text: Chapter 4
  division serving in a role as a JTF or LCC, joint publications such as JP 3-0, JP 3-60, and JP 5-0 will dictate
  these processes, products, and procedures.
  4-10. Upon completion of orders production, rehearsals are critical for success in the OE. Planning time must
  be allocated for technical and tactical rehearsals. Rehearsals clarify the concept of targeting for observers,
  sensor operators, attack system managers, collection managers and the maneuver units they support.
  Rehearsals assist in identifying gaps and unfeasible options.
  SECTION IV – SYNCHRONIZATION
  4-11. The battle rhythm events at division and corps (primary synchronization mechanism) become
  progressively complex due to the increase in organizations, agencies, and enablers contributing to the
  targeting effort. The additional roles performed at these echelons place a greater demand on synchronizing
  internal and external elements in support of operations. In addition to a greater number of contributors,
  coordinating the parallel and supporting bureaus, boards, centers, cells, and working groups (referred to as
  B2C2WGs) within the staff must be emphasized to ensure integration and maximize the joint targeting
  working group and joint targeting coordination board.
  BATTLE RHYTHM EVENTS
  4-12. Divisions and corps operating as a combined/JTF or combined/JFLCC are expected to conduct the
  joint targeting cycle and perform all associated joint targeting tasks in accordance with JP 3-60 and applicable
  CJCSIs. In the event a division or corps is tasked as the ARFOR or tactical HQ, the targeting team must be
  prepared to participate in the joint targeting process of the higher HQ to submit target nominations for joint
  capabilities. All effects that cannot be created by organic capability must be requested through predetermined
  channels. Higher HQ typically prescribe the methods for support requests and target nominations. In addition
  to participating in the higher HQ processes, divisions and corps will conduct joint targeting working groups
  (referred to as JTWGs) and joint targeting coordination boards (referred to as JTCBs) at their level for echelon
  specific synchronization and integration. Working group and board facilitators must be conscious of role,
  targeting tasks, and command and support relationships to include all necessary participants. Units must train
  and develop B2C2WGs to enable distributed execution if the tactical environment dictates smaller command
  posts.
  JOINT/ TARGETING WORKING GROUP
  4-13. The targeting working group participants could vary widely at the division and corps. When operating
  as the ARFOR or a tactical HQ, attendees will be very similar to those at the brigade targeting working group.
  In addition to organic staff sections, below is a list of members to consider when building the working group
  at this level:
  * BCD/Air Operations Center.
  * Air Operations Center.
  * Higher HQ.
  * Corps/division intelligence targeting officer.
  * Corp/division and lower-echelon collection management, ACEs, and PED elements.
  * Military intelligence company unit commander, staff, and technical control elements in the unit.
  * Coalition mission partners and unified action partners as applicable.
  * Components (JFLCC, joint force air component commander, joint force maritime component
  commander.
  * Special operations joint task force (referred to as SOJTF).
  * Any relevant intelligence community members (Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security
  Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of State).
  * United States Space Command (referred to as USSPACECOM) or designated representative.
  * United States Cyber Command (referred to as USCYBERCOM) or designated representative.
  * Combat Aviation Brigade.