Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Hey guys, this will explain some context. I was talking to this guy for about a month when one day I explained to him that I was dealing with some depression and other social anxiety issues. No big deal as it really wasn’t his fault whatsoever that I was having difficulties communicating, but I didn’t find it to be fair to continue to talk to someone romantically if I knew it wouldn’t be a healthy dialogue the majority of the time. 

After I sent my explanation over text (we hadn’t even had the opportunity to meet one another in person yet, but we live in the same city) he told me that I had “expressed the biggest, bullshit excuse” that he’s ever heard. I even apologized for our communication from the last month potentially being a waste of his time, though I didn’t fully consider or understand the effort and dedication that a relationship could take.

He said “that’s obviously an excuse, lmao bye Andrew 😂. Have a nice life,” and blocked my number. I honestly was confused but I just let it go and went about my studies since I’m in school and had other things to concern myself with.  Well it’s been almost a week and he decided to unblock me and send this as an apology: https://imgur.com/a/3rxRASP

AITA if I don’t think it’s sincere? I’ve tried to understand what he’s written but it left me sort of confused, as it seemed like he was trying to write several excuses and explanations in his apology. I just feel like at the end of it he was making it seem like I had explaining to do when in reality I’ve already done it, which is why he blocked me in the first place.

not considering this to be a sincere apology