Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I'm a dude and my hobby is baking.  Christmas is coming and I always get stuff on me when I bake so I asked my SO to get me an apron so that gets dirty instead of my clothes. Well she got me an apron but it's pink and it has sprinkles on it (similar to [this](https://i.imgur.com/2ZYxZa6.jpg)) for less than 10 dollars. I thought it was funny so I tried it on when she brought it home and we both had a laugh. She asked me if I would wear it while I bake and I said maybe. 

A few days later I made a pumpkin pie while she was at work and I didn't wear the apron she got for me. I didn't wear it because we live with my parents and I know they would make fun of me and laugh at me. When she got home she could tell I didn't wear the apron and she got surprisingly angry. She didn't understand why I wouldn't wear it and basically called me ridiculous for caring about the fact that it's pink and has sprinkles on it. 

That's not really what I care about, I just don't want to be laughed at and I feel like that's why she got it. I would wear it if I was home alone but it feels like she got it so she and my parents can laugh at me because I'm wearing a woman's apron.

AITA for not wearing it?

not wearing a pink apron with sprinkles on it my so got for me