text: _________________________________________________________________________________FM 2-22.3
  such as, "You planned this operation for a long time, didn't you? Was it your
  idea?" The HUMINT collector must be patient when using this technique. It
  may appear the technique is not succeeding, but usually will when given a
  reasonable chance.
  8-63. Change of Scenery. (Interrogation and Other MSO) The change-of­
  scenery approach may be used in any type of MSO to remove the source from
  an intimidating atmosphere such as an “interrogation” room type of setting
  and to place him in a setting where he feels more comfortable speaking.
  Bringing a source into a formal setting to conduct an interrogation or
  debriefing has psychological implications. On the positive side, it places the
  HUMINT collector in a superior position since he is operating on his “home
  turf” and has set the conditions for the meeting. It allows the HUMINT
  collector control over the immediate environment including the positioning of
  the participants, to establish the desired atmosphere for the approach.
  8-64. However, there are potential negative factors in the conduct of
  questioning in an “Interrogation Room” environment. The source may be
  intimidated and more guarded; he may consider the formal setting in terms
  of an adversarial relationship; and he may limit his answers as a mode of
  self-protection. In some circumstances, the HUMINT collector may be able to
  invite the source to a different setting for coffee and pleasant conversation.
  When removed from the formal environment, the source may experience a
  feeling of leaving the interrogation behind. The perceived reduced pressure
  may lower his guard and allow him to attach less significance to conversation
  that occurs outside the formal setting, even though pertinent information is
  still being discussed. During the conversation in this more relaxed
  environment, the HUMINT collector steers the conversation to the topic of
  interest. Through this somewhat indirect method, he attempts to elicit the
  desired information. The source may never realize he is still being
  questioned.
  8-65. Mutt and Jeff. (Interrogation) The goal of this technique is to make
  the source identify with one of the interrogators and thereby establish
  rapport and cooperation. This technique involves a psychological ploy that
  takes advantage of the natural uncertainty and guilt that a source has as a
  result of being detained and questioned. Use of this technique requires two
  experienced HUMINT collectors who are convincing actors. The two
  HUMINT collectors will display opposing personalities and attitudes toward
  the source. For example, the first HUMINT collector is very formal and
  displays an unsympathetic attitude toward the source. He may, for instance,
  be very strict and order the source to follow all military courtesies during
  questioning. Although he conveys an unfeeling attitude, the HUMINT
  collector is careful not to threaten or coerce the source. Conveying a threat of
  violence is a violation of the UCMJ.
  8-66. At the point when the interrogator senses the source is vulnerable, the
  second HUMINT collector appears (having received his cue by a signal,
  hidden from the source, or by listening and observing out of view of the
  source), and scolds the first HUMINT collector for his uncaring behavior and
  orders him from the room. The second HUMINT collector then apologizes to
  soothe the source, perhaps offering him a beverage and a cigarette. He