Item 1.
Description of Business
General
Stonecrest One, Inc. (“we”, “us”, the “Company” or like terms) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 5, 2008. We are a developmental stage company and have not generated any revenues to date. We were organized to serve as a vehicle for a business combination through a capital stock exchange, merger, asset acquisition or other similar business combination (a “Business Combination”) with an operating or development stage business (the “Target Business”) which desires to utilize our status as a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which such transactions sometimes are referred to as "reverse acquisitions" or "reverse mergers." Since inception, our business operations have comprised attending to organizational matters, registering our class of common stock under the Exchange Act and identifying and evaluating potential Target Businesses. We have no full-time employees and do not own or lease any property. None of our officers or directors has ever served as an officer or director of a development stage public company with the business purpose of acquiring a Target Business.
The Company, based on its proposed business activities, is a “blank check” company. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) defines those companies as “any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3 (a)(51) of the Exchange Act and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of “blank check” companies in their respective jurisdictions. In addition, under Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, the Company also is a “shell company” which is defined, as a company which has (i) no or nominal operations; and (ii) either (x) no or nominal assets; (y) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or (z) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets. Because we are a "shell" company, the Business Combination we enter into with a Target Business will be deemed to be a "reverse acquisition" or "reverse merger."
Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination, and then only in the discretion of management of our Business Combination partner. The Company intends to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as we are subject to those requirements.
We are not presently engaged in, and will not engage in, any substantive commercial business until we consummate a Business Combination, if ever. We are currently in the process of identifying and evaluating targets for a Business Combination but we do not have any specific Business Combination under consideration. Our efforts to identify a prospective Target Business are not limited to a particular industry or geographic location. We will seek to consummate the transaction which is most attractive and provides the greatest opportunity for creating securityholder value. The determination as to which opportunity is the most attractive will be based on our analysis of a variety of factors, including the terms of the transaction and the perceived quality of the business of the Target Business, among others, some which are described below. We believe that the owners of potential Target Businesses may find an acquisition by us to be an easier and less dilutive means to achieve liquidity than an initial public offering or other forms of financing transactions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and attract a Target Business or that we will be able to engage in a transaction on favorable terms or at all.
Affecting a Business Combination
General.
A Business Combination may involve the acquisition of (which may be referred to as a "reverse acquisition"), or merger with a company that desires to have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act, while avoiding what its management may deem to be the adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself. These include time delays, significant expense, possible loss of voting control by the target's existing management through dilution of their ownership position and compliance with various federal and state securities laws. As more fully described below under the heading “Form of acquisition; Opportunity for stockholder approval,” the proposed structure of a Business Combination may not require that we seek stockholder approval for the transaction and holders of our common stock may not have the opportunity to vote upon a proposed Business Combination.
Search for a target.
We are currently in the process of identifying and evaluating potential Target Businesses. As described below in more detail, we have virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting prospective acquisition candidates. At such time as we affect a Business Combination, if ever, we may be impacted by numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of the Target Business. The risks attendant to the Target Business may include risks typical of a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stage of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.
Sources of Target Businesses.
We intend to source our target opportunities from various internal and external sources. Target candidates have been, and we anticipate will continue to be, brought to our attention from affiliated and unaffiliated sources. We believe that we will be able to identify target opportunities from internal sources primarily resulting from personal contacts and relationships that our officer and director and his affiliates have developed and maintain with various professionals, including accountants, consultants, bankers, attorneys and other investors, as a result of formal or informal inquiries or discussions they may have, as well as attending trade shows or conventions. In no event will our existing officer, director or stockholders, or any entity with which they are affiliated, be paid any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of a Business Combination.
Target Business candidates may be brought to our attention by unaffiliated sources as a result of being solicited by us through calls or mailings. These sources may also introduce us to Target Business candidates in which they believe we may have an interest. In addition, we may retain the services of agents or other representatives to identify or locate suitable targets on our behalf, though we have not engaged any such persons to date. In the event that we retain the services of professional firms or other individuals that specialize in business acquisitions, we may pay a finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length negotiation. We have not adopted any policies with respect to utilizing the services of consultants or advisors to assist in the identification of a Target Business, the criteria to be used in selecting such consultants or advisors, the services to be provided, the term of service, or regarding the total amount of fees that may be paid. However, because of our limited cash resources, it is likely that any such fee we agree to pay would be paid in shares of our common stock.
Selection criteria of a Target Business.
Our management will have virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective Target Business. We have not established any specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective Target Businesses. In evaluating a prospective Target Business, our management will consider, among other factors, the following:
These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive or to in any way limit the board of director’s unrestricted discretion to enter into a Business Combination with any Target Business. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular Business Combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed relevant by our management.
Due Diligence Investigation.
In evaluating a prospective Target Business, we will conduct as extensive a due diligence review of potential targets as possible in view of our lack of financial resources and the inexperience of our management in such endeavors. Moreover, management’s decisions will be made without detailed feasibility studies, independent analyses, market surveys and the like, which, if we had more funds available to us, would be desirable. Given our current resources, we will likely enter into a Business Combination with a privately-held company in its early stages of development or that has only a limited operating history on which to base our decision. Generally, very little public information exists about these companies and we will be required to rely on the ability of our management to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from entering into a Business Combination with such a company. We will be particularly dependent in making decisions upon information provided by the promoters, owners, sponsors or others associated with the business opportunity seeking our participation. We expect that our due diligence may include, among other things, meetings with the Target Business’s incumbent management and inspection of its facilities, as well as a review of financial and other information that is made available to us. This due diligence review will be conducted by our management, possibly with the assistance of the Company's counsel and accountants, as necessary.
It is unlikely that our management at the time of a Business Combination will continue in any material capacity with the Company after the consummation of a Business Combination, other than as a stockholder.
Our assessment of a Target Business and its management may not be accurate. If we do not uncover all material information about a Target Business prior to a Business Combination, we may not make a fully informed investment decision and we may lose money on our investment.
The time and costs required to select and evaluate a Target Business and to structure and complete the Business Combination cannot presently be ascertained with any degree of certainty. Any costs we incur with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective Target Business with which a Business Combination is not ultimately completed may result in a loss to us.
Lack of diversification.
