Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Background: I used to be extremely overweight and it was due to a massive junk food addiction. I've been fixing it the past few years and now I am down to a normal weight range. In doing so, I developed an aversion to junk food like a former alcoholic would to beer. I track everything and don't cheat because I know if I let myself eat cake once ( from experience ) I will keep eating junk at increasingly more frequent times in till I'm back to where I was. So instead, I just don't eat it ever. 

This often leads to social problems. For some reason, every American event revolves around garbage food. Office meeting? Pizza, Co-workers birthday? Cake, Family reunion? Deep-fried pasta. It's not hard for me to resist these things but I get a lot of comments. "Oh /u/Better_MixMaster, you know there is pizza right?". I can deal with one or two but sometimes it's literally everyone I talk to. Or the even worse situation where someone just hands you food and assumes you want it. I often just throw it away when no one is looking. 

This works because it's junk food for large groups and someone else would just eat my serving but it wouldn't work if someone specifically made something for me. So in the situation of "Hey, /u/Better_MixMaster, I hand made these chocolates for you", WIBTA if I refused to eat them? ( I'd still Thank them )

refusing to eat food someone made/bought for me