To me the filters aren't accurate I can always tell when an overlay has been used instead of an actual VHS Camcorder,(reply>), @VauxhallOpel I think the guy was trying to convey that point but the editor only kept in the "...so it's a little bit of both" part,(reply>), @Felipe Gonçalves yes you were off by quite a bit,(reply>), @Advanced Hell I do think that it depends on the source of the footage.<br><br>For instance: the F1 YT channel has posted a number of full races from the '80s and '90s, and the image is crisp and sharp indeed. But an average bloke that maybe happened to record that same race, may not be as sharp of HQ because the VHS records whatever happens to be on the screen. <br><br>And let's imagine that, by some miracle, that man's TV settings are perfectly made. What happens if it's connected to an aerial antenna, not a regular cable antenna? The signal might drop and you'll see it in the screen, and thus in the tape.<br><br>I obviously must be wrong about this too, so there,(reply>), @Neurofied Yamato then I was just thinking of the old CRT telly we had when I was little. <br><br>It's good to know that I've been corrected by some good old data.,(reply>), @Felipe Gonçalves VHS is actually really bright