"- <a href=""https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Days_in_Fallujah"">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Days_in_Fallujah</a><br>You definitely hit some critical points to make people think. I like that. Whenever I see something that even hints at extreme", is when I need to learn more about it. Especially today when CLICKS are so important. Extremism is usually what draws these clicks or views. We've all seen click-bait right?  Im not saying you did that UEG to be clear, but you know many others do.<br> All the different things Ive heard about video games growing up... I remember when it was 1st thought to be a fad in the late 70s, early 80s. Then video games will rot your brain, and since politics has gotten involved," it creates delinquents and the cause of violence. Politics itself is a game and they the use a subject that is hot at the moment as their talking point. Im actually shocked how long video games has been a focus in politics and research. The biggest problem here is majority of people would rather just believe the few things they know (or were told) about a particular subject than to actually learn more about it through research. We have information at our fingertips now and most of it is just told to us instead of using the technology in front of us to learn more. I wouldnt be surprised if this game is under prying eyes by specific people in the government because it is a game based on military tactics. War is dirty and the tactics we use isnt exactly what any government want their people to know.  How can they convince their people they are the good guys by telling them the horrible things they did that war requires?<br>This game is on a very specific encounter and not just a generalization about war. Plus this plays into foreign relations which both sides believe they are the good guys right? There isnt a country in the world that has went into war believing they were the bad guys.<br>Here is something to read if you have the time from 2009<br>The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming<br>  -  <a href=""https://scienceimpact.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/The%20Gaming%20of%20Policy%20and%20the%20Politics%20of%20Gaming.pdf"">https://scienceimpact.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/The%20Gaming%20of%20Policy%20and%20the%20Politics%20of%20Gaming.pdf</a><br>and another good video from you Upper Echelon about politics and gaming<br>  -  <a href=""https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-iWOYK1Od8&amp;ab_channel=UpperEchelonGamers"">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-iWOYK1Od8&amp;ab_channel=UpperEchelonGamers</a><br>1994 Senate Committee Hearings on Violence In Video Games<br>  -  <a href=""https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYC-UVu4rj8&amp;ab_channel=K.Huntington"">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYC-UVu4rj8&amp;ab_channel=K.Huntington</a><br>Are video games linked to real world violence? FOX NEW 2018 saying a killer trained himself on video games. YES OBSURD to think you can train to kill in a game.<br>  -  <a href=""https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29EN9Anic9Q&amp;ab_channel=FoxNews"">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29EN9Anic9Q&amp;ab_channel=FoxNews</a><br>If something is getting a lot of attention", politics will surely be close behind if it wasnt already involved. I can only suggest people to do more research on this topic that involve politics behind the scenes and the news that do not make it on primetime television. Never just take the word of 1 person and always learn more from multiple sources. If there are discrepancies between sources, then find out why by digging in more. There is usually sources from the Government or a University. It doesnt mean it will always be right," but it will be passed off as it is. Remember when smoking was endorsed? <br>Reflections: Smoke ’em if you got ’em   ARMY HISTORY ORG<br>  -  <a href=""https://armyhistory.org/reflections-smoke-em-if-you-got-em/"">https://armyhistory.org/reflections-smoke-em-if-you-got-em/</a><br>When Doctors", and Even Santa," Endorsed Tobacco   NEW YORK TIMES<br>  -  <a href=""https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/media/07adco.html"">https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/media/07adco.html</a><br>Whats the connection here? Politics. Everything is OK until it gets a lot of attention and politics gets involved", then fingers need to be pointed at something. Im not saying smoking is good, but at 1 time it was thought to be good. It was thought to be "COOL". We know now none of that is good or cool but before it didnt even matter.<br>If this game is considered "SENSITIVE" by the government, i wouldnt be surprised it has the attention of somebody that might want to stop it. This game was actually supposed to be released in 2010. There is probably more behind why it hasnt than we realize. Maybe it was just too fresh in the memories of people who have lost someone due to that conflict. Then again, maybe it will always be fresh in their memories. Being someone who is familiar with PTSD, those soldiers that dedicated their time to this game have nerves of steel.