Item 1. Business
On March 16, 2000, the registration statement filed by Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership, (the 'Fund') with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC'), which incorporated the disclosure document filed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the 'CFTC') was declared effective. Offers and sales of the Fund's limited partnership interests (the 'Units') at the initial price of $1,000 per Unit commenced on that date to residents of the States selected by the General Partner. As of July 11, 2000, the Fund had sold in excess of the $700,000 in face amount of Units, the amount required to break escrow and deliver the sales proceeds to the Fund accounts to permit it to commence the speculative trading of commodity futures. Trading commenced in July, 2000. See the financial statements for the total value of the Fund and the NAV as of the date of the statements.
The General Partner suspended trading on January 10, 2005, and all but one affiliated limited partner has redeemed its Units. Subsequently, Michael Pacult resigned as the individual general partner, but remains the principal of the Corporate General Partner.
The Partnership intends to file a new registration statement with new offering terms and a new CTA and, upon effectiveness, offer registered Units to the public. The General Partner, in its sole discretion selects the CTA and the amount of equity assigned to the CTAs, from time to time.
The trades for the Fund are selected and placed with the futures commission merchant ('FCM'), i.e., clearing broker, for the account of the Fund by one or more CTAs selected by the General Partner of the Fund. Initially, the Fund account was traded solely by Ansbacher Investment Management, Inc., then later by both Ansbacher and Mangin Capital Management, Inc. Effective November 1, 2003, the General Partner replaced the two CTAs with a single CTA, Fall River Capital Management, Inc., which remained the sole trader throughout the year 2004, but was terminated January 10, 2005. The books and records of the trades placed by the CTA in the Fund's trading account are kept and are available for inspection by the Partners at the office of the General Partner. The Fund Partnership Agreement is included as Exhibit A to the Prospectus delivered to the prospective investors and filed as part of the Registration Statement. The Partnership Agreement defines the terms of operation of the Fund and is incorporated herein by reference.
None of the purchasers of Limited Partnership Units has a voice in the management of the Partnership. Reports of the Net Asset Value of the Partnership are sent to all Limited Partners at the end of each month.
Belmont Capital Management, Inc., the corporate General Partner and commodity pool operator, provides all clearing costs, including pit brokerage fees, which include floor brokerage, NFA and exchange fees for domestic trades for a seven twelfths of one percent (7/12%) of the total value of the Fund available for trading in the Fund's account at the FCM per month [seven percent (7%) per year]. Trades made on foreign exchanges are charged directly to the Fund. Belmont is also paid a monthly management fee of one third of one percent (1/3%) of the net asset value of the Fund [four percent (4%) per year]. The independent FCM is selected by the General Partner to hold the Fund's trading equity and place the trades as directed by the CTA pursuant to a power of attorney and advisory agreement granted by the Fund. The CTA agreements are terminable at the will of the parties. These terms are expected to change upon the filing of a new registration statement.
The sale of Units is regulated by Securities Act of 1933 and the Commodity Exchange Act. The operation of the Fund is subject to regulation pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the Commodity Exchange Act. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Securities Commissions and securities acts of the several States where its Units are offered and sold have jurisdiction over the operation of the Fund. The National Futures Association has jurisdiction over the operation of the General Partner and the Commodity Trading Advisors. This regulatory structure is not intended, nor does it, protect investors from the risks inherent in the trading of futures and options.
Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The trading of futures, options on futures and other commodities related investments is highly speculative and risky. You should make an investment in the Fund only after consulting with independent, qualified sources of investment and tax advice and only if your financial condition will permit you to bear the risk of a total loss of your investment. You should consider an investment in the Units only as a long-term investment. Moreover, to evaluate the risks of this investment properly, you must familiarize yourself with the relevant terms and concepts relating to commodities trading and the regulation of commodities trading, which are discussed in the Risk Factors section of the Prospectus contained in the Registration Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
You should carefully consider all the information we have included or incorporated by reference in this Report and our subsequent periodic filings with the SEC. In particular, you should carefully consider the risk factors described above and read the risks and uncertainties as set forth in the 'Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations' Section of this Report. Any of the heretofore mentioned risks and uncertainties could materially adversely affect the Fund, its trading activities, operating results, financial condition and Net Asset Value and therefore could negatively impact the value of your investment. You should not invest in the Units unless you can afford to lose all of your investment.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties
Any FCM selected by the General Partner must be registered with the National Futures Association pursuant to the Federal Commodity Exchange Act as a commodity FCM. The trading of futures, options on futures and other commodities is highly speculative and the Fund has an unlimited risk of loss, including the pledge of all of its assets, to the trades made on its behalf by the CTAs in the commodity markets. The Fund expects to maintain a percentage of its assets in a Treasury Direct Account maintained with the United States Department of the Treasury. It also retains the right to invest in foreign treasuries held with the respective issuing department of treasury and to invest in cash management funds that invest in U.S. Treasuries and have high liquidity. Funds maintained with the US Department of Treasury, any foreign treasury department and any cash management funds are in the name of the Fund and not commingled with those of any other entity. The Fund expects to maintain a substantial portion of our net assets in segregation with the FCM for trading by the trading advisor. Approximately 0% to 3% of the previous month's net assets may be retained in our bank accounts to pay expenses and redemptions.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
There have been no legal proceedings against the Fund, its General Partner, the CTA, the IB or any of their Affiliates, directors or officers. The FCM, MF Global Inc., has had the following described reportable events, none of which, in the opinion of the FCM, is material to the performance of the FCM on behalf of the Fund's account:
In May 2006, MFI was sued by the Receiver for Philadelphia Alternate Asset Fund ('PAAF') and associated entities for common law negligence, common law fraud, violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and RICO violations (the 'Litigation'). In December 2007, without admitting any liability of any party to the Litigation to any other party to the Litigation, the Litigation was settled with MFI agreeing to pay $69 million, plus $6 million of legal expenses, to the Receiver, in exchange for releases from all applicable parties and the dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice. In a related action, MFI settled a CFTC administrative proceeding (In the Matter of MF Global, f/k/a Man Financial Inc., and Thomas Gilmartin) brought by the CFTC against MFI and one of its employees for failure to supervise and recordkeeping violations. Without admitting or denying the allegations, MFI agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $2 million and accept a cease and desist order.
