Paul C. Tang|Joan S. Ash|David W. Bates|J. Marc Overhage|Daniel Z. Sands
Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center|Harvard University|Brigham and Women's Hospital|Regenstrief Institute|Oregon Health & Science University|Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center|Harvard University|Brigham and Women's Hospital|Regenstrief Institute|Oregon Health & Science University|Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center|Harvard University|Brigham and Women's Hospital|Regenstrief Institute|Oregon Health & Science University|Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center|Harvard University|Brigham and Women's Hospital|Regenstrief Institute|Oregon Health & Science University|Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center|Harvard University|Brigham and Women's Hospital|Regenstrief Institute|Oregon Health & Science University
recently remarkable upsurge activity surrounding adoption personal health record phr systems patients consumers biomedical literature yet adequately describe potential capabilities utility phr systems addition lack proven business case widespread deployment hinders phr adoption 2005 working symposium american medical informatics associations college medical informatics discussed issues surrounding personal health record systems developed recommendations phrpromoting activities personal health record systems static repositories patient data combine data knowledge software tools help patients become active participants care phrs integrated electronic health record systems provide greater benefits would standalone systems consumers paper summarizes college symposium discussions phr systems provides definitions system characteristics technical architectures benefits barriers adoption strategies increasing adoption