Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I met a guy off of my political instagram account and started talking on my personal account about all sorts of things. But eventually, I realized he was using soft manipulation techniques on me like saying my name a lot and guilting me into doing certain things. But I didn't really care, because he was so sweet and charming. But then we started talking about politics and mentioned David Irving (the holocaust denier) an I blocked him there and then. But I felt so guilty about it because it occurred to me that some people read books that they really disagree with just to know about history-- for example, I'll have to read a bunch of WWII documents in AP World history.

So I unblocked him today and messaged him. It was going well and he said Irving was a crackhead. It was actually quite nice, but then he mentioned he likes the idea of British Fascism because it's "way different than other European fascism" I waited a little while and blocked him. I feel bad because I didn't even bother to argue against him or change his mind (something I'm very good at) and I just ran away. Am I the asshole?

blocking this guy