Imagine building a condo and being accused of having an unfair monopoly on apartments in the condo you just built,(reply>), @TheDexsword I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to convey, but I think it's a language barrier. I'm thinking you're of the opinion that monopolies are bad, and anti-consumer, and thus should be dealt with rather than ignored? I'm also reading that you think that people who argue for said monopolies are the reason we have whole industries that are so anti-consumer that it is obnoxious?,(reply>), What? Thats a bad analogy, literally if a user bought ur phone it should be yours forever and doesnt need bs and interferences from apple, ppl like u is the sources of ppl annoyances trying to curb unjust monopoly and we have shit like u cant repair ur own stuff shit ( i.e. electronics hardware and even fckin tractor).,(reply>), @Max Rovensky you do know that that isn't what that means right? Ad hominim would imply that I didn't address your argument, but sought to undermine it by attacking the person. I did address the argument, i simply commented that your statements imply ignorance of a subject matter. If my argument WAS that you were ignorant, then you would be correct in accusing me of ad-hominim.....but that was not and is not my argument....thus I now think you to be ignorant in more than just economics, but basic logical fallacies as well... however, seeing as you do not wish to converse, I bid you good day.,(reply>), And even that I was opposed to. It's Microsoft's OS and they can do whatever they want with it<br>You seem to be a very educated person as evidenced by your near-immediate switch to ad-hominem "go study basic economics" argument, so I won't engage with you further. Go watch some youtube videos on basic conversation skills 😘,(reply>), @Max Rovensky that was sarcasm. Clearly sarcasm. Pointing out the parallel in the situation where Microsoft products, such as windows and windows platform programs and applications, were deemed monopolistic despite 'alternatives' existing.... I was pointing out how dumb your argument sounds when real world evidence to the contrary exists in a similar field.....