re organized lobbying for cryptography in article r jgbinn i eli cs yale edu jgfoot minerva cis yale edu writes tarl neustaedter tarl coyoacan sw stratus com wrote it means that the eff s public stance is complicated with issues irrelevant to the encryption issue per se there may well be people who care about the encryption issue who don t care to associate themselves with the network erotica issue or may even disagree with the eff s position perhaps these encryption only types would defend the digitized porn if it was posted encrypted these issues are not as seperable as you maintain now why would anyone post anything encrypted encryption is only of use between persons who know how to decrypt the data and why should i care what other people look at what does concern me is the continued erosion of my constitutional rights amendments i ii iv and v to note a few shaun p hughes facts are stupid things sphughes sfsuvax sfsu edu ronald reagan republican national finger for pgp public key convention
