Item 1. Business.
Omitted.
Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Omitted.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties.
Omitted.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Omitted.
Item 4.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Omitted.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Omitted.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Omitted.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Omitted.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Omitted.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Omitted.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Omitted.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Omitted.
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.
Omitted.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Omitted.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Omitted.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Omitted.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Omitted.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Omitted.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS REQUIRED BY GENERAL INSTRUCTION J
Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.
None.
Item 1114(b)(2) and 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.
None.
Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.
None.
Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Information required by Item 1119 has been omitted from this annual report on Form 10-K because it is substantially the same information as has been provided previously in a prospectus timely filed pursuant to Rule 424 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 under the same Central Index Key (CIK) code as this annual report on Form 10-K.
Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.
See Item 15
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Exhibits
(4) Trust Agreement dated as of September 1, 2006, among Structured Asset Securities Corporation, as Depositor, Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on October 13, 2006).
(10) Incorporate by reference as Exhibit (4).
(31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.
(33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
(34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
(35) Servicer compliance statement.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Omitted.
Filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-9 (Issuing Entity)
Aurora Loan Services LLC (Master Servicer)
/s/ E. Todd Whittemore E. Todd Whittemore, Executive Vice President
Date: March 30, 2007
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
(4) Trust Agreement dated as of September 1, 2006, among Structured Asset Securities Corporation, as Depositor, Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on October 13, 2006).
(10) Incorporate by reference as Exhibit (4).
(31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.
(33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
(34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
(35) Servicer compliance statement.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications
I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-9 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian, First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. as Sub-Contractor, LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Newport Management Corporation as Sub-Contractor, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Custodian, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent.
Dated: March 30, 2007
/s/ E. Todd Whittemore Signature
Executive Vice President Title
EX-33 (a) logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria
1. Aurora Loan Services LLC ("Aurora"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as of and for the 12-month period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), as set forth in Appendix A hereto. The transactions covered by this report (these transactions collectively referred to as the "Servicing Platform") include asset-backed securities transactions for which Aurora acted as servicer, closed on or after January 1, 2006 not sponsored by government sponsored enterprises or Government National Mortgage Association, for which the asset type is mortgage loans that (i) are primarily categorized by the servicing designations of conventional prime', 'conventional alt-a' and 'subprime' and (ii) do not receive the benefit of insurance by the Federal Housing Administration or guarantees from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or the Rural Housing Service;
2. Aurora has engaged certain vendors (the "Vendors") to perform specific, limited or scripted activities, and Aurora has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria or portion of the servicing criteria applicable to such Vendors' activities as set forth in Appendix A hereto with the exception of certain Vendors that have provided their own reports on assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.
3. Except as set forth in paragraph 4 below, Aurora used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;
4. The criteria listed in the column titled "Inapplicable Servicing Criteria" on Appendix A hereto are inapplicable to Aurora based on the activities it performs, directly or through its Vendors, with respect to the Servicing Platform, as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period;
5. Aurora has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Servicing Platform taken as a whole;
6. Aurora has not identified and is not aware of any material instance of noncompliance by the Vendors for which Aurora has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Servicing Platform taken as a whole.
7. Aurora has not identified any material deficiency in its policies and procedures to monitor the compliance by the Vendors with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Servicing Platform taken as a whole; and
8. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Aurora's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Reporting Period.
March 13, 2007
Aurora Loan Services LLC
By: /s/ Terry Gentry Name: Terry Gentry Title: Managing Director, Loan Administration
1 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
APPENDIX A
2 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
3 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
4 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
1 For criterion 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), Aurora did not perform the activity described in this criterion as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period. No assessment of compliance, therefore, is necessary.
