re challenge to microsoft supporters tim glauert thg cam orl co uk wrote in article news duke edu kdb teer acpub duke edu kurt bollacker writes tim glauert thg cam orl co uk wrote in article news duke edu kdb sunbar mc duke edu kurt bollacker writes none of this changes the fact that msw is objectively inferior to its competition do you mean that msw is objectively inferior in some respects which is trivially true that it is objectively inferior in all respecets which is trivially false or do you mean something else what criteria have you chosen for your objective assesment are you sure that these criteria are themselves objective i believe that enough is inferior to make it overall as a product inferior to its competition apple system os nextstep unix xwindows pick your favorite flavor in other words it is your opinion that msw is inferior to its competition that s not the same as msw being objectively inferior no it is technically inferior to the os guis that i listed i have already described why to say briefly system easier to learn and use there have been independent studies to that effect os can run msw applications and has more stable multitasking nextstep easier to learn use and program more stable multitasking unix x as easy to learn and use more stable multitasking with the prpoer setup all of these will exchange data with msw machines as well as msw machines will amongst themselves so interoperability is not an issue by this criterion it is inferior if you have another then perhaps i am incorrect do you pick up the glove kurt d bollacker duke university medical center kdb sunbar mc duke edu durham nc