On February 20, 2007, MFI settled a CFTC administrative proceeding (In the Matter of Steven M. Camp and Man Financial Inc., CFTC Docket No. 07-04) in which MFI was alleged to have failed to supervise one of its former associated persons ('AP') who was charged with fraudulently soliciting customers to open accounts at MFI. The CFTC alleged that the former AP misrepresented the profitability of a web-based trading system and of a purported trading system to be traded by a commodity trading advisor. Without admitting or denying the allegation, MFI agreed to pay restitution to customers amounting to $196,900.44 and a civil monetary penalty of $120,000. MFI also agreed to a cease and desist order and to strengthen its supervisory system for overseeing sales solicitations by employees in connection with accounts to be traded under letters of direction in favor of third party system providers.
On March 6, 2008, and thereafter, 5 virtually identical proposed class action securities suits were filed against MFG's parent, MF Global Ltd. (now, MF Global Holdings Ltd.) ('MF Global'), certain of its officers and directors, and Man Group plc. These suits have now been consolidated into a single action. The complaints seek to hold defendants liable under Secs. 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by alleging that the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with MF Global's initial public offering in July 2007 were materially false and misleading to the extent that representations were made regarding MF Global's risk management policies, procedures and systems. The allegations are based upon MF Global's disclosure of $141.5 million in trading losses incurred in a single day by an AP in his personal trading account ('Trading Incident'), which losses MFG was responsible to pay as an exchange clearing member. The consolidated cases have been dismissed on a motion to dismiss by defendants. Plaintiffs have appealed. In January 2011, the parties reached a preliminary agreement to settle whereby MF Global will contribute $2.5 million to an overall settlement amount of $90 million. The preliminary settlement will be subject to Court review and final approval.
On December 17, 2009, MFG settled a CFTC administrative proceeding in connection with the Trading Incident and three other matters without admitting or denying any allegations and accepting a charge of failing to supervise (In the Matter of MF Global Inc. CFTC Docket No. 10-03). The three additional matters that were settled involved allegations that MF Global failed to implement procedures to ensure proper transmissions of price information for certain options that were sent to a customer, specifically that the price indications reflected a consensus taken on [a particular] time and date and were derived from different sources in the market place; failed to diligently supervise the proper and accurate preparation of trading cards and failed to maintain appropriate written authorization to conduct trades for a certain customer. Under the Commission's order, MFG agreed to pay an aggregate civil monetary penalty of $10 million (which it had previously accrued) and agreed to a cease and desist order. In addition, MFG agreed to specific undertakings related to its supervisory practices and procedures and MFG agreed that it would engage an independent outside firm to review and assess the implementation of the undertakings and certain recommendations that MFG previously accepted. At the same time, MFG, without admitting or denying the allegations made by the CME, settled a CME disciplinary action relating to the Trading Incident by paying a fine of $495,000.
On August 28, 2009, Bank of Montreal ('BMO') instituted suit against MFG and its former broker, Joseph Saab ('Saab') (as well as a firm named Optionable, Inc. and five of its principals or employees), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In its complaint, BMO asserts various claims against all defendants for their alleged misrepresentation of price quotes to BMO's Market Risk Department ('MRD') as independent quotes when defendants knew, or should have known, that David Lee ('Lee'), BMO's trader, created the quotes which, in circular fashion, were passed on to BMO through MFG's broker, thereby enabling Lee substantially to overvalue his book at BMO. BMO further alleges that MFG and Saab knew that Lee was fraudulently misrepresenting prices in his options natural gas book and aided and abetted his ability to do so by MFG's actions in sending price indications to the BMO MRD, and substantially assisted Lee's breach of his fiduciary duties to BMO as its employee. The Complaint seeks to hold all defendants jointly and severally liable and, although it does not specify an exact damage claim, it claims CAD 680.0 million (approximately $635.9 million) as a pre-tax loss for BMO in its natural gas trading, claims that it would not have paid brokerage commissions to MFG (and Optionable), would not have continued Lee and his supervisor as employees at substantial salaries and bonuses, and would not have incurred substantial legal costs and expenses to deal with the Lee mispricing. MFG has made a motion to dismiss, which was denied.
