company’s GAAP net income, free cash flow generated from operations or other sources, liquidity position and potential alternative uses of cash, such as acquisitions, as well as economic conditions and expected future financial results. Although we recently paid a third quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of Common Stock and have paid regularly quarterly dividends since the third quarter of 2014, there can be no guarantee that we will continue to pay dividends in the future or that this recent dividend is representative of the amount of any future dividends. Our ability to declare future dividends will depend on our future financial performance, which in turn depends on the successful implementation of our strategy and on financial, competitive, regulatory, technical and other factors, general economic conditions, demand and selling prices for our products and other factors specific to our industry or specific projects, many of which are beyond our control. Therefore, our ability to generate free cash flow depends on the performance of our operations and could be limited by decreases in our profitability or increases in costs, capital expenditures or debt servicing requirements.
Our Predecessor suspended the payments of dividends commencing with the second quarter of 2008. We own substantially all of our Predecessor’s assets, and our Predecessor experienced revenue and cash flow declines in the past. In addition, we may acquire additional companies with declining cash flow as part of a strategy aimed at stabilizing cash flow through expense reduction and digital expansion. If our strategy is not successful, we may not be able to pay dividends.
As a holding company, we are also dependent on our subsidiaries being able to pay dividends to us. Our subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the ability to pay dividends under the various instruments governing their indebtedness. If our subsidiaries incur additional debt or losses, such additional indebtedness or loss may further impair their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. In addition, the ability of our subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends to us will also be dependent on their cash income and cash available and may be restricted under applicable law or regulation. Under Delaware law, approval of the board of directors is required to approve any dividend, which may only be paid out of surplus or net profit for the applicable fiscal year. As a result, we may not be able to pay dividends in accordance with our announced intent or at all.
We have invested in growing our digital business, including Propel, but such investments may not be successful, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We continue to evaluate our business and how we intend to grow our digital business. Internal resources and effort are put towards this business and key partnerships have been entered into to assist with our digital business, including Propel. We continue to believe that our digital businesses, including Propel, offer opportunities for revenue growth to support and, in some cases, offset the revenue trends we have seen in our print business. There can be no assurances that the partnerships we have entered into or the internal strategy being employed will result in generating or increasing digital revenues in amounts necessary to stabilize or offset trends in print revenues. In addition, we have a limited history of operations in this area, and there can be no
assurances that past performance will be indicative of future performance or future trends. If our digital strategy, including with regard to Propel, is not as successful as we anticipate, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends could be adversely affected.
Acquisitions have formed a significant part of our growth strategy in the past and are expected to continue to do so. If we are unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates or successfully integrate the businesses we acquire, our growth strategy may not succeed. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including risks related to integration, and these risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business strategy relies on acquisitions. We expect to derive a significant portion of our growth by acquiring businesses and integrating those businesses into our existing operations. We continue to seek acquisition opportunities, however we may not be successful in identifying acquisition opportunities, assessing the value, strengths and weaknesses of these opportunities or consummating acquisitions on acceptable terms. Furthermore, suitable acquisition opportunities may not even be made available or known to us. In addition, valuations of potential acquisitions may rise materially, making it economically unfeasible to complete identified acquisitions.
Additionally, our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the synergies between New Media and our recent or potential future acquisitions of assets or companies will depend, in part, on our ability to appropriately integrate the business of New Media and the businesses of other such acquired companies. The process of acquiring assets or companies may disrupt our business and may not result in the full benefits expected. The risks associated with integrating the operations of New Media and recent and potential future acquisitions include, among others:
•
uncoordinated market functions;
•
unanticipated issues in integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses;
•
the incurrence of indebtedness and the assumption of liabilities;
•
the incurrence of significant additional capital expenditures, transaction and operating expenses and non-recurring acquisition-related charges;
•
unanticipated adverse impact on our earnings from the amortization or write-off of acquired goodwill and other intangible assets;
•
not retaining key employees, vendors, service providers, readers and customers of the acquired businesses; and
•
the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns.
If we are unable to successfully implement our acquisition strategy or address the risks associated with integrating the operations of New Media and past acquisitions or potential future acquisitions, or if we encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications or delays frequently encountered in connection with the integration of acquired entities and the expansion of operations, our growth and ability to compete may be impaired, we may fail to achieve acquisition synergies and we may be required to focus resources on integration of operations rather than other profitable areas. Moreover, the success of any acquisition will depend upon our ability to effectively integrate the acquired assets or businesses. The acquired assets or businesses may not contribute to our revenues or earnings to any material extent, and cost savings and synergies we expect at the time of an acquisition may not be realized once the acquisition has been completed. Furthermore, if we incur indebtedness to finance an acquisition, the acquired business may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to service that indebtedness. Unsuitable or unsuccessful acquisitions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends.
If we are unable to retain and grow our digital audience and advertiser base, our digital businesses will be adversely affected.
Given the ever-growing and rapidly changing number of digital media options available on the internet, we may not be able to increase our online traffic sufficiently and retain or grow a base of frequent visitors to our websites and applications on mobile devices.
Our Predecessor experienced declines in advertising revenue due in part to advertisers’ shift from print to digital media, and we may not be able to create sufficient advertiser interest in our digital businesses to maintain or increase the advertising rates of the inventory on our websites.
In addition, the ever-growing and rapidly changing number of digital media options available on the internet may lead to technologies and alternatives that we are not able to offer or about which we are not able to advise. Such circumstances could directly and adversely affect the availability, applicability, marketability and profitability of the suite of SMB services and the private ad exchange we offer as a significant part of our digital business. Specifically, news aggregation websites and customized news feeds (often free to users) may reduce our traffic levels by driving interaction away from our websites or our digital applications. If traffic levels stagnate or decline, we may not be able to create sufficient advertiser interest in our digital businesses or to maintain or increase the advertising rates of the inventory on our digital platforms. We may also be adversely affected if the use of technology developed to block the display of advertising on websites proliferates.
Technological developments and any changes we make to our business strategy may require significant capital investments. Such investments may be restricted by our current or future credit facilities.
If there is a significant increase in the price of newsprint or a reduction in the availability of newsprint, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.
The basic raw material for our publications is newsprint. We generally maintain only a 45 to 55-day inventory of newsprint, although our participation in a newsprint-buying consortium has helped ensure adequate supply. An inability to obtain an adequate supply of newsprint at a favorable price or at all in the future could have a material adverse effect on our ability to produce our publications. Historically, the price of newsprint has been volatile, reaching a high of approximately $823 per metric ton in 2008 and experiencing a low of almost $410 per metric ton in 2002. The average price of newsprint during 2015 was approximately $585 per metric ton. Recent and future consolidation of major newsprint suppliers may adversely affect price competition among suppliers. Significant increases in newsprint costs for properties and periods not covered by our newsprint vendor agreement could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our Predecessor experienced declines in advertising revenue, and further declines, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, may occur.
Our Predecessor previously experienced declines in advertising revenue, due primarily to the economic recession and advertisers’ shift from print to digital media. Advertising revenue decreased by $29.6 million, or 9.0%, in the year ended December 29, 2013, as compared to the year ended December 30, 2012 for total company excluding Local Media. Advertising revenue increased by $57.0 million, or 17.4%, in the year ended December 28, 2014, as compared to the year ended December 29, 2013, however, excluding acquisitions, there was a decrease in advertising revenue. Advertising revenue increased by $311.3 million, or 80.8%, in the year ended December 27, 2015, as compared to the year ended December 28, 2014, however, excluding acquisitions, there was a decrease in advertising revenue. We continue to search for organic growth opportunities, including in our digital advertising business, and for ways to stabilize print revenue declines through new product launches and pricing. However, there can be no assurance that our advertising revenue will not continue to decline. In addition, the range of advertising choices across digital products and platforms and the large inventory of available digital advertising space have historically resulted in significantly lower rates for digital advertising
than for print advertising. Consequently, our digital advertising revenue may not be able to replace print advertising revenue lost as a result of the shift to digital consumption. Further declines in advertising revenue could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our Predecessor had a history of losses and filed a voluntary petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in 2013.
Our Predecessor experienced losses from continuing operations of approximately $27.5 million and $21.0 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. On September 27, 2013, GateHouse filed a voluntary petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and emerged from Chapter 11 protection on November 26, 2013. We may not be able to maintain profitable operations in the future and our failure to achieve profitability in the future could adversely affect the trading price of our Common Stock and our ability to pay dividends and raise additional capital for growth.
We compete with a large number of companies in the local media industry; if we are unable to compete effectively, our advertising and circulation revenues may decline.
Our business is concentrated in newspapers and other print publications located primarily in small and midsize markets in the United States. Our revenues primarily consist of advertising and paid circulation. Competition for advertising revenues and paid circulation comes from direct mail, directories, radio, television, outdoor advertising, other newspaper publications, the internet and other media. For example, as the use of the internet and mobile devices has increased, we have lost some classified advertising and subscribers to online advertising businesses and our free internet sites that contain abbreviated versions of our publications. Competition for advertising revenues is based largely upon advertiser results, advertising rates, readership, demographics and circulation levels. Competition for circulation is based largely upon the content of the publication and its price and editorial quality. Our local and regional competitors vary from market to market, and many of our competitors for advertising revenues are larger and have greater financial and distribution resources than us. We may incur increased costs competing for advertising expenditures and paid circulation. We may also experience further declines of circulation or print advertising revenue due to alternative media, such as the internet. If we are not able to compete effectively for advertising expenditures and paid circulation, our revenues may decline.
We are undertaking strategic process upgrades that could have a material adverse financial impact if unsuccessful.
We are implementing strategic process upgrades of our business. Among other things we are implementing the standardization and centralization of systems and processes, the outsourcing of certain financial processes and the use of new software for our circulation, advertising and editorial systems. As a result of ongoing strategic evaluation and analysis, we have made and will continue to make changes that, if unsuccessful, could have a material adverse financial impact.
Our business is subject to seasonal and other fluctuations, which affects our revenues and operating results.
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations that we expect to continue to be reflected in our operating results in future periods. Our first fiscal quarter of the year tends to be our weakest quarter because advertising volume is at its lowest levels following the December holiday season. Correspondingly, our second and fourth fiscal quarters tend to be our strongest because they include heavy holiday and seasonal advertising. Other factors that affect our quarterly revenues and operating results may be beyond our control, including changes in the pricing policies of our competitors, the hiring and retention of key personnel, wage and cost pressures, distribution costs, changes in newsprint prices and general economic factors.
We could be adversely affected by declining circulation.
Overall daily newspaper circulation, including national and urban newspapers, has declined in recent years. For the year ended December 27, 2015, our circulation revenue increased by $182.6 million, or 93.3%, as compared to the year ended December 28, 2014, of which $180.1 million relates to acquisitions. There can be no assurance that our circulation revenue will not decline again in the future. Our Predecessor and us were able to maintain annual circulation revenue from existing operations in recent years through, among other things, increases in per copy prices. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to increase prices to offset any declines in circulation. Further declines in circulation could impair our ability to maintain or increase our advertising prices, cause purchasers of advertising in our publications to reduce or discontinue those purchases and discourage potential new advertising customers, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay dividends.
The increasing popularity of digital media could also adversely affect circulation of our newspapers, which may decrease circulation revenue and cause more marked declines in print advertising. Further, readership demographics and habits may change over time. If we are not successful in offsetting such declines in revenues from our print products, our business, financial condition and prospects will be adversely affected.
The value of our intangible assets may become impaired, depending upon future operating results.
As a result of the Restructuring, which was considered a triggering event for the non-amortizable intangibles, our Predecessor performed a valuation analysis to determine if an impairment existed as of September 29, 2013. The fair values of our Predecessor’s reporting units for goodwill and newspaper mastheads were estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, recent industry transaction multiples and using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed were appropriate in the circumstances and were consistent with the terms of the Plan. The estimates and judgments used in the assessment included multiples for revenue and EBITDA, the weighted average cost of capital and the terminal growth rate. Given the Restructuring, our Predecessor determined that discounted cash flows provided the best estimate of the fair value of its reporting units. The estimated fair value of the Large Daily reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and Step 2 of the analysis was not necessary. The Small Community reporting unit failed the Step 1 goodwill impairment analysis. Our Predecessor performed Step 2 of the analysis using consistent assumptions, as discussed above, and determined an impairment was not present for this reporting unit. The estimated fair value of each reporting unit’s mastheads exceeded their carrying values, using consistent assumptions as discussed above. The masthead fair value was estimated using the relief from royalty valuation method. For further information on goodwill and intangible assets, see Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”.
Due to reductions in our Predecessor’s operating projections during the third quarter of 2013 in conjunction with the Restructuring, an impairment charge of $68.6 million was recognized for advertiser relationships within the Predecessor’s Metro and Small Community reporting units, an impairment charge of $19.1 million was recognized for subscriber relationships within the Company’s Metro and Small Community reporting units, an impairment charge of $2.1 million was recognized for customer relationships within the Company’s Metro reporting unit and an impairment charge of $1.8 million was recognized for trade names and publication rights within the Directories business unit.
During the fourth quarter of 2015, we reorganized our management structure to align with the geography of the market served. As a result, an additional impairment analysis was performed. The analysis of masthead values suggested impairment, and a charge of $4.8 million was recorded in December.
At December 27, 2015 the carrying value of our goodwill is $171.1 million, mastheads is $86.0 million, and amortizable intangible assets is $217.6 million.
We are subject to environmental and employee safety and health laws and regulations that could cause us to incur significant compliance expenditures and liabilities.
Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to the environment, storage tanks and the management and disposal of wastes at our facilities. Under various environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for contamination resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum at that property. Such laws often impose liability on the owner or operator without regard to fault, and the costs of any required investigation or cleanup can be substantial. Although in connection with certain of our Predecessor’s acquisitions, as well as certain of our acquisitions, we have rights to indemnification for certain environmental liabilities, these rights may not be sufficient to reimburse us for all losses that we might incur if a property acquired by us has environmental contamination. In addition, although in connection with certain of our acquisitions we have obtained insurance policies for coverage for certain potential environmental liabilities, these policies have express exclusions to coverage as well as express limits on amounts of coverage and length of term. Accordingly these insurance policies may not be sufficient to provide coverage for us for all losses that we might incur if a property acquired by us has environmental contamination.
Our operations are also subject to various employee safety and health laws and regulations, including those pertaining to occupational injury and illness, employee exposure to hazardous materials and employee complaints. Environmental and employee safety and health laws tend to be complex, comprehensive and frequently changing. As a result, we may be involved from time to time in administrative and judicial proceedings and investigations related to environmental and employee safety and health issues. These proceedings and investigations could result in substantial costs to us, divert our management’s attention and adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop our real property. Furthermore, if it is determined that we are not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or if our properties are contaminated, it could result in significant liabilities, fines or the suspension or interruption of the operations of specific printing facilities.
Future events, such as changes in existing laws and regulations, new laws or regulations or the discovery of conditions not currently known to us, may give rise to additional compliance or remedial costs that could be material.
Sustained increases in costs of employee health and welfare benefits may reduce our profitability. Moreover, our pension plan obligations are currently underfunded, and we may have to make significant cash contributions to our plans, which could reduce the cash available for our business.
In recent years, we and our Predecessor experienced significant increases in the cost of employee medical benefits because of economic factors beyond our control, including increases in health care costs. At least some of these factors may continue to put upward pressure on the cost of providing medical benefits. Although we have actively sought to control increases in these costs, there can be no assurance that we will succeed in limiting cost increases, and continued upward pressure could reduce the profitability of our businesses.
Our pension and postretirement plans were underfunded by $11.2 million at December 27, 2015. Our pension plan invests in a variety of equity and debt securities, many of which were affected by the disruptions in the credit and capital markets in 2009 and 2010. Future volatility and disruption in the stock markets could cause further declines in the asset values of our pension plans. In addition, a decrease in the discount rate used to determine minimum funding requirements could result in increased future contributions. If either occurs, we may need to make additional pension contributions above what is currently estimated, which could reduce the cash available for our businesses.
We may not be able to protect intellectual property rights upon which our business relies and, if we lose intellectual property protection, our assets may lose value.
Our business depends on our intellectual property, including, but not limited to, our titles, mastheads, content and services, which we attempt to protect through patents, copyrights, trade laws and contractual restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements. We believe our proprietary and other intellectual property rights are important to our success and our competitive position.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized third parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our content, services and other intellectual property, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent any misappropriation or confusion among consumers and merchants, or unauthorized use of these rights. If we are unable to procure, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights, we may not realize the full value of these assets, and our business may suffer. If we must litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of third parties, such litigation may be costly and divert the attention of our management from day-to-day operations.
We depend on key personnel and we may not be able to operate or grow our business effectively if we lose the services of any of our key personnel or are unable to attract qualified personnel in the future.
The success of our business is heavily dependent on our ability to retain our management and other key personnel and to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Competition for senior management personnel is intense and we may not be able to retain our key personnel. Although our Predecessor entered into employment agreements with certain of our key personnel, these agreements do not ensure that our key personnel will continue in their present capacity with us for any particular period of time. We do not have key man insurance for any of our current management or other key personnel. The loss of any key personnel would require our remaining key personnel to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement. An inability to find a suitable replacement for any departing executive officer on a timely basis could adversely affect our ability to operate or grow our business.
A shortage of skilled or experienced employees in the media industry, or our inability to retain such employees, could pose a risk to achieving improved productivity and reducing costs, which could adversely affect our profitability.
Production and distribution of our various publications requires skilled and experienced employees. A shortage of such employees, or our inability to retain such employees, could have an adverse impact on our productivity and costs, our ability to expand, develop and distribute new products and our entry into new markets. The cost of retaining or hiring such employees could exceed our expectations which could adversely affect our results of operations.
A number of our employees are unionized, and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected if current or additional labor negotiations or contracts were to further restrict our ability to maximize the efficiency of our operations.
As of December 27, 2015, we employed 9,509 employees, of whom 1,236 (or approximately 13%) were represented by 35 unions. 93% of the unionized employees are in four states: Ohio, Rhode Island, Illinois and Massachusetts and represent 36%, 23%, 17% and 17% of all our union employees, respectively. Most of our unionized employees work under collective bargaining agreements that expire in 2017.
Although our newspapers have not experienced a union strike in the recent past nor do we anticipate a union strike to occur, we cannot preclude the possibility that a strike may occur at one or more of our newspapers at some point in the future. We believe that, in the event of a newspaper strike, we would be able to continue to publish and deliver to subscribers, which is critical to retaining advertising and circulation revenues, although there can be no assurance of this.
The collectability of accounts receivable under adverse economic conditions could deteriorate to a greater extent than provided for in our financial statements and in our projections of future results.
Adverse economic conditions in the United States have increased our exposure to losses resulting from financial distress, insolvency and the potential bankruptcy of our advertising customers. Our accounts receivable are stated at net estimated realizable value and our allowance for doubtful accounts has been determined based on several factors, including receivable agings, significant individual credit risk accounts and historical experience. If such collectability estimates prove inaccurate, adjustments to future operating results could occur.
Our potential inability to successfully execute cost control measures could result in greater than expected total operating costs.
We and our Predecessor have implemented general cost control measures, and we expect to continue such cost control efforts in the future. If we do not achieve expected savings as a result of such measures or if our operating costs increase as a result of our growth strategy, our total operating costs may be greater than expected. In addition, reductions in staff and employee benefits could affect our ability to attract and retain key employees.
We rely on revenue from the printing of publications for third parties that may be subject to many of the same business and industry risks that we are.
In 2015, we generated approximately 4.8% of our revenue from printing third-party publications, and our relationships with these third parties are generally pursuant to short-term contracts. As a result, if the macroeconomic and industry trends described herein such as the sensitivity to perceived economic weakness of discretionary spending available to advertisers and subscribers, circulation declines, shifts in consumer habits and the increasing popularity of digital media affect those third parties, we may lose, in whole or in part, a substantial source of revenue.
A decision by any of the three largest national publications or the major local publications to cease publishing in those markets, or seek alternatives to their current business practice of partnering with us, could materially impact our profitability.
Our possession and use of personal information and the use of payment cards by our customers present risks and expenses that could harm our business. Unauthorized access to or disclosure or manipulation of such data, whether through breach of our network security or otherwise, could expose us to liabilities and costly litigation and damage our reputation.
Our online systems store and process confidential subscriber and other sensitive data, such as names, email addresses, addresses, and other personal information. Therefore, maintaining our network security is critical. Additionally, we depend on the security of our third-party service providers. Unauthorized use of or inappropriate access to our, or our third-party service providers’ networks, computer systems and services could potentially jeopardize the security of confidential information, including payment card (credit or debit) information, of our customers. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we or our third-party service providers may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Non-technical means, for example, actions by an employee, can also result in a data breach. A party that is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate our proprietary information or the information of our customers or users, cause interruption in our operations, or damage our computers or those of our customers or users. As a result of any such breaches, customers or users may assert claims of liability against us and these activities may subject us to legal claims, adversely impact our reputation, and interfere with our ability to provide our products and services, all of which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The coverage and limits of our insurance policies may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches.
A significant number of our customers authorize us to bill their payment card accounts directly for all amounts charged by us. These customers provide payment card information and other personally identifiable information which, depending on the particular payment plan, may be maintained to facilitate future payment card transactions. Under payment card rules and our contracts with our card processors, if there is a breach of payment card information that we store, we could be liable to the banks that issue the payment cards for their related expenses and penalties. In addition, if we fail to follow payment card industry data security standards, even if there is no compromise of customer information, we could incur significant fines or lose our ability to give our customers the option of using payment cards. If we were unable to accept payment cards, our business would be seriously harmed.
There can be no assurance that any security measures we, or our third-party service providers, take will be effective in preventing a data breach. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by breaches. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose customers or users. Failure to protect confidential customer data or to provide customers with adequate notice of our privacy policies could also subject us to liabilities imposed by United States federal and state regulatory agencies or courts. We could also be subject to evolving state laws that impose data breach notification requirements, specific data security obligations, or other consumer privacy-related requirements. Our failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our financial results were affected by the adoption of fresh start reporting and may not reflect historical trends.
Pursuant to the Plan, we acquired substantially all of the assets of our Predecessor. The Restructuring resulted in us becoming a new reporting entity and adopting fresh start accounting. As required by fresh start accounting, our Predecessor’s assets and liabilities were adjusted to estimated fair value, and we recognized certain assets and liabilities not previously recognized in our Predecessor’s financial statements. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after the Effective Date are not comparable to the financial condition and results of operations reflected in our Predecessor’s historical consolidated financial statements, including those presented herein.
Risks Related to Our Manager
We are dependent on our Manager and may not find a suitable replacement if our Manager terminates the Management Agreement and the inability of our Manager to retain or obtain key personnel could delay or hinder implementation of our investment strategies, which could impair our ability to make distributions and could reduce the value of your investment.
Some of our officers and other individuals who perform services for us are employees of our Manager. We are reliant on our Manager, which has significant discretion as to the implementation of our operating policies and strategies, to conduct our business. We are subject to the risk that our Manager will terminate the Management Agreement and that we will not be able to find a suitable replacement for our Manager in a timely manner, at a reasonable cost or at all. Furthermore, we are dependent on the services of certain key employees of our Manager whose compensation may be partially or entirely dependent upon the amount of incentive or management compensation earned by our Manager and whose continued service is not guaranteed, and the loss of such services could adversely affect our operations. If any of these people were to cease their affiliation with us or our Manager, either we or our Manager may be unable to find suitable replacements, and our operating results could suffer. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our Manager’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled personnel. Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, and our Manager may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If we lose or are unable to obtain the services of highly skilled personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered and this could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
There are conflicts of interest in our relationship with our Manager.
Our Management Agreement with our Manager was not negotiated between unaffiliated parties, and its terms, including fees payable, although approved by the independent directors of both Newcastle (our parent prior to the spin-off) and New Media as fair, may not be as favorable to us as if they had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.
There are conflicts of interest inherent in our relationship with our Manager insofar as our Manager and its affiliates-including investment funds, private investment funds, or businesses managed by our Manager-invest in media assets and whose investment objectives overlap with our investment objectives. Certain investments appropriate for us may also be appropriate for one or more of these other investment vehicles. Certain members of our Board of Directors and employees of our Manager who may be officers also serve as officers and/or directors of these other entities. Although we have the same Manager, we may compete with entities affiliated with our Manager or Fortress for certain target assets. From time to time, affiliates of Fortress focus on investments in assets with a similar profile as our target assets that we may seek to acquire. These affiliates may have meaningful purchasing capacity, which may change over time depending upon a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, available equity capital and debt financing, market conditions and cash on hand. Fortress had approximately $70.5 billion of assets under management as of December 31, 2015. In addition, with respect to Fortress funds in the process of selling investments, our Manager may be incentivized to regard the sale of such assets to us positively, particularly if a sale to an unrelated third party would result in a loss of fees to our Manager.
Our Management Agreement with our Manager generally does not limit or restrict our Manager or its affiliates from engaging in any business or managing other pooled investment vehicles that invest in investments that meet our investment objectives. Our Manager may engage in additional investment opportunities related to media assets in the future, which may cause our Manager to compete with us for investments or result in a change in our current investment strategy. In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that if Fortress or an affiliate or any of their officers, directors or employees acquire knowledge of a potential transaction that could be a corporate opportunity, they have no duty, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to offer such corporate opportunity to us, our stockholders or our affiliates. In the event that any of our directors and officers who is also a director, officer or employee of Fortress or its affiliates acquires knowledge of a corporate opportunity or is offered a corporate opportunity, provided that this knowledge was not acquired solely in such person’s capacity as a director or officer of ours and such person acts in good faith, then to the fullest extent permitted by law such person is deemed to have fully satisfied such person’s fiduciary duties owed to us and is not liable to us if Fortress or its affiliates pursues or acquires the corporate opportunity or if such person did not present the corporate opportunity to us.
The ability of our Manager and its officers and employees to engage in other business activities, subject to the terms of our Management Agreement with our Manager, may reduce the amount of time our Manager, its officers or other employees spend managing us. In addition, we may engage in material transactions with our Manager or another entity managed by our Manager or one of its affiliates, which may present an actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest. It is possible that actual, potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to investor dissatisfaction, litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult, and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential, actual or perceived conflicts of interest. Regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including causing an inability to raise additional funds, a reluctance of counterparties to do business with us, a decrease in the prices of our equity securities and a resulting increased risk of litigation and regulatory enforcement actions.
The management compensation structure that we have agreed to with our Manager, as well as compensation arrangements that we may enter into with our Manager in the future (in connection with new lines of business or other activities), may incentivize our Manager to invest in high risk investments. In addition to its management
fee, our Manager is currently entitled to receive incentive compensation. In evaluating investments and other management strategies, the opportunity to earn incentive compensation may lead our Manager to place undue emphasis on the maximization of such measures at the expense of other criteria, such as preservation of capital, in order to achieve higher incentive compensation. Investments with higher yield potential are generally riskier or more speculative than lower-yielding investments. Moreover, because our Manager receives compensation in the form of options in connection with the completion of our equity offerings, our Manager may be incentivized to cause us to issue additional stock, which could be dilutive to existing stockholders.
It would be difficult and costly to terminate our Management Agreement with our Manager.
It would be difficult and costly for us to terminate our Management Agreement with our Manager. After its initial three-year term, the Management Agreement will be automatically renewed for one-year terms unless terminated (i) by a majority vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors, or by a vote of the holders of a simple majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, that there has been unsatisfactory performance by our Manager that is materially detrimental to us or (ii) a determination by a simple majority of our independent directors that the management fee payable to our Manager is not fair, subject to our Manager’s right to prevent such a termination by continuing to provide the services under the Management Agreement at a fee that a simple majority of our independent directors have reasonably determined to be fair. Our Manager will be provided 60 days’ prior notice of any termination and will be paid a termination fee equal to the amount of the management fee earned by the Manager during the 12-month period preceding such termination. In addition, following any termination of the Management Agreement, our Manager may require us to purchase its right to receive incentive compensation at a price determined as if our assets were sold for their then current fair market value or otherwise we may continue to pay the incentive compensation to our Manager. These provisions may increase the effective cost to us of terminating the Management Agreement, thereby adversely affecting our ability to terminate our Manager without cause.
Our Board of Directors does not approve each investment decision made by our Manager. In addition, we may change our investment strategy without a stockholder vote, which may result in our making investments that are different, riskier or less profitable than our current investments.
Our Manager has great latitude in determining the types and categories of assets it may decide are proper investments for us, including the latitude to invest in types and categories of assets that may differ from those in which we currently invest. Our Board of Directors periodically reviews our investment portfolio. However, our Board of Directors does not review or pre-approve each proposed investment or our related financing arrangements. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, our Board of Directors relies primarily on information provided to them by our Manager. Furthermore, transactions entered into by our Manager may be difficult or impossible to unwind by the time they are reviewed by our Board of Directors even if the transactions contravene the terms of the Management Agreement. In addition, we may change our investment strategy, including our target asset classes, without a stockholder vote.
Our investment strategy may evolve in light of existing market conditions and investment opportunities, and this evolution may involve additional risks depending upon the nature of the assets in which we invest and our ability to finance such assets on a short-or long-term basis. Investment opportunities that present unattractive risk-return profiles relative to other available investment opportunities under particular market conditions may become relatively attractive under changed market conditions, and changes in market conditions may therefore result in changes in the investments we target. Decisions to make investments in new asset categories present risks that may be difficult for us to adequately assess and could therefore reduce our ability to pay dividends on our common stock or have adverse effects on our liquidity or financial condition. A change in our investment strategy may also increase our exposure to interest rate, real estate market or credit market fluctuations. In addition, a change in our investment strategy may increase the guarantee obligations we agree to incur or increase the number of transactions we enter into with affiliates. Our failure to accurately assess the risks inherent in new asset categories or the financing risks associated with such assets could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
Our Manager will not be liable to us for any acts or omissions performed in accordance with the Management Agreement, including with respect to the performance of our investments.
Pursuant to our Management Agreement, our Manager will not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder in good faith and will not be responsible for any action of our Board of Directors in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. Our Manager, its members, managers, officers and employees will not be liable to us or any of our subsidiaries, to our Board of Directors, or our or any subsidiary’s stockholders or partners for any acts or omissions by our Manager, its members, managers, sub-advisers, officers or employees, except by reason of acts constituting bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of our Manager’s duties under our Management Agreement. We shall, to the full extent lawful, reimburse, indemnify and hold our Manager, its members, managers, officers and employees, sub-advisers and each other person, if any, controlling our Manager, harmless of and from any and all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims of any nature whatsoever (including attorneys’ fees) in respect of or arising from any acts or omissions of an indemnified party made in good faith in the performance of our Manager’s duties under our Management Agreement and not constituting such indemnified party’s bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of our Manager’s duties under our Management Agreement.
Our Manager’s due diligence of investment opportunities or other transactions may not identify all pertinent risks, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our Manager intends to conduct due diligence with respect to each investment opportunity or other transaction it pursues. It is possible, however, that our Manager’s due diligence processes will not uncover all relevant facts, particularly with respect to any assets we acquire from third parties. In these cases, our Manager may be given limited access to information about the investment and will rely on information provided by the target of the investment. In addition, if investment opportunities are scarce, the process for selecting bidders is competitive, or the timeframe in which we are required to complete diligence is short, our ability to conduct a due diligence investigation may be limited, and we would be required to make investment decisions based upon a less thorough diligence process than would otherwise be the case. Accordingly, investments and other transactions that initially appear to be viable may prove not to be over time, due to the limitations of the due diligence process or other factors.
Because we are dependent upon our Manager and its affiliates to conduct our operations, any adverse changes in the financial health of our Manager or its affiliates or our relationship with them could hinder our Manager’s ability to successfully manage our operations.
We are dependent on our Manager and its affiliates to manage our operations and acquire and manage our investments. Under the direction of our Board of Directors, our Manager makes all decisions with respect to the management of our company. To conduct its operations, our Manager depends upon the fees and other compensation that it receives from us in connection with managing our company and from other entities and investors with respect to investment management services it provides. Any adverse changes in the financial condition of our Manager or its affiliates, or our relationship with our Manager, could hinder our Manager’s ability to successfully manage our operations, which would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders. For example, adverse changes in the financial condition of our Manager could limit its ability to attract key personnel.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
There can be no assurance that the market for our stock will provide you with adequate liquidity.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely, depending upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control. These factors include, without limitation:
•
our business profile and market capitalization may not fit the investment objectives of any stockholder;
•
a shift in our investor base;
•
our quarterly or annual earnings, or those of other comparable companies;
•
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
•
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
•
announcements by us or our competitors of significant investments, acquisitions or dispositions;
•
the failure of securities analysts to cover our Common Stock;
•
changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates;
•
the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies;
•
overall market fluctuations; and
•
general economic conditions.
Stock markets in general and recently have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our Common Stock. Additionally, these and other external factors have caused and may continue to cause the market price and demand for our Common Stock to fluctuate, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of Common Stock, and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock.
Sales or issuances of shares of our common stock could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales might occur, could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. The issuance of our common stock in connection with property, portfolio or business acquisitions or the settlement of awards that may be granted under our Incentive Plan (as defined below) or otherwise could also have an adverse effect on the market price of our Common Stock.
Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.
As a public company, we are required to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The acquisitions of Stephens Media, LLC, Halifax Media Group, The Columbus Dispatch and the Monroe News have resulted in a change to our internal control over financial reporting which has materially affected our internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is complex and may be revised over time to adapt to changes in our business, or changes in applicable accounting rules. We cannot assure you that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in the future or that a material weakness will not be discovered with respect to a prior period for which we had previously believed that internal controls were effective. If we are not able to maintain or document effective internal control over financial reporting, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be able to certify as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Matters impacting our internal controls may cause us to be unable to report our financial information on a timely basis, or may cause us to restate previously issued financial information, and thereby subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions or investigations by the SEC, or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements. Confidence in the reliability of our financial statements is also likely to suffer if we or our independent registered public accounting firm reports a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This could materially adversely affect us by, for example, leading to a decline in our share price and impairing our ability to raise capital, if and when desirable.
The percentage ownership of existing shareholders in New Media may be diluted in the future.
We may issue equity in order to raise capital or in connection with future acquisitions and strategic investments, which would dilute investors’ percentage ownership in New Media. In addition, your percentage ownership may be diluted if we issue equity instruments such as debt and equity financing.
The percentage ownership of existing shareholders in New Media may also be diluted in the future as result of the issuance of ordinary shares in New Media upon the exercise of 10-year warrants (the “New Media Warrants”). The New Media Warrants collectively represent the right to acquire New Media Common Stock, which in the aggregate are equal to 5% of New Media Common Stock as of the Effective Date (calculated prior to dilution from shares of New Media Common Stock issued pursuant to Newcastle’s contribution of Local Media Parent and assignment of related stock purchase agreement to New Media (the “Local Media Contribution”)) at a strike price of $46.35 calculated based on a total equity value of New Media prior to the Local Media Contribution of $1.2 billion as of the Effective Date. As a result, New Media Common Stock may be subject to dilution upon the exercise of such New Media Warrants.
Furthermore, the percentage ownership in New Media may be diluted in the future because of additional equity awards that we expect will be granted to our Manager pursuant to our Management Agreement. Upon the successful completion of an offering of shares of our Common Stock or any shares of preferred stock, we will grant our Manager options equal to 10% of the number of shares being sold in the offering, with an exercise price equal to the offering price per share paid by the public or other ultimate purchaser. The Board of Directors of New Media approved the Incentive Plan, which provides for the grant of equity and equity-based awards, including restricted stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance awards, restricted stock units, tandem awards and other equity-based and non-equity based awards, in each case to our Manager, to the directors, officers, employees, service providers, consultants and advisors of our Manager who perform services for us, and to our directors, officers, employees, service providers, consultants and advisors. Any future grant would cause further dilution. We initially reserved 15 million shares of our Common Stock for issuance under the Incentive Plan; on the first day of each fiscal year beginning during the ten-year term of the Incentive Plan and in and after calendar year 2015, that number will be increased by a number of shares of our Common Stock equal to 10% of the number of shares of our Common Stock newly issued by us during the immediately preceding fiscal year. In January 2016 and 2015, the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan was increased by 724,400 and 746,649 representing 10% of the shares of Common Stock newly issued in fiscal year 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and of Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our company, which could decrease the trading price of our Common Stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the raider and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with our Board rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions provide for:
•
a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms;
•
amendment of provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws regarding the election of directors, classes of directors, the term of office of directors, the filling of director vacancies and the resignation and removal of directors only upon the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the then issued and outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote thereon (provided, however, that for so long as Newcastle and certain other affiliates of Fortress and permitted transferees (collectively, the “Fortress Stockholders”) beneficially own at least 20% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, such provisions may be amended with the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting interest of stockholders entitled to vote or by a majority of the entire Board of Directors);
•
amendment of provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation regarding corporate opportunity only upon the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the then issued and outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote thereon;
•
removal of directors only for cause and only with the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the voting interest of stockholders entitled to vote in the election of directors (provided, however, that for so long as the Fortress Stockholders beneficially own at least 20% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, directors may be removed with or without cause with the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting interest of stockholders entitled to vote);
•
our Board to determine the powers, preferences and rights of our preferred stock and to issue such preferred stock without stockholder approval;
•
provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws prevent stockholders from calling special meetings of our stockholders (provided, however, that for so long as the Fortress Stockholders beneficially own at least 20% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, Fortress Stockholders may call special meetings of our stockholders);
•
advance notice requirements applicable to stockholders for director nominations and actions to be taken at annual meetings;
•
a prohibition, in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, stating that no holder of shares of our Common Stock will have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors, which means that the holders of majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock can elect all the directors standing for election; and
•
action by our stockholders outside a meeting, in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, only by unanimous written consent (provided, however, that for so long as the Fortress Stockholders beneficially own at least 20% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, our stockholders may act without a meeting by written consent of a majority of the voting interest of stockholders entitled to vote).
Public stockholders who might desire to participate in these types of transactions may not have an opportunity to do so, even if the transaction is considered favorable to stockholders. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public stockholders to benefit from a change in control or a change in our management and Board and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties
We own and operate 57 print facilities across the United States. GateHouse’s print facilities range in size from approximately 6,000 to 401,000 square feet (combined printing and office space). GateHouse’s executive offices are located in Pittsford, New York, where we lease approximately 25,870 square feet under a lease terminating in October 2022.
We maintain our properties in good condition and believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet the present needs of our business. We do not believe any individual property is material to our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are and may become involved from time to time in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business, including but not limited to with respect to such matters as libel, invasion of privacy, intellectual property infringement, wrongful termination actions and complaints alleging employment discrimination, and regulatory investigations and inquiries. In addition, we are involved from time to time in governmental and administrative proceedings concerning employment, labor, environmental and other claims. Insurance coverage mitigates potential loss for certain of these matters. Historically, such claims and proceedings have not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial position. Although we are unable to predict with certainty the eventual outcome of any litigation, regulatory investigation or inquiry, in the opinion of management, we do not expect our current and any threatened legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or consolidated results of operations. Given the inherent unpredictability of these types of proceedings, however, it is possible that future adverse outcomes could have a material effect on our financial results.
Item 4.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
New Media Common Stock trades on the NYSE under the trading symbol “NEWM” since the spin-off from Newcastle. A “when-issued” trading market for New Media’s Common Stock on the NYSE began on February 4, 2014 and “regular-way” trading of New Media Common Stock began on February 14, 2014. Prior to February 4, 2014, there was no public market for New Media Common Stock. Set forth in the table below for the periods presented are the high and low sale prices for New Media Common Stock as reported on the NYSE.
From the most recent available Company information, on February 18, 2016 there were approximately 44 holders of record.
Dividends
New Media currently intends to distribute a substantial portion of free cash flow as a dividend to stockholders, through a quarterly dividend, subject to satisfactory financial performance, Board approval and dividend restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement. The Board of Directors’ determinations regarding dividends will depend on a variety of factors, including the Company’s GAAP net income, free cash flow generated from operations or other sources, liquidity position and potential alternative uses of cash, such as acquisitions, as well as economic conditions and expected future financial results.
On July 31, 2014, the Company announced a second quarter 2014 cash dividend of $0.27 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend was paid on August 21, 2014 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 12, 2014.
On October 30, 2014, the Company announced a third quarter 2014 cash dividend of $0.27 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend was paid on November 20, 2014, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2014.
On February 26, 2015, the Company announced a fourth quarter 2014 cash dividend of $0.30 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend was paid on March 19, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 11, 2015.
On April 30, 2015, the Company announced a first quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend was paid on May 21, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on May 13, 2015.
On July 30, 2015, the Company announced a second quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend was paid on August 20, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 12, 2015.
On October 29, 2015, the Company announced a third quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend was on November 19, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2015.
On February 25, 2016, the Company announced a fourth quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend will be paid on March 17, 2016, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 9, 2016.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
In connection with the restructuring of GateHouse, on the Effective Date New Media issued 30,000,000 shares of New Media Common Stock pursuant to the Plan in accordance with Section 1145(a)(1) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”).
Additionally, on the Effective Date, New Media issued 1,362,479 10-year warrants at a strike price of $46.35 per share to the former equity holders of GateHouse pursuant to the Plan, in accordance with Section 1145(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents our selected historical financial data as of and for each of the years in the five year period ended December 27, 2015. The information in this table should be read in conjunction with the information under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, “Business” and our historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The selected consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) data and other data for the years ended December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012 and the selected consolidated balance sheets data at December 29, 2013, December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of our Predecessor that are not included in this report.
(1) We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit), interest/financing expense, depreciation and amortization and non-cash impairments. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to income from operations, net income (loss), cash flow from continuing operating activities or any other measure of performance or liquidity derived in accordance with GAAP. We believe this non-GAAP measure, as we have defined it, is helpful in identifying trends in our day-to-day performance because the items excluded have little or no significance in our day-to-day operations. This measure provides an assessment of controllable expenses and affords management the ability to make decisions which are expected to facilitate meeting current financial goals as well as achieve optimal financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA provides an indicator for management to determine if adjustments to current spending decisions are needed.
Adjusted EBITDA provides us with a measure of financial performance, independent of items that are beyond the control of management in the short-term, such as depreciation and amortization, taxation and interest expense associated with our capital structure. This metric measures our financial performance based on operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely the cost structure or expenses of the Company. Adjusted EBITDA is one of the metrics used by senior management and the board of directors to review the financial performance of our business on a monthly basis.
Not all companies calculate Adjusted EBITDA using the same methods; therefore, the Adjusted EBITDA figures set forth herein may not be comparable to Adjusted EBITDA reported by other companies. A substantial portion of our Adjusted EBITDA must be dedicated to the payment of interest on our outstanding indebtedness and to service other commitments, thereby reducing the funds available to us for other purposes. Accordingly, Adjusted EBITDA does not represent an amount of funds that is available for management’s discretionary use. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements appearing in this report. The discussion and analysis below includes certain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report that could cause our actual future growth, results of operations, performance and business prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Information” at the beginning of this report.
Comparability of Information
As a result of the restructuring of GateHouse Media, LLC (formerly known as GateHouse Media, Inc.) (“GateHouse” or “Predecessor”) (the “Restructuring”), all GateHouse debt, including derivative liabilities and deferred financing assets, was eliminated on November 6, 2013, the confirmation date of the pre-packaged plan under Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Plan”). Fresh start accounting also led to changes in the basis of our assets and liabilities including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets that will impact future depreciation and amortization expense levels. As a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting, New Media’s (“New Media,” “Company,” “us,” or “we”) reorganized company post-emergence financial statements will generally not be comparable with the financial statements of GateHouse prior to emergence, including historical financial information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
New Media is a company that owns, operates and invests in high quality local media assets. We have a particular focus on owning and acquiring strong local media assets in small to mid-size markets. With our collection of assets, we focus on two large business categories; consumers and small to medium size businesses (“SMBs”).
Our portfolio of media assets today spans across 489 markets and 31 states. Our products include 564 community print publications, 489 websites, 476 mobile sites and six yellow page directories. We reach over 19 million people per week and serve over 193,000 business customers.
We are focused on growing our consumer revenues primarily through our penetration into the local consumer market that values comprehensive local news and receives their news primarily from our products. We believe our rich local content, our strong media brands, and multiple platforms for delivering content will impact our reach into the local consumers leading to growth in subscription income. We also believe our focus on smaller markets will allow us to be a dominant provider of valuable, unique local news to consumers in those markets. We believe that one result of our local consumer penetration in these smaller markets will be transaction revenues as we link consumers with local businesses. For our SMB business category, we focus on leveraging our strong local media brands, our in-market sales force and our high consumer penetration rates with a variety of products and services that we believe will help SMBs expand their marketing, advertising and other digital lead generation platforms. We also believe our strong position in our local markets will allow us to develop other products that will be of value to our SMBs in helping them run and grow their businesses.
Our business strategy is to be the preeminent provider of local news, information, advertising and digital services in the markets we operate in today. We aim to grow our business organically through what we believe are both our consumer and SMB strategies. We also plan to pursue strategic acquisitions of high quality local media assets at attractive valuation levels. Finally, we intend to distribute a substantial portion of our free cash flow as a dividend to stockholders through a quarterly dividend, subject to satisfactory financial performance and approval by our board of directors (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) and dividend restrictions in the New Media Credit Agreement (as defined below). The Board of Directors’ determinations regarding dividends will
depend on a variety of factors, including the Company’s U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) net income, free cash flow generated from operations or other sources, liquidity position and potential alternative uses of cash, such as acquisitions, as well as economic conditions and expected future financial results.
Our focus on owning and operating dominant local content oriented media properties in small to mid-size markets, we believe, puts us in a position to better execute on our strategy. We believe that being the dominant provider of local news and information in the markets in which we operate, and distributing that content across multiple print and digital platforms, gives us an opportunity to grow our audiences and reach. Further, we believe our strong local media brands and our in-markets presence gives us the opportunity to expand our advertising and lead generation products with local business customers.
Central to our business strategy are our digital marketing services products called Propel Marketing (“Propel”). We launched the products in 2012 and have seen rapid growth since then. Revenues have grown from $1 million in 2012 to $31.3 million in 2015. We believe Propel and our digital marketing service products, combined with our strong local brands and in market sales force, position this business to be a key component to our overall organic growth strategy.
The opportunity Propel looks to seize upon is as follows:
There are approximately 27.9 million SMBs in the U.S. according to the 2011 U.S. Census data. Of these, approximately 26.7 million have 20 employees or less.
Many of the owners and managers of these SMBs do not have the bandwidth, expertise or resource to navigate the fast evolving digital marketing sector, but they increasingly know they have to be present there to stay connected with current and future customers. Propel is designed to offer a complete set of digital marketing services to SMBs that are turn-key with results that are transparent to the business owners. Propel provides four broad categories of services: building businesses a presence, helping businesses to be located by consumers online, engaging with consumers, and growing their customer base.
We believe our local media properties and local sales infrastructure are uniquely positioned to sell these digital marketing services to local business owners and give us distinct advantages, including:
•
our strong and trusted local brands, with 85% of our daily newspapers having been publishing local content for more than 100 years;
•
our ability to market through our print and online properties, driving branding and traffic; and
•
our more than 1,480 local, direct, in-market sales professionals with long standing relationships with small businesses in the communities we serve.
Our core products include:
•
124 daily newspapers with total paid circulation of approximately 1.5 million;
•
322 weekly newspapers (published up to three times per week) with total paid circulation of approximately 321,000 and total free circulation of approximately 2.0 million;
•
118 “shoppers” (generally advertising-only publications) with total circulation of approximately 2.8 million;
•
489 locally focused websites and 476 mobile sites, which extend our businesses onto the internet and mobile devices with approximately 226 million page views per month;
•
six yellow page directories, with a distribution of approximately 348,000, that cover a population of approximately 620,000 people; and
•
Propel digital marketing services.
In addition to our core products, we also opportunistically produce niche publications that address specific local market interests such as recreation, sports, healthcare and real estate. Similarly, GateHouse Live, our events business, concentrates on local markets and interests.
Our advertising revenue tends to follow a seasonal pattern, with higher advertising revenue in months containing significant events or holidays. Accordingly, our first quarter, followed by our third quarter, historically are our weakest quarters of the year in terms of revenue. Correspondingly, our second and fourth fiscal quarters, historically, are our strongest quarters. We expect that this seasonality will continue to affect our advertising revenue in future periods.
Our Predecessor has experienced on-going declines in print advertising revenue streams and increased volatility of operating performance, despite our geographic diversity, well-balanced portfolio of products, broad customer base and reliance on smaller markets. We may experience additional declines and volatility in the future. These declines in print advertising revenue have come with the shift from traditional media to the internet for consumers and businesses. We believe our local advertising tends to be less sensitive to economic cycles than national advertising because local businesses generally have fewer advertising channels through which to reach their target audience. We are making investments in digital platforms, such as Propel, as well as online, and mobile applications, to support our print publications in order to capture this shift as witnessed by our Predecessor’s digital advertising revenue growth, which doubled between 2009 and 2012.
Our operating costs consist primarily of labor, newsprint, and delivery costs. Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of labor costs.
Compensation represents just under 50% of our operating expenses. Over the last few years, we have worked to drive efficiencies and centralization of work throughout our Company. Additionally, we have taken steps to cluster our operations thereby increasing the usage of facilities and equipment while increasing the productivity of our labor force. We expect to continue to employ these steps as part of our business and clustering strategy.
The Company’s operating segments (Eastern US Publishing, Central US Publishing, and Western US Publishing) are aggregated into one reportable business segment.
Industry
The newspaper industry and the Company have experienced declining same store revenue and profitability over the past several years. As a result, we previously implemented plans to reduce costs and preserve cash flow. We have also invested in potential growth opportunities, primarily in the digital space. We believe the cost reductions and the new digital initiatives, together with the Restructuring described below, will provide the appropriate capital structure and financial resources necessary to invest in the business and ensure our future success and provide sufficient cash flow to enable us to meet our commitments for the next year.
General economic conditions, including declines in consumer confidence, high unemployment levels, declines in real estate values, and other trends, have also impacted the markets in which we operate. Additionally, media companies continue to be impacted by the migration of consumers and businesses to an internet and mobile-based, digital medium. These conditions may continue to negatively impact print advertising and other revenue sources as well as increase operating costs in the future, even after an economic recovery. We expect that we will have adequate capital resources and liquidity to meet our working capital needs, borrowing obligations and all required capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months.
We periodically perform testing for impairment of goodwill and newspaper mastheads in which the fair value of our reporting units for goodwill impairment testing and individual newspaper mastheads were estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows and recent industry transaction multiples, using estimates, judgments and assumptions, that we believe were appropriate in the circumstances. Should general economic, market or business conditions decline, and have a negative impact on estimates of future cash flow and market transaction multiples, we may be required to record additional impairment charges in the future.
Restructuring
On September 4, 2013, our Predecessor, GateHouse, and its affiliated debtors (the “Debtors”) announced that our Predecessor, the Administrative Agent (as defined below), Newcastle Investment Corp. (“Newcastle”) and other lenders (the “Participating Lenders”) under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among certain affiliates of our Predecessor, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Cortland Products Corp., as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), dated February 27, 2007 (the “2007 Credit Facility”) entered into the Restructuring Support Agreement, effective September 3, 2013 (the “Support Agreement”), in which the parties agreed to support, subject to the terms and conditions of the Support Agreement, the Restructuring pursuant to the consummation of the Plan. The Support Agreement relates to the Restructuring of our Predecessor’s obligations under the 2007 Credit Facility and certain interest rate swaps secured thereunder (collectively, the “Outstanding Debt”) and our Predecessor’s equity pursuant to the Plan.
On September 20, 2013, our Predecessor commenced a pre-packaged solicitation of the Plan (the “Solicitation”). Under the Support Agreement, which terminated on the Effective Date (as defined below), each of the Participating Lenders agreed to (a) support and take any reasonable action in furtherance of the Restructuring, (b) timely vote their Outstanding Debt to accept the Plan and not change or withdraw such vote, (c) support approval of the Disclosure Statement (as defined below) and confirmation of the Plan, as well as certain relief to be requested by Debtors from the Bankruptcy Court (as defined below), (d) refrain from taking any action inconsistent with the confirmation or consummation of the Plan, and (e) not propose, support, solicit or participate in the formulation of any plan other than the Plan. Holders of Outstanding Debt sufficient to meet the requisite threshold of 67% in amount and majority in number (calculated without including any insider) necessary for acceptance of the Plan under the Bankruptcy Code voted to accept the Plan in the Solicitation. 100% of the holders of the Outstanding Debt voted to accept the Plan under the terms of the Support Agreement. As a result, Debtors commenced Chapter 11 cases and sought approval of the disclosure statement for the Plan (the “Disclosure Statement”) and confirmation of the Plan therein. The Plan was confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) on November 6, 2013 and our Predecessor effected the transactions contemplated by the Plan to emerge from bankruptcy protection on November 26, 2013. On the Effective Date (as defined below), Newcastle owned 84.6% of New Media’s total equity.
On September 27, 2013, our Predecessor filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, case number 13-12503. On November 6, 2013 the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plan. Our Predecessor effected the transactions contemplated by the Plan and emerged from Chapter 11 protection on November 26, 2013 (the “Effective Date”).
The Plan discharged claims and interests against our Predecessor primarily through the (a) issuance of shares of common stock in a new holding company, New Media (“New Media Common Stock” or our “Common Stock”) and/or payment of cash to holders of claims in connection with the 2007 Credit Facility and related interest rate swaps, (b) reinstatement of certain claims, (c) entry into the Management Agreement (as defined below), (d) issuance of warrants by New Media to former equity holders in our Predecessor and (e) entry into the GateHouse Credit Facilities (as defined below) the net proceeds of which were distributed to holders that elected to receive New Media Common Stock. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, “Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11.”
