This is another reason why I still say that hydrogen FC vehicles are a better option.,(reply>), @Martijn Maas,<br>Did you actually watch those vids? Because if you did you would see that hydrogen is the answer to the aforementioned 'mining emissions' that you say would make nuclear power not a net zero solution. All we would have to do is convert to the use of it. <br><br>I mean you say your not a 'naa sayer' but yet you keep saying 'naa'. You insist that what I say is wrong, and refuse to look at the evidence presented, by bringing up irrelevant things like: "Well are they popular enough?" Who the hell cares if they are or aren't? It's the message that matters. It's what scientific fact they present that matters.,(reply>), @Buck Rodgers Did you actualy red my reactions? I'm not a "naa sayer" here, sofar you only refused to react except by calling statements "incorrect" without decent argumentation and are hiding behind other vide's. Wich are worth watching but did you check their numbers or is just true "coz the interwebz"?<br><br>Keep an open mind. H2 is part of the solution but not the holy grail.,(reply>), @Martijn Maas,<br>Watch those linked vids. Everything I can't explain in text, is explained well enough in those vids. You just want to be a 'naa sayer'. And I'm done with you.,(reply>), @Buck Rodgers Zero emission for nuclear is also not accurate: Mining and construction have to be taken in account as well.<br>"Zero emission" is just the new marketing buzz-phrase. The concept is good but in reality it is often abused.<br>"Low emissions" would be far more acurate.<br><br>If you don't understand the points I was trying to make, fair enough. If you don't even try to give counter arguments, your loss.<br>So in that case I rely on my personal experience in these industries over your unfunded opinion.<br><br>But it's better to agree to disagree before this discussion goes like the intro of one of those video's where the dog turns out to be the smartest.,(reply>), @Martijn Maas,<br>Okay how about ZERO emissions. That's what nuclear power generates. That clean enough for you? If you watch those vids I linked I wouldn't have to tell you this. So watch them. <br><br>The top part of your reply is not even close to accurate so I'm just going to ignore that part.