Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Input: Comment: "And believe this: John Elway will be very antsy if the next evaluation of Lynch is delayed until next spring."
.

You're Insane. Elway is resigned to Paxton being on the bench for this year and beyond! He's not stupid, like someone I could mention.
.

"Fair or not, if the Broncos go worse than 3-1 to open the season, Siemian will be on the hot seat."
.

Not A Chance! Siemian will be starting the whole season, unless because of injury!
.

"“Now, if (Lynch) played this year, in Week 6 or 7, it could be different.”"
.

No surprise, you took that comment out of context. He was being nice to Paxton, by speculating that if the competition could've lasted longer (e.g., a couple more months) then "Possibly" he'd (Paxton) be playing better.
.

Denver Post's Mark Kiszla needs to get his head out of … the clouds

Non-obscene