ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.
We are a Delaware corporation formed on April 11, 2006 to search for available properties in north central British Columbia. In May 2006, we entered into an agreement which was negotiated at arms length with Richard Simpson to acquire a 100% interest in the WILLOW claim. The claim is located in the Omineca Mining Division, NTS map sheet 94D/10E. The property is 4.5 km east of the Sustut River in British Columbia. The property could have been acquired from Simpson by paying a total of $75,000 in two option payments with the last option payment being due on May 15, 2008, however, we did not make the required payments and now do not own these property rights.
We are an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. We did own a 100% interest in a mineral claim that we refer to as the WILLOW mineral claim, however our option to own the mineral claim expired on May 15, 2008 when we did not make the required payment. Our plan of operations was to carry out exploration work on this claim in order to ascertain whether it possesses commercially exploitable quantities of copper. We determined that the mineral claim did not contain a commercially exploitable mineral deposit, or reserve, therefore, we let the option expire and we do not currently own any options on any exploratory lands.
Our board of directors in consultation with our consulting geologist assessed whether to proceed with further exploration and determined that it was in the Company’s best interest to let the WILLOW mineral claim expire. It was determined that there was no existence of commercially exploitable mineral deposits in the WILLOW mineral claim.
Due to our inability to successfully mine the WILLOW mineral claim and our inability to sucessfully implement our business plan, we have ceased operations and are seeking an alternative way to proceed with our business, either through: (i) acquiring a new mineral claim in another location; or (ii) pursuing a potential reverse merger candidate.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.
We currently use approximately 400 square feet of leased office space at 1420 5th Avenue #220 Seattle, Washington 98101. We lease such space from the Regus Group for $237.00 month which covers the use of the telephone, office equipment and furniture.
Mineral Property Agreement
On May 5, 2006, we entered into an agreement with Richard Simpson to acquire a 100% interest in the WILLOW claim. The WILLOW mineral claim is situated approximately 25km east of Johansen Lake in the Province of British Columbia but no longer belongs to us because we did not make the required payments under the option agreement.
Property Option Payments
We were required but failed to pay Mr. Simpson the two Option Payments to keep our Agreement in good standing. The payments are outlined in the table that follows:
Location and Land Status
The WILLOW mineral claim consists of a mineral claim within the Omineca Mining Division of British Columbia.
Name
Record Number
Units
WILLOW
183.83
The WILLOW group total area is 447.70 hectares. The claim is no longer in good standing and we no longer own any rights to the property.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no known or pending litigation proceedings against us..
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Market Information
Our common stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board system under the symbol “STUX” since October 26, 2007. There is a limited trading market for our Common Stock. The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for each quarter within the last fiscal year. These quotations as reported by the OTCBB reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
The source of these high and low prices was the Quotemedia.com. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commissions and may not represent actual transactions. The high and low prices listed have been rounded up to the next highest two decimal places.
The market price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in our quarterly operating results, general trends in the market, and other factors, over many of which we have little or no control. In addition, broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, business and political conditions, may adversely affect the market for our common stock, regardless of our actual or projected performance.
Holders
As of February 6, 2009 in accordance with our transfer agent records, we had 71 record holders of our Common Stock.
Dividends
To date, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future.
Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Sustut Exploration, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 11, 2006 and 10,000,000 shares were issued to Terry Hughes for founders shares. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. These shares have subsequently been cancelled in connection with his resignation from all his offices as sole officer and director.
In April 2006, we completed a Regulation D, Rule 506 Offering in which we issued a total of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock to a total of 12 investors, at a price per share of $.01 for an aggregate offering price of $60,000. Each investor received a copy of our private placement memorandum and completed a questionnaire to confirm that they were either “accredited” or “sophisticated” investors.
On September 15, 2008, the Company authorized the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Andrey Oks as compensation for his appointment as the new sole officer and director. On September 12, 2008, Terry Hughes resigned from his position as the sole officer and director of the Company, and agreed to cancel all 9,902,624 shares of the Company common stock that he owned as of that date, and hereby waived all rights, title and interest he had or may have with respect to the 9,902,624 shares. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering.
On December 23, 2008, the Company authorized the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of common stock to Newbridge Securities as compensation for a business consulting agreement. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
Not applicable.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 relating to future events or our future performance. Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this prospectus. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.
Plan of Operation
To date we have not been able to raise additional funds through either debt or equity offerings. Due to our inability to successfully mine the WILLOW mineral claim and our inability to sucessfully implement our business plan, we have ceased operations and are seeking an alternative way to proceed with our business, either through: (i) acquiring a new mineral claim in another location; or (ii) pursuing a potential reverse merger candidate.
Results of Operation
We did not have any operating income from inception through December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the company recognized a net loss of $13,143 and for the period from inception through December 31, 2008, the company recognized net loss of $89,650. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $6,857 compared to $34,650 for inception through December 31, 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2008, we had $0 in cash.
