Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Posting on behalf of my brother who just had a AITA moment.

So my brother (31M) just came back from buying some ski's for an upcoming trip at a local secondhand sports shop. He knew one of the staff members that worked there through a mutual friend but a different staff member helped him try and find some ski boots. She gave him lots of good advice and was super patient with him. They choose a pair and went to look for skis even though the shop was closing in about ten minutes, although he wasn't aware of this at the time. The staff member who was helping him worked out he needed a certain size of ski which they didn't currently have in the men's section. Instead she found a pair in the women's section which would be her best recommendation in terms of size. The skis in question were coloured gray fading into indigo with cursive writing and plastic sparkly bits on the side. He checked them out but told the staff member, who was female, he didn't like them because they were too girly. The staff member who he knew, who was stood nearby challenged him a bit on it, not in an aggressive way, but saying "Oh come on. Does anybody really care about the whole gender thing?" and told him a story about a boy who came in the day before and bought bright pink skis and how great it was. My brother just said he wasn't making any point about women and he should like the design of the skis he bought. He asked to see if there were any other options but the staff member who had been helping him became slightly abrupt, her body language become  more closed off, standing with her arms folded. She got one other pair out but didn't really give any information about them. She'd been super helpful and informative before and it seemed like there was a sudden shift after the comment. When my brother asked her some more questions about the skis she held up her hands and said "I can only advise you. You need to make a choice. These are your options. We are closing in one minute".
He felt uncomfortable and didn't want to spend $200 on skis so he only purchased the boots and left.

He was bothered about the experience afterwards and explained he found the design overall was targeted towards women in a way that was slightly patronising and gendered in his opinion.  For him 'girly' was the appropriate word as that was the style the skis had been marketed as. For him, he'd rather buy his first skis with a design he identifies with more but felt he was treated a little bit like he was an asshole for not liking the boots and pressured to buying a pair he didn't want. So was the shop assistant an asshole for the way she seemed to react to my brothers comment or was my brother the asshole for not following her recommendations because he didn't like the style and using the term "girly"?

not buying some skis because they were too "girly"