Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I've been renting for the past 4 years and a local real estate company manages the condo I live in. The owner has decided to sell the condo so I'm going to look into purchasing a house as I no longer want to rent and want to build equity.                    

The realty company that manages the condo I live in have of course offered to represent me in buying a home. However, a few months ago in December I failed to pay rent. I don't know how it happened. Whether I didn't navigate all the way to the payment page online or if it just skipped my mind completely. But its the first time its ever happened. I've never been late in the past 4 years and infact, 99% of the time pay my rent 1-2 weeks early.                         

While it is entirely on me for forgetting to pay, I feel that after 4 years of early payment and being very understanding when needing repairs (they aren't timely when I've needed maintenance.) that I deserve some kind of heads up before they take legal action. So on the 5th of December I find a 5 days to pay or vacate document taped to my front door. So of course I paid immediately and also had to pay $50 to cover their legal fees.                

A simple phone call or email would have been nice instead of immediately trying to evict me.              

Knowing that the realtor fee is 6% of home price and in my market will amount to about $10,000 I don't want to give them that money.              

Am I just being petty? Is there some benefit to me for using my former landlords as my realtor?

not wanting to use my landlord as my realtor