Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: A few days ago I was about to enter my tuition class. As I was at the door I saw that my friend’s table was blocking the door (it had a window above half of the door so that I can see what’s blocking the door). I pushed the door a little and my Friend didn’t move his table, so I pushed the door harder and the door opened, which also caused his table to move aside. But suddenly I heard something fell, it was his phone. I helped him pick his phone up and then I went to my seat in class.

When tuition ended, I went to my Friend to see if his phone was okay and saw a cracked corner on the front glass of the phone. I felt sorry so I said that I would pay for the damages. And for a few days after that I thought that it was my fault.

Yesterday I asked him for the repairment fee and he said 900 dollars. I was like, 900 dollars for replacing the front glass?! Then he said I only had to pay 400 dollars, he also stated that his dad was furious about it. This led me to think if it was actually my fault that I broke his phone. We quarrelled through Messenger and both of us exchanged arguments on why I should/shouldn’t pay for the fee.

My points for defending were:
1. I didn’t know/saw his phone was on the table
2. Why was he blocking the door in the first place (after I said this he then stated that he didn’t know that he was blocking the door, which honestly just sounds idiotic)
3. The repairment fee could not be that high. His phone is a Samsung S6 Edge, and the only thing that needs replacing is the front glass

I have not given my money yet, because I’m not sure if it’s entirely my fault or not. Please help!

not paying the repairmen fees for my friend's cracked screen