Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: 2 months ago, my pals and I were deciding whether to set up a game server 24/7 because previously, we had been home hosting it and it was not up 24/7 (No one really had an issue with it being home hosted except one person, we can call him "Humphrey.") So my friend (we can call him "Chad") and I ("Dylan") decided we would rent a server and set it up if Humphrey paid for it. He stated he would and fast forward 2 months later he still owes Chad the money and we have yet to see it. He is now claiming he never made this agreement yet chatlogs say otherwise.

Here are the chat logs (backed up by screenshots, there was also another observer in the group chat who will corroborate.):

Chad:
    “IF YOU PAY ME $15 PAYPAL”
    “I WILL HOST IT”
    “24/7”

Humphrey:
    “Okay”

Dylan:
    “Humphrey you owe me $15”

Humphrey:
    “Just get a fucking server”

He is claiming he used "Okay" as an adverb and not an exclamation. According to everyone, we know they have all agreed with us in that its use was in the terms of an exclamation rather than an adverb. AITA?

wanting my money back