re burden of proof in article apr ousrvr oulu fi ktikkane phoenix oulu fi kari tikkanen writes in math exam i have burden of proof when it says prove that no elements in set a n divided by leaves as a remainder n prime n integer does exist well mathematics is formal science real world may be different thing but if entertainment company sell computer programs saying they are virus safe doesn t they have burden of proof that viruses don t exist in their floppies i don t think so the assumption is there if it turns out that their software has a virus then it is up to you to prove that fact to a court to get any damages you are theoretically suppossed to be able to get damages for that but you have to give some evidence that the virus came from that software but since the computer company is the defendent they are uninvolved until proven guilty ktikkane phoenix oulu fi kari tikkanen b begin sf oulu i f x dx s s eq i finland vega a end please not pascal nooooo mccullou whipple cs wisc edu never program and drink beer at the same m time it doesn t work
