Living systems are smarter bots: Slime mold semiosis versus AI symbol manipulation
Although machines may be good at mimicking, they are not currently able, as organisms are, to act creatively. We offer an understanding of the emergent qualities of biological sign processing in terms of generalization, association, and encryption. We use slime mold as a model of minimal cognition and compare it to deep learning video game bots, which some claim have evolved beyond their merely quantitative algorithms. We find that discrete Turing machine bots are not able to make productive, yet unanticipated, "errors" necessary for biological learning which, based on the physicality of signs, their relatively similar shapes, and relative physical positions spatially and temporally, lead to emergent effects and make learning and evolution possible. In organisms, stochastic resonance at the local level can be leveraged for self organization at the global level. We contrast all this to the symbolic processing of today's machine learning, whereby each logic node and memory state is discrete. Computer codes are produced by external operators, whereas biological symbols are evolved through an internal encryption process.
Biosyst.