Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I started dating my boyfriend a while ago. After we went on our first date, he let me know that another girl he had been talking to was interested in him again, and he'd like to give it another shot with her. I had no problems with that, and I let him know as much. 

A week later, he texted me, and told me that he let the other girl know that he was no longer interested in her. He asked me out on another date. I was, obviously, ecstatic and accepted. Two weeks later, we became boyfriend and girlfriend.

That was over a month ago. Tonight, he told me the truth. He had asked the other girl out, and she had said no. Because she said no, he asked me out again.

I asked him the obvious hypothetical: if she had said yes, would he have still denied her and gone out with me? He told me that if she had said yes, he might be dating her now, and that he cant answer me definitively on whether he would be dating me or her.

AITA for feeling that he only asked me out because his first choice said no? Or for being upset that he couldn't tell me whether or not he'd be dating me or her had the circumstances been different? 

feeling like a second choice