Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Sorry for the clickbait-y title.

I'm a part of the club at my college dedicated to a semi-niche hobby that I'm really passionate about. Last year (I had been in the club for 2 years technically, but had only really been attending meetings &amp; active for 1 year), during elections for the following year (this one), the officer team decided that whoever was elected vice president would become president. At the time, I didn't have too much of a stake so I voted for the person that's currently VP and ran for another officer position (which I got).

Since then, I've had some disagreements and frustrations with how the club has been run, and I've felt like a lot of my suggestions and complaints have been ignored or pushed away. I try not to air my dirty laundry publicly or anything because I think it's important to put up a unified front, but other people in the club and in the non-collegiate community of my hobby that I talk to have told me independently that some of the choices the club has made have been weird and/or frustrating. Elections for next year are coming up soon and the VP taking over as president isn't in our club constitution so I figured that was a hope rather than a rule, so in our group chat for officers I was like "hey, what's the process for running for president" because I thought I would make a good president. Some of the other officers agreed that the way we did things was a little weird so we agreed to have a meeting about it. 

We ended up having an officer meeting where we were told, basically, "the VP earned this, they deserve this, and it's a douche move to try to take that away from them." In addition, we were told that the way we have to charter our club is really convoluted and the organization we're chartered under is super inconsistent with their rules, so this was partially so that the current president could spend the year training the VP to become the next president.

AITA for wanting to run for president? I get that we voted for VP last year, but the decision to change how the president got their job wasn't made by the full club, and I think it's weird to expect people to know 2 years in advance who they want the president to be, especially since most of our members are lowerclassmen and might not have even been members for very long (including, by definition, the person that gets elected as VP).

wanting to run for president of my college club