I'm researching the Fourth Amendment and its impact on criminal procedure. Please provide the full text of the Fourth Amendment. Then, explain what the 'Exclusionary Rule' is, and identify the landmark Supreme Court case mentioned on the FindLaw website that extended this rule to state courts. What was the primary impact of that ruling?
Navigate to 'https://www.findlaw.com/constitution/'. Locate and click on the 'Fourth Amendment' link, or a highly relevant sub-topic like 'Probable Cause' or 'The Exclusionary Rule' if a direct Fourth Amendment link is not immediately visible. Identify and extract the full text of the Fourth Amendment from the page. Locate the section or discussion about 'The Exclusionary Rule'. Explain what the Exclusionary Rule is based on the information provided. Identify the specific landmark Supreme Court case that extended the Exclusionary Rule to state courts. State the primary impact or holding of that specific Supreme Court case. Synthesize all gathered information into a concise answer.
The agent successfully navigates to a page containing information about the Fourth Amendment and the Exclusionary Rule. The agent accurately provides the full text of the Fourth Amendment: 'The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.' The agent explains the Exclusionary Rule as a principle where evidence obtained without a warrant or probable cause cannot be used in court proceedings. The agent identifies the landmark Supreme Court case as *Mapp v. Ohio* (1961). The agent states the primary impact of *Mapp v. Ohio* was extending the application of the exclusionary rule to state courts through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, meaning evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches and seizures by state law enforcement cannot be used in state court proceedings.