(CNN) -- Around the world, media reaction to the Democrats' victory has poured in, as newspapers and broadcasters reflect on the Barack Obama campaign and the global impact his win will have. 

A woman picks up a copy of a newspaper in Sydney, Australia 

The International Herald Tribune said that America had "leaped" across the color line, calling Obama "a 47-year-old black man who made history both because of his race and in spite of it." 

The Times of London said Obama had revitalized U.S. politics. "The immense turnout in yesterday's election was testament to the energy, excitement and expectations of a rejuvenated American democracy, as well as the fears of a nation standing at a crossroads of history," the paper said. 

It added that Obama's inheritance would be challenging. "The new president faces economic and social convulsions at home, conflict abroad." 

Also in London, The Guardian focused on the historic nature of the Democrats' win, saying: "Victory in the end came as easily as the polls had predicted," and comparing Obama's achievement with Roosevelt's of 1932 and Reagan's of 1980. 

In Germany, Der Spiegel's Gregor Peter Schmitz, writing from Chicago, called Obama's rise "astonishing," adding that his "curious ability to remain untouched by all the razzmatazz around him is likely to prove a source of strength." 

Al Jazeera said Obama had "surfed to power on a wave of voter discontent generated by the failures of President George Bush and the Republican Party" and added that he faces "unique challenges." It continued that he must "act quickly" to restore confidence in the economy and with his country "sick of war" is "unlikely to make any additional major overseas military commitments." 

Answer the following questions:
1. The world is reacting to what event?
2. What did the International Herald Tribune say America had done?
3. What did they say Obama had made?
4. Why?
5. What did The Times say he had done for U.S. politics?
6. How did they characterize the election turnout?
7. What did they say it was a testimonial to?
8. And what else?
9. Did they think Obama's inheritance would be easy?
10. What do they believe he has to face in the U.S.?
11. And internationally?
12. What did The Guardian emphasize?
13. Did they call it a hard-won triumph?
14. What prior victorious Democrat did they compare Obama's win to?
15. And which Republican's?
16. What year did the first of those triumphs take place?
17. And the latter one?
18. How did Der Spiegel describe Obama's ascension?
19. What did Al Jazeera describe as the cause of his success?
20. Caused by what?

Numbered answers:
1. The Democrats' victory.
2. "Leaped" across the color line.
3. History.
4. Both because of his race and in spite of it.
5. Revitalized them.
6. Immense.
7. The energy, excitement and expectations of a rejuvenated American democracy.
8. The fears of a nation standing at a crossroads of history.
9. No.
10. Economic and social convulsions.
11. Conflict.
12. The historic nature of the Democrats' win.
13. No.
14. Roosevelt's.
15. Reagan's.
16. 1932.
17. 1980.
18. Astonishing.
19. A wave of voter discontent.
20. The failures of President George Bush and the Republican Party.