Elisa Brosina de Leon, Bruno Mendes Tavares, Tiótrefis Gomes Fernandes, Roberta Lins Gonçalves, Fernanda Figueiroa Sanchez Franco, Marina Batista Chaves Azevedo de Souza, Frida Marina Fischer, Bárbara Iansã de Lima Barroso
Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents (ERICA): factors associated with work in adolescence
Ciencia & saude coletiva
unsatisfactory state hydrology final analysis result dichotomy theoretical recognition hydrology science right practical impossibility studying primary discipline appendage hydraulic engineering geography geology etc consequence perspectives hydrologists tend heavily biased direction nonhydrologic primary disciplines hydrologic backgrounds wide gaps breed large variety misconceptions state affairs often paralyzes hydrologists ability differentiate hydrology water management hydrology statistics facts assumptions science convenience etc consequent dangers scientific development hydrology practical utility danger increases proliferation computerized hydrologic models whose cheaply arranged ability fit data presented proof soundness justification using userattractive hydrologically indefensible extrapolations points illustrated among things discussion flood frequency analysis paper concludes thoughts concerning minimum standards testing hydrologic simulation models would ensure least modest level credibility suggestions ingredients longterm cure prevent hydrology joining alchemy astrology annals dilettantism