re is msg sensitivity superstition in article rcfj innmds roundup crhc uiuc edu mary uicsl csl uiuc edu mary e allison writes which was why i started checking every time i got sick and every time i got sick msg was somehow involved in one of the food products which points up the studies made by amateurs did you also check every time you did not get sick no you say why not check every thing you eat when you don t get sick and find out how much msg you re actually consuming all that s needed now is that final step a double blind study done on humans there isn t even an ethical question about possible harm as this is a widely used and approved food additive but some say that only of the population has a problem with msg some say it s more like but let s say that it s how many people would have to be tested that would have a problem also i know i have a problem with it and i wouldn t volunteer for a test if you knew enough about what the test was about to decide that you didn t want to participate because it involved msg you d ve already made yourself ineligible since msg is detectable by taste how can anybody be so clueless as to what double blind studies are all about carl j lydick internet carl sol gps caltech edu nsi hepnet sol carl disclaimer hey i understand vaxen and vms that s what i get paid for my understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level or below so unless what i m saying is directly related to vax vms don t hold me or my organization responsible for it if it is related to vax vms you can try to hold me responsible for it but my organization had nothing to do with it
