messages.role: user
messages.content: what does this mean
  
  Only through iteration—repeated practice that provides feedback on one’s proximity to success—can one hone one’s ability to Φ; and only when one has honed
  this ability (acquired the skill set to Φ), can one be said to possess procedural
  knowledge of how to Φ (cf. Gaultier, p. 6) Comparing Gaultier’s position with
  TACrevised, we find differences. According to TACrevised, S knows how to Gtoken
  in the absence of the corresponding ability. For Gaultier, the ability (or skill in
  the form of the acquired ability to succeed) necessitates procedural knowledge
  (in this case, knowledge of how to Gtoken). Presumably, in the absence of this
  skill, procedural knowledge is absent. The following comment from Gaultier,
  however, might help align these two seemingly disparate positions: “the more
  reliable or solid… one’s skill or ability to Φ, the more one knows how to
  proceed to succeed in Φ-ing” (p. 6). Here, how one characterizes the extent of
  one’s procedural knowledge is dependent on the degree of skill acquisition
  achieved.
  TACrevised allows one to know how to Φ in the absence of the corresponding ability
  (or skill) in virtue of one’s ability to Φtype (in accordance with the CIA). Thus, how one
  characterizes one’s procedural knowledge is shaped by the ability one has. Pat knows
  how to perform the ski stunts insofar as Pat knows how to ski, given that the ski stunts
  are derived from ski actions (they are tokens of that action-type). Therefore, what Pat
  knows how to do (his procedural knowledge) will be derived largely from his ski skill
  set.
  In conclusion, where one knows how to proceed—that is begin the process of
  acquiring the ability to succeed at the ski stunts—without (yet) having the procedural
  knowledge to succeed then one knows how one should practice in order to begin the
  process of skill acquisition to enable oneself to Φtoken. It is this know-how that