Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I have employees who work in people’s homes, or in retail locations. In other words, their schedule is set for them and they report to the location scheduled. They have their schedule a month in advance, and are able to request a change if necessary. 
Each position gets ample training, and retraining. Occasionally, an employee doesn’t produce results, so I call them in to help figure out why. They make more money when they produce results. Otherwise it’s just an hourly wage. The bonus and commission can be fairly lucrative. Hourly alone, well, they could make more working fast food. So the incentive is there. The training is proven effective, and if they follow the training, they can make $20-25 an hour. 
I have an employee who hasn’t been producing results. I’ve brought her in for retraining, asked what’s going on from her perspective (nicely) and she says she’s doing everything the way she was trained. 
I spot checked her today. She was not doing things according to training. I watched her for a while without her knowing. (Retail location, from another aisle) 
When i approached her, I totally caught her off guard. She went beet red, mouth agape. I greeted her, spoke some niceties, then told her what I observed was not being done right. I am her direct manager. The only one above me is the owner. I hired her. It was well within my realm to correct this action. 

Her only response was, “Did you come here just to check on me?”

I was honest. I said I spot check often, and while I did have some shopping to do, I did Intentionally visit this location to check on her. 

She corrected her activity. But she was very unhappy that I checked on her. 

AITA?

checking on my employees who work offsite