Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I'm a programmer. At my work we had a hackday recently (for those that don't know a hackday is usually an IT thing where you're placed in a team and challenged to solve an issue or implement an idea in a short amount of time) where I was placed as leader of one of 5 teams in our office.

Without going into details, my team kicked ass. Not only because we met our goal, but also because we were kind of underdogs, having less experienced and more junior programmers on our team. We also bothered to have several meetings prior to the event where we planned our strategy, and we worked incredibly hard well passed when the other teams had gone home for the day (both of these things - preplanning and staying late - were allowed in the hackday rules, if that matters to anyone).

However, today the winner was announced. The team that won did no code. They had no meetings prior to the event (so they did no planning which meant they didn't choose which code libraries to use) and only presented a powerpoint presentation. They also left early for the day.

I kind of think that to qualify to win a programmer's hackday you need to at least show you 'hacked' some code. This really bugs me. Not so much because we didn't win but because the team who won put in such little effort.

IATA for wanting to raise this an issue with my supervisor? Will they think I'm an asshole? Will I be creating unnecessary drama?

wanting to raise an issue with my boss over an unfairly judged competition at work