Kamila Poslusna|Ji?í Ruprich|J.H.M. de Vries|Marie Jakubiková|Pieter van’t Veer
Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice
Masaryk University|National Institute of Public Health|National Institute of Public Health|Wageningen University & Research|Masaryk University|National Institute of Public Health|Wageningen University & Research
order assess nutritional adequacy valid estimates nutrient intake required one main errors dietary assessment misreporting objective review extent nature determinants misreporting dietary assessment affects reported intakes micronutrients identified measured identify best ways dealing misreporting interpreting results systematic literature search conducted studies misreporting dietary intake adults 24 hour recalls estimated weighed food records published march 2008 thirtyseven relevant studies identified possible causes misreporting identified methods used identify misreporting goldberg cutoff 46 studies doubly labelled water technique 24 studies magnitude misreporting energy intake similar three dietary assessment methods percentage underreporters 30 energy intake underestimated approximately 15 seven papers presented usable data micronutrient intake absolute intakes fe ca vitamin c three micronutrients addressed papers average 30 lower lowenergy reporters ler nonler although results consistent tendency micronutrient density higher ler excluding underreporters using energy adjustment methods micronutrient intakes discussed residual method energy adjustment seems good tool practice decrease influence misreporting interpreting results studies based food records 24 hour recalls