Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Title is quite vague, but didn't want to go into much detail.

Recently, I remembered a family vacation to the south of France we had about 3 years ago, and during that vacation, naturally, we went to experience French cuisine. Now at the time I was somewhat decent in French speaking, but not enough to be fluent in it, but my family had no idea on how to speak French. So, we go to a restaurant, and the waiter comes to take our orders. This is where my dilemma begins. 

I was too shy to order for my family, so my father decided to do it instead. And instead of butchering an attempt at speaking French, he did, what I thought was the polite thing, and spoke in English. The waiter, however did not like that. He said: "Why do I have to learn English, if you don't bother learning French". Nothing too much out of the ordinary.
 
For some peculiar reason I thought about it today, and didn't know who was in the right, hence my attempt at addressing this to the public. WIBTA  in this situation if I did not know a language, and resorted to English instead of butchering another language (English is not my first language, but I would prefer someone to speak in this language, rather than attempting to speak in my mother tongue)

TLDR WIBTA for speaking in English, rather than attempting to speak in a language that I do not know or know little about. 

not speaking a language