I'm sure ltt comments are informative so I'll ask the question; this Twitter vs Musk - from Musks perspective, since there are higher number of % bots in the user space couldn't he not argue that he's not getting the value as perceived in twitter user base. If it is honestly 10-20% bots instead of 5%, that's a huge number of none value accounts and surely that's of lesser value? Especially if the public knows the stocks will tank to what the value people think it should be?<br><br>Edit: Im not on twitter but I'd be pretty miffed if 1/5th of content is filled by bots. Eg I'd stop reading comments on YouTube if they were 1/5th bot comments.,(reply>), @DemureDave I'm not clued up on Musk and his thoughts but from a outsider perspective; it looks like he's trying to make Twitter honest.<br>Why Musk wants it? He made Tesla without any advertisements, I suspect he'd want to show the world its not "that hard" to make a social platform without biasing/advertisements/political coercion etc. Similar MO to Signal?<br><br>Edit: if people are concern he will spread his own whacky views, I'm sure that won't be the case, look at his previous/current accolades, there's no political views within these companies (except when it relates to work ethics), I don't see why he would want to start now.<br>Besides, current society is pretty toxic and polarised due to the fact that CEOs of these corporate companies knows it sells so they keep pushing it at detriment to society... I don't see him in charge will make it worse.,(reply>), It doesn't seem like they're even considering Elon Musk's side on this show, since this is the 2nd time I've seen them make such wise cracks against him. Twitter seems to be plagued with bots and the current Twitter leadership is refusing to be transparent about it. Why would Elon's investors want to consider such a large buyout when they can't be sure of what they'd really be getting out of it?