re burzynski s antineoplastons nnget in article c bjyt a k ssr com sdb ssr com scott ballantyne says in article icgln asuacad bitnet icgln asuacad bitnet writes moss is people against cancer s director of communications people against cancer seems to offer pretty questionable information not exactly the place a cancer patient should be advised to turn to and where do you advise people to turn for cancer information most maybe all of the infomation in their latest catalogue concern treatments that have been shown to be ineffective against cancer and many of the treatments are quite dangerous as well it seems to me you ve offered a circular refutation of moss s organization who has shown the information in the latest book of pac to be questionable could it be those regulatory agencies and medical industries which moss is showing to be operating with major vested interests whether one believes that these vested interests are real or not or whether or not they actually shape medical research is a seperate argument if one sees a possibility however that these interests exist then the fact that some of the information put out by pac has been refuted by the medical industry doesn t hold much weight as for the ineffectiveness of antineoplasteons the fact that the nih didn t find them effective doesn t make much sense here of course they didn t i tend to have more faith in the word of the patients who are now alive after being told years ago that they would be dead of cancer soon they are fighting like hell to keep that clinic open and they credit his treatment with their survival anyone who looks at the nih s record for investigation of alterna tive cancer therapies will easily see that they have a strange knack for find ing relatively cheap and nontoxic therapies dangerous or useless gn
