text: Chapter 3
  Leveraging Multinational Forces to Create Overmatch
  3-74. Expanding the operational area and striking across domains in depth through speed, range, and the
  convergence of multidomain capabilities provides multinational commanders with the ability to gain and
  maintain decision dominance and the overmatch necessary to prevail in LSCO.
  3-75. SFA teams embedded with the partner FSF can help set the conditions for overmatch by executing and
  enabling nonlinear operations. Given expansive geometry of globally contested operations and a numerically
  superior adversary, multinational forces create overmatch through their ability to attack throughout the depth
  of the operational area and to survive adversary counterstrikes.
  3-76. The partner FSF, properly enabled by SFA, can be instrumental in turning complex terrain into an
  advantage, enabling the multinational forces to attack and defeat land, air, and maritime targets by integrating
  multinational sensors and platforms.
  TRAINING AND EQUIPPING DURING LSCO
  3-77. SFA forces and SA activities may be used to train and equip FSF during LSCO. SFA forces may
  discover gaps in partner force capabilities during combat operations and then rapidly establish training
  programs or strategies to close those gaps.
  3-78. SFA forces and SA activities may use a combination of 10 USC and 22 USC equipping programs to
  close identified gaps or to provide additional capabilities. SFA forces may also provide training on these new
  material capabilities.
  3-79. SFA forces may work with the FSF generating force to build and expand capabilities to train new
  forces or mobilize reserves. This may be critical to sustaining combat power over time during extended
  LSCO.
  3-80. The United States has a long history of serving as the “arsenal of democracy.” Frequently, the United
  States provides a variety of U.S. equipment to partners during conflict. SFA forces and SA activities must be
  prepared to train on employment and sustainment of equipment, as well as to integrate its use into existing
  FSF doctrine. SFA practitioners must also be attuned to establishing systems to train qualified maintainers
  and replacement personnel on these systems.
  3-81. U.S. forces may provide support to a FSF engaged in conflict without directly engaging in that conflict
  themselves. In this case, SC becomes the main effort for defeating the adversary by training and equipping
  the FSF in a proximate location outside the conflict area and then continuing to advise remotely or virtually.
  3-82. Training and equipping a FSF from a proximate location creates unique challenges to SC forces. Since
  SC forces in this situation will not accompany the FSF into the conflict area, the FSF may encounter tactical
  or technical equipment employment problems beyond their capability to solve. At the operational force level,
  SC planners and practitioners should consider utilizing virtual and remote advising technologies (for
  example, reachback kits) to enable and support FSF units requiring specialized tactical and technical
  assistance from both military subject matter experts and technical experts in the defense industry.
  3-83. The virtual and remote advising capability not only enables the FSF in real-time combat operations but
  also improves and enhances future SC training and equipping programs. At the generating force level, SFA
  forces advise the FSF on integrating virtual and remote advising technologies into their DOTMLPF-P
  framework to increase capacity.