re free moral agency in article c v mr z darkside osrhe uoknor edu bil okcforum osrhe edu bill conner writes deleted stuff from andrew wrt which atheist myth is bill re to andrew the myth to which i refer is the convoluted counterfeit athiests have created to make religion appear absurd counterfeit atheists hmmmm so we re just cheap knock offs of the true atheists religion demonstrates itself to be absurd constantly personally if someone asks i m happy to point out how this is so rather than approach religion including christainity in a rational manner and debating its claims as the are stated atheists concoct outrageous parodies and then hold the religious accountable for beliefs they don t have what is more accurately oxymoric is the a term like reasonable atheist man what is your pill wrt atheists if you re going to make such contentious statements back them up at least read news time and time again we ve hashed out the beliefs various religous doctrines hold try debating reasonably with someone who makes a statement like more accurately oxymoric is the a term like reasonable atheist then take a look at the responses we ve given tammy seem pretty reasonable nay even polite to me accusations of myths a flyin here s a good example of of what i said above read the post again i said acoording to which means i am referring to christian doctrine as i understand it if i am speaking for myself you ll know it my purpose in posting was to present a basic overview of christain doctrines since it seemed germane i saw your reference to according to in the original article then you do such an excellent job of spewing dogma that well the implication was pretty clear if wrong in this case jeez a misunderstanding let it go more statements to wrap this thing up if you read my post with same care as read the faq we wouldn t be having this conversation if you had written your post with the same as care as the faq has been we wouldn t be having this discussion gems about evidence deleted yes human reason does always come back to the existence of god we re having this discussion are we not jeez do i have to point this out to you this discussion is not all instances of human reason therefore your implication is false well this is interesting truth is to be determined by it politically correct content granted it s extremely unhip to be a wasp male and anything european is contemptable but i thought this kind of dialogue the purpose of a a was to get at the truth of things but then i remember the oxymoron reasonalble atheist and i understand how lame can you get who said anything about the truth of things read the faq very carefully please then report your findings about where it says the purpose of a a is to find the truth of things and stop impressing your own misguided image of atheists upon us it s really pissing me off bill
