Item 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Omitted.
Item 6.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
Omitted.
Item 7.
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Omitted.
Item 7A.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Omitted.
Item 8.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Omitted.
Item 9.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Omitted.
Item 9A.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures.
Omitted.
Item 9B.
Item 9B.
Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Omitted.
Item 11.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
Omitted.
Item 12.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Omitted.
Item 13.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Omitted.
Item 14.
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Omitted.
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB
Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.
The mortgaged property securing the 535-545 Fifth Avenue loan constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of 1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB. The most recent (unaudited) net operating income of the significant obligor for the 2019 calendar year is $14,349,791.
Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any enhancement or other support for the certificates as described under Item 1114 (a) of Regulation AB.
Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments for the certificates as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.
Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.
The registrant knows of no legal proceeding pending against the sponsors, depositor, trustee, issuing entity, servicer contemplated by Item 1108(a)(3) of Regulation AB, originator contemplated by Item 1110(b) of Regulation AB, or other party contemplated by Item 1100(d)(1) of Regulation AB, or of which any property of the foregoing is the subject, that is material to security holders, other than as disclosed in the prospectus of the issuing entity filed in a 424(b)(5) filing dated November 24, 2015, and other than as follows:
Beginning on June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed civil complaints in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, and later the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo Bank”) in its capacity as trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. The complaints against Wells Fargo Bank alleged that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserted causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee's alleged failure to: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought included money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. In November 2018, Wells Fargo Bank reached an agreement, in which it denied any wrongdoing, to resolve such claims on a classwide basis for the 271 RMBS trusts at issue. On May 6, 2019, the court entered an order approving the settlement agreement. Separate lawsuits against Wells Fargo Bank making similar allegations filed by certain other institutional investors concerning several RMBS trusts in New York federal and state court are not covered by the agreement. With respect to such litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs' claims are without merit and intends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts.
In the last several years, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) and other large financial institutions have been sued in their capacity as trustee or successor trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities ("RMBS") trusts. The complaints, primarily filed by investors or investor groups against U.S. Bank and similar institutions, allege the trustees caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers to comply with the governing agreements for these RMBS trusts. Plaintiffs generally assert causes of action based upon the trustees’ purported failures to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties, notify securityholders of purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loan servicers and abide by a heightened standard of care following alleged events of default. Currently, U.S. Bank is a defendant in multiple actions alleging individual or class action claims against it.
U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were not the cause of losses to investors, that it has meritorious defenses, and it has contested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously. However, U.S. Bank cannot assure you as to the outcome of any of the litigation, or the possible impact of these litigations on the trustee or the RMBS trusts.
On March 9, 2018, a law firm purporting to represent fifteen Delaware statutory trusts (the “DSTs”) that issued securities backed by student loans (the “Student Loans”) filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) in its capacities as indenture trustee and successor special servicer, and three other institutions in their respective transaction capacities, with respect to the DSTs and the Student Loans. This lawsuit is captioned The National Collegiate Student Loan Master Trust I, et al. v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al., C.A. No. 2018-0167-JRS (Del. Ch.). The complaint, which was later amended on June 15, 2018, alleged that the DSTs have been harmed as a result of purported misconduct or omissions by the defendants concerning administration of the trusts and servicing of the student loans.
U.S. Bank believes that it has performed its obligations as indenture trustee and special servicer in good faith and in compliance in all material respects with the terms of the agreements governing the DSTs (the “Governing Agreements”), and accordingly that the claims against it in the lawsuit are without merit.
U.S. Bank has filed a motion seeking dismissal of the operative complaint in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Chancery Court Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, U.S. Bank requested a stay of the case while other prior filed disputes involving the DSTs and the Student Loans are being litigated. On November 7, 2018, the Court ruled that the case should be stayed in its entirety pending resolution of the first-filed cases.
