Item 1. Business.
Omitted.
Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Omitted.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties.
Omitted.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Omitted.
Item 4.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Omitted.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Omitted.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Omitted.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Omitted.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Omitted.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Omitted.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Omitted.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Omitted.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Omitted.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Omitted.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Omitted.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Omitted.
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB
Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.
No single obligor represents 10% or more of the pool assets held by the issuing entity.
Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.
Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.
Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.
The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceeding involving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routine litigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and the following, with respect to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee and as custodian, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, as certificate administrator and as custodian.
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.
On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trustees for 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRock SDNY Case”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “BlackRock California Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among the parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018 and the BlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.
On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of New York’s Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 1, 2021, both motions for summary judgment have been briefed and are awaiting decision by the court.
On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 1, 2021, both motions for summary judgment have been briefed and are awaiting decision by the court.
On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims as to seven trusts. On January 27, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the TIA. The court denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. IKB’s remaining claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed.
It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties under the related servicing agreement for this transaction.
Beginning on June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed civil complaints in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, and later the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo Bank”) in its capacity as trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. The complaints against Wells Fargo Bank alleged that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserted causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee's alleged failure to: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought included money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. In November 2018, Wells Fargo Bank reached an agreement, in which it denied any wrongdoing, to resolve such claims on a classwide basis for the 271 RMBS trusts at issue. On May 6, 2019, the court entered an order approving the settlement agreement. Separate lawsuits against Wells Fargo Bank making similar allegations filed by certain other institutional investors concerning several RMBS trusts in New York federal and state court are not covered by the settlement agreement. In addition to the foregoing cases, in August 2014 and August 2015 Nomura Credit & Capital Inc. (“Nomura”) and Natixis Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Natixis”) filed a total of seven third-party complaints against Wells Fargo Bank in New York state court. In the underlying first-party actions, Nomura and Natixis have been sued for alleged breaches of representations and warranties made in connection with residential mortgage-backed securities sponsored by them. In the third-party actions, Nomura and Natixis allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as master servicer, primary servicer or securities administrator, failed to notify Nomura and Natixis of their own breaches, failed to properly oversee the primary servicers, and failed to adhere to accepted servicing practices. Natixis additionally alleges that Wells Fargo Bank failed to perform default oversight duties. Wells Fargo Bank has asserted counterclaims alleging that Nomura and Natixis failed to provide Wells Fargo Bank notice of their representation and warranty breaches. With respect to each of the foregoing litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs' claims are without merit and intends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank or the related RMBS trusts.
In the last several years, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) and other large financial institutions have been sued in their capacity as trustee or successor trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities ("RMBS") trusts. The complaints, primarily filed by investors or investor groups against U.S. Bank and similar institutions, allege the trustees caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers to comply with the governing agreements for these RMBS trusts. Plaintiffs generally assert causes of action based upon the trustees’ purported failures to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties, notify securityholders of purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loan servicers and abide by a heightened standard of care following alleged events of default. U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were not the cause of losses to investors, that it has meritorious defenses, and it has contested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously. However, U.S. Bank cannot assure you as to the outcome of any of the litigation, or the possible impact of these litigations on the trustee or the RMBS trusts. On March 9, 2018, a law firm purporting to represent fifteen Delaware statutory trusts (the “DSTs”) that issued securities backed by student loans (the “Student Loans”) filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) in its capacities as indenture trustee and successor special servicer, and three other institutions in their respective transaction capacities, with respect to the DSTs and the Student Loans. This lawsuit is captioned The National Collegiate Student Loan Master Trust I, et al. v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al., C.A. No. 2018-0167-JRS (Del. Ch.) (the “NCMSLT Action”). The complaint, as amended on June 15, 2018, alleged that the DSTs have been harmed as a result of purported misconduct or omissions by the defendants concerning administration of the trusts and special servicing of the Student Loans. Since the filing of the NCMSLT Action, certain Student Loan borrowers have made assertions against U.S. Bank concerning special servicing that appear to be based on certain allegations made on behalf of the DSTs in the NCMSLT Action. U.S. Bank believes that it has performed its obligations as indenture trustee and special servicer in good faith and in compliance in all material respects with the terms of the agreements governing the DSTs (the “Governing Agreements”), and accordingly that the claims against it in the NCMSLT Action are without merit. U.S. Bank has filed a motion seeking dismissal of the operative complaint in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Chancery Court Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, a stay of the case while other prior filed disputes involving the DSTs and the Student Loans are litigated. On November 7, 2018, the Court ruled that the case should be stayed in its entirety pending resolution of the first-filed cases. On January 21, 2020, the Court entered an order consolidating for pretrial purposes the NCMSLT Action and three other lawsuits pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery concerning the DSTs and the Student Loans (the “Consolidated Action”). U.S. Bank and other parties to the Consolidated Action have briefed and argued motions for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 12(c) regarding disputed issues of contractual interpretation at issue in one or more of the cases comprising the Consolidated Action, including the NCMSLT Action. The Court has not yet ruled on these motions or on U.S. Bank’s dismissal motion in the NCMSLT Action. U.S. Bank intends to continue to defend the NCMSLT Action vigorously.
Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information regarding this Item has been previously provided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuing entity filed on December 8, 2014 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).
Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.
The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attached hereto under Item 15
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Not applicable
(2) Not applicable
(3) See below
4.1Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC as Cypresswood Court Shopping Center Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein).
4.2Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2014, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein).
4.3Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2014, by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.1Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)
10.2Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)
10.3Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II and Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)
10.4Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II and Starwood Mortgage Funding I LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)
10.5Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014, between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II and MC-Five Mile Commercial Mortgage Finance LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-191331-06 and incorporated by reference herein)
31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.
33Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
33.1Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
33.2LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer
33.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Custodian
33.4Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor
33.5CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant
33.6National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant
33.7Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)
33.8LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)
33.9U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Custodian of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.3)
33.10Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.4)
33.11CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)
33.12National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.13Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)
33.14CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.15Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.16Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan
33.17Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.4)
33.18CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)
33.19National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.20Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)
33.21Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.22Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Custodian of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.23Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
33.24CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)
33.25National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)
34Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
34.1Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
34.2LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer
34.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Custodian
34.4Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor
34.5CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant
34.6National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant
34.7Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)
34.8LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)
34.9U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Custodian of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.3)
34.10Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.4)
34.11CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)
34.12National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.13Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)
34.14CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.15Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.16Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan
34.17Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.4)
34.18CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)
34.19National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.20Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)
34.21Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.22Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Custodian of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.23Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
34.24CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)
34.25National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)
35Servicer compliance statements.
35.1Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
35.2LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer
35.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
35.4Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)
35.5LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Twin Cities Premium Outlets Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)
35.6Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)
35.7CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Bank of America Plaza Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
35.8Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)
35.9Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the Fenley Office Portfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)
(b) The exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.
(c) Not Applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
(Depositor)
/s/ Leah Nivison
Leah Nivison, Chief Executive Officer
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Date: March 22, 2021