Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So I'm in this sticky situation in which we as a group went abroad without 1 of the group (we are 5) because that one person had tests he didn't do well on during the exam period and therefore needed to retake during the very short between-semeter break we have.

So that's the bottom line. Furthermore, one of us asked him before we started planning if he'd be against us going, cause we felt bad going without his permission. He, without a doubt said we should go and not worry about this. 

Now we did go, and that friend is pissed at us. I'm a very good friend of his, so I obviously care. But, I'm not sure if we really did wrong by going? I told him before his exams started that if he needed help I'd love to help, to which he said thanks and that he'll manage, and I said I'm here to support. But I don't think that or anything else makes me morally obliged to stay. I was willing to stay and help had he needed my help, but I felt me staying 3 hour drive away from him while he takes the tests is... Kinda useless, and only makes us, the friends, bored.

I'm truly asking for feedback to ask if I'm in the wrong here, and I've let him down as a friend or if he's being pissed over something he shouldn't be. Thanks guys, don't be too harsh just honest and suggest tips to help mend the situation! &lt;3

going abroad as a group without one member because he had tests he needed to retake