re rewording the second amendment ideas dfo vttoulu tko vtt fi foxvog douglas writes nerve gas and mustard gas are well defined other poisonous gasses should be individually banned only if it can be shown that there is no use not related to weaponry licenses should be available for research purposes on such chemicals i am not a lawyer but these ideas could certainly be a basis for definitions i hope you realize how trivial it is to manufacture these compounds given about k in lab equipment and chemicals which are commercially available and given the knowledge that i have graduating bs ch i could synthesize enough of these compounds to make a serious dent in the population of several major us cities as also noted the knowledge is there for the production of nuclear weapons it s not even that restricted the only thing is the expense now i m not going around making these things but it s not cause of any law i simply don t get any marginal benefit out of killing anyone any law you enact in this respect is only going to give you the ability to add a charge against someone who does make and use said weapons in the case of chemical agents i seriously doubt that you would even know that someone had set up a lab until after the weapons had been used part of the trouble with the chemical weapons ban treaty between the us and the ussr is that many of the precursors to chemical weapons such as gb and sarin etc is that they have very valid commercial uses and it is very easy to divert those precursors to chemical weapons manufacture without anyone knowing about it dan sorenson dod z dan exnet iastate edu viking iastate edu isu only censors what i read not what i say don t blame them doug foxvog douglas foxvog vtt fi aaron arc cco caltech edu
