Item 1. Business
Company Overview and History
Nuvera is a diversified communications company headquartered in New Ulm, Minnesota with more than 114 years of experience in the local telephone exchange and communications business. We operate in one principal business segment: the Communications Segment.
Our principal line of business is the operation of six local telephone companies or incumbent local exchange carriers (ILEC) and the operation of two competitive local exchange carriers (CLEC) telephone companies. Our original business was founded in 1905 and consisted of the operation of a single ILEC (New Ulm Rural Telephone Company). In 1984, we changed our name to New Ulm Telecom, Inc. In 1986, we acquired our second ILEC, Western Telephone Company (WTC). In 1993, we acquired our third ILEC, Peoples Telephone Company (PTC). In 2008, we acquired our fourth ILEC, Hutchinson Telephone Company (HTC). In 2012, we acquired our fifth ILEC, Sleepy Eye Telephone Company (SETC). In 2018, we acquired our sixth ILEC, Scott-Rice Telephone Co. (Scott-Rice). Our businesses consist of connecting customers to our state-of-the-art, fiber-rich communications network, providing managed services, switched service and dedicated private lines, connecting customers to long distance service providers and providing many other services associated with our businesses. Our businesses also provide Internet protocol television (IPTV), cable television services (CATV), Internet access services, including high-speed broadband access, and long distance service. We also install and maintain communications systems to the areas in and around our service territories in southern Minnesota and northern Iowa. In 2002, we formed a CLEC in the city of Redwood Falls, Minnesota and acquired our second CLEC in 2008 with the acquisition of HTC. This CLEC operates in and around the city of Litchfield, Minnesota. In 2010, we acquired the cable TV system in the city of Glencoe and operate Glencoe under the Litchfield CLEC. Our CLECs offer the same services as our ILECs. In 2000, we changed our marketing name to NU-Telecom and operated under that name in our markets. In 2018, we changed our marketing name to Nuvera and currently operate under that name in our markets.
Recent Business Developments
On July 31, 2018, the Company announced that it had completed its acquisition of Scott-Rice from Allstream Business U.S., LLC, an affiliate of Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. (Zayo) for approximately $42 million in cash. Scott-Rice provides voice, video and Internet services with more than 18,000 connections, serving the communities of Prior Lake, Savage, Elko and New Market, Minnesota. The combined Nuvera/Scott-Rice Company had approximately 66,000 connections. Nuvera financed the acquisition with its principal lender CoBank, ACB (CoBank). Further information regarding the CoBank loan terms and amounts can be found on the Company’s 8-K filed with the SEC on August 3, 2018.
Our operations are currently conducted through the following subsidiaries:
Communications Segment
● ILECs:
▪ Nuvera Communications, Inc., the parent company;
▪ Hutchinson Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Peoples Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Scott-Rice Telephone Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Sleepy Eye Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Western Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
● CLECs:
▪ Nuvera, located in Redwood Falls, Minnesota; and
▪ Hutchinson Telecommunications, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of HTC, located in Litchfield and Glencoe, Minnesota;
● Our investments and interests in several of the following entities include some management responsibilities:
▪ FiberComm, LC - 20.00% subsidiary equity ownership interest. FiberComm, LC is located in Sioux City, Iowa;
▪ Broadband Visions, LLC (BBV) - 24.30% subsidiary equity ownership interest. BBV provides video headend and Internet services;
▪ Independent Emergency Services, LLC (IES) - 14.29% subsidiary equity ownership interest. IES is a provider of E-911 services to the State of Minnesota as well as a number of counties located in Minnesota; and
▪ SM Broadband, LLC (SMB) - 10.00% subsidiary equity ownership interest. SMB provides network connectivity for regional businesses.
We report the business operations of our six ILECs and two CLECs and their associated services as a single segment that we refer to as the Communications Segment.
The Communications Segment operates the following ILECs: Nuvera, HTC, PTC, Scott-Rice, SETC and WTC and two CLECs located in the cities of Redwood Falls, Litchfield and Glencoe, Minnesota. Nuvera, HTC, Scott-Rice, SETC and WTC are independent telephone companies that are regulated by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission at the state level, while PTC is an independent telephone company that is regulated by the Iowa Utilities Board at the state level. Our two CLECs are currently not under the same level of regulatory oversight as our ILECs. As of December 31, 2019 we served 25,159 access lines in the Minnesota communities of Bellechester, Courtland, Elko, Evan, Goodhue, Hanska, Hutchinson, Klossner, Litchfield, Mazeppa, New Market, New Ulm, Prior Lake, Redwood Falls, Sanborn, Savage, Searles, Sleepy Eye, Springfield and White Rock, as well as the adjacent rural areas of Blue Earth, Brown, Goodhue, McLeod, Meeker, Nicollet, Redwood, Rice, Scott and Wabasha counties in south central Minnesota. We also serve the community of Aurelia, Iowa as well as the adjacent rural areas surrounding Aurelia. The Communications Segment also operates multiple IPTV and CATV systems in Minnesota (including the cities of Cologne, Courtland, Elko, Glencoe, Goodhue, Hanska, Hutchinson, Litchfield, Mayer, New Market, New Germany, New Ulm, Plato, Prior Lake, Redwood Falls, Sanborn, Savage, Sleepy Eye and Springfield) and one IPTV system in Aurelia, Iowa. These systems serve 11,635 customers.
The Communications Segment derives its principal revenues from (i) local service charges to its residential and business subscribers, (ii) access charges to Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) for providing the carriers access to our local phone networks and (iii) the provisioning of video and data services.
Neither our ILECs nor CLECs are dependent upon any single customer or small group of customers. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated revenues in any of the last two years.
We provide a variety of business communication services to small, medium and large business customers, including many services over our advanced fiber network. The services we offer include scalable high speed broadband Internet access and voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) phone services, which range from basic service plans to virtual hosted systems. Our hosted VoIP package utilizes our soft switching technology and enables our customers to have the flexibility of employing new telephone advances and features without investing in a new telephone system. This package bundles local service, calling features, IP business telephones and unified messaging, which integrates multiple technologies into a single system and allows the customer to receive and listen to voice messages through e-mail.
In addition to Internet and VoIP services, we also offer a variety of commercial data connectivity services in select markets including private line and Ethernet services to provide high bandwidth across point-to-point and multiple site networks.
We receive the majority of our revenues through the following sources:
Local Service - We receive recurring revenue for basic local services that enable end-user customers to make and receive telephone calls within a defined local calling area for a flat monthly fee. In addition to subscribing to basic local telephone services, our customers may choose from multiple service plans with a variety of custom calling features such as call waiting, call forwarding, caller identification and voicemail. Our VoIP digital phone service is also available as an alternative to the traditional telephone line.
Network Access - We provide access services to other communications carriers for the use of our facilities to terminate or originate long distance calls on our network. Additionally, we bill monthly subscriber line charges (SLCs) to substantially all of our customers for access to the public switched network. These monthly SLCs are regulated and approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In addition, network access revenue is derived from several federally administered pooling arrangements designed to provide support and distribute funding to us.
Video - We provide a variety of enhanced video services on a monthly recurring basis to our customers. Depending on geographical market availability, our video services range from limited basic service to advanced digital TV, which includes several plans each with hundreds of local, national music channels including premium and pay-per-view channels as well as video-on-demand service. Certain customers may also subscribe to our advanced video services, which consist of high-definition (HD) TV, digital video recorders (DVR) and Whole Home DVR. Our Whole Home DVR allows customers the ability to watch recorded shows on any TV in the house, record multiple shows at one time and utilize an intuitive on-screen guide and user interface. Video subscribers also have access to our TV Everywhere service which allows subscriber access to full episodes of available shows, movies and live screens using a computer or mobile device. We also receive monthly recurring revenue from our subscribers for providing commercial TV programming in competition with local CATV, satellite dish TV and off-air TV service providers. We serve twenty-two communities with our IPTV services and five communities with our CATV services.
Data - We provide high speed Internet access to business and residential customers depending on the nature of the network facilities that are available, the level of service selected and the location. Our revenue is earned based on the offering of various flat rate packages based on the level of service, data speeds and features. We also provide e-mail and managed services, such as web hosting and design, on-line file back up and on-line file storage.
Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-Cam)/Federal Universal Service Fund (FUSF) - Prior to 2017, we received FUSF funding from the FCC. FUSF funding was established to overcome geographical differences in costs of providing voice service and to enable all citizens to communicate over networks regardless of geographical location and/or personal income. In our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, Nuvera disclosed that we had elected the A-CAM for our Minnesota and Iowa operations, replacing our former legacy support. Nuvera will receive A-CAM support for a period of ten years in exchange for meeting defined broadband build-out requirements. On May 7, 2018, the FCC issued Public Notice DA 18-465, which contained revised offers of A-CAM support and associated revised service deployment obligations. See below for a discussion regarding A-CAM and FUSF.
With the acquisition of Scott-Rice on July 31, 2018, see Note 4 - “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” Nuvera now receives FUSF support for Scott-Rice. The remainder of the Company receives funding from A-CAM. Scott-Rice’s settlements from the National Exchange Carriers Association (NECA) pools are based on nationwide average schedules.
Other - Our customers are billed for toll and long-distance services on either a per call or flat-rate basis. This also includes the offering of directory assistance, operator service and long distance private lines. We also generate revenue from directory publishing, sales and service of customer premise equipment (CPE), bill processing and other customer services. Our directory publishing revenue in our telephone directories recurs monthly. We also provide retail sales and service of cellular phones and accessories through Telespire, a national wireless provider. We resell these wireless services as Nuvera Wireless, our branded product. We receive both recurring revenue for our wireless services, as well as revenue collected for the sale of wireless phones and accessories.
Strategy
Our vision is to position ourselves as a “one-stop” communications solutions provider. We believe our customers place a value on the fact that we are a local company whose goal is to meet their total communications needs. The success of this vision depends on the following strategies:
· We market services to our residential customers either individually or as a bundled package. We offer a competitive, multi-service bundle of voice, high-speed Internet and IPTV. Data connections continue to increase as a result of consumer trends towards increased Internet usage and our enhanced product and service offerings.
· Our consumer broadband speed allows us to continue to meet the needs of our customers and the demand for higher speed resulting from the growing trend of over-the-top content viewing. The availability of faster speeds also complements our wireless home networking (Wi-Fi) and supports our TV everywhere service and allows our subscribers to watch their favorite programs at home or away on a computer, smartphone or tablet.
· We tailor our services to commercial customers by developing solutions to fit their specific needs. We provide services to a wide range of commercial customers from sole proprietors and other small businesses to multi-location corporations. Our business suite of services includes local and long-distance calling plans, hosted voice services using network servers, the added capacity for multiple phone lines, scalable broadband Internet, online back up and business directory listings.
· We believe that we have several advantages over our competition, including a state-of-the-art, fiber-rich communications network, competitive pricing and costs, outstanding service quality, a strong reputation, a high level of commitment to the communities we serve and a direct billing relationship with a vast majority of the customers we serve in our service territories. We manage the potential decline in communications network access and local service revenues by offering value-added services such as higher Internet speeds, HD IPTV, DVR services, managed services, customized communications solutions, along with outstanding customer service as a competitive differentiator.
· We have and will continue to upgrade our networks and enhance our products and services to take advantage of the latest technology including advanced high-bandwidth capabilities and services, expansion of our network for wholesale and retail customers, Fiber-to-the-Tower services for wireless carriers and last mile fiber builds to residential and business customers. We intend to continue to introduce new services that draw upon our core competencies and we believe are attractive to our target customers. In considering new services, we look for market opportunities that we believe present growth opportunities.
· We continue to seek ways to improve our internal processes and gain operational efficiencies. While focusing resources on revenue growth and market share gains, we continually challenge our management team and employees at all levels to seek efficiencies and enhance our customers’ experience. We continue to invest in our networks and train our employees to achieve customer service excellence.
· Our current customer base provides a recurring revenue stream generating stable cash flow. Our focus remains on growing our services and supporting product lines so as to generate sufficient cash flow to fund our current operations, service our debt, fund our capital expenditure needs, pay dividends and expand our business. We have allocated resources to maintain and upgrade our network while focusing on optimizing returns by completing strategic capital outlays that will make our network more efficient and cost effective while providing the products and services that our customers desire in the markets we serve.
· We intend to continue to pursue a disciplined process of evaluating acquisitions of businesses as well as organic growth opportunities of market expansion and/or products which are complementary to our business portfolio.
Competition
We compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive industry, and expect competition will continue to intensify as consolidations and mergers occur within the industry. Regulatory developments and technological advances over the past several years have increased opportunities for alternative communications service providers, which in turn have increased competitive pressures on our business. These alternative providers often face fewer regulations and have lower cost structures than we do. In addition, several of our competitors have consolidated with other communication providers and as a result are generally larger, have more financial and business resources and have greater geographical reach to provide services. Our competitive advantages include: our strong commitment and presence in the communities we serve, knowledge of these markets, our experienced local service and support team, and our ability to offer more flexible communications solutions than our larger competitors.
The long-range effect of competition on the delivery of communications services and equipment will depend on technological advances, regulatory actions at both the federal and the state levels, court decisions, and possible additional future federal and state legislation. Past federal and state legislation have tended to expand competition in the communications industry.
Alternatives to our service include customers leasing private line switched voice and data services in or adjacent to our service territories that permit the bypassing of our communications facilities. In addition, microwave transmission services, wireless communications, fiber-optic/coaxial cable deployment, VoIP, satellite and other services also permit the bypassing of our local exchange network. These alternatives to local exchange service represent a potential threat to our long-term ability to provide local exchange services at economical rates.
In order to meet the competition present in our industry, our businesses have deployed new technology to enable our local exchange networks to capture operating efficiencies and to provide additional new services to our new and existing customer base. These new technologies include the latest release of digital switching technology for all of our switches and the installation of a Common Channel Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) out-of-band system for all of our access lines. Our businesses have also connected fiber rings (redundant route designs that allow traffic to be re-routed in the event of network problems) that protect our local networks and enable them to provide a reliable level of service to our customers. The value of our local network is also enhanced by the ability of our operating companies to offer access to high-speed Internet with broadband access to our access lines. Broadband technology allows customer access to high-speed Internet and traditional voice connectivity over the same connection. In addition, our businesses have further enhanced our networks to allow the offering of video services over the same facilities that provide our customers with voice and Internet access. This technology is available to approximately 94% of our access lines.
