Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I was exercising at the gym, doing an exercise that’s not quite as common (not goofy looking) to target specific functions of the muscle I wanted when some random guy showed up and wanted to give me advice, saying I should do a different exercise instead. He went on for a little bit about how the one he wanted me to do was better. 

I’m a small, so I might look like I just started lifting and don’t know what I’m doing, but but half of my job is literally to understand different motions and how to target which for different purposes and plan around that. I take people through exercises and tweak them according to each individual client accounting for injuries, mobility, etc. 

I didn’t want to start a debate with some random at the gym, but also felt like I should take a firm stand that I’m not doing what he suggested. When he finished, I just said “Cool. I like my way better so I’m sticking to it.” 

He gave me a sort of frustrated look but walked away without saying anything. He just sat down to play with his phone. 

Was I the asshole here? 



ignoring someone's lifting advice