Item 1. Business
Sherwood Acquisition Corporation ("Sherwood" of the "Company") was incorporated on July 19, 2010 under the laws of the State of Delaware to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. Sherwood has been in the developmental stage since inception and its operations to date have been limited to issuing shares to its original shareholders and filing a registration statement. Sherwood has been formed to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting company with a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Company registered its common stock on a Form 10 registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 12(g) thereof. The Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission periodic and current reports under Rule 13(a) of the Exchange Act, including quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports Form 10-K.
The Company has no employees and two officers, directors and shareholders.
The president of Sherwood is the president, director and shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation. Tiber Creek Corporation assists companies in becoming public reporting companies and with introductions to the financial community. To become a public company, Tiber Creek Corporation may recommend that a company file a registration statement, most likely on Form S-1, or alternatively that a company first effect a business combination with Sherwood and then subsequently file a registration statement. A company may choose to effect a business combination with Sherwood before filing a registration statement as such method may be an effective way to obtain exposure to the brokerage community.
Tiber Creek will typically enter into an agreement with the target company for assisting it to become a public reporting company and for the preparation and filing of a registration statement and the introduction to brokers and market makers. The target company pays Tiber Creek Corporation for such services. Such services include, if appropriate, the use of Sherwood. Sherwood will only be used as part of such process and is not offered for sale. If the target company chooses to enter into business combination with Sherwood, the registration statement will be prepared after such business combination. The terms of a business combination may provide for redemption of all or part of their stock in Sherwood, usually at par.
A combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
As of December 31, 2010, Sherwood had not generated revenues and had no income or cash flows from operations since inception. The continuation of Sherwood as a going concern is dependent upon financial support from its stockholders, its ability to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, to successfully locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with Sherwood . Tiber Creek Corporation will pay all expenses incurred by Sherwood until a business combination is effected, without repayment. There is no assurance that Sherwood will ever be profitable.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties
The Company has no properties and at this time has no agreements to acquire any properties. The Company currently uses the offices of Tiber Creek Corporation in Los Angeles, California at no cost to the Company. Tiber Creek Corporation has agreed to continue this arrangement until the Company completes a business combination.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
There is no litigation pending or threatened by or against the Company.
Item 4.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder 	 Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There is currently no public market for the Company's securities.
Following a business combination, a target company will normally wish to cause the Company's common stock to trade in one or more United States securities markets. The target company may elect to take the steps required for such admission to quotation following the business combination or at some later time.
At such time as it qualifies, the Company may choose to apply for quotation of its securities on the OTC Bulletin Board.
The OTC Bulletin Board is a dealer-driven quotation service. Unlike the Nasdaq Stock Market, companies cannot directly apply to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, only market makers can initiate quotes, and quoted companies do not have to meet any quantitative financial requirements. Any equity security of a reporting company not listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market or on a national securities exchange is eligible.
As such time as it qualifies, the Company may choose to apply for quotation of its securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
In general there is greatest liquidity for traded securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market and less on the OTC Bulletin Board. It is not possible to predict where, if at all, the securities of the Company will be traded following a business combination.
Since inception, the Company has sold securities which were not registered as follows:
NUMBER OF DATE NAME SHARES CONSIDERATION
July 19, 2010	 Tiber Creek 	 10,000,000 $1,000 		 Corporation (1)
July 19, 2010	 MB Americus LLC (2) 10,000,000	 $1,000
(1) James M. Cassidy, the president and a director of the Company, is the sole shareholder and director of Tiber Creek Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Mr. Cassidy may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of stock owned by Tiber Creek Corporation.
(2) James McKillop is the sole principal of MB Americus LLC, a California limited liability corporation. Mr. McKillop is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of stock owned by MB Americus LLC.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
	There is no selected financial data required to be filed for a smaller reporting company.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition 	 and Results of Operations
The Company has no operations nor does it currently engage in any business activities generating revenues. The Company's principal business objective is to achieve a business combination with a target company.
The president of Sherwood is the president, director and shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation. Tiber Creek Corporation assists companies in becoming public reporting companies and with introductions to the financial community. To become a public company, Tiber Creek Corporation may recommend that a company file a registration statement, most likely on Form S-1, or alternatively that a company first effect a business combination with Sherwood and then subsequently file a registration statement. A company may choose to effect a business combination with Sherwood before filing a registration statement as such method may be an effective way to obtain exposure to the brokerage community.
Tiber Creek will typically enter into an agreement with the target company for assisting it to become a public reporting company and for the preparation and filing of a registration statement and the introduction to brokers and market makers. The target company pays Tiber Creek Corporation for such services. Such services include, if appropriate, the use of Sherwood. Sherwood will only be used as part of such process and is not offered for sale. If the target company chooses to enter into business combination with Sherwood, the registration statement will be prepared after such business combination. The terms of a business combination may provide for redemption of all or part of their stock in Sherwood, usually at par.
A combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
No assurances can be given that Sherwood will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company.
The most likely target companies are those seeking the perceived benefits of a reporting corporation. Such perceived benefits may include facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be sought, providing liquidity for incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, increasing the opportunity to use securities for acquisitions, providing liquidity for shareholders and other factors. Business opportunities may be available in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities difficult and complex.
Tiber Creek Corporation will supervise the search for target companies as potential candidates for a business combination. Tiber Creek Corporation will pay all expenses of the Company until such time as a business combination is effected, without repayment. James M. Cassidy, who is an officer and a director of the Company, is the sole officer and director and sole shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation.
In analyzing prospective business opportunities, Tiber Creek may consider such matters as the available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operations, if any; prospects for the future; nature of present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management; the potential for further research, development, or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable but which may be anticipated; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition or acceptance of products, services, or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors. This discussion of the proposed criteria is not meant to be restrictive of the virtually unlimited discretion of the Company to search for and enter into potential business opportunities.
The search for a target company will not be restricted to any specific kind of business entities, but may acquire a venture which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its business life. It is impossible to predict at this time the status of any business in which the Company may become engaged, whether such business may need to seek additional capital, may desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer.
In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, the Company may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, licensing agreement or other arrangement with another corporation or entity. On the consummation of a transaction, it is likely that the present management and shareholders of the Company will no longer be in control of the Company. In addition, it is likely that the officer and director of the Company will, as part of the terms of the business combination, resign and be replaced by one or more new officers and directors.
It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such business combination would be issued in reliance upon exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of its transaction, the Company may agree to register all or a part of such securities immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times thereafter. If such registration occurs, it will be undertaken by the surviving entity after the Company has entered into an agreement for a business combination or has consummated a business combination. The issuance of additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in the Company's securities may depress the market value of the Company's securities in the future if such a market develops, of which there is no assurance.
While the terms of a business transaction to which the Company may be a party cannot be predicted, it is expected that the parties to the business transaction will desire to avoid the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition in a tax-free reorganization under Sections 351 or 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The Company will participate in a business combination only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require certain representations and warranties of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by the parties prior to and after such closing and will include miscellaneous other terms.
The Board of Directors has passed a resolution which contains a policy that the Company will not seek a business combination with any entity in which the Company's officer, director, shareholders or any affiliate or associate serves as an officer or director or holds any ownership interest.
2010 Year-End Analysis
The Company has received no income, has had no operations nor expenses, other than accounting fees as required for the preparation of the Company's financial statements.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 are attached hereto.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure for the period covered by this report.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules. This evaluation was done as of the end of the fiscal year under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's principal executive officer (who is also the principal financial officer). There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation. Based upon that evaluation, he believes that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in gathering, analyzing and disclosing information needed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its periodic reports is recorded, summarized and processed timely. The principal executive officer is directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company.
Management's Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
	The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's sole officer, its president, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria establish in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treaedway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010, based on those criteria. A control system can provide only reasonably, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected.
	Anton & Chia our independent registered public accounting firm, has not issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
	There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during its fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance;
The Directors and Officers of the Company are as follows:
Name Age Positions and Offices Held ----------------- ----------- James M. Cassidy 75 President, Secretary, Director James K. McKillop	 51 Vice President, Director
Management of Sherwood
Sherwood has no full time employees. James M. Cassidy and James K. McKillop are the officers and directors of Sherwood and its indirect beneficial shareholders. Mr. Cassidy, as president of Sherwood, and Mr. McKillop as vice president, will allocate a limited portion of time to the activities of Sherwood without compensation. Potential conflicts may arise with respect to the limited time commitment by management and the potential demands of the activities of Sherwood.
There are no agreements or understandings for the officer or director to resign at the request of another person and the above- named officer and director is not acting on behalf of nor will act at the direction of any other person.
Set forth below are the names of the directors and officers of the Company, all positions and offices with the Company held, the period during which they have served as such, and the business experience during at least the last five years:
James Michael Cassidy, Esq., LL.B., LL.M., serves as a director, president and secretary of Sherwood. Mr. Cassidy received a Bachelor of Science in Languages and Linguistics from Georgetown University in 1960, a Bachelor of Laws from The Catholic University School of Law in 1963, and a Master of Laws in Taxation from The Georgetown University School of Law in 1968. From 1963-1964, Mr. Cassidy was law clerk to the Honorable Inzer B. Wyatt of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. From 1964-1965, Mr. Cassidy was law clerk to the Honorable Wilbur K. Miller of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. From 1969-1975, Mr. Cassidy was an associate of the law firm of Kieffer & Moroney and a principal in the law firm of Kieffer & Cassidy, Washington, D.C. From 1975 to date, Mr. Cassidy has been a principal in the law firm of Cassidy & Associates, and its predecessors, specializing in securities law and related corporate and federal taxation matters. Mr. Cassidy is a member of the bars of the District of Columbia and the State of New York, and is admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court and the United States Supreme Court. Sherwood believes Mr. Cassidy to have the business experience necessary to serve as a director of Sherwood as it seeks to enter into a business combination. As a lawyer involved in business transactions and securities matters, Mr. Cassidy has had ample experience in evaluating companies and management, understanding business plans, assisting in capital raising and determining corporate structure and objectives.
James K. McKillop serves as a director and vice president of Sherwood. Mr. McKillop began his career at Merrill Lynch. Mr. McKillop has also been involved in financial reporting and did a daily stock market update for KPCC radio in Pasadena, California. Mr. McKillop is the founder of MB Americus LLC which specializes in consulting and public relations. Mr. McKillop has provided consulting services to Tiber Creek Corporation for more than five years. Mr. McKillop has written articles for varous publications on financial matters. He has been a past member of the World Affairs Council. Mr. McKillop received his Bachelor of Arts in Economics in 1984 from the University of California at Los Angeles. With his background in financial and securities matters, Sherwood believes Mr. McKillop to have experience and knowledge that will serve Sherwood in seeking, evaluting and determining a suitable target company.
There are no agreements or understandings for the above-named officers or directors to resign at the request of another person and the above-named officers and directors are not acting on behalf of nor will act at the direction of any other person.
Recent Blank Check Companies
James M. Cassidy, the president and a director of Sherwood and James McKillop, vice president and a director of Sherwood, are involved with other existing blank check companies, and in creating additional similar companies. The initial business purpose of each of these companies was or is to engage in a business combination with an unidentified company or companies and each were or will be classified as a blank check company until completion of a business combination.
The information summarizes the blank check companies with which Mr. Cassidy and/or Mr. McKillop is or has been involved in the past five years which filed a registration statement on Form 10 or Form 10-SB. In most instances that a business combination is transacted with one of these companies, it is required to file a Current Report on Form 8-K describing the transaction. Reference is made to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for any company listed below and for additional detailed information concerning the business combination entered into by that company.
Cabinet Acquisition Corporation: Form 10-SB filed on 8/28/2000, file number 0-31398. Mr. Cassidy was the sole indirect beneficial shareholder, officer and director of the corporation. On October 8, 2009, the corporation effected a change in control with the redemption of stock and the issuance of additional stock and the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy retained 500,000 shares and resigned from all offices and as a director.
