Subject: Addressing and Resolving Outstanding Issues from August 8 Memo - Agreement Progress & Finalization Concerns<|im_end|>

 Subject: Clarification on Completing the Enron Wind Transaction

Dear Adam,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address the issues you raised in your memo of August 8, 2000, and to provide clarification on the status of the Enron Wind transaction.

Firstly, I would like to confirm that we have formally responded to all your issues and, in almost all cases, we have accepted your position. The agreement we have proposed is very closely aligned with what you would have signed with the competing utility, and we have also agreed to pay a higher price and share credits. Additionally, we have voluntarily increased the term of the agreement to twelve years from ten.

Given the significant progress we have made, I do not understand what is holding up the completion of this transaction. I would like to request your assistance in identifying any remaining issues or obstacles that may be preventing us from reaching a mutually beneficial agreement.

I would like to highlight that the ENA team has worked diligently to facilitate this transaction for Enron Wind, and we were originally solicited by Enron Wind to help build the merchant wind market. We have also had to coax Enron Wind to consider this transaction with ENA instead of TXU.

Therefore, I hope that we can find a solution to this current impasse and complete the transaction as soon as possible. Your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if there is any further information or documentation that you require from us to move forward. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,

[Your Name]<|im_end|>

<|im_start|>system
You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps.<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>user
Write a subject line for this message:

Adam, I believe that we have formally responded to all your issues as per  your memo to me of August 8, 2000. In all or almost all cases, we have  accepted your position. The agreement should look and behave very closely to  what you would have signed with the competing utility. In addition, ENA is  paying a higher price, sharing credits and have voluntarily increased the  term to twelve years from ten. I do not understand what is holding up completing this transaction other than  a complete re-trade on the original transaction. I hope this is not the  case. The ENA team worked hard to facilitate this transaction for Enron  Wind. In fact, we were originally solicited by Enron Wind to help build the  merchant wind market and we had to coax Enron Wind to do this transaction  with ENA versus TXU. I look forward to finding a solution to this current impasse. Regards <|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
