re some more about gun control in article apr mtu edu cescript mtu edu charles scripter writes in article c bu m k ulowell ulowell edu jrutledg cs ulowell edu john lawrence rutledge wrote in article q tpinnpcn gap caltech edu arc cco caltech edu aaron ray clements writes the second amendment is a guarantee of the right to bear arms clearly and unequivocally without infringement i saw this nifty drawn out posting and i thought i might give the two of you a little help with your problem as you both know what you posted and this foolish thing gave me so much shit last time i tried to post i took the liberty of deleting all but the header and a single quote i hope you don t mind as written the second ammendment states rather clearly for anyone who can read the following a well regulated militia being necessarry to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed what is regulated regulated means controlled how about security well hey that would be along the lines of being and feeling safe wouldn t it wow we have a concept forming here don t we now what have we left the right of the people people people people people people people sorry got kinda hungup there shall not be infringed oops backup there hmmm infringed that d be like interfered with altered changed or watered down in any way shape or form so what we have here in it s big old long winded version would be a well controlled militia being necessary to the secure safe feeling of state the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be fucked with in any way shape or form by some happy ass good for nothing in some piddly government building who wants to run my life in the pursuit of his happiness the item is clear and concise in it s present form my young friend it does not need my clarification or that of any other this is only ammendment which guarantees the continued existence of the others it s whole purpose is to give people recourse against the military machine of a government which fails to properly represent it s creators us james madison federalist paper regarding the general welfare clause nothing is more natural nor common than first to use a general phrase and then to explain and qualify it by a recital of particulars any replies or comments can be sent too kane djh rigel tamu edu no representative government need fear it s armed citizens death to tyrants the only thing we have to fear is me
