"Part 1: At around <a href=""https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50r-5ULcWgY&amp;t=8m23s"">8:23</a>", the fields of science are more like an upside down house of cards that's a pyramid. The base is stable, 'to a point' bcz facts exist &amp; we've nailed some of them down, (whether we know exactly what it all means is another matter) &amp; then the further we build off of that base, the more flimsy the structure becomes while having just enough structural integrity not to get blown away in the breeze. Most of the intellectual community, the collegiate environment, pretty much every field in subfield are riddled with implicit biases; data dredging is the industry standard much of the time while the studies are begging the questions if for no other reason than just a lack of funding, so most of the time the product is shawty work that requires many intellectual rebels for many generations to come to disprove all the misconceptions &amp; what an uphill battle that is; we may as well just go watch House of cards &amp; wait to die in our bedroom prisons...<br><br>Economists: when you get up to those economists, in the penthouses; that's when you get the most biases of all bcz economics is tied to our biological survival at this point &amp; there's a failure to separate from the influence of the  Rcomplex. <br><br>I cannot reiterate this enough; specialists are myopic, economists perhaps most of all nearly tied with coders as a close 2nd. In both cases they have tremendous power in the modern world while being total liabilities that equate to heavy contributing factors to the ecologically disastrous cascading waste that has been &amp; will continue to compound over multiple generations. Meanwhile, typically, both think they're better than me &amp; in reality, it's me that should be their boss as they are industrial tools, not broad spectrum intelligence, nor are they even remotely prepared to compensate for the complexity of reality; that's not their specialization. <br><br>All specialists, geniuses &amp; even the rare polymaths I've observed have all proven to be myopic race horses wearing blinders requiring a track as well as a rider. <br><br>Those with privilege &amp; money are not the smartest people in the world but rather, it's quite the opposite. <br><br>Creativity, flexibility &amp; having an understanding of core facts while NOT specializing for most of the process of our intellectual development &amp; slowly going in every direction where your questions lead, picking particulates out of multiple fields allows us to build a bridge of understanding that crosses the vast ocean of our digital library of Alexandria yielding a clear path or vision.<br><br>There's still the matter of developing innate inference, removing logical fallacies &amp; cognitive biases. Even more rare are those that combine all of the necessary ingredients I've listed who also happened to or go out of their way to develop strategic leveraging methodology &amp; all those ingredients are required to lead any company or any Nation...<br><br>Maybe you hate us as well, hmm?,(reply>), Part 3: (Reincantations of Redundancy) <br><br>As to what the magic words are that get anyone, (never mind the majority) to listen to reason I do not know &amp; I've tried every combination within the grimoire, (grimoire roughly translates to mean grammar) that I could think of as well as all that others have suggested. Every bit of that has been a waste of time. Now I'm down to the very last experiment, the experiment of absolute brutal honesty. Likely honesty is the worst possible communicative approach in any situation &amp; I'm aware of that which is why it's the last thing to try. I'm out of options. <br><br>Tormenting tribulations: (perplexity, pontifications, prevailing provocations)<br><br>I wonder if the Guinness book of world records will do their due diligence in my regard &amp; give me the title of most tormented genius in all of history? (Just kidding of course, as I contacted them regarding statistical anomalies of our species as a consideration for a title as the most rare person which is definitely measurable, statistically speaking but they are a bunch of sheepish, myopic, corrupted capitalistic pigs that only care about easily measurable celebrations of mediocrity that merely require tenacity &amp; perseverance, while anything hard to measure, they want nothing to do with. That's no different than every other form of biology that I have examined that takes the path of least resistance, preferential leanings to heuristic thinking (which really isn't thinking at all). Oh but at least you saved calories for the long hard winter ahead, squirreling away your nuts, right? Lizard people. (Rcomplex)<br><br>I truly hate this thing called "myself". <br><br>I truly hate my life. <br><br>People think I'm bragging