Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So before me and my husband got married we were on separate phone plans. I had my own and he was on his mom's with his dad and sister. He never paid his bill, his mom did. His argument before we were married was it saves him money and we're not married yet. I thought that was funny that a 30 something yr old still had his mom pay for his cell phone, but whatever. I told him once we get married he needs to go on my plan. He agreed. 

Fast forward to about a year later, the day after our wedding. Me, my husband and his mom are sitting and chit chatting. We get on the subject of cell phones and his mom brings up the fact she still is paying for his phone plan. Then tells him that now that me and him are married he should go on my plan. I had the biggest smile on my face. I told him, see even your mom says so. Of course he tries to worm his way out of it. He tells his mom it's ok I can stay on your plan.  

So now, today I bring it up again. He's still trying to worm his way out of it. He asks why is it so important that I join your plan? I tell him it's because I feel that now that were married, your an adult you shouldnt still have your mom paying for your bills. Again his argument is still why would I switch, I'll have to pay more. Don't you want to save money? 

So AITA or does my husband need to grow up and pay his own phone bill? 

wanting my husband to join my phone plan