2 Aurora is defining the "Investor" as the party to whom we report and remit under the applicable transaction agreement.
5 of 5
EX-33 (b) (logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria
1. Aurora Loan Services LLC ("Aurora"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank FSB, is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as of and for the 12-month period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), as set forth in Appendix A hereto. The transactions covered by this report (these transactions collectively referred to as the "Master Servicing Platform") include asset-backed securities transactions for which Aurora acted as master servicer, registered on or after January 1, 2006, involving residential mortgage loans;
2. Aurora has not engaged vendors (the "Vendors") to perform significant activities pertaining to the applicable servicing criteria;
3. Except as set forth in paragraph 4 below, Aurora used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;
4. The criteria listed in the column titled "Inapplicable Servicing Criteria" on Appendix A hereto are inapplicable to Aurora based on the activities it performs with respect to the Master Servicing Platform as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period;
5. Aurora has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Master Servicing Platform taken as a whole;
6. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Aurora's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period.
March 13, 2007
Aurora Loan Services LLC
By: /s/ E. Todd Whittemore Name: E. Todd Whittemore Title: Executive Vice President
1 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
APPENDIX A
2 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
3 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
4 of 5
(page)
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
1 Aurora did not perform the activity described in this criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period. No assessment of compliance, therefore, is necessary.
2 For criterion 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), Aurora did not perform the activity described in this criterion as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period. No assessment of compliance, therefore, is necessary.
3 Aurora is defining the "Investor" as the party to whom we report and remit under the applicable transaction agreement.
5 of 5
EX-33 (c) (logo) Countrywide HOME LOANS
2900 MADERA ROAD SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 93065-6298 (805) 955-1000
ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
Countrywide Financial Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, including its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (CHL), Countrywide Tax Services Corporation, Newport Management Corporation, and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL (collectively the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment, for which Countrywide Financial Corporation and such subsidiaries participated in servicing functions, as such term is described under Title 17, Section 229.1122 of the Code of Federal Regulations ("Item 1122 of Regulation AB"), of compliance in respect of the following Applicable Servicing Criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission in regard to the following servicing platform for the following period:
Platform: publicly-issued (i.e., registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities (securities collateralized by residential mortgage loans, including prime, alternative loan products, sub-prime, HELOC and dosed seconds) issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides cash collection and administration, investor remittances and reporting (except for those activities relating to trustee and paying agent services), and pool asset administration (except for those activities relating to custodial operations of pool assets and related documents), collectively "Servicing Functions" and for which the related issuer has a fiscal year end of December 31, 2006. The platform excludes any transactions issued by any government sponsored enterprise for which the Company provides Servicing Functions.
Period: as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Applicable Servicing Criteria: all servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required in the related agreements, except for the following paragraphs: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), only as it relates to information other than that contained in the monthly remittance report delivered by the servicer to the master servicer, trustee, and/or bond administrator, 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), only as it relates to the agreeing with investors' records as to the total unpaid principal balance and number of pool assets serviced by the servicer, 1122(d)(3)(ii), only as it relates to amounts other than amounts remitted by the servicer to the master servicer, trustee, and/or bond administrator, 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), only as 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) relate to the custodial operations of the pool assets and related documents (collateral file) by the document custodian responsible for such functions for the related transaction, and 1122(d)(4)(xv), only as it relates to Item 1115 of Regulation AB (derivative transactions).
(page)
With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:
1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance.
(page)
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
By: /s/ Steve Bailey Steve Bailey
Its: Senior Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Loan Administration
Dated: February 28, 2007
By:/s/ Kevin Meyers Kevin Meyers
Its: Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Loan Administration
Dated: February 28, 2007
(page)
Schedule A
Material Instances of Noncompliance
No material instances of noncompliance: the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
EX-33 (d) Appendix I
MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
Management of the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:
Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage - -backed securities and other asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding any publicly issued transactions sponsored or issued by any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").
Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(2)(iii),1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4) (ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122 (d)(4)(xiv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").
Management's interpretation of Applicable Servicing Criteria: The Company's management has determined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable only with respect to its continuing obligation to act as, or locate a, successor servicer under the circumstances referred to in certain governing documents. It is management's interpretation that Deutsche Bank Trust Company America has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to 1122(d)(1)(iii) as of and for the Period.
Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria 1122(d) (2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii), management has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company's management has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company's management has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, management has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor's activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company's management is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.
With respect to the Platform, the Company's management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:
1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.
2.The Company's management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the management's assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.
