re no land for peace no negotiatians hasan mcrcim mcgill edu writes ok i donot know why there are israeli voices against negotiations however i would guess that is because they refuse giving back a land for those who have the right for it sounds like wishful guessing as for the arabian and palestinean voices that are against the current negotiations and the so called peace process they are not against peace per se but rather for their well founded predictions that israel would not give an inch of the west bank and most probably the same for golan heights back to the arabs an months of negotiations in madrid and washington proved these predictions now many will jump on me saying why are you blaming israelis for no result negotiations i would say why would the arabs stall the negotiations what do they have to loose so called what do you mean how would you see the peace process so you say palestineans do not negociate because of well founded predictions how do you know that they are well founded if you do not test them at the table months did not prove anything but it s always the other side at fault right why i do not know why but if let s say the palestineans some of them want all israel and these are known not to be accepted terms by israelis or maybe they palestinenans are not yet ready for statehood or maybe there is too much politics within the palestinean leadership too many fractions aso i am not saying that one of these reasons is indeed the real one but any of these could make arabs stall the negotiations arabs feel that the current negotiations is only for legitimizing the current status quo and for opening the doors of the arab markets for israeli trade and oranges that is simply unacceptable and would be revoked i like california oranges and the feelings may get sharper at the table regards dorin
