Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I posted [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/b6608k/unleashed_and_unsupervised_dog_attacked_my_dog/) in r/LegalAdvice but there is an aspect of this that want to ask here that I thought wasn't really relevant to legal advice.

TLDR: another dog attacked my dog and the owner not only let him out unleashed but also unsupervised. It wasn't until several minutes into the attack that he came out and struggled to get his dog off my dog. My dog's under arm muscle was ripped. The vet bills were $800 but I have pet insurance so they covered all but $280. I don't want his dog put down  We live in an improvised neighborhood and this wasn't a setback for me but I don't know if he is struggling financially and can actually afford to reimburse me.

We live in an impoverished neighborhood. I grew up here and like it a lot. I am firmly middle class so while this event as been emotionally and mentally taxing it hasn't hurt me financially. The other guy might be struggling (I have no proof of what he can and cannot afford. This is all in my head (anxious mind)). 

AITA for asking for reimbursement, behavior classes, and a fenced in yard? 

I just think he needs to be a more responsible pet owner and the dog just needs proper training and a fenced in yard so he can continue to play.  But I don't want to pile on financial constraints!

&amp;#x200B;

suing someone who might not be able to reimburse me for damages and court fees