Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My friend and I are both in college, and both like to collect the figurines known as "amiibo" (link [here](https://www.nintendo.com/amiibo/) if you've never heard of these). He is much more into them than I am though (he has about 40-50 last I checked while I have about 10). 

We both get monthly allowances from our parents (don't know how much his is or what it's designed for, but mine is for anything not school related, such as eating out, new clothes, etc.) He and I both know that his mom doesn't approve of him constantly buying amiibo, so he has been asking me to do it so his mom doesn't see where he's made purchases on his debit card. Every time I have made a purchase, he has paid me in full the day of, either with cash or Venmo. 

However, two days ago, he asked me to make a purchase again, but this time he said my payment would have to wait because he was "broke" and could pay me back later. Because he has a track record of being unreliable, I told him we would have to wait until he could pay me on the day of the purchase, as we had always been doing. (Example: Once near the end of last semester, I asked if he wanted to go for sushi to celebrate. He agreed until I asked if he could contribute to the Uber fare as the restaurant was slightly off campus, at which point he said he was broke). 

We were discussing the purchase on the phone at the time, and when he mentioned being broke, I lost my temper and yelled at him to stop spending money on amiibo if he is. He promptly hung up the phone after that. I tried calling him today to apologize, but he didn't pick up and he hasn't called me back.

Did I make the right choice?

no longer helping my friend buy figurines and slightly losing my temper