Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I am in medical school on a generous scholarship. A local congressman (CM) was instrumental in getting my scholarship program set up, and without his action I would be in a much deeper pile of debt than I am currently in. (If it makes a difference, it's a publicly funded scholarship and not from his personal fortune). I am also gay and married.

Unfortunately, CM does not have a good track record with LGBT rights. He recently voted to restrict LGBT rights in my state and has supported legislation that would have made my life more difficult. It is clear that he believes opposite-sex marriages are superior to same-sex marriages.

CM's wife just passed away and my scholarship coordinator wants all of the students to sign a card for him. I am strongly considering not participating. We are a very small program. If I declined and/or "forgot" to sign the card, it would definitely be noted, but I'm not sure that I really care.

I am genuinely sorry his wife died. I never met her, but she never did anything to hurt me. However, it galls me that I'm being asked to send condolences to someone who thinks he is better than me. I can handle people who don't like me due to my orientation, but people who attack my marriage hurt a lot worse. Our coordinator wouldn't ask a Jewish student to sign a card for a politician expressing anti-Semitic views, or a black student to sign a card for a politician expressing racist views. Or maybe she would, because it's the socially acceptable thing to do. Maybe I'm being way too oversensitive? WIBTA here?

not sending my condolences