I wonder how far Nvidia will go until people just stop buying their cards "for ray tracing and some synthetic benchmarks" and get AMD.,(reply>), @Steel AMD has FSR, and although less capable, it's a lot easier to set up and platform-agnostic, so it might get better support, but as NVidia can run them both, I'll give you that one.<br><br>As for raytracing: Truth is, most people don't care. There's a few cool uses, and as a graphics nerd I'm looking forward for what's next, but most people don't really care that much.<br><br>As 1st gen RTX demonstrated, future-proof is not always achievable, only time can tell, and just because it has a feature, it doesn't mean it's gonna run well in the future.,(reply>), @carlos nava For gamers NVIDIA is still better, nothing stands up to DLSS. And ray tracing will be a standard sooner rather than later, you want good performance there by the time games start being built around it as their default lighting (probably a few years away).,(reply>), For gamers, yes, AMD might be overall better for most games, but there's a ton of creative applications that either still use CUDA and other NVidia features, or run better in their cards.<br><br>Until the day their devs move on to AMD tech, NVidia will be the better option for creatives for better or for worse,(reply>), @TheNeku123 I don't think they were aiming at gamers the last generation either tbh.,(reply>), They're not aiming gamers this generation, that's why.