Damn AMD is savage,(reply>), Matthew B. Oh right, so because AMD was right about their 8 core architecture means that it was still unethical to say that an 8 core CPU is an 8 core cpu. K then, also what about the oj murder case? How does a person losing their life fit in with a CPU exactly?,(reply>)," Matthew B. Also I just read about the single lawsuit you're talking about. Here's a direct extract from one of the articles:-<br><br>If the writeup at <a href=""http://legalnewsline.com/"">Legalnewsline.com</a> is remotely accurate", the lawsuit is utterly without technical merit. The suit supposedly alleges that because Bulldozer shares certain core resources, the cores can no longer work independently and the chip is no longer capable of performing eight instructions simultaneously. If that’s the hook Dickey is hoping to hang his lawsuit on, he picked a bad one. While it’s true that AMD shared core resources within Bulldozer, the chip doesn’t work the way Dickey alleges it does.,(reply>), Matthew B. You're* and why wouldn't they want the <b>trash</b> FX line if it was for free idiot. They didn't have to spend anything to get the CPUs so they could make stupidly easy money with the FX CPUs, business 101- if it makes more money than it costs, get it. Also yeah, they did do that because even if AMD came up with something that destroyed the competition people still buy Nvidia. Remember the r9 290x? It cost WAY WAY less than the 780shitTyI and performed equally and sometimes better but people still bought the garbage option. So why bother, if people don't want their tech why would they bother to make it for them? Again, business 101- if no-one buys your shit, don't make it. They got a huge payment from Sony to make Navi, the bottom of the barrel chips are probably gonna go to pc while the top of the line best and most efficient Navi chips will go to consoles most probably.,(reply>), Matthew B. Not that I know of :) I welcome more knowledge, so tell me with solid proof that they did something like Intel did. Also let's assume that it was totally AMDs fault for letting Intel bribe OEMs. But which party was the one here that bribed the OEMs even after they had the option to not to and forced them to use Intel chips even after AMD offered them to have their chips for literally free, I forget. The name was something like shintel, I think it was intelligence or something? OH WAIT, YEAH IT WAS INTEL!,(reply>), So releasing CPUs that aren't really that bad is as bad as being mega anti consumer and anti competitive. Okay, if that's how your brain works.