Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Me and my friend were playing on a minecraft server that let you vote on voting sites daily that give you vote keys for voting which you can open chests with and get items from. I found a glitch on one of the sites that lets you vote a unlimited amount of times and I made alot of money off of it. Eventually everyone in the server knew that i was doing that and people started accusing me of duplicating which is against the rules and threatening to get mods to ban me. I was worried about that since glitches like that arent mentioned anywhere in the server's rules and it's a gray area so I decided to give him all the money and asked him to keep it safe so i dont get greedy and waste it by gambling or if i get banned it doesn't go to waste and he agreed. Today i asked him to give me the money back cause i was making a Iron Golem Spawner farm to make more money and he refused, asked me to waste 10\~ minutes of my time exploiting the glitch to get him alot of keys in return for my money. I refused and said that if he gives me the money first, I'll get him some keys later on. We fought like that for about 2 hours while he was insulting me by making fun of my autism, calling me retarded and so on. I said that he can keep the money but im gonna give everything he put in the base back in his base and not gonna let him access my base. He argued a bit more and said " ok fuck u  
Play mc by urself loser" before going offline. AITA?

asking my friend to give me my money and him refusing to