silence is concurance is it not the case that in the eyes of the law when someone is aware of something and has the capability of taking action and does not that individual may be held responsible for that action example the driver of a getaway car may be held as an accomplice to murder the i didn t know defense spawned the ignorance of the law is no excuse when an individual is held as a material witness to a crime is there a criminal charge against the individual if not on what grounds is the person imprisoned james w meritt m mwunix mitre org or jmeritt mitre org the opinions above are mine if anyone else wants to share them fine they may say so if they wish the facts belong to noone and simply are
