"VR is a waste of time because there aren't enough games"<br>Valve makes game for VR<br>"Why are valve making a game for such a small market?"<br><br>Honestly the comments on valve's tweet are insane.,(reply>), @Bitter Cynic You didn't just compared VR to Switch? xDD Those are two completely different mediums, where you can play a completely different set of games (there are some games that exists on both platforms, but that is rather unlikely to happen). For example: Super Mario Bros on VR would be a waste of potential or Beat Saber on the Switch would be unplayable, just because you don't have enough input. You can't compare VR to anything at all what is on the market right now. VR is unique. On PC, Consoles etc. you are looking on a flat screen, every time, just with a different input method. But VR? Completely different. That is why Valve decides to bring Half Life to VR. I do believe VR is the feature of gaming and over all, VR just gives you new opportunities you never had before.,(reply>), @Bitter Cynic But we don't live in the third world, we live in civilisation where a reasonably successful person can easily afford to spend a few hundred quid on something they want.,(reply>), @Bitter Cynic if you can't afford VR, chances are you can't afford the game either. At least a VR headset you could finance out(assuming you didn't fuck over your credit score),(reply>), @Bitter Cynic $200 Windows Mixed Reality exists dumbfuck,(reply>), Bitter Cynic <br><br>Yeah.... I’m sure a person in a third world country has ideally more problems to deal with than purchasing luxury items. <br>Why label VR as a gimmick if there hasn’t been any games to take full effectiveness of it yet? You are consciously attempting to limit what could be revolutionary for the VR market because of a price you can’t afford which has ALTERNATIVES.