I saw this refutation online of Darwin's Random Evolution Theory
and cannot see any holes with the logic. Can anyone crack this
simple refutation? Refutation of the Theory of Random Evolution
As for the theory of evolution, which says that living things
evolved progressively from mud - first organism - bacteria -
fish - animals - humans through tiny random mutations which were
advantageous and naturally selected; there's a lot to say on
this. All currently living life forms appears to be highly
related, sharing the same DNA system and cell structure. This
would suggest a common first ancestor as the theory suggests (or
better yet - one Designer), however, the most obvious flaw with
the theory is that the first organism must have had highly
sophisticated intelligent design. There is a minimum requirement
for even the most primitive possible life form, without which it
could not possibly survive. Minimum Requirements for First
Organism The first organism must have a system of producing
and/or sourcing energy al