The effect of two different etching procedures with inorganic acids (HSE and CSE)—one using additionally strongly oxidising conditions due to the presence of CrO3 (CSE)—and consecutive storage conditions (dry methanol and air) for previous corundum blasted titanium surfaces is compared with respect to their wettability behaviour and the potential of the etching processes for removing remaining blasting material. The etching procedures result in distinct different surface morphologies. Whereas the HSE surface shows sub-mm to sub-μm structures but neither porosity nor undercuts, the CSE surface is extremely rugged and porous with structures protruding the more homogeneously attacked areas by several micrometers. By EDX analysis both remaining blasting material and chromium and sulphur from the etching treatment has been detected on the CSE surfaces only. Both surfaces states show super-hydrophilic behaviour immediately after etching and storage up to 28 days in dry methanol. Whereas contact with air does not change super-hydrophilicity for the CSE samples, wettings angles of the HSE samples increase within minutes and reach about angles of about 60° and 90° after one and 2 days exposure to air, respectively. The increasing hydrophobicity is discussed with respect to the formation of a surface coverage from hydrocarbons originating from aromatic compounds present in traces in air.