Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Hey guys,

&amp;#x200B;

I had this one girl write to me asking if I can reinstall her broken Windows. I told her sure and that I charge X amount of money for it - she agreed. Few days later I finally get her laptop and start working on it. Turns out the HDD is broken and since it was a pretty old laptop she decided it was not worth replacing it, however she did ask me if I can recover some pictures off her drive. This is of course where I fucked up by not telling her how much I charge for it but instead I just asked where she kept the pictures and proceeded to try to recover them. After about 2 hours I managed to recover a 1 GB folder of pictures and she said that's all she needs. We agreed we'd meet in few days and I'd copy the pictures onto her pendrive. Today I realized I completely forgot to tell her the price so I wrote her a quick message, she replied with "For 1 folder? No thanks :)". That's fair since I didn't specify the price first so I replied with 'OK, let's meet on Monday and I will give you the laptop back". 

&amp;#x200B;

Now I feel kinda bad because from her perspective it kinda seems that now that I own her pictures I can basically demand any price I want, especially since the pictures are probably of a sentimental value for her (with her kid). Am I the asshole here?

&amp;#x200B;

&amp;#x200B;

recovering photos off a broken drive without first telling the customer the price first