Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: 4 of us have a regular monthly guys night out. We know each other's wives but have never hung out all together. 

The 4 of us use group text to communicate. Monday night one of the guys sends the following text message: Hey \[SAM\] why don't you leave your kids with a sitter and invite \[SANDY, sam's wife\] to drink with us."

My wife saw the text and asked me if we were still having guys night out on Friday. I said yes. She asked if it was STILL a guys night out, which should have been a red flag but I'm dumb so I said yes. Turns out she saw the text and went nucking futs.

But in my defense...

Sandy is the only one of our wives that drinks regularly, Sandy and Sam drink together all the time while my wife only drinks socially, I can't remember the last time she had even a glass of wine after dinner...

I knew from offline conversations that Sam's wife has plans for Friday and wouldn't be joining us, so it will in fact be another guys night out...

The 4 of us meet regularly for drinks and it has always been just 4 guys...

We mix English and Spanish when we get together and my wife not only does not speak Spanish, but she gets upset when people at her table speak too much Spanish (or any language she doesn't understand/English)...

I honesty don't think she would have fun with us. In fact, if we're going to spend time together, I'd rather go somewhere just the 2 of us and not to a sports bar to drink with the guys. I tried explaining that to her but she's not having it.

In fact, she's so upset I'm getting the feeling maybe I'm missing something. Am I the asshole?

telling my wife that upcoming guys night out is still for guys when another wife was invited