Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So basically I was on a buss and he broke the headphones. They where those big Bluetooth ones (not an expensive brand only twenty quid).

Music came out of both ears but the ear piece on one side was only held on by the wire. 

We argued a bit and he offered to give me a role of tape to fix it. In the end I just forgot about it and he lent me some of his old headphones he didn’t want anymore.

He doesn’t seem to think he did anything wrong at all. But they were new. They weren’t really nice headphones but I liked them. He thinks I’m unreasonable for not taking the tape and he shouldn’t have to pay.

I don’t want the money for new ones anymore but I just think he should’ve at least offered. He just seemed like a bit of an asshole while we argued about it. He accepted it was his fault but expected me to walk around with bust ass headphones held together with tape. He just didn’t give a shit at all that he’d broke them.

Did I over react? Should I have just taped them? If he broke my shit should be pay? AITA?

asking my mate to buy me new headphones after they broke mine