Sometimes I wonder how Lex got into MIT. He may actually be some kind of math savant because with a lot of the things he say he sounds like a complete imbecile. Now I don't know whether he says them in order to be politically correct because he's a coward, which i think is partially true but I really do think he truly believes some of the things he says. Case in point: He takes literally the founding documents when they say that all men were created equal. He seems to truly believe this, that you might be better than someone in one way but at the end of the day it will equalize across the board because they will be better than you at something else. That is categorically false. The bottom line is, that if we list a bunch of things that we care about, intelligence, kindness, attractiveness, likability, height athletic ability etc and weighted them accordingly, without a shadow of a doubt some people will score higher than others and yes some people will come close to being near perfect while others will rank near the bottom. Does that mean that some people are better than others with most of the things we care about, absofuckinglutely!<br><br> What this apparent midwit does not seem to grasp is that the founding document meant that, all men were created equal in the eyes of god and the law, which essentially translates to, no singular person will be treated favorably or unfavorably by the justice system or in terms of rights(everyone is treated equally and fairly). How stupid can someone be to not realize this? Which is why Lex Fridman tires me out and I can only listen to him in small doses, though he does get some pretty good guests on from time to time. He seems like the lovechild of a hippie from the 60s and a semi-autistic MIT professor. Hate his monotone droll, his bad interpretation of some ideas/concepts(often derailed by his failed attempts at being poetic) and his relentless fixation on love. If love was the equivalent of salt, his food would be poisonously inedible.