Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Let me just preface this, I am extremely happy for my sister to be getting married.  She and her hubby to be are getting married in September of this year and I will be her bridesmaid!

\--

I recently dyed my hair black.  My natural hair is a very dark brown.  Nothing major, right?

Today I received a call from my sister saying she does not want me to redye my hair before the wedding so the black can fade out.  Mind you it's only been black for about 2 weeks now. She does not want me to have black hair on her wedding day.  I explained how black is not that simple, it will not just fade and if I left it, the roots would grow out.  I dyed my hair so it would look its best, not it's worst (how it would with roots showing!)  

She blamed it on my mum saying I would look too "gothic" and pale in pictures as their chosen colour is dark red.  I then messaged my mum stating I will not be deciding my hair colour for the next 5 months because of 1 day.  She asked if I could just dye it red or something other than black.  I refused and said I would be keeping it black.  I have now upset both my sister and my mum over my hair choices. 

I personally love having my hair black and it does not seem like a major colour change to me.  Mum already expressed her distaste of it when I saw her last.  I am a 25 year old woman, I should be able to make my own hair decisions.  

&amp;#x200B;

Am I being the asshole here?  

Should I just dye my hair to make them both happy?

&amp;#x200B;

not changing my hair for my sister's wedding