We compete as a CLEC in the cities of Redwood Falls, Litchfield and Glencoe, Minnesota. Our two CLECs are currently not under the same level of regulatory oversight as our ILECs. CenturyLink is the existing ILEC in these markets. Competition also exists in the other communities and areas served by our businesses for traditional telephone service from wireless communications providers and we also expect competition to increase from service providers offering VoIP. We experience competition in the Minnesota communities of Elko, Glencoe, Hutchinson, Litchfield, New Market, New Ulm, Prior Lake, Redwood Falls, Savage, Sleepy Eye and Springfield in the provisioning of video services. Comcast is the existing incumbent provider of video services in the New Ulm market. Mediacom is the existing incumbent provider of video services in the Elko, Hutchinson, Litchfield, New Market, Prior Lake, Redwood Falls, Savage, Sleepy Eye and Springfield markets. Several other communications providers compete with us in our markets in providing Internet services. Our businesses have responded to these competitive pressures by creating active programs to market our products, bundle our services and enhance our infrastructure to create higher customer value.
We are experiencing competition for some of our other services from IXCs, such as customer billing services, dedicated private lines and network switching. The provisioning of these services is contractual in nature and is primarily directed by the IXCs. Other services, such as directory advertising, operator services and cellular communications are open to competition, based primarily on service and customer experience.
Materials and Supplies
The materials and supplies that are necessary for the operation of our businesses are available from a variety of sources. We are not dependent on any particular supplier or group of affiliated suppliers for our equipment needs.
Regulation
The following summary provides a high-level overview, but may not include all present and proposed federal, state and local legislation and regulations affecting the communications industry. Some legislation and other regulations are currently the subject of judicial proceedings, legislative hearings and administrative proposals that could change the manner in which this industry operates. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of any of these developments or their potential impact on us. Regulation can change rapidly in the communications industry and these changes could have an adverse effect on us in the future.
Overview
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), rules and regulations of the SEC and, where applicable, conform to the accounting principles as prescribed by federal and state telephone utility regulatory authorities.
The services we offer are subject to varying levels of regulatory oversight. Federal and state regulatory agencies share responsibility for enforcing statutes and rules relative to the provision of communications services. Our interstate communications services are subject to regulation by the FCC. Intrastate services are governed by the relevant state regulatory commission. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TA96) and the rules enacted under it also gave oversight of interconnection arrangements and access to network elements to the state commissions. Our TV services are governed by FCC rules and municipal franchise agreements. There are also varying levels of regulatory oversight depending on the nature of the services offered or if the services are offered by an ILEC or CLEC.
Our CLEC businesses provide services with less regulatory oversight than our ILEC companies. A company must file for CLEC or interexchange authority to operate with the appropriate public utility commission in each state it serves. Our CLECs provide a variety of services to both residential and business customers in multiple jurisdictions.
Federal Regulatory Framework
All carriers must comply with the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (FCA34) as amended that requires, among other things, that our interstate services be provided at just and reasonable rates and on non-discriminatory terms and conditions. The TA96 amended the FCA34 and has had a dramatic effect on the competitive environment in the communications industry. In addition to these laws, we are also subject to rules promulgated by the FCC and could be affected by any regulatory decisions or orders they issue.
The TA96 and Local Competition
The primary goal of the TA96 and the FCC’s rules promulgated under it was to open local communications markets to competition while enhancing universal service. To some extent, Congress pre-empted the local authority of states to oversee local communications services.
The TA96 imposes a number of requirements on all local communications providers including:
· To interconnect directly or indirectly with other carriers;
· To allow others to resell services;
· To provide for number portability to allow end-users to retain their telephone number when changing providers;
· To ensure dialing parity;
· To ensure that competitor customers have non-discriminatory access to telephone numbers, operator services, directory assistance and directory listing services; and
· To allow competitors access to telephone poles, ducts, conduits and rights-of-way, and to establish reciprocal compensation arrangements for the transport and termination of communications traffic.
Access Charges
Access charges refer to the compensation received by local exchange carriers (LECs) for the use of their networks by an IXC. We provide two types of access services: special access and switched access. Special access is provided through dedicated circuits that connect other carriers to our network and is structured on a flat monthly fee basis. Switched access rates that are billed to other carriers are based on a per-minute of use fee basis. The FCC regulates prices that our businesses charge for interstate access charges. There has been a trend toward lowering the rates charged to carriers accessing local networks and the application of a SLC as a flat rate on end-user bills. Regulation, competition, carriers optimizing their network costs and lower demand for dedicated lines have resulted in lower access rates and overall lower minutes of use on our network, which has affected our network access revenues.
Interstate access rates are established by the nationwide pooling of companies known as NECA. The FCC established NECA in 1983 to develop and administer interstate access service rates, terms and conditions. Revenues are pooled and redistributed on the basis of each company’s actual or average costs. There has been a change in the composition of interstate access charges in recent years, shifting more of the charges to the end user and reducing the amount of access charges paid by IXCs. We believe this trend will continue.
Access rates are filed with the regulatory commissions in Minnesota and Iowa.
Wireline Interstate
Our ILEC companies participated in the NECA common line pool where end-user common line funds collected were pooled. A portion of our ILEC revenue was based on settlements distributed from this pool. Our ILEC companies also participated in the NECA traffic-sensitive pool. These pool settlements were adjusted periodically.
Access rates for CLECs were established according to an order issued by the FCC in 2001. Under that order, the switched access rates charged by a competitive carrier can be no higher than the rates charged by the ILEC with whom the CLEC competes, unless the CLEC qualifies for the Rural Exemption.
Intercarrier Compensation and FUSF Reform
The FCC released the National Broadband Plan in April 2010 recommending significant changes to the access charge policy and processes. This was followed on November 18, 2011, by FCC Order 11-161 (the Transformation Order), with comprehensive rules reforming all forms of intercarrier compensation and implementing a new support mechanism for the deployment of broadband. Generally, the intercarrier compensation reform sets forth a path towards a “bill & keep” regime which eliminates compensation for termination of traffic received from another carrier. The timeline for this transition had numerous steps depending on the type of traffic exchanged and the regulated status of the affected LEC.
These rules have been clarified in several orders on Reconsideration and have had an impact on our companies by reducing our terminating intercarrier compensation, including intrastate and interstate access charges.
The FCC Transformation Order also confirmed the applicability of access charges on VoIP traffic and eliminated reciprocal compensation charges for termination of local wireless traffic. Despite these changes IXCs and others are still quite aggressive in disputing carrier access charges and/or the applicability of access charges to their traffic.
Due to the combination of rate reforms instituted by the FCC, competitive substitution by wireless and other carriers and decreased use of the switched network, the aggregate amount of interstate network access charges paid by long distance carriers to access providers such as our company, has decreased and we project that this decline will continue. For the year ended December 31, 2019, communications network access revenue represented 11.7% of our operating revenue, down from 12.6% for the year ended December 31, 2018. This excludes any funding received from FUSF and the A-CAM for broadband funding (see below for more information).
Federal Universal Service Fund
The FUSF was originally established to overcome geographic differences in costs of providing voice service and to enable all citizens to communicate over networks regardless of geographical location and/or personal income. The FCC established universal service policies at the national level under terms contained in the Telecommunications Act of 1934. The TA96 requires explicit FUSF mechanisms and enlarged the scope of universal service to include four distinct programs:
· High-Cost program that supports local carriers operating in high-cost regions of the country to ensure reasonably based telephone rates;
· Lifeline (low-income) Subscribers program that includes the Link Up and Lifeline programs that provide support for service initiation and monthly fees and have eligibility based on subscriber income;
· Rural Health Care Providers program that supports communication services used by rural health care providers and provides them with toll free access to an Internet service provider; and
· Schools and Libraries program, also called the E-Rate program that provides support funding to schools and libraries for communications services, Internet access and internal connections.
In its Transformation Order released November 18, 2011, the FCC adopted rules which dramatically reform the universal service program and intercarrier compensation regime. These rules eliminated the legacy Local Switching support, but also provide for a new Connect America Fund (CAF) support for rate of return carriers to make up some of their access revenue reductions and provide direct support to PriceCap carriers (i.e. the larger, national LECs such as Verizon and AT&T) for broadband build outs. The new rules have caused rates for end users to increase as intercarrier compensation is reduced and the legacy mandate for ubiquitous voice service shifts toward broadband availability as a key outcome of the program.
FUSF high-cost payments are distributed by NECA and are only available to carriers that have been designated as an eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) by a state commission. Each of our ILECs has been designated as an ETC. CLECs are also eligible to be designated as ETCs if they meet the requirements of the program and meet a public interest standard as determined by the appropriate state regulatory agency. Our CLECs are currently not receiving FUSF support. All ETCs must certify annually to the Universal Service Administrative Company or their appropriate state regulatory commission that the funds they receive from the FUSF are being used in the manner intended. The states must then certify to the FCC which carriers have met this standard. The Transformation Order expands the information that must be reported to the State Commissions to include information on broadband availability, plans for expansion to unserved and underserved areas, in addition to information about voice services. To some extent, these levels of scrutiny make the receipt of a consistent level of FUSF payments each year more difficult to predict.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we received an aggregate of $3,212,066 from FUSF, consisting of $1,696,443 of CAF support and $1,498,644 of Broadband Loop Support. In addition, we received $16,979 in true-ups for prior year disbursements from the Federal common line support funding mechanism. Our net FUSF in 2019 comprised 4.9% of our total revenue for the year. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we received an aggregate of $1,919,884 from FUSF, consisting of $1,475,748 of CAF support and $411,955 of Broadband Loop Support. In addition, we received $32,181 in true-ups to prior year disbursements from the Federal common line support funding mechanism. Our net FUSF in 2018 comprised 3.4% of our total revenue for the year. We receive no State universal service funding as the states in which we operate have not established state universal service funding mechanisms.
From January 1, 2017 through July 31, 2018 we did not receive funding from the FUSF based on the pooling and redistribution of revenues based on a company’s actual or average costs as described above, but instead, elected to receive funding based on the A-CAM as described below.
With the acquisition of Scott-Rice on July 31, 2018, see Note 4 - “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” Nuvera now receives FUSF support for Scott-Rice. The remainder of the Company receives funding from A-CAM as mentioned below. Scott-Rice’s settlements from the NECA pools are based on nationwide average schedules.
A-CAM
The FUSF was established as part of the TA96 and provides subsidies to communications providers as means of increasing the availability and affordability of advanced communications services. In 2011, significant reform was introduced, including the creation of the CAF, to help modernize the FUSF and promote support of these communications services in the nation’s high-cost areas. In 2016, the FCC announced additional reform to further transition the CAF from supporting the provision of voice services to the provision of broadband services. On March 30, 2016, the FCC issued a Report and Order (2016 Order) that adopts the following changes to the FUSF for rate-of-return carriers:
· Establishes a voluntary cost model;
· Creates specific broadband deployment obligations;
· Provides a mechanism for support of broadband-only deployment;
· Gradually reduces the authorized rate-of-return from 11.25 percent to 9.75 percent;
· Eliminates support in those local areas served by unsubsidized competitors;
· Establishes “glide-path” transition periods for all the new changes; and
· Maintains the $2 billion budget established by the 2011 Transformation Order.
While the 2011 FUSF Transformation Order established CAF Phase I and CAF Phase II as high-cost support mechanisms for the price-cap carriers (i.e., the larger, national LECs such as Verizon and AT&T), it was not as specific about how subsidies would change for the rate-of-return carriers (i.e., the smaller LECs, including all rural LECs). In contrast, the 2016 Order focused on the rate-of-return carriers, announced specific changes to existing funding mechanisms as well as a new funding mechanism, and provided rural communications providers with greater certainty about future support.
One of the major changes introduced by the 2016 Order was the creation of the A-CAM, a new CAF support mechanism for rate-of-return carriers. Utilization of the A-CAM was voluntary; and rate-of-return carriers may have instead chose to continue relying on the legacy support mechanism known as interstate common line support (ICLS), but then modified and renamed CAF Broadband Loop Support (CAF-BLS). Each carrier needed to decide which support mechanism to elect, and must have chosen one or the other, per state.
In our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, Nuvera disclosed that we had elected the A-CAM for our Minnesota and Iowa operations, replacing our former ICLS. Nuvera was eligible to receive A-CAM support for a period of ten years in exchange for meeting defined broadband build-out requirements. At the time of Nuvera’s election, the FCC had not yet determined the final award numbers.
Consistent with the stated disclosure in our Form 10-Q, Nuvera notified the FCC that we would continue to elect the A-CAM program. Under the report that accompanied the FCC December 20, 2016 Public Notice, Nuvera would annually receive (i) $391,896 for our Iowa operations and (ii) $6,118,567 for our Minnesota operations. The Company used the annual $6.5 million that it received through the A-CAM program to meet our defined broadband build-out obligations, which the Company is currently completing. These A-CAM payments replaced the Company’s former ICLS payments.
On May 7, 2018, the FCC issued Public Notice DA 18-465, which contained revised offers of A-CAM support and associated revised service deployment obligations.
On May 23, 2018, the Company’s BOD authorized and directed the Company to accept the FCC’s revised offer of A-CAM support and the revised associated service deployment obligations. Under the revised FCC offer Notice, the Company was entitled to annually receive (i) $489,870 for its Iowa operations, which was a $97,974 increase per year and (ii) $7,648,208 for its Minnesota operations, which was a $1,529,641 increase per year. The Company used the additional support that it received through the A-CAM program to continue to meet its defined broadband build-out obligations, which the Company is currently completing. A letter of acceptance to elect the revised A-CAM support was filed by the Company with the FCC on May 24, 2018. The FCC accepted the Company’s letter on May 30, 2018. On August 31, 2018 the Company received approximately $3.12 million for the revised A-CAM support. This represented an 18-month true-up for support back to the original election date, and an increased monthly payment representing the new revised A-CAM support offer.
On February 25, 2019, the FCC issued Public Notice DA 19-115, which contained revised offers of A-CAM support and associated revised service deployment obligations.
On February 27, 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized and directed the Company to accept the FCC’s revised offer of A-CAM support and the revised associated service deployment obligations. Under the revised FCC offer Notice, the Company will be entitled to annually receive (i) $596,084 for its Iowa operations, which was a $106,214 increase per year and (ii) $8,354,481 for its Minnesota operations, which was a $706,273 increase per year. The Company will receive the revised A-CAM offer over the next 10 years starting in 2019. The Company will use the additional support that it receives through the A-CAM program to continue to meet its defined broadband build-out obligations, which the Company is currently completing. A letter of acceptance to elect the revised A-CAM support was filed by the Company with the FCC on March 8, 2019. The FCC accepted the Company’s letter on March 11, 2019. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company received a true-up payment for support back to January 1, 2019 and an increased monthly payment representing the new revised A-CAM support offer.
Privacy and Data Security Regulation
The FCA34 generally restricts the nonconsensual collection and disclosure to third parties of communication company customers’ personally identifiable information by communication companies, except for rendering service, conducting legitimate business activities related to the service, and responding to legal requests. We are also subject to various state and federal regulations that provide protections for customer proprietary network information (CPNI) related to our voice services. The FCC expects broadband Internet access service providers such as us to take reasonable, good faith steps to comply with existing statutory requirements to protect broadband CPNI and plans to propose new privacy and data security rules for broadband Internet service providers. The FCC has recently imposed substantial civil penalties and remediation obligations on several companies for alleged privacy and data security violations.
The Federal Trade Commission exercises authority over privacy protections, generally, using its existing authority over unfair and deceptive acts or practices to apply greater restrictions on the collection and use of personally identifiable and other information relating to customers. It also has undertaken numerous enforcement actions against parties that do not provide sufficient security protections against the loss of unauthorized disclosure of this type of information. We also are subject to stringent data security and data retention requirements on website operators and online services. Other privacy-oriented laws have been extended by courts to online video providers and are increasingly being used in privacy lawsuits, including class actions, against providers of video materials online.
We are also subject to state and federal laws and regulations regarding data security that primarily apply to sensitive personal information that could be used to commit identity theft. Most states have security breach notification laws that generally require a business to give notice to consumers and government agencies when certain information has been disclosed, due to a security breach, and the FCC has adopted security breach rules for voice services. Several states have also enacted general data security requirements to safeguard consumer information, including the proper disposal of consumer information.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology, in cooperation with other federal agencies and owners and operators of United States critical infrastructure, have developed a voluntary framework that provides a prioritized, flexible, repeatable, performance-based and cost-effective approach to cybersecurity risk. It is compendiums of existing cross-sector cyber-defense processes, practices and protocols that can help companies identify, assess and manage their cyber risks and vulnerabilities, and several governmental agencies have encouraged compliance with this framework. Additionally, in December 2015, Congress enacted the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, which is intended to encourage and facilitate the sharing of security threat and defensive measure information with government agencies and other companies, in order to strengthen the country’s overall cybersecurity protections. Finally, there are pending legislative proposals that could impose new requirements on owners and operators of critical infrastructure and the FCC is considering expanding its cybersecurity guidelines or adopting new cybersecurity requirements.
Network Architecture and Technology
We have made significant investments in our technologically advanced communications networks and continue to enhance and expand our network by deploying technologies to provide additional capacity to our customers. As a result, we are able to deliver high-quality, reliable data, video and voice services in the markets we serve. Our wide-ranging network and extensive use of fiber provide an easy reach into existing and new areas. By bringing the fiber network closer to the customer premises, we can increase our service offerings, quality and bandwidth services. Our existing network enables us to efficiently respond and adapt to changes in technology and is capable of supporting the rising customer demand for bandwidth in order to support the growing amount of wireless data devices in our customer’s homes and businesses.
Our networks are supported by advanced switches, with a fiber network connecting our exchanges. We continue to enhance our copper network to increase bandwidth in order to provide additional products and services to our marketable homes. In addition to our copper plant enhancements, we have deployed fiber-optic cable extensively throughout our network, resulting in a 100% fiber backbone network that supports all of the inter-office and host-remote links. In addition, this fiber infrastructure provides the connectivity required to provide video service, Internet and long-distance services to residential and commercial customers. Our fiber network utilizes fiber-to-the-home and fiber-to-the-node networks to offer bundled residential and commercial services.
We operate fiber networks which we own for fiber network access. At December 31, 2019, our fiber-optic network consisted of approximately 1,839 route miles, including 869 transport route miles and 970 local route miles.
Through our extensive fiber network, we are also able to support the increased demand on wireless carriers for data bandwidth. In all the markets we serve, we have launched initiatives to support fiber backhaul services to cell sites.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, storage, disposal of, and exposure to, hazardous materials, the release of pollutants into the environment and the remediation of contamination. We could be subject to environmental laws that impose liability for the entire cost of cleanup at a contaminated site, regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the activity that resulted in contamination. We believe that our operations are in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.
Employees
As of March 1, 2020 we had 187 full-time equivalent employees dedicated to Nuvera’s operations. In addition, as of March 1, 2020 we had an additional 10 full-time equivalent employees that are employed by Nuvera but are dedicated to IES. IES is a minority equity subsidiary of Nuvera and Nuvera acts as the managing entity for IES.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual property is necessary for the operation of our business but not material to the operation of our business.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The names and ages of all our executive officers and the positions held by them as of March 1, 2020, are as follows:
Our executive officers are appointed annually and serve at the discretion of our BOD. Mr. Zerbe, President and CEO; Ms. Bornhoft, Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary; and Mr. Kawlewski, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer have written employment contracts. There are no familial relationships between any director and executive officers.
Mr. Zerbe has been President and CEO since September of 2019. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President of Sales for Frontier Communications Corporation until March 2019, where he held positions of increasing responsibility since joining Frontier in 2011. Prior to his employment with Frontier, Mr. Zerbe had more than 20 years of sales, marketing and management experience in the communications industry, with companies such as Spanlink, Cisco Systems, SBC, AT&T and IBM. Mr. Zerbe serves as Chairman of the Board for IES and BBV, all equity subsidiaries of ours. In addition, Mr. Zerbe serves on the Board of Governors of SMB and FiberComm, LC, also equity subsidiaries of ours.
Ms. Bornhoft has been Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary since 1998. Ms. Bornhoft has been employed with the Company since 1990. Ms. Bornhoft serves as a board member for BBV, in addition to serving as President for both IES and BBV, both equity subsidiaries of ours.
Mr. Kawlewski has been Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since 2009. Mr. Kawlewski also serves as the Treasurer for IES and BBV, both equity subsidiaries of ours.
Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Not required for a smaller reporting company.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not required for a smaller reporting company.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties
Our business is primarily focused on the provision of communication services and our properties are used primarily for administrative support and to house and safeguard our operating equipment. On December 31, 2019, our gross property, plant and equipment totaled $197,664,608 (net balance of $68,059,032).
Our corporate headquarters are located at 27 North Minnesota Street, New Ulm, Minnesota. We also own office facilities and related equipment for administrative personnel, central office buildings and operations in Minnesota and Iowa.
In addition to land and structures, our property consists of equipment necessary for the provision of communication services including central office equipment, CPE and connections, pole lines, towers, remote terminals, aerial and underground cable and wire facilities and associated outside plant for use in providing our services, telephone switches, fiber-optic networks and communications network equipment, vehicles, furniture and fixtures, computers and other equipment.
In addition to plant and equipment we wholly-own, we utilize poles, towers, cable and conduit systems jointly-owned with other entities and lease space on facilities to other entities. These arrangements are in accordance with written agreements customary in the industry. We also have appropriate easements, rights of way and other arrangements for the accommodation of our pole lines, underground conduits, aerial and underground cables and wires.
We believe our properties are suitable and adequate to provide modern and effective communications services within our service areas, including local dial-tone, long distance service, broadband, TV and dedicated and switched long-haul transport. We also believe our properties and equipment are adequately insured. See Note 8 - “Long-Term Debt” for descriptions of the mortgages and collateral relating to the above referenced properties. See Note 1 - “Business Description and Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 5 - “Property, Plant and Equipment” for a description of our depreciation policies and information relating to the above referenced properties and equipment and their respective depreciation.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Other than routine litigation incidental to our business, there are no pending material legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is subject.
Item 4.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace under the symbol "NUVR." As of March 1, 2020 there were 1,277 registered stockholders and approximately 896 beneficial owners of Nuvera stock.
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation restrict any one individual or entity from beneficially owning more than seven percent of the outstanding capital stock of the corporation. Specific details of this restriction are contained in Article III of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Repurchases of Nuvera common stock are made to support the Company’s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes. In May 2019, Nuvera announced the adoption of a $4.0 million stock repurchase program running through the end of 2021. Under the stock repurchase program, repurchases can be made from time to time using a variety of methods, including through open market purchase or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act)
Dividends and Restrictions
We declared a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share for the second, third and fourth quarters of 2019 and $0.12 per share for the first quarter of 2019, which totaled $674,092 per quarter for the third and fourth quarters, $674,805 for the second quarter and $621,031 for the first quarter. We declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share for the second, third and fourth quarters of 2018 and $0.10 per share for the first quarter of 2018, which totaled $621,032 for the fourth quarter, $621,030 per quarter for the second and third quarters and $516,007 for the first quarter. A quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per share will be paid on March 16, 2020 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 5, 2020.
We expect to continue to pay quarterly dividends during 2020, but only if and to the extent declared by our BOD on a quarterly basis and subject to various restrictions on our ability to do so (described below). Dividends on our common stock are not cumulative.
There are security and loan agreements underlying our current CoBank credit facility that contain restrictions on our distributions to stockholders and investment in, or loans, to others. See below and Note 7 - “Long-Term Debt” for additional information.
Our loan agreements include restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders. However, we are allowed to pay dividends (a) (i) in an amount up to $2,700,000 in any year if our “Total Leverage Ratio,” that is, the ratio of our “Indebtedness” to “EBITDA” (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization - as defined in the loan documents), is greater than 2.00 to 1.00, and (ii) in any amount if our Total Leverage Ratio is less than 2.00 to 1.00, and (b) in either case, if we are not in default or potential default under the loan agreements. Our current Total Leverage Ratio at December 31, 2019 is 2.18.
Our BOD reviews quarterly dividend declarations based on our anticipated earnings, capital requirements and our operating and financial conditions. The cash requirements of our current dividend payment practices are in addition to our other expected cash needs. Should our BOD determine a dividend will be declared, we expect we will have sufficient availability from our current cash flows from operations to fund our existing cash needs and the payment of our dividends. In addition, we expect we will have sufficient availability under our revolving credit facility to fund dividend payments in addition to any fluctuations in working capital and other cash needs.
Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not required for a smaller reporting company.
Item 7.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this report.
Overview
Nuvera has a state-of-the-art; fiber-rich communications network and offers a diverse array of communications products and services. Our businesses provide local telephone service and network access to other communications carriers for connections to our networks. In addition, we provide long distance service, broadband Internet access, video services, and managed and hosted solutions services.
Our operations consist primarily of providing services to customers for a monthly charge. Because many of these services are recurring in nature, backlog orders and seasonality are not significant factors. Our working capital requirements include financing the construction of our networks. We also require capital to maintain our networks and infrastructure; fund the payroll costs of our highly skilled labor force; maintain inventory to service capital projects, our network and our telephone equipment customers; pay dividends and provide for the carrying value of trade accounts receivable, some of which may take several months to collect in the normal course of business.
Executive Summary
Highlights:
· On August 29, 2019, the Company entered into a second interest rate swap agreement (IRSA) with CoBank covering an additional $42,000,000 of our aggregate indebtedness to CoBank at August 29, 2019. The swap effectively locked in a significant portion of our variable-rate debt through July 2025. Under this IRSA, we have changed the variable rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the IRSA, we pay a fixed contractual interest rate and (i) make an additional payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is below a contractual rate or (ii) receive a payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is above the contractual rate.
· On August 27, 2019, the Company announced that it had hired Glenn H. Zerbe as CEO of the Company effective Tuesday, September 3, 2019. Mr. Zerbe most recently served as Vice President of Sales for Frontier Communications Corporation, where he held positions of increasing responsibility since joining Frontier in 2011. Prior to his employment with Frontier, Mr. Zerbe had more than 20 years of sales, marketing and management experience in the communications industry, with companies such as Spanlink, Cisco Systems, SBC, AT&T and IBM. Mr. Zerbe replaced former CEO Bill D. Otis who announced his retirement on April 15, 2019. Mr. Otis’s actual retirement date was effective December 31, 2019. Mr. Otis will continue to provide consulting services to ensure a smooth and successful leadership transition. Mr. Otis will also continue to serve on the BOD after the effective date of his retirement. The Company recognized approximately $1.06 million of one-time expenses associated with the transition of the new CEO and payments to a former executive officer in 2019.
· On February 27, 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized and directed the Company to accept the FCC’s revised offer of A-CAM support and the revised associated service deployment obligations. Under the revised FCC offer Notice, the Company will be entitled to annually receive (i) $596,084 for its Iowa operations and (ii) $8,354,481 for its Minnesota operations. The Company will receive the revised A-CAM offer over the next 10 years starting in 2019. The Company will use the additional support that it receives through the A-CAM program to continue to meet its defined broadband build-out obligations, which the Company is currently completing. A letter of acceptance to elect the revised A-CAM support was filed by the Company with the FCC on March 8, 2019. The FCC accepted the Company’s letter on March 11, 2019. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company received a true-up payment for support back to January 1, 2019 and an increased monthly payment representing the new revised A-CAM support offer.
· On July 31, 2018, the Company announced that it had completed its acquisition of Scott-Rice from Zayo for approximately $42 million in cash. Scott-Rice provides voice, video and internet services with more than 18,000 connections, serving the communities of Prior Lake, Savage, Elko and New Market, Minnesota. The combined Nuvera-Scott-Rice company had approximately 66,000 connections. Nuvera financed the acquisition with its principal lender, CoBank. Further information regarding the CoBank loan terms and amounts can be found on the Company’s 8-K filed with the SEC on August 3, 2018.
· Effective June 4, 2018, New Ulm Telecom, Inc. changed its name to Nuvera Communications, Inc. The Company had announced the pending name change at its 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 24, 2018. Concurrent with the June 4, 2018 name change, the ticker symbol for the Company’s common stock on the OTCQB Marketplace became NUVR.
· Net income in 2019 totaled $8,329,979, which was a $566,060, or 7.3% increase compared to 2018. This increase was primarily due to increased operating revenue, partially offset by increased operating expenses, all of which are described below.
· Consolidated revenue for 2019 totaled $64,941,341, which was an $8,586,643 or 15.2% increase compared to 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice and the receipt of additional A-CAM funding support, all of which are described below.
Business Trends
Included below is a synopsis of business trends management believes will continue to affect our business in 2020.
Voice and switched access revenues are expected to continue to be adversely impacted by future declines in access lines due to competition in the communications industry from CATV providers, VoIP providers, wireless, other competitors and emerging technologies. As we experience access line losses, our switched access revenue will continue to decline consistent with industry-wide trends. A combination of changing minutes of use, carriers optimizing their network costs, lower demand for dedicated lines and downward rate pressures may affect our future voice and switched access revenues. Access line losses totaled 1,781 or 6.6% in 2019 compared to 2018 due to the reasons mentioned above.
The expansion of our state-of-the-art; fiber-rich communications network, growth in broadband customer sales along with continued migration to higher connectivity speeds and the sales of Internet value-added services such as on-line data backup, and hosted and managed service solutions are expected to continue to offset the revenue declines from the access line trends discussed above.
