Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Input: Comment: I don’t want my security and safety to rely on the good intentions of a leader who has proven his inability to adhere to international agreements he made with regards to nuclear weapons, who fires artillery shells at his southern neighbour and periodically corks off a missile into the Pacific.  No amount of smooth talking diplomacy with this childish ego maniac is going to convince him to act otherwise.  Unfortunately, the only diplomacy Kim Jong-un is going to recognise comes with overwhelming force.
I am reminded of what Benjamin Netanyahu said, “If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more ‎violence.  If the Jews put ‎down their weapons ‎today, there would be no ‎more Israel.”
I appreciate your desire for peace through peaceful means but I believe Kim Jong-un would see an opportunity in our naivete.  I would prefer Standard Missile III as an alternative.

Non-obscene