We expect that we will be able to consummate a Business Combination with only one candidate given that, among other considerations, we will not have the resources to diversify our operations. Moreover, given that we likely will offer a controlling interest in our Company to a Target Business in order to achieve a tax-free reorganization, as described below, the dilution of interest to present and prospective stockholders will render more than one Business Combination unlikely. Therefore, at least initially, the prospects for our success may be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business and we will not benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses that Business Combinations with multiple operating entities would offer. By consummating a Business Combination with a single entity, our lack of diversification may:
·
result in our dependency upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services; and
·
subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to a Business Combination.
Form of acquisition; Opportunity for stockholder approval.
Although we cannot predict the terms of any Business Combination, we will seek to structure a Business Combination to qualify as a tax-free transaction under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Tax-free treatment of such a transaction can be accomplished, if structured correctly, either through the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of a Target Business or through a merger (either directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company) with a Target Business. Depending on the circumstances of any acquisition, however, we may not be able to structure a transaction in the most tax advantageous manner. Further, we cannot assure you that the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authorities will agree with our tax treatment of any transaction.
If the transaction is structured as an acquisition, we will acquire our participation in a Target Business through the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of its capital stock in exchange for the issuance of our common stock or other securities to the security holders of the Target Business and the Target Business would become our wholly owned subsidiary. If the transaction is structured as a statutory merger or consolidation, we would merge a Target Business with and into our Company or a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company.
Acquisition: Under Section 368(a)(1) of the Code, in order for a stock exchange transaction to qualify as a "tax free" reorganization, the holders of the stock of the target must receive a number of shares of our capital stock equal to 80% or more of the voting stock of our Company. If a transaction were structured to take advantage of these provisions rather than other "tax free" provisions provided under the Code, our existing stockholders would, in such circumstances, retain 20% or less of the total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity. Depending upon the relative negotiating strength of the parties, our stockholders at the time of the Business Combination may retain substantially less than 20% of the total issued and outstanding shares of our Company, which is likely in our case. This would result in substantial additional dilution to the equity of those persons who were stockholders of our Company prior to such Business Combination. As part of such a transaction, all or a majority of our Company's then management at the time may resign and new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders. If the Business Combination is structured as an acquisition of a Target Business's stock, our Company will not require the vote or approval of stockholders and the transaction may be accomplished in the sole determination of management.
Merger: In a merger transaction, we would merge a Target Business with and into our Company or a wholly-owned subsidiary. Simultaneous with the merger, we may affect a recapitalization in order to achieve a manageable float of our outstanding capital stock. However, a proposed merger transaction would require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and it may necessitate calling a stockholders' meeting to obtain such approval and filings with the SEC and state agencies. The necessity to obtain stockholder approval may result in delay and additional expense in the consummation of any proposed transaction and will also give rise to certain rights to dissenting stockholders who could require that the Company purchase their shares at a price equal to the fair market value in cash.
In light of the above, management likely will seek to structure a Business Combination so as not to require stockholder approval.
In view of our status as a "shell" company, any acquisition of the stock of or the merger with an operating company would be deemed to be a "reverse acquisition" or "reverse merger," respectively.
We anticipate that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require significant management time and attention and substantial cost for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs incurred in the related investigation would not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for a Business Combination, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in the loss to the Company of the related costs incurred.
In the case of either an acquisition or merger, our stockholders prior to the consummation of a Business Combination likely will not have control of a majority of the voting shares of the Company following a Business Combination. As part of such a transaction, all or a majority of the Company's then directors may resign and new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.
Competition
Our ability to consummate a Business Combination will be constrained by our lack of financial resources to provide to the Target Business. We expect that in the course of identifying, evaluating and selecting a Target Business, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours. These include blank check companies that have raised significant capital through sales of securities registered under federal securities laws and that have a business plan similar to ours and, consequently, possess a significant competitive advantage over our Company both from a financial and personnel perspective. Additionally, we may be subject to competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including venture capital firms, leveraged buyout firms and operating businesses looking to expand their operations through acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established, possess significant capital, may be able to offer securities for which a trading market exists and that have extensive experience identifying and affecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, nearly all of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than us. In addition, we will experience competition from other modestly capitalized shell companies that are seeking to enter into business combinations with targets similar to those we expect to pursue.
Our sole officer, director and stockholder currently serves as an officer and director and is a stockholder of a shell company the class of common stock of which is registered under the Exchange Act. This officer's/director's affiliation with two shell companies raises the possibility of conflicts of interest, in that both companies may seek to take advantage of the same business opportunity. Neither our Company nor the other shell company with which our management is affiliated has adopted any policy with respect to resolving any potential conflict of interest and it is possible that any conflict or interest that arises between the two companies may not be decided in our favor.
While we believe there may be numerous potential target candidates with which we could affect a Business Combination, our ability to compete in affecting a Business Combination with prime candidates will be limited by our lack of financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of the most attractive Target Businesses.
If we succeed in affecting a Business Combination, there will be, in all likelihood, intense competition from competitors of the Target Business. We cannot apprise you of any of these risks nor can we assure you that, subsequent to a Business Combination, we will have the resources or ability to compete effectively.
Employees
We have one executive officer who has other business interests, including an interest as an officer, director and stockholder of another shell company registered under the Exchange Act, and is not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters. He intends to devote only as much time as he deems necessary to our affairs. The amount of time management will devote to our affairs in any time period will vary based on whether a Target Business has been selected for the Business Combination and the stage of the Business Combination process the Company is in. Accordingly, as management identifies suitable Target Businesses, we expect that our management will spend more time investigating such Target Business and will devote additional time and effort negotiating and processing the Business Combination as developments warrant. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of a Business Combination.
Our management may engage in other business activities similar and dissimilar to those we are engaged in without any limitations or restrictions applicable to such activities. As note above, our management's affiliation with another shell company and association with other businesses raises possible conflicts of interest in as much as he may divert opportunities which would be appropriate for our Company to such other company or to other entities or persons with which he is or may be associated or have an interest, rather than presenting such opportunities to us. Since we have not established any policy for the resolution of such a conflict, we could be adversely affected should our officer/director choose to place his other business interests before ours. We cannot assure you that potential conflicts of interest will not result in the loss of potential opportunities or that any conflict will be resolved in our favor.
Our officer and director may actively negotiate for or otherwise consent to the disposition of all or any portion of the shares of common stock he owns, as a condition to, or in connection, with a Business Combination. Therefore, it is possible that the terms of any Business Combination will provide for the sale of all or a portion of his shares of common stock which would raise issues relating to a possible conflict of interest with any of our other security holders.
Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all of the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K before making a decision to invest in our securities. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
The absence of operations and revenues raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The report of our independent auditor and Note B to the financial statements included in this Annual Report indicate that the Company is in the development stage, has suffered losses from operations, has a net capital deficiency and has yet to generate cash flow, and that these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, we have no significant assets or financial resources. We will continue to sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the consummation of a Business Combination. This will result in continued net operating losses that will increase until we can consummate a Business Combination with a profitable Target Business. Our operating and financial condition renders it unlikely that we would be able to obtain third-party financing to sustain operations, if necessary. In light of our limited resources, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue operations, that we will be able to identify a suitable Target Business or that we will consummate a Business Combination.
We may have insufficient resources to cover our operating expenses and the costs and expenses of consummating a Business Combination.
At June 30, 2010, we had cash on hand of $100 and no other assets of any kind. We do not expect that these funds will be sufficient to cover our operating costs and expenses, including those we will incur in connection with satisfying our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and consummating a Business Combination. If our financial resources are inadequate to cover our costs and expenses, we will require additional financing and we cannot be certain that such financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. Our failure to secure funds necessary to cover our costs and expenses would have an adverse affect on our operations and ability to achieve our objective.
We are dependent entirely upon our stockholders to fund our operations. We may have insufficient resources to cover our operating expenses and the costs and expenses of consummating a Business Combination.
We are not generating any revenues and possess limited capital to fund our operations, including for such purposes as preparing and filing periodic reports under the Exchange Act, identifying a Target Business and negotiating a Business Combination. We are dependent entirely on our sole officer and director and stockholders to provide funds for the foregoing requirements and for any other corporate purposes that may arise in the future. Though our principals have advised us of their intention to fund our operations, there is no written agreement binding them to do so. Our operating and financial condition renders it unlikely that we would be able to obtain third-party financing to sustain operations, if necessary. In the event that our principals do not fund our capital requirements, we may not be able to continue operations and stockholders could lose the entire amount of their investment in our Company.
We are a development stage company with no operating history and, accordingly, there is no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are a development stage company and have not engaged in any revenue generating activities to date. Since we do not have any operating history, you will have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective. We are currently in the process of evaluating and identifying targets for a Business Combination. We are not presently engaged in, and will not engage in, any substantive commercial business or generate any revenue until we consummate such a transaction, if ever. We cannot assure you as to when or if a Business Combination will occur.
One of our current officers may have a conflict of interest with another public shell company that he manages and in which he is an indirect stockholder.
One of our officers currently serves as an officer and director of another shell company that has registered its class of common stock under the Exchange Act, which may result in a conflict of interest with our Company. Our management may in the future become affiliated with entities, including blank check or shell companies, engaged in business activities similar to those being conducted by us. Our management's existing or future affiliation with other shell companies raises the possibility of conflicts of interest, in that both companies may seek to take advantage of the same business opportunity. Neither our Company nor the other shell company with which our officer is affiliated has adopted a conflict of interest policy and it is possible that any conflict or interest that arises between the two companies may not be resolved in our favor.
Our future success is dependent on the ability of management to complete a Business Combination with a Target Business that operates profitably.
The nature of our operations is highly speculative. The future success of our plan of operation will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the Target Business we may acquire. The future success of our plan of operation will depend entirely on the operations, financial condition and management of the Target Business with which we may enter into a Business Combination. While management is seeking to enter into a Business Combination with an entity having an established, profitable operating history and effective management, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in consummating a Business Combination with a candidate that meets that those criteria.
We have no existing agreement for a Business Combination or other transaction.
We presently have no written arrangement or agreement with respect to engaging in a Business Combination. We cannot assure you that we will successfully identify and evaluate suitable business opportunities or that we will enter into a Business Combination. Management has not identified any particular industry or specific business within an industry for evaluation. We cannot assure you that we will be able to negotiate a Business Combination on favorable terms.
The time and cost of preparing a private company to become a public reporting company may preclude us from entering into a Business Combination with the most attractive private companies.
Target companies that we may investigate that fail to comply with SEC reporting requirements, financial and otherwise, may delay or preclude a Business Combination. Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act require reporting companies to provide certain information about significant acquisitions, including audited financial statements for the company acquired. The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare these statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an acquisition. Otherwise suitable acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may be inappropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act are applicable.
We likely will complete only one Business Combination, which will cause us to be dependent solely on a single business and a limited number of products, services or assets.
Given our limited financial resources and other considerations, it is likely we will complete a Business Combination with only one Target Business. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be solely dependent upon the performance of a single business and dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services. In this case, we will not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several Business Combinations or asset acquisitions in different industries or different areas of a single industry so as to diversify risks and offset losses.
If we affect a Business Combination with a financially unstable company or an entity in the early stage of development or growth, we will be subject to greater risks than if we were to affect a Business Combination with a more established company with a proven record of earnings and growth.
Given our financial and personnel resources compared to those of our competitors, we may be limited to consummating a Business Combination with a company that is financially unstable or is in the early stage of development or growth, including an entity without established records of sales or earnings. To the extent we affect a Business Combination with a financially unstable or early stage or emerging growth company, we may be impacted by numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of such company that we would not be subject to if we were to affect a Business Combination with a more seasoned company with a proven record of earnings and growth.
Given our limited resources and the significant competition for Target Businesses, we may not be able to consummate an attractive Business Combination.
We will encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including blank check companies, finance companies, banks, venture capital funds, leveraged buyout funds, operating businesses and other financial buyers competing for acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience in identifying and affecting Business Combinations directly or through affiliates. Nearly all of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do and our financial resources will be negligible when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. In addition, we will experience direct competition from other modestly capitalized shell companies that are seeking to enter into business combinations with targets similar to those we expect to pursue.
It is likely that we will consummate a Business Combination with a private company for which limited information will be available to conduct due diligence.
We likely will enter into a Business Combination with a privately-held company. Generally, very little public information exists about these companies or their management and we will be required to rely on the ability of our management to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential success of entering into a transaction with such a company. In addition, our management will only devote limited time to the business of the Company and will have available to it extremely limited financial resources with which to conduct due diligence. If our assessment of the Target Business’s operations and management is inaccurate or we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, then we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and stockholders may lose their entire investment in our Company.
If we consummate a Business Combination by way of an acquisition, stockholders may not have an opportunity to vote on the transaction.
