"<a href=""https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfJOW2PtrGk&amp;t=0m25s"">0:25</a><br><br>"Which'll be fine... unless sea levels rise"<br><br><b>2.5 million people sweat nervously</b>",(reply>), @Kirill Polyanskiy what? No,(reply>), @JetStream90 Sea-level rise is hard science. What civilians do with this information is not the fault of science. We're generally not the most charismatic people, so civilians often take up the torch to try to spread awareness. I'm not aware of any major climate-science activists building luxury properties, and even if your claim were true, it would not mean the science they're basing their arguments on isn't hard science with an enormous international consensus. <br><br><br>If you want to make a more persuasive argument, I would suggest you cite credible sources to back up your claims instead of using vague terms like "they," as in " <i>they</i> said we were going to have another ice age." Who said this? When? You might do the same thing for "in all manner of directions." Who specifically was wrong? About what? These simple changes would make your argument far more compelling.<br><br>On a syntactical note, in English, one generally says "shed light" <i>or</i> "cast doubt." To "shed" doubt makes it sound like one is getting rid of their doubts, which is the opposite of what I assume you mean.,(reply>), Many people shed doubt on the idea of sea level rise when climate-change proponents are the same people building multi-million dollar properties exactly in the areas supposed to be flooded.  They've been continuously wrong since before the 70s... in all manner of directions.  At one point they said we were going to have another ice age.,(reply>), Uh you don't need to know my name billion*