The problem is quite clear. IF intelligence differences across race turn out to be genetic, THEN the scientific community has effectively created the next generation of atomic weapons. The catch being that they can only be pointed at minorities. <br><br>Science creates knowledge and technology that is ultimately ALWAYS used to wage war by one group on another. It’s not that the critics need it to be explained to them any better. They are well aware that this science will be used as a weapon. Perhaps even worse than the atomic bomb, in that the weapon is not bomb shaped. It can exist and be used in the background, completely out of sight. And propagate via dog whistle and unconscious bias. <br><br>THIS is the crux of the issue. The solution? I suppose you would have to guarantee that the research would not be used to further disadvantage minority groups. How to do that? I have no idea…,(reply>), @Frank Duffy Yes you might be right. But if they would use the data regardless of it's real content, then any group who holds power could bend it to their will.<br><br>Do you think it as box that should be kept shut?,(reply>), @CraigKhatargo Not necessarily true. They could still use it to argue their relative superiority. You’re also assuming that these people are logical enough to come to the conclusion that the science contradicts their claim on their own. But I see your point and I think it could be a potential bulwark against misappropriation of the data.,(reply>), But white europeans are not at the top of this hierarchy, so if White supremacists use the IQ argument to much it would just backfire in the end.,(reply>), If I understand you correctly, I see one problem with the problem solving of the minority.<br>Has it not been in the hands of the minority to create the problems you mention? ..