Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I recently had a phone interview with a company for a data scientist position. In my opinion, it went very badly (I had given my resume to a previous coworker who works at the company currently. Even though I am a masters student and haven’t had research experience since Aug 2016, the company wanted me to apply to their data scientist opening. The qualifications on the posting were: Masters degree and at least 2 years experience in data science) Of course I was upset after getting off the phone but I figured “oh well, I’m sure I’ll never hear from them again”. 
Well, soon after hanging up, I got an email saying that they’d like to do an on site interview the following week where we would talk more about my experience/background for 15-20 minutes and then they’d give me a tour of their labs. I agreed, even though I felt that the phone interview had gone horribly. I sent my availability for the next week. 
There response was basically “let’s do 9am on Friday. You will need to make a 20 minute long presentation about your past research. Send the PowerPoint to me the night before.” 
So, I graciously backed out, saying that I didn’t believe the position was a good fit for me at this time. 
I told them that I had virtually zero research experience over the phone. Why would they tell me to create a 20 min PowerPoint knowing that?
Either way, apparently the team I interviewed with spoke to my former coworker and said I seemed to be “scared off or something”. 
*I would have never agreed to the second interview if they had told me straight up that I needed to create a presentation* 
Am I the asshole for backing out after initially agreeing? 
Thanks, y’all. 

backing out of an interview that I already agreed to