This guy is fucking stupid. Best example for why a high G-Factor, or IQ score doesnt mean you are able to understand and think complex topics. No idea of what interdisciplinary thinking and working actually means. When arguing about a highly philosophical topic such as intelligence, one must always define a physical foundation at first. In Neuroscience(physics of human mind), there is none for a single universal intelligence. There is no such thing as G-Factor. This is pseudoscience. Different people are adapted to different environments, thus develop different types of intelligences adapted to the demands their suroundings put them through. <br><br>Everybody can do something different better than most other people within their contexts of adaptation. Except for people with severe bodily and mental disabilities for example due to malnutrition, or severe brain trauma due to for example a plain crash, or malfunctioning of other organs causing the brain not to receive enough ressources to work properly.<br><br>This is what happens when someone focuses too much on one thing/topic/area of expertise without being able zoom out and see the bigger picture.,(reply>), @theeggtimer tic tic Or when it comes to interpretation of math in a given context. These type of people tend to be good at quantitative stuff, but not qualitative. He shouldnt have become a psychologist i think, since its a vry qualitative and philosophical field. At this stage it is basically about interpreting and integrating neuroscience into our everyday lives rather than freud pontificating about his peers inner mechanistics and terribly failing at it most of the time. <br><br>Live is not a statistic. Statistics help us understand the vast complexity that underlies our everyday lives. This guy didnt seem to understand that yet, like way too many researchers it seems to me honestly.,(reply>), I agree ... What good is maths if you hunt for your food with a spear.  If you out this guy in that situation he'd be a dead man.  It's all about context.