Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So my girlfriend and I were talking on the phone last night when the topic of Jussie Smollet came up. I watched his ABC interview and just couldnt believe the story bleach and noose at 2am by two white MAGA guys who watched empire enough to know this dude? Already a tough thing to believe and Jussies telling of the story only furthered my doubts. My girl of course believes him, she is black and has a habit of defending black people in media, earlier she had even been angry that Bill Cosby had everything taken from him while there are still white men in media who there is proof of their misdeeds yet still havent been taken down. She thinks they should be in trouble before Cosby gets in trouble. 
She says there is no logical reason for Jussie to plan this whole thing then downshot everything I said that might be reasons. More media attention for real hate crimes, more publicity for himself or maybe because he thought he could get away with it and he wants just more attention. She says I have no proof beyond my gut feeling and what the media has out there, this is true but sometimes the gut is right and its not like I can investigate something in Chicago all I have is what multiple sources are saying is what happened. I dont deny that hate crimes still happen I just dont think this particular case happened to him. I in the end just said it doesnt matter what I think I have no sway in anything that happens to him and she hung up the phone on me in anger AITA? 
Sorry for formatting and bad spelling on mobile

not believing Jussie Smollet in an arguement with my girlfriend