Even the day after listening to this exchange, I am still wondering what role “self sabotage” takes in this? Is that what confounds AI with “free will”? Is she so concerned about keeping psychological balance and “happiness” due to the tendency to “self sabotage” being amplified with “unhappiness”? For example, if tying to build a perfect favorable and adequate environment for a “human to thrive”, would AI not understand human actions that result in “detrimental to the overall system”. <br>Like, is that a thing? Unhappy humans not thriving in a system that is created for the purpose of physically healthy specimen?  Is “free will” just essentially the ability to perform an action that is detrimental? <br>Hence the phase,<br> “To Err is Human” lol..                    .   😒🙃🤔