V.M. Goncharenko|Rostyslav Bubnov|Ji?í Polívka|Pavol Žúbor|Kamil Biringer|Tibor Bielik|W. Kühn|Olga Golubnitschaja
Vaginal dryness: individualised patient profiles, risks and mitigating measures
Danylo Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology|Charles University|Martin University Hospital|Comenius University Bratislava|Martin University Hospital|Martin University Hospital|University of Koblenz and Landau|University of Bonn
vaginal dryness vd affects pre postmenopausal women age since hormonal regulation changes climacteric period considered main course vd affected women prefer talk problem however problem exist unfortunately relatively minor group population possesses health literacy sufficient level understand vd suboptimal health condition carries multifactorial character thereby contributing factors clearly preventable therefore treated properly potential milden vd current chapter demonstrates specific signs symptoms flammer syndrome women suffering vaginal dryness although individualised patient profiles clearly discriminate pre postmenopausal women regarding subgroupspecific symptoms noteworthy 20 vd patients involved study notify delayed even impaired wound healing observed couple years optimising modifiable risk factors accompanying fs phenotype level primary prevention strongly recommended individualised patient profiles provide important information vd mitigating measures tailored person future projects essentially deal complexity vulvarvaginal dryness part sicca syndrome individuals fs phenotype order prevent genital female cancers may occur age contrast human papilloma virus possible trigger disease role vulvarvaginal dryness important risk factor strongly underestimated currently applied diagnostic treatment approaches