Canistel Acquisition Corporation. Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53255. Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On December 7, 2010, the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on December 3, 2010 with redemption of 250,000 shares from each of the then two shareholders, the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 250,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee.
Console Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53257. Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On December 22, 2009, the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on December 21, 2009 with the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 250,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee.
Hightower Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53258. Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On May 12, 2010, the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on December 3, 2010 with redemption of 375,000 shares from each of the then two shareholders, the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 125,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee.
Spinnet Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53256 Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On October 5, 2009 the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on September 30, 2010 with redemption of 250,000 shares from each of the then two shareholders, the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 250,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee.
Greenmark Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53259. Mr. Cassidy is the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop is an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop are the only shareholders and each is the indirect beneficial shareholder of 500,000 shares.
Conflicts of Interest
The officers and directors of Sherwood have organized and expect to organize other companies of a similar nature and with a similar purpose. Consequently, there are potential inherent conflicts of interest. In addition, insofar as either Mr. Cassidy or Mr. McKillop may be engaged in other business activities, they may devote only a portion of time to the affairs of Sherwood.
Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop are also the directors of, and sole beneficial shareholders of the following companies which have filed registration statements on Form 10 for the registration of their common stock pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act concurrently with the filing of this registration statement:
Oakwood Acquisition Corporation Alderwood Acquisition Corporation Pinewood Acquisition Corporation
In addition to the above listed companies, at the time of the filing of this registration statement, Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop are the sole shareholders of Greenmark Acquisition Corporation which is a blank check company similar with a purpose similar to that of Sherwood.
A conflict may arise with these listed blank check companies which also seek target companies. It is anticipated that target companies will be located for Sherwood and other blank check companies in chronological order of the date of filing of the Form 10 registration statement of such blank check companies with the Securities and Exchange Commission or, in the case of blank check companies with the same filing date, alphabetically.
Other blank check companies may differ from Sherwood in certain items such as place of incorporation, number of shares and shareholders, working capital, types of authorized securities, or other items. It may be that a target companymay be more suitable for or may prefer a certain blank check company other than Sherwood. In such case, a business combination might be negotiated on behalf of the more suitable or preferred blank check company.
Mr. Cassidy and/or Mr. McKillop may become associated with additional blank check companies prior to the time that Sherwood has effected a business combination.
Mr. Cassidy is the principal of Cassidy & Associates, a securities law firm. As such, demands may be placed on the time of Mr. Cassidy which will detract from the amount of time he is able to devote to Sherwood. Mr. Cassidy intends to devote as much time to the activities of Sherwood as required. However, should such a conflict arise, there is no assurance that Mr. Cassidy would not attend to other matters prior to those of Sherwood.
Mr. Cassidy is the president, sole director and shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation, which is a shareholder of Sherwood. At the time of a business combination, some or all of the shares of common stock owned by Tiber Creek Corporation may be retired by Sherwood. The amount of common stock which may be sold or continued to be owned by Tiber Creek Corporation cannot be determined at this time.
Mr. McKillop is the manager and sole member of MB Americus LLC which is a shareholder of Sherwood. At the time of a business combination, some or all of the shares of common stock owned by MB Americus LLC may be purchased or retired by Sherwood. The amount of common stock which may be sold or continued to be owned by MB Americus cannot be determined at this time.
There are no binding guidelines or procedures for resolving potential conflicts of interest. Failure by management to resolve conflicts of interest in favor of the Company could result in liability of management to the Company. However, any attempt by shareholders to enforce a liability of management to the Company would most likely be prohibitively expensive and time consuming.
