Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: My boyfriend is opposed to me getting a motorcycle, at least for the present time. We live in a large city with notably bad traffic, it is admittedly dangerous to ride a motorcycle in this city. (Or anywhere.) However, one of the nice things about a bike is that you can lane split and get places faster, which would be very helpful for me as I am taking night college classes. I have to get across town after work in a hurry. Also, I'm a basic bro, I've always wanted a motorcycle.

We don't share finances and I can easily afford the motorcycle and the additional insurance for it. He's not against the concept in general, but we are planning to move to a smaller city in a few years, and he says he'll sign off on the decision then. 

WIBTA if I bought a motorcycle despite his objection? I get it, he cares about my safety, but at the same time, I've always wanted a motorcycle, I can afford it, I'm a good safety conscious rider. I always planned to buy a motorcycle someday, but now seems like a good time because of school and my tight schedule.

(Why can't I just leave work early, you ask? The answer is, I can and I do, I can set my own hours and nobody is really allowed to say boo about it. However, it's still a job and I need it for the next few years, sometimes I get stuck working late because my coworkers and vendors decide to shit the bed 5PM and I need to fix it by the next morning. I work as hard as I can to prevent bed-shittings and I can come in early to fix things too, but still, cutting traffic time in half would be a huge help.)

buying a motorcycle without my boyfriend's consent