When someone presents two alternatives as if they are the only
options, and then demands we choose one or the other, he has
committed a logical fallacy known as the "Fallacy of False
Dilemma." As an example, consider a nonsensical challenge posed
by 1MoreMuslim (an excellent source of logical fallacies): David
Wood believes God does not torture Babies. We know Babies face
torture everyday: by diseases, natural disasters, starvation...
So we have to conclude one of the two conclusions: 1/ David
Wood's God has no control over what happens in our world. 2/
David's God doesn't exist in reality. he is only in his
imagination. Which one is it David? Ironically, 1MoreMuslim
posts this silly alternative in the comments section of a post
about him deliberately distorting Craig's position. It's as if
1MM is saying, "Not only can I distort Craig's view, I can also
throw logic out the window!" To even begin a response, I have to
point out that 1MM has committed an additional fallacy known as
"equivocation," whereby a per