Definition: Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.
Input: CONTEXT: Yes, you can detect the difference. How much of a difference will depend on the quality of both the imitation and of the real thing.That said, it's difficult if not impossible for me to pick out the differences in baked goods. So I keep both around, and use the (much cheaper) imitation stuff for baking, and the real stuff for sauces, icing, custards, milkshakes, etc.Incidentally... In a pinch, bourbon makes a half-decent substitute for vanilla.  <sep>  Q: What is the functional difference between imitation vanilla and true vanilla extract? A: it's difficult if not impossible for me to pick out the differences in baked goods  Q: Is there a detectable difference between imitation vanilla and vanilla extract? A: How much of a difference will depend on the quality of both the imitation and of the real thing  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Won't the real thing be more pure therefore be more potent?

No