re ca s pedophilia laws cramer optilink com clayton cramer writes k hobbes kzoo edu jamie r mccarthy writes having completely dived into the abyss of believing that there are no queers in the world who think differently from the child molestation advocating minority on soc motss he doesn t even notice that he s starting a sentence with they believe when the referent of that they is millions of people so few as to be irrelevant if you don t want to be lumped together as a group stop insisting on being treated as a member of a group please point out where i have said i even was a member of that group much less asked to be treated as such much less insisted upon it sexual orientation is not defined by the anti discrimination law that was passed last year pedophilia isn t a sexual orientation wait a minute you ve been claiming for quite a while now that pedophilia according to ca state law is a sexual orientation now your position is that the law doesn t specifically exclude it you know damn well what s going to happen some guy in a nambla t shirt s going to apply at a day care they re going to turn him down he s going to take it to court and the court s going to rule that sexual orientation is defined as homosexuality heterosexuality or bisexuality unless and until that court decides that pedophilia is a sexual orientation you have no business saying so silence death pin or something they turn me down because of that i wholeheartedly support their right to take this action i wouldn t do it myself unless it was something like the nambla t shirt despite the fact that all homosexuals are lying bastards how about a black man applies for a job at a bank the bank decides based on statistics a black person would be more likely to steal money and denies the man the job would you support the bank s right to this freedom i support their right to do so deletia but deletia ah so for example you are opposed to the civil rights act of here s the law that was passed and signed by the governor the people of the state of california do enact as follows section the purpose of this act is to codify existing case law as determined in gay law students v pacific telephone and telegraph cal d and soroka v dayton hudson corp cal app d prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation sec section is added to the labor code to read a sections and prohibit discrimination or disparate treatment in any of the terms and conditions of employment based on actual or perceived sexual orientation b this section shall not apply to a religious association or corporation not organized for private profit whether incorporated as a religious or public benefit corporation there s no for purposes of this act the term sexual orientation will be defined as section no definitions anywhere did they run this through the state congress on an accelerated schedule or something jamie mccarthy internet k kzoo edu applelink j mccarthy
