Clinical Trial to Compare Success Rate of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy and External Dacryocystorhinostomy for Treatment of Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
The purpose of this study is to compare the success rates of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) and external DCR (EX-DCR) for the treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANLDO). Prospective randomized comparative study. Study was conducted for 2 years duration in a teaching hospital with 300 cases of endoscopic and 300 cases of external DCR with a follow-up of minimum 6 months. Data regarding surgical outcome and complications were analyzed and compared using χ2 test. In our study, the overall success rate of DCR for PANLDO was 92.6%, there was difference in terms of anatomical or functional success rate between EN-DCR (93.6%) and EX-DCR (91.6%). The incidence rate of post operative complication in our study was lower in Endonasal DCR (27.33%) as compared to External DCR (48%). Patients who underwent EN-DCR had shorter recovery time, less complications and higher satisfaction due to lack of external incision, although final surgical outcomes were comparable between two groups.