Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I was in a big meme group chat with 300+ people in it and I posted \[this reaction image\]([https://i.imgur.com/IIF96Bb.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/IIF96Bb.jpg)) . Since I am white, I was called out by a black girl for posting it. She, and several others, said I should not have used the meme because of the use of the N-word. My argument was that since I didn't make the meme, I wasn't "voicing" the opinion of the creator. I see it as the same thing as if I were to link a song with heavy use of the N-word. 

I honestly do not feel any hatred or disdain for anyone based on things they cannot like sex, race, sexual orientation, etc. But I was raised in the South with a bunch of true racists and little diversity so maybe I am lacking perspective. 

I was kicked from the group, but it would be nice to hear impartial judgement. 

choosing a poor reaction image