TusaRebecca E. Pannucci|Frances E. Thompson|Regan L Bailey|Kevin W. Dodd|Nancy Potischman|Sharon I. Kirkpatrick|Gwen Alexander|Laura Coleman|Lawrence H. Kushi|Michelle Groesbeck|Maria E. Sundaram|Heather Clancy|Stephanie M. George|Lisa Kahle|Amy F. Subar
Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method
background automated selfadministered 24hour dietary assessment tool asa24 includes highly standardized multipass webbased recall like automated multiple pass method ampm captures detailed information dietary intake using multiple probes reminders enhance recall intakes primary distinction asa24 ampm asa24 user interface guides participants thus removing need interviewers objective objective study compare dietary supplement use reported selfadministered asa242011 vs intervieweradministered ampm 24hour recalls design food reporting comparison study evaluation study designed compare selfreported intakes captured using selfadministered asa24 vs data collected via intervieweradministered ampm recalls 2010 2011 1081 women men enrolled three integrated health care systems belong national cancer institutefunded cancer research network security health plan marshfield clinic wisconsin henry ford health system michigan kaiser permanente northern california california quota sampling used ensure balance age sex raceethnicity participants randomly assigned four groups group asked complete two dietary recalls group 1 two asa24s group 2 two ampms group 3 asa24 first ampm second group 4 ampm first asa24 second dietary supplements coded using 20072008 national health nutrition examination survey dietary supplement database analyses used two onesided tests known tost assess equivalence reported supplement use methods results complete 24hour dietary recalls included dietary supplement intake data available 1076 participants 507 men 569 women proportions reporting supplement use via asa24 ampm 46 43 respectively proportions equivalent small effect size less 20 two exceptions subgroup analyses reported use among 40 59 years age reported use nonhispanic black subjects higher asa24 ampm conclusions study provides evidence little difference reported supplement use mode administration ie interviewadministered vs selfadministered recall