On December 17, 2015, U.S. Bank National Association, the trustee under five pooling and servicing agreements for (i) Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30, (ii) COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2, (iii) Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31, (iv) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-5 and (v) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 commenced a proceeding with the Second Judicial District Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota (the “State Court”) for a declaratory judgment as to the proper allocation of certain proceeds in the alleged amount of $560 million (“Disputed Proceeds”) received by CWCAM in connection with the sale of the Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town property in New York, New York securing loans held by those trusts. CWCAM was the special servicer of such property. The petition requests the State Court to instruct the trustee, the trust beneficiaries, and any other interested parties as to the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, that constitute penalty interest and/or the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, that constitute gain-on-sale proceeds, with respect to each trust. On February 24, 2016, CWCAM made a limited appearance with the State Court to file a motion to dismiss this proceeding based on lack of jurisdiction, mootness, standing and forum non conveniens. On July 19, 2016, the State Court denied CWCAM’s motion to dismiss. On July 22, 2016, the action was removed to federal court in Minnesota (“Federal Court”). On October 21, 2016, the Federal Court held a hearing on the motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY Court”), a motion to remand to state court and a motion to hear CWCAM’s request for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss. On March 14, 2017, the Federal Court reserved the determination on the motion to hear CWCAM’s request for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss, denied the motion to remand the matter to state court and granted the motion to transfer the proceeding to the SDNY Court. Cross motions for judgment on the pleadings were filed but the SDNY Court was unable to decide the case based on the pleadings and the SDNY Court ordered discovery. All fact discovery was completed in December, 2018 and expert discovery was completed on March 15, 2019. The parties to the proceeding are engaging in dispositive motion practice. There can be no assurances as to possible impact on CWCAM of these rulings and the transfer to the SDNY Court. However, CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the related pooling and servicing agreements in good faith, and that the Disputed Proceeds were properly allocated to CWCAM as penalty interest, and it intends to vigorously contest any claim that such Disputed Proceeds were improperly allocated as penalty interest.
On March 31, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding II LTD. (“RAIT Preferred Funding”) commenced a complaint (“RAIT Complaint”) with the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “RAIT Court”), claiming it owns $18,500,000 of a mortgage loan secured by the development of the One Congress Street Property in Boston, Massachusetts (the “Loan”) and seeking (a) a declaratory judgment stating that RAIT Preferred Funding is the directing lender under a co-lender agreement dated March 28, 2007 and a pooling and servicing agreement dated March 1, 2007 (collectively, the “Operative Agreements”) and was the directing lender at the time of the improper modification of the Loan, (b) a declaratory judgment stating that RAIT Preferred Funding has the right to terminate the special servicer, (c) monetary damages for the value of the bonds and fees paid to CWCAM as the special servicer of the Loan and (d) other things. On May 17, 2016, CWCAM filed a motion to dismiss the RAIT Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) stating that the RAIT Complaint did not state a claim and the essential facts of the RAIT Complaint are negated by affidavits and evidentiary materials submitted with the RAIT Complaint. On June 14, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding filed a Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opposition”) stating that the claims in the RAIT Complaint were properly stated. On June 30, 2016, CWCAM filed a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss and in response to the Opposition, stating that each of CWCAM’s arguments is supported by the express language of the agreements between the parties, the documentary evidence and New York case law. On September 30, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding and CWCAM entered into a confidential Settlement Agreement (the “2016 Settlement”), which provides for a stay of the RAIT Preferred Funding litigation (the “Litigation Stay”) through August 25, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the 2016 Settlement, upon satisfaction of a term of the 2016 Settlement by August 25, 2017 (or such later date agreed to by the parties), the RAIT Preferred Funding litigation will be dismissed, with prejudice. On May 19, 2017 the Borrower repaid the Loan in accordance with the terms of the notes and satisfied the condition to dismissal with prejudice. RAIT has refused to dismiss the case and is claiming that the B Note should be paid in full. CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the Operative Agreements in good faith, and that the action should be dismissed with prejudice. On August 29, 