ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Introduction
RiverSource Life Insurance Company is a stock life insurance company with one wholly owned stock life insurance company subsidiary, RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York (“RiverSource Life of NY”). RiverSource Life Insurance Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (“Ameriprise Financial”).
•
RiverSource Life Insurance Company is domiciled in Minnesota and holds Certificates of Authority in American Samoa, the District of Columbia and all states except New York. RiverSource Life Insurance Company issues insurance and annuity products.
•
RiverSource Life of NY is domiciled and holds a Certificate of Authority in New York. RiverSource Life of NY issues insurance and annuity products.
RiverSource Life Insurance Company also wholly owns RiverSource Tax Advantaged Investments, Inc. (“RTA”). RTA is a stock company domiciled in Delaware and is a limited partner in affordable housing partnership investments.
RiverSource Life Insurance Company and RiverSource Life of NY are referred to collectively in this Item 1 and Item 1A
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
RiverSource Life’s operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below, that could have a material adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Based on the information currently known, RiverSource Life believes that the following information identifies the material factors affecting RiverSource Life. However, the risks and uncertainties RiverSource Life faces are not limited to those described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to RiverSource Life or which are currently believed to be immaterial may also adversely affect RiverSource Life’s business.
Risks Relating to RiverSource Life’s Business and Operations
RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by market fluctuations and by economic, political and other factors.
RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations may be materially affected by market fluctuations and by economic and other factors. Such factors, which can be global, national, regional or local in nature, include: (i) political, social, economic and market conditions; (ii) the availability and cost of capital; (iii) the level and volatility of equity prices, commodity prices and interest rates, currency values and other market indices; (iv) technological changes and events; (v) U.S. and foreign government fiscal and tax policies; (vi) U.S. and foreign government ability, real or perceived, to avoid defaulting on government securities; (vii) the availability and cost of credit; (viii) inflation; (ix) investor sentiment and confidence in the financial markets; (x) terrorism and armed conflicts; and (xi) natural disasters such as weather catastrophes and widespread health emergencies. In addition, during periods of unfavorable market or economic conditions, the level of consumer investing and insuring activity may also decrease, which may negatively impact the results of RiverSource Life’s businesses. Moreover, fluctuations in economic and market activity could impact the way then-existing customers allocate their available resources, which could affect RiverSource Life’s persistency, surrender and product cash value loan experience and could negatively impact its business.
Declines and volatility in U.S. and global market conditions have impacted RiverSource Life’s business in the past and may do so again. RiverSource Life’s business has been and in the future may be adversely affected by U.S. and global capital market and credit crises, the repricing of credit risk, equity market volatility and decline, and stress or recession in the U.S. and global economies generally.
Significant downturns and volatility in equity markets may have, and have in the past had, an adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations. Market downturns and volatility may cause, and have caused, potential new purchasers of RiverSource Life’s products to limit purchases of or to refrain from purchasing RiverSource Life’s variable annuities and variable universal life insurance products that have returns linked to the performance of the equity markets. Downturns may also cause contractholders in annuity products and policyholders in insurance products to withdraw cash values from those products. Downturns and volatility may also have an adverse effect on the performance of RiverSource Life’s investment portfolio. In addition, market downturns and volatility in equity markets may cause and have caused RiverSource Life to accelerate amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), which increases its expenses and reduces its net income.
Additionally, downturns and volatility in equity markets can have, and have had, an adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s asset-based revenues because the value of equity-based separate account assets will be reduced.
The GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions offered with certain RiverSource Life variable annuities create obligations which are carried at fair value separately from the underlying host variable annuity contract. Changes in the fair value of these GMAB and GMWB obligations are recorded through earnings with fair value calculated by estimating the present value of future benefits, less applicable fees, using actuarial models, which simulate various economic scenarios. Changes in interest rates, equity prices and/or equity market volatility may impact the fair value of the GMAB and GMWB liabilities. Although RiverSource Life typically hedges against such changes, a significant change in either equity price levels or equity market volatility may result in a net adverse impact to current period financial statements. Further, RiverSource Life’s cost of hedging these guarantees has increased as a result of low interest rates and volatility in the equity markets and broad-based market and regulatory-driven changes in the collateral requirements of hedge trading counterparties. In addition, heightened volatility creates greater uncertainty for the accuracy of RiverSource Life’s future hedging effectiveness.
A significant market decline in equity price levels could also result in guaranteed minimum benefits under GMDB and guaranteed minimum income benefit (“GMIB”) provisions being higher than current account values would support, which could have an adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations. RiverSource Life does not currently hedge, reinsure or sell GMIB provisions.
Changes in interest rates and prolonged periods of low interest rates may adversely affect RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations.
RiverSource Life’s insurance and annuity products are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, and future impacts associated with such variations may differ from historical costs. In addition, interest rate fluctuations could result in fluctuations in the valuation of certain minimum guaranteed benefits contained in some of its variable annuity products. Although RiverSource Life typically hedges to mitigate some of the effect of such fluctuations, significant changes in interest rates could have a material adverse impact on RiverSource Life’s results of operations.
During periods of increasing market interest rates, RiverSource Life offers higher crediting rates on interest-sensitive products, such as universal life insurance and fixed annuities and RiverSource Life increases crediting rates on in force products to keep these products competitive. Because yields on invested assets may not increase as quickly as current interest rates, RiverSource Life may have to accept a lower “spread,” or the difference between the returns it earns on the investments that support its obligations under these products and the amounts that it must pay policyholders and contractholders, and thus lower profitability or face a decline in sales and greater loss of existing contracts and related assets. In addition, increases in market interest rates may cause increased policy surrenders, withdrawals from life insurance policies and annuity contracts and requests for policy loans, as policyholders and contractholders seek to shift assets to products with perceived higher returns. This process may lead to an earlier than expected outflow of cash from the business. These withdrawals and surrenders may require investment assets to be sold at a time when the prices of those assets are lower because of the increase in market interest rates, which may result in realized investment losses. Also, increases in market interest rates may result in extension of the maturity of some of RiverSource Life’s investment assets. Increases in crediting rates, as well as surrenders and withdrawals, could have an adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations. An increase in policy surrenders and withdrawals also may require RiverSource Life to accelerate amortization of DAC, which would increase its expenses and reduce its net income.
During periods of falling interest rates or stagnancy of low interest rates, RiverSource Life’s spread may be reduced or could become negative, primarily because some of these products have guaranteed minimum crediting rates. Due to the long-term nature of the liabilities associated with RiverSource Life’s LTC and universal life with secondary guarantees, as well as fixed annuities and guaranteed benefits on variable annuities, sustained declines in or stagnancy of low long-term interest rates may subject RiverSource Life to reinvestment risks and increased hedging costs. In addition, reduced or negative spreads may require RiverSource Life to accelerate amortization of DAC, which would increase its expenses and reduce its net income.
Interest rate fluctuations also could have an adverse effect on the results of RiverSource Life’s investment portfolio. During periods of declining market interest rates or stagnancy of low interest rates, the interest RiverSource Life receives on variable interest rate investments decreases. In addition, during those periods, RiverSource Life is forced to reinvest the cash it receives as interest or return of principal on its investments in lower-yielding high-grade instruments or in lower-credit instruments to maintain comparable returns. Issuers of certain callable fixed income securities also may decide to prepay their obligations in order to borrow at lower market rates, which increases the risk that RiverSource Life may have to reinvest the cash proceeds of these securities in lower-yielding or lower-credit instruments.
Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect RiverSource Life’s ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital.
The capital and credit markets may experience, and have experienced, varying degrees of volatility and disruption. In some cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers. RiverSource Life needs liquidity to pay contractholder and policyholder claims and benefits as well as operating expenses. Without sufficient liquidity, RiverSource Life could be required to curtail its operations, and its business would suffer.
RiverSource Life’s liquidity needs are satisfied primarily through its reserves and the cash generated by its operations. RiverSource Life believes the level of cash and securities it maintains, when combined with expected cash inflows from investments and operations, is adequate to meet anticipated short-term and long-term benefit and claims payment obligations. In the event current resources are insufficient to satisfy RiverSource Life’s needs, it may access financing sources from its parent holding company, its other affiliates or third parties. The availability of additional financing would depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the availability of liquidity from RiverSource Life’s parent or other affiliates, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, RiverSource Life’s credit ratings and credit capacity, as well as the possibility that customers or potential third-party lenders could develop a negative perception of RiverSource Life’s long- or short-term financial prospects if it incurs large investment losses or if the level of its business activity decreases due to a market downturn. Similarly, RiverSource Life’s access to funds may be rendered more costly or impaired if regulatory authorities or rating organizations take actions against it. Also, transfers of cash or other assets from RiverSource Life’s parent or other affiliates must comply with the applicable revolving credit agreements and may be subject to the prior approval of (or notice to) state insurance regulators.
Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may also limit RiverSource Life’s or its parent’s access to capital required to operate its business. Such market conditions may limit RiverSource Life’s ability to satisfy statutory capital requirements, generate fee income and market-related revenue to meet liquidity needs and access the capital necessary to grow its business. As such, RiverSource Life may be forced to use different types of capital than it would otherwise, less effectively deploy such capital or bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease RiverSource Life’s profitability and significantly reduce its financial flexibility.
A downgrade or a potential downgrade in RiverSource Life’s financial strength ratings could result in a loss of business and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
Financial strength ratings, which various rating organizations publish as a measure of an insurance company’s ability to meet contractholder and policyholder obligations, are important to maintain public confidence in RiverSource Life’s products, the ability to market its products and its competitive position. A downgrade in RiverSource Life’s financial strength ratings, or the announced potential for a downgrade, could have a significant adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations in many ways, including:
•
reducing new sales of insurance and annuity products;
•
adversely affecting RiverSource Life’s relationships with distributors of its products;
•
materially increasing the number or amount of policy surrenders and withdrawals by contractholders and policyholders;
•
requiring RiverSource Life to reduce prices for many of its products to remain competitive; and
•
adversely affecting RiverSource Life’s ability to obtain reinsurance or obtain reasonable pricing on reinsurance.
In view of the difficulties experienced in recent years by certain companies in the insurance industry, the rating organizations have heightened the level of scrutiny that they apply and have requested additional information from the companies that they rate. They may increase the frequency and scope of their reviews or adjust upward the capital and other requirements employed in the rating organizations’ models for maintenance of ratings levels. Rating organizations may also become subject to tighter laws, regulations or scrutiny governing ratings, which may in turn impact ratings assigned to insurance companies.
RiverSource Life cannot predict what actions rating organizations may take, or what actions RiverSource Life may take in response to the actions of rating organizations, which could adversely affect its business. As with other companies in the insurance industry, RiverSource Life’s ratings could be changed at any time and without any notice by the rating organizations.
Intense competition and the economics of changes in RiverSource Life’s product revenue mix and distribution channels could negatively impact RiverSource Life’s ability to maintain or increase its market share and profitability.
RiverSource Life operates in an intensely competitive industry. RiverSource Life competes based on a number of factors including name recognition, service, investment performance, product offerings and features, price, perceived financial strength, and claims-paying ability ratings. RiverSource Life’s competitors include insurers, asset managers and other financial institutions. RiverSource Life may face competitors that have greater market share, offer a broader range of products, have greater financial resources or have higher claims-paying ability ratings than RiverSource Life does. Some of RiverSource Life’s competitors may possess or acquire intellectual property rights that could provide a competitive advantage to them in certain markets or for certain products, which could make it difficult for RiverSource Life to introduce new products and services. Some of RiverSource Life’s competitors’ proprietary products or technology could be similar to its own, and this could result in disputes that could impact RiverSource Life’s financial condition or results of operations. In addition, over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become considerably more concentrated, as financial institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms or distribution firms are seeking to limit the breadth of product offerings in order to simplify their regulatory and risk
management. This convergence could result in RiverSource Life’s competitors gaining greater resources and RiverSource Life may experience pressures on its pricing and market share as a result of these factors and as some of RiverSource Life’s competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.
The offerings available to Ameriprise Financial’s advisor network include not only annuity and insurance products issued by RiverSource Life, but also annuities issued by a limited number of unaffiliated insurance companies. As a result of this and further openings of Ameriprise Financial’s advisor network to annuity and insurance products of other companies, RiverSource Life could experience lower sales of its products, higher surrenders or other developments, which could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
RiverSource Life and its affiliates face intense competition in attracting and retaining key talent.
RiverSource Life’s continued success depends to a substantial degree on its and its affiliates’ ability to attract and retain qualified people. The market for qualified talent is extremely competitive. If RiverSource Life is unable to attract and retain qualified individuals or its recruiting and retention costs increase significantly, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely impacted.
The impairment or negative performance of other financial institutions could adversely affect RiverSource Life.
RiverSource Life has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker-dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, insurers, reinsurers, investment funds and other institutions. The operations of U.S. and global financial services institutions are interconnected and a decline in the financial condition of one or more financial services institutions may expose RiverSource Life to credit losses or defaults, limit access to liquidity or otherwise disrupt the operations of RiverSource Life’s business. While RiverSource Life regularly assesses its exposure to different industries and counterparties, the performance and financial strength of specific institutions are subject to rapid change, the timing and extent of which cannot be known.
Many transactions with, and investments in, the products and securities of other financial institutions expose RiverSource Life to credit risk in the event of default of its counterparty. With respect to secured transactions, RiverSource Life’s credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by it cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices insufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to it. RiverSource Life also has exposure to financial institutions in the form of unsecured debt instruments, derivative transactions, (including with respect to derivatives hedging its exposure on variable annuity contracts with guaranteed benefits), reinsurance, repurchase and underwriting arrangements and equity investments. There can be no assurance that any such losses or impairments to the carrying value of these assets would not materially and adversely impact RiverSource Life’s business and results of operations.
Downgrades in the credit or financial strength ratings assigned to the counterparties with whom RiverSource Life transacts business or other adverse reputational impacts to such counterparties could create the perception that its financial condition will be adversely impacted as a result of potential future defaults by such counterparties. Additionally, RiverSource Life could be adversely affected by a general, negative perception of financial institutions caused by the downgrade or other adverse impact to the reputation of other financial institutions.
Poor investment performance in RiverSource Life’s variable products could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
RiverSource Life believes that investment performance is an important factor in the growth of its variable annuity and variable life insurance business. Poor investment performance could impair revenues and earnings, as well as RiverSource Life’s prospects for growth, because RiverSource Life’s ability to attract funds from existing and new clients might diminish and existing clients might withdraw assets from RiverSource Life’s variable products in favor of better performing products of other companies, which would result in lower revenues.
AFSI may be unable to attract and retain financial advisors.
RiverSource Life is dependent on the financial advisors of AFSI for nearly all of the sales of its annuity and insurance products. A significant number of the financial advisors operate as independent contractors under a franchise agreement with AFSI. There can be no assurance that AFSI will be successful in its efforts to maintain its current network of financial advisors or to recruit and retain new advisors to its network. From time to time, there are regulatory-driven or other trends and developments within the industry, such as the current uncertainty around the Protocol for Broker Recruiting, that could potentially impact the current competitive dynamics between RiverSource Life and RiverSource Life’s competitors and impact the number of advisors affiliated with AFSI. If AFSI is unable to attract and retain quality financial advisors, fewer advisors would be available to sell RiverSource Life’s annuity and insurance products and RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Third-party defaults, bankruptcy filings, legal actions and other events may limit the value of or restrict RiverSource Life’s access to cash and investments.
Capital and credit market volatility can exacerbate, and has exacerbated, the risk of third-party defaults, bankruptcy filings, foreclosures, legal actions and other events that may limit the value of or restrict RiverSource Life’s access to cash and investments.
Defaults in RiverSource Life’s fixed maturity securities portfolio could adversely affect its earnings.
Issuers of the fixed maturity securities that RiverSource Life owns may default on principal and interest payments. As of December 31, 2017, 5% of RiverSource Life’s fixed maturity securities had ratings below investment-grade. Moreover, economic downturns and corporate malfeasance can increase the number of companies, including those with investment-grade ratings, which default on their debt obligations. Default-related declines in the value of RiverSource Life’s fixed maturity securities portfolio could cause its net earnings to decline and could weaken its capital position.
RiverSource Life’s valuation of fixed maturity and equity securities may include methodologies, estimations and assumptions which are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may materially adversely impact its financial condition or results of operations.
Fixed maturity, equity and short-term investments which are reported at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, represent the majority of RiverSource Life’s total cash and invested assets. The determination of fair values by management in the absence of quoted market prices is based on: (i) valuation methodologies; (ii) securities RiverSource Life deems to be comparable; and (iii) assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances. The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on available market information and judgments about financial instruments, including estimates of the timing and amounts of expected future cash flows and the credit standing of the issuer or counterparty. Factors considered in estimating fair value include: coupon rate, maturity, estimated duration, call provisions, sinking fund requirements, credit rating, industry sector of the issuer, interest rates, credit spreads and quoted market prices of comparable securities. The use of different methodologies and assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
During periods of market disruption, including periods of significantly rising or high interest rates and rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain of RiverSource Life’s securities. There may be certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data that become illiquid due to the financial environment. In such cases, the valuation of certain securities may require additional subjectivity and management judgment. As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable and may require greater estimation as well as valuation methods that are more sophisticated, which may result in values less than the value at which the investments may be ultimately sold. Further, rapidly changing and unexpected credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of securities as reported within RiverSource Life’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly. Decreases in value may have a material adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition or results of operations.
The determination of the amount of allowances and impairments taken on certain investments is subject to management’s evaluation and judgment and could materially impact RiverSource Life’s financial position or results of operations.
The determination of the amount of allowances and impairments vary by investment type and is based upon RiverSource Life’s periodic evaluation and assessment of inherent and known risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. Management updates its evaluations regularly and reflects changes in allowances and impairments in operations as such evaluations are revised. Historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments or allowances.
The assessment of whether impairments have occurred is based on management’s case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in fair value that considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer or borrower, and management uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security or loan and in assessing the prospects for recovery. Inherent in management’s evaluation of the security or loan are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential.
Some of RiverSource Life’s investments are relatively illiquid.
RiverSource Life invests a portion of its general account assets in certain privately placed fixed income securities, mortgage loans, policy loans and limited partnership interests, all of which are relatively illiquid. These asset classes represented 19% of the carrying value of RiverSource Life’s investment portfolio as of December 31, 2017. If RiverSource Life requires significant amounts of cash on short notice in excess of its normal cash requirements, it may have difficulty selling these investments in a timely manner, or be forced to sell them for an amount less than it would otherwise have been able to realize, or both, which could have an adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations.
The failure of other insurers could require RiverSource Life to pay higher assessments to state insurance guaranty funds.
RiverSource Life Insurance Company and RiverSource Life of NY are required by law to be a member of the guaranty fund association in every state where they are licensed to do business. In the event of insolvency of one or more unaffiliated insurance companies, RiverSource Life could be adversely affected by the requirement to pay assessments to the guaranty fund associations. Uncertainty and volatility in the U.S. economy and financial markets in recent years, plus the repercussions of a heightened regulatory environment, have weakened or may weaken the financial condition of numerous insurers, including insurers currently in receiverships, increasing the risk of triggering guaranty fund assessments. For more information regarding assessments from guaranty fund associations, see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If the counterparties to RiverSource Life’s reinsurance arrangements or to the derivative instruments it uses to hedge its business risks default or otherwise fail to fulfill their obligations, RiverSource Life may be exposed to risks it had sought to mitigate, which could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
RiverSource Life uses reinsurance to mitigate its risks in various circumstances as described in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K - “Business - Reinsurance.” Reinsurance does not relieve RiverSource Life of its direct liability to its policyholders and contractholders, even when the reinsurer is liable to RiverSource Life. Accordingly, RiverSource Life bears credit and performance risk with respect to its reinsurers, including Genworth Life Insurance Company with whom RiverSource Life finalized various confidential enhancements in July 2016 that have been shared, in the normal course of regular reviews, with RiverSource Life’s domiciliary regulator and rating agencies. A reinsurer’s insolvency or its inability or unwillingness to make payments under the terms of its reinsurance agreement could have a material adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations. See Notes 2 and 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding reinsurance.
