Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: A problematic 'friend' has recently reemerged with a blog. The writing style is basically Taylor Swift accusatory towards everyone she thinks has wronged her. She spams me and other mutual friends with links, asking for an honest review. 

I've been noncommittal with my replies so far - the last thing I want is to trigger a round of suicide threats and cutting. 

Today she texts an overweight friend (A) - who has never discussed her body issues with hrrand struggles with it immensely - for her experiences with body positivity because she wants to put it in her blog. A calls me on the verge of tears because of how insensitively this girl has phrased the request. Not exact words but along the lines of" at that weight you have to believe in body positivity to like yourself"

She's previously also texted A shit like "none of my dresses fit me, I've grown too fat, can I borrow yours"
 We've all been NC with her because of her constant insensitive and toxic behaviour but she's trying to insert herself again. 

What I'm really tempted to do rn is just give her an honest breakdown of how awful her writing is. The way I see  it, she's asked for honesty anyway. But my primary motive is to get her to stop texting me and my friend so WIBTA? 

telling my 'friend' she can't write for nuts