Amber Wutich|Jessica Budds|Laura Eichelberger|Jo Geere|Leila M. Harris|Jennifer A. Horney|Wendy Jepson|Emma S. Norman|Kathleen O’Reilly|Amber L. Pearson|Sameer H. Shah|Jamie E. Shinn|Karen Simpson|Chad Staddon|Justin Stoler|Manuel P. Teodoro|Sera L. Young
Advancing methods for research on household water insecurity: Studying entitlements and capabilities, socio-cultural dynamics, and political processes, institutions and governance
Arizona State University|Center for Global Health|University of East Anglia|The University of Texas at San Antonio|University of East Anglia|University of British Columbia|Texas A&M University|Texas A&M University|Northwest Indian College|Texas A&M University|Michigan State University|University of British Columbia|West Virginia University|University of the West of England|University of the West of England|University of Miami|Texas A&M University|Northwestern University
household water insecurity serious implications health livelihoods wellbeing people around world existing methods assess state household water insecurity focus largely water quality quantity adequacy source reliability affordability methods significant advantages terms simplicity comparability widely recognized oversimplify underestimate global burden household water insecurity contrast broader definition household water insecurity include entitlements human capabilities sociocultural dynamics political institutions processes paper proposes mix qualitative quantitative methods widely adopted across cultural geographic demographic contexts assess hardtomeasure dimensions household water insecurity critically evaluates existing methods assessing household water insecurity suggests ways methodological innovations advance broader definition household water insecurity