ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively "we," "our," "us" or the "Company") is a global biopharmaceutical company primarily engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies designed to treat cancer and immune-inflammatory related diseases. We are dedicated to innovative research and development which is designed to bring new therapies to market, and we are involved in research in several scientific areas that may deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas such as intracellular signaling pathways in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmune diseases, and therapeutic application of cell therapies.
Our primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, THALOMID®, ABRAXANE® and ISTODAX®. Additional sources of revenue include a licensing agreement with Novartis, which entitles us to royalties on FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of services through our Cellular Therapeutics subsidiary and other miscellaneous licensing agreements.
We continue to invest substantially in research and development, and the drug candidates in our pipeline are at various stages of preclinical and clinical development. These candidates include pomalidomide and apremilast, our leading oral anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory agents, PDA-001, our leading cellular therapy, oral azacitidine, CC-223 and CC-115 for hematological and solid tumor malignancies, CC-122, our anti-cancer pleiotropic pathway modifier, and ACE-011 and ACE-536 biological products for anemia in several clinical settings of unmet need. We believe that continued acceptance of our primary commercial stage products, participation in research and development collaboration arrangements, depth of our product pipeline, regulatory approvals of new products and expanded use of existing products will provide the catalysts for future growth.
In 1986, we were spun off from Celanese Corporation and, in July 1987, completed an initial public offering. Our initial operations focused on the research and development of chemical and biotreatment processes for the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. In the intervening years, we invested significantly in developing additional internal pharmaceutical programs and have completed a number of strategic acquisitions that strengthened our research and manufacturing capabilities in addition to enhancing our commercial product portfolio. Our most recent strategic acquisitions included:
•In January 2012, we and Avila Therapeutics, Inc., or Avila, a privately-held biotechnology company, announced a definitive merger agreement under which we will acquire Avila for $350.0 million in cash plus up to $575.0 million in contingent development and regulatory approval milestones. The acquisition is expected to expand our leading role in the future treatment of hematologic cancers with Avila's AVL-292, a highly-selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor, currently in phase I clinical development. In addition, Avila's proprietary Avilomics™ platform will augment our investment in the discovery and development of novel therapeutics. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and will be accounted for as an acquisition of a business.
•In October 2010, we acquired Abraxis Bioscience Inc., or Abraxis, a fully integrated global biotechnology company dedicated to the discovery, development and delivery of next-generation therapeutics and core technologies that offer patients treatments for cancer and other critical illnesses. The acquisition of Abraxis accelerates our strategy to become a global leader in oncology and added ABRAXANE®, which is based on Abraxis' proprietary tumor-targeting platform known as nab® technology, to our portfolio of leading cancer products.
•In January 2010, we acquired Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Gloucester, a privately held pharmaceutical company which developed new therapies that address unmet medical needs in the treatment of hematological cancers, including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or CTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL, and other hematological malignancies. Gloucester added ISTODAX® to our product portfolio and advanced our leadership position in the development of disease-altering therapies through innovative approaches for patients with rare and debilitating blood cancers.
For the year ended December 31, 2011, we reported revenue of $4.842 billion, net income of $1.318 billion and diluted earnings per share of $2.85. Revenue increased by $1.216 billion in 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily due to our continuing expansion into international markets, growth of REVLIMID® and VIDAZA® in both U.S. and international markets and the inclusion of a full year's sales of ABRAXANE® in 2011. Net income and earnings per share increases in 2011 reflect the earnings contributions from a higher sales level, partly offset by increased spending for new product launches, research and development, and expansion of our international operations.
Our future growth and operating results will depend on the continued acceptance of our marketed products, future regulatory approvals and successful commercialization of new products and new product indications, depth of our product pipeline, competition with our marketed products and protection of our intellectual property. See also, Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors contained in Part I, Item 1A
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following statements describe the major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. Any of these factors could significantly and negatively affect our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results or credit ratings, which could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. The risks described below are not the only risks we may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or risks that we currently consider immaterial, could also negatively affect our business, financial results and operations.
We may experience significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results which could cause our financial results to be below expectations and cause our stock price to be volatile.
We have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. These fluctuations are due to a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, and may result in volatility of our stock price. Future operating results will depend on many factors, including:
•demand or lack of demand for our products, including demand that adversely affects our ability to optimize the use of our manufacturing facilities;
•the introduction and pricing of products competitive with ours, including generic competition;
•developments regarding the safety or efficacy of our products;
•regulatory approvals for our products and pricing determinations with respect to our products;
•regulatory approvals for our and our competitor's manufacturing facilities;
•timing and levels of spending for research and development, sales and marketing;
•timing and levels of reimbursement from third-party payers for our products;
•development or expansion of business infrastructure in new clinical and geographic markets;
•the acquisition of new products and companies;
•tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate;
•timing and recognition of certain research and development milestones and license fees;
•ability to control our costs;
•fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; and
•economic and market instability.
We are dependent on the continued commercial success of our primary products REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, THALOMID® and ABRAXANE®, and a significant decline in demand for or use of these products or our other commercially available products could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
During the next several years, the growth of our business will be largely dependent on the commercial success of REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, THALOMID® and ABRAXANE®. We cannot predict whether these or our other existing or new products will be accepted by regulators, physicians, patients and other key opinion leaders as effective drugs with certain advantages over existing or future therapies. We are continuing to introduce our products in additional international markets and to obtain approvals for additional indications both in the United States and internationally. A delay in gaining the requisite regulatory approvals for these markets or indications could negatively impact our growth plans and the value of our stock.
Further, if unexpected adverse experiences are reported in connection with the use of our products, physician and patient comfort with the product could be undermined, the commercial success of such products could be adversely affected and the acceptance of our other products could be negatively impacted. We are subject to adverse event reporting regulations that require us to report to the FDA or similar bodies in other countries if our products are associated with a death or serious injury. These adverse events, among others, could result in additional regulatory controls, such as the performance of costly post-approval clinical studies or revisions to our approved labeling, which could limit the indications or patient population for our products or could even lead to the withdrawal of a product from the market. Similarly, the occurrence of serious adverse events known or suspected to be related to the products could negatively impact product sales. For example, THALOMID® is known to be toxic to the human fetus and exposure to the drug during pregnancy could result in significant deformities in the baby. REVLIMID® is also considered fetal toxic and there are warnings against use of VIDAZA® in pregnant women as well. While we have restricted distribution systems for both THALOMID® and REVLIMID® and we endeavor to educate patients regarding the potential known adverse events including pregnancy risks, we cannot ensure that all such warnings and recommendations will be complied with or that adverse events resulting from non-compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our business.
It is necessary that our primary products achieve and maintain market acceptance. A number of factors may adversely impact the degree of market acceptance of our products, including the products' efficacy, safety and advantages, if any, over competing products, as well as the reimbursement policies of third-party payers, such as government and private insurance plans, patent disputes and claims about adverse side effects.
If we do not gain or maintain regulatory approval of our products we will be unable to sell our current products and products in development.
Changes in law, government regulations or policies can have a significant impact on our results of operations. The discovery, preclinical development, clinical trials, manufacturing, risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (such as our S.T.E.P.S.® and RevAssist® programs), marketing and labeling of pharmaceuticals and biologics are all subject to extensive laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the U.S. Public Health Service Act, Medicare Modernization Act, Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, patent laws, environmental laws, privacy laws and other federal and state statutes, including anti-kickback, antitrust and false claims laws, as well as similar laws in foreign jurisdictions. Enforcement of and changes in laws, government regulations or policies can have a significant adverse impact on our ability to continue to commercialize our products or introduce new products to the market, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
If we or our agents, contractors or collaborators are delayed in receiving, or are unable to obtain all, necessary governmental approvals, we will be unable to effectively market our products.
The testing, marketing and manufacturing of our products requires regulatory approval, including approval from the FDA and, in some cases, from the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, or governmental authorities outside of the United States that perform roles similar to those of the FDA and EPA, including the EMA, European Commission, the Swissmedic, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration and Health Canada. Certain of our pharmaceutical products, such as FOCALIN®, fall under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 that requires authorization by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, or DEA, of the U.S. Department of Justice in order to handle and distribute these products.
The regulatory approval process presents a number of risks to us, principally:
•In general, preclinical tests and clinical trials can take many years, and require the expenditure of substantial resources, and the data obtained from these tests and trials can be susceptible to varying interpretation that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval;
•Delays or rejections may be encountered during any stage of the regulatory process based upon the failure of the clinical or other data to demonstrate compliance with, or upon the failure of the product to meet, a regulatory agency's requirements for safety, efficacy and quality or, in the case of a product seeking an orphan drug indication, because another designee received approval first or receives approval of other labeled indications;
•Requirements for approval may become more stringent due to changes in regulatory agency policy or the adoption of new regulations or legislation;
•The scope of any regulatory approval, when obtained, may significantly limit the indicated uses for which a product may be marketed and reimbursed and may impose significant limitations in the nature of warnings, precautions and contra-indications that could materially affect the sales and profitability of the drug;
•Approved products, as well as their manufacturers, are subject to continuing and ongoing review, and discovery of previously unknown problems with these products or the failure to adhere to manufacturing or quality control requirements may result in restrictions on their manufacture, sale or use or in their withdrawal from the market;
•Regulatory authorities and agencies of the United States or foreign governments may promulgate additional regulations restricting the sale of our existing and proposed products, including specifically tailored risk evaluation and mitigation strategies;
•Guidelines and recommendations published by various governmental and non-governmental organizations can reduce the use of our products;
•Once a product receives marketing approval, we may not market that product for broader or different applications, and the FDA may not grant us approval with respect to separate product applications that represent extensions of our basic technology. In addition, the FDA may withdraw or modify existing approvals in a significant manner or promulgate additional regulations restricting the sale of our present or proposed products. The FDA may also request that we perform additional clinical trials or change the labeling of our existing or proposed products if we or others identify side effects after our products are on the market;
•Products, such as REVLIMID®, that are subject to accelerated approval can be subject to an expedited withdrawal if the post-marketing study commitments are not completed with due diligence, the post-marketing restrictions are not adhered to or are shown to be inadequate to assure the safe use of the drug, or evidence demonstrates that the drug is not shown to be safe and effective under its conditions of use. Additionally, promotional materials for such products are subject to enhanced surveillance, including pre-approval review of all promotional materials used within 120 days following marketing approval and a requirement for the submissions 30 days prior to initial dissemination of all promotional materials disseminated after 120 days following marketing approval; and
•Our risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, labeling and promotional activities relating to our products as well as our post-marketing activities are regulated by the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission, the United States Department of Justice, the DEA, state regulatory agencies and foreign regulatory agencies and are subject to associated risks. In addition, individual states, acting through their attorneys general, have become active as well, seeking to regulate the marketing of prescription drugs under state consumer protection and false advertising laws. If we fail to comply with regulations regarding the promotion and sale of our products, appropriate distribution of our products under our
restricted distribution systems, prohibition on off-label promotion and the promotion of unapproved products, such agencies may bring enforcement actions against us that could inhibit our commercial capabilities as well as result in significant penalties.
Other matters that may be the subject of governmental or regulatory action which could adversely affect our business include:
•changes in laws and regulations, including without limitation, patent, environmental, privacy, health care and competition laws;
•importation of prescription drugs from outside the United States at prices that are regulated by the governments of various foreign countries;
•additional restrictions on interactions with healthcare professionals; and
•privacy restrictions that may limit our ability to share data from foreign jurisdictions.
We collect placentas and umbilical cord blood for our unrelated allogeneic and private stem cell banking businesses. The FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research currently regulates human tissue or cells intended for transplantation, implantation, infusion or transfer to a human recipient under 21 CFR Parts 1270 and 1271. Part 1271 requires cell and tissue establishments to screen and test donors, to prepare and follow written procedures for the prevention of the spread of communicable disease and to register the establishment with FDA. This part also provides for inspection by the FDA of cell and tissue establishments. Currently, we are required to be, and are, licensed to operate in New York, New Jersey, Maryland and California. If other states adopt similar licensing requirements, we would need to obtain such licenses to continue operating our stem cell banking businesses. If we are delayed in receiving, or are unable to obtain at all, necessary licenses, we will be unable to provide services in those states and this could impact negatively on our revenue.
Sales of our products will be significantly reduced if access to and reimbursement for our products by governmental and other third-party payers is reduced or terminated.
Sales of our products will depend, in part, on the extent to which the costs of our products will be paid by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefit and similar health care management organizations, or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers and other third-party payers. Generally, in Europe and other countries outside the United States, the government-sponsored healthcare system is the primary payer of healthcare costs of patients. These health care management organizations and third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. Additionally, the Health Care Reform Act of 2010, or Health Care Reform Act, which became effective in January 2011, has provided sweeping health care reform in the United States, which may impact the prices of drugs. In addition to the federal legislation, state legislatures and foreign governments have also shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. The establishment of limitations on patient access to our drugs, adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures in new jurisdictions or programs, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures,
including the impact of the Health Care Reform Act, could adversely impact our business and future results. If these organizations and third-party payers do not consider our products to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not reimburse providers or consumers of our products or, if they do, the level of reimbursement may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a profitable basis.
Our ability to sell our products to hospitals in the United States depends in part on our relationships with group purchasing organizations, or GPOs. Many existing and potential customers for our products become members of GPOs. GPOs negotiate pricing arrangements and contracts, sometimes on an exclusive basis, with medical supply manufacturers and distributors, and these negotiated prices are made available to a GPO's affiliated hospitals and other members. If we are not one of the providers selected by a GPO, affiliated hospitals and other members may be less likely to purchase our products, and if the GPO has negotiated a strict sole source, market share compliance or bundling contract for another manufacturer's products, we may be precluded from making sales to members of the GPO for the duration of the contractual arrangement. Our failure to renew contracts with GPOs may cause us to lose market share and could have a material adverse effect on our sales, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to renew these contracts at the current or substantially similar terms. If we are unable to keep our relationships and develop new relationships with GPOs, our competitive position may suffer.
We encounter similar regulatory and legislative issues in most countries outside the United States. International operations are generally subject to extensive governmental price controls and other market regulations, and we believe the increasing emphasis on cost-containment initiatives in Europe and other countries has and will continue to put pressure on the price and usage of our products. Although we cannot predict the extent to which our business may be affected by future cost-containment measures or other potential legislative or regulatory developments, additional foreign price controls or other changes in pricing regulation could restrict the amount that we are able to charge for our current and future products, which could adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.
Our long-term success depends, in part, on intellectual property protection.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, protect trade secrets, obtain licenses to technology owned by third parties and to conduct our business without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, including ours, can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions including those related to our risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (such as our S.T.E.P.S.® and RevAssist® programs). In addition, the coverage sought in a patent application can be significantly reduced before the patent is issued.
Consequently, we do not know whether any of our owned or licensed pending patent applications, which have not already been allowed, will result in the issuance of patents or, if any patents are issued, whether they will be dominated by third-party patent rights, whether they will provide significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage or whether they will be circumvented, opposed, invalidated, rendered unenforceable or infringed by others. Further, we are aware of third-party U.S. patents that relate to, for example, the use of certain stem cell
technologies and cannot be assured as to any impact to our potential products, or guarantee that our patents or pending applications will not be involved in, or be defeated as a result of, opposition proceedings before a foreign patent office or any interference proceedings before the United States Patent & Trademark Office, or PTO.
With respect to patents and patent applications we have licensed-in, there can be no assurance that additional patents will be issued to any of the third parties from whom we have licensed patent rights, or that, if any new patents are issued, such patents will not be opposed, challenged, invalidated, infringed or dominated or provide us with significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any of the existing licensed patents will provide us with proprietary protection or commercial advantage. Nor can we guarantee that these licensed patents will not be either infringed, invalidated or circumvented by others, or that the relevant agreements will not be terminated. Any termination of material licenses granted to us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because (1) patent applications filed in the United States on or before November 28, 2000 are maintained in secrecy until patents issue, (2) patent applications filed in the United States on or after November 29, 2000 are not published until approximately 18 months after their earliest claimed priority date, (3) United States patent applications that are not filed outside the United States may not publish at all until issued and (4) publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we, or our licensors, were the first to make the inventions covered by each of the issued patents or pending patent applications or that we, or our licensors, were the first to file patent applications for such inventions. In the event a third party has also filed a patent for any of our inventions, we, or our licensors, may have to participate in interference proceedings before the PTO to determine priority of invention, which could result in the loss of a U.S. patent or loss of any opportunity to secure U.S. patent protection for the invention. Even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us, such interference proceedings could result in substantial cost to us.
Our intellectual property rights will further be affected in ways that are difficult to anticipate at this time by the provisions of the America Invents Act, signed into law on September 16, 2011. The new patent law is the first major overhaul of the U.S. patent system since 1952, and includes a number of changes to established practices. The most significant changes in the new law include the transition to a first-to-file system, the availability of new post-grant review for issued patents, various procedural changes including the submission of prior art and the availability of derivation proceedings and supplemental examination, and an expanded prior commercial user rights defense to a claim of patent infringement. The scope of these changes and the lack of experience with their practical implementation, suggest a transitional period with some uncertainty over the next few years. For example, while some provisions of the new patent law have already taken effect, others will take effect up to 18 months from enactment. The U.S. PTO is still in the process of publishing regulations concerning the implementation of the law. Several provisions of the new law will likely be tested in courts over time.
The changes in the new U.S. patent law will have an impact on our intellectual property rights and how business is conducted in general. For example, the first-to-file system places premium on filing as early as possible and appears to increase what is available as prior art, by changing the
applicable definitions. In the future, in addition to patents and printed publications, we may be required to deal with unfamiliar prior art categories such as art that is "otherwise available to the public." For patent applications filed on or after March 16, 2013, we may expect post-grant review challenges initiated up to nine months after the corresponding patent issues.
While the new patent law was intended to make the resolution of intellectual property disputes easier and less expensive, we may in the future have to prove that we are not infringing patents or we may be required to obtain licenses to such patents. However, we do not know whether such licenses will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Prosecution of patent applications, post-grant opposition proceedings, and litigation to establish the validity and scope of patents, to assert patent infringement claims against others and to defend against patent infringement claims by others can be expensive and time-consuming. There can be no assurance that, in the event that claims of any of our owned or licensed patents are challenged by one or more third parties, any court or patent authority ruling on such challenge will determine that such patent claims are valid and enforceable. An adverse outcome in such litigation or post grant proceeding could cause us to lose exclusivity relating to the subject matter delineated by such patent claims and may have a material adverse effect on our business. If a third party is found to have rights covering products or processes used by us, we could be forced to cease using the products or processes covered by the disputed rights, be subject to significant liabilities to such third party and/or be required to license technologies from such third party. Also, different countries have different procedures for obtaining patents, and patents issued by different countries provide different degrees of protection against the use of a patented invention by others. There can be no assurance, therefore, that the issuance to us in one country of a patent covering an invention will be followed by the issuance in other countries of patents covering the same invention or that any judicial interpretation of the validity, enforceability or scope of the claims in a patent issued in one country will be similar to the judicial interpretation given to a corresponding patent issued in another country. Competitors have chosen and in the future may choose to file oppositions to patent applications, which have been deemed allowable by foreign patent examiners. Furthermore, even if our owned or licensed patents are determined to be valid and enforceable, there can be no assurance that competitors will not be able to challenge the validity or our patent claims in post-grant proceedings, or to design around such patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology. Additionally, for these same reasons, we cannot be sure that patents of a broader scope than ours may be issued and thereby create freedom to operate issues. If this occurs we may need to reevaluate pursuing such technology, which is dominated by others' patent rights, or alternatively, seek a license to practice our own invention, whether or not patented.
We also rely upon unpatented, proprietary and trade secret technology that we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our collaborative partners, employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors. There can be no assurance that these agreements provide meaningful protection or that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach or that our trade secrets, proprietary know-how and technological advances will not otherwise become known to others. In addition, there can be no assurance that, despite precautions taken by us, others have not and will not obtain access to our proprietary technology or that such technology will not be found to be non-proprietary or not a trade secret.
Our products may face competition from lower cost generic or follow-on products and providers of these products may be able to sell them at a substantially lower cost than us.
Generic drug manufacturers are seeking to compete with our drugs and present an important challenge to us. Even if our patent applications, or those we have licensed-in, are issued, innovative and generic drug manufacturers and other competitors may challenge the scope, validity or enforceability of such patents in court, requiring us to engage in complex, lengthy and costly litigation. Alternatively, innovative and generic drug manufacturers and other competitors may be able to design around our owned or licensed patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology. If any of our issued or licensed patents are infringed or challenged, we may not be successful in enforcing or defending our or our licensor's intellectual property rights and subsequently may not be able to develop or market the applicable product exclusively.
Upon the expiration or loss of patent protection for one of our products, or upon the "at-risk" launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation against the generic product) by a generic manufacturer of a generic version of one of our products, we can quickly lose a significant portion of our sales of that product, which can adversely affect our business. In addition, if generic versions of our competitors' branded products lose their market exclusivity, our patented products may face increased competition which can adversely affect our business.
The FDA approval process allows for the approval of an ANDA or 505(b)(2) application for a generic version of our approved products upon the expiration, through passage of time or successful legal challenge, of relevant patent or non-patent exclusivity protection. Generic manufacturers pursuing ANDA approvals are not required to conduct costly and time-consuming clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of their products; rather, they are permitted to rely on the innovator's data regarding safety and efficacy. Thus, generic manufacturers can sell their products at prices much lower than those charged by the innovative pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies who have incurred substantial expenses associated with the research and development of the drug product. Accordingly, while our products currently may retain certain regulatory and or patent exclusivity, our products are or will be subject to ANDA applications to the FDA in light of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The ANDA procedure includes provisions allowing generic manufacturers to challenge the effectiveness of the innovator's patent protection prior to the generic manufacturer actually commercializing their products-the so-called "Paragraph IV" certification procedure. In recent years, generic manufacturers have used Paragraph IV certifications extensively to challenge the applicability of Orange Book-listed patents on a wide array of innovative pharmaceuticals, and we expect this trend to continue. During the exclusivity periods, the FDA is generally prevented from granting effective approval of an ANDA. Upon the expiration of the applicable exclusivities, through passage of time or successful legal challenge, the FDA may grant effective approval of an ANDA for a generic drug, or may accept reference to a previously protected NDA in a 505(b)(2) application. Further, upon such expiration event, the FDA may require a generic competitor to participate in some form of risk management system which could include our participation as well. Depending upon the scope of the applicable exclusivities, any such approval could be limited to certain formulations and/or indications/claims, i.e., those not covered by any outstanding exclusivities.
