I appreciate the questions you asked him, and his insistence that we review the data and the research ourselves. You raised a very important point about the need to anticipate how various bad actors will misinterpret your findings.,(reply>), @SLAYER huh all the childish rhetoric aside. Ponder this: Civilization started in Africa, 6,000 years ago. It took another 4,000 years for civilization to emerge in Europe. While Africa and the Middle East were already developing all the basis for our modern world, like literature, mathematics, etc. Even the first European civilizations, namely the Greeks, were not Caucasians but Mediterraneans. The same is true for the roman civilization. Only after the fall of Rome, it was, that Germanic tribes began dominating Europe. The first Caucasian empire emerged with the discovery of the Americas through the Spaniards in the 14th century, which is just 600 years ago. Caucasians had world dominance for the first time in the 18th century, which is just 200 years ago. Before that, the world was dominated by everybody but Caucasians. How does that fit with the supposed genetic superiority of Caucasians and the idea that the powerful are genetically gifted in general? I recommend watching the clip:  The History of the World: Every Year – Puts things into perspective.,(reply>), @aexesia Sorry let me dumb this down for you.<br>I have no plans on engaging in a dialectic with you so don't @ me.  I was responding to OP.  Your statements aren't worthy of a response beyond the equivalent of, "go away".  <br>Hope that's clear now, bye.,(reply>), @SLAYER huh you just did. Get help.,(reply>), @aexesia I wasn't talking to you and have no plans on doing so, shoo shoo,(reply>), @SLAYER huh There is no lack of data proving that race is not a biological thing in the first place. There is only lack of data connecting iq differences in  socially constructed race to genetics. The reason is not that there is no research, but all research proves the contrary. This genetic race theory is just as sophisticated as the flat earth theory is. There will always be a lack of data to prove it. But tons of data and common sense disproving it.