References in other publications are fleeting and part of larger discussions of Wikipedia, not progressing beyond a definition, although David Brooks in The Nashua Telegraph described it as "wild and woolly".[17] One of the impediments to independent coverage of Wiktionary is the continuing confusion that it is merely an extension of Wikipedia.[lower-alpha 8] In 2005, PC Magazine rated Wiktionary as one of the Internet's "Top 101 Web Sites",[18] although little information was given about the site.