rules of engagement was israelis murdered in march in apr thunder mcrcim mcgill edu hasan mcrcim mcgill edu wrote in article apr frej teknikum uu se flax frej teknikum uu se jonas flygare writes in article apr thunder mcrcim mcgill edu hasan mcrcim mcgill edu writes in article flax apr frej teknikum uu se flax frej teknikum uu se jonas flygare writes first my above statement doesnot say that the existence of israeli citizens in the wb revoke their right of life but it says the israeli occupation of the wb revoke the right of life for some most its citizens basically revokes the right of for its military men clearly occupation is an undeclared war during war attacks against military targets are fully legitimate i d like you to tell me in your own words who the military are wrt israel then in uniform or not on duty or off duty soldier to be or not that is since it s compulsory one might regard any israeli as a legit target using that definition in uniform or not doesnot make a difference if the person is in army on duty or off duty doesnot matter if the army man was on duty or on a vacation week soldier to be or not sure i meant only military men just trying to get this clear so please bear with me as far as i can tell you re proposing the following rules of engagement between israel and the palestinean resistance please feel revise this preliminary draft as necessary israeli military personnel are fair game at any time in uniform or out on duty or off in practice since any male or female israeli of military age may be off duty military all but young children are acceptable targets since the existence of israel constitutes indication of hostile intent no further provocation is required to avoid inpermissable violations of the rights of non combatant palestineans israeli forces must not engage palestineans without positive identification as military personnel clear indication of aggressive intent and a clear field of fire a positive identification may be assured by either checking for palestinean military uniform by posession of exclusively military armament ie t mbts or mig aircraft or self identification either verbal or documentary note that dual use military civilian weaponry such as hand grenades ak rifles and rpg launchers do not constitute positive military identification and require closer inspection such as document checks b aggressive intent as distinct from merely hostile intent which is the normal condition may be assured by not less than three rounds of incoming fire separated by intervals of not less than ten seconds between rounds note that a single burst of automatic weapon fire counds as one round as does a volley of rocket fire from more than one source as noted above dual use weaponry may not be assumed to originate from military personnel and thus do not justify armed response c a clear field of fire can be guaranteed by making a positive military identification of all personnel in the target area of the weapons to be used note that aggressive intent need not be proven for all possible targets thus if iaf aircraft are attacked by a sam crew it is not necessary to check the papers of each crew member so long as none are obviously civilians as indicated for instance by the posession of uniquely civilian weaponry such as stones axes and molotov coctails since it is often difficult for iaf elements to land and make the necessary checks ground forces should first screen prospective strike areas before agm fire for acm purposes a cockpit to cockpit pass within meters is usually sufficient for this purpose but may be repeated if necessary d c sessions speaking for myself note new network address dcs witsend tnet com author and everything else of tmail dos mail news shell