(page)
Appendix I
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
By: /s/ Gary R. Vaughan Name: Gary R. Vaughan Its: Managing Director
By: /s/ David Co Name: David Co Its: Director
By: /s/ Jose Sicilia Name: Jose Sicilia Its: Managing Director
By: /s/ Kevin Fischer Name: Kevin Fischer Its: Vice President
By: /s/ Robert Frier Name: Robert Frier Its: Director
DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
By: /s/ Kevin C. Weeks Name: Kevin C. Weeks Its: Managing Director
By: /s/ Jenna Kaufman Name: Jenna Kaufman Its: Director
EX-33 (e) REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE
First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the "Platform").
The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.
The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section 229.1 22(d)(2)(vii)(13) of the CFR with respect to the Platform, Specifically, the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset-hacked securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction agreements.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.
FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC General Partner
/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla/ Lucy A. Przybyla Senior Vice President February 28, 2007
EX-33 (f) (logo) LaSalle Bank ABN AMRO
LaSalle Bank N.A. 135 South LaSalle Street Suite 1625 Chicago, IL 60603
Global Securities and Trust Services
Management's Assertion on Compliance with Item 1122 Criteria
LaSalle Bank National Association (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB (17 C.F.R, 229.1122(d)) as indicated on Exhibit A annexed hereto entitled "1122 Servicing Criteria to be Addressed in Assessment of Compliance" (the "Servicing Criteria").
The Asserting Party has assessed the effectiveness of its compliance with the applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the period of January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"). In making this assessment, the Asserting Party used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
Based on such assessment, the Asserting Party believes that, as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period, it has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB for the servicing activities it performs in the asset-backed securities transactions detailed on Exhibit B. For servicing criteria 1122(d)(3)(i)(A) and (B), this assertion covers only the information on the report to investors that is required by the respective transaction agreements.
Ernst and Young, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Asserting Party's assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period. The asset-backed securities transactions to which this assertion and the attestation report relate are listed on Exhibit B.
LaSalle Bank National Association
By: /s/ Barbara L. Marik Name: Barbara L. Marik Title: First Vice President Date: February 28, 2007
(page)
Exhibit A
1122 Servicing Criteria to be addressed in an Assessment of Compliance
EX-33 (g) ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
Newport Management Corporation (the "Asserting Party") provides this assessment of compliance with respect to its performance of functions for the Applicable Servicing Criteria, as specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, in regards to the loans selected in the Servicing Platform for the following Period:
Servicing Platform: Pools of loans, underlying publicly-issued residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1, 2006 by Aurora Loan Services, LLC ("Servicer"), on which escrow payments were disbursed in 2006, specifically Item 1122(d)(4)(xi), only as it relates to the "Applicable Servicing Criteria" described below, and as disclosed by the Servicer to the Asserting Party (collectively, "Eligible Loans", as identified in Schedule A).
Period: As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Applicable Servicing Criteria: the servicing criteria which applies to the functions performed by the Asserting Party is set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(4)(xi) ("Applicable Servicing Criteria"). With respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria, the Asserting Party performs the following limited functions: 1. Processes the obligor's hazard insurance information it receives and provides the Servicer with the applicable hazard insurance effective date, payment amount, and payee (collectively, "Insurance Information"); 2. Provides the Insurance Information to the Servicer no later than 5 days prior to the applicable expiration date as indicated in the Insurance Information. 3. Disburses escrowed insurance payments to insurance carriers on or before the applicable expiration date.
With respect to the Servicing Platform, and with respect to the Period, the Asserting Party provides the following assessment of its compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria (as defined above):
1. The Asserting Party is responsible for assessing its compliance with respect to the functions it performs for the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
2. The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with respect to the functions it performs for the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
3. Other than as identified on Schedule B hereto, as of and for the Period, the Asserting Party was in material compliance with respect to the functions it performs for the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
KPMG, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Asserting Party's foregoing assessment of compliance.
NEWPORT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION By: /s/ Mark A. McElroy Mark A. McElroy Its: Executive Vice President
Dated: February 28, 2007
(page)
SCHEDULE A
Exhibit maintained at the office of the depositor.
