Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Right after the midterm elections, one of my second cousins shared a post about how a certain gubernatorial election was unfair because the winning candidate won even though the other candidate won more districts (the districts in question are, obviously, way less populated than the ones that voted for the winner), and how gubernatorial candidates should have to win both the popular vote and some sort of geographical vote. I commented on the post saying that the winning candidate won by a clear majority, it would be unfair for people's votes to count differently based on how dense the area they lived in is, and that I would support the popular vote no matter which candidate won. She proceeded to go into a rant about how I, unprovoked, shared my opinions even though she hadn't shared hers, and that I was being self righteous and a sore winner about it.  She said all this sarcastic stuff about "what would we do without the educated city folk educating us." She implied that I called her an "idiot Republican," when I did no such thing - I was perfectly respectful, no personal attacks, no political attacks, just sharing my opinion on the matter.

She then unfriended me, which I'm not upset about, she's barely in my life as it is and I see no reason for her to be in it moving forward. AITA for commenting my (disagreeing) opinion on a political post?

&amp;#x200B;

commenting on my cousin's political facebook post