re ide vs scsi in article qlbrlinn rk dns nmsu edu bgrubb dante nmsu edu grubb writes in pc magazine april although scsi is twice as fasst as esdi faster than ide and support up to devices its acceptance has long been stalled by incompatability problems and installation headaches note what it does not site as a factor price there is a premium of approx for the controller what is nice is being able to run hard disks tape drives cd roms and scanners of one dma channel and interupt scsi makes sense is you are going to load up a machine if you just want a standard box for windows then ide makes sense i have one loaded box that uses scsi and run unix and one standard box that runs dos windows that uses ide by standard i mean mb ram mh disk s video int eh same article the pc would will get plug and play scsi from the article it seems you get plug and play scsi only since scsi in full implimentation has ten not devices i beleive this last bit is just plain wrong scsi intergration is sited as another part of the microsoft plug and play program guy guy dawson hoskyns group plc guyd hoskyns co uk tel hoskyns uk guyd austin ibm com tel ibm austin usa
