In addition to the existing language from the draft, Alito also responded to the dissent opinion in the final decision, stating "the dissent is very candid that it cannot show that a constitutional right to abortion has any foundation, let alone a 'deeply rooted' one, 'in this Nation's history and tradition'. The dissent does not identify any pre-Roe authority that supports such a right – no state constitutional provision or statute, no federal or state judicial precedent, not even a scholarly treatise."[1] He also addressed the concerns of the dissenting opinion that Dobbs would extend to other rights, stating that the extent of the majority opinion on Dobbs applied only to abortion.[2]