Rebecca A Raciborski, Kyra K Hamerling-Potts, Emily L Mitchell, Sarah R Sullivan, Nidhi Kapil-Pair, Sara J Landes, Shari Jager-Hyman, Marianne Goodman
Cost comparison of in-person and telehealth modalities for a suicide safety planning group intervention: interim results from the "Project Life Force" randomized clinical trial
Frontiers in psychiatry
worldwide millions suffer cataracts impair vision quality life cataract education improves outcomes satisfaction treatment adherence lack health literacy language cultural barriers personal preferences limited resources may impede effective communication ai improve patient education providing personalised interactive accessible information tailored patient understanding interest motivation ai chatbots humanlike conversations give advice numerous topics study investigated efficacy chatbots cataract patient education relative traditional resources like aao website focusing information accuracyunderstandability actionability readability descriptive comparative design used analyse quantitative data frequently asked questions cataracts answered chatgpt bard bing ai aao website solo taxonomy pemat fleschkincaid ease score used collect analyse data chatbots scored higher aao website cataractrelated questions terms accuracy mean solo score chatgpt 31 031 bard 29 072 bing ai 265 049 aao website 24 06 p 0001 understandability mean pematu score aao website 089 004 chatgpt 084 002 bard 084 002 bing ai 081 002 p 0001 actionability mean pemata score chatgpt 086 003 bard 085 006 bing ai 081 005 aao website 081 006 p 0001 aao website scored better chatbots fleschkincaid readability ease analysis showed bard 555 848 highest mean score followed aao website 5196 1246 bing ai 4177 953 chatgpt 3438 975 p 0001 chatbots potential provide detailed accurate data aao website hand aao website advantage providing information understandable practical patient preferences taken account generalised biased information decrease reliability