"I'm @ <a href=""https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hppbxV9C63g&amp;t=1m20s"">1:20</a> and I have to say Thank you Lex for how you are approaching this topic", so far. I was watching and listening with a skeptical eye. 😂 I know some won't agree but my philosophy according to my own mental calculus as it relates to the "truth" or "truths" in general, is that if more harm than good can come as a result of it, then that "truth" is probably better left unsaid. Suggesting that scientist should have a responsibility to calculate how their scientific findings will be interpreted/received/used, I think was extremely insightful, on your part. <br><br>When it comes to this topic and race, I think that unless or until you can prove that more good than bad can come as a result of publishing these type of findings, that they are better to be left unspoken.,(reply>), @nunc ecce, mortiferis cultu Yes,(reply>), @How To Pass Your Road Test - NYC<br><br>"you'll just need to find a way of making nerdy black guys appear to be sexier to the opposite sex." <br><br>And that's where culture comes into play.,(reply>), @Alphonsis61 I think there should be more research done on this but I also suspect that the genetic difference is not about genetic differences in each race but genetic differences between smart people and not so smart people. I think if you find a way to get smart people to procreate with other smart people then this "problem" if it really is a problem, would go away. I think the problem is as simple as who you choose to have sex with and if I'm correct then you won't need to do a scientific study on the molecular biology of memory and learning, you'll just need to find a way of making nerdy black guys appear to be sexier to the opposite sex. 😂🤷🏽‍♂️,(reply>), @Road Test Ready 2.0 fair enough. I suppose I'm thinking specifically in the context of intelligence research amongst groups, where we do not have certainty or consensus, merely hypotheses and interpretations of data, all begging further questions, and wherein there is much potential for positive impact of future research (albeit negative as well, to the extent that we can't sufficiently sideline the actual racists). I think it makes sense to query the motivations and associations of anyone proposing to conduct research in this area. But not cancel good faith actors like Haier.,(reply>), @Alphonsis61 I agree with the first part, for the most part and I think 99% of the time the truth should always be spoken. I'm moreso talking about that other 1% of the time where you are already 90% sure of the outcome.