Karla K. Stuebing|Amy E. Barth|Paul T. Cirino|David Francis|Jack ?. Fletcher
A response to recent reanalyses of the National Reading Panel report: Effects of systematic phonics instruction are practically significant.
authors examine reassessments national reading panel nrp report national institute child health human development 2000 g camilli vargas yurecko 2003 g camilli p wolfe l smith 2006 hammill h l swanson 2006 disagreed nrp magnitude effect systematic phonics instruction using coding nrp studies camilli et al 2003 2006 multilevel regression analyses show findings contradict nrp findings effect sizes small moderate range favoring systematic phonics extending camilli et al 2003 2006 largest effects associated reading instruction enhanced components increase comprehensiveness intensity contrast hammill swanson binomial effect size displays show effect sizes magnitude found systematic phonics nrp meaningful could result significant improvement many students depending base rate struggling readers size effect camilli et al 2003 2006 hammill swanson contradict nrp report concurring supporting comprehensive approaches reading instruction