Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So here’s the situation. My partner (M/29) and I (F/31) have been looking into adopting a dog for awhile. Last week we found an adorable sweetheart of a pit bull, 3 year old female. She came home with us on trial and was so well behaved. We wanted our family and friends to meet her as part of the trial. Everyone loved her until my partner’s parents came over to our home to meet her. As soon as they entered the house, there was this immediate tension. His mother made a shocked comment about the dog’s breed and both of his parents stood glued to the door obviously uncomfortable. The dog picked up on the tension and started acting skittish and even growled at them. 

They left quickly and soon after we got a message from his mother stating that they would never enter our home with the dog present and refused to be around her. At this point I’m angry and completely confused. 

My partner finally explains that his parents have preconceived opinions. He also tells me that he personally had a bad experience with a pit and was not comfortable with the entire adoption. 

Am I in the wrong here for being extremely angry that, first off, he didn’t tell me his family’s opinions or his own experience? And second, he didn’t tell his mother before coming over so she would have know what to expect? 

In the end, we have to end the trial and give this sweet girl back. In addition, I am worried if his mother’s opinions are going to make such a huge impact on our relationship and decisions? AITA? 



being angry my partner didn't disclose that his family disliked my breed of dog