If an ANDA filer or a generic manufacturer were to receive approval to sell a generic or follow-on version of one of our products, that product would become subject to increased competition and our revenues for that product would be adversely affected.
We have received a Paragraph IV Certification Letter dated August 30, 2010, advising us that Natco Pharma Limited of Hyderabad, India, or Natco, submitted an ANDA to the FDA. See Part I, Item 1, Note 20 to Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
If we are not able to effectively compete our business will be adversely affected.
The pharmaceutical and biotech industry in which we operate is highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our present and potential competitors include major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as specialty pharmaceutical firms, including, but not limited to:
•Takeda and Johnson & Johnson, which compete with REVLIMID® and THALOMID® in the treatment of multiple myeloma and in clinical trials with our compounds;
•Eisai Co., Ltd., SuperGen, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, which compete or may potentially compete with VIDAZA®, in addition Eisai Co., Ltd. potentially competes with ABRAXANE®, and in other oncology products in general;
•Amgen, which potentially competes with our TNF-a and kinase inhibitors;
•AstraZeneca PLC, which potentially competes in clinical trials with our compounds and TNF-a inhibitors;
•Biogen Idec Inc. is generally developing drugs that address the oncology and immunology markets;
•Bristol Myers Squibb Co., which potentially competes with ABRAXANE®, and in clinical trials with our compounds and TNF-a inhibitors, in addition to other oncology products in general;
•F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., which potentially competes in clinical trials with our ®TNF-a inhibitors, in addition to other oncology products in general;
•Johnson & Johnson, which potentially competes with certain of our proprietary programs, including our oral anti-inflammatory programs;
•Abbott Laboratories, which potentially competes with our oral anti-inflammatory programs;
•Novartis, which potentially competes with our compounds and kinase programs;
•Pfizer, which potentially competes in clinical trials with our kinase inhibitors; and
•Sanofi, which competes with ABRAXANE®, in addition to other oncology products in general.
Many of these companies have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. This enables them, among other things, to make greater research and development investments and spread their research and development costs, as well as their marketing and promotion costs, over a broader revenue base. Our competitors may also have more experience and expertise in obtaining marketing approvals from the FDA, and other regulatory authorities. We also experience competition from universities and other research institutions, and in some instances, we compete with others in acquiring technology from these sources. The pharmaceutical industry has undergone, and is expected to continue to undergo, rapid and significant technological change, and we expect competition to intensify as technical advances in the field are made and become more widely known. The development of products, including generics, or processes by our competitors with significant advantages over those that we are seeking to develop could cause the marketability of our products to stagnate or decline.
A decline of global economic conditions could adversely affect our results of operations.
Sales of our products are dependent, in large part, on reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers, distribution partners and other organizations. As a result of global credit and financial market conditions, these organizations may be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations or may delay payment. In addition, U.S. federal and state health authorities may reduce Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, and private insurers may increase their scrutiny of claims. A reduction in the availability or extent of reimbursement could negatively affect our product sales, revenue and cash flows.
See our discussion of accounts receivable from Italy, Spain and Portugal in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the caption "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for details related to amounts receivable from the from government owned or controlled hospitals in Italy, Spain and Portugal.
Due to tightened global credit, there may be a disruption or delay in the performance of our third-party contractors, suppliers or collaborators. We rely on third parties for several important aspects of our business, including portions of our product manufacturing, royalty revenue, clinical development of future collaboration products, conduct of clinical trials and raw materials. If such third parties are unable to satisfy their commitments to us, our business could be adversely affected.
We may be required to modify our business practices, pay fines and significant expenses or experience losses due to litigation or governmental investigations.
From time to time, we may be subject to litigation or governmental investigation on a variety of matters, including, without limitation, regulatory, intellectual property, product liability, antitrust, consumer, whistleblower, commercial, securities and employment litigation and claims and other legal proceedings that may arise from the conduct of our business as currently conducted or as conducted in the future.
In particular, we are subject to significant product liability risks as a result of the testing of our products in human clinical trials and for products that we sell after regulatory approval.
Pharmaceutical companies involved in Hatch-Waxman litigation are often subject to follow-on lawsuits and governmental investigations, which may be costly and could result in lower-priced generic products that are competitive with our products being introduced to the market.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC. The FTC requested documents and other information relating to requests by generic companies to purchase our patented REVLIMID® and THALOMID® brand drugs in order to evaluate whether there is reason to believe that we have engaged in unfair methods of competition. In the first quarter of 2010, the State of Connecticut referenced the same issues as those referenced in the 2009 CID and issued a subpoena. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we received a second CID from the FTC relating to this matter. We continue to respond to requests for information.
In the first quarter of 2011, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California informed us that we were under investigation relating to our promotion of the drugs THALOMID® and REVLIMID® regarding alleged off-label marketing and improper payments to physicians. We are cooperating with the United States Attorney in connection with this investigation.
On January 20, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the jurisdiction of the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, or the PMPRB, extends to sales of drugs to Canadian patients even if the locus of sale is within the United States. This means that our U.S. sales of THALOMID® brand drug to Canadian patients under the special access program are subject to PMPRB jurisdiction from and after January 12, 1995. In accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada, we have provided to-date data regarding these special access program sales to the PMPRB. In light of the approval of THALOMID® brand drug by Health Canada on August 4, 2010, this drug is now sold through our Canadian entity and is no longer sold to Canadian patients from the United States. On January 20, 2012, we received confirmation that PMPRB accepted a Voluntary Compliance Undertaking for THALOMID® brand drug, which required us to make a payment of CAD $10 million to the Government of Canada in February 2012.
Litigation and governmental investigations are inherently unpredictable and may:
•result in rulings that are materially unfavorable to us, including claims for significant damages, fines or penalties, and administrative remedies, such as exclusion and/or debarment from government programs, or other rulings that prevent us from operating our business in a certain manner;
•cause us to change our business operations to avoid perceived risks associated with such litigation or investigations;
•have an adverse affect on our reputation and the demand for our products; and
•require the expenditure of significant time and resources, which may divert the attention of our management and interfere with the pursuit of our strategic objectives.
While we maintain insurance for certain risks, the amount of our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover the total amount of all insured claims and liabilities. It also is not possible to obtain insurance to protect against all potential risks and liabilities. If any litigation or governmental investigation were to have a material adverse result, there could be a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See also "Legal Proceedings" contained in Part I, Item 3 of this report.
The development of new biopharmaceutical products involves a lengthy and complex process, and we may be unable to commercialize any of the products we are currently developing.
Many of our drug candidates are in the early or mid-stages of research and development and will require the commitment of substantial financial resources, extensive research, development, preclinical testing, clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up and regulatory approval prior to being ready for sale. This process involves a high degree of risk and takes many years. Our product development efforts with respect to a product candidate may fail for many reasons, including the failure of the product candidate in preclinical studies; adverse patient reactions to the product candidate or indications or other safety concerns; insufficient clinical trial data to support the effectiveness or superiority of the product candidate; our inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product candidate for development or commercialization activities in a timely and cost-efficient manner; our failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, the required regulatory approvals for the product candidate, the facilities or the process used to manufacture the product candidate; or changes in the regulatory environment, including pricing and reimbursement, that make development of a new product or of an existing product for a new indication no longer desirable. Moreover, our commercially available products may require additional studies with respect to approved indications as well as new indications pending approval.
The stem cell products that we are developing through our CCT subsidiary may represent substantial departures from established treatment methods and will compete with a number of traditional products and therapies which are now, or may be in the future, manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies. Furthermore, public attitudes may be influenced by claims that stem cell therapy is unsafe, and stem cell therapy may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community.
Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in conducting clinical studies, we can give no assurances that our studies will have a positive result or that we will receive regulatory approvals for our new products or new indications.
Manufacturing and distribution risks including a disruption at certain of our manufacturing and distribution sites would significantly interrupt our production capabilities, which could result in significant product delays and adversely affect our results.
We have our own manufacturing facilities for many of our products and we have contracted with third-party manufacturers and distributors to provide API, encapsulation, finishing services packaging and distribution services to meet our needs. These risks include the possibility that our or our suppliers' manufacturing processes and distribution channels could be partially or completely disrupted by a fire, natural disaster, terrorist attack, governmental action or military action. In the case of a disruption, we may need to establish alternative manufacturing sources
for these products. This would likely lead to substantial production delays as we build or locate replacement facilities and seek and obtain the necessary regulatory approvals. If this occurs, and our finished goods inventories are insufficient to meet demand, we may be unable to satisfy customer orders on a timely basis, if at all. Further, our business interruption insurance may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur and we would have to bear the additional cost of any disruption. For these reasons, a significant disruptive event at certain of our manufacturing facilities or sites could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, if we fail to predict market demand for our products, we may be unable to sufficiently increase production capacity to satisfy demand or may incur costs associated with excess inventory that we manufacture.
In all the countries where we sell our products, governmental regulations exist to define standards for manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution and storing. All of our suppliers of raw materials, contract manufacturers and distributors must comply with these regulations as applicable. In the United States, the FDA requires that all suppliers of pharmaceutical bulk material and all manufacturers of pharmaceuticals for sale in or from the United States achieve and maintain compliance with the FDA's current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations and guidelines. Our failure to comply, or failure of our third-party manufacturers to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on them or us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, disgorgement, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our products. In addition, before any product batch produced by our manufacturers can be shipped, it must conform to release specifications pre-approved by regulators for the content of the pharmaceutical product. If the operations of one or more of our manufacturers were to become unavailable for any reason, any required FDA review and approval of the operations of an alternative supplier could cause a delay in the manufacture of our products.
If our outside manufacturers do not meet our requirements for quality, quantity or timeliness, or do not achieve and maintain compliance with all applicable regulations, our ability to continue supplying such products at a level that meets demand could be adversely affected.
We have contracted with distributors, to distribute REVLIMID®, THALOMID®, VIDAZA®, ABRAXANE® and ISTODAX®. If our distributors fail to perform and we cannot secure a replacement distributor within a reasonable period of time, we may experience adverse effects to our business and results of operations.
We are continuing to establish marketing and distribution capabilities in international markets with respect to our products. At the same time, we are in the process of obtaining necessary governmental and regulatory approvals to sell our products in certain countries. If we have not successfully completed and implemented adequate marketing and distribution support services upon our receipt of such approvals, our ability to effectively launch our products in these countries would be severely restricted.
The consolidation of drug wholesalers and other wholesaler actions could increase competitive and pricing pressures on pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us.
We sell our pharmaceutical products in the United States primarily through wholesale distributors and contracted pharmacies. These wholesale customers comprise a significant part of the distribution network for pharmaceutical products in the United States. This distribution network is continuing to undergo significant consolidation. As a result, a smaller number of large wholesale distributors and pharmacy chains control a significant share of the market. We expect that consolidation of drug wholesalers and pharmacy chains will increase competitive and pricing pressures on pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us. In addition, wholesalers may apply pricing pressure through fee-for-service arrangements, and their purchases may exceed customer demand, resulting in reduced wholesaler purchases in later quarters. We cannot assure you that we can manage these pressures or that wholesaler purchases will not decrease as a result of this potential excess buying.
Risks from the improper conduct of employees, agents or contractors or collaborators could adversely affect our business or reputation.
We cannot ensure that our compliance controls, policies and procedures will in every instance protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators that would violate the laws or regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including without limitation, employment, foreign corrupt practices, environmental, competition and privacy laws. Such improper actions could subject us to civil or criminal investigations, monetary and injunctive penalties and could adversely impact our ability to conduct business, results of operations and reputation.
The integration of acquired businesses may present significant challenges to us.
We may face significant challenges in effectively integrating entities and businesses that we may acquire and we may not realize the benefits anticipated from such acquisitions. Achieving the anticipated benefits of our acquired businesses will depend in part upon whether we can integrate our businesses in an efficient and effective manner. Our integration of acquired businesses involves a number of risks, including, but not limited to:
•demands on management related to the increase in our size after the acquisition;
•the diversion of management's attention from the management of daily operations to the integration of operations;
•higher integration costs than anticipated;
•failure to achieve expected synergies and costs savings;
•difficulties in the assimilation and retention of employees;
•difficulties in the assimilation of different cultures and practices, as well as in the assimilation of broad and geographically dispersed personnel and operations; and
•difficulties in the integration of departments, systems, including accounting systems, technologies, books and records, and procedures, as well as in maintaining uniform standards, controls, including internal control over financial reporting required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related procedures and policies.
If we cannot successfully integrate acquired businesses we may experience material negative consequences to our business, financial condition or results of operations. Successful integration of acquired businesses will depend on our ability to manage these operations, to realize opportunities for revenue growth presented by offerings and expanded geographic market coverage and, to some degree, to eliminate redundant and excess costs. Because of difficulties in combining geographically distant operations, we may not be able to achieve the benefits that we hope to achieve as a result of the acquisition of acquired businesses.
Our inability to continue to attract and retain key leadership, managerial, commercial and scientific talent could adversely affect our business.
The success of our business depends, in large part, on our continued ability to (i) attract and retain highly qualified management, scientific, manufacturing and commercial personnel, (ii) successfully integrate large numbers of new employees into our corporate culture and (iii) develop and maintain important relationships with leading research and medical institutions and key distributors. Competition for these types of personnel and relationships is intense.
Among other benefits, we use share-based compensation to attract and retain personnel. Share-based compensation accounting rules require us to recognize all share-based compensation costs as expenses. These or other factors could reduce the number of shares and options management and our board of directors grants under our incentive plan. We cannot be sure that we will be able to attract or retain skilled personnel or maintain key relationships, or that the costs of retaining such personnel or maintaining such relationships will not materially increase.
We could be subject to significant liability as a result of risks associated with using hazardous materials in our business.
We use certain hazardous materials in our research, development, manufacturing and general business activities. While we believe we are currently in substantial compliance with the federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use of these materials, we cannot be certain that accidental injury or contamination will not occur. If an accident or environmental discharge occurs, or if we discover contamination caused by prior operations, including by prior owners and operators of properties we acquire, we could be liable for cleanup obligations, damages and fines. This could result in substantial liabilities that could exceed our insurance coverage and financial resources. Additionally, the cost of compliance with environmental and safety laws and regulations may increase in the future, requiring us to expend more financial resources either in compliance or in purchasing supplemental insurance coverage.
Changes in our effective income tax rate could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions, and our domestic and international tax liabilities are dependent upon the distribution of income among these different jurisdictions. Various factors may have favorable or unfavorable effects on
our effective income tax rate. These factors include, but are not limited to, interpretations of existing tax laws, the accounting for stock options and other share-based compensation, changes in tax laws and rates, future levels of research and development spending, changes in accounting standards, changes in the mix of earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate, the outcome of examinations by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other jurisdictions, the accuracy of our estimates for unrecognized tax benefits and realization of deferred tax assets, and changes in overall levels of pre-tax earnings. The impact on our income tax provision resulting from the above-mentioned factors may be significant and could have an impact on our results of operations.
Currency fluctuations and changes in exchange rates could increase our costs and may cause our profitability to decline.
We collect and pay a substantial portion of our sales and expenditures in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Therefore, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect our operating results.
We utilize foreign currency forward contracts, which are derivative instruments, to manage foreign currency risk, but not to engage in currency speculation. We use these forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted transactions and balance sheet exposures denominated in foreign currencies. The use of these derivative instruments is intended to mitigate the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce our risk or cost, but may not fully offset any change in operating results as a consequence of fluctuations in foreign currencies. Any significant foreign exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We may experience an adverse market reaction if we are unable to meet our financial reporting obligations.
As we continue to expand at a rapid pace, the development of new and/or improved automated systems will remain an ongoing priority. During this expansion period, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements in our financial reporting. Such misstatements may result in litigation and/or negative publicity and possibly cause an adverse market reaction that may negatively impact our growth plans and the value of our common stock.
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and you may lose some or all of your investment in us.
The market for our shares of common stock may be subject to conditions that cause prices to fluctuate significantly. The following key factors may have an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock:
•results of our clinical trials or adverse events associated with our marketed products;
•fluctuations in our commercial and operating results;
•announcements of technical or product developments by us or our competitors;
•market conditions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks in particular;
•stock market conditions generally;
•changes in governmental regulations and laws, including, without limitation, changes in tax laws, health care legislation, environmental laws, competition laws, and patent laws;
•new accounting pronouncements or regulatory rulings;
•public announcements regarding medical advances in the treatment of the disease states that we are targeting;
•patent or proprietary rights developments;
•changes in pricing and third-party reimbursement policies for our products;
•the outcome of litigation involving our products or processes related to production and formulation of those products or uses of those products;
•other litigation or governmental investigations;
•competition; and
•investor reaction to announcements regarding business or product acquisitions.
In addition, our operations may be materially affected by conditions in the global markets and economic conditions throughout the world. The global market and economic climate may deteriorate because of many factors beyond our control, including economic instability and market volatility, sovereign debt issues, rising interest rates or inflation, terrorism or political uncertainty. In the event of a market downturn in general and/or the biopharmaceutical sector in particular, the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to service our obligations under our incurred indebtedness.
During 2010 and 2011 we have incurred various forms of indebtedness including senior notes, commercial paper, a senior unsecured credit facility and a credit facility. Our ability to pay interest, principal amounts when due at maturity, to comply with debt covenants or to repurchase the senior notes if a change of control occurs will depend upon, among other things, continued commercial success of our products and other factors that affect our future financial and operating performance, including, without limitation, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, and regulatory factors, many of which are beyond our control.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service the debt service requirements under our incurred indebtedness, we may be forced to take actions such as:
•restructuring or refinancing our debt;
•seeking additional debt or equity capital;
•reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, including research and development expenditures; or
•selling assets, businesses, products or other potential revenue streams.
Such measures might not be successful and might not enable us to service our obligations under our indebtedness. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms.
A breakdown or breach of our information technology systems could subject us to liability or interrupt the operation of our business.
We rely upon our information technology systems and infrastructure for our business. The size and complexity of our computer systems make them potentially vulnerable to breakdown, malicious intrusion and random attack. Likewise, data privacy breaches by employees and others who access our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. While we believe that we have taken appropriate security measures to protect our data and information technology systems, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent breakdowns or breaches in our systems that could adversely affect our business.
We have certain charter and by-law provisions that may deter a third-party from acquiring us and may impede the stockholders' ability to remove and replace our management or board of directors.
Our board of directors has the authority to issue, at any time, without further stockholder approval, up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, and to determine the price, rights, privileges and preferences of those shares. An issuance of preferred stock could discourage a third-party from acquiring a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Additionally, our board of directors has adopted certain amendments to our by-laws intended to strengthen the board's position in the event of a hostile takeover attempt. These provisions could impede the stockholders' ability to remove and replace our management and/or board of directors. Furthermore, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an anti-takeover law, which may also dissuade a potential acquirer of our common stock.
In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, CVR holders are subject to additional risks.
On October 15, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Abraxis and in connection with our acquisition, contingent value rights, or CVRs, were issued under a CVR Agreement entered into between us and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as trustee. A copy of the CVR Agreement was filed on Form 8-A with the SEC on October 15, 2010. Pursuant to the CVR Agreement, each holder of a CVR is entitled to receive a pro rata portion, based on the number of CVRs then outstanding, of certain milestone and net sales payments if certain specified conditions are satisfied. For more information, see Note 2 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, CVR holders are subject to additional risks, including:
•an active public market for the CVRs may not develop or the CVRs may trade at low volumes, both of which could have an adverse effect on the resale price, if any, of the CVRs;
•because a public market for the CVRs has a limited history, the market price and trading volume of the CVRs may be volatile;
•if the clinical approval milestones specified in the CVR Agreement are not achieved for any reason within the time periods specified therein, and if net sales do not exceed the thresholds set forth in the CVR Agreement for any reason within the time periods specified therein, no payment will be made under the CVRs and the CVRs will expire valueless;
•since the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the CVRs is unclear, any part of any CVR payment could be treated as ordinary income and required to be included in income prior to the receipt of the CVR payment;
•any payments in respect of the CVRs are subordinated to the right of payment of certain of our other indebtedness;
•we may under certain circumstances redeem the CVRs; and
•upon expiration of our obligations to achieve each of the CVR milestones and to commercialize ABRAXANE® or any of the other Abraxis pipeline products, we may discontinue such efforts, which would have an adverse effect on the value, if any, of the CVRs.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our Current Reports on Form 8-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Reports on Form 10-K are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC, and all such reports and amendments to such reports filed have been and will be made available, free of charge, through our website (http://www.celgene.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after such filing. Such reports will remain available on our website for at least 12 months. The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549.
The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters are located in Summit, New Jersey and our international headquarters are located in Boudry, Switzerland. Summarized below are the locations, primary usage and approximate square footage of the facilities we own worldwide:
We occupy the following facilities, located in the United States, under operating lease arrangements that have remaining lease terms greater than one year, none of which are individually material to us. Under these lease arrangements, we also are required to reimburse the lessors for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs. All leases are with unaffiliated parties.
We also lease a number of offices under various lease agreements outside of the United States for which the minimum annual rents may be subject to specified annual rent increases. At December 31, 2011, the non-cancelable lease terms for our operating leases expire at various dates between 2011 and 2023 and in some cases include renewal options. The total amount of rent expense recorded for all leased facilities in 2011 was $41.1 million.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We and certain of our subsidiaries are involved in various patent, trademark, commercial and other claims; government investigations; and other legal proceedings that arise from time to time
in the ordinary course of business. These legal proceedings and other matters are complex in nature and have outcomes that are difficult to predict and could have a material adverse effect on us.
Patent proceedings include challenges to scope, validity or enforceability of our patents relating to our various products or processes. Although we believe we have substantial defenses to these challenges with respect to all its material patents, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these matters, and a loss in any of these cases could result in a loss of patent protection for the drug at issue, which could lead to a significant loss of sales of that drug and could materially affect future results of operations.
Among the principal matters pending to which we are a party of are the following:
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we received a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC. The FTC requested documents and other information relating to requests by generic companies to purchase our patented REVLIMID® and THALOMID® brand drugs in order to evaluate whether there is reason to believe that we have engaged in unfair methods of competition. In the first quarter of 2010, the State of Connecticut referenced the same issues as those referenced in the 2009 CID and issued a subpoena. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we received a second CID from the FTC relating to this matter. We continue to respond to requests for information.
