text: Chapter 2
  SECTION III – INTERRELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER OPERATIONS
  2-63. This section describes the relationship that cyberspace operations and EW have with other operations.
  It discusses how cyberspace operations and EW mutually support intelligence operations, space operations,
  and information operations.
  INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS
  2-64. As an operation, intelligence is (1) the product resulting from the collection, processing, integration,
  evaluation, analysis, and interpretation of available information concerning foreign nations, hostile or
  potentially hostile forces or elements, or areas of actual or potential operations; (2) the activities that result
  in the production; and (3) the organizations engaged in such activities (JP 2-0). Intelligence at all echelons
  supports the planning of cyberspace operations and EW and assists with defining measures of performance
  and effectiveness. Intelligence also assists the fires support element in developing the high payoff target
  (HPT) list, and collaborating with the CEMA section to ensure the high payoff target list includes enemy
  cyberspace and EW-related targets. Intelligence also plays a crucial part in assisting the fires support element
  in continued target development, including forwarding targets to the joint task force (JTF) headquarters for
  assessment as potential targets for the joint targeting list.
  2-65. Information collection supports cyberspace operations and EW by collecting information to satisfy
  commander’s critical information requirement(s) (CCIRs) and staff members’ information requirements
  (IRs) regarding friendly, neutral, and enemy cyberspace and EMS capabilities, activities, disposition, and
  characteristics within the OE. Information collection also drives capability development. A robust
  intelligence package is imperative to understanding the target space, developing tools and having meaningful
  effects in cyberspace. There are four tasks and missions nested in information collection: intelligence
  operations, reconnaissance, surveillance, and security operations (See Chapter 4).
  2-66. Information obtained by information collection drives the IPB process. Through the IPB process, the
  G-2 or S-2 analyzes operational and mission variables in an area of interest to determine their effect on
  operations. These variables affect how friendly forces will conduct cyberspace operations and EW within the
  assigned AO. Conversely, cyberspace operations and EW also contribute to intelligence by supporting
  information collection. Cyberspace operations and EW capabilities collect combat information to answer
  CCIRs and IRs for situational awareness and targeting.
  2-67. SIGINT, cyberspace operations, and EW may overlap during operations in the EMS. For this reason,
  effective integration of SIGINT, cyberspace, EW, and spectrum management operations extends well beyond
  simple coordination. Effective integration requires both deconfliction and identification of windows of
  opportunity among these operations. This integration requires close staff collaboration, detailed procedural
  controls, and various technical channels. See Chapter 4 for additional details.
  2-68. The intelligence staff also identifies adversary and enemy key terrain as part of the IPB process.
  Cyberspace operations use the concept of key terrain as a model to identify critical aspects of the cyberspace
  domain. Identified key terrain in cyberspace is subject to actions the controlling combatant (friendly, enemy,
  or adversary) deems advantageous such as defending, exploiting, and attacking. Key terrain in cyberspace
  corresponds to nodes, links, processes, or assets in cyberspace, whether part of the physical, logical, or cyber-
  persona layer. Key terrain in cyberspace may include—
  * Locations in cyberspace in which friendly forces can gather intelligence.
  * Locations in cyberspace that support network connectivity.
  * Entry points to friendly networks that require priorities for defense.
  * Locations in cyberspace that friendly forces require access for essential functions or capabilities.
  SPACE OPERATIONS
  2-69. Cyberspace and space operations are interdependent. Access to the space domain is critical to
  cyberspace operations, especially DODIN operations, enabling global end-to-end network connectivity. In
  the Army, the space domain is only accessible through space operations. Conversely, space capabilities such
  as navigation warfare, offensive space control, and defensive space control are dependent on operations