Item 1. Business
North America Frac Sand, Inc., is a Florida corporation, (the "Company"). Historically, the Company has been in the business of providing marketing of consulting services primarily to independent aquatic farming operators and other market participants located in the Midwest of the United States of America (the "U.S."). Historically, we conducted initial marketing and sales activities to take advantage of opportunities related to time, location and quality of aquatic farming operations. We have conducted our operations primarily in Indiana.
In early 2014, we entered into a share purchase agreement with Innovate Building Systems Inc., an Alberta Company involved in the business of constructing modular building systems markets primarily for the oil and gas industry in Alberta, Canada. In August 2014 we terminated the share purchase agreement and decided not to go ahead with the acquisition. On July 10, 2015, we entered into a share purchase agreement with Canadian Sandtech Inc. ("CSI") to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of North America Frac Sand (CA) Ltd. ("NAFS-CA") by issuing to CSI 26,800,000 shares of the Company. All terms of the acquisition were finalized on February 29, 2016; therefore, subject to the completion of the audit, the required Super 8-K will be finalized shortly.
Description of Principal Products, Services And Their Markets
We were founded in April 2007 and are based in Indianapolis, Indiana. In June of 2012 we changed our domicile from the state of Indiana to the State of Florida. Shortly after formation and during the organizational period in 2007, our previous CEO and President's son, was diagnosed with infantile spasms. Consequently, operations were limited, allowing Mr. Cupp to tend to his son's care. During 2012, our previous CEO and President's son was again diagnosed with continuation of the infantile spasms requiring a second brain surgery, thus limiting the time our CEO was able to spend on the implementation of the 12-18 month plan of operations. Therefore, as a result the following is reflective of the delay and is still our current plan.
We have conducted initial marketing and sales activities to take advantage of opportunities related to time, location and quality of various aquatic farm projects
We currently conduct our marketing operations primarily in Indiana.
Our Plan of Operation for the next twelve months is to raise capital to continue to expand our operations. Although we are not presently engaged in any capital raising activities, we anticipate that we may engage in one or more private offerings of our company's securities. We would most likely rely upon the transaction exemptions from registration provided by Regulation D, Rule 506 or conduct a private offering under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
The implementation of our business strategy is estimated to take approximately 12-18 months. Once we are able to secure funding, implementation will begin immediately. The major parts of the strategy to be immediately implemented will be the sales and marketing and office equipment and human resource procurement.
Our limited revenues have affected the Company directly. Without a strong or known market demand, it was considered a risk to expand in any new geographical areas, since there was realistic probability that costs and overages would not be recovered upon completion and sales generated.
Distribution Methods Of The Products Or Services
Our marketing initiatives will include:
(a) utilizing direct response print advertisements placed primarily in small business, entrepreneurial, and special interest magazines;
(b) affiliated marketing and direct mail;
(c) promoting our services and attracting businesses through our (proposed) website;
(d) presence at industry trade shows;
(e) continue to nurture the relationships we have with our core customers that we have done business with; and,
(f) seek additional customers coming into the marketplace and create relationships with them.
Status Of Any Publicly Announced New Product Or Service
Not applicable
Competitive Business Conditions And The Smaller Reporting Company's Competitive Position In The Industry And Methods Of Competition
Aquaculture Industry
Aquaculture is the farming of aquatic animals or plants. Aquaculture is the fastest growing segment in the food production system and has been for the past two decades. According to a study by the World Food and Agriculture Organization ("FAO") published March 2, 2009 world fisheries production reached a new high of 143.6 million metric tons, including farmed and ocean caught product. Based on the FAO's projections, it is estimated that in order to maintain the current level of per capita consumption, global aquaculture production will need to reach in excess of 80 million tons of fish by 2050.
