Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: This is gonna be hard to explain.
My mom needed a message for TODAY that was sent by a bank to her smartphone which was damaged today, but didn't remember it whle asking for the message to be sent (that message is very important). The screen of that smartphone was broken by her boyfriend  (she's divorced and now has another partner), who is also the one who sold her that smartphone, and can also repair it.
Her and her boyfriend fight all the time, once my mom got so angry that she threatened him with a knife which is scary.
Back to the subject: she blames her boyfriend for the fact that he broke the screen and that it could have affected the fact the smartphone was damaged today, so now she's very angry with him. I told him to come and repair it but he didn't have time.
I have a tablet that requires a large simcard and the one of my mom, well, ins't large enough, so she can't use my tablet to fix this easily (to use my number she would have to go to the bank to change it to mine and she doesn't have time now).
Because of all that I said now my mom wants to talk to him (and by talk i mean fight).
I didn't let her communicate with him using my tablet because, you know: fight. 
She got very angry with me because of that.
So, I'm the asshole for not letting my mother talk (fight with) to him?

Im sorry if there's bad English and if the whole story was confusing, ask for more information if necessary. Thank you

avoiding a fight