In or about October 2003, MFI uncovered an apparent fraudulent scheme conducted by third parties unrelated to MFI that may have victimized a number of its clients. CCPM, a German Introducing Broker, introduced to MFI all the clients that may have been victimized. An agent of CCPM, Michael Woertche (and his asssociates), apparently engaged in a Ponzi scheme in which allegedly unauthorized transfers from and trading in accounts maintained at
MFI were utilized to siphon money out of these accounts, on some occasions shortly after they were established. MFI was involved in two arbitration proceedings relating to these CCPM introduced accounts. The first arbitration involved claims made by two claimants before a NFA panel. The second arbitration involves claims made by four claimants before a FINRA panel. The claims in both arbitrations are based on allegations that MFI and an employee assisted CCPM in engaging in, or recklessly or negligently failed to prevent, unauthorized transfers from, and trading in, accounts maintained by MFI. Damages sought in the NFA arbitration proceeding were approximately $1,700,000 in compensatory damages, unspecified punitive damages and attorney's fees in addition to the rescission of certain deposit agreements. The NFA arbitration was settled for $200,000 as to one claimant and a net of $240,000 as to the second claimant during fiscal 2008. Damages sought in the FINRA proceeding were approximately $6,000,000 in compensatory damages and $12,000,000 in punitive damages. During the year ended March 31, 2009, the FINRA arbitration was settled for an aggregate of $800,000.
The Liquidation Trustee ('Trustee') for Sentinel Management Group, Inc. ('Sentinel') sued MFG in June 2009 on the theory that MFG's withdrawal of $50.2 million within 90 days of the filing of Sentinel's bankruptcy petition on August 17, 2007 is a voidable preference under Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, recoverable by the Trustee, along with interest and costs.
In May 2009, investors in a venture set up by Nicholas Cosmo ('Cosmo') sued Bank of America and MFG, among others, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging that MFG, among others, aided and abetted Cosmo and related entities in a Ponzi scheme in which investors lost $400 million. MFG has made a motion to dismiss which was granted and cannot be appealed by plaintiffs until the conclusion of the case against the Bank of America.
In December 2010, the Court-appointed receiver for Joseph Forte, L.P., ('Forte Partnership') filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that MFG was negligent in the handling of a futures account the Forte Partnership maintained at MFG. The Complaint alleges that as a result of MFG's negligence, Joseph Forte ('Forte') was able to operate a Ponzi scheme in which he misappropriated at least $25,000,000 from limited partners in the Forte Partnership. The Complaint seeks damages 'in excess of $150,000.' MFG has not been served with the complaint.
In the late spring of 2009, MFG was sued in Oklahoma State Court by customers who were substantial investors with Mark Trimble ('Trimble') and/or Phidippides Capital Management ('Phidippides'). Trimble and Phidippides may have been engaged in a Ponzi scheme. Plaintiffs allege that MFG 'materially aided and abetted' Trimble's and Phidippides' violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Oklahoma securities laws and they are seeking damages 'in excess of' $10,000 each. MFG made a motion to dismiss which was granted by the court. Plaintiffs have appealed.
In the late spring of 2009, MFG was sued in Oklahoma State Court by customers who were substantial investors with Mark Trimble ('Trimble') and/or Phidippides Capital Management ('Phidippides'). Trimble and Phidippides may have been engaged in a Ponzi scheme. Plaintiffs allege that MFG 'materially aided and abetted' Trimble's and Phidippides' violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Oklahoma securities laws and they are seeking damages 'in excess of' $10,000 each. MFG made a motion to dismiss which was granted by the court. Plaintiffs have appealed.
On August 4, 2010, MFG was added as a defendant to a consolidated class action complaint filed against Moore Capital Management and related entities in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging claims of manipulation and aiding and abetting manipulation, in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. Specifically, the complaint alleges that, between October 25, 2007 and June 6, 2008, Moore Capital directed MFG, as its executing broker, to enter 'large' market on close orders (at or near the time of the close) for platinum and palladium futures contracts, which allegedly caused artificially inflated prices. On August 10, 2010, MFG was added as a defendant to a related class action complaint filed against the Moore'related entities on behalf of a class of plaintiffs who traded the physical platinum and palladium in the relevant time frame, which alleges price fixing under the Sherman Act and violations of the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. On September 30, 2010 plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated class action complaint that includes all of the allegations and claims identified above on behalf of subclasses of traders of futures contracts of platinum and palladium and physical platinum and palladium. Plaintiffs' claimed damages have not been quantified. This matter is in its earliest stages.MFG and an affiliate, MF Global Market Services LLC ('Market Services'), are currently involved in litigation with a former customer of Market Services, Morgan Fuel & Heating Co., Inc. ('Morgan Fuel') and its principals, Anthony Bottini, Jr., Brian Bottini and Mark Bottini (the 'Bottinis'). The litigations arise out of trading losses incurred by Morgan Fuel in over-the-counter derivative swap transactions, which were unconditionally guaranteed by the Bottinis.
On October 6, 2008, Market Services commenced an arbitration against the Bottinis to recover $8.3 million, which is the amount of the debt owed to Market Services by Morgan Fuel after the liquidation of the swap transactions. MF Global Market Services LLC v. Anthony Bottini, Jr., Brian Bottini and Mark Bottini, FINRA No. 08-03673. Each of the Bottinis executed a guaranty in favor of Market Services personally and unconditionally guaranteeing payment of the obligations of Morgan Fuel upon written demand by Market Services. Market Services asserted a claim of breach of contract based upon the Bottinis' failure to honor the guarantees.
