Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My wife and I both agreed that if the genetic testing was fully covered by our insurance, or if it was at least cheap, we'd do it. Well, I checked the insurance today and it specifically says "genetic testing" is covered.

I told my wife, and she was like "idk if I want to". I was shocked and asked why she changed her mind. She said, "Idk, none of the stuff they test for runs in either of our families, and some of that stuff requires us both to carry the gene. Besides, it doesn't even look for everything."

I told her that didn't make sense to me....if you had the chance of knowing your child would possibly have a life altering condition why *wouldn't* you want to know? Sure it doesn't check for everything but why not? I said if it wasn't covered or was 2 grand or something I'd probably not worry about it...but if we can know, why not? What would it hurt to be prepared? Ya never know right?

She said it was fine and we could do it....but I know she just caved. I didn't want to drop it (still don't) so I told her look...I'm just trying to understand WHY you don't want to...it doesn't make sense to me and I want it to. But every way she explains it just seems very "idk"ish....

Can someone help me understand? This is our first child. AITA for wanting her to want this, or for even wanting it myself? I'm so confused.

wanting to do the optional genetic testing in 2 weeks at our first pregnancy ultrasound appt