Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I am currently on holiday with friends. At the moment we stay at an accomodation where we need to cook for ourselves. 

Before we went on holdiays we already went to buy the necessary things we would need and I would say if you just want to eat something or fridge is always filled with something to eat.

I am a simple man, I do like to buy non-necessary stuff often but I have no problem with drinking only tap water or eat stuff without extra meat/fish. My friends seem to have this problem.

We go shopping everyday and pay, for 4 persons, around 50 euros everyday. The problem is while we are shopping I am telling them which stuff I don't want to eat/drink and it is a lot since I really dont see why to buy stuff in a very expensive shop +30% on most stuff. I told them we could go once for a drive (~40km) and 'go shopping big time' but the answer was: ' If we drive this far we will burn a lot of gasoline ' 

Am I the asshole for just not wanting to pay for things I clearly said I don't want and won't touch. 

As I mentioned before I tell them straight up which stuff I don't want. 
I just told them I am not okay paying my part of the bill without consuming most of the stuff on the bill. Now I was told I am fucking up the holidays and I could just pay because they are my friends and they also don't get a bit from everything (which pretty much isnt the case)





not wanting to pay for the food I don't eat