re waco burning in article blue cis pitt edu jagst pitt edu josh a grossman writes in article c v du d acsu buffalo edu v qheg ubvmsd cc buffalo edu p vasilion writes not necessarily if the body had been denatured cooked or dehydrated due to the heat a projectile needs only a minimal kinetic force to penetrate in fire aftermaths bodies tend to fall apart or loose large chunks of meat with little effort medical examiners tend not to like cleaning up such scenes as such if the body had been suitably cooked a bullet comming from a magazine explosion would more than likely have enough force to enter and thus it would be difficult to determine whether a bullet entered at the time of death or much later unless you were trained to look for the evidence texas rangers are not pathologists p vasilion this is quite corect but a bullet hitting a burned body with little energy will show virtually no deformation ie a hollow point probably would not expand an fmj would be pristene also the bullets will not be marked with the lands ang grooves of a barrel because they didn t come out of one a good pathologist should be able to notice this right away let us hope that the me s that handle these bodies are more competent then the ones who did jfk s body jag speaking of me s the fbi said the fire victims were found face up fire victims apparently are usually found face down suggesting they died prior to the fire the me says in a word bullshit the victims were face down the fbi says they sent a body of a victim that was shot supposedly by bd guards the me says in a word bullshit the body showed no evidence of gunshot wounds can the atf fbi tell the difference between cya and truth wayne j warf wwarf ucs indiana edu i speak for myself only clinton gore cia fbi dea assassinate bomb wod bor atf irs resist nsa christian god satan apocalypse zog nazi socialist communist explosive fundamentalist revolution nsc federal reserve constitution gold fema
