Tom. VHS wasnt in 60 frames per second though.,(reply>), There is no separation between "modern" and "old". All analog media ran in 50 or 60 fps depending on the standard, even in the 1960s.,(reply>), @Eating Rainbows Gaming Remember that analog TV and their related technologies (VHS for example) are interlaced and not progressive. That means one single frame actually contains the information of two, so you need to deinterlace on progressive screens in order to double the framerate. CRTs do it naturally.,(reply>)," @Vicente “vichoste” Calderón From Wikipedia about the VHS signal standards: (listed in the form of standard/lines/frames):<br><br>SECAM/625/25 (SECAM"," French variety)<br>MESECAM/625/25 (most other SECAM countries"," notably the former Soviet Union and Middle East)<br>NTSC/525/30 (Most parts of Americas", Japan," South Korea)<br>PAL/525/30 (i.e.", PAL-M," Brazil)<br>PAL/625/25 (most of Western Europe", Australia, New Zealand, many parts of Asia such as China and India, some parts of South America such as Argentina, Uruguay and the Falklands, and Africa),(reply>), @Vicente “vichoste” Calderón Weird, because when I look it up it is 29.97 fps for NTSC VHS and 25 fps for PAL Modern NTSC is 59.94 and modern PAL is 60 fps. However I was talking about VHS tapes which ran at half the modern standard.,(reply>), Yes, it was, on NTSC standard. PAL is 50 fps.