Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I was playing Blackout and someone posted their twitch in chat. So I did what he probably wanted people to do and went to his stream. He dropped the same place where I dropped, which was directly under where the helicopters spawn. 
We land, I pick up a sniper and I watch his stream on my second monitor. I think in my brain "Haha, I have a sniper and I'm watching this dudes stream, wouldn't it be hilarious if I stream *snipe* him." So he is healing and I aim down my sights. Types in his twitch chat: Get stream SNIPED. And then I fire. He dies, watches the replay, sees my name on twitch and on BO4. Connects the dots and then gets really pissed. 
"Fuck off mate, I'm gonna report you, fucking stream sniper. You know it's a bannable offense? Have fun getting banned." He goes on a rant on that I'm gonna get banned and insults me for being low level. I thought it was hilarious that he was mad at me. I didn't mind at all for him being butthurt. 
I just argued that if he didn't wanna get stream sniped he should post his link in the match he is playing in. But then, am I the asshole for sniping him? I technically cheated, but he made it public that he was in my game. 
My views are, I cheated, but he gave me the opportunity and it was funny as hell. 

stream sniping someone who posted their twitch link in my game