In terms of head to head utility, { -brand-name-opera } and { -brand-name-firefox } are close competitors. { -brand-name-opera } may have an advantage in one aspect with its compatibility with and access to { -brand-name-chrome }’s huge extension library. But one significant factor to consider is the fact that { -brand-name-opera }, because it’s built on { -brand-name-chromium }, is a processor-hungry browser with its RAM consumption comparable to { -brand-name-chrome }, which is known for its high CPU usage.
Chi rij ri rokisaxik jolom chi jolom, { -brand-name-opera } chuqa' { -brand-name-firefox } nikijunamaj ki'. { -brand-name-opera } k'o ruchuqa' chi nuk'äm ri' chuqa' nok pa ri nïm kiwujb'al taq ruk'amal { -brand-name-chrome }. Po ri jun k'o rejqalem ja chi ri { -brand-name-opera } nuk'un chi rij { -brand-name-chromium }, jun okik'amaya'l ri nrokisaj k'ïy prosesa'or chuqa' ri rokisaxik RAM junam rik'in ri { -brand-name-chrome }, ri etaman chi yalan nrokisaj ri CPU.