Title: The way I think about Haskell programs is locked-in statements that tightly sit next to each other (i.e., function compositions) and nothing &quot;leaks&quot;, as in no mutations are allowed (except in monads, like IO).<p>But I wonder if this is mostly a matter of taste. In small programs, the end result of a Haskell program is the same as a Python program. Is there a threshold after which Haskell&#x27;s purely functional paradigm shines the most?
Upvote: