re new thought on deuterocanonicals it is more likely than not that when st john or whomever wrote the book of revelation what was then considered scripture was not the same thing you and i are holding in our hands revelation was almost certainly written durin the reign of domition sp a d thus it could be argues that we are all in sin if we accept peter as scripture since it was added to the book after the composition of revelation when we are told to add nothing more okay i went back and looked sure enough my hunch was right peter was most likely written between a d revelation was almost certainly written between a d odds are the gospel of john was written around a d best dates for luke and acts are around a d maybe later again this is from footnoted information in the new american bible the best translation i ve come across in regards to giving complete historical information about each book mike of course the folks who you re arguing with almost certainly do not accept peter as being pseudonymous in that case they d have to date it far earlier than this clh
