Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Some time ago, I reconnected with a friend from high school (class of 1994) via Facebook. In the intervening years, I developed (pun not intended) an interest in photography, and started taking tentative steps to see if I had any talent, posting a few of my shots for my friends to judge. Obviously, the verdict was yes, or I'd have some other username. I posted that due to the results, I might start a website to sell my work.  


Anyway, a few days later, I was looking at her Facebook profile and *saw one of my photos without credit.* I commented something along the lines of "Yay! I'm flattered you like my photo, but, um, it's *my* photo, and I might want to try to sell it...would you mind taking it down, please? I hope you don't think I'm being a jerk." - and she sent back an angry, "Yes, you are being a jerk. I didn't know you were going to try to sell it. I'll take it down, but not because you asked."  


I thought that was that, until I found she'd edited (cropped) and reuploaded my photos to one of her FB albums. Since I felt she was so belligerent before, I reported her account on copyright grounds.  


Then, when FB suspended her, she really got pissed, sending me an even angrier email.  


The way I see it, I was just looking after my intellectual property, but she insisted I was the one at fault. Note: me and the person in question no longer speak, because *she* thought I was an asshole. ...but I still wonder, so here I am.  


What say you, reddit?

making an art-related Facebook request