To be competitive, we continue to emphasize the bundling of our products and services. Our customers have the option to bundle local phone, high-speed Internet, long distance and video services. These bundles provide our customers with one convenient location to obtain all of their communications and entertainment options, a convenient billing solution and bundle discounts. We believe that product bundles positively impact our customer retention, and the associated discounts provide our customers the best value for their communications and entertainment options. We have a state-of-the-art, fiber-rich broadband network, which, along with the bundling of our voice, Internet and video services allows us to meet customer demands for products and services. We continue to focus on the research and deployment of advanced technological products that include broadband services, wireless services, private line, VoIP, digital video, IPTV and hosted and managed services.
We continue to evaluate our operating structure to identify opportunities for increased operational efficiencies and effectiveness. This involves evaluating opportunities for task automation, network efficiency and the balancing of our workforce based on the current needs of our customers.
Financial results for the Communications Segment for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are included below:
Revenue
Local Service - We receive recurring revenue for basic local services that enable customers to make and receive telephone calls within a defined local calling area for a flat monthly fee. In addition to subscribing to basic local telephone services, our customers may choose from a variety of custom calling features such as call waiting, call forwarding, caller identification and voicemail. Local service revenue was $7,215,848, which is $983,769 or 15.8% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice.
The number of access lines we serve as a company have been decreasing, which is consistent with a general industry trend, as customers are increasingly utilizing other technologies, such as wireless phones and IP services. To help offset declines in local service revenue, we implemented an overall strategy that continues to focus on selling a competitive bundle of services. Our focus on marketing competitive service bundles to our customers creates value for the customer and aids in the retention of our voice lines.
Network Access - We provide access services to other communications carriers for the use of our facilities to terminate or originate traffic on our network. Additionally, we bill SLCs to substantially all of our customers for access to the public switched network. These monthly SLCs are regulated and approved by the FCC. In addition, network access revenue is derived from several federally administered pooling arrangements designed to provide network support and distribute funding to ILECs. Network access revenue was $7,566,579, which is $430,962 or 6.0% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice, partially offset by lower minutes of use on our network.
In recent years, IXCs and others have become more aggressive in disputing both interstate carrier access charges and the applicability of access charges to their network traffic. We believe that long distance and other communication providers will continue to challenge the applicability of access charges either before the FCC or directly with the LECs. We cannot predict the likelihood of future claims and cannot estimate the impact.
Video - We receive monthly recurring revenue from our subscribers for providing commercial TV programming in competition with local CATV, satellite dish TV and off-air TV service providers. We serve twenty-two communities with our IPTV services and five communities with our CATV services. Video revenue was $12,081,824, which is $1,392,674 or 13.0% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice and a combination of rate increases introduced into several of our markets over the course of the last several years.
Data - We provide high speed Internet to business and residential customers. Our revenue is earned based on the offering of various flat rate packages based on the level of service, data speeds and features. We also provide e-mail and managed services, such as web hosting and design, on-line file back up and on-line file storage. Data revenue was $21,739,244, which is $5,315,692 or 32.4% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice and an increase in data customers. We expect continued growth in this area will be driven by expansion of service areas, our aggressively packaging service bundles and marketing managed service solutions to businesses.
A-CAM/FUSF - Prior to 2017, the Company received support from the FUSF based on the pooling and redistribution of revenues based on a company’s actual or average costs. With the acquisition of Scott-Rice, the company now receives FUSF for Scott-Rice based on their average costs. See Note 2 - “Revenue Recognition” for a discussion regarding FUSF.
From January 1, 2017 through July 31, 2018, we did not receive support from the FUSF, but had instead, elected to receive support based on the A-CAM. With the acquisition of Scott-Rice, the company now receives FUSF for Scott-Rice based on their average costs. The remainder of the Company receives A-CAM support. See Note 2 - “Revenue Recognition” for a discussion regarding the A-CAM. A-CAM/FUSF support totaled $12,162,631, which is $477,046 or 4.1% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to increased A-CAM funding through the prior A-CAM offers and the addition of Scott-Rice.
Other Revenue - Our customers are billed for toll and long-distance services on either a per call or flat-rate basis. This also includes the offering of directory assistance, operator service and long distance private lines. We also generate revenue from directory publishing, sales and service of CPE, bill processing and other customer services. Our directory publishing revenue in our telephone directories recurs monthly. We also provide retail sales and service of cellular phones and accessories through Telespire, a national wireless provider. We resell these wireless services as Nuvera Wireless, our branded product. We receive both recurring revenue for our wireless services, as well as revenue collected for the sales of wireless phones and accessories. Other revenue was $4,175,215, which is $13,500 or 0.3% lower in 2019 than in 2018. This decrease was primarily due to decreases in the sales and installation of CPE.
Cost of Services (Excluding Depreciation and Amortization)
Cost of services (excluding depreciation and amortization) was $27,821,575, which is $4,018,165 or 16.9% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice, higher programming costs from video content providers and higher costs associated with increased maintenance and support agreements on our equipment and software.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $10,924,966, which is $1,067,659 or 10.8% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to approximately $1.06 million of one-time expenses associated with the transition of the new CEO and payments to a former executive officer.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $12,120,862, which is $1,777,395 or 17.2% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice network assets and increases in our broadband property, plant and equipment, reflecting our continual investment in technology and infrastructure in order to meet our customers’ demands for products and services.
Operating Income
Operating income was $14,073,938, which is $1,723,424 or 14.0% higher in 2019 than in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Scott-Rice.
See Consolidated Statements of Income Below (for discussion) Other Income (Expense) and Interest Expense
Other income in 2019 and 2018 included a patronage credit earned with CoBank as a result of our debt agreements with them. The patronage credit allocated and received in 2019 was $403,786, compared to $344,031 allocated and received in 2018. CoBank determines and pays the patronage credit annually, generally in the first quarter of the calendar year, based on its results from the prior year. We record these patronage credits as income when they are received.
Interest and dividend income decreased $52,882 in 2019 compared to 2018. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in dividend income earned on our investments.
Interest expense increased $1,124,032 in 2019 compared to 2018. This increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances in connection with our credit facility with CoBank that the Company used to purchase Scott-Rice in the third quarter of 2018.
Other investment income decreased $19,767 in 2019 compared to 2018. Other investment income is primarily from our equity ownerships in several partnerships and limited liability companies.
Income Taxes Income tax expense decreased by $128,993 in 2019 compared to 2018 as we recorded income tax expense of $3,309,467 in 2019 and $3,438,460 in 2018. The decrease in income taxes was primarily due to the effects of state income taxes and other permanent differences. The effective income tax rate was approximately 28.4% for 2019 and 30.7% 2018. The difference between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate are reconciled in Note 9 - “Income Taxes.” Inflation
It is the opinion of our management that the effects of inflation on operating revenue and expenses over the past two years have been immaterial. Our management anticipates that this trend will continue in the near future.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no significant Off Balance Sheet Arrangements (as defined in Item 303 (a)(4) of Regulation S-K).
Non-GAAP Measures
In addition to the results reported with GAAP, we also use certain non-GAAP measures such as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA to evaluate operating performance and to facilitate the comparison of our historical results and trends. These financial measures are not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income as a measure of performance and net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of liquidity. They are not, on their own, necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs as determined in accordance with GAAP. The calculation of these non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP are provided below.
EBITDA is defined as net earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is comprised of EBITDA, adjusted for certain items as permitted or required under our credit facility as described in the reconciliations below. These measures are a common measure of operating performance in the communications industry and are useful, with other data, as a means to evaluate our ability to fund our estimated uses of cash.
The following table is a reconciliation of net income to adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Structure
Nuvera’s total capital structure (long-term and short-term debt obligations, net of unamortized loan fees plus stockholders’ equity) was $136,342,185 at December 31, 2019, reflecting 59.2% equity and 40.8% debt. This compares to a capital structure of $136,191,452 at December 31, 2018, reflecting 54.8% equity and 45.2% debt. In the communications industry, debt financing is most often based on operating cash flows. Specifically, our current use of our credit facilities is in a ratio of approximately 2.18 times debt to EBITDA (as defined in the loan documents), which is well within acceptable limits for our agreements and our industry. Our management believes adequate operating cash flows and other internal and external resources, such as our cash on hand and revolving credit facility, are available to finance ongoing operating requirements, including capital expenditures, business development, debt service, temporary financing of trade accounts receivable and dividends.
Liquidity Outlook
Our short-term and long-term liquidity needs arise primarily from (i) capital expenditures; (ii) working capital requirements needed to support the growth of our business; (iii) debt service; (iv) dividend payments on our stock and (v) potential acquisitions.
Our primary sources of liquidity for the year ended December 31, 2019 were proceeds from cash generated from operations and cash reserves held at the beginning of the period. At December 31, 2019 we had a working capital deficit of $2,146,745. In addition, at December 31, 2019, we also had approximately $10.0 million available under our revolving credit facility to fund any short-term working capital needs. The working capital deficit as of December 31, 2019 was primarily the result of the utilization of operating cash flows to fund operations, purchase capital equipment in lieu of using our revolving credit facility, and servicing debt.
We have not conducted a public equity offering. We operate with original equity capital, retained earnings and additions to indebtedness in the form of senior debt and bank lines of credit.
Cash Flows
We expect our liquidity needs to include capital expenditures, payment of interest and principal on our indebtedness, income taxes and dividends. We use our cash inflow to manage the temporary increases in cash demand and utilize our revolving credit facility to manage more significant fluctuations in liquidity caused by growth initiatives.
While it is often difficult for us to predict the impact of general economic conditions on our business, we believe that we will be able to meet our current and long-term cash requirements primarily through our operating cash flows, and anticipate that we will be able to plan for and match future liquidity needs with future internal and available external resources.
We periodically seek to add growth initiatives by either expanding our network or our markets through organic or internal investments or through strategic acquisitions. We feel we can adjust the timing or the number of our initiatives according to any limitations which may be imposed by our capital structure or sources of financing. At this time, we do not anticipate our capital structure will limit our growth initiatives over the next twelve months.
The following table summarizes our cash flow:
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash generated by operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $22,974,664, compared to cash generated by operations of $17,276,830 in 2018. The increase in cash flows from operating activities in 2019 was primarily due to increases from the timing of receipts of receivables and higher net income, partially offset by decreases from the timing of payables.
Cash generated by operations continues to be our primary source of funding for existing operations, capital expenditures, debt service and dividend payments to stockholders. Cash at December 31, 2019 was $2,993,000, compared to $1,584,769 at December 31, 2018.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
We operate in a capital intensive business. We continue to upgrade our local networks for changes in technology in order to provide advanced services to our customers.
Cash flows used in investing activities was $12,697,887 for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $49,337,156 used in investing activities in 2018. Cash flows used in investing activities was higher in 2018 primarily as a result of the acquisition of Scott-Rice. Capital expenditures relating to on-going operations were $13,046,645 in 2019 and $6,960,876 in 2018. Our total plant additions in 2019 and 2018 were recorded net of broadband grants awarded by the State of Minnesota. Our investing expenditures, excluding the Scott-Rice acquisition, are financed with cash flows from our current operations and advances on our line of credit. We believe that our current operations will provide adequate cash flows to fund our plant additions for the upcoming year; however, funding from our revolving credit facility is available if the timing of our cash flows from operations does not match our cash flow requirements. As of December 31, 2019, we had $10.0 million available under our existing credit facility to fund capital expenditures and other operating needs.
Cash Flows (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $8,868,546. This included long-term debt repayments of $6,110,400, the repurchase of common stock of $114,126 and the distribution of $2,644,020 of dividends to stockholders. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $31,803,003. This included long-term debt repayments of $29,880,200, issuance of long-term debt of $64,550,000, loan origination fees of $487,698 and the distribution of $2,379,099 of dividends to stockholders. The decrease in cash flows provided by Financing Activities in 2019 was primarily due to the issuance of long-term debt to fund the Scott-Rice acquisition in 2018.
Working Capital
We had a working capital deficit (i.e. current assets minus current liabilities) of $2,146,745 as of December 31, 2019, with current assets of approximately $9.0 million and current liabilities of approximately $11.1 million, compared to a working capital deficit of $1,720,931 as of December 31, 2018. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 0.81 and 0.84 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. The working capital deficit as of December 31, 2019 was primarily the result of decreased receivable balances and the utilization of cash to pay down long-term debt at December 31, 2019. In addition, if it becomes necessary, we will have sufficient availability under our revolving credit facility to fund any fluctuations in working capital and other cash needs.
Long-Term Debt and Revolving Credit Facilities
Our long-term debt obligations as of December 31, 2019, were $51,524,000 (excluding long-term loan origination fees), net of current debt maturities of $4,610,400 (excluding short-term loan origination fees). Our long-term debt obligations as of December 31, 2018, were $57,634,400 (excluding long-term loan origination fees), net of current debt maturities of $4,610,400 (excluding short-term loan origination fees).
Our Long-Term Debt consists of the following notes:
Master Loan Agreements (MLA) RX0583
● RX0583(A)-T4 - $64,550,000 term note with interest payable quarterly. Final maturity date of this note is July 31, 2025. Twenty-eight quarterly principal payments of $1,152,600 are due commencing September 30, 2018 through June 30, 2025. A final balloon payment of $32,277,200 is due at maturity of this note on July 31, 2025.
● RX0583(A)-T5 - $10,000,000 revolving note with interest payable quarterly. Final maturity date of this note is July 31, 2025. We currently have drawn $0 on this revolving note as of December 31, 2019.
RX0583(A)-T4 and RX0583(A)-T5 initially bear interest at a “LIBOR Margin” rate equal to a maximum of 3.25 percent over the applicable LIBOR rate. The LIBOR Margin decreases as our “Leverage Ratio” decreases.
We generally use variable-rate debt to finance our operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions. These variable-rate debt obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. The terms of our credit facility with CoBank require that we enter into interest rate agreements designed to protect us against fluctuations in interest rates, in an aggregate principal amount and for a duration determined under the credit facility.
As described in Note 8 - “Interest Rate Swaps,” on August 1, 2018 we entered into an IRSA with CoBank covering 25 percent of our existing debt balance or $16,137,500 of our aggregate indebtedness to CoBank at August 1, 2018. The swap effectively locked in our interest rate on 25 percent of our variable-rate debt through July 2025. Under this IRSA, we have changed the variable rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the IRSA, we pay a fixed contractual interest rate and (i) make an additional payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is below a contractual rate or (ii) receive a payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is above the contractual rate. As of December 31, 2019, our IRSA covered $14,408,600, with a weighted average rate of 6.02%.
