Concerns have also been raised over the journal peer review system, which largely relies on trust among researchers,[18] and the role of journalists reporting on scientific theories that they "are hardly in a position to question and comprehend".[21] Neil Cameron, a historian who specializes in the history of science, writing for the Montreal Gazette, labeled the controversy a "failure of journalism" that resulted in unnecessary deaths, saying that: 1) The Lancet should not have published a study based on "statistically meaningless results" from only 12 cases; 2) the anti-vaccination crusade was continued by the satirical Private Eye magazine; and 3) a grapevine of worried parents and "nincompoop" celebrities fueled the widespread fears.[108] The Gazette also reported that: