Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: A little background, my fiance (28F) and I (30M) got engaged 6 months ago and I love her very much and I know how much they want a very large traditional wedding. I also love my 12 year old pup just as much who without going into too much detail has been plagued with ill health recently causing me to play over $1500 just last year. 

&amp;#x200B;

My fiance really wants us to be married in the same church her parents got married, however the place over the years has grown very popular causing the price of the ceremony there to be well over budget. When I suggested we got married somewhere cheaper but still nice saying "the place may not be where you wanted but it will still be special to us" she began to cry before very aggressively suggesting I should "let my damn dog die in peace" to afford her dream wedding. Although I try to be discreet about the amount I spend on my dog she must have found out somehow and it will not get any cheaper soon.

&amp;#x200B;

I honestly find her words very hurtful and what I thought was just a snarky remark said in the heat of the moment has since become the topic of many hostile debates. She can't see that I'm not choosing my dog over her but i'm creating a compromise so that my beloved pet can continue his happy life for as long as possible. He is not in any visible pain, just has seen better days and although I hate to make my fiance sad I will stand by my choice.

&amp;#x200B;

TLDR: AITA For not funding my fiancees "dream wedding" so I can afford the well being of my much loved dog?

&amp;#x200B;

&amp;#x200B;

choosing to pay vet bills over our wedding