Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: This is a lighter one, for a change. 

Ok, so. I'm the one that always (say, 98% of the time) goes to the mall (that's right next door) to buy whatever little thing we need – like soda, toilet paper, pasta, whatever – and because of this, my dad lets me buy a little extra for everyone (e.g. a chocolate bar for me, a doritos for my brother, whatever). I usually get a Pringles for me, and my siblings' preferred snacks. 

I'm not really a "sweet-tooth". I love sweets, sure, but I just *can't* eat much of it at once. So when I bring a sweet for me (say, a chocolate bar), I eat it over the course of a few days or so. Because of that, my siblings (and my mom agrees with them) keep saying that I only do this to flaunt on them that I still have something to snack on. I wouldn't really mind that since I know it's not true, but the problem is, sometimes they take and eat my sweets. 


So, who's in the wrong here? Should I give up on sweet snacks just because I take my time to eat them?



taking a lot of time to eat sweets