Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: - On Instagram i generally get into a lot of debates in my spare time for some fun and to help my english and stat work since theres usually alot of homework involved 
- i go onto Tessas post, its a comic panel conveying equality between both men and women. Seems good enough, its a movement i am involved in -- egalitarianism. Equality for both genders. Theres a ton of whiteknights and alot of bashing on men for being weak or whatever. 
- i decide enough is enough and partake in an argument since its a good break from my studying for my Physics mocks. 
- "funny how men take that as being hated" i disagree by saying that in the comments at the very least theres a ton of guys whiteknighting and how the schema of third wave feminism (which i cleared up as feminazism to avoid linking it to actual feminism which i support and advocate for) is bashing on men and that the comments dont really decline that fact. 
- someone replies by saying that thats the vocal minority, i agree and that it should not be correlated at all to feminism. 
- whiteknight (whos apparently joking comes in) "we're fragile" theres a ton of comments like this that are genuine so i did not understand its satire. I respond by saying thats not true and that it only should reference men who dislike feminism and say that its cancerous and whatnot, he then stays persistent in that point even after saying it was a joke and that how me calling him a whiteknight proves his point despite the fact that i said it does basically parallel his behaviour and if he is offended "im sorry but its true" 
- continues persistency. 
☆2☆ 
- a chinese game dev says he isnt good at making lovestories because he never fell in love and only faced rejection yet he'll try harder to make better games. 
- someone comments that hes a niceguy and a neckbeard, i argue it isnt and completely deconstruct what he is saying to disprove her point. 
- she resorts to calling me a niceguy and using r/iamverysmart. While i am left confused. 
Help me out here, did i come off as sexist or insulting? 
If so that wasnt my intention and i will try to correct it. 

arguing for equality or atleast I hope