Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I recently moved out of a house with two roommates to start a new job in a new city. I left before our lease was up, and verbally agreed to still pay rent and (perhaps stupidly) utilities until I found a subletter. That hasn’t happened and I’ve been paying for both. 

Recently, one of the roommates has asked me to also chip in on WiFi. I’ve ignored the request so far. From my perspective, I’m being generous by continuing to pay over 100 dollars every month in utilities that I’m not legally obligated to.

I don’t mind paying the rest of utilities because an extra, unexpected 100 bucks can strain a budget. However, the WiFi contribution is closer to 10 dollars, and I do not consider it to be part of utilities. In my mind, I did not agree to pay WiFi before I left, and it is not written down anywhere that I am obligated to do so. 

I know it isn’t a lot of money, but asking me to chip in that small of an amount feels like they are taking advantage of me. 

Admittedly, I’m also stubborn - so I don’t want to pay it just out of principal and because I am trying to save money anywhere I can. It may be that my ex-roommates consider wifi as a portion of utilities, but as they are two separate bills I don’t see it that way. Am I an asshole for refusing to pay? 

TLDR: moved out of a house, still paying rent and utilities. Roomies want WiFi payment, I think it’s not my responsibility. AITA? 

not paying WiFi at a house I moved out of