It really frustrates me when Lex asks guests about I/P conflict because he's shown so many times he himself does not fully understand what Zionism is and what its implications are... having this guest call it 'ethno-supremacism' without the knowledge to refute why it genuinely isn't and why in reality it is actually simply an indigenous rights movement (for Jews) is what holds Lex back from engaging in more productive discussions on this topic. As well as the notion of "cheapening antisemitism" by labelling anti-Zionists as anti-Semites Lex was in a position to counter this now common tactic of anti-Semitic anti-Zionists but couldn't do so due to his lack of knowledge on the subject. I really hope Lex sits down with an Israel/Jewish scholar of Zionism who can teach him what Zionism really is instead of having anti-Zionists define it for him where he can only take what they say as face value and potentially trust it as genuine fact instead of an uninformed opinion.,(reply>), @THE CATCH of course it matters what it is, it's integral to understanding the situation and addressing ignorant people like yourself who do not fully comprehend what is going on 🙄,(reply>), Doesn't matter what Zionism  is, what matters tho is what Zionists are doing to the Palestinians..,(reply>), @ou Langkous if the UN put forward a partition plan that allowed for a 2 state solution whereby the Native Americans were granted their own sovereignty and self-determination then yes I would completely support them and their pursuit of self-determination in their ancestral homeland. We (Jews) accepted the partition plan in '47 whereas the Arabs (Palestinians and Arab world) rejected it and opted for war instead (and lost, thankfully) which created their "nakba" meaning 'catastrophe', though failing to exterminate the Jewish state and massacre hundreds of thousands of Jews can hardly be considered a catastrophe by any rational human being but if you look up the Azzam Pasha quote you'll learn of the Arab leadership attitude towards Jews of the time. What we see today in this quagmire of a conflict is simply the result of Arab rejection to part of its former colonial territory (which it hadn't had sovereignty over for centuries due to Ottoman and British colonial rule) being handed back to those indigenous to it (Jews, Judea/Samaria/Israel) by more powerful benevolent colonial powers (the League of Nations -&gt; UN). That's all there is to it really!,(reply>), even if for arguments sake your point of view is correct, would you support the native americans following a similar pursuit and excersizing the same methods of force against the current american government and public?