Title: I&#x27;ve seen many discussions around this topic lately, but I&#x27;m particularly curious to understand why most people think that software&#x2F;code quality is something secondary and could be addressed late in the process, for instance with peer review.<p>Why isn&#x27;t the idea that software quality starts way before you write any line of code the predominant mindset amongst engineers &#x2F; the industry?<p>I have the feeling that most companies don&#x27;t hold discussions about what software quality means and how it should be measured.<p>To which extent do you agree or disagree with this feeling?
Upvote: