Richard H. Osborne|Christina Cheng|Sandra Nolte|Shandell Elmer|Stéphane Besançon|Shyam Sundar Budhathoki|Xavier Debussche|Sónia Dias|Peter Kolar?ík|Isabel Loureiro|Helle Terkildsen Maindal|Dulce Nascimento do Ó|James A. Smith|Astrid Klopstad Wahl|Gerald R Elsworth|Mélanie Hawkins
Health literacy measurement: embracing diversity in a strengths-based approach to promote health and equity, and avoid epistemic injustice
Swinburne University of Technology|University of Global Health Equity|University of Copenhagen|Swinburne University of Technology|University of Global Health Equity|Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin|Swinburne University of Technology|University of Global Health Equity|Nutrition & Santé (Spain)|Imperial College London|Primary Health Care|Mountain Medicine Society of Nepal|Universidade Nova de Lisboa|National School of Public Health|University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik|Universidade Nova de Lisboa|National School of Public Health|Aarhus University|Universidade Nova de Lisboa|National School of Public Health|Associacao Protectora dos Diabeticos de Portugal|Flinders University|University of Oslo|Swinburne University of Technology|University of Global Health Equity|Swinburne University of Technology|University of Global Health Equity
definitions health literacy evolved notions healthrelated literacy multidimensional concept incorporates importance social cultural knowledge practices contexts evolution evident development instruments seek measure health literacy different ways health literacy measurement important global health diverse stakeholders including use data inform health practice policy understand sources inequity practice paper explore potential negative consequences bias epistemic injustice occur health literacy instruments used across settings without due regard lived experiences people various contexts data collected health literacy measurement approach emicsensitive strengths based solution oriented needed minimise biased data interpretation use avoid epistemic injustice