ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (Company) is a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of Ohio in 1985 and elected to become a financial holding company under the Federal Reserve in 2014. Our primary subsidiary, The Farmers & Merchants State Bank (Bank) is a community bank operating in Northwest Ohio and Northeast Indiana since 1897. Our other subsidiary, Farmers & Merchants Risk Management (Captive) is a captive insurance company formed in December 2014 and located in Nevada. We report our financial condition and net income on a consolidated basis and we report only one segment.
Our executive offices are located at 307 North Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502, and our telephone number is (419) 446-2501.
For a discussion of the general development of the Company’s business throughout 2019, please see the portion of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations captioned “2019 in Review.”
Nature of Activities
The Farmers & Merchants State Bank engages in general commercial banking business. Its activities include commercial, agricultural and residential mortgage as well as consumer and credit card lending activities. Because the Bank's offices are located in Northwest Ohio and Northeast Indiana, a substantial amount of the loan portfolio is comprised of loans made to customers in the farming industry for such things as farm land, farm equipment, livestock and operating loans for seed, fertilizer, and feed. Other types of lending activities include loans for home improvements and loans for such items as autos, trucks, recreational vehicles and motorcycles. With the expansion into newer market areas, the most recent increases in loan activity have been in commercial real estate, providing operating lines of credit and machinery purchases.
The Bank also provides checking account services, as well as savings and time deposit services such as certificates of deposits. In addition, Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) or Interactive Teller Machines (ITMs) are provided at most branch locations along with other independent locations in the market area. The Bank has custodial services for Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). The Bank provides on-line banking access for consumer and business customers. For consumers, this includes bill-pay, on-line statement opportunities and mobile banking. For business customers, it provides the option of electronic transaction origination such as wire and Automated Clearing House (ACH) file transmittal. In addition, the Bank offers remote deposit capture or electronic deposit processing and merchant credit card services. Upgrades to our digital products and services continue to occur in both retail and business lines.
The Bank has established underwriting policies and procedures which facilitate operating in a safe and sound manner in accordance with supervisory and regulatory guidance. Within this sphere of safety and soundness, the Bank's practice has been to not promote innovative, unproven credit products which may not be in the best interest of the Bank or its customers. The Bank does offer a hybrid mortgage loan. Hybrid loans are loans that start out as a fixed rate mortgage but after a set number of years automatically adjust to an adjustable rate mortgage. The Bank offers a three year fixed rate mortgage after which the interest rate will adjust annually. The majority of the Bank's adjustable rate mortgages are of this type. In order to offer longer term fixed rate mortgages, the Bank does participate in the Freddie Mac, Farmer Mac and Small Business Lending programs. The Bank also normally retains the servicing rights on these partially or 100% sold loans. In order for the customer to participate in these programs they must meet the requirements established by those agencies. In addition, the Bank does sell some of its longer term fixed rate agricultural mortgages into the secondary market with the aid of a broker.
The Bank does not have a program to fund sub-prime loans. Sub-prime loans are characterized as a lending program or strategy that targets borrowers who pose a significantly higher risk of default than traditional retail banking customers.
All loan requests are reviewed as to credit worthiness and are subject to the Bank's underwriting guidelines as to secured versus unsecured credit. Secured loans are in turn subject to loan to value (LTV) requirements based on collateral types as set forth in the Bank's Loan Policy. In addition, credit scores of those seeking consumer credit are reviewed and if they do not meet the Bank's Loan Policy guidelines an additional officer approval is required.
Consumer Loans:
•
Maximum loan to value (LTV) for cars, trucks and light trucks vary from 90% to 110% depending on whether direct or indirect.
•
Loans above 100% are generally the result of additional charges for extended warranties and/or insurance coverage for wage or death.
•
Boats, campers, motorcycles, RV's and Motor Coaches range from 80%-90% based on age of vehicle.
•
1st or 2nd mortgages on 1-4 family homes range from 75%-90% with "in-house" first real estate mortgages requiring private mortgage insurance on those exceeding 80% LTV.
•
Raw land LTV maximum ranges from 65%-75% depending on whether or not the property has been improved.
Commercial/Agriculture/Real Estate:
•
Maximum LTVs range from 70%-80% depending on type.
•
Accounts Receivable: Up to 80% LTV less retainages and greater than 90 days.
•
Maximum LTV on non-traditional loan up to 85%.
Inventory:
•
Agriculture:
o
Livestock and grain up to 80% LTV, crops (insured) up to 75% and Warehouse Receipts up to 87%.
•
Commercial:
o
Maximum LTV of 50% on raw and finished goods.
•
Floor plan:
o
New/used vehicles to 100% of wholesale.
o
New/Used recreational vehicles and manufactured homes to 80% of wholesale.
Equipment:
•
New not to exceed 80% of invoice, used NTE 50% of listed book or 75% of appraised value.
•
Restaurant equipment up to 35% of market value.
•
Heavy trucks, titled trailers up to NTE 75% LTV and aircraft up to 75% of appraised value.
F&M Investment Services, the brokerage department of the Bank, opened for business in April 1999. Securities are offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
In December of 2014, the Company became a financial holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 as amended, in order to provide the flexibility to take advantage of the expanded powers available to a financial holding company under the Act. Our subsidiary bank is in turn regulated and examined by the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The activities of our bank subsidiary are also subject to other federal and state laws and regulations. The Company also formed a Captive insurance company in December 2014. The Captive is located in Nevada and regulated by the State of Nevada Division of Insurance.
The Bank’s primary market includes communities located in the Ohio counties of Defiance, Fulton, Hancock, Henry, Lucas, Williams, Wood and in the Indiana counties of Adams, Allen, DeKalb, Jay and Steuben. The commercial banking business in this market is highly competitive, with approximately 34 other depository institutions currently doing business in the Bank’s primary market. In our banking activities, we compete directly with other commercial banks, credit unions, farm credit services, and savings and loan institutions in each of our operating localities. In a number of our locations, we compete against entities which are much larger than us, including Huntington National Bank, Fifth Third Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, NA, KeyBank NA and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA. Based on deposit data as of June 30, 2019 from the FDIC and using zip codes in our markets, the Bank ranked 3rd with a 14.24% market share in markets served. The primary factors in competing for loans and deposits are the rates charged as well as location and quality of the services provided.
At December 31, 2019, we had 357 full time equivalent employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit. We provide our employees with a comprehensive benefit program, some of which is contributory. We consider our employee relations to be good.
Supervision and Regulation
General
The Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Ohio. The business in which the Company and its subsidiaries are engaged is subject to extensive supervision, regulation and examination by various bank regulatory authorities. The supervision, regulation and examination to which the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to are intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the deposit insurance funds that insure the deposits of banks, rather than for the protection of shareholders.
Several of the more significant regulatory provisions applicable to banks and bank holding companies to which the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to are discussed below along with certain regulatory matters concerning the Company and its subsidiaries. To the extent that the following information describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory provisions. Any change in applicable law or regulation may have a material effect on the business and prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Safety and Soundness Standards
The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines that establish operational and managerial standards to promote the safety and soundness of federally insured depository institutions. The guidelines set forth standards for internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality and earnings.
In general, the safety and soundness guidelines prescribe the goals to be achieved in each area, and each institution is responsible for establishing its own procedures to achieve those goals. If an institution fails to comply with any of the standards set forth in the guidelines, the institution’s primary federal regulator may require the institution to submit a plan for achieving and maintaining compliance. If an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, or fails in any material respect to implement a compliance plan that has been accepted by its primary federal regulator, the regulator is required to issue an order directing the institution to cure the deficiency. Until the deficiency cited in the regulator’s order is cured, the regulator may restrict the institution’s rate of growth, require the institution to increase its capital, restrict the rates the institution pays on deposits or require the institution to take any action the regulator deems appropriate under the circumstances. Noncompliance with the standards established by the safety and soundness guidelines may also constitute grounds for other enforcement action by the federal banking regulators, including cease and desist orders and civil money penalty assessments.
Regulatory Agencies
The Company is a financial holding company and is subject to inspection, examination and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. As a financial holding company, the Company is still subject to all the bank holding company regulations.
The Bank is an Ohio chartered commercial bank. It is subject to regulation and examination by both the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions (ODFI) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
The Captive is an insurance company incorporated in Nevada and regulated by the State of Nevada, Division of Insurance.
Holding Company Activities
As a financial holding company incorporated and doing business within the State of Ohio, the Company is subject to regulation and supervision under the Bank Holding Act of 1956, as amended (the "Act"). The Company is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board on quarterly basis information pursuant to the Act. The Federal Reserve Board may conduct examinations or inspections of the Company and its subsidiaries.
On November 12, 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the "GLB Act") was enacted into law. The GLB Act made sweeping changes with respect to the permissible financial services which various types of financial institutions may now provide. The Glass-Steagall Act, which had generally prevented banks from affiliation with securities and insurance firms, was repealed. Pursuant to the GLB Act, bank holding companies may elect to become a "financial holding company," provided that all of the depository institution subsidiaries of the bank holding company are “well capitalized” and “well managed” under applicable regulatory standards.
Under the GLB Act, a bank holding company that has elected to become a financial holding company may affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature. Activities that are "financial in nature" include securities underwriting, dealing and market-making, sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies,
insurance underwriting and agency, merchant banking, and activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be closely related to banking. Federal Reserve Board approval is not required for the Company to acquire a company, other than a bank holding company, bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board. Prior Federal Reserve Board approval is required before the Company may acquire the beneficial ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares, or substantially all of the assets, of a bank holding company, bank or savings association. If any subsidiary bank of the Company ceases to be "well capitalized" or "well managed" under applicable regulatory standards, the Federal Reserve Board may, among other actions, order the Company to divest the subsidiary bank. Alternatively, the Company may elect to conform its activities to those permissible for a bank holding company that is not also a financial holding company. If any subsidiary bank of the Company receives a rating under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 of less than satisfactory, the Company will be prohibited from engaging in new activities or acquiring companies other than bank holding companies, banks or savings associations.
Affiliate Transactions
Various governmental requirements, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W promulgated thereunder limit borrowings by holding companies and non-bank subsidiaries from affiliated insured depository institutions, and also limit various other transactions between holding companies and their non-bank subsidiaries, on the one hand, and their affiliated insured depository institutions on the other. Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act also generally requires that an insured depository institution's loans to its non-bank affiliates be secured, and Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act generally requires that an insured depository institution's transactions with its non-bank affiliates be on arms-length terms.
Interstate Banking and Branching
Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act ("Riegle-Neal"), subject to certain concentration limits and other requirements, adequately capitalized bank holding companies such as the Company are permitted to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any state. Any bank that is a subsidiary of a bank holding company is permitted to receive deposits, renew time deposits, close loans, service loans and receive loan payments as an agent for any other bank subsidiary of that bank holding company. Banks are permitted to acquire branch offices outside their home states by merging with out-of-state banks, purchasing branches in other states and establishing de novo branch offices in other states. The Company could from time to time use Riegle-Neal to acquire banks in additional states.
Control Acquisitions
The Change in Bank Control Act prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring "control" of a bank holding company, unless the Federal Reserve Board has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under the rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve Board, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as the Company, would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of the bank holding company. In addition, a company is required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act before acquiring 25% (5% in the case of an acquirer that is a bank holding company) or more of any class of outstanding voting stock of a bank holding company, or otherwise obtaining control or a "controlling influence" over that bank holding company.
Liability for Banking Subsidiaries
Under the current Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its subsidiary banks and to maintain resources adequate to support each subsidiary bank. This support may be required at times when the bank holding company may not have the resources to provide it. In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a U.S. federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank would be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment. Any depository institution insured by the FDIC can be held liable for any loss incurred, or reasonably expected to be incurred, by the FDIC in connection with (1) the "default" of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution; or (2) any assistance provided by the FDIC to both a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution "in danger of default." The Bank is an FDIC-insured depository institution. If a default occurred with respect to the Bank, any capital loans to the Bank from its parent holding company would be subordinate in right of payment to payment of the Bank's depositors and certain of its other obligations.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Company is required by the various regulatory authorities to maintain certain capital levels. Bank holding companies are required to maintain minimum levels of capital in accordance with Federal Reserve Board capital adequacy guidelines. If capital falls below minimum guideline levels, a bank holding company, among other things, may be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or non-bank businesses. The required capital levels along with the Bank’s capital
position at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are summarized in the table included in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements. Beginning in 2018, the consolidated amounts and ratios for the Company are no longer required.
Beginning in 2015, the Company and Bank were required to measure capital adequacy using Basel III accounting. Basel III is a comprehensive set of reform measures, developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management of the banking sector. Implementation of the rules will be overseen by the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC. Reporting under the new rules began with the March 2015 quarterly regulatory filings.
FDICIA
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"), and the regulations promulgated under FDICIA, among other things, established five capital categories for insured depository institutions-well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized-and requires U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies to implement systems for "prompt corrective action" for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements based on these categories. Unless a bank is well capitalized, it is subject to restrictions on its ability to offer brokered deposits and on certain other aspects of its operations. An undercapitalized bank must develop a capital restoration plan and its parent bank holding company must guarantee the bank's compliance with the plan up to the lesser of 5% of the bank’s assets at the time it became undercapitalized and the amount needed to comply with the plan. As of December 31, 2019, the Bank was well capitalized pursuant to these prompt corrective action guidelines.
Dividend Restrictions
The ability of the Company to obtain funds for the payment of dividends and for other cash requirements will be largely dependent on the amount of dividends which may be declared by its banking subsidiary, which are limited to the Bank’s retained earnings during the current year and its prior two years. Various U.S. federal statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends the Company's banking subsidiary can pay to the Company without regulatory approval. In 2009, The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation issued SR09-4 regarding the safe and sound payment of dividends by bank holding companies. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on applicable dividend restrictions.
Deposit Insurance Assessments
The deposits of the Bank are insured up to the regulatory limits set by the FDIC. The FDIC maintains the Deposit Insurance fund (“DIF”) by assessing depository institutions an insurance premium (assessment). The amount assessed to each institution is based on statutory factors that take into consideration the degree of risk the institution poses to the DIF. The primary purposes of the DIF are to (1) insure the deposits and protect the depositors of insured depository institutions; and (2) resolve failed banks. The DIF is primarily funded through quarterly assessments on insured depository institutions, but it also earns interest income on its securities. Decreases in the DIF result from loss provisions associated with the resolution of failed banks and FDIC operating expenses.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”) revised the statutory authorities governing the FDIC’s management of the DIF. A key requirement from the Dodd-Frank Act resulted in the FDIC’s adoption of new rules in February 2011 regarding Assessments, Dividends, Assessment Base, and Large Bank Pricing. The new rules implemented the following changes: (1) redefined the definition of an institution’s deposit insurance assessment base from one based on domestic deposits to one based on assets now defined as “average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity”; (2) changed the assessment rate adjustments to better account for risk based on an institution’s funding sources; (3) revised the deposit insurance assessment rate schedule in light of the new assessment base and assessment rate adjustments; (4) implemented Dodd-Frank Act dividend provisions; (5) revised the large insured depository institution assessment system to better differentiate for risk and to take into account losses the FDIC may incur from large institution failures; and (6) provided technical and other changes to the FDIC’s assessment rules. Though deposit insurance assessments maintain a risk-based approach, the FDIC imposed a more extensive risk-based assessment system on large insured depository institutions with at least $10 billion in total assets since they are more complex in nature and could pose greater risk. The rules became effective April 1, 2011 implementing the revised assessment rate schedule for the quarter beginning April 1, 2011. The revised assessment rate schedule was used to calculate the June 30, 2011 assessments which were due September 30, 2011 and subsequent quarterly assessments thereafter. Due to the changes to the assessment base and assessment rates, as well as the DIF restoration time frame, the impact on the Company’s future deposit insurance assessments has been and should continue to be favorable.
The Dodd-Frank Act permanently raised the standard maximum deposit insurance coverage amount to $250,000 and applies per depositor, per insured depository institution for each account ownership category.
Depositor Preference Statute
In the "liquidation or other resolution" of an institution by any receiver, U.S. federal legislation provides that deposits and certain claims for administrative expenses and employee compensation against the insured depository institution would be afforded a priority over general unsecured claims against that institution, including federal funds and letters of credit.
Government Monetary Policy
The earnings of the Company are affected primarily by general economic conditions and to a lesser extent by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve. Its policies influence, to some degree, the volume of bank loans and deposits, and interest rates charged and paid thereon, and thus have an effect on the earnings of the Company's subsidiary Bank.
Additional Regulation
Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have resulted in additional rulemaking by the federal regulatory agencies and new rules yet to be issued. Implementing the new and expanded regulations involved extreme diligence to ensure compliance with the complexities of the rules, as well as extensive new disclosure and reporting requirements.
The Dodd-Frank Act created an independent regulatory body, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (“Bureau”), with authority and responsibility to set rules and regulations for most consumer protection laws applicable to all banks - large and small - adds another regulator to scrutinize and police financial activities. Transfer to the Bureau of all consumer financial protection functions for designated laws by the other federal agencies was completed in July 2011. The Bureau was given responsibility for mortgage reform and enforcement, as well as broad new powers over consumer financial activities, including consumer financial products and services and how they are provided.
In accordance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (the “GLB Act”), federal banking regulators adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to non-affiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a non-affiliated third party. The privacy provisions of the GLB Act affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors.
A major focus of governmental policy on financial institutions has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “USA Patriot Act”) substantially broadened the scope of United States anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The U. S. Treasury Department has issued a number of regulations that apply various requirements of the USA Patriot Act to financial institutions such as the Bank. These regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity of their customers. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution.
Significant mortgage rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act provisions were enacted in response to the breakdown in the mortgage lending markets and to provide for consumer protections. Final rules issued by the Bureau or jointly with other regulatory agencies implemented requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act regarding mortgage-related matters such as ability-to-repay, qualified mortgage standards, mortgage servicing, mortgage loan originator compensation, escrow requirements for higher-priced mortgage loans, and providing appraisals. These new mortgage rules, effective in January 2014, addressed problems consumers faced in the three major steps in buying a home - shopping for a mortgage, closing on a mortgage, and paying off a mortgage.
Final rules and amendments to the integrated mortgage disclosure rules under the Real Estate Settlement Act (RESPA) and Truth in Lending Act (TILA) became effective in October 2015. The TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure rule commonly referred to as TRID combined required disclosures into two single forms: 1) The Loan Estimate which is provided shortly after a mortgage loan application and 2) The Closing Disclosure which is provided prior to loan consummation. In addition, a mandated appraisal notice under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the servicing application disclosure under RESPA were also combined into the new integrated disclosures. Process and procedural adjustments were necessary to appropriately implement the new requirements. Implementation to achieve TRID compliance involved extensive collaboration with the Mortgage Loan Origination software vendor, as well as outreach and coordination efforts with real estate agents, attorneys, and closing agents to cultivate preparedness for the new integrated mortgage loan disclosure forms. Amendments to the TRID rules effective in October 2017 with a mandatory compliance in October 2018 were intended to provide further clarity to certain provisions. Remaining attentive to the complexities of the TRID rules will ensure practices and procedures remain compliant and not subject the Bank to unnecessary liability.
Final rules, mostly effective in October 2015, were issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), the Farm Credit Administration, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to implement provisions of the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (HFIAA) and the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (the Biggert-Waters Act). These provisions amended regulations which apply to loans secured by properties located in special flood hazard areas. Final rules for acceptance of private flood insurance policies became effective on July 1, 2019. Fines and penalties continue to be assessed by regulators for non-compliance with flood insurance requirements promote a continued focus on adherence to the flood rules and requirements.
The Department of Defense (DOD) rules amending its regulation that implements the Military Lending Act (MLA) became effective in October 2016. The MLA enacted as part of the John Warner National Defense Act of 2007, significantly expanded the scope of the Act to cover all consumer credit except residential mortgages and purchase money loans. Compliance requirements for credit cards became effective in October 2017. Coverage applies to consumer credit defined as “credit offered or extended for personal, family, or household purpose and that is subject to a finance charge or payable by written agreement in more than four installments.” A covered borrower is a consumer who at the time of becoming obligated on a consumer credit transaction or establishing an account for consumer credit, is a covered member or dependent (including a spouse) of a covered member. A covered member is a member of the armed forces serving on active duty or active guard or reserve duty.
Providing a loan to a MLA-covered borrower that exceeds the 36% Military Annual Percentage Rate is prohibited. Any covered loans made without providing proper disclosures or in violation of the MLA is void. Creditors who knowingly or willfully violate the rules could be subject to a fine, imprisonment up to one year or both. Reliance on and collaboration with Loan Origination System vendors for assistance with calculations and required disclosures along with an efficient and effective process for identifying covered borrowers remains the best defense to prevent violations.
Under the TILA Ability to Repay requirements, the Bank meets the criteria to qualify as a small creditor based on the number of first-lien mortgage loans transactions and due to its asset size; however it is not a creditor that operates predominantly in rural or underserved areas as it did not extend more than 50% of its total first-lien covered transactions in rural or underserved areas. The Bank focuses on Qualified Mortgage (QM) status for mortgage loans originated as they provide certain presumptions of compliance under the Ability to Repay rules adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act. In satisfying QM requirements, any mortgage lender regardless of their size can make loans which are entitled to the QM presumption of compliance.
Revised Regulation C rules which implement the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) published by the Bureau become effective on January 1, 2018 for reportable loan applications. Dodd-Frank Act provisions added new data points for HMDA and authorized the Bureau to require additional information. The types of transactions reportable have expanded to include most consumer purpose transactions that are dwelling-secured loans or open-end lines of credit. Reportable data points were significantly expanded to 52 fields which included applicant age, credit score, automated underwriting system information, property value, application channel, points and fees, borrower-paid origination charges, discount points, lender credits, loan term, prepayment penalty, interest rate, loan originator identifier, as well as other data fields. Ethnicity categories were expanded to include certain subcategories along with a means to capture information on how an applicant’s or borrower’s ethnicity, race, and sex were collected by the institution. A thorough review and validation of data fields to be reported for each application was conducted throughout the year. Year-end submission of data to be reported will utilize the web-based tool developed by the Bureau.
Enactment of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) on May 24, 2018, resulted in a regulatory reform law deemed to be relief from certain burdensome provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The EGRRCPA included provisions with various effective dates, including some that were effective immediately. Matters impacted included access to mortgage credit; access to credit; protections for veterans, consumers, and homeowners; rules for holding companies; capital access; and protections for student borrowers. Though effective immediately, conforming regulations were required for certain provisions such as Reciprocal Deposits, Examination Cycles, and High Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE). The Protecting Tenants in Foreclosure Act was restored and permanently extended as of June 23, 2018. An interim final rule was jointly issued by the OCC, FRB, and FDIC allowing an extended examination cycle for qualifying insured depository institutions with less than $3 billion in total assets. Effective September 21, 2018, consumers could freeze their credit information and place one-year fraud alerts for free. Additionally, parents can freeze the credit information of their children under age 16 for free. In many instances, regulators still need to issue proposals, provide guidance, and publish final rules for various provisions. Thus, issuance of guidance and final rules must be monitored in order to be effectively implemented.
Unfair or deceptive acts or practices (UDAP) standards originally developed years ago by the Federal Trade Commission focused on unacceptable practices that may not specifically be addressed elsewhere in banking or consumer finance law. Banking regulatory agencies have increasingly used this authority over the years to address acts or practices that are deemed
harmful, deceptive, or misleading to consumers. The authority of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for credit practice rules was repealed as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. Guidance issued collectively by the FDIC, FRB, the Bureau, NCUA, and OCC in August 2014 clearly indicated certain consumer credit practices were not permissible and remained subject to Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as well as Sections 1031 and 1036 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The interagency guidance further noted that the Agencies will continue to have supervisory authority and enforcement authority for unfair or deceptive acts or practices, which could include those practices previously addressed in the former credit practices rules. Awareness of UDAP standards, in relation to the offering and marketing of Bank products and services remains important.
The Bank is also subject to federal regulation relating to such matters as required reserves, limitation as to the nature and amount of its loans and investments, regulatory approval of any merger or consolidation, issuance or retirement of their own securities, limitations upon the payment of dividends and other aspects of banking operations. In addition, the activities and operations of the Bank are subject to numerous additional detailed, complex and sometimes overlapping laws and regulations. These include state usury and consumer credit laws, state laws relating to fiduciaries, the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, the federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V, the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and Regulation X, the federal Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, the federal Truth in Savings Act and Regulation DD, the Bank Secrecy Act, the federal Community Reinvestment Act, anti-discrimination laws and legislation, and antitrust laws.
Future Legislation
Changes to the laws and regulations, both at the federal and state levels, can affect the operating environment of the Company and its subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. The Company cannot accurately predict whether those changes in laws and regulations will occur, and, if those changes occur, the ultimate effect they would have upon the financial condition or results of operations of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Available Information
The Company maintains an Internet web site at the following internet address: www.fm.bank. The Company files reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Because the Company makes its filing with the SEC electronically, you may access such reports at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). The Company makes available, free of charge through its internet address, copies of its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials have been filed with or furnished to the SEC. Copies of these documents may also be obtained, either in electronic or paper form, by contacting Barbara J. Britenriker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company at (419) 446-2501.
ITEM 1a.
ITEM 1a. RISK FACTORS
Significant Competition from an Array of Financial Service Providers
Our ability to achieve strong financial performance and a satisfactory return on investment to shareholders will depend in part on our ability to expand our available financial services. In addition to the challenge of attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, our competitors now include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors and finance and insurance companies who seek to offer one-stop financial services to their customers that may include services that banks have not been able or allowed to offer to their customers in the past. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial services providers. If we fail to adequately address each of the competitive pressures in the banking industry, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Credit Risk
The risk of nonpayment of loans is inherent in commercial banking. Such nonpayment could have an adverse effect on the Company’s earnings and our overall financial condition as well as the value of our common stock. Management attempts to reduce the Bank’s credit exposure by carefully monitoring the concentration of its loans within specific industries and through the loan approval process. However, there can be no assurance that such monitoring and procedures will totally mitigate the risks. Credit losses can cause insolvency and failure of a financial institution and, in such event, its shareholders could lose their entire investment. For more information on the exposure of the Company and the Bank to credit risk, see the section under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K captioned “Loan Portfolio.”
Dependence upon the Accuracy and Completeness of Information
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, we may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial
information. We also may rely on representations of clients and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors and accountants if made available. If this information is inaccurate, we may be subject to regulatory action, reputational harm or other adverse effects with respect to the operation of our business, our financial condition and our results of operation.
Our loan portfolio has a large concentration of real estate loans
Real estate loans, which constitute a large portion of our loan portfolio, include home equity, agricultural, commercial, construction and residential loans, and such loans are concentrated in the Bank’s primary markets in northwest Ohio and Northeast Indiana. The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Adverse developments affecting real estate values in our market could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio. Also, real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of the loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Economic events or governmental regulations outside of the control of the borrower could negatively impact the future cash flow and market values of the affected properties.
If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then we may not be able to realize the amount of security that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for loan losses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our real estate loans also include construction loans, including land acquisition and development. Construction, land acquisition and development lending involve additional risks because funds are advanced based upon estimates of costs and the estimated value of the completed project. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation on real property, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. As a result, commercial construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If our appraisal of the value of the completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project.
Payments on agricultural real estate loans are dependent on the profitable operation or management of the farm property securing the loan. The success of the farm may be affected by many factors outside the control of the borrower, including adverse weather conditions that prevent the planting of a crop or limit crop yields (such as hail, drought and floods), loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural products (both domestically and internationally) and the impact of government regulations (including changes in price supports, subsidies and environmental regulations). In addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may significantly affect the successful operation of the farm. If the cash flow from a farming operation is diminished, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. The primary crops in our market areas are corn, wheat and soybeans. Accordingly, adverse circumstances affecting these crops could have an adverse effect on our agricultural real estate loan portfolio.
Commercial loans make up a significant portion of our loan portfolio
Our commercial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. Repayment of our commercial loans is often dependent on the cash flows of the borrower, which may be unpredictable. Most often, this collateral is accounts receivable, inventory, machinery or real estate. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. The other types of collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.
We also originate agricultural operating loans. As with agricultural real estate loans, the repayment of operating loans is dependent on the successful operation or management of the farm property. Likewise, agricultural operating loans involve a greater degree of risk than lending on residential properties, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as farm equipment or assets such as livestock or crops. The primary livestock in our market areas is hogs. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. The majority of our agricultural customers utilize crop insurance to mitigate the possibility of a large loss within one year on their grain operations. Crop insurance can be structured to be triggered by different factors and claim payment may also be customized, such as based on harvest yields, income generation. Farmers may also use hedging techniques to lock in crop prices, input costs for future production.
Susceptibility to Changes in Regulation
Any changes to state and federal banking laws and regulations may negatively impact our ability to expand services and to increase the value of our business. We are subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision, and legislation that govern almost all aspects of our operations. These laws may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds. In addition, the Company’s earnings are affected by the monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. These policies, which include regulating the national supply of bank reserves and bank credit, can have a major effect upon the source and cost of funds and the rates of return earned on loans and investments. The Federal Reserve influences the size and distribution of bank reserves through its open market operations and changes in cash reserve requirements against member bank deposits. We cannot predict what effect any presently contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations would have on us, but such changes could be materially adverse to our financial performance. For more information on this subject, see the section under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K captioned “Supervision and Regulation.”
Changes in U.S. Trade Policies
Throughout 2018 and 2019, the U.S. government implemented tariffs on certain products from countries or entities such as Mexico, Canada, China and the European Union. These countries have issued or continue to threaten retaliatory tariffs against products from the United States, including agricultural products. The United States and these countries may impose additional tariffs and retaliatory tariffs in the future. Tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials that our customers import or export, including agricultural products such as soybeans, could cause the prices of our customers’ products to increase which could reduce demand for such products, or reduce our customer margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results and ability to service debt. This could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, to the extent changes in the political environment have a negative impact on us or on the markets in which we operate, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted in the future. In January 2020, passage of the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement helped to alleviate some of these risks. The USMCA updates trading rules to better reflect 21st century technology, regulates labor and environmental standards in Mexico, tightens the rules the auto industry must follow to trade vehicles duty free across the three countries and provides tariff-free trade in North America.
Interest Rate Risk
Changes in interest rates affect our operating performance and financial condition in diverse ways. Our profitability depends in substantial part on our “net interest spread,” which is the difference between the rates we receive on loans and investments and the rates we pay for deposits and other sources of funds. Our net interest spread will depend on many factors that are partly or entirely outside our control, including competition, federal economic, monetary and fiscal policies, and economic conditions generally. Historically, net interest spreads for other financial institutions have widened and narrowed in response to these and other factors, which are often collectively referred to as “interest rate risk.” After many years of a low and flat rate environment, the Federal Reserve began increasing the Federal Funds rate in 2015 and began decreasing the rate in the second half of 2019. The Company did not experience improvement in its asset yield on loans until such time that the rate increases enabled the loan rates to rise above the floors which had been on the majority of the variable rate loans. During 2017, the increasing rates having reached over 100 basis points, triggered rate changes above the floors and the Company experienced improvement in the interest spread. The improvement in the net interest spread during 2017 through 2019 directly correlated to the improvement of the Bank’s loan to asset ratio.
The Bank manages interest rate risk within an overall asset/liability framework. The principal objectives of asset/liability management are to manage sensitivity of net interest spreads and net interest income to potential changes in interest rates. Funding positions are kept within predetermined limits designed to ensure that risk-taking is not excessive and that liquidity is properly managed. In the event that our asset/liabilities management strategies are unsuccessful, our profitability may be adversely affected. For more information regarding the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk, see Part II, Item 7A of this Form 10-K.
Attraction and Retention of Key Personnel
Our success depends upon the continued service of our senior management team and upon our ability to attract and retain qualified financial services personnel. Competition for qualified employees is intense. In our experience, it can take a significant period of time to identify and hire personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required in carrying out our strategy. If we lose the services of our key personnel or are unable to attract additional qualified personnel, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
A key component of employee retention is providing a fair compensation base combined with the opportunity for additional compensation for above average performance. In this regard, the Company and the Bank use two incentive programs. The Company uses a stock award program to recognize and incentivize officers of the Bank. Under the long-term incentive
compensation plan, restricted stock awards may be granted to officers. The amount of shares to be granted each year is determined by the Board Compensation Committee and may vary each year in its amount of shares and the number of recipients. The Compensation Committee determines the number of shares to be awarded overall and to the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) specifically. The CEO then makes recommendations to the committee as to the recipients of the remaining shares. The full Board of Directors approves the action of the Committee. Since the plan’s inception in 2005, all granted stock awards have utilized a three year cliff vesting feature. This is viewed as a retention aid as the awards may be forfeited should an officer leave employment during the vesting period.
A second incentive program of the Bank is based on cash compensation of which almost all employees participate (excluding commission based employees and other employees paid for specific higher paid positions, such as peak time). A discussion of executive officer pay is incorporated within the proxy and as such, this discussion will pertain to all other employees. Non-officer employees are paid a cash incentive based on the projected overall performance of the Bank in terms of Return of Average Assets (“ROA”). The Compensation Committee determines the target performance levels on which the percentage of pay will be based. The Committee takes into account the five and ten year trend of ROA along with budget forecasted for the next year and the Bank’s past year performance. The Committee also considers the predicted banking environment under which the Bank will be operating. With the formation of the Captive, the ROA goal has been exclusive of the effect of the additional insurance expense at the Bank level. Non-officers receive incentive pay in December of the same year based on the year-to-date base compensation through the last pay received in November.
Officers, other than executive officers, receive incentive pay based on additional criterion. The officers are rewarded based on overall ROA of the Bank along with individual pre-established goals. Officers, therefore, have incentive pay at risk for individual performance. The individualized goals are recommended by each officer’s supervisor and are approved by an incentive committee of the Bank. The goals are designed to improve the performance of the Bank while also limiting the risk of a short-term performance focus. For example, a lending officer may be given two goals of which one is to grow loans within specific targets and another is tied to a specific level of past dues and charge-offs. The second goal limits the ability to be rewarded for growth at all costs along with the specific target levels within the growth goal itself. Officers in a support department may be given goals which create efficiencies, ensure compliance with procedures, or generate new fee or product opportunities. On average, three to four goals were given to each officer in 2019. Officers are paid cash incentives based on the year-end ROA of the Bank and receive it within the first quarter of the following year. Should the ROA be forecasted to be positive but below the base target set by the Board, the officers are paid an incentive under the same basis and timing as non-officers disclosed above.
The percentages of base pay on which the incentive is calculated graduates higher as does the responsibility level of the employee and their ability to impact the financial performance of the Bank. These percentages are recommended by management to the Compensation Committee and Board for approval. The cash incentive plan along with its targets and goals are subject to modification at the Compensation Committee and Board’s discretion throughout each year.
Dividend Payout Restrictions
We currently pay a quarterly dividend on our common shares. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to pay dividends in the future. Dividends are subject to determination and declaration by our Board of Directors, which takes into account many factors. The declaration of dividends by us on our common stock is subject to the discretion of our Board and to applicable state and federal regulatory limitations. The Company may receive dividends from the Bank which is subject to restrictions and limitations in the amount and timing of the dividends it may pay to the Company. The Bank has been declaring additional dividends each quarter to provide this liquidity to the Company. The Captive also upstreams dividends to the Company when reserve levels are adequately provided for and may not exceed the net income of the prior twelve months.
Maintaining Compliance with Regulatory Capital Requirements
Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, we must meet guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could have a material effect on our financial condition and could subject us to a variety of enforcement actions, as well as certain restrictions on our business. Failure to maintain the status of “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework could adversely affect the confidence that our customers have in us, which may lead to a decline in the demand for or a reduction in the prices that we are able to charge for our products and services. Failure to meet the guidelines could also limit our access to liquidity sources.
Access to New Capital
We may at some point need to raise additional capital to maintain our “well-capitalized” status. Any capital we obtain may result in the dilution of the interests of existing holders of our stock. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot make assurances of our ability to raise additional capital if needed, or if the terms will be acceptable to us.
Anti-Takeover Provisions
Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Ohio law could have the effect of discouraging takeover attempts which certain stockholders might deem to be in their interest. These anti-takeover provisions may make us a less attractive target for a takeover bid or merger, potentially depriving shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares of common stock at a premium over prevailing market prices as a result of a takeover bid or merger.
Compliance with Environmental Laws
A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property. We may foreclose on and take title to certain real property. There is a risk that hazardous substances could be found on the property and we may be liable for remediation costs, personal injury and/or property damage. We may incur substantial expenses to comply with environmental laws which may materially reduce the property's value or limit our ability to dispose of the property. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with the property could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Technological Change
Our industry is susceptible to significant technological changes in the future as there continue to be a high level of new technology driven products and services introduced. Technological advancement aids the Company in providing customer service and increases efficiency. Our national competitors have more resources to invest in technological changes and associated required resources. As a result, they may be able to offer products and services that are more technologically advanced and that may put us at a competitive disadvantage. Our future depends on our ability to analyze technological changes to determine the best course of action for our business, customers and shareholders.
Operational Risks
We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, data processing system failures and errors, customer or employee fraud and catastrophic failures resulting from terrorist acts or natural disasters. We maintain a system of internal controls to mitigate against such occurrences and maintain insurance coverage for such risks that are insurable, but should such an event occur that is not prevented or detected by our internal controls, uninsured or in excess of applicable insurance limits, it could have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our operations are dependent on our ability to process financial transactions in a secure manner. Failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors and other service providers, could disrupt our business or the businesses of our customers, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage our reputation, increase our costs and cause losses. We must ensure that information is properly protected from a variety of threats such as cyber attacks, error, fraud, sabotage, terrorism, industrial espionage, privacy violation, service interruption, and natural disaster. These threats arise from numerous sources including human error, fraud on the part of employees or third parties, technological failure, telecommunication outages, and severe weather conditions. Information security risks for financial institutions like us have increased recently in part because of new technologies, the increased use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices and cloud computing) to conduct financial and other business transactions, political activism, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime. Although we employ detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents, early detection may be thwarted by persistent sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection.
We also face risks related to cyber attacks and other security breaches in connection with card transactions that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding our customers through various third parties. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyber attacks, and because the transactions involve third parties and environments that we do not control or secure, future security breaches or cyber attacks affecting any of these third parties could impact us through no fault of our own, and in some cases we may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. We also rely on numerous other third party service providers to conduct other aspects of our business operations and face similar risks relating to them. While we conduct security assessments on our higher risk third party service providers, we cannot be sure that their information security protocols are sufficient to withstand a cyber attack or other security breach. There can be no assurance that cyber incidents will not occur and they could occur more frequently and on a more significant scale.
We devote significant resources to implement, maintain, monitor and regularly upgrade our systems and networks with measures such as intrusion detection and prevention and firewalls to safeguard critical business applications. The additional cost to the Company of our cyber security monitoring and protection systems and controls includes the cost of hardware and software, third party technology providers, consulting, and legal fees, in addition to the incremental cost of our personnel who focus a substantial portion of their responsibilities on cyber security. In addition, because cyber attacks can change frequently we may be unable to implement effective preventive or proactive measures in time. With the assistance of third-party service
providers, we intend to continue to implement security technology and establish procedures to maintain network security, but there is no assurance that these measures will be successful. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.
Any activity that jeopardizes our network and the security of the information stored thereon may result in significant cost and have a significant adverse effect on our reputation. We maintain insurance coverage that may, subject to policy terms and conditions, cover certain aspects of cyber risks. Such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses.
Any successful cyber attack or other security breach involving the misappropriation or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information or that compromises our ability to function could severely damage our reputation, erode confidence in the security of our systems, products and services, expose us to the risk of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business. Any successful cyber attack may also subject the Company to regulatory investigations, litigation or enforcement, or require the payment of regulatory fines or penalties or undertaking costly remediation efforts with respect to third parties affected by a cyber security incident, all or any of which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations and damage its reputation.
Potential Inadequacy of our allowance for loan losses
Like all financial institutions, we maintain an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. Our allowance for loan losses is based on our historical loss experience as well as an evaluation of the risks associated with our loan portfolio, including the size and composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and concentrations within the portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed expectations, we will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for loan losses. Any increases in the allowance for loan losses may result in a decrease in net income and capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," which replaces the current "incurred loss" model for recognizing credit losses with an "expected loss" model referred to as the Current Expected Credit Loss model, or “CECL.” Under the CECL model, we will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the "incurred loss" model required under current GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how we determine our allowance for loan losses and could require us to significantly increase our allowance. Moreover, the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses. If we are required to increase our level of allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The new CECL standard will become effective for us for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 and for interim periods during 2023. We are currently evaluating the impact the CECL model will have on our accounting, but we expect to recognize a one-time cumulative-effect adjustment to our allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective.
Attraction of Deposits and other Short-term Funding
In managing our liquidity, our primary source of short-term funding is customer deposits. Our ability to continue to attract these deposits, and other short-term funding sources, is subject to variability based upon a number of factors, including the relative interest rates we are prepared to pay for these liabilities and the perception of safety of those deposits or short-term obligations relative to alternative short-term investments. The availability and cost of credit in short-term markets depends upon market perceptions of our liquidity and creditworthiness. Our efforts to monitor and manage liquidity risk may not be successful or sufficient to deal with dramatic or unanticipated changes in event-driven reductions in liquidity. In such events, our cost of funds may increase, thereby reducing our net interest revenue, or we may need to dispose of a portion of our investment portfolio, which, depending on market conditions, could result in our realizing a loss or experiencing other adverse consequences.
Vendor Relationship Risk
We rely on third-party vendors to provide key components of our business operations such as data processing, recording and monitoring transactions, online and mobile banking interfaces and services, internet connections and network access. While we have performed due diligence procedures in selecting vendors, we do not control their actions. In the event that one or more of our vendors suffers a bankruptcy or otherwise becomes unable to continue to provide products or services, or fails to protect non-public personal information of our customers or employees, we may suffer operational impairments, reputational damage and financial losses. Replacing these third-party vendors could create significant delay and expense. Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an inherent risk to our business operations.
Limited Trading Market
The Company has its shares of stock listed and traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market. The Company’s trading symbol is “FMAO.”
ITEM 1b.
ITEM 1b. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our principal office is located in Archbold, Ohio.
The Bank operates from its principal office located at 307 North Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio. In addition, the Bank owns the property from 200 to 208 Ditto Street, Archbold, Ohio, which it uses for Bank parking and a community mini-park area. The Bank owns real estate at two locations, 207 Ditto Street and 209 Ditto Street in Archbold, Ohio upon which the bank built a commercial building to be used for storage, and a parking lot for company vehicles and employee parking. The Bank also owns real estate across from the main facilities to provide for parking.
The Bank occupies an Operations Center at 620 S. Clyde’s Way in Archbold, Ohio to accommodate our growth over the years. The bank owns a parking lot in downtown Montpelier which is provided for community use.
The Bank owns all of its office locations, with the exception of Angola, Indiana and Bowling Green, Ohio. Both of these office locations are leased.
The Bank currently maintains retail banking offices at the following locations:
Office
Location
Archbold, Ohio
307 N Defiance Street
1313 S Defiance Street
Wauseon, Ohio
1130 N Shoop Avenue
119 N Fulton Street
Stryker, Ohio
300 S Defiance Street
West Unity, Ohio
200 W Jackson Street
Bryan, Ohio
929 E High Street
1000 S Main Street
Delta, Ohio
101 Main Street
Montpelier, Ohio
1150 E Main Street
Napoleon, Ohio
2255 Scott Street
Swanton, Ohio
7 Turtle Creek Circle
Defiance, Ohio
1175 Hotel Drive
Perrysburg, Ohio
7001 Lighthouse Way
Butler, Indiana
200 S Broadway
Auburn, Indiana
403 Erie Pass
Angola, Indiana
2310 N Wayne Street
Hicksville, Ohio
100 N Main Street
Waterville, Ohio
8720 Waterville-Swanton Road
Custar, Ohio
22973 Defiance Pike
Sylvania, Ohio
5830 Monroe Street
Fort Wayne, Indiana
12106 Lima Road
Bowling Green, Ohio
1072 N. Main Street
Findlay, Ohio
1660 Tiffin Avenue
All but one of the above locations has drive-up service facilities and an ATM. The Captive operates from leased office space at 101 Convention Center Dr., Suite 850, Las Vegas, NV 89109.
On January 1, 2019, the Company acquired Limberlost Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary, Bank of Geneva. Six offices located in Indiana, were merged into the Bank as listed below:
Office
Location
Geneva, Indiana
215 East Line Street
Monroe, Indiana
150 W. Washington Street
Berne, Indiana
718 US Highway 27 N
Monroeville, Indiana
103 Main Street
Portland, Indiana
1451 N Meridian Street
Decatur, Indiana
1061 S 13th Street
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine proceedings incidental to the business of the Company or its subsidiaries, to which we are a party or of which any of our properties are the subject.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the trading symbol “FMAO.”
On August 18, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one stock split payable on September 20, 2017, for shareholders of record on September 5, 2017.
The Company utilizes Computershare as its transfer agent.
As of December 31, 2019, there were 1,806 record holders of our common stock of which 43.33% of the outstanding shares are being held in brokerage accounts or “street name” and only considered as one record holder.
Below is a line-graph presentation comparing the cumulative total shareholder returns for the Corporation, an index for NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) comprised of all domestic common shares traded on the NASDAQ National Market System and the NASDAQ Bank Index for the five-year period ended December 31, 2019. The chart compares the value of $100 invested in the Corporation and each of the indices and assumes investment on December 31, 2014 with all dividends reinvested.
The Board of Directors recognizes that the market price of stock is influenced by many factors, only one of which is performance. The stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
Dividends are declared and paid quarterly. Per share dividends declared for the years ended 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
Dividends declared during 2019 were $0.61 per share totaling $6.73 million, 8.9% higher than 2018 declared dividends of $0.56 per share. During 2019, the Company awarded 38,100 shares to 94 employees and 3,220 shares were forfeited under its long term incentive plan. At year end, 2019, the Company held 1,093,065 shares in Treasury stock and 88,450 in unearned stock awards.
Dividends declared during 2018 were $0.56 per share totaling $5.14 million, 12% higher than 2017 declared dividends of $0.50 per share. During 2018, the Company awarded 33,000 restricted shares to 80 employees and 2,620 shares were forfeited under its long term incentive plan. At yearend 2018, the Company held 1,114,739 shares in Treasury stock and 93,940 in unearned stock awards.
The Company currently expects to continue to maintain the payment of its quarterly dividend consistent with its past practices.
The Company continues to have a strong capital base.
On January 17, 2020, the Company announced the authorization by its Board of Directors for the Company’s repurchase, either on the open market, or in privately negotiated transactions, of up to 550,000 shares of its outstanding common stock commencing January 17, 2020 and ending December 31, 2020.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(1)
From time to time, the Company purchases shares in the market pursuant to a stock repurchase program publicly announced on January 18, 2019. On that date, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 500,000 common shares between January 18, 2019 and December 31, 2019.
(2)
Shares which were repurchased for taxes on vested stock awards are outside of this program.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 2018 and 2017 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2019 presentation.
SUMMARY OF SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
*
Based on weighted average number of shares outstanding
(1)
Share data has been adjusted to reflect a 2-for-1 stock split on September 20, 2017
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Company follows general practices within the financial services industry in which it operates. At times the application of these principles requires management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These assumptions, estimates and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. As this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different assumptions, estimates and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on assumptions, estimates and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Examples of critical assumptions, estimates and judgments are when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not required to be recorded at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability must be recorded contingent upon a future event.
All significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and in the management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued and how those values are determined for the financial statements. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to assumptions, estimates and judgments underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) and the valuation of its Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR) and Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) as the accounting areas that requires the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be the most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
OREO, which is comprised of assets acquired by the Bank, through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
The ALLL represents management's estimate of credit losses inherent in the Bank's loan portfolio at the report date. The estimate is a composite of a variety of factors including experience, collateral value, and the general economy. ALLL includes a specific portion, a formula driven portion, and a general nonspecific portion. The collection and ultimate recovery of the book value of the collateral, in most cases, is beyond our control.
The Company is also required to estimate the value of its MSR. The Company recognizes as separate assets rights to service fixed rate single-family mortgage loans that it has sold without recourse but services for others for a fee. Mortgage servicing assets are initially recorded at fair value, based upon pricing multiples as determined by the purchaser, when the loans are sold. Mortgage servicing assets are carried at the lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization, or estimated fair value. Amortization is determined in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income using the level yield method. For purposes of determining impairment, the mortgage servicing assets are stratified into like groups based on loan type, term, new versus seasoned and interest rate. The valuation is completed by an independent third party.
The expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are the most significant factors driving the potential for the impairment of the value of mortgage servicing assets. Increases in mortgage loan prepayments reduce estimated future net servicing cash flows because the life of the underlying loan is reduced.
The Company’s mortgage servicing rights relating to loans serviced for others represent an asset of the Company. This asset is initially capitalized and included in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The mortgage servicing rights are then amortized as noninterest expense in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying mortgage servicing rights. There are a number of factors, however, that can affect the ultimate value of the mortgage servicing rights to the Company, including the estimated prepayment speed of the loan and the discount rate used to present value the servicing right. For example, if the mortgage loan is prepaid, the Company will receive fewer servicing fees, meaning that the present value of the mortgage servicing rights is less than the carrying value of those rights on the Company’s balance sheet. Therefore, in an attempt to reflect an accurate expected value to the Company of the mortgage servicing rights, the Company receives a valuation of its mortgage servicing rights from an independent third party. The independent third party’s valuation of the mortgage servicing rights is based on relevant characteristics of the Company’s loan servicing portfolio, such as loan terms, interest rates and recent national prepayment experience, as well as current national market interest rate levels, market forecasts and other economic conditions. Management, with the advice from its third party valuation firm, review the assumptions related to prepayment speeds, discount rates, and capitalized mortgage servicing income on a quarterly basis. Changes are reflected in the following quarter’s analysis related to the mortgage servicing asset. In addition, based upon the independent third party’s valuation of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights, management then establishes a valuation allowance by each strata, if necessary, to quantify the likely impairment of the value of the mortgage servicing rights to the Company. The estimates of prepayment speeds and discount rates are inherently uncertain, and different estimates could have a material impact on the Company’s net income and results of operations. The valuation allowance is evaluated and adjusted quarterly by management to reflect changes in the fair value of the underlying mortgage servicing rights based on market conditions. The accuracy of these estimates and assumptions by management and its third party can be directly tied back to the fact that management has not been required to record a valuation allowance through its income statement based upon the valuation of each stratum of serving rights.
For more information regarding the estimates and calculations used to establish the ALLL and the value of Mortgage Servicing Rights, please see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements provided herewith.
2019 in Review
The Company completed the merger with Limberlost on January 1, 2019 and three weeks later integrated the Bank of Geneva into The Farmers & Merchants State Bank’s core operating system. Great benefits will follow as the Company continues its strategy for long-term sustainable growth from the six offices that have been added. Financially, the merger was accretive to earnings during 2019, with a larger legal lending limit enabling the expansion of existing customer’s borrowings and a wider range of products and services now available to all customers. F&M continues to operate on the foundation of a strong community bank platform in the communities we serve.
Federal rate increases and the addition of higher yielding assets from the acquisition resulted in a widening of the net interest margin through second quarter 2019. In the second half of the year, Fed reduced rates three times within a ninety one day period beginning on August 1, 2019. Pressure continues to build on cost of funds as depositors seek out higher rates. The Bank has offered new products in 2019 to attract new depositors and for current depositors to increase their holdings with us. Competitive pressure has forced us to increase rates and thereby put pressure on the margin.
The Company again reports record earnings in total and in earnings per share. This was achieved even with the acquisition costs associated with the merger deal completed January 1, 2019. Earnings per share, with acquisition costs excluded, would have been $1.75 as reported in Note 2 proforma statements which is higher than $1.66 as reported in Note 12. The improvement is credited to a widening of the net interest margin, loan growth and the change in the effective income tax rate, offset by increases in noninterest expense, primarily attributable to salaries, wages and employee benefits.
The Company’s asset size grew $491.2 million with net loans accounting for $372.2 million, and the remaining difference mainly coming from an increase in securities of $53.8 million, goodwill of $43.3 million and cash and equivalents of $12.9 million.
A Chief People Officer was added in second quarter 2019 to assist with increasing the level of our Company’s talent. The Company has invested in our retail infrastructure and has been conducting extensive training. During the second and third quarters, the Company spent time developing a three year strategic plan. The vision statement was updated to be “Community Vested to Help People Realize Their Best Lives.” An outcome of the strategic planning process included the following five strategic initiatives that will help take the Company to the next level: customer acquisition and retention, talent optimization, actively pursue acquisition opportunities, improve operating efficiency and financial performance, and develop a comprehensive digital strategy for internal and external constituencies.
2019 was an unexpected agricultural grain production year as much of our banking territory experienced an unusually wet spring which resulted in a large area of unplanted acres. The year concluded with better revenue results than anticipated as the crops that did get planted yielded better than expected, the government subsidies were more than originally forecasted, and the crop insurance proved to be a key revenue source. This combined with the fact that area farmers in general have been conservative in the preceding years resulted in financial stress that being significantly mitigated. Recent land sales have showed no real sign of reduction in the price per acre. Financial stability and overall optimism in land ownership continues to buoy the market. The agri-businesses had a very tight financial year as they did not have the same safety nets the farmers had available to them to offset the reduced revenues. Their previous financial success however is helping them weather this setback. Conservative management practices have been implemented by many of these businesses with an eagerness to get back to business as usual in 2020. Overall the ag portfolio remains stable.
The commercial performance has been strong in 2019. Labor shortage issues continue to be expressed by most employers as they try to maintain or grow their staffs. Technology efficiencies are creating lending and business opportunities. The competition is very strong in all industries. Price multiples on business sales has been high with more sales occurring than were experienced in previous years. The growth in the loan portfolio was exceptional in the second half of the year making up for some large paydowns and payoffs experienced in the first half of the year. This was especially so in the commercial real estate lending market. F&M being a community bank has played well with borrowers who desire a banking relationship and not a transactional bank.
During the first quarter of 2019, we opened a new office in Decatur, Indiana that had been in process at the time of the acquisition. This office utilizes ITM equipment, offering traditional service with a self-service option. An ITM completes teller transactions using a debit card for recognition - the self-service option. The traditional service completes the transaction by the customer requesting teller assistance and talking to a remote customer assistance representative on-line. Personal Relationship Bankers (PRBs) welcome our customers to the office and provide exceptional customer service as they can complete a teller transaction, open a new deposit account and complete a consumer loan. One additional existing office was physically transformed during 2019 with ITMs. Our other offices have begun the personnel transformations with PRBs at each
office and Community Relationship Bankers (CRBs) covering specific market areas. CRBs focus on the community and especially small business customers. F&M strives to serve our customers where they want, and how they want.
A trend of increasing improvement in net income continued from 2017 through 2019. 2019 increased 23.1% over 2018 and 2018 was 17.5% higher than 2017. Dividends declared also increased over the corresponding years. 2019’s declared dividends at $0.61 a share was 8.9% higher than 2018’s $0.56 per share and 2018 was 12.0% higher than 2017’s $0.50 per share. The Company remains strong, stable and well capitalized and has the capacity to continue to cover the increased costs of doing business. The Company continues to look for new opportunities to generate and protect revenue while providing additional channels through which to serve our customer and maintain our high level of customer satisfaction. The Company plans to continue our strategy of expansion into new markets, whether by acquisition or the establishment of new branch office locations. A new office in Fort Wayne, Indiana is underway for 2020 expansion.
Material Changes in Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
The discussion now centers on the individual line items of the consolidated statement of income and their effect on net income. This section will focus on the most traditional source of revenue contributing to the profitability of the Company which is net interest income.
Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities used to fund those assets, such as interest bearing deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income is affected by changes in both interest rates and the amount and composition of earning assets and liabilities. The change in net interest income is most often measured by two statistics - interest spread and net interest margin. The difference between the yields earned on earning assets and the rates paid for interest bearing liabilities represents the interest spread. The net interest margin is the difference of funds (interest expense) between the yield on earning assets and the cost as a percentage of earning assets. Because noninterest bearing sources of funds such as demand deposits and stockholders’ equity also support earning assets, the net interest margin exceeds the net interest spread.
As mentioned previously, the largest factor of the record earnings for 2019 was the $13.7 million improvement in net interest income as compared to 2018. In 2018, net interest income increased $3.7 million as compared to 2017. Interest and fee income from loans were responsible for the improvement. Interest income from loans, including fees, increased $19.9 million in 2019 as compared to 2018. This was preceded by an increase in 2018 of $5.1 million as compared to 2017. The underlying factors for the reason of the increase differed between the two time periods; however, both years were aided by prime rate increases which drove the effective interest rates on the Bank’s variable loans over their floor rates. During the second half of 2019, the prime rate decreased 75 basis points in a 91-day time period. 2019 loan interest income included $1.985 million for the reversal of a credit loss established for two commercial purchased credit-impaired loans that were paid off during the second quarter. In 2019, the volume of loan growth was the largest contributing factor to the improved profitability. As a comparison to 2018, when the improvement was almost equally impacted by the increased volume and increased rates. Securities were sold or matured with the proceeds used to fund the loan growth. The security portfolio increased $1.6 million in average during 2019 as compared to 2018, reversing the 2018 average decrease of $11.0 million over 2017 average balances. Interest income from that balance sheet component increased $678 thousand over 2018 while 2018 decreased $67 thousand over 2017. Overall, total interest income was $21.9 million higher for 2019 than 2018 and was $5.2 million higher for 2018 than 2017.
Interest expense increased from all interest bearing funding sources with the exception of other borrowed money in 2018 over the time periods shown of 2017 through 2019. Overall, the funding goal the last three years has been to grow core deposits. Two strategies have been employed through the years, one of allowing expensive time deposits to run off until needed for funding and secondly to offer new non-interest bearing deposit products. Both of these strategies were to assist in controlling interest expense in a rising rate environment. Competition has forced us to increase rates for deposits in 2019. During 2019, interest expense from deposits increased by $7.0 million over 2018 and 2018 increased $1.5 million over 2017. The majority, approximately 68.6%, of the increased expense of 2019 was influenced by increased rates rather than due to additional cost associated with deposit growth.
Total interest expense (which includes deposit, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and borrowed funds) totaled $14.8, $6.6 and $5.1 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively. The increased expense is approximately 68.4% attributable to the rising interest rate environment in 2019 as compared to 2018 and almost entirely attributable in the 2018 to 2017 comparison. Borrowed fund balances increased in January of 2019, as a result of the acquisition of Bank of Geneva. All of 2015’s borrowings have since matured in December of 2017 and December of 2018.
The success in improving net interest income confirmed that management’s long term strategy of repositioning the balance sheet and increasing loan balances was the correct approach. Funding loan growth with internal funds, whether from the liquidation of investment securities or core deposits, was a beneficial move.
This concludes the discussion by dollar amount of the improvement. Now the discussion moves on to the percentages and the change in the net interest margin and spread.
Overall, we have seen increased improvement in the net interest margin and spread from 2017 to 2018. Interest margin and spread decreased in 2019 as compared to 2018 with the increased interest expense. Looking at the components behind the change in net interest margin for 2019 as compared to 2018, increased average balances in loans of $297.6 million stands out. The additional revenue of almost $19.9 million that those balances were responsible for was the largest contributor to the improved net yield on loans of 42 basis points. Beginning in 2017, loan revenue was positively impacted by the change in the interest rate. The majority of variable loans with floor rates attained the point where rate increases caused the rate to go above the floor. The Bank had expected 100 basis points of change was needed for this to occur which was reached with the June 2017 Fed Funds rate hike. The next hike did not occur until December of 2017, too late to largely impact 2017 though it benefitted 2018. 2018 saw four additional rate hikes of 25 basis points while 2019 had three rate decreases of 25 basis points. The large revenue gain in loan interest was aided by the increased earnings in securities of $678 thousand. The overall asset yield in 2019 improved by 39 basis points over 2018.
Increased interest expense correlated to the higher rate environment in which the deposits needed to be garnered. The Bank experienced pressure to offer higher rates to public funds in Ohio due to competition. In the area where the strategic plan was to gather core deposits, the average balance in savings grew by $169.1 million during 2019 as compared to 2018’s average balance. The other average balance increase for core deposits was the change in non-interest bearing demand deposits. 2019’s average balance in this portfolio was $49.0 million higher than 2018’s average balance. Overall, cost of funds increased 56 basis points for 2019 over 2018. The reason behind the increase was largely due to rate increases, not the volume increases.
The net interest margin for 2019 was 3.80% compared to 2018 which was 3.83%. The 0.03% decrease for 2019 was directly related to the increased interest expense. Net interest spread was 3.43% for 2019 compared to 2018’s 3.60%, creating a 17 basis point difference in the spread. Loans as a percentage of earning assets was 79.9% while loans to total assets was 75.3% for 2019. The goal is, as always, to improve the net interest margin and spread and thereby improve profitability.
In comparing 2018 to 2017, loan volume was primarily responsible for the improvement in interest income as the yield on the overall loan portfolio increased 33 basis points during 2018. The only category of asset yield to decrease was the investment securities which were used to fund growth. Overall, asset yield increased 30 basis points in 2018 as compared to 2017.
The net interest margin also climbed up in 2018, ending 18 basis points over 2017. Asset yield raised 30 basis points while the cost of funds increased 18 basis points. The yields on the individual segments did cause the overall improvement as all increased with the exception of tax exempt securities. The improvement in the asset yield was primarily a result of the change in rate. In addition, loans as a percentage of earning assets increased to 79.3% in 2018 compared to 77.8% in 2017. Loans to total assets also increased to 74.8% for 2018 compared to 2017’s 72.8%. Overall yield improves when the balances of the highest yield asset increases, which is loans.
With respect to the cost of funds, the Bank’s goal is to grow the least expensive category of funding sources. The largest average balance increase for 2018 was $32.2 million in savings deposits over 2017’s average balances. This growth was mostly responsible for the increase in funding expense of 18 basis points when comparing 2018 to 2017.
The Company will always prefer to see improvement in real dollars over percentages. The strategy for increasing core deposits, in order to mitigate the higher cost of funds and to continue to establish the opportunity for fee dollars from services provided, remains for 2020.
Total assets of the Company increased overall as did the earning assets in both average and year end during 2019 and 2018. This matched the movement in interest dollars and in yields. The percentage of average earning assets to total average assets reflects the best utilization of funds. For 2019, the percentage at 94.26% was only slightly higher than 2018 at 94.23%. The addition of offices in 2017, 2018 and 2019 increased the non-earning assets with cash balances held at the new offices and also the investment in the capital assets of their building and furniture. What made 2019 more profitable was the percentage of average loans to total assets. For 2019 the average balance of loans to total average assets was 75.32%, for 2018, 74.77%, for 2017, 72.76%. Loans are the highest yielding asset for the Company.
Net interest spread is the difference between what the Company earns on its assets and what it pays on its liabilities. It is generally from this spread that the Company must fund its operations and generate profit. When the asset yield decreases so must funding costs in order to maintain profitability. It becomes increasingly challenging as the asset yield gets closer to the prime lending rate, or the break-even point, of operations. The challenge began to change in 2016 as rates increased in December 2015. In a rising rate environment, the challenge is to hold the cost steady while allowing time for the asset portfolio to rise. Floors and ceilings on variable products also impact the level of increase in either scenario. The 25 basis point prime rate increase of 2015 did little to increase the rate on the variable loans because of the floors in place and the spread of rate to prime. The floors provided yield protection in the previous lower rate environment and the rising rates wouldn’t benefit the asset yield until the spread plus prime is higher than the floor. The challenge is to increase the spread during renewals and on new loans. After the December 2015 rate increase, it was another year before the next rate hike in December of 2016. These two rate hikes had little effect on the profitability as the majority of loans were still below the floors. It wasn’t until the third and fourth rate hikes of March and June 2017, that the majority of loans were now either equal to or over the floors. This helped the asset yield in 2017. In December 2017 along with March, June, September and December of 2018, there were rate hikes which contributed to the increased asset yield for 2018 and 2019. During 2019, there were rate decreases in August, September and October.
In terms of interest expense, 2019’s increase as compared to 2018 was approximately 68.4% due to the increase in rates. 2018’s increase was due to an increase in rates as compared to 2017.
The impact of the change in the portfolio mix was a factor in the liabilities as it was in the assets. In comparing to 2018, 2019 had movements as average balances increased in all categories. Other borrowed money increased as part of the acquisition of Bank of Geneva with the final advance maturing in 2028. Time deposits and saving deposits increased in interest expense for 2018 as compared to 2017. Fed Funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase only increased $6 thousand for 2018 and was due to rate.
The following tables present net interest income, interest spread and net interest margin for the three years 2017 through 2019, comparing average outstanding balances of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities with the associated interest income and expense. The tables show the corresponding average rates of interest earned and paid. Average outstanding loan balances include non-performing loans and mortgage loans held for sale. Average outstanding security balances are computed based on carrying values including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities. The average cost of funds for 2019 was 1.42%, 56 basis points higher than 2018’s 0.86% for interest bearing liabilities.
The yield on tax-exempt investment securities shown in the following charts were computed on a tax equivalent basis. The yield on loans has been tax adjusted for the portion of tax-exempt IDB loans included in the total. Total interest earning assets is therefore also reflecting a tax equivalent yield in both line items, also with the net interest spread and margin. The adjustments were based on a 34% tax rate for 2017 and a 21% tax rate for 2018 and 2019.
The following tables show changes in interest income, interest expense and net interest resulting from changes in volume and rate variances for major categories of earnings assets and interest bearing liabilities.
Non-Interest Income
The discussion now focuses on the non-interest income and expense generated from the Company for the years ended 2017 through 2019. Non-interest income increased in total for 2019 as compared to 2018, ending at $11.8 million. 2018 had non-interest income of $10.9 million which exceeded 2017’s $10.7 million.
Components of non-interest income for 2019 which improved over both 2018 and 2017 were combined service charge revenue from the business accounts and consumer accounts which is included in the other service charges and fees line of the consolidated income statement. 2019 combined service charge revenue was $20.2 thousand higher than 2018 while 2018 was $53.1 thousand higher than 2017, mainly due to the increased number of accounts that had service charges attached to them. During the second quarter 2017, new business checking products were announced and existing business accounts were converted to one of three new products, Business Essential, Edge or Elite. The new products provided customers with new options to bundle services and for the Bank to utilize the full relationship to determine pricing. This was a continuation of the
Bank’s “earn to free” strategic initiative. Overdraft, returned check charges and recurring overdraft fees from combined business accounts and consumer accounts increased $257.9 thousand over 2018. Upgrades to our digital products and services continue to occur in both retail and business lines. Increases in the number of accounts and the number of services being utilized by our customers accounted for the increase in fees over the last two years.
The Bank has long promoted the use of debit cards by its customers and continues to build on that philosophy with the introduction of new products. During 2019 the Bank collected interchange revenue, combined with fees collected on foreign ATM fees (noncustomers utilizing our ATMs), of $3.4 million which was $465.5 thousand higher than 2018 and $167.5 thousand higher than 2017. While this revenue stream continues to improve with more depositors using electronic methods for purchasing, the expense attributable to card fraud has offset a portion of the revenue gain. Further discussion can be found in the non-interest section regarding the net effect of debit card activity.
Noninterest income from net gain on sales of loans was the highest in 2017 of the three year periods shown. The change may be related to the increase in rates after the long duration of the flat interest rate environment. The net gain on sale of loans is derived from sales of real estate loans into the secondary market. Of these loan types, the Bank sells 100% of the residential loans and 90% of the agricultural loans. 56% of the gains were attributed to the residential loans in 2019, 66.5% in 2018 and 80% in 2017. In conjunction with these sales, the Bank maintains servicing rights and those income amounts during all three years are included in the customer service fee income line item and accounted for $731 thousand in 2019, $449 thousand in 2018 and $460 thousand in revenue for 2017.
The last item in the non-interest income section is the net gain of sale of investments. The Bank has sold securities over the last three years for two main purposes: to provide funds for loan growth and to take advantage of the position of the yield curve when a gain can be recognized on sales without extending the duration of the portfolio longer than wanted. 2019 and 2018 had limited sales for gain recognition due to the flatness of the yield curve which began to occur in second half of 2017. The Bank will not increase short-terms gains at the sacrifice of long-term profitability. The available for sale security portfolio switched from an unrealized loss position into an unrealized gain position in 2019. Sales in 2017 were made early in the first quarter before the additional Federal Reserve rate hike in March and again in May before the June rate hike. These sales recognized much lower gains than in prior years. The Bank recognized net losses of $26.3 thousand in 2019 and net gains of $9.8 thousand in 2018 and $46.9 thousand for 2017. The Company also recognized a gain on sale of securities from the holding company of $0.4 thousand in 2019 while proceeds from 2018 were used to provide cash for the acquisition with the losses totaling $19.2 thousand. The net effect of the consolidated number is what shows on the line item of net loss of $26 thousand for 2019 and $9 thousand for 2018.
Non-Interest Expense
Noninterest expense increased 29.1% in 2019 as compared to 2018 and was preceded by a 12.1% increase in 2018 as compared to 2017. Represented in dollars, 2019 was $9.4 million higher than 2018 and 2018 was $3.5 million higher than 2017. The largest factor behind the increase in both years was the expense of employee salaries and wages. During 2019, an additional $2.6 million was spent over 2018 which correlates to an 18.7% increase. When making the same analysis for 2018 as compared to 2017, 2018’s costs increased $1.1 million or 9.1%. Three main components flow into salaries and wages: base salary, deferred costs, and incentives composed of the expense of restricted stock awards and performance incentives. Base pay has increased with the addition of the four newer offices of Sylvania, Huntertown, Bowling Green and Findlay in addition to the six offices acquired from Bank of Geneva in 2019, as well as from the operations of the Captive and through normal yearly increases to the remainder of the employees. Base pay was up $3.2 million for 2019 over the previous year and 2018 was up $768.3 thousand over 2017. The full time equivalent number of employees at each yearend increased to 357 for 2019, to 288 for 2018 compared to 2017’s 275. The Company had also chosen to invest a portion of the tax savings dollars of 2018 to increase the base pay of our lowest paid employees.
Incentive pay as it related to performance was down $386.3 thousand in 2019 over 2018 and up $181.7 thousand in 2018 over 2017. The Return on Assets measurement used to award incentive pay dropped in 2019 compared to 2018 resulting in decreased incentive pay. The effect of acquisition costs and fair value accretions/amortizations were removed in 2019 and 2018 for the calculation. The measurements used for award incentive pay had improved in 2018 and 2017 and employees benefited accordingly. The measurements used for 2018 were increased to negate the paying of incentive for the benefit of the lower tax rate. The expense for the restricted stock awards has also increased each of the last three years as more shares have been granted to a larger number of employees and the market value of the shares has increased. The market value of the Company’s stock increased significantly with the listing on NASDAQ and being included in the Russell 3000 Index during the second quarter of 2017. 5,100 more shares were awarded in 2019 with a lower value as compared to 2018. 1,000 additional restricted shares were awarded in 2018 as compared to 2017 with the value of these rewards much higher; therefore, the expense for 2019 was higher by $342.8 thousand which included accelerated expense due to retirement of $244.7 thousand as compared to 2018. 2018’s cost for this program was $237.7 thousand higher than 2017. The awards incorporate a three year vesting period so the increase of any one year carries forward through the next two years. This expense should continue to
increase as the Company continues its expansion strategy. For further discussion in incentive pay and restricted stock awards, see Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements.
Along with the salary and wage increase was an increase in employee benefits in 2019 as compared to 2018. Employee group insurance accounted for the largest portion of the cost, which was an increase of $775.6 thousand over 2018. This was due to an increase in the cost to provide to a larger number of employees along with a higher level of medical claims. The cost of the 401-K retirement plan also increased $198.3 thousand for 2019 as compared to 2018. The contribution portion relating to the discretionary profit-sharing percentage was 5.25% in 2019 compared to 6% for 2018. Overall, employee benefits increased $1.4 million or 39.7% from 2018.
Along with the salary and wage increase was an increase in employee benefits in 2018 as compared to 2017. Employee group insurance accounted for the largest portion of the cost, which was an increase of $293.3 thousand over 2017. This was due to an increase in the cost to provide to a larger number of employees along with a higher level of medical claims. The cost of the 401-K retirement plan also increased $79.7 thousand for 2018 as compared to 2017. Overall, employee benefits increased $480 thousand or 13.2% from 2017.
Net occupancy expense typically increases as the Company expands, which is what has occurred for 2017 through 2019. One factor that can offset occupancy expense is the receipt by the Company of building rent as it is netted out of occupancy expense. The greatest contributor to building rent comes from the division of FM Investments within the Bank. This division experienced a weaker 2019 and 2018; however, the department was short staffed most of 2019 through 2017. For 2019, building rent as generated from FM Investments was lower by $60.6 thousand due to staff turnover. Rent is received in lieu of commissions. This loss of revenue contributed to the increased net occupancy expense of $560 thousand for 2019 as compared to 2018. Building rent as generated by FM Investments was lower by $151.2 thousand in 2018 contributing to the overall increase to net occupancy to $268.5 thousand in 2018 as compared to 2017.
The 1-4 family mortgage refinancing activity has been slow over the last three years though increasing slightly each year. Fourth quarter 2019 accounted for the largest number of loans being closed in the last 10 years. A correlating expense to that activity as it relates to loans sold to the secondary market, is the amortization of mortgage servicing rights. The amortization is the expense that offsets the income recognized when the loan is first made. Income is recorded when the mortgage loan is first sold with servicing retained and is therefore recognized within one year. The amortization, however, is calculated over the life of the loan and accelerated as loans are paid off early. An increase in this expense can be driven by two activities: an increase in the number of sold loans and/or by the acceleration of the expense from payoff and refinance activity. The best picture of the bottom line impact is achieved by netting the income with the expense each year. The net income for 2019 was $244 thousand; 2018 had net income of $86 thousand and was preceded by net income of $107 thousand for 2017. Of course, the value (or income) of the mortgage servicing right when sold also impacts the net position. As of December 31, 2019, 3,691 loans are being serviced with corresponding balances of $303.9 million. 2018 had 3,588 loans serviced with corresponding balances of $289.2 million. As of December 2017, 3,630 loans were being serviced with balances of $288.6 million.
The impact of mortgage servicing rights to both noninterest income and expense is shown in the following table:
Furniture and equipment steadily increase as we continue to add facilities and invest in technology. Annual maintenance costs continue to grow and become a greater piece of the overall cost. As new services are provided to our customers, the backroom cost to supply them continues to rise. The Company accepts it is an expected cost of doing business and keeping our services relevant to the industry.
Data processing costs were higher in 2019 as compared to 2018 by $1.3 million of which $867.6 thousand was acquisition related for termination fees. Overall, data processing expense for 2019 was expected to be higher with the addition of the six acquired Indiana offices. Data processing expense increased $104.4 thousand during 2018 as compared to 2017.
As the pricing on many services is based on number of accounts and the Bank fully expects those to increase with the growth from the newer offices and overall Bank growth, this line item is expected to also increase.
The FDIC assessment has a decreasing cost trend over the years shown. This line item speaks to the health of the Bank and the financial industry. The assessment for 2019 was down $143.5 thousand compared to 2018 as a result of the Small Bank Assessment Credits applied to 3rd and 4th quarter’s invoices. The assessment for 2018 was down $4 thousand from 2017.
The last line items with significant variation in noninterest expense to discuss is “consulting fees” and “other general and administrative.” Two main events are behind the increase of $865 thousand in 2018 as compared to 2017 in this line item. Both events incurred one-time costs which required the use of outside consultants. First related to the use of an executive recruiter firm to conduct a search for a CEO due to an upcoming retirement. The second related to the costs of researching, analyzing and negotiating possible mergers and acquisition opportunities. The consulting fees were beneficial in both instances as a new CEO was hired and a merger was closed on January 1, 2019. Consulting fees increased by $551.2 thousand in 2018 over 2017 while decreasing $259.9 thousand in 2019 compared to 2018. During 2019, consultants were used to complete a pay study review, assist with developing a three year strategic plan and to identify profit enhancement initiatives. Acquisition costs incurred in 2019 and 2018 total $1.28 million and $742.1 thousand respectively with expenses being recorded in multiple line items. Core deposit intangible expense which is included in the other general and administrative line decreased in 2018 as compared to 2017 by $77.7 thousand; however, increased in 2019 compared to 2018 by $560 thousand with the acquisition. Advertising and public relations increased also in 2019 by $682 thousand following an increase of $129.9 thousand in 2018. With the addition of new offices in both years behind the increases, 2019 was expected to increase due to additional offices being added. The Bank also celebrates the anniversary of office openings with a special event in each community.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Provision expense increased by $814 thousand for 2019 as compared to 2018 and $102 thousand for 2018 as compared to 2017 to account for the net charge-off activity of 2019 and 2018. Provision expense decreased by $899 thousand for 2017 due to the consistent strong asset quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio as evidenced by low levels of both net charge-offs and delinquencies. Sustained strong asset quality kept the provision expense lower than the growth alone would have warranted. The consumer portfolios had the highest levels of charge-off activity in 2019, 2018 and 2017 at $491, $359 and $263 thousand respectively. Net charge offs in the consumer portfolio were $371, $245 and $161 thousand for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively. Total net charge-offs were $685, $417 and $138 thousand for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The Company segregates its Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL) into two reserves: The ALLL and the Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit (AULC). When combined, these reserves constitute the total ACL. The AUCL is included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Bank’s ALLL methodology captures trends in leading, current, and lagging indicators which will directly affect the Bank’s allocation amount. The Bank monitors trends in such leading indicators as delinquency, unemployment changes in the Bank’s service area, experience and ability of staff, regulatory trends, and credit concentrations. A current indicator such as the total watch list loan amount to Capital, and a lagging indicator such as the charge off amount are referenced as well. A matrix formed by loan type from these indicators is used in making ALLL adjustments.
Watch list loan balances are comprised of loans graded 5-8. At yearend December 31, 2019 these loans totaled $60.2 million and were $52.3 million higher than December 31, 2018. Grade 5 increased $19.9 million in 2019 as compared to 2018 and Grade 6 increased by $32.2 million in the same comparison. Grade 7 increased $200 thousand in 2019 as compared to 2018. Much of the total increase in 2019, $33.4 million, is in the agricultural real estate portfolio which expanded with the acquired loan portfolio. The watch list loans as of December 31, 2018 were $13.3 million lower than December 31, 2017. Grade 5 decreased $6.6 million and Grade 6 decreased $7.3 million in 2018 as compared to 2017.
At December 31, 2019, 39.3% of the watch list was classified as special mention, with an additional 58.9% classified as substandard. A small 1.8% or $1.1 million of the $60.2 million watch list was classified as doubtful. At yearend 2018, 47.5% of the watch list was comprised of loans classified as special mention, with an additional 41.4% classified as substandard and the remaining 11.1% classified as doubtful.
Of the aggregate watch list loan balances, as of December 31, 2017, special mention accounted for 49.0% with substandard comprising 50.1% and doubtful accounting for the final 0.9%.
In response to these fluctuations and loan growth during 2017 through 2019, the Bank’s ALLL to outstanding loan coverage percentage changed to 0.59% as of December 31, 2019, 0.80% as of December 31, 2018, and 0.83% as of December 31, 2017. In addition, for 2019 our allowance for loan and lease does not include a $2.1 million credit mark associated with the Limberlost acquisition, which further supports the current position of the ALLL.
The above indicators impacting ALLL are reviewed quarterly. Some of the indicators are quantifiable and, as such, will automatically adjust the ALLL once calculated. These indicators include the ratio of past due loans to total loans, loans past due greater than 30 days, and the ratio of watch list loans to capital, with the watch list made up of loans graded 5, 6 or 7 on a scale of 1 (best) to 7 (worst). Other indicators consist of more subjective data used to evaluate the potential for inherent losses in the Bank’s loan portfolio. For example, the economic indicator uses the unemployment statistics from the communities in our market area to help determine whether the ALLL should be adjusted. At the end of each of 2017, 2018 and 2019, improvements were noted in unemployment figures.
All aggregate commercial and agricultural credits including real estate loans of $250,000 and over are reviewed annually by both credit committees and internal loan review to look for early signs of deterioration.
To establish the specific reserve allocation for real estate, a discount to the market value is established to account for liquidation expenses. The discounting percentage used for real estate mirrors the discounting of real estate as provided for in the Bank’s Loan Policy. However, unique or unusual circumstances may be present which will affect the real estate value and, when appropriately identified, can adjust the discounting percentage at the discretion of management.
The ACL increased $658 thousand during 2019 while decreasing $46 thousand and increasing $94 thousand during 2018 and 2017 respectively. With the improved asset quality, the metrics upon which the ACL is calculated did not support a larger increase in 2017 even though loan growth occurred. The percentage of ACL to the total loan portfolio was 0.86% as of December 31, 2017 and 0.83% as of December 31, 2018, and 0.63% as of December 31, 2019. December 31, 2018 had the lowest loans past due 30+ day percentage at 0.09% in the last ten years. December 31, 2017 and 2019 were still at respectable lows of 0.13% and 0.18%.
Please see Note 4 in the consolidated financial statement for additional tables regarding the composition of the ACL.
Federal Income Taxes
Federal income tax expense was approximately $1.0 million more for 2019 than 2018 as result of approximately $4.5 million of additional income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, became effective for the Company’s 2018 fiscal year. Effective tax rates were 18.70%, 17.75% and 28.95%, for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively. The effect of tax-exempt interest from holding tax-exempt securities and Industrial Development Bonds (IDBs) was $182, $229 and $413 thousand for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively less the TEFRA adjustments of $56, $40 and $38 thousand respectively. 2017 included an increase into a higher tax bracket for income over $10 million. 2019 and 2018 had a flat corporate tax rate of 21%. One of the benefits from the establishment of the Captive subsidiary was a lower effective tax rate.
Material Changes in Financial Condition
The shifts in the balance sheet during 2019 through 2017 have positioned the Company for continued improvement in profitability. On the asset side, interest income increased primarily from loan growth with funding for the increase provided by a decrease in the investment portfolio, growth in core deposits and growth in other borrowings generated in 2015 which had laddered maturities, that were then paid off in the following years. $5 million of other borrowings were paid off in December of 2017 and 2018. With the acquisition of Bank of Geneva, other borrowings were acquired. The cost of funds has been impacted by the increase of both interest bearing liabilities and the pressure on rates from competition for funds. Increased balances in non-interest bearing deposits aided in profitability also. Loan growth and a widened net interest margin contributed to improved profitability in 2019 and 2018, and the Company expects continued improvement through 2020.
Average earning assets increased in balances throughout 2019 and 2018. Newer offices have contributed the most towards new loan production. Loan growth in both years was the main factor. 2016 had two offices open, one in each half of the year and operating fully throughout 2017. An additional office opened in early 2018.
Securities
The investment portfolio is primarily used to provide overall liquidity for the Bank. It is also used to provide required collateral for pledging to the Bank’s Ohio public depositors for amounts on deposit in excess of the FDIC coverage limits. It may also be used to pledge for additional borrowings from third parties. Investments are made with the above criteria in mind while still seeking a fair market rate of return and looking for maturities that fall within the projected overall strategy of the Bank. The possible need to fund future loan growth is also a consideration.
During 2016, the Bank began to utilize Promontory’s ICS, product to replace pledged securities; thereby increasing liquidity. ICS utilizes a nation-wide bank network to provide FDIC insurance coverage to the Bank’s depositors. The Bank is using the
product to replace pledged securities to the Bank’s Ohio public customers and for commercial sweep customers previously utilizing daily repurchase agreements to protect balances over $250 thousand. The majority of the commercial accounts converted in 2017 and is evidenced by the movement of funds out of repurchase agreements into interest bearing deposits.
All of the Bank’s security portfolio is categorized as available for sale and as such is recorded at market value.
Security balances as of December 31 are summarized below:
The following table sets forth the maturities of investment securities as of December 31, 2019 and the weighted average yields of such securities calculated on the basis of cost and effective yields weighted for the scheduled maturity of each security. Tax-equivalent adjustments, using a twenty-one percent rate, have been made in yields on obligations of state and political subdivisions. Stocks of domestic corporations have not been included. Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on the stated maturity date of the security. Due to prepayments, actual maturities may be different.
As of December 31, 2019, the Bank did not hold a large block of any one investment security in excess of 10% of stockholders’ equity. The largest segment of holdings is in U.S. Government agencies. The Bank also holds stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati and Indianapolis at a cost of $5.8 million. This is required in order to obtain Federal Home Loan Bank loans.
Loan Portfolio
The Bank’s various loan portfolios are subject to varying levels of credit risk. Management mitigates these risks through portfolio diversification and through standardization of lending policies and procedures.
Risks are mitigated through an adherence to the Bank’s loan policies, with any exception being recorded and approved by senior management or committees comprised of senior management. The Bank’s loan policies define parameters to essential underwriting guidelines such as loan-to-value ratio, cash flow and debt-to-income ratio, loan requirements and covenants, financial information tracking, collection practice and others. The maximum loan amount to any one borrower is limited by the Bank’s legal lending limits and is stated in policy. On a broader basis, the Bank restricts total aggregate funding in comparison to Bank capital to any one business or agricultural sector by an approved sector percentage to capital limitation.
The following table shows the Bank’s loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, by category of loan as of December 31st of each year, net of deferred fees and costs:
The following table shows the maturity of loans excluding fair value adjustments as of December 31, 2019:
The following table presents the total of loans excluding fair value adjustments due after one year which has either 1) predetermined interest rates (fixed) or 2) floating or adjustable interest rates (variable):
The following table summarizes the Company’s nonaccrual, past due 90 days or more and still accruing loans, and accruing troubled debt restructurings as of December 31 for each of the last five years:
Although loans may be classified as non-performing, some pay on a regular basis, and many continue to pay interest irregularly or at less than original contractual rates. Interest income that would have been recorded under the original terms of
these loans would have aggregated $193 thousand for 2019, $99 for 2018 and $205.4 thousand for 2017. Any collections of interest on nonaccrual loans are included in interest income when collected unless it is on an impaired loan with a specific allocation. A collection of interest on an impaired loan with a specific allocation is applied to the loan balance to decrease the allocation. Total interest collections, whether on an accrued or cash basis, amounted to $117 thousand for 2019, $69 thousand for 2018 and $57 thousand for 2017.
Loans are placed on nonaccrual status in the event that the loan is in past due status for more than 90 days or payment in full of principal and interest is not expected. The Bank had nonaccrual loan balances of $3.4 million at December 31, 2019 compared to balances of $542 thousand and $1.0 million as of year-end 2018 and 2017. All of the balances of nonaccrual loans for the past three years were collaterally secured.
As of December 31, 2019, the Bank had $60.2 million of loans which it considers to be “potential problem loans” in that the borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties which are not reflected in the table above. At December 31, 2018, the Bank had $7.9 million of these loans. At December 31, 2017, the Bank had $21.2 million of these loans. These loans are subject to constant management attention and are reviewed at least monthly. The amount of the potential problem loans was considered in management’s review of the loan loss reserve at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
In extending credit to families, businesses and governments, banks accept a measure of risk against which an allowance for possible loan loss is established by way of expense charges to earnings. This expense is determined by management based on a detailed monthly review of the risk factors affecting the loan portfolio, including general economic conditions, changes in the portfolio mix, past due loan-loss experience and the financial condition of the bank’s borrowers.
As of December 31, 2019, the Bank had loans outstanding to individuals and firms engaged in the various fields of agriculture in the amount of $111.8 million with an additional $199.1 million in agricultural real estate loans these compared to $108.5 and $68.6 million respectively as of December 31, 2018. The ratio of this segment of loans to the total loan portfolio is not considered unusual for a bank engaged in and servicing rural communities.
Interest rate modification to reflect a decrease in market interest rates or maintain a relationship with the debtor, where the debtor is not experiencing financial difficulty and can obtain funding from other sources, is not considered a troubled debt restructuring. As of December 31, 2019, the Bank had $1.03 million of its loans that were classified as troubled debt restructurings, of which $50.3 thousand are included in non-accrual loans. This compares to $178.1 thousand of troubled debt restructurings, of which $74.4 thousand are included in non-accrual loans for 2018 and $712.0 thousand of troubled debt restructuring, of which $124.8 thousand are included in non-accrual loans for 2017.
Updated appraisals are required on all collateral dependent loans once they are deemed impaired. The Bank may also require an updated appraisal of a watch list loan which the Bank monitors under their loan policy. On a quarterly basis, Bank management reviews properties supporting asset dependent loans to consider market events that may indicate a change in value has occurred.
To determine observable market value, collateral asset values securing an impaired loan are periodically evaluated. Maximum time of re-evaluation is every 12 months for chattels and titled vehicles and every two years for real estate. In this process, third party evaluations are obtained and heavily relied upon. Until such time that updated appraisals are received, the Bank may discount the existing collateral value used.
Performing “non-watch list” loans secured in whole or in part by real estate, do not require an updated appraisal unless the loan is rewritten and additional funds advanced. Watch List loans secured in whole or in part by real estate require updated appraisals every two years. All loans are subject to loan to values as found in the Bank’s loan policies irrespective of their grade. The Bank’s watch list is reviewed on a quarterly basis by management and any questions to value are addressed at that time.
The majority of the Bank’s loans are made in the market by lenders who live and work in the market. Thus, their evaluation of the independent valuation is also valuable and serves as a double check.
On extremely rare occasions, the Bank will make adjustments to the recorded values of collateral securing commercial real estate loans without acquiring an updated appraisal for the subject property. The Bank has no formalized policy for determining when collateral value adjustments between regularly scheduled appraisals are necessary, nor does it use any specific methodology for applying such adjustments. However, on a quarterly basis as part of its normal operations, the Bank’s senior management and the Loan Review Committee will meet to review all commercial credits either deemed to be impaired or on the Bank’s watch list. In addition to analyzing the recent performance of these loans, management and the Enterprise Risk Management Committee will also consider any general market conditions that might warrant adjustments to
the value of particular real estate collateralizing commercial loans. In addition, management conducts annual reviews of all commercial loans exceeding certain outstanding balance thresholds. In each of these situations, any information available to management regarding market conditions impacting a specific property or other relevant factors are considered, and lenders familiar with a particular commercial real estate loan and the underlying collateral may be present to provide their opinion on such factors. If the available information leads management to conclude a valuation adjustment is warranted, such an adjustment may be applied on the basis of the information available. If management concludes that an adjustment is warranted but lacks the specific information needed to reasonably quantify the adjustment, management will order a new appraisal on the subject property even though one may not be required under the Bank’s general policies for updating appraisal.
Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements may also be reviewed for additional tables dealing with the Bank’s loans and ALLL.
ALLL is evaluated based on an assessment of the losses inherent in the loan portfolio. This assessment results in an allowance consisting of two components, allocated and unallocated.
Management considers several different risk assessments in determining ALLL. The allocated component of ALLL reflects expected losses resulting from an analysis of individual loans, developed through specific credit allocations for individual loans and historical loss experience for each loan category. For those loans where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification and management can reasonably estimate the loss that will be sustained based upon collateral, the borrowers operating activity and economic conditions in which the borrower operates, a specific allocation is made. For those borrowers that are not currently behind in their payment, but for which management believes, based on economic conditions and operating activities of the borrower, the possibility exists for future collection problems, a reserve is established. The amount of reserve allocated to each loan portfolio is based on past loss experiences and the different levels of risk within each loan portfolio. The historical loan loss portion is determined using a historical loss analysis by loan category.
The unallocated portion of the reserve for loan losses is determined based on management’s assessment of general economic conditions as well as specific economic factors in the Bank’s marketing area. This assessment inherently involves a higher degree of uncertainty. It represents estimated inherent but undetected losses within the portfolio that are probable due to uncertainties in economic conditions, delays in obtaining information, including unfavorable information about a borrower’s financial condition and other current risk factors that may not have yet manifested themselves in the Bank’s historical loss factors used to determine the allocated component of the allowance.
Actual charge-off of loan balances is based upon periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio by management. These evaluations consider several factors, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions, financial condition of the borrower, and collateral.
As presented in the table on the next page, charge-offs increased to $841 thousand for 2019. 70.1% of the charge-offs stemmed from the consumer related portfolios. Charge-offs were $580 thousand for 2018, $288 thousand for 2017, preceded by $550 thousand for 2016 and $1.0 million for 2015. Recoveries were $156 thousand in 2019 compared to $163, $150, $156, and $557 thousand for 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The net charge-offs for the last five years were all under $1 million. 2017 was the lowest at $138 thousand.
Higher provision expense was used to fund the ALLL for loan growth in 2016. For 2015 and 2017, the provision was used to replenish the balance decreased by the net charge-off activity. Overall, the ALLL increased from $6.3 million at yearend 2015 to $7.2 million at yearend 2019. After adding the allowance for unfunded loan commitments, the ACL ended 2019 $7.7 million. As the ratios on the bottom of the following table show, the trends for each have continually improved over the five years shown. Asset quality and the ACL are both strong and emphasize the level of credit quality.
In reviewing the bigger picture of the allowance for credit loss, the years with the higher percentage of ACL to total nonperforming loans ratio account for the lower level of nonaccrual and watch list loans. This demonstrates the extended time period with which it has taken to achieve resolution and/or collection of these loans. The ratio of ACL to nonperforming loans increased beginning in 2015 with a significant drop in 2019. 2019’s provision expense was the highest of the five years shown largely due to an increase in watch list loans. Loan growth occurred in 2019 reaching a double-digit percentage increase like 2016. The ACL to nonperforming loans for all years remained more than adequate and emphasizes the existing strong level of credit quality.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the allowance for credit losses for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
*Nonperforming loans are defined as all loans on nonaccrual, plus any loans past due 90 days not on nonaccrual.
Allocation of ALLL per Loan Category in terms of dollars and percentage of loans in each category to total loans is as follows:
Deposits
The amount of outstanding time certificates of deposits and other time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more by maturity as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:
The following table presents the average amount of and average rate paid on each deposit category:
Liquidity
Liquidity remains adequate and up from prior years as the Bank has increased the investment portfolio in 2019. Prior to 2019, the investment portfolio decreased to fund loans. The Bank has access to $69 million of unsecured borrowings through correspondent banks and $116.3 million of unpledged securities which may be sold or used as collateral. The amount of unpledged securities increased almost $42.6 million as compared to 2018. For the Bank, an additional $1.6 million is also
available from the Federal Home Loan Bank based on current collateral pledging with up to $97.0 million available provided adequate collateral is pledged.
Maintaining sufficient funds to meet depositor and borrower needs on a daily basis continues to be among management’s top priorities. This is accomplished not only by immediate liquid resources of cash, due from banks and federal funds sold, but also by the Bank’s available for sale securities portfolio. The average aggregate balance of these assets was $196.9 for 2019, $195.2 for 2018 and $206.3 million for 2017. This represented 13.1%, 17.6% and 19.2% of total average assets, respectively. Of the almost $205.1 million of debt securities in the Bank’s portfolio as of December 31, 2019, $21.8 million, or 10.6% of the portfolio, is expected to receive payments or mature in 2020. This liquidity provides the opportunity to fund loan growth by analysis of the lowest cost and source of funds whether by increasing deposits, sales or runoff of investments or utilizing debt.
In addition to the Bank’s investment portfolio, the Company has $17.2 million held in the holding company’s investment portfolio. $391.7 thousand of those investments will mature or receive payments in the next twelve months. These funds provide liquidity to the Company. The Bank has been declaring additional dividends each quarter to provide this liquidity to the Company. The Captive has also upstreamed dividends to the Company and is expected to continue annually as long as reserve levels are adequately provided for. This provides additional liquidity for Company activities. The company sold securities in December 2018 to provide $8.5 million in cash for the preparation of the acquisition on January 1, 2019.
Historically, the primary source of liquidity has been core deposits that include noninterest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits, savings, money market accounts and time deposits of individuals. Core deposit balances increased in all categories as of December 31, 2019 compared to same date 2018. Average total savings balances increased $169.1 million in 2019 as compared to 2018. Core deposit balances as of year-end 2018 increased in non-interest bearing deposits but decreased in all other categories as compared to 2017. Overall deposits increased an average of $41.7 million in 2018 and $76.9 million in 2017. The Bank also utilized Federal Funds purchased at times during 2017 through 2019. The average balance for 2019 was $2.1 million, for 2018 and 2017 was $1.4 million and $2.2 million respectively. The Bank is comfortable accessing these funds on a regular basis.
Historically, the primary use of new funds is placing the funds back into the community through loans for the acquisition of new homes, consumer products and for business development. The use of new funds for loans is measured by the loan to deposit ratio. The Bank’s average loan to deposit ratio was 91.8% for 2019, 89.4% for 2018, and 88.2% for 2017. The Bank’s goal is for this ratio to be higher in the 80-90 percent range with loan growth being the driver. The Bank ended the year 2019 at a 94.8% loan to deposit ratio.
Short-term debt such as federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase also provides the Company with liquidity. Short-term debt for both federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase amounted to $48.1 million at December 31, 2019, $32.2 million at December 31, 2018, and $39.5 million at the end of 2017. These accounts are used to provide a sweep product to the Bank’s commercial customers and for some term deposits. As ICS was implemented, the sweep balances moved into interest bearing deposits. The repurchase agreements are for term deposits only.
“Other borrowings” are also a source of funds. Other borrowings consist of loans from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati and Indianapolis. These funds are then used to provide loans in our community. The Bank utilized this funding source in December 2015 by borrowing $10 million. In December of 2017 and 2018 $5 million matured and was paid off each year. At yearend 2018, all borrowings were paid off and this has increased the availability from this source of funds. On January 1, 2019, the Bank acquired $49.5 million of borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. During 2019, $23.9 million matured and was paid off.
Asset/Liability Management
The primary functions of asset/liability management are to assure adequate liquidity and maintain an appropriate balance between interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. It involves the management of the balance sheet mix, maturities, re-pricing characteristics and pricing components to provide an adequate and stable net interest margin with an acceptable level of risk. Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to avoid fluctuating net interest margins and to enhance consistent growth of net interest income through periods of changing interest rates.
Changes in net income, other than those related to volume arise when interest rates on assets re-price in a time frame or interest rate environment that is different from that of the re-pricing period for liabilities. Changes in net interest income also arise from changes in the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Historically, the Bank has maintained liquidity through cash flows generated in the normal course of business, loan repayments, maturing earning assets, the acquisition of new deposits, and borrowings. The Bank's asset and liability management program is designed to maximize net interest income over the long term while taking into consideration both credit and interest rate risk. Interest rate sensitivity varies with different types of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Overnight federal funds on which rates change daily and loans that are tied to the market rate differ considerably from long-term investment securities and fixed rate loans. Similarly, time deposits over $100,000 and money market certificates are much more interest rate sensitive than passbook savings accounts. The Bank utilizes shock analysis to examine the amount of exposure an instant rate change of 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points in both increasing and decreasing directions would have on the financials. Acceptable ranges of earnings and equity at risk are established and decisions are made to maintain those levels based on the shock results.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Company’s operations. Unlike most industrial companies, nearly all the assets and liabilities of the Company are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on the Company’s performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and service.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual Obligations of the Company totaled $333.8 million as of December 31, 2019. Excluded from the chart is Federal Funds Purchased of $17.8 million which are immediately payable the next business day. Time deposits represent contractual agreements for certificates of deposits held by its customers. Long term debt represents the borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank and is further defined in Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Capital Resources
Stockholders’ equity was $230.3 million as of December 31, 2019 compared to $143.3 million at December 31, 2018. Dividends declared during 2019 were $0.61 per share totaling $6.7 million and dividends declared during 2018 were $0.56 per share totaling $5.1 million. Throughout 2019, the Company awarded 38,100 shares of restricted stock awards to 94 employees. During 2018, the Company awarded 33,000 shares of restricted stock to 80 employees. For a summary of activity as it relates to the Company’s restricted stock awards, please refer to Note 11: Employee Benefit Plans in the consolidated financial statements. On December 31, 2019 the Company held 1,093,065 shares in Treasury Stock and 88,450 unvested shares of restricted stock. At yearend 2018, the Company held 1,114,739 shares in Treasury stock and 93,940 unvested shares of restricted stock. On January 17, 2020 the Company announced the authorization by its Board of Directors for the Company’s repurchase, either on the open market, or in privately negotiated transactions, of up to 550,000 shares of its outstanding common stock commencing January 17, 2020 and ending December 31, 2020. The Company has a history of approving a similar resolution to be in effect each year for at least the last five years.
The Company continues to have a strong capital base and maintains regulatory capital ratios that are above the defined regulatory capital ratios. At December 31, 2019, the Bank had total risk-based capital ratio of 12.30%. Core capital to risk-based asset ratio of 11.71% for the Bank, is well in excess of regulatory guidelines. The Bank’s leverage ratio of 10.02% is also substantially in excess of regulatory guidelines. Under Basel III, the common equity Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets ratio is also well above the required 4.50% and the 6.50% well capitalized levels with the Bank at 11.71%. As a result of the passage of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) in 2018, the Company is no longer subject to
regulatory capital ratio requirements as long as its total consolidating assets are less than $3.0 billion. For further discussion and analysis of regulatory capital requirements, refer to Note 15 of the Audited Financial Statements.
The Company’s subsidiaries are restricted by regulations from making dividend distributions in excess of certain prescribed amounts. Upon prior regulatory approval, the Bank may be allowed to pay above the prescribed amount.
ITEM 7a.
ITEM 7a. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates and equity prices. The primary market risk to which we are subject is interest rate risk. The majority of our interest rate risk arises from the instruments, positions and transactions entered into for purposes other than trading such as loans, available for sale securities, interest bearing deposits, short term borrowings and long term borrowings. Interest rate risk occurs when interest bearing assets and liabilities re-price at different times as market interest rates change. For example, if fixed rate assets are funded with variable rate debt, the spread between asset and liability rates will decline or turn negative if rates increase.
Interest rate risk is managed within an overall asset/liability framework. The principal objectives of asset/liability management are to manage sensitivity of net interest spreads and net income to potential changes in interest rates. Funding positions are kept within predetermined limits designed to ensure that risk-taking is not excessive and that liquidity is properly managed. In the event that our asset/liabilities management strategies are unsuccessful, our profitability may be adversely affected. The Company employs a sensitivity analysis utilizing interest rate shocks to help in this analysis.
The shocks presented below assume an immediate change of rate in the percentages and directions shown:
The shock chart currently shows a widening in net interest margin over the next twelve months in an increasing rate environment and a tightening in a falling rate environment. Due to nine rate increases since December 2015 and three rate decreases in a 91 day time period beginning on August 1, 2019, the model predicts an expansion in a rising rate environment. The 200 and 300 basis rising rates scenarios are predicted to expand the net interest margin and produce higher levels of net interest income. This would indicate that the assets yield is predicted to increase faster than the cost of funds will rise. The Bank continues to enhance its use of the software model and performs additional stress tests whose results management and the director’s review. The Bank also monitors and adjusts the assumptions for decay rates and key rate ties on certain deposit accounts and continues to review and modify those rates as the index rates change. Both directional changes are well within risk exposure guidelines. The effect of the rate shocks may be mitigated to the extent that not all lines of business are directly tied to an external index and actual balance sheet composition may differ from prediction.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Index To Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Consolidated Statements of Changes to Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders, Board of Directors and Audit Committee
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
Archbold, Ohio
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 26, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014.
Fort Wayne, Indiana
February 26, 2020
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders, Board of Directors and Audit Committee
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
Archbold, Ohio
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.'s (Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated February 26, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definitions and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Fort Wayne, Indiana
February 26, 2020
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2019 and 2018
(000’s Omitted, Except Share Data)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(000’s Omitted, Except Per Share Data)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(000’s Omitted)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes to Stockholders’ Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(000’s Omitted, Except Per Share Data)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(000’s Omitted)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
The Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) through its bank subsidiary, The Farmers & Merchants State Bank (the Bank) provides a variety of financial services to individuals and small businesses through its offices in Northwest Ohio and Northeast Indiana.
Consolidation Policy
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Farmers & Merchants State Bank (the Bank), a commercial banking institution and Farmers & Merchants Risk Management, Inc. (the Captive), a Captive insurance company. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment and market conditions. In connection with the determination of the estimated losses on loans, management obtains independent appraisals for significant collateral.
The Bank’s loans are generally secured by specific items of collateral including real property, consumer assets, and business assets. Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on local economic conditions in the agricultural industry.
While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, further reductions in the carrying amounts of loans may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions. In addition regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the estimated losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additional losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the estimated losses on loans may change materially in the near term. However, the amount of the change that is reasonably possible cannot be estimated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. This includes cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds sold are outstanding for one day periods.
Restrictions on Cash and Amounts Due from Banks
The Bank is required to maintain average balances on hand with the Federal Reserve Bank. The aggregate reserve was $22.5 million for December 31, 2019 and it was $12.6 million for December 31, 2018. The Company and its subsidiaries maintain cash balances with high quality credit institutions. At times such balances may be in excess of the federally insured limits.
Securities
Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income (loss). Net realized gains and losses on securities available for sale are included in noninterest income and, when applicable, are reported as a reclassification adjustment, net of tax, in other comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the specific-identification method.
Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The related write-downs are included in earnings as realized losses.
Other Securities
Other Securities consist of stock in the Federal Home Loan Banks of Cincinnati and Indianapolis (the “FHLBs”), which is held to enable the Bank to conduct business with the entities. The FHLBs sell and purchase their stock at par. The FHLBs stock is carried at cost and held as collateral security for all indebtedness of the Bank to the Federal Home Loan Bank. The FHLBs stock is evaluated for impairment as conditions warrant.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced by unearned discounts, unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans, and deferred loan fees and costs, as well as, by the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on a daily basis based on the principal outstanding.
Generally, a loan is classified as nonaccrual and the accrual of interest income is generally discontinued when a loan becomes ninety days past due as to principal or interest and these loans are placed on a “cash basis” for purposes of income recognition. Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when the estimated net realizable value of collateral is sufficient to cover the principal and accrued interest, and the loan is in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest receivable is charged against income.
Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and amortized as a net adjustment to the related loan’s yield. The Bank is generally amortizing these costs over the contractual life of such loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to income. Loans deemed to be uncollectable and changes in the allowance relating to loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based on management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experiences, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are subject to revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. The unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and agricultural loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
At 90 days delinquent, secured consumer loans are charged down to the value of the collateral, if repossession of the collateral is assured and/or in the process of repossession. Consumer mortgage loan deficiencies are charged down upon the sale of the collateral or sooner upon the recognition of collateral deficiency.
For the majority of the Bank’s impaired loans, the Bank will apply the fair value of collateral or use a measurement incorporating the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate of interest. To determine fair value of collateral, collateral asset values securing an impaired loan are periodically evaluated. Maximum time of re-evaluation is every 12 months for chattels and titled vehicles and every two years for real estate. In this process, third party evaluations are obtained. Until such time that updated appraisals are received, the Bank may discount the collateral value used.
Large groups of homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer loans for impairment, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.
For more information regarding the actual composition and classification of loans involved in the establishment of the allowance for loan loss, please see Note 4 provided here with the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance by charges to income.
Servicing Assets
Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or sale of financial assets. Capitalized servicing rights are amortized into noninterest expense in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights by predominant characteristics, such as interest rates and terms. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market based assumptions. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual stratum, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the stratum. Fees received for servicing loans owned by investors are based on a percentage of the outstanding monthly principal balance of such loans and are included in operating income as loan payments are received. Costs of servicing loans are charged to expense as incurred.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually. If possible impairment is likely, the Bank will utilize the assistance of an independent third party for impairment and any such impairment is recognized in the period identified. Periodically the Bank will have an independent third party assess the possibility of impairment of Goodwill. Such an assessment was performed as of September 30, 2017. The goodwill impairment analysis consisted of a first step goodwill impairment test which was used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of the relevant reporting unity with its carrying value, including goodwill. The analysis was performed under guidance of FASB ASC 350. The engagement would have expanded to the second step goodwill impairment valuation if necessary; however, the findings showed the second step was not warranted. The analysis confirmed no impairment was likely. In quantitative testing done in 2019, the excess fair value of capital was $75.7 million or 37.0% over the carrying value and was over one and a half times the value of the goodwill being carried Therefore, the Bank concluded it is unlikely impairment of Goodwill has occurred from the goodwill established from the Bank’s acquisition of Knisely which occurred on December 31, 2007, and the acquisition of Bank of Geneva which occurred on January 1, 2019.
Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangible assets arising from business acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized on a straight line method over their estimated useful lives and evaluated for impairment. These assets are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Off Balance Sheet Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
Foreclosed Real Estate
Foreclosed real estate held for sale is carried at the lower of fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or cost. Costs of holding foreclosed real estate are charged to expense in the current period, except for significant property improvements, which are capitalized. Valuations are periodically performed by management and an allowance is established by a charge to non-interest expense if the carrying value exceeds the fair value minus the estimated costs to sell. Foreclosed real estate is classified as other real estate owned. The net loss from operations of foreclosed real estate held for sale is reported in non-interest expense. At December 31, the Bank’s holding of other real estate owned totaled $214 thousand and $600 thousand for 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Bank Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the various properties and is computed using straight line and accelerated methods. Costs for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Gains and losses on dispositions are included in current operations.
Revenue Recognition
Accounting Standards Codification 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customer” (ASC 606) provides that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue generated from financial instruments, including loans and investment securities, are not included within the scope of ASC 606. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a change to the accounting for any of the Company’s revenue streams that are within scope of the amendments. Revenue-generating activities that are within the scope of ASC 606 that are presented as non-interest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income include:
o
Customer service fees - these include miscellaneous service fees and transaction-based fees charged for certain services, such as debit card or credit card. Revenue is recognized when the performance obligation is completed, which is generally after a transaction is completed or monthly for account maintenance services.
o
Other service charges and fees - these include service fees charged for deposit account maintenance and activity along with transaction-based fees charged for certain services, such as overdraft activities, returned check charges and wire transfers. Revenue is recognized when the performance obligation is completed, which is generally after a transaction is completed or monthly for account maintenance services.
Federal Income Tax
The Company’s income tax expense consists of the following components: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur.
Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. Based on management’s analysis, the Company did not have any uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state or local examinations by tax authorities for years before 2016.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represent income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. On August 18, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one stock split payable on September 20, 2017, for shareholders of record on September 5, 2017. See Note 12 for additional information.
Stock-Based Compensation
The fair value of restricted common stock is their fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of restricted stock is amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the grants. Compensation expense recognized is included in salaries and wages in the consolidated statements of income.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Corporation - put presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and (3) the Corporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.
Treasury Stock
Common stock shares repurchased are recorded at market value on date of purchase. Restricted shares when awarded are removed from treasury stock using the weighted average method.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet. Such items, along with net income, are components of other comprehensive income (loss).
The company adopted ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2018 and elected to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings. The reclassification increased retained earnings and decreased AOCI by $359 thousand, with zero net effect on total stockholder’s equity.
The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects are as follows:
Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 2018 and 2017 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2019 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 establishes a right of use model that requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a lease liability for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either financing or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. For lessors, the guidance modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. A lease will be treated as a sale if it transfers all of the risks and rewards, as well as control of the underlying asset, to the lessee. If risks and rewards are conveyed without the transfer of control, the lease is treated as a financing. If the lessor doesn’t convey risks and rewards or control, an operating lease results. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for public business entities. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 and recorded a right of use asset and a corresponding liability in the amount of $491.7 thousand. This did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The ASU requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. Organizations will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration.
The ASU is effective for SEC filers for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019 (i.e., January 1, 2020, for calendar year entities). FASB recently approved a delay in adoption for Smaller Reporting Companies. The Company has completed an analysis to determine that it qualifies as a Smaller Reporting Company. As such, adoption can be postponed until periods beginning after December 15, 2022 (i.e., January 1, 2023, for calendar year entities). Early application will be permitted for all organizations for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.
The Company has contracted with an external advisor and has formed a committee to determine the methodology to be used. Most importantly, the Company is gathering as much data as possible to enable review scenarios and determine which calculations will produce the most reliable results. The Company began working with the third party service provider to review parallel reports starting in June 2019. The Company will not adopt ASU 2016-13 in calendar year 2020 and management is currently evaluating when or if they would elect to early adopt ASU 2016-13.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04 “Intangibles - Goodwill and other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” These amendments eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The amendments also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The guidance is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. ASU 2017-04 should be adopted on a prospective basis. The Company does not expect ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on its financial statements, as goodwill testing has been completed annually without any impairment concerns.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The amendments in this update remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, modify/clarify the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. ASU 2018-13 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating and does not expect ASU 2018-13 to have a material impact on its accounting disclosures.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 2 - Business Combination & Asset Purchase
On January 1, 2019, the Company acquired Limberlost Bancshares, Inc. (“Limberlost”), the bank holding company for Bank of Geneva, a community bank based in Geneva, Indiana. Bank of Geneva operated six full-service offices in the northeast Indiana communities of Geneva, Berne, Decatur, Monroe, Portland and Monroeville. Shareholders of Limberlost received 1,830 shares of FMAO common stock and $8,465.00 in cash for each share. Limberlost had 1,000 shares outstanding on January 1, 2019. The share price of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) stock on January 1, 2019 was $38.49. Total consideration for the acquisition was approximately $78.9 million consisting of $8.5 million in cash and $70.4 million in stock. As a result of the acquisition, the Company will have an opportunity to increase its deposit base and reduce transaction costs. The Company also expects to reduce costs through economies of scale.
In 2018, the Company incurred $742.1 thousand of third-party acquisition-related costs. The largest portion of the expenses recognized in 2018 related to consulting fees of $340 thousand, other general and administration expenses of $331.5 thousand and data processing expenses of $58.6 thousand. These three categories of expense accounted for 98.4% of the total acquisition expenses impacting the 2018 financial statements of the Company.
In 2019, the Company has incurred additional third-party acquisition-related costs of $1.28 million. These expenses are comprised of data processing of $867.6 thousand, employee benefits of $163.0 thousand, ATM expense of $31.4 thousand, consulting fees of $19.3 thousand and other general and administrative expense of $199.8 thousand in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase is allocated to net tangible and intangible assets based on their current estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. Of the total purchase price of $78.9 million, $3.9 million has been allocated to core deposit intangible included in other assets and will be amortized over seven years on a straight line basis. Goodwill of $43.3 million resulting from the acquisition consists largely of the synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the Company and Bank of Geneva. Of that total amount, none of the purchase price is deductible for tax purposes. The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Bank of Geneva and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
The fair value of the assets acquired includes loans with a fair value of $257.2 million. The gross principal and contractual interest due under the contracts is $359.2 million, of which $4.7 million is expected to be uncollectible. The loans have a weighted average life of 70 months.
The fair value of building and land included in premises and equipment was written down by $1.2 million and will be amortized based on the remaining life of each building. The combined average remaining life is 16.75 years.
The fair value for certificates of deposit incorporates a valuation amount of $0.5 million which will be amortized over 1.5 years. The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances includes a valuation amount of $1.3 million which will be amortized over 2.3 years.
The Company acquired loans in the acquisition that had evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected.
Loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected are considered to be credit impaired. Evidence of credit quality deterioration as of the purchase date may include information such as past-due and nonaccrual status, borrower credit scores and recent loan to value percentages. Purchased credit-impaired loans are accounted for under the accounting guidance for loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30) and initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for credit losses related to these loans is not carried over and recorded at the acquisition date. Management estimated the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition using our internal risk models, which incorporate the estimate of current key assumptions, such as default rates, severity and prepayment speeds.
The carrying amount of those loans is included in loans, net on the balance sheet at December 31, 2019. The amounts of loans at December 31, 2019 are as follows:
Loans acquired during 2019 for which it was probable at acquisition that all contractually required payments would not be collected are as follows:
During the second quarter, two commercial purchased credit-impaired loans were paid off in full after the customer was able to secure financing at another financial institution. The associated discount originally recognized at acquisition of $1.985 million has been included in loan interest income in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2019. The balance of the fair value adjustment for loans acquired and accounted for under this guidance (ASC 310-30) was $62 thousand at December 31, 2019 and $2.118 million on January 1, 2019, respectively.
Changes in accretable yield, or income expected to be collected, are as follows:
The results of operations of Bank of Geneva have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date of January 1, 2019. The following schedule includes pro-forma results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 as if the Bank of Geneva acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior reporting period.
The pro-forma information includes adjustments for interest income on loans, amortization of intangibles arising from the transaction, interest expense on deposits acquired, premises expense for the branches acquired and the related income tax effects. The pro-forma information for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes approximately $7.4 million, net of tax, of operating revenue from Bank of Geneva since acquisition.
The pro-forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that actually would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of that time, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results.
The Company purchased an office on December 13, 2013 in Custar, Ohio. Core deposit intangible assets of $1.17 million were recognized and are being amortized over its remaining economic useful life of the deposits of 7 years on a straight line basis.
As mentioned previously, the acquisition of Bank of Geneva resulted in the recognition of $3.9 million in core deposit intangible assets which are being amortized over its remaining economic useful life of 7 years on a straight line basis. Core deposit intangible is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
The amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $727, $167, and $245 thousand, respectively.
Future amortization expense of core deposit intangible assets is as follows:
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 3 - Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of securities, with gross unrealized gains and losses, follows:
Investment securities will at times depreciate to an unrealized loss position. The Bank utilizes the following criteria to assess whether impairment is other than temporary. No one item by itself will necessarily signal that a security should be recognized as an other than temporary impairment.
1.
The fair value of the security has significantly declined from book value.
2.
A downgrade has occurred that lowered the credit rating to below investment grade (below Baa3 by Moody and BBB - by Standard and Poors.)
3.
Dividends have been reduced or eliminated or scheduled interest payments have not been made.
4.
The underwater security has longer than 10 years to maturity and the loss position had existed for more than 3 years.
5.
Management does not possess both the intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
If the impairment is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security shall be written down to fair value, thereby establishing a new cost basis. The new cost basis shall not be changed for subsequent recoveries in fair value. The amount of the write down shall be included in current earnings as a realized loss. The recovery in fair value, if any, shall be recognized in earnings when the security is sold. The table below is presented by category of security and length of time in a continuous loss position. The Bank currently does not hold any securities with other than temporary impairment.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 - Securities (Continued)
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2019 and 2018, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position follows:
Unrealized losses on securities have not been recognized into income because the issuers’ bonds are of high credit quality, values have only been impacted by rate changes, and the Company has the intent and ability to hold the securities for the foreseeable future. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach the maturity date.
Sales of $11.1, $10.1, and $13.6 million for 2019, 2018, and 2017 respectively, generated gross realized gains and losses for the years ended December 31, as presented below:
The net realized gain (loss) on sales and related tax expense (benefit) is a reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The net realized gain (loss) is included in net gain (loss) on sale of securities available-for-sale and the related tax expense (benefit) is included in income taxes in the consolidated statements of income.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 - Securities (Continued)
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2019, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Investments with a carrying value and fair value of $88.8 million at December 31, 2019 and $81.8 million at December 31, 2018 were pledged to secure public deposits and securities sold under repurchase agreements.
Other securities include Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati and Indianapolis stock as of December 31, 2019 while December 31, 2018 only includes Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati stock.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 4 - Loans
The Company had $4.2 million in loans held for sale at December 31, 2019 as compared to $495 thousand in loans held for sale at December 31, 2018.
Loans at December 31 are summarized below:
Following are the characteristics and underwriting criteria for each major type of loan the Bank offers:
Consumer Real Estate: Purchase, refinance, or equity financing of one to four family owner occupied dwelling. Success in repayment is subject to borrower’s income, debt level, character in fulfilling payment obligations, employment, and others.
Agricultural Real Estate: Purchase of farm real estate or for permanent improvements to the farm real estate. Cash flow from the farm operation is the repayment source and is therefore subject to the financial success of the farm operation.
Agricultural: Loans for the production and housing of crops, fruits, vegetables, and livestock or to fund the purchase or re-finance of capital assets such as machinery and equipment and livestock. The production of crops and livestock is especially vulnerable to commodity prices and weather. The vulnerability to commodity prices is offset by the farmer’s ability to hedge their position by the use of the future contracts. The risk related to weather is often mitigated by requiring crop insurance.
Commercial Real Estate: Construction, purchase, and refinance of business purpose real estate. Risks include potential construction delays and overruns, vacancies, collateral value subject to market value fluctuations, interest rate, market demands, borrower’s ability to repay in orderly fashion, and others. The Bank does employ stress testing on higher balance loans to mitigate risk by ensuring the customer’s ability to repay in a changing rate environment before granting loan approval.
Commercial and Industrial: Loans to proprietorships, partnerships, or corporations to provide temporary working capital and seasonal loans as well as long term loans for capital asset acquisition. Risks include adequacy of cash flow, reasonableness of projections, financial leverage, economic trends, management ability and estimated capital expenditures during the fiscal year. The Bank does employ stress testing on higher balance loans to mitigate risk by ensuring the customer's ability to repay in a changing rate environment before granting loan approval.
Consumer: Funding for individual and family purposes. Success in repayment is subject to borrower’s income, debt level, character in fulfilling payment obligations, employment, and others.
Other: Primarily funds public improvements in the Bank’s service area. Repayment ability is based on the continuance of the taxation revenue as the source of repayment.
The following is a maturity schedule by major category of loans excluding fair value adjustments at December 31, 2019:
The distribution of fixed rate loans and variable rate loans by major loan category is as follows as of December 31, 2019:
Other loans are included in the commercial and industrial category for the remainder of the tables in this Note 4, unless specifically noted separately.
The following table represents the contractual aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by portfolio classification of loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, net of deferred loan fees and costs:
The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans by portfolio class of loans as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
The Bank uses a nine tier risk rating system to grade its loans. The grade of a loan may change during the life of the loan.
The risk ratings are described as follows.
1.
Zero (0) Unclassified. Any loan which has not been assigned a classification.
2.
One (1) Excellent. Credit to premier customers having the highest credit rating based on an extremely strong financial condition, which compares favorably with industry standards (upper quartile of Risk Management Association ratios). Financial statements indicate a sound earnings and financial ratio trend for several years with satisfactory profit margins and excellent liquidity exhibited. Prime credits may also be borrowers with loans fully secured by highly liquid collateral such as traded stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, savings account, etc. No credit or collateral exceptions exist and the loan adheres to the Bank's loan policy in every respect. Financing alternatives would be readily available and would qualify for unsecured credit. This grade is summarized by high liquidity, minimum risk, strong ratios, and low handling costs.
3.
Two (2) Good. Desirable loans of somewhat less stature than Grade 1, but with strong financial statements. Loan supported by financial statements containing strong balance sheets, generally with a leverage position less than 1.50, and a history of profitability. Probability of serious financial deterioration is unlikely. Possessing a sound repayment source (and a secondary source), which would allow repayment in a reasonable period of time. Individual loans backed by liquid personal assets, established history and unquestionable character.
4.
Three (3) Satisfactory. Satisfactory loans of average or slightly above average risk - having some deficiency or vulnerability to changing economic conditions, but still fully collectible. Projects should normally demonstrate acceptable debt service coverage. Generally, customers should have a leverage
position less than 2.00. May be some weakness but with offsetting features of other support readily available. Loans are meeting the terms of repayment.
Loans may be graded 3 when there is no recent information on which to base a current risk evaluation and the following conditions apply:
At inception, the loan was properly underwritten and did not possess an unwarranted level of credit risk:
a.
At inception, the loan was secured with collateral possessing a loan-to-value adequate to protect the Bank from loss;
b.
The loan exhibited two or more years of satisfactory repayment with a reasonable reduction of the principal balance;
c.
During the period that the loan has been outstanding, there has been no evidence of any credit weakness. Some examples of weakness include slow payment, lack of cooperation by the borrower, breach of loan covenants, or the business is in an industry which is known to be experiencing problems. If any of these credit weaknesses are observed, a lower risk grade is warranted.
5.
Four (4) Satisfactory / Monitored. A “4” (Satisfactory/Monitored) risk grade may be established for a loan considered satisfactory but which is of average credit risk due to financial weakness or uncertainty. The loans warrant a higher than average level of monitoring to ensure that weaknesses do not advance. The level of risk in Satisfactory/Monitored classification is considered acceptable and within normal underwriting guidelines so long as the loan is given management supervision.
6.
Five (5) Special Mention. Loans that possess some credit deficiency or potential weakness which deserve close attention but do not yet warrant substandard classification. Such loans pose unwarranted financial risk that if not corrected could weaken the loan and increase risk in the future. The key distinctions of a 5 (Special Mention) classification are that (1) it is indicative of an unwarranted level of risk, and (2) weaknesses are considered “potential” versus “defined” impairments to the primary source of loan repayment and collateral.
7.
Six (6) Substandard. One or more of the following characteristics may be exhibited in loans classified substandard:
a.
Loans which possess a defined credit weakness and the likelihood that a loan will be paid from the primary source and are uncertain. Financial deterioration is underway and very close attention is warranted to ensure that the loan is collected without loss.
b.
Loans are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower.
c.
The primary source of repayment is weakened, and the Bank is forced to rely on a secondary source of repayment such as collateral liquidation or guarantees.
d.
Loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected.
e.
Unusual courses of action are needed to maintain a high probability of repayment.
f.
The borrower is not generating enough cash flow to repay loan principal but continues to make interest payments.
g.
The lender is forced into a subordinate position or unsecured collateral position due to flaws in documentation.
h.
Loans have been restructured so that payment schedules, terms and collateral represent concessions to the borrower when compared to the normal loan terms.
i.
The lender is seriously contemplating foreclosure or legal action due to the apparent deterioration in the loan
j.
There is significant deterioration in the market conditions and the borrower is highly vulnerable to these conditions.
8.
Seven (7) Doubtful. One or more of the following characteristics may be exhibited in loans classified Doubtful:
a.
Loans have all of the weaknesses of those classified as Substandard. Additionally, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full based on existing conditions improbable.
b.
The primary source of repayment is gone, and there is considerable doubt as to the quality of the secondary source of repayment.
c.
The possibility of loss is high, but, because of certain important pending factors which may strengthen the loan, loss classification is deferred until its exact status is known. A Doubtful classification is established deferring the realization of the loss.
9.
Eight (8) Loss. Loans are considered uncollectable and of such little value that continuing to carry them as assets on the institution’s financial statements is not feasible. Loans will be classified Loss when it is neither practical nor desirable to defer writing off or reserving all or a portion of a basically worthless asset, even though partial recovery may be possible at some time in the future.
The following table represents the risk category of loans by portfolio class, net of deferred fees, based on the most recent analysis performed as of the time periods shown of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
For consumer residential real estate, and other, the Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously stated, and by payment activity. The following tables present the recorded investment in those classes based on payment activity and assigned risk grading as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Information about impaired loans as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
Additional funds of $4 thousand are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.
The Bank had approximately $956 thousand and $178 thousand of its impaired loans classified as troubled debt restructured as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 4 - Loans (Continued)
Modification programs focused on payment pattern changes and/or modified maturity dates with most receiving a combination of the two concessions. The modifications did not result in the contractual forgiveness of principal. In 2019, four of the loans resulted in payment changes to interest only for an extended period of time and one loan had a lowering of payment to match an extended maturity. Consequently, the financial impact of the modifications was immaterial. The following table represents the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were no TDR’s that subsequently defaulted after modification.
For the Bank’s impaired TDR loans, the Bank may utilize a measurement incorporating the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective rate of interest or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. To determine the fair value of collateral, collateral asset values securing an impaired loan are periodically evaluated. Maximum time of re-evaluation is every 12 months for chattels and titled vehicles and every two years for real estate. In this process, third party evaluations are obtained and heavily relied upon. Until such time that updated appraisals are received, the Bank may discount the collateral value used.
The Bank uses the following guidelines as stated in policy to determine when to realize a charge-off, whether a partial or full loan balance. A charge down in whole or in part is realized when unsecured consumer loans, credit card credits and overdraft lines of credit reach 90 days delinquency. At 120 days delinquent, secured consumer loans are charged down to the value of the collateral, if repossession of the collateral is assured and/or in the process of repossession. Consumer mortgage loan deficiencies are charged down upon the sale of the collateral or sooner upon the recognition of collateral deficiency. Commercial and agricultural credits are charged down at 120 days delinquency, unless an established and approved work-out plan is in place or litigation of the credit will likely result in recovery of the loan balance. Upon notification of bankruptcy, unsecured debt is charged off. Additional charge-off may be realized as further unsecured positions are recognized.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 4 - Loans (Continued)
The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by portfolio class of loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 4 - Loans (Continued)
As of December 31, 2019 the Company had $50 thousand of foreclosed residential real estate property obtained by physical possession and $383 thousand of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which foreclosure proceedings are in process according to local jurisdictions. This compares to the Company having $61 thousand of foreclosed residential real estate property obtained by physical possession and $278 thousand of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which foreclosure proceedings are in process according to local jurisdictions as of December 31, 2018.
The ALLL has a direct impact on the provision expense. An increase in the ALLL is funded through recoveries and provision expense. The following tables summarize the activities in the allowance for credit losses.
The following is an analysis of the allowance for credit losses for the years ended December 31:
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 4 - Loans (Continued)
The Company segregates its Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) into two reserves: The ALLL and the Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit (AULC). When combined, these reserves constitute the total Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL).
The AULC is reported within other liabilities on the balance sheet while the ALLL is netted within the loans on the consolidated balance sheet. The ACL presented above represents the full amount of reserves available to absorb possible credit losses.
The following table breaks down the activity within ALLL for each loan portfolio segment and shows the contribution provided by both the recoveries and the provision along with the reduction of the allowance caused by charge-offs.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 4 - Loans (Continued)
Additional analysis related to the allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 4 - Loans (Continued)
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 5 - Premises and Equipment
The major categories of banking premises and equipment and accumulated depreciation at December 31 are summarized below:
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $2.3, $1.7, and $1.6 million, respectively.
Construction in progress of $68 thousand as of December 31, 2019 related to Ft. Wayne, Indiana, a new branch to be opened in 2020. Construction in progress of $3 thousand as of December 31, 2018, related to environmental and foundation study expenses incurred for this same construction project in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Note 6 - Servicing
Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of loans serviced for others were $303.9 and $289.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The balance of capitalized servicing rights included in other assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, was $2.6 and $2.4 million, respectively. The capitalized addition of servicing rights is included in net gain on sale of loans on the consolidated statement of income.
The fair market value of the capitalized servicing rights as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $2.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The valuations were completed by stratifying the loans into like groups based on loan type and term. Impairment was measured by estimating the fair value of each stratum, taking into consideration an estimated level of prepayment based upon current market conditions. An average constant prepayment rate of 14.1% and 8.9% were utilized for 2019 and 2018, respectively. All stratums showed positive values compared to carrying value using a discount yield of 5.42% for 2019 and 6.60% for 2018.
The following summarizes mortgage servicing rights capitalized and amortized during each year:
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 7 - Deposits
Time deposits as of December 31 consist of the following:
At December 31, 2019 the scheduled maturities for time deposits are as follows:
Note 8 - Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold Under Agreement to Repurchase
The Bank’s policy requires qualifying securities to be used as collateral for the underlying repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 securities with a market value of $40.2 million and $34.9 million, respectively, were pledged to secure the repurchase agreements. The table below presents the daily securities sold under agreement to repurchase and the term repurchase agreements. It does not include the Bank’s Federal Funds purchased.
The Company had $17.8 and $6.5 million of Federal Funds Purchased as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 respectively. The $30.2 million in Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase were comprised of U.S. Treasuries and government agency securities. The table below shows the remaining contractual maturity in the repurchase agreements and the collateral pledged as of December 31, 2019.
Note 9 - Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
Long term debit consists of various loans from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Repayment structures vary, ranging from monthly installments, annual payments or upon maturity. Interest payments are due monthly. Total borrowings were $25.5 million excluding $0.7 thousand for fair value related to the acquisition for December 31,2019 and there were no outstanding borrowings for 2018. The advances were secured by $42.1 and $14.9 million of mortgage loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively under a blanket collateral agreement.
The advances are subject to pre-payment penalties and the provisions and conditions of the credit policy of the Federal Home Loan Bank.
The Bank had access to $69 million unsecured borrowings through correspondent banks as of both December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. $116.3 million and $73.7 million at the end of the same time periods, respectively, were unpledged securities which could be sold or used as collateral. An additional $1.6 million at December 31, 2019, and $9.0 million at December 31, 2018, were available from the Federal Home Loan Bank based on current pledging, with up to $97.0 million and $119.0 million, respectively, available provided adequate collateral is pledged. The table below shows the maturities of the borrowings exclusive of the fair value.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 10 - Federal Income Taxes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted on December 22, 2017. Among other things, the new law (i) establishes a new, flat corporate federal statutory income tax rate of 21%, (ii) eliminates the corporate alternative minimum tax and allows the use of any such carryforwards to offset regular tax liability for any taxable year, (iii) limits the deduction for net interest expense incurred by U.S. corporations, (iv) allows businesses to immediately expense, for tax purposes, the cost of new investments in certain qualified depreciable assets, (v) eliminates or reduces certain deductions related to meals and entertainment expenses, (vi) modifies the limitation on excessive employee remuneration to eliminate the exception for performance-based compensation and clarifies the definition of a covered employee and (vii) limits the deductibility of deposit insurance premiums. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also significantly changes U.S. tax law related to foreign operations, however, such changes do not currently impact us.