On October 21, 2008, Morgan Fuel commenced a separate arbitration proceeding before FINRA against MFG and Market Services. Morgan Fuel claims that MFG and Market Services caused Morgan Fuel to incur approximately $14.2 million in trading losses. Morgan Fuel v. MFG and Market Services, FINRA No. 08-03879. Morgan Fuel seeks recovery of $5.9 million in margin payments that it allegedly made to Market Services and a declaration that it has no responsibility to pay Market Services for the remaining $8.3 million in trading losses because Market Services should not have allowed Morgan Fuel to enter into, or maintain, the swap transactions. On MFG's motion, the Supreme Court of the State of New York determined that there was no agreement to arbitrate such claims. Morgan Fuel appealed and all appeals were denied.
The Bottinis also asserted a third-party claim against Morgan Fuel, which in turn asserted a fourth-party claim against MFG, Market Services and Steven Bellino (an MFG employee) in the arbitration proceeding commenced by Market Services. The Supreme Court of the State of New York denied a motion to stay the fourth party claim but the denial to stay was reversed. Morgan Fuel filed a motion to appeal with the New York Court of Appeals which was denied.
On December 12, 2008, MFG settled three CME Group disciplinary actions involving allegations that on a number of occasions in 2006 and 2007, MFG employees engaged in impermissible pre-execution communications in connection with trades executed on the e-cbot electronic trading platform, withheld customer orders that were executable in the market for the purpose of soliciting, and brokering contra-orders and crossed orders on the e-cbot trading platform without allowing for the minimum required exposure period between the entry of the orders. MFG was also charged with failing to properly supervise its employees in connection with these trades. Without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, MFG consented to an order of a CME Business Conduct Committee Panel which found that MFG violated legacy CBOT Rule 504.00 and Regulations 480.10 and 9B.13 and 9B.13(c) and ordered MFG to pay a $400,000 fine, cease and desist from similar conduct and, in consultation with CME Market regulation Staff, enhance its training practices and supervisory procedures regarding electronic trading practices.
MFG acts only as clearing broker for the Fund's futures accounts and as such is paid commissions for executing and clearing trades. MFG has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the Fund's prospectus or this report and will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to the CPO or the CTA, as the case may be, nor participate in the management of the CPO or of the Fund or of the CTA. Therefore, investors should not rely on MFG in deciding whether or not to participate in the Fund.
The Fund is not aware of any threatened or potential claims or legal proceedings to which the Fund is a party or to which any of its assets are subject. MFG has represented to the General Partner that that none of the events it has reported will not now, or at any time in the future, interfere with its performance as the FCM for the Fund's account.
Item 4.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
N/A
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Limited Partnership Units, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Fund desires to be taxed as a partnership and not as a corporation. In furtherance of this objective, the Limited Partnership Agreement, subject to certain exceptions upon the death of a Limited Partner, requires a Limited Partner to obtain the approval of the General Partner prior to the transfer of any Units. Accordingly, there is no trading market for the Fund Units and none is likely to develop. The Limited Partners must rely upon the right of Redemption provided in the Limited Partnership Agreement to liquidate their interest.
The Fund has fewer than 300 holders of its securities. Limited Partners are required to represent to the issuer that they are able to understand and accept the risks of investment in a commodity pool for which no market will develop and the right of redemption will be the sole expected method of withdrawal of equity from the Fund. The General Partner has sole discretion in determining what distributions, if any, the Fund will make to the Limited Partners. The Fund has not made any distributions as of the date hereof. The Fund has no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. See the Limited Partnership Agreement attached as Exhibit A to the Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference, for a complete explanation of the right of redemption provided to Limited Partners.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The Fund is not required to pay dividends or otherwise make distributions and none are expected. The Limited Partners must rely upon their right of redemption to obtain their return of equity after consideration of profits, if any, and losses from the Fund. See the Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference, for a complete explanation of the allocation of profits and losses to a Limited Partner's capital account. Following is a summary of certain financial information for the Registrant for the period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2010.
For the Years Ended December 31,
Total returns are calculated based on the change in value of a unit during the period. An individual partner's total returns and ratios may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of additions and redemptions.
(1) Investment and other income and expenses is calculated using average number of units (limited and general) outstanding during the year.
The following summarized quarterly financial information presents the results of operations for the quarterly periods during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Fund records all investments at market value in its financial statements, with changes in market value reported as a component of realized and change in unrealized trading gain (loss) in the Statements of Operations. In certain circumstances, estimates are involved in determining market value in the absence of an active market closing price (e.g. swap and forward contracts which are traded in the inter-bank market).
Capital Resources
The Fund will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering, and does not intend to raise any capital through resale of Units once issued or borrowing. Due to the nature of the Fund's business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.
Liquidity
Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in commodity futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as 'daily price fluctuation limits' or 'daily limits'. During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has reached the daily limit for that day, positions in that contract can neither be taken nor liquidated. Commodity futures prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if commodity futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Fund may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices, if little trading in such contracts is taking place. Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Fund's commodity futures trading operations, the Fund's assets are expected to be highly liquid.
