messages.role: user
messages.content: As a Canadian M.Sc. student of HRM, I have an assignment and i want you to give me a very detailed structure to get this done.
  The brief goes thus:
  
  Module learning outcomes assessed by this task:
  1. MO1: Understand the nature of contemporary people management in its broader context (including product markets, business strategy, labour markets, organisations, occupational structures, industry sector and national business systems)
  2. MO3: Critically assess core concepts and contemporary practice in HRM, including reward and performance management, employee involvement and resourcing, and the role of tech in the delivery of HRM.
  3. MO5: Understand critical HRM concerns, including ethical decision-making and managing diversity
  
  Completing your assessment 
  This is an individual written assignment which requires students to write a 1,500 word literature review based on one of the topics raised in the final consultancy case study. 
  
  What am I required to do on this assessment?
   Evidence understanding of the topic and key theories
   Demonstrates critical appreciation of relevant theory and empirical research
   Draw from relevant, academic sources to work
   Assignment is written in accordance with traditional academic requirements
   Sources should be cited and referenced using the Harvard system
  
  What do I need to do to pass? 
  The following criteria are considered when marking:
  1. Literature coverage and subject knowledge
  2. Critical evaluation
  3. Narrative and structure
  4. Use of literature and other sources
  5. Writing quality
  
  How do I achieve high marks in this assessment? 
  Demonstrate the following:
  1. Original and innovative use of an impressive range of sources, many beyond those recommended for the topic. Outstanding coverage of all key aspects of the topics literature. Excellent theoretical and conceptual grounding and ability to contextualise key theories and debates within the literature.
  2. Outstanding attempt present, critique and contextualise the literature by making judgements about information, validity of ideas and theories or quality of research on a set of theoretically-based criteria. Outstanding links are made between theory 
  and relevant examples and practice.
  3. Clear and holistic evaluation of the current literature on the topic. Outstanding level of depth and sophistication. Excellent structure which helps develop detailed and comprehensive understanding of all key debates and the themes which underly 
  them. No irrelevant material. Evidence of independent, insightful, innovative thought. 
  4. Outstanding use of external sources, referencing that conforms precisely to UWE Harvard requirements.
  5. Highest standards of literacy (i.e. academic vocabulary, spelling) and presentation. Outstanding clarity, structure and organisation (including paragraph structure, introduction and conclusion). Excellent logical flow throughout. Direction of 
  argument is clearly signposted throughout.
  
  Marking Guide is as follows
  LITERATURE COVERAGE AND SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE 20% - Original / innovative use of animpressive range of sources, many beyond those recommended for the topic. Outstanding coverage of all key aspects of the topics literature. Excellent theoretical / conceptual grounding and ability to contextualise key theories/debates within the literature. (18-20 marks)
  CRITICAL EVALUATION 30% - Outstanding attempt present, critique and contextualise the literature by making judgements about information, validity ofideas/theory or qualityof research on a set of theoretically-based criteria. Outstanding links are made between theory and relevant examples /practice. (27-30 marks)
  NARRATIVE AND STRUCTURE 25% - Clear and holistic evaluation of the current literature on the topic. Outstanding level of depth and sophistication. Excellent structure which helps develop detailed and comprehensive understanding of all key debates and the themes which underly them. No irrelevant material. Evidence of independent, insightful, innovative thought. (23-25 marks)
  USE OF LITERATURE AND OTHER SOURCES 10% - Outstanding use of external sources, referencing that conforms precisely to UWE Harvard requirements. (9-10 marks)
  WRITING QUALITY 15% - Highest standards of literacy (i.e. academic vocabulary, spelling) and presentation. Outstanding clarity, structure and organisation (including paragraph structure, introduction and conclusion). Excellent logical flow throughout. 
  Direction of argument is clearly signposted throughout. (13-15 marks)
messages.role: assistant
messages.content: To create a detailed structure for your literature review assignment, follow this step-by-step guide, which aligns with the marking guide and module learning outcomes:
  
  1. **Introduction (150 words)**
  	* Briefly introduce the topic and its relevance to contemporary people management and HRM.
  	* State the aim and objectives of the literature review, focusing on the specific topic from the final consultancy case study.
  	* Outline the structure of the review.
  
  2. **Literature Coverage and Subject Knowledge (300 words)**
  	* Discuss the key theories and concepts related to the chosen topic, demonstrating your understanding of the broader context (MO1).
  	* Cover all key aspects of the topic's literature, including product markets, business strategy, labor markets, organizations, occupational structures, industry sector, and national business systems.
  	* Use a wide range of sources, including those beyond the recommended readings, to showcase your original and innovative approach.
  
  3. **Critical Evaluation (450 words)**
  	* Present, critique, and contextualize the literature by making judgments about the validity of ideas, theories, and the quality of research (MO3).
  	* Evaluate the core concepts and contemporary practices in HRM, such as reward and performance management, employee involvement, resourcing, and the role of technology in HRM delivery.
  	* Make outstanding links between theory and relevant examples and practices, demonstrating your ability to apply critical thinking and analysis.
  
  4. **Critical HRM Concerns (300 words)**
  	* Discuss critical HRM concerns, including ethical decision-making and managing diversity (MO5).
  	* Evaluate the literature on these concerns, highlighting the key debates and themes that underlie them.
  	* Show evidence of independent, insightful, and innovative thought in your analysis.
  
  5. **Narrative and Structure (150 words)**
  	* Summarize the key findings and insights from the literature review, ensuring a clear and holistic evaluation of the current literature on the topic.
  	* Reflect on the depth and sophistication of your analysis, ensuring that the structure helps develop a detailed and comprehensive understanding of all key debates.
  
  6. **Use of Literature and Other Sources (150 words)**
  	* Ensure that all sources are accurately cited and referenced using the Harvard system.
  	* Demonstrate outstanding use of external sources, showcasing your ability to engage with a wide range of literature.
  
  7. **Writing Quality (150 words)**
  	* Maintain the highest standards of literacy, using academic vocabulary and ensuring correct spelling and grammar.
  	* Ensure outstanding clarity, structure, and organization, including paragraph structure, introduction, and conclusion.
  	* Signpost the direction of the argument throughout the review, ensuring a logical flow and clear communication of ideas.
  
  8. **Conclusion (150 words)**
  	* Summarize the main findings and contributions of the literature review.
  	* Discuss the implications of the review for HRM practice and future research.
  	* Highlight any limitations or gaps in the literature that could be addressed in future studies.
messages.role: user
messages.content: Give me a comprehensive and detailed structure to get this done