Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: This happened back in 2013, but a recent post reminded me of it. I used to work as a server at Olive Garden, and one afternoon, this guy came in for lunch.  Before ordering, he let me know that he had a minor allergy to garlic, and he asked if there was any way to alter items on the menu. I let him know that pretty much everything on our menu has garlic in it, and if it's in a sauce, we won't be able to make it without it. He said he understood. He then proceeded to order some kind of pasta dish with red sauce that has garlic in it, a salad with italian dressing that has garlic. he went through 2 baskets of garlic breadsticks, and he asked for them to have garlic. I made sure to let him know how much garlic was in everything he was ordering, and while he was eating, I checked in on him a couple of times to make sure everything was fine, and he gave me a nod or a thumbs-up.  


When it came time for him to finish up, he looked visibly agitated, and he said he needed his check because he had to leave. He paid, and left in quite a hurry and he didn't tip me!  


Was it my fault that a man with a garlic allergy came to OLIVE GARDEN?

serving a customer exactly what he asked for even though he said he was also allergic