There are two types of judges, de jure and de facto. De Jure
means “in law” while de facto means “in practice”. De facto
judges are judges that have never signed their Oaths of Office
and are acting as judges only in practice, but not under the
law. Their judgments are not legally binding or binding only so
far as a person chooses to personally follow their rulings. Most
people are not aware of it, but as many as 90% of judges in
America fall into this category. They have purposely refused or
otherwise neglected to affirm their status as judges. Many
thought that by doing so, they avoided prosecution under RICO
laws. In 2004, the Oaths Project in New York state discovered
that, not only had judges refused or neglected to sign and file
the oaths and/or bonds required, but so had District Attorneys
and other elected or appointed officials that are responsible
for making and upholding our laws. The Supreme Court has upheld
that judgments rendered by de facto judges are, in fact, no
judgment. Officials are still