Provide an overview of the BCTV/BCGTV/TinyRAM project, specifically detailing its programmability and performance trade-offs. Compare its performance and programmability to the Pepper Buffet system. Additionally, identify where the re-implementation of TinyRAM's source code can be accessed for practical use or comparison.
Navigate to the 'Related projects' page. Locate the description for 'BCTV, BCGTV, and TinyRAM' and extract details on its programmability and overhead. Identify any direct comparisons between BCTV/TinyRAM and Buffet regarding programmability and performance. Navigate to the 'Source code' page. Locate the section for 'Re-implementations of related systems' and identify the availability of TinyRAM's source code. Synthesize the findings to answer the question.
State that BCTV/BCGTV/TinyRAM offers excellent programmability (full C language support) but has very high overhead. State that compared to Buffet, BCTV/TinyRAM's programmability is slightly better but its performance is orders of magnitude worse. State that the TinyRAM re-implementation is available via a link on the 'Source code' page (id: 584) and is also included with Buffet and as a git submodule in their latest development branch.