Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Alright, here goes.

I'm a freelancer in a particular field and I'm part of a team who are working on a big project. It's something I'm passionate about and so I've poured a lot of energy into it in the last few weeks, and it's starting to go well because my boss is coming to me for things like rush jobs.

That was what happened today. One of the others submitted a piece of work that was, bluntly, awful and the deadline for it to be done is tomorrow. My boss asked if I could get in there and rework it, and I did it, mostly by scrapping 85% of what was there and starting from scratch. So far, so straightforward.

I was ready to stick that with my other work to be invoicing when I found out why the other guy's work was so late and so bad - his father died. Now, I feel conflicted about invoicing my work - I absolutely did the work and did it better, but by charging for that the other guy is probably going to lose out.

So, would I be the asshole for invoicing this or not? 

charging for rewriting somebody else's work