Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So me and my gf at the time had been together for about 2 months. Around this time I was moving places and had very few belongings (just the stuff i used regularly). She insisted I took her 45inch TV that he hadnt been using for years and bought 8 years ago. I kindly rejected the offer several times knowing I wouldn't use it as I never watch tv/movies but shes the type that doesn't take no for an answer so eventually I moved it into my house. About 1 month later we broke up and broke off any contact we had with each other. Fast forward 4 months and she randomly texted me one night asking if she could pick up her TV the following day to which I told her I gave away to someone online who would actually use it. She was surprised and proceeded to claim that I owe her $1200 for the TV(the price she bought it for 8 years ago). I told her that the tv was worth no more than $100 and that she shouldn't be surprised I gave it to someone else because I told her I would never use it and she basically forced me to take it from her in the first place. 

TLDR; ex gf of 3 months texts me 4 months after break up to get back her TV that she forcibly gifted to me. I told her that I gave it away and she claims I owe her $1200 for what the TV was worth when she bought it 8 years ago.

giving away my ex's tv