In the first quarter of 2011, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California informed us that we were under investigation relating to our promotion of the drugs THALOMID® and REVLIMID® regarding alleged off-label marketing and improper payments to physicians. We are cooperating with the United States Attorney in connection with this investigation.
REVLIMID®: We have publicly announced that we have received a notice letter dated August 30, 2010, sent from Natco Pharma Limited of India ("Natco") notifying us of Natco's ANDA, which contains Paragraph IV certifications alleging that certain claims of certain patents listed for REVLIMID® in the FDA's Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the "Orange Book") are invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed (the "Notice Letter"). The Notice Letter was sent pursuant to Natco having filed an ANDA seeking permission from the FDA to market a generic version of 25mg, 15mg, 10mg and 5mg capsules of REVLIMID®. Under the federal Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, any generic manufacturer may file an ANDA containing a certification (a "Paragraph IV certification") challenging the validity or infringement of a patent listed in the Orange Book. On October 8, 2010, we filed an infringement action in the United States District Court of New Jersey against Natco in response to the Notice Letter with respect to United States Patent Nos. 5,635,517 (the "'517 patent"), 6,045,501 (the "'501 patent"), 6,281,230 (the "'230 patent"), 6,315,720 (the "'720 patent"), 6,555,554 (the "'554 patent"), 6,561,976 (the "'976 patent"), 6,561,977 (the "'977 patent"), 6,755,784 (the "'784 patent"), 7,119,106 (the "'106 patent"), and 7,465,800 (the "'800 patent"). If Natco is successful in challenging our patents listed in the Orange Book, and the FDA were to approve the ANDA with a comprehensive education and risk management program for a generic version of lenalidomide, sales of REVLIMID® could be significantly reduced in the United States by the entrance of a generic lenalidomide product, potentially reducing our revenue.
Natco responded to our infringement action on November 18, 2010, with its Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. Natco has alleged (through Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims) that the patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed by Natco's proposed generic products. After filing the infringement action, we learned the identity of Natco's U.S. partner, Arrow International Limited, or Arrow, and filed an amended complaint on January 7, 2011, adding Arrow as a defendant. On January 14, 2011, an amended complaint was filed identifying additional defendants including Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Arrow's parent), Watson Pharma, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Anda, Inc. (another wholly owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). On March 25, 2011, we filed a second amended complaint naming only Natco, Arrow, and Watson Laboratories, Inc. (another wholly owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) as Defendants. Those three entities remain the current Defendants in this action.
We believe that Natco's counterclaims are likely to be unsustainable and we intend to vigorously defend our patent rights. We believe it unlikely that Natco will prevail on each and every patent and patent claim subject to the lawsuit and that all of the patent claims would be deemed to be invalid, unenforceable and/or non-infringed. In addition, the FDA will need to approve an appropriate, non-infringing, comprehensive education and risk management program for a generic version of lenalidomide. Accordingly, we believe that the ultimate outcome is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
ABRAXANE®: On December 14, 2011, Cephalon, Inc. and Acusphere, Inc. filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleging, among other things, that the making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing of ABRAXANE® brand drug infringes claims of United States Patent No. RE40.493. Plaintiffs are seeking damages and injunctive relief. We intend to vigorously defend against this infringement suit. If the suit against us is successful, we may have to pay damages, ongoing royalties and may have to license rights from plaintiffs. However, we believe (a) that it is unlikely that the plaintiffs in this matter will prevail and (b) that the ultimate outcome will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. An answer by us was filed on February 20, 2012.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a) MARKET INFORMATION
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "CELG." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the intra-day high and low prices per share of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market:
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Returns*
*$100 Invested on 12/31/06 in Stock or Index - Including Reinvestment of Dividends, Fiscal Year Ended December 31.
(b) HOLDERS
The closing sales price per share of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on February 16, 2012 was $75.50. As of February 16, 2012, there were approximately 536 holders of record of our common stock.
(c) DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
(d) EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
We incorporate information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plan into this section by reference from the section entitled "Equity Compensation Plan Information" to be included in the proxy statement for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
(e) REPURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The following table presents the total number of shares purchased during the three-month period ended December 31, 2011, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could have been purchased, pursuant to our publicly announced repurchase program:
In April 2009, our Board of Directors approved a $0.5 billion common share repurchase program, which was subsequently increased by $3.5 billion to an aggregate of up to $4.0 billion of our common shares that may be repurchased under this program. Approved amounts exclude share repurchase transaction fees.
As of December 31, 2011, an aggregate 45,829,385 common shares were repurchased under the program at an average price of $57.01 per common share and cost of $2.613 billion, excluding share repurchase transaction fees.
During the period covered by this report, we did not sell any of our equity shares that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following Selected Consolidated Financial Data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The data set forth below with respect to our Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are qualified by reference to such Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto. The data set forth below with respect to our Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements, which are not included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (amounts in thousands, except per share data).
Item 7.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Summary
Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively "we," "our," "us" or the "Company") is a global biopharmaceutical company primarily engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies designed to treat cancer and immune-inflammatory related diseases. We are dedicated to innovative research and development which is designed to bring new therapies to market, and we are involved in research in several scientific areas that may deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas such as intracellular signaling pathways in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmune diseases, and therapeutic application of cell therapies.
Our primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, THALOMID®, ABRAXANE® and ISTODAX®.
•REVLIMID® is an oral immunomodulatory drug marketed in the United States and many international markets, in combination with dexamethasone, for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. It is also marketed in the United States and certain international markets for the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, or MDS, associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities.
•VIDAZA® is a pyrimidine nucleoside analog that has been shown to reverse the effects of DNA hypermethylation and promote subsequent gene re-expression. VIDAZA® is a Category 1 recommended treatment for patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and is marketed in the United States for the treatment of all subtypes of MDS. The U.S. regulatory exclusivity for VIDAZA® expired in May 2011. If a generic version of VIDAZA® is successfully launched, we may quickly lose a significant portion of our sales for this product in the United States. In Europe, VIDAZA® is marketed for the treatment of intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS as well as acute myeloid leukemia, or AML, with 30% blasts and has been granted orphan drug designation for the treatment of MDS and AML.
•THALOMID® is marketed for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and for the acute treatment of the cutaneous manifestations of moderate to severe erythema nodosum leprosum, or ENL, an inflammatory complication of leprosy and as maintenance therapy for prevention and suppression of the cutaneous manifestation of ENL recurrence.
•ABRAXANE®, which was obtained in the 2010 acquisition of Abraxis, is a solvent-free chemotherapy treatment option for metastatic breast cancer which was developed using our proprietary nab® technology platform. This protein-bound chemotherapy agent combines paclitaxel with albumin. It is approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in the United States and specific international markets. ABRAXANE® is currently
in various stages of investigation for the treatment of the following cancers: expanded applications for metastatic breast, non-small cell lung, malignant melanoma, pancreatic bladder and ovarian.
•ISTODAX®, which was obtained in the 2010 acquisition of Gloucester, is approved in the United States for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or CTCL, in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Additionally, in June 2011, ISTODAX® received approval for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL, in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. ISTODAX® has received orphan drug designation for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's T-cell lymphomas, which includes CTCL and PTCL. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, or EMA, has granted orphan drug designation for ISTODAX® for the treatment of both CTCL and PTCL.
Additional sources of revenue include a licensing agreement with Novartis, which entitles us to royalties on FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of services through our Cellular Therapeutics subsidiary and other miscellaneous licensing agreements.
We continue to invest substantially in research and development, and the drug candidates in our pipeline are at various stages of preclinical and clinical development. These candidates include pomalidomide and apremilast, our leading oral anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory agents, PDA-001, our leading cellular therapy, oral azacitidine, CC-223 and CC-115 for hematological and solid tumor malignancies, CC-122, our anti-cancer pleiotropic pathway modifier, and ACE-011 and ACE-536 biological products for anemia in several clinical settings of unmet need. We believe that continued acceptance of our primary commercial stage products, participation in research and development collaboration arrangements, depth of our product pipeline, regulatory approvals of new products and expanded use of existing products will provide the catalysts for future growth.
The following table summarizes total revenue and earnings for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data):
Total revenue increased by $1.216 billion in 2011 to $4.842 billion compared to 2010 primarily due to the continued growth of REVLIMID® and VIDAZA® in both U.S. and international markets, in addition to the inclusion of a full year's sales of ABRAXANE® in 2011. Net income and diluted earnings per share for 2011 reflect the higher level of revenue, partly offset by additional costs incurred resulting from the acquisition of Abraxis, in addition to increased research and development activities, new product launch costs and expansion of our international
operations. Diluted earnings per share for 2011 also benefitted from a reduced weighted average diluted share count as a result of our share repurchase activities during 2011.
Results of Operations:
Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Total Revenue: Total revenue and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data):
Total revenue increased by $1.216 billion, or 33.5%, to $4.842 billion in 2011 compared to 2010, reflecting increases of $672.4 million, or 30.7%, in the United States, and $544.0 million, or 37.8% in international markets. The $935.9 million, or 34.8%, increase in 2010 compared to 2009 included increases of $456.4 million, or 26.3%, in the United States and $479.5 million, or 50.1%, in international markets.
Net Product Sales:
Total net product sales for 2011 increased by $1.191 billion, or 34.0%, to $4.700 billion compared to 2010. The increase was comprised of net volume increases of $1.157 billion, price decreases of $4.9 million and a favorable impact from foreign exchange of $38.7 million. The decrease in prices was primarily due to increased Medicare Part D Coverage Gap rebates resulting from the Health Care Reform Act and an increase in rebates to U.S. and international governments resulting from their attempts to reduce health care costs, partly offset by product price increases.
Total net product sales for 2010 increased by $941.1 million, or 36.7%, to $3.508 billion compared to 2009. The increase was comprised of net volume increases of $892.5 million, price decreases of $2.1 million and the favorable impact from foreign exchange of $50.7 million. The decrease in prices was primarily due to increased Medicaid rebates resulting from the Health Care Reform
Act and an increase in rebates to U.S. and international governments resulting from their attempts to reduce health care costs.
REVLIMID® net sales increased by $739.0 million, or 29.9%, to $3.208 billion in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to increased unit sales in both U.S. and international markets. Increased treatment duration of patients using REVLIMID® in multiple myeloma and an increase in market penetration contributed to U.S. growth. The growth in international markets reflects the expansion of our commercial activities in addition to product reimbursement approvals and the launch of REVLIMID® in Japan in the latter part of 2010.
Net sales of REVLIMID® increased by $762.7 million, or 44.7%, to $2.469 billion in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to increased unit sales in both U.S. and international markets. Increased market penetration and the increase in treatment duration of patients using REVLIMID® in multiple myeloma contributed to U.S. growth. The growth in international markets reflects the expansion of our commercial activities in over 65 countries in addition to product reimbursement approvals and the launch of REVLIMID® in Japan in the latter part of 2010.
VIDAZA® net sales increased by $171.0 million, or 32.0%, to $705.3 million in 2011 compared to 2010, with sales increases in both the U.S. and international markets. The growth in international markets was primarily due to the increase in treatment duration of patients using VIDAZA® and product launches in multiple markets, including the United Kingdom and Japan.
Net sales of VIDAZA® increased by $147.1 million, or 38.0%, to $534.3 million in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to increased sales in international markets resulting from the completion of product launches in key European regions during the latter part of 2009 and the increase in treatment duration of patients using VIDAZA®.
THALOMID® net sales decreased by $50.5 million, or 13.0%, to $339.1 million in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to lower unit volumes in the United States.
Net sales of THALOMID® decreased by $47.3 million, or 10.8%, to $389.6 million in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to lower unit volumes in the United States resulting from the increased use of REVLIMID®.
Net sales of ABRAXANE® increased by $314.5 million to $385.9 million in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the inclusion of a full year of sales in 2011 compared to the 2.5 month period in 2010 after the acquisition of Abraxis.
ISTODAX® was obtained in the acquisition of Gloucester in January 2010 and was approved by the FDA for the treatment of CTCL in November 2009 and PTCL in June 2011 in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. ISTODAX® was launched for the treatment of CTCL in March of 2010. ISTODAX® net sales increased by $15.1 million, or 95.9%, to $30.9 million in 2011 compared to 2010.
"Other" net product sales in 2011 primarily included $21.3 million in sales of non-core products obtained from the acquisition of Abraxis, which were exited in April 2011, $5.4 million in sales of non-core Pharmion products to be exited and $1.3 million in sales of FOCALIN®.
"Other" net product sales in 2010 primarily included $15.9 million in sales of non-core products obtained from the acquisition of Abraxis, $8.2 million in sales of Pharmion products to be exited and $3.2 million in sales of FOCALIN®.
Collaborative Agreements and Other Revenue: Revenue from collaborative agreements and other sources increased by $9.0 million to $19.5 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was primarily due to receipt of a $6.3 million milestone payment in February 2011 related to the approval of VIDAZA® in Japan and an increase in certain manufacturing and management fees in 2011.
Revenue from collaborative agreements and from other sources decreased by $3.2 million to $10.5 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease was primarily due to receipt of a $5.0 million milestone payment in 2009 which was not duplicated in 2010, partly offset by an increase in licensing fees and the inclusion of Abraxis other revenues subsequent to the October 2010 acquisition date.
Royalty Revenue: Royalty revenue increased by $16.1 million to $122.9 million in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to an increase in royalties earned from Novartis on its sales of FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, which was partly offset by a decrease in residual payments earned by us from GlaxoSmithKline plc, or GSK's, ALKERAN® revenues.
Royalty revenue decreased by $2.0 million to $106.8 million in 2010 compared to 2009. A $5.9 million decrease in residual payments earned by us based upon GSK's ALKERAN® revenues was partly offset by a net $3.9 million increase in royalties earned from Novartis based upon its FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN® sales.
Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We record gross to net sales accruals for sales returns and allowances, sales discounts, government rebates, and chargebacks and distributor service fees.
REVLIMID® is distributed in the United States through contracted pharmacies under the RevAssist® program, which is a proprietary risk-management distribution program tailored specifically to help ensure the safe and appropriate distribution and use of REVLIMID®. Internationally, REVLIMID® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local competent authorities' specifications to help ensure the product's safe and appropriate distribution and use. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. THALOMID® is distributed in the United States under our proprietary "System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety," or S.T.E.P.S.®, program, which is a comprehensive education and risk-management distribution program with the objective of providing for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID®. Internationally, THALOMID® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local competent authorities' specifications to help ensure the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID®. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. VIDAZA®, ISTODAX® and ABRAXANE® are distributed through the more traditional pharmaceutical industry supply chain and are not subject to the same risk-management distribution programs as THALOMID® and REVLIMID®.
We base our sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains, as applicable. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates do not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, we track actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in determining the current sales return allowance. As noted above, REVLIMID® is distributed primarily through hospitals and contracted pharmacies, lending itself to tighter controls of inventory quantities within the supply channel and, thus, resulting in lower returns activity. THALOMID® is drop-shipped directly to the prescribing pharmacy and, as a result, wholesalers do not stock the product.
Sales discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers.
Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Medicaid rebate percentage was increased and extended to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations in March 2010. The accrual of rebates associated with Medicaid Managed Care Organizations is calculated based on estimated historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. Net revenues for the period ended December 31, 2011 were negatively impacted by a component of the Health Care Reform Act, which became effective in January 2011 and required manufacturers of pharmaceutical products to be responsible for 50% of the patient's cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate the cost to us of this coverage gap responsibility, we analyze data for eligible Medicare Part D patients against data for eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with our products as well as actual invoice data throughout 2011. This expense is recognized throughout the year as incurred. In addition, certain international markets have government-sponsored programs that require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales. The Health Care Reform Act mandated an annual fee in 2011 payable by branded prescription drug manufacturers and importers on branded prescription drugs. The fee, which was not material, is included in selling, general and administrative on the 2011 Consolidated Statements of Income.
Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. We provide a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler
inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. We regularly review the information related to these estimates and adjust the provision accordingly.
Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.
See Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies below for further discussion of gross to net sales accruals.
Gross to net sales accruals and the balance in the related allowance accounts for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
A comparison of allowances for sales within each of the four categories noted above for 2011 and 2010 follows:
2011 compared to 2010: Returns and allowances increased by $10.3 million in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to approximately $7.7 million related to provisions for products with quality issues from contract manufacturers.
Discounts increased by $3.1 million in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to revenue increases in the United States and international markets, both of which offer discount programs, and expansion into new international markets.
Government rebates increased by $69.0 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $52.5 million in rebate rates in certain international markets and $23.9 million in increased costs associated with the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap, partly offset by a $5.4 million benefit related to a refinement of prior year estimates for Medicaid Managed Care Organizations.
Chargebacks and distributor service fees increased by $70.2 million in 2011 compared to 2010. Chargebacks increased by $33.3 million, including $23.2 million related to the inclusion of ABRAXANE® sales in 2011 and $8.8 million related to sales of VIDAZA®, which included $2.1 million related to disputed claims from 2010. Distributor service fees increased by $36.9 million, including $22.8 million in service fees primarily attributable to sales of ABRAXANE®, $7.8 million in rebates related to the launch of VIDAZA® in Japan and a $3.6 million increase in TRICARE rebates.
2010 compared to 2009: Returns and allowances decreased by $8.3 million in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to reduced U.S. provisions resulting from decreased revenue from products with higher return rates.
Discounts increased by $15.7 million in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to revenue increases in the United States and international markets, both of which offer different discount programs, and expansion into new international markets.
Government rebates increased by $69.7 million in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to an approximate $28.4 million increase in Medicaid rebates resulting from the Health Care Reform Act, $40.6 million from reimbursement rate increases in certain international markets and approvals in new markets and the inclusion of ABRAXANE® sales subsequent to the October 2010 acquisition of Abraxis.
Chargebacks and distributor service fees increased by $34.8 million in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to a $17.7 million increase in chargebacks resulting from both an increase in sales, including the addition of ABRAXANE®, and an increase in certain chargeback rates, which are closely aligned with Medicaid rebate rates. Other increases included $5.6 million from TRICARE due to increased utilization in the current year, distributor service fees of $6.5 million and $2.3 million resulting from the Health Care Reform Act.
Cost of Goods Sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets): Cost of goods sold and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased by $119.3 million to $425.9 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was primarily due to the inclusion in 2011 of a $90.3 million inventory step-up amortization adjustment related to sales of ABRAXANE® subsequent to the acquisition of Abraxis compared to a $34.7 million step-up amortization adjustment included in 2010. The remainder of the increase was primarily due to an increase in material costs resulting from a higher level of sales activity. As a percent of net product sales, cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased to 9.1% in 2011 compared to 8.7% in 2010 primarily due to the inventory step-up amortization adjustment for ABRAXANE®. Excluding the step-up amortization adjustments in both years, the cost of goods sold ratios were 7.1% and 7.7% in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased by $90.2 million to $306.5 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The increase was primarily due to the inclusion of a $34.7 million inventory step-up amortization adjustment related to sales of ABRAXANE® subsequent to the October 2010 acquisition of Abraxis, in addition to increased sales of REVLIMID® and VIDAZA®, partly offset by the elimination of higher cost ALKERAN® sales, resulting from the March 31, 2009 conclusion of the GSK license agreement. As a percent of net product sales, cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased to 8.7% in 2010 compared to 8.4% in 2009 primarily due to the inventory step-up amortization for ABRAXANE®.
Research and Development: Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and primarily include salary and benefit costs, third-party grants and fees paid to clinical research organizations, supplies and upfront and milestone payments resulting from collaboration arrangements.
Research and development expenses and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Research and development expenses increased by $471.8 million to $1.600 billion in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase in 2011 was partly due to an increase of $230.1 million related to the Abraxis business, including a $118.0 million impairment charge related to the in-process research and development, or IPR&D, acquired intangible asset. The impairment charge resulted from a change in the probability of obtaining progression-free survival labeling for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer for ABRAXANE® in the United States. The remainder of the increase was primarily due to an increase in research and development project spending in support of multiple programs across a broad range of diseases, with late stage clinical trials completing enrollment during 2011. Expenses for 2011 also included $128.5 million in upfront payments related to research and development collaboration arrangements, a $20.0 million payment to Agios for a one year extension of our collaboration agreement and $14.5 million in milestone payments.
Research and development expenses increased by $333.6 million to $1.128 billion in 2010 compared to 2009, partly due to an increase of $86.7 million in upfront payments related to research and development collaboration arrangements. A $121.2 million upfront payment was made to Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Agios, in 2010, compared to a combined $34.5 million in payments made to GlobeImmune, Inc., or GlobeImmune, and Array BioPharma, Inc., or Array, in 2009. In addition, 2010 included a $10.0 million milestone payment, $65.6 million in expenses related to Abraxis and Gloucester subsequent to their acquisition dates, an increase of approximately $55.0 million in salary and benefits related to an increase in employees, an increase of approximately $50.0 million in research and development project spending and increases in spending in support of multiple programs across a broad range of diseases.
The following table provides a breakdown of research and development expenses (in thousands):
(1)Other pharmaceutical programs include spending for toxicology, analytical research and development, quality and regulatory affairs.
Research and development expenditures support multiple ongoing clinical proprietary development programs for: REVLIMID® in multiple myeloma, or MM, mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, MDS, AML, chronic lymphomcytic leukemia; VIDAZA® for treatment of AML and MDS; ABRAXANE® in melanoma, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancers; ISTODAX® for treatment of CTCL and PTCL; apremilast (CC-10004), our lead anti-inflammatory compound that inhibits multiple proinflammatory mediators and which is currently being evaluated in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondilitis and in phase II for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; pomalidomide, which is currently being evaluated in phase II and III clinical trials in MM and myelofibrosis, Sotalercept, currently in phase II in renal anemia; CC-930, in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and discoid lupus erythematosus; CC-11050, which has a phase II clinical trial in progress in lupus; CC-223, 115 and 122 in solid tumors, non-hodgkins lymphoma, MM; as well as our cellular therapy programs in early development in rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, crohn's disease and sarcoidosis.
We do not collect costs on a project basis or for any category of projects for the majority of costs involved in carrying out research projects. While we do perform cost calculations to facilitate our internal evaluation of individual projects, these calculations include significant estimations and allocations that are not relevant to, or included in, our external financial reporting mechanisms. As a consequence, we do not report research and development costs at the project level.
