Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Sorry for formatting I'm on mobile.

Context, I was in school and we were in the yard and I was at the other corner of the yard going with my friend to the bathroom, when I was coming back to my friend who's phone I broke i was jogging towards him as he was recording me.

So after jogging towards him and he's still recording I purposefully collide with him (he was standing still recording the whole time) and his phone slips out of his hand, falls and cracks.

My friend asked me to fix the phone and I agreed to do so but thing is, I didn't crack his screen protector, i cracked his phone's glass. I asked him where his screen protector was and he said he "didn't have one cause he never needed it" I thought this was stupid because screen protectors are in case you need them not something needed straight after you buy them.

(He has an iPhone 6s with no applecare)

WIBTA if I asked him to pay half as phone glass repairs can be very expensive and he should have had a screen protector anyway?

asking my friend to pay half after I cracked his phone