Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I popped out in my lunch hour to buy a new pair of shoes from an independent store I’ve been frequenting for years. My podiatrist recommended the store originally, my purchase history is in their database, and the consultants who work there really know their stuff and give great advice. I happily handed over the price on the price tag for the new design the consultant recommended.  

I then wandered over to the local shopping center, where I happened to see a sign outside a chain sports shoe store saying “50% off all Asics”. They were selling the identical shoes I’d literally just bought for over £50 off.  I asked if they had my size in stock, and they did.  

So after some hesitation, I traipsed back over to the independent store and said “I hate to do this, but...” [showed them a photo I’d taken of the price tag of the same shoes on sale a few hundred meters away].  The consultant held his hands up in the air and looked completely downcast, “oh our friends at the center are at it again”.  

He ultimately offered to price match and refund me the difference on the grounds he’d rather keep me as a customer than not, and said he could completely see where I was coming from but bemoaned their tactics and explained it wouldn’t make them any money.  

It wasn’t like I had a problem paying the full price, and I value the service in that independent store, so I feel really shitty about having asked - but at the same time, I’m a consumer and not a charity. AITA? 

asking for a refund for shoes I bought from my regular store but found cheaper elsewhere