Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: We're working in a shared office space and I'm no stranger to compromise. They recently redid the cubes so they are a bit smaller and there are 12-15 of us depending on how you look at it. Three of the cubicles are along one wall with windows and the people with the most seniority got to pick those. Those people are always getting cold and it may or may not be because it's colder over there. There is some problem with space heaters where they have been disallowed. When I get too hot I turn a fan on but this only makes me slightly less hot. During the winter it is understandable we are utilizing the heat but now it is spring and everywhere is usually room temperature. 

When the heat kicked on around noon today I asked for the heat to go off in a number of ways but I was "outvoted". Eventually I indicated to my boss what seemed a reasonable expectation at the time. 'If the thermostat is set to 68 and people are cold then either the thermostat is broken or those people have a personal problem that should be solved with coats and blankets.'

I feel like it isn't fair for me to be forced to work where I am uncomfortable and I feel the animalistic desperation of being trapped in a cage when I am forced work in a hot room. I feel as though my agency has been compromised and I am very tempted to raise all hell until the heat is locked up at 68 and they throw away the key. As I reflect in the problem I empathize with these people who are cold and can't have space heaters and I'm sad to be in this desperate 'them or me' situation.

AITA?

not wanting the heat turned on when it's not cold