text: Chapter 3
  Table 3-2. Global clusters and lead agencies
  Global clusters Lead agencies
  Food Security Food and Agriculture Organization (co-lead).
  World Food Programme (WFP) (co-lead).
  Camp Coordination and United Nations (UN) High Commissioner for refugees (UNHCR)
  Management (co-lead).
  International Organization for Migration (co-lead).
  Early Recovery UN Development Programme.
  Education Save the Children (co-lead).
  UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (co-lead).
  Emergency Shelter Disaster: International Federation of the Red Cross and Red
  Crescent.
  Conflict: UNHCR.
  Emergency Telecommunications Process: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
  Data and security communications: WFP.
  Health World Health Organization.
  Logistics WFP.
  Nutrition UNICEF.
  Protection UNHCR.
  Water Sanitation and Hygiene UNICEF.
  COORDINATION WITH OTHER PARTNERS
  3-123. Army units interact with other partners to share information and, when possible, attain unity of
  effort to complete the primary stability tasks effectively. Stability is a multifaceted challenge with military
  and nonmilitary aspects. Different partners have important roles in achieving the desired outcomes;
  however, they will have dissimilar goals, priorities, and authorities. To the extent possible, Army units
  coordinate with these partners to achieve unified action, avoid gaps and redundancies, and resolve
  disagreements.
  3-124. Army leaders determine what level of cooperation is possible and desirable with other actors. They
  consider guidance from the chain of command and the changing situation. Some actors may not desire a
  cooperative relationship even when their stabilization goals overlap with U.S. goals. The operational-level
  determination may differ from tactical levels in certain areas. For example, potential topics for coordination
  may include information regarding civilian risks and needs, humanitarian space considerations, planned
  operations, requests for assistance, transitions, and security concerns. Eventually, host-nation actors assume
  control over the stability tasks, maintain security, and achieve other desired outcomes. This can be
  problematic when host-nation actors who are to be entrusted with the future may be the same actors who
  contributed to state fragility in the past.
  3-125. Different levels of interaction include coexistence, communication, information sharing, formal
  coordination, and collaboration. As shown in figure 3-1, higher levels of interaction may be possible when
  Army units share objectives with other actors and mutual trust exists. In some cases, it is only possible or
  necessary to understand each other’s objectives, requirements, capabilities, limitations, procedures, and
  terminology. However, some closer coordination is often critical; an important example is close integration
  with local police forces. In some cases, the Army units may conduct some level of interaction with
  potential adversaries.