Laura Inhestern, Ramona Otto, Maja Brandt, David Zybarth, Ralf Oheim, Helke Schüler, Thomas S Mir, Konstantinos Tsiakas, Payam Dibaj, Jana Zschüntzsch, Pamela M Okun, Ute Hegenbart, Olaf Sommerburg, Christoph Schramm, Christina Weiler-Normann, Martin Härter, Corinna Bergelt
Patient experiences of interprofessional collaboration and intersectoral communication in rare disease healthcare in Germany - a mixed-methods study
Orphanet journal of rare diseases
assessments medical education require evidence validity interpreted meaningfully contemporary usage validity construct validity requires multiple sources evidence construct validity whole validity multiple facets five sourcescontent response process internal structure relationship variables consequencesare noted standards educational psychological testing fruitful areas seek validity evidencethe purpose article discuss construct validity context medical education summarize example typical sources validity evidence written performance examinationassessments valid invalid rather scores outcomes assessments less evidence support refute specific interpretation passing failing course validity approached hypothesis uses theory logic scientific method collect assemble data support fail support proposed score interpretations given point time data logic assembled argumentspro confor specific interpretation assessment data examples types validity evidence data information source discussed context highstakes written performance examination medical educationall assessments require evidence reasonableness proposed interpretation test data education little intrinsic meaning constructs purported measured assessments important students faculty administrators patients society require solid scientific evidence meaning