Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Soo I live with two roommates, we don’t usually talk too much and we mostly mind our business, I came two months ago and they told me that in my room I would have to sleep nearby a router with white led lights, which are extremely annoying when you try to sleep, I told them that the lights were a bit annoying but I could live with that, a month later I tried to cover it with some boxes and they told me that I should never do that because it can overheat, I apologised and kept living with the router, today I tried to cover the lights with some post it and it worked out pretty good, and it didn’t effect the router either, but they were still pissed off because it was the router they paid and didn’t want sticky stuff on it, I apologised again and thought that they were right and maybe I should just accept it and keep doing my stuff, but later she comes back to me and say that she turned off the lights, sooo now I really want to ask them why they didn’t even tell me that I could turn off the led and keep the router working but I don’t want to start another conversation, but I really don’t understand why they haven’t turned off the led if I already told them that they were annoying during night 

covering the router lights with some post-it notes