Title: A new calculator software cannot really bring attention (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chachatelier.fr&#x2F;chalk&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chachatelier.fr&#x2F;chalk&#x2F;</a>)<p>However, I wrote a full article explaining why I had to build something &quot;new&quot; that does not behave like usual desktop calculator softwares :<p>&lt;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chachatelier.fr&#x2F;chalk&#x2F;article&#x2F;chalk.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chachatelier.fr&#x2F;chalk&#x2F;article&#x2F;chalk.html</a>&gt;<p>TL;DR
All &quot;small&quot; calculator softwares I know share the same design flaws. And the GUI is not the only stumbling block in their poor efficiency. Handling correctly numerical approximations - expected or not - is crucial to trust the results. It is usually not done in lightweight tools. It should. So I prove that if I could do it, OS manufacturers could as well.
Upvote: