Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: So a little background. I spent New Years at my girlfriend's house with her parents. At some point during the night, I mentioned coffee and how I like a  local grocery chain's K Cups as they are fairly cheap and taste fine (I'm not a coffee snob). Because of that fact, I stocked up last week when they were on sale and as a result have somewhere north of 400 K Cups. This is enough to last me 5-6 months. 

Fast forward to yesterday, and my girlfriend and I went to her parents' house for dinner. After dinner, her parents presented me with two 96 packs of the same K Cups. And the receipt with the price for the coffee circled. While it was only around $50 (the normal price, not the sale price), I told them thanks but I had stocked up while they were on sale and that I did not want them and that they could return them (the store is 45 minutes out of my way so I didn't really want to make the trek just to return them). At this point, her parents called me ungrateful. I told them that I appreciated the thought but just did not need them at this point. The money isn't an issue but the fact that they thought they bought them for me and expected me to pay for them when I didn't ask for them is what bothers me. My girlfriend says I should have just given them the money for them and take them. I disagree. Am I the asshole?

not paying for coffee