One thing that is not mentioned is that this system will save a ton of wear on the traditional roads, making maintenance cheaper.  This is a really good solution for individual transportation.,(reply>), @Radar O.  i love public transportation but it is an issue in smaller towns.<br>And tbh this seems like a perfect solution to the issue imo: <br>1. Forces development to have a plan to connect it to the rest of the city thru the paths and road and not just roads. <br>2. Things have to be close enough that a Golfcart going 20miles/hr can reach in s reasonable time<br>3. Golfcarts are significantly cheaper than a car. <br>4. The paths seem to be good for other modes of transport like biking and maybe walking?,(reply>), @Radar O. Yes, I agree.  Systems like this should not displace public transportation.,(reply>), Public transportation would accomplish this more efficiently.  And wouldn't exclude those who can't afford individual transportation.,(reply>), Or there are bikes,(reply>), @Andrew Roberts although I'm highly suspicious of the claims of BEVs being just plain actually worse than ICEs, at best, they're just not so bad as ICEs, but both are far from sort of environmental-friendly way forward. Electricity is key, but batteries are too inefficient. The feasible long-term real solution is probably along the lines of a vast amplification of electric lines of rail vehicles, with wired power, getting rid both of the dead-weight inefficiency of the batteries, and the aspect of waste of old batteries. Plus the raw materials become then "cheaper" to use in devices where it's actually needed. Then maybe it can be combined with a much reduced usage of ICEs, being much more of an oddity or necessity only for special cases, preferably on renewable fuels, but still fuels that make sense in terms of energy return on investment, otherwise they're likely even worse than fossil fuels. At the same time you're also reducing dramatically the problem of tires and road infrastructure. Non-rail BEVs may have their place to some degree, but again more of special-case scenarios, not so much the standards of daily transportation.