This is so true. <br><br>One thing I've noticed, and feel free to share this thought at any time in the future. <br><br>The left radicals (or just the left) calls those of us out that aren't either left or right (or moderately so) for not "attacking the alt-right" or "denouncing them nearly as much as we attack the left".<br><br>The reason we're constantly butting heads with the left and not the right is explained like this:<br><br>- The radical right doesn't care for us. But they call us "inadequate" or "worthless" or just flat out ignore us.<br><br>- The left on the other hand is constantly attacking our character, literally calling us WW2 German names. They try to silence us. <br><br>OF COURSE we're going to come at the left. And the sad irony of it is, that because they come at us, and we push back, they feel justified to come at us more. They truly believe that the reason we "come at them" is because they are on the left. Rather than the real reason, because they attack us and try to control us. <br><br>Leftists, despite what you may think, you don't have to shut down everyone on the right. You don't have to say the "isms" to all to the right of you. You'd find WAY more allies from not doing that. And you'd find 99% of us aren't at ALL what you think we are. <br><br>We hate radicalism on both sides. The only reason we push back on the left, is they are the only ones pushing us in the first place. <br><br>Great vid btw Upper Echelon Gamers. As always.,(reply>), Some day, the nation will look back at the direction the radical left is pushing and despise it. Just as all radical movements eventually become.,(reply>), @Boguslav citation needed, citation needed, citation needed, citation needed. <br><br>Haha the right out breeding the left  what a nonsensical point. Breeding rates of white population is still higher than non whites so honestly mot sure what you are on about. <br><br>Again you say a claim like globalism is immoral and then just leave it at that. No reason why or anything.  <br><br>Europe is not burning again citation needed. I've moved around much of Western Europe and lived in France Holland UK Germany and Italy and non of these countries are 'burning'.<br><br>I wasn't referring to purely gdp actually and I knew you would take that bait. I explicitely said human indices.<br><br>I'm mot going to entartain some of your more egregious points as they are simply so ridiculous.<br><br>I'm not going to respond to this thread any further as I'm going in circles and this is unproductive. I guess we will see who will win in the next few decades. <br><br>See ya!,(reply>), @Liszt Dylan Economically that is not true, the wests economies are growing but unsustainably alongside a growing wellfare system the system cannot support. Imigrants irrespective of quality are a net drain on any system, this economists agree upon. Also appeal to authority fallacy. <br><br>So discrimination is okay good. <br><br>No its not wrong, why is that wrong? Peoples have a right to define themselves. That is a moral right and a right to a home. Identity matters in this case and thus assimilation has never happened in the history of humanity. Humanity is marred by a series of conquests, not peaceful mixing. Mixing has almost always been a result of mass rape, or domination of one group over another. <br><br>Western eurpe is dying, not really flourishing. I wouldnt call a bunch of burnt cars, riots, and furthering inequalities exactly growth. Homogenous countries for example dont have this issue, almost like identity matters. <br><br>haha the ad hom. I am doing just fine, thank you. Nice projection though. Its almost like I am enjoying building a society rather than an economy. <br><br>What is more important in the end, that GDP or maybe the wellbeing of people? just a thought. <br><br>People have a moral right to their institutions to define themselves and exist. Citizenship does not give one a right to this, as they are not of the people that build said institutions. <br><br>discrimination based on race or gender is perfectly fine, literally nothing wrong with that. Morally there is nothing wrong with this. Why would there be? Its not like people cant have a home they define and and that benefits them because it is their home and they dont have anywhere else to go... ohhhh its only bad when white people do it I see. Africa just aint white enough I guess. <br><br>When it comes to morality end goals, intentions, do not matter. To say that they do is to subject action to thaught, meaning that the thought is equivalent if not more important than action. Does this suddenly mean that saving someone froma  fire is wrong because I do it for publicity? According to you, yes it is. According to me, no its not. The action matters, the thought not really. I can import millions of migrants because "my fee fees! Oh these morality tokens look how many I have!" This however is not okay because it is literally human trafficking and denying the host country a right to exist. Not to mention treating humans, people, as literal tokens of morality, objects, nothing more. While totally devalueing what a native people are, as without value. <br><br>Your ideology has led to massive rise of rape, murder, terrorism, and social division in the west. So you are right it is tried and tested, it keeps the third world