Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Context: My family have 2 dogs and one cat. My family enjoys doing favors for other families so much that we have a dog, called Hunter, over frequently, and he constantly tries to harm the family cat. He comes from a well-to-do family that can afford a very nice kennel for 3 days easily. We had to put the cat on Prozac, an antidepressant, to keep her from peeing on the couches. That didn't work. This has been an ongoing issue for 2 or more years. I have made it perfectly clear that Hunter is the issue, and not the cat, as getting rid of Hunter is the only solution not yet tried. Yes, we do refer to our cat as "the cat".

The actual text:

DRUGGING THE CAT DOESN'T SOLVE THE ISSUE OF A PREDATOR CONSTANTLY TRACKING THE CAT DOWN TO KILL IT FOR 3 DAYS STRAIGHT.

Hunter is to never be allowed back in this house after this session of cat torture. We MUST accept the fact that the SAFETY of our own pets should come before the COMFORT of other people's pets. It is simply too risky to continue housing Hunter, or any dog that attacks cats, while we have a cat. 

My course of action: 

I will tell the owner of Hunter the following: 

We are not a kennel. Hunter is truly more than just a mere burden, and he is never to return to this household under any circumstances, due to his threat to the life of the cat that lives here. 

End of text.

sending this text to my entire family, and following through with it