	Code of Ethics. The Company has not at this time adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to rules described in Regulation S-K. The Company has one person who is the sole shareholder and serves as the sole director and officer. The Company has no operations or business and does not receive any revenues or investment capital. The adoption of an Ethical Code at this time would not serve the primary purpose of such a code to provide a manner of conduct as the development, execution and enforcement of such a code would be by the same person and only that person to whom such code applied. Furthermore, because the Company does not have any activities, there are activities or transactions which would be subject to this code. Finally the sole officer and director of the Company is an attorney at law and subject to the ethical code established by the bars in which he is also a member. At the time the Company enters into a business combination or other corporate transaction, the current officer and director will recommend to any new management that such a code be adopted. The Company does not maintain an Internet website on which to post a code of ethics.
	Corporate Governance. For reasons similar to those described above, the Company does not have a nominating nor audit committee of the board of directors. At this time, the Company consists of one shareholder who serves as the sole corporate director and officer. The Company has no activities, and receives no revenues. At such time that the Company enters into a business combination and/or has additional shareholders and a larger board of directors and commences activities, the Company will propose creating committees of its board of directors, including both a nominating and an audit committee. Because there is only one shareholder of the Company, there is no established process by which shareholders to the Company can nominate members to the Company's board of directors. Similarly, however, at such time as the Company has more shareholders and an expanded board of directors, the new management of the Company may review and implement, as necessary, procedures for shareholder nomination of members to the Company's board of directors.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The Company's officer and director does not receive any compensation for his services rendered to the Company, nor has he received such compensation in the past. The officer and director is not accruing any compensation pursuant to any agreement with the Company.
No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the Company for the benefit of its employees.
The Company does not have a compensation committee for the same reasons as described above.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockkholder Matters
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2010, each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of the Company's common stock and the director and officer of the Company. The Company does not have any compensation plans and has not authorized any securities for future issuance. Except as noted, the holder thereof has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.
Name and Address Amount of Beneficial Percent of of Beneficial Owner Ownership Outstanding Stock
James M. Cassidy (1) 10,000,000 50% 215 Apolena Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92662
James K. McKillop (2) 10,000,000 50% 9454 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, California 90212
All Executive Officers and 20,000,000 100% Directors as a Group (1 Person)
(1) As the sole shareholder, officer and director of Tiber Creek Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Mr. Cassidy is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of common stock of Sherwood owned by it.
(2) As the sole principal of MB Americus LLC, a California business entity, Mr. McKillop is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of Sherwood owned by it.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and 	 Director Independence
Sherwood has issued a total of 20,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for a total of $2,000 in cash.
James M. Cassidy is president and a director of Sherwood and the sole officer, director and the shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation, which is a 50% shareholder of Sherwood.
James McKillop is vice president and a director of Sherwood and the sole manager and member of MB Americus LLC, which is a 50% shareholder of Sherwood.
As the organizers and developers of Sherwood, James M. Cassidy and James McKillop may be considered promoters. Mr. Cassidy has provided services to Sherwood without charge consisting of preparing and filing the charter corporate documents and preparing this registration statement. Tiber Creek Corporation, a company of which Mr. Cassidy is the sole director, officer and shareholder, has paid and will continue to pay all expenses incurred by Sherwood until a business combination is effected, without repayment. Tiber Creek is a shareholder of Sherwood and may receive benefits in the future if the company is able to effect a business combination beneficial to the company.
