Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I saw a similar post earlier so I thought I’d ask a question that’s been nagging me.

For my entire life, for some odd reason, I have had an aversion to most tattoos. Ever since I was a child and my mom was skimming through a magazine I’d see a tattoo and say “eeew what is that?” For some reason this has followed me to adulthood and about 90% of tattoos I don’t like and yes, are a big turn off. Such a turn off that seeing or thinking of a particular tattoo can completely ruin my sex drive.

My boyfriend on the other hand has one tattoo and has interest in getting more. He knows how I feel about tattoos but wants them anyways.

Here’s the kicker:
I have absolutely no problem with him getting a tattoo. It is his body and he can do whatever he wants with it, and if it means getting a tattoo, go for it. And one day he asked me, “Would you be less attracted to me if I had [insert tattoo here]” and I answered truthfully, and said yes.

TLDR: Am I the asshole for being completely honest with my boyfriend by telling him I’d be less attracted to him for getting a tattoo but being completely okay with him still getting one?

telling my boyfriend I'd be less attracted to him for getting a tattoo