Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Input: Comment: "Given substantial evidence that Russia is bankrolling extreme right wing candidates across Europe"
Wow, what a sweeping statement, without facts to back it up. You must feel very good about yourself.
Except you're wrong. Because if you are referring to a loan to FN 3 years ago by a small, obscure bank, that was ALLEGEDLY  'linked' to Russia (not a Russian bank, just 'linked') that's not much of a proof of anything, isn't it?
The rest of your post is just as useless, all-over-the-place collection of overused, over-repeated canards.
Or I could call it pure bull crap.

Obscene