Pursuant to the Restructuring, Newcastle purchased the Outstanding Debt claims in cash and at 40% of (i) $1,167 million of principal of claims under the 2007 Credit Facility, plus (ii) accrued and unpaid interest at the applicable contract non-default rate with respect thereto, plus (iii) all amounts, excluding any default interest, arising from transactions in connection with interest rate swaps secured under the 2007 Credit Facility (the “Cash-Out Offer”) on the Effective Date. The holders of the Outstanding Debt had the option of receiving, in satisfaction of their Outstanding Debt, their pro rata share of the (i) Cash-Out Offer or (ii) New Media Common Stock and the net proceeds, if any, of new debt facilities GateHouse Credit Facilities (as defined below). Newcastle received its pro rata share of New Media Common Stock and the $149 million in net proceeds of the GateHouse Credit Facilities (as defined below) for all Outstanding Debt it holds, including Outstanding Debt purchased in the Cash-Out Offer. All pensions, trade and all other unsecured claims will be paid in the ordinary course.
On the Effective Date, New Media entered into a management agreement with FIG LLC (the “Manager”) (“Management Agreement”) pursuant to which the Manager will manage the operations of New Media. The annual management fee is 1.50% of New Media’s Total Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement) and the Manager is eligible to receive incentive compensation.
On August 27, 2013, our Predecessor entered into a management agreement (the “Local Media Management Agreement”) with and among Local Media Group Holdings LLC (“Local Media Parent”) to manage the operations of its direct subsidiary Local Media Group Inc. (“Local Media”). The Company determined that the Local Media Management Agreement resulted in Local Media being a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and has consolidated Local Media’s financial position and results of operations from September 3, 2013. On September 3, 2013, Local Media Parent completed its acquisition of thirty three publications from News Corp Inc. Local Media was not part of the bankruptcy filing. However, as part of the Plan, Newcastle agreed to contribute 100% of the stock of Local Media Parent to New Media as of the Effective Date. The contribution was made to New Media to assign Newcastle’s rights under the stock purchase agreement to which it acquired Local Media as of the Effective Date. Consideration received by Newcastle was the New Media Common Stock collectively equal to the cost of the acquisition of Local Media by Newcastle (as adjusted pursuant to the Plan) upon emergence from Chapter 11 on the Effective Date. The Company accounted for the consolidation of Local Media under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, “Business Combinations”, as New Media received a controlling financial interest in Local Media as of the Effective Date. The Local Media Management Agreement was terminated effective June 4, 2014.
Upon GateHouse’s emergence from Chapter 11, New Media adopted fresh start reporting in accordance with ASC Topic 852, “Reorganizations” (“ASC 852”). Under fresh start accounting, a new entity is deemed to have been created on the Effective Date for financial reporting purposes and our Predecessor’s recorded amounts of assets and liabilities will be adjusted to reflect their estimated fair values. As a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting, New Media’s reorganized company post-emergence financial statements will generally not be comparable with the financial statements of our Predecessor prior to emergence, including the historical financial information in this report. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, “Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11.”
Spin-off from Newcastle
On February 13, 2014, Newcastle completed the spin-off of the Company. Each share of Newcastle common stock outstanding as of 5:00 PM, Eastern Time, on February 6, 2014, the Record Date, entitled the holder thereof to receive 0.07219481485 shares of New Media Common Stock (the “spin-off”). On February 14, 2014 New Media became a separate, publicly traded company trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “NEWM”. As a result of the spin-off, the fees included in the management agreement with the Manager became effective.
Management Agreement
On the Effective Date, New Media entered into the Management Agreement pursuant to which the Manager manages the operations of New Media. The annual management fee is 1.50% of New Media’s Total Equity (as
defined in the Management Agreement) and the Manager is eligible to receive incentive compensation. On March 6, 2015, the Company’s independent directors on the Board approved an amendment to the Management Agreement. See Note 18 “Related Party Transactions” to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
We recognized $9.4 million and $5.6 million for management fees and $30.3 million and $0.1 million for incentive compensation within selling, general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and $9.9 million and $4.4 million in management fees and $8.9 million and $0 in incentive compensation was paid to Fortress during the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively. No management fees or incentive compensation was incurred during the year ended December 29, 2013.
Acquisitions
On February 28, 2014, we completed the acquisition of five publications from Freedom Communications for a total purchase price of $7.9 million, including working capital. The acquisition included two daily and three weekly publications serving Southern California with an aggregate circulation of approximately 56,000.
On June 30, 2014, we completed two acquisitions of 20 publications with a total purchase price of $15.9 million, including working capital. The acquisitions included six daily, ten weekly publications, and four shoppers serving areas of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Virginia with an aggregate circulation of approximately 54,000.
On September 3, 2014, we completed the acquisition of The Providence Journal with a total purchase price of $48.7 million, including working capital. The acquisition included one daily and two weekly publications serving areas of Rhode Island with a daily circulation of approximately 72,000 and 96,000 on Sunday.
On December 1, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Foster’s Daily Democrat along with other publications and related assets for $5.4 million in cash, including working capital, from the Foster family. The publications are located around Dover, NH, and the daily newspaper has a circulation of approximately 12,000.
On January 9, 2015, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets from Halifax Media Group for an aggregate purchase price of $285.4 million, including working capital and net of assumed debt. The acquisition included 24 daily publications, thirteen weekly publications, and five shoppers serving areas of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and South Carolina with a daily circulation of approximately 635,000 and 752,000 on Sunday.
On March 18, 2015, we completed the acquisition of the assets of Stephens Media, LLC (“Stephens Media”) for an aggregate purchase price of $110.8 million, including working capital. The acquisition includes nine daily newspapers, 35 weekly publications and fifteen shoppers serving communities throughout the United States with a combined average daily circulation of approximately 221 and 244 on Sunday.
On June 15, 2015 and September 23, 2015, we acquired substantially all the assets, properties and business of publishing/operating certain newspapers for an aggregate purchase price of $52.0 million, including estimated working capital. The acquisitions included two daily newspapers, twenty-eight weekly publications, and two shoppers serving Central Ohio and Southern Michigan.
Dispositions
On December 10, 2015, we completed the sale of the Las Vegas Review-Journal and related publications (“Review-Journal”) (initially acquired in the Stephens Media acquisition) which are located in Las Vegas, Nevada for an aggregate sale price of $140,000 plus working capital adjustment of $1,000. As a result, a gain of $57.0 million is included in (gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for this period.
Subsequent Events
Acquisitions
On December 31, 2015, we completed the acquisition of the Business Information Division of Dolan LLC (“Dolan”) for $35.0 million in cash, plus working capital. We funded the acquisition with cash on the balance sheet. Dolan is a leading provider of industry-specific news with 39 print and online publications and an audience of over 46,000 paid subscribers.
On January 12, 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the publishing operations of the Times Publishing Company, including the Erie Times-News daily newspaper, for $11.5 million in cash, plus the assumption of liabilities. We funded the acquisition with cash on the balance sheet. Erie Times-News is a dominant source of local news and advertising in Erie, PA with an average weekday circulation of over 39,000 and 55,000 on Sunday.
Dividends
On February 25, 2016, the Company announced a fourth quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend will be paid on March 17, 2016, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 9, 2016.
Critical Accounting Policy Disclosure
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make decisions based on estimates, assumptions and factors it considers relevant to the circumstances. Such decisions include the selection of applicable principles and the use of judgment in their application, the results of which could differ from those anticipated. Due to the bankruptcy filing, we have applied debtor-in-possession accounting and fresh start accounting as described in ASC 852 for the applicable periods of 2013. The following accounting policies require significant estimates and judgments.
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with the provisions of ASC 805. ASC 805 provides guidance for recognition and measurement of identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at fair value. In a business combination, the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interest in the acquiree are recorded as of the date of acquisition at their respective fair values with limited exceptions. Any excess of the purchase price (consideration transferred) over the estimated fair values of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The operating results of the acquired business are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements after the date of the acquisition.
Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets
The application of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations and fresh start accounting related to reorganization require the use of significant estimates and assumptions in the determination of the fair value of assets and liabilities in order to properly allocate the purchase price consideration or enterprise value between assets that are depreciated and amortized from goodwill. Our estimates of the fair values of assets and liabilities are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, and when appropriate, include assistance from independent third-party valuation firms. Refer to Note 3, “Acquisitions and Dispositions” of the consolidated financial statements.
As a result of the application of fresh start accounting and recent acquisitions, we have a significant amount of goodwill. Goodwill at December 27, 2015 was $171.1 million. We assess the potential impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives on an annual basis as of the end of our second fiscal quarter in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 350 “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.” We perform our impairment analysis on each of our reporting units. The Company has the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the Company elects to perform a qualitative assessment and concludes it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, no further assessment of that reporting unit’s goodwill is necessary; otherwise goodwill must be tested for impairment using a two-step process. The reporting units have discrete financial information and are regularly reviewed by management. The fair value of the applicable reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. Calculating the fair value of a reporting unit requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions. We estimate fair value by applying third-party market value indicators to projected cash flows and/or projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. In applying this methodology, we rely on a number of factors, including current operating results and cash flows, expected future operating results and cash flows, future business plans, and market data. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the estimate of fair value, we calculate the impairment as the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value.
We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”. We assess the recoverability of our long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and definite lived intangible assets, whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets, or related group of assets, may not be fully recoverable. Factors leading to impairment include significant under-performance relative to historical or projected results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business and significant negative industry or economic trends. The assessment of recoverability is generally based on management’s estimates by comparing the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows generated by the underlying asset, or other appropriate grouping of assets, to its carrying value to determine whether an impairment existed at its lowest level of identifiable cash flows. However, in some cases the market approach is used to estimate the fair value, particularly when there is a change in the use of an asset. If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than the expected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by such asset, an impairment is recognized to the extent the carrying value of such asset exceeds its fair value.
The fair values of our reporting units for goodwill impairment testing and individual newspaper mastheads are estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, recent industry transaction multiples and using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believes are appropriate in the circumstances.
The sum of the fair values of the reporting units are reconciled to our current market capitalization (based upon the stock market price) plus an estimated control premium.
Significant judgment is required in determining the fair value of our goodwill and long-lived assets to measure impairment, including the determination of multiples of revenue and Adjusted EBITDA and future earnings projections. The estimates and judgments that most significantly affect the future cash flow estimates are assumptions related to revenue, and in particular, potential changes in future advertising (including the impact of economic trends and the speed of conversion of advertising and readership to online products from traditional print products); trends in newsprint prices; and other operating expense items.
We performed annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets during the second quarter of 2015, 2014 and 2013. Additionally, we performed impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles during the fourth quarter of 2015 due to operational management changes. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements “Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” for a discussion of the impairment charges taken.
Newspaper mastheads (newspaper titles) are not subject to amortization and are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The
impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of each group of mastheads with their carrying amount. We used a relief from royalty approach which utilizes a discounted cash flow model to determine the fair value of each newspaper masthead. Our judgments and estimates of future operating results in determining the reporting unit fair values are consistently applied in determining the fair value of mastheads. We performed impairment tests on newspaper mastheads as of December 27, 2015, June 28, 2015, June 29, 2014 and June 30, 2013. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” for a discussion of the impairment charges taken.
Intangible assets subject to amortization (primarily advertiser and subscriber lists) are tested for recoverability whenever events or change in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of each asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of such asset group. We performed impairment assessments on long lived assets (including intangible assets subject to amortization) as of December 27, 2015, June 28, 2015, June 29, 2014, September 29, 2013 and June 30, 2013. Due to reductions in the Company’s operating projections during the third quarter of 2013 in conjunction with the bankruptcy process, an impairment charge was recognized for intangible assets subject to amortization. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” for a discussion of the impairment charges taken.
The newspaper industry and the Company have experienced declining same store revenue and profitability over the past several years. Should general economic, market or business conditions decline, and have a negative impact on estimates of future cash flow and market transaction multiples, we may be required to record additional impairment charges in the future.
Revenue Recognition
Advertising revenue is recognized upon publication of the advertisement. Circulation revenue from subscribers is billed to customers at the beginning of the subscription period and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related subscription. Circulation revenue from single copy sales is recognized based on date of publication, net of provisions for related returns. Revenue for commercial printing is recognized upon delivery. Directory revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period in which the corresponding directory is distributed.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. The assessment of the realizability of deferred tax assets involves a high degree of judgment and complexity. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are expected to be realized. When we determine that it is more likely than not that we will be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be made and reflected either in income or as an adjustment to goodwill. This determination will be made by considering various factors, including our expected future results, that in our judgment will make it more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized.
FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS No. 109” and now codified as ASC 740. ASC 740 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. Under ASC 740, the financial statements will reflect expected future tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts, but without considering time values.
Pension and Postretirement Liabilities
ASC Topic 715, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits” requires recognition of an asset or liability in the consolidated balance sheet reflecting the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans such as retiree health and life, with current-year changes in the funded status recognized in the statement of stockholders’ equity.
The determination of pension plan obligations and expense is based on a number of actuarial assumptions. Two critical assumptions are the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate applied to pension plan obligations. For other postretirement benefit plans, which provide for certain health care and life insurance benefits for qualifying retired employees and which are not funded, critical assumptions in determining other postretirement benefit obligations and expense are the discount rate and the assumed health care cost-trend rates.
Our only pension plan has assets valued at $20.6 million as of December 27, 2015 and the plan’s benefit obligation is $26.1 million resulting in the plan being 79% funded.
To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan’s assets, we consider the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets, input from the actuaries and investment consultants, and long-term inflation assumptions. We used an assumption of 7.75% for our expected return on pension plan assets for 2015. If we were to reduce our rate of return by 50 basis points then the expense for 2015 would have increased approximately $0.1 million.
The assumed health care cost-trend rate also affects other postretirement benefit liabilities and expense. A 100 basis point increase in the health care cost trend rate would result in an increase of approximately $0.5 million in the December 27, 2015 postretirement benefit obligation and a 100 basis point decrease in the health care cost trend rate would result in a decrease of approximately $0.4 million in the December 27, 2015 postretirement benefit obligation.
Self-Insurance Liability Accruals
We maintain self-insured medical and workers’ compensation programs. We purchase stop loss coverage from third parties which limits our exposure to large claims. We record a liability for healthcare and workers’ compensation costs during the period in which they occur as well as an estimate of incurred but not reported claims.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our historical results of operations for New Media, otherwise known as the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014, the two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013. We believe the comparison of combined results for the year ended December 29, 2013 versus the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, provides the best analysis of our results of operations, while the adoption of fresh start accounting presents the results of operations of a new reporting entity, the only consolidated statement of operations items impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization under Chapter 11 are depreciation and amortization expense, interest expense, and reorganization items. Those effects of fresh start accounting are discussed in more detail in the respective sections below. References to “same store” results below take into account material acquisitions and divestitures of the Company by adjusting prior year performance to include or exclude financial results as if the Company had owned or divested a business for the comparable period. The Victorville, American Consolidated Media Southwest Group, Petersburg, Fosters, and Monroe Publishing Company (“Tuck-In”) acquisitions were not considered material.
Year Ended December 27, 2015 Compared To Year Ended December 28, 2014
Revenue. Total revenue for the year ended December 27, 2015 increased by $543.5 million, or 83.3%, to $1,195.8 million from $652.3 million for the year ended December 28, 2014. The increase in total revenue was comprised of a $311.3 million, or 80.8%, increase in advertising revenue, a $182.6 million, or 93.3%, increase in circulation revenue, and a $49.6 million, or 69.6%, increase in commercial printing and other revenue, which includes a $13.0 million, or 71%, increase in digital revenue primarily attributable to Propel. The increase in revenue of $543.5 million includes revenues from our Columbus Dispatch, Stephens Media, Halifax Media Group, and The Providence Journal acquisitions of $552.1 million, which is comprised of $323.1 million from advertising, $180.1 million from circulation, and $48.9 million from commercial printing and other.
Same store revenue for the year ended December 27, 2015 decreased by $48.4 million, or 3.9%. The decrease in same store revenue was comprised of a $45.4 million, or 6.1%, decrease in advertising revenue and a $4.7 million, or 3.8%, decrease in commercial printing and other revenue, which was offset by a $1.7 million, or 0.5%, increase in circulation revenue. Same store advertising revenue declines were primarily driven by declines on the print side of our business in the local retail and preprint categories due to secular pressures and a continuing uncertain economic environment. These secular trends and economic conditions have also led to a decline in our print circulation volumes, which have been partially offset by price increases in select locations. The $4.7 million decrease in commercial printing and other revenue is due in part to a decrease in commercial printing of $9.3 million, primarily due to the acquisition of commercial print customers, which is partially offset by an increase in Propel revenue.
Operating Costs. Operating costs for the year ended December 27, 2015 increased by $288.1 million, or 78.2%, to $656.5 million from $368.4 million for the year ended December 28, 2014. The increase in operating costs of $288.1 million includes operating costs from all acquisitions of $301.0 million, which were partially offset by a $12.9 million decrease in the costs related to the remaining operations. This decline in operating costs related to the remaining operations was primarily due to a decrease in newsprint, hauling and delivery, and postage expenses of $6.2 million, $5.2 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 27, 2015 increased by $194.5 million, or 91.8%, to $406.3 million from $211.8 million for the year ended December 28, 2014. The increase of $194.5 million includes selling, general and administrative expenses from all acquisitions of $169.7 million. The additional $24.8 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to a $34.0 million increase in management and incentive fees, which was partially offset by a decrease in professional and consulting fees, compensation, postage, repairs and maintenance, and hauling and delivery expenses of $4.6 million, $3.7 million, $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.1 million, respectively.
Integration and Reorganization Costs. During the year ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, we recorded integration and reorganization costs of $8.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively, primarily resulting from severance costs related to acquisition-related synergies and the continued consolidation of our operations resulting from our ongoing implementation of our plans to reduce costs and preserve cash flow.
(Gain) Loss on Sale or Disposal of Assets. The gain on sale or disposal of assets for the year ended December 27, 2015 is primarily comprised of a gain on sale of the Review-Journal of $57.1 million, which is partially offset by losses on sales or disposal of less significant assets of $6.0 million.
Mastheads Impairment. During the year ended December 27, 2015 we recorded a $4.8 million impairment on our mastheads due to declines in revenue projections and reductions in certain groups’ royalty rates. There were no such charges during the year ended December 28, 2014.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 27, 2015 increased by $12.7 million to $29.3 million from $16.6 million for the year ended December 28, 2014. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to the increase in our total outstanding debt.
Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs. Amortization of deferred financing costs for the year ended December 27, 2015 increased by $1.7 million, or 158.5%, to $2.7 million from $1.0 million for the year ended December 28, 2014, primarily due to the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the 2015 Incremental Revolver (as defined below).
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During the year ended December 28, 2014 we recorded a loss of $9.0 million due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt. There were no such charges during the year ended December 27, 2015.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). During the year ended December 27, 2015, we recorded an income tax expense of $3.4 million related to a deferred tax liability for indefinite-lived assets where book basis exceeded
tax basis, alternative minimum tax and state taxes. During the year ended December 28, 2014, we recorded an income tax expense of $2.7 million related to a deferred tax liability for indefinite-lived assets where book basis exceeded tax basis.
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing operations for the year ended December 27, 2015 was $67.6 million and loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 28, 2014 was $3.2 million. Our net income from continuing operations increased due to the factors noted above.
Year Ended December 28, 2014 Compared To Year Ended December 29, 2013
Revenue. Total revenue for the year ended December 28, 2014 increased by $135.8 million, or 26.3%, to $652.3 million from $516.5 million for the year ended December 29, 2013. The increase in total revenue was comprised of a $57.0 million, or 17.4%, increase in advertising revenue, a $47.3 million, or 31.9%, increase in circulation revenue, and a $31.5 million, or 79.2%, increase in commercial printing and other revenue. The increase in revenue of $135.8 million includes revenues from our Local Media and The Providence Journal acquisitions of $131.0 million, which is comprised of $62.5 million from advertising, $44.9 million from circulation, and $23.6 million from commercial printing and other.
Same store revenue for the Successor Company for the year ended December 28, 2014 increased by $1.0 million, or 0.1%, to $652.3 million. The increase in same store revenue was comprised of a $1.7 million, or 0.9%, increase in circulation revenue and an $8.9 million, or 14.3%, increase in commercial printing and other revenue, which was partially offset by a $9.6 million, or 2.4%, decrease in advertising revenue. Same store advertising revenue declines were primarily driven by declines on the print side of our business in the local retail category due to secular pressures and a continuing uncertain economic environment. These secular trends and economic conditions have also led to a decline in our print circulation volumes, which have been offset by price increases in select locations. The $8.9 million increase in commercial printing and other revenue is primarily the result of the growth in Propel, our small business marketing service products.
Operating Costs. Operating costs for the year ended December 28, 2014 increased by $79.7 million, or 27.6%, to $368.4 million from $288.7 million for the year ended December 29, 2013. The increase in operating costs of $79.7 million includes operating costs from all 2013 and 2014 acquisitions of $87.7 million, which were partially offset by an $8.0 million decrease in operating costs. This decline in operating costs was primarily due to a decrease in compensation, hauling and delivery, and newsprint expenses of $4.4 million, $2.1 million, and $2.0 million, respectively. On a same store basis, operating costs for the year ended December 28, 2014 decreased by $3.7 million, or 1.0%, to $368.4 million. These decreases are the result of permanent cost reductions as we continue to work to consolidate operations and improve the productivity of our labor force.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 28, 2014 increased by $46.2 million, or 27.9%, to $211.8 million from $165.6 million for the year ended December 29, 2013. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $46.2 million includes selling, general and administrative expenses from acquisitions of $38.8 million. The additional $7.4 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in outside services and professional and consulting fees of $4.5 million and $3.9 million, respectively, which were partially offset by a decrease in compensation of $1.4 million. On a same store basis, selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 28, 2014 increased by $11.9 million, or 6.0%, to $211.8 million, which includes $2.4 million of debt refinancing fees that did not meet capitalization requirements, an increase of $3.7 million of acquisition, closing and transition costs, and $5.6 million of management fees.
Integration and Reorganization Costs. During the year ended December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013, we recorded integration and reorganization costs of $2.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively, primarily resulting from severance costs related to the continued consolidation of our operations resulting from our ongoing implementation of our plans to reduce costs and preserve cash flow.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. During the year ended December 29, 2013 we incurred a charge of $91.6 million related to the impairment on our advertiser relationships, subscriber relationships, customer relationships and other intangible assets due to reductions in our operating projections within our various reporting units. There were no such charges during the year ended December 28, 2014.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 28, 2014 decreased by $59.4 million to $16.6 million from $76.0 million for the year ended December 29, 2013. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the decrease in our total outstanding debt as a result of our restructuring during 2013 and the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income related to the write-off of the derivative instruments due to the termination of the swap agreements of $26.3 million during the year ended December 29, 2013.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During the year ended December 28, 2014 we recorded a loss of $9.0 million due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt. There were no such charges during the year ended December 29, 2013.
Reorganization Items, Net. Costs directly attributable to the bankruptcy filing are reported as reorganization items, net during the Predecessor ten month period ending November 6, 2013. Reorganization items, net primarily relates to the gain on extinguishment of debt of $722.8 million and the revaluation of assets of $246.2 million which were partially offset by $11.6 million of third party bankruptcy fees and a $6.8 million credit agreement amendment fee. There were no such charges during the year ended December 28, 2014.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). During the year ended December 28, 2014, we recorded an income tax expense of $2.7 million related to a deferred tax liability for indefinite-lived assets where book basis exceeded tax basis. During the year ended December 29, 2013, we recorded an income tax expense of $0.3 million due to the state tax related to the bankruptcy filing.
Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations. Net loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 28, 2014 was $3.2 million and net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 29, 2013 was $795.4 million. Our net loss from continuing operations increased due to the factors noted above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary cash requirements are for working capital, debt obligations and capital expenditures. We have no material outstanding commitments for capital expenditures. We expect our 2016 capital expenditure to total between $10.0 million and $12.0 million. The 2016 capital expenditures will be primarily comprised of projects related to the consolidation of print operations and system upgrades. Our long term debt and debt service obligations were significantly reduced following the Restructuring. For more information on our long term debt and debt service obligations, see Note 10 “Indebtedness” of the consolidated financial statements.
As a holding company, we have no operations of our own and accordingly we have no independent means of generating revenue, and our internal sources of funds to meet our cash needs, including payment of expenses, are dividends and other permitted payments from our subsidiaries.
We expect to fund our operations through cash provided by operating activities, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of additional equity securities. The Company expects that it will have adequate capital resources and liquidity to meet its working capital needs, borrowing obligations and all required capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months.
Our leverage may adversely affect our business and financial performance and restrict our operating flexibility. The level of our indebtedness and our on-going cash flow requirements may expose us to a risk that a
substantial decrease in operating cash flows due to, among other things, continued or additional adverse economic developments or adverse developments in our business, could make it difficult for us to meet the financial and operating covenants contained in our credit facilities. In addition, our leverage may limit cash flow available for general corporate purposes such as capital expenditures and our flexibility to react to competitive, technological and other changes in our industry and economic conditions generally.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our historical cash flows.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 27, 2015 was $115.3 million. The net cash provided by operating activities resulted from net income of $67.6 million, depreciation and amortization of $67.8 million, a net increase in cash provided by working capital of $21.9 million, an impairment of mastheads of $4.8 million, non-cash interest expense of $2.1 million, non-cash compensation expense of $1.3 million, an increase in deferred income taxes of $1.2 million, and amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.7 million, partially offset by a gain on the sale or disposal of assets of $51.1 million and an increase funding of pension and other post-retirement obligations of $1.0 million. The increase in cash provided by working capital primarily resulted from an increase in accrued expenses, which was partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 28, 2014 was $41.4 million. The net cash provided by operating activities resulted from depreciation and amortization of $41.5 million, a non-cash loss on early extinguishment of debt of $5.9 million, deferred income taxes of $2.8 million, loss on the sale of assets of $1.5 million, amortization of deferred financing costs of $1.0 million and non-cash interest expense of $0.8 million, partially offset by a net decrease in cash provided by working capital of $7.3 million, a net loss of $3.2 million, and an increase funding of pension and other post-retirement obligations of $1.6 million. The decrease in cash provided by working capital primarily resulted from a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the two months ended December 29, 2013 was $16.2 million. The net cash provided by operating activities resulted from net income of $7.2 million, depreciation and amortization of $6.6 million, a net increase in cash provided by working capital of $2.2 million, and amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.2 million. The increase in cash provided by working capital primarily resulted from an increase in accrued expenses and accounts payable partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable.
