re nhl letter roger s response in catcherc q lb netcom com catcher netcom com paul w francisco writes i wouldn t say that the letter clearly implies representation of the views of a group that you belong to it represents a subset that you don t belong to of a larger group which you do if only because this isn t a moderated group and you can bet that i wouldn t be the only one not belonging to the moderated group if it was moderated by an anally retentive little dullard like yourself look there are several ways to state an opposing viewpoint three that come to mind are as follows i hardly need you to presume to lecture me on how to communicate my points of view this posting that you have made is the second on the subject of the nhl letter and you have yet to communicate your opinion on the matter instead you content yourself with flaming me say it directly and obnoxiously result result moronic little busy bodies like yourself take advantage of a perceived opportunity to post rules for others to live by you realize that anything you say can and most certainly will be used against you well if using it against me means you are going to post something of significance then by all means go ahead i insist otherwise why don t you just go back to sleep or do whatever it is that you do when you are all by yourself cordially as always maynard ramsey cs laurentian ca so many morons rm and so little time
