re new study out on gay percentage in article apr romulus rutgers edu kaldis romulus rutgers edu theodore a kaldis writes in article apr galileo cc rochester edu as b uhura cc rochester edu some caifone writes i certainly hope you don t have an so sir what is so supposed to signify i prefer the companionship of a person not a euphemism because if she heard thankfully you got the gender right for i am not a deviant wow another clayton wannabe typical response lack of logic define deviant someone who deviates from the normal ok so far define normal erm umm if you define yourself as normal then it is for you to prove that you are within limits which then brings in the question what are the limits for you we may have to broaden them to other s intolerance normal difficult to prove from what you have posted it must follow that normal to you means someone without compassion and a sense of justice but it does look as if you went to the clayton school of logic doesn t it how disparaging you are towards political minorities sexual deviants do not comprise a political minorit y again an astounding lack of logic wow you must define what you say such that everyone agrees here you have used the phrase sexual deviant how in the hell do you define that as someone who does something sexually that you don t by this definition you most probably mean the majority of the planet how do you know that your next door neighbour doesn t like custard to be spread over his genetalia then have it licked off by his wife is this sexual deviancy how do we know that you don t like something sexually which others may find repulsive is having sex doggy fashion a sexual deviancy please be more specific and where you do back up your claims or i may have to go to hospital due to laughing too much at yours and clayton s postings secondly if we assume for the moment that the phrase sexual deviant means such people as homosexuals bisexuals c basically everyone you don t like i think that your phrase do not comprise a political minorit y why the brackets is a non sequiteur gay groups exist which lobby their governments that is a fact prove it false hence they are a politial group you state that they are not a political minority are they therefore a political majority i think you boobed really big on this one try thinking about your arguments and if she had any shred of self respect she d be out the door i only associate with girls who do indeed have self respect but were i to find myself with the sort who would be inclined to head out the door on account of my views regarding the aberrant behavior known as homosexuality i would encourage her to indeed do so and i would further advise her not to let the door whack her on the backside on the way out who needs such an airhead prove the first statement please dates phone numbers c again your logic fails again you make statements which you cannot and most probably will not maintain you state that a person girl in this context who considers equal rights for all humans to be an airhead as clayton your best mate would say it just shows how screwed up you are pretty soon they will find themselves retreating back into the closet where they belong don t count on it sweetheart oh i can t do anything but count on it after all it is inevitable for it is part of the natural order of things throughout history nature has always asserted itself don t be so arrogant as to assume that this foolish and misguided generation can change the nature of man where practically every other generation has failed greater men than you haven t been able to do this the above most certainly will happen no matter how much you may wish to pretend otherwise proof please proof that homosexuality is not part of the natural order proof that nature has always asserted itself are you saying that nature is a conciousness are you pretending that you have the ability to see the future are you god tm in fact by your arguement are you waiting for the black people to become slaves again because they were reviled as sub human nb not my view at one time again your arguement falls on its ass moreover i m not your sweetheart touchy touchy touchy right i have shot holes in each and every one of your arguements you are most probably going to put me in your kill file because you have no answers to my questions and challenges since you cannot support your arguments it merely goes to show that what you write is based upon your personal prejudices and cannot be taken to be fact of any kind i await an intelligent response the views expressed herein are theodore a kaldis my own only do you seriously kaldis remus rutgers edu believe that a major university rutgers remus rutgers edu kaldis as this would hold such views adda wainwright does dim atal y llanw o eczcaw mips nott ac uk o mae sig ma ar werth
