re after years can we say that christian morality is in ursa bear com halat pooh bears jim halat writes in article c y b blaze cs jhu edu arromdee jyusenkyou cs jhu edu ken arromdee writes in article o rusnews w w mantis co uk mathew mathew mantis co uk writes there s no objective physics einstein and bohr have told us that speaking as one who knows relativity and quantum mechanics i say bullshit speaking as someone who also knows relativity and quantum mechanics i say go ahead punk make my day my degree can beat up your degree simple take out some physics books and start looking for statements which say that there is no objective physics i doubt you will find any you might find statements that there is no objective length or no objective location but no objective physics consider for instance that speed of light in vacuum is invariant this sounds an awful lot like an objective speed of light in vacuum or you can try not confuse a construct with the constructor if you take a look at quantum mechanics many objective observations can be made as well however physics is not objective bohr said the randomness of atomic motion is inherent in the motion itself einstein said that nature is deterministic it is our method of observation that inserts the randomness they were talking about the exact same results but neither of them claimed to have experimental evidence that proved them right in a similar vein there is as yet no experimental evidence for supersymmetric particles so some physicists believe in them and some don t but all agree that either there is an objectively true answer to the question depends on how you look at it i guess mark pundurs any resemblance between my opinions and those of wolfram research inc is purely coincidental