Sherwood is not currently required to maintain an independent director as defined by Rule 4200 of the Nasdaq Capital Market nor does it anticipate that it will be applying for listing of its securities on an exchange in which an independent directorship is required. It is likely that neither Mr. Cassidy nor Mr. McKillop would not be considered independent directors if it were to do so.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
	The Company has no activities, no income and no expenses. The Company's president has donated his time in preparation and filing of all state and federal required taxes and reports.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees incurred for each of the last two years for professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for the audits of the Company's annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-K and Form 10-Q reports and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were as follows:
December 31, 2010 	 -----------------
======= Audit-Related Fees $ 1,250
	The Company does not currently have an audit committee serving and as a result its board of directors performs the duties of an audit committee. The board of directors will evaluate and approve in advance, the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor renders audit and non-audit services. The Company does not rely on pre- approval policies and procedures.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
	There are no financial statement schedules nor exhibits filed herewith. The exhibits filed in earlier reports and the Company's Form 10 are incorporated herein by reference.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	
Balance Sheet 	
Statement of Operations	
Statement of Cash flows	
Statement of Stockholders' Equity	
Notes to Financial Statements 	 -F9
ANTON & CHIA CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors Sherwood Acquisition Corporation
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Sherwood Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) through December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of Sherwood Acquisition Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) through December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has no revenues and income since inception. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2, which includes the raising of additional equity financing. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Anton & Chia, LLP Newport Beach, CA March 25, 2011
SHERWOOD ACQUISITION CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS December 31, -----------------
Current Assets Cash $ 2,000 ----------------- Total Assets $ 2,000 =================
STOCKHOLDERS' Equity
Stockholders' Equity Common Stock; $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,000,000 shares issued and outstanding 2,000 Additional paid-in capital 1,250 Accumulated deficit (1,250) ----------------- Total Stockholders' Equity $ 2,000 -----------------
Total Stockholders' Equity $ 2,000 =================
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements
SHERWOOD ACQUISITION CORPORATION STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, -----------------
Sales - net $ - -----------------
Cost of Sales - =================
Gross Profit - ================= Operating Expenses 1,250 =================
Net loss $ (1,250) =================
Loss per share - basic and diluted $ (0.00) -----------------
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted 20,000,000 -----------------
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements
SHERWOOD ACQUISITION CORPORATION STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, -----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss $ (1,250)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (1,250) ----------------- CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 2,000 Proceeds from stockholders 1,250 ----------------- Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities 3,250 ----------------- Net Increase in Cash 2,000
Cash at Beginning of Period - ----------------- Cash at End of Period $ 2,000 =================
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements
Sherwood Acquisition Corporation Notes to the Financial Statements For the Period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Sherwood Acquisition Corporation ("Sherwood" or "the Company") was incorporated on July 19, 2010 under the laws of the State of Delaware to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. Sherwood has been in the developmental stage since inception and its operations to date have been limited to issuing shares to its original shareholders and filing this registration statement. Sherwood will attempt to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with Sherwood. The combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No assurances can be given that Sherwood will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company. Sherwood has been formed to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting company with a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company's financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company's management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying financial statements.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Sherwood Acquisition Corporation Notes to the Financial Statements For the Period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES (CONTINUED)
CONCENTRATION OF RISK
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company places its cash with high quality banking institutions. From time to time, the Company maintains cash balances at certain institutions in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit.
INCOME TAXES
Under ASC 740, "Income Taxes", deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic loss per common shares excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. As of December 31, 2010 there are no outstanding dilutive securities.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company's financial instruments include cash. The estimated fair value of these instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to the short maturity of the instrument.
Sherwood Acquisition Corporation Notes to the Financial Statements For the Period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
Note 2 - GOING CONCERN
These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies Sherwood will continue to meet its obligations and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has not generated revenues and or cash flows from operations since inception. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon financial support from its stockholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, successfully locating and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with Sherwood. Tiber Creek Corporation, a company affiliated with management, will pay all expenses incurred by Sherwood until a business combination is effected, without repayment. There is no assurance that Sherwood will ever be profitable.
NOTE 3 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01- Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash. The amendments in this update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). The amendments in this update are effective now. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarifies existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.
Sherwood Acquisition Corporation Notes to the Financial Statements For the Period from July 19, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
NOTE 3 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective now, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial statements.
NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On July 31, 2010, the Company issued 20,000,000 common shares to its sole director and officer for $2,000 in cash.
NOTE 5 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through March 25, 2011, the date the financial statements were issued.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SHERWOOD ACQUISITION CORPORATION
By: /s/ James M. Cassidy James M. Cassidy, President 					Principal executive officer Dated: March 28, 2011
By: /s/ James M. Cassidy James M. Cassidy, President 					Principal financial officer
Dated: March 28, 2011
Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAME OFFICE DATE
/s/ James M. Cassidy Director March 28, 2011