Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: This has bugged me for years. I worked in a corporate office. One of the paralegals there had some health issues (used a cane). She was also enormous. Bottom line, she needed to use the handicapped stall. Fair enough - - bathroom is 4 stalls, I never used it.

Except that one day. I was alone in the bathroom, in my regular stall, and discovered I had a little monthly visitor and no mitigation apparatus. So, I fished through my purse for quarters, put some toilet paper in place, and quickly sprinted over to the Cotton Apparatus Dispenser and dialed up a solution.

Seeing as how I was only half zipped and in distress, I ducked into the handicapped stall to insert said apparatus. You guessed in - - in the literally 30 seconds I was in there, she showed up and started yelling at me that I was thoughtless and entitled. There was no room to interject "30 seconds" or "emergency" or "you weren't even here."

Am I the asshole? Is it never allowable to use that stall if you are not disabled? 

using the handicapped stall when the bathroom was empty