CO2 is not a problem, it actually helps vegetation and the food chain. Some of the complex hydrocarbons might be an issue though.,(reply>), ​@michaelsasylum YOu are correct. Just repeating something doesn't make me correct. The fact I am saying factual statements does however. <b>If you have not figured it out. What I described to you was the concept of carry capacity. Just because you have one element of life does not mean you have all of them.</b><br><br>"BTW, there are more trees on earth right now than there were when the Mayflower landed here."<br>- Care to prove so? Go ahead. I want to see the detailed documents that not only give a accurate inventory of every tree in the forest of the "old world" but the new world as well.<br><br>Even if you are correct it is irrelevant. It isn't trees that dominate the flora and it isn't trees that convert most carbon dioxide. Just proving there are more trees in the world now does not actually prove there are more plants and it doesn't prove more carbon benefit plants. You are failing basic logic on a grade school level here mate.,(reply>), @Cloud Seeker Sorry, but regurgitating some old shit doesn't make you right.  BTW, there are more trees on earth right now than there were when the Mayflower landed here.,(reply>), Yeah no. You do not understand the carbon cycle or how "that" thing you are talking about works.<br><br>I once asked my biology teacher a thing when we studied the water composition of a nearby lake. If the lake has so many things that life in the lake ate, why didn't more things live in the lake?<br>The reply I got was.<br>If you think the lake as a bucket made out of wood, but the planks of the wood are all made in different lengths. The amount of life in the lake can be seen as the water the bucket can hold. Just because you have a massive plank that represent food, does not mean you can fill the bucket with water to that height. You can only fill it if all other planks are at least that tall, and in this lake the other planks are not long enough.<br><br>Having more carbon does NOT help vegetation. Just because you add more carbon does not mean plants can eat more. They require many more things than just carbon.