re watergate was temper tantrums from the s in article apr oracle us oracle com mfriedma us oracle com michae writes in article apr pony ingres com garrett ingres com writes in article apr oracle us oracle com mfriedma us oracle com michae writes in article apr pony ingres com garrett ingres com writes in article philc lru lxa netcom com phil netcom com phil ronzone writes in article apr pony ingres com garrett ingres com writes why did ford go to the trouble of pardoning him if he did nothing wrong duh garrett you ignorant slut read up on watergate so are all you guys so unarticulate that you all must must call names are none of you above grade school levels in intelligence jesus garret haven t you ever watched saturday night live not only are you a historical ignoramus but you are also a cultural ignoramus what does saturday night live have to do with anything when they make fun of someone they do it with a little bit of creativity and talent you on the other hand have a complete lack of creativity talent and verbal mechanics and if you think that snl is culture then it just shows where your intellectual level is what is generally accepted is that nixon attempted to cover up the break in after it occurred it was actions in pursuit of that end that he was pardoned for you of course are so ignorant of history that you think that he was involved in the break in i guess that makes you even dumber than me then because he was officially accused of alot more than that let me list it for you obstructing justice as part of the coverup granted abusing his presidential powers to do the coverup only in part let s not forget that nixon personally authorized the break in of ellsberg s psychiatrist subverting the constitutional rights of citizens i challenge you to provided any evidence that nicon was officially accused of thi if nothing else it s meaningless how can you subvert someone s constitutional rights the verb doesn t go with the noun tell that to the house that was the charge or are you going to challenge me on that as well subverting the constitutional rights of citizens has nothing to do with covering up for watergate you have been proved wrong again but i don t expect you to believe this since your arrogance has replaced your reason and willfully disobeying lawful subpoenas for white house records and tapes part of the coverup granted garrett please note that every charge you mention except for the one that has no english meaning was part of the coverup wrong again you forgot about ellsberg btw why od you think he tried to cover it up loyalty to people who worked for him this would be funny if it weren t so sad that you actually believe this in his loyalty he allowed the people who worked for him to take the rap while he idly sat by and let it happen if he really was loyal to the people who worked for them he would have pardoned them before he resigned death to all modifiers he declared one day and out of garrett johnson every letter that passed through his hands went every garrett ingres com adverb and adjective the next day he made war on articles the following day he blacked out everything in the letters but a an and the joseph heller s catch
