Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I work at a tech company that recently established an "Autism at work" program. The company made a huge push to hire autistic folks as an "untapped talent", which I totally get and think that it's a great initiative.

"Johnny" was hired onto our team as a QA tester through this program. The only experience with computers he's had is working as a repair tech at a previous job. He has no formal programming experience or experience with software development at all.

I...can't stand him. The lack of experience isn't the issue, it's just the fact that he's just straight up bad at his job and obnoxious.

When he was hired he worked with another QA tester who would basically hold his hand through everything and he was able to write QA tests and do the job.

Well, management decided that he was so good at his job (that he wasn't actually doing on his own) that they'd promote him to full-time. Shortly thereafter, the other QA tester left on paternity leave for almost half a year.

Shit. Hit. The. Fan.

Every meeting we'd have to discuss the work for the next two weeks, we would talk about what needed to be done and always check that he would understand. He would nod his head enthusiastically and say that he did.

We'd meet a week later to review his test scenarios and most of them were just straight up irrelevant or showed a clear lack of understanding of the work. We'd explain why they were wrong, he'd say "oh I get it now", and then we'd check back a day later and his new tests were also wrong.

Eventually we got to the point where we would basically write the test scenarios for him as a team. That didn't fix anything either. He would complete the tests and claim the tests all looked good, then we'd roll our code to production and end up with major issues that should have been caught during testing.

Past all this, he's just obnoxiously annoying. Constantly during serious business meetings he will say stupid "jokes" that take us off track and just annoy people ("oh that doesn't work, must be because we're using Winblows rather than Linux", "oh our server went down, must be the damn Russians trying to get Hillary's emails", “that task looks like it’ll take 246 years to finish, might as well just give up now”). When he has a question during testing he doesn't even attempt to be specific ("yeah so there's a problem with the doohickey where the doohickey doesn't work" is an actual quote I've been told many times)

I brought this up with my mentor at work and was told "he's autistic, you're being rude, he needs a lot of patience" but I think it's a ridiculous standard to hold someone to. If he wasn't autistic he would have been fired months ago because he's just straight up incompetent at his job.

I'm at my wit's end dealing with this, and I feel like I'm the only one that is at a breaking point dealing with it every day. AITA for not being able to stand this guy?

not being able to stand my autistic coworker