David O. Francis|James J. Daniero|Kristen L. Hovis|Nila A Sathe|Barbara H. Jacobson|David F. Penson|Irene D. Feurer|Melissa L McPheeters
Voice-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Instrument Development and Validation
Vanderbilt University Medical Center|Quality Research|University of Virginia|Vanderbilt University|Vanderbilt University Medical Center|Vanderbilt University Medical Center|Quality Research|Vanderbilt University Medical Center|Valley Health System|Quality Research|Vanderbilt University Medical Center|Vanderbilt University Medical Center
purpose study perform comprehensive systematic review literature voicerelated patientreported outcome pro measures adults evaluate instrument presence important measurement propertiesmedline cumulative index nursing allied health literature health psychosocial instrument databases searched using relevant vocabulary terms key terms related pro measures voice inclusion exclusion criteria developed consultation expert panel three independent investigators assessed study methodology using criteria developed priori measurement properties examined entered evidence tablesa total 3744 studies assessing voicerelated constructs identified list narrowed 32 pro measures basis predetermined inclusion exclusion criteria questionnaire measurement properties varied widely important thematic deficiencies apparent lack patient involvement item development process b lack robust construct validity c lack clear interpretability scalingpro measures principal means evaluating treatment effectiveness voicerelated conditions despite prominence available pro measures disparate methodological rigor care must taken understand psychometric measurement properties applicability pro measures advocating use clinical research applications