re objective values v scientific accuracy was re after years can we say that christian morality is in article c j jzv dcs ed ac uk tk dcs ed ac uk tommy kelly wrote in article qjahh mrs horus ap mchp sni de frank d s uucp frank o dwyer writes science the real world has its basis in values not the other way round as you would wish it you must be using values to mean something different from the way i see it used normally and you are certainly using science like that if you equate it to the real world science is the recognition of patterns in our perceptions of the universe and the making of qualitative and quantitative predictions concerning those perceptions science is the process of modeling the real world based on commonly agreed interpretations of our observations perceptions it has nothing to do with values as far as i can see values are well they are what i value they are what i would have rather than not have what i would experience rather than not and so on values can also refer to meaning for example in computer science the value of is true and is false science is based on commonly agreed values interpretation of observations although science can result in a reinterpretation of these values objective values are a set of values which the proposer believes are applicable to everyone the values underlaying science are not objective since they have never been fully agreed and the change with time the values of newtonian physic are certainly different to those of quantum mechanics steve lang slang sling slink slick slack shack shank thank think thick
