I can't help but notice how easy it is to follow &amp; understand  Stephen Wolfram vs Eric Weinstein.   Yet the complexity of the subject matter isn't any less &amp; my training aligns more with Weinstein,(reply>), I got to say i have had the exact feeling in this thread about Weinstein for some time. Maybe I'm naive but the thing that always gives me pause is that he's still managing director at Thiel. In my imagination, that's a job that allows no room for spin. I am guessing that if you aren't brilliant and proving it by delivering consistent results then you don't last long. But I'm not a finance guys so maybe I'm just wrong about the field.,(reply>), @The Black Hundreds he speaks about many topics maybe even outside of his expertise. What expertise are you suggesting?,(reply>), I can't help but feel the same way. I have a suspecting feeling that he's quite over the top and is enjoying his influence/power and trying to gain more. I recently unfollowed him on twitter.,(reply>), @ObsoleteBoomerMobile Obsolete I agree completely.   That was kind of my hidden point.   He's very bright but also a bit of a nut job,(reply>), Thats because Weinstein doesn't actually have anything meaningful to explain 99% of the time. Most of the time he's just regurgitating complex words without making any meaningful connections between them