If we consummate a Business Combination by way of an acquisition of the capital stock or assets of the Target Business, the transaction may be accomplished in the sole determination of management without any vote or approval by our securityholders. Accordingly, holders of our securities at the time of any Business Combination may not have an opportunity to evaluate the Target Business or its management and will have to rely on the judgment of management in assessing the future profitability and viability of the Target Business.
A Business Combination with a foreign company may subject us to additional risks.
If we enter into a Business Combination with a foreign entity, we will be subject to all of the risks inherent in business operations outside of the United States. These risks include:
·
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
·
changes in duties and tariffs, taxes, trade restrictions, license obligations and other non-tariff barriers to trade;
·
longer payment cycles and difficulties collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;
·
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
·
political and economic instability.
If we are not successful managing these risks among others that we may not identify at the time of a Business Combination, our business may be negatively impacted.
Since we have not yet selected a particular industry or Target Business with which to complete a Business Combination, we are unable to ascertain the merits or risks of the industry or business in which we may ultimately operate at this time.
We are currently in the process of evaluating and identifying targets for a Business Combination. However, our plan of operation permits our board of directors to consummate a Business Combination with a company in any industry it chooses and is not limited to any particular industry or type of business. Accordingly, there is no current basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the particular industry in which we may ultimately operate or the Target Business that we may ultimately acquire. To the extent we complete a Business Combination with a company that does not have a stable history of earnings and growth or an entity in a relatively early stage of its development, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations of those entities. If we complete a Business Combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, we may be affected by the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. Such risks, among other things, could preclude the Company's ability to secure financing for operations after a Business Combination, should it be required. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular industry or Target Business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. Even if we properly assess those risks, some of them may be outside of our control.
Our long-term success will be dependent in large part upon the management team of the Target Business, which may be difficult to fully evaluate.
After a Business Combination, our long-term success we will be dependent upon the management team of the Target Business. Although we intend to scrutinize the management team of a prospective Target Business as closely as possible in connection with evaluating the desirability of affecting a Business Combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of the management team will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the complex disclosure and financial reporting requirements imposed on U.S. public companies and other requirements of operating a public company, which could divert their attention from their core business to the determent of the operating results of the Target Business.
If we are unable to structure the Business Combination as a “tax free” transaction, potential Target Businesses could be deterred from entering into such a transaction with our Company.
We may not be able to structure our acquisition to result in tax-free treatment for the companies or their stockholders, which could deter third parties from entering into certain Business Combinations with us. Currently, a transaction may be structured so as to result in tax-free treatment to both companies, as prescribed by various federal and state tax provisions. We intend to structure any Business Combination so as to minimize the federal and state tax consequences to both us and the target entity and the respective stockholders of each company; however, we cannot assure investors that the Business Combination will meet the statutory requirements of a tax-free reorganization or that the parties will obtain the intended tax-free treatment upon a transfer of stock or assets. A non-qualifying reorganization could result in the imposition of both federal and state taxes that may have an adverse affect on all parties to the transaction.
We have not conducted any market research concerning prospective business opportunities, which may affect our ability to identify a Target Business.
We have neither conducted nor have others made available to us results of market research concerning prospective business opportunities. Therefore, we have no assurances that market demand exists for a Business Combination as contemplated by us. There is no assurance that we will be able to enter into a Business Combination on terms favorable to us. Decisions as to which business opportunity to participate in will be unilaterally made by our management, which, in many cases, may act without the consent, vote or approval of our stockholders.
The Company may be subject to further government regulations which would adversely affect our operations.
Although we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, management believes we will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ( the “Investment Company Act”), since we will not be engaged in the business of investing or trading in securities. If we engage in business combinations which will result in our holding passive investment interests in a number of entities, we could be subject to regulations under the Investment Company Act. If so, we would be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs. We have received no formal determination from the SEC as to our status under the Investment Company Act and, consequently, violation of the Investment Company Act could subject us to material adverse consequences.
Limitations on liability and indemnification matters.
As permitted by the corporate laws of the State of Nevada, we have included in our articles of incorporation a provision to eliminate the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach or alleged breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, subject to certain exceptions, including, for example if the director did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. In addition, our bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our officers and directors under certain circumstances, including those circumstances in which indemnification would otherwise be discretionary, and we will be required to advance expenses to our officers and directors as incurred in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified.
Our compliance with changing laws and rules regarding corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses to us which, in turn, may adversely affect our ability to continue our operations.
Keeping abreast of, and in compliance with, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and, in the event we are ever approved for listing on either an automated quotation system or a registered exchange, and system or stock exchange rules, will require an increased amount of management attention and external resources. We intend to continue to invest all reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards, which may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. This could have an adverse impact on our operations.
We expect to issue a significant number of new shares of capital stock in a Business Combination, which will result in substantial dilution and a change in control of ownership of the Company.
Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Any Business Combination affected by us may result in the issuance of additional securities without stockholder approval and may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, the common stock issued in any such transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm's-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Our board of directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued in connection with a Business Combination or otherwise, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holders of common stock might be materially adversely affected.
We may issue preferred stock which may have greater rights than our common stock.
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize our Company to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Currently, no preferred shares have been issued; however, we can issue shares of our preferred stock in one or more series and can set the terms of the preferred stock without seeking any further approval from our common stockholders. Any preferred stock that we issue may rank ahead of our common stock in terms of dividend priority or liquidation premiums and may have greater voting rights than our common stock. In addition, such preferred stock may contain provisions allowing those shares to be converted into shares of common stock, which could dilute the value of common stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price, if any, of our common stock.
There are significant restrictions on the transferability of the Shares.
No outstanding shares of our common stock have been registered under the Securities Act, and, consequently, they may not be resold, transferred, pledged as collateral or otherwise disposed of under federal securities laws unless such transaction is registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. In connection with any transfer of shares of our common stock other than pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, the Company may require the holder to provide to the Company an opinion of counsel to the effect that such transfer does not require registration under the Securities Act. Persons who acquired our common stock prior to a Business Combination will not be entitled to rely on Rule 144 under the Exchange Act for the resale of our securities unless and until (i) we cease to be a shell company, (ii) at the time of the sale we are reporting under the Exchange Act, (iii) we have filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed during the preceding 12 months, and (iv) at least one year has elapsed from the time that we file the disclosure required by the SEC reflecting the fact that we are no longer a shell company. These restrictions will limit the ability of our stockholders to liquidate their investment.
