Definition: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
Input: Statement: Gray Davis to Los Angeles Superior Court, April 2000; partner, Morrison &amp; Foerster, 1991-2000; partner, Hufstedler, Kaus &amp; Ettinger (and predecessor firms), 1983-91; associate, Beardsley, Hufstedler &amp; Kemble (and related firms), 1977-82 Law  Harvard Law School  49 Choices: 1. Gray Davis was associated with a court in April of 2000. 2. Beardsley founded a firm that was unrelated to law. 3. Kaus & Ettinger won a case in court.

3