Sentence 1: In Tibetan , Amitābha , and in its reflex form is called Amitāyus , they are iconographically diverse .
Sentence 2: In Tibetan , Amitābha is called and in its reflex form as Amitāyus , . They are iconographically distinct .
Question: Do Sentence 1 and Sentence 2 express the same meaning? Yes or No?