Panpsychism: Utter vagueness. Listened to this interview and have no idea what support there is for pansychysm. Not the slightest clue is given as to how any observable phenomenon owes its existence to panpsychism. One could conjecture that the past doesn't exist. For any given moment, all memory and future conjectures are solely the properties of that instant and unrelated to any other moment of time. This idea has just as much support as panpsychism. Why is panpsychism given so much attention if is as weak as the history-is-an-illusion concept. It seems that panpsychism is an "Ether Theory" of consciousness.