Hey, questions are good 1. There is a paradigm of the future
perfect indicative of Î»ÏÏ‰. The future perfect middle is
basically formed by adding -ÏƒÎ¿Î¼Î±Î¹ to the stem of the
perfect middle. Reading Monro's grammar, he doesn't mention the
active, so I guess it doesn't occur in Homer (and it's very rare
in Attic Greek). Conjugation is like the normal future. 2. Yes,
without the augment. The augment only occurs in the indicative.
For á¼€ÎµÎ¯Î´Ï‰, the aorist is á¼¤ÎµÎ¹ÏƒÎ± so the unaugmented
stem is á¼€ÎµÎ¹Ïƒ- and the subjunctive is á¼€ÎµÎ¯ÏƒÏ‰,
á¼€ÎµÎ¯Ïƒá¿ƒÏ‚, á¼€ÎµÎ¯Ïƒá¿ƒ, etc. for á¼•Î±Î´Î¿Î½ the
subjunctive would be á¼…Î´Ï‰, á¼…Î´á¿ƒÏ‚, á¼…Î´á¿ƒ, etc. as you
say. 3. Sometimes the subjunctive has extended endings, e.g.
both Î»ÏÏ‰ and Î»ÏÏ‰Î¼Î¹ are possible, and so on. 4. You're
right. Lots of the perfect forms are formed with participle plus
the corresponding form of Îµá¼°Î¼Î¯.