Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I recently went to this parlour to get my very first tattoo. So we go over the legal stuff, everything is dandy, he seems like a down to earth guy. 
When I go at the appointment and show him reference pictures he tells me ''No worries, I can get this sorted" 
He shows me a couple of sketches and everything looks good. He makes a stensil and places it on my arm and I ask him to move it up a bit. 
The tattooist was like, I totally understand, get it perfect it's your first tattoo. He reapplies it however it was too far to the left, as in the inside of my forearm which wasn't ideal and I just was not happy with it. I debate whether or not to prompt him to move and finally decide to tell him about the issue. 
The guy absolutely loses his shit and goes 
 "Get out of my studio! I've done everything and you just won't be happy with it whatever I do"
Being absolutely shocked, I sincerely apologise to him and ask him to please continue working on it "No chance, two strikes and you are out" 

So am I the asshole? It's my first tattoo and maybe it's a pain having to adjust the stensil but why react so aggressively? 


asking the tattoo artist to adjust the stensil to the right