Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My brother and his friends play a lot of magic which I joined in once for a draft and now my phone is constantly receiving texts that are of no relevance to me. I asked if he or someone else could set up a group text that doesn't include me since the conversation doesn't include me. They could even use still text me along with everyone else next time a draft came about. Apparently this is an unreasonable burden to put on the group and that I should simply block it, which it turns out I cant. My brother then spent twice as long as it would have taken to set up a new group text trying to block the current one on my phone to no avail. And of course I'm the bad guy for pointing this out. Is this request even unreasonable. Only one person would have to take on the "burden" of setting up a new one, not the whole group and it would also make it easier to include me on draft setups in the future since they wouldn't have to text me separately from everyone else, but he wouldn't have any of it saying I was requesting that everyone else to inconvenience themselves for me. It's not even inconvenient, I have a group text for just my parents and one for the whole family and it has never once been inconvenient.

requesting my brother's friend use a separate chat for Magic set up that doesnt include me