my issue with qu'ran is that we can't trust memory enough to name a certain set of symbols and sounds to be "the word of god" since to even construct the name of the thing we are trying to name we have to trust the words to have a certain provenance that encloses just <b>and only just</b> what they mean, which is beyond any of us to even guarantee, let alone fulfill in its entirety. not across eternity, at least. it just a matter of a little ripple making certain ah go eh and the punches that come afterwards (and in a micro scale we having next to zero control over symbols besides their context - the kind of stuff a penis involved in a sexual assault trial would argue) it can either wipe an idea out of existence or perpetuate it despite its flaws. i think it's somewhat arrogant to name such thing, the particular state of a chessboard of unknown dimensions. that's my issue with religions - really? words?,(reply>), *✉️📊📩ꜱᴇɴᴅ ᴍᴇ ᴀ ᴅɪʀᴇᴄᴛ ᴍᴇꜱꜱᴀɢᴇꜱ ʀɪɢʜᴛ ᴀᴡᴀʏ,