re rewording the second amendment ideas in article apr ousrvr oulu fi dfo vttoulu tko vtt fi foxvog douglas writes this means you would support a ban if it were narrow enough good this was not stated nor implied try asking nerve gas and mustard gas are well defined other poisonous gasses should be individually banned only if it can be shown that there is no use not related to weaponry licenses should be available for research purposes on such chemicals this is laughable licenses right so then i would need a license to possess chlorine gas it is a weapons grade poison would i be breaking the law then if i were to say pour chlorox on the spot where my cat pissed on the floor the reaction of ammonia and bleach liberates pure chlorine gas do i go to jail for this why or why not would i need a license to possess other chemical agents what about nicotine deadly poison and rather fast acting must i now become licensed to posess tobacco and what about nicotine sulphate an even deadlier poison will i need a license to possess this type of insecticide what about raid tm black flag gasoline benzene hydrazine a violent poison will i go to jail for possessing a can of tomatoes that went bad with botulinus what about my mom pop qc lab where i use cyanogen bromide mustard gas to do lot analysis on certain non prescription pharmaceuticals what if i wish to use potassium cyanide to recover gold from aqua regia a license would i need a license to possess beryllium perhaps the most poisonous non radioactive metal how about beryllium copper alloy do i need a license for nitrate fertilizers which could be used to make very powerful explosive devices such as the one that the ira recently detonated killing and injuring can i have vinegar without license hydrogen peroxide where is the line drawn i am not a lawyer but these ideas could certainly be a basis for definitions yes they could but are they good ideas are they needed is there any shred of sanity in them scarcely i trust andy v