We believe we can not satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with our current cash. If we are unable to satisfy our cash requirements we may be unable to proceed with our plan of operations. We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any significant equipment. We also do not expect any significant additions to the number of employees. The foregoing represents our best estimate of our cash needs based on current planning and business conditions. In the event we are not successful in reaching our initial revenue targets, additional funds may be required, and we may not be able to proceed with our business plan for the development and marketing of our core services. Should this occur, we will suspend or cease operations.
We anticipate that depending on market conditions and our plan of operations, we may incur operating losses in the foreseeable future. Therefore, our auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
To date we have not been able to raise additional funds through either debt or equity offerings. Due to our inability to successfully mine the WILLOW mineral claim and our inability to sucessfully implement our business plan, we have ceased operations and are seeking an alternative way to proceed with our business, either through: (i) acquiring a new mineral claim in another location; or (ii) pursuing a potential reverse merger candidate.
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue and Cost Recognition
The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting for financial statement reporting. Revenues and expenses are recognized in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for the industry. Certain period expenses are recorded when obligations are incurred.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those results.
Accounts Receivable, deposits, Accounts Payable and accrued Expenses
Accounts receivable have historically been immaterial and therefore no allowance for doubtful accounts has been established. Normal operating refundable Company deposits are listed as Other Assets. Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of trade payables created from the normal course of business.
Non-mining Property and Equipment
Property and equipment purchased by the Company are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred as are any items purchased which are below the Company’s capitalization threshold of $1,000.
For assets sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from accounts, and any related gain or loss is reflected in income for the period.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of event that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company's management determines if a valuation allowance is necessary to reduce any tax benefits when the available benefits are more likely than not to expire before they can be used.
Stock Based Compensation
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (SFAS 123(R)). SFAS 123(R) requires that companies recognize compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments based on fair value. The Company has adopted SFAS 123(R) in accounting for stock-based compensation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Credit Risk
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all cash accounts with maturities of 90 days or less and which are not subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties, as cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet. The portion of deposits in a financial institution that insures its deposits with the FDIC up to $100,000 per depositor in excess of such insured amounts are not subject to insurance and represent a credit risk to the Company.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
The Company’s functional currency is the US dollar. No material translations or transactions have occurred. Upon the occurrence of such material transactions or the need for translation adjustments, the Company will adopt Financial Accounting Standard No. 52 and other methods in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Earnings Per Share
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS 128), "Earnings Per Share". SFAS 128 replaces the presentation of primary earnings per share with a presentation of basic earnings per share based upon the weighted average number of common shares for the period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 affects those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161). This statement is intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the scope of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) as well as related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating the disclosure implications of this statement.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting the principles used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 6, Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements (AS/6). The adoption of FASB 162 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements. SFAS 163 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of FASB 163 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We do not have substantial operations at this time so they are not susceptible to these market risks. If, however, they begin to generate substantial revenue, their operations will be materially impacted by interest rates and market prices.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
SUSTUT EXPLORATION, INC.
(an exploration stage company)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008
Financial Statements Table of Contents
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page #
Report of Independent Registered Public Accountant
Balance Sheet
Statement of Operations and Retained Deficit
Statement of Stockholders Equity
Cash Flow Statement
Notes to the Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Director and shareholders
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Sustut Exploration, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and the related statement of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and from inception (April 11, 2006) through the year then ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Indestructible I, Inc. at December 31, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and from inception (April 11, 2006) through December 31, 2008 in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Gately & Associates, L.L.C.
Lake Mary, FL
January 14, 2009
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
SUSTUT EXPLORATION, INC.
(an exploration stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Sustut Exploration, Inc. (the Company), an exploration stage company, was incorporated on April 11, 2006 in the State of Delaware. The Company was an exploration stage mineral company. However, after the change in ownership on September 12, 2008, the Company plans to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with The Company. The combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for assets exchange. In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No assurances can be given that The Company will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company.
The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of the mineral properties and other assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred losses from inception to December 31, 2008. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management continues to actively seek additional sources of capital to fund current and future operations. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in continuing to raise additional capital, establishing probable or proven reserves. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue and Cost Recognition
The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting for financial statement reporting. Revenues and expenses are recognized in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for the industry. Certain period expenses are recorded when obligations are incurred.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those results.
SUSTUT EXPLORATION, INC.
(an exploration stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounts Receivable, deposits, Accounts Payable and accrued Expenses
Accounts receivable have historically been immaterial and therefore no allowance for doubtful accounts has been established. Normal operating refundable Company deposits are listed as Other Assets. Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of trade payables created from the normal course of business.
Non-mining Property and Equipment
Property and equipment purchased by the Company are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred as are any items purchased which are below the Company’s capitalization threshold of $1,000.
For assets sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from accounts, and any related gain or loss is reflected in income for the period.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company’s management determines if a valuation allowance is necessary to reduce any tax benefits when the available benefits are more likely than not to expire before they can be used.
Stock Based Compensation
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," (SFAS 123(R)). SFAS 123(R) requires that companies recognize compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments based on fair value. The Company has adopted SFAS 123(R) in accounting for stock-based compensation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Credit Risk
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all cash accounts with maturities of 90 days or less and which are not subject to withdrawel restrictions or penalties, as cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet.
SUSTUT EXPLORATION, INC.
(an exploration stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The portion of deposits in a financial institution that insures its deposits with the FDIC up to $100,000 per depositor in excess of such insured amounts are not subject to insurance and represent a credit risk to the Company.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
The Company’s functional currency is the US dollar. No material translations or transactions have occurred. Upon the occurrence of such material transactions or the need for translation adjustments, the Company will adopt Financial Accounting Standard No. 52 and other methods in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Earnings Per Share
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS 128), "Earnings Per Share". SFAS 128 replaces the presentation of primary earnings per share with a presentation of basic earnings per share based upon the weighted average number of common shares for the period.
NOTE 3 - AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTIES
Significant relationships with (1) companies affiliated through common ownership and/or management, and (2) other related parties are as follows: The Company had ownership of the Don 1-2 claims which were placed in trust with the Company’s President. The mineral claims, per the purchase agreement, had been reverted back to the seller.
The Company has stock-based compensation with directors of the Company as disclosed in Footnote No. 7.
NOTE 4 - MINERAL PROPERTIES
The Company's net investment in mineral properties include one claim as described in footnote number 1 have all costs related to the claim have be expended in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for the industry .
NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES
The income tax payable that was accrued from inception through September 12, 2008 was offset by the Company’s net operating loss carry-forward therefore the provisions for income tax in the income statement is $0. The accounting for these losses derives a deferred tax asset for the period from inception to September 12, 2008 of 17,540. However, $87,700 of the net operating loss carryforwards are disallowed due to the change in ownership of more than 50% and the change in continuity of business enterprise.
SUSTUT EXPLORATION, INC.
(an exploration stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
No provision was made for federal income tax since the Company has significant net operating losses. From September 13 through December 31, 2008, the Company incurred net operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $469,797. The net operating loss carry forwards may be used to reduce taxable income through 2028. The availability of the Company’s net operating loss carry-forwards are subject to limitation if there is a 50% or more positive change in the ownership of the Company’s stock. The provision for income taxes consists of the federal and state minimum tax imposed on corporations.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 2008 are as follows:
The Company has provided a 100% valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets at December 31, 2008 to reduce such asset to zero, since there is no assurance that the Company will generate future taxable income to utilize such asset. Management will review this valuation allowance requirement periodically and make adjustments as warranted.
The reconciliation of the effective income tax rate to the federal statutory rate for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is as follows:
NOTE 6 - CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS
On May 5, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Richard Simpson of Vancouver, BC to acquire one rock mineral claim covering 445.70 hectares. The agreement called for a 100% interest in the claims subject to a 2.5% Net Smelter Royalty (NSR) for a total of $25,000. 1.5% of the NSR can be acquired for $1.0 million within 12 months from commencement of commercial production. Advance royalties of $20,000 shall be paid annually commencing January 17, 2010. The purchase of the claim
SUSTUT EXPLORATION, INC.
(an exploration stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
required payment of $55,000 on May 15, 2006 and a further $20,000 on or before May 15, 2008. The Company has satisfied the initial payment of $55,000. Subsequently from the initial payment the Company defaulted on the next payment per the purchase agreement. The mineral claims, per the purchase agreement, have reverted back to the seller.
On November 24, 2008, the Company entered into a Business Advisory Agreement with Newbridge Securities Corporation (“Advisor”), a Virginia corporation. The agreement calls for the Advisor to furnish certain business and financial related advice and services to the Company. The term of the agreement shall be for one (1) year commencing from the date of the agreement. It may be renewed or extended upon such terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed upon the parties. Compensation agreed upon for advisory services was the issuance of 2,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to Advisor in the amount of $400,000, or $0.20 per share. In the event the Advisor effects, underwrites or introduces a financing by offering or selling any of the securities of the Company, pursuant to which the Company obtains financing or other consideration, the Advisor shall receive a Financing fee, which shall be mutually determined between the Company and the Advisor at the time of any such Financing. In connection with any merger or acquisition transaction consummated by the Company during the period ending two years from the termination of this agreement in which the Advisor during term of this agreement introduced the other party to the Company, the Company shall pay to the Advisor a transaction fee based on the aggregate consideration received or to be paid by the Company in connection with such transaction, and commuted as follows:
7% of the first million dollars or part thereof
6% of the next million dollars or part thereof
5% of the next million dollars or part thereof
4% of the next million dollars or part thereof
3% of the balance of the value of the transaction
NOTE 7 - SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock
The Company has authorized two hundred million (200,000,000) shares of common stock with a par value of $.001.
