Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So some backstory, in my English class we are studying a text by a Nigerian women, it's basically a collection of short stories with there own characters focused around the lives on women in Africa during certain events.

We where given the essay topic

"Jumping monkey hill highlights the pressures women are placed under at the hands of men".

I chose to do the thing that every other teacher at my school recommends and agree/disagree not completely either. So I said that yes it does show that but it also shows how men can be placed under that same pressure. (As it does, it's about a group of people at a writing conference (men and women) and the old man running it is a pedophile who harras some of the women, the story rather clearly shows the men feel pressure not to say any thing as the man can provide them with opportunity. (Very clear).

I got my essay back and the teacher *corrected* my intention to be that women as supposed to what I originally said "jumping monkey hill explores how women are pressured by those around them, however it also highlights that men can face the same pressure"

She "corrected" it to not include the bit about men. 

When she came over and asked me (and the rest of the table) if we had any questions about our feedback. I in no uncertain way said that I think she's wrong, and that the point of a contention is to state your interpretation, my interpretation was that and she has no right to edit that contention if it's completely related to the essay topic as it was. 

Everyone at my table seemed to think I was being rude and sexist for pointing that out.... 

This was a practise essay but I just got the three options for our assessed essay and all three focus exclusively on women (although the story does explore things like religion, race, war, politics, immigrants and so much else) even things that could super easily be multi gender she's chosen to say only happen to women. 

Am I the asshole for choosing to disagree with these topics all going along how women are the victims ect ect.

*I'm not sexism I believe in just testing everyone the same, if gender isn't needed to make a point (and imo the only time it is is when talking about physical differences) I just don't think you should make things about gender, if she was doing the same thing about men my response would be the same.* 

calling out my english teacher for trying to push her views on us through essay questions, and saying Im "off topic" for disagreeing with her