Definition: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
Input: In another subreddit, Public freakout, there is a video of a white woman sitting at a table who tells the woman recording that she doesn’t want her to sit by her because she had dark skin, and that she would prefer that America be all white.  

Yes, this white woman is a racist idiot.  She is a jerk and a horrible person, no doubt about it!  But the reason I stuck up for her was that she was literally just sitting there kind in her own business!  The woman recording was the one who chose to escalate the issue, so much so that the racist woman moved tables.  It was clear she didn’t want to talk about it or get into a confrontation with the woman recording.  

In this country, we have a right to hold any stupid, backwards view we want as long as we don’t harm anyone.  That’s what this white woman was doing.  I support her right to be a complete moron, as long as she does it by herself, which she was doing.  Am I the asshole for supporting her freedom?  Am I the asshole for thinking the woman with the darker skin tone should have simply risen above and stayed true to the beautiful woman she is?  

supporting the freedom in this country to be an ignorant moron