Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So a few years ago my sister (S) bought me a DVD set of a TV show called Gargoyles for my birthday. I used to be a fan of the show when I was a teenager, but interest faded as I got older. I went on Facebook to thank her and the conversation went something like this:

**Me**: Hey, just got your gift in the mail. I appreciate it!

**S**: You're welcome. I didn't know what else to get you and I remembered you used to watch that show a lot.

**Me**: Yeah, I did. Not so much now. But thanks anyway!

**S**: Wait... so, you don't like it anymore?

**Me:** Nah, not really, but it's the thought that counts, right?

**S**: I can't believe this! You're telling me I wasted my money? If you don't like it, pay me back what I spent on it!

**Me**: Wait... you're saying you want me to give you back the money... that you spent on my *birthday gift*?

**S**: Yes. It's not fair to make me pay for something you don't want.

**Me**: Well, I don't mind sending it back to you... but I'm not paying you anything.

**S**: I don't want it! Just refund me the money since my gift was wasted.

The conversation goes back and forth like this with both of us getting more and more frustrated with each other until I eventually just turn off the chat. We didn't speak to each other for a few weeks after that.

(**Edit**: I know that I opened the can of worms by saying 'thanks anyway' it's just that I didn't know how else to make it clear I was no longer into that show so she wouldn't get me Gargoyle related gifts again in the future)

not liking my sister's birthday gift