Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: One of my classes is in a computer lab. They have regular chairs and the same chairs, but they have little wheels on the bottom of them. Every time I come into class, I either get a chair with wheels or just a regular one. Most of the time, I swap out a regular one for one with wheels from a table that nobody uses since we’re always on the computers.
One day, I walked in and had a regular chair. The boy next to me had some wheelied chairs, and out of laziness to go to the tables, I swapped them. Whatever.
Then he comes into class, and he sees that there’s a regular chair. He was like “ughh I don’t wanna go get another chair,“ and I admitted that I swapped our chairs. Because he didn’t want to go get the wheelied one, he says that I should go get the chair for him. I said no, and that there was one at the tables waiting for him. He starts whining for me to go get one, and the girls who sit behind us say I need to go get the chair.
Now I’m confused on why they’re starting to get mad at me. They raise their voices a bit at me and tell me to go get the chair while the boy whines and demands for me to get it for him too. I cave in, and I just go get it for him. 
AITA?
Note, i use the wheely chairs often, since I move around the room in the chairs so I can quickly turn to help the people around me since they ask for help often. 

not getting a wheely chair for someone