David P. Goldberg|Geoffrey M. Reed|Rebeca Robles|Fareed Aslam Minhas|Bushra Razzaque|Sandra Fortes|Jair de Jesus Mari|Tai Pong Lam|José Ángel García|Linda Gask|Anthony Dowell|Marianne Rosendal|Joseph Mbatia|Shekhar Saxena
Screening for anxiety, depression, and anxious depression in primary care: A field study for ICD-11 PHC
King's College London|World Health Organization|Columbia University Irving Medical Center|Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría|Rawalpindi Medical University|Rawalpindi Medical University|Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro|Universidade Federal de São Paulo|University of Hong Kong|Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría|University of Manchester|University of Otago|University of Southern Denmark|Sebastian Kolowa Memorial University|World Health Organization
field study whos revised classification mental disorders primary care settings icd11 phc tested usefulness two fiveitem screening scales anxiety depression administered primary care settingsthe study conducted primary care settings four large middleincome countries primary care physicians pcps referred individuals suspected might psychologically distressed study screening scales well structured diagnostic interview revised clinical interview schedule cisr adapted proposed decision rules icd11 phc administered 1488 participantsa score 3 one screening scale predicted 896 abovethreshold mood anxiety disorder diagnoses cisr anxious depression common cisr diagnosis among referred patients however exact diagnostic match screening scales cisr 629 high scoresthis study confined pcp suspected psychological distress provide information prevalence mental disorders primary care settingsthe two fiveitem screening scales anxiety depression provide practical way pcps evaluate likelihood mood anxiety disorders without paper pencil measures feasible many settings scales may provide substantially improved case detection compared current primary care practice realistic alternative complex diagnostic algorithms used specialist mental health professionals