I think we need to develop graphene batteries before we truly dive into truly  “clean” power. Also you can use pollution ( or a part of pollution aka carbon) to create graphene.<br><br>Issue is, graphene is ridiculously hard and slow to create, so we need to figure that out first.,(reply>), @Chris G Concepts and prototypes of the batteries and capacitors exist, i would link an article, but when I did that last time my comment got deleted for using a link.,(reply>), Concepts for a graphene battery don't even exist yet. Stop praying for a technological breakthrough to save humanity and instead look at what we can achieve with existing tech.,(reply>), @LPSoldin It’s not economically feasible with current technology, hopefully with further research it can be, but that’s only a hope. But  if it isn’t able to be made into a weapon, I doubt the U.S. govt would bother funding further research 🙄.,(reply>), @LPSoldin Carbon and CO2 are NOT a pollutant, that is a myth the climate nazis have put out.  If you want a carbon based pollutant then you need carbon monoxide which is.  If you do not like the amount of carbon in the environment, plant a tree.,(reply>), I've talked about it before about how we could trap pollution from generator use or manufacturing and refine it as graphene (as the majority of polluted air is Carbon and CO2.)<br><br>The issue is that it's just not economically feasible. It's a lot of effort and resources for very little output.<br><br>And yet we somehow live in a world where some places were willing to push the idea of selling expensive masks to farmers and expecting them to hassle with them to trap Cow Burps to reduce methane emissions and potentially concentrate them for fuel... despite that being even more wasteful of time and resources than trying to collect carbon emissions from industry.