I think that the boy who was eaten still had just as much of a right to live as the other people and just because he was the minority in that case the one who maybe had less of a chance to keep living that doesn't mean that the others automatically have a right to eat him just because it would give a greater amount of people the chance to live. so there may be a certain rights that the minority members have that the individual has that shouldn't be traded off for the sake of utility? yes Anna?