Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I run my own cleaning business, last week we went to work on a house in the process of renovation, along with me and 6 of my employees there were also workers there to fix the electricity outlets and others installing lights. One of my employees went to her car to grab her supplies and found that she'd forgotten her brush, we were working in a different town from where we live so she couldn't drive to get it and, I believe, used her common sense and knocked at a home opposite to ask if they could lend her a brush for an hour. They agreed and she finished her job with no issues at all, then returned the brush to the lady. Two days later I was spoken to by one of the projects managers who said he needed to have a word with me, he told me a worker from another company had saw my employee borrowing a brush and was "concerned" . I couldn't believe someone had taken the time to report that and later that day I received an 8 paragraph email about the "incident" being unacceptable. The week after he told me the work was not up to his standards, with absolutely NO feedback, I'd cleaned absolutely every surface and not a thing was left on the floor, when I asked him what the issue was he replied complaining about smell, I told him the smell was completely unrelated to my work and the issue was with the actual floorboards to which he said I was too argumentative and hostile, I decided then to quit the project and told him to find another cleaning service because I didn't have time for pettiness affecting me when I work 8 hours almost daily. He remains firm that his actions were perfectly in line as so his partners. So am I in actuality the asshole here?

refusing to work with this client