Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I've had some health issues lately, and a close friend of mine of almost 20 years got me a necklace with a gemstone that is supposedly red topaz, and what are supposedly a few diamonds.

The thing is, I generally don't wear jewelry...I have my reasons, and I made him very aware of this over the years. Jewelry is a waste of money to me and whatever jewelry anyone buys me literally just sits in a box in a drawer. He had not forgotten this, as he prefaced giving me the gift with "I know you said you don't wear jewelry but..."

To compound the issue, he got ripped off. The necklace did not look like it did in the photo. The stones are oddly set and the topaz is dyed and the dye is flaking off. 

At first I tried to be gracious about this as to not hurt his feelings but after doing some research, I learned he paid $200. Not only was I annoyed that he got me a gift I had explicitly told him I had no interest in, I was now annoyed that he got ripped off and thought he should get his money back.

I tried to not say anything about it as I was trying to be gracious but as I looked at it more and more, the idea that he paid so much money for this really started to get to me so finally I told him he got ripped off and should return it, get his money back, and we could go to dinner or see a show with it or something.

He refused, so now I just have this thing sitting in a box collecting dust.


telling my friend he should return the gift he got me