Joern Birkmann|Susan L. Cutter|Dale S. Rothman|Torsten Welle|Matthias Garschagen|Bas van Ruijven|Brian C. O’Neill|Benjamin L. Preston|Stefan Kienberger|Omar D. Cardona|Tiodora Hadumaon Siagian|Deny Hidayati|Neysa J. Setiadi|Claudia R. Binder|Barry B. Hughes|Roger S. Pulwarty
Scenarios for vulnerability: opportunities and constraints in the context of climate change and disaster risk
Institute for Environment and Human Security|United Nations University|University of South Carolina|University of Denver|Institute for Environment and Human Security|United Nations University|Institute for Environment and Human Security|United Nations University|National Center for Atmospheric Research|National Center for Atmospheric Research|Oak Ridge National Laboratory|University of Salzburg|Universidad Nacional de Colombia|Indonesian Institute of Sciences|Institute for Environment and Human Security|United Nations University|Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München|University of Denver|NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory|National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
scientific assessments climate change adaptation risk reduction based scenarios climatic change scenarios socioeconomic development particularly terms vulnerability adaptive capacity largely lacking paper focuses utility socioeconomic scenarios vulnerability risk adaptation research paper introduces goals functions scenarios general reflects current global debate around shared socioeconomic pathways ssps examines options constraints scenario methods risk vulnerability assessments context climate change natural hazards two case studies used contrast opportunities current constraints scenario methods different scales global worldriskindex based quantitative data indicators local participatory scenario development process jakarta showing qualitative approach juxtaposition quantitative approach global data qualitativeparticipatory local approach provides new insights different methods scenario techniques applied vulnerability risk research