re islamic genocide in article qjipo pen horus ap mchp sni de frank d s uucp frank o dwyer writes in article qinmd sp fido asd sgi com livesey solntze wpd sgi com jon livesey writes at any rate even if your interpretation is correct this does not imply that the killings are religously motivated which was the original poster s seeming claim tricky tricky i m replying to your blanket claim that they are not religiously motivated they aren t irish catholics in the south do not kill irish protestants in the south yet have precisely the same history behind them those who think the killings are religously motivated ignore the rather obvious matter of british occupation partition and misguided patriotism on both sides false dichotomy you claimed the killing were not religiously motivated and i m saying that s wrong i m not saying that each and every killing is religiously motivate as i spelled out in detail the problems fault along the religious divide because at the historical roots of this thing we have a catholic country partitioned and populated by a protestant one the grotesque killing of soldiers and civilians is supposedly motivated by patriotism civil rights issues and revenge it s only difficult to understand insofaras insanity is hard to understand religion need not be invoked to explain it does anyone else see the contradiction in this paragraph but to claim that the killings in n i are not religously motivated is grotesque all that means is that the church and believers are doing what they always do with history they can t face they rewrite it you re attacking a different claim my claim is that when an ira terrorist plants a bomb in warrington s he does not have as a motive the greater glory of god sorry frank but what i put in quotes is your own words from your posting qi b ec horus ap mchp sni de don t tell us now that it s a different claim if you can no longer stand behind your original claim just say so jon