Upon incorporation the Company issued 10,000,000 common shares to directors of the Company as compensation in the amount of $10,000, or $0.001 per share.
SUSTUT EXPLORATION, INC.
(an exploration stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During April 2006 the Company undertook a Section 4(2) registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to raise $60,000 in the issuance of 6,000,000 shares of common stock for the purpose of acquisition and exploration of mining properties. The Company’s management considers this offering to be exempt under the Securities Act of 1933.
During February 2007, the Company undertook a Section 4(2) registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to raise $17,700 in the issuance of 59,000 shares of common stock at $.30 per share. The Company’s management considers this offering to be exempt under the Securities Act of 1933.
During March 2007, the Company cancelled the issuance of 1,000 shares of common stock at $.30 per share.
During July 2007, the Company reissued 1,000 shares of common stock at $0.30 per share that were cancelled during March 2007.
During April 2008, the Company undertook a 0.99026241954-for-1 reverse stock split of the Corporation’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock.
On September 12, 2008, the Company authorized the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Andrey Oks as compensation for his appointment as the new sole officer and director. On September 12, 2008, Terry Hughes resigned from his position as the sole officer and director of the Company, and agreed to cancel all 9,902,624 shares of the Company common stock that he owned as of that date, and hereby waived all rights, title and interest he had or may have with respect to the 9,902,624 shares.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
On November 24, 2008, the Company authorized the issuance of 2,000,000 restricted shares of common stock as compensation in the amount of $400,000, or $0.20 per share.
NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Management is not aware of any contingent matters that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
NOTE 9 - LITIGATION, CLAIMS AND ASSESSMENTS
From time to time in the normal course of business the Company will be involved in litigation. The Company’s management has determined any asserted or unasserted claims to be immaterial to the financial statements.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Our accountant is Gately & Associates, L.L.C.. independent certified public accountants. We do not presently intend to change accountants. At no time have there been any disagreements with such accountants regarding any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2008. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules based on the material weakness described below:
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with United State’s generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP), including those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this assessment, Management concluded the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS: COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Our executive officers and directors and their ages as of February 6, 2009 is as follows:
Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our executive officers and directors for the past five years.
Mr. Andrey Oks, 30, President and Chief Executive Officer
Over the last 6 1/2 years, Mr. Oks worked as a technical specialist and supervisor in the utility industry. He is also an engineering analyst in the corporate planning group for a major utility company. Most recently, Mr. Oks was appointed as a district operator in the Energy Control Center. Mr. Oks graduated from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and is currently pursuing a Masters of Business Administration.
None of our Officers and/or Directors have filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted of or been the subject of any criminal proceedings or the subject of any order, judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal securities laws within the past five (5) years.
Term of Office
Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our stockholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.
Current Issues and Future Management Expectations
No board audit committee has been formed as of the filing of this Annual Report.
Compliance With Section 16(A) Of The Exchange Act.
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are required to furnish copies to the Company. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, any reports required to be filed were timely filed in fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This Code of Ethics is filed herewith as an exhibit.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officers by any person for all services rendered in all capacities to us from the date of our inception until the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Stock Option Grants
None.
(1)
Mr. Oks received 10,000,000 shares for services rendered to us. He will not receive such compensation in the future.
Employment Agreements
We do not have any employment agreements in place with our sole officer and director.
Compensation of Directors
Directors do not receive any compensation for their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such capacity.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of the Company's Common Stock, all directors individually and all directors and officers of the Company as a group. Except as noted, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.
(1) Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of such security or the power to dispose or direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities if that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of the date hereof. Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the named entities or individuals have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially owned.
(2) This table is based upon information obtained from our stock records. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the above table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each shareholder named in the above table has sole or shared voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.
Stock Option Grants
We have not granted any stock options to our executive officer since our incorporation.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
None.
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees
For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we were billed approximately $3,000 and $1,500 for professional services rendered for the audit and review of our financial statements.
Audit Related Fees
There were no fees for audit related services for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Tax Fees
For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we were not billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
All Other Fees
The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:
-approved by our audit committee; or
-entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management.
We do not have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records of what percentage of the above fees were pre-approved. However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.
PART IV
ITEM15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
a) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report
1. Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
3. Exhibits
14.1 Code of Ethics
31.1 Certification of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
32.1
Certification of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: February 6, 2009
By /s/ Andrey Oks
Andrey Oks,
President,
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Andrey Oks
President,
February 6, 2009
Andrey Oks
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer