ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
The nature of our business subjects us to a number of uncertainties and risks. The following risk factors and other risk factors that we discuss in our periodic reports filed with the SEC should be considered for a better understanding of our Company. These important factors and other matters discussed herein could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially.
OPERATING RISKS
Our current or future development, expansion and acquisition activities may not be successful, which could impair our ability to execute our growth strategy.
Execution of our future growth plan is dependent on successful ongoing and future development, expansion and acquisition activities. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to complete development projects or acquisitions we undertake or continue to develop attractive opportunities for growth. Factors that could cause our development, expansion and acquisition activities to be unsuccessful include:
•
Our inability to obtain required governmental permits and approvals or the imposition of adverse conditions upon the approval of any acquisition;
•
Our inability to secure adequate utility rates through regulatory proceedings;
•
Our inability to obtain financing on acceptable terms, or at all;
•
The possibility that one or more credit rating agencies would downgrade our issuer credit rating to below investment grade, thus increasing our cost of doing business;
•
Our inability to successfully integrate any businesses we acquire;
•
Our inability to attract and retain management or other key personnel;
•
Our inability to negotiate acceptable acquisition, construction, fuel supply, power sales or other material agreements;
•
Reduced growth in the demand for utility services in the markets we serve;
•
Changes in federal, state, local or tribal laws and regulations, particularly those which would make it more difficult or costly to fully develop our coal reserves, our oil and gas reserves or our power generation capacity;
•
Fuel prices or fuel supply constraints;
•
Pipeline capacity and transmission constraints;
•
Competition within our industry and with producers of competing energy sources; and
•
Changes in tax rates and policies.
The SourceGas Transaction may not achieve its intended results, including anticipated operating efficiencies and cost savings, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
While management expects that the SourceGas Transaction will result in various benefits, including a significant amount of operating efficiencies and other financial and operational benefits, there can be no assurance regarding when or the extent to which we will be able to realize these operating efficiencies or other benefits. Events outside of our control, including but not limited to regulatory changes or developments, could also adversely affect our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the transaction.
Our financial performance depends on the successful operation of our facilities. If the risks involved in our operations are not appropriately managed or mitigated, our operations may not be successful and this could adversely affect our results of operations.
Operating electric generating facilities, oil and gas properties, the coal mine and electric and natural gas distribution systems involves risks, including:
•
Operational limitations imposed by environmental and other regulatory requirements;
•
Interruptions to supply of fuel and other commodities used in generation and distribution. Our utilities purchase fuel from a number of suppliers. Our results of operations could be negatively impacted by disruptions in the delivery of fuel due to various factors, including but not limited to, transportation delays, labor relations, weather and environmental regulations, which could limit our utilities’ ability to operate their facilities;
•
Breakdown or failure of equipment or processes, including those operated by PacifiCorp at the Wyodak plant;
•
Our ability to transition and replace our retirement-eligible utility employees. At December 31, 2016, approximately 27% of our Electric Utilities and Gas Utilities employees were eligible for regular or early retirement;
•
Inability to recruit and retain skilled technical labor;
•
Disrupted transmission and distribution. We depend on transmission and distribution facilities, including those operated by unaffiliated parties, to deliver the electricity and gas that we sell to our retail and wholesale customers. If transmission is interrupted, our ability to sell or deliver product and satisfy our contractual obligations may be hindered;
•
Operating hazards such as leaks, mechanical problems and accidents, including explosions, affecting our natural gas distribution system which could impact public safety, reliability and customer confidence;
•
Electricity is dangerous for employees and the general public should they come in contact with power lines or electrical service facilities and equipment. Natural conditions and other disasters such as wind, lightning and winter storms can cause wildfires, pole failures and associated property damage and outages;
•
Disruption in the functioning of our information technology and network infrastructure which are vulnerable to disability, failures and unauthorized access. If our information technology systems were to fail and we were unable to recover in a timely manner, we would be unable to fulfill critical business functions; and
•
Labor relations. Approximately 27% of our employees are represented by a total of seven collective bargaining agreements.
Construction, expansion, refurbishment and operation of power generating and transmission and resource extraction facilities involve significant risks which could reduce profitability.
The construction, expansion, refurbishment and operation of power generating and transmission and resource extraction facilities involve many risks, including:
•
The inability to obtain required governmental permits and approvals along with the cost of complying with or satisfying conditions imposed upon such approvals;
•
Contractual restrictions upon the timing of scheduled outages;
•
The cost of supplying or securing replacement power during scheduled and unscheduled outages;
•
The unavailability or increased cost of equipment;
•
The cost of recruiting and retaining or the unavailability of skilled labor;
•
Supply interruptions, work stoppages and labor disputes;
•
Increased capital and operating costs to comply with increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations;
•
Opposition by members of public or special-interest groups;
•
Weather interferences;
•
Availability and cost of fuel supplies;
•
Unexpected engineering, environmental and geological problems; and
•
Unanticipated cost overruns.
The ongoing operation of our facilities involves many of the risks described above, in addition to risks relating to the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes and performance below expected levels of output or efficiency. New plants may employ recently developed and technologically complex equipment, including newer environmental emission control technology. Any of these risks could cause us to operate below expected capacity levels, which in turn could reduce revenues, increase expenses or cause us to incur higher operating and maintenance costs and penalties. While we maintain insurance, obtain warranties from vendors and obligate contractors to meet certain performance levels, the proceeds of such insurance and our rights under warranties or performance guarantees may not be timely or adequate to cover lost revenues, increased expenses, liability or liquidated damage payments.
Operating results can be adversely affected by variations from normal weather conditions.
Our utility businesses are seasonal businesses and weather patterns can have a material impact on our operating performance. Demand for electricity is typically greater in the summer and winter months associated with cooling and heating. Demand for natural gas depends heavily upon winter-weather patterns throughout our service territory and a significant amount of natural gas revenues are recognized in the first and fourth quarters related to the heating seasons. Accordingly, our utility operations have historically generated lower revenues and income when weather conditions are cooler than normal in the summer and warmer than normal in the winter. Unusually mild summers and winters therefore could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our businesses are located in areas that could be subject to seasonal natural disasters such as severe snow and ice storms, flooding and wildfires. These factors could result in interruption of our business, damage to our property such as power lines and substations, and repair and clean-up costs associated with these storms. We may not be able to recover the costs incurred in restoring transmission and distribution property following these natural disasters through a change in our regulated rates thereby resulting in a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our Mining operations are subject to operating risks that are beyond our control which could affect our profitability and production levels. Our surface mining operations could be disrupted or materially affected due to adverse weather or natural disasters such as heavy snow, strong winds, rain or flooding.
While our planned activity related to our Oil and Gas segment is limited, weather conditions can also limit or temporarily halt our drilling, completion and producing activities at our crude oil and natural gas operations. Primarily in the winter and spring, our operations can be curtailed because of cold, snow and wet conditions, and severe weather could exacerbate these operational issues. In addition, weather conditions and other events could temporarily impair our ability to transport our crude oil and natural gas production.
Prices for some of our products and services as well as a portion of our operating costs are volatile and may cause our revenues and expenses to fluctuate significantly.
A portion of our net income is attributable to sales of contract and off-system wholesale electricity and natural gas. Energy prices are influenced by many factors outside our control, including, among other things, fuel prices, transmission constraints, supply and demand, weather, general economic conditions, and the rules, regulations and actions of system operators in those markets. Moreover, unlike most other commodities, electricity cannot be stored and therefore must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, wholesale power markets may be subject to significant, unpredictable price fluctuations over relatively short periods of time.
The success of our crude oil and natural gas operations is affected by the prevailing market prices of crude oil and natural gas. Crude oil and natural gas prices and markets historically have been, and are likely to continue to be, unpredictable. A decrease in crude oil or natural gas prices not only reduces revenues and profits, but also reduces the quantity and value of reserves that are commercially recoverable and may result in charges to earnings for impairment of the net capitalized cost of these assets. Crude oil and natural gas prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for crude oil and natural gas, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control.
The proliferation of domestic crude oil and natural gas shale plays in recent years has provided the market with an abundant new supply of crude oil and natural gas, which has driven prices down in recent years. There is also risk that increased domestic resources could drive both crude oil and natural gas prices lower.
Our mining operation requires reliable supplies of replacement parts, explosives, fuel, tires and steel-related products. If the cost of these increase significantly, or if sources of supplies and mining equipment become unavailable to meet our replacement demands, our productivity and profitability could be lower than our current expectations.
Our revenues, results of operations and financial condition are impacted by customer growth and usage in our service territories and may fluctuate with current economic conditions, emerging technologies or responses to price increases.
Our revenues, results of operations and financial condition are impacted by demand in our service territories. Customer growth and usage may be impacted by a number of factors, including: the voluntary reduction of consumption of electricity and natural gas by our customers in response to increases in prices and demand-side management programs, economic conditions impacting decreases in customers’ disposable income and the use of distributed generation resources or other emerging technologies. Continued technological improvements may make customer and third-party distributed generation and energy storage systems, including fuel cells, micro-turbines, wind turbines, solar cells and batteries, more cost effective and feasible for our customers. If more customers utilize their own generation, demand for energy from us would decline. Such developments could affect the price of energy and delivery of energy, require further improvements to our distribution systems to address changing load demands and could make portions of our electric system power supply and transmission and/or distribution facilities obsolete prior to the end of their useful lives. Each of these factors could materially affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Our operations rely on storage and transportation assets owned by third parties to satisfy our obligations.
Our Electric Utilities, Gas Utilities and Power Generation segment rely on pipeline companies and other owners of gas storage facilities to deliver natural gas to ratepayers, to supply our natural gas-fired power plants and to hedge commodity costs. If storage capacity is inadequate or transportation is disrupted, our ability to satisfy our obligations may be hindered. As a result, we may be responsible for damages incurred by our counterparties, such as the additional cost of acquiring alternative supply at then-current market rates, or for penalties imposed by state regulatory authorities.
Our utilities are subject to pipeline safety and system integrity laws and regulations that may require significant capital expenditures or significant increases in operating costs.
Compliance with pipeline safety and system integrity laws and regulations, or future changes in these laws and regulations, may result in increased capital, operating and other costs which may not be recoverable in a timely manner from customers in rates. Failure to comply may result in fines, penalties, or injunctive measures that would not be recoverable from customers in rates and could result in a material impact on our financial results.
Our energy production, transmission and distribution activities, and our storage facilities for our natural gas involve numerous risks that may result in accidents and other catastrophic events that could give rise to additional costs and cause a substantial loss to us.
Inherent in our natural gas and electricity transmission and distribution activities, as well as in our production, transportation and storage of crude oil and natural gas and our Mining operations, are a variety of hazards and operating risks, such as leaks, blowouts, fires, releases of hazardous materials, explosions and operational problems. These events could impact the safety of employees or others and result in injury or loss of human life, and cause significant damage to property or natural resources (including public lands), environmental pollution, impairment of our operations and substantial financial losses to us. Particularly for our transmission and distribution lines located near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites and other public gathering areas, the damages resulting from any such events could be substantial. While we maintain liability and property insurance coverage, such policies are subject to certain limits and deductibles. The occurrence of any of these events not fully covered by our insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Threats of terrorism and catastrophic events that could result from terrorism, or individuals and/or groups attempting to disrupt our businesses, or the businesses of third parties, may impact our operations in unpredictable ways.
Terrorist acts or other similar events could harm our businesses by limiting their ability to generate, purchase or transmit power and by delaying their development and construction of new generating facilities and capital improvements to existing facilities. These events, and governmental actions in response, could result in a material decrease in revenues and significant additional costs to repair and insure our assets and could adversely affect our operations by contributing to disruption of supplies and markets for natural gas, oil and other fuels. They could also impair our ability to raise capital by contributing to financial instability and lower economic activity.
The implementation of security guidelines and measures and maintenance of insurance, to the extent available, addressing such activities could increase costs. These types of events could materially adversely affect our financial results. In addition, these types of events could require significant management attention and resources and could adversely affect our reputation among customers and the public.
A cyber attack may disrupt our operations, or lead to a loss or misuse of confidential and proprietary information and create a potential liability.
We use and operate sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we collect and retain sensitive information including personal information about our customers and employees. Cyber attacks targeting our electronic control systems used at our generating facilities and for electric and gas distribution systems, could result in a full or partial disruption of our electric and/or gas operations. Cyber attacks targeting other key information technology systems could further add to a full or partial disruption to our operations. Any disruption of these operations could result in a loss of service to customers and a significant decrease in revenues, as well as significant expense to repair system damage and remedy security breaches. Any theft, loss and/or fraudulent use of customer, shareowner, employee or proprietary data as a result of a cyber attack could subject us to significant litigation, liability and costs, as well as adversely impact our reputation with customers and regulators, among others.
We have instituted security measures and safeguards to protect our operational systems and information technology assets, including certain safeguards required by FERC. The security measures and safeguards we have implemented may not always be effective due to the evolving nature and sophistication of cyber attacks. Despite our implementation of security measures and safeguards, all of our information technology systems are vulnerable to disability, failures or unauthorized access, including cyber attacks. If our information technology systems were to fail or be breached by a cyber attack or a computer virus and be unable to recover in a timely way, we would be unable to fulfill critical business functions and sensitive confidential and other data could be compromised which could have a material adverse effect not only on our financial results, but on our public reputation as well.
Increased risks of regulatory penalties could negatively impact our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Business activities in the energy sector are heavily regulated, primarily by agencies of the federal government. Agencies that historically sought voluntary compliance, or issued non-monetary sanctions, now employ mandatory civil penalty structures for regulatory violations. The FERC, NERC, CFTC, EPA, OSHA, SEC and MSHA may impose significant civil and criminal penalties to enforce compliance requirements relative to our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and/or our financial results.
Certain Federal laws, including the Migratory Bird Act and the Endangered Species Act, provide special protection to certain designated species. These laws and any state equivalents provide for significant civil and criminal penalties for non-permitted activities that result in harm to or harassment of certain protected animals, including damage to their habitats. If such species are located in an area in which we conduct operations, or if additional species in those areas become subject to protection, our operations and development projects, particularly transmission, generation, wind, pipeline or drilling projects, could be restricted or delayed, or we could be required to implement expensive mitigation measures.
Utilities
Regulatory commissions may refuse to approve some or all of the utility rate increases we have requested or may request in the future, or may determine that amounts passed through to customers were not prudently incurred and therefore are not recoverable.
Our regulated electric and gas utility operations are subject to cost-of-service regulation and earnings oversight from federal and state utility commissions. This regulatory treatment does not provide any assurance as to achievement of desired earnings levels. Our retail electric and gas utility rates are regulated on a state-by-state basis by the relevant state regulatory authorities based on an analysis of our costs, as reviewed and approved in a regulatory proceeding. The rates that we are allowed to charge may or may not match our related costs and allowed return on invested capital at any given time. While rate regulation is premised on the full recovery of prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, there can be no assurance that the state public utility commissions will judge all of our costs, including our direct and allocated borrowing and debt service costs, to have been prudently incurred or that the regulatory process in which rates are determined will always result in rates that produce a full recovery of our costs and the return on invested capital allowed by the applicable state public utility commission.
To some degree, each of our gas and electric utilities are permitted to recover certain costs (such as increased fuel and purchased power costs) without having to file a rate case. To the extent we are able to pass through such costs to our customers and a state public utility commission subsequently determines that such costs should not have been paid by the customers; we may be required to refund such costs. Any such costs not recovered through rates, or any such refund, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
If market or other conditions adversely affect operations or require us to make changes to our business strategy in any of our utility businesses, we may be forced to record a non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Any significant impairment of our goodwill related to these utilities would cause a decrease in our assets and a reduction in our net income and shareholders’ equity.
We had approximately $1.3 billion of goodwill on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016. A substantial portion of the goodwill is related to the SourceGas Acquisition and the Aquila Transaction. If we make changes in our business strategy or if market or other conditions adversely affect operations in any of our businesses, we may be forced to record a non-cash impairment charge, which would reduce our reported assets, net income and shareholders’ equity. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. If the testing performed indicates that impairment has occurred, we are required to record an impairment charge for the difference between the carrying value of the goodwill and the implied fair value of the goodwill in the period the determination is made. The testing of goodwill for impairment requires us to make significant estimates about our future performance and cash flows, as well as other assumptions. These estimates can be affected by numerous factors, including: future business operating performance, changes in economic conditions and interest rates, regulatory, industry or market conditions, changes in business operations, changes in competition or changes in technologies. Any changes in key assumptions, or actual performance compared with key assumptions, about our business and its future prospects could affect the fair value of one or more business segments, which may result in an impairment charge.
Municipal governments may seek to limit or deny franchise privileges which could inhibit our ability to secure adequate recovery of our investment in assets subject to condemnation.
Municipal governments within our utility service territories possess the power of condemnation and could establish a municipal utility within a portion of our current service territories by limiting or denying franchise privileges for our operations and exercising powers of condemnation over all or part of our utility assets within municipal boundaries. Although condemnation is a process that is subject to constitutional protections requiring just and fair compensation, as with any judicial procedure, the outcome is uncertain. If a municipality sought to pursue this course of action, we cannot assure that we would secure adequate recovery of our investment in assets subject to condemnation.
Mining
If the assumptions underlying our reclamation and mine closure obligations are materially inaccurate, our costs could be significantly greater than anticipated or be incurred sooner than anticipated.
We conduct surface mining operations that are subject to operations, reclamation and closure standards. We estimate our total reclamation liabilities based on permit requirements, engineering studies and our engineering expertise related to these requirements. The estimate of ultimate reclamation liability is reviewed periodically by our management and engineers and by government regulators. The estimated liability can change significantly if actual costs vary from our original assumptions or if government regulations change significantly. GAAP requires that asset retirement obligations be recorded as a liability based on fair value, which reflects the present value of the estimated future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, we consider the estimated current cost of reclamation and apply inflation rates. The resulting estimated reclamation obligations could change significantly if actual amounts or the timing of these expenses change significantly from our assumptions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Estimates of the quality and quantity of our coal reserves may change materially due to numerous uncertainties inherent in three-dimensional structural modeling, and any inaccuracies in interpretation or modeling could materially affect the estimated quantity and quality of our reserves.
The process of estimating coal reserves is uncertain and requires interpretations and modeling. Significant inaccuracies in interpretation or modeling could materially affect the quantity and quality of our reserve estimates. The accuracy of reserve estimates is a function of engineering and geological interpretation, conditions encountered during actual reserve recovery and undetected deposit anomalies. Variance from the assumptions used and drill hole modeling density could result in additions or deletions from our volume estimates. In addition, future environmental, economic or geologic changes may occur or become known that require reserve revisions either upward or downward from prior reserve estimates.
Oil and Gas
Our inability to successfully include our Oil and Gas segment core assets in utility Cost of Service Gas Programs may result in additional material impairments of our Oil and Gas assets.
In our oil and gas business, we are actively divesting non-core assets while retaining those assets best suited for a Cost of Service Gas Program for our utilities and third-party utilities, and have refocused our professional staff on assisting with the implementation of a Cost of Service Gas Program. The implementation of Cost of Service Gas Programs will provide a long-term physical hedge for a portion of a utility’s gas supply, enhancing the quality of the overall gas supply portfolio. In addition to providing utility customers the potential benefits associated with more predictable and lower long-term natural gas prices, it also provides utilities an opportunity to increase earnings through investment in gas reserves. Cost of Service Gas Programs require regulatory approval from state commissions that regulate utility participants in these programs. Failure to obtain these approvals may result in additional impairments of our Oil and Gas assets, and could adversely affect the market perception of our business, operating results and stock price.
Estimates of the quantity and value of our proved oil and gas reserves may change materially due to numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating oil and natural gas reserves. Significant inaccuracies in interpretations or assumptions could materially affect the estimated quantities and present value of our reserves.
The process of estimating crude oil and natural gas reserves requires interpretation of available technical data and various assumptions, including assumptions relating to economic factors. Significant variances in interpretations or assumptions could materially affect the estimated quantities and present value of our reserves. Actual prices, production, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable crude oil and natural gas reserves may vary significantly from those assumed in our estimates. Any significant variance from the assumptions used could cause the actual quantity of our reserves and future net cash flow to be materially different from our estimates. In addition, results of drilling, testing and production, changes in future capital expenditures and fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas prices after the date of the estimate may result in substantial upward or downward revisions that could adversely affect our results of operations.
The potential adoption of federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing could result in restrictions which could increase costs and cause delays to the completion of certain oil and gas wells and potentially preclude the economic drilling and completion of wells in certain reservoirs.
Hydraulic fracturing is an essential and common practice in the oil and gas industry used extensively for decades to stimulate production of natural gas and/or oil from dense subsurface rock formations. We routinely apply hydraulic fracturing techniques on our crude oil and natural gas properties. Hydraulic fracturing involves using mostly water, sand and a small amount of certain chemicals to fracture the hydrocarbon-bearing rock formation to enhance flow of hydrocarbons into the well-bore. The process is typically regulated by state crude oil and natural gas commissions. However, the EPA does assert federal regulatory authority over certain hydraulic fracturing activities when diesel comprises part of the fracturing fluid. In addition several agencies of the federal government including the EPA and the BLM are conducting studies of the fracturing stimulation process which may result in additional regulations. In addition, legislation has been introduced before Congress, called the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act, to provide the federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process.
In the event federal, state, local or municipal legal restrictions on the hydraulic fracturing are adopted in areas where we are conducting or in the future plan to conduct operations, we may incur additional costs to comply with such regulations that may be significant, experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of exploration, development or production activities, and perhaps even be precluded from utilizing fracture stimulation and effectively preclude the drilling of wells.
Exploratory and development drilling are speculative activities that may not result in commercially productive reserves. Lack of drilling success could result in uneconomical investments.
While our planned activity related to our Oil and Gas segment is limited, drilling activities are subject to many risks, including the risk that no commercially productive oil or gas reservoirs will be encountered. Drilling for oil and gas may involve unprofitable efforts, not only from dry wells, but also from wells that are productive but do not produce sufficient net revenues to return a profit after drilling, operating and other costs. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain. Our drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including economic conditions, mechanical problems, pressure or irregularities in formations, title problems, weather conditions, compliance with governmental rules and regulations and shortages in or delays in the delivery of equipment and services. Such equipment shortages and delays are caused by the high demand for rigs and other needed equipment by a large number of companies in active drilling basins. Lack of drilling success could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We could incur additional write-downs of the carrying value of our natural gas and oil properties, which would cause a decrease in our assets and stockholders' equity and could adversely impact our results of operations.
We review the carrying value of our natural gas and oil properties under the full cost accounting rules of the SEC on a quarterly basis, which is referred to as a ceiling test. Under the ceiling test, capitalized costs, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, may not exceed an amount equal to the sum of the present value of estimated future net revenues less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves, less any related income tax effects. Two primary factors in the ceiling test are natural gas and crude oil reserve quantities, which are impacted by current commodity prices, and SEC-defined crude oil and gas prices, both of which impact the present value of estimated future net revenues. We recorded non-cash impairment charges in 2016 and 2015 due to the full cost ceiling limitations. See Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
FINANCING RISKS
Our credit ratings could be lowered below investment grade in the future. If this were to occur, it could impact our access to capital, our cost of capital and our other operating costs.
Our issuer credit rating is Baa2 (Stable outlook) by Moody’s; BBB (Stable outlook) by S&P; and BBB+ (Negative outlook) by Fitch. Reduction of our credit ratings could impair our ability to refinance or repay our existing debt and to complete new financings on reasonable terms, or at all. A credit rating downgrade, particularly to a sub-investment grade, could also result in counterparties requiring us to post additional collateral under existing or new contracts or trades. In addition, a ratings downgrade would increase our interest expense under some of our existing debt obligations, including borrowings under our credit facilities.
Derivatives regulations included in current financial reform legislation could impede our ability to manage business and financial risks by restricting our use of derivative instruments as hedges against fluctuating commodity prices and interest rates.
Dodd-Frank contains significant derivatives regulations, including a requirement that certain transactions be cleared resulting in a requirement to post cash collateral (commonly referred to as “margin”) for such transactions. Dodd-Frank provides for a potential exception from these clearing and cash collateral requirements for commercial end-users such as utilities and it includes a number of defined terms that will be used in determining how this exception applies to particular derivative transactions and the parties to those transactions.
We use crude oil and natural gas derivative instruments for our hedging activities for our oil and gas production activities and our gas utility operations. We also use interest rate derivative instruments to minimize the impact of interest rate fluctuations. As a result of Dodd-Frank regulations promulgated by the CFTC, we may be required to post collateral to clearing entities for certain swap transactions we enter into. In addition our exchange-traded futures contracts are subject to futures margin posting requirements, which could have a significant impact on our business by reducing our ability to execute derivative transactions to reduce commodity price and interest rate uncertainty and to protect cash flows. Requirements to post collateral may cause significant liquidity issues by reducing our ability to use cash for investment or other corporate purposes, or may require us to increase our level of debt. In addition, a requirement for our counterparties to post collateral could result in additional costs being passed on to us, thereby decreasing our profitability.
Our hedging activities that are designed to protect against commodity price and financial market risks may cause fluctuations in reported financial results due to accounting requirements associated with such activities.
We use various financial contracts and derivatives, including futures, forwards, options and swaps to manage commodity price and financial market risks. The timing of the recognition of gains or losses on these economic hedges in accordance with GAAP does not always match up with the gains or losses on the commodities or assets being hedged. The difference in accounting can result in volatility in reported results, even though the expected profit margin may be essentially unchanged from the dates the transactions were consummated.
Our use of derivative financial instruments could result in material financial losses.
From time to time, we have sought to limit a portion of the potential adverse effects resulting from changes in commodity prices and interest rates by using derivative financial instruments and other hedging mechanisms. To the extent that we hedge our commodity price and interest rate exposures, we forgo the benefits we would otherwise experience if commodity prices or interest rates were to change in our favor. In addition, even though they are closely monitored by management, our hedging activities can result in losses. Such losses could occur under various circumstances, including if a counterparty does not perform its obligations under the hedge arrangement, the hedge is economically imperfect, commodity prices or interest rates move unfavorably related to our physical or financial positions, or hedging policies and procedures are not followed.
Market performance or changes in other assumptions could require us to make significant unplanned contributions to our pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. Increasing costs associated with our defined benefit retirement plans may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
As discussed in Note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have one defined benefit pension plan and several defined post-retirement healthcare plans and non-qualified retirement plans that cover certain eligible employees. Assumptions related to future costs, return on investments, interest rates and other actuarial assumptions have a significant impact on our funding requirements and the expense recognized related to these plans. These estimates and assumptions may change based on actual return on plan assets, changes in interest rates and any changes in governmental regulations.
We have a holding company corporate structure with multiple subsidiaries. Corporate dividends and debt payments are dependent upon cash distributions to the holding company from the subsidiaries.
As a holding company, our investments in our subsidiaries are our primary assets. Our operating cash flow and ability to service our indebtedness depend on the operating cash flow of our subsidiaries and the payment of funds by them to us in the form of dividends or advances. Our subsidiaries are separate legal entities that have no obligation to make any funds available for that purpose, whether by dividends or otherwise. In addition, each subsidiary’s ability to pay dividends to us depends on any applicable contractual or regulatory restrictions that may include requirements to maintain minimum levels of cash, working capital, equity or debt service funds.
There is no assurance as to the amount, if any, of future dividends because they depend on our future earnings, capital requirements and financial conditions and are subject to declaration by the Board of Directors. Our operating subsidiaries have certain restrictions on their ability to transfer funds in the form of dividends or loans to us. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding these restrictions and their impact on our liquidity.
We may be unable to obtain financing on reasonable terms needed to refinance debt, fund planned capital expenditures or otherwise execute our operating strategy.
Our ability to execute our operating strategy is highly dependent upon our access to capital. Historically, we have addressed our liquidity needs (including funds required to make scheduled principal and interest payments, refinance debt and fund working capital and planned capital expenditures) with operating cash flow, borrowings under credit facilities, proceeds of debt and equity offerings, and proceeds from asset sales. Our ability to access the capital markets and the costs and terms of available financing depend on many factors, including changes in our credit ratings, changes in the federal or state regulatory environment affecting energy companies, volatility in commodity or electricity prices, and general economic and market conditions.
In addition, because we are a holding company and our utility assets are owned by our subsidiaries, if we are unable to adequately access the credit markets, we could be required to take additional measures designed to ensure that our utility subsidiaries are adequately capitalized to provide safe and reliable service. Possible additional measures would be evaluated in the context of then-prevailing market conditions, prudent financial management and any applicable regulatory requirements.
National and regional economic conditions may cause increased counterparty credit risk, late payments and uncollectible accounts, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and liquidity.
A future recession may lead to an increase in late payments from retail, commercial and industrial utility customers, as well as from our non-utility customers. If late payments and uncollectible accounts increase, earnings and cash flows from our continuing operations may be reduced.
Our ability to obtain insurance and the terms of any available insurance coverage could be adversely affected by international, national, state or local events and company-specific events, as well as the financial condition of insurers. Our insurance coverage may not provide protection against all significant losses.
Our ability to obtain insurance, as well as the cost of such insurance, could be affected by developments affecting insurance businesses, international, national, state or local events, as well as the financial condition of insurers. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available at all, or at rates or on terms similar to those presently available to us. A loss for which we are not fully insured could materially and adversely affect our financial results. Our insurance may not be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which the Company may be subject, including but not limited to environmental hazards, fire-related liability from natural events or inadequate facility maintenance, risks associated with our oil and gas exploration and production activities, distribution property losses, cyber-security risks and dangers that exist in the gathering and transportation of gas in pipelines.
While we maintain insurance coverage for our operated wells and we participate in insurance coverage maintained by the operators of our wells, there can be no assurances that such coverage will be sufficient to prevent a material adverse effect to us if any of the foregoing events occur.
Increasing costs associated with our health care plans and other benefits may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
The costs of providing health care benefits to our employees and retirees have increased substantially in recent years. We believe that our employee benefit costs, including costs related to health care plans for our employees and former employees, will continue to rise. Significant regulatory developments have, and likely will continue to, require changes to our current employee benefit plans and in our administrative and accounting processes, as well as changes to the cost of our plans, and the increasing costs and funding requirements associated with our health care plans may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Our electric and gas utility rates are regulated on a state-by-state basis by the relevant state regulatory authorities based on an analysis of our costs, as reviewed and approved in a regulatory proceeding. Within our utility rates we have generally recovered the cost of providing employee benefits. As benefit costs continue to rise, there can be no assurance that the state public utility commissions will allow recovery.
An effective system of internal control may not be maintained, leading to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.
Prior to the Acquisition, SourceGas was a private company, exempt from reporting and control requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As permitted by the guidance set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the acquired SourceGas businesses are not included in management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2016. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires management to make an assessment of the design and effectiveness of internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to the effectiveness of these controls. During their assessment of these controls, management or our independent registered public accounting firm may identify areas of weakness in control design or effectiveness, which may lead to the conclusion that a material weakness in internal control exists. Any control deficiencies we identify in the future could adversely affect our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis, which could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports or have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business or access sources of liquidity.
A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. While we expect our control system to adequately integrate the SourceGas processes, we cannot be certain that our current design for internal control over financial reporting, or any additional changes to be made, will be sufficient to enable management to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, market perception of our business, operating results and stock price could be adversely affected.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
Federal and state laws concerning greenhouse gas regulations and air emissions may materially increase our generation and production costs and could render some of our generating units uneconomical to operate and maintain.
We own and operate regulated and non-regulated fossil-fuel generating plants in South Dakota, Wyoming and Colorado. Recent developments under federal and state laws and regulations governing air emissions from fossil-fuel generating plants may result in more stringent emission limitations, which could have a material impact on our costs of operations. Various pending or final state and EPA regulations that will impact our facilities are also discussed in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Environmental Matters.”
The GHG Tailoring Rule, effective June 2010, will impact us in the event of a major modification at an existing facility or in the event of a new major source as defined by EPA regulations. Upon renewal of operating permits for existing facilities, monitoring and reporting requirements will be implemented. New projects or major modifications to existing projects will result in a Best Available Control Technology review that could impose more stringent emissions control practices and technologies. The EPA’s GHG New Source Performance Standard for new steam electric generating units, published October 2015, effectively prohibits new coal-fired units until carbon capture and sequestration becomes technically and economically feasible.
On October 23, 2015, the EPA finalized the CPP to cut carbon emissions from existing electric generating units. The design of the CPP is to decrease existing coal-fired generation, increase the utilization of existing gas generation, increase renewable energy and demand side management. The rule, which does not propose to regulate individual emission sources, calls for each state to develop plans to meet the EPA-assigned statewide average emission rate target for that state by 2030. The rule also allows states to formulate a regional approach whereby they would join with other states and be assigned a new single target for the group. The U.S. Supreme Court entered an order staying the CPP in February 2016, pending appeal. The effect of the order is to delay the CPP’s compliance deadlines until challenges to the CPP have been fully litigated and the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled. In 2015 and again in 2016, we met with the staff of state air programs and public utility commissions on several occasions. We will continue to work closely with state regulatory staff as these plans develop.
Due to uncertainty as to the final outcome of federal climate change legislation, legal challenges, state clean power plan developments or regulatory changes under the Clean Air Act, we cannot definitively estimate the effect of GHG legislation or regulation on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
New or more stringent regulations or other energy efficiency requirements could require us to incur significant additional costs relating to, among other things, the installation of additional emission control equipment, the acceleration of capital expenditures, the purchase of additional emissions allowances or offsets, the acquisition or development of additional energy supply from renewable resources, the closure or reduction of load of coal generating facilities and potential increased load of our combined cycle natural gas fired units. To the extent our regulated fossil-fuel generating plants are included in rate base we will attempt to recover costs associated with complying with emission standards or other requirements. We will also attempt to recover the emission compliance costs of our non-regulated fossil-fuel generating plants from utility and other purchasers of the power generated by those non-regulated power plants. Any unrecovered costs could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, future changes in environmental regulations governing air emissions could render some of our power generating units more expensive or uneconomical to operate and maintain.
The costs to achieve or maintain compliance with existing or future governmental laws, regulations or requirements, and any failure to do so, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Our business is subject to extensive energy, environmental and other laws and regulations of federal, state, tribal and local authorities. We generally must obtain and comply with a variety of regulations, licenses, permits and other approvals in order to operate, which can require significant capital expenditure and operating costs. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could be subject to civil or criminal liability and the imposition of penalties, liens or fines, claims for property damage or personal injury, or environmental clean-up costs. In addition, existing regulations may be revised or reinterpreted and new laws and regulations may be adopted or become applicable to us or our facilities, which could require additional unexpected expenditures or cause us to reevaluate the feasibility of continued operations at certain sites and have a detrimental effect on our business.
In connection with certain acquisitions, we assumed liabilities associated with the environmental condition of certain properties, regardless of when such liabilities arose, whether known or unknown, and in some cases agreed to indemnify the former owners of those properties for environmental liabilities. Future steps to bring our facilities into compliance or to address contamination from legacy operations, if necessary, could be expensive and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Environmental compliance expenditures could be substantial in the future if the trend towards stricter standards, greater regulation, more extensive permitting requirements and an increase in the number of assets we operate continues.
The characteristics of coal may make it difficult for coal users to comply with various environmental standards related to coal combustion or utilization and the use of alternative energy sources for power generation as mandated by states could reduce coal consumption.
Future regulations may require further reductions in emissions of mercury, hazardous pollutants, SO2, NOx, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter and GHG, which are released into the air when coal is burned. These requirements could require the installation of costly emission control technology or the implementation of other measures. Reductions in mercury emissions required by EPA’s MATS rule described earlier, will likely require some power plants to install new equipment, at substantial cost, or discourage the use of certain coals containing higher levels of mercury. The EPA’s October 23, 2015 CPP described earlier, which has been stayed pending appeal, is designed to reduce carbon emissions from existing electric generating units. The basis of the CPP is to decrease existing coal-fired generation, increase the utilization of existing gas fired combined cycle generation, increase renewable energy and demand side management. This rule could have a significant impact on our coal and natural gas generating fleet. The rule calls for states to develop plans to meet their assigned emission rate targets by 2030. The rule also allows states to formulate a regional approach whereby they would join with other states and be assigned a new single target for the group.
Coal competes with other energy sources, such as natural gas, wind, solar and hydropower. The CPP regulation is expected to have an adverse effect on coal as a domestic energy source, and could have a significant impact on our mining operations.
Existing or proposed legislation focusing on emissions enacted by the United States or individual states could make coal a less attractive fuel alternative for our customers and could impose a tax or fee on the producer of the coal. If our customers decrease the volume of coal they purchase from us or switch to alternative fuels as a result of existing or future environmental regulations aimed at reducing emissions, our operations and financial results could be adversely impacted.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Information regarding our legal proceedings is incorporated herein by reference to the “Legal Proceedings” sub-caption within Item 8, Note 19, “Commitments and Contingencies”, of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Sections 1503(a) of Dodd-Frank is included in Exhibit 95 of this Annual Report.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BKH. As of December 31, 2016, we had 3,860 common shareholders of record and approximately 28,000 beneficial owners, representing all 50 states, the District of Columbia and 8 foreign countries.
We have paid a regular quarterly cash dividend each year since the incorporation of our predecessor company in 1941 and expect to continue paying a regular quarterly dividend for the foreseeable future. At its January 25, 2017 meeting, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.445 per share, equivalent to an annual dividend of $1.78 per share, marking 2017 as the 47th consecutive annual dividend increase for the Company.
For additional discussion of our dividend policy and factors that may limit our ability to pay dividends, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Quarterly dividends paid and the high and low prices for our common stock, as reported in the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions, for the last two years were as follows:
UNREGISTERED SECURITIES ISSUED
There were no unregistered securities sold during 2016.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 6.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Minor differences may result due to rounding)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA continued
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA continued
____________________________________
(a)
2016 includes the debt associated with the SourceGas acquisition (see Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
(b)
2016 includes non-cash after-tax impairment charges to our crude oil and natural gas properties of $67 million. 2015 includes non-cash after-tax ceiling test impairment charges to our crude oil and natural gas properties of $158 million and a non-cash after-tax equity investment impairment charge of $2.9 million (see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). 2012 includes a non-cash after-tax ceiling test impairment charge to our crude oil and natural gas properties of $32 million offset by an after-tax gain on sale of $49 million related to our Williston Basin assets.
(c)
On April 14, 2016, BHEG sold a 49.9% interest in Black Hills Colorado IPP. Net income available for common stock for 2016 was reduced by $9.6 million attributable to this noncontrolling interest. 2013 includes $6.6 million after-tax expense relating to the settlement of interest rate swaps and write-off of deferred financing costs in conjunction with the prepayment of Black Hills Wyoming’s project financing.
(d)
2016 and 2015 include incremental SourceGas Acquisition costs, after-tax of $30 million and $6.7 million, respectively. 2016 and 2015 also include after-tax internal labor costs attributable to the SourceGas Acquisition of $9.1 million and $3.0 million that otherwise would have been charged to other segments. 2013 and 2012 include $20 million and $1.2 million non-cash after-tax unrealized mark-to-market gains, respectively, related to certain interest rate swaps; 2013 also includes $7.6 million after-tax expense for a make-whole premium, write-off of deferred financing costs relating to the early redemption of our $250 million notes and interest expense on new debt, while 2012 includes an after-tax make-whole provision of $4.6 million for early redemption of our $225 million notes.
(e)
Discontinued operations in 2013 and 2012 include post-closing adjustments and operations relating to Enserco, sold in 2012.
(f)
In 2016, we issued 1.97 million shares at an average share price of $60.95 under our ATM equity offering program. In November 2015, we issued 6.3 million shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share at a price of $40.25.
(g)
Effective January 1, 2016, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas utility results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. Cheyenne Light’s gas utility results have been reclassified from the Electric Utilities segment to the Gas Utilities segment in the amounts of $1.7 million, $2.3 million, $3.1 million and $0.5 million for the years ending December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 respectively. Due to this reclassification, there also exists an intersegment elimination of $0.2 million that has been moved to “Corporate and intersegment eliminations” for the period ended December 31, 2015.
For additional information on our business segments see Item 7.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission “COSO”. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
Our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 excluded the assets and operations acquired on February 12, 2016 in the SourceGas Transaction. SourceGas’ assets and operations constitute approximately 20% of total assets and 22% of sales (excluding SourceGas’ goodwill and intangible assets which were integrated into the Company’s systems and control environment) of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. Such exclusion was in accordance with SEC guidance that an assessment of a recently acquired business may be omitted in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting, provided the acquisition took place within twelve months of management’s evaluation.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as auditors of Black Hills Corporation’s financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of Black Hills Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. Deloitte & Touche LLP's report on Black Hills Corporation's internal control over financial reporting is included herein.
Black Hills Corporation
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Black Hills Corporation
Rapid City, South Dakota
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Black Hills Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Black Hills Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 2017
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Black Hills Corporation
Rapid City, South Dakota
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Black Hills Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Black Hills Gas Holdings, LLC, formerly known as SourceGas Holdings, LLC (“SourceGas”), which was acquired on February 12, 2016, and whose assets and operations constitute approximately 20% of total assets and 22% of sales (excluding SourceGas’ goodwill and intangibles which were integrated into the Company’s systems and control environment), of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at SourceGas. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, of the Company and our report dated February 24, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 24, 2017
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
See Note 16 for additional disclosures related to Comprehensive Income.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Continued)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
See Note 17 for supplemental disclosure of cash flow information.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Dividends per share paid were $1.68, $1.62 and $1.56 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
(1)
BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business Description
Black Hills Corporation is a customer-focused, growth-oriented, vertically-integrated utility company headquartered in Rapid City, South Dakota. We are a holding company that, through our subsidiaries, conducts our operations through the following reportable segments: Electric Utilities, Gas Utilities, Power Generation, Mining, and Oil and Gas.
Segment Reporting
Our reportable segments are based on our method of internal reporting, which is generally segregated by differences in products, services and regulation. All of our operations and assets are located within the United States. Prior to 2016, our segments were reported within two business groups, our Utilities Group, containing the Electric Utilities and Gas Utilities segments, and our Non-regulated Energy Group, containing the Power Generation, Mining and Oil and Gas segments. We have continued to report our operations consistently through our reportable segments. However, we will no longer separate the segments by business group.
Our Electric Utilities segment includes the operating results of the regulated electric utility operations of South Dakota Electric, Wyoming Electric and Colorado Electric, which supply regulated electric utility services to areas in South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado and Montana. Our Gas Utilities Segment consists of the operating results of our regulated natural gas utility subsidiaries in Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Wyoming and Nebraska.
All of our non-utility business segments support our electric utilities, other than the Oil and Gas segment. Our Power Generation segment, which is conducted through Black Hills Electric Generation and its subsidiaries, engages in independent power generation activities in Wyoming and Colorado. Our Mining segment, which is conducted through WRDC, engages in coal mining activities located near Gillette, Wyoming. Our Oil and Gas segment, which is conducted through BHEP and its subsidiaries, engages in crude oil and natural gas exploration and production activities in Colorado, Louisiana, Montana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, North Dakota, Wyoming, Texas and California. Our Oil and Gas segment’s focus is on cost of service gas programs. We are divesting non-core oil and gas assets while retaining those best suited for a cost of service gas program and have refocused our professional staff on assisting our utilities with the implementation of a Cost of Service Gas Program.
For further descriptions of our reportable business segments, see Note 5.
The following changes have been made to our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) to reflect combined revenue and combined operations and maintenance expenses, rather than by business group as previously reported, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 respectively:
This presentation reclassification did not impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Segment Reporting Transition of Cheyenne Light’s Natural Gas Distribution
Effective January 1, 2016, the natural gas operations of Cheyenne Light have been included in our Gas Utilities Segment. Through December 31, 2015, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas operations were included in our Electric Utilities Segment as these natural gas operations were consolidated within Cheyenne Light since its acquisition. This change is a result of our business segment reorganization to, among other things, integrate all regulated natural gas operations, including the SourceGas Acquisition, into our Gas Utilities Segment which is led by the Group Vice President, Natural Gas Utilities. Likewise, all regulated electric utility operations, including Cheyenne Light’s electric utility operations, are reported in our Electric Utilities Segment, which is led by the Group Vice President, Electric Utilities. The prior periods have been reclassified to reflect this change in presentation between the Electric Utilities and Gas Utilities segments. See Note 5 for Revenues and Net Income amounts reclassified from the Electric Utilities segment to the Gas Utilities segment for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; and Segment Assets reclassified from the Electric Utilities segment to the Gas Utilities segment for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. This segment reclassification did not impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Revisions
Certain revisions have been made to prior years’ financial information to conform to the current year presentation.
The Company revised its presentation of cash and book overdrafts. For accounts with the same financial institution where there is a banking arrangement that clears payments with balances in other bank accounts, book overdrafts are presented on a combined basis by bank as cash and cash equivalents. Prior year amounts were corrected to conform with the current year presentation, which decreased cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable by $16 million, $12 million and $3.8 million as of December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and decreased net cash flows provided by operations by $3.7 million and $8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively. We assessed the materiality of these changes, taking into account quantitative and qualitative factors, and determined them to be immaterial to the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 and to the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. There is no impact to the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss), the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) or the Consolidated Statements of Equity, for any period reported.
Use of Estimates and Basis of Presentation
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates and actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Black Hills Corporation and its wholly-owned and majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Investment in non-controlled entities over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. In applying the equity method of accounting, the investments are initially recognized at cost and subsequently adjusted for our proportionate share of earnings and losses and distributions. Under this method, a proportionate share of pretax income is recorded as Equity earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For additional information on inter-company revenues, see Note 5.
Our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) include operating activity of acquired companies beginning with their acquisition date. We use the proportionate consolidation method to account for our working interests in oil and gas properties and for our ownership interest in any jointly-owned electric utility generating facility, wind project or transmission tie and the BHEP gas processing plant. See Note 4 for additional information.
Variable Interest Entities
We evaluate arrangements and contracts with other entities to determine if they are VIEs and if so, if we are the primary beneficiary. GAAP provides a framework for identifying VIEs and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interest and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements.
A VIE should be consolidated if a party with an ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) has the power to direct the VIEs most significant activities and the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary beneficiary generally must initially record all of the VIE’s assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests at fair value and subsequently account for the VIE as if it were consolidated.
Our evaluation of whether it qualifies as the primary beneficiary of a VIE involves significant judgments, estimates and assumptions and includes a qualitative analysis of the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and whether the Company has the power to direct those activities, the design of the entity, the rights of the parties and the purpose of the arrangement. Black Hills Colorado IPP is a VIE. See additional information in Note 12.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash and Equivalents
We maintain cash accounts for various specified purposes. Therefore, we classify these amounts as restricted cash.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable for our Electric and Gas Utilities business segments primarily consists of sales to residential, commercial, industrial, municipal and other customers, all of which do not bear interest. These accounts receivable are stated at billed and estimated unbilled amounts net of write-offs and allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable for our Mining, Oil and Gas, and Power Generation business segments consists of amounts due from sales of coal, crude oil and natural gas, electric energy and capacity.
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts which reflects our estimate of uncollectible trade receivables. We regularly review our trade receivable allowance by considering such factors as historical experience, credit worthiness, the age of the receivable balances and current economic conditions that may affect collectibility.
In specific cases where we are aware of a customer’s inability or reluctance to pay, we record an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the net receivable balance to the amount we reasonably expect to collect. However, if circumstances change, our estimate of the recoverability of accounts receivable could be affected. Circumstances which could affect our estimates include, but are not limited to, customer credit issues, the level of commodity prices, customer deposits and general economic conditions. Accounts are written off once they are deemed to be uncollectible or the time allowed for dispute under the contract has expired.
We utilize master netting agreements which consist of an agreement between two parties who have multiple contracts with each other that provide for the net settlement of all contracts in the event of default on or termination of any one contract. When the right of offset exists, accounting standards permit the netting of receivables and payables under a legally enforceable master netting agreement between counterparties. Accounting standards also permit offsetting of fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim, or the obligation to return, cash collateral against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty.
Following is a summary of accounts receivable as of December 31 (in thousands):
________________
(a)
Effective January 1, 2016, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas utility results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. Cheyenne Light’s gas utility accounts receivable has been reclassified from the Electric Utilities segment to the Gas Utilities segment. Accounts receivable of $6.8 million as of December 31, 2015, previously reported in the Electric Utilities segment is now presented in the Gas Utilities segment.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement with a fixed or determinable price and delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. Sales and franchise taxes collected from our customers is recorded on a net basis (excluded from Revenue).
Utility revenues are based on authorized rates approved by the state regulatory agencies and the FERC. Revenues related to the sale, transmission and distribution of energy, and delivery of service are generally recorded when service is rendered or energy is delivered to customers. To the extent that deliveries have occurred but a bill has not been issued, our utilities accrue an estimate of the revenue since the latest billing. This estimate is calculated based upon several factors including billings through the last billing cycle in a month and prices in effect in our jurisdictions. Each month the estimated unbilled revenue amounts are trued-up and recorded in Accounts receivable, net on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For long-term non-regulated power sales agreements, revenue is recognized either in accordance with accounting standards for revenue recognition, or in accordance with accounting standards for leases, as appropriate. Under accounting standards for revenue recognition, revenue is generally recognized as the lesser of the amount billed or the average rate expected over the life of the agreement.
Natural gas and crude oil sales are recognized when the products are sold to a purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, delivery has occurred, title has transferred and collectibility of the revenue is reasonably assured. Our Oil and Gas segment records its share of revenues based on production volumes and contracted sales prices. The sales price for natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs is adjusted for transportation costs and other related deductions when applicable. The transportation costs and other deductions are based on contractual or historical data and do not require significant judgment.
Materials, Supplies and Fuel
The following amounts by major classification are included in Materials, supplies and fuel on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of (in thousands):
Materials and supplies represent parts and supplies for all of our business segments. Fuel - Electric Utilities represents oil, gas and coal on hand used to produce power. Natural gas in storage primarily represents gas purchased for use by our gas customers. All of our Materials, supplies and fuel are valued using weighted-average cost. The value of our natural gas in storage fluctuates with seasonal volume requirements of our business and the commodity price of natural gas.
Accrued Liabilities
The following amounts by major classification are included in Accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of (in thousands):
Property, Plant and Equipment
Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Included in the cost of regulated construction projects is AFUDC, when applicable, which represents the approximate composite cost of borrowed funds and a return on equity used to finance a regulated utility project. We also capitalize interest, when applicable, on undeveloped leasehold costs and certain non-regulated construction projects. In addition, asset retirement costs associated with tangible long-lived regulated utility assets are recognized as liabilities with an increase to the carrying amounts of the related long-lived regulated utility assets in the period incurred. The amounts capitalized are included in Property, plant and equipment on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We also classify our base or “cushion gas” as property, plant and equipment. Cushion gas is the portion of natural gas necessary to force saleable gas from a storage field into the transmission system and for system balancing, representing a permanent investment necessary to use storage facilities and maintain reliability.
The cost of regulated utility property, plant and equipment retired, or otherwise disposed of in the ordinary course of business, less salvage plus retirement costs, is charged to accumulated depreciation. Estimated removal costs associated with non-legal obligations related to our regulated properties are reclassified from accumulated depreciation and reflected as regulatory liabilities. Retirement or disposal of all other assets, except for crude oil and natural gas properties as described below, result in gains or losses recognized as a component of operating income. Ordinary repairs and maintenance of property, except as allowed under rate regulations, are charged to operations as incurred.
Depreciation provisions for property, plant and equipment are generally computed on a straight-line basis based on the applicable estimated service life of the various class of property. Capitalized coal mining costs and coal leases are amortized on a unit-of-production method based on volumes produced and estimated reserves. For certain non-utility power plant components, depreciation is computed on a unit-of-production methodology based on plant hours run.
Oil and Gas Operations
We account for our oil and gas activities under the full cost method. Under the full cost method, costs related to acquisition, exploration and estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing proved reserves as well as estimated reclamation and abandonment costs, net of estimated salvage values are capitalized. These costs are amortized using a unit-of-production method based on volumes produced and proved reserves. Any conveyances of properties, including gains or losses on abandonment of properties, are typically treated as adjustments to the cost of the properties with no gain or loss recognized.
Costs directly associated with unproved properties and major development projects, if any, are excluded from the costs to be amortized. These excluded costs are subsequently included within the costs to be amortized when it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. The properties excluded from the costs to be amortized are assessed for impairment at least annually and any amount of impairment is added to the costs to be amortized. These costs are generally expected to be included in costs to be amortized within the term of the underlying lease agreement, which varies in length.
Under the full cost method, net capitalized costs, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, are subject to a ceiling test which limits the pooled costs to the aggregate of the discounted value of future net revenue attributable to proved natural gas and crude oil reserves using a discount rate defined by the SEC, plus the lower of cost or market value of unevaluated properties. Future net cash flows are estimated based on SEC-defined end-of-period commodity prices adjusted for contracted price changes and held constant for the life of the reserves. An average price is calculated using the price at the first day of each month for each of the preceding 12 months. If the net capitalized costs exceed the full cost “ceiling” at period end, a permanent non-cash write-down would be charged to earnings in that period. As a result of lower natural gas prices, we recorded non-cash ceiling test impairments of oil and gas long-lived assets included in the Oil and Gas segment in 2016 and 2015. No ceiling test write-down was recorded in 2014. See Note 13 for additional information.
The SEC definition of “reliable technology” permits the use of any reliable technology to establish reserve volumes in addition to those established by production and flow test data. This definition allows, but does not require us, to calculate PUDs to be booked at more than one location away from a producing well. We have no PUDs at December 31, 2016. See information on our oil and gas drilling activities in Note 21.
Companies are permitted but not required to disclose probable and possible reserves. We have elected not to report these additional reserve categories.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but the carrying values are reviewed upon an indicator of impairment or at least annually. Intangible assets with a finite life continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives.
We perform a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis or upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the asset might be impaired. Beginning in 2016, we changed our annual goodwill impairment testing date from November 30 to October 1 to better align the testing date with our financial planning process. We believe that the change in the date of the annual goodwill impairment test from November 30 to October 1 is not a material change in the application of an accounting principle. The new and old testing dates are close in proximity; both are in the fourth quarter of the year, and our current testing date is within ten months of the most recent impairment testing. We would not expect a materially different outcome as a result of testing on October 1 as compared to November 30. The change in assessment date does not have a material effect on the financial statements.
We estimated the fair value of the goodwill using discounted cash flow methodology, EBITDA multiple method and an analysis of comparable transactions. This analysis required the input of several critical assumptions, including future growth rates, cash flow projections, operating cost escalation rates, rates of return, a risk-adjusted discount rate, timing and level of success in regulatory rate proceedings, the cost of debt and equity capital and long-term earnings and merger multiples for comparable companies.
The Company has determined that the reporting units for its goodwill impairment test are its operating segments, or components of an operating segment, that constitute a business for which discrete financial information is available and for which segment management regularly reviews the operating results. See Note 5 for additional business segment information.
Goodwill at our Electric utilities primarily arose from Colorado Electric, acquired in the Aquila acquisition, which allocated approximately $246 million, or 72% of the transaction to Colorado Electric. Goodwill at our Gas Utilities is primarily from the SourceGas Acquisition, which was allocated entirely to the Gas Utilities adding $940 million in goodwill and the Aquila Transaction, which allocated approximately $94 million, or 28% of the transaction, to the Gas Utilities.
We believe that the goodwill reflects the inherent value of the relatively stable, long-lived cash flows of the regulated electric and gas utility businesses, considering the regulatory environment, and the long-lived cash flow and rate base growth opportunities at our utilities. Goodwill balances were as follows (in thousands):
_________________
(a)
Goodwill of $2.0 million and $6.3 million for December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015, respectively, is now presented in the Gas Utilities segment as a result of the inclusion of Cheyenne Light’s Gas operations in the Gas Utilities segment, previously reported in the Electric Utilities segment. See above in this Note 1 for additional details.
(b)
Goodwill was recorded on the July 1, 2015 acquisition of Wyoming natural gas utility Energy West Wyoming, Inc., and natural gas pipeline assets from Energy West Development, Inc.
(c)
Represents goodwill recorded with the acquisition of SourceGas. See Note 2 for more information.
Our intangible assets represent easements, rights-of-way, customer listings, and trademarks and are amortized using a straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. The finite lived intangible assets are currently being amortized from 2 years up to 40 years. Changes to intangible assets for the years ended December 31, were as follows (in thousands):
_________________
(a)
Amortization expense for existing intangible assets is expected to be $0.8 million for each year of the next five years.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Accounting standards for asset retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets require that the present value of retirement costs for which we have a legal obligation be recorded as liabilities with an equivalent amount added to the asset cost and depreciated over an appropriate period. The associated ARO accretion expense for our non-regulated operations is included within Depreciation, depletion and amortization on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The accounting for the obligation for regulated operations has no income statement impact due to the deferral of the adjustments through the establishment of a regulatory asset or a regulatory liability.
We initially record liabilities for the present value of retirement costs for which we have a legal obligation, with an equivalent amount added to the asset cost. The asset is then depreciated or depleted over the appropriate useful life and the liability is accreted over time by applying an interest method of allocation. Any difference in the actual cost of the settlement of the liability and the recorded amount is recognized as a gain or loss in the results of operations at the time of settlement for our non-regulated operations, other than Oil and Gas. For the Oil and Gas segment, differences in the settlement of the liability and the recorded amount are generally reflected as adjustments to the capitalized cost of oil and gas properties and depleted pursuant to our use of the full cost method. Additional information is included in Note 8.
Fair Value Measurements
Derivative Financial Instruments
Assets and liabilities are classified and disclosed in one of the following fair value categories:
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities. This level primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded securities or listed derivatives.
Level 2 - Pricing inputs include quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs reflect management’s best estimate of fair value using its own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. We record transfers, if necessary, between levels at the end of the reporting period for all of our financial instruments.
Transfers into Level 3, if any, occur when significant inputs used to value the derivative instruments become less observable such as a significant decrease in the frequency and volume in which the instrument is traded, negatively impacting the availability of observable pricing inputs. Transfers out of Level 3, if any, occur when the significant inputs become more observable such as the time between the valuation date and the delivery date of a transaction becomes shorter, positively impacting the availability of observable pricing inputs.
Valuation Methodologies for Derivatives
Oil and Gas Segment:
•
The commodity contracts for the Oil and Gas segment are valued under the market approach and include exchange-traded futures and basis swaps. Fair value was derived using exchange quoted settlement prices from third party brokers for similar instruments as to quantity and timing. The prices are then validated through third party sources and therefore support Level 2 disclosure.
Electric Utilities and Gas Utilities Segments:
•
The commodity contracts for the Utilities, valued using the market approach, include exchange-traded futures, options, basis swaps and over-the-counter swaps (Level 2) for natural gas contracts. For exchanged-traded futures, options and basis swap Level 2 assets and liabilities, fair value was derived using broker quotes validated by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange pricing for similar instruments. For over-the-counter swaps and option Level 2 assets and liabilities, fair value was derived from, or corroborated by, observable market data where market data for pricing is observable. In addition, the fair value for the over-the-counter swaps and option derivatives include a CVA component. The CVA considers the fair value of the derivative and the probability of default based on the life of the contract. For the probability of a default component, we utilize observable inputs supporting Level 2 disclosure by using our credit default spread, if available, or a generic credit default spread curve that takes into account our credit ratings.
Corporate Segment:
•
The interest rate swaps are valued using the market valuation approach. We establish fair value by obtaining price quotes directly from the counterparty which are based on the floating three-month LIBOR curve for the term of the contract. The fair value obtained from the counterparty is then validated by utilizing a nationally recognized service that obtains observable inputs to compute fair value for the same instrument. In addition, the fair value for the interest rate swap derivatives includes a CVA component. The CVA considers the fair value of the interest rate swap and the probability of default based on the life of the contract. For the probability of a default component, we utilize observable inputs supporting Level 2 disclosure by using our credit default spread, if available, or a generic credit default spread curve that takes into account our credit ratings. Our remaining interest rate swap as of December 31, 2016 expired in January 2017.