a third world, and disparages native people. You thankfully openly admit how genocidal it is, only that the people it is removing from the face of the earth arent your morality tokens so you dont particularly care, now do you. The times are changing and nationalism is rising in literally almot every country, globalism is already a failed project. The future is traditionalist, because all the lefites will simply die out replaced by traditionalists of all colors and creeds. Islamist, Christian, budhhist, pagan, etc. Globalis, is an immoral ideology, akin to stalins and hitlers views on humanity from where it gets its roots. Only this time with a rainbow flag rather than a swastika or hammer and sickle. <br><br>sorry bucko but the gulag isnt the future, your arguments have run their course and the world is changing for the better. you are literally a dying breed because you are both intellectually and physically sterile. In the end the islamist doesnt need guns to beat you, he will simply outbreed you, and so will I. The trends aint changing any time soon either. And unlike your fantasy, my reality truimphs.,(reply>), @Boguslav You can make law that benefits the minority and will result in a benefit to the majority. You outright denying that is suprising. In economics look no further than pareto improvement. Or how any mainstream economist agrees that immigration leads to a net benefit for the country's economy.<br><br>Not all forms of discrimination is bad. Save children before adults, pregnant women should be a priority on a sinking ship. Sicker people deserve priority treatment. Family over strangers. However discriminating a group of strangers based off their race gender or sexuality is inherently wrong. All these strangers are theoretically equal and by dismissing some of them based off factors they can't control is outright wrong. There are even cases of racial discrimination which would be ok. Its all about what the end-goal is. <br><br>People have a right to work if they are citizens within your country irrespective of their past generations. Nationalist especially ethnic nationalist seem very hung up on their ancestors achievements (maybe because they themselves are unable to achieve anything of note) maybe its time to do something yourself.<br><br>Regarding your rhetorical questions at the end. Half of them appear to be strawmen. I never said nations or societies can't exist. I also didn't say people can't discriminate. What makes you say someone wouldn't have a right to assimilate into another culture?<br><br>I don't understand how my ideology is destructive, its pretty tried and tested at this point. Most of western Europe is like this and they are literally some of the highest performing countries in many social indices. I'd say your nationalist ideology has historically been more damaging than you realize. The times are changing and globalism is the future whether you like it or not.,(reply>), @Liszt Dylan There is no majority or minority class, there is the majority and the minority. We cannot form rules around minorities without putting down the majority some group has to dominate society. And notice how this has changed, the majority of society ergo the nrom wants ahrrasment outlawed in the workplace, ergo harrassment in general goes away. Not focused laws like you propose, this is the difference between a majority focused law and a minority focused law. One produces a functional law that protects often times all, at other times some. <br><br>Why is discrimination bad? The nation has a right to insularity and to define itself etc. Families require discrimination, not everyone is family and we have a right to treat our mother better than a stranger. We have a right, bah, a duty to save our child before we save a stranger. We have a right to a nation and a duty to it. Friend groups are also heavily discriminatory. Morality necessitates we discriminate, there is literally no system where discrimination is not a function of that system. It is not only a fundumental fucntion but a right. And it doesnt need to be calculated with "how many chickens can you make by not discriminating or discriminating" a moral right is a right irrespective of "amount of chickens made". I dont think I need to explain that your own mother is worth by the fact that she is your mother, more than a stranger, or me. <br><br>people have a right to work if that work is within their homeland, they have priority. There is no such thing as unfair barrier to work say outside your homeland, since that is not your institution. If you wish to be an outlier in society you have to live with the consequences of that society simply wanting to have its own norms and exist. Pathological individuals such as alcoholics are regularly excluded from work. Much like mentally ill individuals. <br><br>im sorry but you dont have a leg to stand on you use vague terms to mask a complete lack of substance behind the argument. Why do people not deserve to have the right of discrimination, to self definition? Why is it right to deny societies the right to define themselves and the norms according to the universal moral good? Why do nations not have a right to exist, much less societies, because someone with no right to that institution wants access? Your philosophy is more destructive than you could ever realize.