Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My fiance's brother is getting married in September. They decided to not allow kids at anything. The wedding is 3-5 hrs from everyone except the bride's parents. My fiance's sister has 3 kids, expressed she was upset, and brother made an exception for her kids. 

I have a 3 year old son with another woman, and we are in the middle of a custody battle. I currently get him about 30% of the time. To keep it short, in past occasions when we have switched dates, she has backed out and kept my son even when I was supposed to have him. The future is very unsure, as she is trying to move across the country with him. 

I do not want to change my time with my son.
- As mentioned before, I have limited time with him.
- I've been screwed out of time in past when switching time.
- In the last 2 years I've asked to switch maybe once or twice, and I've tried to have the appearance that my time with him is my #1 priority, so giving up the weekend if she wouldn't switch isn't an option in my mind.

My fiance expressed the situation and my thoughts to her brother once she found out he was letting her sister's kids go because she has never had anyone other than the grandparents watch the kids. He replied that it's a firm rule. When she told him I wouldn't be able to come, he replied with, "I'm sure you could figure out something, but that's your choice. You guys aren't married yet and I've only met his kid once."

My fiance is upset at her brother, but also upset at me, saying I'm being too stubborn.

For the record, if people don't want kids, so be it. But if that's the case I don't think they should be upset when people decline because of it.

AITA?

not going to future Brother-In-Law's wedding because I have my son