Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Disclaimer: I haven't used the internet to fact check them in over a year as it's not worth the argument.

I don't think my SO or his friend are dumb, just definitely misinformed on many things. They both confronted me lately about how I'm basically an insufferable "know it all" and they feel humiliated by my fact checking. I'll admit I have PREVIOUSLY been pretty bad about it, especially over   year ago. I like to know the truth about things and am full of pretty useless information, as I think most people who grew up with the internet are. 99% of the time I was/am right, and the other 1% I take as a learning experience and apologize for questioning them. But, when I call them out on something that isn't true they feel like I am questioning their intelligence and get highly offended. I stopped whipping out my phone to show them why they are wrong and usually just tell them what I already know.
The last argument was on if blood is blue when it's still in your body (it's not). A lot of our arguments are over dumb stuff like this. I'm not trying to belittle them, I'm just trying to educate them so they don't look silly when these topics come up around other people, as they both seem insecure about their intelligence.
When I haven't "checked" them in the past they will go on to tell misinformation to others and get corrected, to which they will ask me "Did you know that? Why didn't you tell me that?" It seems like either way I'm an asshole to them. I'm either a know it all, or I want to watch them burn. 

AITA???

"fact checking" my so and his friend