Jessica Reszel, Olivia Daub, Jenny Leese, Hanna Augustsson, Danielle Moeske Bellows, Christine E Cassidy, Beth E Crowner, Sandra I Dunn, Lisa B Goodwin, Alison M Hoens, Sarah C Hunter, Elizabeth A Lynch, Jennifer L Moore, Miriam R Rafferty, Wendy Romney, Dawn Stacey, Ian D Graham
Essential content for teaching implementation practice in healthcare: a mixed-methods study of teams offering capacity-building initiatives
Implementation science communications
cardiovascular disease previous studies suggested young age one reasons explain obesity paradox study attempts provide different opinion claim unexpected findings used crosssectional analysis us nationally representative data total 10175 participants recruited 20132014 nhanes total 947 participants selected included study inclusion criteria exclusion criteria statistical analysis relationship obesity abdominal aortic calcificationaac smooth curve fitting multivariate regression analyses conducted examine associations obesity aac adjusting age gender associated variates depending age population relationship obesity aac showed different outcome obesity associated lower risk aac among individuals older 52 years age according difference adjusted covariates aac scores obesity group decreased 092 087 111 52 years old older individuals particular risk aac lower patients obesity following characteristics male low ldl low triglyceride dm noncancer patient smoking drinking vigorous work activity low annual household income education 9 11th grades nonhispanic white us adults aged 52 years older obesity associated decreased aac risk older age may one potential reason obesity paradox