I've been watching UEG for a really long time and while i enjoy the expanded direction of talking about many topics outside of gaming, the focus on issues and then simply leaving it at that, leaves a lot to be desired<br><br>I understand that this message is meant to be for those who buy a tesla because feels-good-environment politics, but it almost sounds like an excuse not to actually delve deeper (Not meaning to disrespect UEG's work, the reporting was sufficient). What are we supposed to take from this video? Are regular cars better? What about their pollution? Where do they get their resources from? Are they also exploiting people? Is this actually about the fact that resources are obtained from human exploitation rather than teslas or cars? <br><br>If we fix pollution and human exploitation from resources, would we at the same time solve the issue with gas cars? Should we just avoid cars and go with bikes? What about E-bikes and scooters or public transport? Should companies stop mass-producting multiple generations and versions of products on a yearly basis like iphones and instead produce a single high-quality product every half decade?<br><br>All of these could be a video of their own and i'm not expecting them all to be answered, but the question remains of where do we go from here? The video just kind of comes off as shitting on people with Teslas, but if those people genuinely bought a Tesla for environmental reasons, what are they supposed to do about it now? Damned if you do, damned if you don't?,(reply>), @Emaruse Renraku I don't think the world governments i.e 'the west' is unaware of these problems. In fact, as UEG showed, it was even brought up in court. It's mostly a matter of innocent until proven guilty (Edit: Forgot in America you need a lot of cash for court), and it's also the african governments' responsibilities to actually solve child labour in their own countries... I mean that would quite literally solve slavery, human exploitation, trafficking and many other things on a large scale if human rights were global. Our governments can't fight against something that is exploiting our freedoms and rights given to private companies, without being hypocritical by using those same rights to breach them or using their own power to remove such rights. Poor explanation, the point is we're not Xi Jinping that can just abolish or take over a company ''for the greater good'', and we're better than Xi Jinping because we don't do that. This is a big issue in Europe with the migration policy and what to do with a crapton of undesirable people that are a cost or damage society, or illegal/using loopholes. We just don't have an answer to this in our western democracies yet and the migration issue is similar to the corporate issue in the sense that part of the responsibility or dependency is on the receiving country, which more often than not has nothing but self interest for the royal families and couldn't give a damn otherwise<br><br>I think now some time after typing my original comment, my real issue is that UEG's video just doesn't say anything<br><br><br>Even if someone cares about the environment, finding out about this information is pretty meaningless, and Tesla could still be a more environmentally friendly option than a regular gas car that still pollutes and probably exploits labour as well, i mean who knows right? Who is going to go through that extensive research?<br><br>And the same goes for anyone not riding the EV-wagon, other than feeling validated for their choice<br><br>The real takeaway that i wish EUG would have emphasized towards the end shouldn't be about ''you're no better than anyone else'', but ''we need to fight against these exploitative companies for ethical production and industries'', because that's really what this video was covering<br><br>In fact i believe UEG has talked about this in a previous video a long time ago in regards to ''pre-planned expiration'', products that after a certain time are deliberately malfunctioning for the sake of producing to sell more. This could've been a great time to refer to that<br><br>I'm kinda ranting but, i'm just disappointed. This video felt uncharacteristic of him, in my opinion,(reply>), I understand the need to have an explanation on what to be done, but that really shouldn't be UEG's job, and maybe he'll do another video about it, but if the world governments at large need a Youtuber to give them the answers, we, as a species, are truly screwed.