The following table presents significant developments in our population of phase III clinical trials that occurred during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2011 and developments that are expected to occur if the future occurrence is material and reasonably certain:
New phase III trials
Phase III trial suspension or termination
Regulatory approval requests in major markets
Regulatory agency approvals or rejections
1 Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer
2 Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
3 Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
Selling, General and Administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include salary and benefit costs for employees included in our sales, marketing, finance, legal and administrative organizations, costs related to the launch of new products or those approved for new indications, outside legal and professional services, donations to non-profit foundations and facilities costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $275.7 million to $1.226 billion in 2011 compared to 2010, partly due to higher marketing and sales-related expenses resulting from ongoing product launch activities, including REVLIMID® in Japan, preparation for the filing and launch of REVLIMID® in China, ISTODAX® in PTCL in the United States and ABRAXANE® in the United States and Europe. In addition, 2011 included an increase of $72.1 million in expenses related to the Abraxis business, resulting from a full year's expense being included in 2011.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $196.8 million to $950.6 million in 2010 compared to 2009, partly due to the inclusion of $50.0 million in expenses related to Abraxis and Gloucester subsequent to their acquisition dates, a $19.1 million increase in facilities costs and an $11.7 million increase in donations to non-profit foundations. The remaining increase includes higher marketing and sales related expenses, resulting from ongoing product launch activities of VIDAZA® in Europe and ISTODAX® in the United States, in addition to the continued expansion of our international commercial activities.
Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets: Amortization of acquired intangible assets is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased by $86.0 million to $289.2 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase in amortization expense was primarily due to a full year's amortization of intangible assets obtained in the October 2010 acquisition of Abraxis being included in 2011. In addition, in June 2011, the FDA approved ISTODAX®, which was obtained in the January 2010 acquisition of Gloucester, for treatment of PTCL in patients who have
received at least one prior therapy. As a result of the FDA approval, amortization of the intangible asset commenced with an 8.8 year expected useful life, increasing amortization expense by $17.8 million.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased by $119.8 million to $203.2 million in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily due to $95.8 million of incremental expense associated with an acceleration of amortization beginning in 2010 related to the VIDAZA® intangible resulting from the acquisition of Pharmion. The revised monthly amortization reflects an updated sales forecast related to VIDAZA®. An increase in amortization expense due to the initiation of amortization related to the Abraxis and Gloucester acquired intangibles was partly offset by a reduction in expense associated with certain developed product rights obtained in the Pharmion acquisition becoming fully amortized during 2009.
Acquisition Related (Gains) Charges and Restructuring, net: Acquisition related (gains) charges and restructuring, net was a net gain of $142.3 million in 2011, primarily due to a $151.5 million favorable adjustment to the fair value of our liability related to publicly traded contingent value rights, or CVRs, that were issued as part of the acquisition of Abraxis. The favorable adjustment was partly offset by $4.0 million in accretion of contingent consideration related to U.S. and EU approval of ISTODAX® for treatment of PTCL and $5.2 million in restructuring and other acquisition related charges.
Acquisition related (gains) charges and restructuring, net was a charge of $47.2 million in 2010 and included $22.7 million in accretion of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Gloucester in January 2010 and $24.5 million in net costs related to the acquisition of Abraxis in October 2010. In addition to acquisition related fees of $21.4 million, the costs related to Abraxis included restructuring costs of $16.1 million, partly offset by a $13.0 favorable adjustment to the fair value of our liability related to CVRs that were issued as part of the acquisition of Abraxis. The restructuring costs are primarily severance related.
Interest and Investment Income, Net: Interest and investment income, net is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Interest and investment income, net decreased by $18.9 million to $25.9 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a $14.2 million reduction in interest income due to lower overall yields, a $7.4 million net reduction in gains on sales of marketable securities and a $0.3 million decrease in dividend income, partly offset by a $3.0 million net decrease in the amortization of premiums and discounts related to the purchase of marketable securities.
Interest and investment income, net decreased by $32.0 million to $44.8 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a $19.6 million net reduction in gains on sales of marketable securities in 2010 compared to 2009 and a $13.6 million reduction in interest
income due to lower overall yields and the liquidation of securities to fund the Abraxis acquisition.
Equity in Losses of Affiliated Companies: Under the equity method of accounting, we recorded losses of $2.8 million, $1.9 million and $1.1 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The losses in 2011 and 2010 included losses from non-core Abraxis equity method investments which were divested in April 2011.
Interest Expense: Interest expense was $42.7 million, $12.6 million and $2.0 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The $30.1 million increase in 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily due to a $29.6 million increase in interest accrued on the $1.25 billion in senior notes issued in October 2010 and to the issuance of commercial paper beginning in September 2011.
We entered into interest rate swap contracts in February and March 2011 to convert a portion of our interest rate exposure related to the senior notes from fixed rate to floating rate to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on our cash equivalent and investment balances. In August 2011, we settled the swap contracts resulting in the receipt of $34.3 million. The proceeds from the swap settlement are being accounted for as a reduction of current and future interest expense associated with our $500.0 million, 2.45% fixed-rate notes due in 2015. There were no interest rate swap contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011.
Other Income, Net: Other income, net is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Other income (expense), net was a net expense of $3.6 million in 2011 and $7.2 million in 2010. The $3.7 million decrease in expense in 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily due to a $3.6 million economic development grant received from the State of New Jersey in 2011.
Other income, net decreased by $67.7 million in 2010 to a net expense of $7.2 million compared to an income of $60.5 million in 2009 primarily due to a reduction in net gains on foreign currency forward contracts that had not been designated as hedges entered into in order to offset net foreign exchange gains and losses.
Income Tax Provision: The income tax provision decreased by $30.4 million to $102.1 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The full year 2011 underlying effective tax rate of 11.5% reflects the impact from our low tax Swiss manufacturing operations, the favorable impact of a shift in earnings between the United States and lower tax foreign jurisdictions, and tax deductions related to our acquisitions. The decrease in the underlying effective tax rate also reflects benefits from an increase in acquisition-related charges, including an IPR&D asset impairment charge of $118.0 million and a non-taxable gain from a decrease in the fair value of our liability under the CVR Agreement related to the acquisition of Abraxis of $151.5 million. The effective tax rate was reduced by 4.3 percentage points in 2011 as a result of discrete items which included tax benefits related to a foreign tax credit, a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits for certain ongoing income tax audits and expirations of statutes of limitations, and a net tax benefit related to changes in state tax laws.
The income tax provision decreased by $66.5 million to $132.4 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The full year 2010 underlying effective tax rate of 15.9% reflects the impact from our low tax Swiss manufacturing operations, the favorable impact of a shift in earnings between the United States and lower tax foreign jurisdictions, and tax deductions related to our acquisitions. The effective tax rate was reduced by 2.8 percentage points in 2010 as a result of discrete items which included tax benefits related to a settlement of a tax examination and the reduction in a valuation allowance related to certain tax carryforwards, partially offset by an increase in unrecognized tax benefits for certain ongoing income tax audits.
The income tax provision for 2009 included a full year underlying effective tax rate of 21.8%. The effective tax rate was reduced by 1.4 percentage points in 2009 as a result of discrete items which included tax benefits related to filing our 2008 income tax returns with certain items being more favorable than originally estimated and settlement of tax examinations, partially offset by an increase in unrecognized tax benefits for certain ongoing income tax audits.
Net Income: Net income and per common share amounts for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data):
Net income for 2011 reflects the earnings impact from higher sales of REVLIMID®, VIDAZA® and a full year's sales of ABRAXANE®. The favorable impact of higher revenues was partly offset by increased spending for new product launches, research and development activities, expansion of our international operations, increase in amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions and an increase in interest expense related to the issuance of senior notes in October 2010. Earnings per diluted share were also favorably impacted in 2011 by the repurchase of 38.3 million common shares under our common share repurchase program, reducing our outstanding share base.
Net income for 2010 reflects the earnings impact from higher sales of REVLIMID® and VIDAZA®. The favorable impact of higher revenues was partly offset by increased spending for new product launches, research and development activities, expansion of our international operations and the additional costs and intangible amortization related to acquisitions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes the components of our financial condition for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
(1)Includes cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale, accounts receivable, net of allowances, inventory and other current assets, less short-term borrowings, accounts payable, accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other current liabilities.
We rely primarily on positive cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from sales of available-for-sale marketable securities, and borrowings in the form of long-term notes payable and, beginning in September 2011, short-term Commercial Paper to provide for our liquidity requirements. We expect continued growth in our expenditures, particularly those related to research and development, clinical trials, commercialization of new products, international expansion and capital investments. However, we anticipate that existing cash and cash equivalent balances, marketable securities available for sale, cash generated from operations and existing sources of and access to financing are adequate to fund our operating needs, capital expenditures, debt service requirements and our plans to repurchase stock or pursue other strategic business initiatives for the foreseeable future. In January 2012, we announced one such strategic business initiative when we and Avila Therapeutics, Inc., or Avila, a privately-held biotechnology company, announced a definitive merger agreement under which we will acquire Avila, subject to customary closing conditions, including the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, for $350 million in cash plus up to $575 million in contingent development and approval milestones.
We consider the cumulative unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely invested outside the United States. Of the total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities at December 31, 2011, approximately $2.3 billion was generated from operations in foreign tax jurisdictions and is intended for use in our foreign operations. We do not rely on these unremitted earnings as a source of funds for our domestic business as we expect to have sufficient cash flow in the United States to fund our U.S. operational and strategic needs. Consequently,
we have not provided for U.S. federal or state income taxes on these undistributed foreign earnings. While we do not anticipate changing our intention regarding permanently reinvested earnings, if certain foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated, the related U.S. tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings.
Share Repurchase Program: Our Board of Directors has approved an aggregate $4.0 billion common share repurchase program of which we have approximately $1.387 billion remaining for future share repurchases. During 2011 we used $2.221 billion for share repurchases.
Components of Working Capital
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available for Sale: We invest our excess cash primarily in money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities and global corporate debt securities. All liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents and all investments with maturities of greater than three months from the date of purchase are classified as marketable securities available for sale. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase. The $46.9 million increase in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale at December 31, 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily due to cash generated from operations and short-term borrowings, partly offset by the $2.221 billion cash paid out under our share repurchase program.
Marketable securities available for sale are carried at fair value, held for an unspecified period of time and are intended for use in meeting our ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges, is included in interest and investment income, net. For more information related to the fair value and valuation of our marketable securities, see Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Accounts Receivable, Net: Accounts receivable, net increased by $239.1 million to $945.5 million in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to increased U.S. and international sales, including sales of REVLIMID®, VIDAZA® and ABRAXANE®. Amounts due from customers increased primarily in the United States and certain European countries. Sales made outside the United States typically have payment terms that are greater than 60 days, thereby extending collection periods beyond those in the United States. We expect our accounts receivable balance to continue to grow as our international sales continue to expand.
We continue to monitor economic conditions, including the volatility associated with international economies, the sovereign debt crisis in certain European countries and associated impacts on the financial markets and our business. Our current business model in these markets is to sell our products directly to principally government owned or controlled hospitals, who in turn directly deliver critical care to patients. Our products are used to treat life-threatening diseases and we believe this business model enables timely delivery and adequate supply of
products. Many of the outstanding receivable balances are related to government-funded hospitals and we believe the receivable balances are ultimately collectible. Similarly, we believe that future sales to these customers will continue to be collectible.
The credit and economic conditions within Greece, Spain, Italy, and Portugal, as well as increasing sales levels in those countries have resulted in, and may continue to result in, an increase in the average length of time it takes to collect accounts receivable. Our total net receivables in Spain, Italy and Portugal are composed almost entirely of amounts receivable from government owned or controlled hospitals and the public sector and amounted to $396.1 million at the end of 2011 compared to $231.6 million at the end of 2010. Approximately $81.2 million of the $396.1 million receivable at December 31, 2011 was greater than one year past due. Our exposure to the sovereign debt crisis in Greece is limited, as we do not have a material amount of receivables in Greece. We maintain timely and direct communication with hospital customers in Italy, Portugal, and Spain regarding both the current and past due receivable balances. We continue to receive payments from these countries, and closely monitor the plans for payment at the regional government level. We also regularly request and receive positive confirmation of the validity of our receivables from most of the regional governmental authorities. We have the option to pursue legal action against certain of our customers. In view of the protracted timeline associated with collecting the outstanding balances through legal action and the current direct communication with our customers, in many instances, we do not believe this to be the best approach for any of the parties involved.
In determining the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts for Italy, Portugal, and Spain, we considered that the balance of past due receivables is related to sales made to government-owned or supported customers. We regularly monitor developments in Europe to assess whether the level of risk of default for any customers has increased and note the ongoing efforts by the European Union, European Monetary Union and International Monetary Fund to support countries with large public deficits and outstanding debt balances. We have not experienced significant losses or write-offs with respect to the collection of our accounts receivable in these countries as a result of their economic difficulties and we do not expect to have write-offs or adjustments to accounts receivable which would have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Inventory: Inventory balances decreased by $70.6 million to $189.6 million at the end of 2011 compared to the end of 2010, primarily due to a $90.3 million reduction in ABRAXANE® inventory related to the inventory step-up adjustment to fair value resulting from the acquisition of Abraxis, which flowed through cost of goods sold during 2011. The favorable impact from the reduction in the step-up adjustment was partly offset by an increase in REVLIMID®, VIDAZA® and ABRAXANE® inventories, attributable to higher sales levels.
Other Current Assets: Other current assets increased by $120.1 million to $395.1 million at the end of 2011 compared to the end of 2010 primarily due to a $64.2 million increase in the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts, in addition to increases in royalties receivable and other prepaid expenses, including taxes and insurance.
Commercial Paper: In September 2011, we entered into a commercial paper program, or the Program, under which we issued unsecured commercial paper notes, or Commercial Paper, on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of
$1.0 billion, the proceeds of which will be used for general corporate purposes. The maturities of the Commercial Paper may vary, but may not exceed 270 days from the date of issue. The Commercial Paper is sold under customary terms to a dealer or in the commercial paper market and is issued at a discount from par or, alternatively, is sold at par and bears varying interest rates on a fixed or floating basis. Borrowings under the Program are accounted for as short-term borrowings. As of the end of 2011, $401.4 million of Commercial Paper was outstanding bearing an effective interest rate of 0.5%.
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility: In September 2011, we entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility, providing for revolving credit in the aggregate amount of $1.0 billion. Subject to certain conditions, we have the right to increase the amount of the Credit Facility (but in no event more than one time per annum), up to a maximum aggregate amount of $1.250 billion.
The Credit Facility has a five-year term and amounts may be borrowed for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. The Credit Facility serves as backup liquidity for our Commercial Paper borrowings. As of the end of 2011, there was no outstanding borrowing under the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants including certain customary financial covenants. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of the end of 2011.
Credit Facility: In November 2011, we entered into an uncommitted facility, or Facility, not exceeding an aggregate of $125.0 million. Advances are to be in currencies agreed upon and will be for periods of one or three months. Interest will accrue and be calculated in respect to each advance on the basis of the number of days elapsed and a 360 day year in the case of advances in U.S. Dollars at a rate per annum of 1.0% above LIBOR. Interest accrued on each advance will be paid at its maturity. The Facility may be terminated at any time by the lending party with or without prior notice. As of the end of 2011, $125.0 million was outstanding under the Facility and accounted for as short-term borrowings. The outstanding balance was repaid in January 2012.
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities: Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased by $34.4 million to $961.7 million as of the end of 2011 compared to the end of 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the payment of $180.0 million of contingent consideration related to the purchase of Gloucester, which had a fair value of $171.9 million on December 31, 2010 and payment of a litigation settlement, which was reserved for at $80.0 million in 2010, mostly offset by increases in governmental rebates and Medicaid reimbursements, in addition to clinical trial and compensation-related accruals.
Income Taxes Payable (Current and Non-Current): Income taxes payable increased by $83.2 million to $646.5 million as of the end of 2011 compared to the end of 2010, primarily from the current provision for income taxes of $187.9 million, mostly offset by tax payments of $50.8 million and a tax benefit of stock options of $35.0 million.
Analysis of Cash Flows
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
Operating Activities: Net cash provided by operating activities in 2011 increased by $627.1 million to $1.809 billion as compared to 2010. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to an expansion of our operations and related increase in net earnings, partially offset by the increase in accounts receivable associated with expanding international sales, which take longer to collect, and the timing of receipts and payments in the ordinary course of business.
Investing Activities: Net cash provided by investing activities in 2011 changed to a positive $377.7 million compared to a net cash use of $2.107 billion in 2010. The 2010 investing activities included net cash used in the acquisition of Abraxis of $2.315 billion and the acquisition of Gloucester of $337.6 million. Investing activities included net sales of marketable securities available in the amount of $481.8 million in 2011 compared to $659.7 million in 2010.
In April 2011, we sold non-core assets acquired with Abraxis to various entities that are owned or controlled by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the former majority shareholder and executive chairman of Abraxis. We received cash consideration of $110.0 million, 10% equity ownership in an entity, Active Biomaterials, LLC, formed with certain of the non-core assets with revenue-producing potential and a future royalty stream based on net sales of certain products of Active Biomaterials, LLC. The net proceeds from this sale amounted to $93.2 million.
Financing Activities: Net cash used in financing activities in 2011 was $1.655 billion compared to net cash provided of $1.177 billion in 2010. The $2.832 billion decrease in net cash provided by financing activities in 2011 was primarily attributable to proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt in 2010 that provided net cash of $1.237 billion and the $2.221 billion in common share repurchases in 2011 under the common share repurchase program. In July 2011, we made a payment of $180.0 million to the former shareholders of Gloucester in satisfaction of an acquisition-related milestone payment requirement based on the FDA approval of the Supplemental New Drug Application for ISTODAX® for treatment in the United States of PTCL in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. The acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration for this milestone was $156.7 million, the settlement of which is reflected as a financing activity in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2011.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
(1)The senior note obligation amounts include future principal and interest payments.
Senior Notes: In October 2010, we issued a total of $1.25 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2015 (the "2015 notes"), $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "2020 notes") and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.7% Senior Notes due 2040 (the "2040 notes" and, together with the 2015 notes and the 2020 notes, referred to herein as the "notes").
Short-term Borrowings: Contractual obligations for short-term borrowings includes principal, interest and fees of $401.4 million related to commercial paper and $125.3 million related to borrowings from our credit facility that were outstanding at December 31, 2011.
Operating Leases: We lease office and research facilities under various operating lease agreements in the United States and various international markets. The non-cancelable lease terms for operating leases expire at various dates between 2012 and 2023 and include renewal options. In general, we are also required to reimburse the lessors for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs associated with the leases. For more information on the major facilities that we occupy under lease arrangements refer to Part I, Item 2, "Properties" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Contract Commitments: Other contract commitments include $107.5 million in contractual obligations related to product supply contracts. In December 2006, we purchased an API manufacturing facility and certain other assets and liabilities located in Zofingen, Switzerland. At December 31, 2011, our remaining commitment resulting from the acquisition was $21.4 million. In addition, we have committed to invest an aggregate $25.0 million in two investment funds over a ten-year period, which is callable at any time. On December 31, 2011, our remaining investment commitment was $8.9 million.
Collaboration Arrangements: We have entered into certain research and development collaboration agreements with third parties that include the funding of certain development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts with the potential for future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial
targets. Our obligation to fund these efforts is contingent upon continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs. Due to the nature of these arrangements, the future potential payments related to the attainment of specified development and regulatory approval milestones over a period of several years are inherently uncertain, and accordingly, no amounts have been recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010 contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Potential milestone payments total approximately $4.5 billion, including approximately $2.7 billion contingent on the achievement of various research, development and regulatory approval milestones and approximately $1.8 billion in sales-based milestones. The most significant collaboration agreements are identified in Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
New Accounting Principles
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2011-11, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities," or ASU 2011-11. Under ASU 2011-11, an entity is required to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position as well as instruments and transactions executed under a master netting or similar arrangement and was issued to enable users of financial statements to understand the effects or potential effects of those arrangements on its financial position. ASU 2011-11 is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment," or ASU 2011-08. The update simplifies how a company tests goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 allows a company the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under that option, an entity would no longer be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 in 2012 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)," or ASU 2011-05. ASU 2011-05 was issued to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2011-12, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective
Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassification of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05," or ASU 2011-12. Under ASU 2011-12, the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05 are reinstated, effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)," or ASU 2011-04. ASU 2011-04 was issued to improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, and International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. The guidance in ASU 2011-04 explains how to measure fair value, but does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. ASU 2011-04 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operation and requires management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report, we believe the following accounting estimates and policies to be critical:
Revenue Recognition: Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when title and risk of loss of the product is transferred to the customer. Provisions for discounts, early payments, rebates, sales returns and distributor chargebacks under terms customary in the industry are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. We record estimated reductions to revenue for volume-based discounts and rebates at the time of the initial sale. The estimated reductions to revenue for such volume-based discounts and rebates are based on the sales terms, historical experience and trend analysis.
We recognize revenue from royalties based on licensees' sales of our products or products using our technologies. Royalties are recognized as earned in accordance with the contract terms when royalties from licensees can be reasonably estimated and collectability is reasonably assured. If royalties cannot be reasonably estimated or collectability of a royalty amount is not reasonably assured, royalties are recognized as revenue when the cash is received.
Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We record gross to net sales accruals for sales returns and allowances; sales discounts, government rebates, and chargebacks and distributor service fees.
REVLIMID® is distributed in the United States through contracted pharmacies under the RevAssist® program, which is a proprietary risk-management distribution program tailored specifically to help ensure the safe and appropriate distribution and use of REVLIMID®.
Internationally, REVLIMID® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local competent authorities' specifications to help ensure the product's safe and appropriate distribution and use. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. THALOMID® is distributed in the United States under our proprietary "System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety," or S.T.E.P.S.®, program, which is a comprehensive education and risk-management distribution program with the objective of providing for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID®. Internationally, THALOMID® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local competent authorities' specifications to help ensure the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID®. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. VIDAZA®, ISTODAX® and ABRAXANE® are distributed through the more traditional pharmaceutical industry supply chain and are not subject to the same risk-management distribution programs as THALOMID® and REVLIMID®.
