Krishnan Sathishkumar, Jayasankar Sankarapillai, Aleyamma Mathew, Rekha A Nair, Nitin Gangane, Sushma Khuraijam, Debabrata Barmon, Shashank Pandya, Gautam Majumdar, Vinay Deshmane, Eric Zomawia, Tseten Wangyal Bhutia, Kaling Jerang, Preethi Sara George, Swapna Maliye, Rajesh Laishram, Anand Shah, Shiromani Debbarma, Shravani Koyande, Lalawmpuii Pachuau, Priya D Pradhan, Gegong Jongkey, Meesha Chaturvedi, Priyanka Das, Prashant Mathur
Survival of patients with cervical cancer in India - findings from 11 population based cancer registries under National Cancer Registry Programme
The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia
faculty evaluation surveys frame student evaluation teaching sets widely utilized tool assess faculty teaching although sets used regularly evaluate teaching effectiveness sole use making administrative decisions indicator teaching quality controversial survey containing 22 items assessing demographics perception factors evaluating faculty distributed medical students institute statistical analyses conducted using microsoft excel r software utilizing regression analysis anova test survey received 374 responses consisting 191 511 male students 183 489 female students 178 475 students considered optimal time providing faculty evaluation release exam results compared 127 339 students chose exam release exam results option asked happens whenever tutor aware sets data 273 729 254 679 students believed would influence difficulty exam gradingcurving exam results respectively better teaching skills 93 348 responsive open student feedback suggestions 847 317 committed class time schedule 801 300 easier exam 686 257 considered important factors acquire positive evaluation considerable proportion students fewer lectures p 005 decreased number slides per lecture p 001 easier exam p 005 giving clues students exam p 005 found important obtain positive tutor evaluation students institutions ought continue exploring areas improvement faculty evaluation process raising awareness among students importance administrative implications feedback