David L. Feldman|Santina Contreras|Beth Karlin|Victoria Basolo|Richard A. Matthew|Brett F. Sanders|Douglas Houston|Wing Cheung|Kristen A. Goodrich|Abigail Reyes|Kimberly Serrano|Jochen E. Schubert|Adam Luke
Communicating flood risk: Looking back and forward at traditional and social media outlets
University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|Irvine University|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|Irvine University|University of California, Irvine|University of California, Irvine|Irvine University
communication information natural hazard risks public difficult task decision makers research suggests newer forms technology present useful options building disaster resilience however effectively newer forms media used inform populations potential hazard risks community remains unclear research uses primary data inperson survey 164 residents newport beach california spring 2014 ascertain current preferred mechanisms individuals receive information flood risks community factor analysis survey data identified two predominant routes dissemination risk information older traditional media newer social media sources logistic regression model specified identify predictors choosing particular communication route analysis revealed age central factor predicting sources people use receive risk information follow analysis discussing finding policy implications