Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: This is not a fundamental one, just something that I could use a level-headed perspective on. My bf and I listen to political podcasts frequently. Eventhough we agree on most big topics, there are some things we see differently and we have discussed them fiercely but lovingly in the past. He is a little more on the right, while i am a little more on the left. Now there was a podcast that really hit a nerve with me and upset me, because I found it callous and racist. I texted my bf quotes from the interview and told him why they upset me so much. He then proceeded to take the counterposition and to explain to me why he actually agreed with some of the speaker’s points. I told him that i was not in the mood for a discussion and that he should let one go every once in a while and just be my supporting and understanding boyfriend. He then ended the conversation by stating that if I didnt want his opinion, I shouldnt have texted him the quotes. AITA for expecting him to feel the room and leave aside the political quarreling? Not everything needs to be a debate. One of the reasons why I love him is precisely that he is opinionated and well-spoken. I wouldnt want him to ever have to compromise or betray his political beliefs, which are part of his identity. AITA to ask him to write/say something nice and not to take a position/counterposition? Dont get me wrong, I dont want him agreeing with me. It would just be nice if he acknowledged that I was upset and not treat the conversation like a debate. Am I being too sensitive here?

getting annoyed at my bf for treating my venting like an opening to a debate