Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: We were having a casual chat about whatever and it came to answering the door to random people. She said she mostly never answers the door, which i knew immediately as bullshit as she always answers the door. I tell her that I know she always answers, and she thinks for a bit and says she does, and that she was just thinking about how she doest want to answer so she assumed real fast she never did answer. I said “so you lied”.
“No”
“you just said you never answered the door, but now you’re saying you almost always do”
“i had an answer in my head that sounded good enough to me so i gave it to you”
-skipping a bit-
Her- “its like answering some free response question on a test, i can give a GREAT answer by thinking about it more and get 6 points, or spend less time on it and have a GOOD answer for like 3 or 4 points or something”
“Why are you telling me this?”
“both the answers i gave you were right, the second one was just more right”

No, your first answer wasn’t right at all. Not going to the door, and almost always going to the door are not the same. I know its really some small issue but I don’t like how she thinks thats just a mistake. I feel like she would lie about things and not owe up to it, say it was just a “mistake”. Am i the asshole for taking this small thing too far? Or am I right?
 

telling my gf this is a lie