A number of prominent bitcoin promoters remained unconvinced by the reports.[55] Subsequent reports also raised the possibility that the evidence provided was an elaborate hoax,[56][57] which Wired acknowledged "cast doubt" on their suggestion that Wright was Nakamoto.[58] Bitcoin developer Peter Todd said that Wright's blog post, which appeared to contain cryptographic proof, actually contained nothing of the sort.[59] Bitcoin developer Jeff Garzik agreed that evidence publicly provided by Wright does not prove anything, and security researcher Dan Kaminsky concluded Wright's claim was "intentional scammery".[60]