I feel like the "walk away" option was not explained clearly enough. So Mike could have walked away with the $6k without attempting to make any offer to the other players?<br><br>If that's the case, then purely from a gameplay perspective, at that point, there is no gameplay incentive to offer anything to the other players. You can get all $6k with no risk. If this was a board game and the aim was to have the most money to be declared the "winner" at the end, I would definitely do that. However, there are non-gameplay reasons to split up the money. There's the social pressure of staying true to his word, of not wanting to feel regret about it later, of not wanting to upset anyone which could carry over to consequences beyond the game, and of course, the feeling of all of it being scrutinized publicly on YouTube. Those things are not nothing, and I definitely would have done what Mike did if I was in his position.