S Crispim|J.H.M. de Vries|Anouk Geelen|Olga W. Souverein|P.J.M. Hulshof|Lionel Lafay|Anne-Sophie Rousseau|Inger Therese Lillegaard|Lene Frost Andersen|Inge Huybrechts|Willem De Keyzer|Ji?í Ruprich|Marcela Dofková|M Ocké|Evelien de Boer|Nadia Slimani|Pieter van’t Veer
Two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft software are sufficiently valid for comparing protein and potassium intake between five European centres – results from the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) study
Wageningen University & Research|Wageningen University & Research|Wageningen University & Research|Wageningen University & Research|Wageningen University & Research|French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety|Université Côte d'Azur|University of Oslo|University of Oslo|Ghent University|International Agency For Research On Cancer|Ghent University|University College Ghent|National Institute of Public Health|National Institute of Public Health|National Institute for Public Health and the Environment|National Institute for Public Health and the Environment|International Agency For Research On Cancer|Wageningen University & Research
use two nonconsecutive 24 h recalls using epicsoft standardised dietary monitoring european countries previously proposed european food consumption survey method consortium whether methodology sufficiently valid assess nutrient intake comparable way among populations different food patterns europe subject study european food consumption validation consortium objective study compare validity usual protein k intake estimated two nonconsecutive standardised 24 h recalls using epicsoft five selected centres europe total 600 adults aged 4565 years recruited belgium czech republic france netherlands norway participant two 24 h recalls two 24 h urines collected mean distribution usual protein k intake well ranking intake compared protein k excretions within centres underestimation protein range 213 k range 417 intake seen centres except czech republic found fair agreement prevalences estimated based intake excretion data lower end usual intake distribution 10 difference larger differences points protein k intake moderately correlated excretion within centres ranges 039067 037069 respectively comparable across centres conclusion two standardised 24 h recalls epicsoft appear sufficiently valid assessing comparing mean distribution protein k intake across five centres europe well ranking individuals