When evolutionists find the same design in otherwise very
different species, they say that, like lightning striking twice,
the design evolved independently in the two different
evolutionary lineages. They will appeal to common environmental
“induction,” developmental “plasticity,” and other serendipitous
cartoon explanations that don’t actually tell us anything about
how such astronomically unlikely events could have occurred.
Particularly when these distant species are in completely
different environments to begin with. For example, humans and
squid share uncannily similar, incredibly detailed and
complicated, vision systems. This in spite of the fact their
environments are very different. [Side note: Evolutionists
dismiss this profound contradiction because the squid photocells
are not inverted as the human’s are. This would be like
travelling to a distant planet and finding a Lexus automobile
with the steering wheel on the passenger side, and therefore
dismissing all the similarities as meaningless]. And t