I feel the entire premise, as well as his explanations of how/why, we should look to AI for more answers is totally flawed.  The hubris of man, especially science, knows no bounds. It makes no sense to use AI to solve things without said AI also being able to aid in understanding.  All that does is magnify the weaknesses already built into our brains, which is too much processing power not enough refinement to have deep understanding of the overarching systems and their transference.  To use AI to give us info does nothing to temper us using that Info despite the lack of deep understanding, and that my friends is dangerous.  It's akin to giving a kid a loaded gun and no other info about it, and just saying here use this, it protects and provides food.  That kid has no context and therefore is more likely to use the info and device wrong and cause unintentional harm.  It's a bad idea to try and reverse engineer knowledge given by AI because humans cannot help themselves and will eventually experiment with and apply their newly acquired knowledge in dangerous ways.  Why?  Because very human things like capitalism of private industry and power of government will influence science.  We will continue to create with this new knowledge what we always create.  More devastating weapons and means of controlling ppl.  I'll pass.<br>Idk why scientists are a all so short sighted and idealistic.  They choose to never look beyond their meager role in all this.  They never look downstream and see what their ideas and inventions become.  To me science is greatly flawed due to human factors because what science is used for is a far cry from what drives it and the reasoning of the ppl using science to create things.  <br>This is why the Dao is important to understand.  Action is dangerous, the more we put into this world the more chaos and transference there will be.  You cannot ever invent something that will be just for good because the universe doesn't work that way, that is a human concept.