In addition, RiverSource Life uses a variety of derivative instruments (including options, forwards and interest rate swaps) with a number of counterparties to hedge business risks. The amount and breadth of exposure to derivative counterparties, as well as the cost of derivative instruments, have increased significantly in connection with RiverSource Life’s strategies to hedge guaranteed benefit obligations under its variable annuity products. If RiverSource Life’s counterparties fail to honor their obligations under the derivative instruments in a timely manner, RiverSource Life’s hedges of the related risk will be ineffective. That failure could have a material adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations. This risk of failure of RiverSource Life’s hedge transactions from counterparty default may be increased by capital market volatility.
RiverSource Life provides investment securities as collateral to its derivative counterparties which they may sell, pledge, or rehypothecate. RiverSource Life has exposure, under the relevant arrangement, if the collateral is not returned to RiverSource Life to the extent that the fair value of the collateral exceeds RiverSource Life’s liability. Additionally, RiverSource Life may also accept investment securities as collateral from its derivative counterparties, which RiverSource Life may sell, pledge, or rehypothecate. If the counterparties that RiverSource Life pledges the collateral to are not able to return these investment securities under the terms of the relevant arrangements, RiverSource Life would be required to deliver alternative investments or cash to its derivative counterparty, which could impact RiverSource Life’s liquidity and could adversely impact its financial condition or results of operations.
If RiverSource Life’s reserves for future policy benefits and claims are inadequate, it may be required to increase its reserve liabilities, which would adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
RiverSource Life establishes reserves as estimates of its liabilities to provide for future obligations under its insurance policies and annuities contracts. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of the liability, but rather are estimates of contract benefits and related expenses RiverSource Life expects to incur over time. The assumptions and estimates RiverSource Life makes in establishing reserves require certain judgments about future experience and, therefore, are inherently uncertain. RiverSource Life cannot determine with precision the actual amounts that it will pay for contract benefits, the timing of payments, or whether the assets supporting its stated reserves will increase to the levels it estimates before payment of benefits or claims. RiverSource Life monitors its reserve levels continually. If RiverSource Life were to conclude that its reserves are insufficient to cover actual or expected contract benefits, it would be required to increase its reserves and incur income statement charges for the period in which it makes the determination, which would adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. For more information on how RiverSource Life sets its reserves, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Morbidity rates or mortality rates that differ significantly from RiverSource Life’s pricing expectations would negatively affect profitability.
RiverSource Life has historically set, and continues to set, prices for its life and DI insurance (and historically LTC insurance) as well as some annuity products based upon expected claim payment patterns, derived from assumptions RiverSource Life makes about its policyholders and contractholders, including morbidity and mortality rates. The long-term profitability of these products depends upon how RiverSource Life’s actual experience compares with its pricing assumptions. For example, if morbidity rates are higher or mortality rates are lower than its pricing assumptions, RiverSource Life could be required to make greater payments under DI insurance policies, chronic care riders and immediate annuity contracts than it had projected. The same holds true for LTC policies RiverSource Life previously underwrote to the extent of the risks that RiverSource Life retained. If mortality rates are higher than its pricing assumptions, RiverSource Life could be required to make greater payments under its life insurance policies and annuity contracts with GMDBs than it has projected.
The risk that RiverSource Life’s claims experience may differ significantly from its pricing assumptions is particularly significant for its LTC insurance products, notwithstanding RiverSource Life’s ability to implement future price increases with regulatory approvals. As with life insurance, LTC insurance policies provide for long-duration coverage and, therefore, its actual claims experience will emerge over many years. However, as a relatively new product in the market, LTC insurance does not have the extensive claims experience history of life insurance, and, as a result, RiverSource Life’s ability to forecast future claim rates for LTC insurance is more limited than for life insurance. RiverSource Life has sought to moderate these uncertainties to some extent by partially reinsuring LTC policies at the time the policies were underwritten and limiting its present stand-alone LTC insurance offerings to policies underwritten fully by unaffiliated third-party insurers and also RiverSource Life has implemented rate increases on certain in-force policies. Certain estimates and assumptions used in setting RiverSource Life’s LTC reserves (which is an inherently uncertain and complex process) are
described in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K - “Business - Insurance: Product Features and Risks - Long Term Care Insurance.” RiverSource Life may be required to implement additional rate increases in the future and may or may not receive regulatory approval for the full extent and timing of any rate increases that RiverSource Life may seek.
RiverSource Life may face losses if there are significant deviations from its assumptions regarding the future persistency of its insurance policies and annuity contracts.
The prices and expected future profitability of RiverSource Life’s insurance and deferred annuity products are based in part upon assumptions related to persistency, which is the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force from one period to the next. Economic and market dislocations may occur and future consumer persistency behaviors could vary materially from the past. The effect of persistency on profitability varies for different products. For most of its life insurance and deferred annuity products, actual persistency that is lower than its persistency assumptions could have an adverse impact on profitability, especially in the early years of a policy or contract, primarily because RiverSource Life would be required to accelerate the amortization of expenses it deferred in connection with the acquisition of the policy or contract.
For RiverSource Life’s LTC insurance and universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees, as well as variable annuities with GMWB, actual persistency that is higher than its persistency assumptions could have a negative impact on profitability. If these policies remain in force longer than RiverSource Life assumed, RiverSource Life could be required to make greater benefit payments than it had anticipated when it priced or partially reinsured these products. Some of its LTC insurance policies have experienced higher persistency and poorer morbidity experience than RiverSource Life had assumed, which led it to increase premium rates on certain policies.
Because RiverSource Life’s assumptions regarding persistency experience are inherently uncertain, reserves for future policy benefits and claims may prove to be inadequate if actual persistency experience is different from those assumptions. Although some of its products permit RiverSource Life to increase premiums during the life of the policy or contract, RiverSource Life cannot guarantee that these increases would be sufficient to maintain profitability. Additionally, some of these pricing changes require regulatory approval, which may not be forthcoming. Moreover, many of RiverSource Life’s products do not permit RiverSource Life to increase premiums or limit those increases during the life of the policy or contract while premiums on certain other products (primarily LTC insurance) may not be increased without prior regulatory approval. Significant deviations in experience from pricing expectations regarding persistency could have an adverse effect on the profitability of RiverSource Life’s products.
RiverSource Life may be required to accelerate the amortization of DAC, which would increase its expenses.
DAC represent the portion of costs which are incremental and direct to the acquisition of new or renewal business, principally direct sales commissions and other distribution and underwriting costs that have been deferred on the sale of annuity, life and DI products. For annuity and universal life products, DAC are amortized based on projections of estimated gross profits over amortization periods equal to the approximate life of the business. For other insurance products, DAC are generally amortized as a percentage of premiums over amortization periods equal to the premium-paying period.
RiverSource Life’s projections underlying the amortization of DAC require the use of certain assumptions, including interest margins, mortality rates, persistency rates, maintenance expense levels and customer asset value growth rates for variable products. RiverSource Life periodically reviews and, where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions. When RiverSource Life changes its assumptions, it may be required to accelerate the amortization of DAC or to record a charge to increase benefit reserves.
For more information regarding DAC, see Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading - “Management’s Narrative Analysis - Critical Accounting Estimates - Deferred Acquisition Costs.”
Misconduct by RiverSource Life’s employees and agents and its affiliates’ employees, financial advisors and agents is difficult to detect and deter and could harm RiverSource Life’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Misconduct by RiverSource Life’s employees and agents and its affiliates’ employees, financial advisors and agents could result in violations of law, regulatory sanctions and/or serious reputational or financial harm. Misconduct can occur in each of RiverSource Life’s businesses and could include:
•
binding RiverSource Life to transactions that exceed authorized limits;
•
hiding unauthorized or unsuccessful activities resulting in unknown and unmanaged risks or losses;
•
improperly using, disclosing, or otherwise compromising confidential information, including client confidential information;
•
recommending transactions that are not suitable;
•
engaging in fraudulent or otherwise improper activity, including the misappropriation of funds;
•
engaging in unauthorized or excessive trading to the detriment of customers; or
•
otherwise not complying with laws, regulations or RiverSource Life’s control procedures.
RiverSource Life cannot always deter misconduct by employees and agents and its affiliates’ employees, financial advisors and agents and the precautions RiverSource Life takes to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. RiverSource Life cannot also assure that misconduct by employees and agents and its affiliates’ employees, financial advisors and agents will not lead to a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Damage to the reputation of RiverSource Life or its affiliates could adversely affect the business of RiverSource Life.
The ability of RiverSource Life to market and sell its products is highly dependent upon external perceptions of its business practices and financial condition, as well as the business practices and financial condition of its affiliates. Damage to the reputation of RiverSource Life or its affiliates could cause significant harm to the business and prospects of RiverSource Life and may arise from numerous sources, including litigation or regulatory actions, failing to deliver minimum standards of service and quality, compliance failures, any perceived or actual weakness in RiverSource Life’s financial strength or liquidity, technological, cybersecurity, or other security breaches (including attempted breaches) resulting in improper disclosure of client or employee personal information, unethical behavior and the misconduct of employees, AFSI’s advisors and counterparties. Negative perceptions or publicity regarding these matters could damage RiverSource Life’s reputation among existing and potential clients, employees and distributors. Reputations may take decades to build, and any negative incidents can quickly erode trust and confidence, particularly if they result in adverse mainstream and social media publicity, governmental investigations or litigation. Adverse developments with respect to the financial industry may also, by association, negatively impact RiverSource Life’s reputation or result in greater regulatory or legislative scrutiny or litigation.
RiverSource Life’s reputation is also dependent on its continued identification of and mitigation against conflicts of interest, including those relating to the activities of its affiliated entities. For example, conflicts may arise between RiverSource Life’s position as a manufacturer of insurance and annuity products and the position of AFSI, the distributor of these products. RiverSource Life and its affiliated entities have procedures and controls that are designed to identify, address and appropriately disclose perceived conflicts of interest. However, identifying and appropriately addressing conflicts of interest is complex and RiverSource Life’s reputation could be damaged if it fails, or appears to fail, to address conflicts of interest appropriately. In addition, the SEC and other federal and state regulators have increased their scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest. It is possible that potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to litigation or enforcement actions. Also, it is possible that the regulatory scrutiny of, and litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest will make RiverSource Life’s clients less willing to enter into transactions in which such a conflict may occur, and will adversely affect RiverSource Life’s business.
RiverSource Life’s operational systems and networks have been, and will continue to be, subject to evolving cybersecurity or other technological risks, which could result in the disclosure of confidential client information, loss of proprietary information, damage to its reputation, additional costs, regulatory penalties and other adverse impacts.
The business of RiverSource Life and its affiliates is reliant upon internal and third-party personnel, technology systems and networks to process, transmit and store information including sensitive client and proprietary information, and to conduct business activities and transactions with clients, distributors, vendors and other third parties. Maintaining the security and integrity of this information and these systems and networks is critical to the success of RiverSource Life’s business operations, including RiverSource Life’s reputation, the retention of clients, and to the protection of RiverSource Life’s proprietary information and RiverSource Life’s clients’ personal information. To date, RiverSource Life or its affiliates have not experienced any material breaches of or interference with these centrally controlled systems and networks; however, RiverSource Life and its affiliates routinely face and address such threats. For example, in past years, RiverSource Life and its affiliates and other financial institutions experienced distributed denial of service attacks intended to disrupt the centrally controlled systems that provide RiverSource Life’s clients’ online systems and information. While RiverSource Life has been able to detect and respond to these incidents to date without loss of client assets or information, RiverSource Life enhanced its security capabilities and will continue to assess its ability to monitor for, detect, prevent, mitigate, respond to and recover from such threats. In addition to the foregoing, RiverSource Life’s experiences with cybersecurity and technology threats have included phishing scams, account takeovers, introductions of malware, attempts at electronic break-ins and the submission of fraudulent payment requests. Any successful breaches or interference (as well as attempted breaches or interference) by third parties or by RiverSource Life’s employees that may occur in the future could have a material adverse impact on RiverSource Life’s business, reputation, financial condition or results of operations.
RiverSource Life and its affiliates are subject to international, federal and state regulations, and, in some cases contractual obligations, that require it to establish and maintain corporate policies and procedures designed to protect sensitive client, employee, contractor and vendor information. RiverSource Life and its affiliates have implemented and maintain security measures designed to protect against breaches of corporate security and other interference with systems and networks resulting from attacks by third parties, including hackers, and from employee or service provider error or malfeasance. RiverSource Life’s affiliates have implemented policies that require AFSI’s independent franchisee advisors who locally control their own technology operations to do the same. RiverSource Life and its affiliates also contractually require third-party vendors who, in the provision of services to RiverSource Life and its affiliates, are provided with access to RiverSource Life’s systems and information pertaining to RiverSource Life’s business or its clients, to meet certain information security standards. RiverSource Life’s affiliates recommend through policies that AFSI’s independent franchisee advisors do the same. Changes in RiverSource Life’s client base or technology platform changes, such as an evolution to accommodate mobile computing, virtual interface and multi-device functionality, may also require corresponding changes in its systems, networks and data security measures. While accessing RiverSource Life’s products and services, RiverSource Life’s customers may use computers and other devices that sit outside of its security control. In addition, the ever-increasing reliance on technology systems and networks and the occurrence and potential adverse impact of attacks on such systems and networks, both generally and in the financial services industry, have enhanced government and regulatory scrutiny of the measures taken by companies to protect against cybersecurity threats. As these threats, and government and regulatory oversight of associated risks,
continue to evolve, RiverSource Life may be required to expend additional resources to enhance or expand upon the security measures RiverSource Life and its affiliates (as well as certain parties RiverSource Life does not control) currently maintain.
Despite the measures RiverSource Life and its affiliates have taken and may in the future take to address and mitigate cybersecurity and technology risks, RiverSource Life cannot assure that the systems and networks of RiverSource Life and its affiliates will not be subject to successful attacks, breaches or interference. Nor can RiverSource Life assure that parties its affiliates do not control will do what RiverSource Life recommends in this regard. Any such event may result in operational disruptions as well as unauthorized access to or the disclosure or loss of RiverSource Life’s proprietary information or RiverSource Life’s clients’ personal information, which in turn may result in legal claims, regulatory scrutiny and liability, reputational damage, the incurrence of costs to eliminate or mitigate further exposure, the loss of clients or other damage to its business. While RiverSource Life maintains cyber liability insurance that provides both third-party liability and first-party liability coverages, this insurance may not be sufficient to protect it against all cybersecurity-related losses. Furthermore, RiverSource Life may be subject to indemnification costs and liability to third parties if RiverSource Life breaches any confidentiality obligations regarding vendor data or for losses related to the data. In addition, the trend toward broad consumer and general public notification of such incidents could exacerbate the harm to RiverSource Life’s business, reputation, financial condition, or results of operations. Even if RiverSource Life successfully protected its technology infrastructure and the confidentiality of sensitive data, RiverSource Life may incur significant expenses in connection with its responses to any such attacks as well as the adoption, implementation and maintenance of appropriate security measures. RiverSource Life could also suffer harm to its business and reputation if attempted security breaches are publicized regardless of whether or not harm was actually done to any client or client information. RiverSource Life cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities, discovery of new vulnerabilities, attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in its systems or third-party systems RiverSource Life uses, data thefts, physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access, or other developments will not compromise or breach the technology or other security measures protecting the networks and systems used in connection with its products and services.
Protection from system interruptions and operating errors is important to RiverSource Life’s business. If RiverSource Life experienced a sustained interruption to its telecommunications or data processing systems or other failure in operational execution, it could harm its business.
Operating errors and system or network interruptions could delay and disrupt RiverSource Life’s ability to develop, deliver or maintain its products and services, or to operate compliance or risk management functions, causing harm to its business and reputation and resulting in loss of customers or revenue. Interruptions could be caused by operational failures arising from service provider or employee error or malfeasance, interference by third parties, including hackers, RiverSource Life’s implementation of new technology, as well as from maintenance of existing technology. RiverSource Life’s financial, accounting, data processing or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate or report data properly, experience connectivity disruptions or otherwise become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond its control, adversely affecting its ability to process transactions or provide products and services to customers. These interruptions can include fires, floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters, power losses, equipment failures, attacks by third parties, failures of internal or vendor personnel, software equipment or systems and other events beyond its control. Although RiverSource Life has developed and maintains a comprehensive business continuity plan that covers potential disruptions to centrally controlled systems and platforms and requires key technology vendors and service providers to do the same, there are inherent limitations in such plans and they might not, despite testing and monitoring, operate as designed in the event of an actual event or crisis. Further, RiverSource Life cannot control the execution of any business continuity plans implemented by its service providers.
RiverSource Life relies on third-party service providers and vendors for certain communications, technology and business functions and other services, and faces the risk of operational failure (including, without limitation, failure caused by an inaccuracy, untimeliness or other deficiency in data reporting), termination or capacity constraints of any of the clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses or other third-party service providers that RiverSource Life uses to facilitate or are component providers to its securities transactions and other product manufacturing and distribution activities. For example, most of RiverSource Life’s applications run on a technology infrastructure managed on an outsourced basis by IBM since 2002. Under this arrangement, IBM is responsible for all mainframe, mid-range, computing network and storage operations, which includes a portion of RiverSource Life’s web hosting operations, and RiverSource Life is subject to the risks of any operational failure, termination or other restraints in this arrangement. These risks are heightened by RiverSource Life’s deployment in response to both client interest and evolution in the financial markets of increasingly sophisticated products, such as those which incorporate automatic asset re-allocation, multiple portfolios or funds, and business-driven hedging, compliance and other risk management or investment or financial management strategies. Any such failure, termination or constraint could adversely impact its ability to effect transactions, service its clients, manage its exposure to risk or otherwise achieve desired outcomes.
RiverSource Life’s risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in identifying or mitigating its risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, including employee and financial advisor misconduct.
RiverSource Life has devoted significant resources to develop its risk management policies and procedures and will continue to do so. Nonetheless, RiverSource Life’s policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective in mitigating its risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk. Many of its methods of managing risk and the associated exposures are based upon its use of observed historical market behavior or statistics based on historical models. During periods of market volatility or due to unforeseen events, the historically-derived correlations upon which these methods are based may not be valid. As a result, these methods may not predict future exposures accurately, which could be significantly greater than what its models indicate. This could cause RiverSource Life to incur investment losses or cause its hedging and other risk management strategies to be ineffective. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, catastrophe occurrence or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible to RiverSource Life, which may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated.
Moreover, RiverSource Life is subject to the risks of errors and misconduct by its employees and AFSI’s advisors, such as fraud, non-compliance with policies, recommending transactions that are not suitable, and improperly using or disclosing confidential information. These risks are difficult to detect in advance and deter, and could harm RiverSource Life’s business, financial condition or results of operations. RiverSource Life is further subject to the risk of nonperformance or inadequate performance of contractual obligations by third-party vendors of products and services that are used in its businesses. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating RiverSource Life’s risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk. Insurance and other traditional risk-shifting tools may be held by or available to RiverSource Life in order to manage certain exposures, but they are subject to terms such as deductibles, coinsurance, limits and policy exclusions, as well as risk of counterparty denial of coverage, default or insolvency.
