Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Working a closing shift the other evening at the coffeehouse I work at, and a lady comes in and hmmm's about what drink she wants because I tell her we are unfortunately out of hazelnut. I suggest a french vanilla latte because that syrup technically consists of vanilla AND hazelnut flavoring. After making her the latte, her boyfriend brings the drink back to me and very politely lets me know that his girlfriend "isn't the biggest fan of the drink". Being the nice guy I am, I gladly make her a new drink to try (a cafe mocha this time) without charging them for the drink. However, I can't help but feel that they are assholes for not offering to pay for the drink. If you don't like something you purchase I believe it is common sense that it's not the businesses fault you didn't like THAT particular flavor, and *you* therefore should have to pay for another drink. AITA for feeling that way?

thinking that if you don't like my coffeehouse's drink, you should offer to pay for another drink