Does the accuracy of pedicle screw placement differ between the attending surgeon and resident in navigated robotic assisted minimally invasive spine surgery?
Robotic assistance with integrated navigation is an area of high interest for improving the accuracy of minimally invasive pedicle screw placement. This study analyzes the accuracy of pedicle screw placement between an attending spine surgeon and a resident by comparing the left and right sides of the first 101 consecutive cases using navigated robotic assistance in a private practice clinical setting. A retrospective, Institutional Review Board exempt review of the first 106 navigated robot assisted spine surgery cases was performed. One attending spine surgeon and one resident performed pedicle screw placement consistently on either the left or right side (researchers were blinded) A CT based Gertzbein and Robbins system (GRS) was used to classify pedicle screw accuracy, with grade A or B considered accurate. There were 630 consecutive lumbosacral pedicle screws placed. Thirty screws (5 patients) were placed without the robot due to surgeon discretion. Of the 600 pedicle screws inserted by navigated robotic guidance (101 patients) only 1.5% (9/600) were repositioned intraoperatively. Based on the GRS CT based grading of pedicle breach, 98.67% (296/300) of left side screws were graded A or B, 1.3% (4/300) were graded C, and 0% (0/300) were graded D. For the right side screws, 97.67% (293/300) were graded A or B, 1.67% (5/300) were graded C, and 0.66% (2/300) were graded D. This study demonstrated a high level of accuracy (based on GRS) with no significant differences between the left and right side pedicle screw placements (98.67% vs. 97.67% respectively) in the clinical use of navigated, robot assisted surgery.
Journal of Robotic Surgery