Bothered me when Lex was saying that humans have evolved to drive he meant in terms of learning to process and deeply understand the context of our environment. Jim Keller cut him off and made a joke about how humans have been driving cars in the prehistoric. I respect Jim but cmon. <br><br>Sure machine learning is getting better at learning and completing tasks... But is it understanding? From what I understand the underlying maths results in associations and geometric relationships between contextual objects but between all this data there doesn't seem to be understanding and learning in the same way that humans learn. The fact that humans can decide on what they want to learn is amazing in itself. Noone has to sit us down and force us to have a reward mechanism (although to a degree it helps). What is consciousness? And will we ever produce computers sophisticated and fast enough to process and contextualize information like humans? I personally don't think they'll be computers in the sense that we have now.