re gun nuts and holly silva in article c tsd va news cso uiuc edu irvine uxh cso uiuc edu brent irvine writes in article apr mnemosyne cs du edu rcanders nyx cs du edu mr nice guy writes both the gun nuts and the gays are aggressively defensive and quite hostile to any one trying to deprive them of their rights just like any group trying to protect their rights the fallacy of this whole thing is that your rights are not in jeapardy by these posts how can you say that i presume that you mean that talking about restricting rights is not the same as restricting those rights well arguing for those restrictions may lead to implementation much the same way as assault can lead to battery legal definitions most t p g people and the homosexual groups won t even discuss the subject at all in a polite form the mere raising of a question as to why the rights are there or what exactly the right encompasses bring shrill posts and angry hostile traffic well i can t speak for the homosexuals but i ve seen alot of polite discussion on t p g please everyone don t take this guy s word or mine for that matter on it read t p g for a while and try to determine from which direction most of the flameage originates if you post without flamebait you will generally receive reasoned responses true there are those who tend to lose their tempers quickly as there are on all newsgroups but they really do feel their rights are in jeopardy oh and neat trick talking derisively about another newsgroup while not crossposting to allow them to defend themselves i think a lot of t p g people have very thin skin when it comes to discussing these subjects methinks you doth protest too much dave schabel dave schabel opinions and comments contained herein are mine and schabel calspan com do not necessarilly reflect those of calspan corp or located in western ny its customers
