re a message for you mr president how do you know what happened note the followup to redirect s to alt conspiracy talk politics misc in article c sqya f v noose ecn purdue edu tbrent bank ecn purdue edu timothy j brent said in response to p vasilion but then i don t pack heavy weaponry with intent to use it you don t really think he should have been allowed to keep that stuff do you if so tell me where you live so i can be sure to steer well clear the public also has rights and they should be placed above those of the individual go ahead call me a commie but you d be singing a different tune if i exercised my right to rape your daughter he broke the law he was a threat to society they did there job simple you have no evidence that david koresh or his followers were packing that heavy weaponry with any intent to use for other that recreational and self defense purposes your statement that the public also has rights is correct only is parsed as the individuals who comprise the public also have rights there is no separate rights bearing entity known as the public since the rights of the public of which you spoke are in fact only rights of individuals the statement that the rights of the public should be placed above the rights of the individual has no meaning you have artificially created an illusionary conflict of individuals rights when you speak of my right to rape your daughter no person has the right to rape another person therefore there is no conflict how do you define society do you hold that this society is a rights bearing entity which is separate from any individual people how do you define a threat to society to what extent do you believe that a person loses his rights when he is declared by whom to be such a threat william december starr wdstarr athena mit edu
