Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My commute home use to be through rush hour traffic. Everyday cars would line up like lemmings in the left lane three intersections away because two lanes would merge into one and no one wanted to be the "asshole". This would drive me nuts. The right lane would be completely empty THREE intersections away because everyone wanted to prematurely merge so they weren't that guy trying to "cut" people off. Meanwhile traffic would back up on the whole street and make a terrible commute worse. If people just used the right lane and merged when appropriate then you could fit double the amount of cars on that section of the road and there would be less backups all around. 

I of course would ride the right lane until the merge point at which time I would turn on my blinker and merge over. Without fail I would get death stares, middle fingers, and the ol' I own the road in front of me and there's no way you are getting past. 

Am I part of the problem or part of the solution for taking the right lane?*...cue "Go your own way" \~Fleetwood Mac*

pulling ahead in the right lane