Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Ok, so I'm currently attending my last year of uni. We've got our schedule, I don't have problems with it. We have 4-hours lecture scheduled on Monday, 12 pm - 4 pm. I don't mind it, in fact, I'm pleased with lectures starting at 12 since I'm terrible at getting up early. However, my group is strongly against it, since they believe it would be better for us to move this lecture to Wednesday, and by doing so have 3-day weekend. I do see the reasoning behind this, but it simply doesn't work for me. I'd rather have classes from Monday to Friday, rather than moving this long lecture to Wednesday, when we already have another 4 hours lecture. By doing so we would have free Monday, but would be forced to stay 8 hours on Wednesday, from 8 am to 4 pm. 

I didn't like the idea, but I was the only one opposing this solution, so beside voicing my concerns I didn't do anything about this and let my classmates go to dean's office and change our schedule.

And here it starts to get messy. Dean's office informed my classmates they need signature of EVERY person in our group to change the schedule. And the only person that didn't sign the petition was me. So now I have 20+ people pressuring me to sign it. And my only argument is "I'd rather have classes on Monday". However, their only argument is "we'd rather have longer classes on Wednesday". So, would I be the asshole if I refuse them and "make" them come to the classes on Monday, even though I'm the only person satisfied with this solution?

refusing to change our class schedule because I simply don't want to, even though my whole group pressures me to do it