Race based testing of any kind is already a ridiculous premise so the conception of the questions is inherently flawed and will lead to racist conclusions. Race is the same as acne, are you doing acne based intelligence testing on groups? What about birth marks? That proves nothing, especially if you’re quoting an average. Why not test based on economic status, maybe people of lower classes have lower iq’s because of environmental factors like not being able to eat a decent meal which will affect your brain capacity on a day to day, and on average more black people are disenfranchised by a racist society which brings down the total average. And it’s weird to say “disenfranchised people” and the second category is “Caucasian’s” disenfranchised means poor not black, it’s not an ethnic group. The data is biased and flawed in its conception, in an almost eugenics type of way, race is a myth perpetuated by these strange types findings.,(reply>), @Dale Rohling race is a social construct you're thinking of phenotypes, but I guess I understand why this type of research always finds support. People who have no talents, skills, or meaning in their lives often rely on concepts like race in order to raise their own ranks in social hierarchies. It's like if you play on the 96 Chicago Bulls as a benchplayer, you're still gonna take credit for Michael Jordan. So these people get to feel good that their race is superior to another race when in reality they as individuals are inferior to nearly everyone.,(reply>), What about “race” are you not getting. It’s a category made up of certain species of human that have very distinct biological attributes, both physical and mental. <br>You obviously know very little of how psychometrics works.,(reply>), 🤮