Hey Eschelon, I'd like to know ... how exactly do you feel about far right ideals? Not just someone's right to express those beliefs, but your actual beliefs about the alt-right?,(reply>), @Kudz ok, i see what you meant now, but when i said that it wouldn't be career-ending, i was trying to say that the fines weren't too bad overall and that alex jones would still be able to keep his website and revenue alive. but yeah, him returning to mainstream platforms (like facebook, twitter and youtube) isn't happening any time soon outside of a few video interviews with other youtubers.,(reply>), @Rapechamp basically what I'm saying is the court didn't find that he committed a crime or contributed to a criminal act but his constant misinformation set up these families to be harassed by his viewer base. So basically he gave his viewers ammo and where to point with the idea that if they watched these people close enough you'd see that their kids are alive. But the decision to go and fire the gun, that being doing the criminal act was solely his viewer's choice. <br><br>On the issue of career-ending I don't think that will help him get back onto most social media platforms. With a ruling like this it puts on notice such companies like Facebook that they could be liable for spreading misinformation that leads to harassment especially if they've had complaints and policy violation reports for years. Which goes back to what I said about him being removed, if they were implicated in discovery someone would have wanted to see all the reporting  that has ever been done on their platform on questionable content and if it was found out that they ignore policy breaking content because they have the highest views then that would be very problematic. Like we suspect that 1) Facebook can't keep up with reports and 2) they leave up what's profitable for them; but that's speculation that won't get much government involvement. But if it's on the record in court that they do such practices then a visit from the FTC would definitely be on the books.,(reply>), ​@Kudz i see. i guess the 100k fine isn't that career-ending for alex jones but i don't really get your analogy or what it's talking about.,(reply>), @Kudz again, the doxxing is the fault of the viewers, not aj. just because alex jones is theorising about sandy hook being staged doesn't mean the victims weren't real or that he is responsible for the retarded viewers to harrass the families in real life, unless aj was calling for that which i highly doubt. the reason he said that he made some things about sandy hook was because a few of the sources he cited turned out to be bogus, just a few. but he decided to completely change his mind about the entire thing which was bad for him in the case and his pr.<br>but i don't have a problem with him apologising for (very) indirectly inspiring that lunatic that bought 2 guns into a pizza chain, it was definitely the best thing he could've done in that situation,(reply>), @Rapechamp I'm confused at how you don't know the Alex Jones Infowars stuff.. Alex Jones didn't  just make comments he spent years accusing Obama of false flag operation and that the parents of the kids killed were in on it. Years. It got so bad that his fans started harassing the family's and doxing them to other infowars fans. If it was an isolated comment I would 100% agree that it was would be a ridiculous lawsuit but since it was years of fake news outrage and him actually  admitting in court that he was making things up underscores why the court case is legitimate.  Also tried this tactic during his family court trial to keep custody of his kids and the judge didn't believe that he was making false and crazy claims as comedy and proceeded to grant sole custody to his ex wife. <br><br>In the Pizzagate thing Alex Jones apologized for promoting the conspiracy after the shooting. Google Alex Jones Apologizes for Pizzagate.