Love the interview, a lot of good points, but how was the US going to set up a university, help women, etc from the outside. We could barely do it from the inside.,(reply>), @Adam Beiter I wasn't really suggesting huge amounts of aid.  Just suggesting that to improve womens lives, its not an ideological war you have to win more just certain material conditions have to be met before women will improve their own lives.,(reply>), @Flyer I think you are taking my comment out of proportion a little.  I mean the gains women made in the early half of the 20th century in Europe and not Twitter feminists in the 21st Century.,(reply>), @Peter Hardie So we just hand over pallets of money and hope everything works out in 50 years? I'm no expert on game theory but I don't see that working out. We were in country and couldn't keep track of all the money we sent. Good theory though,(reply>), @Peter Hardie most of the “developed” world’s women aren’t feminists,a testament to the fact that feminism doesn’t follow the tractor.<br>And women are increasingly distancing themselves from this movement these days。<br>Thanks.,(reply>), You help the material conditions. Then the changes will happen by themselves.  There is a saying 'feminism follows the tractor'  meaning that when women aren't doing 15 hrs of unpaid labour every day, they become feminists.