Additional information is included in Note 10.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The accounting standards for derivatives and hedging require that derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value and that changes in the derivative instrument’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met and designated accordingly, or if they qualify for certain exemptions, including the normal purchases and normal sales exemption. Each Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects the offsetting of net derivative positions with fair value amounts for cash collateral with the same counterparty when a legal right of offset exists.
Accounting standards for derivatives and hedging require that the unrealized gains or losses on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a fair value hedging instrument as well as the offsetting unrealized gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk be recognized currently in earnings in the same accounting period. Conversely, the effective portion of the unrealized gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging instrument must be reported as a component of other comprehensive income and be reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument, if any, is recognized currently in earnings.
Revenues and expenses on contracts that qualify are designated as normal purchases and normal sales and are recognized when the underlying physical transaction is completed under the accrual basis of accounting. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts where physical delivery is probable, quantities are expected to be used or sold in the normal course of business over a reasonable amount of time, and price is not tied to an unrelated underlying derivative. As part of our electric and gas utility operations, we enter into contracts to buy and sell energy to meet the requirements of our customers. These contracts include short-term and long-term commitments to purchase and sell energy in the retail and wholesale markets with the intent and ability to deliver or take delivery. If it was determined that a transaction designated as a normal purchase or normal sale no longer met the exceptions, the fair value of the related contract would be reflected as either an asset or liability, under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging.
We utilize master netting agreements which consist of an agreement between two parties who have multiple contracts with each other that provide for the net settlement of all contracts in the event of default on or termination of any one contract. When the right of offset exists, accounting standards permit the netting of receivables and payables under a legally enforceable master netting agreement between counterparties. Accounting standards also permit offsetting of fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim, or the obligation to return, cash collateral against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the estimated useful life of the related debt.
Development Costs
According to accounting standards for business combinations, we expense, when incurred, development and acquisition costs associated with corporate development activities prior to acquiring or beginning construction of a project. Expensed development costs are included in Other operating expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Legal Costs
Litigation liabilities, including potential settlements, are recorded when it is both probable that a liability or settlement has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs related to ongoing litigation are expensed as incurred.
When a range of the probable loss exists and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, we record a loss contingency at the minimum amount in the range. If the loss contingency at issue is not both probable and reasonably estimable, we do not establish an accrual and the matter will continue to be monitored for any developments that would make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable.
Regulatory Accounting
Our Electric Utilities and Gas Utilities follow accounting standards for regulated operations and reflect the effects of the numerous rate-making principles followed by the various state and federal agencies regulating the utilities. The accounting policies followed are generally subject to the Uniform System of Accounts of the FERC. These accounting policies differ in some respects from those used by our non-regulated businesses. If rate recovery becomes unlikely or uncertain due to competition or regulatory action, these accounting standards may no longer apply which would require these net assets to be charged to current income or OCI. Our regulatory assets represent amounts for which we will recover the cost, but generally are not allowed a return, except as described below. In the event we determine that our regulated net assets no longer meet the criteria for following accounting standards for regulated operations, the accounting impact to us could be an extraordinary non-cash charge to operations, which could be material.
We had the following regulatory assets and liabilities (in thousands):
__________
(a)
Recovery of costs, but we are not allowed a rate of return.
(b)
In addition to recovery of costs, we are allowed a rate of return.
(c)
In addition to recovery or repayment of costs, we are allowed a return on a portion of this amount or a reduction in rate base, respectively.
(d)
Our deferred energy, fuel cost and gas cost adjustments represent the cost of electricity and gas delivered to our electric and gas utility customers that is either higher or lower than current rates and will be recovered or refunded in future rates. Our electric and gas utilities file periodic quarterly, semi-annual and/or annual filings to recover these costs based on the respective cost mechanisms approved by their applicable state utility commissions.
(e)
Increase compared to 2015 was driven by the addition of the SourceGas employee benefit plans.
Regulatory assets represent items we expect to recover from customers through probable future rates.
Deferred Energy and Fuel Cost Adjustments - Current - Deferred energy and fuel cost adjustments represent the cost of electricity delivered to our electric utility customers that is either higher or lower than the current rates and will be recovered or refunded in future rates. Deferred energy and fuel cost adjustments are recorded and recovered or amortized as approved by the appropriate state commission.
Deferred Gas Cost Adjustment - Our regulated gas utilities have GCA provisions that allow them to pass the cost of gas on to their customers. The GCA is based on forecasts of the upcoming gas costs and recovery or refund of prior under-recovered or over-recovered costs. To the extent that gas costs are under-recovered or over-recovered, they are recorded as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. Our Gas Utilities file periodic estimates of future gas costs based on market forecasts with state utility commissions.
Gas Price Derivatives - Our regulated utilities, as allowed or required by state utility commissions, have entered into certain exchange-traded natural gas futures and options to reduce our customers’ underlying exposure to fluctuations in gas prices. Gas price derivatives represent our unrealized positions on our commodity contracts supporting our utilities. The 4-year term represents the maximum forward term hedged.
Deferred Taxes on AFUDC - The equity component of AFUDC is considered a permanent difference for tax purposes with the tax benefit being flowed through to customers as prescribed or allowed by regulators. If, based on a regulator’s action, it is probable the utility will recover the future increase in taxes payable represented by this flow-through treatment through a rate revenue increase, a regulatory asset is recognized. This regulatory asset is a temporary difference for which a deferred tax liability must be recognized. Accounting standards for income taxes specifically address AFUDC-equity and require a gross-up of such amounts to reflect the revenue requirement associated with a rate-regulated environment.
Employee Benefit Plans - Employee benefit plans include the unrecognized prior service costs and net actuarial loss associated with our defined benefit pension plans and post-retirement benefit plans in regulatory assets rather than in AOCI, including costs being amortized from the Aquila Transaction.
Environmental - Environmental expenditures are costs associated with manufactured gas plant sites. The amortization of this asset is first offset by recognition of insurance proceeds and settlements with other third parties. Any remaining recovery will be requested in future rate filings. Recovery has not yet been approved by the applicable commission or board and therefore, the recovery period is unknown.
Asset Retirement Obligations - Asset retirement obligations represent the estimated recoverable costs for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset. See Note 8 for additional details.
Loss on Reacquired Debt - Loss on reacquired debt is recovered over the remaining life of the original issue or, if refinanced, over the life of the new issue.
Renewable Energy Standard Adjustment - The renewable energy standard adjustment is associated with incentives for our Colorado Electric customers to install renewable energy equipment at their location. These incentives are recovered over time with an additional rider charged on customers’ bills.
Deferred Taxes on Flow-Through Accounting - Under flow-through accounting, the income tax effects of certain tax items are reflected in our cost of service for the customer in the year in which the tax benefits are realized and result in lower utility rates. A regulatory asset was established to reflect that future increases in income taxes payable will be recovered from customers as the temporary differences reverse. As a result of this regulatory treatment, we continue to record a tax benefit for costs considered currently deductible for tax purposes, but are capitalized for book purposes.
Decommissioning Costs - South Dakota Electric and Colorado Electric received approval in 2014 for recovery of the remaining net book values and decommissioning costs of their decommissioned coal plants. South Dakota Electric is allowed a return on their costs, in addition to recovery of those costs.
Gas Supply Contract Termination - Black Hills Gas Holdings had agreements under the previous ownership that required the Company to purchase all of the natural gas produced over the productive life of specific leaseholds in the Bowdoin Field in Montana. The majority of these purchases were committed to distribution customers in Nebraska, Colorado, and Wyoming, which are subject to cost recovery mechanisms. The prices to be paid under these agreements varied, ranging from $6 to $8 per MMBtu at the time of acquisition, and exceeded market prices. We recorded a liability for this contract in our purchase price allocation. We were granted approval to terminate these agreements from the NPSC, CPUC and WPSC, on the basis that these agreements are not beneficial to customers over the long term. We received written orders allowing us to create a regulatory asset for the net buyout costs associated with the contract termination, and recover the majority of costs from customers over a period of five years. We terminated the contract and settled the liability on April 29, 2016.
Regulatory liabilities represent items we expect to refund to customers through probable future decreases in rates.
Deferred Energy and Gas Costs - Deferred energy costs and gas costs related to over-recovery of purchased power, transmission and natural gas costs.
Employee Benefit Plans - Employee benefit plans represent the cumulative excess of pension and retiree healthcare costs recovered in rates over pension expense recorded in accordance with accounting standards for compensation - retirement benefits. In addition, this regulatory liability includes the income tax effect of the adjustment required under accounting for compensation - defined benefit plans, to record the full pension and post-retirement benefit obligations. Such income tax effect has been grossed-up to account for the revenue requirement aspect of a rate regulated environment.
Cost of Removal - Cost of removal represents the estimated cumulative net provisions for future removal costs included in depreciation expense for which there is no legal obligation for removal.
Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal income tax returns. As a result of the SourceGas transaction, certain subsidiaries acquired file as a separate consolidated group. Where applicable, each tax-paying entity records income taxes as if it were a separate taxpayer and consolidating adjustments are allocated to the subsidiaries based on separate company computations of taxable income or loss.
We use the asset and liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized at currently enacted income tax rates, to reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Such temporary differences are the result of provisions in the income tax law that either require or permit certain items to be reported on the income tax return in a different period than they are reported in the financial statements.
It is our policy to apply the flow-through method of accounting for investment tax credits. Under the flow-through method, investment tax credits are reflected in net income as a reduction to income tax expense in the year they qualify. An exception to this general policy is the deferral method, which applies to our regulated businesses. Such a method results in the investment tax credit being amortized as a reduction to income tax expense over the estimated useful lives of the underlying property that generated the credit.
We recognize interest income or interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters in Income tax (expense) benefit on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting standards for income taxes. The unrecognized tax benefit is classified in Other deferred credits and other liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 15 for additional information.
Earnings per Share of Common Stock
Basic earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations is computed by dividing Income (loss) from continuing or discontinued operations by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share is computed by including all dilutive common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted common shares are primarily due to equity units, and outstanding stock options, restricted stock and performance shares under our equity compensation plans.
A reconciliation of share amounts used to compute earnings (loss) per share is as follows (in thousands):
Due to our Net loss available for common stock for the year ended December 31, 2015, potentially diluted securities were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect. In computing diluted net loss per share, 83,000 equity compensation shares were excluded from the computation for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The following outstanding securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):
Business Combinations
We record acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and net intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The application of ASC 805, Business Combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions in the determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in order to properly allocate purchase price consideration between goodwill and assets that are depreciated and amortized. Our estimates are based on historical experience, information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and, when appropriate, include assistance from independent third-party appraisal firms. These estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. In addition, unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or validity of such estimates. See Note 2 for additional detail on the accounting for the SourceGas Acquisition.
Noncontrolling Interest
We account for changes in our controlling interests of subsidiaries according to ASC 810, Consolidations. ASC 810 requires that the Company record such changes as equity transactions, recording no gain or loss on such a sale. GAAP requires that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and affiliates be reported in the equity section of a company’s balance sheet. In addition, the amounts attributable to the noncontrolling interest net income (loss) of those subsidiaries are reported separately in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. See Note 12 for additional detail on Noncontrolling Interests.
Share-Based Compensation
We account for our share-based compensation arrangements in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, by recognizing compensation costs for all share-based awards over the respective service period for employee services received in exchange for an award of equity or equity-based compensation. Awards that will be settled in stock are accounted for as equity and the compensation expense is based on the grant date fair value. Awards that are settled in cash are accounted for as liabilities and the compensation expense is re-measured each period based on the current market price and performance achievement measures.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards
Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, ASU 2016-15
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU requires changes in the presentation of certain items including but not limited to debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies and distributions received from equity method investees. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We will use the retrospective transition method to adopt this standard with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, ASU 2016-09
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for forfeitures, income taxes, and statutory tax withholding requirements. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Certain amendments of this guidance are to be applied retrospectively and others prospectively. We will adopt this standard for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Leases, ASU 2016-02
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes ASC 840, Leases. This ASU requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms of more than 12 months. Lessees are permitted to make an accounting policy election to not recognize the asset and liability for leases with a term of 12 months or less. The ASU does not significantly change the lessees’ recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows from the previous accounting standard. Lessors’ accounting under the ASU is largely unchanged from the previous accounting standard. In addition, the ASU expands the disclosure requirements of lease arrangements. Lessees and lessors will use a modified retrospective transition approach, which includes a number of practical expedients. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the impact that adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, ASU 2015-16
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. This ASU eliminates the requirement to retrospectively account for changes to provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date in a business combination. ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined, including the effect of the change in the provisional amount as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date. We have implemented ASU 2015-16 as of January 1, 2016. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent), ASU 2015-07
On May 1, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent). The ASU removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient and also removes certain disclosure requirements. The new requirements were effective for us beginning January 1, 2016 and were applied retrospectively to all periods presented, in our 2016 Form 10-K. This ASU did not materially affect our financial statements and disclosures, but did change certain presentation and disclosure of the fair value of certain plan assets in our pension and other postretirement benefit plan disclosures in our 2016 Form 10-K, for all periods presented.
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, ASU 2015-03
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. Debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability will be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, similar to the presentation of debt discounts, rather than as an asset. Amortization of these costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. ASU 2015-03 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We adopted ASU 2015-03 in the first quarter of 2016 on a retrospective basis. As of December 31, 2016, we presented the debt issuance costs, previously reported in other assets, as direct deductions from the carrying amount of long-term debt. The implementation of this standard resulted in reductions of other assets, non-current and long-term debt of $13 million in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers, ASU 2014-09
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer. The new disclosure requirements will provide information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from revenue contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption on January 1, 2017 permitted. Entities will have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach to adopting this guidance. Under the modified approach, an entity would recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance with an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.
We will adopt this standard for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and are actively assessing all of our sources of revenue to determine the impact that adoption of the new standard will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Our evaluation includes identifying revenue streams by like contracts to allow for ease of implementation. A majority of our revenues are from regulated tariff offerings that provide natural gas or electricity with a defined contractual term. For such arrangements, we expect that the revenue from contracts with the customer will be equivalent to the electricity or gas delivered in that period. Therefore, we do not expect that there will be a significant shift in the timing or pattern of revenue recognition for regulated tariff based sales. The evaluation of other revenue streams is ongoing, including our non-regulated revenues and those tied to longer term contractual commitments. However, a number of industry-specific implementation issues are still unresolved and the final resolution of these issues could impact our current accounting policies and/or patterns for revenue recognition, as well as the transition method selected.
(2) ACQUISITION
Acquisition of SourceGas
On February 12, 2016, Black Hills Corporation acquired SourceGas, pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement executed on July 12, 2015 for approximately $1.89 billion, including the assumption of $760 million in debt at closing. The purchase price was subject to post-closing adjustments for capital expenditures, indebtedness and working capital. Post-closing adjustments of approximately $11 million were agreed to and received from the sellers in June 2016. SourceGas is a 99.5% owned subsidiary of Black Hills Utility Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Black Hills Corporation and has been renamed Black Hills Gas Holdings, LLC. Black Hills Gas Holdings primarily operates four regulated natural gas utilities serving approximately 429,000 customers in Arkansas, Colorado, Nebraska and Wyoming, and a 512-mile regulated intrastate natural gas transmission pipeline in Colorado.
Cash consideration of $1.135 billion paid on February 12, 2016 to close the SourceGas Acquisition included net proceeds of approximately $536 million from the November 23, 2015 issuance of 6.325 million shares of our common stock, 5.98 million equity units, and $546 million in net proceeds from our debt offerings on January 13, 2016. We funded the cash consideration and out-of-pocket expenses payable with the SourceGas Acquisition using the proceeds listed above, cash on hand, and draws under our revolving credit facility.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded pre-tax, incremental acquisition costs of approximately $45 million and $10 million for the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These costs consisted of transaction costs, professional fees, employee-related expenses and other miscellaneous costs. The costs are recorded primarily in Other operating expenses and Interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Our consolidated operating results for the year ended December 31, 2016 include revenues of $348 million and net income (loss) of $15 million, attributable to SourceGas for the period from February 12 through December 31, 2016. The SourceGas operating results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. We believe the SourceGas Acquisition enhances Black Hills Corporation’s utility growth strategy, providing greater operating scale, driving more efficient delivery of services and benefiting customers.
We accounted for the SourceGas Acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. Substantially all of SourceGas’ operations are subject to the rate-setting authority of state regulatory commissions, and are accounted for in accordance with GAAP for regulated operations. SourceGas’ assets and liabilities subject to rate setting provisions provide revenues derived from costs, including a return on investment of assets and liabilities included in rate base. As such, the fair value of these assets and liabilities equal their historical net book values.
The final purchase price allocation of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is included in the table below. The cash consideration paid of $1.124 billion, net of long-term debt assumed of $760 million and a working capital adjustment received of approximately $11 million, resulted in goodwill of $940 million. We had up to one year from the acquisition date to finalize the purchase price allocation. From the time of acquisition through December 31, 2016, we decreased goodwill by $6.7 million, reflecting the working capital adjustment received of $11 million and changes in valuation estimates for intangible assets, accrued liabilities and deferred taxes. Approximately $252 million of the goodwill balance is amortizable for tax purposes, relating to the partnership interests that were directly acquired in the transaction. The remainder of the goodwill balance is not amortizable for tax purposes. Goodwill generated from the acquisition reflects the benefits of increased operating scale and organic growth opportunities.
Conditions of SourceGas Acquisition Regulatory Approval
The acquisition was subject to regulatory approvals from the public utility commissions in Arkansas (APSC), Colorado (CPUC), Nebraska (NPSC), and Wyoming (WPSC). Approvals were obtained from all commissions, subject to various conditions as set forth below:
The APSC order includes a twelve-month base rate moratorium, an annual $0.25 million customer credit for a term of up to five years or until we file the next rate review, whichever comes first, and provides the Company recovery of a portion of specific labor synergies at the time of the next base rate case, as well as various other terms and reporting requirements.
The CPUC order includes a two-year base rate moratorium for our regulated transmission and wholesale natural gas provider, a three-year base rate moratorium for our regulated gas distribution utility, an annual $0.2 million customer credit for a term of up to five-years or until we file the next rate review, whichever comes first, and provides the Company recovery of a portion of specific labor synergies at the time of the next base rate case, as well as various other terms and reporting requirements.
The NPSC order includes a three-year base rate moratorium, a three-year continuation of the Choice Gas Program, and provides the Company recovery of a portion of specific labor synergies at the time of the next base rate review, as well as various other terms and reporting requirements.
The WPSC order includes a three-year continuation of the Choice Gas Program, as well as various other terms and reporting requirements.
All four orders also disallowed recovery of goodwill and transaction costs. Recovery of transition costs is disallowed in Arkansas, Colorado and Nebraska. However, Wyoming allows for request of recovery of transition costs. Transition costs are those non-recurring costs related to the transition and integration of SourceGas. In the conditions mentioned above, the orders that include base rate moratoriums over a specified period of time do not impact our ability to adjust rates through riders or gas supply cost recovery mechanisms as allowed under the current enacted state tariffs. In certain cases, we may file for leave to increase general base rates and/or cost of sales recovery limited to material adverse changes, but only if there are changes in law or regulations or the occurrence of other extraordinary events outside of our control which result in a material adverse change in revenues, revenue requirement and/or increase in operating costs.
Settlement of Gas Supply Contract
On April 29, 2016, we settled for $40 million, a former SourceGas contract that required the Company to purchase all of the natural gas produced over the productive life of specific leaseholds in the Bowdoin Field in Montana. This contract’s intangible negative fair value is included with Current liabilities in the purchase price allocation. Approximately 75% of these purchases were committed to distribution customers in Nebraska, Colorado and Wyoming, which are subject to cost recovery mechanisms, while the remaining 25% was not subject to regulatory recovery. The prices to be paid under this contract varied, ranging from $6 to $8 per MMBtu at the time of acquisition and exceeded market prices. We applied for and were granted approval to terminate this agreement from the NPSC, CPUC and WPSC, on the basis that the agreement was not beneficial to customers in the long term. We received written orders allowing recovery of the net buyout costs associated with the contract termination that were allocated to regulated subsidiaries. These costs were recorded as a regulatory asset of approximately $30 million that is being recovered over a five-year period.
