I find it interesting that the filter is intentionally designed to exaggerate the appearance of VHS and also make it look damaged based on people's idea of what VHS <b>should</b> look like.,(reply>), REMEMBER that most 1960s to Mid-90s TV shows were recorded or stored on analog tape (Umatic, Betamax, VHS, Betacam, S-VHS).  When released for sale to customers, they don’t look anywhere as bad as this VHS tape filter<br><br>.,(reply>), @Michael Zaite That's because tapes deteriorate over time. That doesn't mean the recording always looked that bad, just that one left in normal/meh conditions for decades has damage- big surprise there. It's not really 90's/nostalgic if it's ' badly aged stuff 20-30 years old' and not really original to the experience/look that it had in the 90s. It's like being nostalgic for a 70's muscle car.. but one in 1989 that wasn't maintained/taken care of, left outside to rust and barely starts anymore... instead of being nostalgic for the actual, original 'as-newish' car in good condition.,(reply>), @Brian Tristam Williams Sure a FRESH tape. Your average now 10-20 year old VHS copy of something you recorded off broadcast tv or a crappy camcorder. Not so much. The link I posted is Actual pulled from a VHS tape garbage I made as a kid.,(reply>), @Michael Zaite No it isn't, silly. They've intentionally added damage and that is GuyNamedSean's point. Actual VHS is far better than what these n00bs want it to look like.,(reply>), @GuyNamedSean this