This is painful to watch. I've decided to bail out in minute 14 already. <br>Based on others episodes of his, I admire Lex very much, but here he seems not just obtuse, but actually of stupid, as he repeatedly misses the whole point of Garland's work. Is it just an 'interview technique', where one pretends to be a bit obtuse, as a way of bringing out the interviewee? No doubt some interviewers play that game, allowing themselves to look somewhat dull, as a kind of 'sacrifice' for the sake of a more interesting interview, but I could not convince myself that such a model would explain the interactions here. It's just sad, since I'm very interested in Garland, but cannot stand to watch this particular interview beyond minute 14. (Apologies if I am repeating someone else's view as expressed in one of the 440 comments that precede mine.)