Hmmm.... I'll keep an open mind when I listen to this, but the fact that the guest is NOT a scientist and yet is attempting to draw his own conclusions on a scientific matter is a big red flag to me. That's not to say he's incorrect, it's a credibility issue for me,(reply>), @boo Jay That’s what we need. have a good day :),(reply>), @CC agreed, I'm not dismissing it at all. I just question the source, that's all. But I question all sources anyway (from both sides).,(reply>), @boo Jay yeah you right but let’s not dismiss this quickly as his arguments are interesting and we also know the power politics can have over the science domain, sadly. We just have to keep our minds open, and listen carefully at both sides.,(reply>), @CC true, but not being a trained and true scientist means you're closer to an armchair expert (which anyone can be) as opposed to an actual expert. That said, scientists aren't always correct either, but the good ones are aware of their fallibility, which is why evidence-based claims and conclusions are so critical, not just speculation and so-called logic-based claims. New evidence can overturn and change previous ways of thinking--this is how science works and progresses.,(reply>), Not being a scientist doesn’t stop you from doing research, your brain still works