2017, the RAIT Court granted leave to RAIT Preferred Funding to amend its complaint. On September 20, 2017, RAIT Preferred Funding filed an Amended Complaint (the “RAIT Amended Complaint”), which omits its original claims, adds Wells Fargo Bank as a defendant, and seeks (a) specific performance requiring repayment of the $18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note or, in the alternative, monetary damages, including the $18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note, in an amount to be determined at trial, (b) monetary damages on any fees paid to CWCAM as special servicer or Wells Fargo Bank as master servicer in connection with the borrower’s repayment of the Loan, (c) a declaratory judgment that RAIT Preferred Funding is entitled to recover the full $18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note, (d) punitive damages against CWCAM, and (e) other things. On October 11, 2017, CWCAM filed a motion to dismiss the RAIT Amended Complaint (“CWCAM Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint”) stating that the RAIT Amended Complaint did not state a claim and the essential facts of the RAIT Amended Complaint are negated by the Operative Agreements and other admissible evidentiary materials. On November 13, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank filed a motion to dismiss the RAIT Amended Complaint (the “Wells Fargo Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint”) and joined the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. On January 29, 2018, the court dismissed all claims but for breach of contract and discovery has commenced. CWCAM filed a Motion for Summary Judgement on March 18, 2019. This matter was settled and the case dismissed on May 15, 2019.
On December 1, 2017, a complaint against CWCAM and others was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., No. 17-cv-9463 (the “Original Complaint”). The gravamen of the Original Complaint alleged breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties by CWCAM’s affiliate, CWCapital Investments LLC in its capacity as collateral manager for the collateralized debt obligation transaction involving CWCapital Cobalt Vr, Ltd. In total, there are 14 counts pled in the Original Complaint. Of those 14, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. On May 23, 2018, the Original Complaint was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On June 28, 2018, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a substantially similar complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., Index No. 653277/2018 (the “New Complaint”). The gravamen of the New Complaint is the same as the previous complaint filed in the United State District Court for the Southern District of New York. In total there are 16 counts pled in the New Complaint. Of those 16 counts, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment, 1 count seeks a declaratory judgement that the plaintiff has the right to enforce the contracts in question and 1 count seeks an injunction requiring the defendants to recognize the plaintiff as the directing holder for the trusts in question. On January 11, 2019, the plaintiff dismissed with prejudice the declaratory judgment and injunction counts. The New Complaint and related summons was not served on the defendants until July 13, 2018 and July 16, 2018. The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction was denied by the court on July 31, 2018. On August 3, 2018, the defendants, including CWCAM, filed a motion to dismiss the New Complaint in its entirety. On August 20, 2019, the court entered an order granting defendants’ motion almost in its entirety, dismissing 11 of the 16 counts and partially dismissing 2 additional counts. Of the remaining counts, 2 are asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. On September 19, 2019, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a notice of appeal relating to the August 20, 2019 dismissal order and on September 26, 2019, filed an amended complaint against CWCI and CWCAM attempting to address deficiencies relating to certain of the claims dismissed by the August, 20, 2019 order. CWCI and CWCAM filed its Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on October 28, 2019. CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the related pooling and servicing agreements in good faith and the remaining allegations in the New Complaint are without merit. CWCAM intends to vigorously contest each of the remaining claims.
Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
In addition to the information regarding this Item that has been disclosed in the prospectus of the issuing entity filed in a 424(b)(5) filing dated November 24, 2015, LNR Partners, LLC, the special servicer of the 535-545 Fifth Avenue mortgage loan under the MSBAM 2015-C24 pooling and servicing agreement, is an affiliate of Starwood Mortgage Funding III LLC, a sponsor and mortgage loan seller under the MSBAM 2015-C27 securitization transaction, Starwood Mortgage Capital LLC, an originator of certain of the mortgage loans included in the MSBAM 2015-C27 securitization transaction, and LNR Securities Holdings, LLC (which, at the time of the appointment of LNR Partners, LLC as special servicer with respect to the 535-545 Fifth Avenue mortgage loan, was the controlling class representative and the holder of certificates representing more than 50% of the aggregate certificate balance of the controlling class under the MSBAM 2015-C26 transaction, pursuant to which the 535-545 Fifth Avenue control note was securitized).
Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.
The reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and the related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance are attached hereto under Item 15.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Exhibits.
(4.1) Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian, certificate administrator, certificate registrar and authenticating agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on February 24, 2016 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(4.2) Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as trust advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, certificate registrar, authenticating agent and custodian, relating to the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization transaction, pursuant to which the 535-545 Fifth Avenue Mortgage Loan is serviced (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(4.3) Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as servicer and special servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as certificate administrator and trustee, relating to the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization transaction, pursuant to which the U-Haul Portfolio Mortgage Loan is serviced (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(4.4) Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2015, between Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as trust advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, certificate registrar, authenticating agent and custodian, relating to the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization transaction, pursuant to which the Herald Center Mortgage Loan is serviced (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.
(33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
33.1 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator
33.2 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian
33.3 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
33.4 CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer
33.5 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor
33.6 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant
33.7 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant
33.8 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.3)
33.9 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.10 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.7)
33.11 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.3)
33.12 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.13 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.7)
33.14 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.3)
33.15 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.6)
33.16 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.7)
33.17 LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19)
33.18 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19)
33.19 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.2)
33.20 U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19)
33.21 U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 33.20)
(34). Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.
34.1 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator
34.2 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian
34.3 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
34.4 CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer
34.5 Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor
34.6 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant
34.7 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant
34.8 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.3)
34.9 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.10 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.7)
34.11 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.3)
34.12 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.13 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.7)
34.14 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.3)
34.15 CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.6)
34.16 National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.7)
34.17 LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19)
34.18 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19)
34.19 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.2)
34.20 U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19)
34.21 U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 34.20)
(35). Servicer compliance statement.
35.1 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator
35.2 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian
35.3 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer
35.4 CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer
35.5 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 35.3)
35.6 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSJP 2015-HAUL securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: U-Haul Portfolio (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 35.3)
35.7 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C25 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Herald Center (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 35.3)
35.8 LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19)
35.9 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2015-C24 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: 535-545 Fifth Avenue (from 1/1/19 to 12/31/19) (see Exhibit 35.2)
(99.1) Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated November 19, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.2) Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated November 19, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and Bank of America, National Association (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.3) Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated November 19, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and CIBC Inc. (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.4) Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated November 19, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Starwood Mortgage Funding III LLC and Starwood Mortgage Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.5) Agreement Between Note Holders, dated July 24, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note A-1 Holder, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note A-2 Holder, and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note A-3 Holder, relating to the 535-545 Fifth Avenue loan combination (filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.6) Agreement Between Note Holders, dated September 1, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note 1 Holder, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Initial Note 2 Holder, relating to the U-Haul Portfolio loan combination (filed as Exhibit 99.6 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.7) Agreement Between Note Holders, dated October 15, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, as Initial Note A-1 Holder, Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, as Initial Note A-2 Holder, and Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, as Initial Note A-3 Holder, relating to the Herald Center loan combination (filed as Exhibit 99.7 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on March 10, 2016 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.8) Agreement Between Note Holders, dated November 24, 2015, between Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note A Holder, and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note B Holder, relating to the Hammond Square loan combination (filed as Exhibit 99.8 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on February 24, 2016 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(99.9) Agreement Between Note Holders, dated October 28, 2015, between Bank of America, N.A., as Initial Note A-1 Holder, and Bank of America, N.A., as Initial Note A-2 Holder, relating to the University West Apartments loan combination (filed as Exhibit 99.9 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2015 under SEC File No. 333-180779-20 and incorporated by reference herein).
(b) See (a) above.
(c) Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
(Depositor)
By: /s/ Jane Lam
Jane Lam, Director and President
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Date: March 27, 2020