re why i won t be getting my low rider this year in article apr cbnewsj cb att com car cbnewsj cb att com charles a rogers writes in article mar pb esac uucp prahren pb esac uucp peter ahrens writes that would be low drag bars and way rad rearsets for the fj so that the ergonomic constraints would have contraceptive consequences ouch this brings to mind one of the recommendations in the hurt study because the rear of the gas tank is in close proximity to highly prized and easily damaged anatomy hurt et al recommended that manufacturers build the tank so as to reduce the er step function provided when the rider s body slides off of the seat and onto the gas tank in the unfortunate event that the bike stops suddenly and the rider doesn t i think it s really inspiring how the manufacturers have taken this advice to heart in their design of bikes like the cbr rr and the gts a i dunno on my old gs e the tank seat junction was nice and smooth but if you were to travel all the way forward you d collect the top triple clamp in a sensitive area i d hate to have to make the choice but i think i d prefer the fj s gas tank blaine gardner evans sutherland bgardner dsd es com
