text: _________________________________________________________________________________FM 2-22.3
  clearly defined. The objective should include the type of information to be
  collected, methods of operations unique to the area, and the command
  objectives. Additionally, the collector should know limitations on liaison
  activities. These limitations include––
  • Prohibitions against collecting certain types of information or
  contacting certain types of individuals or organizations.
  • Memorandums of understanding with other echelons which delineate
  each echelon’s AOR and AORs for subordinate units.
  • Coordination requirements per DCID 5/1 dated 19 December 1984,
  which are required for selected types of liaison activities.
  5-48. Administrative considerations include––
  • Type, method, and channels of reporting information obtained from
  liaison activities.
  • Project and contingency fund site numbers to be used.
  • Funding and incentive acquisition procedures.
  • Limitations on the use of ICFs or incentives.
  • Reporting system used.
  • Authority under which the specific liaison program is conducted and
  guidelines for joint and combined operations are set.
  5-49. Benefits of liaison include––
  • Establishing working relations with various commands, agencies, or
  governments.
  • Arranging for and coordinating joint and combined operations.
  • Exchanging operational information and intelligence within legal
  limits.
  • Facilitating access to records and personnel of other agencies not
  otherwise accessible.
  • Acquiring information to satisfy US requirements.
  • Accessing a larger pool of information.
  INTERROGATION OPERATIONS
  5-50. HUMINT interrogation is the systematic process of using approved
  interrogation approaches to question a captured or detained person to obtain
  reliable information to satisfy intelligence requirements, consistent with
  applicable law and policy. Applicable law and policy include US law; the law
  of war; relevant international law; relevant directives including DOD
  Directive 3115.09, “DOD Intelligence Interrogations, Detainee Debriefings,
  and Tactical Questioning”; DOD Directive 2310.1E, “The Department of
  Defense Detainee Program”; DOD instructions; and military execute orders
  including FRAGOs. Interrogation is to be conducted by personnel trained
  and certified to use legal, approved methods of convincing EPWs/detainees to
  give their cooperation. Interrogation sources are detainees, including EPWs.
  5-51. Definitions of EPWs and rules for their treatment are contained in the
  Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (GPW).
  The definition and rules for the treatment of civilians are contained in the