For the third game, an interesting strategy could have been to elect one player everyone gives their money to who then promises to put it all in their box. Suddenly, it would have been entirely transparent. Whether someone banks out and doesn't give the money to the trusted individual or whether the individual withholds money.,(reply>), I had the same thought, but it has some problems; for starters, whoever is chosen is now easily able to guarantee themselves the medals, which makes it a hard sell to everyone else at the table to just <b>give</b> that to one person.<br>And even once you've gotten everyone to accept giving the medals away and everything goes smoothly, by round three the chosen person now has the choice of "Do I want $380 and 'Trust'~ or do I want $1800?", which would have been about as much as  anyone made by the end of this game already, on top of them still being a heavy contender for the case with two tokens.<br><br>::Edit:: wait I'm a dumbass the round 3 betray would be to not invest, so it would be $380 vs $900, so a good bit less tempting than I'd been accounting for