Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So I'm going to try and give all of the facts, I want this to be unbiased! 

I own the flat my partner (of 3 years) and I live in as I bought it before we got together. (There is a mortgage but I own a fair chunk and it has gained c£55,000 value since I bought it 4 years ago)

Recently I've felt like I missed out on my childhood dream of becoming a vet because I wasn't emotionally ready to go to uni as I suffered from anxiety.

I broached the subject with my partner and asked if he would be willing to help out with more household bills if I were to go back to uni, and he flipped out on me saying that was selfish.

I want to add that I would be working part time and would be paying some house bills, just perhaps not 50/50 as we have it now... I also suggested that I would sign over some of the ownership so that he wouldn't feel like he was putting money in and getting nothing out.

He said that I couldn't ask someone to do that for me as it was too much, and that's something only a married person would be willing to do. This made me think he's not invested in our relationship and doesnt care much about my dreams! 

Considering before moving in with me he was renting and that's paying someone else's mortgage with no gain, I don't see how doing it for someone you love is worse? 

Also for bonus lols... He said it would stop him retiring in his 30s like he planned! 

Am I in the wrong here? 

wanting to go back to uni and needing to take a back seat on bills