re poisoning the well was islamic genocide in article rbpq ibg horus ap mchp sni de frank d s uucp frank o dwyer writes in article bbacbc i dbstu rz tu bs de i dbstu rz tu bs de benedikt rosenau writes by the way that s why i consider you a theist points consisting of rhetorical fallacy unsupported claims and demonstrable falsehoods deleted no wonder that we don t see any detail for this claim it is good to remember that you have answered the statement that you are a theist by another correspondent with that you are not a member of a denomination it is either stupidity or an attempt at a trick answer not unlike the rest of your arguments mr roseneau i have little patience with people who tell me what i believe and who call me a liar when i disagree i m in a position not only to know what it is that i believe but to say so i am an agnostic i am extremely wary of the way you use words like in this case there are broader definitions of gods used by persons who are considered by themselves and others theists i have pointed to that in my post you use one of them your use of definitions seems to rest on the assumption because my moral is objective absolute or the other buzz words you are so fond of everybody will know it and there is no need to define it more exactly and as a user has shown recently the easiest way to dispell you is to ask you for definitions you are of course free to speculate on my motives for objecting to seeming irrational bigotry if you wish but the flaws which i point out in your arguments stand on their own merits since you are the only one seeing them and many correspondents point to the flaws in your reasoning respectively discussing i can t say i am impressed benedikt
