not sure i can deal with paul for an hour but im going to try because you do good work lex. hopefully you push back where appropriate. lets see how it goes...,(reply>), @Lex Fridman I think you did a fine job of striking an appropriate balance.,(reply>), Lex Fridman your doing great lex! would like to see you press a little harder or reword the question when they trail off without a direct answer to your question,(reply>), ​@Lex Fridman Certainly understandable. I think AI isn't usually an adversarial topic (even though opinions on some parts of it vary wildly) so I don't necessarily expect you to rake a guest over the coals. <br><br>I mainly feel as though paul has ducked answering for some of his claims (being invited to debate Andrew Yang specifically) so I was hopeful for a chance to see him pressed on it. <br><br>It can be difficult to facilitate a robust discussion without seeming confrontational.,(reply>), In this conversation on topics of highest disagreement (i.e., effect of automation or role safety nets &amp; UBI), I let the opinion stand, because it IS an opinion and I will talk with many others who have a different opinion. In the future, I will make sure to explore deeper on these topics. I'm sorry if I don't do a good enough job of that here. I'm working hard to improve. I want to balance my natural inclination to be respectful of other people and my role as someone who has to facilitate exploration of difficult ideas.