Did you really expect anything else from Nvidia?<br>Thank god there is AMD. Who knows how bad it would be with Nvidia only. Let's see what happens when Intel enters the chat.,(reply>), @Tuncay D going forward pc gaming will be less important for them. they will only target high margin segment. nvidia and intel will dug it out at the mid range and below. what AMD did with Navi 23 and Navi 24 somehow reflect this. why did you think AMD give more focus on open source driver? they did that so they can push the burden more towards open source community instead of spending more money and effort to do the job themselves. i still remember a few years ago when AMD actually fire people from their linux division once the open source driver community are more established. freesync might be open and cheaper but if anything AMD own experience with freesync teach them they cannot just hope everything will work fine without them spending more money and effort to make freesync a better experience. anandtech have an article about this and back then it explain why some of the good Freesync monitor end being just as expensive Gsync monitors. don't be surprise if AMD end up letting go even the console business. because the console business are preventing AMD from generating better margin for the company when the contract they got with console maker end up eating 80% of their 7nm capacity.,(reply>), @ArenZ RIcodeXD You are wrong with your assumptions. AMD is the most important player in the gaming market, be it on mobile, on console, on pc. AMD cards are cheaper and does not require as much power like Nvidia cards. Nvidia is more interested in AI technology for cars in example and selling cards to crypto miners. Nvidia couldn't care less for pc gamers or console gamers at all, there is no focus on this market.<br>AMD is creating much better open source drivers and does not vendor lock FreeSync like Nvidia does with G-Sync. Now you see why AMD is the most important player in the pc gaming market.,(reply>), @Tuncay D nvidia need the revenue they get from the gaming segment to keep fueling their professional effort. nvidia professional effort will not where it is right now if they only rely on the money they got from professional business. this is the primary reason why intel finally decided to seriously enter GPU market. they did not enter the market because they think they can make massive money from the gaming GPU market, they did it so they can reduce nvidia revenue and halt nvidia advancement in professional space. intel does not like it nvidia keep taking CPU away from the equation. first it was HPC. then AI. now nvidia are invading the 5G space with accelerating the Edge with GPU replacing cpu from that task. <br><br>AMD? even if they have extremely competitive GPU product they still losing market share to nvidia. AMD used to brag about how their GPU architecture is very good for blockchain stuff like Crypto now that space also being dominated by nvidia. of course AMD will not going to leave GPU market completely but AMD probably will not going to give their best to give gamer the best value like they did in the past. their focus will be on the high end where margin will be much better to be had. AMD used to be praised how good their reference design are even on mid range /low end product. now AMD is cutting corners on their mid range/low end product to maximize profit. the upcoming RX6500 XT? AMD even allow board partner to limit the PCI-E connection down to x4 to save cost.,(reply>), ​@ArenZ RIcodeXD If any company leaves the gaming gpu market, it would be Nvidia.,(reply>), @Tuncay D nah many thinking that when intel start competing in GPU the we will have three way competition. AMD now have tasted much higher profit margin probably will leave  intel and nvidia to dug it out on the budget market.