14 year old here, recently started playing Hell Let Loose, which is my first FPS. Even though I don't back such law, I can sort of get behind the argument of violent video games needing to be regulated especially with minors, but the notion that video games cause all, if any, violence is plain retarded to me. Violent video games do <b><i>not</i></b> cause violence, or at least are not a primary cause of it. I don't get off Hell Let Loose and want to start wearing a Waffen-SS uniform and shooting up my school with an StG44 or MG42, do I?,(reply>), @Kilo39 No, let me clear things up. I don't support that argument, but I can sort of see where people are coming from. Personally I don't know enough about the topic, so I will not be taking any hard and fast stances about it though. I am open to others' interpretations.,(reply>), So since your a minor do you support the government regulating games like Hell Let Loose so you wouldn't be able to play it because of the violence in the game?,(reply>), Allowing the government to regulate art is a slippery slope we don't want to tread towards. That type of introduction to government censorship would affect movies, music, traditional art, etc. <br>The ESRB ratings are there for a reason. If you're child wants an M rated game the parent needs to evaluate why it has an M rating and make a decision.<br>The government does not need to get involved in any way on the creation of video games.