(page)
SCHEDULE B
MATERIAL INSTANCES OF NONCOMPLIANCE
No material instances of noncompliance: Newport Management Corporation has compiled, in all material respects, with the aforementioned criterion as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
EX-33 (h) Management's Assertion
Report on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") as a party participating in the servicing function for the following transactions:
U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities Platform^1
hereby provides the following report on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 of Regulation AB applicable to it and as described on Exhibit A hereto:
1 U.S. Bank is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it as noted on the accompanying Exhibit A;
2 U.S. Bank used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;
3 U.S. Bank's assessment of its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria is as of and for the period beginning on January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2006, the end of the fiscal year covered by the Form 10-K report. U.S. Bank's participation in the servicing function complied in all material respects with the applicable servicing criteria
4 Ernst & Young, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on U.S. Bank's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the period beginning on January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2006, the end of the fiscal year covered by the Form 10-K report
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
/s/ Bryan R. Calder Name: Bryan R. Calder Title: Executive Vice President
Date: February 26, 2007
1 The U.S. Bank Corporate Trust ABS Platform (the "Platform") consists of the activities involved in the performance of servicing functions for publicly issued asset-backed and mortgage-backed transactions the securities of which were offered on or after January 1, 2006 and (ii) certain asset-backed transactions offered prior to January 1, 2006 for which the Issuer has voluntarily elected to make Regulation AB compliant filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Platform does not include transactions conmprised of the repackaging of corporate debt and/or other agency securities.
(page)
EXHIBIT A to Management's Assertion
Reg AB Servicing Criteria Reference
General Servicing Considerations
(page)
(page)
EX-33 (i) Management's Assertion
Report on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") as a party participating in the servicing function for the following transactions:
U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities Platform^1
hereby provides the following report on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 of Regulation AB applicable to it and as described on Exhibit A hereto:
1 U.S. Bank is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it as noted on the accompanying Exhibit A;
2 U.S. Bank used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;
3 U.S. Bank's assessment of its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria is as of and for the period beginning on January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2006, the end of the fiscal year covered by the Form 10-K report. U.S. Bank's participation in the servicing function complied in all material respects with the applicable servicing criteria
4 Ernst & Young, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on U.S. Bank's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the period beginning on January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2006, the end of the fiscal year covered by the Form 10-K report
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
/s/ Bryan R. Calder Name: Bryan R. Calder Title: Executive Vice President
Date: February 26, 2007
1 The U.S. Bank Corporate Trust ABS Platform (the "Platform") consists of the activities involved in the performance of servicing functions for publicly issued asset-backed and mortgage-backed transactions the securities of which were offered on or after January 1, 2006 and (ii) certain asset-backed transactions offered prior to January 1, 2006 for which the Issuer has voluntarily elected to make Regulation AB compliant filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Platform does not include transactions conmprised of the repackaging of corporate debt and/or other agency securities.
(page)
EXHIBIT A to Management's Assertion
Reg AB Servicing Criteria Reference
General Servicing Considerations
(page)
(page)
EX-33 (j) (logo) WELLS FARGO
Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045-1951 410 884-2000 410 715-2380 Fax
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the period as follows:
Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing, trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").
Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").
Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors"). The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.
With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:
1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A hereto.
KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By:/s/ Brian Bartlett Brian Bartlett
Its: Executive Vice President
Dated: March 1, 2007
(page)
(logo) WELLS FARGO
Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045-1951 410 884-2000 410 715-2380 Fax
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Schedule A
Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company
1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct those errors and to remedy related procedures.
Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor
NONE
Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors' Compliance
NONE
EX-33 (k) (logo) WELLS FARGO
Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045-1951 410 884-2000 410 715-2380 Fax
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the period as follows:
Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing, trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").
Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").
Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors"). The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.
With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:
1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A hereto.
KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By:/s/ Brian Bartlett Brian Bartlett
Its: Executive Vice President
Dated: March 1, 2007
(page)
(logo) WELLS FARGO
Corporate Trust Services 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045-1951 410 884-2000 410 715-2380 Fax
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Schedule A
Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company
1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct those errors and to remedy related procedures.
Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor
NONE
Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors' Compliance
NONE
EX-34 (a) (logo) ERNST & YOUNG
Ernst & Young LLP Suite 3300 370 17th Street Denver, Colorado 80202-5663
Phone: (720) 931-4000 Fax: (720) 931-4444
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform
Board of Directors Aurora Loan Services LLC
We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Management Certification"), that Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Certification, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by the Interpretation 17.06 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
(page)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG
As described in management's assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform certain activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06. As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4) (xii) for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Regulation AB 1122 Servicing Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 13, 2007
EX-34 (b) (logo) ERNST & YOUNG
Ernst & Young LLP Suite 3300 370 17th Street Denver, Colorado 80202-5663
Phone: (720)931-4000 Fax: (720)931-4444 www.ey.com
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform
Board of Directors Aurora Loan Services LLC
We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Management Certification"), that Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank FSB, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan master servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Certification, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), I122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
(page)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG
Ernst & Young LLP
In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Regulation AB 1122 Master Servicing Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ Ernst & Young,LLP
March 13, 2007
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
EX-34 (c) (logo) KPMG
KPMG LLP Suite 2000 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors Countrywide Financial Corporation:
We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Countrywide Financial Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, including its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, Countrywide Home Loans (CHL), Countrywide Tax Services Corporation, Newport Management Corporation, and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of CHL (collectively the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly issued residential mortgage-backed securities (securities collateralized by residential mortgage loans, including prime, alternative loan products, subprime, HELOC, and closed seconds) issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides cash collection and administration, investor remittances, and reporting (except for those activities relating to trustee and paying agent services), and pool asset administration (except for those activities relating to custodial operations of pool assets and related documents), collectively "Servicing Functions", excluding any transactions issued by any government sponsored enterprise for which the Company provides Servicing Functions (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), only as it relates to information other than that contained in the monthly remittance report delivered by the servicer to the master servicer, trustee, and/or bond administrator, and 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), only as it relates to the agreeing with investors' records as to the total unpaid principal balance and number of pool assets serviced by the servicer, 1122(d)(3)(ii), only as it relates to amounts other than amounts remitted by the servicer to the master services, trustee, and/or bond administrator, 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii), only as 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) relate to the custodial operations of the pool assets and related documents (collateral file) by the document custodian responsible for such functions for the related transaction and 1122(d)(4)(xv), only as it relates to Item 1115 of Regulation AB (derivative transactions), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore,
(page)
our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated in all material respects.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California February 28, 2007
KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
EX-34 (d) (logo) KPMG
KPMG LLP 303 East Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-5212
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:
We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding any publicly issued transactions, sponsored or issued by any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4) (viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d) (4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv ), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
As described in management's assertion included in the accompanying Appendix I, for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC
(page)
(logo) KPMG
Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois February 28, 2007
KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
EX-34 (e) (logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Suite 1800 2001 Rose Ave. Dallas TX 75201-2997 Telephone (214) 999 1400 Facismile (214) 754 7991 www.pwc.com
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation;
We have examined First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P.'s (the "Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation), compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential tax service provider (the "Platform") described in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
Our examination disclosed the following material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB applicable to the Company during year ended December 31, 2006. Account reconciliations for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts were not prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements as required by item 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB.
