A remarkably superficial discussion.  Islam gest a PR treatment, wholly unchallenged by Fridman.  Worse, here we have an agitprop presentation that imagines peaceful and moral Palestinians against violent and immoral Israelis. An educated person knows this is comic. And Friedman challenges nothing--rather, he smirks in constant, compliant servitude to Suleiman--as if a holy text were being quoted and was beyond question.<br><br>Too bad,  Fridman admitted that the conversation wasn't challenging.  He lets himself off too easily.  A conversation should be a civil dialectic--argument and counterargument.  Perhaps, some agreement.  This was just a long and free platform for an ideologue whose veneer cracks toward the end of the interview--gone is the false, Cheshire smile--the smothered contempt for the truth gives way to a sewage spill of hatred.<br><br>Suleiman closes by saying "slander doesn't stand."  Let's hope he is right, because his slander implies that Muslims and Palestinians exist to serve us all.  We've heard such slander from tyrants before--even tyrants who present themselves as "saints.",(reply>), Try becoming a Palestinian Christian for a week in Occupied Palestine and come back to tell us about it.