The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters and catastrophes could adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of RiverSource Life.
The occurrence of natural disasters and catastrophes, including earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, fires, blackouts, severe winter weather, explosions, pandemic disease and man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism, insurrections and military actions, could adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations of RiverSource Life. Such disasters and catastrophes may damage its facilities, preventing its employees from performing their roles or otherwise disturbing its ordinary business operations, and by impacting claims, as described below. These impacts could be particularly severe to the extent they affect RiverSource Life’s computer-based data processing, transmission, storage and retrieval systems and destroy or release valuable data. Such disasters and catastrophes may also impact RiverSource Life indirectly by changing the condition and behaviors of its customers, business counterparties and regulators, as well as by causing declines or volatility in the economic and financial markets.
The potential effects of natural and man-made disasters and catastrophes on the business of RiverSource Life include but are not limited to the following: (i) a catastrophic loss of life may materially increase the amount of or accelerate the timing in which benefits are paid under its insurance policies; (ii) an increase in claims and any resulting increase in claims reserves caused by a disaster may harm the financial condition of its reinsurers, thereby impacting the cost and availability of reinsurance and the probability of default on reinsurance recoveries; and (iii) declines and volatility in the financial markets could harm its financial condition.
RiverSource Life cannot predict the timing and frequency with which natural and man-made disasters and catastrophes may occur, nor can RiverSource Life predict the impact that changing climate conditions may have on the frequency and severity of natural disasters or on overall economic stability and sustainability. As such, RiverSource Life cannot be sure that its actions to identify and mitigate the risks associated with such disasters and catastrophes, including predictive modeling, establishing liabilities for expected claims, acquiring insurance and reinsurance and developing business continuity plans, will be effective.
Legal, Regulatory and Tax Risks
Legal and regulatory actions are inherent in RiverSource Life’s business and could result in financial losses or harm its business.
RiverSource Life is, and in the future may be, subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of its operations. Actions brought against RiverSource Life may result in awards, settlements, penalties, injunctions or other adverse results, including reputational damage. In addition, RiverSource Life may incur significant expenses in connection with its defense against such actions regardless of their outcome. Various regulatory and governmental bodies have the authority to review RiverSource Life’s products and business practices and those of its employees and agents and its affiliates’ employees and agents and to bring regulatory or other legal actions against RiverSource Life if, in their view, RiverSource Life’s practices, or those of its employees and agents and its affiliates’ employees and agents, are improper. Pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings relating to aspects of RiverSource Life’s business and operations that are specific to it and proceedings that are typical of the industries in which it operates. In or as a result of turbulent times, the volume of claims and amount of damages sought in litigation and regulatory proceedings generally increase.
RiverSource Life’s business is regulated heavily, and changes to the laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s operations, reputation and financial condition.
RiverSource Life is subject to various federal and state laws and regulations, and is required to obtain and maintain licenses for its business in addition to being subject to regulatory oversight. For a discussion of the regulatory framework in which RiverSource Life operates, see Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K - “Regulation.” Compliance with these applicable laws and regulations is time-consuming and personnel-intensive, and RiverSource Life has invested and will continue to invest substantial resources to ensure compliance by its parent company and its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees and affiliated employees and agents. Any enforcement actions, investigations or other proceedings brought against RiverSource Life or its subsidiaries, directors, employees and affiliated employees and agents by its regulators may result in fines, injunctions or other disciplinary actions that could harm RiverSource Life’s reputation or impact its results of operations. Further, any changes to the laws and regulations applicable to RiverSource Life’s business, as well as changes to the interpretation and enforcement of such laws and regulations, may affect its financial condition and operations. Such changes may impact the operations and profitability of RiverSource Life, including with respect to the scope of products and services provided and the incurrence of additional costs of doing business. Ongoing changes to regulation and oversight of the insurance industry may produce results, the full impact of which cannot be immediately ascertained. In addition, RiverSource Life continues to see enhanced legislative and regulatory interest regarding retirement investing, and RiverSource Life will continue to closely review and monitor any legislative or regulatory proposals and changes. Any incremental requirements, costs and risks imposed on RiverSource Life in connection with such current or future legislative or regulatory changes, may constrain its ability to market its products to potential customers, and could negatively impact its profitability and make it more difficult for RiverSource Life to pursue its growth strategy.
Some of the changes resulting from rules and regulations called for under the Dodd-Frank Act could present operational challenges and increase costs. For example, in the area of derivatives, higher margin and capital requirements, coupled with more restrictive collateral rules, could impact RiverSource Life’s ability to effectively manage and hedge risk. Ultimately these complexities and increased costs could have an impact on RiverSource Life’s ability to offer cost-effective and innovative insurance products to its clients.
A significant portion of RiverSource Life’s annuity product sales derive from annuities funding qualified accounts, specifically IRAs. As a provider of products and services to tax-qualified retirement accounts, certain aspects of RiverSource Life’s business fall within the compliance oversight of the Departments of Labor and Treasury, particularly regarding the enforcement of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and the tax reporting requirements applicable to such accounts. The Department of Labor published regulations in April 2016 that expanded the scope of who is considered an ERISA fiduciary and these regulations focus in large part on investment recommendations made by financial advisors, registered investment advisors, and other investment professionals to retirement investors, as well as how financial advisors are able to discuss IRA rollovers and how financial advisors and affiliates can transact with retirement investors. The first phase of the regulations went into effect on June 9, 2017 and requires financial advisors to make recommendations related to assets held in IRAs and employer sponsored retirement plans in accordance with the following impartial conduct standards: recommendations must be in the best interest of the client, compensation paid for the recommendations must be reasonable and the financial advisor must not make any misleading statements. RiverSource Life’s affiliated selling firms adopted policies and procedures designed to comply with the impartial conduct standards and communicated those policies and procedures to their affiliated advisors and staff. The second phase of the regulation pertaining to a new “best interest contract exemption” would put into place a number of additional requirements including entering into a best interest contract with clients, enhanced disclosure of fees and conflicts of interest, limits on differential commissions within a product category, the adoption of policies and procedures to ensure the best interest standard is met, and findings related to platforms that are limited to products that pay third-party payments and/or include proprietary products. The second phase of the regulation is currently scheduled to become effective on July 1, 2019. However, these regulations are currently under review by the Department of Labor to determine if further revisions to the regulations are advisable. As a result, it is unclear whether the Department of Labor will substantially rescind or revise the regulations as adopted in 2016. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission is also working on developing its own fiduciary standard that would apply to recommendations made by financial advisors who work on a commission basis and would apply regardless of the type of account (IRA or non-qualified) an investor holds. Furthermore, several states have either issued their own fiduciary rules or are considering doing so and those rules may extend to certain types of products (e.g. insurance and annuities, financial planning, etc.) or may broadly cover all recommendations made by financial advisors. RiverSource Life is also seeing self-regulatory bodies like the Certified Financial Planner Board working on a fiduciary standard that would apply to financial advisors who hold a Certified Financial Planner designation. In light of the various fiduciary rules and regulations that have been proposed or finalized, RiverSource Life continues to exert significant efforts to evaluate and prepare to comply with each rule. Depending on the span and substance of any final regulations and timing of their applicability, the scope of any implementation could also require various changes in the financial services industry, any of which could negatively impact RiverSource Life’s results of operations.
RiverSource Life is subject to state regulation and must comply with statutory reserve and capital requirements, including preparing financial statements in accordance with statutory accounting principles. State regulators, as well as the NAIC, continually review and update these requirements and other requirements relating to the business operations of insurance companies, including their underwriting and sales practices. Changes in these requirements that are made for the benefit of the consumer sometimes lead to additional expense for the insurer and, thus, could have a material adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations. In December 2012, the NAIC adopted a new reserve valuation manual that applies principles-based reserve standards to
life insurance products. The valuation manual has been adopted by the required number of states and the percentage of U.S. insurance premium threshold has been reached, therefore, the valuation manual was effective for companies domiciled in adopted states on January 1, 2017. Minnesota adopted the valuation manual in 2016 and New York announced it will adopt the valuation manual in January 2018 (although New York has not adopted the valuation manual as of this date). RiverSource Life Insurance Company and RiverSource Life of NY have developed an implementation plan and expect to have the capability to complete principles-based reserve valuation in December 2018 for a selected product and continue implementation for all life insurance products throughout the three-year transition period ending in 2020. The requirement for principles-based life insurance reserves may result in statutory reserves being more sensitive to changes in interest rates, policyholder behavior and other market factors. It is not possible at this time to estimate the potential impact of future changes in statutory reserve and capital requirements. Further, RiverSource Life cannot predict the effect that proposed federal legislation may have on RiverSource Life or its competitors, such as the option of federally chartered insurers, a mandated federal systemic risk regulator, future initiatives of the FIO within the Department of the Treasury, or by any of the domiciliary regulators of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors with respect to insurance holding company supervision, capital standards or systemic risk regulation. For additional discussion on the role and activities of the FIO, see Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K - “Regulation.”
RiverSource Life’s profit margins and earnings are dependent in part on its ability to maintain current fee levels for the products and services that it offers. Competition within the financial services industry could lead RiverSource Life to reduce the fees that it charges its clients for products and services. See the risk factor entitled “Intense competition and the economics of changes in RiverSource Life’s product revenue mix and distribution channels could negatively impact RiverSource Life’s ability to maintain or increase its market share and profitability.” In addition, RiverSource Life may be required to reduce its fee levels, or restructure the fees it charges, as a result of regulatory initiatives or proceedings that are either industry-wide or specifically targeted at RiverSource Life. Reductions or other changes in the fees that RiverSource Life charges for its products and services could reduce its revenues and earnings.
Changes in the supervision and regulation of the financial industry could materially impact RiverSource Life’s business.
The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted into law in 2010, called for sweeping changes in the supervision and regulation of the financial services industry designed to provide for greater oversight of financial industry participants, reduce risk in banking practices and in securities and derivatives trading, enhance public company corporate governance practices and executive compensation disclosures, and provide greater protections to individual consumers and investors. In June 2017, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Financial CHOICE Act of 2017 (the “CHOICE Act”) that would make sweeping changes to the financial regulatory system by amending, repealing and replacing certain portions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The prospects of this in the Senate are unclear and the CHOICE Act is not yet law and may not become law. However, the CHOICE Act is reflective of aspects of the current U.S. regulatory environment and the Trump Administration has indicated it intends to advance a variety of financial regulatory relief measures through Executive Branch action and to effect a potentially significant shift in the supervisory approach of agencies that has wide-ranging implications. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act (as well as any related reforms through the Trump Administration, the CHOICE Act or otherwise) on RiverSource Life, the financial industry and the economy cannot be known until such rules and regulations have been finalized, and, in some cases, implemented over time.
Insurance companies and the business of insurance are exempted from several major provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. However, because the Dodd-Frank Act significantly changes the regulation of the financial services industry and financial markets generally, and because the Dodd-Frank Act will apply directly to certain key affiliates of RiverSource Life, implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act could nevertheless materially impact RiverSource Life’s business. For example, to the extent that RiverSource Life invests in debt securities issued by a financial company that becomes subject to the orderly liquidation authority under the Dodd-Frank Act, RiverSource Life’s rights as a creditor could be adversely affected. RiverSource Life could also be subject to assessments to repay federal funding advanced to liquidated financial companies. Further, RiverSource Life may be impacted by the creation of the FIO within the Department of the Treasury, which is required to monitor the insurance industry and gather relevant information, including issues or gaps in the current state-based solvency regulation system.
In recent years, other national and international authorities have also proposed measures intended to increase the intensity of regulation of financial institutions, requiring greater coordination among regulators and efforts to harmonize regulatory regimes. These measures have included enhanced risk-based capital requirements, leverage limits, liquidity and transparency requirements, single counterparty exposure limits, governance requirements for risk management, stress-test requirements, debt-to-equity limits for certain companies, early remediation procedures, resolution and recovery planning and guidance for maintaining appropriate risk culture.
Changes in corporate tax laws and regulations (including recent U.S. federal tax reform) and changes in the interpretation of such laws and regulations, as well as adverse determinations regarding the application of such laws and regulations, could adversely affect RiverSource Life’s earnings and could make certain products less attractive to clients.
RiverSource Life is subject to the income tax laws of the U.S., its states and municipalities. These tax laws are complex and may be subject to different interpretations. RiverSource Life must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws when determining the provision for income taxes and must also make estimates about when in the future certain items affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Disputes over interpretations of the tax laws may be settled with the taxing authority upon examination or audit. In addition, changes to the Internal Revenue Code, administrative rulings or court decisions could increase RiverSource Life’s provision for income taxes and reduce its earnings.
On December 22, 2017, the legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was enacted. The Tax Act is complex and materially changes U.S. corporate income tax rates, imposes significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest and net operating losses, and allows for the expensing of certain capital expenditures.
RiverSource Life continues to examine the impact the Tax Act may have on its business. Despite the beneficial impact in the corporate income tax rate, the full impact is uncertain and RiverSource Life’s business and financial condition could be adversely affected. For example, it is unclear what impact the Tax Act will have on RiverSource Life’s clients and competitors and therefore it is unclear how RiverSource Life may be advantaged or disadvantaged (such as client demand for lower pricing or competitors that are better situated to respond or adjust to the evolving marketplace and investor sentiment). Furthermore, many of the products RiverSource Life issues or on which RiverSource Life’s businesses are based receive favorable treatment under current U.S. federal income or estate tax law. Changes in U.S. federal income or estate tax law could reduce or eliminate the tax advantages of certain RiverSource Life products and thus make such products less attractive to clients and the Tax Act will cause a change in client demand and activity.
RiverSource Life may not be able to protect its intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.
RiverSource Life relies on a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws to establish and protect its intellectual property. Although RiverSource Life uses a broad range of measures to protect its intellectual property rights, third parties may infringe or misappropriate its intellectual property. RiverSource Life may have to litigate to enforce and protect its copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets and know-how or to determine their scope, validity or enforceability, which represents a diversion of resources that may be significant in amount and may not prove successful. The loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to secure or enforce the protection of RiverSource Life’s intellectual property assets could have a material adverse effect on its business and its ability to compete.
RiverSource Life also may be subject to costly litigation in the event that another party alleges its operations or activities infringe upon or constitute misappropriation of such other party’s intellectual property rights. Third parties may have, or may eventually be issued, patents or other protections that could be infringed by RiverSource Life’s products, methods, processes or services or could otherwise limit its ability to offer certain product features. Any party that holds such a patent could make a claim of infringement against RiverSource Life. RiverSource Life may also be subject to claims by third parties for breach of copyright, trademark, license usage rights, or misappropriation of trade secret rights. Any such claims and any resulting litigation could result in significant liability for damages. If RiverSource Life were found to have infringed or misappropriated a third-party patent or other intellectual property rights, it could incur substantial liability, and in some circumstances, could be enjoined from providing certain products or services to its customers or utilizing and benefiting from certain methods, processes, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets or licenses, or alternatively could be required to enter into costly licensing arrangements with third parties, all of which could have a material adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in and the adoption of accounting standards or inaccurate estimates or assumptions in applying accounting policies could have a material impact on RiverSource Life’s financial statements and change in the regulation of independent registered public accounting firms are present with increasing frequency in connection with broader market reforms.
RiverSource Life’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how it records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported value of RiverSource Life’s assets or liabilities and results of operations and are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. If those assumptions, estimates or judgments were incorrectly made, RiverSource Life could be required to correct and restate prior period financial statements.
RiverSource Life prepares financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and other regulators often change the financial accounting and reporting standards governing the preparation of RiverSource Life’s financial statements. In addition, the conduct of RiverSource Life’s independent registered public accounting firm is overseen by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). These and other regulators may make additional inquiries regarding, or change their application of, existing laws and regulations regarding RiverSource Life’s independent auditor, financial statements or other financial reports and the possibility of such additional inquiries or changes is increasing in frequency in connection with broader market reforms. These changes are difficult to predict, and could impose additional governance, internal control and disclosure demands. In some cases, RiverSource Life could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in RiverSource Life restating prior period financial statements. It is possible that the changes could have a material adverse effect on RiverSource Life’s financial condition and results of operations. For example, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) informed RiverSource Life that it has identified a potential issue related to its independence under Rule 2-01(c)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (referred to as the “Loan Rule”). The Loan Rule prohibits accounting firms, such as PwC, from being deemed independent if they have certain financial relationships with their audit clients or certain affiliates of those clients. Pursuant to the SEC’s application of the Loan Rule, PwC has advised RiverSource Life that certain relationships between PwC and its lenders who also are record owners of various funds in the Columbia Threadneedle family of funds (collectively, the “Columbia Threadneedle Funds”) or certain other entities within the Ameriprise Financial investment company complex, may implicate the Loan Rule. On June 20, 2016, the Staff of the SEC issued a “no-action” letter confirming that it would not recommend that the SEC commence enforcement action against an unrelated fund that relied on audit services performed by an audit firm that was not in compliance with the Loan Rule in certain specified circumstances. The SEC Staff stated that the relief under the letter was temporary and would expire 18 months after the issuance of the letter and on September 22, 2017, the SEC subsequently issued a
letter extending the no-action relief until the SEC amends the Loan Rule to address concerns expressed in the no-action letter. If it was determined that PwC was not independent, or RiverSource Life does not receive some form of exemptive relief, among other things, the financial statements audited by PwC and the interim financial statements reviewed by PwC may have to be audited and reviewed, respectively, by another independent registered public accounting firm. PwC has advised us that, based on its knowledge and analyses of RiverSource Life’s facts and circumstances, it is not aware of any facts that would preclude reliance by RiverSource Life, its affiliates and other entities within the Ameriprise Financial investment company complex on the no-action letter. PwC has also affirmed to RiverSource Life that they are able to exercise objective and impartial judgment in their audits of RiverSource Life, its affiliates and the Columbia Threadneedle Funds, are independent accountants within the meaning of PCAOB Rule 3520 and in their view can continue to serve as RiverSource Life’s independent registered public accounting firm. RiverSource Life has considered disclosures made to it by PwC of lending relationships described by PwC, PwC’s representation that it is independent within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3520 Auditor Independence, and representations made to Ameriprise Financial’s Audit Committee (which is also RiverSource Life’s Audit Committee) by PwC that PwC believes that a reasonable investor possessing all the facts regarding the lending relationships and audit relationships would conclude that PwC is able to exhibit the requisite objectivity and impartiality to report on River Source Life’s financial statements as the independent registered public accounting firm. Based on the foregoing, RiverSource Life does not believe that PwC is incapable of exercising objective and impartial judgment with respect to audit services.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
RiverSource Life Insurance Company owns and leases office space in Minneapolis, Minnesota. RiverSource Life of NY rents office space in Albany, New York. RiverSource Life believes that the facilities it occupies are suitable and adequate.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a discussion of any material legal proceedings, see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
All of RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s outstanding common stock is owned by Ameriprise Financial, Inc. There is no established public trading market for RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s common stock.
For discussion regarding RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s payment of dividends and restrictions on dividends, see Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K - “Management’s Narrative Analysis - Capital Activity” and Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item omitted pursuant to General Instructions I(2)(a) of Form 10-K.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS
Overview
RiverSource Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries are referred to collectively in this Form 10-K as the “Company.” The following discussion and management’s narrative analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Item 1A - Risk Factors” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management’s narrative analysis is presented pursuant to General Instructions I(2) (a) of Form 10-K in lieu of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
See “Item 1 - Business” and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the business.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies that the Company uses affect its Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain of the Company’s accounting and reporting policies are critical to an understanding of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the application of these policies can be significantly affected by the estimates, judgments and assumptions made by management during the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The accounting and reporting policies and estimates the Company has identified as fundamental to a full understanding of its financial condition and results of operations are described below. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about the Company’s accounting policies.