We base our sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains, as applicable. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates do not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, we track actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in determining the current sales return allowance. As noted above, REVLIMID® is distributed primarily through hospitals and contracted pharmacies, lending itself to tighter controls of inventory quantities within the supply channel and, thus, resulting in lower returns activity. THALOMID® is drop-shipped directly to the prescribing pharmacy and, as a result, wholesalers do not stock the product.
Sales discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers.
Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Medicaid rebate percentage was increased and extended to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations in March 2010. The accrual of rebates associated with Medicaid Managed Care Organizations is calculated based on estimated historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. Net revenues for the period ended December 31, 2011 were negatively impacted by a component of the U.S. Health Care Reform Act of 2010, or Health Care Reform Act, which became effective in January 2011 and required manufacturers of pharmaceutical products to be responsible for 50% of the patient's cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate
the cost to us of this coverage gap responsibility, we analyze data for eligible Medicare Part D patients against data for eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with our products as well as actual invoice data throughout 2011. This expense is recognized throughout the year as incurred. In addition, certain international markets have government-sponsored programs that require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales. The Health Care Reform Act mandated in 2011 an annual fee payable by branded prescription drug manufacturers and importers on branded prescription drugs. The fee, which is not material, is included in selling, general and administrative on the 2011 Consolidated Statements of Income.
Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. We provide a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. We regularly review the information related to these estimates and adjust the provision accordingly.
Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts primarily based on the credit worthiness of our customers, historical payment patterns, aging of receivable balances and general economic conditions, including publicly available information on the credit worthiness of countries themselves and provinces or areas within such countries where they are the ultimate customers.
Income Taxes: We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. We provide a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized.
We account for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of our provision for income taxes. These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues common among multinational corporations in our industry. We apply a variety of methodologies in making these estimates which include studies performed by independent economists, advice from industry and subject experts, evaluation of public actions taken by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities, as well as our own industry experience. We provide estimates for unrecognized tax benefits. If our estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, our results of operations could be materially impacted.
We periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and reduce the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including our recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, various income tax strategies and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is required in making this assessment and, to the extent future expectations change, we would have to assess the recoverability of our deferred tax assets at that time. At December 31, 2011, it was more likely than not that we would realize our deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances.
Share-Based Compensation: The cost of share-based compensation is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on the fair value of all awards granted, using the Black-Scholes method of valuation for stock options. The fair values of restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units are based on the market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each award is determined and the compensation cost is recognized over the service period required to obtain full vesting. Compensation cost to be recognized reflects an estimate of the number of awards expected to vest after taking into consideration an estimate of award forfeitures based on actual experience.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Available-For-Sale Marketable Securities: A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale marketable security below its cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to operations and a new cost basis for the security established. The determination of whether an available-for-sale marketable security is other-than-temporarily impaired requires significant judgment and requires consideration of available quantitative and qualitative evidence in evaluating the potential impairment. Factors evaluated to determine whether the investment is other-than-temporarily impaired include: significant deterioration in the issuer's earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, business prospects of the issuer, adverse changes in the general market conditions in which the issuer operates, length of time that the fair value has been below our cost, our expected future cash flows from the security, our intent not to sell and an evaluation as to whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell before recovery of our cost basis. Assumptions associated with these factors are subject to future market and economic conditions, which could differ from our assessment.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities: All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether a derivative instrument is designated as part of a hedging transaction and, if it is, the type of hedging transaction. For a derivative to qualify as a hedge at inception and throughout the hedged period, we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged item. We assess, both at inception and on an on-going basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used in cash flow hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in cash flows of hedged items. We assess hedge effectiveness on a quarterly basis and record the gain or loss related to the ineffective portion of derivative instruments, if any, to current earnings. If we determine that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring, we discontinue hedge accounting and any related unrealized gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in current earnings. We use derivative instruments, including
those not designated as part of a hedging transaction, to manage our exposure to movements in foreign exchange and interest rates. The use of these derivative instruments modifies the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce our risk or cost. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative trading purposes and are not a party to leveraged derivatives.
Investments: We apply the equity method of accounting to our investment in common stock of an affiliated company and certain investment funds, which primarily invest in companies conducting business in life sciences such as biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical technology, medical devices, diagnostics and health and wellness. We also maintain a portfolio of strategic investments in equity securities on a cost method basis which are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
All of our investments are reviewed on a regular basis for possible impairment. If an investment's fair value is determined to be less than its net carrying value and the decline is determined to be other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to its fair value. Such an evaluation is judgmental and dependent on specific facts and circumstances. Factors considered in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: market value or exit price of the investment based on either market-quoted prices or future rounds of financing by the investee; length of time that the market value was below its cost basis; financial condition and business prospects of the investee; our intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in market value of the investment; issues that raise concerns about the investee's ability to continue as a going concern; and any other information that we may be aware of related to the investment.
Accounting for Long-Term Incentive Plans: We have established a Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, designed to provide key officers and executives with performance-based incentive opportunities contingent upon achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives covering a three-year period. We currently have three three-year performance cycles running concurrently ending December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Performance measures for the performance cycles ending in 2012 and 2013 are based on the following components in the last year of the three-year cycle: 25% on non-GAAP earnings per share; 25% on non-GAAP net income; and 50% on total non-GAAP revenue, as defined. The performance cycle ending in 2014 is based on the following components in 2014: 37.5% on non-GAAP earnings per share; 37.5% on total non-GAAP revenue, as defined; and 25% on relative total shareholder return, which is a measurement of our stock price performance during the year compared with a group of other companies in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Payouts may be in the range of 0% to 200% of the participant's salary for the plans. Awards are payable in cash or, at our discretion, in our common stock or a mixture of cash and our common stock. For selected participants at our discretion, awards are payable in our common stock, with the number of shares determined using the average closing price for the 30 trading days prior to the beginning of the cycle, or a mixture of cash and our common stock. Payments made in our common stock are restricted from trading for a period of three years. We accrue the long-term incentive liability over each three-year cycle. Prior to the end of a three-year cycle, the accrual is based on an estimate of our level of achievement during the cycle. Upon a change in control, participants will be entitled to an immediate payment equal to their target award, or an award based on actual performance, if higher, through the date of the change in control.
Accruals recorded for the LTIP entail making certain assumptions concerning future non-GAAP earnings per share, non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP revenues, as defined; the actual results of which could be materially different than the assumptions used. Accruals for the LTIP are reviewed on a regular basis and revised accordingly so that the liability recorded reflects updated estimates of future payouts. In estimating the accruals, management considers actual results to date for the performance period, expected results for the remainder of the performance period, operating trends, product development, pricing and competition.
Valuation of Goodwill, Acquired Intangible Assets and IPR&D: We have recorded goodwill, acquired intangible assets and IPR&D primarily through the acquisitions of Pharmion, Gloucester and Abraxis. When identifiable intangible assets, including in-process research and development, are acquired, we determine the fair values of these assets as of the acquisition date. Discounted cash flow models are typically used in these valuations if quoted market prices are not available, and the models require the use of significant estimates and assumptions including but not limited to:
•projecting regulatory approvals,
•estimating future cash flows from product sales resulting from completed products and in-process projects and
•developing appropriate discount rates and probability rates
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination accounted for by the acquisition method of accounting and is not amortized, but subject to impairment testing at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment. We test our goodwill annually for impairment each November 30. We are organized as a single reporting unit and therefore the goodwill impairment test is done using our overall market value, as determined by our traded share price, as compared to our book value of net assets.
Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized to their estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment if certain events occur. Intangible assets related to IPR&D product rights are treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets and not amortized until the product is approved for sale by regulatory authorities in specified markets. At that time, we will determine the useful life of the asset, reclassify the asset out of IPR&D and begin amortization. Impairment testing is also performed at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment. Such test entails completing an updated discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the asset. Our IPR&D product rights were obtained in the Gloucester and Abraxis acquisitions. The Gloucester related product rights will become definite-lived intangibles when marketing approval is received for ISTODAX® for treatment of PTCL in the European Union. The Abraxis related product rights will become definite-lived intangibles when marketing approval is received for ABRAXANE® for treatment of either NSCLC, pancreatic cancer or melanoma in a major market, typically either the United States or the European Union, or in a series of other countries, subject to certain specified conditions and management judgment.
Valuation of Contingent Consideration Resulting from a Business Combination: We record contingent consideration resulting from a business combination at its fair value on the acquisition
date, and for each subsequent reporting period revalue these obligations and record increases or decreases in their fair value as an adjustment to operating earnings in the consolidated statements of income. Changes to contingent consideration obligations can result from movements in publicly traded share prices of CVRs, adjustments to discount rates and periods, updates in the assumed achievement or timing of any development milestones or changes in the probability of certain clinical events and changes in the assumed probability associated with regulatory approval. The assumptions related to determining the value of a contingent consideration include a significant amount of judgment and any changes in the assumptions could have a material impact on the amount of contingent consideration expense recorded in any given period. Our contingent consideration liabilities were acquired in the acquisitions of Gloucester and Abraxis. The fair value of the Gloucester contingent consideration liability is based on the discount rate, probability and estimated timing of a cash milestone payment to the former Gloucester shareholders. The fair value of the Abraxis contingent consideration liability is based on the quoted market price of the publicly traded CVRs.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following discussion provides forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risk. Market risk represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in the value of financial instruments. The risk of loss is assessed based on the likelihood of adverse changes in fair values, cash flows or future earnings.
We have established guidelines relative to the diversification and maturities of investments to maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are reviewed periodically and may be modified depending on market conditions. Although investments may be subject to credit risk, our investment policy specifies credit quality standards for our investments and limits the amount of credit exposure from any single issue, issuer or type of investment. At December 31, 2011, our market risk sensitive instruments consisted of marketable securities available for sale, long-term debt and certain foreign currency forward contracts.
Marketable Securities Available for Sale: At December 31, 2011, our marketable securities available for sale consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities, global corporate debt securities and a marketable equity security. U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS include mortgage backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities consist of direct obligations of highly rated governments of nations other than the United States, obligations of sponsored agencies and other entities that are guaranteed or supported by highly rated governments of nations other than the United States. Corporate debt-global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies.
Marketable securities available for sale are carried at fair value, held for an unspecified period of time and are intended for use in meeting our ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a
separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges, is included in interest and investment income, net.
As of December 31, 2011, the principal amounts, fair values and related weighted-average interest rates of our investments in debt securities classified as marketable securities available for sale were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Long-Term Debt: In October 2010, we issued a total of $1.25 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2015, $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2020 and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.7% Senior Notes due 2040. The notes were issued at 99.854%, 99.745% and 99.813% of par, respectively, and the discount amortized as additional interest expense over the period from issuance through maturity. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 each year beginning April 15, 2011 and the principal on each note is due in full at their respective maturity dates. The notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price defined in a make-whole clause equaling accrued and unpaid interest plus the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal. If we experience a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the debt to below investment grade, we will be required to offer to repurchase the notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. We are subject to covenants which limit our ability to pledge properties as security under borrowing arrangements and limit our ability to perform sale and leaseback transactions involving our property. At December 31, 2011, the fair value of our senior notes outstanding was $1.294 billion.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies and to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010 had settlement dates within 36 months. These foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815 and, accordingly, to the extent effective, any unrealized gains or losses on them are reported in other comprehensive income (loss), or OCI, and reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect operations. Any ineffectiveness on these foreign currency forward contracts is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net. Foreign
currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows (in thousands):
We consider the impact of our own and the counterparties' credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract. As of December 31, 2011, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts.
We recognized decreases in net product sales for certain effective cash flow hedge instruments of $33 thousand in 2011 and increases of $47.7 million in 2010. These settlements were recorded in the same period as the related forecasted sales occurred. Changes in time value, which we excluded from the hedge effectiveness assessment, were included in other income (expense), net.
We also enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges under ASC 815 and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized in other income (expense), net in the current period. Changes in the fair value of these currency forward contracts that have not been designated as hedges resulted in gains of $31.9 million in 2011 compared to losses of $70 thousand in 2010. The aggregate notional amounts of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $916.9 million and $848.6 million, respectively.
Although not predictive in nature, we believe a hypothetical 10% threshold reflects a reasonably possible near-term change in foreign currency rates. Assuming that the December 31, 2011 exchange rates were to change by a hypothetical 10%, the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts would change by approximately $225.6 million. However, since the contracts either hedge specific forecasted intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies or relate to assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the entities' functional currencies, any change in the fair value of the contract would be either reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings or re-measured through earnings each period along with the underlying asset or liability.
From time to time we enter into interest rate swap contracts to convert a portion of our interest rate exposure from fixed rate to floating rate to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on our cash equivalent and investment balances. There were no interest rate swap contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010
Consolidated Statements of Income - Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Celgene Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the consolidated financial statement schedule, "Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts." These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 22, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
February 22,
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature of Business and Basis and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively "Celgene" or the "Company") is a global biopharmaceutical company primarily engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies designed to treat cancer and immune-inflammatory diseases. The Company is dedicated to innovative research and development which is designed to bring new therapies to market and is involved in research in several scientific areas that may deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas such as intracellular signaling pathways in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmune diseases, and therapeutic application of cell therapies.
The Company's primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, THALOMID®, ABRAXANE® and ISTODAX®. Additional sources of revenue include a licensing agreement with Novartis, which entitles us to royalties on FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of services through our Cellular Therapeutics subsidiary and other miscellaneous licensing agreements.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries. Investments in limited partnerships and interests where the Company has an equity interest of 50% or less and does not otherwise have a controlling financial interest are accounted for by either the equity or cost method. The Company records net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest in its Consolidated Statements of Income equal to the percentage of ownership interest retained in the respective operations by the non-controlling parties.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company is subject to certain risks and uncertainties related to product development, regulatory approval, market acceptance, scope of patent and proprietary rights, competition, European credit risk, technological change and product liability.
Financial Instruments: Certain financial instruments reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (e.g., cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, certain other assets, accounts payable, short-term borrowings and certain other liabilities) are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair values of financial instruments other than marketable securities are determined through a combination of management estimates and information obtained from third parties using the latest market data. The fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities is determined utilizing the valuation techniques appropriate to the type of security (See Note 5).
Derivative Instruments and Hedges: All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether a derivative instrument is designated as part of a hedging transaction and, if it is, the type of hedging transaction. For a derivative to qualify as a hedge at inception and throughout the hedged period, the Company formally documents the nature and relationships between the
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
hedging instruments and hedged item. The Company assesses, both at inception and on an on-going basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used in cash flow hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in cash flows of hedged items. The Company assesses hedge ineffectiveness on a quarterly basis and records the gain or loss related to the ineffective portion of derivative instruments, if any, to current earnings. If the Company determines that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring, it discontinues hedge accounting and any related unrealized gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in current earnings. The Company uses derivative instruments, including those not designated as part of a hedging transaction, to manage its exposure to movements in foreign exchange and interest rates. The use of these derivative instruments modifies the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce the Company's risk or cost. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative trading purposes and is not a party to leveraged derivatives.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available for Sale: The Company invests its excess cash primarily in money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities and global corporate debt securities. All liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents and all investments with maturities of greater than three months from date of purchase are classified as marketable securities available for sale. The Company determines the appropriate classification of its investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase. Marketable securities available for sale are carried at fair value, held for an unspecified period of time and are intended for use in meeting the Company's ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges, is included in interest and investment income, net.
A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below its carrying value that is determined to be other-than-temporary would result in a charge to earnings and decrease in the security's carrying value down to its newly established fair value. Factors evaluated to determine if an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired include significant deterioration in earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality or business prospects of the issuer; adverse changes in the general market condition in which the issuer operates; the Company's intent to hold to maturity and an evaluation as to whether it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell before recovery of its cost basis; and issues that raise concerns about the issuer's ability to continue as a going concern.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk. The Company invests its excess cash primarily in money market funds, U.S. Treasury fixed rate securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency fixed rate securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed fixed rate securities and FDIC guaranteed fixed rate corporate debt, non-U.S. government issued securities and non-U.S. government guaranteed securities (See Note 7). The
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Company may also invest in unrated or below investment grade securities, such as equity in private companies. The Company has established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities to maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are reviewed periodically and may be modified to take advantage of trends in yields and interest rates.
The Company sells its products in the United States primarily through wholesale distributors and specialty contracted pharmacies. Therefore, wholesale distributors and large pharmacy chains account for a large portion of the Company's U.S. trade receivables and net product revenues (See Note 21). International sales are primarily made directly to hospitals, clinics and retail chains, many of which in Europe are government owned and have extended their payment terms in recent years given the economic pressure these countries are facing. The Company continuously monitors the creditworthiness of its customers, including these governments, and has internal policies regarding customer credit limits. The Company estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts primarily based on the credit worthiness of its customers, historical payment patterns, aging of receivable balances and general economic conditions, including publicly available information on the credit worthiness of countries themselves and provinces or areas within such countries where they are the ultimate customers.
The Company continues to monitor economic conditions, including the volatility associated with international economies, the sovereign debt crisis in certain European countries and associated impacts on the financial markets and its business. The Company's products are used to treat life-threatening diseases. The Company's current business model in these markets is to sell its products directly to principally government owned or controlled hospitals, who in turn directly deliver critical care to patients. The Company believes this business model enables timely delivery and adequate supply of products. Many of the outstanding receivable balances are related to government-funded hospitals; therefore, the Company believes the receivable balances are ultimately collectible. Similarly, the Company believes that future sales to these customers will continue to be collectible.
The credit and economic conditions within Greece, Spain, Italy, and Portugal, as well as increasing sales levels in those countries have resulted in, and may continue to result in, an increase in the average length of time it takes to collect accounts receivable. The Company's total net receivables in Spain, Italy and Portugal are composed almost entirely of amounts receivable from government owned or controlled hospitals and the public sector and amounted to $396.1 million at the end of 2011 compared to $231.6 million at the end of 2010. Approximately $81.2 million of the $396.1 million receivable at December 31, 2011 was greater than one year past due. The Company's exposure to the sovereign debt crisis in Greece is limited, as it does not have a material amount of receivables in Greece. The Company maintains timely and direct communication with hospital customers in Italy, Portugal, and Spain regarding both the current and past due receivable balances. The Company continues to receive payments from these countries, and closely monitors the plans for payment at the regional government level. The Company also regularly requests and receives positive confirmation of the validity of its receivables from most of the regional governmental authorities. The Company has the option to pursue legal action against certain of its customers. In view of the protracted timeline associated
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
with collecting the outstanding balances through legal action and the current direct communication with its customers, in many instances, the Company does not believe this to be the best approach for any of the parties involved.
In determining the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts for Italy, Portugal, and Spain, the Company considered that the balance of past due receivables is related to sales made to government-owned or supported customers. The Company regularly monitors developments in Europe to assess whether the level of risk of default for any customers has increased and notes the ongoing efforts by the European Union, European Monetary Union and International Monetary Fund to support countries with large public deficits and outstanding debt balances. The Company has not experienced significant losses or write-offs with respect to the collection of its accounts receivable in these countries as a result of their economic difficulties and it does not expect to have write-offs or adjustments to accounts receivable which would have a material adverse impact on its financial position or results of operations.
Inventory: Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company periodically reviews the composition of inventory in order to identify obsolete, slow-moving or otherwise non-saleable items. If non-saleable items are observed and there are no alternate uses for the inventory, the Company will record a write-down to net realizable value in the period that the decline in value is first recognized. Included in inventory are raw materials used in the production of preclinical and clinical products, which are charged to research and development expense when consumed.
Assets Held for Sale: Assets to be disposed of are separately presented in the consolidated balance sheet and reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are not depreciated. The assets and related liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale are presented separately in the current asset and current liability sections of the consolidated balance sheet.
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of plant and equipment is recorded using the straight-line method. Building improvements are depreciated over the remaining useful life of the building. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the economic useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease, including anticipated renewal options. The estimated useful lives of capitalized assets are as follows:
Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred, while expenditures for improvements which extend the life of an asset are capitalized.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Capitalized Software Costs: The Company capitalizes software costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software. Capitalized software costs are included in property, plant and equipment, net and are amortized over their estimated useful life of three to seven years from the date the systems are ready for their intended use.
Investment in Affiliated Companies: The Company applies the equity method of accounting to its investments in common stock of affiliated companies and certain investment funds, which primarily invest in companies conducting business in life sciences such as biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical technology, medical devices, diagnostics and health and wellness. The Company also maintains a portfolio of strategic investments in equity securities on a cost method basis which are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
All investments are reviewed on a regular basis for possible impairment. If an investment's fair value is determined to be less than its net carrying value and the decline is determined to be other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to its fair value. Such an evaluation is judgmental and dependent on specific facts and circumstances. Factors considered in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: market value or exit price of the investment based on either market-quoted prices or future rounds of financing by the investee; length of time that the market value was below its cost basis; financial condition and business prospects of the investee; the Company's intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in market value of the investment; issues that raise concerns about the investee's ability to continue as a going concern; any other information that the Company may be aware of related to the investment.
Other Intangible Assets: Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized to their estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment if certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Intangible assets which are not amortized include acquired in-process research and development, or IPR&D, and acquired intangible assets held for sale. Amortization is initiated for IPR&D intangible assets when their useful lives have been determined. IPR&D intangible assets which are determined to have had a drop in their fair value are adjusted downward and an expense recognized on the earnings statement. These are tested at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment.
Goodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination accounted for by the acquisition method of accounting and is not amortized, but subject to impairment testing at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment. The Company tests its goodwill annually for impairment each November 30.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. If the carrying amount of the assets exceed their estimated future undiscounted net cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Foreign Currency Translation: Operations in non-U.S. entities are recorded in the functional currency of each entity. For financial reporting purposes, the functional currency of an entity is determined by a review of the source of an entity's most predominant cash flows. The results of operations for non-U.S. dollar functional currency entities are translated from functional currencies into U.S. dollars using the average currency rate during each month, which approximates the results that would be obtained using actual currency rates on the dates of individual transactions. Assets and liabilities are translated using currency rates at the end of the period. Adjustments resulting from translating the financial statements of the Company's foreign entities into the U.S. dollar are excluded from the determination of net income and are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction gains and losses are recorded in other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company had net foreign exchange losses of $3.1 million in 2011, $9.8 million in 2010 and $54.5 million in 2009.
