text: Chapter 7
  attack guidance matrix is a synchronization and integration tool. It is normally included as part of the fire
  support annex. However, it is not a tasking document. Attack tasks for unit assets, including IRCs, are
  identified as taskings to subordinate units and agencies in the body or appropriate annexes or appendixes of
  the OPLAN/ OPORD.
  Target Synchronization Matrix
  7-35. The target synchronization matrix lists HPTs by category and the agencies responsible for detecting
  them, attacking them, and assessing the effects of the attacks. It combines data from the high-payoff target
  list, information collection plan, and attack guidance matrix. A completed target synchronization matrix
  allows the targeting team to verify that assets have been assigned to each targeting process task for each
  target. The targeting team may prepare a target synchronization matrix for each COA, or may use the high-
  payoff target list, target selection standards, and attack guidance matrix for the war game and prepare a target
  synchronization matrix for only the approved COA.
  COURSE OF ACTION COMPARISON AND APPROVAL AND ORDERS PRODUCTION
  7-36. After war-gaming all the COAs, the staff compares them and recommends one to the commander for
  approval. When the commander approves a COA, the targeting products for that COA become the basis for
  targeting for the operation. The targeting team meets to finalize the high-payoff target list, target selection
  standards, attack guidance matrix, and input to the information collection plan. The team also performs any
  additional coordination required. After accomplishing these tasks, targeting team members ensure that
  targeting factors that fall within their functional areas are placed in the appropriate part of the
  OPLAN/OPORD.
  DETECT
  7-37. This function involves locating HPTs accurately enough to engage them. It primarily entails execution
  of the information collection plan. All staff agencies, including the IO officer, are responsible for passing to
  the G-2 (S-2) information collected by their assets that answer IRs. Conversely, the G-2 (S-2) is responsible
  for passing combat information and intelligence to the agencies that identified the IRs. Sharing information
  allows timely evaluation of attacks, assessment of IO, and development of new targets. Effective information
  and knowledge management are, therefore, essential.
  7-38. The information collection plan focuses on identifying HPTs and answering PIRs. These are prioritized
  based on the importance of the target or information to the commander’s concept of operation and intent.
  When designated by the commander, PIRs can include requirements concerning IO; obtaining answers to
  these requirements will assist the IO officer in assessing IO. Thus, there is some overlap between detect and
  assess functions. Detecting targets for nonlethal attacks may require information collection support from
  higher headquarters. The targeting team adjusts the high-payoff target list and attack guidance matrix to meet
  changes as the situation develops. The IO officer submits new IO IRs/RFIs as needed.
  7-39. During the detect function, the IO officer updates the high-payoff target list and target synchronization
  matrix. In addition to the information collection plan, the IO officer will use other information sources,
  particularly culturally-attuned ones that have unique access to or knowledge of the information environment
  and its various audiences. Examples include atmospheric teams; cultural attaches or advisors; joint,
  interorganizational or multinational partner cultural experts; interpreters, or indigenous leaders.
  DELIVER
  7-40. This function occurs primarily during execution, although some IO-related targets may be engaged
  while the command is preparing for the overall operation. The key to understanding the deliver function is to
  know which assets are available to perform a specific function or deliver a specific effect and to ensure these
  assets are ready and capable. Examples of delivery methods include but are not limited to:
  * Corps/division/brigade commander.
  * Provincial reconstruction team member or other unified action partner.
  * Host nation government leader.