This is very akin to python using a for loop to iterate through a list of objects directly. <br><br>Like "for people in class" as apposed to <br><br>"for i in range(0, len(class)):<br> class[i]",(reply>), @Alexander Krneta yeah I don't think we disagree lmao,(reply>), @EvilTaco I agree with you? I'm sorry but I don't understand where I disagreed? I was trying to say that Python's implementation of := feels a lot like their implementation of what we are talking about. Its just.. nice? Its simple, and makes sense. I, for the longest time didnt quite understand the "for person in people" because I grew so used to the other method. But when I realized what it was doing, there was just a "ahaa" moment. And that is the feeling I am getting from this new operator.,(reply>), @Alexander Krneta well it's not about the example, I just mean looping through each element in the list is easier than doing range(len(list)),(reply>), @EvilTaco I bad, it of course would depend, but I meant for each person in a college class. But yeah. For animal in zoo,(reply>), yes and wouldn't you say "for person in people" is a lot simpler than the other alternative?