In May, the National Political Board of the Broad Front expressed its rejection of the "urgent consideration" mechanism and characterized the project as "inopportune, unconstitutional and undemocratic".[43] During the parliamentary analysis, its legislators worked to incorporate various modifications, but they considered that the final version did not present substantial changes with respect to the original and, therefore, they maintained their negative vote on the bill,[44] despite voting in favor of almost 50% of the articles.[45]