re after years can we say that christian morality is frank d s uucp frank o dwyer writes specifically i d like to know what relativism concludes when two people grotesquely disagree is it a both are right b one of them is wrong and sometimes though perhaps rarely we have a pretty good idea who it is c one of them is wrong but we never have any information as to who so we make our best guess if we really must make a decision d the idea of a right moral judgement is meaningless implying that whether peace is better than war e g is a meaningless question and need not be discussed for it has no correct answer e something else a short positive assertion would be nice from whose point of view would you like to know what relativism concludes one of the people involved in the argument or some third person observing the arguers mathew
