No offense intended to you, Tom, you're brilliant, and I love your channel.<br> But, in response to the idea you explain in the video, I have to say:<br><br>The solution to the utterly non-existent system inertia inherent in essentially all renewable/non-hydrocarbon energy sources (aside from nuclear, which is still the very best option for power generation, particularly breeder reactors that produce essentially no radioactive waste) is increasing the number of charge/discharge cycles in consumer electric vehicle lithium ion batteries, thereby requiring them to be replaced sooner. Batteries whose production results in environmental devastation on a truly horrific scale. Yes, I see the wise stewardship of the environment in these plans. /S<br><br>Renewable <b>doesn't work</b> it's that simple. In the end, renewable energy generation is just not a practical, sustainable means of powering a civilization. Hydrocarbons are suboptimal, but they work. Nuclear is unparalleled in its potential for safe, environmentally neutral, and inexhaustible energy/power generation, and it's the best bet we've got, barring antimatter or something.