Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Throwaway for obvious reasons.

I'll try to keep this short; 

At my workplace, unless you are explicitly in a tipped position, you are not too accept tips. You can accept gifts with a value of up to $100 but it cannot be considered currency in any way. 

I know with almost 100% certainty that most of an entire department is accepting tips under the table. These are people I've worked with in the past, and while I wouldn't call them friends, we all know each other and are friendly. These tips can be upwards of $500 and likely even more, and while I don't know the frequency, it's safe to assume that each individual participating are getting these tips on at least a weekly basis. If it's true that most of these people are accepting tips against policy, there's no way they're being claimed with their taxes and they are effectively defrauding the IRS for tens of thousands of dollars annually.

Truthfully, I think they, and everyone else, SHOULD be able to accept tips, given the environment that we work in (I won't specify but it's probably not hard to figure out). My issue comes from the fact that many other people have turned down hundreds and thousands in tips while this particular group of people have been accepting then because there in a position where they can do it behind closed doors, and in turn, this income goes unreported.

I won't deny that these thoughts are partially driven by jealousy and greed, as I've heard that the IRS sometimes financially rewards people for tips leading to issues like these, so that begs the question.

WIBTA?

turning in a group of acquaintances to the IRS