S Y Wakeman, R Pennington, B Cerrato, A Saunders, L Ahlgrim-Delzell
Parent perceptions regarding literacy instruction for students with intellectual disability
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR
cognitive reflection test crt measure analytical reasoning cues intuitive incorrect response must rejected successful performance attained crt yields two types errors intuitive errors attributed type 1 processes nonintuitive errors result poor numeracy skills deficient reasoning past research shows participants commit highest numbers errors crt overestimate performance whereas lowest errorrates tend slightly underestimate example dunningkruger effect dke present study examined intuitive vs nonintuitive errors contribute overestimation crt different levels performance female undergraduate students completed sevenitem crt test subsequently estimated raw score also filled faith intuition fi questionnaire dispositional measure intuitive thinking data separated quartiles based level performance crt results demonstrated dke additionally intuitive nonintuitive errors predicted miscalibration among low high performers however intuitive errors stronger predictor miscalibration finally fi positively correlated crt selfestimates miscalibration indicating participants perceived intuitive worse estimating score results taken together suggest participants perform poorly crt also score higher intuitive thinking disposition susceptible influences heuristicbased cues answer fluency judging performance