As described in Note 8 - “Interest Rate Swaps,” on August 29, 2019 we entered into a second IRSA with CoBank covering an additional $42,000,000 of our aggregate indebtedness to CoBank at August 29, 2019. The swap effectively locked in a significant portion of our variable-rate debt through July 2025. Under this IRSA, we have changed the variable rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the IRSA, we pay a fixed contractual interest rate and (i) make an additional payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is below a contractual rate or (ii) receive a payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is above the contractual rate. As of December 31, 2019, our IRSA covered $40,384,734, with a weighted average rate of 4.25%
Our remaining debt of $11.3 million ($10.0 million available under the revolving credit facilities and $1.3 million currently outstanding) remains subject to variable interest rates at an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.79%, as of December 31, 2019.
Nuvera and its respective subsidiaries also have entered into security agreements under which substantially all the assets of Nuvera and its respective subsidiaries have been pledged to CoBank as collateral. In addition, Nuvera and its respective subsidiaries have guaranteed all the obligations under the credit facility. The mortgage notes are required to be paid in quarterly installments covering principal and interest, beginning in the year of issue and maturing on July 31, 2025.
Our credit facility requires us to comply with specified financial ratios and tests. These financial ratios include total leverage ratio, debt service coverage ratio, equity to total assets ratio and annual maximum aggregate capital expenditures. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all the stipulated financial ratios in the loan agreements.
Our loan agreements include restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders. However, we are allowed to pay dividends (a) (i) in an amount up to $2,700,000 in any year if our “Total Leverage Ratio,” that is, the ratio of our “Indebtedness” to “EBITDA” - as defined in the loan documents is greater than 2.00 to 1.00, and (ii) in any amount if our Total Leverage Ratio is less than 2.00 to 1.00, and (b) in either case, if we are not in default or potential default under the loan agreements. Our current Total Leverage Ratio at December 31, 2019 is 2.18.
There are security and loan agreements underlying our current CoBank credit facility that contain restrictions on our distributions to stockholders and investment in, or loans, to others. Also, our credit facility contains restrictions that, among other things, limits or restricts our ability to enter into guarantees and contingent liabilities, incur additional debt, issue stock, transact asset sales, transfers or dispositions, and engage in mergers and acquisitions, without CoBank approval.
See Note 7 - “Long-Term Debt” for information pertaining to our long-term debt and current effective interest rates.
Guarantees
We have guaranteed a portion of the obligations of our Nuvera subsidiary joint venture investment in FiberComm, LC. See Note 14 - “Guarantees.”
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations stated in this 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K are based upon Nuvera’s consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, rules and regulations of the SEC and, where applicable, conform to the accounting principles as prescribed by federal and state telephone utility regulatory authorities. We presently give accounting recognition to the actions of regulators where appropriate. The preparation of our financial statements requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our senior management has discussed the development and selection of accounting estimates and the related Management Discussion and Analysis disclosure with our Audit Committee. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, see Note 1 - “Business Description and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
Revenue Recognition
See Note 2 - “Revenue Recognition” for a discussion of our revenue recognition policies.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. In making the determination of the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider specific accounts, historical write-offs, changes in customer relationships, credit worthiness and concentrations of credit risk. Specific accounts receivable are written off once a determination is made that the account is uncollectible. Additional allowances may be required if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $120,000 and $113,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Financial Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
We have adopted the rules prescribed under GAAP for our financial assets and liabilities. GAAP includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures.
The fair value of our IRSAs is discussed in Note 8 - “Interest Rate Swaps.” The fair value of our swap agreement was determined based on Level 2 inputs.
Valuation of Goodwill
We have goodwill on our books related to prior acquisitions of telephone properties. As discussed more fully in Note 6 - “Goodwill and Intangibles,” and in accordance with GAAP, goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value below its carrying value. We perform our annual fair value evaluation in the fourth quarter of each year.
The impairment test for goodwill involves a two-step process: step one consists of a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit. If the carrying amount is in excess of the fair value, step two requires the comparison of the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill. Any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill over the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill will be recorded as an impairment loss.
In 2019 and 2018, we engaged an independent valuation firm to aid in the completion of an annual impairment test for existing goodwill acquired. For 2019 and 2018, the testing resulted in no impairment to goodwill as the determined fair value was sufficient to pass the first step of the impairment test. We used a combination of Income (Discounted Cash Flow Method or DCF Method) and Market Approaches to estimate the fair value of the goodwill on our books related to prior acquisitions of telephone properties. The assumptions used in the estimates of fair value were based on projections provided by our management and a rate of return based on market information observed in debt and traded equity securities. Their Market Approaches considered market multiples observed in companies comparable to ours, traded on public exchange or over-the-counter, or transacted in a merger or acquisition transaction.
Assumptions used in our 2019 DCF model include the following:
· An 8.00% weighted average cost of capital based on an industry weighted average cost of capital;
· A 1.50% terminal revenue growth rate.
The most significant amount of goodwill recorded on our books was due to the acquisitions of HTC, SETC and Scott-Rice. The carrying value of the goodwill was $49,903,029 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
In 2019, we tested the HTC, SETC and Scott-Rice goodwill. Based on the DCF model approach that was used, we determined the estimated enterprise fair value of our reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount of that reporting units by approximately 29.9%, 73.2% and 30.8% for HTC, SETC and Scott-Rice, respectively, which indicated that we had no impairment as of December 31, 2019. Future negative changes relating to our financial operations could result in a potential impairment of goodwill.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of an amount for taxes currently payable and a provision for tax consequences deferred to future periods. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, and their respective tax basis. Significant components of our deferred taxes arise from differences (i) in the basis of property, plant and equipment due to the use of accelerated depreciation methods for tax purposes, as well as (ii) in partnership investments and intangible assets due to the difference between book and tax basis. Our effective income tax rate is normally higher than the United States tax rate due to state income taxes and permanent differences.
We account for income taxes in accordance with GAAP, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. As required by GAAP, we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more-likely-than-not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. The Company has identified no significant income tax uncertainties as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
In accordance with GAAP, we record net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the income tax provision when recorded. See Note 9 - “Income Taxes.”
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 we had $0 of unrecognized tax benefits.
We are primarily subject to United States, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota and Wisconsin income taxes. Tax years subsequent to 2015 remain open to examination by federal and state tax authorities. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 we had no interest or penalties accrued that related to income tax matters.
Property, Plant and Equipment
We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets. In assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, we compare the carrying value to the undiscounted future cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If the total of the undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, we would write down those assets based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally determined by calculating the discounted future cash flows expected from those assets. Changes in these estimates could have a material adverse effect on the assessment of long-lived assets, thereby requiring a write-down of the assets. Write-downs of long-lived assets are recorded as impairment charges and are a component of operating expenses. We have reviewed our long-lived assets and concluded that no impairment charge on these long-lived assets is necessary.
We use the group life method (mass asset accounting) to depreciate the assets of our telephone companies. Telephone plant acquired in a given year is grouped into similar categories and depreciated over the remaining estimated useful life of the group. When an asset is retired, both the asset and the accumulated depreciation associated with that asset are removed from the books. Due to rapid changes in technology, selecting the estimated economic life of communications plant and equipment requires a significant amount of judgment. We periodically review data on expected utilization of new equipment, asset retirement activity and net salvage values to determine adjustments to our depreciation rates. We have not made any significant changes to the lives of assets in the two-year period ended December 31, 2019.
Equity Method Investment
We are an investor in several partnerships and limited liability corporations. Our percentages of ownership in these joint ventures range from 10.00% to 24.30%. We use the equity method of accounting for these investments, which reflects original cost and the recognition of our share of the net income or losses from the respective operations.
Incentive Compensation
We engaged an outside consultant in 2005 to advise us in our development of an Employee Incentive Plan for employees other than executive officers and a Management Incentive Plan for our executive officers. Both plans were implemented in 2006. Both of these plans are cash/stock-based incentive plans. Payments on each plan are based on an achievement of objectives of measurable corporate performance using financial targets. The financial targets are based on an achievement of specified operating revenues and operating income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (OIBITDA).
We accrue an estimated liability each year for these potential payouts and reverse that accrual if the incentive payout targets are not met and paid out. Incentive payouts, if earned, are typically paid in late March of the year following the target year and after the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On February 24, 2017, our BOD adopted the Nuvera Communications, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan (2017 Plan) effective May 25, 2017. The shareholders of the Company approved the plan at the May 25, 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The purpose of the 2017 Plan was to enable Nuvera and its subsidiaries to attract and retain talented and experienced people, closely link employee compensation with performance realized by shareholders, and reward long-term results with long-term compensation. The plan enables us to grant stock incentive awards to current and new employees, including officers, and to Board members and service providers. The 2017 Plan permits stock incentive awards in the form of options (incentive and non-qualified), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSU), performance stock, performance units, and other awards in stock or cash. The 2017 Plan permits the issuance of up to 625,000 shares of our Common Stock in any of the above stock awards.
See Note 16 - “Restricted Stock Units” for a detailed discussion of our incentive compensation and RSUs.
Recent Accounting Developments
See Note 1 - “Business Description and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for a discussion of recent accounting developments.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not required for a smaller reporting company.
Item 8.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Nuvera Communications, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nuvera Communications, Inc. (a Minnesota corporation) and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 16, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Olsen Thielen & Co., Ltd.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
Roseville, Minnesota
March 16, 2020
NOTE 1 - BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
Nuvera is a diversified communications company headquartered in New Ulm, Minnesota with more than 114 years of experience in the local telephone exchange and communications business. Our principal line of business is the operation of six local telephone companies and the operation of two CLEC telephone companies. Our businesses consist of connecting customers to our state-of-the-art, fiber-rich communications network, providing managed services, switched service and dedicated private lines, connecting customers to long distance service providers and providing many other services associated with our company. Our businesses also provide IPTV, CATV, Internet access services, including high-speed broadband access, and long distance service. We also install and maintain communications systems to the areas in and around our service territories in southern Minnesota and northern Iowa.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
Our accounting policies conform with GAAP and rules and regulations of the SEC and, where applicable, conform to the accounting principles as prescribed by federal and state telephone utility regulatory authorities. We presently give accounting recognition to the actions of regulators where appropriate in preparing general purpose financial statements for most public utilities. In general, the type of regulation covered by this statement permits rates (prices) for some services to be set at levels intended to recover the estimated costs of providing regulated services or products, including the cost of capital (interest costs and a provision for earnings on stockholders’ investments).
Our consolidated financial statements report the financial condition and results of operations for Nuvera and its subsidiaries in one business segment: the Communications Segment. Inter-company transactions have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.
Classification of Costs and Expenses
Cost of services includes all costs related to delivery of communication services and products. These operating costs include all costs of performing services and providing related products including engineering, network monitoring and transportation costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include direct and indirect selling expenses, customer service, billing and collections, advertising and all other general and administrative costs associated with the operations of the business.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and judgements used in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based on our management’s evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.
Revenue Recognition
See Note 2 - “Revenue Recognition” for a discussion of our revenue recognition policies.
Receivables
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, our consolidated receivables totaled $2,356,742 and $3,977,322, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We believe our receivables as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are recorded at their fair value. As there may be exposure or risk with receivables, we routinely monitor our receivables and adjust the allowance for doubtful accounts when events occur that may potentially affect the collection of our receivables.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. In making the determination of the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider specific accounts, historical write-offs, changes in customer relationships, credit worthiness and concentrations of credit risk. Specific accounts receivable are written off once a determination is made that the account is uncollectible. Additional allowances may be required if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments.
The activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts includes the following:
Inventories
Inventory includes parts, materials and supplies stored in our warehouses to support basic levels of service and maintenance as well as scheduled capital projects and equipment awaiting configuration for customers. Inventory also includes (i) parts and equipment shipped directly from vendors to customer locations while in transit and (ii) parts and equipment returned from customers that are being returned to vendors for credit. Our inventory value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $2,827,159 and $2,581,389.
We value inventory using the lower of cost or net realizable value. Similar to our allowance for doubtful accounts, we make estimates related to the valuation of inventory. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had no inventory reserve. We adjust our inventory carrying value for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory to the net realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. As market and other conditions change, we may establish additional inventory reserves at a time when the facts that give rise to a lower value are warranted. We use the first-in, first-out method of inventory costing for our non-retail inventory. We use the average cost method of inventory costing for our retail inventory.
Fair Value Measurements
We have adopted the rules prescribed under GAAP for our financial assets and liabilities. GAAP includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon its own market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Inputs are derived from valuation techniques where one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable.
We have used financial derivative instruments to manage our overall cash flow exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. We accounted for derivative instruments in accordance with GAAP that requires derivative instruments to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments must be recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met, in which case, the gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income rather than in earnings.
We have entered into IRSAs with our lender CoBank to manage our cash flow exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These instruments are designated as a cash flow hedges and are effective at mitigating the risk of fluctuations on interest rates in the market place. Any gains or losses related to changes in the fair value of these derivatives are accounted for as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for as long as the hedges remain effective.
The fair value of our IRSAs is discussed in Note 8 - “Interest Rate Swaps.” The fair value of our swap agreements were determined based on Level 2 inputs.
Property, Plant and Equipment
We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets. In assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, we compare the carrying value to the undiscounted future cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If the total of the undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, we would write down those assets based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally determined by calculating the discounted future cash flows expected from those assets. Changes in these estimates could have a material adverse effect on the assessment of long-lived assets, thereby requiring a write-down of the assets. Write-downs of long-lived assets are recorded as impairment charges and are a component of operating expenses. We have reviewed our long-lived assets and concluded that no impairment charge on our long-lived assets is necessary.
We use the group life method (mass asset accounting) to depreciate the assets of our telephone companies. Telephone plant acquired in a given year is grouped into similar categories and depreciated over the remaining estimated useful life of the group. When an asset is retired, both the asset and the accumulated depreciation associated with that asset are removed from the books. Due to rapid changes in technology, selecting the estimated economic life of communications plant and equipment requires a significant amount of judgment. We periodically review data on expected utilization of new equipment, asset retirement activity and net salvage values to determine adjustments to our depreciation rates. We have not made any significant changes to the lives of these assets in the two year period ended December 31, 2019.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We amortize our definite-lived intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Customer relationships are amortized over fourteen to fifteen years, regulatory rights are amortized over fifteen years and trade names are amortized over three to five years. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives. In accordance with GAAP, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually. See Note 6 - “Goodwill and Intangibles” for a more detailed discussion of the intangible assets and goodwill. Our goodwill balance was $49,903,029 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2019 and 2018 we completed our annual impairment tests for existing acquired goodwill. This testing resulted in no impairment charges to goodwill at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Investments and Other Assets
We are a co-investor with other communication companies in several partnerships and limited liability companies. These joint ventures make it possible to offer services to customers, including digital video services and fiber-optic transport services that we would have difficulty offering on our own. These joint ventures also make it possible to invest in new technologies with a lower level of financial risk. We use the equity method of accounting for these investments that reflects original cost and recognition of our share of the net income or losses from the respective operations. See Note 17 - “Segment Information” for a listing of our investments.
