At what point in the talk does he provide sufficient testable evidence to support his claim that a god exists? Timestamp for that?,(reply>), May be he doesn't give such evidence, but I will give you one personal testable evidence: <br>Imagine your beginning, from where it originated? No doubt you can do that and come up with some sensible answer. <br>Now imagine the universe and its origination, what sensible answer do you come up with ? <br>You must come up with something and you must give it some definitions. One of these definitions must be the "originator of the universe" <br>Is there any doubt in the originator of the universe ? <br>Now try to add more definitions, what can you come up with from what you observe in the universe ? <br>Can you observe beauty, order, magnificence, grandeur, complexity, microscopy, multiplicity, intelligence, structure in this universe ? So these qualia in the universe must be taken into account when you add more definitions to the originator. <br>You can carry on and on with observations and add more and more definitions until you exhaust your observations and your self generated definitions. Others can do the same and some of these definitions will be common to yours and some will be different. <br>But you and others will still have a limited set of definitions no matter how many of you try. <br>So how can we know more about the originator of the universe ?  <br>Well, perhaps it is obvious that the originator knows more about himself than the sum of all humans that ever existed or would exist in the future, as there is always a limit to all human observations and definitions; and may be many of these observations and definitions are either incomplete or inaccurate in the detail (the developing sciences give us good reason to conclude this). <br>So can we expect the originator to offer us more accurate definitions about who he is, from any of the definitions that we as humans have generated through our observations in the universe ? <br>Perhaps the observation of intelligence in the universe, at a minimum a human communicating intelligence, would lead us to justify the definition of "communicator" to the intelligent originator. <br>If this definition is possibly accurate then where would we expect to observe such communication ? <br>Perhaps somewhere in the fabric of the universe ? Somewhere in life ? Somewhere in a genetic code ? Somewhere in the complex communications within a cell, somewhere in the communications between cells, tissues, organs and nervous systems. Perhaps even in the communications between entangled particles and betwen every other particle in the universe. And we can build up a complex system of communications throughout the universe. Some of it known to us and some of it is still unknown waiting to be uncovered with further scientific research into the making of the universe. <br>Doesn't it feel to you that the equations that humans have managed to discover, that model to a close degree a useful description of the universe, somehow communicate a map for the universe to follow on its journey in time ?,(reply>), <b>ᴛhαnks fσr wαtchíng..</b><br><b>mαkє α nσtє tσ Mason Watson вч tєхtíng hím чσu whєrє rєfєrrєd вч mє чσu’ll вє guídєd rєgαrdíng crчptσ ínvєstmєnt вtc/єth skílls………..±𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟑𝟗𝟕𝟎𝟎𝟑𝟐𝟔</b><br>✍️ ᵒⁿ ʷʰᵃᵗˢᵃᵖᵖ<br><br><b>lєt hím knσw í sєnt чσu💯....…</b>