For the second game wouldn't a better strategy be to have two people vote 1, two people vote two, and one person vote 5? Then if any individual other than the 5 vote betrays they're only benefiting their matching pair.,(reply>), @eoghan. I disagree. For that game, it was immediately clear that trust would be broken, if not in round 1 or 2 then for round 3, where none would give the medals to anyone willingly (especially as that ended up the deciding factor for who won the briefcase) so I would've been happy to choose 3 in round 2 and win 150 while losing trust from the rest, which for Mike had been lost unjustly. Perhaps not break trust round 1 as the margin of gain would be too small.,(reply>), Except there's no real chance of anyone breaking rank anyway because it's so public (unlike round 3),(reply>), TRUE