In the United Kingdom, the Quality Assurance Agency published a report[57] advocating the use of a legal approach as one way to tackle contract cheating, and suggested that existing fraud laws might be used, since the activities of such services, and their clients, could be reasonably interpreted to fit with definitions of fraud, as they involve false representation and failure to disclose information. A subsequent research project[58] compared the UK fraud laws with the terms and conditions used by contract cheating services and concluded that such services would be unlikely to fall foul of fraud law because the disclaimers, terms and conditions the services provide generally state that any custom written products are to be used only as "study guides" or "revision aids", thereby placing responsibility and intent on the student client. Despite this, media stings have shown that companies can be complicit in the inappropriate use of these products.[59] A similar analysis in Lithuania[60] concluded that contract cheating services were unlikely to fall foul of existing laws, although an analysis of Australian[61] law concluded that fraud, as well as forgery and conspiracy, might be legal avenues via which contract cheating could be targeted.