Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Input: Comment: You missed (so mysteriously for such a scrupulous person such as yourself!) this from your OWN link:

"the total new spending under the bill would be between $50 billion and $100 billion each year"

If EXISTING premiums, copays, employer subsidies, etc. are re-labelled as "taxes" then there isn't much money to come up with since there isn't much NEW spending beyond what is already spent -- just the peace of mind that money isn't the center of health care for an individual patient. 

Yes, for wingnuts, making EXISTING spending into government spending is a cause for a heart attack. But for sober-minded people focused on problem solution, it's a dull as reviewing school budgets. 

And let's be clear, this $50-100B ignores that not providing health care isn't itself free - the costs just show up elsewhere, off the balance sheet: bankruptcies, charity, crime, etc.

Sorry, California isn't panicked.  But nice try, snowflake.

Non-obscene