Investments in other companies that are not intended for resale and are not accounted for on the equity method of accounting are valued at fair value where there are readily determinable fair values. Investments in other companies that are not intended for resale and are not accounted for on the equity method of accounting are valued at cost where there are no readily determinable fair values. See Note 13 - “Other Investments” for additional information regarding our investments.
Other Financial Instruments
Other Investments - We conducted an evaluation of our investments in all of our investees in connection with the preparation of our audited financial statements at December 31, 2019. We believe the carrying value of our investments is not impaired.
Debt - We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt based on the discounted future cash flows we expect to pay using current rates of borrowing for similar types of debt. Fair value of the debt approximates carrying value.
Other Financial Instruments - Our financial instruments also include cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and accounts payable where the current carrying amounts approximate fair market value.
Advertising Expense
Advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense charged to operations was $364,932 and $312,674 in 2019 and 2018.
Interest During Construction
We include an average cost of debt for the construction of plant in our communications plant accounts.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with GAAP, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from the difference between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements and operating and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as income tax expense. Income tax expense or benefit is the tax payable or refundable, respectively, for the period plus or minus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period.
GAAP requires us to recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more-likely-than-not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. See Note 9 - “Income Taxes” for additional information regarding income taxes.
Collection of Taxes from Customers
Sales, excise and other taxes are imposed on most of our sales to nonexempt customers. We collect these taxes from our customers and remit the entire amounts to governmental authorities. Our accounting policies dictate that we exclude these taxes collected and remitted from our revenues and expenses.
Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments and receivables. We deposit our cash investments in high credit quality financial institutions accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in these accounts and do not believe we are exposed to any significant credit risk. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to our large number of customers.
Earnings and Dividends Per Share
Basic and diluted net income per share are calculated as follows:
The weighted-average shares outstanding, basic and diluted, are calculated as follows:
Dividends per share have been declared quarterly by the Nuvera BOD.
Recent Accounting Developments
In August, 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-12 (ASU 2017-12), “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.” ASU 2017-12 amends current guidance on accounting for hedges mainly to align more closely an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. In addition, amendments in ASU 2017-12 simplify the application of hedge accounting by allowing effectiveness assessments to be performed on a qualitative basis after hedge inception. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 as of January 1, 2019 and is applying the guidance to our hedging activities. The new guidance did not have a material effect on our overall operations.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and other (Topic 350).” ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment and removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. The same one-step impairment test will be applied to goodwill at all reporting units, even those with zero or negative carrying amounts. The amendments in this update should be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-04 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. Management is evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will have on the Company’s financial statements (if any).
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a new forward-looking, expected loss model to estimate credit losses. It also requires additional disclosures relating to the credit quality of trade and other receivables, including information relating to management’s estimate of credit allowances. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2016-13 for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption as of December 15, 2018 was permitted. Management is evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on the Company’s financial statements (if any).
We have reviewed all other significant newly issued accounting pronouncements and determined they are either not applicable to our business or that no material effect is expected on our financial position and results of operations.
NOTE 2 - REVENUE RECOGNITION
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606),” which is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. ASU 2014-09 provides a single principles-based, five-step model to be applied to all contracts with customers, which steps are to (1) identify the contract(s) with the customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied.
We adopted ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method for open contracts. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606. The Company did not have any material cumulative-effect adjustments that would have affected its January 1, 2018 assets, liabilities or retained earnings. The adoption of this new standard by the Company resulted in additional disclosures around the nature and timing of the Company’s performance obligations, deferred revenue contract liabilities, deferred contract cost assets, as well as significant judgements and practical expedients used by the Company in applying the new five-step revenue model.
Our revenue contracts with customers may include a promise or promises to deliver services such as broadband, video or voice services. Promised services are considered distinct as the customer can benefit from the services either on their own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer and the Company’s promise to transfer service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract. The Company accounts for services as separate performance obligations. Each service is considered a single performance obligation as it is providing a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer.
The transaction price is determined at contract inception and reflects the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring service to the customer. This amount is generally equal to the market price of the services promised in the contract and may include promotional or bundling discounts. The majority of our prices are based on tariffed rates filed with regulatory bodies or standard company price lists. The transaction price excludes amounts collected on behalf of third parties such as sales taxes and regulatory fees. Conversely, nonrefundable up-front fees, such as service activation and set-up fees, which are immaterial to our overall revenues, are included in the transaction price. In determining the transaction price, we consider our enforceable rights and obligations within the contract. We do not consider the possibility of a contract being cancelled, renewed or modified, which is consistent with ASC 606-10-32-4.
The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of the service, net of the related discount, as applicable.
Revenue is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied by transferring service to the customer as described below.
Significant Judgments
The Company often provides multiple services to a customer. Provision of CPE and additional service tiers may have a significant level of integration and interdependency with the subscription voice, video, Internet, or connectivity services. Judgement is required to determine whether provision of CPE, installation services, and additional service tiers are considered distinct and accounted for separately, or not distinct and accounted for together with the subscription services.
Allocation of the transaction price to the distinct performance obligations in bundled service subscriptions requires judgement. The transaction price for a bundle of services is frequently less than the sum of standalone selling prices of each individual service. Bundled discounts are allocated proportionally to the selling price of each individual service within the bundle. Standalone selling prices for the Company’s services are directly observable.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table summarizes revenue from contracts with customers for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 78.50% of our total revenue was from month-to-month and other contracted revenue from customers. Approximately 20.00% of our total revenue was from revenue sources outside of the scope of ASC 606. The remaining 1.50% of total revenue was from other sources including CPE and equipment sales and installation.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, approximately 76.07% of our total revenue was from month-to-month and other contracted revenue from customers. Approximately 22.18% of our total revenue was from revenue sources outside of the scope of ASC 606. The remaining 1.75% of total revenue was from other sources including CPE and equipment sales and installation.
A significant portion of our revenue is derived from customers who may generally cancel their subscriptions at any time without penalty. As such, the amount of revenue related to unsatisfied performance obligations is not necessarily indicative of the future revenue to be recognized from our existing customer base. Revenue from customers with a contractually specified term and non-cancelable service period will be recognized over the term of such contracts, which is generally 3 to 10 years for these types of contracts.
Nature of Services
Revenues are earned from our customers primarily through the connection to our networks, digital and commercial TV programming, Internet services (high-speed broadband), and hosted and managed services. Revenues for these services are billed based on set rates for monthly service or based on the amount of time the customer is utilizing our facilities. The revenue for these services is recognized over time as the service is rendered.
Voice Services - We receive recurring revenue for basic local services that enable end-user customers to make and receive telephone calls within a defined local calling area for a flat monthly fee. In addition to subscribing to basic local telephone services, our customers may choose from multiple voice service plans with a variety of custom calling features such as call waiting, call forwarding, caller identification and voicemail. Our VoIP digital phone service is also available as an alternative to the traditional telephone line. Customers may generally cancel their subscriptions at any time without penalty. Each subscription service provided is accounted for as a distinct performance obligation and revenue is recognized over a one month service period as the subscription services are delivered. Other optional services purchased by the customer are generally accounted for as a distinct performance obligation when purchased and revenue is recognized when the service is provided.
Network Access - We provide access services to other communication carriers for the use of our facilities to terminate or originate long distance calls on our network. Additionally, we bill monthly SLCs to substantially all of our customers for access to the public switched network. These monthly SLCs are regulated and approved by the FCC. In addition, network access revenue is derived from several federally administered pooling arrangements designed to provide support and distribute funding to us.
Revenues earned from other communication carriers accessing our network are based on the utilization of our network by these carriers as measured by minutes of use on the network or special access to the network by the individual carriers on monthly basis. Revenues are billed at tariffed access rates for both interstate and intrastate calls and are recognized into revenue monthly based on the period the access was provided.
The NECA pools and redistributes the SLCs to various communication providers through the CAF. These revenues are earned and recognized into revenue on a monthly basis. Any adjustments to these amounts received by NECA are adjusted for in revenue upon receipt of the adjustment.
Video - We provide a variety of enhanced video services on a monthly recurring basis to our customers. We also receive monthly recurring revenue from our subscribers for providing commercial TV programming in competition with local CATV, satellite dish TV and off-air TV service providers. We serve twenty-two communities with our IPTV services and five communities with our CATV services. Customers may generally cancel their subscriptions at any time without penalty. Each subscription service provided is accounted for as a distinct performance obligation and revenue is recognized over a one month service period as the subscription services are delivered. Other optional services purchased by the customer are generally accounted for as a distinct performance obligation when purchased and revenue is recognized when the service is provided.
Data - We provide high speed Internet access to business and residential customers depending on the nature of the network facilities that are available, the level of service selected and the location. Our revenue is earned based on the offering of various flat rate packages based on the level of service, data speeds and features. We also provide e-mail and managed services, such as web hosting and design, on-line file back up and on-line file storage. Data customers may generally cancel their subscriptions at any time without penalty. Each subscription service provided is accounted for as a distinct performance obligation and revenue is recognized over a one month service period as the subscription services are delivered. Other optional services purchased by the customer are generally accounted for as a distinct performance obligation when purchased and revenue is recognized when the service is provided.
Directory - Our directory publishing revenue in our telephone directories recurs monthly and is recognized into revenue on a monthly basis.
Other Contracted Revenue - Managed services and certain other data customers include fiber-delivered communications and managed information technology solutions to mainly business customers, as well as high-capacity last-mile data connectivity services to wireless and wireline carriers. Services are primarily offered on a subscription basis with a contractually specified and non-cancelable service period. The non-cancelable contract terms for these customers generally range from 3 to 10 years. Each subscription service provided is accounted for as a distinct performance obligation and revenue is recognized ratably over the contract period as the subscription services are delivered. These services are billed as monthly recurring charges to customers.
Other - We also generate revenue from the sales, service and installation of CPE and other services. Sales and service of CPE are billed and recognized into revenue once the sale or service is complete or delivered. These sales and services are generally short-term in nature and are completed within one month. Other revenues are immaterial to our total revenues.
Subsidy and Other Revenue outside the Scope of ASC 606 - We receive subsidies from governmental entities to operate and expand our networks. In addition, we have revenue from leasing arrangements. Both of these revenue streams are outside of the scope of ASC 606.
Interstate access rates are established by a nationwide pooling of companies known as NECA. The FCC established NECA in 1983 to develop and administer interstate access service rates, terms and conditions. Revenues are pooled and redistributed on the basis of a company's actual or average costs. There has been a change in the composition of interstate access charges in recent years, shifting more of the charges to the end user and reducing the amount of access charges paid by the IXC’s. We believe this trend will continue.
Intrastate access rates are filed with state regulatory commissions in Minnesota and Iowa.
From January 1, 2017 through July 31, 2018 we did not receive funding from the FUSF based on the pooling and redistribution of revenues based on a company's actual or average costs as described above, but instead, elected to receive funding based on the A-CAM as described below.
With the acquisition of Scott-Rice on July 31, 2018, see Note 4 - “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” Nuvera now receives FUSF support for Scott-Rice. The remainder of the Company receives funding from A-CAM as mentioned below. Scott-Rice’s settlements from the pools are based on nationwide average schedules.
A-Cam/FUSF - Prior to 2017, we received FUSF funding from the FCC. FUSF funding was established to overcome geographical differences in costs of providing voice service and to enable all citizens to communicate over networks regardless of geographical location and/or personal income. In our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, Nuvera disclosed that we had elected the A-CAM for our Minnesota and Iowa operations, replacing our former legacy support. Nuvera will receive A-CAM support for a period of ten years in exchange for meeting defined broadband build-out requirements. On May 7, 2018, the FCC issued Public Notice DA 18-465, which contained revised offers of A-CAM support and associated revised service deployment obligations. See above for a discussion regarding A-CAM and FUSF.
With the acquisition of Scott-Rice on July 31, 2018, see Note 4 - “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” Nuvera now receives FUSF support for Scott-Rice. The remainder of the Company receives funding from A-CAM. Scott-Rice’s settlements from the NECA pools are based on nationwide average schedules.
A-CAM
The FUSF was established as part of the TA96 and provides subsidies to communications providers as means of increasing the availability and affordability of advanced communications services. In 2011, significant reform was introduced, including the creation of the CAF, to help modernize the FUSF and promote support of these communications services in the nation’s high-cost areas. In 2016, the FCC announced additional reform to further transition the CAF from supporting the provision of voice services to the provision of broadband services. On March 30, 2016, the FCC issued the 2016 Order that adopts the following changes to the FUSF for rate-of-return carriers:
· Establishes a voluntary cost model;
· Creates specific broadband deployment obligations;
· Provides a mechanism for support of broadband-only deployment;
· Gradually reduces the authorized rate-of-return from 11.25 percent to 9.75 percent;
· Eliminates support in those local areas served by unsubsidized competitors;
· Establishes “glide-path” transition periods for all the new changes; and
· Maintains the $2 billion budget established by the 2011 Transformation Order.
While the 2011 FUSF Transformation Order established CAF Phase I and CAF Phase II as high-cost support mechanisms for the price-cap carriers (i.e., the larger, national LECs such as Verizon and AT&T), it was not as specific about how subsidies would change for the rate-of-return carriers (i.e., the smaller LECs, including all rural LECs). In contrast, the 2016 Order focused on the rate-of-return carriers, announced specific changes to existing funding mechanisms as well as a new funding mechanism, and provided rural communications providers with greater certainty about future support.
One of the major changes introduced by the 2016 Order was the creation of the A-CAM, a new CAF support mechanism for rate-of-return carriers. Utilization of the A-CAM was voluntary; and rate-of-return carriers may have instead chose to continue relying on the legacy support mechanism known as ICLS, but then modified and renamed CAF-BLS. Each carrier needed to decide which support mechanism to elect, and then choose one or the other, per state.
In our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, Nuvera disclosed that we had elected the A-CAM for our Minnesota and Iowa operations, replacing our former ICLS. Nuvera was eligible to receive A-CAM support for a period of ten years in exchange for meeting defined broadband build-out requirements. At the time of Nuvera’s election, the FCC had not yet determined the final award numbers.
Consistent with the stated disclosure in our Form 10-Q, Nuvera notified the FCC that we would continue to elect the A-CAM program. Under the report that accompanied the FCC December 20, 2016 Public Notice, Nuvera would annually receive (i) $391,896 for our Iowa operations and (ii) $6,118,567 for our Minnesota operations. The Company used the annual $6.5 million that we receive through the A-CAM program to meet our defined broadband build-out obligations, which the Company is currently completing. These A-CAM payments replaced the Company’s former ICLS payments.
