re soc motss et al princeton axes matching funds for boy scouts student writes somewhere roger colin shouse writes about radical gay dogma somewhere else he claims not to claim to have a claim to knowing those he doesn t know there are at least twenty instances of this kind of muddleheaded fourth reich sophistique shit in his postings maybe more in fact i m not sure the instances could be counted because they reproduce like a virus the more you consider his words my question is this what is the best response to weasels like shouse and stan krieger possibilities a study them dispassionately and figure out how they work then remember what you ve learned so as to combat them when they or their clones get into office contribute your insights to your favorite abnormal psych ward b learn to overcome your repugnance for serial murder this posting is totally uncalled for in rec scouting the point has been raised and has been answered roger and i have clearly stated our support of the bsa position on the issue specifically that homosexual behavior constitutes a violation of the scout oath specifically the promise to live morally straight there is really nothing else to discuss trying to cloud the issue with comparisons to blacks or other minorities is also meaningless because it s like comparing apples to oranges i e people can t control their race but they can control their behavior what else is there to possibly discuss on rec scouting on this issue nobody including bsa is denying anybody the right to live and or worship as they please or don t please but it doesn t mean that bsa is the big bad wolf for adhering to the recognized positive religious and moral standards on which our society has been established and on which it should continue to be based stan krieger all opinions advice or suggestions even unix system laboratories if related to my employment are my own summit nj smk usl com
