On one hand, Paul argues that politics are the main drive for a dysfunctional economy vs automation and I think its a fair assessment currently. <br><br>However when arguing against something like UBI, he says we should instead enhance our current programs. So basically it comes down to fixing politics so we can enhance our programs. This is where he contradicts himself because we are so divided on complex programs where as UBI is easy to understand and the universality/opt-in makes it more passable.