On May 7, 2018, the FCC issued Public Notice DA 18-465, which contained revised offers of A-CAM support and associated revised service deployment obligations.
On May 23, 2018, the Company’s BOD authorized and directed the Company to accept the FCC’s revised offer of A-CAM support and the revised associated service deployment obligations. Under the revised FCC offer Notice, the Company was entitled to annually receive (i) $489,870 for its Iowa operations, which was a $97,974 increase per year and (ii) $7,648,208 for its Minnesota operations, which was a $1,529,641 increase per year. The Company used the additional support that it received through the A-CAM program to continue to meet its defined broadband build-out obligations, which the Company is currently completing. A letter of acceptance to elect the revised A-CAM support was filed by the Company with the FCC on May 24, 2018. The FCC accepted the Company’s letter on May 30, 2018. On August 31, 2018 the Company received approximately $3.12 million for the revised A-CAM support. This represented an 18-month true-up for support back to the original election date, and an increased monthly payment representing the new revised A-CAM support offer.
On February 25, 2019, the FCC issued Public Notice DA 19-115, which contained revised offers of A-CAM support and associated revised service deployment obligations.
On February 27, 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized and directed the Company to accept the FCC’s revised offer of A-CAM support and the revised associated service deployment obligations. Under the revised FCC offer Notice, the Company will be entitled to annually receive (i) $596,084 for its Iowa operations, which was a $106,214 increase per year and (ii) $8,354,481 for its Minnesota operations, which was a $706,273 increase per year. The Company will receive the revised A-CAM offer over the next 10 years starting in 2019. The Company will use the additional support that it receives through the A-CAM program to continue to meet its defined broadband build-out obligations, which the Company is currently completing. A letter of acceptance to elect the revised A-CAM support was filed by the Company with the FCC on March 8, 2019. The FCC accepted the Company’s letter on March 11, 2019. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company received a true-up payment for support back to January 1, 2019 and an increased monthly payment representing the new revised A-CAM support offer.
The following table provides information about our receivables, contracts assets and contract liabilities from revenue contracts with our customers:
Contract Assets
Contract assets include costs that are incremental to the acquisition of a contract. Incremental costs are those that result directly from obtaining a contract or costs that would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained, which primarily relates to sales commissions. In 2019, we expanded our commission plans and began deferring and amortizing these costs over the expected customer life as the contract obligations are satisfied. We determined that the expected customer life is the expected period of benefit as the commission on the renewal contact is not commensurate with the commission on the initial contract. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized expense of $24,095 and $0, respectively, related to deferred contract acquisition costs. Short-term contract assets are included in current assets under prepaid expenses and other current assets. Long-term contract assets are included in investments and other assets under other assets.
Contract Liabilities
Contract liabilities include deferred revenues related to advanced payments for services and nonrefundable, upfront service activation and set-up fees, which under the new standard are generally deferred. In addition, contract liabilities include customer deposits that are not recognized into revenue, but are instead returned to the customer after a holding period. Short-term contract liabilities include deferred revenues for advanced payments for managed services and other long-term contracts. This includes the current portion of the deferred revenues that will be recognized monthly within one year. Short-term contract liabilities are included in current liabilities under other accrued liabilities. Long-term contract liabilities include deferred revenues for advanced payments for managed services and other long-term contracts. This includes the portion longer than one year and the corresponding deferred revenues are recognized into revenue on a monthly basis based of the term of the contract. Long-term contract liabilities are included in noncurrent liabilities under other accrued liabilities. We recognized approximately $264 thousand of contract liabilities in 2019 and $79 thousand in 2018.
Receivables
A receivable is recognized in the period the Company provides goods and services when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. Payment terms on invoiced amounts are generally 30-60 days.
Performance Obligations
ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requires that the Company disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price that is allocated to remaining performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of December 31, 2019. The guidance provides certain practical expedients that limit this requirement. The service revenue contracts of the Company meet the following practical expedients provided by ASC 606:
1. The performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less.
2. Revenue is recognized from the satisfaction of the performance obligations in the amount billable to the customer in accordance with ASC 606-10-55.18.
The Company has elected these practical expedients. Performance obligations related to our service revenue contracts are generally satisfied over time. For services transferred over time, revenue is recognized based on amounts invoiced to the customer as the Company has concluded that the invoice amount directly corresponds with the value of services provided to the customer. Management considers this a faithful depiction of the transfer of control as services are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer over the life of the contract. As such, revenue related to unsatisfied performance obligations that will be billed in future periods has not been disclosed.
NOTE 3 - LEASES
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which, together with its related clarifying ASUs, provided revised guidance for lease accounting and related disclosure requirements and established a right-to-use (ROU) model that requires lessees to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition. This guidance was effective for us on January 1, 2019. We adopted the standard using the modified retrospective method which applied to leases that exist or were entered into on or after January 1, 2019. The Company elected to utilize the package of practical expedients that allows to 1) not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, 2) retain the existing classification of lease contracts as of the date of adoption and 3) not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The ASU also requires disclosures to allow financial statement users to better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements.
On January 1, 2019, upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company recorded an Operating Lease ROU of $599,308, a short-term operating lease liability of $100,844 and a long-term operating lease liability of $498,464. The Company used an estimated incremental borrowing rate of 6%, which approximates our fixed CoBank borrowing rate to determine the inception present value at January 1, 2019. The terms of our leases range from two to seventeen years.
The following table includes the ROU and operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019.
Maturity analysis under these lease agreements are as follows:
We amortize our leases over the shorter of the term of the lease or the useful life of the asset. Lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $428,680.
NOTE 4 - ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
Scott-Rice Acquisition
On July 31, 2018, the Company announced that it had completed its acquisition of Scott-Rice from Allstream Business U.S., LLC, an affiliate of Zayo for approximately $42 million in cash. Scott-Rice provides phone, video and internet services with more than 18,000 connections, serving the communities of Prior Lake, Savage and Elko New Market, Minnesota. The combined Nuvera/Scott-Rice Company had approximately 66,000 connections. Nuvera financed the acquisition with its principal lender, CoBank. Further information regarding the CoBank loan terms and amounts can be found on the Company’s 8-K filed with the SEC on August 3, 2018.
The allocation of the acquisition value of Scott-Rice, as determined by an independent valuation firm, is shown below:
The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with current standards. As a result, the fair value of the consideration paid, which consists of approximately $42 million in cash, has been allocated to the fair value of the assets and liabilities received. The allocation of the purchase price to Scott-Rice’s assets and liabilities was based on estimates of fair values. Criteria have been established in ASC 805, “Business Combinations” for determining whether intangible assets should be recognized separately from goodwill. Based upon our fair value allocation, the excess of the purchase price and acquisition costs over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible assets acquired was $23,697,680, which is not deductible for income tax purposes. The Company recorded an intangible asset related to the acquired company’s customer relationships of $13,600,000. The estimated useful life of the customer relationship intangible is fifteen years.
Pro Forma Financial Information
On July 31, 2018, Nuvera completed the acquisition of Scott-Rice. The following pro forma results presented are for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 as if the acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2018. The Company has provided this pro forma condensed Statement of Income to facilitate analysis of the Statement of Income. The pro forma statements do not reflect any effect of operating efficiencies, cost savings and other benefits anticipated by the Company’s management as a result of the acquisition.
NOTE 5 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, include the following:
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated service or remaining useful lives of the various classes of depreciable assets. Depreciation expense was $8,797,091 and $7,585,225 in 2019 and 2018. The composite depreciation rates on communications plant and equipment for the two years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were 4.6% and 4.2%. Other property and video plant is depreciated over estimated useful lives of three to twenty-five years.
NOTE 6 - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
We account for goodwill and other intangible assets under GAAP. Under GAAP, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are instead tested for impairment (i) on at least an annual basis and (ii) when changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of goodwill may be below its carrying value. Our goodwill totaled $49,903,029 at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
As required by GAAP, we do not amortize goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives, but test for impairment on an annual basis or earlier if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. These circumstances include, but are not limited to (i) a significant adverse change in the business climate, (ii) unanticipated competition or (iii) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. Determining impairment involves estimating the fair value of a reporting unit using a combination of (i) the income or DCF approach and (ii) the market approach that utilizes comparable companies’ data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss is calculated by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill. We recognize impairment loss when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
In 2019 and 2018, we engaged an independent valuation firm to aid in the completion of our annual impairment testing for existing goodwill. For 2019 and 2018, the testing results indicated no impairment charge to goodwill as the determined fair value was sufficient to pass the first step of the impairment test.
Our intangible assets subject to amortization consist of acquired customer relationships, regulatory rights and trade names. We amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their respective estimated useful lives. Identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are evaluated for impairment. In addition, we periodically reassess the carrying value, useful lives and classifications of our identifiable intangible assets.
The components of our identified intangible assets are as follows:
Amortization expense related to the definite-lived assets was $3,323,771 for 2019 and $2,758,242 for 2018. Amortization expense for the next five years is estimated to be:
NOTE 7 - LONG-TERM DEBT
On July 31, 2018, we entered into an Amended and Restated MLA with CoBank. This MLA refinanced the existing credit facility between CoBank and Nuvera and its subsidiaries. Nuvera and its respective subsidiaries also have entered into security agreements under which substantially all the assets of Nuvera and its respective subsidiaries have been pledged to CoBank as collateral. In addition, Nuvera and its respective subsidiaries have guaranteed all the obligations under the credit facility. These mortgage notes are required to be paid in quarterly installments covering principal and interest, beginning in the year of issue and maturing on July 31, 2025.
Secured Credit Facility:
MLA RX0583
● RX0583(A)-T4 - $64,550,000 term note with interest payable quarterly. Final maturity date of this note is July 31, 2025. Twenty-eight quarterly principal payments of $1,152,600 are due commencing September 30, 2018 through June 30, 2025. A final balloon payment of $32,277,200 is due at maturity of this note on July 31, 2025.
● RX0583(A)-T5 - $10,000,000 revolving note with interest payable quarterly. Final maturity date of this note is July 31, 2025. We currently have drawn $0 on this revolving note as of December 31, 2019.
RX0583(A)-T4 and RX0583(A)-T5 initially bear interest at a “LIBOR Margin” rate equal to 3.25 percent over the applicable LIBOR rate. The LIBOR Margin decreases as our “Leverage Ratio” decreases.
We generally use variable-rate debt to finance our operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions. These variable-rate debt obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. The terms of our credit facility with CoBank require that we enter into interest rate agreements designed to protect us against fluctuations in interest rates, in an aggregate principal amount and for a duration determined under the credit facility.
As described in Note 8 - “Interest Rate Swaps,” on August 1, 2018 we entered into an IRSA with CoBank covering 25 percent of our existing debt balance or $16,137,500 of our aggregate indebtedness to CoBank at August 1, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, our IRSA covered $14,408,600, with a weighted average rate of 6.02%.
As described in Note 8 - “Interest Rate Swaps,” on August 29, 2019 we entered into a second IRSA with CoBank covering an additional $42,000,000 of our aggregate indebtedness to CoBank at August 29, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, our IRSA covered $40,384,734, with a weighted average rate of 4.25%.
Our remaining debt of $11.3 million ($10.0 million available under the revolving credit facilities and $1.3 million currently outstanding) remains subject to variable interest rates at an effective weighted average interest rate of 4.79%, as of December 31, 2019.
Our loan agreements include restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders. However, we are allowed to pay dividends (a) (i) in an amount up to $2,700,000 in any year if our “Total Leverage Ratio,” that is, the ratio of our “Indebtedness” to “EBITDA” - as defined in the loan documents is greater than 2.00 to 1.00, and (ii) in any amount if our Total Leverage Ratio is less than 2.00 to 1.00, and (b) in either case, if we are not in default or potential default under the loan agreements. Our current Total Leverage Ratio at December 31, 2019 is 2.18.
Our credit facility requires us to comply with specified financial ratios and tests. These financial ratios include total leverage ratio, debt service coverage ratio, equity to total assets ratio and annual maximum aggregate capital expenditures. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all the stipulated financial ratios in the loan agreements.
There are security and loan agreements underlying our current CoBank credit facility that contain restrictions on our distributions to stockholders and investment in, or loans, to others. Also, our credit facility contains restrictions that, among other things, limits or restricts our ability to enter into guarantees and contingent liabilities, incur additional debt, issue stock, transact asset sales, transfers or dispositions, and engage in mergers and acquisitions, without CoBank approval.
Required principal payments for the next five years are as follows:
NOTE 8 - INTEREST RATE SWAPS
We assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely affect expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.
We generally use variable-rate debt to finance our operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions. These variable-rate debt obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. The terms of our credit facility with CoBank required that we enter into interest rate agreements designed to protect us against fluctuations in interest rates, in an aggregate principal amount and for a duration determined under the credit facility.
To meet this objective, on August 1, 2018 we entered into an IRSA with CoBank covering 25 percent of our existing outstanding debt balance or $16,137,500 of our aggregate indebtedness to CoBank at August 1, 2018. This swap effectively locked in the interest rate on 25 percent of our variable-rate debt through July 2025. Under this IRSA, we have changed the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the IRSA, we pay a fixed contractual interest rate and (i) make an additional payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is below a contractual rate or (ii) receive a payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is above the contractual rate.
On August 29, 2019 we entered into a second IRSA with CoBank covering an additional $42,000,000 of our aggregate indebtedness to CoBank at August 29, 2019. The swap effectively locked in a significant portion of our variable-rate debt through July 2025. Under this IRSA, we have changed the variable rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the IRSA, we pay a fixed contractual interest rate and (i) make an additional payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is below a contractual rate or (ii) receive a payment if the LIBOR variable rate payment is above the contractual rate.
Each month, we make interest payments to CoBank under its loan agreements based on the current applicable LIBOR Rate plus the contractual LIBOR margin then in effect with respect to the loan, without reflecting our IRSAs. At the end of each calendar month, CoBank adjusts our aggregate interest payments based on the difference, if any, between the amounts paid by us during the month and the current effective interest rate. Net interest payments are reported in our consolidated income statement as interest expense.
As of December 31, 2019 we had the following IRSA in effect.
(1) As described in Note 7 - “Long-Term Debt,” the notes above initially bears interest at a LIBOR rate determined by the maturity of the note, plus a “LIBOR Margin” rate equal to a maximum of 3.25% according to the individual secured credit facility. The LIBOR Margin decreases as the borrower’s “Leverage Ratio” decreases. The “Current Effective Interest Rate” in the table reflects the rate we pay giving effect to the swaps.
Our IRSAs under our credit facilities both qualify as a cash flow hedges for accounting purposes under GAAP. We reflect the effect of these hedging transactions in the financial statements. The unrealized gain/loss is reported in other comprehensive income. If we terminate our IRSAs, the cumulative change in fair value at the date of termination would be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, which is classified in stockholders’ equity, into earnings on the consolidated statements of income.
