Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So, some more context. This was at a dinner in front of a group of friends as well as some people I didn't personally know. The girl (who I knew) asked me if I'd date someone with depression, because they were talking about dating with depression and wanted my opinion as someone healthy. 

I was really put on the spot and said something like "well if my bf became depressed I would definitely support him no matter what." Then she said "no not your current boyfriend, I meant like would you BEGIN dating someone already depressed if you were still single?"  

It was awkward as fuck and I just stammered a bit and said "um I guess not... But it's just I don't think I'd be a great partner to someone with severe depression." At this point several people rolled their eyes and just said something like oh classic person who doesn't understand that depressed people are just normal people. I kinda kept my mouth shut for the rest of the night. 

A few days ago that friend messaged me saying that next time I get that question I need to be way more supportive. She said that several people were really offended by what I said and only reinforced their view that depressed people are unlovable and will never get dates. I got a bit defensive and said that it was unfair for her to put me on the stop, but she just told me to "get over myself" and learn some "empathy." W/AITA for what I said?

saying I wouldn't date a depressed person in front of depressed people