Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So I'm a part of a Discord server with a friend of mine, and some mutual friends of his. The server was made, originally, to discuss an idea for a video game we wanted to collaborate on (and, naturally, the majority of the conversation is just swapping memes back and forth.)

Now, one of my Discord friends-by-association lives in South Africa. Every now and then he'll talk about the political and economic troubles in his country. Most recently, he posted two Youtube videos explaining why South Africa is "a failed state." I did some Googling and found the channel he got the videos from leans into alt-right stuff and other conspiracy theories. I informed him as such, and asked him if he had any better sources for the stuff the videos were claiming. This lead to a long discussion of my showing what I found, showing the Youtube channel wasn't a trustworthy source, him talking about how farm killings are being committed by paramilitary professionals, and me trying to explain why sourcing your information was important.

Now I'm not South African, so I don't have a frame of reference. I'm mainly just trying to figure out if this guy just used videos from a bad channel but there's a *lot* more bad shit going on in South Africa than I knew, or if this guy is just into some conspiracy theories. Am I the asshole for not fully believing him and wanting credible sources, even though he actually lives in South Africa?

asking someone on Discord to source their claims