Sandra We?ntraub|Sureyya Dikmen|Robert K. Heaton|David S. Tulsky|Philip David Zelazo|Patricia J. Bauer|Noelle E. Carlozzi|Jerry Slotkin|David L. Blitz|Kathleen Wallner?Allen|Nathan A. Fox|Jennifer L. Beaumont|Dan Mungas|Cindy J. Nowinski|Jennifer J. Richler|Joanne A. Deocampo|Jacob E. Anderson|Jennifer J. Manly|Beth Borosh|Richard J. Havlik|Kevin Conway|Emmeline Edwards|Lisa S. Freund|J. W. King|Claudia S. Moy|Ellen D. Witt|Richard Gershon
Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|University of California, San Diego|University of Minnesota|University of Washington
cognition 1 4 domains measured nih toolbox assessment neurological behavioral function nihtb complements modules testing motor function sensation emotion basis expert panels cognition subdomains identified important health success school work independence daily functioning executive function episodic memory language processing speed working memory attention seven measures designed tap constructs within subdomains instruments validated english sample 476 participants ranging age 3 85 years representation sexes 3 racialethnic categories 3 levels education report describes development cognition battery presents results testretest reliability age effects performance convergent discriminant construct validity nihtb cognition battery intended serve brief convenient set measures supplement outcome measures epidemiologic longitudinal research clinical trials computerized format national standardization battery provide common currency among researchers comparisons across wide range studies populations