first biggest mistake:<br>Thinking general intelligence = academic intelligence.<br>Simply said, imagine these exact same tests in the context of a pre-historic tribe. What are you even measuring? nothing<br><br>2nd biggest mistake:<br>Thinking correlations of random content actually means anything. what a slap in the face of physics<br>If you're making correlations you gotta go down to the minute detail, not brush off content as unimportant. That's so half-a$$ed<br><br>If we're truly trying to grasp the "root" of intelligence  you gotta strip everything down. Like... EVERYTHING, No one has time or money for that... Well... SOME do. No interest though.,(reply>), ​@nwogamesalert In terms of being pretentious and not getting at the root of things, yes.<br><br>It's literally a nothing-burger that has been romanticized.<br>IQ tests don't measure intelligence at all, nor does any test for that matter.<br><br>Tests only measure what they were designed to do.<br>......I really don't have to spell it out, all you're doing is facing off against a template. It means absolutely nothing in the scope of the context.<br><br>This has been done because people are too facking lazy and incompetent to actually be smart themselves and play the "elder" archetype for the entire "tribe".  IQ tests are the fast food burger version of that.,(reply>), Did they hurt your feelings?