Net cash used in operating activities for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 was $6.0 million. The net cash used in operating activities resulted from non-cash reorganization items, net of $954.6 million and an increase funding of pension and other post-retirement obligations of $1.1 million, partially offset by net income of $787.2 million, an impairment of long-lived assets of $91.6 million, an increase in non-cash interest related to unrealized losses upon dedesignation of cash flow hedges of $26.3 million, depreciation and amortization of $33.5 million, a net increase in cash provided by working capital of $8.0 million, a $2.3 million loss on the sale of assets, and amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.8 million. The increase in cash provided by working capital primarily resulted from an increase in accrued expenses.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 27, 2015 was $298.7 million. During the year ended December 27, 2015, we used $431.1 million, net of cash acquired, for acquisitions and $10.2 million for capital expenditures, which was offset by $142.6 million received from the sale of publications and other assets.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 28, 2014 was $81.6 million. During the year ended December 28, 2014, we used $77.6 million, net of cash acquired, for acquisitions and $5.0 million for capital expenditures, which was offset by $1.0 million received from the sale of publications and other assets.
Net cash used in investing activities for the two months ended December 29, 2013 was $1.4 million. During the two months ended December 29, 2013, we used $1.5 million for capital expenditures, which was offset by $0.1 million received from the sale of publications and other assets.
Net cash used in investing activities for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 was $2.8 million. During the ten months ended November 6, 2013, we used $3.6 million for capital expenditures, which was offset by $0.8 million received from the sale of publications and other assets.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 27, 2015 was $206.3 million due to the issuance of common stock of $149.5 million from the public offering, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, borrowings under term loans of $122.9 million, and borrowings under the revolving credit facility of $99.0 million, which were offset by repayments under the revolving credit facility of $104.0 million, payment of dividends of $57.4 million, repayments under long-term debt of $3.1 million, and the payment of debt issuance costs of $0.6 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 28, 2014 was $132.1 million due to borrowings under term loans of $217.8 million, the issuance of common stock of $115.7 million from the public offering, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, and borrowings under the revolving credit facility of $24.1 million, which were offset by repayments under long-term debt of $158.6 million, repayments under the revolving credit facility of $44.1 million, payment of dividends of $18.2 million, and the payment of debt issuance costs of $4.6 million.
Net cash used in financing activities for the two months ended December 29, 2013 was $3.7 million due to the payment of dividends of $149.0 million and the payment of debt issuance costs of $3.7 million offset by borrowings under the GateHouse Credit Facilities of $149.0 million.
Net cash used in financing activities for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 was $5.0 million due to a repayment under the 2007 Credit Facility of $6.6 million which was offset by additional paid-in capital of $1.6 million related to the VIE Local Media.
Changes in Financial Position
The discussion that follows highlights significant changes in our financial position and working capital from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015.
Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable increased by $56.1 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, which relates to $63.6 million of accounts receivable assets acquired in the year ended December 27, 2015, which was partially offset by $11.8 million of accounts receivable assets sold and the timing of cash collections and lower same store revenue recognized in the year ended December 27, 2015 compared to 2014.
Inventory. Inventory increased by $5.9 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, which relates primarily to inventory assets acquired in the year ended December 27, 2015.
Prepaid Expenses. Prepaid expenses increased by $5.4 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, which relates primarily to prepaid expenses acquired in the year ended December 27, 2015.
Property, Plant, and Equipment. Property, plant, and equipment increased by $101.0 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, of which $190.8 million relates to property, plant, and equipment assets acquired and $10.1 million of which was used for capital expenditures, which was partially offset by depreciation of $51.5 million, $46.1 million of property, plant, and equipment assets sold or disposed of, and $2.4 million of property, plant, and equipment assets classified as held for sale in 2015.
Goodwill. Goodwill increased by $37.1 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, of which $43.5 million relates to goodwill acquired which was offset by $6.4 million of goodwill sold in 2015.
Intangible Assets. Intangible assets increased by $146.8 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, of which $199.7 million relates to intangible assets acquired in 2015, which was offset by $31.8 million of intangible assets sold or disposed of in 2015, $16.3 million of amortization, and a $4.8 million masthead impairment.
Current Portion of Long-term Debt. Current portion of long-term debt increased by $1.3 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, due to the increase in long-term debt to current portion of long-term debt of $2.1 million resulting from an increase in total debt outstanding under the credit agreement, which was partially offset by repayments under current portion of long-term debt of $0.8 million.
Accrued Expenses. Accrued expenses increased by $52.4 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, of which $16.5 million relates primarily to accrued expenses acquired in 2015, an increase in the management and incentive fees payable of $21.0 million, an increase in accrued interest of $5.2 million due to the timing of interest payments and higher debt levels, an increase in accrued bonus of $3.2 million, and an increase in health insurance of $3.0 million.
Deferred Revenue. Deferred revenue increased $26.5 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, which relates primarily to deferred revenue acquired in 2015.
Long-term Debt. Long-term debt increased by $133.6 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, due to borrowings under term loans of $122.9 million, which includes a $4.1 million original issue discount, borrowings under the revolving credit facility of $99.0 million, debt assumed from the Halifax Media Group acquisition of $18.0 million, and $2.1 million non-cash interest expense. These increases were offset by repayments under the revolving credit facility of $104.0 million, a $2.1 million reclassification from long-term debt to current portion of long-term debt, and repayments under long-term debt of $2.3 million.
Long-term Liabilities, Less Current Portion. Long-term liabilities, less current portion increased $3.6 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, of which $2.0 million relates to the long-term portion of workers compensation due to the increase in employees in 2015 and $1.6 million relates to the long-term portion of lease liabilities resulting from leases assumed in connection with assets acquired in 2015.
Additional Paid-in Capital. Additional paid-in capital increased $120.8 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, which resulted primarily from the issuance of common stock from the public offering of $150.1 million, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs and $1.3 million from non-cash compensation expense, which was partially offset by dividends of $30.8 million.
Retained Earnings. Retained earnings increased $40.7 million from December 28, 2014 to December 27, 2015, due to net income of $67.6 million which was offset by the payment of dividends of $26.9 million.
Indebtedness
As part of the Restructuring, our Predecessor’s previous long-term debt was extinguished pursuant to the Support Agreement on the Effective Date of the Plan.
GateHouse Credit Facilities-terminated June 4, 2014
The Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement (the “First Lien Credit Facility”) dated November 26, 2013 by and among GateHouse, GateHouse Media Intermediate Holdco, LLC formerly known as GateHouse Media Intermediate Holdco, Inc. (“GMIH”), certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of GMIH, all of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of New Media (collectively with GMIH and GateHouse, the “Loan Parties”), PNC Bank, National Association, as the administrative agent, Crystal Financial LLC, as term loan B agent, and each of the lenders party thereto provided for (i) a term loan A in the aggregate principal amount of $25 million, (ii) a term loan B in the aggregate principal amount of $50 million, and (iii) a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $40 million. The Term Loan and Security Agreement (the “Second Lien Credit Facility” and together with the First Lien Credit Facility, the “GateHouse Credit Facilities”) dated November 26, 2013 by and among the Loan Parties, Mutual Quest Fund and each of the lenders party thereto provided for a term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $50 million. The GateHouse Credit Facilities were secured by a first and second priority security interest in substantially all the assets of the Loan Parties.
The GateHouse Credit Facilities imposed upon GateHouse certain financial and operating covenants, including, among others, requirements that GateHouse satisfy certain financial tests, including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0, a maximum leverage ratio of not greater than 3.25 to 1.0, a minimum EBITDA and a limitation on capital expenditures, and restrictions on GateHouse’s ability to incur additional debt, incur liens and encumbrances, consolidate, amalgamate or merge with any other person, pay dividends, dispose of assets, make certain restricted payments, engage in transactions with affiliates, materially alter the business it conducts and taking certain other corporate actions.
The GateHouse Credit Facilities were paid in full on June 4, 2014.
Local Media Credit Facility-terminated June 4, 2014
Certain of Local Media Parent’s subsidiaries (together, the “Borrowers”) and Local Media Parent entered into a Credit Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2013, with a syndicate of financial institutions with Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent (the “Local Media Credit Facility”). The Local Media Credit Facility provided for: (a) a $33 million term loan facility; and (b) a $10 million revolving credit facility, with a $3 million sub-facility for letters of credit and a $4 million sub-facility for swing loans. On October 25, 2013, CS assigned the revolving loan commitment to Capital One Business Corp and the revolving credit facility was activated.
The Local Media Credit Facility contained financial covenants that required Local Media Parent and the Borrowers to maintain (a) a Leverage Ratio of not more than 2.5 to 1.0 and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Local Media Credit Facility) of at least 2.0 to 1.0, each measured at the end of each fiscal quarter for the four-quarter period then ended. The Local Media Credit Facility contained affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Local Media and the Borrowers customarily found in loan agreements for similar transactions, including, but not limited to, restrictions on their ability to incur indebtedness, create liens on assets, engage in certain lines of business, engage in mergers or consolidations, dispose of assets, make investments or acquisitions, engage in transactions with affiliates, pay dividends or make other restricted payments. The Local Media Credit Facility contained customary events of default, including, but not limited to, defaults based on a failure to pay principal, interest, fees or other obligations, subject to specified grace periods (other than with respect to principal); any material inaccuracy of representation or warranty; breach of covenants; default in other
material indebtedness; a Change of Control (as defined in the Local Media Credit Facility); bankruptcy and insolvency events; material judgments; certain ERISA events; and impairment of collateral. The Local Media Credit Facility was amended on October 17, 2013 and on February 28, 2014. The October 17, 2013 amendment corrected a typographical mistake. The February 28, 2014 amendment provided that among other things, sales of real property collateral and reinvestment of the proceeds from such sales could only be made with the consent of the Administrative Agent, modified the properties included in the real property collateral, and set forth in detail the documentary post-closing requirements with respect to the real property collateral.
The Local Media Credit Facility was paid in full on June 4, 2014.
New Media Credit Agreement
On June 4, 2014, New Media Holdings II LLC (the “New Media Borrower”), a wholly owned subsidiary of New Media, entered into a credit agreement (the “New Media Credit Agreement”) among the New Media Borrower, New Media Holdings I LLC (“Holdings”), the lenders party thereto, RBS Citizens, N.A. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch as syndication agent and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania as administration agent which provides for (i) a $200 million senior secured term facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) and (ii) a $25 million senior secured revolving credit facility (of which $0 was drawn as of December 27, 2015), with a $5 million sub-facility for letters of credit and a $5 million sub-facility for swing loans, (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and together with the Term Loan Facility, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”). In addition, the New Media Borrower may request one or more new commitments for term loans or revolving loans from time to time up to an aggregate total of $75 million (the “Incremental Facility”) subject to certain conditions. On June 4, 2014, the New Media Borrower borrowed $200 million under the Term Loan Facility (the “Term Loans”). The Term Loans mature on June 4, 2020 and the maturity date for the Revolving Credit Facility is June 4, 2019. The proceeds of the Term Loans, which included a $6.7 million original issue discount, were used to repay in full all amounts outstanding under the GateHouse Credit Facilities and the Local Media Credit Facility and to pay fees associated with the financing, with the balance going to the Company for general corporate purposes. On November 20, 2014, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to increase the amount of the Incremental Facility that may be requested after the date of the amendment from $75 million to $225 million. On January 9, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the 2015 Incremental Term Loan (as defined below) and the 2015 Incremental Revolver (as defined below). On February 13, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the replacement of the existing term loans under the Term Loan Facility (including the 2014 Incremental Term Loan and the 2015 Incremental Term Loan) with a new class of replacement term loans (the “Replacement Term Loans”) on the same terms as the existing term loans except that the Replacement Term Loans are subject to a 1.00% prepayment premium for any prepayments made in connection with certain repricing transactions effected within six months of the date of the amendment. This amendment was considered a modification and the related $0.1 million of fees were expensed during the first quarter. On March 6, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for $15 million in additional revolving commitments under the Incremental Facility. In connection with this transaction, the Company incurred approximately $0.2 million of fees and expenses which were capitalized as deferred financing costs. On May 29, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the May 2015 Incremental Term Loan (as defined below). As of September 27, 2015, $15 million was drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The New Media Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Holdings, the New Media Borrower and the New Media Borrower’s subsidiaries, including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, fundamental changes, dispositions, and dividends and other distributions. The New Media Credit Agreement contains a financial covenant that requires Holdings I, the New Media Borrower and the New Media Borrower’s subsidiaries to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio of 3.25:1.00. The New Media Credit Agreement contains customary events of default. The foregoing descriptions of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Senior Secured Credit Facilities. The New Media Credit Agreement was amended on July 17, 2014 to cure an omission.
In connection with the June 4, 2014 transaction, one lender under the New Media Credit Agreement was also a lender under the GateHouse Credit Facilities. This portion of the transaction was accounted for as a modification under ASC Subtopic 470-50, “Debt Modifications and Extinguishments” (“ASC Subtopic 470-50”), as the difference between the present value of the cash flows under the New Media Credit Agreement and the present value of the cash flows under the GateHouse Credit Facilities was less than 10%. The unamortized deferred financing costs and original issuance discount balances as of the refinance date pertaining to this lender’s portion of the GateHouse Credit Facilities will be amortized over the terms of the new facility. The remaining portion of the GateHouse Credit Facilities and the Local Media Credit Facility debt refinancing constituted an extinguishment of debt under ASC Subtopic 470-50, and was accounted for accordingly. In connection with this 2014 transaction, the Company incurred approximately $10.2 million of fees and expenses, of which $6.7 million were recognized as original issue discount and $1.7 million were capitalized as deferred financing costs. These amounts will be amortized over the term of the new Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Additionally, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $9.0 million associated with this transaction, which consisted of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and other expenses not eligible for capitalization under ASC Subtopic 470-50.
On September 3, 2014, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for additional term loans under the Incremental Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $25 million (such term loans, the “2014 Incremental Term Loan,” and such amendment, the “2014 Incremental Amendment”) in connection with the acquisition of the assets of The Providence Journal. The 2014 Incremental Term Loan is on terms identical to the term loans that were extended pursuant to the New Media Credit Agreement and will mature on June 4, 2020. In addition, the New Media Borrower was required to pay an upfront fee of 2.00% and an underwriter fee of 1.50% of the aggregate amount of the 2014 Incremental Term Loan as of the effective date of the 2014 Incremental Amendment. This amendment was considered a modification and the related $0.6 million of fees were expensed. On January 9, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended (such amendment, the “2015 Incremental Amendment”) to provide for $102 million in additional term loans (the “2015 Incremental Term Loan”) and $50 million in additional revolving commitments (the “2015 Incremental Revolver”) under the Incremental Facility and to make certain amendments to the Revolving Credit Facility in connection with the Halifax Media acquisition. The 2015 Incremental Term Loan is on terms identical to the term loans that were extended pursuant to the New Media Credit Agreement and will mature on June 4, 2020. In addition, the New Media Borrower was required to pay an upfront fee of 1.00% and an underwriter fee of 2.25% of the aggregate amount of the 2015 Incremental Term Loan and the 2015 Incremental Revolver as of the effective date of the 2015 Incremental Amendment. On January 20, 2015, the outstanding loans under the 2015 Incremental Revolver were repaid with the proceeds of a common stock offering by New Media and the 2015 Incremental Revolver commitments were terminated. In connection with this transaction, we incurred approximately $5.4 million of fees and expenses. The lender fees for the 2015 Incremental Term Loan increased the original issue discount by $3.3 million. Third party expenses of $0.1 million were allocated to new lenders, capitalized as deferred financing costs, and will be amortized over the remaining term of the loan. Third party expenses of $0.2 million were allocated to existing lenders and were expensed during the first quarter. Lender fees and third party expenses of $1.8 million were allocated to the 2015 Incremental Revolver, capitalized, and written off to amortization of deferred financing costs after the balance of the 2015 Incremental Revolver was repaid. On May 29, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended (such amendment, the “May 2015 Incremental Amendment”) to provide for $25 million in additional term loans (the “May 2015 Incremental Term Loan”) under the Incremental Facility. The 2015 Incremental Term Loan is on terms identical to the Replacement Term Loans and will mature on June 4, 2020. In addition, the New Media Borrower was required to pay an upfront fee of 1.00% and an underwriter fee of 2.25% of the aggregate amount of the May 2015 Incremental Term Loan as of the effective date of the May 2015 Incremental Amendment. In connection with this transaction, the Company incurred approximately $0.9 million of fees and expenses. This amendment was considered a modification and the related $0.1 million of third-party fees were expensed during the second quarter. The lender fees for the May 2015 Incremental Term Loan increased the original issue discount by $0.8 million.
As of December 27, 2015, we are in compliance with all of the covenants and obligations under the New Media Credit Agreement.
Refer to Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, “Indebtedness,” for further discussion of the New Media Credit Agreement.
Advantage Credit Agreements
In connection with the purchase of the assets of Halifax Media, which closed on January 9, 2015, CA Daytona Holdings, Inc. (the “Florida Advantage Borrower”) and CA Alabama Holdings, Inc. (the “Alabama Advantage Borrower”, and, collectively with the Florida Advantage Borrower, the “Advantage Borrowers”), each subsidiaries of the Company, agreed to assume all of the obligations of Halifax Media and its affiliates required to be performed after the closing date in respect of each of (i) that certain Consolidated Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated January 6, 2012 among Halifax Media Acquisition LLC, Advantage Capital Community Development Fund XXVIII, L.L.C., and Florida Community Development Fund II, L.L.C., as amended pursuant to that certain First Amendment to Consolidated Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 27, 2012 and that certain Second Amendment to Consolidated Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 18, 2013, and all rights and obligations thereunder and related thereto (the “Halifax Florida Credit Agreement”), and (ii) that certain Credit Agreement dated June 18, 2013 between Halifax Alabama, LLC and Southeast Community Development Fund V, L.L.C. (the “Halifax Alabama Credit Agreement” and, together with the Halifax Florida Credit Agreement, the “Advantage Credit Agreements”), respectively. In consideration therefore, the amount of cash payable by the Company to Halifax Media on the closing date was reduced by approximately $18 million, representing the aggregate principal amount outstanding plus the aggregate amount of accrued interest through the closing date under the Advantage Credit Agreements (the debt under the Halifax Florida Credit Agreement, the “Advantage Florida Debt”; the debt under the Halifax Alabama Credit Agreement, the “Advantage Alabama Debt”; and the Advantage Florida Debt and the Advantage Alabama Debt, collectively, the “Advantage Debt”). On May 5, 2015, the Halifax Alabama Credit Agreement was amended to cure an omission.
The Advantage Florida Debt is in the principal amount of $10 million and bears interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, maturing on December 31, 2016. The Advantage Alabama Debt is in the principal amount of $8 million and bears interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 6.25% per annum (with a minimum of 1% LIBOR) payable quarterly in arrears, maturing on March 31, 2019. The Advantage Debt is secured by a perfected second priority security interest in all the assets of the Borrowers and certain other subsidiaries of the Company, subject to the limitation that the maximum amount of secured obligations is $15 million. The Advantage Credit Facilities are unconditionally guaranteed by Holdings I and certain subsidiaries of the New Media Borrowers and are required to be guaranteed by all future material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The Advantage Debt is subordinated to the New Media Credit Facilities pursuant to an intercreditor agreement.
The Advantage Credit Agreements contain covenants substantially consistent with those contained in the New Media Credit Facilities in addition to those required for compliance with the New Markets Tax Credit program. The Advantage Borrowers are permitted to make voluntary prepayments at any time without premium or penalty. The Advantage Borrowers are required to repay borrowings under the Advantage Credit Agreements (without payment of a premium) with (i) net cash proceeds of certain debt obligations (except as otherwise permitted under the Advantage Credit Agreements) and (ii) net cash proceeds from non-ordinary course asset sales (subject to reinvestment rights and other exceptions).
The Advantage Credit Agreements contain customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Advantage Borrowers and certain of the Company subsidiaries, including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, fundamental changes, dispositions, and dividends and other distributions. The Advantage Credit Agreements contain a
financial covenant that requires Holdings I, the New Media Borrower and the New Media Borrower’s subsidiaries to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1.00. The Advantage Credit Agreements contain customary events of default.
As of December 27, 2015, we are in compliance with all of the covenants and obligations under the Advantage Credit Agreements.
Refer to Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, “Indebtedness,” for further discussion of the Advantage Credit Agreements.
Summary Disclosure About Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table reflects a summary of our contractual cash obligations, including estimated interest payments where applicable, as of December 27, 2015:
The table above excludes future cash requirements for pension and postretirement obligations. The periods in which these obligations will be settled in cash are not readily determinable and are subject to numerous future events and assumptions. We estimate cash requirements for these obligations in 2016 totaling approximately $0.4 million. See Note 15 “Pension and Postretirement Benefits” to the consolidated financial statements, included herein.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial statements, financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources that are material to investors.
Contractual Commitments
Credit Amendment
On or around September 4, 2013, GateHouse and certain lenders (including Newcastle) constituting the “Required Lenders” under the 2007 Credit Agreement entered into Amendment Agreement to the 2007 Credit Agreement effective September 3, 2013 ( the “Credit Amendment”). Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Amendment, GateHouse obtained the following improvement in terms: a clarified and expanded definition of “Eligible Assignee”; an increase in the base amount in the formula used to calculate the “Permitted Investments” basket from $35 million to a base of $50 million; the removal of the requirement that GateHouse’s annual financial statements not have a “going concern” or like qualification to the audit; the removal of a cross default from any Secured Hedging Agreement to the 2007 Credit Agreement; the removal of a Bankruptcy Default, as defined therein, arising from actions in furtherance of or indicating consent to the specified actions; and a waiver of any prior Default or Event of Default, as defined therein, including without limitation from the negotiation, entry into, or performance of the Support Agreement or the investment commitment letter entered into in connection with the Restructuring pursuant to which the Plan Sponsor (as defined below) agreed to purchase the Cash-Out Offer claims.
In consideration of the changes described above, GateHouse agreed to pay each of the lenders party to the Credit Amendment that timely executed and delivered its signature to the Credit Amendment and the Support Agreement, an amendment fee equal to 3.5% multiplied by the aggregate outstanding amount of the loans held (including through trades pending settlement) by such lender, unless waived in writing. Newcastle and certain other lenders elected to waive their amendment fee pursuant to the Credit Amendment. Newcastle indemnified other lenders with respect to their entry into the Credit Amendment, subject to the limitations set forth in the Credit Amendment. Such fee amounted to $6.8 million.
Derivative Instruments
The bankruptcy filing on September 27, 2013, was a termination event under our Predecessor’s interest rate swap agreements. For more detailed information on our historical interest rate swap agreements, See item 7A
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and commodity prices. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in earnings and cash flow. In the normal course of business, exposure to certain of these market risks is managed as described below.
Interest Rates
On September 27, 2013, we filed for bankruptcy and on November 26, 2013, we emerged from bankruptcy with a new capital structure. The interest rate discussion below is based on our capital structure and interest rates pre-filing and post emergence.
Pre Bankruptcy Filing
The pre-filing discussion is based on our Predecessor’s average long-term debt of $1,171.2 million and interest rate swaps totaling $625.0 million during the pre-filing period.
On August 18, 2008, our Predecessor terminated interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $570.0 million. At September 27, 2013, after consideration of the interest rate swaps described below, $542.5 million of the remaining principal amount of our term loans were subject to floating interest rates.
On February 27, 2007, our Predecessor executed an interest rate swap in the notional amount of $100.0 million with a forward starting date of February 28, 2007. The interest rate swap had a term of seven years. Under this swap, our Predecessor paid an amount to the swap counterparty representing interest on a notional amount at a rate of 5.14% and received an amount from the swap counterparty representing, interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to the one month LIBOR.
On April 4, 2007, our Predecessor executed an additional interest rate swap in the notional amount of $250.0 million with a forward starting date of April 13, 2007. The interest rate swap had a term of seven years. Under this swap, our Predecessor paid an amount to the swap counterparty representing interest on a notional amount at a rate of 4.971% and received an amount from the swap counterparty representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to one month LIBOR.
On April 13, 2007, our Predecessor executed an additional interest rate swap in the notional amount of $200.0 million with a forward starting date of April 30, 2007. The interest rate swap had a term of seven years. Under this swap, our Predecessor paid an amount to the swap counterparty representing interest on a notional amount at a rate of 5.079% and received an amount from the swap counterparty representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to one month LIBOR.
On September 18, 2007, our Predecessor executed an additional interest rate swap based on a notional amount of $75.0 million with a forward starting date of September 18, 2007. The interest rate swap had a term of seven years. Under the swap, our Predecessor paid an amount to the swap counterparty representing interest on a notional amount at a rate of 4.941% and received an amount from the swap counterparty representing interest on the notional amount at a rate equal to one month LIBOR.
The bankruptcy filing on September 27, 2013, was a termination event under our Predecessor’s interest rate swap agreements. Our Predecessor’s debt structure and interest rate risks were primarily managed through the use of floating rate debt and interest rate swaps.
Post Emergence
The post emergence discussion is based on average long-term debt of $367.4 million during the year ended December 27, 2015. There were no interest rate swaps in place during this period.
As of December 27, 2015, we have $366.3 million of term debt, with a minimum variable rate plus a fixed margin. On the term debt the minimum variable rate is 1.0% and the fixed margin is 6.25%. Our primary exposure is to LIBOR. A 100 basis point change in LIBOR would change our interest expense on an annualized basis by approximately $2.6 million, based on average floating rate debt outstanding for the year ended December 27, 2015 and after consideration of minimum variable rates.
Commodities
Certain operating expenses of ours are sensitive to commodity price fluctuations. Primary commodity price exposures are newsprint, energy costs and, to a lesser extent, ink. We manage these risks through annual fixed pricing agreements for our newsprint purchases and annual contracts with independent contractors or third party distributers for our newspaper distributions.
A $10 per metric ton newsprint price change would result in a corresponding annualized change in our income from continuing operations before income taxes of $1.2 million based on newsprint usage for the year ended December 27, 2015 of approximately 119,900 metric tons.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
New Media Investment Group Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended December 27, 2015, the year ended December 28, 2014, the period from November 7, 2013 to December 29, 2013, and the period from December 31, 2012 through November 6, 2013 (Predecessor). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on November 6, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the plan of reorganization, which became effective November 26, 2013. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification 852-10, “Reorganizations”, for the Successor Company as a new entity with assets, liabilities and a capital structure having carrying amounts not comparable with prior periods as described in Note 1 and 2.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of New Media Investment Group and subsidiaries at December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 27, 2015, the year ended December 28, 2014, the period from November 7, 2013 to December 29, 2013, and the period from December 31, 2012 through November 6, 2013 (Predecessor), in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 25, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
February 25, 2016
NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except per share data)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(In thousands, except share data)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share data)
(1) Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Description of Business
New Media Investment Group Inc. (“New Media,” “Company,” “us,” “our,” or “we”), formerly known as GateHouse Media, Inc. (“GateHouse” or “Predecessor”), was formed as a Delaware corporation on June 18, 2013. New Media was capitalized and issued 1,000 common shares to Newcastle Investment Corp. (“Newcastle”). Newcastle owned approximately 84.6% of New Media until February 13, 2014, upon which date Newcastle distributed the shares that it held in New Media to its shareholders on a prorata basis. New Media had no operations until November 26, 2013, when it assumed control of GateHouse and Local Media Group Holdings LLC (“Local Media Parent”). The Company’s Predecessor and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) on September 27, 2013. On November 6, 2013 (the “Confirmation Date”), the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the plan of reorganization (the “Plan” or “Plan of Reorganization”) and on November 26, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), the Debtors emerged from Chapter 11.
GateHouse was determined to be the predecessor to New Media, as the operations of GateHouse comprise substantially all of the business operations of the combined entities. As such, the consolidated financial statements presented herein for all periods prior to November 6, 2013 reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of GateHouse and its subsidiaries. Further, the Reorganization Value, as defined below, of GateHouse at the Confirmation Date, as defined below, approximated fair value as of November 26, 2013. The Company is a leading U.S. publisher of local newspapers and related publications that are generally the dominant source of local news and print advertising in their markets. As of December 27, 2015, the Company owned and operated 564 publications located in 31 states. The majority of the Company’s paid daily newspapers have been published for more than 100 years and are typically the only paid daily newspapers of general circulation in their respective nonmetropolitan markets. The Company’s publications generally face limited competition as a result of operating in small and midsized markets that can typically support only one newspaper. The Company has strategically clustered its publications in geographically diverse, nonmetropolitan markets in the Midwest and Eastern United States, which limits its exposure to economic conditions in any single market or region.
As of December 27, 2015, the Company’s operating segments (Eastern US Publishing, Central US Publishing, Western US Publishing) are aggregated into one reportable business segment.
(b) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of New Media and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
As discussed in Note 2 “Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11”, the Debtors emerged from Chapter 11 protection and adopted fresh start accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Topic 852, “Reorganizations” (“ASC 852”). The adoption of fresh start accounting resulted in the Company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes as of November 6, 2013. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements on November 7, 2013 and subsequent periods are not comparable, in various material respects, to the Company’s consolidated financial statements prior to that date.
Fresh start accounting requires resetting the historical net book value of assets and liabilities to fair value by allocating the entity’s reorganization value (“Reorganization Value”) to its assets and liabilities pursuant to ASC
Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”). The excess reorganization value over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets is recorded as goodwill on the consolidated balance sheet. Deferred taxes are determined in conformity with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”).
In addition, ASC 852 requires that financial statements, for periods including and subsequent to a Chapter 11 filing, distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization proceedings and the ongoing operations of the business, as well as additional disclosures. Effective September 27, 2013, expenses, gains and losses directly associated with the reorganization proceedings were reported as reorganization items in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, liabilities subject to compromise in the Chapter 11 cases were distinguished from liabilities not subject to compromise and from post-petition liabilities. Liabilities subject to compromise were reported at amounts allowed or expected to be allowed under Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.
The “Company,” when used in reference to the period subsequent to the application of fresh start accounting on November 6, 2013, refers to the “Successor Company,” and when used in reference to periods prior to fresh start accounting, refers to the “Predecessor Company.” Further, references to the “Ten months ended November 6, 2013” refer to the period from December 31, 2012 to November 6, 2013 and references to the “Two months ended December 29, 2013” refer to the period from November 7, 2013 to December 29, 2013.
(c) Newspaper Industry
The newspaper industry and the Company have experienced declining same store revenue and profitability over the past several years. As a result, the Company continues to implement, plans to reduce costs and preserve cash flow. This includes cost reduction programs and the sale of non-core assets. The Company believes these initiatives will provide it with the financial resources necessary to invest in the business and provide sufficient cash flow to enable the Company to meet its commitments.
(d) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Examples of significant estimates include fresh start accounting, pension and postretirement benefit obligation assumptions, income taxes, allowance for doubtful accounts, self-insurance liabilities, goodwill impairment analysis, stock-based compensation, and valuation of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(e) Fiscal Year
The Company’s fiscal year is a 52 week operating year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. The Company’s 2015, 2014 and 2013 fiscal years ended on December 27, December 28 and December 29, respectively, and encompassed 52-week periods. The fiscal years consisted of four thirteen-week fiscal quarters. The first month of each quarter contains five weeks of results and the second and third months of each fiscal quarter contain four weeks of results. Accordingly, net sales are typically higher in the first month of any given quarter.
(f) Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon several factors including the length of time the receivables are past due, historical payment trends and current economic factors. The Company generally does not require collateral.
In connection with the application of fresh start accounting on November 6, 2013, the carrying value of accounts receivable was adjusted to fair value, eliminating the allowance for doubtful accounts.
(g) Inventory
Inventory consists principally of newsprint, which is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. In 2014 and 2015, the Company purchased approximately 95% and 93% of its newsprint from one vendor, respectively.
(h) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is calculated under the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, principally 3 to 40 years for buildings and improvements, 1 to 20 years for machinery and equipment, and 1 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and computer software. Leasehold improvements are amortized under the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset.
As part of fresh start accounting, property, plant and equipment were restated to fair value and the depreciable lives were updated to reflect the remaining estimated useful life of the assets.
(i) Business Combinations
The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with the provisions of ASC 805. ASC 805 provides guidance for recognition and measurement of identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at fair value. In a business combination, the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interest in the acquiree are recorded as of the date of acquisition at their respective fair values with limited exceptions. Any excess of the purchase price (consideration transferred) over the estimated fair values of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The operating results of the acquired business are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements after the date of the acquisition.
(j) Goodwill, Intangible, and Long-Lived Assets
Intangible assets consist of noncompete agreements, advertiser, subscriber and customer relationships, mastheads, trade names and publication rights. Goodwill is not amortized pursuant to ASC Topic 350 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). Mastheads are not amortized because it has been determined that the useful lives of such mastheads are indefinite.
In accordance with ASC 350, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually or when events indicate that an impairment could exist which may include an economic downturn in a market, a change in the assessment of future operations or a decline in the Company’s stock price. The Company performs an annual impairment assessment on the last day of its fiscal second quarter. As required by ASC 350, the Company performs its impairment analysis on each of its reporting units. The Company has the option to
qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the Company elects to perform a qualitative assessment and concludes it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, no further assessment of that reporting unit’s goodwill is necessary; otherwise goodwill must be tested for impairment using a two-step process. The reporting units have discrete financial information which are regularly reviewed by management. The fair value of the applicable reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. Calculating the fair value of a reporting unit requires significant estimates and assumptions by the Company. The Company estimates fair value by applying third-party market value indicators to projected cash flows and/or projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. In applying this methodology, the Company relies on a number of factors, including current operating results and cash flows, expected future operating results and cash flows, future business plans, and market data. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the estimate of fair value, the Company calculates the impairment as the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value.
Refer to Note 7 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for additional information on the impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets.
The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”). The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and definite lived intangible assets, whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets, or related group of assets, may not be fully recoverable. Impairment indicators include significant under performance relative to historical or projected future operating losses, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business, and significant negative industry or economic trends. The assessment of recoverability is based on management’s estimates by comparing the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows generated by the underlying asset, or other appropriate grouping of assets, to its carrying value to determine whether an impairment existed at its lowest level of identifiable cash flows. If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than the expected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by such asset, an impairment is recognized to the extent the carrying value of such asset exceeds its fair value.
(k) Revenue Recognition
Advertising revenue is recognized upon publication of the advertisement. Circulation revenue from subscribers is billed to customers at the beginning of the subscription period and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related subscription. Circulation revenue from single-copy income is recognized based on date of publication, net of provisions for related returns. Revenue for commercial printing is recognized upon delivery.
(l) Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company has determined that it is more likely than not that its existing deferred tax assets will not be realized, and accordingly has provided a full valuation allowance. Any changes in the scheduled reversals of deferred taxes may require an additional valuation allowance against the remaining deferred tax assets. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance could result in an increase or decrease in income tax expense in the period of adjustment.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions under the provisions of ASC 740. The Company does not anticipate significant increases or decreases in our uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes penalties and interest relating to uncertain tax positions in tax expense.
(m) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of the Company’s cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. An estimate of the fair value of the Company’s debt is disclosed in Note 10 “Indebtedness”.
The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”) and ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”). These standards require an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. Additionally, the fair value adjustments will affect either accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income or net income (loss) depending on whether the derivative instrument qualifies as an effective hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature of the hedging activity. The fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments is disclosed in Note 11 “Derivative Instruments”.
(n) Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents represent highly liquid certificates of deposit which have original maturities of three months or less.
(o) Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred in connection with debt financings. Such costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the estimated remaining term of the related debt.
(p) Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. The Company incurred total advertising expenses for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 and the two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 of $11,567, $5,179, $808 and $2,693, respectively.
(q) Earnings (loss) per share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed as net income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issued through common stock equivalents.
(r) Stock-based Employee Compensation
ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” requires that all share-based payments to employees and the board of directors, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the consolidated financial statements over the service period (generally the vesting period) based on fair values measured on grant dates.
(s) Pension and Postretirement Liabilities
ASC Topic 715, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits” requires recognition of an asset or liability in the consolidated balance sheet reflecting the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans such as retiree health and life, with current-year changes in the funded status recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. For the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 and the two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013, a total of $1,311, $(4,927), $458 and $69, net of taxes of $0, $0, $0 and $0 after valuation allowance, respectively, was recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) income (see Note 15 “Pension and Postretirement Benefits”).
(t) Self-Insurance Liability Accruals
The Company maintains self-insured medical and workers’ compensation programs. The Company purchases stop loss coverage from third parties which limits our exposure to large claims. The Company records a liability for healthcare and workers’ compensation costs during the period in which they occur as well as an estimate of incurred but not reported claims.
(u) Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior periods consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
(v) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment: Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU No. 2014-08”). ASU No. 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area and is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The amendments in ASU No. 2014-08 did impact the Company’s assessment of the disposition of the Las Vegas Review-Journal and related publications.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU No. 2014-09 will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic and eliminate all industry-specific guidance. The new revenue recognition standard provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance would have been effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date” which defers for one year the effective date of the new revenue standard (ASU No. 2014-09) for public and non-public entities reporting under U.S. GAAP. The standard is to be applied using one of two retrospective application methods. The FASB is permitting entities to adopt the standard as of the original effective date. The Company is currently reviewing the amendments in ASU No. 2014-09 and application methods but does not expect them to have a material impact on the financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”, that establishes management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and setting rules for how this information should be disclosed in the financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance on December 26, 2016 and do not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810)-Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU No. 2015-02”). ASU No. 2015-02 eliminates the deferral of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (R) previously provided to investment companies and certain other entities pursuant to ASC 810-10-65-2. ASU No. 2015-02 also amends the evaluation of whether (1) fees paid to a decision maker or service provider represent a variable interest, (2) a limited partnership or similar entity has the characteristics of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and (3) a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. ASU No. 2015-02 eliminates certain conditions for evaluating whether a fee paid to a decision maker or a service provider represents a variable interest. Fees received by a decision maker or service provider are no longer considered variable interests and are now excluded from the evaluation of whether the reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE if the fees are both customary and commensurate with the level of effort required for the services provided and the decision maker or service provider does not hold other interests in the entity being evaluated that would absorb more than an insignificant amount of the expected losses or returns of the entity. If the reporting entity determines that it does not have a variable interest in an entity, no further consolidation analysis is performed as the reporting entity would not be required to consolidate the entity. The effective date of ASU No. 2015-02 is for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 for public companies and early adoption is permitted. We have elected to early adopt ASU No. 2015-02, and the guidance was applied to our analysis of the management agreement with DB Nevada Holdings, Inc. The fees received under the Management Agreement do not represent a variable interest.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest” (Topic 835), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance of debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2016 and requires the Company to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis on adoption. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements”, which addresses the presentation of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. These amendments are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-04, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits” (Topic 716), which allows entities with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year-end. The practical expedient, if elected, relieves an employer from having to adjust the asset values to the appropriate fair values as of its fiscal year end. The Company decided to early adopt ASU No. 2015-04 as of December 27, 2015. The adoption did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, “Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement” (Subtopic 350-40), which clarifies the circumstances under which a cloud computing arrangement contains a software license. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2016. Entities may adopt the guidance retrospectively or prospectively to arrangements entered into, or materially modified, after the effective date. The amendments in ASU No. 2015-05 are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (Topic 330), which simplifies the measurement of inventory by requiring certain inventory to be measured at the “lower of cost and net realizable value” and options that currently exist for “market value” will be eliminated. The ASU defines net realizable value as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” The standard will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2017. Entities should adopt the guidance prospectively, and early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU No. 2015-11 are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments” (Topic 805), which eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments. The ASU requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is recognized. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2016. Entities should adopt the guidance prospectively, and early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU No. 2015-16 are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU No. 2015-17”), which requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current in a classified balance sheet to simplify the reporting of deferred taxes. The Company has adopted ASU No. 2015-17 retroactively to the year ended December 28, 2014. The FASB indicated that the primary reason for the change was that segregation of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as current or non-current was not beneficial for financial reporting purposes since the classification may not accurately reflect the time period in which the deferred tax amounts are recovered or settled.
(w) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the years ended December 28, 2014 and December 27, 2015 are outlined below.
(1) This accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 15 “Pension and Postretirement Benefits”.
The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, two months ended December 29, 2013, and for the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013.
(1) This accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost and recognized in income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes. See Note 15 “Pension and Postretirement Benefits”.
(2) Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11
Our Predecessor and certain of its subsidiaries commenced voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court on September 27, 2013 (the “Petition Date”). Concurrent with the bankruptcy filing, our Predecessor filed and requested confirmation of the Plan. On September 4, 2013, our Predecessor entered into a restructuring support agreement (“RSA”) with Cortland Products Corp., as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”) and certain of the lenders under the 2007 Credit Facility (as defined below), including Newcastle and its affiliates.
Pursuant to its RSA, the Company solicited votes on the Plan from holders of claims under the Company’s 2007 Credit Facility and certain related interest rate swaps. The Plan was accepted by the only impaired class of creditors entitled to vote on it. Specifically, 100% of holders of secured debt voted to accept the Plan. No creditors voted to reject the Plan.
Pension, trade and all other unsecured creditors of the Company were not impaired under the prepackaged Plan, and their votes were not solicited. The Company’s common stock was canceled under the Plan, and holders of secured debt had the option of receiving a cash distribution equal to 40% of their claims, or stock in New Media, a holding company that owns GateHouse and Local Media Parent, as described below.
The key terms of the Plan were as follows:
The Plan proposed a restructuring of the Company pursuant to a pre-packaged restructuring under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code whereby each Creditor (as defined below) had the option of exchanging its holdings in the Outstanding Debt (as defined below) for either its pro rata share of cash or common stock in New Media (such common stock, “New Media Common Stock”) with ownership interests in the reorganized Company (such reorganized Company, “New GateHouse”).
The Plan included the restructuring of the following indebtedness of the Company (the “Outstanding Debt”):
(a) Indebtedness under the 2007 Credit Facility, consisting of a “Revolving Credit Facility,” a “Term Loan Facility,” a “Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility” and an “Incremental Term Loan Facility” (collectively, the “2007 Credit Facility Claims”). The 2007 Credit Facility Claims consisted of a (i) Revolving Credit Facility of $0 at September 27, 2013, (ii) Term Loan Facility of and $654,554 at and September 27, 2013, (iii) Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility of $244,236 at September 27, 2013, and (iv) Incremental Term Loan Facility of $268,660 at September 27, 2013.
(b) Swap Liability, including (i) $100,000 notional amount executed February 27, 2007, (ii) $250,000 notional amount executed April 4, 2007, (iii) $200,000 notional amount executed April 13, 2007 and (iv) $75,000 notional amount executed September 18, 2007. As of September 27, 2013 the carrying value of the Swap Liability was $28,440.
Holders of the Outstanding Debt are referred to herein as “Creditors.”
The Plan restructured the Outstanding Debt as follows:
(a) Each Creditor of the Outstanding Debt received, in full and final satisfaction of its respective claim, at its election (with respect to all or any portion of its claims) to be made in connection with solicitation of the Plan, its pro rata share of:
i. Cash pursuant to the Cash-Out Offer (described below under “Cash-Out Offer”) (the “Cash-Out Option”); or
ii. (A) New Media Common Stock (subject to dilution as discussed herein) and (B) the Net Proceeds (as defined below), net of certain transaction costs (collectively, the “New Media Equity Option”).
Creditors that did not make an election during the solicitation period with respect to their claims were deemed to have elected the Cash-Out Option.
(b) Pension, trade and all other unsecured claims were unimpaired by the Plan.
(c) The interest of holders of equity interests in the Company, including warrants, rights and options to acquire such equity interests (“Former Equity Holders”), were cancelled, and Former Equity Holders received 10-year warrants, collectively representing the right to acquire, in the aggregate, equity equal to 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of New Media (the “New Media Warrants”) (subject to dilution) as of the Effective Date, with the strike price per share of $46.35 calculated based on a total equity value of New Media prior to the Local Media Contribution (as defined below) of $1,200,000 as of the Effective Date. New Media Warrants do not have the benefit of antidilution protections, other than customary protections including for stock splits and stock dividends.
Cash-Out Offer
In connection with the Plan, Newcastle (“Plan Sponsor”) (or its designated affiliates) offered to purchase, in cash, an amount equal to 40% of the sum of (a) $1,167,450 of principal of the claims under the 2007 Credit
Facility, plus (b) accrued and unpaid interest at the applicable contract non-default rate with respect thereto, plus (c) all amounts due under and subject to the terms of the interest rate swaps secured under the 2007 Credit Facility (for the avoidance of doubt, excluding any default interest) on the Effective Date of the Plan. The Cash-Out Offer was coterminous with the solicitation period.
New Media Equity Option
Instead of the Cash-Out Offer, each Creditor could have elected to receive, in satisfaction of its claims, a pro rata share of New Media Common Stock and the Net Proceeds (as defined below), net of certain transaction costs. New Media listed New Media Common Stock (the “Listing”) on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on February 14, 2014 and may continue to raise equity capital. The Listing was not a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the Plan. Under the Plan, New Media did not impose any transfer restrictions on New Media Common Stock.
Registration Rights
As of the Effective Date of the Plan, New Media entered into a registration rights agreement with certain holders of the Outstanding Debt that received 10% or more of the New Media Common Stock, to provide customary registration rights.
Financing
The Company was to use commercially reasonable efforts based on market conditions and other factors, to raise up to $165,000 of new debt, including a $150,000 facility to fund distributions and other payments under the Plan (the “Financing”). The distribution was made to holders of New Media Common Stock, including Plan Sponsor (or its designated affiliates) on account of the Cash-Out Offer, on the Effective Date (the “Net Proceeds”). The Net Proceeds distributed to holders of the Outstanding Debt totaled $149,000. The Financing was not a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the Plan.
Contribution of Local Media Group Holdings LLC
The Plan Sponsor acquired Local Media Group, Inc. (“Local Media”), a publisher of weekly newspaper publications, on September 3, 2013. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Plan Sponsor contributed Local Media Parent and assigned its rights under the related stock purchase agreement to New Media on the Effective Date (the “Local Media Contribution”) in exchange for shares of New Media Common Stock equal in value to the cost of the Local Media Acquisition (as defined below) (as adjusted pursuant to the Plan) based upon the equity value of New Media as of the Effective Date prior to the contribution.
Management Agreement
On the Effective Date, New Media entered into a management agreement with FIG LLC (the “Manager”) (as amended and restated, the “Management Agreement”) pursuant to which the Manager manages the operations of New Media. The annual management fee is 1.50% of New Media’s Total Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement) and the Manager is eligible to receive incentive compensation. On March 6, 2015, the Company’s independent directors on the Board approved an amendment to the Management Agreement. See Note 18 “Related Party Transactions” for further discussion.
Releases
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the restructuring included a full release from liability of the Company, Plan Sponsor, the Administrative Agent, the Creditors, and all current and former direct and indirect members, partners, subsidiaries, affiliates, funds, managers, managing members, officers, directors,
employees, advisors, principals, attorneys, professionals, accountants, investment bankers, consultants, agents, and other representatives (including their respective members, partners, subsidiaries, affiliates, funds, managers, managing members, officers, directors, employees, advisors, principals, attorneys, professionals, accountants, investment bankers, consultants, agents, and other representatives) by the Company, Plan Sponsor and the Creditors from any claims or causes of action related to or arising out of the Company, the Outstanding Debt or the Restructuring on or prior to the Effective Date, except for any claims and causes of action for fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct.
Confirmation of the Plan
On November 6, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plan.
Investment Commitment Letter
On September 4, 2013 the Plan Sponsor and the Company entered into an investment commitment letter in connection with the restructuring, pursuant to which Plan Sponsor agreed to purchase the Cash-Out Offer claims, described above. The investment commitment letter provides that, on account of the claims purchased in the Cash-Out Offer on the Effective Date of the Plan, Plan Sponsor will receive its pro rata share of (a) New Media Common Stock and (b) Net Proceeds, net of transaction expenses associated with transactions under the Plan.
Fresh Start Accounting
Upon confirmation of the Plan by the Bankruptcy Court on the Effective Date, the Company satisfied the remaining material conditions to complete the implementation of the Plan, and as a result, the Company adopted fresh start accounting as (i) the reorganization value of the assets of the Successor Company immediately before the date of confirmation of the Plan was less than the total of all post-petition liabilities and allowed claims and (ii) the holders of the Predecessor’s voting shares immediately before confirmation of the Plan received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity.
The Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plan based upon an estimated enterprise value of the Company between $385,000 and $515,000, which was estimated using various valuation methods, including (i) a comparison of the Company and its projected performance to the market values of comparable companies; (ii) a review and analysis of several recent transactions of companies in similar industries to the Company; and (iii) a calculation of the present value of the future cash flows of the Company based on its projections. The Company concluded the enterprise value was $489,931 based upon the Cash-Out Offer and equity distribution plus estimated transaction fees.
The determination of the estimated reorganization value was based on a discounted cash flow analysis. This value was reconciled to the transaction value as outlined within the Plan and was within a reasonable range of comparable market multiples. The assumptions used in the calculations for the discounted cash flow analysis included projected revenue, costs, and cash flows through 2016 and represented the Company’s best estimates at the time the analysis was prepared. While the Company considers such estimates and assumptions reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and, therefore, may not be realized.
Upon adoption of fresh start accounting, the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities were adjusted to reflect their Reorganization Values. Accordingly, the reported historical financial statements of the Predecessor prior to the adoption of fresh start accounting for periods ended on or prior to November 6, 2013 are not comparable to those of the Successor Company.
In applying fresh start accounting, the Company followed these principles:
The Reorganization Value, which represents the concluded enterprise value plus excess cash and cash equivalents and non-interest bearing liabilities, of the Predecessor was allocated to the entity’s net assets in conformity with ASC 805. The Reorganization Value exceeded the sum of the fair value assigned to assets and liabilities. This excess was recorded as Successor Company goodwill as of November 6, 2013.
Each liability existing as of the fresh start accounting date, other than deferred taxes, has been stated at the fair value, and determined at appropriate risk adjusted interest rates. Deferred taxes were reported in conformity with applicable income tax accounting standards, principally ASC 740.
Reorganization Items, Net
In accordance with ASC 852 the Company segregated reorganization items related to the Plan in its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss). A summary of reorganization items, for the Predecessor Company is presented in the following table:
For the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013, the Company paid approximately $6,988 for reorganization items.
(3) Acquisitions and Dispositions
Acquisitions
Stephens Media, LLC
On March 18, 2015, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company completed its acquisition of the assets of Stephens Media, LLC (“Stephens Media”) for an aggregate purchase price of $110,767, including working capital. The Stephens Media acquisition was financed with cash on hand. The purchase price was allocated to the fair value of the net assets acquired and any excess value over the tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The acquisition includes nine daily newspapers, thirty-five weekly publications and fifteen shoppers serving communities throughout the United States with a combined average daily circulation of approximately 221 and 244 on Sunday. The acquisition was completed because of the attractive nature of the newspaper assets and cash flows as well as the cost saving opportunities. The purchase price reflects a working capital adjustment of $312 paid in July 2015.
The Company accounted for the material business combination of Stephens Media under the acquisition method of accounting. The net assets, including goodwill, have been recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values in accordance with ASC 805.
The following table summarizes the fair values of Stephens Media assets and liabilities:
The Company obtained a third party independent valuation to assist in the determination of the fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The property, plant and equipment valuation includes an analysis of recent comparable sales and offerings of land parcels in each of the subject’s markets. The estimated fair value is supported by the consideration paid and was determined using standard generally accepted appraisal practices and valuation procedures. The valuation firm used the three basic approaches to value: the cost approach (used for equipment where an active secondary market is not available and building improvements), the direct sales comparison (market) approach (used for land and equipment where an active secondary market is available) and the income approach (used for intangible assets). These approaches used are based on the cost to reproduce assets, market exchanges for comparable assets and the capitalization of income. Useful lives range from 1 to 15 years for personal property and 9 to 29 years for real property.
The valuation utilized a relief from royalty method, an income approach, to determine the fair value of mastheads. Key assumptions utilized in this valuation include revenue projections, a royalty rate of 2.0%, a long-term growth rate of 0.0%, a tax rate of 40.0% and a discount rate of 22.0%. The following intangible assets were valued using the income approach, specifically the excess earnings method: subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships and customer relationships. In determining the fair value of these intangible assets, the excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the asset after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. A static pool approach using historical attrition rates was used to estimate attrition rates of 5.0% to 10.0% for advertiser relationships, subscriber relationships and customer relationships. The long term growth rate was estimated to be 0.0% and the discount rate was estimated at 23.0%. The licensing agreement asset was valued using a discounted cash flow analysis, an income approach. In determining the fair value of this intangible asset, the discounted cash flow approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the asset. The terms of the licensing agreement provide for a $2,500 annual payment. A discount rate of 10.0% and income tax rate of 40.0% were used in the discounted cash flow calculation. Amortizable lives range from 14 to 16 years for subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships and customer relationships, while mastheads are considered a non-amortizable intangible asset and the licensing agreement is amortized over the remaining contract life of approximately 25 years.
Trade accounts receivable, having an estimated fair value of $13,177, were included in the acquired assets. The gross contractual amount of these receivables was $14,398 and the contractual cash flows not expected to be collected were estimated at $1,221 as of the acquisition date.
The Company recorded approximately $802 of selling, general and administrative expense for acquisition related costs for Stephens Media during the year ended December 27, 2015.
From the date of acquisition through December 27, 2015, Stephens Media had revenues of $99,388 and net income of $67,831, including gain on sale of assets of $57,072.
For tax purposes, the amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible is $3,082, after the allocation of goodwill to the Review-Journal (as defined below).
Halifax Media Group
On January 9, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets from Halifax Media Group for an aggregate purchase price of $285,369, including working capital and net of assumed debt. Of the purchase price, $17,000 is being held in an escrow account, to be available for application against indemnification and certain other obligations of the sellers arising during the first twelve months following the closing, with the remainder not so applied or subject to claims being delivered to the sellers. Subsequently, the escrow period was extended four months. The acquisition includes twenty-four daily publications, thirteen weekly publications, and five shoppers serving areas of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and South Carolina with a daily circulation of approximately 635 and 752 on Sunday. The acquisition was completed because of the attractive nature of the newspaper assets and cash flows as well as the cost saving opportunities. The purchase price reflects a working capital adjustment of $750 received in August 2015.
In conjunction with the acquisition on January 9, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement (as defined below) was amended to provide for the 2015 Incremental Term Loan (as defined below) under the Incremental Facility (as defined below) in an aggregate principal amount of $102,000, the 2015 Incremental Revolver (as defined below) under the Incremental Facility (as defined below) in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000 and to make certain amendments to the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Halifax Media Group. In addition, the New Media Borrower (as defined below) was required to pay an upfront fee of 1.00% of the aggregate amount of the 2015 Incremental Term Loan and 2015 Incremental Revolver as of the effective date of the amendment. The remaining amount of the purchase price was funded by operating cash. On January 20, 2015, the Company repaid the outstanding loans under the 2015 Incremental Revolver and the 2015 Incremental Revolver commitments were terminated.
The Company accounted for the material business combination of Halifax Media Group under the acquisition method of accounting. The net assets, including goodwill have been recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values in accordance with ASC 805.
The following table summarizes the fair values of Halifax Media Group assets and liabilities:
The Company obtained a third party independent valuation to assist in the determination of the fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The property, plant and equipment valuation included an analysis of recent comparable sales and offerings of land parcels in each of the subject’s markets. The estimated fair value is supported by the consideration paid and was determined using standard generally accepted appraisal practices and valuation procedures. The valuation firm used three basic approaches to value: the cost approach (used for equipment where an active secondary market is not available and building improvements), the direct sales comparison (market) approach (used for land and equipment where an active secondary market is available) and the income approach (used for intangible assets). The approaches used are based on the cost to reproduce assets, market exchanges for comparable assets and the capitalization of income. Useful lives range from 1 to 17 years for personal property and 8 to 22 years for real property.
The valuation utilized a relief from royalty method, an income approach, to determine the fair value of mastheads. Key assumptions utilized in this valuation include revenue projections, a royalty rate of 2.0%, long-term growth rate of 0.0%, tax rate of 40.0% and discount rate of 16.0%. The Company valued the following intangible assets using the income approach, specifically the excess earnings method: subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships and customer relationships. In determining the fair value of these intangible assets, the excess earnings approach will value the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the asset after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. A static pool approach using historical attrition rates was used to estimate attrition rates of 5.0% to 10.0% for advertiser relationships, subscriber relationships and customer relationships. The long-term growth rate was estimated to be 0.0% and the discount rate was estimated at 16.5%. Amortizable lives range from 14 to 17 years for subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships and customer relationships, while mastheads are considered a non-amortizable intangible asset.
Trade accounts receivable, having an estimated fair value of $34,255, were included in the acquired assets. The gross contractual amount of these receivables was $36,266 and the contractual cash flows not expected to be collected were estimated at $2,011 as of the acquisition date.
The Company recorded approximately $1,775 of selling, general and administrative expense for acquisition related costs for Halifax Media Group during the year ended December 27, 2015.
From the date of acquisition through December 27, 2015, Halifax Media Group had revenues of $332,993 and net income of $40,264.
For tax purposes, the amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible is $31,744.
2015 Other Acquisitions
The Company acquired substantially all the assets, properties and business of publishing/operating certain newspapers on June 15, 2015 and September 23, 2015 (“2015 Other Acquisitions”), which included two daily newspapers, twenty-eight weekly publications, and two shoppers serving Central Ohio and Southern Michigan for an aggregate purchase price of $52,021, including estimated working capital. The acquisition completed on June 15, 2015 was financed with $25,000 of additional term debt under the New Media Credit Agreement and the remaining amount from operating cash. The acquisition completed on September 23, 2015 was financed from operating cash. The rationale for the acquisitions was primarily due to the attractive nature of the newspaper assets and cash flows combined with cost saving opportunities available by clustering with the Company’s nearby newspapers.
The fair value determination of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are preliminary based upon all information available to us at the present time. The Company has accounted for these transactions under the acquisition method of accounting. The net assets, including goodwill have been recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at their preliminary fair values in accordance with ASC 805, pending finalization of working capital settlement.
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets and liabilities:
The Company obtained third party independent valuations or performed similar calculations internally to assist in the determination of the fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The three basic approaches were used to estimate the fair values: the cost approach (used for equipment where an active secondary market is not available and building improvements), the direct sales comparison (market) approach (used for land and equipment where an active secondary market is available) and the income approach (used for subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships, customer relationships and mastheads).
The Company recorded approximately $195 of selling, general and administrative expense for acquisition related costs for the 2015 Other Acquisitions during the year ended December 27, 2015, respectively.
For tax purposes, the amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible is $2,193.
The Providence Journal
On September 3, 2014, the Company completed its acquisition of the assets of The Providence Journal Company for an aggregate purchase price of $48,666, including working capital. The acquisition was completed because of the attractive nature of the newspaper assets and cash flows as well as the cost saving opportunities available by clustering with the Company’s nearby newspapers. The purchase price reflects a working capital adjustment of $576 paid in November 2014.
The Company accounted for the material acquisition of The Providence Journal under the acquisition method of accounting. The net assets, including goodwill have been recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values in accordance with ASC 805. The Providence Journal acquisition was financed with $9,000 of revolving debt, $25,000 of additional term debt under the New Media Credit Agreement, and the remaining amount from operating cash. The Providence Journal consists of one daily and one weekly publications serving areas of Rhode Island with a daily circulation of approximately 72 and 96 on Sunday. The results of operations for The Providence Journal were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from September 3, 2014.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of The Providence Journal assets and liabilities:
The Company obtained a third party independent valuation to assist in the determination of the fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The property, plant and equipment valuation included an analysis of recent comparable sales and offerings of land parcels in each of the subject’s markets. The estimated fair value is supported by the consideration paid and was determined using standard generally accepted appraisal practices and valuation procedures. The valuation firm used the three basic approaches to value: the cost approach (used for equipment where an active secondary market is not available and building improvements), the direct sales comparison (market) approach (used for land and equipment where an active secondary market is available) and the income approach (used for intangible assets). The approaches used are based on the cost to reproduce assets, market exchanges for comparable assets and the capitalization of income. Useful lives range from 1 to 15 years for personal property and 4 to 28 years for real property.
The valuation utilized a relief from royalty method, an income approach, to determine the fair value of mastheads. Key assumptions utilized in this valuation include revenue projections, a royalty rate of 1.5%, long-term growth rate of 0%, tax rate of 40.0% and discount rate of 21.5%. The Company valued the following intangible assets using the income approach, specifically the excess earnings method: subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships and customer relationships. In determining the fair value of these intangible assets, the excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the asset after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. A static pool approach using historical attrition rates was used to estimate attrition rates of 3.0% to 10.0% for advertiser relationships, subscriber relationships and customer relationships. The long term growth rate was estimated to be 0.0% and the discount rate was estimated at 22.0%. Amortizable lives range from 13 to 16 years for subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships and customer relationships, while mastheads are considered a non-amortizable intangible asset.
Trade accounts receivable, having an estimated fair value of $6,851, were included in the acquired assets. The gross contractual amount of these receivables was $7,032 and the contractual cash flows not expected to be collected were estimated at $181 as of the acquisition date.
For tax purposes, the amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible is $3,653.
2014 Other Acquisitions
The Company acquired substantially all the assets, properties and business of publishing/operating certain newspapers on the following dates: February 28, 2014, June 30, 2014 and December 1, 2014 (“2014 Other Acquisitions”), which included eight daily, seventeen weekly publications, and eleven shoppers serving areas of California, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Virginia, New Hampshire and Maine for an aggregate purchase price of
$29,092, including working capital. The rationale for the acquisitions was primarily due to the attractive nature of the community newspaper assets and cash flows combined with cost saving opportunities available by clustering with the Company’s nearby newspapers.
The Company has accounted for these transactions under the acquisition method of accounting. The net assets, including goodwill have been recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values in accordance with ASC 805.
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets and liabilities:
The Company obtained third party independent valuations or performed similar calculations internally to assist in the determination of the fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The three basic approaches were used to estimate the fair values: the cost approach (used for equipment where an active secondary market is not available and building improvements), the direct sales comparison (market) approach (used for land and equipment where an active secondary market is available) and the income approach (used for subscriber relationships, advertiser relationships, customer relationships and mastheads).
For tax purposes, the amount of goodwill that is expected to be deductible is $4,490.
Dispositions
On December 10, 2015, the Company completed its sale of the Las Vegas Review-Journal and related publications (“Review-Journal”) (initially acquired in the Stephens Media acquisition) which are located in Las Vegas, Nevada for an aggregate sale price of $140,000 plus working capital adjustment of $1,000. As a result, a pre-tax gain of $57,072, net of selling expenses, is included in (gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for this period, since the disposition did not qualify for treatment as a discontinued operation under ASU No. 2014-08. From the date of acquisition through December 10, 2015, the Review-Journal had revenues of $63,849 and net income of $6,377.
The carrying amount of assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal group were:
The Company entered into a Management and Advisory Agreement with DB Nevada Holdings, Inc. in conjunction with the sale of the Review-Journal on December 10, 2015. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is authorized to manage and conduct business and oversee the assets and operations. The Company analyzed the terms of the agreement based on the guidance in ASU No. 2015-02 and concluded that the fees received from the Review-Journal do not represent a variable interest.
Pro-Forma Results
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations information for 2015 and 2014, set forth below, presents the results of operations as if the consolidation of the newspapers from The Providence Journal, Halifax Media Group, and Stephens Media had occurred on December 30, 2013. The pro forma information excludes results of operations of the Review-Journal, as well as the gain on sale of assets. The results of operations of the 2014 Other Acquisitions and 2015 Other Acquisitions are not material to the Company’s 2015, 2014 or 2013 results of operations and have been excluded from the pro-forma results. These amounts are not necessarily indicative of future results or actual results that would have been achieved had the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of such period.
(4) Share-Based Compensation
The Company and Predecessor recognized compensation cost for share-based payments of $1,319, $59, $0 and $25 for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, two months ended December 29, 2013, and for the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013, respectively. The total compensation cost not yet recognized related to non-vested awards as of December 27, 2015 was $3,799, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.19 years through February 2018.
Restricted Share Grants (“RSGs”)
On February 3, 2014, the Board of Directors of New Media adopted the New Media Investment Group Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) that authorized up to 15,000,000 shares that can be granted under the Incentive Plan. On the same date, the New Media Board adopted a form of the New Media Investment Group Inc. Non-Officer Director Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (the “Form Grant Agreement”) to govern the terms of awards of restricted stock (“New Media Restricted Stock”) granted under the Incentive Plan to directors who are not officers or employees of New Media (the “Non-Officer Directors”). On February 24, 2015, the New Media Board adopted a form of the New Media Investment Group Inc. Employee Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (the “Form Employee Grant Agreement”) to govern the terms of awards of New Media Restricted Stock granted under the Incentive Plan to employees of New Media and its subsidiaries (the “Employees”). Both the Form Grant Agreement and the Form Employee Grant Agreement provide for the grant of New Media Restricted Stock that vests in equal annual installments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service, and immediate vesting in full upon death or disability. If service terminates for any other reason, all unvested shares of New Media Restricted Stock will be forfeited. Any dividends or other distributions that are declared with respect to the shares of New Media Restricted Stock will be paid at the time such shares vest. During the period prior to the lapse and removal of the vesting restrictions, a grantee of a restricted stock grant (“RSG”) will have all the rights of a stockholder,
including without limitation, the right to vote and the right to receive all dividends or other distributions. As a result, the RSGs are reflected as outstanding common stock. The value of the RSGs on the date of issuance is recognized as selling, general and administrative expense over the vesting period with an increase to additional paid-in-capital.
On March 14, 2014, a grant of restricted shares totaling 15,870 shares was made to the Company’s Non-Officer Directors, 5,289 of which vested on March 14, 2015. During the year ended December 27, 2015, grants of restricted shares totaling 234,267 shares were made to the Company’s Employees.
As of December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014, December 29, 2013, and November 6, 2013, there were 244,848, 15,870, 0, and 0 RSGs, respectively, issued and outstanding with a weighted average grant date fair value of $21.67, $14.18, $0.00, and $0.00, respectively. As of December 27, 2015, the aggregate intrinsic value of unvested RSGs was $4,831.
RSG activity was as follows:
As part of the Plan discussed in Note 2 “Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11”, all Predecessor share-based awards were cancelled.
(5) Restructuring
Over the past several years, and in furtherance of the Company’s cost reduction and cash preservation plans outlined in Note 1 “Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, the Company has engaged in a series of individual restructuring programs, designed primarily to right size the Company’s employee base, consolidate facilities and improve operations, including those of recently acquired entities. These initiatives impact all of the Company’s geographic regions and are often influenced by the terms of union contracts within the region. All costs related to these programs, which primarily reflect involuntary severance expense, are accrued at the time of announcement or over the remaining service period.
Information related to restructuring program activity for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 is outlined below.
(1) Other costs primarily included costs to consolidate operations.
The restructuring reserve balance is expected to be paid out over the next twelve months.
The following table summarizes the costs incurred and cash paid in connection with these restructuring programs for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014.
(6) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
Depreciation expense for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, two months ended December 29, 2013, and for the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 was $51,460, $34,785, $5,539 and $15,163, respectively.
(7) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets consisted of the following:
As of December 27, 2015, the weighted average amortization periods for amortizable intangible assets are 15.8 years for advertiser relationships, 16.5 years for customer relationships, 14.9 years for subscriber relationships, and 10.0 years for trade names. The weighted average amortization period in total for all amortizable intangible assets is 15.6 years.
Amortization expense for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 was $16,292, $6,665, $1,049 and $18,246, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense as of December 27, 2015, is as follows:
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 are as follows:
As of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, goodwill in the amount $623,195 and $587,157, respectively, was deductible for income tax purposes.
The Company’s annual impairment assessment is made on the last day of its fiscal second quarter.
As part of the annual impairment assessment, as of June 30, 2013, the fair values of the Company’s reporting units for goodwill impairment testing and newspaper mastheads were estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, recent industry transaction multiples and using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed were appropriate in the circumstances. The estimates and judgments used in the assessment included multiples for revenue and EBITDA, the weighted average cost of capital and the terminal growth rate. Given the then current market conditions, the Company determined that recent transactions provided the best estimate of the fair value of its reporting units. As a result of the annual assessment performed no impairment of goodwill was identified. Additionally, the estimated fair value exceeded carrying value for all mastheads. The total Company’s estimate of fair value was reconciled to its then market capitalization (based upon the stock market price and fair value of debt) plus an estimated control premium.
The bankruptcy filing was considered a triggering event for the non amortizable intangibles and the Company performed a valuation analysis to determine if an impairment existed as of September 29, 2013. The
fair values of the Company’s reporting units for goodwill and newspaper mastheads were estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, recent industry transaction multiples and using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believed were appropriate in the circumstances and were consistent with the terms of the Plan. The estimates and judgments used in the assessment included multiples for revenue and EBITDA, the weighted average cost of capital and the terminal growth rate. Given the bankruptcy Plan, the Company determined that discounted cash flows provided the best estimate of the fair value of its reporting units. The estimated fair value of the Large Daily reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and Step 2 of the analysis was not necessary. The Small Community reporting unit failed the Step 1 goodwill impairment analysis. The Company performed Step 2 of the analysis using consistent assumptions, as discussed above, and determined an impairment was not present for this reporting unit. The estimated fair value of each reporting unit’s mastheads exceeded their carrying values, using consistent assumptions as discussed above. The masthead fair value was estimated using the relief from royalty valuation method.
The Company considered the impairment analysis for goodwill and mastheads to be an indicator of impairment under ASC 360, and performed an analysis of its undiscounted cash flows for amortizable intangibles. For any groups where the carrying value exceeded the undiscounted cash flows a discounted cash flow analysis was performed to determine the amount of the impairment. Key assumptions within this analysis included earnings projections, discount rates, attrition rates, long-term growth rates, and effective tax rate that the Company considers appropriate. Earnings projections reflected continued declines in print advertising revenue of 5.0% to 9.0% per year, which is expected to moderate in later years, growth in circulation revenue of up to 2.0% per year, and expense declines of up to 4.0% per year. Discount rates ranged from 14.5% to 17.0%, attrition rates ranged from 5.0% to 7.5%, the long-term growth rate was 0% and the effective tax rate was 39.15%. The resulting cash flows were reconciled to the projections supporting the Plan.
Due to reductions in the Company’s operating projections during the third quarter in conjunction with the bankruptcy process, an impairment charge of $68,573 was recognized for advertiser relationships within the Company’s Metro and Small Community reporting units, an impairment charge of $19,149 was recognized for subscriber relationships within the Company’s Metro and Small Community reporting units, an impairment charge of $2,077 was recognized for customer relationships within the Company’s Metro reporting unit and an impairment charge of $1,800 was recognized for trade names and publication rights within the Directories business unit. Refer to Note 17 “Fair Value Measurement” for additional information on the impairment charge.
As part of the annual impairment assessments as of June 29, 2014, the fair values of the Company’s reporting units for goodwill impairment testing, which include Large Daily Newspapers, Metro Newspapers, Small Community Newspapers, Local Media Newspapers, and Ventures, and newspaper mastheads were estimated. As a result of the annual assessment’s Step 1 analysis that was performed, no impairment of goodwill was identified.
As part of the annual impairment assessments as of June 28, 2015, the fair values of the Company’s reporting units for goodwill impairment testing, which include Large Daily Newspapers, Metro Newspapers, Small Community Newspapers, Local Media Newspapers, and Ventures, and newspaper mastheads were estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, recent industry multiples and using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believes were appropriate in the circumstances. The estimates and judgments used in the assessment included multiples for revenue and EBITDA, the weighted average cost of capital and the terminal growth rate. The Company determined that the future cash flow and industry multiple analyses provided the best estimate of the fair value of its reporting units. As a result of the annual assessment’s Step 1 analysis that was performed, no impairment of goodwill was identified. The Company uses a “relief from royalty” approach which utilizes a discounted cash flow model to determine the fair value of each masthead. Additionally, the estimated fair value exceeded carrying value for all mastheads. The Company performed a qualitative assessment for the Recent Acquisitions reporting unit and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are impaired. As a result, no quantitative analysis was performed for the Recent Acquisitions. The total Company’s estimate of reporting unit fair value was reconciled to its then market capitalization (based upon the stock market price and fair value of debt) plus an estimated control premium.
During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company reorganized its management structure to align with the geography of the market served. As a result, the composition of our reporting units has changed and the fair value of goodwill was allocated to each of the new reporting units based on a relative fair value allocation approach: Western US Publishing, Central US Publishing and Eastern US Publishing. Due to the change in the composition of the reporting units, the Company performed a goodwill impairment test before and after the reorganization. The Company also assessed its mastheads for impairment as a result of the reorganization.
In the analysis performed before the reorganization and because of the recent revaluation of assets related to fresh start accounting, there is a relatively small amount of fair value excess for certain reporting units. Specifically, the fair value of the Large Daily Newspapers, Small Community Newspapers and Ventures reporting units exceeded carrying value by less than 10%. Considering a relatively low headroom for the historical reporting units and declining same store revenue and profitability in the newspaper industry over the past several years, there is a risk for future impairment in the event of decline in general economic, market or business conditions or any significant unfavorable changes in the forecasted cash flows, weighted-average cost of capital and/or market transaction multiples. As a result of reduced royalty rates and a decline in revenues, an impairment charge of $4,800 was recognized for mastheads within the Company’s Large Daily, Small Community and Metro reporting units. Key assumptions within the masthead analysis included revenue projections, discount rates, royalty rates, long-term growth rates, and the effective tax rate that the Company considers appropriate. Revenue projections reflected slight declines in early years, and revenues are expected to moderate to a terminal growth rate of 1%. Discount rates ranged from 14.0% to 15.0%, royalty rates ranged from 1.25% to 1.75%, and the effective tax rate was 40.0%.
The fair values of the Company’s reporting units for goodwill impairment testing and newspaper mastheads were estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, recent industry multiples and using estimates, judgments and assumptions that management believes were appropriate in the circumstances. The estimates and judgments used in the assessment included multiples for revenue and EBITDA, the weighted average cost of capital and the terminal growth rate. The Company determined that the future cash flow and industry multiple analyses provided the best estimate of the fair value of its reporting units. Similar methodology and assumptions were utilized for the post-reorganization impairment assessment. In the resulting Step 1 analysis that was performed post-reorganization, fair values of the reporting units were determined to be greater than the carrying values of the reporting units. Additionally, the estimated fair value exceeded carrying value for all mastheads. The total Company’s estimate of reporting unit fair value was reconciled to its then market capitalization (based upon the stock market price and fair value of debt) plus an estimated control premium.
(8) Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
(9) Lease Commitments
The future minimum lease payments related to the Company’s non-cancelable operating lease commitments as of December 27, 2015 are as follows:
Rental expense under operating leases for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 was $22,425, $7,432, $1,121 and $4,685, respectively.
In addition to minimum lease payments, certain leases require payment of the excess of various percentages of gross revenue or net operating income over the minimum rental payments. The leases generally require the payment of taxes assessed against the leased property and the cost of insurance and maintenance. The majority of lease terms range from 1 to 10 years, and typically, the leases contain renewal options. Certain leases include minimum scheduled increases in rental payments at various times during the term of the lease. These scheduled rent increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, resulting in an accrual, which is included in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities, for the amount by which the cumulative straight-line rent exceeds the contractual cash rent.
(10) Indebtedness
Successor Company
GateHouse Credit Facilities-terminated June 4, 2014
The Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement (the “First Lien Credit Facility”) dated November 26, 2013 by and among GateHouse, GateHouse Media Intermediate Holdco, LLC formerly known as GateHouse Media Intermediate Holdco, Inc. (“GMIH”), certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of GMIH, all of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of New Media (collectively with GMIH and GateHouse, the “Loan Parties”), PNC Bank, National Association, as the administrative agent, Crystal Financial LLC, as term loan B agent, and each of the lenders party thereto provided for (i) a term loan A in the aggregate principal amount of $25,000, (ii) a term loan B in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000, (iii) and a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $40,000.
The Term Loan and Security Agreement (the “Second Lien Credit Facility” and together with the First Lien Credit Facility, the “GateHouse Credit Facilities”) dated November 26, 2013 by and among the Loan Parties, Mutual Quest Fund and each of the lenders party thereto provided for a term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000. The GateHouse Credit Facilities were secured by a first and second priority security interest in substantially all the assets of the Loan Parties.
The GateHouse Credit Facilities imposed upon GateHouse certain financial and operating covenants, including, among others, requirements that GateHouse satisfy certain financial tests, including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0, a maximum leverage ratio of not greater than 3.25 to 1.0, a minimum EBITDA and a limitation on capital expenditures, and restrictions on GateHouse’s ability to incur
additional debt, incur liens and encumbrances, consolidate, amalgamate or merge with any other person, pay dividends, dispose of assets, make certain restricted payments, engage in transactions with affiliates, materially alter the business it conducts and taking certain other corporate actions.
The GateHouse Credit Facilities were paid in full on June 4, 2014.
Local Media Credit Facility-terminated June 4, 2014
Certain of Local Media Parent’s subsidiaries (together, the “Borrowers”) and Local Media Parent entered into a Credit Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2013, with a syndicate of financial institutions with Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent (the “Local Media Credit Facility”).
The Local Media Credit Facility provided for: (a) a $33,000 term loan facility; and (b) a $10,000 revolving credit facility, with a $3,000 sub-facility for letters of credit and a $4,000 sub-facility for swing loans. The Borrowers used the proceeds of the Local Media Credit Facility to (a) fund a portion of the acquisition of Dow Jones Local Media Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Local Media Acquisition”), (b) provide for working capital and other general corporate purposes of the Borrowers and (c) fund certain fees, costs and expenses associated with the transactions contemplated by the Local Media Credit Facility and consummation of the Local Media Acquisition. The Local Media Credit Facility was secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all assets of the Borrowers and Local Media Parent. In addition, the loans and other obligations of the Borrowers under the Local Media Credit Facility were guaranteed by Local Media Group Holdings LLC.
The Local Media Credit Facility contained financial covenants that required Local Media Parent and the Borrowers to maintain (a) a Leverage Ratio of not more than 2.5 to 1.0 and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Local Media Credit Facility) of at least 2.0 to 1.0, each measured at the end of each fiscal quarter for the four-quarter period then ended. The Local Media Credit Facility contained affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Local Media and the Borrowers customarily found in loan agreements for similar transactions, including, but not limited to, restrictions on their ability to incur indebtedness, create liens on assets, engage in certain lines of business, engage in mergers or consolidations, dispose of assets, make investments or acquisitions, engage in transactions with affiliates, pay dividends or make other restricted payments. The Local Media Credit Facility contained customary events of default, including, but not limited to, defaults based on a failure to pay principal, interest, fees or other obligations, subject to specified grace periods (other than with respect to principal); any material inaccuracy of representation or warranty; breach of covenants; default in other material indebtedness; a Change of Control (as defined in the Local Media Credit Facility); bankruptcy and insolvency events; material judgments; certain ERISA events; and impairment of collateral. The Local Media Credit Facility was amended on October 17, 2013 and on February 28, 2014. The October 17, 2013 amendment corrected a typographical mistake. The February 28, 2014 amendment provided that among other things, sales of real property collateral and reinvestment of the proceeds from such sales could only be made with the consent of the Administrative Agent, modified the properties included in the real property collateral, and set forth in detail the documentary post-closing requirements with respect to the real property collateral.
The Local Media Credit Facility was paid in full on June 4, 2014.
New Media Credit Agreement
On June 4, 2014, New Media Holdings II LLC (the “New Media Borrower”), a wholly owned subsidiary of New Media, entered into a credit agreement (the “New Media Credit Agreement”) among the New Media Borrower, New Media Holdings I LLC (“Holdings I”), the lenders party thereto, RBS Citizens, N.A. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch as syndication agent and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania as administration agent which provides for (i) a $200,000 senior secured term facility (the “Term Loan Facility” and any loan thereunder, including as part of the Incremental Facility, “Term Loans”) and (ii) a $25,000 senior secured revolving credit facility, with a $5,000
sub-facility for letters of credit and a $5,000 sub-facility for swing loans, (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and together with the Term Loan Facility, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”). In addition, the New Media Borrower may request one or more new commitments for term loans or revolving loans from time to time up to an aggregate total of $75,000 (the “Incremental Facility”) subject to certain conditions. On June 4, 2014, the New Media Borrower borrowed $200,000 under the Term Loan Facility (the “Initial Term Loans”). The Term Loans mature on June 4, 2020 and the maturity date for the Revolving Credit Facility is June 4, 2019. The New Media Credit Agreement was amended on July 17, 2014 to cure an omission. On September 3, 2014, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the 2014 Incremental Term Loan (as defined below). On November 20, 2014, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to increase the amount of the Incremental Facility that may be requested after the date of the amendment from $75,000 to $225,000. On January 9, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the 2015 Incremental Term Loan and the 2015 Incremental Revolver (as defined below). On February 13, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended (the “Fourth Amendment”) to provide for the replacement of the existing term loans under the Term Loan Facility (including the 2014 Incremental Term Loan and the 2015 Incremental Term Loan) with a new class of replacement term loans (the “Replacement Term Loans”) on the same terms as the existing term loans except that the Replacement Term Loans are subject to a 1.00% prepayment premium for any prepayments made in connection with certain repricing transactions effected within six months of the date of the amendment. This amendment was considered a modification, and the related $104 of fees were expensed during the first quarter. On March 6, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for $15,000 in additional revolving commitments under the Incremental Facility. In connection with this transaction, the Company incurred approximately $237 of fees and expenses which were capitalized as deferred financing costs. On May 29, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for the May 2015 Incremental Term Loan (as defined below). As of December 27, 2015, $0 was drawn under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The proceeds of the Initial Term Loans, which included a $6,725 original issue discount, were used to repay in full all amounts outstanding under the GateHouse Credit Facilities and the Local Media Credit Facility and to pay fees associated with the financing, with the balance going to the Company for general corporate purposes.
Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility bear interest, at the New Media Borrower’s option, at a rate equal to either (i) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the New Media Credit Agreement), plus an applicable margin equal to 6.25% per annum (subject to a Eurodollar Rate floor of 1.00%) or (ii) the Base Rate (as defined in the New Media Credit Agreement), plus an applicable margin equal to 5.25% per annum (subject to a Base Rate floor of 2.00%). The New Media Borrower currently uses the Eurodollar Rate option.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at the New Media Borrower’s option, at a rate equal to either (i) the Eurodollar Rate, plus an applicable margin equal to 5.25% per annum or (ii) the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin equal to 4.25% per annum, with a step down based on achievement of a certain total leverage ratio. The New Media Borrower currently uses the Eurodollar Rate option.
If any borrowings under the Incremental Facility have an all-in yield more than 50 basis points greater than the Term Loans (the “Incremental Yield”), the all-in yield for the Term Loans shall be adjusted to be 50 basis points less than the Incremental Yield. As of December 27, 2015 the New Media Credit Agreement had a weighted average interest rate of 7.20%.
The Senior Secured Credit Facilities are unconditionally guaranteed by Holdings I and certain subsidiaries of the New Media Borrower (collectively, the “Guarantors”) and is required to be guaranteed by all future material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. All obligations under the New Media Credit Agreement are secured, subject to certain exceptions, by substantially all of the New Media Borrower’s assets and the assets of the Guarantors, including (a) a pledge of 100% of the equity interests of the New Media Borrower and the Guarantors (other than Holdings I), (b) a mortgage lien on the New Media Borrower’s material real property and that of the Guarantors and (c) all proceeds of the foregoing.
Repayments made under the Term Loans are equal to 1.0% annually of the original principal amount in equal quarterly installments for the life of the Term Loans, with the remainder due at maturity. The New Media Borrower is permitted to make voluntary prepayments at any time without premium or penalty, except in the case of prepayments made in connection with certain repricing transactions with respect to the Term Loans effected within six months of the Fourth Amendment, to which a 1.00% prepayment premium applies. The New Media Borrower is required to repay borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities (without payment of a premium) with (i) net cash proceeds of certain debt obligations (except as otherwise permitted under the New Media Credit Agreement), (ii) net cash proceeds from non-ordinary course asset sales (subject to reinvestment rights and other exceptions), and (iii) commencing with the Company’s fiscal year started December 30, 2013, 100% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the New Media Credit Agreement), subject to step-downs to 50%, 25% and 0% of Excess Cash Flow based on achievement of a total leverage ratio of less than or equal to 3.00 to 1.00 but greater than 2.75 to 1.00; less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00 but greater than 2.50 to 1.00; and less than or equal to 2.50 to 1.00, respectively.
The New Media Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Holdings I, the New Media Borrower and the New Media Borrower’s subsidiaries, including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, fundamental changes, dispositions, and dividends and other distributions. The New Media Credit Agreement contains a financial covenant that requires Holdings I, the New Media Borrower and the New Media Borrower’s subsidiaries to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio of 3.25 to 1.00. The New Media Credit Agreement contains customary events of default. The foregoing descriptions of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Senior Secured Credit Facilities.
In connection with the June 4, 2014 transaction, one lender under the New Media Credit Agreement was also a lender under the GateHouse Credit Facilities. This portion of the transaction was accounted for as a modification under ASC Subtopic 470-50, “Debt Modifications and Extinguishments” (“ASC Subtopic 470-50”), as the difference between the present value of the cash flows under the New Media Credit Agreement and the present value of the cash flows under the GateHouse Credit Facilities was less than 10%. The unamortized deferred financing costs and original issuance discount balances as of the refinance date pertaining to this lender’s portion of the GateHouse Credit Facilities will be amortized over the terms of the new facility. The remaining portion of the GateHouse Credit Facilities and the Local Media Credit Facility debt refinancing constituted an extinguishment of debt under ASC Subtopic 470-50, and was accounted for accordingly. In connection with this 2014 transaction, the Company incurred approximately $10,202 of fees and expenses, of which $6,725 was recognized as original issue discount and $1,700 were capitalized as deferred financing costs. These amounts will be amortized over the term of the new Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Additionally, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $9,047 associated with this transaction, which consisted of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and other expenses not eligible for capitalization under ASC Subtopic 470-50.
On September 3, 2014, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended to provide for additional term loans under the Incremental Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $25,000 (such term loans, the “2014 Incremental Term Loan,” and such amendment, the “2014 Incremental Amendment”) in connection with the acquisition of the assets of The Providence Journal. The 2014 Incremental Term Loan is on terms identical to the term loans that were extended pursuant to the New Media Credit Agreement and will mature on June 4, 2020. In addition, the New Media Borrower was required to pay an upfront fee of 2.00% and an underwriter fee of 1.50% of the aggregate amount of the 2014 Incremental Term Loan as of the effective date of the 2014 Incremental Amendment. This amendment was considered a modification and the related $595 of fees were expensed. On January 9, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended (such amendment, the “2015 Incremental Amendment”) to provide for $102,000 in additional term loans (the “2015 Incremental Term Loan”) and $50,000 in additional revolving commitments (the “2015 Incremental Revolver”) under the Incremental Facility and to make certain amendments to the Revolving Credit Facility in connection with the Halifax Media acquisition. The 2015 Incremental Term Loan is on terms identical to the term loans that were extended pursuant to the New
Media Credit Agreement and will mature on June 4, 2020. In addition, the New Media Borrower was required to pay an upfront fee of 1.00% and an underwriter fee of 2.25% of the aggregate amount of the 2015 Incremental Term Loan and the 2015 Incremental Revolver as of the effective date of the 2015 Incremental Amendment. On January 20, 2015, the outstanding loans under the 2015 Incremental Revolver were repaid with the proceeds of a common stock offering by New Media and the 2015 Incremental Revolver commitments were terminated. This amendment was treated as new debt for new lenders and as a modification for existing lenders. In connection with this transaction, the Company incurred approximately $5,379 of fees and expenses. The lender fees for the 2015 Incremental Term Loan increased the original issue discount by $3,315. Third party expenses of $110 were allocated to new lenders, capitalized as deferred financing costs, and will be amortized over the remaining term of the loan. Third party expenses of $185 were allocated to existing lenders and were expensed during the first quarter. Lender fees and third party expenses of $1,769 were allocated to the 2015 Incremental Revolver, capitalized, and written off to amortization of deferred financing costs after the balance of the 2015 Incremental Revolver was repaid. On May 29, 2015, the New Media Credit Agreement was amended (such amendment, the “May 2015 Incremental Amendment”) to provide for $25,000 in additional term loans (the “May 2015 Incremental Term Loan”) under the Incremental Facility. The 2015 Incremental Term Loan is on terms identical to the Replacement Term Loans and will mature on June 4, 2020. In addition, the New Media Borrower was required to pay an upfront fee of 1.00% and an underwriter fee of 2.25% of the aggregate amount of the May 2015 Incremental Term Loan as of the effective date of the May 2015 Incremental Amendment. In connection with this transaction, the Company incurred approximately $878 of fees and expenses. This amendment was considered a modification and the related $65 of third-party fees were expensed during the second quarter. The lender fees for the May 2015 Incremental Term Loan increased the original issue discount by $813.
As of December 27, 2015, the Company is in compliance with all of the covenants and obligations under the New Media Credit Agreement.
Advantage Credit Agreements
In connection with the purchase of the assets of Halifax Media, which closed on January 9, 2015, CA Daytona Holdings, Inc. (the “Florida Advantage Borrower”) and CA Alabama Holdings, Inc. (the “Alabama Advantage Borrower”, and, collectively with the Florida Advantage Borrower, the “Advantage Borrowers”), each subsidiaries of the Company, agreed to assume all of the obligations of Halifax Media and its affiliates required to be performed after the closing date in respect of each of (i) that certain Consolidated Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated January 6, 2012 among Halifax Media Acquisition LLC, Advantage Capital Community Development Fund XXVIII, L.L.C., and Florida Community Development Fund II, L.L.C., as amended pursuant to that certain First Amendment to Consolidated Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 27, 2012 and that certain Second Amendment to Consolidated Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 18, 2013, and all rights and obligations thereunder and related thereto (the “Halifax Florida Credit Agreement”), and (ii) that certain Credit Agreement dated June 18, 2013 between Halifax Alabama, LLC and Southeast Community Development Fund V, L.L.C. (the “Halifax Alabama Credit Agreement” and, together with the Halifax Florida Credit Agreement, the “Advantage Credit Agreements”), respectively. In consideration therefore, the amount of cash payable by the Company to Halifax Media on the closing date was reduced by approximately $18,000, representing the aggregate principal amount outstanding plus the aggregate amount of accrued interest through the closing date under the Advantage Credit Agreements (the debt under the Halifax Florida Credit Agreement, the “Advantage Florida Debt”; the debt under the Halifax Alabama Credit Agreement, the “Advantage Alabama Debt”; and the Advantage Florida Debt and the Advantage Alabama Debt, collectively, the “Advantage Debt”). On May 5, 2015, the Halifax Alabama Credit Agreement was amended to cure an omission.
The Advantage Florida Debt is in the principal amount of $10,000 and bears interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, maturing on December 31, 2016. The Advantage Alabama Debt is in the principal amount of $8,000 and bears interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 6.25% per annum (with a minimum of 1% LIBOR) payable quarterly in arrears, maturing on March 31, 2019. The Advantage Debt is secured by a
perfected second priority security interest in all the assets of the Borrowers and certain other subsidiaries of the Company, subject to the limitation that the maximum amount of secured obligations is $15,000. The Advantage Credit Facilities are unconditionally guaranteed by Holdings I and certain subsidiaries of the New Media Borrowers and are required to be guaranteed by all future material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The Advantage Debt is subordinated to the New Media Credit Facilities pursuant to an intercreditor agreement.
The Advantage Credit Agreements contain covenants substantially consistent with those contained in the New Media Credit Facilities in addition to those required for compliance with the New Markets Tax Credit program. The Advantage Borrowers are permitted to make voluntary prepayments at any time without premium or penalty. The Advantage Borrowers are required to repay borrowings under the Advantage Credit Agreements (without payment of a premium) with (i) net cash proceeds of certain debt obligations (except as otherwise permitted under the Advantage Credit Agreements) and (ii) net cash proceeds from non-ordinary course asset sales (subject to reinvestment rights and other exceptions).
The Advantage Credit Agreements contain customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Advantage Borrowers and certain of the Company subsidiaries, including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, fundamental changes, dispositions, and dividends and other distributions. The Advantage Credit Agreements contain a financial covenant that requires Holdings I, the New Media Borrower and the New Media Borrower’s subsidiaries to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1.00. The Advantage Credit Agreements contain customary events of default.
As of December 27, 2015, the Company is in compliance with all of the covenants and obligations under the Advantage Credit Agreements.
Fair Value
The fair value of long-term debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Advantage Credit Agreements was estimated at $366,302 as of December 27, 2015, based on discounted future contractual cash flows and a market interest rate adjusted for necessary risks, including the Company’s own credit risk as there are no rates currently observable in publically traded debt markets of risk with similar terms and average maturities. Accordingly, the Company’s long-term debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Payment Schedule
As of December 27, 2015, scheduled principal payments of outstanding debt are as follows:
Predecessor Company
As part of the Restructuring, the Predecessor’s previous long term debt was extinguished pursuant to the Support Agreement on the Effective Date of the Plan.
2007 Credit Facility
The Borrowers entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2007, with a syndicate of financial institutions with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor-by-merger to Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”), as administrative agent (the “2007 Credit Facility”).
The 2007 Credit Facility, prior to execution of the Second Amendment (defined below), provided for: (a) a $670,000 term loan facility which would have matured on August 28, 2014; (b) a delayed draw term loan facility of up to $250,000 which would have matured on August 28, 2014, and (c) a revolving credit facility with a $40,000 aggregate loan commitment amount available, including a $15,000 sub-facility for letters of credit and a $10,000 swingline facility, which would have matured on February 28, 2014. The Borrowers used the proceeds of the 2007 Credit Facility to refinance existing indebtedness and for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, financing acquisitions permitted under the 2007 Credit Facility. The 2007 Credit Facility was secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of Holdco, Operating and their present and future direct and indirect domestic restricted subsidiaries. In addition, the loans and other obligations of the Borrowers under the 2007 Credit Facility were guaranteed, subject to specified limitations, by Holdco, Operating and their present and future direct and indirect domestic restricted subsidiaries.
The 2007 Credit Facility also contained a financial covenant that required Holdco to maintain a Total Leverage Ratio of less than or equal to 6.5 to 1.0 at any time an extension of credit was outstanding under the revolving credit facility and other affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Holdco, Operating and their restricted subsidiaries customarily found in loan agreements for similar transactions. The 2007 Credit Facility contained customary events of default, including defaults based on a failure to pay principal, reimbursement obligations, interest, fees or other obligations, subject to specified grace periods; any material inaccuracy of a representation or warranty; breach of covenant; failure to pay other indebtedness and cross-accelerations; a Change of Control (as defined in the 2007 Credit Facility); events of bankruptcy and insolvency; material judgments; failure to meet certain requirements with respect to ERISA; and impairment of collateral.
First Amendment to 2007 Credit Facility
On May 7, 2007, the Borrowers entered into the First Amendment to the 2007 Credit Facility (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment provided, among other things, an incremental term loan facility under the 2007 Credit Facility in the amount of $275,000. As amended by the First Amendment, the 2007 Credit Facility included $1,195,000 of term loan facilities and $40,000 of a revolving credit facility.
Second Amendment to 2007 Credit Facility
On February 3, 2009, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the 2007 Credit Facility (the “Second Amendment”).
Among other things, the Second Amendment reduced the aggregate principal amounts available under the 2007 Credit Facility, as follows: (a) for revolving loans, from $40,000 to $20,000; (b) for the letter of credit subfacility, from $15,000 to $5,000; and (c) for the swingline loan subfacility, from $10,000 to $5,000.
In addition, the Second Amendment provided that Holdco may not incur additional term debt under the 2007 Credit Facility unless the Senior Secured Incurrence Test (as defined in the Second Amendment) was less than 4.00 to 1.00 and the current Incurrence Test (as defined in the Second Amendment) was satisfied.
Agency Amendment to 2007 Credit Facility
On April 1, 2011, the Borrowers entered into an Agency Succession and Amendment Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2011, to the 2007 Credit Facility (the “Agency Amendment”).
Pursuant to the Agency Amendment, among other things, (a) Wells Fargo Bank resigned as administrative agent and (b) Gleacher Products Corp. was appointed as administrative agent. In addition, the Agency Amendment effected certain amendments to the 2007 Credit Facility that provided that (x) the administrative agent need not be a lender under the 2007 Credit Facility and (y) the lenders holding a majority of the outstanding term loans and loan commitments under the 2007 Credit Facility have (i) the right, in their discretion, to remove the administrative agent and (ii) the right to make certain decisions and exercise certain powers under the 2007 Credit Facility that had previously been within the discretion of the administrative agent.
Fourth Amendment to 2007 Credit Facility
On September 4, 2013, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to the Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility Fourth Amendment”). Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility Fourth Amendment, the Company obtained the following improvement in terms: a clarified and expanded definition of “Eligible Assignee”; an increase in the base amount in the formula used to calculate the “Permitted Investments” basket from $35,000 to a base of $50,000; the removal of the requirement that the Company’s annual financial statements not have a “going concern” or like qualification to the audit; the removal of a cross default from any Secured Hedging Agreement to the 2007 Credit Facility; the removal of a Bankruptcy Default, as defined therein, arising from actions in furtherance of or indicating consent to the specified actions; and a waiver of any prior Default or Event of Default, as defined therein.
In consideration of the changes described above, the Company agreed to pay each of the lenders party to the Credit Facility Fourth Amendment that timely executed and delivered its signature to the Credit Facility Fourth Amendment and the RSA, an amendment fee equal to 3.5% multiplied by the aggregate outstanding amount of the Loans held (including through trades pending settlement) by such lender, unless waived in writing. Newcastle and certain other lenders elected to waive their amendment fee pursuant to the Credit Facility Fourth Amendment. Newcastle indemnified other Lenders with respect to their entry into the Credit Facility Fourth Amendment, subject to the limitations set forth in the Credit Facility Fourth Amendment for a total amendment fee paid of approximately $6,790.
2007 Credit Facility Excess Cash Flow Payment and Outstanding Balance
As required by the 2007 Credit Facility, as amended, on March 26, 2013 and March 15, 2012, the Company made principal payments of $6,648 and $4,600, respectively, which represented 50% of the Excess Cash Flow related to the fiscal years ended December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. As of December 29, 2013, a total of $0 was outstanding under the 2007 Credit Facility.
(11) Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The Company has used derivative instruments to manage its interest rate risk in the past. On February 25, 2014, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $6,250, which was scheduled to mature in November 2018 to economically hedge the risk of fluctuations in interest payments with respect to the First Lien Credit Facility under the GateHouse Credit Facilities. The interest rate swap agreement was terminated on June 4, 2014 when the GateHouse Credit Facilities were paid in full. Under the swap agreement, the Company received interest equivalent to one-month LIBOR and paid a fixed rate of 1.5%, with settlements occurring monthly. The Company did not designate this swap as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes. The gains (losses) on the swap were recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations. The counterparty on the interest rate swap was PNC Bank, N.A.
In 2014, the Company’s derivative instruments were carried at fair value and were generally valued using models with observable market inputs that could be verified and which do not involve significant judgment. The significant observable inputs used in determining the fair value of its Level 2 derivative contracts were contractual cash flows and market based parameters such as interest rates.
The Predecessor used certain derivative financial instruments to hedge the aggregate risk of interest rate fluctuations with respect to its borrowings under the 2007 Credit Facility, which required payments based on a variable interest rate index. These risks included: increases in debt rates above the earnings of the encumbered assets, increases in debt rates resulting in the failure of certain debt ratio covenants, increases in debt rates such that assets can no longer be refinanced, and earnings volatility. The bankruptcy filing on September 27, 2013 was a termination event under the Predecessor’s interest rate swap agreements.
In order to reduce such risks, the Predecessor primarily used interest rate swap agreements to change floating-rate long-term debt to fixed-rate long-term debt. This type of hedge was intended to qualify as a “cash-flow hedge” under ASC 815. For these instruments, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity (deficit) and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) in the same period in which the hedged transaction impacts earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative was immediately recognized in earnings.
The restructuring process resulted in the dedesignation of the hedging relationship as it was not probable that the forecasted transaction would occur according to the original strategy; any related amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net were recognized into earnings of the Predecessor as of the Petition Date. The derivative liability balances were classified as liabilities subject to compromise at the allowed claim amount. The remaining amount of other comprehensive income totaling $26,313 was recognized through earnings for the Predecessor for the ten months ended November 6, 2013. There are no derivative assets or liabilities outstanding as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014.
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
for the Successor Company for the Year Ended December 28, 2014 and for the Predecessor Company for the Ten Months Ended November 6, 2013 (1)
(1) For the Successor Company for the year ended December 27, 2015 and the two months ended December 29, 2013, there were no derivative assets or liabilities outstanding.
(2) During the quarter ended September 29, 2013, the Predecessor recognized $2,041 in reorganization items, net to adjust the fair value of derivatives to the allowed claim.
In connection with the 2007 Credit Facility, the Predecessor Company entered into and designated an interest rate swap based on a notional amount of $100,000 maturing September 2014, as a cash flow hedge. Under the swap agreement, the Predecessor Company received interest equivalent to one month LIBOR and pays a fixed rate of 5.14%, with settlements occurring monthly.
In connection with the 2007 Credit Facility, the Predecessor Company entered into and designated an interest rate swap based on a notional amount of $250,000 maturing September 2014, as a cash flow hedge. Under the swap agreement, the Predecessor Company received interest equivalent to one month LIBOR and pays a fixed rate of 4.971%, with settlements occurring monthly.
In connection with the First Amendment to the 2007 Credit Facility, the Predecessor Company entered into and designated an interest rate swap based on a notional amount of $200,000 maturing September 2014, as a cash flow hedge. Under the swap agreement, the Predecessor Company received interest equivalent to one month LIBOR and pays a fixed rate of 5.079% with settlements occurring monthly.
In connection with the First Amendment to the 2007 Credit Facility, the Predecessor Company entered into and designated an interest rate swap based on a notional amount of $75,000 maturing September 2014, as a cash flow hedge. Under the swap agreement, the Predecessor Company received interest equivalent to one month LIBOR and pays a fixed rate of 4.941% with settlements occurring monthly.
The aggregate amount of unrealized loss related to derivative instruments recognized in other comprehensive loss as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 was $0 and $0, respectively.
(12) Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit) on income (loss) from continuing operations for the periods shown below consisted of:
Income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes as a result of the following:
The effect of retroactive adoption of ASU No. 2015-17 to 2014 results in combining net current deferred tax assets of $4,269, after valuation allowance of $18,039, with net non-current deferred tax assets of $28,851, after valuation allowance of $121,897, and non-current deferred tax liabilities of $35,941 resulting in net deferred tax liabilities reported of $2,821.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 are presented below:
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.
During the ten months ended November 6, 2013, the valuation allowance decreased by $277,679, of which $59,839 was a benefit to earnings, $370 was charged to discontinued operations, and $20,412 was recorded as a benefit through accumulated other comprehensive income, and a reduction of $197,798 was attributable to the reduction of tax attributes related to the cancellation of indebtedness and other fresh start adjustments. During the two months ended December 29, 2013, the valuation allowance decreased by $2,142, all of which was a benefit to earnings. As a result of the Restructuring in 2013, we recognized cancellation of indebtedness income, which is not subject to tax provided we reduce certain tax attributes. The final determination of the reduction in tax attributes was made in 2014. At that time, final calculations were made as to the manner in which we would reduce our tax attributes. For the year ended December 28, 2014, the valuation allowance decrease was primarily attributable to finalization of tax attribute reduction adjustments from the cancellation of indebtedness. During the year ended December 28, 2014, the valuation allowance decreased by $24,834 of which $26,762 was a benefit to earnings and $1,928 was recorded as an increase to accumulated other comprehensive income. During the year ended December 27, 2015, the valuation allowance decreased by $27,172 of which $26,660 was a benefit to earnings and $512 was recorded as an increase to accumulated other comprehensive income.
At December 27, 2015, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $180,881 after tax attribute reductions, which are available to offset future taxable income, if any. State net operating loss carryforwards may differ significantly from Federal net operating loss carryforwards due to state tax attribute reduction requirements that differ from Federal tax law. These federal and state net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire on various dates from 2019 through 2035. The majority of the operating losses are subject to the limitations of Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) Section 382. This section provides limitations on the availability of net operating losses to offset current taxable income if significant ownership changes have occurred for Federal tax purposes.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 are as follows:
At December 27, 2015, the Company had uncertain tax positions of $1,289 which, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. The Company did not record significant amounts of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions for the year ended December 27, 2015. The Company does not anticipate significant increases or decreases in our uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes penalties and interest relating to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. During the period, the Company did not recognize any accrued interest or penalties. At December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, the accrual for uncertain tax positions, included $229 and $287 of interest and penalties, respectively.
The Company files a U.S. federal consolidated income tax return for which the statute of limitations remains open for the 2012 tax year and beyond. U.S. state jurisdictions have statute of limitations generally ranging from 3 to 6 years. The Company’s six month federal tax return ended December 29, 2013 is under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. We do not anticipate any material adjustments related to this examination.
(13) Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
For the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, two months ended December 29, 2013, and for the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013, 1,362,479, 1,362,479, 1,362,479, and 0 common stock warrants, 0, 15,870, 0, and 0 RSGs, and 700,000, 745,062, 0 and 0 stock options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted income (loss) per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.
Equity
In September 2014, the Company issued 7,450,625 shares of its common stock in a public offering at a price to the public of $16.25 per share for net proceeds of approximately $115,058. Certain principals of Fortress and certain of the Company’s officers and directors participated in this offering and purchased an aggregate of 224,038 shares at a price of $16.25 per share.
For the purpose of compensating the Manager (as defined below) for its successful efforts in raising capital for the Company, in connection with this offering, the Company granted options to the Manager to purchase 745,062 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $16.25, which had an aggregate fair value of approximately $2,963 as of the grant date. The assumptions used in valuing the options were: a 2.8% risk-free rate, a 6.6% dividend yield, 31.8% volatility and a 10 year term. The options granted to the Manager, were fully vested on the date of grant and one thirtieth of the options become exercisable on the first day of each of the following thirty calendar months, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a change in control of the Company or the termination of the Management Agreement (as defined below). The options expire ten years from the date of issuance. The fair value of the options issued as compensation to the Manager was recorded as an increase in equity with an offsetting reduction of capital proceeds received. As a result of the 2014 return of capital, the strike price decreased to $15.71.
In January 2015, the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of its common stock in a public offering at a price to the public of $21.70 per share for net proceeds of approximately $150,129. Certain principals of Fortress and certain of the Company’s officers and directors participated in this offering and purchased an aggregate of 104,400 shares at a price of $21.70 per share. For the purpose of compensating the Manager for its successful efforts in raising capital for the Company, in connection with this offering, the Company granted options to the Manager to purchase 700,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $21.70, which had an aggregate fair value of approximately $4,144 as of the grant date. The assumptions used in valuing the options were: a 2.0% risk-free rate, a 3.4% dividend yield, 36.8% volatility and a 10 year term.
