re challenge to microsoft supporters in article sundaram msuinfo sundaram egr msu edu wrote jenk microsoft com jen kilmer writes much bs deleted for brevity again my point was that not all microsofties are here to sell readers on our products which would conflict with the no ads philosophy of usenet nor do we necessarily have access to info that others have it certainly smacks of that remember the poll that you quoted saying that you had seen a of users being satisfied with dos care to recall how unbiased the sample set was that post sure looked like fud and coming from a microsoftie well it sure seemed like something was not on level it came from a reseller survey advocacy is good but spreading fud to advocate your favorite os is very unethical especially when you have a vested interest in the success of that os i don t recall any fud here maybe an example i also get tired of people assuming that microsofties are like members of the borg that is because their actions seem to invite this opinion never seen more defensive people in my life moreover many of their posts seem to encourage this too imho for the most part this newsgroup is attack oriented microsoft has been attacked on anything ranging from the quality of our products the intelligence of our people the integrity of our business etc anyone would get defensive when being baselessly attacked we are human beings as well you should expect a response when a claim that an employee might feel is unwarranted is leveled seriously speaking it is a shame that ms techie employees get the heat for ms s actions most of which are perpetrated by the management and marketing i am sure that they are very talented etc i have not doubts about their abilities just about the ethics of their marketing practices divya divya live long and then die a slow and horrible death what confucius wanted to say
