Paul Howard?Jones|Sashank Varma|Daniel Ansari|Brian Butterworth|Bert De Smedt|Usha Goswami|Diana Laurillard|Michael S. C. Thomas
The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016).
University of Bristol|Minnesota Department of Education|University of Minnesota|Western University|University College London|KU Leuven|Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience|University of Cambridge|University College London|Birkbeck, University of London
recent critique educational neuroscience bowers argues neuroscience role play informing education equates classroom teaching neuroscience suggests adds nothing learn psychology commentary argue bowers assertions misrepresent nature aims work new field suggest contrast psychological neural levels explanation complement rather compete bowers analysis also fails include role educational expertisea guiding principle new field basis conclude critique potentially misleading set welldocumented goals research educational neuroscience show collaboration educators significant progress already achieved prospect even greater progress future psycinfo database record