Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: For context: I have been writing a (fantasy) story for some years just for fun. Some months ago, an anonymous user told me that they had read the prologue and listed some things that were, in their opinion, "objectively" wrong with the story, although there was no possible way that the list was accurate, since it portrayed things that either made sense in the story's world and I explained later on, that I simply hadn't written nor did I have the intention to write or that I thought were unaccurate.

I then told the user that the list was not accurate for the reasons stated above, then they got mad at me for "making excuses" and said that I should learn how to write before doing anything else.

I tried to explain my point of view, but the discussion got nowhere. Am I the asshole?

(If I wasn't clear in any point, please tell me so I can clarify).

just wanting to write for fun and avoid anonymous criticism