We have not registered or qualified any shares of our class of our common stock for resale under the Blue Sky laws of any state, which will limit the liquidity of the common stock.
The Company has not registered or qualified its class of common stock for resale or trading under the Blue Sky laws of any state and current management does not anticipate doing so. Current stockholders and persons who desire to purchase our common stock should be aware that significant state Blue Sky law restrictions may limit our stockholders from selling their shares and potential purchasers from acquiring our common stock.
The absence of an established trading market will limit the ability of stockholders to dispose of their common stock.
There is currently no public trading market for any of our securities. The Company will not seek to list any of our securities on any exchange or have them quoted on an automated quotation system or over-the-counter market. Any decision to initiate public trading of our common stock will be in the discretion of management of a Target Company with which we consummate a Business Combination. Since stockholders will not be able to sell their shares, stockholders should consider their liquidity needs with respect to the securities and should be prepared to hold their shares for an indefinite period.
We cannot assure you that following a Business Combination with an operating business, our common stock will be listed or admitted to quotation on any securities exchange or other trading medium, which will limit the liquidity of the shares.
Following a Business Combination, new management may seek to initiate a public market for our common stock. However, we cannot assure you that following such a transaction, our Company as then constituted will meet the initial listing standards of any stock exchange or that our common stock will be admitted for quotation on the over the counter bulletin board or commence trading on any other medium. If our common stock does not trade publicly, holders may not be able to sell common stock.
The designation of our common stock as a "penny stock" would limit the liquidity of the shares.
Our common stock after a Business Combination may be deemed a “penny stock” as that term is defined under Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. Generally, a "penny stock" is a common stock that is not listed on a securities exchange and trades for less than $5.00 a share. Prices often are not available to buyers and sellers and the market may be very limited. Penny stocks in start-up companies are among the riskiest equity investments. Broker-dealers who sell penny stocks must provide purchasers of these stocks with a standardized risk-disclosure document prepared by the SEC. The document provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks involved in investing in the penny stock market. A broker must also provide purchasers with bid and offer quotations and information regarding broker and salesperson compensation, make a written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and obtain the purchaser's written agreement to the purchase. Many brokers choose not to participate in penny stock transactions. Because of the penny stock rules, there may be less trading activity in penny stocks in any market that develops for our common stock in the future and stockholders are likely to have difficulty selling their shares.
FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.
In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock stocks in any market that develops for our common stock in the future, which may limit the ability to buy and sell our stock and which will have an adverse effect on any market that develops for our shares.
We have never paid dividends on our common stock.
We have never paid dividends on our common stock and do not presently intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. In the unlikely event we generated profits prior to a Business Combination, we expect to retain such earnings and re-invest them into the Company to further its business strategy.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not Applicable.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties.
We maintain our principal executive offices at 14338 Crown Harbor Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina, where our President maintains an office. We use this office space free of charge. We believe that this space is sufficient for our current requirements. The Company does not own or lease any properties at this time and does not anticipate owning or leasing any properties prior to the consummation of a Business Combination, if ever.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
The Company presently is not a party to, nor is management aware of, any pending, legal proceedings.
Item 4.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
As of November 10, 2010, there were four holders of record of 1,000,000 outstanding shares of our common stock.
Our common stock does not trade, nor is it admitted to quotation, on any stock exchange or other trading facility. Management has no present plan, proposal, arrangement or understanding with any person with regard to the development of a trading market in any of our securities. Any decision to initiate public trading of our common stock will be in the discretion of management of a Target Company with which we consummate a Business Combination. We cannot assure you that a trading market for our common stock will ever develop. We have not registered our class of common stock for resale under the blue sky laws of any state and current management does not anticipate doing so. The holders of shares of common stock, and persons who may desire to purchase shares of our common stock in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that, in addition to transfer restrictions imposed by federal securities laws, significant state blue sky law restrictions may exist which could limit the ability of stockholders to sell their shares and limit potential purchasers from acquiring our common stock.We are not obligated by contract or otherwise to issue any securities and there are not outstanding any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock.
Shares Available for Future Sale.
All outstanding shares of our common stock are “restricted securities,” as that term is defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, because they were issued in a private transaction not involving a public offering. Accordingly, none of the outstanding shares of our common stock may be resold, transferred, pledged as collateral or otherwise disposed of unless such transaction is registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration is available. In connection with any transfer of shares of our common stock other than pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, the Company may require the holder to provide to the Company an opinion of counsel to the effect that such transfer does not require registration of such transferred shares under the Securities Act.
Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by companies that are, or previously were, shell companies, like us, unless the following conditions are met:
·
the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
·
at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current comprehensive disclosure with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.
Neither the Company nor its officer and director has any present plan, proposal, arrangement, understanding or intention of selling any unissued or outstanding shares of common stock in the public market subsequent to a Business Combination. Nevertheless, in the event that a substantial number of shares of our common stock were to be sold in any public market that may develop for our securities subsequent to a Business Combination, such sales may adversely affect the price for the sale of the Company's common stock securities in any such trading market. We cannot predict what effect, if any, market sales of currently restricted shares of common stock or the availability of such shares for sale will have on the market prices prevailing from time to time, if any.
Dividends.
We have not paid any dividends on our common stock to date and do not presently intend to pay cash dividends prior to the consummation of a Business Combination.
The payment of any dividends subsequent to a Business Combination will be within the discretion of our then seated board of directors. Current management cannot predict the factors which any future board of directors would consider when determining whether or when to pay dividends.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
None.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The Company did not issue or sell any securities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The information to be furnished under this Item 6 is not required of smaller reporting companies.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following plan of operation provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results, expectations and plans discussed in these forward-looking statements.
Plan of Operation
We were formed to serve as a vehicle to acquire, through a capital stock exchange, reverse acquisition, reverse merger, asset acquisition or other similar business combination, an operating or development stage business which desires to utilize our status as a reporting corporation under the Exchange Act. We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues during the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2010.
We are currently in the process of evaluating and identifying targets for a Business Combination. We are not presently engaged in, and will not engage in, any substantive commercial business until we consummate a Business Combination.
Our management has broad discretion with respect to identifying and selecting a prospective Target Business. We have not established any specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective Target Businesses. There are numerous risks in connection with our current and proposed operations and plans, including those enumerated under "Item 1A Risk Factors." By way of example, we will be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of the Target Business and, if such business is a foreign entity, we will be subject to all of the risks attendant to foreign operations. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular Target Business, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in our efforts to identify a Target Business and consummate a Business Combination or that any business with which we consummate a Business Combination will be successful.
We expect that in connection with any Business Combination, we will issue a significant number of shares of our common stock (equal to at least 80% of the total number of shares outstanding after giving effect to the transaction, in order to ensure that Business Combination qualifies as a “tax free” transaction under federal tax laws). The issuance of additional shares of our capital stock:
·
will significantly reduce the equity interest of our stockholders as of the date of the transaction; and
·
will cause a change in likely result in the resignation or removal of our management as of the date of the transaction.
Our management anticipates that the Company likely will be able to affect only one Business Combination, due primarily to our financial resources and the dilution of interest for present and prospective stockholders, which is likely to occur as a result of our management's plan to offer a controlling interest to a Target Business in order to achieve a tax free reorganization. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in us, because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against potential gains from another.
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
At June 30, 2010, we had cash on hand of $100. We do not expect that the funds available will be sufficient to cover our operating costs and expenses over the next twelve months during which we anticipate that we will incur costs and expenses in connection with the preparation and filing of reports under the Exchange Act, the identification and evaluation of targets for a Business Combination and, possibly, costs associated with negotiating and entering into a Business Combination.
To date, we have funded our operations through loans from our stockholders, and as of June 30, 2010, we had borrowed an aggregate of $8,295 from them. We also have accrued outstanding liabilities of $9,940 and accrued expenses of $868 for the year then ended. Our stockholders have indicated their present intention to fund the Company's operating expenses through the date of a Business Combination, through loans or further investment in the Company, as and when necessary, though this intention may change based upon numerous circumstances.
We cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will have sufficient capital resources to identify a suitable Target Business, to conduct effective due diligence as to any Target Business or to consummate a Business Combination. As a result of our negative working capital, our losses since inception and failure to generate revenues from operations, in its report on our financial statements and in the notes thereto, our auditor has expressed doubt about our ability to continue as a "going concern."
Results of Operations.
Since our inception, we have not generated any revenues. We reported a net loss for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 of $10,604 and $8,499, respectively, and a have suffered a net loss since inception of $19,103. The Company has used cash from operations of $18,235 since its inception, consisting primarily of professional fees, and has a negative working capital of $19,003 at June 30, 2010.
We do not expect to engage in any substantive activities unless and until such time as we enter into a Business Combination with a Target Business, if ever. We cannot provide investors with any assessment as to the nature of a Target Business’s operations or speculate as to the status of its products or operations, whether at the time of the Business Combination it will be generating revenues or its future prospects.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The information to be furnished under this Item 7A is not required of smaller reporting companies.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT INDEX
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Stonecrest One, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Stonecrest One, Inc. (“The Company”) as June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the two years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stonecrest One, Inc. as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the two years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the notes to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a deficit accumulated during the development stage, has negative cash flows from operations, and has negative working capital, all of which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
November 18, 2010
Bongiovanni & Associates
Cornelius, North Carolina
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
STONECREST ONE, INC.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2010
NOTE A-ORGANIZATION, BUSINESS, AND OPERATIONS
Stonecrest One, Inc. (“The Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 5, 2008 as a corporation with a year end of June 30. The Company’s objective is to acquire or merge with a target business or company in a business combination.
NOTE B-GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $19,103, used cash from operations of $18,235 since its inception, and has a working capital deficiency of $19,103 at June 30, 2010.
The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is also dependent on its ability to find a suitable target company and enter into a possible reverse merger with such company. Management’s plan includes obtaining additional funds by equity financing through a reverse merger transaction and/or related party advances; however there is no assurance of additional funding being available. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise as a result of this uncertainty.
NOTE C-SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation- The financial statements included herein were prepared under the accrual basis of accounting.
Cash and Cash Equivalents- For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Management’s Use of Estimates- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statements above reflect all
of the costs of doing business.
Revenue Recognition- The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met:
(i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
(ii) the services have been rendered and all required milestones achieved,
(iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and
(iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) - The Company reports Comprehensive income and its components following guidance set forth by section 220-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification which establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. There were no items of comprehensive income (loss) applicable to the Company during the period covered in the financial statements.
Net Income per Common Share- Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
Deferred Taxes- The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments- The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts receivable and payable approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets- The Company evaluates the recoverability of its fixed assets and other assets in accordance with section 360-10-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Disclosure requires recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds its expected cash flows. If so, it is considered to be impaired and is written down to fair value, which is determined based on either discounted future cash flows or appraised values. The Company adopted the statement on inception. No impairments of these types of assets were recognized during the year ended June 30, 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation- The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value method following the guidance set forth in section 718-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosure about Stock-Based Compensation. This section requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award- the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service.
STONECREST ONE, INC.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2010
NOTE C-SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES-CONT’D
Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities- The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at June 30, 2010.
The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2010, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the year ended June 30, 2010.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-01)
In June 2009, FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“the Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. All existing accounting standard documents, such as FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force and other related literature, excluding guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), have been superseded by the Codification. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification has become nonauthoritative. The Codification did not change GAAP, but instead introduced a new structure that combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. The
Codification is effective for interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and impacts the Company’s financial statements as all future references to authoritative accounting
literature will be referenced in accordance with the Codification. There have been no changes to the content of our consolidated financial statements or disclosures as a result of implementing the Codification during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
As a result of our implementation of the Codification during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, previous references to new accounting standards and literature are no longer applicable. In the current annual financial statements, we will provide reference to both new and old guidance to assist in understanding the impacts of recently adopted accounting literature, particularly for guidance adopted since the beginning of the current fiscal year but prior to the Codification.
STONECREST ONE, INC.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2010
NOTE C-SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES-CONT’D
Recent Accounting Pronouncements-cont’d
Subsequent Events
(Included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855 “Subsequent Events”, previously SFAS No. 165 “Subsequent Events”)
SFAS No. 165 established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued (“subsequent events”). An entity is required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the basis for that date. For public entities, this is the date the financial statements are issued. SFAS No. 165 does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other GAAP and did not result in significant changes in the subsequent events reported by us. SFAS No. 165 became effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and did not impact our consolidated financial statements. We evaluated for subsequent events through the issuance date of our consolidated financial statements. No recognized or non-recognized subsequent events were noted.
