Simon Buckingham Shum|Karl Aberer|Albrecht Schmidt|Steven R. Bishop|Paul Lukowicz|Stuart Anderson|Yannis Charalabidis|John Domingue|Sara de Freitas|Ian Dunwell|Bruce Edmonds|F. Grey|Muki Haklay|Márk Jelasity|A. Karpištšenko|Jörn Kohlhammer|Jérôme Lewis|Jeremy Pitt|Robert W. Sumner|Dirk Helbing
Towards a global participatory platform
The Open University|École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne|University of Stuttgart|University College London|University of Passau|University of Edinburgh|University of the Aegean|The Open University|Coventry University|Coventry University|Manchester Metropolitan University|European Organization for Nuclear Research|University College London|MTA-SZTE Research Group on Artificial Intelligence|University of Szeged|Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research|University College London|Imperial College London|Walt Disney (Switzerland)|ETH Zurich
futurict project seeks use power big data analytic models grounded complexity science collective intelligence yield societal benefit accordingly paper argues new tools remain preserve restricted government scientific corporate lites opened societal engagement critique democratise assets public good requires sustainable ecosystem enabling different kinds stakeholder society including limited citizens advocacy groups school university students policy analysts scientists software developers journalists politicians working name envisioning sociotechnical infrastructure capable engaging wide constituency global participatory platform gpp consider means develop gpp different levels data models deliberation motivating framework different stakeholders find ecological niches different levels within system serving functions sensing environment order pool data ii mining resulting data patterns order model pastpresentfuture iii sharing contesting possible interpretations models might mean policy context possible decisions research objective also apply concepts tools complexity science social science projects work therefore conceive global participatory platform resilient epistemic ecosystem whose design make capable selforganization adaptation dynamic environment whose structure contributions networks stakeholders challenges issues ideas arguments whose structure dynamics modelled analysed