Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I’m a senior in college and I live with three roommates in an apartment. We’ve just finished the semester so normally all four of us would go home for winter break, and the apartment would sit empty. However, if one so chooses our college offers a winter term where you can pay to take sprint classes that last the duration of the break.  One of our roommates announced the other day that he plans upon staying over winter break to take a class, because he won’t be working so he thinks he would be bored otherwise. Naturally, this would mean keeping the cable/internet on as well as keeping the apartment much warmer than what we would leave it on were it to sit empty. Because of this, we asked this roommate if he would pay the cable/internet for that month (as nobody else would be there to use it, and we could otherwise shut it off if he weren’t there) as well as 50% of the electricity as opposed to his usual 25%. He did not take us even asking well at all. He essentially threw a tantrum, claiming that it was unfair for us to ask this of him and that he had signed up for the class under the assumption that we would split the bills evenly despite not being there (keep in mind, he could simply drop the class). So now he’s saying that he’s just going to commute instead of staying of winter term (biting off his nose to spite his face), which will be a way bigger hassle for him than it would be to just eat the $150 and be a five minute walk away from class. Are we assholes? It seems to us that our request was totally reasonable, and that our roommate was basically banking on all of us footing the bill for him to sit around over break. 

asking my roommate to pay more rent