re the gospels josephus etc and origins in article apr rambo atlanta dg com wpr atlanta dg com bill rawlins writes i will agree that creation should not be taught as science if macroevolution is not taught as science however if we are teaching the wildly speculative theories of macroevolution as an explanation of origins then equal time should be given to creation neither one qualifies as science create a philosophy course call it origins bill rawlins wpr atlanta dg com i speak for myself only interesting idea this suggestion has inspired me to post under the title theories of creation a collection of various philosophies of creation that i am aware of could you explain which of these theories you would want taught and which ones you would not or perhaps i haven t included a favorite theory of yours if so could you describe it for me for inclusion in an updated list tom scharle scharle irishmvs room g computing center scharle lukasiewicz cc nd edu university of notre dame notre dame in usa
