n people gathered to hold a jury meeting of the upcoming competition, the i-th member of the jury came up with a_i tasks, which they want to share with each other.

First, the jury decides on the order which they will follow while describing the tasks. Let that be a permutation p of numbers from 1 to n (an array of size n where each integer from 1 to n occurs exactly once).

Then the discussion goes as follows:

  * If a jury member p_1 has some tasks left to tell, then they tell one task to others. Otherwise, they are skipped. 
  * If a jury member p_2 has some tasks left to tell, then they tell one task to others. Otherwise, they are skipped. 
  * ... 
  * If a jury member p_n has some tasks left to tell, then they tell one task to others. Otherwise, they are skipped. 
  * If there are still members with tasks left, then the process repeats from the start. Otherwise, the discussion ends. 



A permutation p is nice if none of the jury members tell two or more of their own tasks in a row. 

Count the number of nice permutations. The answer may be really large, so print it modulo 998 244 353.

Input

The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4) — the number of test cases.

The first line of the test case contains a single integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — number of jury members.

The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the number of problems that the i-th member of the jury came up with.

The sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5.

Output

For each test case, print one integer — the number of nice permutations, taken modulo 998 244 353.

Example

Input


4
2
1 2
3
5 5 5
4
1 3 3 7
6
3 4 2 1 3 3


Output


1
6
0
540

Note

Explanation of the first test case from the example:

There are two possible permutations, p = [1, 2] and p = [2, 1]. For p = [1, 2], the process is the following:

  1. the first jury member tells a task; 
  2. the second jury member tells a task; 
  3. the first jury member doesn't have any tasks left to tell, so they are skipped; 
  4. the second jury member tells a task. 



So, the second jury member has told two tasks in a row (in succession), so the permutation is not nice.

For p = [2, 1], the process is the following:

  1. the second jury member tells a task; 
  2. the first jury member tells a task; 
  3. the second jury member tells a task. 



So, this permutation is nice.
t = int(input())


def perm(n):
    r = 1
    while n > 1:
        r *= n
        n -= 1

    return r


for _ in range(t):
    n = int(input())

    words = input().split(" ")

    jury = {int(i) for i in words}

    first = max(jury)
    jury.remove(first)
    if len(jury) > 0:
        second = max(jury)
    else:
        second = first

    diff = first - second

    if diff == 0:
        print(perm(n))
        continue

    if diff == 1:
        res = perm(n) - perm(n - 1) * 3 // 2
        print(res)
        continue

    print(0)
