Definition: Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.
Input: CONTEXT: If you have a gas stove, you need a hood to send the exhaust outside. One that recirculates is not sufficient.In my experience, the recirculator hoods work OK if you're not doing a lot of cooking. If you do, however, you'll end up with a nasty, greasy dusty coating on everything in your kitchen. I wouldn't bother with a recirculation hood if you ever cook things that involve grease or smoke. For someone who mostly heats up processed foods, it's probably good enough.  <sep>  Q: Are recirculation extractor hoods good? A: In my experience, the recirculator hoods work OK if you're not doing a lot of cooking  Q: How good are they? A: I wouldn't bother with a recirculation hood if you ever cook things that involve grease or smoke  Q: What kind of hood do you recommend? A: If you have a gas stove, you need a hood to send the exhaust outside. One that recirculates is not sufficient  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Will a pipe for the exhaust be needed?

No