I’m sorry but I think that’s a load of wash. I had to kind of speak my mind but I think the government is perfectly well capable of keeping secrets. By ridicule. For example telling a lot main stream academia scientists to ridicule the subject of extraterrestrials and UFOs If their students and people bring it up and to not pursue it.  Or especially at the time, tell them we will make you look crazy and take away your livelihood And then guess what scientist are simply zipped. Good way to keep a secret to me. Thus Hiding something in plain sight. There are a lot of instances I feel like the government would’ve kept a secret fine, if somebody like Bob lazar didn’t come out and spill the beans about their tests at s4.. so in my opinion, I’m not sure I agree. Also, I don’t agree on the idea that there’s been no evidence. There’s been plenty of evidence to suggest we’ve been visited.. but you won’t find it, unless you look for it. Putting a big poster of “I want to believe” is not actively looking for something And judging real cases, (Betty and barny hill Wit their star map of a system that wasn’t discovered at the time, Travis Walton, and tons of others..) Also a detailed sketch about the incident and encounter could be another form of evidence. Especially if it’s really detailed and made a heavy impact on the person, so I disagree there too. it’s just Another form of being a skeptic, that never actually looked into cases and come to actually believe. That’s not a skeptic to me.. that’s just somebody that is wanting to remain ignorant. Real skeptics are swayed by evidence, eventually.. when They see it and she’s never actually bothered to look into the cases.. So her claim that there’s no evidence is meaningless to me. That’s the problem I have with mainstream scientists today is that they claim there’s no evidence but look the other way. Sorry.,(reply>), yes, they can keep big secrets.  Often they are open secrets; people know but society don't want to know.  Cheney, for example.  Also, who shot JR.