text: Index
  Entries are by paragraph number.
  ministry of defense, partners, assistance from, 3-120 physiological regulation,
  responsibilities of, 1-88 benefits from, 3-131 managing emotions, 3-48
  mission objectives, organizational capabilities of, 4-26 planners, Interagency Conflict
  differences, 3-22 challenges of, 2-34 Assessment Framework, 4-25
  support to, 3-70 coordination of, 3-122, 3-123– partners, 2-15
  3-133
  MOEs, transition phases, 2-35 transition phases, 2-17
  differences in, 3-19
  transitions, 2-2, 2-30
  monitoring, District Stability forces and, 3-123
  Framework, 4-11–4-13 integration, 3-103 planning, conflict prevention, 4-22
  counterinsurgency, 1-135
  MOPs, transition phases, 2-35 Interagency Conflict
  partners, 2-3
  Assessment Framework
  multinational operations, 3-134– reconstruction and stabilization
  and, 4-20
  3-136 contingency, 4-23, 4-24
  neutrality of, 3-121
  participants, 3-136 rule of law and, 1-98
  planning, 2-3
  security sector reform, 1-74–
  N responsibilities, 1-73
  1-76
  security sector reform, 1-73
  naïve realism, 3-41 transition, 2-11, 4-47–4-49
  strengths, 3-70
  neutrality, humanitarian actors support from, 2-24 policies, security sector reform,
  and, 3-151 transfer from, 2-33 1-84
  nongovernmental organizations, transitions, 2-5, 2-38 policy, strategy and defense, 1-76
  code of conduct, 3-162–3-163 transparency and, 2-13
  populace, assessment of, 3-49
  humanitarian, 3-149–3-165 U.S. Government, 1-66–1-68
  attitudes, 3-136
  nonpermissive environment, partnerships, building, 3-54 expression, 2-11
  criminal justice system reform, interagency, 3-6 participation by, 2-65
  3-113 patience, transition and, 2-14– treatment of, 2-71–2-75
  O 2-15 principles, security sector reform,
  patterns, institutional, 4-36 1-77
  officials, criteria for, 2-63
  transitions, 2-6–2-15
  selecting, 2-66 peace building, civilian protection,
  1-58 protection, challenges, 1-62
  operational environment,
  civilians, 1-44–1-62
  understanding, 3-16 peace development, civilian
  guidelines for, 1-52–1-61
  protection, 1-58
  operational form, transitional positive outcomes for, 1-57
  military authority, 2-54–2-56 peace operations, 1-120–1-124 transitional military authority,
  political objectives and, 1-123
  operational level, transition, 2-1 2-75
  types, 1-120
  opportunity, describe, 4-44–4-46 provincial reconstruction teams,
  perceptions, focus on, 4-13
  3-11
  organizational culture, 3-18
  interagency partners, 3-24
  public health, infrastructure, 2-84
  organizational differences, 3-18– transparency and, 2-12
  transitional military authority
  3-23
  permissive environment, criminal and, 2-83–2-84
  organizations, differences, 3-18– justice system reform, 3-112
  public law, sources for funding,
  3-23
  perspective taking, 3-53
  3-94–3-98
  Oslo Guidelines, 3-164 ACTion approach, 3-38
  purpose, building shared, 3-76–
  outcomes, desired, 1-57–1-58 benefits, 3-35
  3-79
  challenges, 3-37
  oversight, civilian, 1-87–1-91
  social, 3-34 Q
  funding, 3-83
  legislative branch and, 1-89 perspectives, understanding, quick impact funds, 3-87–3-92
  responsibilities, 1-88 3-34–3-53
  R
  phase, definition, 2-17
  P
  reconciliation, conflict
  phases of stability framework, civil
  participants, See also actors, transformation, 2-7
  control, 1-14–1-16
  civilians, military forces, developing, 2-8
  civil security, 1-8–1-10
  partners, populace, transition, 2-7–2-11
  essential services, 1-19–1-21
  stakeholders stability transition phases, 2-21 reconstruction, USAID principles
  inclusion of, 1-81 support to economic and for, 3-115–3-119
  multinational operations, 3-136
  infrastructure development, reconstruction and stabilization,
  partner capacity, building, 3-137– 1-29–1-31 contingency planning, 4-23
  3-141 support to governance, 1-24– crisis response planning, 4-24
  building, 3-140 1-26