re new study out on gay percentage piatt gdc com gary piatt writes clayton cramer cramer optilink com wrote when you and the rest of the homosexual community pass laws to impose your moral codes on me by requiring me to hire rent to or otherwise associate with a homosexual against my will yes you are in my face until homosexuals stop trying to impose their morals on me i will be in your face about this ahh what s good for the goose is not necessarily what s good for the gander you don t want homosexuals to impose their moral codes such diabolical ideas as equal rights on you yet you are willing to impose your moral codes on them do i detect a double standard what exactly does the american constitution say about the right to association homosexuals whether clayton likes it or not are as much members of society as he is as such they have the right to participate and have an equal opportunity to pursue their goals no one is saying that clayton should be forced to associate with queerfolk in his private life one suspects the gays in question would object also but by proclaiming the general right not to associate with them in the public sphere which includes housing hiring etc he s giving his right to non association priority over their rights to equal access to opportunity historically people can associate publically with disliked groups with very little ill effect however cutting a group off from normal commerce has a severe impact on their lives clayton why exactly should your right to non association in the public sphere take priority over homosexual s rights to equal opportunity tony quirke wellington new zealand quirke a kosmos wcc govt nz usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea massive difficult to redirect awe inspiring entertaining and a source of mind boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it gene spafford
