Hey UEG is there a possibility for you to talk about ACCC "antagonizing" Australian content creators by forcing social medias to only monetize mainstream media ?<br>If not it's ok 👍,(reply>), ​@Light Buzard112 First: that's insane. Second: I still doubt that any social media will want to have MSM on their platform if they have to pay extra to have them on. What is supposed to be the endgame for MSM in Australia on social media? Make their own service? that'll cost them more than it's worth. People will still be on YouTube, Instagram, Tik Tok, FB, twitch and whatever else is out there and Australian MSM will be shut out. I can't help but think that ACCC will seriously backfire for Australian MSM, same as the law to force news aggregator and searchengines to give a share of their revenue to newspaper outlets in Germany backfired (as was called out beforehand from everyone having an understanding of the internet and how it works),(reply>), Also for a person to be eligible for monetization the person needs a channel with at least 3  journalist and a income of 150 thousand dollars per year,(reply>), @Martin Bisanz yeah I know Rupert Murdoch wanted 1 billion for a revenue of 10 million but it's not only on youtube it's on all platforms that the Australian MSM uses to display news that the ACCC wants to prevent content creators their monetization,(reply>), that sounds like someone wanting to get rid of dissenting voices by taking away their ability to make money,(reply>), you should watch some legal review of what the changes to YouTube policy in response to the ACCC actually mean, because as far as I can tell, it's exactly the opposite of what you're claiming. YouTube doesn't want to be forced to share revenue with MSM in Australia (apart from what they're already sharing in ad revenue, I guess), so they'll not have their content on the platform