TAKBIR!!!:Sorry, nice guy I guess, but for non-Muslims who know the basics on Islam &amp; can engage in the “dialectic” this was “3hrs” of soft-dawa &amp; faux-ecumenism: soft-dawa bcuz (not limited to)  over emphasizing the CHRISTIAN Palestinians while NOT talking about this population voting with their feet after the continued Islamist rise  after every Intifada, discrimination by Muslim Palestinian institutions in  🇵🇸 &amp; the interesting lack of CHRISTIAN 🇵🇸 SUICIDE BOMBERS &amp; JIHADIS. This dynamic is independent of 🇮🇱 (I’m not a uncritical supporter of that country however). <br><br>Soft “dawa” #2 about how the imam doesn’t speak on the specific anti-jew suras: or the hadith/quran/jurisprudence structural uniqueness of Islam today that is problematic when it exists within modernity. This is very similar to the Talmud:Torah split  in pre-Reform Judaism. <br><br>FAUX-ECUMENISM: bcuz the imam would only interface on “his terms” meaning he would never stand in prayer if it was lead by a Jew  (yahoodi) and only a Jewish act. <br><br>I’m not categorically against Islam but I am not naive &amp; people lacking basic points of debate &amp; critique of Islam may leave this podcast feeling warm &amp; fuzzy and misled. That is intent of dawa &amp; the intent of this guest. <br><br>Godwilling we will have a greater podcast on this topic.,(reply>), I find it fairly unfair that podcasts can be 'warm and fuzzy' when it comes to other religions without people getting upset while there is tremendous tyranny made by nations of other Abrahamic (and other) religions.<br><br>I do think people that speak as some sort of 'representative' of a religion should have some level of challenging questions but it should be across the board to all; not just Muslims.,(reply>), Thanks for your comment. Reach out, I've got something to introduce you to!!!👆