The fair value of the Company’s IRSAs were determined based on valuations received from CoBank and were based on the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates appropriate with the terms of the IRSAs. The fair value indicates an estimated amount we would be required to pay if the contracts were canceled or transferred to other parties. At December 31, 2019, the fair value liability of these swaps were $260,418, which has been recorded net of deferred tax benefit of $74,323, resulting in the $186,095 in accumulated other comprehensive loss. At December 31, 2018, the fair value liability of these swaps were $407,250, which has been recorded net of deferred tax benefit of $116,230, resulting in the $291,021 in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
NOTE 9 - INCOME TAXES
Income taxes recorded in our consolidated statements of income consists of the following:
We account for income taxes in accordance with GAAP, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. As required by GAAP, we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more-likely-than-not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.
As of December 31, 2019 we had no unrecognized tax benefits.
We are primarily subject to United States, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota and Wisconsin income taxes. Tax years subsequent to 2015 remain open to examination by federal and state tax authorities. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 we had no interest or penalties accrued that related to income tax matters.
The differences between the statutory federal tax rate and the effective tax rate were as follows:
Deferred income taxes and unrecognized tax benefits reflected in our consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows:
NOTE 10 - RETIREMENT PLAN
We have a 401(k) employee savings plan in effect for employees who meet age and service requirements. Our contributions to our 401(k) employee savings plan were $692,655 and $539,584 in 2019 and 2018.
NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in certain contractual disputes in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of any of these existing matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We did not experience any changes to material contractual obligations in the year ended December 31, 2019.
Our capital budget for 2020 is approximately $13.8 million and will be financed through internally generated funds.
NOTE 12 - NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Noncash investing activities included $225,548 and $533,043 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. These activities related to plant and equipment additions placed in service and are recorded in our accounts payable at year-end.
NOTE 13 - OTHER INVESTMENTS
We are a co-investor with other communication companies in several partnerships and limited liability companies. These joint ventures make it possible to offer services to customers, including digital video services and fiber-optic transport services that we would have difficulty offering on our own. These joint ventures also make it possible to invest in new technologies with a lower level of financial risk. We recognize income and losses from these investments on the equity method of accounting. For a listing of our investments, see Note 17 - “Segment Information.”
The FASB requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. As of December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss on one of our investments of $104,044.
NOTE 14 - GUARANTEES
Nuvera has guaranteed a portion of a ten-year loan owed by FiberComm, LC set to mature on April 30, 2026. As of December 31, 2019, we have recorded a liability of $319,346 in connection with the guarantee on this loan. This guarantee may be exercised if FiberComm, LC does not make its required payments on this note.
NOTE 15 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we have recorded other deferred compensation relating to executive compensation payable to certain former executives of the Company and certain former executives of past acquisitions.
NOTE 16 - RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
On February 24, 2017, our BOD adopted the 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan (2017 Plan) effective May 25, 2017. The shareholders of the Company approved the 2017 Plan at the May 25, 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The purpose of the 2017 Plan was to enable Nuvera and its subsidiaries to attract and retain talented and experienced people, closely link employee compensation with performance realized by shareholders, and reward long-term results with long-term compensation. The 2017 Plan enables the Company to grant stock incentive awards to current and new employees, including officers, and to Board members and service providers. The 2017 Plan permits stock incentive awards in the form of options (incentive and non-qualified), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, performance stock, performance units, and other awards in stock or cash. The 2017 Plan permits the issuance of up to 625,000 shares of our Common Stock in any of the above stock awards. As of March 16, 2020, 583,244 shares remain available to be issued under the 2017 Plan.
Starting in 2017 and each subsequent year following 2017, our BOD and Compensation Committee granted awards to the Company’s executive officers under the 2017 Plan. We recognize share-based compensation expense for these RSUs over the vesting period of the RSUs which is determined by our BOD. Forfeitures of RSU’s are accounted for as they occur. Each executive officer received or will receive time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs. The time-based RSUs are computed as a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary based on the closing price of Company common stock on a date set by the BOD, and will vest over a three-year period based on the executive officer being employed by the Company on the vesting date. The performance-based RSUs are also computed as a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary based on the closing price of Company common stock on a date set by the BOD, and will vest over a three-year period based on the Company attaining an average Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) over that three-year period. The ROIC target is set by the BOD. Executive officers may earn more or less performance-based RSU’s based on if the actual ROIC over the time period is more or less than target. Upon vesting of either time-based or performance-based RSUs, the executive officers will be able to receive Common Stock in the Company in exchange for the RSUs.
RSUs currently issued and outstanding are as follows:
NOTE 17 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate in the Communications Segment and have no other significant business segments. The Communications Segment consists of voice, data and video communication services delivered to the customer over our local communications network. No single customer accounted for a material portion of our consolidated revenues in any of the last two years.
The Communications Segment operates the following ILECs and CLECs and has investment ownership interests as follows:
Communications Segment
● ILECs:
▪ Nuvera Communications, Inc., the parent company;
▪ Hutchinson Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Peoples Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Scott-Rice Telephone Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Sleepy Eye Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
▪ Western Telephone Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvera;
● CLECs: ▪ Nuvera, located in Redwood Falls, Minnesota; and
▪ Hutchinson Telecommunications, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of HTC, located in Litchfield and Glencoe, Minnesota;
● Our investments and interests in the following entities include some management responsibilities:
▪ FiberComm, LC - 20.00% subsidiary equity ownership interest. FiberComm, LC is located in Sioux City, Iowa;
▪ Broadband Visions, LLC - 24.30% subsidiary equity ownership interest. BBV provides video headend and Internet services;
▪ Independent Emergency Services, LLC - 14.29% subsidiary equity ownership interest. IES is a provider of E-911 services to the State of Minnesota as well as a number of counties located in Minnesota; and
▪ SM Broadband, LLC - 10.00% subsidiary equity ownership interest. SMB provides network connectivity for regional businesses.
NOTE 18 - BROADBAND GRANTS
In January 2017, the Company was awarded a broadband grant from the Minnesota Department of Employment Development (DEED). The grant provided up to 45% of the total cost of building fiber connections to homes and businesses for improved high-speed internet in unserved or underserved communities and businesses in the Company’s service area. The Company was eligible to receive $850,486 of the $1,889,968 total project costs. The Company provided the remaining 55% matching funds. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has received $765,465. These projects were completed below the awarded project costs and final documentation was provided to the DEED office in October 2018.
In November 2017, the Company was awarded a broadband grant from the DEED. The grant provided up to 42.6% of the total cost of building fiber connections to homes and businesses for improved high-speed internet in unserved or underserved communities and businesses in the Company’s service area. The Company was eligible to receive $736,598 of the $1,727,998 total project costs. The Company provided the remaining 57.4% matching funds. Construction and expenditures for these projects began in 2018. We have not yet received any funds for these projects as of December 31, 2019.
Note 19 - Transactions with equity method investments
We receive and provide services to various partnerships and limited liability companies where we are an investor. Services received include digital video, special access and communications circuits. Services provided include BOD meeting attendance, labor, Internet help desk services and management services. Cost of services we receive from affiliated parties may not be the same as the costs of such services had they been obtained from different parties.
Total revenues from transactions with affiliates were $1,028,636 and $1,090,464 for 2019 and 2018. Total expenses from transactions with affiliates were $512,953 and $520,044 for 2019 and 2018.
NOTE 20 -- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Nuvera’s BOD has declared a regular quarterly dividend on our common stock of $.13 per share, payable on March 16, 2020 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 5, 2020.
In February of 2020, Nuvera amended its MLA with CoBank to update and expand its interest rate structure. See Exhibit 10.24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding this amendment.
In January 2020, the Company was awarded a broadband grant from the DEED. The grant will provide up to 36.5% of the total cost of building fiber connections to homes and businesses for improved high-speed internet in unserved or underserved communities and businesses in the Company’s service area. The Company is eligible to receive $730,000 of the approximately $2,000,000 total project costs. The Company will provide the remaining 63.5% matching funds. Construction and expenditures for these projects will begin in the spring of 2020. We have not yet received any funds for these projects as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K.
We have evaluated and disclosed subsequent events through the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e), as of the end of the period subject to this Report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:
(1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and
(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection or unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of preventing and detecting misstatements on a timely basis. It is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, the risk that misstatements are not prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company.
Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2019, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The financial controls for Scott-Rice Telephone Company (acquired in July 2018) have been fully integrated in the Company’s overall internal control structure as of December 31, 2019. The financial controls of Scott-Rice were eligible for a one-year exemption from the requirements of Section 404 and had been excluded from this report as of December 31, 2018. There was no exemption available for internal controls over financial reporting of the Company’s processes and systems as they relate to our oversight and consolidation of Scott-Rice operations into the consolidated financial results.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Based upon the evaluation performed by our management, which was conducted with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2019, management had fully integrated Scott-Rice’s internal controls over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Nuvera Communications, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Nuvera Communications, Inc.’s and subsidiaries (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the related statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes of the Company, and our report dated March 16, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definitions and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Olsen Thielen & Co., Ltd.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
Roseville, Minnesota
March 16, 2020
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Information Incorporated by Reference
In response to Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, portions of the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting to be held on May 21, 2020 are incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. The Proxy Statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of December 31, 2019, the last day of the Company fiscal year.
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K relating to directors and nominees of the Company is contained under “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference. Information required under Item 401 about executive officers is included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Executive Officers of the Registrant.” The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is contained under “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
We have adopted a code of conduct that applies to all officers, directors and employees of the company. This code of conduct is available on our Website at www.nuvera.net and in print upon written request to Nuvera Communications, Inc., 27 North Minnesota Street, New Ulm, Minnesota 56073, Attention: Chief Financial Officer. Any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of conduct will be posted to the above-referenced Website.
The information required by Item 407(d)(4) and (d)(5), under “Audit Committee,” is contained under “The Board of Directors and Committees - Audit Committee” in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference. There is no disclosure required under Item 407(c)(3) regarding material changes in shareholder director nominating procedures.
Item 11.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is contained under “Executive Compensation” in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
The information required by Regulation S-K Item 407(e)(4), “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and Item 407(e)(5), “Compensation Committee Report,” is not required because the Company is a smaller reporting company.
Item 12.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners and Management, and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K, “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” is contained under “Non-Employee Director Compensation” in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is contained under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in our 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
There are no matters that require disclosure with respect to certain transactions with related persons as set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K.
The information required by Item 404(b) and Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K is contained under “Certain Relationship and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance,” respectively in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated by reference.
Item 14.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information relating to principal accounting fees and services required by Item 9(e) of Regulation 14A is set forth under “Proposal 2- Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” - “Fees Billed and Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, - “Audit Fees,” - “Audit-Related Fees,” - “Tax Fees,” - “All Other Fees,” and - “Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” in the Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference.
Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not Applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: March 16, 2020
NUVERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Registrant)
By
/s/ Glenn H. Zerbe
Glenn H. Zerbe, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By
/s/ Curtis O. Kawlewski
Curtis O. Kawlewski, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated have signed this report.
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 1, 2018
3.2
Bylaws of Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019
4.1*
Description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
10.1+
August 27, 2019 Offer Letter to Glenn Zerbe, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 27, 2019
10.2+
Change in Control Agreement with Glenn Zerbe incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 27, 2019
10.3+
Transitional Retirement Agreement dated August 27, 2019 between Nuvera Communications, Inc. and Bill Otis, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 27, 2019
10.4+
Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2006, between Nuvera Communications, Inc. and Barbara A.J. Bornhoft, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
10.4.1+
Amendment dated March 21, 2012, to Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2006, between Nuvera Communications, Inc. and Barbara A.J. Bornhoft, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.1 to the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K
10.4.2+
Stay Bonus Agreement dated August 27, 2019 between Nuvera Communications, Inc. and Barbara A.J. Bornhoft, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 27, 2019
10.5+
Employment Agreement dated as of March 11, 2012, between Nuvera Communications, Inc. and Curtis Kawlewski, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.1 to the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K
10.5.1+
Amendment dated July 24, 2017, to Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2012, between Nuvera Communications, Inc. and Curtis Kawlewski, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K
10.5.2+
Stay Bonus Agreement dated August 27, 2019 between Nuvera Communications, Inc. and Curtis Kawlewski, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 27, 2019
10.6+
Nuvera Communications, Inc. Amended Management Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013
10.7+
Amended Director Separation Compensation Policy dated May 26, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
10.8+
Nuvera Communications, Inc. 2015 Employee Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the definitive proxy statement dated April 15, 2015 for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 28, 2015
10.9+
Nuvera Communications, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the definitive proxy statement dated April 17, 2017 for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 25, 2017
10.1
Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 22, 2018 between and among Nuvera Communications, Inc., Scott-Rice Telephone Co. and Allstream Business U.S. LLC., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017
10.11
Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement (MLA No. RX0583), dated as of December 31, 2014 between CoBank, ACB and Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015
10.12
Amended and Restated Second Supplement to the Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement dated as of December 31, 2014 between CoBank, ACB and Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015
10.13
Amended and Restated Third Supplement to the Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement between CoBank, ACB and Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015
10.14
Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of December 31, 2014 from (a) Nuvera Communications, Inc. and (b) the Nuvera Communications, Inc. Subsidiaries in favor of CoBank, ACB, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015
10.15
Amended and Restated Continuing Guaranty dated as of December 31, 2014 by (a) Nuvera Communications, Inc. Subsidiaries in favor of CoBank, ACB, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015
10.16
Waiver and Consent dated as of November 30, 2015 between CoBank, ACB and Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015
10.17
Second Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement dated as of July 31, 2018 between CoBank, ACB and Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2018
10.18
Fourth Supplement to the Second Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement dated as of July 31, 2018 between CoBank, ACB and Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2018
10.19
Promissory Note (Revolver) in the principal amount of $10.0 Million, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2018
10.20
Fifth Supplement to the Second Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement dated as of July 31, 2018 between CoBank, ACB and Nuvera Communications, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2018
10.21
Promissory Note (Term) in the principal amount of $64,550,000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2018
10.22
Second Amended and Restated Continuing Guaranty dated as of July 31, 2018 by (a) Nuvera Communications, Inc. in favor of CoBank, ACB, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2018
10.23
Second Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of July31, 2018 from (a) Nuvera Communications, Inc. and (b) the Nuvera Communications, Inc. Subsidiaries in favor of CoBank, ACB, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2018
21*
Subsidiaries of Nuvera Communications, Inc.
23.1*
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Rule 13a-14(a) Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Under Rule 13a-14(a) adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
XBRL Instance File
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema File
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase File
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase File
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase File
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase File
*Filed Herewith
+Management compensation plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit