Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My daughter is 11 months old (9 months on christmas) and my in laws odviously got her gifts. They got her a tickle me elmo which she loves, plays with it all the time. They also got her a potty. Which my husband and I havent taken out of the box. We dont expect her to even potty train her till shes aboug 2+. I dont think it was the best gift for her age but I still appreciate it and plan to use it hen the time was right.

Well we saw the in laws and they mentioned "how does she liked the potty" which my husband and I did that "who wants to say it" look at each other. He said we didnt even take it out of the box. They both gave us shit all night long, and told us she doesnt need to use it but at least sit/pretend. Thats how he (step father in law) had his kids potty trained at 18 months ect. 

I mean shes so young. I understand where they are coming from and thats how they wanted to parent their children. I understand its advice I may not agree with but now I think they expect us to have it out of the box when they come over next time. I dont  feel like i want to take it out until my daughters ready, but dont want to hear them give me crap again. This is rare we disagree on things, and normally we get along super well. 

not wanting to using my daughters christmas present from the in laws