Jada G. Hamilton|Margaux Genoff Garzon|Joy S. Westerman|Elyse Shuk|Jennifer L. Hay|Chasity Burrows Walters|Elena B. Elkin|Corinna Bertelsen|Jessica Cho|Bobby Daly|Ayca Gucalp|Andrew D. Seidman|Marjorie G. Zauderer|Andrew S. Epstein|Mark G. Kris
“A Tool, Not a Crutch”: Patient Perspectives About IBM Watson for Oncology Trained by Memorial Sloan Kettering
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University|Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center|Cornell University
purpose ibm watson oncology trained memorial sloan kettering wfo clinical decision support tool designed assist physicians choosing therapies patients cancer although substantial technical clinical expertise guided development wfo patients perspectives technology examined facilitate optimal delivery implementation tool solicited patients perceptions preferences wfo methods conducted nine focus groups 46 patients breast lung colorectal cancer various treatment experiences neoadjuvantadjuvant chemotherapy chemotherapy metastatic disease systemic therapy clinical trial indepth qualitative quantitative data collected analyzed describe patients attitudes perspectives concerning wfo may used clinical care results analysis qualitative data identified three main themes patient acceptance wfo physician competence physicianpatient relationship practical logistic aspects wfo overall participant feedback suggested high levels patient interest perceived value acceptance wfo long used supplementary tool inform physicians decision making participants also described important concerns including need strict processes guarantee integrity completeness data presented possibility physician overreliance wfo conclusion participants generally reacted favorably prospect wfo integrated cancer treatment decisionmaking process caveats regarding comprehensiveness accuracy data powering system potential giving wfo excessive emphasis decisionmaking process addressing patients perspectives critical ensuring smooth integration wfo cancer care