Let me show you that  maybe we are alone: If our galaxy contains a trillion planets," how many would have a civilization?<br><br>Habitability: the right planet around the right star<br>We went from a trillion to a billion<br><br>Stability: a climate that lasts benign for eons a billion becomes a million<br><br>Life must start the million is now 1000 planets<br> <br>complete life forms develops 1000 planets become  1 planet.<br><br>Develop use of sophisticated tools<br>that gives a planet in 1000 galaxies<br><br>Develop math and science<br>that's a planet in a million galaxies<br><br>In order to travel to other stars they must be sociable creatures<br>capable of developing abstract concepts with complex grammar<br>1 planet in a billion galaxies<br><br>and they must avoid the disaster not only their own but of asteroids<br><br>1 planet in a trillion galaxies"," that is<br><br>It's just us in the entire visible universe.<br><br>Oh and i dont evem Mention the probability of having a moon at the right distance and the right size", without the moon tides ," winds and earth tilt axis variations would make life impossible also earth rotationl speed will change. So we must care our earth.<br><br>when you look at the stars and see all that space full of stars", you should feel immense,"<br>I know that the universe made all those tests so that you and 8000 million other human beings exist. oh and its obvious ufos are us from the future . and if they are not just us", they are then from another dimension.  Mind is a priori. I agree with rare earth Theory, abiogenesis  probability alone dwarfs everything. The real question is much deeper: Is intelligence a random mistake? i mean a random not pre planned emergence? And if it is ? how can it resonate with an intelligible universe (order, disorder, rythm, physics etc),? i mean goethe said that to see the sun we must have some of it on our eyes. Imagine a dumb universe a no sense universe an act in an empty theather, and then intelligent beings start to try to give it some sense...i really found that its impossible a materialistic way of understanding the universe without a mind first, if not it always leads to a logical impasse. i really like schroedingers theory, he says that mind is a priori and mind is all there is, totally undestructible not belonging to this world of energy, and for mind its always NOW, so the universe already happened. But i guess some science guys like to do abstraction and while abstracting the subject from the object they cheat and pretend to be there but abstracted and all their logic will give an error at the end, you cannot use a buddha to find a buddha. If you are in, you are in and forever in.