Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I live in Holland, so obviously I cycle a lot, going to places in and outside the city.
I live in a rather flat area of the country, so the winds can sometimes rise up to become extremely hard to deal with. I love to cycle at around 30-35 km/h, so for most people that's quite a fast tempo, but during heavy wind, I can only cycle about 5-10 minutes at those speeds before needing a rest.

That's why I use people sometimes as windshields. I cycle behind them, leaving a small gap and lean over my steer. This minimizes the wind from the front and allows me to rest while maintaining decent speed.

Am I the asshole for this? Today I used a man on an electrical bicycle to block the insane winds coming from the front. He was obviously not having a problem with it due to his build-in battery motor, so I made good use of the opportunity, however, after about 10-15 seconds of slipstreaming behind him, he turned around. Irritated by my actions, he told me to either overtake him or stay at a far distance.

I live by the rule that if there's an opportunity for improvement, I should take it, but if it annoys people or makes them uncomfortable, I don't want to do it anymore.

Am I the asshole? 

using people as windshields while cycling