The entire offering proceeds will be credited to the Fund's bank and brokerage accounts to engage in trading activities and as reserves for that trading. The Fund meets its margin requirements by depositing U.S. government securities or cash or both with the futures broker and the over-the-counter counterparties. In this way, substantially all (i.e., 97% or more) of the Fund's assets, whether used as margin for trading purposes or as reserves for such trading, can be invested in U.S. government securities and time deposits with U.S. banks. Investors should note that maintenance of the Fund's assets in U.S. government securities and banks does not reduce the risk of loss from trading futures, forward and swap contracts. The Fund receives all interest earned on its assets. No other person shall receive any interest or other economic benefits from the deposit of Fund assets.
Approximately 10% to 40% of the Fund's assets normally are committed as required margin for futures contracts and held by the futures broker, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury bills in segregated accounts with the futures broker pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. When combined with the previously described assets committed to margin, a total of up to approximately 40% of the Fund's assets may be deposited with over-the- counter counterparties in order to initiate and maintain forward and swap contracts. Such assets are not held in segregation or otherwise regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless such over-the-counter counterparty is registered as a futures commission merchant. These assets are held either in U.S. government securities or short-term time deposits with U.S.-regulated bank affiliates of the over-the-counter counterparties. The remaining 60% to 90% of the Fund's assets are normally invested in cash equivalents, such as U.S. Treasury bills, and held by the futures broker or the over-the-counter counterparties.
The Fund's assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other person in violation of law or invested with or loaned to the Fund, the General Partner or any affiliated entities.
Results of Operations
The initial start-up costs attendant to the sale of Units by use of a Prospectus which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission are substantial. The Limited Partnership Agreement grants solely to the General Partner the right to select the CTA and to otherwise manage the operation of the Fund. See the Registration Statement, incorporated by reference herein, for an explanation of the operation of the Fund.
The General Partner suspended trading on January 10, 2005, and all but one limited partner who is affiliated with the General Partner has redeemed its Units. Accordingly, the Fund was not operational during since that time, including the periods covered by this report. For non-financial reporting purposes (subscription and redemption purposes), its net asset value (NAV) per Unit was $637.74 and $637.74 and $637.74 as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively.
The Fund is subject to ongoing offering and operating expenses; however, upon the commencement of business, profits or losses will be primarily generated by the commodity trading advisors by methods that are proprietary to them. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund experienced (losses) of $(29,950) [$(11,653.50) per Unit], $(34,229) [$(13,318.68) per Unit] and $(33,157) [$(12,901.55) per Unit] for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The fluctuations in losses over the three year period are the result of varying legal and accounting compliance costs with respect to keeping current the registration of the Fund's securities. These results are not to be construed as an expectation of similar profits or losses in the future.
Since the General Partner suspended trading on January 10, 2005, the Fund has not paid any commissions or earned any interest income. The Fund did not have any additions or withdrawals during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, nor did inflation have a material impact on the operations or on the financial condition of the Fund during this period.
Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The term 'off-balance sheet risk' refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures, forward and swap contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of
off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts there exists a risk to the Fund, market risk, that such contracts may be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Fund at the same time, and if the Fund's trading advisor was unable to offset futures interests positions of the Fund, the Fund could lose all of its assets and the Limited Partners would realize a 100% loss. The Fund, the General Partner and the CTAs minimize market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio that rarely exceeds 40%.
In addition to market risk, in entering into futures, forward and swap contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Fund. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.
In the case of forward and swap contracts, which are traded on the interbank market rather than on exchanges, the counterparty is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a group of financial institutions; thus there may be a greater counterparty credit risk. The CTAs trade for the Fund only with those counterparties which they believe to be creditworthy. All positions of the Fund are valued each day on a mark-to-market basis. There can be no assurance that any clearing member, clearinghouse or other counterparty will be able to meet its obligations to the Fund.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The securities of the Fund are not traded and no market for the Fund securities is expected to develop. The Fund is engaged in the speculative trading of futures and options on futures. The risks are fully explained in the Fund prospectus delivered to each prospective Limited Partner prior to their investment.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The Fund financial statements as of December 31, 2010, were audited by Patke & Associates, Ltd., 300 Village Green Drive Ste 210, Lincolnshire, IL 60069, and are provided in this Report beginning on page. The supplementary financial information specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K is included in Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Registrant has adopted procedures in connection with the operation of its business including, but not limited to, the review of account statements sent to the General Partner before the open of business each day that disclose the positions held overnight in the Fund accounts, the margin to hold those positions, and the amount of profit or loss on each position, and the net balance of equity available in each account. The Fund brokerage account statements and financial books and records accounts are prepared by an independent CPA Firm and then are reviewed each quarter and audited each year by a different independent CPA firm.