As the availability of sites for aquaculture is becoming increasingly limited and the ability to develop non-agricultural land is often restricted, the competition to develop additional aquaculture production systems is intensifying. As the intensification for aquaculture production systems increases, the demand for institutional support, services, and skilled persons is anticipated to increase, along with the demand for more knowledge-based aquaculture education and training as aquaculture becomes more important worldwide
Shrimp Industry
The United States population is vast, with an annual shrimp consumption of approximately 1.25 billion pounds, approximately 4 pounds per capita. The current average wholesale cost for frozen and delivered shrimp is $3 to $5 per pound, depending on quality and season,. The target market for the Company is to establish assist the establishment of production facilities and distribution networks in metropolitan areas of the United States, as well as international distribution networks through Joint Venture partnerships throughout the world. This should allow the Company to capture a significant portion of shrimp sales by offering locally grown, environmentally "green", naturally grown, fresh shrimp at competitive wholesale prices.
Fresh Shrimp Market
The Company believes that a substantial market exists for live and fresh shrimp throughout the world. The Company plans to consult and assist to develop aquaculture farm operations to sell shrimp by using distributors or delivering them directly to market by packing the shrimp in salt water or ice, without freezing them. The Company has the added advantage of being able to market its shrimp as fresh, natural and locally grown. Being able to advertise the shrimp as locally grown and the fact that very few resources were used to transport the product provides the Company with an immense marketing advantage over the competition. Many customers are willing to pay a premium for such products.
Strategy for Growth
Our strategy for growth involves increasing our sales force and support staff and expanding our presence to other geographic markets across the United States. We focus on geographic areas, products and price points where we believe there are significant demand for our services and the potential for attractive returns to our company and investors. We currently are selling services primarily in Indiana.
¨
Increase Sales. Our growth strategy is to increase our Sales volume by expanding our presence in our current geographic markets and by entering new geographic markets.
¨
Internal Growth. We intend to continue to recruit highly-qualified sales professionals and support staff. Our compensation plan will include stock options and stock bonuses for production enhancing our ability to recruit and retain key employees.
In executing our business strategy, we focus on the following elements:
¨
Leveraging Technology to Maximize Efficiency. We utilize the internet to give our clients easy access to our company. We will continue to utilize technology to reduce operating costs, improve communication with clients, and centralize data among our branch operations.
¨
Promoting Sales & Recruitment Culture. To maintain a culture of continuous growth and recruitment, we have implemented a program whereby employees are encouraged to recruit earning them additional equity ownership.
Sources And Availability Of Raw Materials And The Names Of Principal Suppliers
Not applicable
Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements Or Labor Contracts, Including Duration
Not applicable
Need For Any Government Approval Of Principal Products Or Services
Not applicable
Effect Of Existing Or Probable Governmental Regulations On The Business
Not applicable
Estimate Of The Amount Spent During Each Of The Last Two Fiscal Years On Research And Development Activities And The
The Company planned the milestones over the next twelve months:
0-3 Months
Create contact plan for current operational farms
Explore online marketing options
Interview producing aquatic farmers
4-6 Months
Begin development of Online Marketing Website
Hire photographer and determine farm operations to use for literature
Continue design literature explaining our services
Negotiate for online merchant account
7-9 Months
Finish Website
Add content to website
10-12 Months
Analyze online marketing and make necessary changes for increased exposure
Prepare for year 2 marketing
The estimated costs for providing the services outlined in year one is approximately $150,000 and year two $250,000.
Extent To Which The Cost Of Such Activities Is Borne Directly By Customers
Not applicable
Subsequent Events
The status of our acquisition of North America Frac Sand (CA) Ltd. ("NAFS-CA") is that all terms have been met and that we are in the position to close. Actual Closing will take place upon the completion of the audit of NAFS-CA at which time the Super Form 8-K will be filed.
The terms of the leases being acquired are as follows:
NAFS-CA owns approximately 30,000 acres of mineral leases approximately 30 kilometers east of Saskatchewan, Canada, called the Eagle Creek leases.
A description of the Eagle Creek mineral leases is as follows:
Lease
Description of Lease
Lease Rate
# 1
Section 11, NE ¼ of Section 2, N (½) of Section 3, in Township 38, Range 10, West of the 3rd Meridian, as to the surface rights referenced in the Certificate of Title.
