Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: The title doesn't describe the situation too well, because I dont know what title would. Anyway to my story.

Two or three years ago I wanted to commission some art for some OC's. An artist contacts me and we start talking about payment and what I wanted. A price is agreed upon and I message him asking if PayPal is what we were using. He sent back that no, we would be using another payment website. I waited a few days to reply, which the two of us had done multiple times, to try and figure out setting up the account for the new site. (I didn't have my banking information at the time, so it was hard to do)

I then get a message saying that he had made a PayPal account that worked and that we could use it to pay. I say okay and pay him 215-220 dollars. Everything is good, I get a rough sketch and told that it will be done in a month.

Not long after, I got a message from him saying that his PayPal won't work and I try to help him. As I'm helping him figure it out, he tells me that he faked the information because he lived in a country that didn't support PayPal. I tell him there's not much I can do, and he gets mad. Tells me that paypal is a shit thing to use. The nll last thing he said was that he'd finish my drawing, but that he would have basically done it for free. 

I never got the drawing finished.

To add, no one of the artists in my post history are the one in the story. I've talked to a few others on here and they're great and even have a drawing commissioned right now.

I also am smarter and will pay half, get a progress picture, and then send the rest.

paying with Paypal