re death penalty was re political atheists in article c rlyz mt darkside osrhe uoknor edu bil okcforum osrhe edu bill conner writes this is fascinating atheists argue for abortion prove it i am an atheist it doesn t mean i am for or against abortion defend homosexuality as a means of population control an obvious effect of homosexuality is non procreation that unlike your statement is a fact please prove that a homosexuality is defended as means of population control b being atheist causes you to hold these beliefs i defend homosexuality because a what people do with their bodies is none of my business b i defend the equal rights of all humans do you insist that the only values are biological define values prove your statement something is contardictory it cannot exist which in this case means atheists i suppose prove your statement electrons are waves electrons are particles i believe in both i have physical proof of both i have no proof of god tm only an ancient book that is not indicative of the existence of a being with omnipotence or omnipresence and by your own argument christians don t exist i would like to understand how an atheist can object to war an excellent means of controlling population growth or to capital punishment i m sorry but the logic escapes me and why just capital punishment what is being questioned here the propriety of killing or of punishment what is the basis of the ecomplaint first of all your earlier statements have absolutely nothing to do with your question why did you post them to show that athiests besides not existing your view are more humane than christians other religions secondly i am very much for the control of population growth the logic that you cannot grasp indicates ignorance of contraception but of course this is outlawed sometimes literally by religion since if it can t create more followers it will die i bill adda wainwright does dim atal y llanw o eczcaw mips nott ac uk o mae sig ma ar werth
