re rejoinder questions to israelis in article apr yuma acns colostate edu bh lance colostate edu writes bh tsiel bh i would contend that there was shelling from both sides of the border bh starting from the early s certainly the plo did shell northern bh israel from the arqoub region but israel did much more shelling bh destroying several south lebanese villages at the very least bh we can say that both sides exchanged shelling with occasional bh aerial raids by israel on lebanese villages bh in any case steve s characterization that the invasion was only in bh response to years of shelling from lebanon is false israel had bh many reasons for invading but mainly it did so to install a government bh in lebanon favorable to israel and it nearly achieved this aim bh with the election of basheer el gemayel and his brother amin bh el gemayel but the internal situation in lebanon was too hard bh to control and predict so israel had to withdraw and amin el gemayel bh had to abrogate the th of may agreement basil i was only correcting steve s statement that geurillas were shelling israel from the golan which was absurd the fact that israel did much more shelling was in response to palestinian shelling from lebanon israel has no intention of keeping an inch of lebanese territory israel will continue to fight hizbullah plo fplp etc as long as its northern border is not quiet if the lebanese army can control these elements then i think we can see genuine peace on the israel lebanese border i remind you that a couple thousand lebanese cross each day into israel to work as for the election of bashir gemayel it is true that he was favorable to israel is that why the syrians killed him his brother amin was a syrian puppet if he had not been he would have been dead by now tsiel tsiel ohayon jcpl co jp if you do not receive this e mail please let me employer may not have same know as soon as possible if possible opinions if any two percent of zero is almost nothing
