Sandra We?ntraub|Sureyya Dikmen|Robert K. Heaton|David S. Tulsky|Philip David Zelazo|Jerry Slotkin|Noelle E. Carlozzi|Patricia J. Bauer|Kathleen Wallner?Allen|Nathan A. Fox|Richard J. Havlik|Jennifer L. Beaumont|Dan Mungas|Jennifer J. Manly|Claudia S. Moy|Kevin Conway|Emmeline Edwards|Cindy J. Nowinski|Richard Gershon
The Cognition Battery of the NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function: Validation in an Adult Sample
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative|Northwestern University|University of Washington|University of California, San Diego|NYU Langone Health|Kessler Foundation|University of Minnesota|Northwestern University|University of Michigan–Ann Arbor|Emory University|Westat (United States)|University of Maryland, College Park|Westat (United States)|Northwestern University|University of California, Davis|Columbia University|National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke|National Institute on Drug Abuse|National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health|Northwestern University|Northwestern University
study introduces special series validity studies cognition battery cb us national institutes health toolbox assessment neurological behavioral function nihtb gershon wagster et al 2013 adult sample first study series describes sample seven instruments nihtbcb briefly general approach data analysis data provided testretest reliability practice effects raw scores mean standard deviation range presented instrument gold standard instruments used measure construct validity accompanying papers provide details instrument including information instrument development psychometric properties age education effects performance convergent discriminant construct validity one study series devoted factor analysis nihtbcb adults another describes psychometric properties three composite scores derived individual measures representing fluid crystallized abilities combination nihtbcb designed provide brief comprehensive common set measures allow comparisons among disparate studies improve scientific communication