Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Input: Comment: "the only proof of collusion found by Mueller was the Clinton machine paying the Russians for dirt on Trump."
.
FALSE. Fusion GPS, which compiled the Dossier, has no connection to Russia. The work was initially funded by a conservative group, and then (when they stopped funding it) by the Democratic sources. The only people getting political dirt from the Russians were members of the Trump campaign. 
.
"There is zero evidence of Russia doing anything aside from a lousy $150K in facebook advertising."
.
FALSE again. There has been considerable evidence of quite a bit more than just that advertising. 
.
"At worst, Trump will be exposed for using Russian mob money to finance one of his fabulous hotels."
.
Criminal conspiracy, obstructing justice, money laundering, sexual assault, perjury, soliciting campaign donations from foreign nationals, and a number of other crimes are on the list of things he has already been exposed for.

Non-obscene