Up front payment of $3,000. Ten year lease dated July 17, 2015, automatically extended for second 10 years if royalties are being paid. Lease rate is $1 per acre per year. Royalty rate is $5.00 per ton of processed ore sold at $80 per metric ton or less, and $5.00 plus the 10% of the difference between sales price greater than $80 and $80 per metric ton.
# 2
West ½ of Section 2, Township 38, Range 10, West of the 3rd Meridian, portion of NW (¼) of Section 35 on Township 37, Range 10, West of the 3rd Meridian, as to the surface rights referenced in the Certificate of Title.
Ten year lease dated June 21, 2008, automatically extended for second 10 years if royalties are being paid. Lease rate is $1 per acre per year. Royalty rate is $3.00 per ton if 25% waste, $4.00 per ton if 20% waste, and $5.00 per ton if 15% or less waste.
Management of NAFS-CA has broken down their financial requirements in a number of phases, each of which is dependent on the success of the previous phase.
The first phase will be to continue with the exploration of the 30,000 acres of mineral leases and to complete a NI 43-101. The results of this finding should result in further recommendations from the independent geological consultant as to subsequent phases of activity. We expect that our second phase will build upon the recommendations of the first phase.
The end result of the exploration and testing will to try to establish an economic resource, complete a full feasibility study and develop such resource.
Management of NAFS-CA feel that the following is required start:
·
Drill and assay additional test holes as recommended by our independent geological consultant. Complete a NI Form 43-101.
·
Based on the NI Form 43-101 drill and assay additional test holes.
Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Because we are a Smaller Reporting Company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties
Our offices, are located at Bay 9B - 318 - 105th Street East, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 1Z3. We do not believe that we will need to obtain additional office space at any time in the foreseeable future, approximately 12 months.
For information on the leases see Item 1. Subsequent Events.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings nor are any contemplated by us at this time.
Item 4.
Item 4. Mine safety disclosures
Not Applicable
PART II.
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
North America Frac Sand Inc. trades on the OTC-QB market under the trading symbol NASF. Trading for NAFS for the last two years by quarter is as follows:
Holders
As of April 14, 2016 there were 414 shareholders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
Since inception we have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
NONE
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Because we are a Smaller Reporting Company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this report. The management's discussion, analysis of financial condition, and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this prospectus.
Our Business Overview
North America Frac Sand, Inc. is a Florida corporation (the "Company"). During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire North America Frac Sand (CA) Ltd ("NAFS-CA")., an Alberta Corporation. We completed the due diligence on February 29, 2016 and have agreed to close formally upon completion of the audit of NAFS-CA.
The Company was providing consulting services to independent aquatic farming operators and other market participants located in the Midwest of the United States. Historically, we conducted initial marketing and sales activities to take advantage of opportunities related to time, location and quality of aquatic farming operations. We have conducted our operations primarily in Indiana.
On April 25, 2014 the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement to acquire the issued and outstanding shares of Innovate Building Systems, Inc., ("Innovate") a manufacturer of modular buildings located in Edmonton Alberta, Canada. In accordance with the Agreement, the Company changed its name from New Found Shrimp, Inc. to Innovate Building Systems, Inc. In the course of the due diligence, the Innovate (the Alberta Company) was unable to supply audited financial statements. For this and other reasons, the Company decided not to proceed with the acquisition. On September 9, 2014, the Company changed its name from Innovate Building Systems Inc. to Xterra Building Systems Inc.
On July 10, 2015, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement to acquire the issued and outstanding shares of North America Frac Sand (CA) Ltd. ("NAFS-CA"). where the Company would issue 37,800,000 shares of common stock in the Company in exchange for the issued and outstanding shares of NAFS-CA. In accordance with the agreement, the Company changed its name from Xterra Building Systems, Inc. to North America Frac Sand, Inc. The final release of the shares held in escrow is subject to the completion the audit of NAFS-CA and the requisite filings.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions and apply judgments. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be important at the time the financial statements are prepared and actual results could differ from our estimates and such differences could be material. We have identified below the critical accounting policies which are assumptions made by management about matters that are highly uncertain and that are of critical importance in the presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. On a regular basis, we review our accounting policies and how they are applied and disclosed in our financial statements.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014
Financial Condition
Total Assets. Total assets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $Nil and $Nil, respectively.
Total Liabilities. Total liabilities at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $91,884 and $26,468, respectively. Total liabilities consist of accounts payable of $1,302, related party accounts payable of $23,000; and note payable to related party of $67,582 (2014 - accounts payable of $13,878, related party accounts payable of $9,000; and note payable to related party of $3,590).
Liquidity
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
The Company sustained a loss for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 of $65,416 and $13,780,487, respectively. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $34,508,101. Because of the absence of positive cash flows from operations, the Company will require additional funding for continuing the development and marketing. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
We are presently not able to meet our obligations as they come due. At December 31, 2015 we had working capital deficit of $91,884. Our working capital deficit is due to the results of operations.
Net cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $63,992 and $1,202, respectively.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $63,992 and $490, respectively.
We anticipate that our future liquidity requirements will arise from the need to fund our growth from operations, pay current obligations and future capital expenditures. The primary sources of funding for such requirements are expected to be cash generated from operations and raising additional funds from the private sources and/or debt financing. However, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and/or obtain additional financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, to remain a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitability. Our Plan of Operation for the next twelve months is to raise capital to continue to expand our operations. Although we are not presently engaged in any capital raising activities, we anticipate that we may engage in one or more private offering of our company's securities after the completion of this offering. We would most likely rely upon the transaction exemptions from registration provided by Regulation D, Rule 506 or conduct another private offering under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. See "Note 2 - Going Concern" in our financial statements for additional information as to the possibility that we may not be able to continue as a "going concern."
We have no known demands or commitments and are not aware of any events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to materially increase or decrease our current liquidity.
We are not aware of any trends or known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in material increases or decreases in liquidity.
Capital Resources
We have no material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2015.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Because we are a Smaller Reporting Company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The report of the independent registered public accounting firm and the financial statements listed on the accompanying index at page of this report are filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
On July 3, 2015, the Company dismissed Messineo & Co. CPA's LLC. On July 6, 2015, the Company appointed BF Borgers CPA PC. There have been no Changes in or Disagreement with BF Borgers CPA PC on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company's financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As of December 31, 2015, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and based on the criteria for effective internal control described Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our financial disclosure controls and procedures were not effective so as to timely identify correct and disclose information required to be included on our Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") reports due to the Company's limited internal resources and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review. Through the use of external consultants and the review process, management believes that the financial statements and other information presented herewith are materially correct.
The management including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our sole officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures, or its internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable not absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefit of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any within the Company have been detected.
Material weaknesses identified by management included: lack of an audit committee and audit committee financial expert; lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives and affecting the functions of authorization, recordkeeping, custody of assets, and reconciliation; and, management dominated by a single individual without adequate compensating controls.
Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.
Management's Remediation Initiatives
In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:
We will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us. And, we plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when funds are available to us.
Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.
We will work as quickly as possible to implement these initiatives; however, the lack of adequate working capital and positive cash flow from operations will likely slow this implementation.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this Annual Report.
This report shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of this section, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Change in internal controls
We have not made any significant changes to our internal controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date. We have not identified any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses or other factors other than those specified above that could significantly affect these controls, and therefore, no corrective action was taken.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information
NONE
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
The names and ages of our directors and executive officers are set forth below. Our By Laws provide for not less than one and not more than fifteen directors. All directors are elected annually by the stockholders to serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
____________
(1) Mr. Alexander will serve as a director until the next annual shareholder meeting.
Background of Executive Officers and Directors
Mr. David Alexander is a Chartered Accountant with other 25 years' experience in providing audit, accounting, and consulting services to both private and public companies. In the last five years Mr. Alexander has served as a director of Shalex Energy Corporation (oil and gas) from May 2012 - September 2013, WasteFixx Systems Inc. (water and soil clean up) from May 2013 - September 2013, and has since January 2016 served as the Chief Financial Officer of Veritas Pharma Inc. (pharmaceuticals). Mr. Alexander additionally provides business consulting services to several clients through his consulting practice. Based upon the aforementioned background and experience, Company principals believe that Mr. Alexander is eminently qualified to discharge the duties required for the directorship of the Company. On February 9, 2015, Mr. David Alexander assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Cupp is a 2001 graduate of Ball State University with a Bachelor's Degree in Secondary Education. He continued his education at Olivet Nazarene University and holds a Master's Degree in Education. Mr. Cupp has over 11 years of teaching and coaching experience and is currently the girls head basketball coach Avon High School, Indianapolis, Indiana. Mr. Cupp has shown the ability to create a winning team in each of his coaching assignments. Mr. Cupp has participated in many leadership and counseling camps during his tenure as teacher and coach at such prestigious institutions as Duke, Marquette, Ball State, and the University of Illinois. During the past five years Mr. Cupp has been primarily focused on his full time employment as a High School teacher and Girls Basketball coach in Indianapolis, Indiana. Other than the company Mr. Cupp does not have any other business experience. Mr. Cupp resigned as an officer of the Company on February 9, 2015, and as a director of the Company on March 15, 2016.
Legal Proceedings
To the best of our knowledge, except as set forth herein, none of the directors or director designees to our knowledge has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past five years that resulted in a judgment decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws, except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement.
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
We do not have a nominating committee of the Board of Directors, or any committee performing similar functions. Nominees for election as a director are selected by the Board of Directors.
We do not yet have an audit committee or an audit committee financial expert. We expect to form such a committee composed of our non-employee directors. We may in the future attempt to add a qualified board member to serve as an audit committee financial expert in the future, subject to our ability to locate and compensate such a person. Despite the lack of an audit committee, those members of the board of directors that would otherwise be on our audit committee will continue to analyze and investigate our actual and potential businesses prospects as members of our board of directors. Furthermore, our entire board of directors is aware of the importance of the financial and accounting due diligence that must be undertaken in furtherance of our business and they intend to conduct a comprehensive accounting financial analysis of the Company's business.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning the annual and long term compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, and the executive officers who served at the end of the fiscal year December 31, 2015, for services rendered in all capacities to us. The listed individuals shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Named Executive Officers." Currently, we have no employment agreements with any of our Directors or Officers. All of our directors are unpaid. Compensation for the future will be determined when and if additional funding is obtained.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
_____________________
(1) There is no employment contract with Mr. Cupp at this time. Nor are there any agreements for compensation in the future. A salary and stock option and/or warrants program may be developed in the future
(2) The restricted stock was valued at the last trade price on the day of issuance in accordance with ASC 718.
(3) There is no employment contract with Mr. Alexander at this time. Nor are there any agreements for compensation in the future. A salary and stock option and/or warrants program may be developed in the future
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our current Board of Directors consist of David M. Alexander (Mr. David R. Cupp resigned March 15, 2016). We will be appointing two directors as required under the Share Purchase Agreement with NAFS - CA.
Director Compensation
There are currently no compensation arrangements in place for members of the board of directors.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth information concerning the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock with respect to stockholders who were known by us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock as of December 31, 2015, and our officers and directors, individually and as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares of common stock.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with the SEC rules, shares of our common stock which may be acquired upon exercise of stock options or warrants which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table are deemed beneficially owned by the optionees, if applicable. Subject to community property laws, where applicable, the persons or entities named below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock indicated as beneficially owned by them.
________________
(1) The percentages are based on of 46,915,446 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this report
(2) A total of 45,665,448 shares of our common stock are considered to be outstanding pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3(d) (1).
(3) These shares are being held in escrow by the Company's attorneys.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons
On July 3, 2012, the Company issued to David R. Cupp one share of our Class A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Preferred A Stock") and forty thousand (40,000), post reverse split, of our Common Stock. Mr. Cupp was issued the common stock and the Preferred A Stock in connection with and as consideration for his agreement to continue as an officer and director for the Company. The certificate of designations for the Preferred A Stock provides that as a class it possesses a number of votes equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of all votes of capital stock of the Company that could be asserted in any matter put to a vote of the shareholders of the Company.
Mr. Alexander has charged management fees of $14,000 in 2015 and $9,000 in 2014.
Our offices are currently located Bay 9B - 318 - 105th Street East, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 1Z3.
Future Transactions
Future transactions with our officers, directors or greater than five percent stockholders will be on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from independent third parties, and all such transactions will be reviewed and subject to approval by our board of directors.
Director Independence
We do not presently have any independent directors. We consider independent directors to be individuals who are not employed by the Company in any capacity and who do not have any equity ownership interest in the Company. Our Board of Directors is comprised of our President, David Alexander who also serves as our Secretary/Treasurer. Until March 21, 2016, Mr. Cupp also served on the Board of Directors. Mr. Cupp is currently majority shareholder of the company's common equity. We intend to seek independent directors for our board of directors when the market conditions improve and we are able to provide compensation for our board of director members.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The Company does not currently have an audit committee. The normal functions of the audit committee are handled by the board of directors, which consists of our sole director only.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
NAME
TITLE
DATE
/s/ David Alexander
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
April 14, 2016
David Alexander
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants
Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act
NONE
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of North America Frac Sand, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of North America Frac Sand, Inc. ("the Company") as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of North America Frac Sand, Inc., as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company's significant operating losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ B F Borgers CPA PC
B F Borgers CPA PC
Lakewood, CO
April 14, 2016
North America Frac Sand, Inc.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
Balance Sheets
See notes to audited financial statements
North America Frac Sand, Inc.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
Statements of Operations
see notes to unaudited condensed financial statements
North America Frac Sand, Inc.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
Statements of Cash Flow
see notes to unaudited condensed financial statements
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
NOTES TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
ORGANIZATION
The Company is Florida corporation which was incorporated on April 26, 2007. The Company was formed as New Found Shrimp, Inc. to provide consultation to the aquatic farming industry. It was the Company's plan to provide consolidation opportunities for on-going and start up aquatic farming operations. The Company's approach was to be to assist aquatic farming operations with the organizational structure, customer service and marketing aspects of their business, allowing our customers to focus on the business aspects of operating the farms. On April 25, 2014, the Company changed its name to Xterra Building Systems, Inc. On July 10, 2015, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Canadian Sandtech Inc. to acquire its wholly owned subsidiary, North America Frac Sand (CA) Ltd. ("NASD-CA"). In accordance with this Share Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 37,800,000 shares of common stock and placed these shares in escrow. On September 17, 2015, the Company changed its name to North America Frac Sand, Inc. On February 29, 2016, all subjects were removed by the Company to close on the acquisition of NASD-CA, except for the issuance of audited financial statements. NASD-CA has approximately 30,000 acres of mineral leases located approximately 30 kilometers east of Saskatoon Saskatchewan.
The Company is now headquartered in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
NOTE 2. GOING CONCERN
The Company has a history of losses, including $65,416 and $13,780,487 the years ending December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Losses result in an accumulated deficit of $34,508,101. The Company has negative working capital of $91,884 and $26,468 as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively. The Company's financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating cost and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.
In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plan to obtain such resources for the Company include, obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.
There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain sufficient additional funds when needed or that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to the Company. In addition, profitability will ultimately depend upon the level of revenues received from business operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company will attain profitability. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern
NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
USE OF ESTIMATES
The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
NOTES TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $Nil at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
CASH FLOWS REPORTING
The Company follows ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method ("Indirect method") as defined by ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company has applied the provisions of ASC topic 350 - Intangible - goodwill and other, in accounting for its intangible assets. Intangible assets are being amortized by straight-line method on the basis of a useful life of 3 years, to begin upon the operational commencement. Intangible assets consist of website development cost. The balance at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $-0- and $-0-, respectively.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG- LIVED ASSETS
The Company reviews and evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The assets are subject to impairment consideration under FASB ASC 360-10-35-17 if events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amount might not be recoverable. When the Company determines that an impairment analysis should be done, the analysis will be performed using the rules of FASB ASC 930-360-35, Asset Impairment, and 360-0 through 15-5, Impairment or Disposal of Long- Lived Assets.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company's balance sheet includes financial instruments, specifically accounts payable, accrued expenses, and payables to related parties. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
·
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities
·
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
·
Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
NOTES TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2015. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company follows ASC 605, Revenue Recognition -The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company has not generated any revenues for the periods presented.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company expenses research and development costs when incurred. Research and development costs include engineering and testing of product and outputs. Indirect costs related to research and developments are allocated based on percentage usage to the research and development. We spent $-0- in research and development costs for the years December 31, 2015 and 2014.
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND VALUATION ALLOWANCE
The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740 Income Taxes. Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings Per Share." The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic earning or loss per share. Diluted earnings or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares and diluted potential common shares outstanding. Dilutive potential common shares are additional common shares assumed to be exercised.
Basic net income (loss) per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2015 and at December 31, 2014. The Series B Preferred stock can be converted to common shares at a rate determined by the Board of Directors.
SHARE-BASED EXPENSE
ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions in which employee services are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options, and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, Equity - Based Payments to Non-Employees. Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued.
Share-based expense for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 totaled $-0- and $-0-, respectively.
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
NOTES TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, which eliminated certain financial reporting requirements of companies previously identified as "Development Stage Entities" (Topic 915). The amendments in this ASU simplify accounting guidance by removing all incremental financial reporting requirements for development stage entities. The amendments also reduce data maintenance and, for those entities subject to audit, audit costs by eliminating the requirement for development stage entities to present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity. Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity's financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915. The Company has adopted this standard.
In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12 Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. A performance target in a share-based payment that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be accounted for as a performance condition under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. As a result, the target is not reflected in the estimation of the award's grant date fair value. Compensation cost would be recognized over the required service period, if it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after 15 December 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. Management has reviewed the ASU and believes that they currently account for these awards in a manner consistent with the new guidance, therefore there is no anticipation of any effect to the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-15 Preparation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity's liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity's liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting in accordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of Financial Statements-Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity's liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this Update should be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company will evaluate the going concern considerations in this ASU, however, at the current period, management does not believe that it has met conditions which would subject these financial statements for additional disclosure.
We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation's reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.
NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES
At December 31, 2015, the Company had a net operating loss carry-forward for Federal income tax purposes of $34,508,101 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2032. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company's net deferred tax assets of $12,275,734, calculated at an effective tax rate of 34%, was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a valuation allowance of $12,275,734.
Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability.
The Company has open tax periods, subject to IRS audit for the years 2009 through 2015.
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
NOTES TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
COMMON STOCK
On September 17, 2014, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation. The Company has been authorized to issue 10,000,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value. Each share of issued and outstanding common stock shall entitle the holder thereof to fully participate in all shareholder meetings, to cast one vote on each matter with respect to which shareholders have the right to vote, and to share ratably in all dividends and other distributions declared and paid with respect to common stock, as well as in the net assets of the corporation upon liquidation or dissolution.
During the month of August 2014 the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 515 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 515,050 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation.
On July 10, 2015, the Company issued 37,800,000 shares of the Company pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement. The 37,800,000 shares were placed into escrow pending the Closing of the acquisition of NAFS-CA.
On July 17, 2015, the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 15 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 3,750,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation.
On August 25, 2015, the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 2 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 500,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation.
On September 18, 2015, the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 3 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 750,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation
On October 13, 2015, the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 8 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 2,000,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation
At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 there were 45,665,448 and 865,450 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
PREFERRED STOCK
On September 17, 2014, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation. The Company has been authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of $0.00001 par value Preferred Stock. The Board of Directors is expressly vested with the authority to divide any or all of the Preferred Stock into series and to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of the shares of each series so established, within certain guidelines established in the Articles of Incorporation.
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
NOTES TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Series A: 10 shares of preferred stock has been designated as Series A. The certificate of designations for the Preferred A Stock provides that it may only be issued in exchange for the partial or full retirement of debt held by management, employees or consultants, or as directed by a majority vote of the Board of Directors. Series A may be convertible into the number of shares of common stock which equals four times the sum of (i) the total number of shares of common stock which are issued and outstanding at the time of conversion, plus (ii) the total number of shares of Series B and Series C preferred stocks which are issued and outstanding at the time of conversion. The Series A class possesses a number of votes equal to the number of common stock equivalents, if converted.
Series B: 999,999,990 shares of preferred stock has been designated as Series B. The certificate of designation for the Preferred B Stock provides that as a class shall be entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion. Preferred Series B will have liquidation rites, an amount equal to $1.00 per share, plus any declared but unpaid dividends for each share held. Each share will have 10 votes. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible into common shares, at any time, and/or from time to time, into the number of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, equal to the price of the Series B Preferred Stock, divided by the par value of the Common Stock, subject to adjustment as may be determined by the Board of Directors from time to time (the "Conversion Rate").
On September 17, 2014, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation. The amendment modified the terms of the Preferred Series A conversion exchange to common stock. As a result of this modification, the addition of a material conversion option triggered extinguishment accounting which requires the Company to fair value the new instrument and consider the incremental value of the fair value of the modified preferred stock over the carrying value at the date of the modification as a reduction of income available to common stockholders. The Preferred Series A was deemed to have a fair value of $13,741,679 based upon the converted valuation approach as the primary driver of value in the instrument, its common stock equivalency.
In addition, as a result of this new conversion feature, the Company cannot assert it has sufficient shares to settle both Preferred Series A and Preferred Series B and accordingly has re-classed such share to mezzanine equity. The Preferred Series A is reclassified at its modification fair value of $13,741,679.
At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 there was 1 share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 there were 76,106 and 76,133 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
There are no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock of the Company.
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
NOTES PAYABLE
In support of the Company's efforts and cash requirements, it has relied on advances from related parties until such time that the Company can support its operations or attains adequate financing through sales of its equity or traditional debt financing. There is no formal written commitment for continued support by these related parties. Amounts represent advances or amounts paid in satisfaction of liabilities of the Company. The advances are considered temporary in nature and have not been formalized by a promissory note.
As of December 31, 2015, David Alexander had advanced to the Company $67,582 ($3,590-2014) with no stated interest rate, payment terms and is due on demand.
On May 18, 2011 David Cupp loaned the Company $100 with no stated interest rate, payment terms and is due on demand. Additionally, payments were made on behalf of the Company in satisfaction of liabilities, totaling $27,541. The total amount due to Mr. Cupp, $27,641, was forgiven in 2014 and recognized as a contribution to capital. No amount was due to Mr. Cupp as of December 31, 2015 or 2014.
NORTH AMERICA FRAC SAND, INC.
(fka Xterra Building Systems, Inc.)
NOTES TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of the year ending December 31, 2015, Mr. David Alexander accrued and unpaid consulting fees of $14,000 ($9,000 - 2014).
Amounts due to related parties at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 totaled $90,582 and $12,590, respectively.
OTHER
The officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities that become available. They may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.
The Company does not own or lease property or lease office space. The Company has been provided office space by a member of the Board of Directors at no cost.
The above amounts are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent parties.
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time the Company may be a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 21, 2016, the Company announced the resignation of Mr. David Cupp as Director of the Company.
On March 21, 2016, the Company changed its principal address to Unit 9B, 218 105th Street East, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7I 0J9.
On March 28, 2016, the Company issued 1,250,000 of shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of 5 Series B Preferred Shares.
The completion of the reverse merger with North America Frac Sand (CA) Ltd. and the shares held in escrow will be released subject to the completion of the audited financial statements of North America Frac Sand (CA) Ltd and completion of the requisite filing.
Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on our evaluation no events have occurred requiring adjustment or disclosure.