Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I have a friend who is a Star Wars fanboy, and I only have seen the first 3 original movies. He was the one who forced me to watch them, it was hella boring for me. (I really enjoy independent European cinema.) But no problem, I care about him and appreciate his efforts to share his tastes in cinema, music etc. with me.

He said that people who haven't seen Star Wars are "culturally uneducated" because it's "general knowledge". He also claimed that "those people are a little left out because Star Wars is a crucial part of the pop culture."

I agreed with his second opinion but I said I was a bit disappointed that he just disregards the whole history of cinema and the great directors like Luis Bunuel, Kieslowski and Gaspar Noe.

When I told him that he just called me culturally uneducated, his response was "yeah you were, but I introduced you the series and now you're not" 

This has happened like a month ago. Yesterday he implied the same thing again. 

Am I the asshole for being upset? 



being upset because my friend implied that I am culturally uneducated