Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?
IntroductionWe analysed the efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean section and which were the most important variables associated with an increased risk of repeated cesarean delivery.Materials and methodsWe designed an observational retrospective study of 418 women with unfavourable cervices (Bishop Score <5) a prior cesarean delivery, and induction of labour with a double balloon catheter. Baseline maternal data and perinatal outcomes were recorded for a descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analysis. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsMost women improved their initial Bishop Score (89.5% although only a 20.8% of them went into spontaneous active labour. Finally, 51.4% of the women achieved a vaginal delivery. Five cases of intrapartum uterine rupture (1.2% occurred. After multivariate analysis, main risk factors for repeated cesarean section were dystocia in the previous pregnancy (OR 1.744; CI 95% 1.066 2.846) the absence of previous vaginal delivery (OR 2.590; CI 95% 1.066 6.290) suspected fetal macrosomia (OR 2.410; CI 95% 0.959 6.054) and duration of oxytocin induction period (OR 1.005; CI 95% 1.004 1.006) The area under the curve was 0.789 (p 0.001).ConclusionsDouble balloon catheter seems to be safe and effective for cervical ripening in women with a previous cesarean delivery and unfavourable cervix. In our study, most women could have a vaginal delivery in spite of their risk factors for cesarean delivery. A multivariate model based on some clinical variables has moderate predictive value for intrapartum cesarean section.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics