The Pulitzer prize did the exact same shit just a few months ago to actively push for diversity.,(reply>), @Jeff D <br>The definition of racism got pretty morphed. I agree that prejudicial would be a better word though.<br>But I agree that Obama got the nobel price too early. But that was not yet during the "sjw-time".,(reply>), @ThePandafriend calling someone African American would imply they're a recent immigrant would it not?,(reply>), @ThePandafriend You don't win a Nobel Peace price for saying "I want peace in the middle east", you get it for actually creating peace in the middle east. That was at the start of his presidency. <br><br>You should also look up the definition of racism; as I keep telling people - Everyone is prejudice, few are racist.,(reply>), ​@Jeff D It was because he wanted to work for peace in the middle east and stuff like that. It had nothing to do with his race. Also when I think about it isn't saying "black" also racist? I mean the "blacks" are comprised out of a lot of races after all.<br>But in general imo everyone, no matter the race, sex or gender should be treated equally, unless the equal treatment causes a disadvantage (trans people or men in women sports have for example an advantage over people who were born as women).,(reply>), Remember when Obama won the Nobel Peace prize right after he became the US president just because he was black? Pepperidge farm remembers.