Definition: Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.
Input: CONTEXT: I agree with yossarian, if I question it, I chuck it. Although in this case, the salmon probably will not harm you, it might just taste bad. Loss of moisture (freezer burn), taking on of flavours, etc. I wouldn't eat it because it wouldn't taste great. My father-in-law would eat it, because you don't throw out food (his rule). Bottom line, if it has been in the freezer for those two years straight, it won't give you food poisoning or harm you. It's just a matter of palate. But rest assured, it won't taste great.  <sep>  Q: Can I still eat this fish?### I just found a couple of salmon fillets in my freezer that seem to have been there for about two years. Are they still edible, or should I bin them? A: if it has been in the freezer for those two years straight, it won't give you food poisoning or harm you  Q: So I can still eat these? A: It's just a matter of palate. But rest assured, it won't taste great  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How long can I store the Salmon Fillets in the freezer?

No