Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Hi everyone. My ex and I broke up about three months ago because I felt there were a lot of problems with our relationship - mainly that I was putting in way more effort than he was. 

Ever since, he's been extremely clingy, trying to stay friends and constantly wanting to talk over what happened. I'm extremely stressed out right now due to a lot of life events happening at once, and when I was pissed off the other night he sent me a message essentially blaming me for the death of our relationship.

I lost my shit and called him that night, and told him I didn't have time for this bullshit and he needed to stop. However, I still haven't replied to the original message even though he asked me to.

WIBTA if I outline everything I felt went wrong in the relationship before I finally block him? He knows that the reasons I've given already weren't all there was to the split, so I think he deserves to know. But at the same time, most of my problems were with him and his actions, so I don't want it to seem like a personal attack. I don't want to be a bitch, but at the same time, I want to make it clear what the issues were. WIBTA?

explaining point by point exactly what he did wrong