Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Input: Comment: "I know this fellow named John; he is really for any statist program. The more, the sooner the better."

Nothing I have ever said or written at any time or in any place would lead a reasonable or honest person to believe this.

"He thinks outlawing bullying will put a stop to it."

Nothing I have ever said or written at any time or in any place would lead a reasonable or honest person to believe this.

"He applauds victimhood and encourages self-pity, and nursing of resentment."

Nothing I have ever said or written at any time or in any place would lead a reasonable or honest person to believe this.

Four sentences, three lies, with more lies to follow.

The whole of RD's post is one extended Ad Hominem, and not just is it an attack on me, there are more lies than in an a Donald Trump speech.

Non-obscene