Luca Frank|Susann Hueber|Thomas Kühlein|Angela Schedlbauer|Marco Roos
Zwischen Evidenz und Praxis: Wie bewerten Hausärzte Früherkennungsmaßnahmen? Eine Fragebogenstudie
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg|Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg|Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg|Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg|Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
background patients receiving screening intervention informed risks benefits part physician requires understanding statistical evidence statistical literacy objectives general practitioners gps make different recommendations screening interventions rely statistics compared decisions everyday practice decisions relying statistics decisions made everyday practice consistent official recommendations way presenting numbers table versus pictogram affect decision methods online survey among german gps gps asked make recommendations three different screening scenarios based statistical evidence existing screening interventions avoid bias statistics presented relation actual diseases numbers presented either table pictogram afterwards gps asked recommendations screening interventions everyday practice results fortythree gps surveyed compared everyday medical practice participants less likely recommend screening intervention confronted underlying statistical evidence f 1 3 10483 p 002 partial 2 97 decisions everyday practice consistent official recommendations decisions relying statistics likely deviate everyday practice 179 sd 077 scenario 144 sd 080 42 229 p 03 way numbers presented affect decision 127 183 p 07 conclusions everyday practice gps screening recommendations seem based statistical evidence presumably would reluctant recommend screening interventions knew statistical evidence