Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Yesterday, my SO asked me if I wanted to go get froyo. I knew we had a couple pints of ice cream in the freezer, and really was craving one, and mentioned that to see if that was preferable. She said no, she would rather go get froyo, which I was fine with so I agreed. About 5 min later, she asked if it would be ok to pick it up and bring it back to the apartment to eat, which of course it is. This is where the fight started. 

&amp;#x200B;

Since we were going to be bringing it home, and since I still preferred the pint in the freezer, I said Id like to eat that while she eats the froyo. I figured it wouldn't matter since we both get what we want and we are still eating dessert together. But apparently not. This led to a meltdown and me being called "selfish" and that I should just get what she wants and that what I wanted was not the same. Further, this led to her saying in the heat of the moment that "things aren't working out." This morning things have cooled down but she still contends I committed some kind of terrible sin.

&amp;#x200B;

I'm still bewildered by this reasoning and why it mattered so wondering if others can give me some clarity. For context, the prior part of the day had been very stressful for the both of us, and I am suspecting that probably played a significant role in the reaction, although she denies that. 

&amp;#x200B;

not wanting froyo