This ruling stated that there was no sufficient evidence to support the accusations against Kavala and that “the prosecution’s attitude could be considered such as to confirm the applicant’s assertion that the measures taken against him pursued an ulterior purpose, namely to reduce him to silence as an NGO activist and human-rights defender, to dissuade other persons from engaging is such activities and to paralyse civil society in the country.” It also requested that the Turkish Government “take every measure to put an end to the applicant’s detention and to secure his immediate release.” [34]