Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I see a lot of memes about "depression and anxiety" on basically every sub. So much, it just feels unnatural, like, it's hard to belive that there are really dozens or even hundreds of thousands of people with depression and anxiety on a \~250k users sub for problems that affect about 5-10% the world population (unless when it's on a sub specifically about this subject). It feels even more suspicious after seeing people who though they were depressed/anxious, but turned out normal after a diagnosis. When I see these posts, I often have to question myself stuff like "Is this person *actually* mentally unhealthy or are they pretending to be so they can post this kind of stuff for easy internet points?" or "does this person *really* have depression or did they feel justifiably sad for ten minutes *once* and assumed that's how it works?". Because healthy people pretending to be depressed for karma feels like a dick move. Of course, really long texts talking about how miserable they're feeling and begging for help and advice  or constant posts talking about their issue are really hard not to belive, but someone going "I have depression lol xd" and moving on pretty normally after getting a certain ammount of upvotes still sounds fishy to me, and I think karma-whoring fucking **mental illnesses** just doesn't sound right.

being skeptical when someone on reddit says they're mentally unhealthy