Valuation of Investments
The most significant component of the Company’s investments is its Available-for-Sale securities, which the Company carries at fair value within its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the Company’s Available-for-Sale securities as of December 31, 2017 was primarily obtained from third-party pricing sources. For a discussion of the Company’s accounting policies related to the valuation of its investments and other-than-temporary impairments, see Note 2 and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deferred Acquisition Costs
The Company incurs costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal insurance and annuity businesses. The portion of these costs which are incremental and direct to the acquisition of a new or renewal insurance policy or annuity contract are deferred. Significant costs capitalized include sales based compensation related to the acquisition of new and renewal insurance policies and annuity contracts, medical inspection costs for successful sales, and a portion of employee compensation and benefit costs based upon the amount of time spent on successful sales. Sales based compensation paid to Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (“AFSI”), a subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (“Ameriprise Financial”), advisors and employees and third-party distributors is capitalized. Employee compensation and benefits costs which are capitalized relate primarily to sales efforts, underwriting and processing. All other costs which are not incremental direct costs of acquiring an insurance policy or annuity contract are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) accounting policy.
Non-Traditional Long-Duration Products
For the Company’s non-traditional long-duration products (including variable and fixed deferred annuity contracts, universal life (“UL”) and variable universal life (“VUL”) insurance products), the DAC balance at any reporting date is based on projections that show management expects there to be estimated gross profits (“EGPs”) after that date to amortize the remaining balance. These projections are inherently uncertain because they require management to make assumptions about financial markets, mortality levels and contractholder and policyholder behavior over periods extending well into the future. Projection periods used for the Company’s annuity products are typically 30 to 50 years and for UL insurance products 50 years or longer.
EGPs vary based on persistency rates (assumptions at which contractholders and policyholders are expected to surrender, make withdrawals from and make deposits to their contracts), mortality levels, client asset value growth rates (based on equity and bond market performance), variable annuity benefit utilization and interest margins (the spread between earned rates on invested assets and rates credited to contractholder and policyholder accounts). Changes in these assumptions can be offsetting and the Company is unable to predict their movement or offsetting impact over time. When assumptions are changed, the percentage of EGPs used to amortize DAC might also change. A change in the required amortization percentage is applied retrospectively; an increase in amortization percentage will result in a decrease in the DAC balance and an increase in DAC amortization expense, while a decrease in amortization percentage will result in an increase in the DAC balance and a decrease in DAC amortization expense. The effect on the DAC balance that would result from the realization of unrealized gains (losses) is recognized with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The client asset value growth rates are the rates at which variable annuity and VUL insurance contract values invested in separate accounts are assumed to appreciate in the future. The rates used vary by equity and fixed income investments. The long-term client asset value growth rates are based on assumed gross annual returns of 9% for equity funds and 6.8% for fixed income funds. The Company typically uses a five-year mean reversion process as a guideline in setting near-term equity fund growth rates based on a long-term view of financial market performance as well as recent actual performance. The suggested near-term equity fund growth rate is reviewed quarterly to ensure consistency with management’s assessment of anticipated equity market performance.
A decrease of 100 basis points in separate account fund growth rate assumptions is likely to result in an increase in DAC amortization and an increase in benefits and claims expense for variable annuity and VUL insurance contracts. The following table presents the estimated impact to current period pretax income:
An assessment of sensitivity associated with changes in any single assumption would not necessarily be an indicator of future results.
Traditional Long-Duration Products
For traditional long-duration products (including traditional life and disability income (“DI”) insurance products), the DAC balance at any reporting date is based on projections that show management expects there to be adequate premiums after the date to amortize the remaining balance. These projections are inherently uncertain because they require management to make assumptions over periods extending well into the future. These assumptions include interest rates, persistency rates and mortality and morbidity rates and are not modified (unlocked) unless recoverability testing deems to be inadequate. Projection periods used for the Company’s traditional life insurance are up to 30 years. Projection periods for DI products can be up to 45 years. The Company may experience accelerated amortization of DAC if policies terminate earlier than projected or a slower rate of amortization of DAC if policies persist longer than projected.
For traditional life and DI insurance products, the assumptions provide for adverse deviations in experience and are revised only if management concludes experience will be so adverse that DAC are not recoverable. If management concludes that DAC are not recoverable, DAC are reduced to the amount that is recoverable based on best estimate assumptions.
Future Policy Benefits and Claims
The Company establishes reserves to cover the risks associated with non-traditional and traditional long-duration products. Reserves for non-traditional long-duration products include the liabilities related to guaranteed benefit provisions added to variable annuity contracts, a portion of UL and VUL policies and the embedded derivatives related to variable annuity contracts, indexed annuities and indexed universal life (“IUL”) insurance. Reserves for traditional long-duration products are established to provide adequately for future benefits and expenses for term life, whole life, DI and long term care (“LTC”) insurance products.
The establishment of reserves is an estimation process using a variety of methods, assumptions and data elements. If actual experience is better than or equal to the results of the estimation process, then reserves should be adequate to provide for future benefits and expenses. If actual experience is worse than the results of the estimation process, additional reserves may be required.
Non-Traditional Long-Duration Products
A portion of the Company’s UL and VUL policies have product features that result in profits followed by losses from the insurance component of the contract. These profits followed by losses can be generated by the cost structure of the product or secondary guarantees in the contract. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges. The liability for these future losses is determined using actuarial models to estimate the death benefits in excess of account value and the expected assessments (e.g. cost of insurance charges, contractual administrative charges, similar fees and investment margin). Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and assessments relate to customer asset value growth rates, mortality, persistency and investment margins and are consistent with those used for DAC valuation for the same contracts. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the liability for contracts with secondary guarantees.
The Company has approximately $80 billion of variable annuity account value that has been issued over a period of more than fifty years. The diversified variable annuity block consists of $30 billion of account value with no living benefit guarantees and $50 billion of account value with living benefit guarantees, primarily guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (“GMWB”) provisions. The business is predominately issued through AFSI’s financial advisor network. The majority of the variable annuity contracts offered by the Company contain guaranteed minimum death benefit (“GMDB”) provisions. When market values of the customer’s accounts decline, the death benefit payable on a contract with a GMDB may exceed the contract accumulation value. The Company also offers variable annuities with death benefit provisions that gross up the amount payable by a certain percentage of contract earnings which are referred to as gain gross-up (“GGU”) benefits. In addition, the Company offers contracts with GMWB and guaranteed minimum
accumulation benefit (“GMAB”) provisions and, until May 2007, the Company offered contracts containing guaranteed minimum income benefit (“GMIB”) provisions.
The GMDB and GGU liability is determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value and recognizing the excess over the estimated life based on expected assessments (e.g., mortality and expense fees, contractual administrative charges and similar fees).
If elected by the contract owner and after a stipulated waiting period from contract issuance, a GMIB guarantees a minimum lifetime annuity based on a specified rate of contract accumulation value growth and predetermined annuity purchase rates. The GMIB liability is determined each period by estimating the expected value of annuitization benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value at the date of annuitization and recognizing the excess over the estimated life based on expected assessments.
The liability for the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions is determined by estimating the expected value of benefits that are contingent upon survival after the account value is equal to zero and recognizing the benefits over the estimated life based on expected assessments (e.g., mortality and expense fees, contractual administrative charges and similar fees).
In determining the liabilities for GMDB, GGU, GMIB and the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB, the Company projects these benefits and contract assessments using actuarial models to simulate various equity market scenarios. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and assessments relate to customer asset value growth rates, mortality, persistency, benefit utilization and investment margins and are consistent with those used for DAC valuation for the same contracts. As with DAC, management reviews, and where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year.
Regarding the exposure to variable annuity living benefit guarantees, the source of behavioral risk is driven by changes in policyholder surrenders and utilization of guaranteed withdrawal benefits. The Company has extensive experience studies and analysis to monitor changes and trends in policyholder behavior. A significant volume of company-specific policyholder experience data is available and provides management with the ability to regularly analyze policyholder behavior. On a monthly basis, actual surrender and benefit utilization experience is compared to expectations. Experience data includes detailed policy information providing the opportunity to review impacts of multiple variables. The ability to analyze differences in experience, such as presence of a living benefit rider, existence of surrender charges, and tax qualifications provides the Company an effective approach in quickly detecting changes in policyholder behavior.
At least annually, the Company performs a thorough policyholder behavior analysis to validate the assumptions included in its benefit reserve, embedded derivative and DAC balances. The variable annuity assumptions and resulting reserve computations reflect multiple policyholder variables. Differentiation in assumptions by policyholder age, existence of surrender charges, guaranteed withdrawal utilization, and tax qualification are examples of factors recognized in establishing management’s assumptions used in reserve calculations. The extensive data derived from the Company’s variable annuity block highly informs management in confirming previous assumptions and revising the variable annuity behavior assumptions. Changes in assumptions are governed by a review and approval process to ensure an appropriate measurement of all impacted financial statement balances.
Additionally, the Company’s Corporate Actuarial Department calculates the fair value of the embedded derivatives on a monthly basis. During this process, control checks are performed to validate the completeness of the data. Actuarial management approves various components of the valuation along with the final results. The change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives is reviewed monthly with senior management.
See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our variable annuity contracts.
See the table in the previous discussion of “Deferred Acquisition Costs” for the estimated impact to benefits and claims expense related to variable annuity and VUL insurance contracts resulting from a decrease of 100 basis points in separate account fund growth rate assumptions.
The fair value of embedded derivatives related to GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions, indexed annuities and IUL fluctuate based on equity, interest rate and credit markets which can cause these embedded derivatives to be either an asset or a liability. In addition, embedded derivatives are impacted by an estimate of the Company’s nonperformance risk adjustment. This estimate results in a spread over the LIBOR swap curve as of the balance sheet date. As the Company’s estimate of this spread over LIBOR widens or tightens, the liability will decrease or increase. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the fair value measurement of embedded derivatives.
Traditional Long-Duration Products
Liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported DI and LTC claims include any periodic or other benefit amounts due and accrued, along with estimates of the present value of obligations for continuing benefit payments. These unpaid amounts are calculated using anticipated claim continuance rates based on established industry tables, adjusted as appropriate for the Company’s experience. The discount rates used to calculate present values are based on average interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability for unpaid amounts.
Liabilities for estimates of benefits that will become payable on future claims on term life, whole life and DI policies are based on the net level premium and LTC policies are based on a gross premium valuation reflecting management’s current best estimate
assumptions. Both include anticipated premium payments, mortality and morbidity rates, policy persistency and interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability. Anticipated mortality and morbidity rates are based on established industry mortality and morbidity tables, with modifications based on our experience. Anticipated premium payments and persistency rates vary by policy form, issue age, policy duration and certain other pricing factors.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims accounting policy.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to various market risks. All derivatives are recorded at fair value. The fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments is determined using either market quotes or valuation models that are based upon the net present value of estimated future cash flows and incorporate current market observable inputs to the extent available.
For further details on the types of derivatives the Company uses and how it accounts for them, see Note 2, Note 13 and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For discussion of the Company’s market risk exposures and hedging program and related sensitivity testing, see Item 7A.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Items required under this section are included in Item 7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K - “Management’s Narrative Analysis - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Schedules:
All information on schedules to the Consolidated Financial Statements required by Rule 7-05 in Article 7 of Regulation S-X is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto or is not required. Therefore, all schedules have been omitted.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of RiverSource Life Insurance Company:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RiverSource Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 22, 2018
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation
RiverSource Life Insurance Company is a stock life insurance company with one wholly owned stock life insurance company subsidiary, RiverSource Life Insurance Co. of New York (“RiverSource Life of NY”). RiverSource Life Insurance Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (“Ameriprise Financial”).
•
RiverSource Life Insurance Company is domiciled in Minnesota and holds Certificates of Authority in American Samoa, the District of Columbia and all states except New York. RiverSource Life Insurance Company issues insurance and annuity products.
•
RiverSource Life of NY is domiciled and holds a Certificate of Authority in New York. RiverSource Life of NY issues insurance and annuity products.
RiverSource Life Insurance Company also wholly owns RiverSource Tax Advantaged Investments, Inc. (“RTA”). RTA is a stock company domiciled in Delaware and is a limited partner in affordable housing partnership investments.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of RiverSource Life Insurance Company and companies in which it directly or indirectly has a controlling financial interest (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
In 2017, the Company recorded the following out-of-period corrections:
•
a $12 million out-of-period correction related to a variable annuity model assumption that decreased amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) by $8 million and decreased benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses by $4 million.
•
a $20 million decrease to income tax provision for a reversal of a tax reserve.
In 2016, the Company recorded a $29 million increase to long term care (“LTC”) reserves for an out-of-period correction related to its claim utilization factor.
The impact of these out-of-period corrections was not material to current or prior period financial statements.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) which vary in certain respects from reporting practices prescribed or permitted by state insurance regulatory authorities as described in Note 15.
The Company evaluated events or transactions that may have occurred after the balance sheet date for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued.
The Company’s principal products are variable deferred annuities, universal life (“UL”) insurance, including indexed universal life (“IUL”) and variable universal life (“VUL”) insurance, which are issued primarily to individuals. Waiver of premium and accidental death benefit riders are generally available with the UL products, in addition to other benefit riders. Variable annuity contract purchasers can choose to add optional benefit riders to their contracts, such as guaranteed minimum death benefit (“GMDB”), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (“GMWB”) and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (“GMAB”) riders.
The Company also offers immediate annuities, fixed deferred annuities, and traditional life and disability income (“DI”) insurance. The Company issues only non-participating life insurance policies which do not pay dividends to policyholders and contractholders.
Nearly all of the Company’s business is sold through the retail distribution channel of Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (“AFSI”), a subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial. RiverSource Distributors, Inc., a subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, serves as the principal underwriter and distributor of variable annuity and life insurance products issued by the Company.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is an entity that either has equity investors that lack certain essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest (including substantive voting rights, the obligation to absorb the entity’s losses, or the rights to receive the entity’s returns) or has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities.
Voting interest entities (“VOEs”) are those entities that do not qualify as a VIE. The Company consolidates VOEs in which it holds a greater than 50% voting interest. The Company generally accounts for entities using the equity method when it holds a greater than 20% but less than 50% voting interest or when the Company exercises significant influence over the entity. All other investments that are not reported at fair value as trading or Available-for-Sale securities are accounted for under the cost method when the Company owns less than a 20% voting interest and does not exercise significant influence.
A VIE is consolidated by the reporting entity that determines it has both:
•
the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and
•
the obligation to absorb potentially significant losses or the right to receive potentially significant benefits to the VIE.
All VIEs are assessed for consolidation under this framework. When evaluating entities for consolidation, the Company considers its contractual rights in determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance. In determining whether the Company has this power, it considers whether it is acting in a role that enables it to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of an entity or if it is acting in an agent role.
In determining whether the Company has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, the Company considers an analysis of its rights to receive benefits such as investment returns and its obligation to absorb losses associated with any investment in the VIE in conjunction with other qualitative factors. Management and incentive fees that are at market and commensurate with the level of services provided, and where the Company does not hold other interests in the VIE that would absorb more than an insignificant amount of the VIE’s expected losses or receive more than an insignificant amount of the VIE’s expected residual returns, are not considered a variable interest and are excluded from the analysis.
The consolidation guidance has a scope exception for reporting entities with interests in registered money market funds which do not have an explicit support agreement.
Amounts Based on Estimates and Assumptions
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements. In part, they are based upon assumptions concerning future events. Among the more significant are those that relate to investment securities valuation and recognition of other-than-temporary impairments, DAC and the corresponding recognition of DAC amortization, valuation of derivative instruments and hedging activities, claims reserves and income taxes and the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities. These accounting estimates reflect the best judgment of management and actual results could differ.
Investments
Available-for-Sale Securities
Available-for-Sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains (losses) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of impacts to DAC, deferred sales inducement costs (“DSIC”), unearned revenue, benefit reserves, reinsurance recoverables and income taxes. Gains and losses are recognized on a trade date basis in the Consolidated Statements of Income upon disposition of the securities.
When the fair value of an investment is less than its amortized cost, the Company assesses whether or not: (i) it has the intent to sell the security (made a decision to sell) or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions exist, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and the Company recognizes an other-than-temporary impairment for the difference between the investment’s amortized cost and its fair value through earnings. For securities that do not meet the above criteria and the Company does not expect to recover a security’s amortized cost, the security is also considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For these securities, the Company separates the total impairment into the credit loss component and the amount of the loss related to other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to credit loss is recognized in earnings.
The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”), net of impacts to DAC, DSIC, unearned revenue, benefit reserves, reinsurance recoverables and income taxes. For Available-for-Sale securities that have recognized an other-than-temporary impairment through earnings, the difference between the amortized cost and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income if through subsequent evaluation there is a sustained increase in the cash flow expected. Subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value of Available-for-Sale securities are included in OCI.
The Company provides a supplemental disclosure on the face of its Consolidated Statements of Income that presents: (i) total other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized during the period and (ii) the portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI. The sum of these amounts represents the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairments that were recognized in earnings during the period. The portion of other-than-temporary losses recognized in OCI includes: (i) the portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses related to factors other than credit recognized during the period and (ii) reclassifications of other-than-temporary impairment losses previously determined to be related to factors other than credit that are determined to be credit-related in the current period. The amount presented on the Consolidated Statements of Income as the portion of other-than-temporary losses recognized in OCI excludes subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value of these securities.
For all securities that are considered temporarily impaired, the Company does not intend to sell these securities (has not made a decision to sell) and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. The Company believes that it will collect all principal and interest due on all investments that have amortized cost in excess of fair value that are considered only temporarily impaired.
Factors the Company considers in determining whether declines in the fair value of fixed maturity securities are other-than-temporary include: (i) the extent to which the market value is below amortized cost; (ii) the duration of time in which there has been a significant decline in value; (iii) fundamental analysis of the liquidity, business prospects and overall financial condition of the issuer; and (iv) market events that could impact credit ratings, economic and business climate, litigation and government actions, and similar external business factors. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss component for corporate debt securities considered other-than-
temporarily impaired, a best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected discounted at the security’s effective interest rate is compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. The significant inputs to cash flow projections consider potential debt restructuring terms, projected cash flows available to pay creditors and the Company’s position in the debtor’s overall capital structure.
For structured investments (e.g., residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities), the Company also considers factors such as overall deal structure and its position within the structure, quality of underlying collateral, delinquencies and defaults, loss severities, recoveries, prepayments and cumulative loss projections in assessing potential other-than-temporary impairments of these investments. Based upon these factors, securities that have indicators of potential other-than-temporary impairment are subject to detailed review by management. Securities for which declines are considered temporary continue to be monitored by management until management determines there is no current risk of an other-than-temporary impairment.
Other Investments
Other investments primarily reflect the Company’s interests in affordable housing partnerships and syndicated loans which represent investments in below investment grade loan syndications. Affordable housing partnerships are accounted for under the equity method.
Financing Receivables
Mortgage Loans and Syndicated Loans
Mortgage loans, net reflect the Company’s interest in commercial mortgage loans less the related allowance for loan losses and, as of December 31, 2016, residential mortgage loans.
Mortgage loans and syndicated loans are stated at amortized cost, net of allowances for loan losses.
Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balances of the loans as earned.
Policy Loans
Policy loans include life insurance policy and annuity loans and are reported at the unpaid principal balance, plus accrued interest.
