Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: This is a 2-part: and also not understanding my fiancee's point of view on it? 

A relative passed recently who was a hoarder and she had tons of items she purchased, some of which she never opened. As with hoarding there were bug droppings in some things - for context - but for practically this fact never came up in our discussions. 

So she passed and left a bunch of opened and unopened kitchenaid stuff, all of which can be cleaned. My fiancee loves her kitchenaid and wanted stuff on the wedding registry for it but claims that if we take one of these items we'll have less on our registry to fill out for guests, which is a bit of a valid point because we're already having trouble filling out our registry and guests are asking us what we want, which shows me they want to give us a gift - however from a practical point of view I consider it completely wasteful and impractical for that. However I'm not interested in the kitchenaid gear, so I have no stake in where we get it from, so now it's just me trying to convince her that her feelings are wrong and I can't understand it at all.

Can someone please tell me I'm the asshole and why? Because I really don't get this. 

wanting an item of inheritance