Here's an excerpt from one of Omar Suleiman's article:<br>... Insulting the Prophet almost always signals that a country is attempting to exert dominance over Muslims, either their homegrown minorities or neighbors abroad. When France uses the insult of the Prophet as the marquee issue of freedom of speech, it simultaneously engages in all sorts of repression against the Muslim community that set a chilling tone for the rest of Europe. .... <br><br>So this man thinks that an act of individual 'non-muslim' citizen of a 'non-muslim' country that is perceived negatively by islamic community is an act of aggression of a whole country against the islamic community? It's very interesting because this line of reasoning can be easily used to justify j1h 4dist activity, because in islam you aren't justified in waging war, unless it's in defense or retaliation for aggression. He wants western laws to bow down to his community's special needs, if we don't want them to see us as being at war with muslims and islam.,(reply>), ​@TheGamingAlong This is interesting because i just came from turkish language video about "swedish police allowing burning of quran in front of turkish embassy", which and people there are calling it a "Casus Belli". <br><br>As for the word Jihad - in the section called 'Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)' of  'Sahih al Bukhari' i think it's pretty clear that it's not psychological strife that is being talked about. Are you going to tell me that most muslims do not hold respect for Sahih al Bukhari <br><br>"The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."  Like, come on, it doesn't sound like a call for meditation practice (i could be wrong).<br><br>Also, Sunan Abi Dawud - Jihad (Kitab Al-Jihad), is clearly talking about war as well. I don't understand why you are trying to deceive me with this...,(reply>), just wanted to point out that taking an excerpt from an article out of context can skew the meaning and intent. The article is discussing the impact of freedom of speech on marginalized communities, not advocating for aggression towards non-Muslims. It's important to understand the context and not make assumptions about the author's intentions. Also, just to clarify, the concept of 'jihad' in Islam is about personal and spiritual struggle, not about physical aggression towards others