In our opinion, except for the material instance of noncompliance described in the preceding paragraph, First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential tax service provider, in all material respects.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 28, 2007
EX-34 (f) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Item 1122 Criteria, that LaSalle Bank National Association ("LBNA" or "the Company"), a wholly owned subsidiary of LaSalle Bank Corporation, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all new Asset Backed Securities, Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities and Residential Mortgage Backed Securities securitization trust transactions subsequent to January 1, 2006, to the extent subject to Regulation AB for which LBNA is trustee ("the Platform"), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for those criteria which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this report. See Exhibit A of management's assertion for a list of servicing criteria determined by the Company to be applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform. As indicated in the Management's Assertion on Compliance with Item 1122 Criteria, management's assertion for servicing criteria 1122(d)(3)(i)(A) and (B) covers only the information in reports to investors that is specifically required by the respective transaction agreements, and not to any additional information included in reports to investors that is not required by the respective transaction agreements. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria listed in Exhibit A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual mortgage transactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 28, 2007 Chicago, Illinois
EX-34 (g) (logo) KPMG
KPMG LLP Suits 2000 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors Newport Management Corporation:
We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Newport Management Corporation (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for pools of loans, underlying publicly issued residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1, 2006 by Aurora Loan Services, LLC, on which escrow payments were disbursed in 2006 (the Platform), specifically Item 1122(d)(4)(xi), only as it relates to: (1) processing the obligor's hazard insurance information the Company receives; (2) providing Aurora Loan Services, LLC with the applicable hazard insurance effective date, payment amount, and payee (collectively, Insurance Information); (3) providing the Insurance Information to Aurora Loan Services, LLC no later than 5 days prior to the applicable expiration date as indicated in the Insurance Information; and (4) disbursing escrowed insurance payments to insurance carriers on or before the applicable expiration date, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has determined that no other servicing criteria are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. Schedule A to the Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria lists the individual loans identified by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss Cooperative.
(page)
In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criterion as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ KPMG LLP Los Angeles, California
February 28, 2007
EX-34 (h) (logo) Ernst & Young
Ernst & Young LLP 220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400 Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509
Phone: (612) 343-1000 www.ey.com
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 26, 2007
A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
EX-34 (i) (logo) Ernst & Young
Ernst & Young LLP 220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400 Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509
Phone: (612) 343-1000 www.ey.com
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 26, 2007
A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
EX-34 (j) (logo) KPMG
KPMG LLP 303 East Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60801-5212
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:
We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing, trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and
KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
(page)
(logo) KPMG
procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.
Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i), as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.
In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, IL 60601 March 1, 2007
EX-34 (k) (logo) KPMG
KPMG LLP 303 East Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60801-5212
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:
We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing, trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.
As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and
KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
(page)
(logo) KPMG
procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.
Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i), as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.
In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, IL 60601 March 1, 2007
EX-35 (a) (logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES
Depositor: Structured Asset Securities Corporation Attention: Mortgage Finance SARM 2006-9 745 7th Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10019
Master Servicer:Aurora Loan Services LLC Chris Baker 327 Inverness Drive South Englewood, CO 80112
Trustee: U.S. Bank, N.A. Attention: Structured Finance SARM 2006-9 60 Livingston Avenue St. Paul, MN 55107
Subject: Annual Officer's Certification Fiscal Year: 2006 Investor Code: Investor Name: SARM 2006-9
I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2006:
1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision.
2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout 2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have specifically identified to the Master Servicer, the Depositor, and the Trustee each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof, including the steps being taken by the Servicer to remedy such default.
Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC
By /s/ Terry L. Gentry Name: Terry L. Gentry Title: Managing Director
EX-35 (b) (logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES A Lehman Brothers Company
Depositor: Structured Asset Securities Corporation 745 Seventh Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10019
Trustee: US Bank, N.A. One Federal Street, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02110
Securities Administrator: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045
Subject: Annual Officer's Certification Fiscal Year: 2006 Securitization: SARM 2006-9
I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2006:
1.A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision.
2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout 2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have specifically identified to the Depositor, and the Trustee each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof, including the steps being taken by the Master Servicer to remedy such default.
Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC
By: /s/ E. Todd Whittemore Name: E. Todd Whittemore Title: Executive Vice President
(logo) EQUAL HOUSING LENDER
EX-35 (c) (logo) Countrywide HOME LOANS
400 Countrywide Way Simi Valley, California 93065-6298
February 28, 2007
WELLS FARGO 9062 OLD ANNAPOLIS RD COLUMBIA, MD 21045 Laneise Foxworth
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide LP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "Servicer"). I further certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to the securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Servicing Agreement") that:
(a) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.
/s/ Joseph Candelario Joseph Candelario First Vice President Compliance Officer Loan Administration
February 28, 2007
See Deal Name listing on following page.