Pro Forma Results (unaudited)
We calculated the pro forma impact of the SourceGas Acquisition and the associated debt and equity financings on our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2016. The following pro forma results give effect to the acquisition, assuming the transaction closed on January 1, 2015:
We derived the pro forma results for the SourceGas Acquisition based on historical financial information obtained from the sellers and certain management assumptions. Our pro forma adjustments relate to incremental interest expense associated with the financings to effect the transaction, and for the year ended December 31, 2015, also include adjustments to shares outstanding to reflect the equity issuances as if they had occurred on January 1, 2015, and to reflect pro forma dilutive effects of the equity units issued. The pro forma results do not reflect any cost savings, (or associated costs to achieve such savings) from operating efficiencies or restructuring that could result from the acquisition, and exclude any unique one-time items resulting from the acquisition that are not expected to have a continuing impact on the combined consolidated results. Pro forma results for the year ended December 31, 2016 reflect unfavorable weather impacts resulting in lower gas usage by our customers than in the same periods of the prior year. In addition, we calculated the tax impact of these adjustments at an estimated combined federal and state income tax rate of 37%.
These pro forma results are for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the SourceGas Acquisition been completed on January 1, 2015, or that may be obtained in the future.
Seller’s noncontrolling interest
One of the sellers retained 0.5% of the outstanding equity interests of SourceGas under the terms of the purchase agreement. As part of the transaction, we entered into an associated option agreement with that holder of the retained interest. The terms of this agreement provide us a call option to purchase the remaining interest beginning 366 days after the initial close of the SourceGas Transaction. If we choose not to exercise this option during a ninety-day period, the seller may exercise the put option to sell us the retained interest. The value of this 0.5% equity interest is shown as Redeemable noncontrolling interest on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(3) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
_____________
(a)
The plant acquisition adjustment is included in rate base and is being recovered with 14 years remaining.
(b)
Capital lease - plant in service represents the assets accounted for as a capital lease under the PPA between Colorado Electric and Black Hills Colorado IPP. The capital lease ends in conjunction with the expiration of the PPA on December 31, 2031.
(c)
Effective January 1, 2016, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas utility results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. Cheyenne Light’s gas utility net Property, Plant and Equipment of $117 million previously reported in the Electric Utilities segment in 2015 is now presented in the Gas Utilities segment.
_____________
(a)
Cushion gas is the portion of natural gas necessary to force saleable gas from a storage field into the transmission system and for system balancing, representing a permanent investment necessary to use storage facilities and maintain reliability. Depreciation of cushion gas is determined by the respective regulatory jurisdiction in which the cushion gas resides.
(b)
Effective January 1, 2016, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas utility results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. Cheyenne Light’s gas utility net Property, Plant and Equipment of $117 million previously reported in the Electric Utilities segment in 2015 is now presented in the Gas Utilities segment.
_____________
(a)
Net Property, Plant and Equipment includes full cost pool net assets of approximately $43 million.
___________
(a)
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization at Corporate reflects the elimination of the capital lease accumulated depreciation difference between Colorado Electric and Black Hills Colorado IPP.
___________
(a)
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization at Corporate reflects the elimination of the capital lease accumulated depreciation difference between Colorado Electric and Black Hills Colorado IPP.
(4) JOINTLY OWNED FACILITIES
Utility Plant
Our consolidated financial statements include our share of several jointly-owned utility facilities as described below. Our share of the facilities’ expenses are reflected in the appropriate categories of operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Each owner of the facility is responsible for financing its investment in the jointly-owned facilities.
•
South Dakota Electric owns a 20% interest in the Wyodak Plant, a coal-fired electric generating station located in Campbell County, Wyoming. PacifiCorp owns the remaining ownership percentage and operates the Wyodak Plant. South Dakota Electric receives its proportionate share of the Wyodak Plant’s capacity and is committed to pay its proportionate share of its additions, replacements and operating and maintenance expenses. In addition to supplying South Dakota Electric with coal for its share of the Wyodak Plant, our Mining subsidiary, WRDC, supplies PacifiCorp’s share of the coal to the Wyodak Plant under a separate long-term agreement. This coal supply agreement is collateralized by a mortgage on and a security interest in some of WRDC’s coal reserves.
•
South Dakota Electric also owns a 35% interest in, and is the operator of, the Converter Station Site and South Rapid City Interconnection (the transmission tie), an AC-DC-AC transmission tie. Basin Electric owns the remaining ownership percentage. The transmission tie provides an interconnection between the Western and Eastern transmission grids, which provides us with access to both the WECC region and the MAPP region. The total transfer capacity of the tie is 400 MW, including 200 MW from West to East and 200 MW from East to West. South Dakota Electric is committed to pay its proportionate share of the additions and replacements and operating and maintenance expenses of the transmission tie.
•
South Dakota Electric owns 52% of the Wygen III coal-fired generation facility. MDU and the City of Gillette each owns an undivided ownership interest in Wygen III and are obligated to make payments for costs associated with administrative services and their proportionate share of the costs of operating the plant for the life of the facility. We retain responsibility for plant operations. Our Mining subsidiary supplies coal to Wygen III for the life of the plant.
•
Colorado Electric owns 50% of the Busch Ranch Wind Farm while AltaGas owns the remaining undivided ownership interest and is obligated to make payments for costs associated with their proportionate share of the costs of operating the wind farm for the life of the facility. We retain responsibility for operations of the wind farm.
Non-Regulated Plants
Our consolidated financial statements include our share of a jointly-owned non-regulated power generation facility as described below. Our share of direct expenses for the jointly-owned facility is included in the corresponding categories of operating expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Each of the respective owners is responsible for providing its own financing.
•
Black Hills Wyoming owns 76.5% of the Wygen I plant while MEAN owns the remaining ownership percentage. MEAN is obligated to make payments for its share of the costs associated with administrative services, plant operations and coal supply provided by our Mining subsidiary during the life of the facility. We retain responsibility for plant operations.
At December 31, 2016, our interests in jointly-owned generating facilities and transmission systems were (in thousands):
(5) BUSINESS SEGMENTS INFORMATION
Our reportable segments are based on our method of internal reporting, which is generally segregated by differences in products, services and regulation. All of our operations and assets are located within the United States.
Segment information was as follows (in thousands):
__________________
(a)
The PPA under which Black Hills Colorado IPP provides generation to support Colorado Electric customers from the Pueblo Airport Generation station is accounted for as a capital lease. As such, assets owned by our Power Generation segment are recorded at Colorado Electric under accounting for a capital lease.
(b)
Includes the assets acquired in the SourceGas acquisition on February 12, 2016.
(c)
Corporate assets at December 31, 2015 include proceeds received from the November 23, 2015 equity offerings. These proceeds were subsequently used on February 12, 2016 to partially fund the SourceGas Acquisition.
(d)
Effective January 1, 2016, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas utility results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. Assets of $135 million, previously reported in the Electric Utilities segment in 2015 are now presented in the Gas Utilities segment.
_________________
(a)
Includes accruals for property, plant and equipment.
(b)
Effective January 1, 2016, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas utility results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. Cheyenne Light’s gas utility property additions of $30 million previously reported in the Electric Utilities segment in 2015 is now presented in the Gas Utilities segment.
(c)
SourceGas was acquired on February 12, 2016. Net cash paid of $1.124 billion was net of long-term debt assumed and working capital adjustments received. See Note 2. The 2015 acquisitions represent two acquisitions made by Wyoming Gas.
_______________
(a)
The PPA under which Black Hills Colorado IPP provides generation to support Colorado Electric customers from the Pueblo Airport Generation station is accounted for as a capital lease. As such, assets owned by our Power Generation segment are recorded at Colorado Electric under accounting for a capital lease.
(b)
Effective January 1, 2016, Cheyenne Light’s natural gas utility results are reported in our Gas Utilities segment. Cheyenne Light’s gas utility Property, Plant and Equipment of $130 million, previously reported in the Electric Utilities segment in 2015 is now presented in the Gas Utilities segment.
(c)
Includes Property, Plant and Equipment acquired in the SourceGas acquisition on February 12, 2016.
________________
(a)
Oil and Gas includes oil and gas property impairments (see Note 13).
________________
(a)
Oil and Gas includes ceiling test and equity investment impairments (see Note 13).
(6) LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt outstanding was as follows (dollars in thousands):
_______________
(a)
Variable interest rate, based on LIBOR plus a spread.
(b)
See Note 12 for RSN details.
(c)
Variable interest rate.
(d)
Includes deferred financing costs associated with our Revolving Credit Facility of $2.3 million and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt, excluding amortization of premiums or discounts, for future years are (in thousands):
Our debt securities contain certain restrictive financial covenants, all of which the Company and its subsidiaries were in compliance with at December 31, 2016.
Substantially all of the tangible utility property of South Dakota Electric and Wyoming Electric is subject to the lien of indentures securing their first mortgage bonds. First mortgage bonds of South Dakota Electric and Wyoming Electric may be issued in amounts limited by property, earnings and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. The first mortgage bonds issued by South Dakota Electric and Wyoming Electric are callable, but are subject to make-whole provisions which would eliminate any economic benefit for us to call the bonds.
Assumption of Long-Term Debt
At the closing of the SourceGas Acquisition on February 12, 2016, we assumed $760 million in long-term debt, consisting of the following:
•
$325 million, 5.9% senior unsecured notes with an original issue date of April 16, 2007, due April 1, 2017.
•
$95 million, 3.98% senior secured notes with an original issue date of September 29, 2014, due September 29, 2019.
•
$340 million unsecured corporate term loan due June 30, 2017. Interest under this term loan was LIBOR plus a margin of 0.875%.
The $760 million in long-term debt assumed in the SourceGas Acquisition was repaid in August 2016.
Debt Transactions
On August 19, 2016, we completed a public debt offering of $700 million principal amount of senior unsecured notes. The debt offering consisted of $400 million of 3.15% 10-year senior notes due January 15, 2027 and $300 million of 4.20% 30-year senior notes due September 15, 2046 (together the “Notes”). The proceeds of the Notes were used for the following:
•
Repay the $325 million 5.9% senior unsecured notes assumed in the SourceGas Acquisition;
•
Repay the $95 million, 3.98% senior secured notes assumed in the SourceGas Acquisition;
•
Repay the remaining $100 million on the $340 million unsecured term loan assumed in the SourceGas Acquisition;
•
Pay down $100 million of the $500 million three-year unsecured term loan discussed below;
•
Payment of $29 million for the settlement of $400 million notional interest rate swap; and
•
Remainder was used for general corporate purposes.
On August 9, 2016, we entered into a $500 million, three-year, unsecured term loan expiring on August 9, 2019. The proceeds of this term loan were used to pay down $240 million of the $340 million unsecured term loan assumed in the SourceGas Acquisition and the $260 million term loan expiring on April 12, 2017. This new term loan has substantially similar terms and covenants as the amended and restated Revolving Credit Facility.
In accordance with regulatory orders related to the early termination and settlement of the gas supply contract described in Note 1, on June 7, 2016, we entered into a 2.32%, $29 million term loan, due June 7, 2021. Proceeds from this term loan were used to finance the early termination of the gas supply contract, resulting in a regulatory asset. Principal and interest are payable quarterly at approximately $1.6 million, the first of which was paid on June 30, 2016.
On January 13, 2016, we completed a public debt offering of $550 million principal amount of senior unsecured notes. The debt offering consisted of $300 million of 3.95%, ten-year senior notes due 2026, and $250 million of 2.50%, three-year senior notes due 2019. After discounts and underwriter fees, net proceeds from the offering totaled $546 million and were used as funding for the SourceGas Acquisition. The discounts are amortized over the life of each respective note.
Amortization Expense
Our deferred financing costs and associated amortization expense included in Interest expense on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) were as follows (in thousands):
Dividend Restrictions
Our credit facility and other debt obligations contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends when a default or event of default occurs. In addition, the agreements governing our equity units contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends upon any time we have exercised our right to defer payment of contract adjustment payments under the purchase contracts or interest payments under the RSNs included in such equity units. As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with these covenants.
Due to our holding company structure, substantially all of our operating cash flows are provided by dividends paid or distributions made by our subsidiaries. The cash to pay dividends to our shareholders is derived from these cash flows. As a result, certain statutory limitations or regulatory or financing agreements could affect the levels of distributions allowed to be made by our subsidiaries. The following restrictions on distributions from our subsidiaries existed at December 31, 2016:
•
Our utilities are generally limited to the amount of dividends allowed to be paid to our utility holding company under the Federal Power Act and settlement agreements with state regulatory jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2016, the restricted net assets at our Electric and Gas Utilities were approximately $257 million.
(7) NOTES PAYABLE
Our Revolving Credit Facility and debt securities contain certain restrictive financial covenants. As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all of these financial covenants.
We had the following short-term debt outstanding at the Consolidated Balance Sheets date (in thousands):
Revolving Credit Facility
On August 9, 2016, we amended and restated our corporate Revolving Credit Facility to increase total commitments to $750 million from $500 million and extend the term through August 9, 2021 with two one-year extension options (subject to consent from the lenders). This facility is similar to the former agreement, which includes an accordion feature that allows us, with the consent of the administrative agent and issuing agents and subject to receipt of additional commitments from existing or new lenders, to increase total commitments of the facility up to $1.0 billion. Borrowings continue to be available under a base rate or various Eurodollar rate options. The interest costs associated with the letters of credit or borrowings and the commitment fee under the Revolving Credit Facility are determined based upon our most favorable Corporate credit rating from either S&P or Moody’s for our unsecured debt. Based on our credit ratings, the margins for base rate borrowings, Eurodollar borrowings, and letters of credit were 0.250%, 1.250%, and 1.250%, respectively, at December 31, 2016. A 0.200% commitment fee is charged on the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility.
On December 22, 2016, we implemented a $750 million, unsecured CP Program that is backstopped by the Revolving Credit Facility. Amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and the CP Program, either individually or in the aggregate, cannot exceed $750 million. The notes issued under the CP Program may have maturities not to exceed 397 days from the date of issuance and bear interest (or are sold at par less a discount representing an interest factor) based on, among other things, the size and maturity date of the note, the frequency of the issuance and our credit ratings. Under the CP Program, any borrowings rank equally with our unsecured debt. Notes under the CP Program are not registered and are offered and issued pursuant to a registration exemption. We did not borrow under the CP Program in 2016 and do not have any notes outstanding as of December 31, 2016.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $36 million and approximately $33 million, respectively.
Deferred financing costs on the facility of $5.4 million are being amortized over the estimated useful life of the Revolving Credit Facility and included in Interest expense on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The deferred financing costs on the new facility are being amortized as follows (in thousands):
Debt Covenants
On December 7, 2016, we amended our Revolving Credit Facility and term loan agreements, allowing the exclusion of the Remarketable Junior Subordinated Notes (RSNs) from our Consolidated Indebtedness to Capitalization Ratio covenant calculation. Under the amended and restated Revolving Credit Facility and term loan agreements, we are required to maintain a Consolidated Indebtedness to Capitalization Ratio not to exceed 0.70 to 1.00 for the quarter ending December 31, 2016 and subsequently for future quarters beginning March 31, 2017, maintain the ratio not to exceed 0.65 to 1.00. Our Consolidated Indebtedness to Capitalization Ratio is calculated by dividing (i) Consolidated Indebtedness, which includes letters of credit, certain guarantees issued and excludes RSNs by (ii) Capital, which includes Consolidated Indebtedness plus Net Worth, which excludes noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and includes the aggregate outstanding amount of the RSNs.
Our Revolving Credit Facility and our Term Loans require compliance with the following financial covenant at the end of each quarter:
(8) ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
We have identified legal retirement obligations related to plugging and abandonment of natural gas and oil wells in the Oil and Gas segment, reclamation of coal mining sites in the Mining segment and removal of fuel tanks, asbestos, transformers containing polychlorinated biphenyls, an evaporation pond and wind turbines at the regulated Electric Utilities segment, retirement of gas pipelines at our Gas Utilities and asbestos at our regulated utilities segments. We periodically review and update estimated costs related to these asset retirement obligations. The actual cost may vary from estimates because of regulatory requirements, changes in technology and increased costs of labor, materials and equipment.
The following tables present the details of ARO which are included on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other deferred credits and other liabilities (in thousands):
_____________________
(a)
Represents our legal liability for retirement of gas pipelines, specifically to purge and cap these lines in accordance with Federal regulations. Approximately $22 million was recorded with the purchase price allocation of SourceGas.
(b)
The Gas Utilities Revision to Prior Estimates represents our legal liability for retirement of gas pipelines, specifically to purge and cap these lines in accordance with Federal regulations.
(c)
The 2016 Mining Revision to Prior Estimates reflects an approximately 33% reduction in equipment costs as promulgated by the State of Wyoming. The 2015 Mining Revision to Prior Estimates reflects a change in backfill yards and disturbed acreage used in calculating the estimated liability as well as changes in inflation rate assumptions.
We also have legally required AROs related to certain assets within our electric transmission and distribution systems. These retirement obligations are pursuant to an easement or franchise agreement and are only required if we discontinue our utility service under such easement or franchise agreement. Accordingly, it is not possible to estimate a time period when these obligations could be settled and therefore, a value for the cost of these obligations cannot be measured at this time.
(9) RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
Our activities in the regulated and non-regulated energy sectors expose us to a number of risks in the normal operations of our businesses. Depending on the activity, we are exposed to varying degrees of market risk and credit risk. To manage and mitigate these identified risks, we have adopted the Black Hills Corporation Risk Policies and Procedures. Valuation methodologies for our derivatives are detailed within Note 1.
Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss that may occur as a result of an adverse change in market price or rate. We are exposed to the following market risks, including, but not limited to:
•
Commodity price risk associated with our natural long position of crude oil and natural gas reserves and production, our retail natural gas marketing activities, and our fuel procurement for certain of our gas-fired generation assets; and
•
Interest rate risk associated with our variable rate debt.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss resulting from non-performance of contractual obligations by a counterparty.
For production and generation activities, we attempt to mitigate our credit exposure by conducting business primarily with high credit quality entities, setting tenor and credit limits commensurate with counterparty financial strength, obtaining master netting agreements and mitigating credit exposure with less creditworthy counterparties through parental guarantees, prepayments, letters of credit and other security agreements.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current creditworthiness, as determined by review of their current credit information. We maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based upon historical experience and any specific customer collection issue that is identified.
As of December 31, 2016, our credit exposure included a $1.1 million exposure to a non-investment grade rural electric cooperative. The remainder of our credit exposure was concentrated primarily among retail utility customers, investment grade companies, cooperative utilities and federal agencies. Our derivative and hedging activities included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) are detailed below and within Note 10.
Oil and Gas
We produce natural gas, NGLs and crude oil through our exploration and production activities. Our natural long positions, or unhedged open positions from these activities, result in commodity price risk and variability to our cash flows.
To mitigate commodity price risk and preserve cash flows, we primarily use exchange traded futures, swaps and options to hedge portions of our crude oil and natural gas production. Futures contracts provide the requirement to buy or sell the commodity at a fixed price in the future. Option contracts provide the right, but not the obligation to buy or sell the commodity at a fixed price. Swap contracts require receipt of payment based on the difference between the fixed price and the settled commodity market price on the settlement date. We elect hedge accounting on the swaps and futures contracts. These transactions were designated upon inception as cash flow hedges, documented under accounting standards for derivatives and hedging and initially met prospective effectiveness testing. Effectiveness of our hedging position is evaluated at least quarterly.
