Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Alrighty, so a gay (f) aquaintence of mine shows me and a group of people a video of a guy calling another guy a fag. She says 

"look at this fucking homophobe, people like this dont deserve to live"

I mention that words like that shouldnt be used, but that i dont think that its reasonable to make that judgement like that based on the fact that he said it once a 5 second clip.

(I understand now that she was seeking validation, but this is all realized in hindsight. )

She tells me that im not allowed to have an opinion on this opinion (even though she just asked me lol) due to the fact that i am a straight male. 

This honestly pissed me off, so from tbis point on im pretty unsure with the tone in which i spoke in.

I started off by saying that thats ridiculous and that people should be allowed to voice their mind on things, regardless of their characteristicks. I say that saying this would be like saying that she has no right to an opinion on anti-semitism because she isnt jewish.

She ended up getting up and leaving, but not before calling me an asshole and an idiot.

I dont particulary care about my relationship with them, but i was thinking that maybe i had done something wrong


telling my gay aquaintence that a person is not a homophobe if they use the word "fag" once