False, black holes from which light cannot escape do not exist nor are compatible with empirically observed laws of nature in our universe. There is no infinite mass-density paradox and there also is no information loss paradox, both are a hoax. To cite Stephen Hawking on this topic from the Event Horizon Wikipedia page's top paragraph:<br><br>One of the leading developers of theories to describe black holes, Stephen Hawking, suggested that an apparent horizon should be used instead of an event horizon, saying, "gravitational collapse produces apparent horizons but no event horizons." He eventually concluded that "the absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes – in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity."[2][3]<br><br>Any object approaching the horizon from the observer's side appears to slow down, never quite crossing the horizon.[4] Due to gravitational redshift, its image reddens over time as the object moves away from the observer.[5] <br><br>[2] Hawking, Stephen W. (2014). "Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes". arXiv:1401.5761v1 [hep-th].<br>[3] Curiel, Erik (2019). "The many definitions of a black hole". Nature Astronomy. 3: 27–34. arXiv:1808.01507. Bibcode:2019NatAs...3...27C. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0602-1. S2CID 119080734.<br>[4] Chaisson, Eric J. (1990). Relatively Speaking: Relativity, Black Holes, and the Fate of the Universe. W. W. Norton &amp; Company. p. 213. ISBN 978-0393306750.<br>[5] Bennett, Jeffrey; Donahue, Megan; Schneider, Nicholas; Voit, G. Mark (2014). The Cosmic Perspective. Pearson Education. p. 156. ISBN 978-0-134-05906-8.<br><br>Some reasons for why nothing may ever in finite time pass an event horizon would be that if it happened, then as past it, the escape speed is beyond the speed of light, it couldn't act on the outside anymore. And the cosmic expansion were to not help in this case either (besides then just implying the true event horizon were further inwards anyway), as it doesn't shorten but lengthen the travel distance. Though empirical observations show that clearly, quasars hold onto galaxies quite well, and even if gravity were exempt from the speed of light limit, a black hole's charge is not. Furthermore, gravitative time dilation seems to diverge towards +infinity at the event horizon, so nothing should in finite time pass it but have time slowed down arbitrarily much preventing it from doing that. And a 3rd reason would seem to be that no outside observer can ever see anything pass an event horizon in finite time. And so if something were to pass it, and at that point in space-time then not be able anymore to affect the outside, growing a sphere there at speed of light should cover any observer in finite time, where the growing sphere were to resemble the in time growing region for which the object that passed the event horizon should've disappeared.,(reply>), <b>Tell lex I referred you to him,,⤴️for a business investment degree that will change your financial life.. 🎉</b>