The sad truth people need to realize is, even though it's good to shine a light on and destroy practices like this, as long as someone wants something bad enough, they'll do what they can to get it. <br><br>So weither its TikTok, Amazon or Google today, it will just be somewhere else tomorrow.,(reply>), @Richard Harlos oh i havent seen the other commenty, my bad,(reply>), @Talleyrand wrote, <i>"its just a neutral statement..."</i><br><br>It's a tautology: true by definition, and universal in scope. When people offer a tautology, it doesn't impart anything new or insightful. In this case, saying 'people will always find a way to do what they're intent on doing' doesn't convey anything new. And, it doesn't apply only to pedo, but to everything under the sun. So, when a tautology is introduced with the notion that 'people need to know', it has the appearance that something unknown is going to follow that introduction. But I think it's safe to say that most people already realize that we don't live in a utopia, and that bad people will always find a way to do bad things, regardless the laws that prohibit bad things.<br><br><i>"seority doesn't say that it means that one should not fight them. correct me if in wrong @Seority"</i><br><br>I didn't say that seority said that, though. And, seority already answered my request for clarification yesterday so... I'm unclear on the intention of your reply to me: do you  imagine that your reply has elaborated some aspect of my conversation with seority that they didn't already address?,(reply>), @Richard Harlos no? its just a neutral statement saying that pedos will always find a way to share their stuff. thats just true, seority doesn't say that it means that one should not fight them. correct me if in wrong @Seority,(reply>), @Seority wrote, <i>"...let's not think it's possible to completely eradicate it."</i><br><br>I don't think that's the premise of the video's narrative, so your statement doesn't appear to me to be <i>contextually relevant</i> to the video.<br><br>When we counter a point that another has <b>not</b> made, we're not countering the other's view -- we're countering a strawman of that other's view. This is true whether our strawman was intentional or accidental. I guess I'm trying to find the point at which your earlier comment, and this one, actually fit into what the video <b>did</b> say.,(reply>), @Richard Harlos Its not a fruitless endeavor to stop evil from happening, but let's not think it's possible to completely eradicate it. <br><br>Best form of prevention is to put as many steps as possible between the do'er and the deed.