Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I advertised an item for sale online, guy offers trade, fair trade, done deal. When we met to trade, I said "oh, I have this I could sell you." He agreed to buy it another day. In the mean time, he takes my item home and apparently it's not working perfectly. Thing is... It was working perfectly for me, I had no reason to suspect it was less than 100%. So, he's not upset that I can tell, these things happen... We're both reading into what the issue could be. I'm trying to help to some extent. Then, I asked him if he was still interested in buying that other item... Haven't heard back. It got me wondering, was that an asshole move? Should I have offered it to him for free, for his trouble? The traded item was worth $1000, the second item is worth $100. $100 that I could really use right now. 

So, obviously not a big deal,  just wondering if trying to sell him more after what he got from me has issues is an asshole move?

trying to sell a guy more stuff