The General Partner of the Fund, under the actions of its sole principal, Michael Pacult, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) with respect to the Fund as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on their evaluation, Mr. Pacult has concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the General Partner to evaluate annually the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting in all annual reports. There were no changes in the General Partner's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Fund.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Fund's financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by a company's board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The General Partner's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
*	pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Fund's assets;
*	provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the Fund's financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the Fund's receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the General Partner's management and directors; and
*	provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Fund's assets that could have a material effect on the Fund's financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Fund securities are not publicly traded so that there can be no insider trading or leaks of confidential information to the public. All Fund money is on deposit either with a bank or a futures commission merchant. See Subsequent Events in Item 1 of this Report. There is an audit trail produced by both. A certified public accountant prepares the monthly financial statements. The Fund units are sold during the month at a net asset value to be determined as of the close of business on the last day of trading each month. No information related to the value of the units during the month is available to the Fund sales force or the prospects. All quarterly financial statements are reviewed by an independent certified public accountant who audits the Fund financial statements at the end of each calendar year. The Fund maintains its subscription agreements and other records for six years.
The management of the General Partner assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting with respect to the Fund as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control ' Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, the General Partner's internal control over financial reporting with respect to the Fund is effective based on those criteria.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None
Part III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The Fund is a Delaware Limited Partnership which acts through its corporate General Partner. Accordingly, the Registrant has no Directors or Executive Officers.
The General Partner of the Registrant during the year 2010 was Belmont Capital Management, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation. The General Partner is registered with the National Futures Association as a commodity pool operator pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act, and Mr. Michael Pacult, age 66, is the sole shareholder, director, registered principal and executive officer of the corporate General Partner. The background and qualifications of Mr. Pacult are disclosed in the Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference.
There has never been a material administrative, civil or criminal action brought against the Fund, the General Partner or any of its directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons.
No Forms 3, 4, or 5 have been furnished to the Registrant since inception. To the best of the Fund's knowledge, no such forms have been or are required to be filed.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Mr. Pacult, in his capacity as the sole principal for the General Partner of the Fund, has determined that he qualifies as an 'audit committee financial expert' in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. He is not independent of management.
Code of Ethics
The Fund General Partner is registered with the National Futures Association as a Commodity Pool Operator and its President, Michael P. Pacult is registered as its principal. Both the Fund and the General Partner are subject to Federal Commodity Exchange Act and audit for compliance and the rules of good practice of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the industry self regulatory organization, the National Futures Association. Having said that, neither the Commodity Futures Trading Commission nor the National Futures Association are responsible for the quality of the Fund disclosures or its operation, those functions are exclusively the responsibility of the Fund and its General Partner.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Although there are no executives of the Fund, the corporate General Partner and certain persons Affiliated with the General Partners are paid compensation that the Fund has elected to disclose on this Report. As described previously, upon reopening of the Fund, the General Partner will be paid fixed brokerage commissions of seven percent (7%) per year and a management fee of four percent (4%) per year, each payable monthly, to cover the cost of the domestic trades entered by the CTA. The corporate General Partner retains the difference, if any, between the cost to enter the trades and the seven percent (7%).
All compensation is disclosed in the Registration Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
(a) The following Limited Partners owned more than five percent (5%) of the total equity of the Fund on December 31, 2010:
Name			Percent Ownership
Shira Del Pacult	62.5%
(b) As of December 31, 2010, the corporate General Partner owned 1.00 Unit of Limited Partnership Interest, which constitutes the other 37.5% ownership.
(c) The Limited Partnership Agreement governs the terms upon which control of the Fund may change. No change in ownership of the Units will, alone, determine the location of control. The Limited Partners must have 120 days advance notice and the opportunity to redeem prior to any change in the control from the General Partner to another general partner. Control of the management of the Partnership may never vest in one or more Limited Partners.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
See Item 11, Executive Compensation and Item 12, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. The General Partner has sole discretion over the selection of trading advisors. Belmont Capital Management, Inc., the corporate General Partner, is paid a fixed commission for trades and, therefore, the General Partner has a potential conflict in the selection of a CTA that makes few trades rather than produces profits for the Fund. This conflict and others are fully disclosed in the Registration Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Only fees to the Principal Accountant, or Auditor, and not fees for other accounting, are required to be disclosed in this section.
(1)	Audit Fees
The fees and costs paid to Patke and Associates, Ltd. for the audit of the Fund's annual financial statements, for review of financial statements included in the Fund's Forms 10-Q and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filing or engagements (i.e., consents related to SEC registration statements) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $11,320 and $13,482, respectively.
(2)	Audit Related Fees
None
(3)	Tax Fees
The aggregate fees paid to Patke and Associates, Ltd. for tax compliance services for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $320 and $500, respectively.
(4)	All Other Fees
None
(5)	The Board of Directors of Belmont Capital Management, Inc., General Partner of the Fund, approved all of the services described above. The Board of Directors has determined that the payments made to its independent certified public accountants for these services are compatible with maintaining such auditors' independence. The Board of Directors explicitly pre-approves all audit and non-audit services and all engagement fees and terms.
(6)	Close to 100% of the hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time permanent employees. However, all work performed was supervised by a full-time permanent employee.
Part IV
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)	The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. All Financial Statements
The Financial Statements begin on page of this Report.
2. Financial Statement Schedules required to be filed by Item 8 on this form, and by paragraph (b) below.
Not applicable, not required, or included in the Financial Statements.
3. List of those Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K (Sec 229.601 of this chapter) and by paragraph (b) below.
