re riddle me this in article apr ucsu colorado edu fcrary ucsu colorado edu frank crary writes in article apr jupiter sun csd unb ca j jupiter sun csd unb ca fuller m writes that the gas was not harmful as the sensitive caring janet reno described it is it as far as i know tear gas especially in large concentrations is very dangerous even toxic for small children this makes the fbi s supposedconcern for the safety of the children seem rather hypocritical not to mention that the g men believed the children didn t have gas masks but that was not with respect to the children the point of the gassing the feds knew that the children s health would be in danger and proceeded under the assumption that the motherly instinct of the davidian women would remove them from harm s way i busted a gut on that one someone else on the net observed that the administration s appeal to a woman s motherly instinct would never wash with feminists and liberals if a republican were in the white house i say that such an justification could only come from a feminist mindset btw i d read in the paper yesterday that the type of gas used was cs the paper didn t provide any specifics about it guess i m still writing malcolm fuller surveying engineering university of new brunswick malcolm atlantic cs unb ca or j jupiter csd unb ca malo periculosam libertatem quam quietam servitutem
