Acrobatic is being incorrectly used, although it is slightly more complicated than that.
"Aerobatic" refers specifically to flight, and "acrobatic" refers specifically to feats of the human body, so referring to an aircraft as performing acrobatics is wrong.
That said, the word "aerobatic" is derived from "aero-acrobatics" and sounds nearly identical, so it's an understandable and relatively common error.
aviation.stackexchange.com/users/9800/ArgumentBargument
The Oxford English Dictionary's etymology for "aerobatics" is "After acrobatics " and defines it as: Feats of expert aviation, performed esp.
for display.
Hence aeroˈbatic a .; ˈaerobat , one who performs aerobatics;
hence as v. intr .
, to perform aerobatics; also trans .
So it's a new word pertaining to aviation based on one for (also Oxford English Dictionary): A rope-dancer; a performer of daring gymnastic feats and evolutions; a tumbler. lit .
and fig .
Edit: Notice the fig. at the end of the definition (which is an abbreviation for figuratively ).
So "acrobatic" can correctly be used to describe a person, cat, airplane , etc ... performing "acrobatics".
aviation.stackexchange.com/users/9806/user2121
Some of the other answers seem to claim that acrobatics would be incorrect when used to describe aerobatics, however when you look up various definitions you will find out that acrobatics : difficult and dangerous acts done by an acrobat; also : difficult or dangerous acts, movements, etc., done by another kind of performer Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acrobatics
So, acrobatics is just the generic word, whilst aerobatics is the more specific word describing a very specific form of acrobatics: acrobatics in the air flowing from the following etymology: aer-
+ acrobatics =
>
aerobatics Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aerobatics
So in conclusion it's fine to use either term, especially when it's already clear that the context is about aviation.
In an undefined context it might however be useful to have two words, for example I went to an aerobatics display and
I went to an acrobatics display of course hold two very different meanings.
Point is just: If you can pick, pick aerobatics, but don't go correcting people who aren't saying anything wrong.
aviation.stackexchange.com/users/1368/David Mulder
In my opinion, acrobatic is more related to a person, "One who is skilled in feats of balance and agility in gymnastics".
However, aerobatic relates to maneuvers on the air.
aviation.stackexchange.com/users/9458/Eduardo Guilherme
“Aerobatics” is only a portmanteau of “Aeronatical Acrobatics” either is fine and anyone who corrects you is a word snob.
aviation.stackexchange.com/users/26545/Buddy
I hear and read both the terms "aerobatic" and "acrobatic" used to describe the more extreme maneuvers such as spins, rolls, loops and more. My questions is about the terms themselves. It seems that they are interchangeable, but is one actually more correct to use than the other? Why do we have these two very similar words in the aviation vernacular that seem to mean the same thing?
Is there a difference between "aerobatic" and "acrobatic" flight?
aviation.stackexchange.com
<terminology><aerobatics>
aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/18897
aviation.stackexchange.com/users/8490/ryan1618
Acrobatics refers to feats of the human bosy. Aerobatics refers specifically to flight, it is the shortened version of Aeronautical Acrobatics. There is disagreement as to whether both terms are correct. Some maintain that "aerobatic" is correct, while "acrobatic" is incorrect. Others maintain that both terms are correct.
"Aerobatic" refers to flight while "acrobatic" refers to the human body so "acrobatic" is incorrect. "Aerobatics" comes from "Aeronautical acrobatics" so it is correct.