Please get someone like Nassim Taleb on as a counterweight - who is equally painful to listen to for anyone sympathetic to Krugman's point of view. Asking your audience to listen and endure a guy like Krugman for an hour is asking a lot. This is the problem with wading into the social sciences territory - everything is bound to get political as it builds on assumptions about human nature - which polarizes just about everything and anybody.,(reply>), ​@Jimmy Baker The assumptions are politicized and both sides will deride any attack on their assumption as pseudoscience.<br><br><br>For example: the blank slatism of the left vs the hereditary human differences of the right. The belief of historical moral progress of the left vs the conservative belief in a fundamentally flawed human nature.,(reply>), Would love to see you talk to quants and practical mathematicians who use(d) ML actively to play markets like Jim Simons or direct large institutions via advanced business intelligence like Alex Karp - inkeeping with the AI perspective of your podcast.,(reply>), @Lex Fridman Thanks.,(reply>), I'll definitely talk to Nassim Taleb. I'm trying to learn how to have conversations like this. I think I'm realizing that my role is to represent the best counter-arguments in these conversations as opposed to just letting the opinion stand. I'm working hard to improve, it's a learning process.