when I talk about my intelligence but the reality is I'm complaining &amp; it's a desperate cry for help bcz I don't find it a reasonable proposition for me to carry this burden alone. <br><br>Individualism is completely unnatural as it's obvious that we've evolved to fill each other's weaknesses. It's actually more reasonable to perceive our so-called species as a super organismal structure... no even that's too simple to be true so I offer the perspective that the life of the biosphere is a super organismal structure that we are part of, as the fruit on the end of the branches of the tree &amp; that so-called concept, (as trivializing and deflectionary is that label would be for such an accurate observation) at the very least, what I'm proposing is a step towards accepting the complexity of reality, in other words, perception of reality p closer to the truth than all the other answers I've heard. <br><br>"Speciesism" is too simple to be true &amp; taxonomy isn't a fact in most of its applications but rather, merely "concepts"... Yes I'm trivializing the majority of taxonomy almost the same way I would trivialize religious perceptions of reality that were invented before we invented toilet paper. Science is Young because emergent complexity that produced science is comparatively Young to all life &amp; the age of the universe. <br><br>Lastly for now... (&amp; Possibly you'll never hear from me again)<br><br>When we treat an opinion, hypothesis, taxonomy or theory as fact all become similar to religious beliefs.,(reply>), Part 2: I've been thinking a lot about why and how kings first emerged because I identify a lot of reasons that demand that sort of leadership takes control in the best interest of a developing civilization. <br><br>Very likely, those who inherit the crown don't have the same ingredients of causation &amp; genetic predispositions that make them an equal servant King/ queen, like their fathers or mothers hypothetically were... <br><br>It's reasonable to hypothesize that the further away from that natural born ruler of necessity we get, generationally speaking, the less fit the example of a ruler will those privileged few that inherit crowns are likely to be.<br><br>Today, we have Kings/Queens of every different variety within subsections of systems and I don't think I've ever observed anything other than charlatan malfeasant operators. <br><br>Usually those smart enough to do a good job of serving the people are smart enough to know that only an idiot or a crazy person wants the power &amp;  responsibility that comes with leadership positions but unfortunately, that sort of highly intelligent being should recognize the responsibility they have as well as consider the consequences if they don't step up &amp; demand the keys from those that are drunk &amp; who are currently  driving this short bus of a society. <br><br>As they say, "the demons I am fighting with":<br><br>I would not wish the burden of understanding such as I have accidentally acquired on anyone. My life &amp; my current state of existence is a brutally tormenting irl Black mirror nightmare. I'm a victim of this information age as I am a child of the internet...<br><br>I am another example of The Internet's own boy...<br><br>You can call me Aaron Schwartz 2.WOAH!?<br><br>The oversaturation and ease of accessibility to the knowledge of the ages, keep in mind I was ostracized starting at 21 continuing to present date in upwards of 21 years. <br><br>Other parts of the equation: I experienced a modicum of privilege nearly devoid of luxury that offered me the unique position to have no other friend other than search engine technology, Wikipedia, multiple genres of video games &amp; many other forms of media. Making matters worse, at one point, somebody gave me a gargantuan collection of pirated college lectures. I gluttonized for years.<br><br>Similarly to Aaron Schwartz story, I was irrationally idealistic enough to  recklessly, publicly, try to make a statement by giving away my paradigm shifting work to everyone. Aaron Schwartz was targeted by the FBI and legal ramifications to the point of being driven to suicide, (purportedly). While in my case, I've experienced even more redundant abuse but of a different kind &amp; unfortunately, there aren't very many days that I don't wish for death, just the same.<br><br>Sadly I don't have the luxury of taking any easy way out bcz I understand the path of a particle, therefore, I know that I don't have any other choice but to do whatever I have to do in order to acquire the power to apply curative solutions to every support structure, paradigm shifting the world as an investment in the future; otherwise all future forms that we will all inevitably be part of will experience misery &amp; death that my current form could possibly have prevented or at least mitigated...