Everyone sees Newtonian 1D-4D "necessary" universe is a dead model? <br><br>We know all about how important 0, and it's geometric counterpart 0D, are in 2022. <br><br>Quantum physics needs a better set of fundamentals than Newton can offer. (Nothing matches Newton's logic)<br><br>Leibniz went into great detail about 0D in his Monadology 📚.<br><br>Leibniz knew 0D as necessary and 1D-9D as contingent 300 years ago.<br><br>We have a workable ToE right now. Update Hamilton's 4D quaternion algebra from 1D-4D Newtonian nonsense to Leibniz's 0D-3D. <br><br>0D-3D matches quantum physics: <br><br>0D Monad is Quark <br>1D Line is Lepton <br>2D Plane is Guage Boson <br>3D Volume is Higgs Boson <br><br>0D-3D are our first four dimensions. <br><br>1D, 2D, 3D = spatial (line, width, height) <br><br>4D, 5D, 6D = temporal (length, breadth, depth) <br><br>7D, 8D, 9D = spectral (continuous, emission, absorption) <br><br>Symmetry/entanglement:  <br><br>1D, 4D, 7D line, length, continuous  <br><br>2D, 5D, 8D width, breadth, emission  <br><br>3D, 6D, 9D height, depth, absorption,(reply>), R