The exception for child pornography is distinct from the obscenity exception in a few ways. First, the rule is much more specific to what falls under the exception. Second, it is irrelevant whether any part of the speech meets the Miller test; if it is classified under the child pornography exception at all, it becomes unprotected.[30] The rule provides that speech is unprotected if it (1) "visually depicts" children below the age of majority and (2) "performing sexual acts or lewdly exhibiting their genitals".[31] Unlike the rules for simple obscenity, private possession of child pornography "may be outlawed".[32]