When originated, policy loan balances do not exceed the cash surrender value of the underlying products. As there is minimal risk of loss related to these loans, the Company does not record an allowance for loan losses for policy loans.
Nonaccrual Loans
Generally, loans are evaluated for or placed on nonaccrual status when either the collection of interest or principal has become 90 days past due or is otherwise considered doubtful of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest payments received on loans on nonaccrual status are generally applied to principal unless the remaining principal balance has been determined to be fully collectible.
Commercial mortgage loans are evaluated for impairment when the loan is considered for nonaccrual status, restructured or foreclosure proceedings are initiated on the property. If it is determined that the fair value is less than the current loan balance, it is written down to fair value less estimated selling costs. Residential mortgage loans are impaired when management determines the assets are uncollectible and commences foreclosure proceedings on the property, at which time the property is written down to fair value less selling costs. Foreclosed property is recorded as real estate owned in other investments. Syndicated loans are placed on nonaccrual status when management determines it will not collect all contractual principal and interest on the loan.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Management determines the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on the overall loan portfolio composition, recent and historical loss experience, and other pertinent factors, including when applicable, internal risk ratings, loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios, FICO scores of the borrower, debt service coverage and occupancy rates, along with economic and market conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates, which may be susceptible to significant change.
The Company determines the amount of the allowance based on management’s assessment of relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance is recorded for homogeneous loan categories on a pool basis, based on an analysis of product mix and risk characteristics of the portfolio, including geographic concentration, bankruptcy experiences, and historical losses, adjusted for current trends and market conditions.
While the Company attributes portions of the allowance to specific loan pools as part of the allowance estimation process, the entire allowance is available to absorb losses inherent in the total loan portfolio. The allowance is increased through provisions charged to net realized investment gains (losses) and reduced/increased by net charge-offs/recoveries.
Impaired Loans
The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due (both interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans may also include loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Management evaluates for impairment all restructured loans and loans with higher impairment risk factors. Factors used by the Company to determine whether all amounts due on commercial mortgage loans will be collected, include but are not limited to,
the financial condition of the borrower, performance of the underlying properties, collateral and/or guarantees on the loan, and the borrower’s estimated future ability to pay based on property type and geographic location. The impairment recognized is measured as the excess of the loan’s recorded investment over: (i) the present value of its expected principal and interest payments discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (ii) the fair value of collateral or (iii) the loan’s observable market price.
Restructured Loans
A loan is classified as a restructured loan when the Company makes certain concessionary modifications to contractual terms for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. When the interest rate, minimum payments, and/or due dates have been modified in an attempt to make the loan more affordable to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties, the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring. Generally, performance prior to the restructuring or significant events that coincide with the restructuring are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms which may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of the restructuring or after a performance period. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan remains on nonaccrual status.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original or remaining maturities at the time of purchase of 90 days or less.
Reinsurance
The Company cedes insurance risk to other insurers under reinsurance agreements. The Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers prior to entering into new reinsurance contracts and on a periodic basis during the contract term.
Reinsurance premiums paid and benefits received are accounted for consistently with the basis used in accounting for the policies from which risk is reinsured and consistently with the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Reinsurance premiums for traditional life, LTC and DI, net of the change in any prepaid reinsurance asset, are reported as a reduction of premiums. UL and VUL reinsurance premiums are reported as a reduction of policy and contract charges. In addition, for UL and VUL insurance policies, the net cost of reinsurance ceded, which represents the discounted amount of the expected cash flows between the reinsurer and the Company, is classified as an asset or contra asset and amortized over the estimated life of the policies in proportion to the estimated gross profits (“EGPs”) and is subject to retrospective adjustment in a manner similar to retrospective adjustment of DAC. The assumptions used to project the expected cash flows are consistent with those used for DAC valuation for the same contracts. Changes in the net cost of reinsurance are reflected as a component of policy and contract charges. Reinsurance recoveries are reported as components of benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses.
Insurance liabilities are reported before the effects of reinsurance. Policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims recoverable under reinsurance contracts are recorded as reinsurance recoverables.
The Company also assumes life insurance and fixed annuity risk from other insurers in limited circumstances. Reinsurance premiums received and benefits paid are accounted for consistently with the basis used in accounting for the policies from which risk is reinsured and consistently with the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Liabilities for assumed business are recorded within policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims.
See Note 8 for additional information on reinsurance.
Land, Buildings, Equipment and Software
Land, buildings, equipment and internally developed or purchased software are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization and are reflected within other assets. The Company uses the straight-line method of depreciation and amortization over periods ranging from three to 30 years.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, land, buildings, equipment and software were $142 million and $148 million, respectively, net of accumulated depreciation of $159 million and $144 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $15 million, $14 million and $15 million, respectively.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Freestanding derivative instruments are recorded at fair value and are reflected in other assets or other liabilities. The Company’s policy is to not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivatives and collateral arrangements executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on its intended use and the resulting hedge designation, if any. The Company primarily uses derivatives as economic hedges that are not designated as accounting hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The Company occasionally designates derivatives as (i) hedges of changes in the fair value of assets, liabilities, or firm commitments (“fair value hedges”) or (ii) hedges of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedges”).
Derivative instruments that are entered into for hedging purposes are designated as such at the time the Company enters into the contract. For all derivative instruments that are designated for hedging activities, the Company documents all of the hedging relationships between the hedge instruments and the hedged items at the inception of the relationships. Management also documents its risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge transactions. The Company assesses, at inception and on a quarterly basis, whether derivatives designated as hedges are highly effective in offsetting the fair value or cash flows of hedged items.
If it is determined that a derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge, the Company will discontinue the application of hedge accounting.
For derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as accounting hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in current period earnings. Changes in fair value of derivatives are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on the nature and use of the instrument. Changes in fair value of derivatives used as economic hedges are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income with the corresponding change in the hedged asset or liability.
For derivative instruments that qualify as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives, as well as changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments, are recognized on a net basis in current period earnings. The carrying value of the hedged item is adjusted for the change in fair value from the designated hedged risk. If a fair value hedge designation is removed or the hedge is terminated prior to maturity, previous adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged item are recognized into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item.
The equity component of indexed annuities and IUL obligations are considered embedded derivatives. Additionally, certain annuities contain GMAB and GMWB provisions. The GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions are also considered embedded derivatives.
See Note 13 for information regarding the Company’s fair value measurement of derivative instruments and Note 17 for the impact of derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Deferred Acquisition Costs
The Company incurs costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal insurance and annuity businesses. The portion of these costs which are incremental and direct to the acquisition of a new or renewal insurance policy or annuity contract are deferred. Significant costs capitalized include sales based compensation related to the acquisition of new and renewal insurance policies and annuity contracts, medical inspection costs for successful sales, and a portion of employee compensation and benefit costs based upon the amount of time spent on successful sales. Sales based compensation paid to AFSI advisors and employees and third-party distributors is capitalized. Employee compensation and benefits costs which are capitalized relate primarily to sales efforts, underwriting and processing. All other costs which are not incremental direct costs of acquiring an insurance policy or annuity contract are expensed as incurred. The DAC associated with insurance policies or annuity contracts that are significantly modified or internally replaced with another contract are accounted for as contract terminations. These transactions are anticipated in establishing amortization periods and other valuation assumptions.
The Company monitors other DAC amortization assumptions, such as persistency, mortality, morbidity, interest margin, variable annuity benefit utilization and maintenance expense levels each quarter and, when assessed independently, each could impact the Company’s DAC balances.
The analysis of DAC balances and the corresponding amortization is a dynamic process that considers all relevant factors and assumptions described previously. Unless the Company’s management identifies a significant deviation over the course of the quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these DAC amortization assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year.
Non-Traditional Long-Duration Products
For non-traditional long-duration products (including variable and fixed deferred annuity contracts, UL and VUL insurance products), DAC are amortized based on projections of EGPs over amortization periods equal to the approximate life of the business.
EGPs vary based on persistency rates (assumptions at which contractholders and policyholders are expected to surrender, make withdrawals from and make deposits to their contracts), mortality levels, client asset value growth rates (based on equity and bond market performance), variable annuity benefit utilization and interest margins (the spread between earned rates on invested assets and rates credited to contractholder and policyholder accounts) and are management’s best estimates. Management regularly monitors financial market conditions and actual contractholder and policyholder behavior experience and compares them to its assumptions. These assumptions are updated whenever it appears that earlier estimates should be revised. When assumptions are changed, the percentage of EGPs used to amortize DAC might also change. A change in the required amortization percentage is applied retrospectively; an increase in amortization percentage will result in a decrease in the DAC balance and an increase in DAC amortization expense, while a decrease in amortization percentage will result in an increase in the DAC balance and a decrease in DAC amortization expense. The impact on results of operations of changing assumptions can be either positive or negative in any particular period and is reflected in the period in which such changes are made. At each balance sheet date, the DAC balance is adjusted for the effect that would result from the realization of unrealized gains or losses impacting EGPs, with the related change recognized through AOCI.
The client asset value growth rates are the rates at which variable annuity and VUL insurance contract values invested in separate accounts are assumed to appreciate in the future. The rates used vary by equity and fixed income investments. Management reviews and, where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions with respect to client asset value growth rates on a regular basis. The Company typically uses a five-year mean reversion process as a guideline in setting near-term equity fund growth rates based on a long-term view of financial market performance as well as recent actual performance. The suggested near-term equity fund growth rate is reviewed quarterly to ensure consistency with management’s assessment of anticipated equity market performance. DAC amortization
expense recorded in a period when client asset value growth rates exceed management’s near-term estimate will typically be less than in a period when growth rates fall short of management’s near-term estimate.
Traditional Long-Duration Products
For traditional long-duration products (including traditional life and DI insurance products), DAC are generally amortized as a percentage of premiums over amortization periods equal to the premium paying period. The assumptions made in calculating the DAC balance and DAC amortization expense are consistent with those used in determining the liabilities.
For traditional life and DI insurance products, the assumptions provide for adverse deviations in experience and are revised only if management concludes experience will be so adverse that DAC are not recoverable. If management concludes that DAC are not recoverable, DAC are reduced to the amount that is recoverable based on best estimate assumptions and there is a corresponding expense recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Deferred Sales Inducement Costs
Sales inducement costs consist of bonus interest credits and premium credits added to certain annuity contract and insurance policy values. These benefits are capitalized to the extent they are incremental to amounts that would be credited on similar contracts without the applicable feature. The amounts capitalized are amortized using the same methodology and assumptions used to amortize DAC. DSIC is recorded in other assets, and amortization of DSIC is recorded in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses.
Separate Account Assets and Liabilities
Separate account assets and liabilities are primarily funds held for the benefit of variable annuity contractholders and variable life insurance policyholders, who have a contractual right to receive the benefits of their contract or policy and bear the related investment risk. Gains and losses on separate account assets accrue directly to the contractholder or policyholder and are not reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Separate account assets are recorded at fair value. Changes in the fair value of separate account assets are offset by changes in the related separate account liabilities.
Policyholder Account Balances, Future Policy Benefits and Claims
The Company establishes reserves to cover the risks associated with non-traditional and traditional long-duration products. Reserves for non-traditional long-duration products include the liabilities related to guaranteed benefit provisions added to variable annuity contracts, variable and fixed annuity contracts and UL and VUL policies and the embedded derivatives related to variable annuity contracts, indexed annuities and IUL insurance. Reserves for traditional long-duration products are established to provide adequately for future benefits and expenses for term life, whole life, DI and LTC insurance products.
Changes in future policy benefits and claims are reflected in earnings in the period adjustments are made. Where applicable, benefit amounts expected to be recoverable from reinsurance companies who share in the risk are separately recorded as reinsurance recoverable within receivables.
Non-Traditional Long-Duration Products
The liabilities for non-traditional long-duration products include fixed account values on variable and fixed annuities and UL and VUL policies, liabilities for guaranteed benefits associated with variable annuities and embedded derivatives for variable annuities, indexed annuities and IUL products.
Liabilities for fixed account values on variable and fixed deferred annuities and UL and VUL policies are equal to accumulation values, which are the cumulative gross deposits and credited interest less withdrawals and various charges.
A portion of the Company’s UL and VUL policies have product features that result in profits followed by losses from the insurance component of the contract. These profits followed by losses can be generated by the cost structure of the product or secondary guarantees in the contract. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges. The liability for these future losses is determined by estimating the death benefits in excess of account value and recognizing the excess over the estimated life based on expected assessments (e.g. cost of insurance charges, contractual administrative charges, similar fees and investment margin). See Note 10 for information regarding the liability for contracts with secondary guarantees.
Liabilities for indexed annuity products and indexed accounts of IUL products are equal to the accumulation of host contract values covering guaranteed benefits and the fair value of embedded equity options.
The GMDB and gain gross-up (“GGU”) liability is determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value and recognizing the excess over the estimated life based on expected assessments (e.g., mortality and expense fees, contractual administrative charges and similar fees).
If elected by the contract owner and after a stipulated waiting period from contract issuance, a guaranteed minimum income benefit (“GMIB”) guarantees a minimum lifetime annuity based on a specified rate of contract accumulation value growth and predetermined annuity purchase rates. The GMIB liability is determined each period by estimating the expected value of annuitization benefits in excess of the projected contract accumulation value at the date of annuitization and recognizing the excess over the estimated life based on expected assessments.
The liability for the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions is determined by estimating the expected value of benefits that are contingent upon survival after the account value is equal to zero and recognizing the benefits over the estimated life based on expected assessments (e.g., mortality and expense fees, contractual administrative charges and similar fees).
In determining the liabilities for GMDB, GGU, GMIB and the life contingent benefits associated with GMWB, the Company projects these benefits and contract assessments using actuarial models to simulate various equity market scenarios. Significant assumptions made in projecting future benefits and assessments relate to customer asset value growth rates, mortality, persistency, benefit utilization and investment margins and are consistent with those used for DAC valuation for the same contracts. As with DAC, management reviews and, where appropriate, adjusts its assumptions each quarter. Unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring, management reviews and updates these assumptions annually in the third quarter of each year.
See Note 10 for information regarding variable annuity guarantees.
The fair value of embedded derivatives related to GMAB and the non-life contingent benefits associated with GMWB provisions, indexed annuities and IUL fluctuate based on equity, interest rate and credit markets and the estimate of the Company’s nonperformance risk, which can cause these embedded derivatives to be either an asset or a liability. See Note 13 for information regarding the fair value measurement of embedded derivatives.
Liabilities for fixed annuities in a benefit or payout status are based on future estimated payments using established industry mortality tables and interest rates.
Traditional Long-Duration Products
The liabilities for traditional long-duration products include liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported claims, estimates of benefits payable on claims incurred but not yet reported and estimates of benefits that will become payable on term life, whole life, DI and LTC policies as claims are incurred in the future.
Liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported life insurance claims are equal to the death benefits payable under the policies.
Liabilities for unpaid amounts on reported DI and LTC claims include any periodic or other benefit amounts due and accrued, along with estimates of the present value of obligations for continuing benefit payments. These unpaid amounts are calculated using anticipated claim continuance rates based on established industry tables, adjusted as appropriate for the Company’s experience. The discount rates used to calculate present values are based on average interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability for unpaid amounts.
Liabilities for estimated benefits payable on claims that have been incurred but not yet reported are based on periodic analysis of the actual time lag between when a claim occurs and when it is reported.
Liabilities for estimates of benefits that will become payable on future claims on term life, whole life and DI insurance policies are based on the net level premium and LTC policies are based on a gross premium valuation reflecting management’s current best estimate assumptions. Both include anticipated premium payments, mortality and morbidity rates, policy persistency and interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability. Anticipated mortality and morbidity rates are based on established industry mortality and morbidity tables, with modifications based on the Company’s experience. Anticipated premium payments and persistency rates vary by policy form, issue age, policy duration and certain other pricing factors.
For term life, whole life, DI and LTC policies, the Company utilizes best estimate assumptions as of the date the policy is issued with provisions for the risk of adverse deviation, as appropriate. After the liabilities are initially established, management performs premium deficiency tests using best estimate assumptions without provisions for adverse deviation annually in the third quarter of each year unless management identifies a material deviation over the course of quarterly monitoring. If the liabilities determined based on these best estimate assumptions are greater than the net reserves (i.e., GAAP reserves net of any DAC balance), the existing net reserves are adjusted by first reducing the DAC balance by the amount of the deficiency or to zero through a charge to current period earnings. If the deficiency is more than the DAC balance, then the net reserves are increased by the excess through a charge to current period earnings. If a premium deficiency is recognized, the assumptions as of the date of the loss recognition are locked in and used in subsequent periods. The assumptions for LTC insurance products are management’s best estimate as of the date of loss recognition and thus no longer provide for adverse deviations in experience.
See Note 9 for information regarding the liabilities for traditional long-duration products.
Unearned Revenue Liability
The Company’s UL and VUL policies require payment of fees or other policyholder assessments in advance for services to be provided in future periods. These charges are deferred as unearned revenue and amortized using EGPs, similar to DAC. The unearned revenue liability is recorded in other liabilities and the amortization is recorded in policy and contract charges.
Income Taxes
The Company qualifies as a life insurance company for federal income tax purposes. As such, the Company is subject to the Internal Revenue Code provisions applicable to life insurance companies.
The Company’s taxable income is included in the consolidated federal income tax return of Ameriprise Financial. The Company provides for income taxes on a separate return basis, except that, under an agreement between Ameriprise Financial and the Company, tax benefits are recognized for losses to the extent they can be used in the consolidated return. It is the policy of Ameriprise Financial that it will reimburse its subsidiaries for any tax benefits recorded.
The Company’s provision for income taxes represents the net amount of income taxes that the Company expects to pay or to receive from various taxing jurisdictions in connection with its operations. The Company provides for income taxes based on amounts that the Company believes it will ultimately owe taking into account the recognition and measurement for uncertain tax positions. Inherent in the provision for income taxes are estimates and judgments regarding the tax treatment of certain items.
In connection with the provision for income taxes, the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect certain amounts related to deferred tax assets and liabilities, which result from temporary differences between the assets and liabilities measured for financial statement purposes versus the assets and liabilities measured for tax return purposes.
The Company is required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of its deferred tax assets that management believes will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining if a valuation allowance should be established and the amount of such allowance if required. Factors used in making this determination include estimates relating to the performance of the business. Consideration is given to, among other things in making this determination: (i) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; (ii) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; (iii) taxable income in prior carryback years; and (iv) tax planning strategies. Management may need to identify and implement appropriate planning strategies to ensure its ability to realize deferred tax assets and reduce the likelihood of the establishment of a valuation allowance with respect to such assets. See Note 19 for additional information on the Company’s valuation allowance.
Changes in tax rates and tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effect of a change in tax laws or rates and the effect is included in net income. See Note 19 for further discussion on the enactment of the legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) and the impact to the Company’s provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Revenue Recognition
Premiums on traditional life, DI and LTC insurance products and immediate annuities with a life contingent feature are net of reinsurance ceded and are recognized as revenue when due.
Interest income is accrued as earned using the effective interest method, which makes an adjustment of the yield for security premiums and discounts on all performing fixed maturity securities classified as Available-for-Sale so that the related security or loan recognizes a constant rate of return on the outstanding balance throughout its term. When actual prepayments differ significantly from originally anticipated prepayments, the retrospective effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date and updated future payment assumptions and a catch-up adjustment is recorded in the current period. In addition, the new effective yield, which reflects anticipated future payments, is used prospectively.