The derivatives were marked to fair value and recorded as Derivative assets or Derivative liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effective portion of the gain or loss on these derivatives for which we have elected cash flow hedge accounting is reported in AOCI in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and the ineffective portion, if any, is reported in Revenue on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
The contract or notional amounts and terms of our crude oil futures and options and natural gas futures held at our Oil and Gas segment are comprised of short positions. A short position is a contract to sell the commodity while a long position is a contract to purchase the commodity. We had the following short positions as of:
________________________
(a)
Crude in Bbls, gas in MMBtus.
(b)
These financial instruments were designated as cash flow hedges upon inception.
(c)
Refers to the maximum forward period hedged.
Based on December 31, 2016 market prices, a $0.9 million loss would be reclassified from AOCI during 2017. Estimated and actual realized gains or losses will change during future periods as market prices fluctuate.
Utilities
The operations of our utilities, including natural gas sold by our Gas Utilities and natural gas used by our Electric Utilities’ generation plants or those plants under PPAs where our Electric Utilities must provide the generation fuel (tolling agreements) expose our utility customers to volatility in natural gas prices. Therefore, as allowed or required by state utility commissions, we have entered into commission-approved hedging programs utilizing natural gas futures, options, over-the-counter swaps and basis swaps to reduce our customers’ underlying exposure to these fluctuations. These transactions are considered derivatives, and in accordance with accounting standards for derivatives and hedging, mark-to-market adjustments are recorded as Derivative assets or Derivative liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of balance sheet offsetting as permitted by GAAP.
For our regulated utilities’ hedging plans, unrealized and realized gains and losses, as well as option premiums and commissions on these transactions are recorded as Regulatory assets or Regulatory liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with the state utility commission guidelines. When the related costs are recovered through our rates, the hedging activity is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss), or the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
We buy, sell and deliver natural gas at competitive prices by managing commodity price risk. As a result of these activities, this area of our business is exposed to risks associated with changes in the market price of natural gas. We manage our exposure to such risks using over-the-counter and exchange traded options and swaps with counterparties in anticipation of forecasted purchases and/or sales during time frames ranging from January 2017 through April 2019. A portion of our over-the-counter swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate the commodity price risk associated with deliveries under fixed price forward contracts to deliver gas to our Choice Gas Program customers. The effective portion of the gain or loss on these designated derivatives is reported in AOCI in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and the ineffective portion, if any is reported in Fuel, purchased power and cost of natural gas sold. Effectiveness of our hedging position is evaluated at least quarterly.
The contract or notional amounts and terms of the natural gas derivative commodity instruments held by our Utilities are comprised of both short and long positions. We had the following net long positions as of:
__________
(a)
Term reflects the maximum forward period hedged.
(b)
Volumes purchased as of December 31, 2016 is net of 2,133,000 MMBtus of collar options (call purchase and put sale) transactions.
(c)
As of December 31, 2016, 2,138,300 MMBtus were designated as cash flow hedges for the natural gas over-the-counter swaps purchased.
(d)
Volumes exclude contracts that qualify for normal purchase, normal sales exception.
Financing Activities
In October 2015 and January 2016, we entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a notional value totaling $400 million to fix the Treasury yield component associated with the anticipated issuance of senior notes. These swaps were settled at a loss of $29 million in connection with the issuance of our $400 million of unsecured ten-year senior notes on August 10, 2016. The effective portion of the loss in the amount of $28 million was recognized as a component of AOCI and will be recognized as a component of interest expense over the ten-year life of the $400 million unsecured note issued on August 19, 2016. The ineffective portion of $1.0 million, related to the timing of the debt issuance, was recognized in earnings as a component of interest expense. The contract or notional amounts, terms of our interest rate swaps and the interest rate swaps balances reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows (dollars in thousands) as of:
___________________
(a)
The $25 million in swaps expired in October 2016 and the $50 million in swaps expired in January 2017. These swaps were designated to borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility and were priced using three-month LIBOR, matching the floating portion of the related borrowings.
(b)
These swaps were settled on August 19, 2016.
Based on December 31, 2016 market interest rates and balances related to our designated interest rate swaps, a loss of approximately $2.9 million would be realized, reported in pre-tax earnings and reclassified from AOCI during the next 12 months. This total includes the $28 million loss currently deferred in AOCI. Estimated and realized gains or losses will change during future periods as market interest rates change.
Cash Flow Hedges
The impact of cash flow hedges on our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) is presented below for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands). Note that this presentation does not reflect the expected gains or losses arising from the underlying physical transactions; therefore, it is not indicative of the economic gross profit we realized when the underlying physical and financial transactions were settled.
The following table summarizes the gains and losses arising from hedging transactions that were recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The amounts included in the table below exclude gains and losses arising from ineffectiveness because these amounts are immediately recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income (Loss) as incurred.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedge Instruments
The following table summarizes the impacts of derivative instruments not designated as hedge instruments on our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands). Note that this presentation does not reflect the expected gains or losses arising from the underlying physical transactions; therefore, it is not indicative of the economic gross profit we realized when the underlying physical and financial transactions were settled.
As discussed above, financial instruments used in our regulated utilities are not designated as cash flow hedges. However, there is no earnings impact because the unrealized gains and losses arising from the use of these financial instruments are recorded as Regulatory assets or Regulatory liabilities. The net unrealized losses included in our Regulatory assets or Regulatory liability accounts related to the hedges in our Utilities were $8.8 million and $24 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(10) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
There have been no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 derivative balances during 2016 or 2015. Amounts included in cash collateral and counterparty netting in the following tables represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow us to settle positive and negative positions, netting of asset and liability positions permitted in accordance with accounting standards for offsetting as well as cash collateral posted with the same counterparties.
A discussion of fair value of financial instruments is included in Note 11. The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our gross assets and gross liabilities and related offsetting as permitted by GAAP that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis for derivative instruments (in thousands):
Fair Value Measures by Balance Sheet Classification
As required by accounting standards for derivatives and hedges, fair values within the following tables are presented on a gross basis, aside from the netting of asset and liability positions permitted in accordance with accounting standards for offsetting and under terms of our master netting agreements and the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow us to settle positive and negative positions.
The following tables present the fair value and balance sheet classification of our derivative instruments as of December 31, (in thousands):
Derivatives Offsetting
It is our policy to offset in our Consolidated Balance Sheets contracts which provide for legally enforceable netting for our accounts receivable and payable and derivative activities.
As required by accounting standards for derivatives and hedges, fair values within the following tables reconcile the gross amounts to the net amounts. Amounts included in Gross Amounts Offset on Consolidated Balance Sheets in the following tables include the netting of asset and liability positions permitted in accordance with accounting standards for offsetting as well as the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow us to settle positive and negative positions as well as cash collateral posted with the same counterparties. Additionally, the amounts reflect cash collateral on deposit in margin accounts at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, to collateralize certain financial instruments, which are included in Derivative assets and/or Derivative liabilities. Therefore, the gross amounts are not indicative of either our actual credit exposure or net economic exposure.
Offsetting of derivative assets and derivative liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 was as follows (in thousands):
Offsetting of derivative assets and derivative liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):
(11) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair values of our financial instruments, excluding derivatives which are presented in Note 10, were as follows at December 31 (in thousands):
_______________
(a)
Carrying value approximates fair value. Cash and restricted cash are classified in Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
(b)
Notes payable consist of borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility. Carrying value approximates fair value due to the short-term length of maturity; since these borrowings are not traded on an exchange, they are classified in Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
(c)
Long-term debt is valued based on observable inputs available either directly or indirectly for similar liabilities in active markets and therefore is classified in Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Included in cash and cash equivalents is cash, overnight repurchase agreement accounts, money market funds, and term deposits. As part of our cash management process, excess operating cash is invested in overnight repurchase agreements with our bank. Repurchase agreements are not deposits and are not insured by the U.S. Government, the FDIC, or any other government agency and involve investment risk including possible loss of principal. We believe however, that the market risk arising from holding these financial instruments is minimal.
Restricted Cash and Equivalents
Restricted cash and cash equivalents represent restricted cash and uninsured term deposits.
Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt
For additional information on our notes payable and long-term debt, see Note 6 and Note 7.
(12) EQUITY
Equity Units
On November 23, 2015, we issued 5.98 million equity units for total gross proceeds of $299 million. Each Equity Unit has a stated amount of $50 and consists of (i) a forward purchase contract to purchase the Company’s common stock and (ii) a 1/20, or 5%, undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of RSNs due 2028. The RSNs, a debt instrument, and the forward purchase contracts, an equity instrument, are deemed to be separate instruments as the investor may trade the RSNs separately from the forward purchase contract and may also settle the forward purchase contract separately.
The forward purchase contracts obligate the holders to purchase from the Company on the settlement date, which shall be no later than November 1, 2018, for a price of $50 in cash, the following number of shares of our common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments:
•
if the “Applicable Market Value” (AMV) of the Company’s common stock, which is the average volume-weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the trading days during the 20 consecutive scheduled trading day period ending on the third scheduled trading day immediately preceding the forward purchase contract settlement date, equals or exceeds $47.2938, 1.0572 shares of the Company’s common stock per Equity Unit;
•
if the AMV is less than $47.2938 but greater than $40.25, a number of shares of the Company’s common stock having a value, based on the AMV, equal to $50; and
•
if the AMV is less than or equal to $40.25, 1.2422 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The RSNs bear interest at a rate of 3.5% per year, payable quarterly, and mature on November 1, 2028. The RSNs will be remarketed in 2018. If this remarketing is successful, the interest rate on the RSNs will be reset, and thereafter interest will be payable semi-annually at the reset rate. If there is no successful remarketing, the interest rate on the RSNs will not be reset, and the holders of the RSNs will have the right to put the RSNs to the Company at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, and the proceeds of the put right will be deemed to have been applied against the holders’ obligation under the forward purchase contracts.
The Company will also pay the Equity Unit holders quarterly contract adjustment payments at a rate of 4.25% per year of the stated amount of $50 per Equity Unit, or $2.125 per year up to November 1, 2018. The present value of the future contract adjustment payments, $33 million, is recorded as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. Until settlement of the forward purchase contracts, the shares of stock underlying each forward purchase contract are not outstanding. The forward purchase contracts will only be included in the computation of diluted earnings per share to the extent they are dilutive. As of December 31, 2016, the forward purchase contracts were dilutive and therefore included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share will not be affected until the forward purchase contracts are settled and the holders thereof become stockholders.
Selected information about our equity units is presented below (in thousands except for percentages):
At-the-Market Equity Offering Program
On March 18, 2016, we implemented an ATM equity offering program allowing us to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate value of up to $200 million. The shares may be offered from time to time pursuant to a sales agreement dated March 18, 2016. Shares of common stock are offered pursuant to our shelf registration statement filed with the SEC. During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we issued 218,647 common shares for $13 million, net of $0.1 million in commissions under the ATM equity offering program. Through December 31, 2016, we have sold and issued an aggregate of 1,968,738 shares of common stock under the ATM equity offering program for $119 million, net of $1.2 million in commissions. As of December 31, 2016, there were no shares sold that were not settled.
Common Stock Offering
On November 23, 2015, we issued 6.325 million shares of Common stock pursuant to a public offering at $40.25 per share. Net proceeds were $246 million. The proceeds from the offering were used to partially fund the purchase of SourceGas, which closed on February 12, 2016.
Equity Compensation Plans
Our 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan allows for the granting of stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options and performance shares. We had 1,115,557 shares available to grant at December 31, 2016.
Compensation expense is determined using the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of accounting standards for stock compensation and is recognized over the vesting periods of the individual awards. As of December 31, 2016, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards was approximately $13.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years. Stock-based compensation expense included in Operations and maintenance on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) was as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Stock Options
The Company has not issued any stock options since 2014 and has 119,415 stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016. The amount of stock options granted during the last three years, related exercise activity and the number of stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016 are not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Restricted Stock
The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards equals the market price of our stock on the date of grant.
The shares carry a restriction on the ability to sell the shares until the shares vest. The shares substantially vest over 3 years, contingent on continued employment. Compensation expense related to the awards is recognized over the vesting period.
A summary of the status of the restricted stock and restricted stock units at December 31, 2016, was as follows:
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock granted and the total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, was as follows:
As of December 31, 2016, there was $10.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
Performance Share Plan
Certain officers of the Company and its subsidiaries are participants in a performance share award plan, a market-based plan. Performance shares are awarded based on our total shareholder return over designated performance periods as measured against a selected peer group. In addition, certain stock price performance must be achieved for a payout to occur. The final value of the performance shares will vary according to the number of shares of common stock that are ultimately granted based upon the actual level of attainment of the performance criteria.
The performance awards are paid 50% in cash and 50% in common stock. The cash portion accrued is classified as a liability and the stock portion is classified as equity. In the event of a change-in-control, performance awards are paid 100% in cash. If it is determined that a change-in-control is probable, the equity portion of $2.3 million at December 31, 2016 would be reclassified as a liability.
Outstanding performance periods at December 31 were as follows (shares in thousands):
A summary of the status of the Performance Share Plan at December 31 was as follows:
_____________________
(a)
The grant date fair values for the performance shares granted in 2016, 2015 and 2014 were determined by Monte Carlo simulation using a blended volatility of 24%, 21% and 23%, respectively, comprised of 50% historical volatility and 50% implied volatility and the average risk-free interest rate of the three-year United States Treasury security rate in effect as of the grant date.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of performance share awards granted was as follows in the years ended:
Performance plan payouts have been as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):
On January 24, 2017, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors determined that the Company’s performance criteria for the January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016 performance period was not met. As a result, there will be no payout for this period.
As of December 31, 2016, there was $3.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding performance share plans that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
Shareholder Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
We have a DRSPP under which shareholders may purchase additional shares of common stock through dividend reinvestment and/or optional cash payments at 100% of the recent average market price. We have the option of issuing new shares or purchasing the shares on the open market. We are currently issuing new shares.
A summary of the DRSPP for the years ended December 31 is as follows (shares in thousands):
Preferred Stock
Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of 25 million shares of preferred stock of which we had no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Sale of Noncontrolling Interest in Subsidiary
Black Hills Colorado IPP owns and operates a 200 MW, combined-cycle natural gas generating facility located in Pueblo, Colorado. On April 14, 2016, Black Hills Electric Generation sold a 49.9%, noncontrolling interest in Black Hills Colorado IPP for $216 million to a third-party buyer. FERC approval of the sale was received on March 29, 2016. Black Hills Electric Generation is the operator of the facility, which is contracted to provide capacity and energy through 2031 to Black Hills Colorado Electric. Proceeds from the sale were used to pay down short-term debt and for other general corporate purposes.
ASC 810 requires the accounting for a partial sale of a subsidiary in which control is maintained and the subsidiary continues to be consolidated. The partial sale is required to be recorded as an equity transaction with no resulting gain or loss on the sale. GAAP requires that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and affiliates be reported in the equity section of a company’s balance sheet. Distributions of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests are due within 30 days following the end of a quarter, but may be withheld as necessary by Black Hills Electric Generation.
Net income available for common stock for the year ended December 31, 2016, was reduced by $9.6 million attributable to this noncontrolling interest. The net income allocable to the noncontrolling interest holders is based on ownership interests with the exception of certain agreed upon adjustments.
Black Hills Colorado IPP has been determined to be a variable interest entity (VIE) in which the Company has a variable interest. Black Hills Electric Generation has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE as Black Hills Electric Generation is the operator and manager of the generation facility and, as such, has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Black Hills Colorado IPP’s economic performance. Black Hills Electric Generation, as the primary beneficiary, continues to consolidate Black Hills Colorado IPP. Black Hills Colorado IPP has not received financial or other support from the Company outside of pre-existing contractual arrangements during the reporting period. Black Hills Colorado IPP does not have any debt and its cash flows from operations are sufficient to support its ongoing operations.
We have recorded the following assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets related to the VIE described above as of December 31:
(13) IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
Long-lived assets
Under the full cost method of accounting used by our Oil and Gas segment to account for exploration, development and acquisition of crude oil and natural gas reserves, all costs attributable to these activities are capitalized. These capitalized costs, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, are subject to a ceiling test that limits the pooled costs to the aggregate of the discounted value of future net revenue attributable to proved natural gas and crude oil reserves using a discount rate defined by the SEC plus the lower of cost or market value of unevaluated properties. Any costs in excess of the ceiling are written off as a non-cash charge.
As a result of continued low commodity prices throughout 2016, we have recorded non-cash ceiling test impairments of oil and gas assets included in the Oil and Gas segment totaling approximately $92 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. In determining the ceiling value of our assets, we utilized the average of the quoted prices from the first day of each month from the previous 12 months. For natural gas, the average NYMEX price was $2.48 per Mcf, adjusted to $2.25 per Mcf at the wellhead; for crude oil, the average NYMEX price was $42.75 per barrel, adjusted to $37.35 per barrel at the wellhead.
In 2015, we recorded a non-cash ceiling test impairment of oil and gas assets included in the Oil and Gas segment totaling approximately $250 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. In determining the ceiling value of our assets, we utilized the average of the quoted prices from the first day of each month from the previous 12 months. For natural gas, the average NYMEX price was $2.59 per Mcf, adjusted to $1.27 per Mcf at the wellhead; for crude oil, the average NYMEX price was $50.28 per barrel, adjusted to $44.72 per barrel at the wellhead.
During the second quarter of 2016, we advanced our Oil and Gas strategy, identifying certain non-core assets which may be sold as they are not expected to be utilized in the Cost of Service Gas Program. We assessed these assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 360. We valued the assets applying a market method approach utilizing assumptions consistent with similar known and measurable transactions and determined that the carrying amount exceeded the fair value. As a result, we recorded a pre-tax impairment of depreciable properties at June 30, 2016 of $14 million, in addition to the impairments noted above. The remaining book value of these depreciable assets is approximately $23 million as of December 31, 2016.
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
Our Oil and Gas segment owned a 25% interest in a pipeline and gathering system, accounted for under the equity method of accounting. During the second quarter of 2015, due to sustained low commodity prices, recurring operating losses and future expectations we reviewed this investment interest for impairment utilizing the other-than-temporary impairment model under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements. We valued the investment applying a market method approach utilizing assumptions consistent with similar known and measurable transactions. The carrying amount of this equity method investment exceeded the fair value, and we concluded the decline was considered to be other than temporary. As a result, we recorded a pre-tax impairment loss at June 30, 2015 of $5.2 million, the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the investment. In December of 2015, we sold our 25% interest in this pipeline and gathering system.
(14) OPERATING LEASES
We have entered into lease agreements for vehicles, equipment and office facilities. Rental expense incurred under these operating leases, including month to month leases, for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):
The following is a schedule of future minimum payments required under the operating lease agreements (in thousands):
(15) INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations for the years ended December 31 was (in thousands):
The temporary differences, which gave rise to the net deferred tax liability, for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
_______________
(a)
Other deferred tax assets consist primarily of state tax credits, state net operating loss, alternative minimum tax credit and federal research and development credits. No single item exceeds 5% of the total net deferred tax liability.
(b)
To conform with the 2016 presentation of accelerated depreciation, amortization and other property-related differences, 2015 is net of deferred tax assets of $182 million, previously presented as an asset impairment and includes $184 million of a liability previously presented as mining development and oil exploration.
The effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate for the years ended December 31, as follows:
_________________________
(a)
The tax benefit includes additional percentage depletion deductions that were claimed with respect to the oil and gas properties involving prior tax years. Such deductions were primarily the result of a change in the application of the maximum daily limitation of 1,000 barrels of oil equivalent as allowed under the Internal Revenue Code.
(b)
The tax benefit relates to the release of after-tax interest expense that was previously accrued with respect to the liability for uncertain tax positions involving the like-kind exchange transaction effectuated in connection with the IPP Transaction and Aquila Transaction that occurred in 2008. In addition, the tax benefit includes the release of reserves involving research and development credits and deductions. Both adjustments are the result of a re-measurement of the liability for uncertain tax positions predicated on an agreement reached with IRS Appeals in early 2016.
(c)
The flow-through adjustments related primarily to an accounting method change for tax purposes that allows us to take a current tax deduction for repair costs that continue to be capitalized for book purposes. In addition, flow-through adjustments were recorded related to an accounting method change for tax purposes that allows us to take a current tax deduction for certain indirect costs that continue to be capitalized for book purposes. We recorded a deferred income tax liability in recognition of the temporary difference created between book and tax treatment and flowed the tax benefit through to tax expense. A regulatory asset was established to reflect the recovery of future increases in taxes payable from customers as the temporary differences reverse. As a result of this regulatory treatment, we continue to record tax benefits consistent with the flow-through method.
