Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So, here's some context. Me and my friends run live streamed monster truck events on a game called Rigs of Rods. These events have gotten all of us connections within the IRL monster truck universe, and personally has helped me through depression and gotten me opportunities for jobs I couldn't have dreamed of.

&amp;#x200B;

Me and my friend (we'll call him Sam) have met in real life and seen a monster truck show together. This is what led to us doing the RoR events together. He was set to be the third driver, since he's the best out of almost anybody in the community.

&amp;#x200B;

Sam yesterday had something happen to him. He went offline and only told two people (one he hasn't even met irl and the other his cousin) about what happened. The worst part is all I hear about the situation is he wants to take his own life.  I was shocked to know he considered it but also shocked to know he didn't tell me anything. I was sad but also angry that he didn't even consider telling me anything, especially that he wouldn't be back for months. I started to think about the event and how it could be affected, especially since we have only three weeks. After talking about this with some folks in Discord, they started calling me an asshole for caring about my event and not solely on his health. Am I in the wrong? I feel like I have a right to be mad about something important, regardless of his mental status.

getting mad at somebody depressed and suicidal for going offline without notice