Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Ok, so here's the thing. My brother wanted me to buy something for him as I have Amazon Prime and he doesn't (he wanted it shipped faster). I bought it. I already owe him a decent amount of money for a shared phone bill, and he's been kind enough to let it go on, although recently he's been more on me about it. After I bought it, he asked me if I would want the price of what I bought to be taken off what I owe him (it was less than what I owe him) or if I wanted him to repay me for it. I said I wanted him to repay me for it. He asked me if he wanted him to Venmo me it, and I said I'd rather our parents (who are the primary account holders on our bank accounts we've had since we were younger) just transfer the money. He said he was ok with that as long as I was the one to ask our parents to transfer the money. I agreed to that. I just recently asked them and they refused to transfer it, because it's "not right" to ask for money from someone you owe money to. While I agree with that to an extent, my brother and I already had an agreement on it. When I told them as such they still refused to transfer the money.

asking for repayment for something I bought my brother when I owe him