re burden of proof mark mccullough mccullou snake cs wisc edu wrote but if entertainment company sell computer programs saying they are virus safe doesn t they have burden of proof that viruses don t exist in their floppies i don t think so the assumption is there if it turns out that their software has a virus then it is up to you to prove that fact to a court to get any damages you are theoretically suppossed to be able to get damages for that but you have to give some evidence that the virus came from that software but since the computer company is the defendent they are uninvolved until proven guilty all right i m not and won t be lawyer what about doctors i going to fly aeroplane or drive car doctors have to look for different kind of illnesses in me before i get permission to fly an aeroplane they have burden of proof that harmful illnesses don t exist in me do they i m just questioning my belief that believers have the burden of proof please not pascal nooooo oh are you those bug generator c programmers turbo pascal is the best and fastest for edit run edit run cycles ktikkane phoenix oulu fi kari tikkanen b begin
