It was argued that the Sessions Court in Kanpur had no jurisdiction to try Roy , that he was not legally committed as no proper and legal regular charges under Section 121A of the Penal Code were framed and he was convicted upon the evidence which was irrelevant and incompetent . 
यह तरक दय गय थ , क कनपर क सशन अदलत क रय पर मकदम चलन क नययधकर नह थ , क उनह कननत  गरफतर नह कय गय थ , कयक भरतय दड सहत क धर 12ए क अतरगत कई समचत और अयगय परमण क आधर पर दडत कय गय थ . 
<bos><start_of_turn>user
It was argued that the Sessions Court in Kanpur had no jurisdiction to try Roy , that he was not legally committed as no proper and legal regular charges under Section 121A of the Penal Code were framed and he was convicted upon the evidence which was irrelevant and incompetent .<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
यह तरक दय गय थ , क कनपर क सशन अदलत क रय पर मकदम चलन क नययधकर नह थ , क उनह कननत  गरफतर नह कय गय थ , कयक भरतय दड सहत क धर 12ए क अतरगत कई समचत और अयगय परमण क आधर पर दडत कय गय थ .<end_of_turn>
