Natacha Akshoomoff|Erik Newman|Wesley K. Thompson|Connor McCabe|Cinnamon S. Bloss|Linda Chang|David G. Amaral|B. J. Casey|Thomas Ernst|Jean A. Frazier|Jeffrey R. Gruen|Walter E. Kaufmann|Tal Kenet|David N. Kennedy|Ondrej Libiger|Stewart H. Mostofsky|Sarah Murray|Elizabeth R. Sowell|Nicholas J. Schork|Anders M. Dale|Terry L. Jernigan
The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: Results from a large normative developmental sample (PING).
University of California, San Diego|University of California, San Diego|University of California, San Diego|University of California, San Diego|Scripps Research Institute|Scripps Health|University of Hawaii System|Cornell University|University of Hawaii System|University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School|Pediatrics and Genetics|Yale University|Kennedy Krieger Institute|Massachusetts General Hospital|University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School|Scripps Research Institute|Scripps Health|Kennedy Krieger Institute|Scripps Research Institute|Scripps Health|University of Southern California|Scripps Research Institute|Scripps Health|University of California, San Diego|University of California, San Diego
nih toolbox cognition battery ntcb designed provide brief efficient computerized test key neuropsychological functions appropriate use children young 3 years age report describes performance large group typically developing children adolescents examines impact age sociocultural variables test performancethe ntcb administered sample 1020 typically developing males females ranging age 3 20 years diverse terms socioeconomic status ses raceethnicity part new publicly accessible pediatric imaging neurocognition genetics ping data resource 9 sites across united statesgeneral additive models nonlinear agefunctions estimated agedifferences test performance 8 ntcb subtests controlling family ses genetic ancestry factors gafs age accounted majority variance across ntcb scores additional significant contributions gender measures ses raceethnicity gafs adjusting age gender ses gafs explained substantial proportion remaining unexplained variance picture vocabulary scoresthe results highlight sensitivity developmental effects efficiency new computerized assessment battery neurodevelopmental research limitations observed form ceiling effects older children floor effects particularly executive function tests youngest participants evidence variable measurement sensitivity culturalsocioeconomic factors