On February 24, 2015, a grant of restricted shares totaling 200,092 shares was made to the Company’s Employees (as defined below). See Note 4 “Share-Based Compensation”.
In March 2015, the Company issued 9,735 shares of its common stock to its Non-Officer Directors (as defined below) to settle a liability of $225 for 2014 services.
During the three months ended September 27, 2015, a grant of restricted shares totaling 34,175 shares were made to the Company’s Employees. See Note 4 “Share-Based Compensation”.
On July 31, 2014, the Company announced a second quarter 2014 cash dividend of $0.27 per share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The dividend was paid on August 21, 2014 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 12, 2014.
On October 30, 2014, the Company announced a third quarter 2014 cash dividend of $0.27 per share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The dividend was paid on November 20, 2014, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2014.
On February 26, 2015, the Company announced a fourth quarter 2014 cash dividend of $0.30 per share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The dividend was paid on March 19, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 11, 2015.
On April 30, 2015, the Company announced a first quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New Media. The dividend was paid on May 21, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on May 13, 2015.
On July 30, 2015, the Company announced a second quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New Media. The dividend was paid on August 20, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 12, 2015.
On October 29, 2015, the Company announced a third quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New Media. The dividend was paid on November 19, 2015, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2015.
(14) Employee Benefit Plans
For the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, the Company maintained the New Media Investment Group, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan, which was previously known as the GateHouse Media, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan, (the “New Media 401(k) Plan”), which is intended to be a qualified defined contribution plan with a cash or deferred arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Code. The Company became the plan sponsor of the New Media 401(k) Plan effective January 1, 2014. In general, eligible employees of the Company and participating affiliates who satisfy minimum age and service requirements are eligible to participate. Eligible employees can contribute amounts up to 100% of their eligible compensation to the New Media 401(k) Plan, subject to IRS limitations. The New Media 401(k) Plan also provides for discretionary matching and nonelective contributions that can be made in separate amounts among different allocation groups. For the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, the two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013, the Company’s matching contributions to the New Media 401(k) Plan were $2,527, $1,212, $146 and $845, respectively. The Company did not make nonelective contributions for the reported years.
For the year ended December 29, 2013, Local Media sponsored the Local Media Group, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Local Media 401(k) Plan”), which also was intended to be a qualified defined contribution plan with a cash or deferred arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Code. The Company became the plan sponsor of the Local Media 401(k) Plan effective January 1, 2014. The Local Media 401(k) Plan was frozen with respect to all new eligibility and contributions effective after December 31, 2013. Accordingly, after that date, no contributions were made to the Local Media 401(k) Plan for the year ended December 28, 2014. On March 14, 2014, the Local Media 401(k) Plan was merged into the New Media 401(k) Plan and ceased to exist as a separate plan.
The Company maintains three nonqualified deferred compensation plans, as described below, for certain of its employees.
The Company maintains the GateHouse Media, Inc. Publishers’ Deferred Compensation Plan (“Publishers Plan”), a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of certain designated publishers of the Company’s newspapers. Under the Publishers Plan, the Company credits an amount to a bookkeeping account established for each participating publisher pursuant to a pre-determined formula, which is based upon the gross operating profits of each such publisher’s newspaper. The bookkeeping account is credited with earnings and losses based upon the investment choices selected by the participant. The amounts credited to the bookkeeping account on behalf of each participating publisher vest on an installment basis over a period of 15 years. A participating publisher forfeits all amounts under the Publishers Plan in the event that the publisher’s employment with the Company is terminated for “cause”, as defined in the Publishers Plan. Amounts credited to a participating publisher’s bookkeeping account are distributable upon termination of the publisher’s employment with the Company and will be made in a lump sum or installments as elected by the publisher. The Publisher’s Plan was frozen effective as of December 31, 2006, and all accrued benefits of participants under the terms of the Publisher’s Plan became 100% vested. The Company recorded $0, $0, $0 and $0 of compensation expense related to the Publishers Plan for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, the two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013, respectively.
The Company maintains the GateHouse Media, Inc. Executive Benefit Plan (“Executive Benefit Plan”), a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of certain key employees of the Company. Under the Executive Benefit Plan, the Company credits an amount, determined at the Company’s sole discretion, to a bookkeeping account established for each participating key employee. The bookkeeping account is credited with earnings and losses based upon the investment choices selected by the participant. The amounts credited to the bookkeeping account on behalf of each participating key employee vest on an installment basis over a period of 5 years. A participating key employee forfeits all amounts under the Executive Benefit Plan in the event that the key employee’s employment with the Company is terminated for “cause”, as defined in the Executive Benefit
Plan. Amounts credited to a participating key employee’s bookkeeping account are distributable upon termination of the key employee’s employment with the Company, and will be made in a lump sum or installments as elected by the key employee. The Executive Benefit Plan was frozen effective as of December 31, 2006, and all accrued benefits of participants under the terms of the Executive Benefit Plan became 100% vested. The Company recorded $0, $0, $0 and $0 of compensation expense related to the Publishers Plan for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, the two months ended December 29, 2013, and the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013, respectively.
The Company maintains the GateHouse Media, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan (“Executive Deferral Plan”), a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of certain key employees of the Company. Under the Executive Deferral Plan, eligible key employees may elect to defer a portion of their compensation for payment at a later date. Currently, the Executive Deferral Plan allows a participating key employee to defer up to 100% of his or her annual compensation until termination of employment or such earlier period as elected by the participating key employee. Amounts deferred are credited to a bookkeeping account established by the Company for this purpose. The bookkeeping account is credited with earnings and losses based upon the investment choices selected by the participant. Amounts deferred under the Executive Deferral Plan are fully vested and non-forfeitable. The amounts in the bookkeeping account are payable to the key employee at the time and in the manner elected by the key employee.
(15) Pension and Postretirement Benefits
As a result of the Enterprise News Media, LLC and Copley Press, Inc. acquisitions, the Company maintains a pension plan and postretirement medical and life insurance plans which cover certain employees. The Company uses the accrued benefit actuarial method and best estimate assumptions to determine pension costs, liabilities and other pension information for defined benefit plans.
The Enterprise News Media, LLC pension plan was amended to freeze all future benefit accruals as of December 31, 2008, except for a select group of union employees whose benefits were frozen during 2009. Also, during 2008, the medical and life insurance benefits were frozen, and the plan was amended to limit future benefits to a select group of active employees under the Enterprise News Media, LLC postretirement medical and life insurance plan.
The following table provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status, along with the related amounts in the consolidated balance sheets of the Company’s pension and postretirement medical and life insurance plans as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014:
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost and other changes in plan assets recognized in other comprehensive loss of the Company’s pension and postretirement medical and life insurance plans for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, two months ended December 29, 2013, and for the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013:
The following assumptions were used in connection with the Company’s actuarial valuation of its defined benefit pension and postretirement plans:
The following assumptions were used to calculate the net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement plans:
To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the Company considers the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets, input from the actuaries and investment consultants, and long-term inflation assumptions. The expected allocation of pension plan assets is based on a diversified portfolio consisting of domestic and international equity securities and fixed income securities. This expected return is then applied to the fair value of plan assets. The Company amortizes experience gains and losses, including the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions and plan provisions over a period equal to the average future service of plan participants.
Amortization of prior service costs was calculated using the straight-line method over the average remaining service periods of the employees expected to receive benefits under the plan.
Fair Value of plan assets are measured on a recurring basis using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets, Level 1 input. The pension plan’s assets by asset category are as follows:
Plan fiduciaries of the George W. Prescott Publishing Company LLC Pension Plan set investment policies and strategies for the pension trust. Objectives include preserving the funded status of the plan and balancing risk against return. The general target allocation is 70% in equity funds and 30% in fixed income funds for the plan’s investments. To accomplish this goal, each plan’s assets are actively managed by outside investment managers with the objective of optimizing long-term return while maintaining a high standard of portfolio quality and proper diversification. The Company monitors the maturities of fixed income securities so that there is sufficient liquidity to meet current benefit payment obligations.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future services, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:
The postretirement plans are not funded.
The aggregate amount of net actuarial loss related to the Company’s pension and postretirement plans recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income as of December 27, 2015 was $3,158 of which $59 is expected to be amortized in 2016.
Multiemployer Plans
The Company is a participant in three multi-employer pension plans covering certain employees with Collective Bargaining Agreements (“CBAs”) in Ohio, Massachusetts and Illinois. The risks of participating in these multi-employer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects:
•
The Company plays no part in the management of plan investments or any other aspect of plan administration.
•
Assets contributed to the multi-employer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
•
If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.
•
If the Company chooses to stop participating in some of its multi-employer plans, the Company may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the unfunded status of the plan, referred to as withdrawal liability.
The Company’s participation in these plans for the year ended December 27, 2015, is outlined in the table below. The “EIN/Pension Plan Number” column provides the Employee Identification Number (EIN) and the three-digit plan number. Unless otherwise noted, the two most recent Pension Protection Act (PPA) zone statuses available are for the plans for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively. The zone status is based on information that the company received from the plan and is certified by the plan’s actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65% funded; plans in the orange zone are both a) less than 80% funded and b) have an accumulated/expected funding deficiency in any of the next six
plan years, net of any amortization extensions; plans in the yellow zone meet either one of the criteria mentioned in the orange zone; and plans in the green zone are at least 80% funded. The “FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented” column indicates plans for which a financial improvement plan (FIP) or a rehabilitation plan (RP) is either pending or has been implemented. The last column lists the expiration date(s) of the collective-bargaining agreement(s) to which the plans are subject.
The Company makes all required contributions to these plans as determined under the respective CBAs. For each of the plans listed below, the Company’s contribution represented less than 5% of total contributions to the plan.
(1) This plan has elected to utilize special amortization provisions provided under the Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010.
(16) Fair Value Measurement
The Company measures and records in the accompanying consolidated financial statements certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for those instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs).
These inputs are prioritized as follows:
•
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
•
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market corroborated inputs; and
•
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which require us to develop our own assumptions about how market participants price the asset or liability.
The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
•
Market approach-Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities;
•
Income approach-Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectation about those future amounts;
•
Cost approach-Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).
The following table provides information for the Company’s major categories of financial assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:
The following tables reflect the activity of our derivative liabilities measured at fair value using models with observable market inputs (Level 2) for year ended December 28, 2014:
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).
During the quarter ended September 29, 2013, certain intangible assets were written down to their implied fair value using Level 3 inputs. The valuation techniques and significant inputs and assumptions utilized to measure fair value are discussed in Note 7 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”. The fair value of select advertiser relationships was $19,120, subscriber relationships $5,310, customer relationships $270, trade names was $270, and publication rights was $0 at September 29, 2013.
During the quarter ended December 29, 2013, the Company applied fresh start accounting which resulted in its assets and liabilities being recorded at their fair values utilizing Level 3 inputs as of November 6, 2013.
For the acquisitions during the quarters ended September 29, 2013, December 29, 2013, March 30, 2014, September 28, 2014, December 28, 2014, March 29, 2015, June 28, 2015, and September 27, 2015, the Company consolidated the assets and liabilities under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair value. Property, plant and equipment was valued using Level 2 inputs and intangible assets were valued using Level 3 inputs. Refer to Note 3 “Acquisitions and Dispositions” for discussion of the valuation techniques, significant inputs, assumptions utilized, and the fair value recognized.
During the quarter ended December 27, 2015, certain mastheads were written down to their implied fair value using Level 3 inputs. The valuation techniques and significant inputs and assumptions utilized to measure fair value are discussed in Note 7 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”. The fair value of select mastheads was $37,550 at December 27, 2015.
Refer to Note 10 “Indebtedness” for the discussion on the fair value of the Company’s total long-term debt.
Refer to Note 15 “Pension and Postretirement Benefits” for the discussion on the fair value of the Company’s pension plan.
(17) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is and may become involved from time to time in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its business, including but not limited to with respect to such matters as libel, invasion of privacy, intellectual property infringement, wrongful termination actions and complaints alleging employment discrimination, and regulatory investigations and inquiries. In addition, the Company is involved from time to time in governmental and administrative proceedings concerning employment, labor, environmental and other claims. Insurance coverage mitigates potential loss for certain of these matters. Historically, such claims and proceedings have not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. Although the Company is unable to predict with certainty the eventual outcome of any litigation, regulatory investigation or inquiry, in the opinion of management, the Company does not expect its current and any threatened legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position or consolidated results of operations. Given the inherent unpredictability of these types of proceedings, however, it is possible that future adverse outcomes could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results.
Restricted cash at December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, in the aggregate amount of $6,967 and $6,467, respectively, is used to collateralize standby letters of credit in the name of the Company’s insurers in accordance with certain insurance policies and as cash collateral for certain business operations.
(18) Related-Party Transactions
As of December 29, 2013, Newcastle (an affiliate of FIG LLC (“Fortress”)) beneficially owned approximately 84.6% of the our outstanding common stock. On February 13, 2014, Newcastle completed the spin-off of the Company. On February 14, 2014 New Media became a separate, publicly traded company trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “NEWM”. As a result of the spin-off, the fees included in the Management Agreement with our Manager became effective. As of December 27, 2015, Fortress and its affiliates owned approximately 1.5% of the Company’s outstanding stock and approximately 39.5% of the Company’s outstanding warrants. The Company’s Manager holds 1,445,062 stock options of the Company’s stock as of December 27, 2015. During the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, Fortress and its affiliates were paid $879 and $368 in dividends, respectively.
In addition, the Company’s Chairman, Wesley Edens, is also the Co-Chairman of the board of directors of FIG LLC. The Company does not pay Mr. Edens a salary or any other form of compensation.
Our Chief Operating Officer owns an interest in a company from which we recognized revenue of $421, $355 and $117 during the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013, respectively, for commercial printing services and managed information technology services which is included in commercial printing and other on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are employees of Fortress and their salaries are paid by Fortress.
Management Agreement
On the Effective Date, we entered into a Management Agreement with our Manager. Our Management Agreement requires our Manager to manage our business affairs subject to the supervision of our Board of Directors. On March 6, 2015, the Company’s independent directors on the Board approved an amendment to the Management Agreement.
The initial term of our Management Agreement will expire on March 6, 2018 and will be automatically renewed for one-year terms thereafter unless terminated either by the us or the Manager. From the commencement date of the Listing, the Manager is (a) entitled to receive from us a management fee, (b) eligible to receive incentive compensation that is based on the our performance and (c) eligible to receive options to purchase New Media Common Stock upon the successful completion of an offering of shares of the our Common Stock or any shares of preferred stock with an exercise price equal to the price per share paid by the public or other ultimate purchaser in the offering, see Note 13 “Earnings (Loss) Per Share”. In addition, we are obligated to reimburse certain expenses incurred by the Manager. The Manager is also entitled to receive a termination fee from us under certain circumstances.
The Company recognized $9,438 and $5,618 for management fees and $30,306 and $112 for incentive compensation within selling, general and administrative expense and $9,903 and $4,358 in management fees and $8,862 and $0 in incentive compensation was paid to Fortress during the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively. In addition, the Company reimbursed Fortress for expenses of approximately $1,041 and $0 for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 respectively. No management fees or incentive compensation was incurred during the year ended December 29, 2013.
GateHouse Management and Advisory Agreement
On November 26, 2013, New Media entered into the GateHouse Management and Advisory Agreement (the “GateHouse Management Agreement”) with GateHouse, pursuant to which New Media managed the assets and the day-to-day operations of GateHouse. New Media was responsible for, among other things (i) the purchase and sale of GateHouse’s investments (ii) the financing of GateHouse’s investments and (iii) investment advisory services. Such services may have been performed by the Manager.
The GateHouse Management Agreement had an initial three-year term and was to be automatically renewed for one-year terms thereafter unless terminated by New Media or Gate House. The GateHouse Management Agreement would have automatically terminated if the Management Agreement between New Media and the Manager was terminated.
Commencing from the Listing, New Media was (a) entitled to receive a management fee equal to 1.50% per annum of GateHouse’s Total Equity (as defined in the GateHouse Management Agreement) and (b) eligible to receive incentive compensation that is based on GateHouse’s performance. In addition, GateHouse was obligated to reimburse certain expenses incurred by New Media in connection with the performance of its duties under the agreement. These fees eliminate in consolidation.
The GateHouse Management Agreement was terminated effective June 4, 2014.
Local Media Management and Advisory Agreement
On August 27, 2013, GateHouse entered into the Local Media Management Agreement with Local Media Parent, which was substantially assigned to Local Media, to manage the operations of Local Media. Local Media Parent was a subsidiary of Newcastle (an affiliate of Fortress) prior to the Effective Date.
While the agreement was in effect, GateHouse received an annual management fee of $1,100, subject to adjustments (up to a maximum annual management fee of $1,200), and an annual incentive compensation fee based on exceeding EBITDA targets of Local Media. These fees eliminate in consolidation.
The Local Media Management Agreement was terminated effective June 4, 2014.
Holdings I Management Agreement
On June 4, 2014, we entered into a management agreement with Holdings I (as amended and restated, the “Holdings I Management Agreement”). The Holdings I Management Agreement requires we manage the business affairs of Holdings I subject to the supervision of the Board of Directors of Holdings I.
The Holdings I Management Agreement has an initial three-year term and will be automatically renewed for one-year terms thereafter unless terminated by the Holdings I. We are (a) entitled to receive from the Holdings I a management fee and (b) eligible to receive incentive compensation that is based on the performance of Holdings I. In addition, Holdings I is obligated to reimburse certain expenses incurred by us. We are also entitled to receive a termination fee from Holdings I under certain circumstances. These fees eliminate in consolidation.
Registration Rights Agreement with Omega
The Company entered into a registration rights agreement with Omega Advisors, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, “Omega”). Under the terms of the registration rights agreement, subject to customary exceptions and limitations, the Company is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to file a registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) providing for the registration and sale by Omega of its New Media Common Stock acquired pursuant to the Plan (the “Registrable Securities”) (the “Shelf Registration”), subject to customary exceptions and limitations. Omega is entitled to initiate up to three offerings or sales with respect to some or all the Registrable Securities pursuant to the Shelf Registration.
Omega may only exercise its right to request Shelf Registrations if the Registrable Securities to be sold pursuant to such Shelf Registration are at least 3% of the then-outstanding New Media Common Stock.
(19) Discontinued Operations
For the Successor Company for the year ended December 27, 2015 and under the guidance adopted as a result of ASU No. 2014-08, there was no disposal that is required to be reported in discontinued operations. For the Successor Company for the year ended December 28, 2014, no material publications were discontinued.
In May 2013, the Predecessor Company disposed of a non wholly owned subsidiary in Chicago, Illinois. As a result, the asset, liability and noncontrolling interest carrying amounts of this subsidiary were derecognized. A loss of $1,146 was recognized in discontinued operations.
The net revenue for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, the two months ended December 29, 2013, and for the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 for the aforementioned discontinued operations were $0, $0, $0, and $394, respectively. Loss, net of income taxes of $0, for the Successor Company for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, the two months ended December 29, 2013, and for the Predecessor Company for the ten months ended November 6, 2013 for the aforementioned discontinued operations was $0, $0, $0, and $1,034, respectively.
(20) Quarterly Results (unaudited)
(21) Subsequent Events
Acquisitions
Dolan, LLC
On December 31, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of the Business Information Division of Dolan LLC (“Dolan”) for $35,000 in cash, plus working capital. The Company funded the acquisition with cash on the balance sheet. Dolan is a leading provider of industry-specific news with 39 print and online publications and an audience of over 46 paid subscribers.
Times Publishing Company
On January 12, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the publishing operations of the Times Publishing Company, including the Erie Times-News daily newspaper, for $11,500 in cash, plus the assumption of liabilities. The Company funded the acquisition with cash on the balance sheet. Erie Times-News is a dominant source of local news and advertising in Erie, PA with an average weekday circulation of over 39 and 55 on Sunday.
Dividends
On February 25, 2016, the Company announced a fourth quarter 2015 cash dividend of $0.33 per share of New Media Common Stock. The dividend will be paid on March 17, 2016, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 9, 2016.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 27, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Except for the changes noted below, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is currently engaged in refining the internal controls and processes relating to the acquisitions of Halifax Media Group, Stephens Media, The Columbus Dispatch, and the Monroe News with the Company’s internal controls and processes. The operating results of Halifax Media Group, Stephens Media, The Columbus Dispatch, and the Monroe News since the acquisition dates are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 27, 2015 and constituted approximately $410.0 million of combined total assets as of December 27, 2015, and approximately $502.1 million of combined total revenue for the year then ended. Internal control over financial reporting of the Halifax Media Group, Stephens Media, The Columbus Dispatch, and the Monroe News have been excluded from the Company’s annual assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the general guidance issued by the SEC that an assessment of a recent business combination may be omitted from management’s report on internal control over financial reporting in the year of acquisition.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control system was designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer and with the participation of management in order to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and our preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed and tested, have inherent limitations, including, among other things, the possibility of human error, circumvention or disregard. Therefore, even those systems of internal control that have been determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer and with the participation of management, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” (the “COSO” criteria) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.
As noted above, the Company has excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting of recently acquired businesses in accordance with the general guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission that an assessment of a recent business combination may be omitted from management’s report on internal control over financial reporting in the year of acquisition.
Based on an assessment of such criteria, management concluded that, as of December 27, 2015, we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on the COSO criteria.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2015, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young LLP’s attestation report is included below.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
New Media Investment Group Inc.
We have audited New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Halifax Media Group, Stephens Media, The Columbus Dispatch, and the Monroe News, that are included in the 2015 consolidated financial statements of New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries and constituted $410.0 million of total assets as of December 27, 2015 and $502.1 million of revenues for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the Halifax Media Group, Stephens Media, The Columbus Dispatch, and the Monroe News.
In our opinion, New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended December 27, 2015, the year ended December 28, 2014, the period from November 7, 2013 to December 29, 2013, and the period from December 31, 2012 through November 6, 2013 (Predecessor) of New Media Investment Group Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated February 25, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
February 25, 2016
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Except as set forth below, the information required by this Item 10 is incorporated into this report by reference to our proxy statement to be issued in connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” which proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the year ended December 27, 2015.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also applies to all of our other employees and, as set forth therein, to our directors. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at www.ir.newmediainv.com under Investor Relations/Corporate Governance. We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirements pursuant to Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, certain provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our website under Investor Relations/Corporate Governance.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated into this report by reference to our proxy statement to be issued in connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Compensation of Executive Officers,” which proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the year ended December 27, 2015.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Except as set forth below, the information required by this Item 12 is incorporated into this report by reference to our proxy statement to be issued in connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the heading “Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” which proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the year ended December 27, 2015.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of December 27,
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated into this report by reference to our proxy statement to be issued in connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the headings “Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance Principles” and “Board Matters,” which proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the year ended December 27, 2015.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated into this report by reference to our proxy statement to be issued in connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, under the heading “Matters Relating to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” which proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the year ended December 27, 2015.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements required by this Item 15 are set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
New Media Investment Group Inc.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(In Thousands)
(1) Amounts are primarily related to the write off of fully reserved accounts receivable.
(2) Amount is primarily attributable to finalization of tax attribute reduction adjustments from the cancellation of indebtedness.
(3) Amount is primarily related to the tax effects of the change in derivative value and is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
(4) Amount primarily relates to the reduction of tax attributes related to the cancellation of indebtedness and other fresh start adjustments.
(5) Amount relates to a valuation allowance for a pension actuarial loss recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
All other schedules are omitted because the conditions requiring their filing do not exist, or because the required information is provided in the consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits. The following Exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit No.
Description
10.7
Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2007, among GateHouse Media Holdco, Inc., as Holdco, GateHouse Media Operating, Inc., as the Company, GateHouse Media Massachusetts I, Inc., GateHouse Media Massachusetts II, Inc., and ENHE Acquisition, LLC, as Subsidiary Borrowers, the Domestic Subsidiaries of Holdco from time to time Parties thereto, as Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P., General Electric Capital Corporation and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to GateHouse Media, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Items 1.01, 2.03, and 9.01), filed March 1, 2007).
10.8
Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2007, among GateHouse Media Holdco, Inc., as Holdco, GateHouse Media Operating, Inc., as the Company, GateHouse Media Massachusetts I, Inc., GateHouse Media Massachusetts II, Inc., and ENHE Acquisition, LLC, as Subsidiary Borrowers, the Domestic Subsidiaries of Holdco from time to time Parties thereto, as Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, as Administrative Agent, for the several banks and other financial institutions as may from time to time becomes parties to such Credit Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to GateHouse Media, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Items 1.01, 2.03, and 9.01), filed March 1, 2007).
10.9
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2007, by and among GateHouse Media Holdco, Inc., as Holdco, GateHouse Media Operating, Inc., as the Company, GateHouse Media Massachusetts I, Inc., GateHouse Media Massachusetts II, Inc. and ENHE Acquisition, LLC, as Subsidiary Borrowers, the Domestic Subsidiaries of Holdco from time to time Parties thereto, as Guarantors, the Lenders Parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to GateHouse Media, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 11, 2007).
10.10
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2009, by and among GateHouse Media Holdco, Inc., as Holdco, GateHouse Media Operating, Inc., as the Company, GateHouse Media Massachusetts I, Inc., GateHouse Media Massachusetts II, Inc. and ENHE Acquisition, LLC, as Subsidiary Borrowers, the Domestic Subsidiaries of Holdco from time to time Parties thereto, as Guarantors, the Lenders Parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to GateHouse Media, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 5, 2009).
*10.11
Employment Agreement dated as of January 9, 2009, by and among GateHouse Media, Inc., GateHouse Media Operating Inc., and Kirk Davis (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to GateHouse Media, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 9, 2009).
*10.12
Form of amendment to Employment Agreement for Kirk Davis (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to GateHouse Media, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 8, 2012).
10.13
Agency Succession and Amendment Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2011 by and among GateHouse Media Holdco, Inc., GateHouse Media Operating, Inc., GateHouse Media Massachusetts I, Inc., GateHouse Media Massachusetts II, Inc., ENHE Acquisition, LLC, each of those domestic subsidiaries of Holdco identified as a “Guarantor” on the signature pages of the Credit Agreement, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor-by-merger to Wachovia Bank, National Association, as the resigning Administrative Agent, and the Successor Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to GateHouse Media, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 7, 2011).
* Asterisks identify management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements.
** Furnished electronically herewith.
 Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. New Media hereby undertakes to supplementally furnish copies of any of the omitted schedules upon request by the SEC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NEW MEDIA INVESTMENT GROUP INC.
By:
/s/ MICHAEL E. REED
Michael E. Reed
Chief Executive Officer
February 25, 2016
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.