re what s a shit shoveler to do was re amusing atheists and in article qvn pinnj shelley u washington edu jimh carson u washington edu james hogan writes when the various bill conners and bobbys post here i felt that their passive aggressive knock that chip off my shoulder type of approach meant that attempts at reasoned argument would be wasted i still think that however while more primitive responses teasing bronx cheers sarcasm are somewhat satisfying apologies to anyone who still thinks bobby is a performance artist some of them feed in to a pointless circular round of ad hominem name calling witness precisely my position as a newbie i tried the point by point approach to debate with these types it wasted both my time and my lifespan ignoring them is not an option since they don t go away and doing so would leave one with large stretches of complete anonymity in this group what s left healthy flaming i m sure on occassion i ve appeared to be little more than a caustic boob to some of the bobby types but why waste breath arguing with someone whose most rational though process involves his excretory system and i stand by my record of recognizing these people long before most of the rest of the group so let s see what this timmons character has in store for us bob beauchaine bobbe vice ico tek com they said that queens could stay they blew the bronx away and sank manhattan out at sea
