re clipper considered harmful in article optilink com brad optilink com brad yearwood writes if clipper comes to cellular phones along with legal proscriptions against using other cipher systems on these phones a new and potentially dangerous class of crime is created aside from possession of terrorist tools unapproved encryption devices or programs criminals who very badly want inscrutable tactical communications specifically the terrorists and drug dealers who proponents of key escrow cite as threats will be highly motivated to steal the cipher phone of a legitimate user and to kill this person or hold them hostage so discovery of compromise of the device will be delayed once a suitable collection of devices is stolen criminals can communicate with impunity assuming the cipher system carries no trapdoors apart from key escrow until and unless the compromise is discovered by some other means because life is cheap criminals are currently willing to kill people to steal very large and conspicuous property luxury cars it is reasonable to assume that they will be willing to kill people to steal small and inconspicuous property a cipher cellular phone just as we have seen in the past with blue box technology and in the present with modified cellular phones we can expect to see among high stakes criminals a lucrative market for stolen cipher phones which can be used for a few days the high stakes criminals will pay the life is cheap types substantial amounts for stolen instruments because a person is typically discovered as missing or dead in a few days a stolen instrument will be usable for only a few days there will be a continuing demand for fresh phones fresh bodies and since clinton is also going full bore to deny unconnected citizens the means to defend themselves we will protect you is good enough for you by perverting or trashing the second amendment the targeted individuals will be guaranteed easy prey what is a few bodies compared to the greater good of the fed being able to defeat a citizen s security with impunity you don t think there doesn t exist a means by which the nsa can do their usual eavesdropping scanning for keywords with or without a court order or any keys do you if so i got some great florida real estate you might be interested in perhaps the idea of escrowed keys is meant to divert the discussion to how they will be safeguarded and away from the basic fact that the government is systematically taking away our right to privacy to be secure for the means of self defense and just about every other right spelled out in the bill of rights nawwww they are the government trust us in other words clipper and similar systems have the potential to turn a current inconvenience to law enforcement into a direct vicious and persistent threat to the general public what is more important to the government law enforcement people control or the safety of the general public the gun control issue should answer that one look at how good that works in making cities safer the places that are the worst in that regard are also the places with the best gun control government is not about public good it is about control never forget that our founding fathers sure were concerned about it remainder deleted pat rwing uucp without prejudice ucc pat myrto seattle wa if all else fails try uunet pilchuck rwing pat wisdom only two things are infinite the universe and human stupidity and i am not sure about the former albert einstien
