Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My school has a system where every week, we have one period were you're allowed to go to any teacher's class and do anything, work or not, as long as you abide by that teacher's rules. Of course, some people spend time working, and some spend time cooling off and taking a bit of a rest from the hectic rest of the day, and this time around, my friend group basically decided to take some time off. 

We've got a modded Terraria server set up on Google Cloud, and three of us are playing on that, one is playing that online MTG game, one is playing Brawl Stars, and one more person is playing League. Other people all around the room are doing assorted computer tasks, including games. After maybe half of the period finishes, my English teacher comes up and tells us this:  


ET: "So I can't even get into Schoology (the system we use for grades, class management, etc), is it possible that you're causing it or taking up all of the bandwidth?"

Now, at this point at the conversation I'm already calling BS because I know how much data is coming/going from the server and it's not a lot (picture attached). If you'd looked at our screens you'd see just a ton of projectiles, but to be honest the server isn't even working that hard.

ME: "Uhh, it might be why. We'll get off if you'd like."

At this point she walks away, probably to go back to working. Then, halfway across the room from us (we were sitting in the furthest corner from her), she says, quite loudly:

ET: "And if you guys don't get off in the next 10 seconds, I think we can all say that you're addicted."

She goes back to her computer and 30 minutes later, as we're walking out as the period ends, I see her filling out grades, guess where? Schoology.

&amp;#x200B;

And this is the point which I've been thinking about. We're all actually in the process of getting off (and I know for a fact that everyone that was on the server basically exited immediately). I don't think that she had any right to call us all addicted without any proof. 

In addition, I know basically for a fact that we were not causing, or at least not the main cause of her site not loading. The other 20 other people in the room were basically all on computers or playing a video game of some kind, save a couple of people. I remember for a fact at least 4 other people playing video games on their phones or computers from where I could see. Other people were using Schoology in the room, so that proves that it was just her computer. We weren't even that loud- we were trying to keep our volumes down.

Finally, I live in a quite well-to-do region of Silicon Valley, and the internet at our schools is spotty outside of classrooms, but it has always been reliable inside, and we've done this in previous free periods without teachers or anyone else in the room complaining, for essentially the entirety of the first semester. The wifi should definitely be able to handle the amount of data coming in/out of the server. It's done it before with no issue.

&amp;#x200B;

**TL;DR: My English teacher singled out and called my entire friend group addicted to video games over a likely false accusation that we were causing her wifi to slow down. AITA for getting mad at her?**

getting mad at my english teacher over video games