response fucking news reader i don t think this got posted if it did ignore it this time a response to korey begin my response in article plorlinnslt matt ksu ksu edu kkruse matt ksu ksu edu korey j kruse writes lamontg u washington edu writes well i just did a quick medline scan and came up with the following article by tashkin that reviews the literature i d probably start here document an a au tashkin d p in department of medicine university of california school of medicine los angeles ti pulmonary complications of smoked substance abuse rf review article refs why isn t this information in the faq on marijuana if we expect people to think we are telling them the truth about drugs why does this group constantly refute every negative thing about almost all drugs maybe because the claims deserve refute the above abstract lists various possible links to cannabis use unfiltered almost guaranteed and lung problems someone may get overly excited when they see that article but without actually digging up the study and seeing how the studies gathered their data it really doesn t tell you shit i m going to track down that study hopefully tomarrow i never claimed pot was more or less damageing than cigarettes i was just trying to keep ourselves honest if we are going to educate kids and adults and tell them the truth about drugs don t you think a much better approach would be to list the pro s and con s of each type of drug what justifies the truth about drugs research what sort of research correlational data can help establish a theory but it does not prove anything how can you expect someone to make a decision when the pdfa on one hand says that all drugs are absolutely bad bad bad and this newsgroup consistently refuses to admit that drugs like heroin even have negative side effects heroin is a relatively safe drug what makes it unsafe are iv administration and shit like adulterants there are side effects like withdrawal but they effect people differently i ve seen numerous posts claiming heroin has lower addiction rates that cigarettes which might be true but it is very deceiving because heroin is much more harmful drug to be addicted to than cigarettes heroin addicts are far more prone to end up in the gutter and destroy their family and friends than people addicted to just cigarettes stereotypical statement i know people who use heroin and opiates that function just fine in society this group does provide some very good information to people but i am worried that the pro legalization pro decriminalization movement is being hurt when it refuses to admit that any some drugs are very harmful name some of these drugs so we can debate about them more specifically i m all for legalization of most drugs but when someone asks me about relative risks of certain drugs or possible bad side effects i would like to know them and not be given the run around by this group which recently tried to tell me that pot was not harmful in any manner to people s lungs no no no or at least i haven t been arguing this there is not enough data to form a scientific conclusion that doesn t mean that cannabis is benign to users lungs we can form all the theories we want but they are only theories some theories are supported by more evidence than others and that makes them stronger i think it s time y all re examined your positions and try to understand that you cannot fight the pdfa by calling them a bunch of liars the hell i can t they state un justified conclusions as fact as a political strategy to stop drug use in general i somewhat see what you re saying and people like jack herer contribute to this this has been quite a big mind fuck for me recently and i ve pretty came to the conclusion that you can t trust anybody by word of mouth alone my attitude about the general population has decreased significantly gotta run to class marc andersom spot colorado edu kkruse ksuvm bitnet kkruse ksuvm ksu edu kkruse matt ksu edu
