Jennifer E. Prey|Min Qian|Susan Restaino|Judith H. Hibbard|Suzanne Bakken|Rebecca Schnall|Gloria Rothenberg|David K. Vawdrey|Ruth Masterson Creber
Reliability and validity of the patient activation measure in hospitalized patients
Columbia University|Columbia University|New York Hospital Queens|University of Oregon|Columbia University|Columbia University|Columbia University|New York Hospital Queens|Columbia University|Columbia University
purposes paper describe internal consistency reliability construct validity pam13 hospitalized cardiology oncology patients examine predictors low patient activation populationwe evaluated internal consistency reliability pam13 inpatient setting construct validity pam13 assessed using two approaches expected knowngroups differences patients planned unplanned admissions pam13 levels convergence pam13 levels measuresthe pam demonstrated adequate internal consistency overall cronbach 081 patients unplanned admissions likely low activation patients planned admissions adjusted or57 p0008 pam13 modestly correlated p0001 promis global health components used study global physical mental healththis study demonstrates pam13 reliable valid measure use inpatient hospital setting type admission planned versus unplanned important predictor patient activationby measuring patient activation pam13 clinicians researchers provide tailored communication care strategies meet patients needs