re nc vs hunt marine gay bashing in wilmington nc verdict wdstarr athena mit edu william december starr writes in article apr lynx dac northeastern edu tfarrell lynx dac northeastern edu thomas farrell said a good case a f king good case the defense lawyer asked the victim questions like what kind of sexual perversions do you participate in and you think he made a good case speaking as someone who s only about six weeks and a tuition bill away from becoming an unemployed slob with a law degree i d really like to see a transcript of this trial i d especially like to know what happened immediately after the defense attorney asked that question assuming that the reports that he did so are accurate i m not accusing tom farrell of making anything up but this is the sort of case that spawns garbled misquotes false rumors and urban legends like tribbles it d be nice to think that the prosecutor objected irrelevant prejudicial inflammatory take your pick and that the judge upheld the objection having watched most of the televised trial i can answer that when such statements were made by the defense atty the prosecutor did object and the judge tended to sustain the ones that were obviously falling under the self incrimination type of objection there was quite a bit of meta discussion during the trial over the use of graphic language with most folks asking the judge if she wanted to hear the exact language practically every time the defense tried to get the plaintiffs to self incriminate by asking them such questions there were objections and sustains at one point the defense managed to get in a quip about solicitation for a felony and the judge herself said sustained before the prosecutor could get the objection stated g wolfe woodbury the wolves den durham nc this site is not affiliated wolfe wolves durham nc us with duke university idiots uucp duke wolves wolfe standard disclaimers apply above all we celebrate celebrate the circle statement of purpose
