re yet more rushdie re islamic law in article bu edu jaeger buphy bu edu gregg jaeger writes deletion that s was the original answer while it does not say that he has the head necessarily up its ass it would be meaningless and pointless if it was not insinuated i don t see a header referring to bob as the poster to whom i was responding i distinctly remember thinking i was responding to you when i wrote this in which case i would make no apologies but in the event that i was in fact responding to bob i hereby apologize to bob for insinuating such a thing sorry bob on the other hand it could be that ben has his head so far up his ass that he can t tell himself from bob sorry gregg it was no answer to a post of mine and you are quite fond of using abusing language whenever you think your religion is misrepresented by the way i have no trouble telling me apart from bob beauchaine i still wait for your answer to that the quran allows you to beat your wife into submission you were quite upset about the claim that it was in it to be more correct you said it wasn t i asked you about what your consequences were in case it would be in the quran but you have simply ceased to respond on that thread can it be that you have found out in the meantime that it is the holy book what are your consequences now was your being upset just a show do you simple inherit your morals from a book ie is it suddenly ok now is it correct to say that the words of muhammad reflect the primitive machism of his society or have you spent your time with your new gained freedom benedikt
