Hussein's case became a test case for women's rights in Sudan.[1] Hussein, who considers herself to be a good Muslim and was wearing loose-fitting pants covered by a long blouse,[14] contends that the case "is not about religion, it is about men treating women badly." She stated that she wanted to change the law on behalf of all the women of Sudan.[3] She argued that Article 152, which allows the flogging or fining of anyone who "violates public morality or wears indecent clothing" without defining "indecent clothing", itself violates both the 2005 Interim Constitution of Sudan and Sharia.