Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: Yesterday I posted in my town’s “memories” Facebook group asking if anyone had any old photos of my house. It was built in 1898 so I’m sure it’s gone through many changes in its long life time, so I wanted to know what it has looked like in the past. Cue some asshole telling me, “definitely haunted!!” and continuing to comment about it and tagging someone who’s previously lived here, after I told them I don’t think it’s haunted and want to know nothing about that bullshit. We’ve lived here since September and haven’t had any creepy feelings or weird experiences (and believe me, if it was haunted we’d have probably heard it by now— I can hear my husband walk across the upper floor step by step when I’m downstairs). 

Earlier today, I was at work and someone else sent me a message on Messenger, telling me about how some couple lived in the basement (which is unfinished and not even remotely liveable currently, nor does it look like it’s ever been liveable) in the 1980s was on drugs and stomped their newborn baby to death while their 2-year-old watched. Like why the FUCK would you message someone about something like that, ESPECIALLY after they explicitly expressed no desire to hear any negative things about the house? So I became angry and told them to go fuck themselves and mind their own fucking business. They told me, “there’s no need to be rude” as if they weren’t being supremely rude by sending me the message in the first place. So, AITA and was I actually rude for telling them to fuck themselves?

telling someone to fuck themselves after they gave me unwanted information about my house's past