Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So my brother (30) moved back in with my parents two years ago. He was living out of state and got surgery, and so had to move home because he couldn't work anymore at his former occupation. Things are always fine, but he has very different political views than my other siblings and I. That's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion. However, he constantly tries to start a political conversation, and rather than have a debate, he just starts yelling his opinion. Again, fine, if that's how you want to act as an adult that's your choice. Last time I was there it started with a discussion on medical marijuana, and how employers shouldn't be able to hold it against you. Which I agree with. it then spiraled out of control with statements like "the green new deal the stupid Dems are pushing will outlaw planes". Now, I don't really follow politics that much, but I have my opinions. My response was that I don't think that's what it says, I don't think  anyone wants to outlaws planes, because that simply doesn't even sound like a rational position. But I admitted that I wasn't really informed of the situation, but made the argument that it sounded far fetched. Now he starts yelling, got up and pushed me. I apologized to my parents and told them I won't be coming back until he either gets help or moves out. I know politics are particularly nasty right now, but it's absurd to think that I can't go see my own parents without worrying about being physically assulted.  I sent him a text saying we have an infinite number of things we can talk about that aren't politics, and we should refrain from any further discussion. 

telling my parents I won't come to their house unless my brother leaves or gets help