Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My fiance asked me about my opinions on the new abortion law saying how, even though she is pro choice, having the option to abort a child basically just before its born is not right.

I told her there is nothing wrong with the law. Although such late term abortion may not be right, that is not my burden to bear. I think it's a fucked up decision as you should know your choice long before then, but that's the mothers problem, not mine. 

Then she asked me, if it were my decision to have an autistic child or a late term abortion what would I choose? I, mind you, I was rather drunk, said something along the lines of "well if human breed to natural selection the weaker child wouldnt last, so, if it were *my* decision I would say FUCK that kids life I can breed another one that ISNT retarded"

Then she asked me, what if it was *our* child, I said well then i would go along with your decision, if you wanted the autistic child I would give my 100% to raise it and give it the best life I could, having an autistic child is not the end of the world, but you just asked me, basically, if I had the choice of an autistic child or a normal one which would I choose. 

Well, fiance stopped talking to me for the night

Am I the asshole for being so explicit about my political views?
Or is she being rediculous by assuming I wouldnt be my own person about how I feel and then being offended by it?

having a different political opinion