Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: We recently visited family for Christmas, and everything was fine except my niece caught the flu a few days before Christmas. Her parents still came around, and sister in law insisted on holding my child. I did not want that, but was told to "not worry" and that "shes too small to get the flu".

So the SIL still held the baby. Now we are back home and my wife has the flu. I am worried that my baby girl will get very sick. I have heard the flu can be deadly to children. Naturally I am extremely pissed at this point. In our family group chat, my wife informs the group she has the flu. SIL tells us this flu is the worst and to quarantine my wife. I say "Thanks for letting us know. Would have been nice not to have been exposed. We will manage. But, I am kinda low on PTO, so."

Ensue chaos. Everyone is pissed at me, including my wife. My other SIL said, it's not like they got sick on purpose, and I think to myself, "They could have chosen to stay home and not spread the flu, on purpose..."

Apparently potentially infecting a baby with the flu isn't as bad as sending a frustrated text. AITA?

being frustrated at family member exposing my 3 month child to the flu