re darrrrrrrrryl in article mssc kcru ip netcom com mss netcom com mark singer writes that exuberance disappeared immediately however when strawberry went into a tirade at the man all reports indicate he used a lot of profanity and accused the man of interference and therefore of costing the dodgers a game shortly afterwards other fans hurled food and beverages toward the man who made the catch dodger stadium officials started to remove him from the park but then relented and just relocated him to another area in an interview after the game lasorda blamed the fan for the loss strawberry also went into a tirade about how the fans are stupid and they don t care about winning l a times columnists similarly blasted the man who made the catch sounds like darryl being darryl tommy spending too much time on slim fast and needs a pasta fix and the media being their usual charming selves sounds like a new york like story to me i saw the replay and am wondering what the big deal is i didn t realize the folks in la were making a big to do about it i think stawberry lasorda and the various media types should sit and watch the replay then apologize to the fan others have questioned why darryl should be so concerned with what the fan did when he has a grand total of rbi through the first nine games darryl has not gotten off to a good start he has to blame someone but i guess the big debate continues as to what are the responsibilities of the fan as long as the fan doesn t interfere with the play i see no problems scott barman mets mailing list feed the following into your shell scott asd com mail mets request asd com subscribe let s go mets
