The solace of radicalism: Self uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat
Abstract From uncertainty identity theory, it was hypothesized that where people feel their self relevant values and practices are under threat, self uncertainty strengthens identification with "radical" groups, and either has no effect on or weakens identification with "moderate" groups. Since this hypothesis was tested on Australian students, who prefer to identify with moderate groups, the context specific expectation was for that preference to disappear under uncertainty. This prediction was confirmed by a laboratory experiment in which self uncertainty and group radicalism were manipulated in a 2 x 2 design (N 82) the preference to identify with a moderate over a radical group disappeared under uncertainty because uncertainty strengthened identification with the radical group. This effect was directly mirrored in people's intentions to engage in specific group behaviors, and behavioral intentions were mediated by identification. The research is framed by a discussion of the relationship between uncertainty and social extremism, and implications for future research are noted.