Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I dance WCS, and I prefer to dance with more adept leads because I like having complex patterns thrown at me for me to follow. It forces me to improve. I am a strong believer in "it's better to dance than to not dance," so I will \*never\* turn down a dance no matter what. However, I tend to avoid the newer leads so that I can continually continue (heh, redundant) to improve in my dancing. I have my first competition in January, though, and it just hit me that there is a chance I will get a lead less adept than I. I feel really bad now; I feel like I should've practiced dancing with the newer leads more so that I can be better at adapting and focus more on super styling the basics. Maybe I'm overthinking it also, but I'm not sure... AITA? Please don't hold your tongue. Also worth noting, I try to dance with \*everyone\* in socials, but I usually always seek out the adept leads as a priority.

avoiding new leads in dance socials