Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Throwaway account yada yada yada.

A short time ago I broke up with my gf. I signed up to Tinder just to see what happens – searching for neither hookups nor new relationships. Just browsing. I matched with A who seemed just a bit too enthusiastic about meeting me.

Well, I went to the date and met B instead. She explained the situation like this:

* A's Tinder game is weak and B, as her friend and as a psychology student, helped her out by taking over her Tinder account and texting with several guys, including me.
* When B set up the date, A got cold feet. She didn't know me, after all. So A threatened to stand me up and B felt bad and went instead.

Weird flex, but okay. I asked her how they could have thought this was a good idea, but was determined to have my coffee. So we did and grabbed some food afterwards. All in all quite alright as a date, and we agreed on meeting again.

In the next morning, A started texting me.

* In her version, it was all a ruse to get B out there. B is pretty busy and neglects dating, so A tricked her into finding someone on Tinder and meeting them (me).

She was pretty proud of herself and spammed me with the face-with-tears-of-joy emoji (which may or may not have made me a little bit miffed). I chose some rather plain words to express my unhappiness with being the collateral damage of their double game.

I still intend to meet B a second time (as promised), but I have to admit that this whole situation pisses me off. It's not B's fault, but I still don't see a real future. Am I the asshole for bitching about the setup?

not wanting to date the friend of a tinder date