re did he really rise in article apr athos rutgers edu luomat alleg edu timothy j luoma writes in article apr athos rutgers edu suppose you were part of the christian consipracy which was going to tell people that christ had risen never mind the stoning the being burned alive the possible crucifixion let s just talk about a scourging the whip that would be used would have broken pottery metal bone and anything else that they could find attached to it you would be stood facing a wall with nothing to protect you scream out in agony that your raw back was being torn at again you would say to yourself all this for a lie and you had more coming at the third hit you would scream out that it was all a lie beg for them to stop and tell them that you would swear on your life that it had all been a lie if they would only stop no one was ever flogged beaten burned fed to the lions or killed in any other way because of a belief in the resurrection sorry to disappoint you the idea of resurrection is one which can be found in a host of different forms in the religions of antiquity the problem was not the resurrection which was a mediorce issue for a tiny fragment of the jewish population the saducees but was a non issues for everyone else the real problem was that christians were pacifist and preached there was only one god when the state operates by a system of divinitation of the emperor monotheism becomes a capital offense the jews were able to get exemption from this and were also not evangelistic christians were far more vocal and gentile and hence dangerous and were therefore targets of persecution also since christians were a relatively powerless group they made good scapegoats as is seen by nero s blaming them for the burning of rome let s not cloud the issues with the resurrection randy i agree with you that christians were not persecuted specifically because they believed in resurrection however the beliefs that did cause trouble were dependent on belief in the resurrection of jesus of course the problem with it is that there are alternatives other than a great conspiracy the most common theory among non christians scholars seems to be that the resurrection was a subjective event in effect a delusion clh
