Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I am in my university’s ballroom dance club. Today was Week 2 for Polka. My strong suit is West Coast Swing, but like to expand my horizons. I’ve learned and developed compensation techniques for when it comes to newer leads, one of which is backleading. So today in the class I danced with this guy who had a good frame and knew how to dance but had zero sense of rhythm. So I backled. I almost started counting out the rhythm “ONE AND TWO, THREE AND FOUR” but he said “If I lead you this way you should go this way.” I said “It wouldn’t be a problem if you kept up with the rhythm.” After the turn I told him “You led very well but if I can make just one comment, it’s that your rhythm is off. You should go ask [the instructor] to help you with your rhythm.” I feel like I could’ve worded the first time better and then let it go or just ignored him and continued to backlead. Nonetheless I feel like an anus...so...what do you say? Am I the anus?

backleading and then defending my point