Here goes nothing into the internet:<br>1. I am an Anesthesiologist. The hypothesis pertaining to his view that intelligence is related to the amount of anesthesia, is absolute garbage. This is the problem with "intellectuals" exiting their field of domain knowledge and trying to enter the world of biology. The amount of anesthesia reaching your brain depends on how well your liver and kidneys function. The liver is very much responsible for breaking down anesthetics even before it hits your brain, so opening up a book about anesthesia and thinking that drug dose and weight are correlated is FALSE. You could have two 28 year old twins that weigh the same but, one is an alcoholic and the other never drinked a drop of alcohol, the liver of the abuser will get used to drugs/alcohol and will ALSO break down anesthetics FASTER, thus the drug user will always need more anesthetics. This does not mean he is more "intelligent". This is the average patient.<br>2. He stated that his Anesthesia "friend" told him there are NO records of anesthesia doses about anesthetics that patients received. This is also FALSE. It's ILLEGAL to apply anesthesia and not document the doses. So I'm not sure at what hospital his "friend" worked in. <br>3. I am not only an Anesthesiologist with 10 years of clinical experience, but also an Engineer. One thing that I know is TRUE is that Engineering fields or Biochem fields are very precise, but psychology is based on hypotheses, not theories(please read about the difference of scientific Hypothesis, Theory and Law). As much as a Psychology Prof wants to believe that they are working in the theoretical world, its FALSE. Psychology, unlike Engineering, Mathematics or Biochemistry still is a HYPOTHETICAL form of view and interpretation. His abysmal knowledge of medicine, biology and genetics is reflected by this interview, he has no clue about Biology/Genetics.<br>4. Every doctor is a specialist when it comes to the human race, the homo sapiens. We are not like veterinarians who specialize in different animal species, we specialize in Humans, OUR biology. The human race is one species, the other "races" died out, another dead race example is the "Neanderthals". <br>5. Difference in IQ is correlated with economic well being. In 1850s Europe the Irish and the Polish were considered "subhuman" because they had a very low average IQ compared to Germans or the French. Ireland and Poland now have a higher GDP, ther general IQ is also a LOT higher than in 1850's. So saying Blacks, Arabs or Latinos are genetically "inferior" because of IQ scores is nonsense. UKRAINIANS today have lower IQ scores on average than Swedes, does that mean Eastern Europeans are dumber? NO! It's the economy! An average salary of 800 dollars a moth in Ukraine means you go to work as a child, leave school and harvest crops for the Family.  Nigerians have lower IQ scores than Singaporeans, so are they inferior? <br>More money means more time means more knowledge, not the other way around!