Karen Eden|Nancy Perrin|Ginger C. Hanson|Jill T. Messing|Tina Bloom|Jacquelyn C. Campbell|Andrea Carlson Gielen|Amber Clough|Jamie Barnes-Hoyt|Nancy Glass
Use of Online Safety Decision Aid by Abused Women
Oregon Health & Science University|Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research|Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research|Arizona State University|University of Missouri|Johns Hopkins University|Johns Hopkins University|Johns Hopkins University|Johns Hopkins University|Johns Hopkins University|Center for Global Health
background internet safety decision aid developed help abused women understand risk repeat nearlethal intimate partner violence clarify priorities related safety develop action plan customized priorities purpose test effectiveness safety decision aid compared usual safety planning control delivered secure website using multistate rct design paper evaluates effectiveness safety decision aid reducing decisional conflict single use abused women design rct referred internet resource intervention safety iris settingparticipants abused women spoke english n708 enrolled fourstate rct intervention intervention interactive safety decision aid personalized safety plan control condition usual safety planning resources delivered participants secure study website main outcome measures paper compares womens decisional conflict safety total decisional conflict four subscales measure feeling uninformed uncertain unsupported unclear safety priorities interventioncontrol conditions data collected march 2011 may 2013 analyzed january march 2014 results immediately following first use interactive safety decision aid intervention women significantly lower total decisional conflict control women controlling baseline value decisional conflict p0002 effect size012 controlling baseline values safety decision aid group significantly greater reduction feeling uncertain p0006 effect size007 feeling unsupported p0008 effect size007 safety usual safety planning group conclusions abused women randomized safety decision aid reported less decisional conflict safety abusive intimate relationship one use compared women randomized usual safety planning condition internet safety decision aid developed help abused women understand risk repeat nearlethal intimate partner violence clarify priorities related safety develop action plan customized priorities test effectiveness safety decision aid compared usual safety planning control delivered secure website using multistate rct design paper evaluates effectiveness safety decision aid reducing decisional conflict single use abused women rct referred internet resource intervention safety iris abused women spoke english n708 enrolled fourstate rct intervention interactive safety decision aid personalized safety plan control condition usual safety planning resources delivered participants secure study website paper compares womens decisional conflict safety total decisional conflict four subscales measure feeling uninformed uncertain unsupported unclear safety priorities interventioncontrol conditions data collected march 2011 may 2013 analyzed january march 2014 immediately following first use interactive safety decision aid intervention women significantly lower total decisional conflict control women controlling baseline value decisional conflict p0002 effect size012 controlling baseline values safety decision aid group significantly greater reduction feeling uncertain p0006 effect size007 feeling unsupported p0008 effect size007 safety usual safety planning group abused women randomized safety decision aid reported less decisional conflict safety abusive intimate relationship one use compared women randomized usual safety planning condition