If something's being brought up more than once, then usually we can derive something by combining the two facts we're given about a certain thing. If we are reading and we see conditional logic wording, we'll definitely start thinking about maybe diagramming some of the conditional logic. If we see comparative or causal wording, which is much less rare here, then we might enter more of that sort of mindset, seeing if there's a causal chain or trying to sort of itemize where are their similarities, where are their differences between these things being compared. When it comes to step three, anticipating an answer, there are two main directions that you will usually see a correct answer go on a must be false. It'll typically either contradict a conditional statement that we were given, or it'll contradict a possible inference that we could have made. Let's look at each of those.