Frances E. Thompson|Sujata Dixit?Joshi|Nancy Potischman|Kevin W. Dodd|Sharon I. Kirkpatrick|Lawrence H. Kushi|Gwen Alexander|Laura Coleman|Thea Palmer Zimmerman|Maria E. Sundaram|Heather Clancy|Michelle Groesbeck|Deirdre Douglass|Stephanie M. George|TusaRebecca E. Schap|Amy F. Subar
Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems
National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute|National Cancer Institute
twentyfourhour dietary recalls provide highquality intake data prohibitively expensive large epidemiologic studies studys goal assess whether webbased automated selfadministered 24hour recall asa24 performs similarly enough standard intervieweradministered automated multiplepass method ampm 24hour dietary recall considered viable alternative 20102011 1081 adults 3 integrated health systems detroit michigan marshfield wisconsin kaiserpermanente northern california participated field trial quota design ensured diverse sample sex age raceethnicity participant asked complete 2 recalls randomly assigned 1 4 protocols differing type recall administration order energy mean intakes 2425 versus 2374 kcal men 1876 versus 1906 kcal women ampm asa24 respectively 20 nutrientsfood groups analyzed controlling false discovery rate 87 judged equivalent 20 bound asa24 preferred ampm 70 respondents attrition lower asa24ampm study group ampmasa24 group lower asa24asa24 group ampmampm group asa24 offers potential collect highquality dietary intake information low cost less attrition