Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I'm planning a trip with 3 or so friends to go to France in the summer. Now I speak fluent French, although I'm rusty, having done it for 7 years through school (ages 11-18) and using it during my degree for research. 2 of my other friends also speak the language to varying degrees, mostly at a conversational level. 

Now something has cropped up which is bothering me- namely that on a few occasions I've had members of the group openly assume that I'm going to be a translator. On one occasion we were looking up some tourist sites online and some art thing we found was in French only. One of the friends who wanted to go to this was saying "well that's not a problem, you can translate", making the assumption that I'd be happy doing this, which I'm not. I said this at the time and it caused something of an argument, with her saying I'm being selfish and me saying that it's more so to simply expect that I'm going to do something without asking. 

 As far as I'm concerned, it's my holiday too and the last thing I want is to be a workhorse, especially when in at least two people's cases they're perfectly capable of working things out for themselves using a phrasebook or simply learning stuff beforehand. Neither is it totally impossible if they're that worried about their language skills, especially with the Internet, that we couldn't find things to do which have the option of using the English language. 

So, WIBTA? 

refusing to play translator for a holiday I'm taking with friends