censorship wouldnt be necessary if the platform was standing on solid ground to begin with.<br><br>never has censorship EVER helped anyone, EVER. censorship is the precursor to tyrrany, its a 100% guarantee, proven by multiple millenia of human history.,(reply>), Colvian Nemori If the name of a movement you belong to is synonymous with racism and is nearly universally hated, it may be time to look back at what you did wrong (assuming I read the comment correctly and you mean to say you currently consider yourself far right/alt right.),(reply>), Colvian Nemori First, just because something “has always been this way,” doesn’t mean it should stay that way.  I would argue that the suffering prevented by opening our borders more than the (rather pitiful,) amount we do now greatly outweighs the fairly negligible negative consequences.  <br><br>Also, I would like a citation for the claim that homogenous cultures are more stable.  That said, I don’t expect you to be able to provide more than a correlation as opposed to a causation, as almost all stability comes from government intervention, geographical location and historical period rather than homogeny.<br><br>I would also caution you on delving into any rabbitholes while attempting to find such citation, as you appear to be well on your way to being in the Alt-Right, or at least far right.,(reply>), sygo And? It’s still a private company.,(reply>), @Nihilistic Space Lizard Youtube is completely by Google. Google bought out Youtube completely. Notice youtube's worst policy changes happened after the buyout.,(reply>), David Smith Also, you realize that the immigration act of ‘65 amended the immigration act of ‘24, right?  1924 was a pretty inherently racist time, and that act wasn’t any different.  The express purpose was “to preserve the ideal of  American homogeny,” in reference to allowing only Africans and North Europeans on the premise the races wouldn’t intermingle.  Additionally, the only people who really opposed the act of ‘65 were Southern politicians who thought it wasn’t racist enough.  You’re trying to argue with the wrong side of the Civil Rights Movement 50 years after it happened, and it is not a good look.