Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: This morning, I walked to the store with clenched cheeks and a broken toe. I woke up for work having to take a shit and theres no TP in the bathroom. A typical situation for most I think, but I live in a house with 6 people including myself.  

When I buy things for the house: TP, food, garbage bags, etc. I put them in the places they go and everyone in the house uses them as they would. But when any of the other 5 buy anything, its kept in their rooms and nobody else is allowed to use it. Apparently, this was a silent agreement amongst 4/5 of them..1/5 of them just kinda went along with it but they agree with me that since were all sharing a living space, we should all pitch in for house supplies together, this way not all of our money is being spent, and nobody is left up shitcreek without a paddle.  

However, everytime I bring attention to this, I'm told that I'm just gonna cause an issue, that I'm an asshole and I'm being confrontational. Granted, I'm on meds that have been making me act as such but in this situation I feel like I'm right.  

We'll argue about this every couple of days and their "winning point" is that if we all share, stuff disappears so quickly, and people dont mind being wasteful because they didnt buy it.  

**A:** No shit. 6 people in a house, stuff goes fast.  
**B:** If we all pool the money to buy things, people wont have that mentality because they spent money on it too.  

So am I making a big deal over something stupid, or am I right in thinking it should be different.

thinking my housemates should share and work together