re hr a gun law i can live with in article apr dg rtp dg com meyers leonardo rtp dg com bill meyers me writes a bill to establish the right to obtain firearms for security and to use firearms in defense of self family or home and to provide for the enforcement of such right in response to which in article qkeo drg eagle natinst com chrisb natinst com chris bartz writes so you have the right unless the federal government says you don t i don t think i like this very much and in article qkshq l transfer stratus com cdt sw stratus com c d tavares writes maybe i m too religious but when i see a bill to establish a right i wince keep in mind what the law giveth the law can taketh away and in article ql aiinn c gap caltech edu arc cco caltech edu aaron ray clement s writes right mentioned in the bill is already established under the second amendment the bill should be reworded to reaffirm the second amendment hey guys you re absolutely correct and well on the way to winning this battle and losing the war yes there are serious philosophical flaws in hr technical ones too how d you like to sue the feds lose and have to pay their reasonable attorney s fee still i have one basic question compared to what we ve got is hr a better or b worse this one shouldn t even take you three guesses if there s a good enough show of support for hr maybe for a change we could be the ones saying it s a reasonable first step the nd amendment is about sovereignty not duck hunting
