Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I’ve been seeing [This post](https://www.instagram.com/prettylou11/p/BvAIwJGgPHX/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&amp;igshid=7chppkl31ua) floating around on people’s instagram stories. It’s mostly kids I go to school with. To me they obviously have their heart in the right place and what they’re doing is no harm to anyone. But I feel the original poster was trying to guilt people into liking and sharing because it says “I bet 97% of you wont share”. And it is also kind of like beating a dead horse. Yes, cancer is a terrible illness and should be stopped. But everyone knows that. I doubt there are any cancer activists out there at all, let alone ones who would be moved by this person saying fuck cancer to be against it. Am I the asshole for not reposting a post exploiting an illness for like bait?

not wanting to share a post that says "share if cancer sucks"