Mortality and expense risk fees are based on a percentage of the fair value of assets held in the Company’s separate accounts and recognized when assessed. Variable annuity guaranteed benefit rider charges, cost of insurance charges on UL and VUL insurance and contract charges (net of reinsurance premiums and cost of reinsurance for UL insurance products) and surrender charges on annuities and UL and VUL insurance are recognized as revenue when assessed.
Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities, other than equity method investments, are recognized using the specific identification method, on a trade date basis.
Fees received under marketing support and distribution services arrangements are recognized as revenue when earned.
3.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) updated the accounting standards related to classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The update includes amendments to address diversity in practice for the classification of eight specific cash flow activities. The specific amendments the Company evaluated include the classification of debt prepayment and extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments, proceeds from insurance settlements and corporate owned life insurance settlements, distributions from equity method investees and the application of the predominance principle to separately identifiable cash flows. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted and all amendments must be adopted during the same period. The Company early adopted the standard for the interim period ended March 31, 2017 on a retrospective basis. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating, investing or financing cash flows.
Future Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB updated the accounting standards related to the presentation of tax effects stranded in OCI. The update allows a reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for tax effects stranded in AOCI resulting from the Tax Act. The update is optional and entities may elect not to reclassify the stranded tax effects. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities may elect to record the impacts either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Act is recognized. Early adoption is permitted in any period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the update on its consolidated financial condition.
Derivatives and Hedging - Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
In August 2017, the FASB updated the accounting standards to amend the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. The objectives of the update are to better align the financial reporting of hedging relationships to the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities and simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance. The update also adds new disclosures and amends existing disclosure requirements. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and should be applied on a modified retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Receivables - Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
In March 2017, the FASB updated the accounting standards to shorten the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Under current guidance, premiums are generally amortized over the contractual life of the security. The amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The update applies to securities with explicit, non-contingent call features that are callable at fixed prices and on preset dates. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Income Taxes - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
In October 2016, the FASB updated the accounting standards related to the recognition of income tax impacts on intra-entity transfers. The update requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers, other than inventory, upon the transfer of the asset. The update requires the selling entity to recognize a current tax expense or benefit and the purchasing entity to recognize a deferred tax asset or liability when the transfer occurs. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Financial Instruments - Measurement of Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB updated the accounting standards related to accounting for credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. The update replaces the current incurred loss model for estimating credit losses with a new model that requires an entity to estimate the credit losses expected over the life of the asset. Generally, the initial estimate of the expected credit losses and subsequent changes in the estimate will be reported in current period earnings and recorded through an allowance for credit losses on the balance sheet. The current credit loss model for Available-for-Sale debt securities does not change; however, the credit loss calculation and subsequent recoveries are required to be recorded through an allowance. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption will be permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. A modified retrospective cumulative adjustment to retained earnings should be recorded as of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective for loans, receivables, and other financial instruments subject to the new expected credit loss model. Prospective adoption is required for establishing an allowance related to Available-for-Sale debt securities, certain beneficial interests, and financial assets purchased with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Leases - Recognition of Lease Assets and Liabilities on Balance Sheet
In February 2016, the FASB updated the accounting standards for leases. The update was issued to increase transparency and comparability for the accounting of lease transactions. The standard will require most lease transactions for lessees to be recorded on the balance sheet as lease assets and lease liabilities and both quantitative and qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The update should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In January 2016, the FASB updated the accounting standards on the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. The update requires entities to carry marketable equity securities, excluding investments in securities that qualify for the equity method of accounting, at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in net income each reporting period. The update affects other aspects of accounting for equity instruments, as well as the accounting for financial liabilities utilizing the fair value option. The update eliminates the requirement to disclose the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial assets or liabilities held
at cost on the balance sheet and requires entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB updated the accounting standards for revenue from contracts with customers. The update provides a five step revenue recognition model for all revenue arising from contracts with customers and affects all entities that enter into contracts to provide goods or services to their customers (unless the contracts are in the scope of other standards). The standard also updates the accounting for certain costs associated with obtaining and fulfilling a customer contract and requires disclosure of quantitative and qualitative information that enables users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The standard may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or retrospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment at the date of adoption. The Company adopted the revenue recognition guidance on a retrospective basis on January 1, 2018. The update does not apply to revenue associated with the manufacturing of insurance and annuity products or financial instruments as these revenues are in the scope of other standards. Therefore, the update did not have an impact on these revenues. The Company’s implementation efforts included the identification of revenue within the guidance and the review of the customer contracts to determine the Company’s performance obligation and the associated timing of each performance obligation. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
4.
Variable Interest Entities
The Company is a limited partner in affordable housing partnerships that qualify for government-sponsored low income housing tax credit programs and partnerships that invest in multi-family residential properties that were originally developed with an affordable housing component. The Company has determined it is not the primary beneficiary and therefore does not consolidate these partnerships.
A majority of the limited partnerships are VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investment in the VIEs is limited to the carrying value. The carrying value is reflected in other investments and was $408 million and $482 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company had a $97 million and $135 million liability recorded as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to original purchase commitments not yet remitted to the VIEs. The Company has not provided any additional support and is not contractually obligated to provide additional support to the VIEs beyond the above mentioned funding commitments.
The Company invests in structured investments which are considered VIEs for which it is not the sponsor. These structured investments typically invest in fixed income instruments and are managed by third parties and include asset backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities and residential mortgage backed securities. The Company classifies these investments as Available-for-Sale securities. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these structures due to the size of the Company’s investment in the entities and position in the capital structure of these entities. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investment in these structured investments is limited to its carrying value. The carrying value is included in Available-for-Sale fixed maturities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has no obligation to provide financial or other support to the structured investments beyond its investment nor has the Company provided any support to the structured investments. See Note 5 for additional information on these structured investments.
5.
Investments
Available-for-Sale securities distributed by type were as follows:
(1) Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses in AOCI. Amount includes unrealized gains and losses on impaired securities subsequent to the initial impairment measurement date. These amounts are included in gross unrealized gains and losses as of the end of the period.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, investment securities with a fair value of 1.6 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, were pledged to meet contractual obligations under derivative contracts and short-term borrowings, of which $711 million and $428 million, respectively, may be sold, pledged or rehypothecated by the counterparty.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, fixed maturity securities comprised approximately 84% and 83%, respectively, of the Company’s total investments. Rating agency designations are based on the availability of ratings from Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (“NRSROs”), including Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) and Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”). The Company uses the median of available ratings from Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, or if fewer than three ratings are available, the lower rating is used. When ratings from Moody’s, S&P and Fitch are unavailable, the Company may utilize ratings from other NRSROs or rate the securities internally. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately $906 million and $944 million, respectively, of securities were internally rated by Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (“CMIA”), an affiliate of the Company, using criteria similar to those used by NRSROs.
A summary of fixed maturity securities by rating was as follows:
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately 35% and 40%, respectively, of the securities rated AAA were GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC mortgage backed securities. No holdings of any other issuer were greater than 10% of total equity.
The following tables provide information about Available-for-Sale securities with gross unrealized losses and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
As part of the Company’s ongoing monitoring process, management determined that the change in gross unrealized losses on its Available-for-Sale securities is primarily attributable to tighter credit spreads.
The following table presents a rollforward of the cumulative amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for other-than-temporary impairments related to credit losses on Available-for-Sale securities for which a portion of the securities’ total other-than-temporary impairments was recognized in OCI:
Net realized gains and losses on Available-for-Sale securities, determined using the specific identification method, recognized in net realized investment gains (losses) were as follows:
Other-than-temporary impairments for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily related to credit losses on corporate debt securities and non-agency residential mortgage backed securities.
See Note 18 for a rollforward of net unrealized investment gains (losses) included in AOCI.
Available-for-Sale securities by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities are not due at a single maturity date. As such, these securities, as well as common stocks, were not included in the maturities distribution.
The following is a summary of net investment income:
Net realized investment gains (losses) are summarized as follows:
6.
Financing Receivables
The Company’s financing receivables include commercial and residential mortgage loans, syndicated loans and policy loans. Syndicated loans are reflected in other investments.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Policy loans do not exceed the cash surrender value of the policy at origination. As there is minimal risk of loss related to policy loans, the Company does not record an allowance for loan losses for policy loans.
The following table presents a rollforward of the allowance for loan losses for the years ended and the ending balance of the allowance for loan losses by impairment method:
The recorded investment in financing receivables by impairment method was as follows:
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s recorded investment in financing receivables individually evaluated for impairment for which there was no related allowance for loan losses was $17 million and $5 million, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company purchased $156 million, $73 million and $106 million, respectively, and sold $259 million, $250 million and $15 million, respectively. The loans purchased consisted of syndicated loans. The loans sold during 2017 and 2016 primarily consisted of residential mortgage loans. See below for additional discussion on the sales of these loans. The loans sold during 2015 primarily consisted of syndicated loans.
Credit Quality Information
Nonperforming loans, which are generally loans 90 days or more past due, were $5 million and $2 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. All other loans were considered to be performing.
Commercial Mortgage Loans
The Company reviews the credit worthiness of the borrower and the performance of the underlying properties in order to determine the risk of loss on commercial mortgage loans. Based on this review, the commercial mortgage loans are assigned an internal risk rating, which management updates as necessary. Commercial mortgage loans which management has assigned its highest risk rating were nil of total commercial mortgage loans as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016. Loans with the highest risk rating represent distressed loans which the Company has identified as impaired or expects to become delinquent or enter into foreclosure within the
next six months. In addition, the Company reviews the concentrations of credit risk by region and property type.
Concentrations of credit risk of commercial mortgage loans by U.S. region were as follows:
Concentrations of credit risk of commercial mortgage loans by property type were as follows:
Residential Mortgage Loans
The recorded investment in residential mortgage loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was nil and $300 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company sold $249 million and $250 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans and recorded a loss of $4 million and a gain of $10 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016, approximately 2% of residential mortgage loans had FICO scores below 640. As of December 31, 2016, none of the Company’s residential mortgage loans had LTV ratios greater than 90%. The Company’s most significant geographic concentration for residential mortgage loans was in California which represented 52% of the portfolio as of December 31, 2016. Colorado and Washington represented 18% and 13%, respectively, of the portfolio as of December 31, 2016. No other state represented more than 10% of the total residential mortgage loan portfolio.
Syndicated Loans
The recorded investment in syndicated loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $397 million and $392 million, respectively. The Company’s syndicated loan portfolio is diversified across industries and issuers. The primary credit indicator for syndicated loans is whether the loans are performing in accordance with the contractual terms of the syndication. Total nonperforming syndicated loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $5 million and $1 million, respectively.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
The recorded investment in restructured loans was not material as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Troubled debt restructurings did not have a material impact to the Company’s allowance for loan losses or income recognized for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. There are no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans have been restructured.
7.
Deferred Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducement Costs
In the third quarter of the year, management updated market-related inputs and implemented model changes related to the Company’s living benefit valuation. In addition, management conducted its annual review of life insurance and annuity valuation assumptions relative to current experience and management expectations including modeling changes. These aforementioned changes are collectively referred to as unlocking. The impact of unlocking to DAC for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily reflected improved persistency and mortality on life insurance contracts and a correction related to a variable annuity model assumption partially offset by updates to market-related inputs to the living benefit valuation. The impact of unlocking to DAC for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily reflected low interest rates that more than offset benefits from persistency on annuity contracts without living benefits. In addition, the Company’s review of its closed LTC business in the prior year resulted in the write-off of DAC, which was included in the impact of unlocking. The impact of unlocking to DAC for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily reflected the difference between the Company’s previously assumed interest rates versus the low interest rate environment partially offset by improved persistency.
The balances of and changes in DAC were as follows:
(1) Includes a $27 million benefit related to the write-off of the deferred reinsurance liability in connection with the loss recognition on LTC business. The benefit was reported in other insurance and operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Includes a $58 million expense related to the loss recognition on LTC business.
The balances of and changes in DSIC, which is included in other assets, were as follows:
8.
Reinsurance
The Company reinsures a portion of the insurance risks associated with its traditional life, DI and LTC insurance products through reinsurance agreements with unaffiliated reinsurance companies. Reinsurance contracts do not relieve the Company from its primary obligation to policyholders.
The Company generally reinsures 90% of the death benefit liability for new term life insurance policies beginning in 2001 (RiverSource Life of NY began in 2002) and new individual UL and VUL insurance policies beginning in 2002 (2003 for RiverSource Life of NY). Policies issued prior to these dates are not subject to these same reinsurance levels.
However, for IUL policies issued after September 1, 2013 and VUL policies issued after January 1, 2014, the Company generally reinsures 50% of the death benefit liability. Similarly, the Company reinsures 50% of the death benefit and morbidity liabilities related to its universal life product with LTC benefits.
The maximum amount of life insurance risk the Company will retain is $10 million on a single life and $10 million on any flexible premium survivorship life policy; however, reinsurance agreements are in place such that retaining more than $1.5 million of insurance risk on a single life or a flexible premium survivorship life policy is very unusual. Risk on UL and VUL policies is reinsured on a yearly renewable term basis. Risk on most term life policies starting in 2001 (2002 for RiverSource Life of NY) is reinsured on a coinsurance basis, a type of reinsurance in which the reinsurer participates proportionally in all material risks and premiums associated with a policy.
The Company also has life insurance and fixed annuity risk previously assumed under reinsurance arrangements with unaffiliated insurance companies.
For existing LTC policies, the Company has continued ceding 50% of the risk on a coinsurance basis to subsidiaries of Genworth Financial, Inc. (“Genworth”) and retains the remaining risk. For RiverSource Life of NY, this reinsurance arrangement applies for 1996 and later issues only. Under these agreements, the Company has the right, but never the obligation, to recapture some, or all, of the risk ceded to Genworth.
Generally, the Company retains at most $5,000 per month of risk per life on DI policies sold on policy forms introduced in most states starting in 2007 (2010 for RiverSource Life of NY) and reinsures the remainder of the risk on a coinsurance basis with unaffiliated reinsurance companies. The Company retains all risk for new claims on DI contracts sold on other policy forms introduced prior to 2007 (2010 for RiverSource Life of NY). The Company also retains all risk on accidental death benefit claims and substantially all risk associated with waiver of premium provisions.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, traditional life and UL insurance in force aggregated $195.9 billion and $196.5 billion, respectively, of which $142.4 billion as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016 were reinsured at the respective year ends.
The effect of reinsurance on premiums for traditional long-duration products was as follows:
Policy and contract charges are presented on the Consolidated Statements of Income net of $114 million, $110 million and $107 million of reinsurance ceded for non-traditional long-duration products for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Reinsurance recovered on all contracts was $298 million, $318 million and $287 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Reinsurance recoverables include approximately $2.3 billion and $2.0 billion related to LTC risk ceded to Genworth as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims include $509 million and $529 million related to previously assumed reinsurance arrangements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
9.
Policyholder Account Balances, Future Policy Benefits and Claims and Separate Account Liabilities
Policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims consisted of the following:
(1)
Includes fixed deferred annuities, non-life contingent fixed payout annuities and indexed annuity host contracts.
(2) Includes the fair value of GMAB embedded derivatives that was a net asset as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016 reported as a contra liability.
Fixed Annuities
Fixed annuities include deferred, payout and indexed annuity contracts.
Deferred contracts offer a guaranteed minimum rate of interest and security of the principal invested. Payout contracts guarantee a fixed income payment for life or the term of the contract. Liabilities for fixed annuities in a benefit or payout status are based on future estimated payments using established industry mortality tables and interest rates, ranging from 2.71% to 9.38% as of December 31, 2017, depending on year of issue, with an average rate of approximately 4.09%. The Company generally invests the proceeds from the annuity contracts in fixed rate securities.
The Company’s equity indexed annuity (“EIA”) product is a single premium fixed deferred annuity. The Company discontinued new sales of EIA in 2007. The contract was issued with an initial term of seven years and interest earnings are linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index. This annuity has a minimum interest rate guarantee of 3% on 90% of the initial premium, adjusted for any surrenders. The Company generally invests the proceeds from the annuity contracts in fixed rate securities and hedges the equity risk with derivative instruments.
In November 2017, the Company began offering a fixed index annuity product which is a fixed annuity that includes an indexed account. The rate of interest credited above the minimum guarantee for funds allocated to the indexed account is linked to the performance of the specific index for the indexed account (subject to a cap). The Company offers S&P 500® Index and MSCI® EAFE Index account options. Both options offer two crediting durations, one-year and two-year. The contractholder may allocate all or a portion of the policy value to a fixed or indexed account. The portion of the policy allocated to the indexed account is accounted for as an embedded derivative. The Company hedges the interest credited rate including equity and interest rate risk related to the indexed account with derivative instruments. The contractholder can choose to add a GMWB for life rider for an additional fee.
See Note 17 for additional information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments used to hedge the risk related to indexed annuities.
Variable Annuities
Purchasers of variable annuities can select from a variety of investment options and can elect to allocate a portion to a fixed account. A vast majority of the premiums received for variable annuity contracts are held in separate accounts where the assets are held for the exclusive benefit of those contractholders.
Most of the variable annuity contracts currently issued by the Company contain one or more guaranteed benefits, including GMWB, GMAB, GMDB and GGU provisions. The Company previously offered contracts with GMIB provisions. See Note 2 and Note 10 for additional information regarding the Company’s variable annuity guarantees. The Company does not currently hedge its risk under the GGU and GMIB provisions. See Note 13 and Note 17 for additional information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments used to hedge risks related to GMWB, GMAB and GMDB provisions.
Insurance Liabilities
VUL/UL is the largest group of insurance policies written by the Company. Purchasers of VUL can select from a variety of investment options and can elect to allocate a portion to a fixed account or a separate account. A vast majority of the premiums received for VUL policies are held in separate accounts where the assets are held for the exclusive benefit of those policyholders.
IUL is a universal life policy that includes an indexed account. The rate of credited interest above the minimum guarantee for funds allocated to the indexed account is linked to the performance of the specific index for the indexed account (subject to a cap and floor). The Company offers an S&P 500® Index account option and a blended multi-index account option comprised of the S&P 500 Index, the MSCI® EAFE Index and the MSCI EM Index. Both options offer two crediting durations, one-year and two-year. The policyholder may allocate all or a portion of the policy value to a fixed or any available indexed account. The portion of the policy allocated to the indexed account is accounted for as an embedded derivative at fair value. The Company hedges the interest credited rate including equity and interest rate risk related to the indexed account with derivative instruments. See Note 17 for additional information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments used to hedge the risk related to IUL.
The Company also offers term life insurance as well as DI products. The Company no longer offers standalone LTC products and whole life insurance but has in force policies from prior years.
Insurance liabilities include accumulation values, unpaid reported claims, incurred but not reported claims and obligations for anticipated future claims.
The liability for estimates of benefits that will become payable on future claims on term life, whole life and DI policies is based on the net level premium and LTC policies is based on a gross premium valuation reflecting management’s current best estimate assumptions. Both include the anticipated interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability. Anticipated interest rates for term and whole life ranged from 3% to 10% as of December 31, 2017. Anticipated interest rates for DI policies ranged from 3.75% to 7.5% as of December 31, 2017 and for LTC policies ranged from 6% to 6.4% as of December 31, 2017.
The liability for unpaid reported claims on DI and LTC policies includes an estimate of the present value of obligations for continuing benefit payments. The discount rates used to calculate present values are based on average interest rates earned on assets supporting the liability for unpaid amounts and were 4.5% and 6.25% for DI and LTC claims, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.
Portions of the Company’s UL and VUL policies have product features that result in profits followed by losses from the insurance component of the policy. These profits followed by losses can be generated by the cost structure of the product or secondary guarantees in the policy. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges.
