re was go hezbollah in article y m d witsend uucp d c sessions dcs witsend tnet com writes please clarify your standards for rules of engagement as i understand it israelis are at all times and under all circumstances fair targets their opponents are legitimate targets only when mirandized or some such i m sure that this makes perfect sense if you grant a priori that israelis are the black hats and that therefore killing them is automatically a good thing go hezbollah the corollary is that the hezbollah are the white hats and that whatever they do is a good thing and the israelis only prove themselves to be bad guys by attacking them this sounds suspiciously like a hockey fan i know who cheers when one of the players on his team uses his stick to permanently rearrange an opponent s face and curses the ref for penalizing his side of course when it s different when the roles are reversed d c sessions well you should have noted that i was cheering an attack on an israeli patrol inside lebanese territory while i was condemning the retaliatory shelling of lebanese villages by israeli and israeli backed forces my team you see was playing fair while the opposing team was rearranging the faces of the spectators in my team s viewing stands so to speak i think that you should try to find more sources of news about what goes on in lebanon and try to see through the propaganda there are no a priori black and white hats but one sure wonders how the idf can bombard villages in retaliation to pin point attacks on its soldiers in lebanon and then call the lebanese terrorists brad hernlem hernlem chess ncsu edu
