Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: https://www.reddit.com/r/Advice/comments/aytqvd/office_mate_that_takes_pictures_without/?utm_source=reddit-android

Above is what happened earlier. 

This post is about the same woman. She had taken a picture of us earlier. Today during breakfast, she asked if it's okay to post it on Instagram. I said no, im not comfortable with it. She got mad. Asked me why I came on an office trip if im being like this. 

She told me I'm violating her rights by not letting her post it. I told her I was very reluctantly okay with the picture being taken. I'm not okay with it being posted. She still insists I'm violating her rights. She believes it's her right to post it now that she has the picture. 

So my question is: just coz I said yes to photo being taken, does it make me the asshole to say she can't post it? Does she have a point in saying that picture being taken= her property? 

Ps: she posted it after I walked off as she was getting loud

saying no to my picture being posted on social media, even if I was okay with the picture being taken