Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Alright, here's some context. There are a few friends that are involved, who I'll be giving nicknames for anonymity. There are Deer and Toad, people who I am still friends with, and then there's Neon, the one I've been having a conflict with. 

After Deer and Toad brought up how Neon said the N-word in front of him when he expressed his discomfort for it, and Toad mentioned how Neon made a Nazi joke (Toad's Jewish, Neon is not) and refused to apologize, I confronted Neon simply saying I didn't want to be friends with them.

At first, it was tame, I told him that he didn't have the right to go against my friend's wishes for his offensive jokes, and we talked civilly for a little while before Neon quite literally confirmed what Deer told me; he had tried to *force* Deer to say the N-word. Neon said that he had "told him it was okay for him to say it", while Deer and another one of our friends said Neon had said something like "oh come on, say it! I dare you to," or something like that despite their obvious discomfort. 

Neon has also made claims such as "women aren't really oppressed in America" and other things like that. All I said was I didn't to be friends with them, and Deer and Toad followed, but by their own accord. Am I the asshole?

not wanting my white friend to say the n-word