Birdem Amoutzopoulos|Toni Steer|Caireen Roberts|Janet Cade|Carol J. Boushey|Clare E. Collins|Ellen Trolle|E. J. de Boer|Nida Ziauddeen|Caroline van Rossum|E. Buurma|Daisy H. Coyle|Polly Page
Traditional methods<i>v.</i>new technologies – dilemmas for dietary assessment in large-scale nutrition surveys and studies: a report following an international panel discussion at the 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods (ICDAM9), Brisbane, 3 September 2015
MRC Human Nutrition Research|MRC Human Nutrition Research|NatCen Social Research|University of Leeds|Cancer Center of Hawaii|University of Hawai?i at M?noa|University of Hawaii System|University of Newcastle Australia|Technical University of Denmark|National Institute for Public Health and the Environment|MRC Human Nutrition Research|National Institute for Public Health and the Environment|National Institute for Public Health and the Environment|University of Newcastle Australia|MRC Human Nutrition Research
aim present paper summarise current future applications dietary assessment technologies nutrition surveys developed countries includes discussion key points highlights subsequent developments panel discussion address strengths weaknesses traditional dietary assessment methods food records ffq 24 h recalls diet history interviewerassisted data collection v new technologybased dietary assessment methods webbased mobile device applications panel discussion traditional methods v new technologies dilemmas dietary assessment population surveys held 9th international conference diet activity methods icdam9 brisbane september 2015 despite respondent researcher burden traditional methods commonly used nutrition surveys however dietary assessment technologies offer potential advantages including faster data processing better data quality fastmoving field evidence increasing demand use new technologies amongst general public researchers need research investment support efforts made facilitate inclusion new technologies rapid accurate representative data