Very interesting conversation, super relevant discussion.<br><br>1 point I think to note is that not everything that attracts popularity remains good. One example is Everest and other natural spaces and touristic towns. A high number of people takes away some of the beauty of that space which is one things social networks can take into consideration which he then mentions later by saying that future networks should try to make their platforms less social.<br><br>Wow!!! Extremely fascinating conversation that sounds progressive and critical.,(reply>), Something like Jarvis sounds great. A personalised social media platform that does not need to retain your attention but again unfortunately it sounds like such a product has to be private as in you have to pay for it individually and maintain at your own cost or public as in we pay some sort of tax, of course, in order for it to be free and non profit...... but to make something like that non profit could turn it into a religion of some sort where people pay for something they might not use or agree with....<br><br>Super super fascinating, I am absolutely fascinated,(reply>), Unfortunately for those in the business it is possible to start thinking that maybe users would benefit from using the product less but the utility that the product could have to improve the users quality of life in terms of autonomy and discipline and decreasing the chances of depression and such problems that social networks have come across...,(reply>), Also, social media and media and gaming has to be a able to promote an healthy lifestyle for the biological human as well as the social human. It’s hard because the too are inseparable.