Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Okay, so my boyfriend, C, worked at a starbucks at our local grocery store about a year ago, and he HATED it. One of his friends at the time, J, was the one that actually recommended the job. It turned out horribly because they had no management, people were quitting left and right, J refused to work more than one night a week, and C ended up working 40+ hours during finals week (we are in high school). He was so stressed and in such a bad mental state that he just couldn't handle it and would complain and break down over it constantly. Eventually, J transferred to a different starbucks at a different grocery store, and C ended up quitting and getting a new job at a movie theater.

Fast forward to now. J started acting like an asshole, causing me and my boyfriend to have a falling out with him. In retaliation, I guess, he picks on/bullies me and C whenever he gets the chance. Anyways, today, for whatever reason, he told C that he should apply to the starbucks he is working at. He made it clear that he still only works once a week, that they wouldn't have to work together, and that the manager will hire him right away. A little while later, C gets a call from one of our friends working at the same starbucks basically saying that she's looking to quit, but that the manager will hire C on the spot if he applies today. This all seemed sketchy to me, but like a big neon thumbs up to C.

We get into an argument about this, and I say that if people are quitting and the manager will hire anyone on the spot, it's got to be too good to be true, and that it will probably just end up like last time. On top of this, I reminded him of how stressed and how adamant he was about never getting a job at a grocery store starbucks again. I also made it clear that working with J will be hellish, and if he really needs a new job, it's not that hard to find one.

 He replied by saying that he is in a better mental state now, can be stronger than before and quit if things get that bad again, and has work experience at a starbucks. He also assured me that he can ignore J, that this is a guaranteed job, and that he needs (wants) more money.

I just think that there are always jobs hiring and that he can find one closer to home that pays even more if he took the time to look for one. There is no need to put himself through that much stress again. I'm also afraid that if he goes in to ask how many people work there, how many hours a week he'd have, etc., he'd get lied to.

Am I the asshole for not letting him apply to this job, or is he a big boy who can made (bad) decisions on his own?

&amp;#x200B;

Summary: My bf worked at a terrible starbucks that didn't respect their employees, and his bully recommended they start working together at a new starbucks, even though the manager is hiring on the spot and people are quitting. It sounds to me like the beginning of round 2 of the first bad job.

not letting my boyfriend apply for a (potentially) bad job