re mr cramer s evidence in article philc hsii gft netcom com phil netcom com phil ronzone writes in article apr sun urz uni heidelberg de gsmith lauren iwr uni heidelberg de gene w smith writes when are libertarians going to draw a clear line between themselves and nambla by your own statements you were once a member of an organization which you knew supported exactly what nambla supports namely abolishing the age of consent i ve never supported any such organization you have while both organizations may on paper support the abolition of the age of consent there the resemblance stops one supports the removal of a coercive law the other a paper facade to legitimize sexual relations with children what s the difference in practice it amounts to your saying it s disgusting but should be legal or someone else saying let s allow the parties involved to decide what is disgusting or if you re like me you think that it isn t a coercive law because some children can t make informed consent brian kane buast astro bu edu hot young star astronomy dept boston university boston ma true personal salvation is achieved by absolute faith in ones true self
