Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So this happened a little after Christmas. I work at a chain bakery as an apprentice, which means I have to go do full time manual labor in the morning and go to school for my pastry chef degree instantly after that every day.  I leave home at 06:00 and return at 21:00. My mother is out of country for work and my dad was then at the hospital for about a month (he's fine now), so I had housework on top of that. Christmas is also a pretty tough season for my line of work.

So me and my co-worker, a 40 yo woman, who tended to be very loud and annoying at work, were in the elevator, and I was leaning on the wall, and I unconsciously sigh.

"Hey, what's wrong, you ok?"

"Yeah, sorry, just thinking."

"Oh? What do *you* have to be worried about? You don't have any *real* troubles! You're like 20, and you don't even have kids!"

She said that (more or less) in a very irritated tone, like I insulted her. So I got pissed, and told her something along the lines of "just cause I don't have kids doesn't mean I don't have a family to feed" and "it's not my fault you can't handle yours".

I understand that she might have her own problems, but I just don't think it gave her the right to dismiss other people's, especially with such ridiculous reasoning.



snapping at a co-worker for assuming that you don't have problems if you don't have kids