Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: For context, my dad bought me a 1999 BMW m3. It's a nice car and I'm really grateful for it. This weekend he went on an out of state trip and me, my sister, and my mom stayed home. None of us (from my knowledge) touched the BMW. My dad decided to go out to the car and dink around with the CDs since we hadn't tested that yet, while I stayed inside. While there he decided to put the top down (it's a convertible). When he did this he heard something shatter like glass. He came in and immediately started saying someone was screwing with the car. I reply, 
"I don't think anyone has touched the car this weekend" and "I didn't touch it". He starts screaming someone is lying and is slamming things and throwing things. I start yelling back
"Well I didn't touch it" and go outside to read a book. A couple hours later and I'm still pissed about being accused of screwing with it when I've never even touched the exterior without him around and I'm always honest, I'm not some rebellious teen. I'm a four point o 16 year old taking college classes. My dad started talking to me like earlier exchange never happened, and since I'm still annoyed, I give short answers. He started yelling at me again about why I won't let it go and I told him 
"You yelled at me for something I didn't do and you never said sorry." He then gets mad again and starts yelling about someone lying to him. I'm still pissed, but should I just let it go? Am I being an asshole by caring it on?

carrying on an argument, when they never appologized