Research and Development Costs: Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These include all internal and external costs related to services contracted by the Company. Upfront and milestone payments made to third parties in connection with research and development collaborations are expensed as incurred up to the point of regulatory approval. Milestone payments made to third parties subsequent to regulatory approval are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the related product.
Income Taxes: The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company recognizes the benefit of an uncertain tax position that it has taken or expects to take on income tax returns it files if such tax position is more likely than not to be sustained.
Revenue Recognition: Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when title and risk of loss of the product is transferred to the customer. Provisions for discounts, early payments, rebates, sales returns and distributor chargebacks under terms customary in the industry are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
Sales discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers.
Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The accrual of rebates associated with Medicaid Managed Care Organizations is calculated based on estimated historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. Manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are required to be responsible for 50% of the patient's cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate the cost to the Company of this coverage gap responsibility, the Company analyzes data for eligible Medicare Part D patients against data for
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with its products as well as actual invoice data. This expense is recognized throughout the year as incurred. In addition, certain international markets have government-sponsored programs that require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales. The Health Care Reform Act mandated an annual payable by branded prescription drug manufacturers and importers on branded prescription drugs. The fee, which is not material, is included in selling, general and administrative on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. The Company provides a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. The Company regularly reviews the information related to these estimates and adjusts the provision accordingly.
The Company bases its sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains. If the historical data used by the Company to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, the Company tracks actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in determining the current sales return allowance.
Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.
The Company records estimated reductions to revenue for free goods and volume-based discounts at the time of the initial sale. The estimated reductions to revenue for such free goods and volume-based discounts are based on the sales terms, historical experience and trend analysis. The cost of free goods is included in Cost of Goods Sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets).
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The Company recognizes revenue from royalties based on licensees' sales of its products or products using its technologies. Royalties are recognized as earned in accordance with the contract terms when royalties from licensees can be reasonably estimated and collectability is reasonably assured. If royalties cannot be reasonably estimated or collectability of a royalty amount is not reasonably assured, royalties are recognized as revenue when the cash is received.
Share-Based Compensation: The Company utilizes share based compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, or RSUs, and performance-based restricted stock units, or PSUs. Compensation expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on the estimated fair value of the awards at grant date. Compensation expense recognized reflects an estimate of the number of awards expected to vest after taking into consideration an estimate of award forfeitures based on actual experience and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period required to obtain full vesting. Management expectations related to the achievement of performance goals associated with PSU grants is assessed regularly and that assessment is used to determine whether PSU grants are expected to vest. If performance-based milestones related to PSU grants are not met or not expected to be met, any compensation expense the Company has recognized to date associated with grants that are not expected to vest will be reversed.
The fair values of stock option grants are estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair values of RSU and PSU grants are based on the market value of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, assuming potentially dilutive common shares, resulting from option exercises, restricted stock units, warrants and other incentives had been issued and any proceeds thereof used to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The assumed proceeds used to repurchase common stock is the sum of the amount to be paid to the Company upon exercise of options, the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized and, if applicable, the amount of excess income tax benefit that would be credited to paid-in capital upon exercise.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2011-11, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities," or ASU 2011-11. Under ASU 2011-11, an entity is required to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position as well as instruments and transactions executed under a master netting or similar arrangement and was issued to enable users of financial statements to understand the effects or potential effects of those arrangements on its financial position. ASU 2011-11 is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment." The update simplifies how a company tests goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 allows a company the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under that option, an entity would no longer be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company as the Company has only one reporting unit.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)," or ASU 2011-05. ASU 2011-05 was issued to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2011-12, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassification of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05," or ASU 2011-12. Under ASU 2011-12, the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05 are reinstated, effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)," or ASU 2011-04. ASU 2011-04 was issued to improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, and International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. The guidance in ASU 2011-04 explains how to measure fair value, but does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. ASU 2011-04 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
2. Acquisitions and Divestitures
Abraxis BioScience, Inc.
On October 15, 2010, or the Acquisition Date, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Abraxis in exchange for consideration valued at the Acquisition Date at approximately $3.205 billion, consisting of cash, stock and contingent value rights, or CVRs. The transaction, referred to as the Merger, resulted in Abraxis becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
As discussed further under "Contingent Value Rights" below, a holder of a CVR is entitled to receive a pro rata portion of cash payments that the Company is obligated to pay to all holders of CVRs, which is determined by achievement of certain net sales and U.S. regulatory approval milestones. Potential cash payments to CVR holders range from no payment, if no regulatory milestones or net sales thresholds are met, to a maximum of $650.0 million in milestone payments plus payments based on annual net sales levels if all milestones are met at the earliest target dates and annual net sales exceed threshold amounts.
The Merger has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting which requires that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the Acquisition Date and requires the fair value of acquired in-process research and development, or IPR&D, to be classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts.
The table below lists the fair value of consideration transferred in the Merger:
(1) Issued 10,660,196 shares of the Company's Common Stock on October 15, 2010 with a fair value of $57.95 per share based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the day before the Acquisition Date.
(2) Issued 43,273,855 CVRs valued at $5.20 per CVR based on the closing price on the Acquisition Date.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The purchase price allocation resulted in the following amounts being allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date based upon their respective preliminary fair values summarized below:
(1)Includes cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and other current liabilities. (2)Includes assets held for sale of $345.6 million less liabilities of disposal group of $39.3 million. (3)Includes current deferred income tax asset of $110.7 million and non-current deferred tax liability of $750.7 million.
The amounts recorded for the major components of acquired identifiable intangible assets are as follows:
Other finite-lived intangible assets include the fair value of licensing contract rights, non-compete agreements and future compassionate use sales.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The IPR&D product right asset was assigned a fair value of $1.290 billion based on probability-weighted net cash flows associated with future ABRAXANE® approval for indications to treat non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, pancreatic cancer and melanoma. Acquired IPR&D will be accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until regulatory approval in specified markets or discontinuation.
The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition. The goodwill recorded as part of the Merger is largely attributable to synergies expected to result from combining the operations of Abraxis and the Company and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. The Company does not expect any portion of this goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill attributable to the Merger has been recorded as a noncurrent asset in its Consolidated Balance Sheets and is not amortized, but is subject to review for impairment annually.
Sale of Non-core Assets
The purchase of Abraxis included a number of assets that are not associated with nab® technology or ABRAXANE®. These assets, or non-core assets, consisted of a number of subsidiaries, tangible assets, equity investments, joint venture partnerships and assets that supported research and sales of products not directly related to the nab® technology or ABRAXANE®. At the time of acquisition, the Company committed to a plan to divest certain non-core assets and they were classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 as assets held for sale and the associated liabilities were classified as liabilities of disposal group. In April 2011, the Company sold these non-core assets to various entities that are owned or controlled by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the former majority shareholder and executive chairman of Abraxis.
The Company received cash consideration of $110.0 million, 10% equity ownership in Active Biomaterials, LLC, which is an entity that was formed with certain of the non-core assets with revenue-producing potential, and a future royalty stream based on net sales of certain products of Active Biomaterials, LLC. The royalties, which commence in 2014 at the earliest and are not to exceed an annual amount of $128.0 million, will be calculated based on a range of between 10% and 12.5% of net sales of certain future products. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong holds an option to purchase the 10% equity ownership in Active Biomaterials, LLC from the Company for a price of $15.0 million at any time prior to April 2013. The Company recorded the equity ownership at its fair market value of $14.0 million based on the present value of the amount likely to be received upon exercise of the purchase option. The Company recorded the future royalty stream as an asset and assigned a value of $170.0 million based on its fair market value calculated as the present value of estimated future net cash flows. The sale of the non-core assets resulted in a gain of $2.9 million which was included in the Consolidated Statements of Income, in other income (expense), net. The Company's policy is to present gains and losses from sales of businesses as other income or expense.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Assets Held For Sale
The remaining balances in the assets held for sale and liabilities of disposal group line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 relate to two facilities that were acquired in the purchase of Abraxis. The Company intends to sell these assets as it rationalizes certain manufacturing facilities. No material gain or loss is expected to result from the sale.
Contingent Value Rights
In connection with the Merger on October 15, 2010, CVRs were issued under a Contingent Value Rights Agreement, or CVR Agreement, entered into between Celgene and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as trustee. The CVRs are registered for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "CELGZ." The fair value of the CVRs and the liability of the Company related to payments under the CVR Agreement are subject to fluctuation based on trading prices for the publicly traded CVRs. Subsequent to the Acquisition Date, the Company has measured the contingent consideration represented by the CVRs at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in operating earnings.
Each holder of a CVR is entitled to receive a pro rata portion, based on the number of CVRs then outstanding, of each of the following contingent cash payments:
•Milestone Payment #1. $250.0 million upon U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approval of ABRAXANE® for use in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, if such approval permits the Company to market ABRAXANE® with FDA approval that includes a progression-free survival, or PFS, claim, but only if this milestone is achieved no later than the fifth anniversary of the Merger.
•Milestone Payment #2. $400.0 million (if achieved no later than April 1, 2013) or $300.0 million (if achieved after April 1, 2013 and before the fifth anniversary of the Merger) upon FDA approval of ABRAXANE® for use in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, if such approval permits the Company to market ABRAXANE® with FDA approval that includes an overall survival claim.
•Net Sales Payments. For each full one-year period ending December 31 during the term of the CVR Agreement, which we refer to as a net sales measuring period (with the first net sales measuring period beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011):
•2.5% of the net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $1.0 billion but are less than or equal to $2.0 billion for such period, plus
•an additional amount equal to 5% of the net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $2.0 billion but are less than or equal to $3.0 billion for such period, plus
•an additional amount equal to 10% of the net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $3.0 billion for such period.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
No payments will be due under the CVR Agreement with respect to net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products after December 31, 2025, which we refer to as the net sales payment termination date, unless net sales for the net sales measuring period ending on December 31, 2025 are equal to or greater than $1.0 billion, in which case the net sales payment termination date will be extended until the last day of the net sales measuring period subsequent to December 31, 2025 during which net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products are less than $1.0 billion or, if earlier, December 31, 2030.
The final results for the ongoing ABRAXANE® phase III study in NSCLC, or the NSCLC study, were presented at a major scientific congress in June 2010. These results showed that the primary endpoint of the study, response rate, was met and was statistically significant. An interim analysis for the secondary endpoint of PFS was announced in January 2011 and, although not statistically significant, did not show a negative trend against the comparator. In June 2011, the Company announced that the final analysis for both PFS and Overall Survival, or OS, was completed during the second quarter of 2011 and the PFS remained consistent with the interim analysis. In addition, the final OS, similar to the final PFS analysis, did not show a negative trend against the comparator. The Special Protocol Assessment, or SPA, as agreed with the FDA, states that the NSCLC study must reach the primary endpoint of response rate, which has been met, as well as showing that the secondary endpoints of both PFS and OS are not negative, i.e. no detrimental effect on PFS or OS for the ABRAXANE® group of the NSCLC study. Accordingly, because the final PFS results were not statistically significant, this reduced the probability that a payment will be made for Milestone Payment #1 under the CVR Agreement that the Company entered into with the former shareholders of Abraxis. Milestone Payment #1 relates to FDA approval of ABRAXANE® for the treatment of NSCLC that permits the Company to market ABRAXANE® with FDA approval that includes a PFS claim, which the Company believes is now unlikely to be achieved based on the foregoing data. The market value of the publicly traded CVRs, which represents the fair value of the Company's liability for all potential payments under the CVR Agreement, decreased from $212.0 million at December 31, 2010 to $60.5 million at December 31, 2011. The reduction in the fair value of the Company's liability was recognized as a gain of $151.5 million in acquisition-related (gains) charges and restructuring, net on the 2011 Consolidated Statement of Income.
In the first quarter of 2011, the Company evaluated the value assigned to the IPR&D from Abraxis and determined that, based on a lower level of probable sales than that estimated at the time of the Merger for sales of ABRAXANE® for NSCLC with FDA approval that includes a PFS claim, the fair value of the IPR&D acquired from Abraxis has fallen below the $1.290 billion recorded at the time of acquisition. An impairment charge included in research and development on the accompanying 2011 Consolidated Statements of Income in the amount of $118.0 million was recorded to reduce the value of the IPR&D asset acquired from Abraxis to its revised current fair value of $1.172 billion at December 31, 2011.
Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
On January 15, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock and stock options of Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Gloucester. The assets acquired and liabilities
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
assumed of Gloucester were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated with those of the Company. Gloucester's results of operations are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
The Company paid $338.9 million in cash before milestone payments with potential additional future payments of up to $300.0 million in contingent regulatory milestone payments. As part of the consideration for the Gloucester acquisition, the Company is contractually obligated to pay certain consideration resulting from the outcome of future events. The Company updates its assumptions each reporting period based on new developments and records such amounts at fair value until such consideration is satisfied.
The purchase price allocation resulted in the following amounts being allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date based upon their respective fair values summarized below:
Asset categories acquired in the Gloucester acquisition included working capital, inventory, fixed assets, developed product right assets and IPR&D product right assets. Fair values of working capital and fixed assets were determined to approximate book values while the fair value of inventory was determined to be greater than book value.
The fair value of developed product right assets was based on expected cash flows from developed product right sales of ISTODAX® (romidepsin), a novel histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, which was approved for marketing in the United States in November 2009 by the FDA for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or CTCL, in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Prior to the acquisition, Gloucester was also conducting a registration trial in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL, in the United States, which resulted in a supplemental New Drug Application filing in December 2010 for this indication. Fair values were derived using probability-weighted cash flows. The U.S. CTCL developed product right asset is being amortized over its economic useful life of ten years. The compassionate use right asset was amortized evenly over the asset's economic useful life of 1.5 years and became fully amortized during 2011.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The fair value of IPR&D product right assets was based on expected cash flows from sales of ISTODAX® for the treatment of PTCL, which had not yet achieved regulatory approval for marketing and has no future alternative use. The $349.0 million estimated fair value of IPR&D product rights was derived using probability-weighted cash flows. The fair value was based on expected cash flows from the treatment of PTCL in the United States and PTCL in the European Union, or E.U., based on key assumptions such as estimates of sales and operating profits related to the programs considering their stages of development; the time and resources needed to complete the regulatory approval process for the products and the life of the potential commercialized products and associated risks, including the inherent difficulties and uncertainties in obtaining regulatory approvals.
The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition. The Company does not expect any portion of this goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill attributable to the Company's acquisition of Gloucester has been recorded as a noncurrent asset in its Consolidated Balance Sheets and is not amortized, but is subject to review for impairment annually.
In June 2011, the FDA granted accelerated approval of the Supplemental New Drug Application for ISTODAX® for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL, in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. This FDA approval was the triggering event for the payment of one of the two contingent regulatory milestone payments associated with the Gloucester acquisition. The Company made a payment of $180.0 million to the former shareholders of Gloucester in July 2011 in satisfaction of this milestone payment requirement. The single remaining contingent milestone payment is for a $120.0 million cash payment upon the marketing approval for the European Union PTCL.
Subsequent to the acquisition date, the Company has measured the contingent consideration arrangement at fair value for each period with changes in fair value recognized in operating earnings. Changes in fair values reflect new information about the IPR&D assets and the passage of time. In the absence of new information, changes in fair value reflect only the passage of time as development work towards the achievement of the milestones progresses, and will be accrued based on an accretion schedule. At December 31, 2011, the balance of the contingent consideration, which reflects the fair value of the single remaining continent milestone payment, was $76.9 million and is included in other non-current liabilities.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Pro Forma Information
The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the acquisitions of Abraxis and Gloucester had occurred on January 1, 2009.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated results were prepared using the acquisition method of accounting and are based on the historical financial information of the Company, Abraxis and Gloucester. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give effect to the pro forma events that are: (i) directly attributable to the respective acquisition, (ii) factually supportable and (iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results are not necessarily indicative of what the Company's consolidated results of operations actually would have been had we completed the acquisitions on January 1, 2009. In addition, the unaudited pro forma consolidated results do not purport to project the future results of operations of the combined company nor do they reflect the expected realization of any cost savings associated with the acquisitions. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results reflect primarily the following pro forma pre-tax adjustments:
•Elimination of Abraxis' historical intangible asset amortization expense of approximately $32.0 million in the pre-acquisition period in 2010 and $39.8 million in 2009.
•Additional amortization expense of approximately $65.8 million in 2010 and $114.8 million in 2009 related to the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired in the acquisitions of Abraxis and Gloucester.
•Adjustment of expense related to the accretion of contingent consideration issued in the acquisition of Gloucester amounting to a $6.4 million reduction of expense in 2010 and additional expense of $23.7 million in 2009. No corresponding adjustment was made for the change in value of contingent consideration resulting from the acquisition of Abraxis as changes in the fair value of the Abraxis contingent consideration is dependent on the market price of the publicly traded CVRs.
•A net reduction of depreciation expense of approximately $8.1 million in 2010 and $8.6 million in 2009 reflecting the cessation of depreciation expense on assets acquired in the Abraxis acquisition that are classified as held for sale, partially offset by an increase in depreciation related to the fair value adjustment of property, plant and equipment acquired.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
•A reduction of interest income of approximately $21.9 million in 2010 and $66.8 million in 2009 associated with cash and marketable securities that were used to partially fund the acquisition of Abraxis.
•Elimination of $34.7 million incurred in 2010 related to the fair value adjustments to acquisition-date inventory from the acquisition of Abraxis that has been sold, which is considered nonrecurring. There is no long-term continuing impact of the fair value adjustments to acquisition-date inventory, and, as such, the impact of those adjustments is not reflected in the unaudited pro forma operating results for 2010 and 2009.
•Elimination of $222.5 million of costs incurred in 2010, which are directly attributable to the acquisition of Abraxis, and which do not have a continuing impact on the combined company's operating results. Included in these costs are restructuring, advisory, legal and regulatory costs incurred by both the Company and Abraxis.
•Adjusted basic and diluted shares of Celgene common stock to reflect the addition of 10,660 shares of common stock issued to stockholders of Abraxis. The common stock was assumed to have been issued on January 1, 2009.
In addition, an income tax adjustment was included in the calculation of the pro forma consolidated results using the Company's U.S. statutory tax rate, estimated at 40%, applied to the pro forma adjustments impacting taxable income.
3. Restructuring
The Company has incurred costs from restructuring activities related to the October 15, 2010 acquisition of Abraxis. Restructuring costs include employee termination costs, contract termination fees and facility closing costs. Employee termination costs are generally recorded when the actions are probable and estimable and include accrued severance benefits and health insurance continuation, many of which may be paid out during periods after termination of employment.
The following table summarizes the restructuring expenses and changes in the restructuring liability related to the Abraxis acquisition during 2011:
Restructuring expenses of $16.1 million related to employee termination benefits were recognized during 2010. The Company does not expect to incur material additional restructuring
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
expenses related to the acquisition of Abraxis. Future cash payments related to the restructuring activity are estimated to be approximately $2.7 million in 2012 and $1.8 million in 2013.
4. Earnings Per Share
The total number of potential common shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive was 25,864,186 in 2011, 24,123,172 in 2010 and 23,337,108 in 2009.
5. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement
The table below presents information about assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value. Fair values determined based on Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company's Level 1 assets consist of marketable equity securities. Fair values determined based on Level 2 inputs utilize observable quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and observable quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not very active. The Company's Level 2 assets consist primarily of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities and global corporate debt securities. Fair values determined based on Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable inputs and include valuations of assets or liabilities for which there is little, if any, market activity. The Company's Level 3 assets consist of warrants for the purchase of equity securities in non-publicly traded companies. The Company's Level 1 liability relates to the Company's publicly traded CVRs. The Level 2 liability relates to forward
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
currency contracts and the Level 3 liability consists of contingent consideration related to undeveloped product rights resulting from the Gloucester acquisition.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
There were no security transfers between Levels 1 and 2 in 2011. The following tables represent a roll-forward of the fair value of Level 3 instruments (significant unobservable inputs):
Settlements of $22.5 million during 2011 consisted of Level 3 instruments that were considered non-core assets acquired in the acquisition of Abraxis and were included in the sale of the non-core assets in April 2011.
Transfers out of Level 3 assets during 2011 consisted of warrants to purchase stock in two privately held companies. Transfers out of Level 3 liabilities consisted of $180.0 million related to a milestone that was part of the contingent consideration in the Gloucester acquisition. The milestone was achieved and valued based on its contractually defined amount. The milestone was paid in July 2011.
6. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies and to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had settlement dates within 36 months. These foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and, to the extent
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
effective, any unrealized gains or losses on them are reported in other comprehensive income (loss), or OCI, and reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect operations. Any ineffectiveness on these foreign currency forward contracts is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net. Foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows at December 31, 2011 and 2010:
The Company considers the impact of its own and the counterparties' credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract on an ongoing basis. As of December 31, 2011, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of the Company's foreign currency forward contracts.
The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net in the current period. The aggregate notional amount of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $916.9 million and $848.6 million, respectively.
From time to time the Company hedges the fair value of certain debt obligations through the use of interest rate swap contracts. The interest rate swap contracts are designated hedges of the fair value changes in the notes attributable to changes in interest rates. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap match those of the debt being hedged, it is assumed to be a highly effective hedge and all changes in fair value of the swaps are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with no net impact recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, any net interest payments made or received are recognized as interest expense. During 2011, the Company was a party to three pay-floating, receive-fixed interest rate swap contracts designated as fair value hedges of fixed-rate notes in which the notional amounts matched the amount of the hedged fixed-rate notes. In August 2011, the Company settled the swap contracts resulting in the receipt of $34.3 million. The proceeds from the swap settlement are being accounted for as a reduction of current and future interest expense. There were no interest rate swap contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the consolidated balance sheets for derivative instruments as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:
*Derivative instruments in this category are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented on a net basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASC 210-20.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following tables summarize the effect of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
(1)Gains of $32,623 are expected to be reclassified from Accumulated OCI into operations in the next 12 months. (2)The amount of net losses recognized in income represents $2,837 in losses related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and $7,806 of losses related to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
(1)The amount of net loss recognized in income represents $52 in losses related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and $47 of losses related to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
The impact of gains and losses on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are generally offset by net foreign exchange gains and losses, which are also included on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net for all periods presented.
7. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available for Sale
Money market funds of $0.739 billion and $1.050 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were recorded at cost, which approximates fair value and are included in cash and cash equivalents.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities by major security type and class of security at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, or MBS, include mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities consist of direct obligations of highly rated governments of nations other than the United States and obligations of sponsored agencies and other entities that are guaranteed or supported by highly rated governments of nations other then the United States. Corporate debt-global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations, including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies.
The fair value of all available-for-sale securities, which have been in an unrealized loss position for less than and longer than 12 months at December 31, 2011, was as follows:
The Company believes that the decline in fair value of securities held at December 31, 2011 below their cost is temporary and intends to retain its investment in these securities for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in the market value of these investments.
Duration periods of available-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 2011 were as follows:
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
8. Inventory
A summary of inventories by major category at December 31, 2011 and 2010 follows:
The finished goods inventory balance at December 31, 2010 includes the unamortized acquisition accounting step-up to fair value resulting from the acquisition of Abraxis in the amount of $90.3 million which has been fully amortized as of December 31, 2011.
9. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:
The balance of construction in progress at December 31, 2011 relates primarily to construction of a manufacturing facility in Phoenix, Arizona and an expansion of the Company's international headquarters in Boudry, Switzerland.
10. Investment in Affiliated Companies
As of December 31, 2011, the Company maintained four equity method investments, including three limited partnership investment funds. Additional equity method investment contributions, net of investment returns totaled $3.9 million and $1.9 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
A summary of the Company's equity investment in affiliated companies follows:
(1)The Company records its interest and share of losses based on its ownership percentage.
(2)Consists of goodwill.
(3)Affiliated companies losses in 2011 and 2010 included certain losses related to non-core former Abraxis equity method investments which were divested in the second quarter of 2011.
11. Other Financial Information
Assets held for sale at December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Liabilities of disposal group at December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:
Accrued expenses at December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:
Other current liabilities at December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Other non-current liabilities at December 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:
12. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets: The Company's intangible assets consist of developed product rights from the Pharmion, Gloucester and Abraxis acquisitions, IPR&D product rights from the Gloucester and Abraxis acquisitions, contract-based licenses, technology and other. The amortization periods related to non-IPR&D intangible assets range from one to 17 years. The following summary of intangible assets by category includes intangibles currently being amortized and intangibles not yet subject to amortization:
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
In June 2011, ISTODAX® was approved by the FDA for the treatment of PTCL in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Accordingly, the related $287.0 million intangible asset obtained from the Gloucester acquisition was reclassified from an acquired IPR&D intangible to an acquired developed product rights intangible and amortization commenced with an 8.8 year expected useful life. The $113.5 million decrease in gross carrying value of intangible assets at December 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 was primarily due to a $118.0 million impairment charge related to a change in the probability of obtaining PFS labeling for the treatment of NSCLC with ABRAXANE® in the United States, which was partly offset by the addition of two intangible assets with a combined value of approximately $4.5 million.
Amortization of intangible assets was $290.3 million, $204.5 million and $84.3 million for the years ended 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The $85.8 million increase in amortization expense in 2011 compared to 2010 resulted primarily from a full year's amortization of intangible assets obtained in the October 2010 Abraxis acquisition being included in 2011, increasing amortization expense by $67.6 million. In addition, amortization of intangible assets obtained from the Gloucester acquisition increased by $18.4 million primarily due to the commencement of amortization related to ISTODAX® for the U.S. treatment of PTCL in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Assuming no changes in the gross carrying amount of intangible assets, the amortization of intangible assets for the next five years is estimated to be approximately $139.9 million for 2012, $138.4 million for 2013, $134.0 million for 2014, $130.0 million for 2015 and $129.7 million for 2016. Amortization of intangible assets beginning in year 2012 is estimated to be significantly less than the amortization of intangible assets in 2011 due to the acquired developed product rights for Vidaza in the U.S. becoming fully amortized during 2011.
Goodwill: At December 31, 2011, the Company's goodwill principally related to the October 2010 acquisition of Abraxis, the January 2010 acquisition of Gloucester and the March 2008 acquisition of Pharmion.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The change in carrying value of goodwill is summarized as follows:
13. Debt
Senior Notes: Summarized below are the carrying values of the Company's senior notes at December 31, 2011 and 2010:
In October 2010, the Company issued a total of $1.25 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2015 (the "2015 notes"), $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "2020 notes") and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.7% Senior Notes due 2040 (the "2040 notes" and, together with the 2015 notes and the 2020 notes, referred to herein as the "notes"). The notes were issued at 99.854%, 99.745% and 99.813% of par, respectively, and the discount is being amortized as additional interest expense over the period from issuance through maturity. Offering costs of approximately $10.5 million have been recorded as debt issuance costs on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the period from issuance through maturity. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 each year beginning April 15, 2011 and the principal on each note is due in full at their respective maturity dates. The notes may be redeemed at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price defined in a make-whole clause equaling accrued and unpaid interest plus the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal. If a change of control of the Company occurs accompanied by a downgrade of the debt to below investment grade, the Company will be required to offer to repurchase the notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company is subject to covenants which limit the ability of the Company to pledge properties as security under borrowing arrangements and limit the ability of the Company to perform sale and leaseback transactions involving the property of the Company. At December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Company's Senior Notes outstanding was $1.294 billion.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The Company entered into interest rate swap contracts in February and March 2011 to convert a portion of its interest rate exposure from fixed rate to floating rate to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on its cash equivalent and investment balances. In August 2011, the Company settled the swap contracts resulting in the receipt of $34.3 million. The proceeds from the swap settlement are being accounted for as a reduction of current and future interest expense associated with the Company's $500.0 million, 2.45% fixed-rate notes due in 2015. There were no interest rate swap contracts outstanding at December 31, 2011.
Commercial Paper: In September 2011, the Company entered into a commercial paper program, or the "Program," under which the Company issues unsecured commercial paper notes, or "Commercial Paper," on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1.0 billion, the proceeds of which will be used for general corporate purposes. The maturities of the Commercial Paper may vary, but may not exceed 270 days from the date of issue. The Commercial Paper is sold under customary terms to a dealer or in the commercial paper market and is issued at a discount from par or, alternatively, is sold at par and bears varying interest rates on a fixed or floating basis. Borrowings under the Program are accounted for as short-term borrowings. As of December 31, 2011, the carrying value of Commercial Paper was $401.4 million and approximated its fair value. The effective interest rate on the outstanding Commercial Paper balance at December 31, 2011 was 0.5%.
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility: In September 2011, the Company, entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or the "Credit Facility," providing for revolving credit to the Company in the aggregate amount of $1.0 billion. Subject to certain conditions, the Company has the right to increase the amount of the Credit Facility (but in no event more than once per annum) up to a maximum aggregate amount of $1.250 billion.
The Credit Facility has a five-year term and amounts may be borrowed in U.S. dollars for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. The Credit Facility serves as backup liquidity for the Company's Commercial Paper borrowings. Costs of $3.5 million associated with securing the Credit Facility have been recorded as other non-current assets on the balance sheet and are being amortized to income over the five-year term of the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2011 there was no outstanding borrowing against the Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to (i) the Base Rate, a fluctuating rate equal to the Applicable Margin plus the highest of (x) Citibank, N.A.'s Base Rate, (y) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (z) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% or (ii) the Eurodollar Rate, a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus the Applicable Margin. The Applicable Margin is determined based on a pricing grid and is dependent on the Company's public debt ratings.
The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants including certain customary financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with all financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2011.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Credit Facility: In November 2011, the Company entered into an uncommitted facility, or Facility, not exceeding an aggregate $125.0 million. A bank structuring fee of $40 thousand payable in full upon repayment and cancellation of the Facility was recorded to interest expense. Advances are to be made in currencies agreed to between the Company and the lending party and will be for periods of one or three months. Interest will accrue and be calculated in respect to each advance on the basis of the number of days elapsed and a 360 day year in the case of advances in U.S. Dollars at a rate per annum of 1.0% above LIBOR. Interest accrued on each advance shall be paid at its maturity. The Facility may be terminated at any time by the lending party with or without prior notice. As of the end of 2011, $125.0 million was outstanding under the Facility and accounted for as short-term borrowings. The outstanding balance was repaid in January 2012.
14. Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock: The Board of Directors is authorized to issue, at any time, without further stockholder approval, up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, and to determine the price, rights, privileges, and preferences of such shares.
Common Stock: At December 31, 2011, the Company was authorized to issue up to 575,000,000 shares of common stock of which shares of common stock issued totaled 487,381,255.
Treasury Stock: Certain employees exercised stock options containing a reload feature and, pursuant to the Company's stock option plan, tendered mature shares of 81,281 in 2011, 152,361 in 2010 and 39,681 in 2009 related to stock option exercises. Such tendered shares are reflected as treasury stock.
The Company's Board of Directors has approved an aggregate $4.0 billion common share repurchase program. The Company has used $2.220 billion, $183.1 million and $209.5 million, excluding transaction fees, to repurchase treasury stock under the program in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2011 an aggregate 45,829,385 common shares were repurchased under the program at an average price of $57.01 per common share and total cost of $2.613 billion.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
A summary of changes in common stock issued and treasury stock is presented below:
15. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of other comprehensive income (loss) consist of changes in pension liability, changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities classified as available-for-sale, net unrealized gains (losses) related to cash flow hedges and changes in foreign currency translation adjustments, which includes changes in a subsidiary's functional currency and net asset transfers of common control subsidiaries.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
A summary of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, is summarized as follows:
16. Share-Based Compensation
The Company has a stockholder approved stock incentive plan, the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan as amended and restated in 2009 and 2011, or the Plan, that provides for the granting of options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, performance awards and other share-based awards to employees and officers of the Company. The Management Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee, may determine the type, amount and terms, including vesting, of any awards made under the plan.
On June 15, 2011, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment and restatement of the plan, which included the following key modifications: adoption of an aggregate share reserve of 81,981,641 shares of Common Stock, which number includes 11,200,000 new shares of Common Stock; extension of the term of the plan through April 13, 2021; precludes the granting of any award to eligible employees or non-employee directors who are resident in France or subject to the French social scheme on or after the fifth anniversary of stockholder approval of the Amendment. In addition to these stockholder approved amendments, the following modifications which were not subject to stockholder approval were made to the Plan: awards granted on or after the date of the 2011 Annual Meeting will not vest upon a change in control, but will vest upon an involuntary termination without cause that occurs within 2 years following a change in control; the Company may not repurchase stock options with an exercise price per share that is below the fair market value of our Common Stock without stockholder approval; the amount of awards granted to Non-Employee Directors are no longer specified in the Plan but were made discretionary and subject to the Plan provisions regarding vesting; certain other modifications related to the vesting of shares of non-Employee Directors.
With respect to options granted under the Plan, the exercise price may not be less than the market closing price of the common stock on the date of grant. In general, options granted under the Plan vest over periods ranging from immediate vesting to four-year vesting and expire ten years from the date of grant, subject to earlier expiration in case of termination of employment unless the participant meets the retirement provision under which the option would have a maximum of three additional years to vest. The vesting period for options granted under the Plan is subject to certain acceleration provisions if a change in control, as defined in the Plan, occurs.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Plan participants may elect to exercise options at any time during the option term. However, any shares so purchased which have not vested as of the date of exercise shall be subject to forfeiture, which will lapse in accordance with the established vesting time period. Each share of common stock subject to full value awards (e.g., restricted stock, other stock-based awards or performance awards denominated in common stock) will be counted as 1.6 shares against the aggregate share reserve under the Plan.
Shares of common stock available for future share-based grants under all plans were 17,227,135 at December 31, 2011.
The following table summarizes the components of share-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:
Included in share-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was compensation expense related to non-qualified stock options of $154.4 million, $142.6 million and $117.0 million, respectively.
Share-based compensation cost included in inventory was $2.0 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, there was $299.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under the plans. That cost will be recognized over an expected remaining weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
The Company does not recognize a deferred tax asset for excess tax benefits that have not been realized and has adopted the tax law method as its accounting policy regarding the ordering of tax benefits to determine whether an excess tax benefit has been realized.
Stock Options: Cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $166.5 million, $86.9 million and $49.8 million, respectively, and the excess tax benefit recognized was $31.1 million, $36.1 million and $97.8 million, respectively.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of the stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $17.09 per share, $18.59 per share and $20.10 per share,
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
respectively. The Company estimated the fair value of options granted using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon curve. Expected volatility of stock option awards is estimated based on the implied volatility of the Company's publicly traded options with settlement dates of six months. The use of implied volatility was based upon the availability of actively traded options on the Company's common stock and the assessment that implied volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. The expected term of an employee share option is the period of time for which the option is expected to be outstanding. The Company has made a determination of expected term by analyzing employees' historical exercise experience from its history of grants and exercises in the Company's option database and management estimates. Forfeiture rates are estimated based on historical data.
The following table summarizes all stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2011:
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $162.8 million, $149.0 million and $111.2 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $147.9 million, $109.6 million and $157.3 million, respectively. The Company primarily utilizes newly issued shares to satisfy the exercise of stock options.
Stock options granted to executives at the vice-president level and above under the Plan, formerly the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, after September 18, 2000, contained a reload feature which provided that if (1) the optionee exercises all or any portion of the stock option (a) at least six months prior to the expiration of the stock option, (b) while employed by the Company and (c) prior to the expiration date of the Plan and (2) the optionee pays the exercise price for the portion of the stock option exercised or the minimum statutory applicable withholding taxes by using common stock owned by the optionee for at least six months prior to the date of exercise, the optionee shall be granted a new stock option under the Plan on the date all or any portion of the stock option is exercised to purchase the number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares of common stock exchanged by the optionee. The reload stock option is exercisable on the same terms and conditions as apply to the original stock option except that (x) the reload stock option will become exercisable in full on the day which is six months after the date the original stock option is exercised, (y) the exercise price shall be the fair value (as defined in the Plan) of the common stock on the date the reload stock option is granted and (z) the expiration of the reload stock option will be the date of expiration of the original stock option. As of December 31, 2011, 137,122 options that contain the reload features noted above are still outstanding and are included in the tables above. The Plan was amended to eliminate the reload feature for all stock options granted on or after October 1, 2004.
Restricted Stock Units: The Company issues restricted stock units, or RSUs, under its equity program in order to provide an effective incentive award with a strong retention component. Equity awards may, at the option of employee participants, be divided between stock options and restricted stock units, or RSUs. The employee has three choices: (1) 100% stock options; (2) a mix of stock options and RSUs based on a two-thirds and one-third mix, using a three-to-one ratio of stock options to RSUs in calculating the number of RSUs to be granted; or (3) a mix of stock options and RSUs based on a fifty-fifty mix, using a three-to-one ratio of stock options to
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
RSUs in calculating the number of RSUs to be granted. Information regarding the Company's RSUs for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
As of December 31, 2011, there was $103.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards of RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. The Company primarily utilizes newly issued shares to satisfy the vesting of RSUs.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units: The Company's performance-based restricted stock units vest contingent upon the achievement of pre-determined performance-based milestones typically related to product development. The following table summarizes the Company's performance-based restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2011:
As of December 31, 2011, there was $1.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards of performance-based RSUs that is expected to be recognized over a period of 2.0 years.
17. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors an employee savings and retirement plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, or the Code, for its U.S. employees. The Company's contributions to the U.S. savings plan are discretionary and have historically
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
been made in the form of the Company's common stock (See Note 14). Such contributions are based on specified percentages of employee contributions up to 6% of eligible compensation or a maximum permitted by law. Total expense for contributions to the U.S. savings plans were $20.7 million, $14.4 million and $10.6 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company also sponsors defined contribution plans in certain foreign locations. Participation in these plans is subject to the local laws that are in effect for each country and may include statutorily imposed minimum contributions. The Company also maintains defined benefit plans in certain foreign locations for which the obligations and the net periodic pension costs were determined to be immaterial at December 31, 2011.
In 2000, the Company's Board of Directors approved a deferred compensation plan. The plan was frozen effective as of December 31, 2004, and no additional contributions or deferrals can be made to that plan. Accrued benefits under the frozen plan will continue to be governed by the terms under the tax laws in effect prior to the enactment of Section 409A. In February 2005, the Company's Board of Directors adopted the Celgene Corporation 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005, and amended the plan in February 2008. This plan operates as the Company's ongoing deferred compensation plan and is intended to comply with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Section 409A. Eligible participants, which include certain top-level executives of the Company as specified by the plan, can elect to defer up to an amended 90% of the participant's base salary, 100% of cash bonuses and equity compensation allowed under Section 409A of the Code. Company contributions to the deferred compensation plan represent a match to certain participants' deferrals up to a specified percentage, which currently ranges from 10% to 20%, depending on the employee's position as specified in the plan, of the participant's base salary. The Company recorded expense of $0.7 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million related to the deferred compensation plans in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company's recurring matches are fully vested, upon contribution. All other Company contributions to the plan do not vest until the specified requirements are met. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had a deferred compensation liability included in other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of approximately $50.8 million and $46.3 million, respectively, which included the participant's elected deferral of salaries and bonuses, the Company's matching contribution and earnings on deferred amounts as of that date. The plan provides various alternatives for the measurement of earnings on the amounts participants defer under the plan. The measuring alternatives are based on returns of a variety of funds that offer plan participants the option to spread their risk across a diverse group of investments.
In 2003, the Company established a Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, designed to provide key officers and executives with performance-based incentive opportunities contingent upon achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives covering a three-year period. The Company currently has three separate three-year performance cycles running concurrently ending December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Performance measures for the performance cycles ending in 2012 and 2013 are based on the following components in the last year of the three-year cycle: 25% on non-GAAP earnings per share; 25% on non-GAAP net income; and 50% on total non-GAAP revenue, as defined. The performance cycle ending in 2014 is based on the following components in 2014; 37.5% on non-GAAP earnings per share; 37.5% on total non-GAAP
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
revenue, as defined; and 25% on relative total shareholder return, which is a measurement of the Company's stock price performance during the year compared with a group of other companies in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Payouts may be in the range of 0% to 200% of the participant's salary for the LTIPs. The estimated payout for the concluded 2011 Plan is $7.3 million, which is included in accrued expenses at December 31, 2011, and the maximum potential payout, assuming maximum objectives are achieved for the 2012, 2013 and 2014 Plans are $11.3 million, $18.4 million and $19.6 million, respectively. Such awards are payable in cash or common stock or a mixture of cash and common stock, which will be determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of award delivery. For selected participants at the Company's discretion, awards are payable in common stock with the number of shares determined using the average closing price for the 30 trading days prior to the beginning of the cycle or a mixture of cash and common stock. Payments made in common stock are restricted from trading for a period of three years. The Company accrues the long-term incentive liability over each three-year cycle. Prior to the end of a three-year cycle, the accrual is based on an estimate of the Company's level of achievement during the cycle. Upon a change in control, participants will be entitled to an immediate payment equal to their target award or, if higher, an award based on actual performance through the date of the change in control. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized expense related to the LTIP of $12.0 million, $8.1 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
18. Income Taxes
The income tax provision is based on income before income taxes as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, U.S. income before income taxes reflects charges related to share-based compensation, up-front collaboration payments, and acquisitions. These charges were less significant outside the U.S.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The provision (benefit) for taxes on income is as follows:
Amounts are reflected in the preceding tables based on the location of the taxing authorities. As of December 31, 2011, the Company has not made a U.S. tax provision on $3.6 billion of unremitted earnings of its international subsidiaries. These earnings are expected to be reinvested overseas indefinitely. It is not practicable to compute the estimated deferred tax liability on these earnings.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Deferred taxes arise because of different treatment between financial statement accounting and tax accounting, known as temporary differences. The Company records the tax effect on these temporary differences as deferred tax assets (generally items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in future periods) or deferred tax liabilities (generally items for which the Company received a tax deduction but that have not yet been recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income). The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and reduces the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent it believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including its recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available to it for tax reporting purposes, tax planning strategies and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is required in making this assessment.
At December 31, 2011 and 2010 the tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
At December 31, 2011 and 2010, deferred tax assets and liabilities were classified on the Company's balance sheet as follows:
Reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate for continuing operations is as follows:
Celgene has operations in many foreign tax jurisdictions, which impose income taxes at different rates than the U.S. The impact of these rate differences is included in the foreign tax rate differences that Celgene discloses in its reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate. The benefit related to foreign tax rate differences primarily results from the Company's commercial operations in Switzerland, which include significant research and development and manufacturing for worldwide markets. The Company operates under an income tax holiday in Switzerland through 2015 that exempts the Company from Swiss income taxes on most of its operations in Switzerland. The impact of the Swiss tax holiday is reflected in the Company's effective tax rate. The difference between the maximum statutory Swiss income tax rate (22.18% in 2011, 2010, and 2009) and the Company's Swiss income tax rate under the tax holiday resulted in a reduction in the 2011, 2010, and 2009 effective tax rates of 20.2, 15.8, and 11.4 percentage points, respectively. The increase in benefits reflected in the foreign tax rate differences from 2009 to 2011 results from growth in the Company's Non-US operations and an increase in the proportion of consolidated income before income taxes from Non-U.S. operations.
At December 31, 2011, the Company had federal net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards of $49.6 million and combined state NOL carryforwards of approximately $541.1 million that will expire in the years 2012 through 2031. The Company also has research and experimentation
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
credit carryforwards of approximately $18.8 million that will expire in the years 2016 through 2025. Excess tax benefits related to stock option deductions incurred after December 31, 2005 are required to be recognized in the period in which the tax deduction is realized through a reduction of income taxes payable. As a result, the Company has not recorded deferred tax assets for certain stock option deductions included in its state NOL carryforwards and research and experimentation credit carryforwards. At December 31, 2011, deferred tax assets have not been recorded on state NOL carryforwards of approximately $116.7 million and for research and experimentation credits of approximately $9.0 million. These stock option tax benefits will be recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital when realized.
At December 31, 2011 and 2010, it was more likely than not that the Company would realize its deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances. The principal valuation allowance relates to Swiss deferred tax assets and the Swiss tax holiday that expires at the end of 2015.
The Company realized stock option deduction benefits in 2011, 2010 and 2009 for income tax purposes and has increased additional paid-in capital in the amount of approximately $25.1 million, $32.5 million and $98.8 million, respectively. The Company has recorded deferred income taxes as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income resulting in a deferred income tax asset at December 31, 2011 of $1.6 million and a deferred income tax asset at December 31, 2010 of $0.3 million.