(d)
Black Hills Colorado IPP went from a single member LLC, wholly-owned by Black Hills Electric Generation, to a partnership as a result of the sale of 49.9% of its membership interest in April 2016. The effective tax rate reflects the income attributable to the noncontrolling interest for which a tax provision was not recorded.
(e)
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2015 represents a tax benefit due to the pre-tax net loss.
At December 31, 2016, we have federal and gross state NOL carryforwards that will expire at various dates as follows (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2016, we had a $0.9 million valuation allowance against the state NOL carryforwards. Our 2016 analysis of the ability to utilize such NOLs resulted in a slight increase of the valuation allowance of approximately $0.1 million, which resulted in an increase to tax expense. The valuation allowance adjustment was primarily attributable to a projected decrease in state taxable income for years beyond 2016. Such a decrease impacted the utilization of NOL carryforward in those states where the carryforward period is significantly shorter than the federal carryforward period of 20 years. In certain states, the carryforward period is limited to 5 years. Ultimate usage of these NOLs depends upon our future tax filings. If the valuation allowance is adjusted due to higher or lower than anticipated utilization of the NOLs, the offsetting amount will affect tax expense.
The following table reconciles the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, without interest, at the beginning and end of the period included in Other deferred credits and other liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate is approximately $0.7 million.
As a result of an agreement in principle that was reached with IRS Appeals in the first quarter of 2016, we recognized no interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016, and approximately $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We had no accrued interest (before tax effect) associated with income taxes at December 31, 2016, and approximately $13.3 million accrued at December 31, 2015.
We file income tax returns with the IRS and various state jurisdictions. We received a 30-day Letter along with a Revenue Agent’s Report from the IRS in regards to the audit of the 2007 to 2009 tax years. A protest was timely filed with the IRS in August 2014 related to the like-kind exchange transaction described below and research and development (“R&D”) credits and deductions claimed with respect to certain costs and projects. A settlement in principle was reached with IRS Appeals in the first quarter of 2016. We are also currently under examination by the IRS for the 2010 to 2012 tax years. We received a 30-day letter along with Revenue Agent’s Report from the IRS in regard to the audit of the 2010 to 2012 tax years. A protest was timely filed with IRS Appeals in the second quarter of 2016 related to R&D credits and deductions claimed with respect to certain costs and projects.
We have deferred a substantial amount of tax payments through various tax planning strategies including the deferral of approximately $125 million in income taxes attributable to the like-kind exchange effectuated in connection with the IPP Transaction and Aquila Transaction that occurred in 2008. The IRS had challenged our position with respect to the like-kind exchange. In the first quarter of 2016, we reached a settlement agreement in principle with IRS Appeals related to both the like-kind exchange transaction in addition to the R&D credits and deductions issues. The settlement resulted in a reduction to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $29 million excluding interest. Approximately $17 million of the reduction was to restore accumulated deferred income taxes and the remaining portion of approximately $12 million was reclassified to current taxes payable.
As of December 31, 2016, we do not have any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease on or before December 31, 2017.
Excess foreign tax credits have been generated and are available to offset United States federal income taxes. At December 31, 2016, we had foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $2.3 million, which expire in 2017.
We had a $1.7 million and $0.5 million valuation allowance against the foreign tax credit carryforwards as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively. Approximately $1.8 million of foreign tax credits was previously reflected as an offset to liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits in recognition of the estimated impact the resolution of material uncertain tax positions could have with respect to utilization. Subsequent to the settlement agreement in principle that was reached with IRS Appeals in the first quarter of 2016, it has been determined to be more beneficial to deduct the $1.8 million of foreign tax credits. In determining the valuation allowance amount, we compared the tax benefit associated with either deducting foreign taxes or claiming them as credits. The tax benefit of being able to deduct such foreign tax credits is approximately $0.6 million resulting in an increase to the valuation allowance of approximately $1.2 million.
State tax credits have been generated and are available to offset future state income taxes. At December 31, 2016, we had the following state tax credit carryforwards (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2016, we had a $6.6 million valuation allowance against the state tax credit carryforwards. The re-evaluation of our ability to utilize such credits resulted in an increase of the valuation allowance of approximately $3.6 million of which approximately $1.9 million resulted in an increase to tax expense. The remaining $1.7 million increase is attributable to our regulated business and is being accounted for under the deferral method whereby the credits are amortized to tax expense over the estimated useful life of the underlying asset that generated the credit. The valuation allowance adjustment was primarily attributable to the impact of lower projected apportionment factors resulting in decreased state taxable income in years beyond 2016. Ultimate usage of these credits depends upon our future tax filings. If the valuation allowance is adjusted due to higher or lower than anticipated utilization of the state tax credit carryforwards, the offsetting amount will affect tax expense.
(16) OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
We record deferred gains (losses) in AOCI related to interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges, commodity contracts designated as cash flow hedges and the amortization of components of our defined benefit plans. Deferred gains (losses) for our commodity contracts designated as cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings upon settlement, while deferred gains (losses) related to our interest rate swaps are recognized in earnings as they are amortized.
The following table details reclassifications out of AOCI and into net income. The amounts in parentheses below indicate decreases to net income in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the period, net of tax (in thousands):
Balances by classification included within AOCI, net of tax on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows (in thousands):
(17) SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(18) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
On February 12, 2016, as disclosed in Note 2, we completed the acquisition of SourceGas, adding an additional defined benefit pension plan, two additional defined benefit healthcare postretirement plans and a 401K retirement savings plan to cover employees of the utilities acquired. Benefits under these plans are determined based on each employee’s compensation, years of service, and/or age at retirement, among other factors.
In accordance with accounting standards, the SourceGas benefit liabilities were re-measured as of February 11, 2016. In addition, prior service costs not previously expensed were reclassified to a Regulatory asset and will be amortized over the average remaining service life of the plans.
Amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets upon the February 12, 2016 acquisition are (in thousands):
Defined Contribution Plans
We sponsor 401(k) retirement savings plans (the 401(k) Plans). Participants in the 401(k) Plans may elect to invest a portion of their eligible compensation to the 401(k) Plan up to the maximum amounts established by the IRS. The 401(k) Plans provide employees the opportunity to invest up to 50% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax or after-tax basis. The 401(k) Plans provide a Company Matching Contribution for all eligible participants and for certain eligible participants a Company Retirement Contribution based on the participant’s age and years of service. Vesting of all Company contributions ranges from immediate vesting to graduated vesting at 20% per year with 100% vesting when the participant has 5 years of service with the Company.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Pension Plans)
During 2016 we maintained three defined benefit pension plans, BHC Pension Plan, Black Hills Utility Holding, Inc. Pension Plan and SourceGas Retirement Plan that as of December 31, 2016 were merged into one single plan, the Black Hills Retirement Plan. The Pension Plans cover certain eligible employees of the Company. The benefits for the Pension Plans are based on years of service and calculations of average earnings during a specific time period prior to retirement. All three Pension Plans have been closed to new employees and certain employees who did not meet age and service based criteria.
Black Hills Retirement Plan assets are held in a Master Trust. Due to the plan merger on December 31, 2016, reporting beginning in 2017 will no longer represent an undivided interest in the Master Trust. Our Board of Directors has approved the Plans’ investment policy. The objective of the investment policy is to manage assets in such a way that will allow the eventual settlement of our obligations to the Pension Plans’ beneficiaries. To meet this objective, our pension assets are managed by an outside adviser using a portfolio strategy that will provide liquidity to meet the Plans’ benefit payment obligations. The Pension Plans’ assets consist primarily of equity, fixed income and hedged investments.
The expected rate of return on pension plan assets is based on a targeted asset allocation range determined by the funded ratio of the plan. As of December 31, 2016, the expected rate of return on pension plan assets is based on the targeted asset allocation range of 40% to 50% equity securities and 50% to 60% fixed-income securities and the expected rate of return from these asset categories. The expected rate of return on other postretirement plan assets is based on the targeted asset allocation range of 30% to 40% equity securities and 60% to 70% fixed-income securities and the expected rate of return from these asset categories. The expected return on plan assets for other postretirement benefits reflects insurance-related investment costs.
The expected long-term rate of return for investments was 6.75% for the BHC Pension Plan and Black Hills Utility Holding, Inc. Plan 2016 and 2015 plan years and 7.5% for the SourceGas Retirement Plan 2016 plan year. Our Pension Plan is funded in compliance with the federal government’s funding requirements.
Plan Assets
The percentages of total plan asset fair value by investment category for our Pension Plans at December 31 were as follows:
Supplemental Non-qualified Defined Benefit Plans
We have various supplemental retirement plans for key executives of the Company. The plans are non-qualified defined benefit and defined contribution plans (Supplemental Plans). The Supplemental Plans are subject to various vesting schedules and are not funded by the Company.
Plan Assets
We do not fund our Supplemental Plans. We fund on a cash basis as benefits are paid.
Non-pension Defined Benefit Postretirement Healthcare Plans
With the addition of the two SourceGas Postretirement Healthcare Plans, BHC now sponsors five retiree healthcare plans (Healthcare Plans) for employees who meet certain age and service requirements at retirement. Healthcare Plan benefits are subject to premiums, deductibles, co-payment provisions and other limitations. A portion of the Healthcare Plans is pre-funded via VEBAs and a Grantor Trust. Effective January 1, 2014, health care coverage for Medicare-eligible retirees is provided through an individual market healthcare exchange for BHC and Black Hills Utility Holdings retirees. SourceGas retirees do not participate in the individual market healthcare exchange; therefore, all permissible health claims are paid under the self-insured plan.
Plan Assets
We fund the Healthcare Plans on a cash basis as benefits are paid. The Black Hills Utility Holding and SourceGas Postretirement - AWG Plans provides for partial pre-funding via VEBAs and a Grantor Trust. Assets related to this pre-funding are held in trust and are for the benefit of the union and non-union employees located in the states of Arkansas, Kansas and Iowa. We do not pre-fund the Healthcare Plans for those employees outside Arkansas, Kansas and Iowa.
Plan Contributions
Contributions to the Pension Plans are cash contributions made directly to the Master Trust. Healthcare and Supplemental Plan contributions are made in the form of benefit payments. Contributions for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
While we do not have required contributions, we expect to make approximately $10 million in contributions to our Defined Benefit Pension Plans in 2017.
Fair Value Measurements
Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the assets that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
_____________
(a)
Certain investments that are measured at fair value using Net Asset Value “NAV” per share (or its equivalent) for practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in these tables for these investments are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the reconciliation of changes in the plans’ benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets above.
Additional information about assets of the Benefit Plans, including methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these assets, is as follows:
Cash and Cash Equivalents: This represents an investment in Invesco Treasury Portfolio, which is a short-term investment trust, as well as an investment in Northern Institutional Government Assets Portfolio, which is described as a government money market fund. As shares held reflect quoted prices in an active market, they are categorized as Level 1.
Equity Securities: These represent investments in a combination of equity positions for mainly large cap core allocation and Exchange Trade Funds (EFTs) for diversification into the other sectors of the economy. EFTs are a basket of securities traded like individual stocks on the exchange. Value of equity securities held at year end are based on published market quotations of active markets. The ETF funds can be redeemed on a daily basis at their market price and have no redemption restrictions. As shares held reflect quoted prices in an active market, they are categorized as Level 1.
Intermediate-term bond: This is comprised of a diversified pool of high quality, individual municipal bonds. Pricing is evaluated using multi-dimensional relational models, as well as a series of matrices using Standard Inputs, including Municipal Securities Rule Making Board (MSRB) reported trades and material event notices, plus Municipal Market Data (MMD) benchmark yields and new issue data. As the models use observable inputs and standard data, the investments are categorized as Level 2.
AXA Equitable General Fixed Income Fund: This fund is a diversified portfolio, primarily composed of fixed income instruments. Assets are invested in long-term holdings, such as commercial, agricultural and residential mortgages, publicly traded and privately place bonds and real estate as well as short-term bonds. Fair values of mortgage loans are measured by discounting future contractual cash flows to be received on the mortgage loans using interest rates at which loans with similar characteristics have. The discount rate is derived from taking the appropriate U.S. Treasury rate with a like term. The fair value of public fixed maturity securities are generally based on prices obtained from independent valuation service providers with reasonableness prices compared with directly observable market trades. The fair value of privately placed securities are determined using a discounted cash flow model. These models use observable inputs with a discount rate based upon the average of spread surveys collected from private market intermediaries and industry sector of the issuer. The Plan’s investments in the AXA Equitable General Fixed Income Fund are categorized as Level 2.
Common Collective Trust Funds: These funds are valued based upon the redemption price of units held by the Plan, which is based on the current fair value of the common collective trust funds’ underlying assets. Unit values are determined by the financial institution sponsoring such funds by dividing the fund’s net assets at fair value by its units outstanding at the valuation dates. The Plan’s investments in common collective trust funds, with the exception of shares of the common collective trust-real estate are categorized as Level 2.
Common Collective Trust-Real Estate Fund: This fund is valued based on various factors of the underlying real estate properties, including market rent, market rent growth, occupancy levels, etc. As part of the trustee’s valuation process, properties are externally appraised generally on an annual basis. The appraisals are conducted by reputable independent appraisal firms and signed by appraisers that are members of the Appraisal Institute, with professional designation of Member, Appraisal Institute. All external appraisals are performed in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices. We receive monthly statements from the trustee, along with the annual schedule of investments, and rely on these reports for pricing the units of the fund. The funds without participant withdrawal limitations are categorized as Level 2.
The following investments are measured at NAV and are not classified in the fair value hierarchy, in accordance with accounting guidance.
Common Collective Trust-Real Estate Fund: This fund is valued based on various factors of the underlying real estate properties, including market rent, market rent growth, occupancy levels, etc. As part of the trustee’s valuation process, properties are externally appraised generally on an annual basis. The appraisals are conducted by reputable independent appraisal firms and signed by appraisers that are members of the Appraisal Institute, with professional designation of Member, Appraisal Institute. All external appraisals are performed in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices. We receive monthly statements from the trustee, along with the annual schedule of investments, and rely on these reports for pricing the units of the fund. Certain of the funds’ assets contain participant withdrawal policy.
Hedge Funds: Hedge funds represent investments in other investment funds that seek a return utilizing a number of diverse investment strategies. The strategies, when combined aim to reduce volatility and risk while attempting to deliver positive returns under all market conditions. Amounts are reported on a one-month lag. The fair value of hedge funds is determined using net asset value per share based on the fair value of the hedge fund’s underlying investments. Generally, shares may be redeemed at the end of each quarter, with a 65 day notice and are limited to a percentage of total net asset value of the fund. The net asset values are based on the fair value of each fund’s underlying investments. There are no unfunded commitments related to these hedge funds.
Other Plan Information
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the employee benefit plan obligations, fair value of assets and amounts recognized in the statement of financial position, components of the net periodic expense and elements of AOCI (in thousands):
Benefit Obligations
____________________
(a)
Change from 2015 reflects a decrease in the discount rate offset by increased asset returns and a change in the mortality tables used in employee benefit plan estimates.
____________________
(a)
Assets of VEBAs and Grantor Trust.
The funded status of the plans and the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 consist of (in thousands):
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
____________________
(a)
The Defined Benefit Pension Plans Accumulated Benefit Obligation for 2016 represents the obligation for the merged Black Hills Retirement Plan. The 2015 obligation represents the BHC Pension Plan and Black Hills Utility Holding, Inc. Pension Plan and has been combined for presentation purposes to conform to the 2016 merged plan. The Non-pension Defined Benefit Retirement Healthcare Plans Accumulated Benefit Obligation for 2016 represents that obligation for the five postretirement plans maintained by BHC. The 2015 obligation represents the three postretirement plans maintained by BHC.
Components of Net Periodic Expense
____________________
(a)
Settlement expense is the result of lump-sum payments on the SourceGas Retirement Plan in excess of interest and service costs for the year.
AOCI
For defined benefit plans, amounts included in AOCI, after-tax, that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
The amounts in AOCI, Regulatory assets or Regulatory liabilities, after-tax, expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost during calendar year 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
Assumptions
_____________________________
(a)
The estimated discount rate for the merged Black Hills Retirement Plan is 4.27% for the calculation of the 2017 net periodic pension costs.
(b)
The expected rate of return on plan assets is 6.75% for the calculation of the 2017 net periodic pension cost.
The healthcare benefit obligation was determined at December 31 as follows:
_____________________________
(a)
The 2016 Medical Trend Rates include the two additional non-pension defined benefit postretirement plans from SourceGas.
We do not pre-fund our supplemental plans or three of the five healthcare plans. The table below shows the expected impacts of an increase or decrease to our healthcare trend rate for our Healthcare Plans (in thousands):
Beginning in 2016, the Company changed the method used to estimate the service and interest cost components of the net periodic pension, supplemental non-qualified defined benefit and other postretirement benefit costs. The new method uses the spot yield curve approach to estimate the service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used to determine the benefit obligations to relevant projected cash outflows. Previously, those costs were determined using a single weighted-average discount rate. The change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligations as the change in service and interest costs offsets the actuarial gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income. The new method provides a more precise measure of interest and service costs by improving the correlation between the projected benefit cash flows and the discrete spot yield curve rates. The Company accounted for this change as a change in estimate prospectively beginning in the first quarter of 2016. See “Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations” within our Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7 on Form 10-K for additional details.
The following benefit payments, which reflect future service, are expected to be paid (in thousands):
(19) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Power Purchase and Transmission Services Agreements
Through our subsidiaries, we have the following significant long-term power purchase contracts with non-affiliated third-parties:
•
Black Hills Wyoming sold its CTII 40 MW natural gas-fired generating unit to the City of Gillette, Wyoming on September 3, 2014. Under the terms of the sale, Black Hills Wyoming entered into ancillary agreements to operate CTII, provide use of shared facilities including a ground lease and dispatch generation services. In addition, the agreement includes a 20-year economy energy PPA that contains a sharing arrangement in which the parties share the savings of wholesale power purchases made when market power prices are less than the cost of operating the generating unit.
•
South Dakota Electric’s PPA with PacifiCorp, expiring December 31, 2023, for the purchase of 50 MW of electric capacity and energy from PacifiCorp’s system. The price paid for the capacity and energy is based on the operating costs of one of PacifiCorp’s coal-fired electric generating plants.
•
South Dakota Electric has a firm point-to-point transmission service agreement with PacifiCorp that expires December 31, 2023. The agreement provides 50 MW of capacity and energy to be transmitted annually by PacifiCorp.
•
Wyoming Electric’s PPA with Duke Energy’s Happy Jack wind site, expiring September 3, 2028, provides up to 30 MW of wind energy from Happy Jack to Wyoming Electric. Under a separate inter-company agreement, Wyoming Electric sells 50% of the facility output to South Dakota Electric.
•
Wyoming Electric’s PPA with Duke Energy’s Silver Sage wind site, expiring September 30, 2029, provides up to 30 MW of wind energy. Under a separate inter-company agreement, Wyoming Electric has agreed to sell 20 MW of energy from Silver Sage to South Dakota Electric.
•
Colorado Electric’s REPA with AltaGas expiring October 16, 2037, provides up to 14.5 MW of wind energy from the Busch Ranch Wind Farm in which Colorado Electric owns a 50% undivided ownership interest.
Costs under these power purchase contracts for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
________________
(a)
PPAs with Cargill expired on December 31, 2016.
Other Gas Supply Agreements
Our Utilities also purchase natural gas, including transportation and storage capacity to meet customers’ needs, under short-term and long-term purchase contracts. These contracts extend to 2044.
Natural Gas Delivery Commitment
In 2012, we entered into a ten-year gas gathering and processing contract for natural gas production from our properties in the Piceance Basin in Colorado, under which we pay a gathering fee per Mcf. This take or pay contract requires us to pay the fee on a minimum of 20,000 Mcf per day, regardless of the volume delivered. The 10 year agreement expiring in 2024 became effective in first quarter of 2014 upon completion of the processing infrastructure capable of handling the committed volumes.
Purchase Commitments
We maintain natural gas supply contracts with several vendors that generally cover a period of up to one year. Commitments for estimated baseload gas volumes are established prior to the beginning of the month under these contracts on a monthly basis at contractually negotiated prices. Commitments for incremental daily purchases are made as necessary during the month based on requirements in accordance with the terms of the individual contract.
Our Gas Utilities segment has commitments to purchase physical quantities of natural gas under contracts indexed to various forward natural gas price curves. A portion of our gas purchases are purchased under evergreen contracts and are therefore, for purposes of this disclosure, carried out for 60 days. At December 31, 2016, the long-term commitments to purchase quantities of natural gas under contracts indexed to the following forward indices were as follows (in MMBtus):
Purchases under these contracts totaled $31 million, $48 million and $31 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following is a schedule of unconditional purchase obligations required under the power purchase, transmission services, gathering commitments, coal and natural gas transportation and storage agreements (in thousands):
Future Purchase Agreement - Related Party
Wyoming Electric’s PPA for 60 MW of capacity and energy from Black Hills Wyoming’s Wygen I generating facility expiring on December 31, 2022, includes an option for Wyoming Electric to purchase Black Hills Wyoming’s ownership in the Wygen I facility. The purchase price related to the option is $2.6 million per MW which is the equivalent per MW of the pre-construction estimated cost of the Wygen III plant, which was completed in April 2010. This option purchase price is adjusted for capital additions and reduced by an amount equal to annual depreciation based on a 35-year life starting January 1, 2009. The purchase option would be subject to WPSC and FERC approval in order to obtain regulatory treatment.
Power Sales Agreements
Through our subsidiaries, we have the following significant long-term power sales contracts with non-affiliated third-parties:
•
During periods of reduced production at Wygen III in which MDU owns a portion of the capacity, or during periods when Wygen III is off-line, MDU will be provided with 25 MW from our other generation facilities or from system purchases with reimbursement of costs by MDU.
•
South Dakota Electric has an agreement to serve MDU capacity and energy up to a maximum of 50 MW in excess of Wygen III ownership.
•
During periods of reduced production at Wygen III in which the City of Gillette owns a portion of the capacity, or during periods when Wygen III is off-line, we will provide the City of Gillette with its first 23 MW from our other generating facilities or from system purchases with reimbursement of costs by the City of Gillette. Under this agreement, South Dakota Electric will also provide the City of Gillette their operating component of spinning reserves.
•
South Dakota Electric has a PPA with MEAN expiring May 31, 2023. This contract is unit-contingent on up to 10 MW from Neil Simpson II and up to 10 MW from Wygen III based on the availability of these plants. The capacity purchase requirements decrease over the term of the agreement.
Related Party Lease
Colorado Electric’s PPA with Black Hills Colorado IPP expiring on December 31, 2031, provides 200 MW of power to Colorado Electric from Black Hills Colorado IPP’s combined-cycle turbines. This PPA is accounted for as a capital lease whereby Colorado Electric, as lessee, has included the combined-cycle turbines as property, plant and equipment along with the related lease obligation and Black Hills Colorado IPP, as lessor, has recorded a lease receivable. Segment revenue and expenses associated with the PPA have been impacted by the lease accounting. The effect of the lease accounting is eliminated in corporate consolidations.
Reimbursement Agreement
We have a reimbursement agreement in place with Wells Fargo on behalf of Wyoming Electric for the 2009A bonds of $10 million due in 2027 and the 2009B bonds of $7.0 million due in 2021. In the case of default, we hold the assumption of liability for drawings on Wyoming Electric’s Letter of Credit attached to these bonds.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to costs resulting from a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations which affect future planning and existing operations. They can result in increased capital expenditures, operating and other costs as a result of compliance, remediation and monitoring obligations. Due to the environmental issues discussed below, we may be required to modify, curtail, replace or cease operating certain facilities or operations to comply with statutes, regulations and other requirements of regulatory bodies.
Air
Our generation facilities are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of air quality. These laws and regulations cover, among other pollutants, carbon monoxide, SO2, NOx, mercury, hazardous air pollutants, particulate matter and GHG. Power generating facilities burning fossil fuels emit each of the foregoing pollutants and, therefore, are subject to substantial regulation and enforcement oversight by various governmental agencies.
Title IV of the Clean Air Act applies to several of our generation facilities, including the Neil Simpson II, Neil Simpson CT, Lange CT, Wygen I, Wygen II, Wygen III, Wyodak and Pueblo Airport Generating Station plants. Title IV of the Clean Air Act created an SO2 allowance trading program as part of the federal acid rain program. Without purchasing additional allowances, we currently hold sufficient allowances to satisfy Title IV at all such plants through 2046.
The EPA issued the Industrial and Commercial Boiler Regulations for Area Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants, with updates which imposed emission limits, fuel requirements and monitoring requirements. The rule had a compliance deadline of March 21, 2014. In anticipation of this rule we suspended operations at the Osage plant in October 2010 and as a result of this rule, we suspended operations at the Ben French facility on August 31, 2012. We permanently retired Ben French, Osage and Neil Simpson I on March 21, 2014. In conjunction with the Colorado Clean Air Clean Jobs Act, the CPUC issued an order approving the closure of the W.N. Clark facility no later than December 31, 2013. This facility suspended operations December 31, 2012 and was retired on December 31, 2013. The net book value of these plants was allowed regulatory accounting treatment and is recorded as a Regulatory Asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The CPUC also approved a CPCN for the retirement of Pueblo Units #5 and #6 effective December 31, 2013.
Solid Waste Disposal
Various materials used at our facilities are subject to disposal regulations. Our Osage plant, permanently retired on March 21, 2014, had an on-site ash impoundment that was near capacity. An application to close the impoundment was approved on April 13, 2012. Site closure work was completed in 2013 with the state providing closure certification in 2014. Post closure monitoring activities will continue for 30 years following the closure certification date.
In September 2013, Osage also received a permit to close the small industrial rubble landfill. Site work was completed with the state providing closure certification in 2014. Post closure monitoring will continue for 30 years following the closure certification date.
Our W.N. Clark plant, which has been retired, previously delivered coal ash to a permitted, privately-owned landfill. While we do not believe that any substances from our solid waste disposal activities will pollute underground water, we can provide no assurance that pollution will not occur over time. In this event, we could incur material costs to mitigate any resulting damages.
Reclamation Liability
For our Pueblo Airport Generation site, we posted a bond of $4.1 million with the State of Colorado to cover the costs of remediation for a waste water containment pond permitted to provide wastewater storage and processing for this zero discharge facility. The reclamation liability is recorded at the present value of the estimated future cost to reclaim the land.
Under its land lease for Busch Ranch, Colorado Electric is required to reclaim all land where it has placed wind turbines. The reclamation liability is recorded at the present value of the estimated future cost to reclaim the land.
Under its mining permit, WRDC is required to reclaim all land where it has mined coal reserves. The reclamation liability is recorded at the present value of the estimated future cost to reclaim the land.
See Note 8 for additional information.
Manufactured Gas Processing
As a result of the Aquila Transaction, we acquired whole and partial liabilities for several former manufactured gas processing sites in Nebraska and Iowa which were previously used to convert coal to natural gas. The acquisition provided for an insurance recovery, now valued at $1.5 million recorded in Other assets, non-current on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, which will be used to help offset remediation costs. The remediation cost estimate could change materially due to results of further investigations, actions of environmental agencies or the financial viability of other responsible parties.
In March 2011, Nebraska Gas executed an Allocation, Indemnification and Access Agreement with the successor to the former operator of the Nebraska MGPs. Under this agreement, Nebraska Gas agreed to remediate the Blair and Plattsmouth sites in Nebraska. Subsequent to this transaction, Nebraska Gas enrolled Blair and Plattsmouth in Nebraska's Voluntary Cleanup Program. Site remediation was completed in September 2012. However, there was a potential for additional minimal remediation work at Plattsmouth where monitoring was required until 2015. Both Nebraska sites were required to monitor groundwater quality for a minimum two year period, ending in 2015. In late 2015, groundwater concentrations were proposed and approved by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality as meeting steady or declining pollution levels. We assembled our final removal action completion reports to formally close the site, and submitted reports to the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality in December 2015. In 2016, we received state approval for “no further action” at both sites.
As of December 31, 2016, our estimated liabilities for Iowa’s MGP sites currently range from approximately $2.6 million to $6.1 million for which we had $2.6 million accrued for remediation of sites as of December 31, 2016 included in Other deferred credits and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Prior to Black Hills Corporation's ownership, Aquila received rate orders that enabled recovery of environmental cleanup costs in certain jurisdictions. We anticipate recovery of these current and future costs would be allowed. Additionally, we may pursue recovery or agreements with other potentially responsible parties when and where permitted.
As a result of the SourceGas Transaction, we acquired potential liability for at least one former MGP site in McCook, Nebraska. The Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality conducted a limited assessment in 2012 which documented soil and groundwater impacts. However, there has been no directive from the state to pursue either remediation or further assessment. We are currently evaluating the potential for other Potential Responsible Parties and future comprehensive analysis to fully determine and delineate the extent of contamination. The assigned liability for this site cannot be determined at this time. However, based on the state’s assessment, we anticipate costs will be less than $1.0 million.
Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, we are subject to various lawsuits, actions, proceedings, claims and other matters asserted under laws and regulations. We believe the amounts provided in the consolidated financial statements to satisfy alleged liabilities are adequate in light of the probable and estimable contingencies. However, there can be no assurance that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from various legal proceedings, claims and other matters discussed, and to comply with applicable laws and regulations will not exceed the amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
In the normal course of business, we enter into agreements that include indemnification in favor of third parties, such as information technology agreements, purchase and sale agreements and lease contracts. We have also agreed to indemnify our directors, officers and employees in accordance with our articles of incorporation, as amended. Certain agreements do not contain any limits on our liability and therefore, it is not possible to estimate our potential liability under these indemnifications. In certain cases, we have recourse against third parties with respect to these indemnities. Further, we maintain insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims under these indemnities.
(20) GUARANTEES
We have entered into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain of our subsidiaries. The agreements include indemnification for reclamation and surety bonds and a contract performance guarantee.
We had the following guarantees in place as of (in thousands):
_______________________
(a)
We have guarantees in place for reclamation and surety bonds for our subsidiaries. The guarantees were entered into in the normal course of business. To the extent liabilities are incurred as a result of activities covered by the surety bonds, such liabilities are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(21) OIL AND GAS RESERVES (Unaudited)
BHEP has operating and non-operating interests in 713 gross developed oil and gas wells in 9 states and holds leases on approximately 127,919 net acres.
Costs Incurred
Following is a summary of costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development during the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Reserves
The following table summarizes BHEP’s quantities of proved developed and undeveloped oil, natural gas and NGL reserves, estimated using SEC-defined product prices, as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and a reconciliation of the changes between these dates. These estimates are based on reserve reports by CG&A. Such reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and may be subject to revisions as a result of numerous factors including, but not limited to, additional development activity, evolving production history and continual reassessment of the viability of production under varying economic conditions.
Minor differences in amounts may result in the following tables relating to oil and gas reserves due to rounding.
________________________
(a)
Production for reserve calculations does not include volumes for natural gas liquids (NGLs) for historical periods.
(b)
A specific NYMEX price for NGL is not available. Market prices for NGL are broken down by various liquid components, including ethane, propane, isobutane, normal butane, and natural gasoline. Each of these components is traded as an index. Presently, ethane is not being recovered at any of the facilities that process our natural gas production.
(c)
For reserves purposes, costs to gather gas previously netted from the gas price were reclassified into operating expenses in 2016, with approximate rates of $1.54/Mcf for Piceance, $0.92/Mcf for San Juan and $0.53/Mcf for all others. For accounting purposes, consistent with prior years, the sales price for natural gas is adjusted for transportation costs and other related deductions when applicable, as further described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Reserve additions for 2016 totaled 0.1 Bcfe, replacing 0% of annual production. Reserve additions in 2016 were minimal due to continued poor economic conditions and our focus on supporting utility Cost of Service Gas Programs, which together, limited any further drilling. Capital spending in 2016 was primarily for existing infrastructure and acquiring right-aways. Future capital spending rates will be dependent on product prices, processing availability and support of our Cost of Service Gas program.
In 2016, we had negative revisions of (9.4 Bcfe) to previous reserve estimates. Most of the negative revision was the result of lower equivalent prices of oil, liquids and gas received at the wellhead of (12.3 Bcfe), partially offset by improved wellhead performance of 3.5 Bcfe.
SEC regulations require that PUD locations meet the test of being developed within five years of being categorized as proved. In 2016, we had no PUD locations that were required to be dropped because of the five year rule.
Companies are required to include a narrative disclosure of the total quantity of PUD locations at year end, any material changes in PUD locations during the year and investment and progress made in converting the PUD locations to proved developed during the year.
•
We have no PUDs at December 31, 2016, and due to economic conditions in 2016, no new gross PUD locations were added for future drilling in the Piceance Mancos or Powder River Basin.
•
The number of locations and reconciliation of our proved undeveloped reserve and future development costs in our year-end proved undeveloped reserves as of December 31, 2016 were:
Capitalized Costs
Following is information concerning capitalized costs for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Results of Operations
Following is a summary of results of operations for producing activities for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Unproved Properties
Unproved properties not subject to amortization at December 31, 2016, relate primarily to direct purchase leasehold and work-in-progress projects. Unproved properties not subject to amortization at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted mainly of exploration costs on various existing work-in-progress projects as well as leasehold acquired through significant natural gas and oil property acquisitions and through direct purchases of leasehold. We capitalized approximately $0.9 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million of interest during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, on significant investments in unproved properties that were not yet included in the amortization base of the full-cost pool. We will continue to evaluate our unevaluated properties. However, the timing of the ultimate evaluation and disposition of the properties has not been determined.
The table below sets forth the cost of unproved properties excluded from the amortization base as of December 31, 2016 and notes the year in which the associated costs were incurred (in thousands):
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Following is a summary of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and changes relating to proved oil and gas reserves for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows during the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Changes in the standardized measure from “revisions of previous quantity estimates” are driven by reserve revisions, modifications of production profiles and timing of future development. For all years presented, we had minimal net reserve revisions to prior estimates due to performance. Production forecast modifications are generally made at the well level each year through the reserve review process. These production profile modifications are based on incorporation of the most recent production information and applicable technical studies. Timing of future development investments are reviewed each year and are often modified in response to current market conditions for items such as permitting and service availability.
(22) QUARTERLY HISTORICAL DATA (Unaudited)
The Company operates on a calendar year basis. The following tables set forth select unaudited historical operating results and market data for each quarter of 2016 and 2015.
All quarters of 2016 included non-cash impairments of oil and gas properties and external incremental acquisition and transaction costs. We recorded after-tax impairments of oil and gas properties of $8.8 million during the first quarter, $16 million during the second quarter, $7.9 million during the third quarter and $34 million during the fourth quarter. We incurred after-tax external incremental acquisition and transaction expenses of $15 million during the first quarter, $4.1 million during the second quarter, $4.1 million during the third quarter and $5.5 million during the fourth quarter.
All quarters of 2015 included non-cash impairments of oil and gas properties. We incurred external incremental acquisition and transaction costs during the second, third and fourth quarters. We recorded after-tax impairments of oil and gas properties of $14 million during the first quarter, $66 million during the second quarter, $36 million during the third quarter and $44 million during the fourth quarter. We incurred after-tax external incremental acquisition and transaction expenses of $0.5 million during the second quarter, $2.8 million during the third quarter and $3.7 million during the fourth quarter.
(23) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
None.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of December 31, 2016. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of SourceGas, which is integrated within the Company’s Gas Utilities operations. As part of our ongoing integration activities, we are continuing to incorporate our controls and procedures into SourceGas and to implement company-wide controls over its operations. Other than the changes due to the SourceGas acquisition, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is presented on Page 123 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9B.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information required under this item with respect to directors and information required by Items 401, 405, 406, 407(c)(3), 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K, is set forth in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive Officers
David R. Emery, age 54, has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since January 2016 and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from 2005 through 2015. Prior to that, he held various positions with the Company, including President and Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors from 2004 to 2005, President and Chief Operating Officer - Retail Business Segment from 2003 to 2004 and Vice President - Fuel Resources from 1997 to 2003. Mr. Emery has 27 years of experience with the Company.
Scott A. Buchholz, age 55, has been our Senior Vice President - Chief Information Officer since the closing of the Aquila Transaction in 2008. Prior to joining the Company, he was Aquila’s Vice President of Information Technology from 2005 until 2008, Six Sigma Deployment Leader/Black Belt from 2004 until 2005, and General Manager, Corporate Information Technology from 2002 until 2004. Mr. Buchholz has 36 years of experience with the Company, including 28 years with Aquila.
Linden R. Evans, age 54, has been President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since January 2016 and President and Chief Operating Officer - Utilities from 2004 through 2015. Mr. Evans served as the Vice President and General Manager of our former communication subsidiary in 2003 and 2004, and served as our Associate Counsel from 2001 to 2003. Mr. Evans has 15 years of experience with the Company.
Brian G. Iverson, age 54, has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer since April 2016. He served as Senior Vice President - Regulatory and Governmental Affairs and Assistant General Counsel from 2014 to April 2016, Vice President and Treasurer from 2011 to 2014, Vice President - Electric Regulatory Services from 2008 to 2011 and as Corporate Counsel from 2004 to 2008. Mr. Iverson has 13 years of experience with the Company.
Richard W. Kinzley, age 51, has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2015. He served as Vice President - Corporate Controller from 2013 to 2014, Vice President - Strategic Planning and Development from 2008 to 2013, and as Director of Corporate Development from 2000 to 2008. Mr. Kinzley has 17 years of experience with the Company.
Jennifer C. Landis, age 42, has been Senior Vice President - Chief Human Resources Officer since February 1, 2017. She served as Vice President of Human Resources from April 2016 through January 2017, Director of Corporate Human Resources and Talent Management from March 2013 to April 2016, and Director of Organization Development from October 2008 to February 2013. Ms. Landis has 15 years of experience with the Company.
Robert A. Myers, age 59, has been Senior Vice President since February 1, 2017. He served as our Senior Vice President - Chief Human Resource Officer from 2009 to February 2017 and served as our Interim Human Resources Executive in 2008. He was a partner with Strategic Talent Solutions, a human resources consulting firm, from 2006 until 2008, Senior Vice President - Chief Human Resource Officer for Devon Energy in 2006, and Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer at Reebok International, Ltd from 2003 until 2006. He has over 35 years of service in key human resources leadership roles. Mr. Myers has 8 years of experience with the Company and plans to retire effective April 1, 2017.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required under this item is set forth in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information regarding the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is set forth in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table includes information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to our equity compensation plans. These plans include the 2005 Omnibus Incentive plan and 2015 Omnibus Incentive plan.
_________________________
(1)
Includes 135,650 full value awards outstanding as of December 31, 2016, comprised of restricted stock units, performance shares, short-term incentive plan (STIP) units and Director common stock units. The weighted average exercise price does not include the restricted stock units, performance shares, STIP or common stock units. In addition, 293,095 shares of unvested restricted stock were outstanding as of December 31, 2016, which are not included in the above table because they have already been issued.
(2)
Shares available for issuance are from the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards and other stock based awards.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is set forth in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services is set forth in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
1.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial statements required under this item are included in Item 8 of Part II
2.
Schedules
Schedule II - Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All other schedules have been omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
3.
Exhibits
SCHEDULE II
__________________
(a)
Represents allowance balances added with the SourceGas acquisition.
3.
Exhibits
________________________
*
Previously filed as part of the filing indicated and incorporated by reference herein.
†
Indicates a board of director or management compensatory plan.
(a)
See (a) 3. Exhibits above.
(b)
See (a) 2. Schedules above.
ITEM 16.
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
__________________________
*
Previously filed as part of the filing indicated and incorporated by reference herein.
†
Indicates a board of director or management compensatory plan.