Kirsten J McCaffery, Suzanne Morony, Danielle M Muscat, Andrew Hayen, Heather L Shepherd, Haryana M Dhillon, Sian K Smith, Erin Cvejic, Wedyan Meshreky, Karen Luxford, Don Nutbeam
Evaluation of an Australian Health Literacy Program Delivered in Adult Education Settings
Health literacy research and practice
according ra fisher randomization relieves experimenter anxiety considering innumerable causes data may disturbed since particular said control known unknown nuisance factors may considerably challenge validity result become popular contribution challenges received view first looking quantitative support study number straightforward mathematically simple models demonstrate optimism surrounding randomization questionable small mediumsized samples random allocation units treatments typically yields considerable imbalance groups ie confounding due randomization rule rather exception second part contribution reasoning extended number traditional arguments favour randomization discussion rather nontechnical sometimes touches rather fundamental frequentistbayesian debate however result analysis turns quite similar contribution randomization remains doubtful comparability contributes much compelling conclusion summing classical experimentation based sound background theory systematic construction exchangeable groups seems advisable