Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Genuinely asking because I'm really not sure.


My husband entered a home brewing contest a year ago, and won in a category with his rendition of a smoked beer. Local commercial brewers were in attendance as judges, and one approached him to tell him how awesome his beer/recipe was, and told him he'd like to brew it with him at his Small-town Brewery and sell it. My husband was excited to try his hand at a full brewing system so he accepted.


He spent several days at the brewery, monitoring every step and working with the brewer to make sure the larger scale version matched the winning home brew.


He got invited to the brewery the day it was released, so we all drove an hour there to celebrate. It was listed on the draft list with no mention of his name, which I was a little sad about but I guess understood - their equipment, their brewery, etc.


Husband had messaged brewer asking if he could get a single use small keg of the beer to bring home, and he said absolutely! The brewer was not there yesterday however, and when husband asked the brewer's wife about it she said no such keg had been set aside.


So instead she fills up the growler my husband brought with him, and charges him full-price.


Note - I realize that it's their brewery, their rules. But the more I think about it the more I get annoyed about it. They wanted to brew his beer because it was a quality recipe, and I think maybe just one gesture of good-will like a free growler would have been nice, since they were making money off the recipe and not mentioning his name as creator and co-brewer at all.


Am I the asshole here?



thinking my husband should have gotten more recognition for a beer he created and brewed at a local brewery