Hey Techlinked. Regarding your fusion reaction news - please keep in mind all these companies mislead (100% intentionally of course) giving these numbers. They ONLY talk about the energy put into the chamber to create plasma - but the total energy cost is 10-100 fold bigger: to achieve vacuum, keep the temperature of the magnetic coils low, and aaall the other very power hungry devices you need to run to sustain the experiment for even a brief moment. All the experiments have the efficiency of about 0.05 to 0.2 or so (the ratio being the total energy put into the system to what we get out). So yeah... fusion as a commercial application is very far away (if possible at all - with current technology it isnt).<br>This is a thing plaguing all the information we get about fusion status quo - scientists deliberately misinforming the public, so that they can get the funding / dont discourage investors. They even had the nerve to be this "vague" when they talk to US Senate (operational director of ITER lied to US Senate on a hearing claiming they are about to break even or GAIN energy from ITERs tokamak... despicable)