Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My roommate and I live on campus in a dorm. I have a router that speeds up the campus internet. This morning I found my roommate playing CSGO at 4AM (2 hours before my alarm, and I can hear his game), I texted him through the Steam app (I'm half-ass awake by this point) to turn it down and calm down. He said that his game wasn't the reason why I woke up, and told me that he could hear me. I have infected tonsils and my doctor told me to get plenty of rest. At this time, my rest is pretty vital to college (I had mono and was out for a week. Don't want it \*ever\* again.) 16 hours later, I hear him bang on his desk multiple times (like the Hulk),  yelling about hitboxes right as I'm doing my homework. This isn't new, he's been yelling over a game at night while I'm studying, doing homework, and even trying to go to sleep. My response was always "Calm down." At this rate, telling him that isn't worth it. Recently, I found I can control my router's time for certain devices connected to it. The question is: WIBTA for limiting his access on my router?

&amp;#x200B;

tl;dr - roommate is toxic and loud over CSGO, thinking about limiting his access through my router so I can focus on studies and/or get decent sleep.

limiting my roommate's access to my router