Pauline Ducrot|Caroline Méjean|Chantal Julia|Emmanuelle Kesse?Guyot|Mathilde Touvier|Léopold Fezeu|Serge Herçberg|Sandrine Péneau
Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels among Nutritionally At-Risk Individuals
Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité|Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité|Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité|Hôpital Avicenne|Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité|Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité|Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité|Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité|Hôpital Avicenne|Université Sorbonne Paris Nord|Nutritional Epidemiology Research Unit|Inserm|Sorbonne Paris Cité|Université Paris Cité
ongoing debate frontofpackage fop nutrition labels little data exist regarding nutritionally atrisk populations although critical targets prevention programs study aimed compare impact fop labels ability rank products according nutritional quality among french adults potentially risk poor dietary quality n 14230 four labels evaluated guideline daily amounts gda multiple traffic lights mtl 5color nutrition label 5cnl green tick tick along reference without label mixed models used assess individual characteristics fop labels associated ability rank products older participants lower educational level income nutritional knowledge likelihood reading nutrition facts less skilled ranking food products according nutritional quality compared individual characteristics nutrition labels increased impact food product ranking ability overall 5cnl corresponded highest rate correct responses followed mtl gda tick p 00001 strongest impact 5cnl observed among individuals nutritional knowledge odds ratio 2024 95 confidence interval ci 13193106 therefore 5cnl appeared effective informing consumers including nutritionally atrisk nutritional quality food products