text: Index
  Entries are by paragraph number.
  information, accessibility, 3-29 interagency standing committee, transitional military authority
  sharing, 3-123, 3-128 humanitarian assistance and, and, 2-50–2-52
  information-related capability, 3-165 leaders, See also commanders
  1-39–1-43 interagency team, evaluation by, and officials
  definition of, 1-39 4-30–4-31 assessment by, 2-37
  synchronized, 1-40 Interagency Conflict collaboration with, 3-56
  in-group/out-group bias, 3-43 Assessment Framework considerations, 2-6, 2-29, 3-5,
  and, 4-25 3-17, 3-22, 3-26, 3-55,
  initial response phase, civil
  responsibilities, 4-33, 4-37– 3-124
  control, 1-14
  4-38, 4-44 dynamics and, 1-55–1-56
  civil security, 1-8
  engagement, 3-116
  essential services, 1-19 intergovernmental organization,
  focus of, 2-14, 3-15
  support to economic and security sector reform and, 1-70
  interagency groups and, 3-27
  infrastructure development, interim civil authority, 2-98–2-110
  responsibilities, 1-52, 2-1,
  1-29 activities of, 2-102
  3-62, 3-68
  support to governance, 1-24 characteristics of, 2-101–2-103
  situational understanding,
  instability, criteria, 4-9 military and, 2-104–2-110 1-53–1-56
  forecasting, 4-19 occurrence of, 2-98–2-100 support from, 2-25
  organization, 2-103
  integration, comprehensive leadership, organizational
  approach, 2-23 internal defense and differences, 3-21
  definition, 2-4 development, 1-139–1-140
  legal restrictions, funding, 3-84
  multinational operations, 3-135 lines of effort, 1-140
  transition and, 2-4–2-5 objectives, 1-139 legal system, security sector
  reform, 1-99–1-100
  InterAction, Department of international law, transitional
  Defense and, 3-158–3-159 military authority, 2-40 legislative branch, security sector
  reform and, 1-89
  interaction, levels of, 3-125 International Red Cross, code of
  conduct, 3-162–3-163 legitimacy, civil affairs, 3-146
  interagency collaboration,
  establishment of, 1-71
  facilitating, 3-59 Red Crescent Movement and,
  justice system, 1-94
  3-160–3-163
  Interagency Conflict Assessment law enforcement, 1-95–1-98
  Framework, 4-14–4-49 interorganizational coordination, transparency and, 2-12
  application of, 4-20–4-28 definition, 3-2
  lines of effort, internal defense
  conflict diagnosis, 4-29–4-43 stability efforts and, 3-120
  and development, 1-140
  purpose of, 4-16–4-19
  J
  location, interagencies, 3-60
  responsibilities of, 4-25–4-28
  joint force commander,
  tasks of, 4-28
  M
  responsibilities of, 2-49
  transition into planning, 4-47–
  4-49 judge advocates, coordination by, mass atrocity, response, 1-63
  3-105 measurement, tools, 2-36
  interagency coordination, 3-5–
  3-18 justice, transitions, 2-10 mediation, relationships and, 3-73
  benefits of, 3-9–3-11 justice system, See also criminal military forces, combination of, 1-4
  characteristics of, 3-6–3-8 justice system coordination by, 2-108
  competencies for, 3-12–3-18 development of, 1-94 development of, 1-93
  considerations, 3-20 reform, 1-99 foreign humanitarian
  definition, 3-1 justice system reform, U.S. assistance and, 1-127
  fostering, 3-5 Government partners and, 1-67 interim civil authority, 2-104–
  relationships and, 3-74 2-110
  understanding, 3-14–3-15 K responsibility of, 1-33
  interagency group, considerations key actors, constituencies, 4-42– responsibilities, 1-97
  by, 3-57 4-43 security sector reform and,
  interagency partners, assistance identify, 4-39–4-41 1-78
  size needed, 1-4
  from, 4-14
  L stability operations and, 4-15
  capabilities of, 3-16–3-17
  collaboration, 3-10 law enforcement, development, strategies for, 3-58
  responsibilities of, 3-108 1-95–1-98, 1-104 support from, 1-5, 1-69
  oversight of, 1-91 military police, support from, 1-96
  interagency partnerships,
  challenges, 3-8 law of war, civilians and, 1-45 military support, humanitarian
  laws, penal, 2-93 action, 3-154