Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Throwaway for obvious reasons. 

I’ll try to keep this short and vague to protect both our identities. Husband and I have been trying to conceive on off for the past three years to no success. We finally had tests and he’s infertile due to an underlying genetic condition that none of us knew about (esp not before getting married). 

We both still want kids (me probably more than him) and we’ve been discussing our options lately. He wants to adopt but I would like to actually get pregnant and give birth to my own child as this is an experience I truly do not want to miss out on. However in order to do that I’d need to conceive via sperm donation. This is something he’s completely against and I can’t seem to understand his reasoning. 

He would much rather adopt a child that’s unrelated to either of us than allow us to have a child that’s at least one of ours. It would also let me experience what I’ve always wanted to experience as a mother. Is it unreasonable for me to want to conceive my own child instead of adopting? Friends and family are all hinting that I’m the one being unreasonable when I feel like he’s being extremely stubborn and illogical. 

Adoption is an extremely long and expensive process. Natural birth would be much easier in comparison and it’s something he knows I’ve wanted since he’s known me. AITA here really?

wanting to conceive via sperm donor than adopt with my husband