Mike really was a uniting autocrat that took a disruptive incentive off the board so that the players could unite against the house. Seems like this is possible anytime a medal leader exists after round 2 (and is smart enough to realize their dominant position).<br><br>Would love to know what this type of stabilizing scenario is called in game theory. Can’t help but feel like this is allegorical for how society needs both a uniting singular force that limits our focus, yet also enough differential incentives between collaboration and competition that competing hurts too much to risk.