Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: McDonalds is having a promotion where you peel a label off an item and you can win a free item once in awhile.

On this day my wife gave me 2 labels.  One with a free medium fry and one  with a free shake/frappe/cappachino thing.  The free shake thing was worth $2 and I don't enjoy the shakes/frappes/whatever else they are and I just wanted to get a beverage ($1) in place of the free item.

The girl at the front register had no issue with it and just needed the manager to submit the promo for her.  When the manager showed up and seen the label was for a free *something* and not a beverage, I was told that an exchange can not be made.

I explained that I just wanted to get a sweet tea that's worth only $1 and not the more expensive item and to just ring it up as the free *something*  and hand me a cup for a beverage.  To which I was told "Not exchanges."

I got slightly frustrated bit kept my cool and asked just for a shake with nothing in it.  So the manager rung it up and gave me a shake cup and lid so I took the empty container and got a sweet tea with it.

AITA for this? Should I have just given my free item to someone else?  I feel like I was THAT customer and I should have just shut up and walked away.

asking for a large soda instead of the winning item