re what about no fault in article galileo rtn ca boeing com meb galileo rtn ca boeing com michael bain writes insurance companies sure seem to go for no fault coverage since the majority of accidents are the cagers fault doesn t this imply that we would have to pay much higher rates under a no fault system with a cars only system it seems to make sense on the surface take the legal costs out of the system but it looks like motorcyclists would get screwed yup unfortunately as has been pointed out the cost of insurance does not go down with no fault the crappiest drivers make out like bandits because they no longer have to bear the responsibility of paying for insurance that they have boosted in price for themselves by being crappy drivers the good drivers now pay through the nose to spread the cost of the crappy drivers actions and that s not fair any plan that caps rates for crappy drivers is inherently a piece of shit because the rest of us end up paying more any plan that uses speeding tickets as a basis for raising rates is also a piece of shit as it is based upon the lie that faster drivers are inherently less safe than slower drivers and the nhtsa disproved that two years ago now later chris behanna dod h d fxwg wide glide jubilee s red lady behanna syl nj nec com cb t baby bike disclaimer now why would nec zx needs a name agree with any of this anyway i was raised by a pack of wild corn dogs
