Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I am in high school and a bit of an odd situation. I am the biggest kid at my school (I'm 6'8") and I am a star athlete. I am relatively famous in my neck of the woods. But I am not a jock. When I am not playing or practicing I am either playing video games, D&amp;D, or MTG. So I kind of live in both worlds but most of my friends are the nerd type not the jock type.

One friend of mine is constantly bullied by one kid, I don't know why but it is always him. The school has giving the kid a couple referrals and sent him home from school once but that's it and it hasn't helped.

So the other day I got sick of it and confronted the bully. I threatened to kick his ass and made him beg for my friends forgiveness on his knees in front of what seemed like half the school and he ended up crying.

I have no interest in bullying him or anyone else again I just wanted him to stop bullying my friend. And I figured since the teachers telling him not to haven't stopped him maybe finding out what it feels like would.

His mom his pissed and wants me suspended and kicked off the teams. But my coach is definitely not going to let me get kick off the team and it looks like he is going to stop me from getting any sort of suspension either.

I know the whole 2 wrongs don't make a right thing but am I still an asshole for 1 wrong in order to stop a constant wrong?

bullying a bully