Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So I met this group of gaming friends a few years back through a game called Arma and the same core of people have stayed together but originally the group was larger. This someone I recently got very angry at and wanted to remove from all of our online community communication methods, from my point of view, caused a lot of the problems that caused the original group to break up, we shall call him Mr. Z for this period of time.

Background:

Mr. Z has always been free thinking and didn't follow community rules that well. He would always cause trouble for those writing papers to better organise ourselves when the paper would infringe on his right to act less serious than some of us, including me, would have liked. Mr. Z would also commonly side with people who cause chaos because these people oppose the set rules or common courtesy's set in place.

One major thing that Mr. Z supported was this character we shall name Mr. K. Mr. K would always assume the role to destroy the heaviest enemy targets immediately as they popped up and would cause who ever was running the session that night to up the difficulty. Afterwards there would be large dissent because that session was more 'difficult' than normal. Mr. K after these sessions would also brag about how he destroyed the heaviest enemy targets that might have other wised presented a suitable challenge for everyone else. Back to Mr. Z, he would also support Mr. K and in the end Mr. K Would be removed because of his lack of compliance to follow rules and regulations. Mr. Z did notboike this and would for the next several sessions bring everyone else's session quality down by being even more obnoxious.

Another major thing Mr. Z did was when ever we would play a game he disagreed with or in the game Arma 3 play as a faction other people would like but he didn't, Mr. Z would take the obnoxiousness and stupid act and turn it up a notch. We play as Guerilla fighters to try something different? He acts like a literal terrorist and actively is a detriment to the other participants. Not fighting the enemy he would like? Mr. Z would dress very similarly to the enemy. Mr. Z doesen't get the mission type he likes? He complains so that everyone would hear.

The last thing he really did that really angered me, This all was a few years ago by the way, was that when we would all try and settle our differences sit down and talk about how people feel about each other deep down. He blatantly said to everyone he had no problems and believes this activity was stupid and left. I was fine with that because I didn't find out later he was talking with someone through a private chat window about how he has all of these problems with everyone.

Time now:

The big group fell apart a few months after. Fast forward a few years a lot of us are older have jobs and some out of High School so we believe we've matured enough to get together and form a new group. The same core of people including Mr Z and I stuck around and when we did our first session I wasn't surprised but I wasn't happy that he didn't mature one bit. I went on a very pessimistic tirade of how we should get rid of the peoblem, Mr. Z, and remove him permanently because of how he caused so many problems and continued to cause problems until now. I called him a number of things like a parasite, worthless member of the online community and a ton of racial slurs.

I come here asking if I went overboard in wanting him removed completely and if my harsh comments fell into the 'asshole' level.

wanting to remove someone completely from the situation due to their past actions