Incorporated by reference from the Fund's Registration Statement on Form S-1, and all amendments at file No. 333-85755 previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
31.1 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 302
32.2 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906
(b)	Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K (Sec 229.601 of this chapter).
See response to 15(a)(3), above.
(c)	Financial statements required by Regulation S-X (17 CFR 210) which are excluded from the annual report to shareholders by Rule 14a-3(b) including (1) separate financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated and fifty percent or less owned persons; (2) separate financial statements of affiliates whose securities are pledged as collateral; and (3) schedules.
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant:	Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership By Belmont Capital Management, Inc. Its General Partner
By: /s/ Michael Pacult Mr. Michael P. Pacult Sole Director, Sole Shareholder President and Treasurer
Date: March 30, 2011
BROMWELL FINANCIAL FUND, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
ANNUAL REPORT
December 31, 2010
GENERAL PARTNER: Belmont Capital Management, Inc. % Corporate Systems, Inc. 505 Brookfield Drive Dover, Kent County, Delaware 19901
Index to the Financial Statements
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Statements of Assets and Liabilities			
Statements of Operations				
Statements of Changes in Net Assets			
Statements of Cash Flows				
Notes to the Financial Statements			 -
Affirmation of the Commodity Pool Operator		
Patke & Associates, Ltd.
Certified Public Accountants
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners of Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership Dover, Delaware
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. An audit includes, examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations, its changes in net assets and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Patke & Associates, Ltd. Patke & Associates, Ltd. Lincolnshire, Illinois February 24, 2011
300 Village Green Drive, Suite 210 * Lincolnshire, Illinois 60069 Phone: (847) 913-5400 * Fax: (847) 913-5435
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2010 and 2009
							2010		2009
Assets
Cash							$175		$163
Total assets						175		163
Liabilities
Accrued expenses					29,684		31,422 Due to related parties				146,374		114,674
Total liabilities					176,058		146,096
Net assets						$(175,883)	$(145,933)
Analysis of net assets
Limited partners					$(107,446)	$(89,150) General partner					(68,437)	(56,783)
Net assets (equivalent to $(68,436.77) and $(56,783.27) per unit)				$(175,883)	$(145,933)
Partnership units outstanding
Limited partners units outstanding			1.57		1.57 General partner units outstanding			1.00		1.00
Total partnership units outstanding			2.57		2.57
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
							2010		2009		2008
Investment income
Interest income					$-		$-		$-
Total investment income				-		-		-
Expenses
Professional accounting and legal fees		28,491		32,904		32,632 Other operating and administrative expenses		1,459		1,325		525
Total expenses					29,950		4,229		33,157
Net investment (loss)					(29,950)	(34,229)	(33,157)
Net (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations					$(29,950)	$(34,229)	$(33,157)
Net (loss) per unit
Limited partner unit					$(11,653.50)	$(13,318.68)	$(12,901.55) General partner unit					$(11,653.50)	$(13,318.68)	$(12,901.55)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010
1.	Nature of the Business
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (the "Fund") was formed January 12, 1999 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The general partner and commodity pool operator ("CPO") of the Fund is Belmont Capital Management, Inc. ("General Partner"). The Fund was actively engaged in the speculative trading of futures contracts in commodities from its commencement of business in July 2000 to January 10, 2005, when it ceased trading. In the near future, the Fund expects to file a post effective amendment to allow it to resume the sale of its limited partnership interests on an issuer direct best efforts basis. Once the Fund sells a to be determined minimum in limited partnership units, it will restart active trading of futures and options on futures through a commodity trading advisor ("CTA") selected by the General Partner.
2.	Significant Accounting Policies
Regulation - The Fund is a registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"). The Fund is subject to the regulations of the SEC and the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Fund is also subject to the regulations of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), an agency of the U.S. government which regulates most aspects of the commodity futures industry, the rules of the National Futures Association ("NFA") and the requirements of various commodity exchanges where the Fund executes transactions. Additionally, the Fund is subject to the requirements of futures commission merchants and interbank market makers through which the Fund trades.
Reorganization Costs and Operating Expenses - For financial reporting purposes in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), all accumulated reorganization costs since January 10, 2005 have been expensed as incurred. The Fund has incurred $177,522 in reorganization costs from the cessation of trading on January 10, 2005 through December 31, 2010. For all other purposes, including determining the Net Asset Value per Unit for subscription and redemption purposes, the Fund will not reflect these costs in capital until after the reimbursement is made on the resumption of trading and, thereafter, all costs will be expensed as incurred. The resumption of business is contingent upon the sale of a to be determined amount of partnership interests. The Fund has agreed to reimburse the General Partner, and other affiliated companies for all such expenses upon the sale of the minimum and resumption of business. All costs after the resumption of business will be paid directly by the Fund.
Consequently, as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Net Asset Value and Net Asset Value per unit for financial reporting purposes and for all other purposes are as follows:
Registration Costs - Costs incurred for the initial filings with the SEC, CFTC, NFA and the states where the offering was made were accumulated, deferred and charged against the gross proceeds of offering at the initial closing as part of the offering expenses. Costs to maintain the Fund's registration of its securities and recurring registration costs incurred since the cessation of trading on January 10, 2005 are treated as reorganization expenses and, accordingly, are accounted for as described above under "Reorganization Costs and Operating Expenses".
