Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Here's some context.   
The university I attend provides transportation services for students who are interested. So, the students in my bus play loud music on the bus speakers, everyday during mornings and evenings. When one student gets off, the other uses the aux cord, and when that person gets off, the next student takes it. And the cycle continues till everyone gets off which is to the second to last person (I get dropped off last and picked up first).   
When I told the student who plays music to turn it down a little, she told me to plug my ears with cotton, I didn't say anything then because she a year ahead of me and it would be disrespectful (it's a huge thing in my country). And other one does lower the volume but she is only one of many (around +5 students who play music).   
So a few days ago, I complained about it to transport service head, and he said he would take care of it. And then they weren't allowed to play anymore. But now the students are writing applications to the transport head and the advisory to get permission.   
Keep in mind that I am perhaps the only person who objects to this. They don't know that I'm the one filed the complaint.   
Today, a 4th year student said that she would appeal to the advisory to get permission and I am thinking about countering it when she eventually does.   
AITA for doing what I'm doing? Even if I'm just one person, I think my choice should also be taken into account. I already told them that I object to this behaviour and that if anyone wants to listen to music that badly, then they should bring their earphones but they hell bent on playing music on the speakers.

complaining about the music that students play in the bus