Brian Greene is my favorite science communicator up there with Carl Sagan. He is so articulate and easy to understand while possessing such a rich vocabulary. The way he layers his sentences is so poetic and entertaining that it's impossible to be distracted.,(reply>), @Bruno oh boo hoo,(reply>), @Bruno well no hes not. Listen his last interviews. Atheist is like me to expose and ridicule religious lies. He said he "respect religion". Tyson and greene the same. Its hard to be atheist in srill primitive religious society,(reply>), @Prophet of the Singularity I prefer the mindset that Greene has, he doesn't need to  disqualify people for believing something or hating other beliefs like if religion as a whole is completely bad when it's not, it has also positive things. Of course, many people have died unjustly, just as religious people have died because of secular atheists, they reacted in the same way because they wanted to impose their atheistic thought, how did religions react? Religious fundamentalisms were formed, including Islamic terrorism. Both extremes are indefensible and unfortunate, but it is not good to add fuel to the fire and seek revenge on one side, so intolerance will never end. I have to read more of Sagan to be honest to have better understanding but I remember like he hated religion a lot, same case as Richard Dawkins.,(reply>), @Bruno understandable considering the lack of tolerance religion has had for science for 1,000s of years. Such as insisting the universe revolves around the Earth and Placing Galileo on trial for heresy for stating so and imprisoning him for stating this truth. Religion has never tolerated the truth so why should Atheists tolerate religion which is based on ancient myths and retold legends and not facts?,(reply>), The main difference is that Sagan was more of an intolerant atheist.