i am right no i am right was re bob knepper was damn right in article news duke edu fierkelab bchm biochem duke edu eric roush writes in article qv aginn ba shelley u washington edu tannerg hardy u washington edu glenn tanner writes no but i am for starting rec sports idiots for people who respond to obvious flamebait nah let s reserve rec sports idiots for people who post obvious flamebait like yourself funny i didn t realize mr tanner brought up bob knepper v pam postema in the first place thought it was someone named jacobs if someone posts something as controversial not to mention idiotic as what austin posted in a widely accessed newsgroup someone should challenge the statement why if a statement is truly idiotic and is universally thought so the challenge is a waste of panting further challenges that have nothing yes nothing to do with baseball are wasting others time you got a problem with what bob knepper thinks let s hear it in some sort of categorical manner actually i question whether either knepper or postema aren t old news at this point although what i have read of postema s book is interesting there is a school of thought that suggests that silence consent i agree this far whereas this idea may not apply to everything in life it certainly should apply to a forum of public discussion sez you if you ve been reading r s b lately you ll find that even elementary school children have had access to our postings albeit in an edited form it s making me think a little more carefully about some of the things i post that does not come out in what you say down the road here in conclusion if someone like austin wants to post his drivel in some obscure newsgroup that i don t read fine he s got the right to rant rave and drool all he wants to in the name of free speech but if he drools in a newsgroup that i read then i will support the right of anyone to provide rebuttal to his drooling yo even elementary school children have had access to our postings albeit in an edited form you want them to hear you talk like this don t you want people who come to this group to talk baseball to think you like to do the same or do you want them to think you re some politically correct demagogue who s oh so sensitive ho hum plus you re here limiting free speech to some obscure newsgroup that i don t read what bs you got a problem with what jacobs says what knepper thinks all you have to do is defeat it with better ideas more and better speech yours is the easy way out as for knepper ever notice how sometimes these guys will say just about any darn thing that pops in their heads when a mike is shoved in front of them you know that often the best copy for the news is the one that isn t pre prepared they know knepper has controversial ideas about women they pop some question about postema an interesting related question would be whether the two ever appeared in the same game off the top of my head i guess no if my guess is right knepper popped off about something that had nothing to do with him and postema gets a book for it and he doesn t now of course you don t have to read any of this and if you want to cut down on flames then don t post flamebait you don t have to respond to flames either saves cyberspace now why didn t i think of that rg i can play me better than anyone there s only one of me barry bonds on playing himself in two movies
