Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I'm currently studying abroad in Europe but before I left (about a month ago) I had to move out of my apartment a couple days before my flight. I talked with a friend (who is with me on this study abroad trip) of mine like a month in advance to make sure it was okay with his roommates that I would stay at their house for 2 nights so I wasn't homeless and they all agreed. I slept on a couch, and in the morning (as I still had classes) would go to school, shower at the gym, go to classes, eat at the cafeteria for lunch, and buy my own snacks/Jimmy John's on the way home for dinner.

&amp;#x200B;

Anyway, it's now about a month later and **my friend tells me** that his roommates insist I pay them $10 to help with the bills. AITA for being reluctant to pay? Honestly it's not that much money (which is an argument that can go both ways) but I would feel so much better about paying if the roommates were to politely ask me themselves during my stay instead of telling my friend to tell me to pay up a month after the fact. I just feel like it was a rude execution on their part but that's for Reddit to decide. I did already pay them.

&amp;#x200B;

I understand I should've probably done something or offered to pay a little bit but because I had planned this in advance and it was with a good friend I felt it wasn't super necessary especially since I didn't really use any of their utilities except some internet (which they pay like $30 a month for).

feeling reluctant to pay my friend's roommates for staying at their house for 2 nights