Alezandra Torres-Castaño, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Débora Koatz, Vanesa Ramos-García, Ana Isabel González-González, Ana Toledo-Chávarri, Carlos Jesús Bermejo-Caja, Himar Gonzalez-Pacheco, Analia Abt-Sack, Valeria Pacheco-Huergo, Carola Orrego
Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions about the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study from a Virtual Community of Practice
International journal of integrated care
misinformation often continuing effect peoples reasoning despite clear correction one factor assumed affect postcorrection reliance misinformation worldviewdriven motivated reasoning example recent study australian undergraduate sample found politically situated misinformation retracted political partisanship influenced effectiveness retraction worldview effect asymmetrical particularly pronounced politically conservative participants however evidence regarding worldview effects symmetry inconsistent thus present study aimed extend previous findings examining sample 429 prescreened us participants supporting either democratic republican party participants received misinformation suggesting politicians either party likely commit embezzlement subsequently retracted participants inferential reasoning measured political worldview ie partisanship influenced extent participants relied misinformation overall retractions equally effective across conditions impact political worldview retraction effectiveness let alone evidence backfire effect thus replicate asymmetry observed australianbased study pattern emerged despite evidence republicans showed stronger emotional response democrats worldviewincongruent misinformation article part theme issue political brain neurocognitive computational mechanisms