Revenue Recognition - Futures contracts are recorded on the trade date and are reflected in the balance sheet at the difference between the original contract amount and the fair value on the last business day of the reporting period.
Fair value of futures contracts is based upon exchange or other applicable market best available closing quotations.
Interest income is recognized when it is earned.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010
2.	Significant Accounting Policies - Continued
Use of Accounting Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Income Taxes - The Fund is not required to provide a provision for income taxes. Income tax attributes that arise from its operations are passed directly to the individual partners. The Fund may be subject to state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates.
Management has continued to evaluate the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740, "Income Taxes", to the Fund and has determined that ASC 740 does not have a material impact on the Fund's financial statements. The Fund files federal and state tax returns. The 2007 through 2010 tax years generally remain subject to examination by the U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.
Statement of Cash Flows - For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Fund considers money market funds to be cash equivalents. Net cash used in operating activities includes no cash payments for interest or income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Fund Reopening - The Fund was closed as of December 31, 2010. The Fund will reopen to new funds at a time to be set by the General Partner.
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures - ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability, including the Fund?s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Fund had no investments.
3.	General Partner Duties
The responsibilities of the General Partner, in addition to directing the trading and investment activity of the Fund, including suspending all trading, includes executing and filing all necessary legal documents, statements and certificates of the Fund, retaining independent public accountants to audit the Fund, employing attorneys to represent the Fund, reviewing the brokerage commission rates to determine reasonableness, maintaining the tax status of the Fund as a limited partnership, maintaining a current list of the names, addresses and numbers of units owned by each limited partner and taking such other actions as deemed necessary or desirable to manage the business of the Fund.
If the daily net unit value of the Fund falls to less than 50% of the highest value earned through trading subsequent to the resumption of business, then the General Partner will immediately suspend all trading, provide all limited partners with notice of the reduction and give all limited partners the opportunity, for fifteen days after such notice, to redeem partnership interests. No trading will commence until after the lapse of the fifteen day period.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010
4.	The Limited Partnership Agreement
The Limited Partnership Agreement provides, among other things, the following:
Capital Account - A capital account shall be established for each partner. The initial balance of each partner's capital account shall be the amount of the initial contributions to the Fund.
Monthly Allocations - Any increase or decrease in the Fund's net asset value as of the end of a month shall be credited or charged to the capital account of each Fund in the ratio that the balance of each account bears to the total balance of all accounts.
Any distribution from profits or partners' capital will be made solely at the discretion of the General Partner.
Federal Income Tax Allocations - As of the end of each fiscal year, the Fund's realized capital gain or loss and ordinary income or loss shall be allocated among the partners, after having given effect to the fees and expenses of the Fund.
Subscriptions - Investors must submit subscription agreements and funds at least five business days prior to month end. Subscriptions must be accepted or rejected by the General Partner within five business days. The investor also has five business days to withdraw his subscription. Funds are deposited into an interest bearing escrow account and will be transferred to the Fund's account on the first business day of the month after the subscription is accepted. Interest earned on the escrow funds will accrue to the account of the investor.
Redemptions - A limited partner may request any or all of his investment be redeemed at the net asset value as of the end of a month. The written request must be received by the General Partner no less than ten days prior to a month end. Redemptions are generally paid within twenty days of the effective month end. However, in various circumstances the General Partner may be unable to comply with the request on a timely basis. There are no fees for redemption.
5.	Fees
The Fund will be charged various fees upon the sale of the minimum and resumption of business. These terms are currently being negotiated.
The General Partner has reserved the right to change the fee structure at its sole discretion.
6.	Related Party Transactions
Due to related parties at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of amounts due to Ashley Capital Management, Inc., Futures Investment Company, the introducing broker, Michael Pacult, president of Futures Investment Company, and the General Partner. The balances result from operating and reorganization costs paid by the related parties on behalf of the Fund and cash advances. These amounts bear no interest or due dates and are unsecured. The balances are expected to be paid back upon the resumption of trading. The following balances were outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
					December 31,	December 31, 					2010		2009
Futures Investment Company		$114,800	$83,100 General Partner			27,541		27,541 Ashley Capital Management, Inc.	3,033		3,033 Michael Pacult			1,000		1,000
Total due to related parties		$146,374	$114,674
ASC 460, "Guarantees", identifies certain disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. In the normal course of business, the Fund has provided general indemnifications to the General Partner, its CTA and others when they act, in good faith, in the best interests of the Fund. The Fund is unable to develop an estimate for future payments resulting from hypothetical claims, but expects the risk of having to make any payments under these indemnifications to be remote.
7. Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Fund?s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. The Fund expects the risk of any future obligation under these indemnifications to be remote.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership (A Delaware Limited Partnership)
Notes to the Financial Statements December 31, 2010
8.	Financial Highlights
Total returns are calculated based on the change in value of a unit during the period. An individual partner's total returns and ratios may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of additions and redemptions.
(1) Investment and other income and expenses is calculated using average number of units (limited and general) outstanding during the year.
Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership Affirmation of the Commodity Pool Operator For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
*****************************************************************************
To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained in this report is accurate and complete.
/s/ Michael Pacult Michael Pacult President, Belmont Capital Management, Inc. General Partner Bromwell Financial Fund, Limited Partnership