Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: The situation is pretty heated.
It's a hypothetical argument - my son is 7 months old currently and does not use cutlery on his own yet.
So long story short - she seems to not comprehend there can be different methods, to each their own. Asked her to demonstrate the correct and the best way to hold a pen and draw an animal. Any kind of an animal. She drew a circle with eminating straight lines saying its the sun. Showed her a video of a lad without arms holding a pen with his toes, drawing like Michelangelo - got me nowhere. Says she does not have the correct holding position of a pen and my argument is invalid. 
Asking why won't she then learn the "correct" way or how could she even teach the so called "correct" way if she herself does not hold it that way was like throwing a lot of Na in H2O
I feel like I'm fighting for my sons liberty - to hold a spoon or a pen or whatever whichever way he feels suitable for him to get the job done so to say. Feel like this is the most absurd BS yet. 
She persists that she's going to teach him the "correct" and "best" way to use a spoon or a pen, and i do not want that kind of authoritarian dictatorship for my son.

telling my sons mother there's no "correct" way to use a spoon or a pen that she can teach my son