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(Included in ASC 350 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other”, previously FSP SFAS No. 142-3 “Determination of the Useful Lives of Intangible Assets”)
FSP SFAS No. 142-3 amended the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under previously issued goodwill and intangible assets topics. This change was intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under topics related to business combinations and other GAAP. The requirement for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. FSP SFAS No. 142-3 became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of FSP SFAS No. 142-3 did not impact our consolidated financial statements.
Noncontrolling Interests
(Included in ASC 810 “Consolidation”, previously SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51”)
SFAS No. 160 changed the accounting and reporting for minority interests such that they will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. SFAS No.
160 became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 with early application prohibited. We implemented SFAS No. 160 at the start of fiscal 2009 and no longer record an intangible asset when the purchase price of a noncontrolling interest exceeds the book value at the time of buyout. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have any other material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - Amended
(To be included in ASC 810 “Consolidation”, SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”)
SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities regarding certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity and modifies the methods allowed for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amendments include: (1) the elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, (2) a new approach for determining who should consolidate a variable-interest entity, and (3) changes to when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity. SFAS No. 167 is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009, with earlier adoption prohibited. We will adopt SFAS No. 167 in fiscal 2010 and do not anticipate any material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE D-SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as follows:
Cash paid during the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 for interest and income taxes:
2010 2009
Income Taxes $ --- $ ---
Interest $ --- $ ---
Cash paid for the period from inception through June 30, 2010 for interest and income taxes is $0.
NOTE E-SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company follows the guidance set forth by section 280-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for reporting and disclosure on operating segments of the Company. It also requires segment disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The Company determined that it did not have any separately reportable operating segments as of June 30, 2010.
NOTE F-INCOME TAXES
Due to the operating loss and the inability to recognize an income tax benefit there is no provision for current or deferred federal or state income taxes for year ended June 30, 2010
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used
for federal and state income tax purposes.
The Company’s total deferred tax asset, calculated using federal and state effective tax rates, as of June 30, 2010 is as follows:
The reconciliation of income taxes computed at the federal statutory income tax rate to total income taxes for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
Income tax computed at the federal statutory rate
34.0%
34.0%
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit
0.0%
0.0%
Total
34.0%
34.0%
Valuation allowance
-34.0%
-34.0%
Total deferred tax asset
0.0%
0.0%
Because of the Company’s lack of earnings history, the deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $3,605 and $2,890 for the years ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had a federal and state net operating loss carry forward in the amount of approximately $ 19,003 which expires in the year ending June 30, 2030.
STONECREST ONE, INC.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2010
NOTE G-CAPITAL STOCK
The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 common shares at $0.0001 par value per share.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued no common stock.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had the following common shares outstanding:
The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 preferred shares at $0.0001 per share.
During the years ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 the Company issued no preferred stock.
NOTE H-DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY
The Company is in the development stage as of June 30, 2010 and to date has had no significant operations. Recovery of the Company assets is dependent on future events, the outcome of which is indeterminable. In addition, successful completion of the Company’s development program and its transition, ultimately, to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon obtaining adequate financing to fulfill its development activities and achieving a level of sales adequate to support the Company’s cost structure.
NOTE I-NOTE PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTY & ACCRUED INTEREST
The Company has a signed a promissory note with a related party. The total amount of the unsecured loan is $8,295 at June 30, 2009, and bears interest at 8% per annum on demand. The interest accrued, but not paid, for the years ending June 30, 2010 and 2009 is $664 and $204, respectively. The interest accrued, but not paid from inception to June 30, 2010 is $868.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
On September 2, 2010, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission to disclose that it dismissed Traci J. Anderson, CPA’s (“TJA”) as its independent registered public accountants as of August 19, 2010, as required by Item 4.01. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant thereof (the “8-K”). TJA had audited our financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and 2009 and for the period from September 26, 2007 (date of inception) to June 30, 2009. In the 8-K, the Company also disclosed that it had engaged Bongiovanni & Associates, CPA’s (“B&A”) as its independent registered public accountants, effective September 6, 2010 (the “Engagement Date”), to (i) audit the financial statements of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2010 and for the period from January 22, 2008 (date of inception) to June 30, 2010 and (ii) re-audit the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009. There were no disagreements with TJA.
During the period from January 22, 2008 (date of inception) and through the Engagement Date, the Company has not consulted with B&A regarding either:
(1)
the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that B&A concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
(2)
any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the year covered by this Annual Report, management performed, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer, who is our Principal Financial Officer, and who we refer to in this Annual Report as our PEO, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our PEO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on this evaluation, our PEO has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2010 the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The table sets forth information as of the date of this report with respect to our management:
Name
Age
Title
George C. Critz, III
President, Secretary and Director
George Critz, III has been the President and Secretary of the Company since inception. Since August 2007, Mr. Critz has acted as an independent consultant and business advisor for Gamma Services LLC where he engages in the design and implementation of growth strategies for small to mid-range companies. From October 2006 to August 2007, he was employed by Lending Tree as an Agent Network Consultant and was an integral part of a team that built and established an agent network of real estate professionals across the country. In August 1998, Mr. Critz founded World On Hold, an on-hold marketing and advertising company, which he built into an industry leader, with hundreds of clients nationwide and supervised all sales efforts and general and administrative aspects of the company. In 2007, he brokered a successful merger of World On Hold. Mr. Critz also serves as the corporate secretary of Shatrusen, Inc., a shell company with a business purpose identical to ours that registered its class of common stock under the Exchange Act in April 2008.
The term of office of our director expires at the Company's annual meeting of stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Our director is not compensated for serving as such. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Shell Company Experience
As indicated below, Mr. Critz, our sole officer, director and stockholder, serves as an officer and director and owns shares of capital stock of another shell company identified in the following table:
Conflicts of Interest
In view of his current involvement with another shell company and his right to become involved in the future with other companies that have a business purpose similar to ours, there exists the possibility for conflicts of interest. Potential investors should be aware of the following:
·
In the course of his other business activities, our officer and director may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as for other shell companies with which he is affiliated, which would result in a conflict of interest in determining to which shell company a particular business opportunity should be presented.
