This is the stupidest argument ever. He is criticizing US government for lockdowns by using data from South Asian countries. How is that relevant? How is a lockdown in New York city going to affect anyone in India? He is talking about people dying due to hunger because of the lockdowns, which is correct but not in the US. He is completely ignoring the fact that with no lockdowns the hospitals will be overrun and people affected by other diseases/accidents would die because there would be shortage of hospital equipments and staff, is he accounting for those possible deaths? This is a perfect example of cherry picking data to support baseless claims. I expected better from you Lex. :(,(reply>), ✛①⑥⑥⑨ ②⑤⑧ ④③⑥③