Taking a 30% cut on in app purchases is not a “monopoly” you are utilizing there store to sell your item and agree to the terms before listing your software... in top of the fact apple is not the only App Store and doesn’t even have the majority market share in the world apple, google, steam, ps store, Xbox, etc, etc , etc this lawsuit is bogus not to mention the epic games store being no better lol and on top of all this they are relying on the argument that Spotify used of this being “anti-competitive” but unlike Spotify v. Apple Music, apple does not have a first party competitor to fortnite,(reply>), BrettHanaNoah you have many good points but in the eye of the goverment they just see apple has a product that competes with Spotify and so if apple is charging them 30% to be on the store but they can be on there own store for free they see it as anti-competitive but you have fair points that i agree with,(reply>), Even Spotify has not leg to stand on. They pay nothing on the free app and also you can signup through their website to bypass Apple. Also Spotify cries poor and calls Apple anti competitive but then brags about their numbers and how many more subscribers they have than Apple. Devs have made plenty of money out of Apple and do not seem to realise Apple has to pay for employees to run the store and hardware and software to maintain it. If there was no store Devs would have to supply and provide all this themselves.,(reply>), Exactly. Finally someone gets it