The authors regret that incorrect version of Fig. 6, were used in this article. The yellow line (charged to 1.3 V) in this wrong figure was not from the right sample. We are here to replace Fig. 6e with a corrected version. This replacement does not affect the conclusion of the manuscript.Fig. 6(a–c) High resolution XPS of vanadium in the pristine, fully discharged, and charged V2O5 nanopaper; (d) High resolution XPS of zinc in the pristine, fully discharged, and charged V2O5 nanopaper (e) The ex-situ XRD patterns of the V2O5 nanopaper at different states of charge.Fig. 6 The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.