(page)
Exhibit A
ACE 2006-CW1 ACE 2006-FM2 ACE 2006-NC2 ACE 2006-NC3 BAFC 2006-2 BAFC 2006-A BAFC 2006-D BAFC 2006-H BCAP 2006AA1 BCAP 2006-AA2 BSALTA 2006-1 BSALTA 2006-2 BSALTA 2006-3 BSALTA 2006-4 BSALTA 2006-5 BSALTA 2006-6 BSALTA 2006-7 BSALTA 2006-8 BSARM 2006-2 BSARM 2006-4 CSAB 2006-2 CSAB 2006-3 CSAB 2006-4 CSFB ARMT 2006-1 CSFB ARMT 2006-2 CSFB ARMT 2006-3 CSMC 2006-1 CSMC 2006-2 CSMC 2006-3 CSMC 2006-4 CSMC 2006-5 CSMC 2006-7 CSMC 2006-8 CSMC 2006-9 DBALT 2006-AB3 (SUB) DBALT 2006-AB4 (SUB) DBALT 2006-AF1 DBALT 2006-AR1 DBALT 2006-AR2 DBALT 2006-AR3 DBALT 2006-AR4 DBALT 2006-AR5 (SUB) DBALT 2006-AR6 (SUB) DBALT 2006-OA1 (SUB) GSAA 2006-10 (SUB) GSAA 2006-11 GSAA 2006-14 GSAA 2006-16 GSAA 2006-17
(page)
Exhibit A (con't.) GSAA 2006-19 GSAA 2006-20 GSAA 2006-4 GSAA 2006-4 (SUB) GSAA 2006-7 SUB GSAA 2006-8 GSAA 2006-8 (SUB) GSR 2006-1F (SUB) GSR 2006-1F (SUB) GSR 2006-2F (SUB) GSR 2006-2F (SUB) GSR 2006-3F (SUB) GSR 2006-3F (SUB) GSR 2006-5F (SUB) GSR 2006-5F (SUB) GSR 2006-6F GSR 2006-7F GSR 2006-8F GSR 2006-9F GSR 2006-10F GSR 2006-AR1 GSR 2006-AR2 GSR 2006-OA1 HARBORVIEW 2006-2 HARBORVIEW 2006-6 HARBORVIEW 2006-11 HARBORVIEW 2006-12 SASCO 2006-BC2 SASCO 2006-BC3 SASCO 2006-BC4 SASCO 2006-BC5 THORNBURG 2006-1 THORNBURG 2006-2 THORNBURG 2006-4 THORNBURG 2006-5 DBALT 2006-AR6 DBALT 2006-OA1 GSR 2006-1F GSR 2006-5F JPMMT 2006-A7 JPMMT 2006-S2 JPMMT 2006-S3 JPMMT 2006-54 LMT 2006-9 LUMINENT 2006-2 LUMINENT 2006-5 LUMINENT 2006-5 LUMINENT 2006-6 MARM 2006-2 MARM 2006-OA2 MLMI 2006-A1
(page)
Exhibit A (con't.) MLMI 2006-A2 MLMI 2006-A3 MLMI 2006-A4 MSAC 2006-HE8 MSIX 2006-1 MSM 2006-1AR SAIL 2006-3 SAMI II 2006-AR1 SAMI II 2006-AR2 SAMI II 2006-AR3 SAMI II 2006-AR4 SAMI II 2006-AR6 SAMI II 2006-AR7 SAMI II 2006-AR8 SARM 2006-2 SARM 2006-3 SARM 2006-4 SARM 2006-5 SARM 2006-7 SARM 2006-8 SARM 2006-9 THORNBURG 2006-3 ZUNI 2006-OA1 GSR 2006-3F GSR 2006-2F PRIME 2006-CL1 SARM 2006-1 THORNBURG 2006-6 JPALT 2006-A1 JPALT 2006-A2 JPALT 2006-A3 JPALT 2006-A4 JPALT 2006-A6 JPALT 2006-A7 JPALT 2006-S1 JPALT 2006-S3 JPALT 2006-S4 JPMAC 2006-CW2 JPMMT 2006-A1 JPMMT 2006-A2 JPMMT 2006-A3 JPMMT 2006-A4 JPMMT 2006-A6 HASCO 2006-HE1 SEQUOIA 2006-1 SEQUOIA 2006-1 SQALT 2006-1