Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So my friend group and I are going abroad for a week in the summer. This coast me a £150 deposit which I payed a while back as well as a £430 payment which I payed just three weeks ago. 

This is all well and good. Except an issue has come up where one of the people going with us may not be able to go due the possibility of it clashing with a more long term work/study holiday abroad.

Now to be fair, she payed her remaining balance (£430) two weeks ago and only found out last week that these dates could clash. She will find out whether or not the dates are ok soon enough I hope.

My issue is that if, in the worst case, where the dates do clash, she of course won’t be able to go meaning according to the person organising the holiday, the remaining people will have to bail her out pretty much. We have all of us, payed our share towards it, each of us having payed £430 each. 

Of course I feel bad that she is put in a pretty unfortunate predicament, but I can’t help but feel like my friends and I are getting shafted, having to pay for the room that she can’t attend. We aren’t aware yet whether we will have to pay if she pulls out, and we’ll find out from the place where we are staying soon. 

TLDR: Am I an asshole for not wanting to split the bill to bail my friend out, when I’ve already payed for myself. 

not wanting to bail out a friend when I've payed my share