I'm guessing the Getty image was supposed to be a placeholder...that never got replaced. How does a major studio not have someone managing their assets? Nonetheless, trying to claim copyright on 200 year old public domain works is just scammy.,(reply>), @flameshana9 Well except in this case the sky is all kinds of colors but blue. False copyright claims cary ridiculously small penalty, so small in fact that for copyright trolls and large companies the law effectively doesn't exist.,(reply>), @I lick the insides of microwave popcorn packages &gt;Law breakers should be punished.<br><br>Also: the sky is blue.,(reply>), @I lick the insides of microwave popcorn packages Definitely. Lobbying has rigged copyright in favor of corporations against customers and creators.,(reply>), Getty is absolute trash, claiming copyright on public domain works is something they've done repeatedly in the past. What's worse, they don't just claim copyright on them, they then proceed to threaten people who use those images and try to charge them money for using them. Most notably, Getty literally sent a bill to a photographer after she posted her own selfie on her own website.  <br>It's one of the great examples of why copyright laws need to be re-worked to serve their original purpose of protecting the creators. Illegitimate attempts to abuse the system should be punished.