Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input:   My boss has been pushing for me to find a new chair for a month or so, because the one I have is falling apart/very ratty looking. Well I finally decided to go look for one on Friday &amp; chose 3 options in differing price ranges, although he said money was no object. 
  The cheapest &amp; (most uncomfortable one) was about $120. I didn’t mention the fact that it wasn’t great because it’s not my money that is being spent. The next tier was $200, &amp; $300 was a blissfully supportive chair with a 2 year warranty. I sat down with my boss &amp; told him about all 3 options saying they were all great &amp; it was his choice which one I should order. 
He refused, telling me that it was my call and again, that money was no object- he wants to make sure it’s supportive enough for me to work comfortably for 9-10 hours and will be long lasting. 
  I picked the $300 one after once more making sure that it was permissible. Well this morning the office administrator who is picking it up saw the receipt and blew a gasket. She &amp; the boss in hushed voices were talking about how expensive it was &amp; that it was wrong for me to use his money for it. 
AITA for picking this pricey chair? 

ordering a $300 office chair