text: Chapter 3
  3-18. Table 3-2 lists those staff members whose contributions to key intelligence tasks enable the
  effectiveness of the intelligence warfighting function. The list is not all-inclusive; staff members vary based
  on the echelon and specific unit.
  Table 3-2. Staff support to the intelligence warfighting function
  IPOE, situation development, and Collection management
  Staff section
  intelligence support to targeting input participation
  • Based on staff expertise, assist the • Based on staff expertise, develop
  intelligence staff in analyzing and information requirements, as needed; assist
  developing— the collection management team in—
  ▪Modified combined obstacle overlays. ▪Developing or refining indicators and
  ▪Civil considerations products. SIRs.
  ▪Threat objectives and the desired end ▪ Matching collection assets to SIRs.
  All staff sections: Provide subject matter state. ▪ Developing NAIs and active time.
  expertise to assist the intelligence staff in the ▪NAIs. ▪Planning the use of technical collection,
  following tasks. ▪High-value targets, which become high- biometric, forensic, and document and
  payoff targets. media exploitation capabilities.
  ▪Possible threat decision points. ▪Planning the use of ancillary collection
  • Assist the intelligence staff in deciding assets from associated warfighting
  what key aspects to add to the intelligence function or specialty knowledge.
  portion of the common operational picture • Assist the G-3/S-3 in developing the final
  and intelligence running estimate. Annex L (Information Collection).
  • Provides operational experience.
  • Assists in determining—
  ▪Friendly and enemy TAIs. • Develops threat C2 indicators, SIRs, and
  ▪Friendly and enemy engagement areas. NAIs.
  ▪Enemy time phase lines. • Develops threat reconnaissance,
  surveillance, and security operations
  G-3/S-3: Provides subject matter expertise on • Assists the entire staff in determining how indicators, SIRs, and NAIs.
  the art and science of military operations, the threat might integrate and synchronize • Develops threat maneuver unit indicators,
  including reconnaissance, surveillance, and its operations. SIRs, and NAIs.
  security operations. Evaluates IPOE products • Develops threat C2 models, intent,
  • Refines—
  to ensure they support friendly COA vulnerabilities, and templating.
  development and analysis. Plans and directs • Provides threat reconnaissance, ▪Friendly TAIs.
  information collection based on collection surveillance, and security operations ▪Friendly engagement areas.
  management. models; intent; vulnerabilities; and ▪Enemy time phase lines.
  templating. • Effectively integrates and synchronizes
  • Provides threat maneuver unit models, (feasible and supported) reconnaissance,
  intent, vulnerabilities, and templating. surveillance, and security operations into
  • Assists the staff in developing relative the collection management plan.
  combat power matrices for friendly and
  enemy forces.
  • Provides threat logistics models, intent,
  vulnerabilities, and templating. • Develops threat logistics and
  • Templates threat supply/resupply supply/resupply indicators, SIRs, and NAIs.
  G-4/S-4: Provides subject matter expertise on
  routes/points. • Conducts logistics planning for technical
  sustainment operations.
  Note. Threat logistic activities and lack of collection and document and media
  activities can be a good indicator of threat exploitation.
  intent and future threat operations/COAs.
  G-6/S-6: Provides subject matter expertise on
  friendly communications systems and assists • Provides threat communications systems
  the G-2/S-2 in identifying and evaluating models, intent, vulnerabilities, and Develops threat communications systems
  friendly communications systems’ templating, including networks and nodes. indicators, SIRs, and NAIs.
  vulnerabilities to cyberspace and • Conducts line-of-sight analysis.
  electromagnetic attack.