text: _________________________________________________________________________________FM 2-22.3
  AMOUNT OF PERTINENT KNOWLEDGE
  Most Least
  1-A 1-B 1-C
  2-A 2-B 2-C
  3-A 3-B 3-C
  Least
  NOITAREPOOC
  DETCEPXE
  AMOUNT OF PERTINENT KNOWLEDGE
  MMost Least
  Priioorriitty
  II IIII IIIIII IIVV VV
  1-A 1-B 1-C
  2-A 2-B 2-C
  3-A 3-B 3-C
  Least
  NOITAREPOOC
  DETCEPXE
  AMOUNT OF PERTINENT KNOWLEDGE
  ost Least
  Pr
  1-A 1-B 1-C
  2-A 2-B 2-C
  3-A 3-B 3-C
  Least
  NOITAREPOOC
  DETCEPXE
  PPrriioorriittyy
  II IIII IIIIII IIVV VV
  Figure 6-3. Interrogation Priorities by Screening Category.
  SCREENING METHODOLOGIES
  6-28. Depending on the specific operation or echelon, screening may be a
  separate operation or may be integrated into a specific collection mission. For
  example, a HUMINT collector accompanying a patrol encounters a civilian
  who may have information that is relevant to collection requirements. The
  HUMINT collector screens the source (that is, asks some general questions to
  determine the source’s level of cooperation and knowledge). Upon receiving a
  positive response, the HUMINT collector may debrief the civilian on a
  specific topic or question him on areas of PIR interest. He then reverts to the
  screening role to determine other relevant knowledge. If the HUMINT
  collector determines through screening that the source either has no relevant
  information or cannot be persuaded to cooperate within an operationally
  expedient timeframe, he is not debriefed as part of the screening process. In
  detainee or refugee operations, a separate element will normally conduct all
  screenings. They establish a prioritized list of sources who are then
  systematically questioned on specific topics by other HUMINT collectors or
  other technical specialists.