Separate Account Liabilities
Separate account liabilities consisted of the following:
10.
Variable Annuity and Insurance Guarantees
The majority of the variable annuity contracts offered by the Company contain GMDB provisions. The Company also offers variable annuities with GGU, GMWB and GMAB provisions. The Company previously offered contracts containing GMIB provisions. See Note 2 and Note 9 for additional information regarding the Company’s variable annuity guarantees.
The GMDB and GGU provisions provide a specified minimum return upon death of the contractholder. The death benefit payable is the greater of (i) the contract value less any purchase payment credits subject to recapture less a pro-rata portion of any rider fees, or (ii) the GMDB provisions specified in the contract. The Company has the following primary GMDB provisions:
•
Return of premium - provides purchase payments minus adjusted partial surrenders.
•
Reset - provides that the value resets to the account value every sixth contract anniversary minus adjusted partial surrenders. This provision was often provided in combination with the return of premium provision and is no longer offered.
•
Ratchet - provides that the value ratchets up to the maximum account value at specified anniversary intervals, plus subsequent purchase payments less adjusted partial surrenders.
The variable annuity contracts with GMWB riders typically have account values that are based on an underlying portfolio of mutual funds, the values of which fluctuate based on fund performance. At issue, the guaranteed amount is equal to the amount deposited but the guarantee may be increased annually to the account value (a “step-up”) in the case of favorable market performance or by a benefit credit if the contract includes this provision.
The Company has GMWB riders in force, which contain one or more of the following provisions:
•
Withdrawals at a specified rate per year until the amount withdrawn is equal to the guaranteed amount.
•
Withdrawals at a specified rate per year for the life of the contractholder (“GMWB for life”).
•
Withdrawals at a specified rate per year for joint contractholders while either is alive.
•
Withdrawals based on performance of the contract.
•
Withdrawals based on the age withdrawals begin.
•
Credits are applied annually for a specified number of years to increase the guaranteed amount as long as withdrawals have not been taken.
Variable annuity contractholders age 79 or younger at contract issue can also obtain a principal-back guarantee by purchasing the optional GMAB rider for an additional charge. The GMAB rider guarantees that, regardless of market performance at the end of the 10-year waiting period, the contract value will be no less than the original investment or a specified percentage of the highest anniversary value, adjusted for withdrawals. If the contract value is less than the guarantee at the end of the 10-year period, a lump sum will be added to the contract value to make the contract value equal to the guarantee value.
Certain UL policies offered by the Company provide secondary guarantee benefits. The secondary guarantee ensures that, subject to specified conditions, the policy will not terminate and will continue to provide a death benefit even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the monthly deductions and charges.
The following table provides information related to variable annuity guarantees for which the Company has established additional liabilities:
(1) Individual variable annuity contracts may have more than one guarantee and therefore may be included in more than one benefit type. Variable annuity contracts for which the death benefit equals the account value are not shown in this table.
(2) Amount revised to reflect updated contractholder mortality assumptions as of December 31, 2016.
The net amount at risk for GMDB, GGU and GMAB is defined as the current guaranteed benefit amount in excess of the current contract value. The net amount at risk for GMIB is defined as the greater of the present value of the minimum guaranteed annuity payments less the current contract value or zero. The net amount at risk for GMWB is defined as the greater of the present value of the minimum guaranteed withdrawal payments less the current contract value or zero.
The following table provides information related to insurance guarantees for which the Company has established additional liabilities:
The net amount at risk for UL secondary guarantees is defined as the current guaranteed death benefit amount in excess of the current policyholder account balance.
Changes in additional liabilities (contra liabilities) for variable annuity and insurance guarantees were as follows:
(1) The incurred claims for GMWB and GMAB represent the change in the fair value of the liabilities (contra liabilities) less paid claims.
The liabilities for guaranteed benefits are supported by general account assets.
The following table summarizes the distribution of separate account balances by asset type for variable annuity contracts providing guaranteed benefits:
No gains or losses were recognized on assets transferred to separate accounts for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
11.
Lines of Credit
RiverSource Life Insurance Company, as the borrower, has a revolving credit agreement with Ameriprise Financial as the lender. The aggregate amount outstanding under the line of credit may not exceed 3% of RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s statutory admitted assets (excluding separate accounts) as of the prior year end. The interest rate for any borrowing under the agreement is established by reference to LIBOR for U.S. dollar deposits with maturities comparable to the relevant interest period, plus an applicable margin subject to adjustment based on debt ratings of the senior unsecured debt of Ameriprise Financial. Amounts borrowed may be repaid at any time with no prepayment penalty. There were no amounts outstanding on this line of credit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
RiverSource Life of NY, as the borrower, has a revolving credit agreement with Ameriprise Financial as the lender. The aggregate amount outstanding under the line of credit may not exceed the lesser of $25 million or 3% of RiverSource Life of NY’s statutory admitted assets (excluding separate accounts) as of the prior year end. The interest rate for any borrowing is established by reference to LIBOR for U.S. dollar deposits with maturities comparable to the relevant interest period. Amounts borrowed may be repaid at any time with no prepayment penalty. There were no amounts outstanding on this line of credit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
RTA has a revolving credit agreement with Ameriprise Financial as the lender not to exceed $100 million. The interest rate for any borrowing is established by reference to LIBOR for U.S. dollar deposits with maturities comparable to the relevant interest period, plus an applicable margin subject to adjustment based on debt ratings of the senior unsecured debt of Ameriprise Financial. This line of credit is automatically renewed annually with Ameriprise Financial. There were no amounts outstanding on this revolving credit agreement as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
RiverSource Life Insurance Company, as the lender, has a revolving credit agreement with Ameriprise Financial as the borrower. This line of credit is not to exceed 3% of RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s statutory admitted assets as of the prior year end. The interest rate for any borrowing is established by reference to LIBOR for U.S. dollar deposits with maturities comparable to the relevant interest period, plus an applicable margin subject to adjustment based on debt ratings of the senior unsecured debt of Ameriprise Financial. In the event of default, an additional 1% interest will accrue during such period of default. There were no amounts outstanding on this revolving credit agreement as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
12.
Short-term Borrowings
The Company enters into repurchase agreements in exchange for cash which it accounts for as secured borrowings and has pledged Available-for-Sale securities to collateralize its obligations under the repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has pledged $43 million and $33 million, respectively, of agency residential mortgage backed securities and $8 million and $19 million, respectively, of commercial mortgage backed securities. The amount of the Company’s liability including accrued interest as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $50 million. The remaining maturity of outstanding repurchase agreements was less than one month and less than three months as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The weighted average annualized interest rate on repurchase agreements held as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 1.4% and 0.9%, respectively.
RiverSource Life Insurance Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Des Moines which provides access to collateralized borrowings. The Company has pledged Available-for-Sale securities consisting of commercial mortgage backed securities to collateralize its obligation under these borrowings. The fair value of the securities pledged is recorded in investments and was $750 million and $771 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amount of the Company’s liability including accrued interest as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $150 million. The remaining maturity of outstanding FHLB advances was less than four months as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016. The weighted average annualized interest rate on the FHLB advances held as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 1.5% and 0.8%, respectively.
13.
Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date; that is, an exit price. The exit price assumes the asset or liability is not exchanged subject to a forced liquidation or distressed sale.
Valuation Hierarchy
The Company categorizes its fair value measurements according to a three-level hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used by the Company’s valuation techniques. A level is assigned to each fair value measurement based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date.
Level 2
Prices or valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 3
Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(1) Amounts are comprised of certain financial instruments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient and have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.
(2) The fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives included $443 million of individual contracts in a liability position and $492 million of individual contracts in an asset position as of December 31, 2017.
(3) The Company’s adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $(399) million cumulative increase (decrease) to the embedded derivatives as of December 31, 2017.
(4) The fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives included $880 million of individual contracts in a liability position and $266 million of individual contracts in an asset position as of December 31, 2016.
(5) The Company’s adjustment for nonperformance risk resulted in a $(498) million cumulative increase (decrease) to the embedded derivatives as of December 31, 2016.
The following tables provide a summary of changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(1) Included in net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Included in interest credited to fixed accounts in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(3) Included in benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The increase (decrease) to pretax income of the Company’s adjustment for nonperformance risk on the fair value of its embedded derivatives was $(71) million, $98 million and $74 million, net of DAC, DSIC, unearned revenue amortization and the reinsurance accrual, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Securities transferred from Level 3 primarily represent securities with fair values that are now obtained from a third-party pricing service with observable inputs. Securities transferred to Level 3 represent securities with fair values that are now based on a single non-binding broker quote. The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as of the beginning of the quarter in which each transfer occurred. For assets and liabilities held at the end of the reporting periods that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.
The following tables provide a summary of the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements developed by the Company or reasonably available to the Company of Level 3 assets and liabilities:
(1) The nonperformance risk is the spread added to the observable interest rates used in the valuation of the embedded derivatives.
(2) The utilization of guaranteed withdrawals represents the percentage of contractholders that will begin withdrawing in any given year.
(3) Market volatility is implied volatility of fund of funds and managed volatility funds.
Level 3 measurements not included in the table above are obtained from non-binding broker quotes where unobservable inputs utilized in the fair value calculation are not reasonably available to the Company.
Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurements to Changes in Unobservable Inputs
Significant increases (decreases) in the yield/spread to U.S. Treasuries used in the fair value measurement of Level 3 corporate debt securities in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
Significant increases (decreases) in nonperformance risk used in the fair value measurement of the IUL embedded derivatives in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
Significant increases (decreases) in utilization and volatility used in the fair value measurement of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) liability value. Significant increases (decreases) in nonperformance risk and surrender rate used in the fair value measurement of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) liability value. Utilization of guaranteed withdrawals and surrender rates vary with the type of rider, the duration of the policy, the age of the contractholder, the distribution channel and whether the value of the guaranteed benefit exceeds the contract accumulation value.
Determination of Fair Value
The Company uses valuation techniques consistent with the market and income approaches to measure the fair value of its assets and liabilities. The Company’s market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The Company’s income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future projected cash flows to a single discounted present value amount. When applying either approach, the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs.
The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value and the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.
Assets
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original or remaining maturities at the time of purchase of 90 days or less. The Company’s cash equivalents are classified as Level 2 and measured at amortized cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short time between the purchase of the instrument and its expected realization.
Available-for-Sale Securities
When available, the fair value of securities is based on quoted prices in active markets. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are obtained from third-party pricing services, non-binding broker quotes, or other model-based valuation techniques. Level 1 securities primarily include U.S. Treasuries. Level 2 securities primarily include corporate bonds, residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities, state and municipal obligations, asset backed securities and foreign government securities. The fair value of these Level 2 securities is based on a market approach with prices obtained from third-party pricing services. Observable inputs used to value these securities can include, but are not limited to, reported trades, benchmark yields, issuer spreads and non-binding broker quotes. Level 3 securities primarily include certain corporate bonds, non-agency residential mortgage backed securities and asset backed securities. The fair value of corporate bonds, non-agency residential mortgage backed securities and certain asset backed securities classified as Level 3 is typically based on a single non-binding broker quote. The underlying inputs used for some of the non-binding broker quotes are not readily available to the Company. The Company’s privately placed corporate bonds are typically based on a single non-binding broker quote. In addition to the general pricing controls, the Company reviews the broker prices to ensure that the broker quotes are reasonable and, when available, compares prices of privately issued securities to public issues from the same issuer to ensure that the implicit illiquidity premium applied to the privately placed investment is reasonable considering investment characteristics, maturity, and average life of the investment.
In consideration of the above, management is responsible for the fair values recorded on the financial statements. Prices received from third-party pricing services are subjected to exception reporting that identifies investments with significant daily price movements as well as no movements. The Company reviews the exception reporting and resolves the exceptions through reaffirmation of the price or recording an appropriate fair value estimate. The Company also performs subsequent transaction testing. The Company performs annual due diligence of third-party pricing services. The Company’s due diligence procedures include assessing the vendor’s valuation qualifications, control environment, analysis of asset-class specific valuation methodologies, and understanding of sources of market observable assumptions and unobservable assumptions, if any, employed in the valuation methodology. The Company also considers the results of its exception reporting controls and any resulting price challenges that arise.
Separate Account Assets
The fair value of assets held by separate accounts is determined by the NAV of the funds in which those separate accounts are invested. The NAV is used as a practical expedient for fair value and represents the exit price for the separate account. Separate account assets are excluded from classification in the fair value hierarchy.
Other Assets
Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as derivatives that are exchange-traded, are classified as Level 1 measurements. The variation margin on futures contracts is also classified as Level 1. The fair value of derivatives that are traded in less active over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets is generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include swaps and the majority of options. The counterparties’ nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative assets was immaterial as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. See Note 16 and Note 17 for further information on the credit risk of derivative instruments and related collateral.
Liabilities
Policyholder Account Balances, Future Policy Benefits and Claims
The Company values the embedded derivatives attributable to the provisions of certain variable annuity riders using internal valuation models. These models calculate fair value by discounting expected cash flows from benefits plus margins for profit, risk and expenses less embedded derivative fees. The projected cash flows used by these models include observable capital market assumptions and incorporate significant unobservable inputs related to contractholder behavior assumptions, implied volatility, and margins for risk, profit and expenses that the Company believes an exit market participant would expect. The fair value also reflects a current estimate
of the Company’s nonperformance risk specific to these embedded derivatives. Given the significant unobservable inputs to this valuation, these measurements are classified as Level 3. The embedded derivatives attributable to these provisions are recorded in policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims.
The Company uses various Black-Scholes calculations to determine the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with the provisions of its indexed annuity and IUL products. Significant inputs to the EIA calculation include observable interest rates, volatilities and equity index levels and, therefore, are classified as Level 2. The fair value of the fixed index annuity and IUL embedded derivatives includes significant observable interest rates, volatilities and equity index levels and the significant unobservable estimate of the Company’s nonperformance risk. Given the significance of the nonperformance risk assumption to the fair value, the fixed index annuity and IUL embedded derivatives are classified as Level 3. The embedded derivatives attributable to these provisions are recorded in policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims.
The Company’s Corporate Actuarial Department calculates the fair value of the embedded derivatives on a monthly basis. During this process, control checks are performed to validate the completeness of the data. Actuarial management approves various components of the valuation along with the final results. The change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives is reviewed monthly with senior management. The Level 3 inputs into the valuation are consistent with the pricing assumptions and updated as experience develops. Significant unobservable inputs that reflect policyholder behavior are reviewed quarterly along with other valuation assumptions.
Other Liabilities
Derivatives that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, such as derivatives that are exchange-traded, are classified as Level 1 measurements. The variation margin on futures contracts is also classified as Level 1. The fair value of derivatives that are traded in less active OTC markets is generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and include swaps and the majority of options. The Company’s nonperformance risk associated with uncollateralized derivative liabilities was immaterial as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. See Note 16 and Note 17 for further information on the credit risk of derivative instruments and related collateral.
Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company assesses its investment in affordable housing partnerships for other-than-temporary impairment. The investments that are determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to their fair value. The Company uses a discounted cash flow model to measure the fair value of these investments. Inputs to the discounted cash flow model are estimates of future net operating losses and tax credits available to the Company and discount rates based on market condition and the financial strength of the syndicator (general partner). During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized $64 million of impairments on its investment in affordable housing partnerships primarily due to the enactment of the Tax Act. The balance of affordable housing partnerships measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis was $166 million as of December 31, 2017 and is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Asset and Liabilities Not Reported at Fair Value
The following tables provide the carrying value and the estimated fair value of financial instruments that are not reported at fair value.
(1)
Amounts are comprised of certain financial instruments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient and have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage Loans, Net
The fair value of commercial mortgage loans, except those with significant credit deterioration, is determined by discounting contractual cash flows using discount rates that reflect current pricing for loans with similar remaining maturities, liquidity and characteristics including LTV ratio, occupancy rate, refinance risk, debt service coverage, location, and property condition. For commercial mortgage loans with significant credit deterioration, fair value is determined using the same adjustments as above with an additional adjustment for the Company’s estimate of the amount recoverable on the loan. Given the significant unobservable inputs to the valuation of commercial mortgage loans, these measurements are classified as Level 3.
The fair value of residential mortgage loans as of December 31, 2016 is determined by discounting estimated cash flows and incorporating adjustments for prepayment, administration expenses, loss severity and credit loss estimates, with discount rates based on the Company’s estimate of current market conditions. Given the significant unobservable inputs to the valuation of residential mortgage loans as of December 31, 2016, these measurements are classified as Level 3.
Policy Loans
Policy loans represent loans made against the cash surrender value of the underlying life insurance or annuity product. These loans and the related interest are usually realized at death of the policyholder or contractholder or at surrender of the contract and are not transferable without the underlying insurance or annuity contract. The fair value of policy loans is determined by estimating expected cash flows discounted at rates based on the U.S. Treasury curve. Policy loans are classified as Level 3 as the discount rate used may be adjusted for the underlying performance of individual policies.
Other Investments
Other investments primarily consist of syndicated loans and an investment in FHLB. The fair value of syndicated loans is obtained from a third-party pricing service or non-binding broker quotes. Syndicated loans that are priced using a market approach with observable inputs are classified as Level 2 and syndicated loans priced using a single non-binding broker quote are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the investment in FHLB is approximated by the carrying value and classified as Level 3 due to restrictions on transfer and lack of liquidity in the primary market for this asset.
Policyholder Account Balances, Future Policy Benefits and Claims
The fair value of fixed annuities in deferral status is determined by discounting cash flows using a risk neutral discount rate with adjustments for profit margin, expense margin, early policy surrender behavior, a margin for adverse deviation from estimated early policy surrender behavior and the Company’s nonperformance risk specific to these liabilities. The fair value of non-life contingent fixed annuities in payout status, indexed annuity host contracts and the fixed portion of a small number of variable annuity contracts classified as investment contracts is determined in a similar manner. Given the use of significant unobservable inputs to these valuations, the measurements are classified as Level 3.
Short-term Borrowings
The fair value of short-term borrowings is obtained from a third-party pricing service. A nonperformance adjustment is not included as collateral requirements for these borrowings minimize the nonperformance risk. The fair value of short-term borrowings is classified as Level 2.
Other Liabilities
Other liabilities consist of future funding commitments to affordable housing partnerships and other real estate partnerships. The fair value of these future funding commitments is determined by discounting cash flows. The fair value of these commitments includes an adjustment for the Company’s nonperformance risk and is classified as Level 3 due to the use of the significant unobservable input.
Separate Account Liabilities
Certain separate account liabilities are classified as investment contracts and are carried at an amount equal to the related separate account assets. The NAV of the related separate account assets is used as a practical expedient for fair value and represents the exit price for the separate account liabilities. Separate account liabilities are excluded from classification in the fair value hierarchy.
14.
Related Party Transactions
CMIA is the investment advisor for the proprietary mutual funds used as investment options by the Company’s variable annuity contractholders and variable life insurance policyholders. The Company provides distribution and certain administrative services on behalf of CMIA and is compensated for the services it provides. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company earned $322 million, $313 million and $311 million, respectively, from CMIA for these services.
Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. (“CMID”), an affiliate of the Company, is the principal underwriter and distributor for the proprietary mutual funds used as investment options by the Company’s variable annuity contractholders and variable life insurance policyholders. The Company provides certain administrative services to assist in the promotion, distribution and account servicing of shares of the portfolios of the Company’s variable products and is compensated for providing these services. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company earned $167 million, $158 million and $162 million, respectively, from CMID for these services.
Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. (“CMIS”), an affiliate of the Company, is the transfer agent that processes transactions related to the Company’s variable products. The Company provides administrative services related to these transactions and is compensated for providing these services. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company earned $42 million, $40 million and $41 million, respectively, from CMIS for these services.
Charges by Ameriprise Financial and affiliated companies to the Company for use of joint facilities, technology support, marketing services and other services aggregated $390 million, $400 million and $437 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Certain of these costs are included in DAC. Expenses allocated to the Company may not be reflective of expenses that would have been incurred by the Company on a stand-alone basis.
Dividends paid and received by RiverSource Life Insurance Company were as follows:
(1) RiverSource REO 1, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of RiverSource Life Insurance Company which holds foreclosed mortgage loans and real estate.
On February 20, 2018, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $200 million to Ameriprise Financial, payable on or before March 22, 2018, pending approval by the Minnesota Department of Commerce.
For dividends from the life insurance companies, advance notification was provided to state insurance regulators prior to all dividend payments. See Note 15 for additional information.
The Company’s taxable income is included in the consolidated federal income tax return of Ameriprise Financial. The net amount due to Ameriprise Financial for federal income taxes was $105 million and $168 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which is reflected in Other, net within operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
15.
Regulatory Requirements
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) defines Risk-Based Capital (“RBC”) requirements for insurance companies. The RBC requirements are used by the NAIC and state insurance regulators to identify companies that merit regulatory actions designed to protect policyholders. These requirements apply to the Company. The Company has met its minimum RBC requirements.
Insurance companies are required to prepare statutory financial statements in accordance with the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the insurance departments of their respective states of domicile, which vary materially from GAAP. Prescribed statutory accounting practices include publications of the NAIC, as well as state laws, regulations and general administrative rules. The more
significant differences from GAAP include charging policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing annuity and insurance reserves using different actuarial methods and assumptions, valuing investments on a different basis and excluding certain assets from the balance sheet by charging them directly to surplus, such as a portion of the net deferred income tax assets.
RiverSource Life Insurance Company received approval from the Minnesota Department of Commerce to apply a permitted statutory accounting practice, effective July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, for certain derivative instruments used to economically hedge the interest rate exposure of certain variable annuity products that do not qualify for statutory hedge accounting. The permitted practice is intended to mitigate the impact to statutory surplus from the misalignment between variable annuity statutory reserves, which are not carried at fair value, and the fair value of derivatives used to economically hedge the interest rate exposure of non-life contingent living benefit guarantees. The permitted practice allows RiverSource Life Insurance Company to defer a portion of the change in fair value, net investment income and realized gains or losses generated from designated derivatives to the extent the amounts do not offset the current period interest-rate related change in the variable annuity statutory reserve liability. The deferred amount is amortized over ten years using the straight-line method with the ability to accelerate amortization at management’s discretion. There was no immediate impact to statutory surplus at the effective date for the permitted statutory accounting practice. As of December 31, 2017, application of this permitted practice resulted in a decrease to RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s statutory surplus of approximately $3 million.
State insurance statutes contain limitations as to the amount of dividends that insurers may make without providing prior notification to state regulators. For RiverSource Life Insurance Company, dividends in excess of unassigned surplus, as determined in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the State of Minnesota, require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s primary regulator, and are subject to potential disapproval. RiverSource Life Insurance Company’s statutory unassigned surplus (deficit) aggregated $(306) million and $275 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In addition, dividends whose fair market value, together with that of other dividends made within the preceding 12 months, exceeds the greater of the previous year’s statutory net gain from operations or 10% of the previous year-end statutory capital and surplus are referred to as “extraordinary dividends.” Extraordinary dividends also require advance notice to the Minnesota Department of Commerce, and are subject to potential disapproval. Statutory capital and surplus was $2.4 billion and $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Statutory net gain from operations and net income (loss) are summarized as follows:
Government debt securities of $4 million as of both December 31, 2017 and 2016 were on deposit with various states as required by law.
16.
Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
Certain financial instruments and derivative instruments are eligible for offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s derivative instruments and repurchase agreements are subject to master netting arrangements and collateral arrangements and qualify for offset. A master netting arrangement with a counterparty creates a right of offset for amounts due to and from that same counterparty that is enforceable in the event of a default or bankruptcy. The Company’s policy is to recognize amounts subject to master netting arrangements on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following tables present the gross and net information about the Company’s assets subject to master netting arrangements:
(1)
Represents the amount of assets that could be offset by liabilities with the same counterparty under master netting or similar arrangements that management elects not to offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following tables present the gross and net information about the Company’s liabilities subject to master netting arrangements:
(1) Represents the amount of liabilities that could be offset by assets with the same counterparty under master netting or similar arrangements that management elects not to offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In the tables above, the amounts of assets or liabilities presented are offset first by financial instruments that have the right of offset under master netting or similar arrangements, then any remaining amount is reduced by the amount of cash and securities collateral. The actual collateral may be greater than amounts presented in the tables.
When the fair value of collateral accepted by the Company is less than the amount due to the Company, there is a risk of loss if the counterparty fails to perform or provide additional collateral. To mitigate this risk, the Company monitors collateral values regularly and requires additional collateral when necessary. When the value of collateral pledged by the Company declines, it may be required to post additional collateral.
Freestanding derivative instruments are reflected in other assets and other liabilities. Cash collateral pledged by the Company is
reflected in other assets and cash collateral accepted by the Company is reflected in other liabilities. Repurchase agreements are reflected in short-term borrowings. See Note 17 for additional disclosures related to the Company’s derivative instruments and Note 12 for additional disclosures related to the Company’s repurchase agreements.
17.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments enable the Company to manage its exposure to various market risks. The value of such instruments is derived from an underlying variable or multiple variables, including equity and interest rate indices or prices. The Company primarily enters into derivative agreements for risk management purposes related to the Company’s products and operations.
The Company’s freestanding derivative instruments are all subject to master netting arrangements. The Company’s policy on the recognition of derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets is to not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivatives and collateral arrangements executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. See Note 16 for additional information regarding the estimated fair value of the Company’s freestanding derivatives after considering the effect of master netting arrangements and collateral.
The Company uses derivatives as economic hedges and accounting hedges. The following table presents the notional value and gross fair value of derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives:
N/A Not applicable.
(1) The fair value of freestanding derivative assets is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) The fair value of freestanding derivative liabilities is included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of GMWB and GMAB, IUL, and indexed annuity embedded derivatives is included in Policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(3) The fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives as of December 31, 2017 included $443 million of individual contracts in a liability position and $492 million of individual contracts in an asset position. The fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives as of December 31, 2016 included $880 million of individual contracts in a liability position and $266 million of individual contracts in an asset position.
See Note 13 for additional information regarding the Company’s fair value measurement of derivative instruments.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, investment securities with a fair value of $89 million and $235 million, respectively, were received as collateral to meet contractual obligations under derivative contracts, of which $89 million and $118 million, respectively, may be sold, pledged or rehypothecated by the Company. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had sold, pledged, or rehypothecated nil and $19 million, respectively, of these securities. In addition, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, non-cash collateral accepted was held in separate custodial accounts and was not included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table presents a summary of the impact of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, including embedded derivatives, on the Consolidated Statements of Income:
The Company holds derivative instruments that either do not qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. These derivative instruments are used as economic hedges of equity, interest rate, credit and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to various products and transactions of the Company.
Certain annuity contracts contain GMWB or GMAB provisions, which guarantee the right to make limited partial withdrawals each contract year regardless of the volatility inherent in the underlying investments or guarantee a minimum accumulation value of consideration received at the beginning of the contract period, after a specified holding period, respectively. The GMAB and non-life contingent GMWB provisions are considered embedded derivatives, which are bifurcated from their host contracts for valuation purposes and reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. The Company economically hedges the exposure related to GMAB and non-life contingent GMWB provisions primarily using futures, options, interest rate swaptions, interest rate swaps, total return swaps and variance swaps.
The deferred premium associated with certain of the above options and swaptions is paid or received semi-annually over the life of the contract or at maturity. The following is a summary of the payments the Company is scheduled to make and receive for these options and swaptions as of December 31, 2017:
Actual timing and payment amounts may differ due to future settlements, modifications or exercises of the contracts prior to the full premium being paid or received.
The Company has a macro hedge program to provide protection against the statutory tail scenario risk arising from variable annuity reserves on its statutory surplus and to cover some of the residual risks not covered by other hedging activities. As a means of economically hedging these risks, the Company uses a combination of futures, options, swaps and swaptions. Certain of the macro hedge derivatives contain settlement provisions linked to both equity returns and interest rates. The Company’s macro hedge derivatives that contain settlement provisions linked to both equity returns and interest rates are shown in Other contracts in the tables above.
Indexed annuity and IUL products have returns tied to the performance of equity markets. As a result of fluctuations in equity markets, the obligation incurred by the Company related to indexed annuity and IUL products will positively or negatively impact earnings over the life of these products. The equity component of indexed annuity and IUL product obligations are considered embedded derivatives, which are bifurcated from their host contracts for valuation purposes and reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. As a means of economically hedging its obligations under the provisions of these products, the Company enters into index options and futures contracts.
Cash Flow Hedges
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company held no derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2017, the Company expects to reclassify $2 million of deferred losses on derivative instruments from AOCI to earnings during the next 12 months that will be recorded in net investment income. These were originally losses on derivative instruments related to interest rate swaptions. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, no hedge relationships were discontinued due to forecasted transactions no longer being expected to occur according to the original hedge strategy. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, amounts recognized in earnings on derivative transactions that were ineffective were not material. See Note 18 for a summary of net unrealized gains (losses) included in AOCI related to previously designated cash flow hedges.
Currently, the longest period of time over which the Company is hedging exposure to the variability in future cash flows is one year and relates to interest credited on forecasted fixed premium product sales.
Credit Risk
Credit risk associated with the Company’s derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. To mitigate such risk, the Company has established guidelines and oversight of credit risk through a comprehensive enterprise risk management program that includes members of senior management. Key components of this program are to require preapproval of counterparties and the use of master netting and collateral arrangements whenever practical. See Note 16 for additional information on the Company’s credit exposure related to derivative assets.
Certain of the Company’s derivative contracts contain provisions that adjust the level of collateral the Company is required to post based on the Company’s financial strength rating (or based on the debt rating of the Company’s parent, Ameriprise Financial). Additionally, certain of the Company’s derivative contracts contain provisions that allow the counterparty to terminate the contract if the Company does not maintain a specific financial strength rating or Ameriprise Financial’s debt does not maintain a specific credit rating (generally an investment grade rating). If these termination provisions were to be triggered, the Company’s counterparty could require immediate settlement of any net liability position. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the aggregate fair value of derivative contracts in a net liability position containing such credit contingent provisions was $299 million and $206 million, respectively. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral for such instruments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $296 million and $198 million, respectively. If the credit contingent provisions of derivative contracts in a net liability position as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were triggered, the aggregate fair value of additional assets that would be required to be posted as collateral or needed to settle the instruments immediately would have been $3 million and $8 million, respectively.
18.
Shareholder’s Equity
The following tables provide the amounts related to each component of OCI:
(1) Includes other-than-temporary impairment losses on Available-for-Sale securities related to factors other than credit that were recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) during the period.
(2) Reclassification amounts are recorded in net realized investment gains (losses).
(3) Reclassification amounts are recorded in net investment income.
Other comprehensive income (loss) related to net unrealized securities gains (losses) includes three components: (i) unrealized gains (losses) that arose from changes in the market value of securities that were held during the period; (ii) (gains) losses that were
previously unrealized, but have been recognized in current period net income due to sales of Available-for-Sale securities and due to the reclassification of noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses to credit losses; and (iii) other adjustments primarily consisting of changes in insurance and annuity asset and liability balances, such as DAC, DSIC, unearned revenue, benefit reserves and reinsurance recoverables, to reflect the expected impact on their carrying values had the unrealized gains (losses) been realized as of the respective balance sheet dates.
The following table presents the changes in the balances of each component of AOCI, net of tax:
(1) Includes nil, nil and $2 million of noncredit related impairments on securities and net unrealized securities losses on previously impaired securities at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
19.
Income Taxes
The components of income tax provision were as follows:
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was signed into law. The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes an expense of $140 million due to the enactment of the Tax Act. The $140 million expense includes a $136 million expense for the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the Tax Act’s statutory rate of 21% and a $4 million expense for the remeasurement of tax contingencies, specifically state tax contingencies and interest accrued for tax contingencies.
The Company considers the expenses related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to be provisional amounts based on reasonable estimates as discussed below.
The principal reasons that the aggregate income tax provision is different from that computed by using the U.S. statutory rate of 35% were as follows:
The effective tax rates are lower than the statutory rate as a result of tax preferred items including the dividends received deduction and low income housing credits. The increase in the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to a $140 million expense in 2017 due to provisions of the Tax Act, including remeasurement of net deferred tax assets and remeasurement of tax contingencies. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to lower pretax income in relation to preferred items including the dividends received deduction and low income housing tax credits.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had not fully completed its accounting for the tax effects of the enactment of the Tax Act; however, the Company is able to provide reasonable estimates of the Tax Act’s impact. The Company’s provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017 is based in part on a reasonable estimate of the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities under the Tax Act. The Company recognized a provisional tax amount of $140 million, which is included as a component of provision for income taxes from continuing operations. The Company considers the accounting for the Tax Act’s expense related to the remeasurement of tax contingencies to be final and complete. The Company recorded a provisional tax amount of $136 million to remeasure certain deferred tax assets and liabilities as a result of the enactment of the Tax Act. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Tax Act and is refining the estimate of the expected reversal of its deferred tax balances. This can potentially affect the measurement of these balances or give rise to new deferred tax amounts. In addition, further guidance from federal and state taxing authorities may change the provisional tax liability or the accounting treatment of the provisional tax liability.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the assets and liabilities measured for GAAP reporting versus income tax return purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at 21% as of December 31, 2017 and 35% as of December 31, 2016. The significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which are included net within other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were as follows:
Included in the Company’s deferred income tax assets are tax benefits related to state net operating losses of $9 million, net of federal benefit, which will expire beginning December 31, 2018. Based on analysis of the Company’s tax position, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize certain state deferred tax assets, primarily state net operating losses and therefore a valuation allowance of $11 million has been established.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
If recognized, approximately $5 million, $6 million and $9 million, net of federal tax benefits, of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, would affect the effective tax rate.
It is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months. Based on the current audit position of the Company, it is estimated that the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by $9 million to $10 million in the next 12 months due to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) settlements and state exams.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax provision. The Company recognized a net decrease of $1 million, a net decrease of $39 million, and a net increase of $1 million in interest and penalties for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a payable of $1 million and $2 million, respectively, related to accrued interest and penalties.
The Company or one or more of its subsidiaries files income tax returns as part of its inclusion in the consolidated federal income tax returns of Ameriprise Financial in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. In the third quarter of 2017, the Company received final cash settlements for resolution of the 2006 and 2011 audits. The IRS has completed its examination of the 2008 through 2010 tax returns, and these years are effectively settled; however, the statutes of limitation, remain open for certain carryover adjustments. The IRS is currently auditing the Company’s U.S. income tax returns for 2012 through 2015. The Company’s
or certain of its subsidiaries’ state income tax returns are currently under examination by various jurisdictions for years ranging from 2011 through 2015.
20.
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Commitments
The following table presents the Company’s funding commitments as of December 31:
The decrease in residential mortgage loan funding commitments as of December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year is primarily due to the sale of loans. See Note 6 for additional information.
Guarantees
The Company’s annuity and life products all have minimum interest rate guarantees in their fixed accounts. As of December 31, 2017, these guarantees range from 1% to 5%.
Contingencies
RiverSource Life Insurance Company and RiverSource Life of NY are required by law to be a member of the guaranty fund association in every state where they are licensed to do business. In the event of insolvency of one or more unaffiliated insurance companies, the Company could be adversely affected by the requirement to pay assessments to the guaranty fund associations.
The Company projects its cost of future guaranty fund assessments based on estimates of insurance company insolvencies provided by the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations (“NOLHGA”) and the amount of its premiums written relative to the industry-wide premium in each state. The Company accrues the estimated cost of future guaranty fund assessments when it is considered probable that an assessment will be imposed, the event obligating the Company to pay the assessment has occurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.
The Company has a liability for estimated guaranty fund assessments and a related premium tax asset. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the estimated liability was $14 million and $16 million, respectively, and the related premium tax asset was $12 million and $14 million, respectively. The expected period over which guaranty fund assessments will be made and the related tax credits recovered is not known.
Insurance companies have been the subject of increasing regulatory, legislative and judicial scrutiny. Numerous state and federal regulatory agencies have commenced examinations and other inquiries of insurance companies regarding sales and marketing practices (including sales to older consumers and disclosure practices), claims handling, and unclaimed property and escheatment practices and procedures. The Company has cooperated and will continue to cooperate with the applicable regulators.
The Company is involved in the normal course of business in a number of other legal and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of its business activities. The Company believes that it is not a party to, nor are any of its properties the subject of, any pending legal, arbitration or regulatory investigation, examination or proceeding that is likely to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is possible that the outcome of any current or future legal, arbitration or regulatory proceeding could have a material impact on results of operations in any particular reporting period as the proceedings are resolved.
Uncertain economic conditions, heightened and sustained volatility in the financial markets and significant financial reform legislation may increase the likelihood that clients and other persons or regulators may present or threaten legal claims or that regulators increase the scope or frequency of examinations of the Company or the insurance industry generally.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be reported in the Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in and pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations, including controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and chief financial officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure. It should be noted that, because of inherent limitations, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met.
The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable level of assurance as of December 31, 2017.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and includes those policies and procedures that:
•
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
•
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
•
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and chief financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on management’s assessment and those criteria, management believes that, as of December 31, 2017, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
ITEM 9B.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item omitted pursuant to General Instructions I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item omitted pursuant to General Instructions I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Item omitted pursuant to General Instructions I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Item omitted pursuant to General Instructions I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (“Ameriprise Financial”) has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Fees Paid to the Registrant’s Independent Auditor
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and other fees billed for other services rendered by PwC during those periods.
(1) Audit fees include audit work performed in the review of the financial statements, as well as services that generally only the independent auditor can be expected to provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2) Audit-related fees include services provided by the independent auditor that are reasonably related to the performance or review of the audit.
(3) Tax fees include services provided by the independent auditor related to tax items.
Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the terms of the engagement of PwC are subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee of Ameriprise Financial. All audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed by PwC for the Company require pre-approval by the Audit Committee of Ameriprise Financial in accordance with pre-approval procedures established by the Audit Committee of Ameriprise Financial. The procedures require all proposed engagements of PwC for services to the Company of any kind to be directed to the General Auditor of Ameriprise Financial, and then submitted for approval to the Audit Committee of Ameriprise Financial prior to the beginning of any services. In 2017 and 2016, 100% of the services provided by PwC for the Company were pre-approved by the Audit Committee of Ameriprise Financial.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) and (2)
Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
The information required herein has been provided in Item 8.
(3)
Exhibit Index
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report or, where indicated, were already filed and are hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Registrant
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors and officers of RiverSource Life Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation, does hereby make, constitute and appoint John R. Woerner, Brian J. McGrane and David H. Weiser, and each of them, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name, place and stead, to sign and affix the undersigned’s name as such director and/or officer of said corporation to an Annual Report on Form 10-K or other applicable form, and all amendments thereto, to be filed by such corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with all exhibits thereto and other supporting documents, with said Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and any of them, full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts necessary or incidental to the performance and execution of the powers herein expressly granted.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been duly signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: February 22, 2018
By
/s/ Brian J. McGrane
Brian J. McGrane, Director, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)