Talking about self regulation as if that's a viable option when you know who runs the ESA. You always need an independent, non 'private fundable' body to regulate in order to avoid blatant corruption.<br>Then your remark about how there's an argument to be had around the economics of investors needing increased profits each year?? What argument??? YOU CANNOT KEEP MAKING INCREASING PROFIT INDEFINITELY! End of. No argument to be had, that's just an obvious fact due to money not being infinite. Of course it's bloody unethical to increasingly look for ways to bleed more and more out of your consumers without giving them a substantial increase in quality for their money. Chop shopping games to sell off the parts as 'extras' will never have a leg to stand on in terms of ethics.<br>Bit disappointed in you UEG,(reply>), Frankly, I was always taught that the point of business was to make a profit, in general. If it costs X million to make and distribute Y game and it goes on to make Z million at retail... So long as Z is &gt; X... Is that not successful? Is that not how economics works? I am legitimately thoroughly confused