SPOILER:<br>I honestly think Mike would have been justified to offer each of them $1000 at the end and keep $2000 for himself. His decision to go for the tokens really reunited the team and allowed them to build up money in the last round,(reply>), @Argenteus Most people just wouldn't care indeed, but even a small percentage of thousands of people might still be a lot of hate messages coming his way, even if they're dumb.,(reply>), @Digital Freedom Anyone who'd hate him for that is dumb. It's a game. A high stakes game, sure, but it's expected that you'll do whatever you can to maximize your winnings; everyone agreed to play knowing they might be screwed over, so you can't extrapolate how someone would behave in a genuine situation from that. He was nice to have split it, but I wouldn't have considered him a bad person for walking away with the full $6000.,(reply>), @flo xbr  The only ways to have a high likelihood of deception is to either have strangers as contestants to effectively negate any post-game consequences, or to have players as featured but playing for charity.,(reply>), @Digital Freedom He also knew the others in advance. That had an impact.,(reply>), @x87 yep that's what I thought too. I don't know Mike and be might just be a super nice guy but becoming hated on the internet is also not worth 4k for him.