Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Input: Comment: < I think it can be argued that it was not so much Trump winning as Hilary losing.>
A distinction without a difference: Trump is president.
Clinton had a record, and the record was not perfect; but it was and is different from Trump's not only in degree but in kind.  Trump is 'sui generis': one of a kind -- a truly unique combination of incompetence, corruption and emotional instability. I reject any suggestion of equivalence, even roughly, with Clinton -- or with anyone else who was running in either party; and that includes some folks I think are pretty far out there.   
<Let's pray for better next time - more agreement!>
I do agree with that sentiment.  We deserve better, and must work and pray for it.

Non-obscene