The authors regret that Fig. 5 of this paper was incorrect. As a result, discussion on Fig. 5 needs to be revised. The corrected Fig. 5 and discussion are given below. The authors would like to apologize for an inconvenience that may have caused to the readers of the journal. The last sentence of the 5th paragraph in Section 3.1 should be revised as “It can be observed in Fig. 4(b) and (d) that the lattice interplanar spacings of 2.48Å, 3.03Å and 3.73Å corresponds to the (002), (020)/(211) and (011) planes of orthorhombic LiMn0.9Fe0.1PO4, respectively, revealing a preferable crystal growth along bc plane.” The sentence “In morphological viewpoint, plate-like particles (S22) with prominent ac plane and small size in [010] direction is expected to provide a higher capacity than spindle-like particles (S21).” is to be deleted in the 1st paragraph in Section 3.2. The word “ac plane” in Section 4 should be revised as “bc plane”.