In general, officers and directors of a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada are required to present business opportunities to a corporation if:
·
the opportunity is within the corporation's line of business; and
Accordingly, as a result of multiple business affiliations, our officer and director may have similar legal obligations with respect to presenting business opportunities meeting the above-listed criteria to multiple entities. In addition, conflicts of interest may arise when our board evaluates a particular business opportunity with respect to the above-listed criteria. We cannot assure you that any conflicts that may arise will be resolved in our favor. Under Nevada law and our articles of incorporation, our board of directors has the power to renounce in advance, our interest or expectancy in specified business opportunities or specified classes or categories of business opportunities that are presented to us or to any of our officer, director or stockholder and may from time to time do so. Neither our Company nor the other public shell company with which our officer and director is affiliated has adopted any policy with respect to resolving any conflict of interest that may arise between the companies and it is possible that any conflict may not be resolved in our favor.
Section 16 Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange requires officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities of a company that has a class of common stock registered under the Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish us with copies of all forms filed pursuant to Section 16(a).
Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations from our sole officer and director that no other reports were required, to our knowledge, we believe that our sole officer and director and stockholder required to file reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act did not file any of the report he was required to under 16(a) during the last fiscal year.
Code of Ethics.
The Company has not adopted a code of ethics. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires a code of ethics at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will adopt a code of ethics that will be suitable for its operations after the Company consummates a Business Combination.
Audit Committee.
The board of directors has not established an audit committee nor adopted an audit committee charter, rather, the entire board of directors serves the functions of an audit committee. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires an audit committee at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will make a determination as to whether to establish an audit committee and to adopt an audit committee charter that will be suitable for its operations after the Company consummates a Business Combination.
Stockholder Communications.
The board of directors has not adopted a process for security holders to send communications to the board of directors. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires a process for security holders to send communications to the board of directors at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will establish such a process that will be appropriate for its operations after the Company consummates a Business Combination.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The Company has not paid any compensation to any person since inception and will not pay any compensation until it affects a Business Combination, at which time compensation shall be in the discretion of then current management. Current management expects to devote only such time to the affairs of the Company as required to affect the Company’s business plan.
The Company has not adopted any retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs for the benefit of its employees.
The Company does not have a compensation committee. Given the nature of the Company’s business, its limited stockholder base and the current composition of management, the board of directors does not believe that the Company requires a compensation committee at this time. The board of directors takes the position that management of a Target Business will take such action to establish and seat a compensation committee that will be suitable for its operations at such time as the Company consummates a Business Combination, if ever.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth, as of November 10, 2010, the number of shares of common stock owned of record and beneficially by our executive officer and director and holders of 10% or more of outstanding shares of our common stock:
The calculation of the percentage of stock owned in the following table is based on 1,000,000 shares outstanding as of November 10, 2010. The Company does not have outstanding any options, warrants or other rights outstanding that are exercisable for or convertible into shares of capital stock.
(1) The address for each of the persons named in the table above is c/o the Company.
(2) Represents shares owned by Enverdia LLC, an entity in which Dayna Critz, the wife of George C. Critz, III, our sole director and officer, is the managing director and owns 90% of the outstanding interests. George Critz, III owns 9% of the outstanding interests in the entity. See note 6 to the table, below.
(3) This entity is controlled by Mark Radford.
(4) This entity is controlled by Anna C. Rubin.
(5) This entity is controlled by Forrest W. Garvin.
(6) As described in note 2 to the table, Dayna Critz, the wife of George C. Critz, III, our sole director and officer, is the managing director and owns 90% of the outstanding interests. George Critz, III owns 9% of the outstanding interests in the entity.Compensation PlansWe have not adopted any compensation plans for the benefit of our employees, representatives or consultants.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Related Party Transactions.
The Company utilizes office space provided free of charge by Mr. Critz. The Company will continue to maintain its offices at this location until the consummation of a Business Combination, if ever.
Since inception, the Company has borrowed an aggregate of $8,295 from Stonecrest Strategic Capital, LLC, which is evidenced by a promissory note which is payable on demand with interest calculated at the rate of 8% per annum. The proceeds from the loans have been utilized by the Company to cover the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the organization of the Company, the registration of its class of common stock under the Exchange Act, the preparation and filing of Exchange Act reports and the target entity selection and the due diligence process.
Director Independence.
The Company has not established its own definition for determining whether its directors and nominees for directors are “independent” nor has it adopted any other standard of independence employed by any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system.
Current management cannot predict whether incoming management of a Target Business upon the consummation of a Business Combination, if such transaction occurs, will adopt a definition of “independence” or establish any committees of the board, such as an audit committee, a compensation committee or nominating committee.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
AUDIT FEES. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Bongiovanni & Associates,, CPA’s for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements for the fiscal years ending on June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were $2,100 and $1,500, respectively. In addition, Traci J. Anderson, CPA’s (“TJA”) has the charged the Company the sum of $2,500 in connection with the audit of the 2009 financial statements; however, upon the revocation of that firm’s registration by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Company is not entitled to rely upon TJA’s audit report for 2009, necessitating the re-audit of the 2009 financial statements by Bongiovanni & Associates,, CPA’s. The aggregate fees billed for professional fees rendered in connection with the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were $1,500 and $1,500, respectively.
AUDIT-RELATED FEES. We did not pay any audit related fees paid to our accountants for either of the past two fiscal years. Audit-related fees generally include fees in support of the Company's filing of registration statements with the SEC and similar matters.
TAX FEES. We did not pay any tax fees to our accountant for either of the past two fiscal years.
ALL OTHER FEES. We did not pay any fees billed for services rendered for the past two fiscal years to our accountants, other than the fees for audit services referenced above.PRE-APPROVAL POLICY. The Company has not established an audit committee nor adopted an audit committee charter. Rather, it is the responsibility of the entire board of directors to serve the functions of an audit committee and to pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors, such approval to take place in advance of such services when required by law, regulation, or rule, subject to the de minimus exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act that are approved by the board prior to completion of the audit.
PART IV
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Financial Statements
The following financial statements are filed as part of this report:
Independent Auditor’s Report
Balance Sheet for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Statement of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and cumulative since inception (March 5, 2008)
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and cumulative since inception (March 5, 2008)
Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and cumulative since inception (March 5, 2008)
Notes to Financial Statements
(b) Exhibits.
The following are filed as exhibits to this report:
1.
Incorporated by reference to the registrant's registration statement on Form 10 as filed with the SEC on July 3, 2008.
2. Filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on November 18, 2010.
STONECREST ONE, INC.
By: /s/ George C. Critz, III
George C. Critz, III, President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on November 19, 2010.
Signature
Title
/s/ George C. Critz, III
George C. Critz, III
President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer. Principal Accounting Officer and Director