re after years can we say that christian morality is in article r su dm horus ap mchp sni de frank d s uucp frank o dwyer writes in article sandvik sandvik kent apple com sandvik newton apple com kent sandvik writes frank unless you didn t realize it you are just now involved in a debate where we have various opinions and each entity has its own frame where the opinion is expressed i think i don t need to state the dreadful r word so it s sometimes correct to say that morality is objective or what if you were able to prove that morality is objective then it would be correct to do so the problem is by the very meaning of the words in question to do so is oxymoronic of course you could redefine the words but that would still not lend support to the underlying concept after all i could hardly be wrong without dragging in the o word this does not parse how could you hardly be wrong without dragging in the o word for your part when you say that relativism is true that s just your opinion why do folk get so heated then if a belief in relativism is merely a matter of taste to be fair you have been very calm i get the impression that s because you don t care about notions of objectivity in any flavour right i have no problem with objectivity at all it is my objectivity that has led me to conclude that morality is subjective frank o dwyer i m not hatching that odwyer sse ie from hens by evelyn conlon eric
