Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So this Halloween I wanted to invite some friends at my place, nothing too serious, just a small party with a bunch of close friends and some less close guys they wanted to come with. Me and said close friends decided to buy some junk food, candy (what Halloween would it be otherwise) and drinks, mainly beer. My best friend Mark volunteered to bring some weed too. 

After we had bought everything I reminded everyone to pay their part, because it was decided from the start that we would have split the bill (the final cost was something around 3$ each). Everything was fine, until one of the not-so-close friends simply wrote in the group chat “Come on, man, why would I pay”. 

Confused, I asked him in private what was the deal, the conversation went something like this: (I’ll call him Z for short)

Me: What do you mean why would you pay? 
Z: Come on man, don’t be an asshole
Me: How am I being an asshole? Everyone else has agreed. 
Z: Are you serious?
Me: Yup. 
Z: But I’ve already paid for the weed. 
Me: No you didn’t, Mark did. Just pay or bring something on your own. 
Z: Like a beer?
Me: Yeah, like a couple of bottles. 
Z: Come on man. 

This went on for a while, with me telling him to bring something and him just saying “Come on man” like that was the most logical argument he could’ve imagined. It got to the point where I was completely done with this, so I just told him to bring something, pay up or to not show up. He chose the latter.
 
So, am I the asshole for not letting this guy come empty handed to a party where everyone had helped buying something?


not letting someone come to my party without paying for food