re is msg sensitivity superstition between who over what i would be most interested in seeing you provide peer reviewed non food industry funded citations to articles disputing that msg has no effects whatsoever you mean asserting you re being intellectually dishonest or just plain confused because you re conflating reports which do not necessarily have anything to do with each other olney s reports would argue a potential for problems in human infants but that s not to say that this says anything whatsoever about the use of msg in most foods nor does he provide any studies in humans which indicate any deleterious effects for obvious reasons it says nothing about msg s contribtion to the phenomenon of the chinese restaurant syndrome it says nothing about the frequent inability to replicate anecdotal reports of msg sensitivity in the lab okay mr dyer we re properly impressed with your philosophical skills and ability to insult people you re a wonderful speaker and an adept politician however i believe that all you were asked to do was simply provide scientific research refuting the work of olney i don t think the original poster sought to start a philisophical debate she wanted some information given a little effort one could justify that shooting oneself with a before breakfast is a healthy practice but we re not particularily interested in what you can verbally prove disprove or rationalize where s the research where are the studies i appoligize if this sounds flamish i simply would like to see the thread get back on track lone wolf happy are they who dream dreams ed philips and pay the price to see them come true slyx cc usu edu unknown
