Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I made an order for delivery a couple weeks back. Since I didn't want to have it come to my house, I asked my friend if he would be okay with the order being shipped to his house. He was okay with it and told me he would be fine accepting it on my behalf.

The day the shipment was updated to have entered the country, I contacted him telling him that it was most likely coming the next day and he acknowledged what I had said.

The next day, he's in school with me and I tell him that according to the postal service website, it would take 2 days instead of 1 for the delivery to be made and tell him that it may or may not be arriving. Couple hours later, he receives a message which says, "There was a delivery for John Doe here. Does anyone know a John Doe?". So apparently, he didn't tell anyone at home that there was a package delivery being expected with my name on it and so the delivery person was told that there was no person by my name who lived there.

Now, the package is en-route to sender because the postal service doesn't have the authority to hold it. If I want it asap, I have to pay a retrieval fee of $21.40. So I'm obviously pretty angry because I already payed like $25 for shipping the first time round. I ask him to give me half the money because he didn't live up to his end of the agreement and notify anyone at home. When I asked him why not he said that it was my fault because I told him that the postal service website said it would take 2 working days.

I'm still asking him to pay me half the price before I have to go collect the thing and have made it pretty clear that I am pissed off at him. AITA here?

asking my friend to pay me half the money