Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: I recently made a post about my recent arguments with my “best friend.” We has another argument today. This one started with an argument about playing Minecraft, then it switched to her saying I acted like I was perfect and that I was always right.
So, it started out with her accusing me of not wanting to be her friend because I was playing Minecraft without her. It was over text. At one point she typed “your” instead of “you’re.” I don’t always correct people, but the difference between “your” and “you’re” is my biggest grammar pet peeve. Anyways, I quickly slipped in “you’re*” into the argument, then continued proving my point. I never said anything about her being bad at grammar or calling her stupid. She then accused me of acting like I’m perfect and acting like I’m always right. (The fact that I’m coming on here to see if I was right or wrong proves that I’m not always sure if I’m right.) I’ve corrected the grammar of her and other people on multiple occasions, and I frequently correct myself. Correcting grammar is just a habit of mine that I can’t easily control. So, what do you think? Am I an ah for correcting her grammar? 

correcting my friend's grammar