billsats jeffrey l cook sez this object would not interfere with anyone s enjoyment of the night sky it would be invisible at night nor would it have any significant impact on astronomical observations i suspect there must be some kind of underlying agenda coming to the surface when in spite of this people are so quick to shrilly denounce and condemn something that would so vividly demonstrate the strength of western capitalism lazlo nibble sez buying lichtenstein and paving it over with ground glass would also demonstrate the strength of western capitalism but that doesn t make it a particularly attractive idea is that what this country has been reduced to the planetary equivalent of a guy who gets his penis out at parties actually paving ground glass over lichtenstein wouldn t demonstrate the strength of western capitalism since it s strength depends on use of the mind and materials in the fulfillment of needs and desires mind you i m not saying no one would benefit from glassed over land but i don t think anyone would actually pay for it unlike the potential billsats i don t quite follow you on the part about someone exposing their genitals at parties but i got a chuckle from it anyway and i thought i had some strange friends tommy mac tom mcwilliams wk they communicated with the communists tm ibm cl msu edu hm and pacified the pacifists timbuk
