Terrell R Morton, Wesley Agee, Kilan C Ashad-Bishop, Lori D Banks, Zanethia Choice Barnett, Imari D Bramlett, Briana Brown, Walter Gassmann, Korie Grayson, Gail P Hollowell, Ruth Kaggwa, Gaurav S Kandlikar, Marshaun Love, Whitney N McCoy, Mark A Melton, Monica L Miles, Catherine L Quinlan, ReAnna S Roby, Checo J Rorie, Tatiane Russo-Tait, Ashlyn M Wardin, Michele R Williams, Ashley N Woodson
Re-Envisioning the Culture of Undergraduate Biology Education to Foster Black Student Success: A Clarion Call
CBE life sciences education
limited research food systems food insecurity fi following disasters finds contextual differences postdisaster food systems shape dimensions fi measurement limitations make difficult address fi develop effective practices disasteraffected communities develop validate test disaster food security framework dfsf mixedmethods approach used including indepth interviews understand lived experiences disasters expert panel input validate dfsf designed using responses indepth interviews quantitative testing robustness dfsf using coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic disaster example indepth interviews included participants vermont n 5 north carolina n 3 oklahoma n 2 living states hurricane irene 2011 hurricane florence 2018 moore tornadoes 2013 coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic 2020 expert panel consisted researchers practitioners different us geographical regions foodrelated disciplines n 18 quantitative testing survey data 4 us states new york new mexico vermont maryland n 3228 national food access covid research team used outcomes indepth interviews dimensions disaster fi expert panel content validity ratio quantitative testing number items components included inductive deductive reasoning using reporting indepth interviews expert panel results including frequencies quantitative testing conducted using multiple correspondence analysis indepth interviews revealed four dimensions fi availability supply donation accessibility economic physical social acceptability preference health agency infrastructure selfefficacy panel experts reported high content validity dfsf dimensions content validity ratio 042 thus giving higher credibility dfsf multiple correspondence analysis performed 25 foodrelated variables identified one component 13 indicators representing three four dimensions availability acceptability accessibility agency