Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Hello all,

My family often does a crawfish boil for St. Patty’s. We live in the South and it’s sort of a fun, off-beat tradition. We don’t necessarily always do it, sometimes we do corned beef and cabbage instead (or nothing), but we often do if the weather is okay.

My sister started dating a new guy a few months ago, call him Bill. He’s allergic to shellfish, which I think we knew, but it hadn’t come up before. We planned the crawfish boil, and then day of, preparation already started, my sister asks what the menu is. My mom tells her we’re doing the crawfish boil thing. She goes “what’s bill going to eat?” Record scratch as we all realize.

We panicked and debated alternate food options for him, but then he said he wouldn’t be able to come if shellfish was served. We went ahead with the original plans (as food had already been bought.)

His family was in town, so he and my sister went to their place for dinner. She and Bill joined us the next day for a more casual dinner.

Turns out, he was super pissed and offended that we didn’t change the menu. I feel bad, but I also don’t think he should be pissed at us. I think he should be pissed at my sister.

AWTA? 

not changing dinner to accommodate an allergy