I'll still keep using Firefox, it's actually insane that chromium controls ~70% of internet browsing and a change in it affects basically everyone. Having independence is important, allowing single project to be that big is never good for healthy competition. Not to mention just how much private Firefox browser is when compared to Chrome or other of those mentioned browsers.,(reply>), @Weta partially, but they just live from Google's money they get by keeping Google default search engine, google doesn't directly control them, and they sadly don't have much of a choice since Mozilla needs some income to pay for the developers to keep the project up to date, patch vulnerabilities and bugs and even just improve the software.<br><br>It is however inarguable that it's a better choice than chrome,(reply>), @RavenThePlayer well that's partially true,but unless you want to completely give up convenience and go with something like GNU Icecat browser, Firefox is pretty much the best option for now,(reply>), @RyhanZFX that doesn't mean it's private, I can open-source a software with tons of telemetry, that's why we call software that's actually privacy respecting free and open source, where free isn't referring to the price, but to freedom that the app gives you. And sure, pure chromium may not have that many trackers, but just things like auto translation relies on google translate, therefore it sends all data back to google anyway, not to mention default search engine and the need for Google's API tokens for some things.<br><br><br>But nevertheless even for free and open software, monopolies are never a good thing competition is needed so that projects are forced to be improved constantly , not to mention most projects using chromium are then closed and have their trackers added too.,(reply>), @RavenThePlayer hey, no fake news here please!,(reply>), I agreed for a bit, but they are mad pro-censorship so if there’s a hero here it’s not Mozilla. Someone more honest and freedom oriented needs to come up.