re no land for peace no negotiatians in article apr unocal com stssdxb st unocal com dorin baru writes alan stein writes what are you talking about the rabin government has clearly indicated its interest in a territorial compromise that would leave the vast majority of the arabs in judea samaria and gaza outside israeli control just an interrupting comment here since early s israelis said they are willing to give up the adminstration rule of the occupied terretories to palestineans palestineans refused and will refuse such settlement that denies them their right of self determination period i know i was just pointing out that not compromising may be a bad idea and there are in israel voices against negotiations and i think there are many among palestineans also against any negociations just an opinion dorin ok i donot know why there are israeli voices against negotiations however i would guess that is because they refuse giving back a land for those who have the right for it as for the arabian and palestinean voices that are against the current negotiations and the so called peace process they are not against peace per se but rather for their well founded predictions that israel would not give an inch of the west bank and most probably the same for golan heights back to the arabs an months of negotiations in madrid and washington proved these predictions now many will jump on me saying why are you blaming israelis for no result negotiations i would say why would the arabs stall the negotiations what do they have to loose arabs feel that the current negotiations is only for legitimizing the current status quo and for opening the doors of the arab markets for israeli trade and oranges that is simply unacceptable and would be revoked just an opinion hasan