As stated above, as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017, we remeasured our deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon the newly enacted U.S. statutory federal income tax rate of 21%, which is the tax rate at which these assets and liabilities are expected to reverse in the future. We recognized a net tax benefit related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities totaling $8 thousand in 2017.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate:
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 10 - Federal Income Taxes (Continued)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 are comprised of the following:
Note 11 - Employee Benefit Plans
The Bank has established a 401(k) profit sharing plan, which allows eligible employees to save at a minimum one percent of eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis, subject to certain Internal Revenue Service limitations. The Bank will match 50% of employee 401(k) contributions up to four percent of total eligible compensation. In addition, the Bank may make a discretionary contribution from time to time. A participant is 100% vested in the participant’s deferral contributions and employer matching contributions. A six-year vesting schedule applies to employer discretionary contributions. Contributions expensed for the 401(k) profit sharing plan for both the employer matching contribution and the discretionary contribution were $1.2 million, $1.1 million and $972 thousand for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards
The Company has a Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan under which 38,100 shares of restricted stock were issued to 94 employees during 2019, 33,000 shares of restricted stock were issued to 80 employees during 2018 and 32,000 shares of restricted stock were issued to 74 employees during 2017. Under the plan, the shares vest 100% in three years. During the 3 year vesting period, the employees receive dividends or dividend equivalent compensation on the shares. Due to employee termination, there were 3,220, 2,620, and 1,080 shares forfeited during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. During 2019, three employees retired and received 14,300 shares from the shares awarded in 2016, 2017 and 2018. During 2017, due to retirement, one employee received 640 shares from awards granted in 2014, 2015 and 2016. During 2019, 26,070 shares awarded in 2016 were 100% vested and 63 employees received the stock. During 2018, 28,790 shares awarded in 2015 were vested 100% and 56 employees received the stock. During 2017, 24,230 shares awarded in 2014 were vested 100% and 52 employees received the stock. Compensation expense applicable to the restricted stock awards totaled $1.1 million, $745 thousand and $507 thousand for the years ending December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 11 - Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)
The table below summarizes the details of the restricted shares issued, vested, and forfeited for the years ending December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The following table summarizes the activity of restricted stock awards as of December 31:
As of December 31, 2019, there was $1.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested portion of restricted stock awards under the plan to be recognized over the next three years.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 12 - Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula under which earnings per share is calculated from common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings distributed and undistributed, are allocated to participating securities and common shares based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities (i.e. unvested restricted stock), not subject to performance based measures. Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Application of the two-class method for participating securities results a more dilutive basic earnings per share as the participating securities are allocated the same amount of income as if they are outstanding for purposes of basic earnings per share. There is no additional potential dilution in calculating diluted earnings per share, therefore basic and diluted earnings per share are the same amounts. Other than the restricted stock plan, the Company has no other stock based compensation plans.
The table below presents basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.
Note 13 - Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has granted loans to senior officers and directors and their affiliated companies amounting to $1.3 million and $1.5 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Six new loans were approved during 2019 of which no additional borrowings were utilized. During 2019, subsequent advances totaled $10.1 million and payments of $10.7 million were received. The difference in related borrowings amounted to $146 thousand, net decrease. Deposits of directors, executive officers and companies in which they have a direct or indirect ownership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, amounted to $33.7 million and $26.1 million, respectively.
Note 14 - Off Balance Sheet Activities
Credit Related Financial Instruments
The Bank is a party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing need of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Commercial Letters of Credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Bank's exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Bank follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. The allowance for credit losses as it relates to unfunded loan commitments (AULC) is included under other liabilities. The AULC as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $479 thousand and $274 thousand, respectively.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 14 - Off Balance Sheet Activities (Continued)
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the following financial instruments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit, credit card arrangements and Standby Letters of Credit all include exposure to some credit loss in the event of nonperformance of the customer. The Bank’s credit policies and procedures for credit commitments and financial guarantees are the same as those for extensions of credit that are recorded in the financial statements. Due to the fact that these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them expire without being drawn upon, they generally do not present any significant liquidity risk to the Bank.
Collateral Requirements
To reduce credit risk related to the use of credit-related financial instruments, the Bank might deem it necessary to obtain collateral. The amount and nature of the collateral obtained is based on the Bank's credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, securities, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant, and real estate.
Legal Contingencies
Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business, which, in the opinion of management, will have no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Note 15 - Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.
The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
The Basel III Capital Rules, a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations, became effective on January 1, 2015 (subject to a phase-in period for certain provisions). Quantitative measures established by the Basel III Capital Rules to ensure capital adequacy require the maintenance of minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to adjusted quarterly average assets (as defined).
In connection with the adoption of the Basel III Capital Rules, we elected to opt-out of the requirement to include most components of accumulated other comprehensive income in Common Equity Tier 1.
Common Equity Tier 1 is reduced by, goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities, and subject to transition provisions.
The Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and Total capital ratios are calculated by dividing the respective capital amounts by risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets are calculated based on regulatory requirements and include total assets, with certain exclusions, allocated by risk weight category, and certain off-balance-sheet items, among other things. The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by adjusted quarterly average total assets, which exclude goodwill and other intangible assets, among other things.
As fully phased in effective January 1, 2019, the Basel III Capital Rules require the Bank to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation), (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier 1 capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation), (iii) a minimum ratio of Total capital (that is, Tier 1 plus Tier 2) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation) and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average quarterly assets.
The implementation of the capital conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and was phased in over a four-year period (increasing by that amount on each subsequent January 1, until it reached 2.5% on January 1, 2019). The Basel III Capital Rules also provide for a “countercyclical capital buffer” that is applicable to only certain covered institutions and does not have any current applicability to the Company or Bank. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and, as detailed above, effectively increases the minimum required risk-weighted capital ratios. Banking institutions with a ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets below the effective minimum (4.5% plus the capital conservation buffer and, if applicable, the countercyclical capital buffer) will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.
Management believes, as of December 31, 2019, that the Bank meets all the capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
As of December 31, 2019, the most recent notification from the FDIC indicated the Bank was categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To remain categorized as well capitalized, the Bank will have to maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, Common Tier 1 and Tier I leverage ratios as disclosed in the table to follow. There are no conditions or events since the most recent notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s prompt corrective action category.
The following tables present actual and required capital ratios as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 under the Basel III Capital Rules. The minimum required capital amounts presented include the minimum required capital levels as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Capital levels required to be considered well capitalized are based upon prompt corrective action regulations, as amended to reflect the changes under the Basel III Capital Rules.
The Bank’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:
The following table presents the Bank’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2018.
The above tables exclude the capital conservation buffer requirements.
With the enactment of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act on May 24, 2018, the Company is no longer required to file the FR Y-9C consolidated financial statements for holding companies but will file the FR Y-9SP parent company only financial statements for small holding companies. As a result, the consolidated amounts and ratios were no longer required beginning in 2018.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 16 - Restrictions of Dividends & Inter-company Borrowings
The Bank is restricted as to the amount of dividends that can be paid. Dividends declared by the Bank that exceed the net income for the current year plus retained income for the preceding two years must be approved by federal and state regulatory agencies. Under this formula dividends of $19.0 million may be paid without prior regulatory approval. Regardless of formal regulatory restrictions, the Bank may not pay dividends that would result in its capital levels being reduced below the minimum requirements shown above. Under current Federal Reserve regulations, the Bank is limited as to the amount and type of loans it may make to the Company. These loans are subject to qualifying collateral requirements on which the amount of the loan may be based.
Note 17 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are management’s estimate of the values at which the instruments could be exchanged in a transaction between willing parties. These estimates are subjective and may vary significantly from amounts that would be realized in actual transactions. In addition, other significant assets are not considered financial assets including deferred tax assets, premises, equipment and intangibles. Further, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on the fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.
The following assumptions and methods were used in estimating the fair value for financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, cash equivalents and federal funds sold approximate their fair values. Also included in this line item are the carrying amounts of interest-bearing deposits maturing within ninety days which approximate their fair values. Fair values of other interest-bearing deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current rates for similar types of deposits.
Interest Bearing Time Deposits
Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Securities - Available-for-sale
Fair values for securities, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank stock, are based on quoted market price, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.
Other Securities
The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Loans Held for Sale
The carrying amount approximates fair value due to insignificant amount of time between origination and date of sale.
Loans, net
The fair values of the loans are estimated using a credit mark adjustment along with discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. The credit mark adjustment was estimated using merger and acquisition analysis of nationwide bank and thrift deals.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 17 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
Deposits
The fair values disclosed for deposits with no defined maturities are equal to their carrying amounts, which represent the amount payable on demand. The carrying amounts for variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair value at the reporting date. Fair value for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold Under Agreement to Repurchase
The carrying value of Federal Funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase approximates fair values.
FHLB Advances
Fair values or FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types or borrowing arrangements.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable
The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair values.
Off Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
Fair values for off-balance-sheet, credit related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties' credit standing.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 17 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The estimated fair values, and related carrying or notional amounts, for on and off-balance sheet financial instruments as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are reflected below. The aggregate fair values in the table below do not represent the total market value of the Bank’s assets and liabilities. The table excludes the following: Bank Premises and Equipment, Goodwill, Mortgage Servicing Rights, Other Real Estate Owned, Other Assets, Other Liabilities and Accrued Expenses.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 17 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine those fair values. There were no changes to valuation techniques during 2019.
In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.
Available-for-sale securities - When quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are valued using the quoted price and are classified as Level 1. The quoted prices are not adjusted.
Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
Available-for-sale securities classified as Level 2 are valued using the prices obtained from an independent pricing service. The prices are not adjusted. Securities of obligations of state and political subdivisions are valued using a type of matrix, or grid, pricing in which securities are benchmarked against the treasury rate based on credit rating. Substantially all assumptions used by the independent pricing service are observable in the marketplace, can be derived from observable data, or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are available in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the related asset or liability. The Bank holds two local municipals that the Bank evaluates based on the credit strength of the underlying project. The fair value is determined by valuing similar credit payment streams at similar rates.
In instances where inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels in the above fair value hierarchy, fair value measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the valuation. The Company’s assessment of the significance of particular inputs to these fair value measurements requires judgment and considers factors specific to each asset.
The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 segregated by level or the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 17 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
Most of the Company’s available for sale securities, including any bonds issued by local municipalities, have CUSIP numbers or have similar characteristics of those in the municipal markets, making them marketable and comparable as Level 2.
There have been no transfers into or out of Level 3 during 2019 and 2018.
The Company also has assets that, under certain conditions, are subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, such assets consist primarily of collateral dependent impaired loans. Collateral dependent impaired loans categorized as Level 3 assets consist of non-homogeneous loans that are considered impaired. The Company estimates the fair value of the loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows using management’s best estimate of key assumptions. These assumptions include future payment ability, timing of payment streams, and estimated realizable values of available collateral (typically based on outside appraisals).
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 17 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, collateral dependent impaired loans categorized as Level 3 were $444 and $215 thousand, respectively. The specific allocation for collateral dependent impaired loans was $197 thousand as of December 31, 2019 and $31 thousand as of December 31, 2018, respectively, which are accounted for in the allowance for loan losses (see Note 4).
Other real estate is reported at the lower of either the fair value of the real estate, minus the estimated costs to sell the asset, or the cost of the asset. The determination of the fair value of the real estate relies primarily on appraisals from third parties. If the fair value of the real estate, minus the estimated costs to sell the asset, is less than the asset’s cost, the deficiency is recognized as a valuation allowance against the asset through a charge to expense. The valuation allowance is therefore increased or decreased, through charges or credits to expense, for changes in the asset’s fair value or estimated selling costs.
The following table presents collateral dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned as recorded at fair value:
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 17 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements:
The Company also has other assets, which under certain conditions, are subject to measurement at fair value. These assets include loans held for sale and mortgage servicing rights. The Company estimated the fair values of these assets utilizing Level 3 inputs, including, the discounted present value of expected future cash flows. At December 31, 2019, the Company estimates that there is no impairment of these assets and therefore, no impairment charge to other expense was required to adjust these assets to their estimated fair values.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 18 - Condensed Financial Statements of Parent Company
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017
Note 19 - Quarterly Financial Data
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
No disagreements exist on accounting and financial disclosures or related matter.
ITEM 9a.
ITEM 9a. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management Report Regarding
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019, pursuant to Exchange Act 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.
MANAGEMENT REPORT REGARDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND
COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGNATED LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Management of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary is responsible for preparing the Bank’s annual financial statements. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting presented in conformity with both generally accepted accounting principles and regulatory reporting in conformity with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Instructions for Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (call report instructions). The Bank’s internal control contains monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies identified.
There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.
It is also management’s responsibility to ensure satisfactory compliance with all designated laws and regulations and in particular, those laws and regulations concerning loans to insiders. The federal laws concerning loans to insiders are codified at 12 USC 375a and 375b, and the federal regulations are set forth at 12 CFR 23.5, 31, and 215.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in the 2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019. The registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this annual report has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting which can be found under Item 8 of this form 10-K.
There was no change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9b.
ITEM 9b. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The information called for herein is presented below:
Name
Age
Principal Occupation or
Employment for Past Five Years
Year First
Became Director
Andrew J. Briggs
1st Sr. Vice President of Business Development
Farmers & Merchants State Bank
Eugene N. Burkholder
President, Falor Farm Center, Inc.
Lars B. Eller
President and CEO of the Company and
Farmers & Merchants State Bank
Steven A. Everhart
Self Employed
Jo Ellen Hornish
CEO, Hornish Bros, Inc./Fountain City Leasing, Inc./ Advantage Powder Coating, Inc.
Jack C. Johnson
President, Hawk’s Clothing, Inc.
Dr. Marcia S. Latta
Vice President of University Advancement,
The University of Findlay
Steven J. Planson
President, Planson Farms, Inc.
Anthony J. Rupp
Retired, Past President of Rupp Furniture Co.
Kevin J. Sauder
President/CEO, Sauder Woodworking Co.
Paul S. Siebenmorgen
Retired, Past President and CEO of the Company and
Farmers & Merchants State Bank
Dr. K. Brad Stamm
President and Educational Consultant of
Stamm Management Group
Directors are elected annually at the annual meeting of shareholders.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Name
Age
Principal Occupation & Offices Held with
Corporation & Bank for Past Five Years
Jack C. Johnson
Chairman
Lars B. Eller
President and Chief Executive Officer(1)
Barbara J. Britenriker
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Retail Banking Officer(2)
Edward A. Leininger
Executive Vice President
Chief Operating Officer
Rex D. Rice
Executive Vice President
and Chief Lending Officer(3)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(1) The designation PEO means principal executive officer and PFO means principal financial officer under the rules of the SEC. From 2013-2017, Mr. Eller was Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer of Royal Bank America in Philadelphia. From January 1, 2018, until June 30, 2018, Mr. Eller was a consultant for Cambridge Savings Bank in Massachusetts.
(2) Ms. Britenriker was appointed to serve as the Chief Retail Banking Officer of the Bank on January 7, 2019 and will also remain as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
(3) Mr. Rice was the Executive Vice President and Senior Commercial Banking Manager until January 31, 2020. Mr. Rice assumed the position of Chief Lending Officer of the Bank effective upon the retirement of Todd Graham as of February 1, 2020.
Any remaining information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is presented in the proxy statement to be furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Registrant for use at its Annual Meeting to be held on April 16, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of the proxy statement captioned ‘Nominations for Members of the Board of Director” and “PROPOSAL ONE - Election of Directors and Information Concerning Directors and Officers.” The information called for under Item 405 of Regulation S-K and called for under paragraphs (d)(4) and (d)(5) of Item 407 is presented in the proxy statement to be furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Registrant for use at its Annual Meeting to be held on April 16, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of the proxy statement captioned “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports,” “Audit Committee Report” and “Committees of the Board of Directors.”
The Board of Directors of the Company adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) at its meeting on February 13, 2004. While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates the adoption of a code of ethics for the most senior executive officers of all public companies, the Code adopted by the Corporation's Board of Directors is broader in the activities covered and applies to all officers, directors and employees of the Corporation and the Bank, including the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer and other senior officers performing accounting, auditing, financial management or similar functions. The administration of the Code has been delegated to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, a Committee comprised entirely of “independent directors.” The Code addresses topics such as compliance with laws and regulations, honest and ethical conduct, conflicts of interest, confidentiality and protection of Corporation assets, fair dealing and accurate and timely periodic reports, and also provides for enforcement mechanisms. The Board and management of the Corporation intends to continue to monitor not only the developing legal requirements in this area, but also the best practices of comparable companies, to assure that the Corporation maintains sound corporate governance practices in the future. Annual testing and review of the Code is conducted and attested to by signatures of all officers and directors of the Company.
A copy of the Corporation's Code is available on the website of the Bank (www.fm.bank). In addition, a copy of the Code is available to any shareholder free of charge upon request. Shareholders desiring a copy of the Code should address written requests to Mr. Lars B. Eller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., 307 North Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502, and are asked to mark Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on the outside of the envelope containing the request.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information called for herein by Item 402 and paragraphs (e)(4) and (e)(5) of Item 407, Regulations S-K is presented in the proxy statement to be furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Registrant for use at its Annual Meeting to be held on April 16, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of the proxy statement captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation,” and “Related Party Transactions.”
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information called for by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is presented in the proxy statement to be furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Registrant for use at its Annual Meeting to be held Thursday, April 16, 2020 and is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the proxy statement captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Named Executive Officers.”
On April 16, 2015 the Company’s shareholders approved the Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 2015 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (which replaced the expired 2005 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan). The plan authorizes the issuance of up to 1,600,000 (adjusted for a two-for-one stock split) of the Company’s common shares in the form of stock options, restricted stock, performance shares, and unrestricted stock to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. To date, the Company has only made awards of restricted stock under the Plan, which awards are subject to time vesting. This requires the executive or employee to remain employed with the Company or the Bank, as the case may be, until the awards have vested or such shares of restricted stock will be forfeited. During 2019, 38,100 shares were awarded to 94 employees and 3,220 were forfeited under its long term incentive plan. At year end, 2019, the Company held 1,093,065 shares in Treasury stock and 88,450 in unearned stock awards.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information called for herein by Item 404 and paragraph (a) of Item 407 is presented in the proxy statement to be furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Registrant for use at its Annual Meeting to be held on April 16, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of the proxy statement captioned “Related Party Transactions” and “Director Independence.”
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information called for by this Item is presented in the proxy statement to be furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Registrant for use at its Annual Meeting to be held on April 16, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the proxy statement captioned “Selection of Auditors/Principal Accounting Firm Fees.”
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
By
/s/ Lars B. Eller
Date:
February 21, 2020
Lars B. Eller
Chief Executive Officer
President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.