The Company's U.S. federal income tax returns have been audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, through the year ended December 31, 2005. Tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are currently under examination by the IRS and scheduled to be completed within the next 12 months. The Company is also subject to audits by various state and foreign taxing authorities, including, but not limited to, most U.S. states and major European and Asian countries where the Company has operations.
The Company regularly reevaluates its tax positions and the associated interest and penalties, if applicable, resulting from audits of federal, state and foreign income tax filings, as well as changes in tax law that would reduce the technical merits of the position to below more likely than not. The Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years. Many factors are considered in making these evaluations, including past history, recent interpretations of tax law and the specifics of each matter. Because tax regulations are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently uncertain, these evaluations can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. The Company applies a variety of methodologies in making these estimates and assumptions, which include studies performed by independent economists, advice from industry and subject experts, evaluation of public actions taken by the IRS and other taxing authorities, as well as the Company's industry experience. These evaluations are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management. However, if management's estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, the Company's results of operations could be materially impacted.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Unrecognized tax benefits, generally represented by liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and all subject to tax examinations, arise when the estimated benefit recorded in the financial statements differs from the amounts taken or expected to be taken in a tax return because of the uncertainties described above. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues common among multinational corporations. If recognized, unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $550.0 million would have a net impact on the effective tax rate. The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its provision for income taxes. Accrued interest at December 31, 2011 and 2010 is approximately $53.2 million and $32.5 million, respectively.
The Company effectively settled examinations with various taxing jurisdictions in 2010. These settlements resulted in decreases in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken in prior years of $29.3 million in 2010. The Company has recorded changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits for prior years related to ongoing income tax audits in various taxing jurisdictions.
The Company's tax returns are under routine examination in many taxing jurisdictions. The scope of these examinations includes, but is not limited to, the review of our taxable presence in a jurisdiction, our deduction of certain items, our claim for research and development credits, our compliance with transfer pricing rules and regulations and the inclusion or exclusion of amounts from our tax returns as filed. Any settlements of examinations with taxing authorities or statute of limitations expirations would likely result in a significant decrease in the Company's unrecognized tax benefits. It is reasonably possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest, could decrease by as much as $450.0 million during the next 12-month period as a result of settlements with taxing authorities and statute of limitations expirations in various taxing jurisdictions. Our estimates of unrecognized tax benefits and potential tax benefits may not be representative of actual outcomes, and variation from such estimates could materially affect our financial statements in the period of settlement or when the statutes of limitations expire.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
19. Collaboration Agreements
The Company has entered into a number of alliances in the ordinary course of business, as is customary in its industry. Although the Company does not consider these arrangements to be material, the following is a brief description of certain of the more notable agreements:
Novartis Pharma AG: The Company licensed the worldwide rights (excluding Canada) regarding certain chirally pure forms of methylphenidate for FOCALIN® and FOCALIN XR® to Novartis. The Company also licensed to Novartis the rights related to long-acting formulations of methylphenidate and dex-methylphenidate products which are used in FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN LA®. As a result of the grant of these licenses the Company sells FOCALIN® to Novartis and receives royalties of between 30% and 35% on their sales of FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN LA®. Under the agreement, the Company has received upfront and regulatory achievement milestone payments totaling $55.0 million.
The agreement will continue until the later of (i) the tenth anniversary of the first commercial launch on a country-by-country basis or (ii) when the last applicable patent expires with respect to that country. At the expiration date, the Company will grant Novartis a perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to make, have made, use, import and sell products using the dex-methylphenidate and long-acting formulation technology.
The agreement may be terminated by Novartis upon 12 months prior written notice or by either party upon, among other things, the material breach of the other or in the event of withdrawal of the dex-methylphenidate product or RITALIN® product from the market because of regulatory mandate.
If the agreement is terminated by the Company then all licenses granted to Novartis under the agreement will terminate and Novartis will grant the Company a non-exclusive license to certain of their intellectual property related to the compounds and products. If the agreement is terminated by Novartis then all licenses granted to Novartis under the agreement will terminate.
When generic versions of long-acting methylphenidate hydrochloride and dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride enter the market, the Company expects Novartis' sales of RITALIN LA® and FOCALIN XR® products to decrease and therefore its royalties under this agreement to also decrease. Actavis Group, a generic manufacturer, has announced that they have launched a generic version of RITALIN LA® in January 2012.
Array BioPharma Inc.: The Company has a research collaboration agreement with Array BioPharma Inc., or Array, focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics in cancer and inflammation. As part of this agreement, as amended, the Company made payments to date in the aggregate amount of $54.5 million, which were recorded as research and development expense, in return for an option to receive exclusive worldwide rights for compounds developed against up to two research targets defined in the agreement. Array will be responsible for all discovery and clinical development through phase I or phase IIa and be entitled to receive, for each compound, potential milestone payments of approximately
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
$200.0 million if certain discovery, development and regulatory milestones are achieved, and $300.0 million if certain commercial milestones are achieved, as well as royalties on net sales. In December 2010, the Company made a required $10.0 million discovery milestone payment upon the filing and clearance of an investigational new drug application with the FDA.
The Company's option will terminate upon the earlier of a termination of the agreement by its terms, the date the Company has exercised its options for compounds developed against two of the four research targets identified, or September 21, 2012. The Company may unilaterally extend the option term for two additional one-year terms until September 21, 2014 and the parties may mutually extend the term for two additional one-year terms until September 21, 2016. Upon the expiration of the agreement, Array will grant the Company a fully paid-up, royalty-free license to use certain intellectual property of Array to market and sell the compounds and products developed under the agreement.
Acceleron Pharma: The Company entered into a worldwide strategic collaboration agreement with Acceleron Pharma, Inc., or Acceleron, for the joint development and commercialization of ACE-011, currently being studied for treatment of renal anemia. The collaboration agreement, as amended, combines both companies' resources and commitment to developing products for the treatment of cancer and cancer-related bone loss and expands the joint development, manufacturing and commercialization of Acceleron's products to include anemia exclusivity. Under the terms of the ACE-011 agreement, the Company and Acceleron will jointly develop, manufacture and commercialize Acceleron's products for bone loss. The Company made a payment to Acceleron in February 2008 of $50.0 million, which included a $5.0 million equity investment in Acceleron series C-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, with the remainder recorded as research and development expense. In December 2011, the Company made a $25.0 million equity investment in Acceleron series F Convertible Preferred Stock. In the event of an initial public offering of Acceleron, the Company will purchase a minimum of $7.0 million of Acceleron common stock. The Company has agreed to pay all development costs related to ACE-011 incurred after January 1, 2013.
Acceleron is eligible to receive development, regulatory approval and sales-based milestones of up to $367.0 million for the ACE-011 program and up to an additional $348.0 million for each of the three discovery stage programs. The parties also agreed to co-promote the products under the ACE-011 agreement in North America. Acceleron will receive tiered royalties on worldwide net sales upon the commercialization of a development compound. The Company made a $7.0 million development milestone payment to Acceleron in April 2011 for the initiation of enrollment into a phase II study for chemotherapy-induced anemia.
In August 2011, the Company also entered into a collaboration, license and option agreement with Acceleron, for the joint development and commercialization of ACE-536 for the treatment of anemia. The ACE-536 agreement also includes an option for future Acceleron anemia programs. The ACE-536 agreement provides the Company with an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license to the ACE-536 program and future Acceleron programs for the treatment of anemia. The parties also agreed to co-promote the products under the ACE-536 agreement in the United States, Canada and Mexico.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
In connection with the ACE-536 agreement, the Company made a payment to Acceleron in the amount of $25.0 million. The Company has also agreed to pay all development costs incurred after January 1, 2013. Acceleron is eligible to receive development, regulatory approval and sales-based milestones of up to $217.5 million for the ACE-536 program and up to an additional $170.8 million for the first discovery stage program, $148.8 million for the second discovery stage program and $125.4 million for each additional discovery stage program thereafter. In October 2011, we made a $7.5 million milestone payment for the initiation of a phase I clinical study of ACE-536. Acceleron will receive tiered royalties on worldwide net sales upon the commercialization of a development compound.
Pursuant to the ACE-011 agreement, the Company has an option to buy down the royalty rate, for both ACE-011, as described above, and ACE-536, until and including January 1, 2013, at the Company's sole discretion, for a one-time payment of $25.0 million.
The agreements for ACE-011 and ACE-536 may be terminated by the Company, at its sole discretion, at any time for the ACE-011 agreement, and, with respect to the ACE-536 agreement, after completion of the initial phase II clinical trials, or by either party, among other things, upon a material breach of the other party.
GlobeImmune, Inc.: To date, the Company has paid an aggregate amount of $13.1 million for equity investments in GlobeImmune, Inc., or GlobeImmune. In addition, the Company entered into a collaboration and option agreement with GlobeImmune focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics in cancer. As part of this agreement, the Company made a payment in May 2009 of $30.0 million, which was recorded as research and development expense, in return for the option to license compounds and products based on the GI-4000, GI-6200, GI-3000 and GI-6300 oncology drug candidate programs, as well as oncology compounds and products resulting from future programs controlled by GlobeImmune. GlobeImmune will be entitled to receive potential milestone payments of approximately $230.0 million for the GI-4000 program, $145.0 million for each of the GI-6200 and GI-3000 programs and $161.0 million for each of the GI-6300 program and each additional future program if certain development, regulatory and sales-based milestones are achieved. GlobeImmune will also receive tiered royalties on worldwide net sales.
The Company's options with respect to the GI-4000, GI-6200, GI-3000 and GI-6300 oncology drug candidate programs will terminate if the Company does not exercise its respective options after delivery of certain reports from GlobeImmune on the completed clinical trials with respect to each drug candidate program. If the Company does not exercise its options with respect to any drug candidate program or future program, the Company's option with respect to the oncology products resulting from future programs controlled by GlobeImmune will terminate three years after the last of the options with respect to the GI-4000, GI-6200, GI-3000 and GI-6300 oncology drug candidate programs terminates.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: On April 14, 2010, the Company entered into a discovery and development collaboration and license agreement with Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Agios, which focuses on cancer metabolism targets and the discovery, development and commercialization of associated therapeutics. As part of the agreement, as amended, the Company paid Agios $121.2 million, which was recorded by the Company as research and development expense. The Company also made an $8.8 million equity investment in Agios Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. In October 2011, we made a $20.0 million payment to Agios for a one year extension of our oncology collaboration and licensing agreement and in November 2011, made a $28.7 million investment in Agios series C-2 Convertible Preferred Stock. With respect to each product in a program that the Company chooses to license, Agios could receive up to $120.0 million upon achievement of certain milestones plus royalties on sales, and Agios may also participate in the development and commercialization of certain products in the United States. Agios may also receive a one-time milestone payment of $25.0 million upon dosing of the final human subject in a phase II study, such payment to be made only once with respect to only one program. The Company's option will terminate on April 14, 2014.
The Company has determined that Agios is a variable interest entity; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of Agios. Although the Company would have the right to receive the benefits from the collaboration and license agreement, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities under the collaboration and license agreement as Agios has the decision-making authority for the Joint Steering Committee and Joint Research Committee until the Company exercises its option to license a product. The Company's interest in Agios is limited to its equity ownership and it does not have any obligations or rights to the future losses or returns of Agios beyond this ownership.
The Chan Soon-Shiong Institute for Advanced Health: In April 2011, we entered into an agreement with the Institute for Advanced Health, later renamed to The Chan Soon-Shiong Institute for Advanced Health, or the CSS Institute, that included an upfront contribution, future contingent matching contributions and an additional milestone-based contingent payment. The CSS Institute is a non-profit organization dedicated to research and technology development in personalized molecular medicine of which Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the agreement, we made an initial contribution with a value of $41.0 million. The agreement provides for additional contributions of up to $50.0 million to be made by us based on the level of other third-party contributions received by the CSS Institute. No additional contributions have been made as of December 31, 2011. A final additional $25.0 million milestone-based payment is contingent upon the CSS Institute achieving specified results related to the collection of DNA data and genomic sequences and the initiation of research and development alliances to be achieved before December 31, 2015. Contributions made under this agreement will be recorded on our statements of income as research and development expense.
As part of the contribution agreement, we will receive a right of first offer and matching rights with respect to all oncology products developed, funded, acquired or licensed by the CSS Institute, the right to designate one of our employees to the CSS Institute's Scientific Advisory Board and we will become the exclusive oncology therapeutics sponsor of the CSS Institute.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
These rights will continue for as long as we continue to make payments under a preexisting agreement up to an aggregate $150.0 million.
Other Collaboration Arrangements in 2011: In addition to the collaboration agreements described above, the Company entered into a number of collaborative arrangements during 2011 that resulted in research and development expenses of $62.5 million. Subject to various conditions, future potential milestone payments of up to an aggregate $425.0 million plus sales royalties are possible under these additional arrangements entered into during 2011.
20. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases: The Company leases offices and research facilities under various operating lease agreements in the United States and international markets. At December 31, 2011, the non-cancelable lease terms for the operating leases expire at various dates between 2012 and 2023 and include renewal options. In general, the Company is also required to reimburse the lessors for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs associated with the leases.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2011 are:
Total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $48.1 million in 2011, $36.4 million in 2010 and $24.4 million in 2009.
Lines of Credit: The Company maintains lines of credit with several banks to support its hedging programs and to facilitate the issuance of bank letters of credit and guarantees on behalf of its subsidiaries. Lines of credit supporting the Company's hedging programs as of December 31, 2011 allowed the Company to enter into derivative contracts with settlement dates through 2014. As of December 31, 2011, the Company has entered into derivative contracts with net notional amounts totaling $2.425 billion. Lines of credit facilitating the issuance of bank letters of credit and guarantees as of December 31, 2011 allowed the Company to have letters of credit and guarantees issued on behalf of its subsidiaries totaling $48.4 million.
Other Commitments: The Company's obligations related to product supply contracts totaled $117.9 million at December 31, 2011. The Company also owns an interest in three limited
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
partnership investment funds and has committed to invest an additional $8.9 million, which is callable any time within a ten-year period from the date of original investment.
Collaboration Arrangements: The Company has entered into certain research and development collaboration agreements, as identified in Note 19, with third parties that include the funding of certain development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts with the potential for future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets. The Company's obligation to fund these efforts is contingent upon continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs. Due to the nature of these arrangements, the future potential payments are inherently uncertain, and accordingly no amounts have been recorded in the Company's accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Contingencies: The Company believes it maintains insurance coverage adequate for its current needs. The Company's operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations, which impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for the treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. The Company reviews the effects of such laws and regulations on its operations and modifies its operations as appropriate. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.
On January 20, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the jurisdiction of the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, or the PMPRB, extends to sales of drugs to Canadian patients even if the locus of sale is within the United States. This means that the Company's U.S. sales of THALOMID® brand drug to Canadian patients under the special access program are subject to PMPRB jurisdiction from and after January 12, 1995. In accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Company has provided to-date data regarding these special access program sales to the PMPRB. In light of the approval of THALOMID® brand drug by Health Canada on August 4, 2010, this drug is now sold through the Company's Canadian entity and is no longer sold to Canadian patients from the United States. On January 20, 2012, the Company received confirmation that PMPRB accepted a Voluntary Compliance Undertaking for THALOMID® brand drug, which required Celgene to make a payment of CAD $10.0 million to the Government of Canada in February 2012.
Legal Proceedings:
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in various patent, trademark, commercial and other claims; government investigations; and other legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. These legal proceedings and other matters are complex in nature and have outcomes that are difficult to predict and could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Patent proceedings include challenges to scope, validity or enforceability of our patents relating to the Company's various products or processes. Although the Company believes it has
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
substantial defenses to these challenges with respect to all its material patents, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these matters, and a loss in any of these cases could result in a loss of patent protection for the drug at issue, which could lead to a significant loss of sales of that drug and could materially affect future results of operations.
Among the principal matters pending to which the Company is a party to are the following:
In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC. The FTC requested documents and other information relating to requests by generic companies to purchase the Company's patented REVLIMID® and THALOMID® brand drugs in order to evaluate whether there is reason to believe that the Company has engaged in unfair methods of competition. In the first quarter of 2010, the State of Connecticut referenced the same issues as those referenced in the 2009 CID and issued a subpoena. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company received a second CID from the FTC relating to this matter. The Company continues to respond to requests for information.
In the first quarter of 2011, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California informed the Company that it was under investigation relating to its promotion of the drugs THALOMID® and REVLIMID® regarding alleged off-label marketing and improper payments to physicians. The Company is cooperating with the United States Attorney in connection with this investigation.
REVLIMID®: The Company has publicly announced that it has received a notice letter dated August 30, 2010, sent from Natco Pharma Limited of India ("Natco") notifying it of Natco's ANDA, which contains Paragraph IV certifications alleging that certain claims of certain patents listed for REVLIMID® in the FDA's Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the "Orange Book") are invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed (the "Notice Letter"). The Notice Letter was sent pursuant to Natco having filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") seeking permission from the FDA to market a generic version of 25mg, 15mg, 10mg and 5mg capsules of REVLIMID®. Under the federal Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, any generic manufacturer may file an ANDA containing a certification (a "Paragraph IV certification") challenging the validity or infringement of a patent listed in the Orange Book. On October 8, 2010, we filed an infringement action in the United States District Court of New Jersey against Natco in response to the Notice Letter with respect to United States Patent Nos. 5,635,517 (the "'517 patent"), 6,045,501 (the "'501 patent"), 6,281,230 (the "'230 patent"), 6,315,720 (the "'720 patent"), 6,555,554 (the "'554 patent"), 6,561,976 (the "'976 patent"), 6,561,977 (the "'977 patent"), 6,755,784 (the "'784 patent"), 7,119,106 (the "'106 patent"), and 7,465,800 (the "'800 patent"). If Natco is successful in challenging the Company's patents listed in the Orange Book, and the FDA were to approve the ANDA with a comprehensive education and risk management program for a generic version of lenalidomide, sales of REVLIMID® could be significantly reduced in the United States by the entrance of a generic lenalidomide product, potentially reducing the Company's revenue.
Natco responded to the Company's infringement action on November 18, 2010, with its Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. Natco has alleged (through Affirmative Defenses and
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Counterclaims) that the patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed by Natco's proposed generic products. After filing the infringement action, the Company learned the identity of Natco's U.S. partner, Arrow International Limited, or Arrow, and filed an amended complaint on January 7, 2011, adding Arrow as a defendant. On January 14, 2011, an amended complaint was filed identifying additional defendants including Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Arrow's parent), Watson Pharma, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Anda, Inc. (another wholly owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). On March 25, 2011, Celgene filed a second amended complaint naming only Natco, Arrow, and Watson Laboratories, Inc. (another wholly owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) as Defendants. Those three entities remain the current Defendants in this action.
The Company believes that Natco's counterclaims are likely to be unsustainable and intends to vigorously defend its patent rights. The Company believes it unlikely that Natco will prevail on each and every patent and patent claim subject to the lawsuit and that all of the patent claims would be deemed to be invalid, unenforceable and/or non-infringed. In addition, the FDA will need to approve an appropriate, non-infringing, comprehensive education and risk management program for a generic version of lenalidomide. Accordingly, the Company believes that the ultimate outcome is not expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
ABRAXANE®: On December 14, 2011, Cephalon, Inc. and Acusphere, Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleging, among other things, that the making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing of ABRAXANE® brand drug infringes claims of United States Patent No. RE40.493. Plaintiffs are seeking damages and injunctive relief. The Company intends to vigorously defend against this infringement suit. If the suit against the Company is successful, the Company may have to pay damages, ongoing royalties and may have to license rights from plaintiffs. However, the Company believes (a) that it is unlikely that the plaintiffs in this matter will prevail and (b) that the ultimate outcome will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. An answer by the Company was filed on February 20, 2012.
21. Geographic and Product Information
Operations by Geographic Area: Revenues primarily consist of sales of REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, ABRAXANE®, THALOMID®, and ISTODAX®. Additional sources of revenue include a licensing agreement with Novartis, which entitles us to royalties on FOCALIN XR®
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of services through our Cellular Therapeutics subsidiary and other miscellaneous licensing agreements.
(1)Long-lived assets consist of net property, plant and equipment.
Revenues by Product: Total revenues from external customers by product for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
Major Customers: The Company sells its products primarily through wholesale distributors and specialty pharmacies in the United States, which account for a large portion of the Company's total revenues. International sales are primarily made directly to hospitals, clinics and retail chains, many of which are government owned. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the following customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company's total revenue in at least one of those years. The
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
percentage of amounts due from these same customers compared to total net accounts receivable is also depicted below as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.
22. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
(1)Gross profit is computed by subtracting cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) from net product sales.
(2)The sum of the quarters may not equal the full year due to rounding. In addition, quarterly and full year basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated separately.
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
23. Subsequent Events
In January 2012, the Company and Avila Therapeutics, Inc., or Avila, a privately-held biotechnology company, announced a definitive merger agreement under which Celgene Corporation will acquire Avila for $350.0 million in cash plus up to $575.0 million in contingent development and regulatory approval milestones. The acquisition is expected to expand Celgene's leading role in the future treatment of hematologic cancers with Avila's AVL-292, a highly-selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor, currently in phase I clinical development. In addition, Avila's proprietary Avilomics™ Platform will augment Celgene's investment in the discovery and development of novel therapeutics for managing complex disorders.
The transaction has been approved by the Board of Directors of each company and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. The acquisition of Avila will be accounted for as an acquisition of a business.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
CONCLUSION REGARDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (the "Exchange Act"). Based on the foregoing evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In connection with the preparation of our annual consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or the COSO Framework. Management's assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this report, has issued their report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, a copy of which is included herein.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Celgene Corporation:
We have audited Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, and our report dated February 22, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
February 22,
ITEM 9B.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Pursuant to Paragraph G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K, the information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) is being incorporated by reference herein from our definitive proxy statement (or an amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K) to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 in connection with our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
See Item 10.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
See Item 10.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
See Item 10.
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
See Item 10.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Page
(a) 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010
Consolidated Statements of Income - Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) 2. Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(a) 3. Exhibit Index
The following exhibits are filed with this report or incorporated by reference:
*Filed herewith.
SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person or entity whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert J. Hugin its true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for it and in its name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all contents and purposes as it might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 22, 2012
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Celgene Corporation and Subsidiaries
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(1)Amounts are a reduction from gross sales. (2)The Other Additions column represents valuation account balances assumed in the 2010 acquisition of Abraxis.