text: Chapter 4
  Figure 4-6. Example of changes to tactics based on density shift
  4-103. Individuals within a network can also shape an insurgency. If one individual or a small group of
  individuals have relationships essential to maintaining an insurgency, counterinsurgents must understand
  those relationships. One node or a very few central nodes could dominate a highly centralized network.
  These nodes are called hubs and can be essential for an insurgency. A less centralized network may have no
  single point of failure.
  OTHER ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORKS
  4-104. The district stability framework assists planners in identifying and mitigating sources of instability.
  Because of the uniqueness of the stability environment in each district within an area of operations, the
  district stability framework was designed to identify and mitigate sources of instability. This framework
  works as a planning assessment tool and nests into the military decisionmaking process. There are three
  steps to the district stability framework: analysis, design, and monitoring and assessment. (See ADRP 3-07
  for more details on the district stability framework.)
  4-105. The interagency conflict assessment framework is another framework used to understand conflict.
  The purpose of the interagency conflict assessment framework is to develop a commonly held
  understanding, across relevant U.S. government departments and agencies, of the dynamics driving and
  mitigating violent conflict within a country. This common understanding informs U.S. policy and planning
  decisions. It may also include steps to establish a strategic baseline against which U.S. government
  engagement can be evaluated. It is a both a process and a tool available for use by any U.S. government
  agency to supplement interagency planning. (For more information on interagency conflict assessment
  framework, see the U.S. government publication Interagency Conflict Assessment Framework.)