With JWST and LHC showing us how wrong Newton is...shouldn't we swap to Leibniz?<br><br>We have ten whole, rational numbers 0-9 and their geometric counterparts 0D-9D.<br><br>0 and it's geometric counterpart 0D are:<br>1) whole ✅<br>2) rational ✅<br>3) not-natural ✅<br>4) necessary ✅<br><br>1-9 and their geometric counterparts 1D-9D are: <br>1) whole ✅<br>2) rational ✅<br>3) natural ✅<br>4) contingent ✅<br><br>Newton says since 0 and 0D are "not-natural" ✅ then they are also "not-necessary". 🚫<br><br>Newton also says since 1-9 and 1D-9D are "natural" ✅ then they are also "necessary". 🚫<br><br>This is called "conflating" (similar words but different definitions) and is repeated throughout Newton's Calculus/Physics/Geometry/Logic.<br><br>Leibniz does not make these fundamental mistakes.<br><br>Leibniz's "Monadology" 📚 is 0 and it's geometric counterpart 0D.<br><br>The Egyptians, Syrians, Greeks, Mathematicians, Plato (the Good at top of 0D-3D pyramid) and don't forget Jesus and John all speak of the Monad (0 and 0D).<br><br>0D Monad <br>1D Line <br>2D Plane <br>3D Volume <br><br>We should all be learning Leibniz's Calculus/Physics/Geometry/Logic.<br><br>Matches quantum physics and cosmogony and cosmology. <br><br>Isn't that the Theory of Everything?<br><br>Fibonacci sequence starts with 0 for a reason...