Edward L. Hannan|Zaza Samadashvili|Kimberly Cozzens|Gary Walford|Alice K. Jacobs|David R. Holmes|Nicholas J. Stamato|Jeffrey P. Gold|Sanjeev Sharma|Ferdinand J. Venditti|Tia Powell|Spencer B. King
Comparative Outcomes for Patients Who Do and Do Not Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease in New York
Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center|Albany Medical Center Hospital|Mayo Clinic in Arizona|University at Albany, State University of New York|Boston Medical Center
little known treatments patients receive diagnosed stable coronary artery disease comparative outcomes routine medical treatment rmt versus percutaneous coronary intervention pci rmt patients setting apart randomized controlled trialspatients stable coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac catheterization new york state 2003 2008 followed determine treatment received patients receiving rmt patients receiving pci rmt propensity matched use 20 factors could bearing outcomes resulting cohort 933 matched pairs used compare mortalitymyocardial infarction mi mortality mi subsequent revascularization rates total 89 patients underwent pci rmt pcirmt patients significantly lower adverse outcome rates 4 years mortalitymi 165 versus 212 p0003 mortality 102 versus 145 p002 mi 80 versus 113 p0007 subsequent revascularization 241 versus 291 p0005 adjusted rmt versus pci rmt hazard ratios 149 95 confidence interval 116193 mortalitymi 146 95 confidence interval 108197 mortality differences patients 65 years age patients singlevessel diseasemost patients stable coronary artery disease new york undergoing catheterization 2003 2008 received pci patients received pci experienced lower mortality mortalitymi revascularization rates reasons finding need better understood including possible role low medication adherence rates found studies